LIVE: The Daily Wolf with Scott Melker
391 segments
For the second week in a row, Michael
Sailor's strategy sold Bitcoin to buy
back STRC. And that's just one of the
many stories we're going to unpack on
today's Daily Wolf. You don't want to
miss this one. Let's go.
Happy noon everybody to those who
celebrate. Welcome to the Daily Wolf on
Yahoo Finance. I'm your host Scott
Melker, also known as the Wolf of All
Streets. Now, since I know there's
millions and billions and trillions of
you that watch this show every week with
baited breath, you're probably wondering
what happened last week. We did take a
blackout week. I was on vacation
exploring around the Mediterranean.
And finding out that Europeans call
anything with a rock and an ocean a
beach. The European mind cannot
comprehend sand on a beach is something
that I learned in the last week. People
lay out on jagged rocks and pretend that
they're having a good time. But we did
have a great time and it left us a lot
of fodder here to discuss on the Daily
Wolf because we took so much time off.
But regardless, it's Monday, which means
our first story has to always be this
one with this guy. Strategy sells 1690
Bitcoin, raises 653 million from MSTR
shares. So, what happened this week?
They sold 690 Bitcoin as it says, raised
$18.6
million. I would say not coincidentally,
they bought back exactly $108.6 6
million worth of STRC, which is now
floating around $95, almost back to par.
As I told you in the past, buying STRC
in the 70s was probably a really, really
good deal when there was peak FUD and
maximum insanity with people saying that
strategy was going to zero. They also
issued a whole lot of MSTR to raise
another 653 million, re bringing their
cash reserves up to $4.65 65 billion
about 32 months of coverage for STRC and
other expenses. But the big story here,
we used to have Megade Sailor who would
just suck up all the Bitcoin. He had one
strategy. One strategy. Issue stock,
raise debt, do anything you could to
simply get cash and buy Bitcoin.
Remember when we started the show, we
used to talk about Megaade all the time.
Well, unfortunately back then we used to
joke, "What ever happened if Mega Vade
went from suck to blow like in the
movie?" Well, here he is blowing out all
the bitcoins into the apocalyptic
hellscape of planet Jeridia, right? So,
listen, clearly the market does not
care. And I think that that's actually
the biggest story here. But we had a
machine that was, you know, to sell all
of these things to be able to buy
Bitcoin. And now he's selling Bitcoin to
be able to buy all of these things. And
like I said, last week they also sold
1638 uh 1638 Bitcoin to raise 104.7
million which also was used uh for SDRC
buybacks and to fund dividends and to
raise cash. So we have a very
interesting scenario here. A like I said
the most bullish scenario here was that
strategy would start to sell Bitcoin and
the market wouldn't care. We've seen
that now over the past few months. Every
time they sell the price of Bitcoin
shrugs it off and does nothing. So
clearly selling Bitcoin is not a problem
and the fact that he's not buying also
seemingly not a problem for the market.
But the thing that I'm wondering now at
this point and this remains an
open-ended question is now that he's
selling Bitcoin to buy STRC, what
happens when STRC inevitably returns to
par? I guess it's not inevitable, but
gets back to 100 bucks and the old
machine of using STRC to buy Bitcoin
kicks back into motion. Are they
actually going to then be selling STRC
to buy Bitcoin back at a higher price?
right? Are we selling the lows on
Bitcoin after buying the highs on
Bitcoin? Uh only to then buy that
Bitcoin back higher with the very same
instrument that he's buying back. I
would say that Michael Sailor here is in
a bit of a pickle. But once again,
having this not be the main narrative
for crypto at the moment is really,
really good news, right? I mean, Michael
Sailor spent years here turning dollars
into Bitcoin. Now he has discovered that
there's a reverse button, you know? uh
and and I don't love it. But either way,
that is the story for now and we can
move on to the next one, which is one
that I did not have the chance to unpack
at all last week. So, it's not brand new
news, but it's really important. And
that, of course, is the cold card
self-custody wallet hack that we saw in
crypto. I like this headline because
it's not necessarily the news, but it
does encapsulate what I'm thinking here.
why the latest Bitcoin hack hurt more
than most. So listen, we all remember
the 2022
downtrend, the bare market, the
collapses of Voyager, BlockFi, FTX,
Teraluna, you name it, right?
Those were counterparties that failed.
