HomeVideos

LIVE: The Daily Wolf with Scott Melker

Now Playing

LIVE: The Daily Wolf with Scott Melker

Transcript

391 segments

0:58

For the second week in a row, Michael

1:00

Sailor's strategy sold Bitcoin to buy

1:04

back STRC. And that's just one of the

1:06

many stories we're going to unpack on

1:08

today's Daily Wolf. You don't want to

1:10

miss this one. Let's go.

1:17

Happy noon everybody to those who

1:19

celebrate. Welcome to the Daily Wolf on

1:22

Yahoo Finance. I'm your host Scott

1:23

Melker, also known as the Wolf of All

1:27

Streets. Now, since I know there's

1:28

millions and billions and trillions of

1:29

you that watch this show every week with

1:31

baited breath, you're probably wondering

1:33

what happened last week. We did take a

1:35

blackout week. I was on vacation

1:38

exploring around the Mediterranean.

1:40

And finding out that Europeans call

1:42

anything with a rock and an ocean a

1:44

beach. The European mind cannot

1:46

comprehend sand on a beach is something

1:49

that I learned in the last week. People

1:51

lay out on jagged rocks and pretend that

1:53

they're having a good time. But we did

1:55

have a great time and it left us a lot

1:57

of fodder here to discuss on the Daily

2:00

Wolf because we took so much time off.

2:03

But regardless, it's Monday, which means

2:05

our first story has to always be this

2:07

one with this guy. Strategy sells 1690

2:12

Bitcoin, raises 653 million from MSTR

2:16

shares. So, what happened this week?

2:18

They sold 690 Bitcoin as it says, raised

2:21

$18.6

2:22

million. I would say not coincidentally,

2:25

they bought back exactly $108.6 6

2:29

million worth of STRC, which is now

2:31

floating around $95, almost back to par.

2:35

As I told you in the past, buying STRC

2:37

in the 70s was probably a really, really

2:39

good deal when there was peak FUD and

2:42

maximum insanity with people saying that

2:44

strategy was going to zero. They also

2:47

issued a whole lot of MSTR to raise

2:49

another 653 million, re bringing their

2:52

cash reserves up to $4.65 65 billion

2:56

about 32 months of coverage for STRC and

3:00

other expenses. But the big story here,

3:03

we used to have Megade Sailor who would

3:06

just suck up all the Bitcoin. He had one

3:08

strategy. One strategy. Issue stock,

3:12

raise debt, do anything you could to

3:14

simply get cash and buy Bitcoin.

3:17

Remember when we started the show, we

3:18

used to talk about Megaade all the time.

3:20

Well, unfortunately back then we used to

3:22

joke, "What ever happened if Mega Vade

3:24

went from suck to blow like in the

3:26

movie?" Well, here he is blowing out all

3:29

the bitcoins into the apocalyptic

3:31

hellscape of planet Jeridia, right? So,

3:34

listen, clearly the market does not

3:36

care. And I think that that's actually

3:38

the biggest story here. But we had a

3:40

machine that was, you know, to sell all

3:42

of these things to be able to buy

3:44

Bitcoin. And now he's selling Bitcoin to

3:47

be able to buy all of these things. And

3:49

like I said, last week they also sold

3:51

1638 uh 1638 Bitcoin to raise 104.7

3:56

million which also was used uh for SDRC

3:59

buybacks and to fund dividends and to

4:01

raise cash. So we have a very

4:04

interesting scenario here. A like I said

4:06

the most bullish scenario here was that

4:09

strategy would start to sell Bitcoin and

4:10

the market wouldn't care. We've seen

4:12

that now over the past few months. Every

4:13

time they sell the price of Bitcoin

4:15

shrugs it off and does nothing. So

4:17

clearly selling Bitcoin is not a problem

4:19

and the fact that he's not buying also

4:22

seemingly not a problem for the market.

4:23

But the thing that I'm wondering now at

4:25

this point and this remains an

4:26

open-ended question is now that he's

4:28

selling Bitcoin to buy STRC, what

4:30

happens when STRC inevitably returns to

4:32

par? I guess it's not inevitable, but

4:34

gets back to 100 bucks and the old

4:36

machine of using STRC to buy Bitcoin

4:40

kicks back into motion. Are they

4:41

actually going to then be selling STRC

4:43

to buy Bitcoin back at a higher price?

