Trump responds why he's "lowkeying it" with an Iran deal.

Watch on YouTube

Now Playing

Transcript

18 segments

0:00

if there's damages to be paid, I think

0:01

Iran should pay those damages.

0:03

[clears throat] They ask for

0:04

reparations, you might say, or they ask

0:06

for money for the damage that we've

0:09

done. I said, that's a good idea. Well,

0:11

we're going to ask for money for the

0:12

damage they've done over a 50-year

0:13

period. Whether you go SS Cole, or

0:15

whether you go all of the people that

0:17

were so badly hurt, so badly wounded or

0:19

killed, and maybe damages for the 52,000

0:22

protesters over the last four months

0:24

that were killed in Iran. We think they

0:27

their family should get damages for

0:29

killing their person or their child or

0:31

mother father. It was 52,000 a month and

0:34

a half ago. So now what is it?

Interactive Summary

Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.

The speaker believes Iran should pay damages for harm caused over a 50-year period, citing incidents like the SS Cole and casualties. This stance is presented as a counter-argument to Iran's requests for reparations from the US. Additionally, the speaker suggests that families of the 52,000 protesters reportedly killed in Iran should also receive damages.