So people who listen to Bitcoin maxis
back then could understand not your
keys, not your coins, that you should be
self-custodying your Bitcoin. You should
never trust a counterparty. Leaving your
tokens on exchanges was dangerous. That
rationally made sense. It gave you a
boogeyman to blame. Well, now we have
self-custody, not writ large, but an
example of self-custody failing here. So
cold card was hacked. Now people saying
up to $130 million worth. The number
doesn't really matter. What matters to
me is that these were people that took
their self-custody seriously and did
everything right. These are not
speculators. They're not altcoin
gamblers. They're not out there flipping
meme coins. They're not leaving their
coins on their exchange. They bought
Bitcoin. They moved it to self-custody.
They saved their seed phrase and were
hoping that that would be safe forever.
And that's exactly what they were told
to do. And they still lost their money,
right? Right. I mean about 1,816 Bitcoin
so far drained from 5,200
addresses. And what happened was a flaw
weakened weakened the randomness that
was used to generate seed phrases. So
people didn't realize that when they
generated their seed phrase that it
could theoretically be reconstructed
without stealing the device, in
installing any malware on their device
or even having that device connected to
the internet. Now Coin Kite behind Coin
Glass is a small issuer. This doesn't
mean that all self-custody is broken,
but it should definitely shake your
faith. I believe in the ability to trust
yet again another counterparty in this
case, your self-custody wallet provider,
also a counterparty, but from outside
the crypto echo chamber. This is what I
want to get at. This is so nonsensical.
I mean, think about like trying to
explain this to someone, right? Like I
bought a $200 effectively 80s looking
Texas Instruments calculator. That's
what a cold card looks like to protect
my imaginary internet money, but I
couldn't uh trust it to generate a
random number. So I rolled casino dice
99 times to create enough entropy,
whatever that is, right? And then after
I created all my entropy, uh, my fifth
level ender dragon killed the grand
wizard and I engraved my 24 magic words
provided by the death of this grand
wizard onto a steel plate and I I buried
it under a bird bath in the backyard.
Right? I mean, we talk about this like
it's the future of banking, but it's
really not, right? I mean, it's yatsi
crossed with Dungeons and Dragons.
Except if you lose, your retirement
disappears and customer service is 12
nerds on Reddit telling you that it's
your fault you did everything wrong,
right? Like, who in the world right now
that's not deep in crypto is looking at
us and not thinking that this is a
complete and utter clown show? These
guys are storing their life savings on a
flash drive and burying it and hoping
that their family can find it. Now, I'm
a fan of self-custody in general, of
multi-IG, but I've often said like you
have to be really serious about this and
be willing to go very deep down the
rabbit hole to be self- sovereign and to
be your own bank and to do it. And
clearly, even if you do that, you can
still at certain times lose your money.
And that's not the only clown show.
Listen, I just want to give this one a
very uh quick honorable mention, right?
I mean, Bitcoin hits block 961,632
as the controversial BIP 110 software
attempts begin. Like, if it wasn't bad
enough, the optics of the self-custody
hack, we have like the entire Bitcoin
maximalist community fighting on X. You
sign on to X as a new user and all you
see is a bunch of dudes talking in code
about things that aren't even going to
happen. And we got a fork and then it
was two blocks were mined and then the
miners were right and sailors weighing
in. Nobody
cares. None of this works unless grandma
can understand it. And all we're doing
with our community is is confusing
everybody with narratives they can't
understand and are going to just dismiss
outright as nerd talk for DND weirdos.
Right? Bitcoin maximalists are the best
thing that ever happened to Bitcoin in
that they drove us this far to the point
where, you know, there was institutional
adoption, all these things. The problem
is is that they don't know how to
communicate and stop fighting with each
other about things that nobody
understands. This wallet hack to me is
an absolutely huge deal. Uh it made it
to Bloomberg unfortunately and is just
going to confuse people further, but
once again has nothing to do with actual
Bitcoin
uh or the future of Bitcoin as digital
money or as digital gold. Next story,
hopefully the last time we have to talk
about this for a month. Clarity Act
survives barely. Barely. US Senate opens
first stage of cryptoclarity act voting
to give uh bill a chance next month. So
obviously they didn't get it done in
August as we said, but majority leader
John Thun on a Saturday morning filed
for closure, which is a word that none
of you had any idea what it meant until
we started talking about genius in the
Clarity Act. Don't pretend you know what
closure is, right? But basically, the
Senate started the process of eventually
deciding whether to start the process.