4:47

right? Are we selling the lows on

4:48

Bitcoin after buying the highs on

4:50

Bitcoin? Uh only to then buy that

4:53

Bitcoin back higher with the very same

4:55

instrument that he's buying back. I

4:57

would say that Michael Sailor here is in

4:59

a bit of a pickle. But once again,

5:03

having this not be the main narrative

5:05

for crypto at the moment is really,

5:06

really good news, right? I mean, Michael

5:09

Sailor spent years here turning dollars

5:11

into Bitcoin. Now he has discovered that

5:12

there's a reverse button, you know? uh

5:16

and and I don't love it. But either way,

5:18

that is the story for now and we can

5:20

move on to the next one, which is one

5:23

that I did not have the chance to unpack

5:25

at all last week. So, it's not brand new

5:27

news, but it's really important. And

5:29

that, of course, is the cold card

5:31

self-custody wallet hack that we saw in

5:34

crypto. I like this headline because

5:38

it's not necessarily the news, but it

5:39

does encapsulate what I'm thinking here.

5:42

why the latest Bitcoin hack hurt more

5:44

than most. So listen, we all remember

5:47

the 2022

5:49

downtrend, the bare market, the

5:50

collapses of Voyager, BlockFi, FTX,

5:53

Teraluna, you name it, right?

5:56

Those were counterparties that failed.

5:59

So people who listen to Bitcoin maxis

6:02

back then could understand not your

6:05

keys, not your coins, that you should be

6:06

self-custodying your Bitcoin. You should

6:08

never trust a counterparty. Leaving your

6:11

tokens on exchanges was dangerous. That

6:14

rationally made sense. It gave you a

6:16

boogeyman to blame. Well, now we have

6:18

self-custody, not writ large, but an

6:21

example of self-custody failing here. So

6:23

cold card was hacked. Now people saying

6:25

up to $130 million worth. The number

6:28

doesn't really matter. What matters to

6:30

me is that these were people that took

6:33

their self-custody seriously and did

6:35

everything right. These are not

6:36

speculators. They're not altcoin

6:37

gamblers. They're not out there flipping

6:40

meme coins. They're not leaving their

6:42

coins on their exchange. They bought

6:44

Bitcoin. They moved it to self-custody.

6:47

They saved their seed phrase and were

6:50

hoping that that would be safe forever.

6:51

And that's exactly what they were told

6:53

to do. And they still lost their money,

6:56

right? Right. I mean about 1,816 Bitcoin

6:59

so far drained from 5,200

7:02

addresses. And what happened was a flaw

7:04

weakened weakened the randomness that

7:06

was used to generate seed phrases. So

7:09

people didn't realize that when they

7:10

generated their seed phrase that it

7:12

could theoretically be reconstructed

7:14

without stealing the device, in

7:17

installing any malware on their device

7:18

or even having that device connected to

7:22

the internet. Now Coin Kite behind Coin

7:24

Glass is a small issuer. This doesn't

7:27

mean that all self-custody is broken,

7:29

but it should definitely shake your

7:31

faith. I believe in the ability to trust

7:35

yet again another counterparty in this

7:38

case, your self-custody wallet provider,

7:41

also a counterparty, but from outside

7:44

the crypto echo chamber. This is what I

7:46

want to get at. This is so nonsensical.

7:48

I mean, think about like trying to

7:49

explain this to someone, right? Like I

7:52

bought a $200 effectively 80s looking

7:55

Texas Instruments calculator. That's

7:57

what a cold card looks like to protect

7:59

my imaginary internet money, but I

8:02

couldn't uh trust it to generate a

8:03

random number. So I rolled casino dice

8:06

99 times to create enough entropy,

8:08

whatever that is, right? And then after

8:12

I created all my entropy, uh, my fifth

8:15

level ender dragon killed the grand

8:17

wizard and I engraved my 24 magic words

8:20

provided by the death of this grand

8:22

wizard onto a steel plate and I I buried

8:26

it under a bird bath in the backyard.

8:28

Right? I mean, we talk about this like

8:30

it's the future of banking, but it's

8:31

really not, right? I mean, it's yatsi

8:33

crossed with Dungeons and Dragons.

8:35

Except if you lose, your retirement

8:38

disappears and customer service is 12

8:40

nerds on Reddit telling you that it's

8:41

your fault you did everything wrong,

8:44

right? Like, who in the world right now

8:47

that's not deep in crypto is looking at

8:49

us and not thinking that this is a

8:51

complete and utter clown show? These

8:54

guys are storing their life savings on a

8:58

flash drive and burying it and hoping

9:00

that their family can find it. Now, I'm

9:01

a fan of self-custody in general, of

9:03

multi-IG, but I've often said like you

9:06

have to be really serious about this and

9:07

be willing to go very deep down the

9:09

rabbit hole to be self- sovereign and to

9:11

be your own bank and to do it. And

9:13

clearly, even if you do that, you can

9:16

still at certain times lose your money.

