Why shareholders might be alarmed by Meta’s new AI strategy
148 segments
Meta
>> out this morning with the news of they
call it Muse Glimmer. It's a new AI
model, light enough to run at home on
your own computer. You download it. You
can tweak it however you want. Kind of
appealing to the the customer, the you
and I. We also saw Mark Zuckerberg
coming out this morning with this. I
think it was 6,500 word essay arguing
the personal super intelligence for
everybody.
>> 6,500 words. Come on, man. Like are you
what what are we doing here? You know,
like
>> could have been 300.
>> I mean,
>> could have been nothing. Could have been
nothing.
>> Did Glimmer write it? I mean, I I have
to ask anyway. Sorry. Go ahead.
>> No, I'm I'm going to I'm going to get
some angry calls from Metaccoms about
this, no doubt. But but generally, I
[laughter]
Mark Zuckerberg is maybe one of the
greatest businessmen in the world, one
of the greatest CEOs in the world, has
created a huge amount of shareholder
value, which is all I care about. Um,
and so this idea, right, I I did read
the essay. This idea that
suddenly meta is moving altruistically.
This isn't this isn't a new one. We had
this with open internet back in the day.
We've had various sorts of rebrands and
PR pushes.
>> Um, I I don't know. There's there's it's
very hard from with my investing hat on.
I'm I'm very pleased that Meta is trying
to compete aggressively here. And I
think that'll be a real boon for their
shares if they can figure it out and
keep the talent. That's an open
question.
>> But it also unfortunately precages
another question which Demis obviously
Mark Zuckerberg courted him very
aggressively. There's this one anecdote
he has uh about Mark Zuckerberg and I
have not confirmed this. I don't know if
it's true but no reason to lie here,
right? Um where essentially he sat down
to dinner with Mark and Mark said,
"Look, I'm so excited about AI. I think
this and Demos he's saying all the right
things." And then they test him out. He
says, "Well, what do you think about the
metaverse?" And Mark Zuckerber responded
with the same amount of excitement for
for the metaverse, for virtual reality,
for gadgets, for devices. And Deus goes,
"Okay, you just
>> you just get excited about everything.
You don't actually see this as the
transformative transformative tech that
I do." And I think it's always been a
question. Why is Meta playing here? Why
are we spending tens of billions of
dollars poaching these people? It's why
>> Well, this has been the question for
Meta going back how long? The metaverse,
the glasses, the goggles.
>> Again, I've said this here multiple
times, and I'm going to get some angry
emails, too. it always feels like
they're just a bit behind the ball. So,
>> so I mean two things I want to say quote
from the from the essay. Meta's mission
since our founding has been focused on
putting pe power in people's hands.
>> Sure it has.
>> Yeah. Exactly. Right. But then on the
flip side, I think it kind of makes
sense to doing what to to do what
they're doing right now with this with
the the the open claw moment for them,
right? They're basically saying putting
into your hands, right? But what that
really means is down the line is hey
we're going to have our own deepseat
type thing where you don't need to like
pay the front of your mouth so much
money
>> and that is why they want because the US
government there there is a stunningly
shallow bench of of open-source
uh US or Canadian or European models
that actually work and are good.
>> That's right. And so Meta, whether this
is altruistic or a bit of political
calculus or a bit of economic calculus,
>> this is a great move for them if it
works and if there is adoption because
the government will look at that and
smile and if anything make them a
preferred vendor,
>> right? And I was talking to our Dan
Howie about this and it's like it's not
that they're be running these these
models on the their own systems going be
on Meta's Meta Cloud, right? And Meta's
data centers and they get that money.
Oh,
>> very low licensing fee for the software.
We're going to charge you a lot for the
data.
>> And don't forget, they're also going to
be selling that excess compute back,
making more money there. You see that
Mark Zuckerberg feels like he's where
can I extend this just a little bit
further? Where can I find? And look, if
you've committed to spending $2
trillion, makes sense to broaden out the
customer base.
>> It does. Although it should
it should alarm shareholders I think a
little bit that a company company's
primary obligation is to be a good
steward of capital misassessed their own
demand which they should know better
than anyone
>> for data centers and comput and Mark can
say whatever he wants of this always
being the plan I'm sure he will I'm sure
he has um the fact that you are
overbuilding or overcommitted to a
degree that you need to start building
out a new business line
>> um is is disturbing and a little scary
and it also says something deeper I
think which is that if Meta could they
would get out of it.
>> That's right.
>> I think it's also too little too late
what you were saying. I think that's a
big point.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The discussion revolves around Meta's new AI model, Muse Glimmer, and Mark Zuckerberg's essay advocating for personal super intelligence. Skepticism is raised regarding Meta's altruistic motives, drawing parallels to past PR pushes and Zuckerberg's seemingly equal excitement for AI and the metaverse. The speakers suggest Meta's strategy with open-source AI models is a calculated move to gain political favor and monetize its Meta Cloud infrastructure. Concerns are also voiced about Meta potentially overbuilding data centers, leading to the necessity of creating new business lines, which could alarm shareholders.
Videos recently processed by our community