And they did it in a tiny window in
September when they will have a few days
to decide this. So maybe they can get it
passed and maybe they'll vote on it and
maybe all the things. So listen, not
only did the poly market or the couch,
they all jumped in the 20% chance
clarity act passes, but if you actually
look at what's being said, I would say
that the odds have actually decreased
even though this first vote is being
proposed. Why? You have seven Republican
senators, three or four outright, and a
few that have been listed by the
Blockchain Association and others as now
saying it's safe to poke their heads out
and do what they've been paid to do by
the bank lobby, which is to oppose the
Clarity Act. All these Republicans, a
bunch of them that were supposed to be
voting for it, have come out and said,
you know, I don't really like that this
doesn't protect community banks and
there's going to be deposit flight. all
the old narratives we were seeing from
Jamie Diamond and JP Morgan. Now that
they realize this thing is unlikely to
pass now they're like, "Oh, we we need
to go earn that bank lobby money, that
sweet, sweet bank lobby money we've been
collecting and stick our heads out and
say that we oppose this." Not because of
the ethics or all the new things back to
the old stable coin yield argument. Now,
there's this completely seemingly
irrelevant, but I think he's irrelevant
because he was on the OC guy named Ben
McKenzie who wrote a book about crypto
who probably is also captured by the
same banking lobby. He made a video
about this celebrating. I'm going to
show it to you really quick. Let's
>> having a beer. Why? Because today is a
good day. The good guys won. I teamed up
with Indivisible and Americans for
Financial Reform and together we beat
the corrupt crypto bill, the Clarity
Act. Few months ago, the odds of it
passing were 75%, now it's dead. In
fact, we beat it so bad they didn't even
bring it up for a vote. This is a win,
not for us, but for the vast majority of
Americans who are sick of Trump's
cryptocrumption. Sick of the hundreds of
millions of dollars the crypto lobby is
spending to corrupt our democracy. Sick
of the lying and the nonsense coming out
of Washington. I want to be clear, the
fight against crypto is far from over.
The Clarity Act could still come back
like a corporate zombie rising from the
dead. But today, we won. And because of
that, I'm having a beer to the most
corrupt president in history. And to the
crypto bros everywhere. Cheers.
That's not beer. That's apple juice.
That's not apple juice. It's ODS. That's
not a beer. That is a tumbler glass.
Nobody drinks beer out of a tumbler
glass. that probably had ice in it. I
don't even care what he said. I'm so
confused that he's drinking beer out of
that glass, right? But who he's
literally sitting here saying that he
and his friends are responsible somehow
for the Clarity Act not passing. Oh, and
by the way, it is going to get that
initial vote in September. But that
basically just sums up the sentiment.
Who is that guy? It sums up the
sentiment uh from the anti-bank lobby
and the rest of the world as to what
they think about crypto right now and to
what they think about the process here
around the Clarity Act. Let's not spend
any more time. I really just wanted to
talk about him drinking beer out of that
glass. That beer's warm. We all know
that apple juice. I think it's apple
juice. Anyways, we have another story
right here. Mastercard completes BVNK
acquisition to boost stable coin
infrastructure. uh BVNK taking a note
out of a Coachella flyer and spelling
bank in a really funny uh kind of way
and flipping the V upside down and not
having any vowels. That's what DJs do.
There's a company now that's getting 1
point I think 1.8 billion here. Yet
another unicorn uh in the crypto world.
The story here though isn't that
Mastercard bought this. It's that
Mastercard realized that there's they're
in a hell of a lot of trouble and
they're struggling to catch up to make
sure that they are a part of the stable
coin race. This is the biggest story in
crypto right now is the adoption of
stable coins and the incumbents in
payments struggling to find ways to keep
up and make sure that they're able to
capitalize from this new revolution.
Right. And this is going to give
Mastercard the ability to do all things
on chain. It's going to connect stable
coins, traditional currencies, bank
accounts, payment systems across more
than
130 countries. Willing to pay $1.8 8
billion for a company that you and I
have never heard of that has bank
spelled wrong just to keep up. Guys,
that is basically what we've got for you
today. The sailor machine is in reverse.
It's a bit confusing, but we're going to
see how it plays out over the coming
weeks. That's all I got for you today.
See you tomorrow. Peace.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
This episode of the Daily Wolf covers several key cryptocurrency news items. Michael Saylor's strategy has shifted, with his company now selling Bitcoin to buy back STRC shares and issuing MSTR to raise cash, departing from his previous Bitcoin accumulation-only approach. A significant Cold Card self-custody wallet hack occurred due to a flaw in seed phrase randomness, leading to substantial Bitcoin loss for users who diligently followed self-custody advice, which raises concerns about the complexity and accessibility of self-sovereignty. Politically, the US Senate is initiating voting for the Crypto Clarity Act, but its prospects are dim due to opposition from Republican senators, allegedly influenced by the banking lobby. Finally, Mastercard acquired BVNK for $1.8 billion to enhance its stablecoin infrastructure, signaling a move by traditional payment incumbents to catch up in the growing stablecoin market.
Videos recently processed by our community