9:19

And that's not the only clown show.

9:20

Listen, I just want to give this one a

9:21

very uh quick honorable mention, right?

9:24

I mean, Bitcoin hits block 961,632

9:27

as the controversial BIP 110 software

9:30

attempts begin. Like, if it wasn't bad

9:32

enough, the optics of the self-custody

9:33

hack, we have like the entire Bitcoin

9:36

maximalist community fighting on X. You

9:39

sign on to X as a new user and all you

9:40

see is a bunch of dudes talking in code

9:44

about things that aren't even going to

9:45

happen. And we got a fork and then it

9:48

was two blocks were mined and then the

9:50

miners were right and sailors weighing

9:51

in. Nobody

9:53

cares. None of this works unless grandma

9:57

can understand it. And all we're doing

9:59

with our community is is confusing

10:02

everybody with narratives they can't

10:05

understand and are going to just dismiss

10:08

outright as nerd talk for DND weirdos.

10:12

Right? Bitcoin maximalists are the best

10:14

thing that ever happened to Bitcoin in

10:16

that they drove us this far to the point

10:18

where, you know, there was institutional

10:19

adoption, all these things. The problem

10:21

is is that they don't know how to

10:23

communicate and stop fighting with each

10:25

other about things that nobody

10:27

understands. This wallet hack to me is

10:31

an absolutely huge deal. Uh it made it

10:34

to Bloomberg unfortunately and is just

10:36

going to confuse people further, but

10:38

once again has nothing to do with actual

10:40

Bitcoin

10:41

uh or the future of Bitcoin as digital

10:45

money or as digital gold. Next story,

10:48

hopefully the last time we have to talk

10:49

about this for a month. Clarity Act

10:52

survives barely. Barely. US Senate opens

10:55

first stage of cryptoclarity act voting

10:57

to give uh bill a chance next month. So

10:59

obviously they didn't get it done in

11:00

August as we said, but majority leader

11:02

John Thun on a Saturday morning filed

11:04

for closure, which is a word that none

11:06

of you had any idea what it meant until

11:09

we started talking about genius in the

11:11

Clarity Act. Don't pretend you know what

11:12

closure is, right? But basically, the

11:14

Senate started the process of eventually

11:16

deciding whether to start the process.

11:18

And they did it in a tiny window in

11:20

September when they will have a few days

11:21

to decide this. So maybe they can get it

11:23

passed and maybe they'll vote on it and

11:24

maybe all the things. So listen, not

11:27

only did the poly market or the couch,

11:30

they all jumped in the 20% chance

11:32

clarity act passes, but if you actually

11:34

look at what's being said, I would say

11:35

that the odds have actually decreased

11:37

even though this first vote is being

11:38

proposed. Why? You have seven Republican

11:42

senators, three or four outright, and a

11:44

few that have been listed by the

11:45

Blockchain Association and others as now

11:47

saying it's safe to poke their heads out

11:49

and do what they've been paid to do by

11:51

the bank lobby, which is to oppose the

11:53

Clarity Act. All these Republicans, a

11:55

bunch of them that were supposed to be

11:56

voting for it, have come out and said,

11:57

you know, I don't really like that this

11:58

doesn't protect community banks and

12:00

there's going to be deposit flight. all

12:02

the old narratives we were seeing from

12:04

Jamie Diamond and JP Morgan. Now that

12:06

they realize this thing is unlikely to

12:08

pass now they're like, "Oh, we we need

12:10

to go earn that bank lobby money, that

12:13

sweet, sweet bank lobby money we've been

12:14

collecting and stick our heads out and

12:16

say that we oppose this." Not because of

12:18

the ethics or all the new things back to

12:20

the old stable coin yield argument. Now,

12:23

there's this completely seemingly

12:25

irrelevant, but I think he's irrelevant

12:27

because he was on the OC guy named Ben

12:29

McKenzie who wrote a book about crypto

12:31

who probably is also captured by the

12:33

same banking lobby. He made a video

12:35

about this celebrating. I'm going to

12:36

show it to you really quick. Let's

12:38

>> having a beer. Why? Because today is a

12:40

good day. The good guys won. I teamed up

12:44

with Indivisible and Americans for

12:46

Financial Reform and together we beat

12:49

the corrupt crypto bill, the Clarity

12:51

Act. Few months ago, the odds of it

12:53

passing were 75%, now it's dead. In

12:56

fact, we beat it so bad they didn't even

12:59

bring it up for a vote. This is a win,

13:02

not for us, but for the vast majority of

13:04

Americans who are sick of Trump's

13:06

cryptocrumption. Sick of the hundreds of

13:08

millions of dollars the crypto lobby is

13:10

spending to corrupt our democracy. Sick

13:12

of the lying and the nonsense coming out

13:13

of Washington. I want to be clear, the

13:16

fight against crypto is far from over.

13:18

The Clarity Act could still come back

13:20

like a corporate zombie rising from the

13:22

dead. But today, we won. And because of

13:26

that, I'm having a beer to the most

13:28

corrupt president in history. And to the

13:31

crypto bros everywhere. Cheers.

13:35

That's not beer. That's apple juice.

13:37

That's not apple juice. It's ODS. That's

13:40

not a beer. That is a tumbler glass.

13:44

Nobody drinks beer out of a tumbler

13:46

glass. that probably had ice in it. I

13:49

don't even care what he said. I'm so

13:51

confused that he's drinking beer out of

13:52

that glass, right? But who he's

13:55

literally sitting here saying that he

13:57

and his friends are responsible somehow

14:00

for the Clarity Act not passing. Oh, and

14:02

by the way, it is going to get that

14:03

initial vote in September. But that

14:05

basically just sums up the sentiment.

14:08

Who is that guy? It sums up the

14:10

sentiment uh from the anti-bank lobby

14:13

and the rest of the world as to what

14:14

they think about crypto right now and to

14:16

what they think about the process here

14:18

around the Clarity Act. Let's not spend

14:20

any more time. I really just wanted to

14:22

talk about him drinking beer out of that

14:23

glass. That beer's warm. We all know

14:26

that apple juice. I think it's apple

14:29

juice. Anyways, we have another story

14:31

right here. Mastercard completes BVNK

14:34

acquisition to boost stable coin

14:35

infrastructure. uh BVNK taking a note

14:38

out of a Coachella flyer and spelling

14:40

bank in a really funny uh kind of way

14:42

and flipping the V upside down and not

14:44

having any vowels. That's what DJs do.

14:47

There's a company now that's getting 1

14:48

point I think 1.8 billion here. Yet

14:51

another unicorn uh in the crypto world.

14:55

The story here though isn't that

14:56

Mastercard bought this. It's that

14:58

Mastercard realized that there's they're

14:59

in a hell of a lot of trouble and

15:01

they're struggling to catch up to make

15:03

sure that they are a part of the stable

15:05

coin race. This is the biggest story in

15:07

crypto right now is the adoption of

15:09

stable coins and the incumbents in

15:11

payments struggling to find ways to keep

15:14

up and make sure that they're able to

15:16

capitalize from this new revolution.

15:19

Right. And this is going to give

15:21

Mastercard the ability to do all things

15:23

on chain. It's going to connect stable

15:24

coins, traditional currencies, bank

15:26

accounts, payment systems across more

15:28

than

15:29

130 countries. Willing to pay $1.8 8

15:32

billion for a company that you and I

15:34

have never heard of that has bank

15:36

spelled wrong just to keep up. Guys,

15:38

that is basically what we've got for you

15:43

today. The sailor machine is in reverse.

15:46

It's a bit confusing, but we're going to

15:48

see how it plays out over the coming

15:49

weeks. That's all I got for you today.

15:50

See you tomorrow. Peace.

Interactive Summary

This episode of the Daily Wolf covers several key cryptocurrency news items. Michael Saylor's strategy has shifted, with his company now selling Bitcoin to buy back STRC shares and issuing MSTR to raise cash, departing from his previous Bitcoin accumulation-only approach. A significant Cold Card self-custody wallet hack occurred due to a flaw in seed phrase randomness, leading to substantial Bitcoin loss for users who diligently followed self-custody advice, which raises concerns about the complexity and accessibility of self-sovereignty. Politically, the US Senate is initiating voting for the Crypto Clarity Act, but its prospects are dim due to opposition from Republican senators, allegedly influenced by the banking lobby. Finally, Mastercard acquired BVNK for $1.8 billion to enhance its stablecoin infrastructure, signaling a move by traditional payment incumbents to catch up in the growing stablecoin market.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts