HomeVideos

Washtenaw County Edition: $500K to Planned Parenthood, Healthcare Millage Debate, 911 surcharge

Now Playing

Washtenaw County Edition: $500K to Planned Parenthood, Healthcare Millage Debate, 911 surcharge

Transcript

550 segments

0:00

I will say that this of the mill that I

0:03

have considered and this is my eighth

0:05

year sitting up here.

0:07

>> Um this is the first millillage where

0:09

I've heard from my constituents [music]

0:11

uh a majority

0:14

uh of opposition to the question.

0:17

>> You know, some have contacted me in

0:19

support, more have contacted me in

0:21

opposition to this, and that's a first.

0:23

That was Commissioner Jason Machki

0:25

speaking at the Washaw County Board of

0:27

Commissioners meeting on July 1st, 2026.

0:30

This is Washington County edition.

0:38

Before their regular meeting at 7 p.m.,

0:41

the County Board of Commissioners held a

0:43

work session about winter sheltering and

0:46

emergency 911 sir charges. A panel of

0:49

service providers updated the board on

0:52

winter sheltering services and the

0:54

impact of $1.3 million in county funds.

0:58

So, the CH PATH team provided street

1:01

outreach to 45 individuals who remained

1:04

living outside for the duration of the

1:05

winter months. Uh, and some of those we

1:09

engaged into hotels during the most

1:12

severe weather that we had, but 45

1:14

individuals consistently remained living

1:16

outside. The shelter saw 882

1:19

unduplicated individuals during the

1:21

winter months. This is just an amazing

1:23

number that the shelter system was able

1:26

to uh support uh with an average of 176

1:31

individuals per night across all the

1:33

sites. So we served 77 families or 332

1:38

people sheltered by IHN and SOS during

1:42

the winter months. Um and family shelter

1:45

had an increased capacity by 29 units.

1:48

Uh Alpha House is um expanding uh and

1:52

we'll have a se 70 total units once

1:55

they're able to fully open.

1:58

Ozone House, we served 198 youth across

2:01

all of our programs during the winter

2:03

months. You can read the details

2:05

obviously, but overall our latest report

2:07

this winter showed approximately 30% of

2:09

clients were served from outside of

2:11

county. So, this is an issue we're

2:13

talking about how to address, and it

2:14

isn't an easy one. For this upcoming

2:16

winter, our community needs another

2:18

location or two that allows us to have

2:20

people supported by multiple agencies so

2:22

we can start to solve this issue, this

2:24

issue with a well-unded system for our

2:26

housing and homelessness continuum of

2:27

care. For everyone standing up here,

2:30

everyone in this room, for everyone

2:31

listening online, for everyone in this

2:33

county, we need to see this as all of

2:35

our issue. If we don't address this

2:38

together right now for our upcoming

2:39

winter, people are going to die

2:41

unhoused.

2:42

>> They offered explanation about why the

2:44

Delana shelter in Ann Arbor is over

2:46

capacity.

2:48

>> We think one of those reasons is because

2:49

a Monroe shelter closed and so we think

2:52

[clears throat] a lot of those f maybe

2:53

we're not sure it's an anecdote that a

2:55

lot of those folks came out. This is

2:56

partially why the path team saw 100

2:59

people instead of 50 after the winter

3:02

season ended because at the Delana

3:04

Center there were 130 people on that

3:06

last night unless sleep.

3:07

>> The board offered feedback.

3:09

>> I just wanted to add quickly that I got

3:11

a communication a couple of maybe a

3:14

month ago and I sent it to Rhonda and

3:17

Shona and I I sent it. It was about a

3:22

complex that was

3:24

vacant and I thought, okay, we could

3:28

figure out a way to obtain that. Can we

3:31

look into this and find out why is it

3:34

empty and how much would it cost to to

3:36

assume it? And

3:38

I mean, it would have been enough

3:41

to handle all of your issues.

3:44

So, I'm just putting it out there.

3:46

>> I fully agree with Commissioner Sanders.

3:48

Uh, I think it's a great idea. Uh it's

3:50

one that I floated before when we had

3:52

those hotels available to purchase uh

3:55

over near Palm Palace.

3:56

>> We're looking into those hotels right

3:58

now. So, we will bring that to you if

4:00

it's if it's a possibility.

4:02

>> That's awesome. I I think it should be a

4:03

possibility. Like I said a year ago

4:05

whenever I first brought this up.

4:11

The board then heard a presentation from

4:13

County Sheriff Alicia Dyer, who

4:15

presented a plan to help fund 911

4:18

response by increasing a search charge

4:20

that appears on phone bills. The board

4:22

would put a question on the ballot for

4:24

county voters to approve. Our county sir

4:28

charge cost is 43 cents per month. Um,

4:32

we are an outlier compared to some of

4:34

our neighboring regions. And what this

4:37

is is it is the fee that you'll see on

4:39

your telephone bill. You'll see like a

4:40

E911 charge. A lot of people don't

4:43

realize that they're even paying it. Our

4:45

current funding structure for E911 in

4:48

county is uh this sir charge along with

4:52

the county general fund that you all

4:54

contribute to uh public safety and

4:56

dispatch services. If you see here where

4:59

stands versus our neighboring counties,

5:01

we are at the 43 cents in Washington. We

5:04

were grandfathered in at that many many

5:06

years ago. Our neighboring counties have

5:08

actually already um increased their

5:10

search charge to be able to fund their

5:12

dispatch center um with you know

5:14

Livingston $185, Monroe's at $2, Lenway

5:19

is at $3 and that would be the state

5:20

cap. So as of now you can't go higher

5:23

than that $3. Our current reality is we

5:26

have rising call volumes. There's a

5:27

growing need for mental health calls to

5:29

be triaged appropriately as

5:31

municipalities think through alternative

5:33

response and we have a rising community

5:35

d demand just for dispatch service. We

5:38

have a huge structural gap between the

5:39

dispatch cost and the actual

5:41

searchcharge revenue that we um get as a

5:44

as a county. If the search charge was to

5:47

increase by $2, we would actually bring

5:50

in significantly more revenue. It would

5:53

be about 8.3 million. Um, Metro Dispatch

5:56

would get 7.4 million and then the other

5:58

PAPs would also see an increase in in

6:01

their revenue which is significant for

6:03

for their current current budgets. This

6:06

is not a millage. It is not a property

6:08

tax. It is not based on um property

6:11

taxes. It is a user sir charge and so it

6:15

is a monthly charge that is on your

6:18

phone wireless and voice over internet

6:20

connection. A lot of people have no clue

6:23

they're paying this E911 charge on their

6:26

phone bill. Um, and we want to make sure

6:27

we get out accurate information and we

6:30

want to do public education across our

6:32

our county um, alongside our local

6:35

municipality uh, and public safety

6:37

partners so that way people really can

6:39

evaluate their options and then

6:41

ultimately make a decision.

6:42

>> The board had questions for Sheriff

6:44

Dyer. I think this is a good opportunity

6:46

for us to get voter buy in to sh change

6:51

a system that we currently use and make

6:52

it better.

6:53

>> How would things change though for the

6:55

municipal contracts if we were to go to

6:57

something like 250 or three?

7:00

>> So if we went to um the the $250 or even

7:06

$230 or 40 um it would cover dispatch

7:11

services across county. we would no

7:14

longer have to contract for dispatch

7:15

services. We could county fund it and it

7:18

would not cost or burden the county

7:19

fund. Um, and would give us some room

7:22

for putting social workers into dispatch

7:25

or looking at fire or other streamlining

7:28

services between the sheriff's office

7:30

and our other dispatch partners. And so,

7:33

um, that would that would cover it. $3

7:36

would be significant. Then how does this

7:39

impact the um payment and the how HVA

7:44

emergent comes into this equation?

7:46

>> Yeah. So there could be a couple options

7:48

with that. So you know some some local

7:50

municipal municipalities have expressed

7:53

interest for years over more

7:54

centralization between police and fire.

7:57

And this funding could be used to cover

7:59

the cost that people have to pay for

8:01

emergent health um because they also do

8:03

the EMS side. And so there's a lot of

8:05

possibilities there. I think we're on a

8:08

pretty quick turnaround timeline to get

8:11

this moving. Our our municipalities, if

8:14

this were approved at a funding level

8:18

appropriate to cover,

8:21

should likely save money.

8:24

>> Every local municipality in our county

8:26

would save money. Uh Ann Arbor alone,

8:29

they're paying, I think, 1 point

8:31

something million for dispatch right

8:32

now. They would not have to pay that

8:34

anymore. After the work session, the

8:36

board held their regular meeting.

8:42

At the June meeting of the board, county

8:45

administrator Greg Dill announced his

8:47

retirement effective July 12th. The

8:49

board read a lengthy resolution honoring

8:52

his service. Whereas Gregory Dill has

8:55

dedicated more than 30 years of his

8:57

professional career to public service,

8:59

providing exceptional leadership to

9:01

local government. Now therefore, be it

9:03

resolved that the county Board of

9:05

Commissioners does hereby honor and

9:07

recognize Gregory Dill for his many

9:09

years of exemplary service to county and

9:12

its residents. Be it further resolved

9:14

that the Board of Commissioners extends

9:16

its deepest gratitude to Gregory Dill

9:18

for his leadership, integrity, and

9:20

unwavering commitment to the well-being

9:22

of the county community. Greg Dill

9:26

responded,

9:26

>> "We are the form of government that's

9:28

closest to the community and our work is

9:31

paramount important right now,

9:34

particularly given the external

9:36

environment that we operate under."

9:42

The board considered a question for the

9:44

November 2026 ballot that would ask the

9:47

community to approve a millillage

9:49

funding healthcare in the county. It is

9:51

designed to address acute funding

9:53

challenges that exist due to current

9:55

policy at the federal level. At first

9:58

reading, the board considered ballot

10:00

language for a proposed mill that would

10:02

last only 3 years. The board considered

10:05

the question of adjusting other millages

10:07

so that taxpayers would not see an

10:09

increase in their total bill. I want to

10:12

move that we add under the now therefore

10:14

be resolved clauses a section that would

10:16

say the board uh directs county

10:19

administration to provide

10:22

recommendations on how to reduce

10:26

uh any other millages and put s in

10:30

parenthesis by 2 mills.

10:32

>> I appreciate this. I would like this

10:34

millillage to be on the ballot and I

10:35

would like it to be um a neutral mill

10:38

for folks in our community. We can't

10:40

reduce the millages because they're

10:42

already voted on, right? But we can

10:44

choose to not levy the amount that have

10:47

been approved by the voters. So every

10:49

year we'd have to reup our commitment.

10:53

So there's basically what I'm driving at

10:54

is there's no way of guaranteeing that

10:57

the money would be not levied. It

10:59

depends on every board's decision-making

11:02

authority in that year.

11:04

>> Yes.

11:05

>> Okay. We've got to find a better way to

11:07

do it because this this this just isn't

11:09

working.

11:11

Especially because we are

11:14

quas

11:16

six mills away from hitting the ceiling.

11:19

>> In a hypothetical situation in which the

11:21

federal landscape changes significantly,

11:24

we could always choose to stop levying

11:26

this millillage or if if needed. None of

11:29

this is truly ideal, but all of us have,

11:33

you know, coalesed around this notion

11:35

that we're trying to minimize the tax

11:37

burden as much we can.

11:38

>> And my constituents and even some of my

11:41

peers that said, you know, y'all better

11:44

quit asking us for more and more money

11:46

and figure out ways. They saying we're

11:49

being poor budgeters because we're not,

11:53

as I was on a bandwagon last week, we we

11:56

have other options.

11:58

We have other options

12:00

>> on the amendment. I'm just nervous

12:02

because I'm looking here at our

12:04

countywide villages and I can't think of

12:08

a single one where I want to draw money

12:14

away from parks or older persons or

12:18

roads or emergency communication system

12:23

or veterans or conservation. like I

12:26

can't think of anything.

12:28

>> I hate to do this, but um just want to

12:30

point out that the amendment that you've

12:32

made is to a first reading resolution.

12:35

So, in theory, it won't be directing

12:38

county staff to do anything until

12:41

later.

12:41

>> Yeah.

12:42

>> The board approved an amendment

12:44

directing county staff to recommend a

12:46

strategy for reducing other millages.

12:49

Only commissioners Machki, Sanders, and

12:51

Bean voted against. Discussion of the

12:54

main motion continued. I advocated for

12:56

three years. That way, um, the board can

12:59

reassess how things are in about two or

13:02

three years to see if we need to put it

13:04

back up on the ballot to meet this need.

13:06

Um, because I think it gets to the point

13:08

of this is like a temporary um, fix for

13:11

a problem that we did not create. So, I

13:14

would like to make a motion to table

13:16

this until we get all of the answers. I

13:18

want exact numbers. I want to know how

13:20

this is going to move. I want to know

13:21

what millages we're going to pull from,

13:23

how they're going to operate, how that

13:25

funding is going to substain. I want to

13:26

know all of those answer because we

13:28

don't have them.

13:29

>> I think in order to comply with the

13:32

ballot language uh requirements, we do

13:35

have to keep this moving uh for an

13:38

August uh uh 5th meeting. Um,

13:42

corporation council, can you clarify

13:45

um if that's even a a a technical

13:48

possibility to be able to do it in one

13:51

night? I'm not saying I would support

13:52

that, but is that even a legal option?

13:55

>> It is possible. Yes.

13:56

>> Since it would be legally possible to do

13:58

it in one reading, but if the motion to

14:01

postpone to or adjurnn to a time certain

14:04

passes and then we're at the August

14:06

meeting, wouldn't we then need to make a

14:08

motion to approve it in a single

14:10

reading? and then that would require

14:11

twothirds of the board to approve it.

14:13

>> Only commissioners Crystal Light and

14:14

Caroline Sanders voted in support of a

14:17

postponement.

14:18

>> And I also feel like um we have not

14:21

engaged our communities and our

14:23

residents with this millillage. It was

14:26

just brought like snuck in and we

14:29

haven't had time because I want to go

14:31

out into district 2 and ask you know the

14:34

thoughts and have town halls and have

14:37

the big harrah that we had. I want to

14:40

remind commissioners and and the

14:42

community, we we have discussed the

14:44

issue of public health at length. If

14:46

voters in four months say no, we will

14:50

come back to this table and make do as

14:52

best we can. Um they do have that right.

14:55

>> We're ignoring um our our most

14:58

vulnerable taxpayers here in this county

15:02

who don't seem to really get a voice.

15:06

Um, and

15:09

you know, I've got people that are

15:10

telling me they What are we doing?

15:14

When do we stop with these last minute

15:18

emergency millages?

15:20

>> We're talking about voting and putting

15:21

it out to the voters. And there's a

15:23

large difference between what voting

15:26

looks like in Ann Arbor and what voting

15:27

looks like in my district. So yes, we

15:30

can put it to the voters and yes, the

15:32

voters can vote, but in Ann Arbor, in

15:34

Ward 3, you have six places to vote. In

15:37

Bridgewater Township, you have one.

15:39

>> I appreciate the fact that we are trying

15:41

to make this neutral on residents. It

15:44

started out as a conversation about 8

15:45

years. I think 3 years is more

15:47

appropriate.

15:47

>> County staff offered more explanation

15:49

about what the millillage would fund.

15:51

>> Washington Health Project helps 4,000

15:53

people a year access Medicaid. With this

15:56

additional funding, we would help 3,000

15:58

additional people. That would be 7,000

16:00

people total. And then we would help 300

16:03

additional people access marketplace

16:06

coverage for paying for their premiums.

16:08

The ballot question for a healthcare

16:10

mill was approved at first reading with

16:12

commissioners Crystal Light, Caroline

16:14

Sanders, Shannon Bean, and Jason Machki

16:17

voting against.

16:23

Public commenters offered support for

16:25

$500,000 in bridge funding for Planned

16:28

Parenthood Michigan

16:29

>> for those who are uninsured,

16:31

underinsured, or living on low incomes.

16:33

Planned Parenth Planned Parenthood

16:35

Health Centers are often the only

16:37

affordable option. Planned Parenthood of

16:39

Michigan's Ann Arbor Health Center is a

16:41

critical provider of sexual and

16:43

reproductive health care in Washington

16:45

County. The Ann Arbor Health Center

16:47

provides birth control, STI testing,

16:50

cancer screenings, wellness exams,

16:52

abortion care, and many other essential

16:55

health services.

16:56

>> I'm Paula Thornton Greer. I am the

16:58

president and CEO of Planned Parenthood

17:00

of Michigan. at our power family health

17:03

center here in this county. Nearly one

17:06

in four patients we serve live at or

17:08

below the federal poverty level. And for

17:11

them, the difference between a door that

17:13

opens and one that doesn't is not this

17:15

abstract idea. It's whether they get

17:19

cancer screening, as you've heard, or

17:21

birth control, the care that lets them

17:23

plan their own lives.

17:26

7,000 visits a year happen at that

17:29

health center. Last year, I visited

17:31

Planned Parenthood's Ann Arbor location

17:33

after finding a lump in my breast. I

17:36

didn't have a primary care physician at

17:38

the time, so I immediately called around

17:40

to make an appointment. I was able to go

17:42

to Planned Parenthood's website and get

17:44

an appointment within two days. Later in

17:47

the year, I went to there to have an IUD

17:50

placed. Planned Parenthood provides

17:52

vital services to residents of county

17:55

who don't have other options. So I urge

17:58

you please to extend funding and support

18:01

this very necessary essential services.

18:05

>> The board expressed support for the

18:07

funding.

18:07

>> The emergency funding that you guys

18:09

referenced uh from a few years ago was

18:12

not the first time county u allocated

18:14

funds for Planned Parenthood. I got to

18:17

experience the ups and downs of uh the

18:21

attacks on Planned Parenthood in the

18:24

legislature. um and served under a

18:28

Republican trifecta where the Republican

18:30

party tried to put up legislate

18:32

legislative effort after legislative

18:34

effort to strip away and restrict

18:36

abortion access in the state of

18:38

Michigan. And I'm very proud of the

18:40

organization that you are because you

18:42

are resilient in the face of those

18:44

attacks.

18:45

>> The funding was approved.

18:51

The board considered a resolution

18:53

establishing a study committee to create

18:55

a historic district at Woodlon Cemetery

18:58

in Ipsellante. A spokesperson from the

19:00

Woodlon Cemetery Restoration Project

19:02

offered a public comment.

19:04

>> This fall and spring, we dedicated our

19:06

time to do listening sessions with the

19:08

descendants of those that are interurred

19:10

at the only black cemetery in county. It

19:13

is abandoned and if you drove past it,

19:15

you wouldn't even really know it's a

19:16

cemetery. Um, we've been working very

19:19

diligently to clear a lot of that excess

19:21

overgrowth over the last year. In those

19:23

listening sessions, the descendants

19:25

noted that one of the most critical

19:26

components was preservation of the site

19:29

in perpetuity, ensuring that it would

19:31

not be damaged or developed or anybody

19:34

would be disinterred. The board reacted

19:36

to the resolution.

19:38

>> I have a chainsaw and I know how to use

19:39

it. You [clears throat] guys need people

19:41

that know how to use chainsaws for your

19:43

cleanup.

19:43

>> Our next volunteer event is July 11th.

19:46

That's a Saturday. It's from 10 to 3 and

19:48

it's every other Saturday. So, bring

19:50

your chainsaw and gloves. It was

19:52

approved.

19:58

Due to the retirement of Greg Dill, the

20:00

county considered the appointment of

20:02

Derek Jackson as interim county

20:04

administrator. A memo from other county

20:06

leaders, including prosecutor Ellie

20:08

Savit, Sheriff Alicia Dyer, Clerk Larry

20:11

Kenbomb, Treasurer Leticia Sharp, and

20:14

Water Resources Commissioner Gretchen

20:16

Driscoll, expressed support for the

20:18

choice of Derek Jackson as interim. The

20:20

memo acknowledged the fact that Jackson

20:22

was previously a candidate for sheriff

20:24

in 2024, but lost to current sheriff

20:27

Dyer. The memo emphasized that their

20:30

recommendation was not political. The

20:32

board discussed the appointment. Does

20:35

this appointment have time limitation or

20:38

is it unlimited?

20:41

>> That has not been determined.

20:44

>> That has not been determined. I believe

20:46

it would probably be part of the

20:47

contract negotiation.

20:49

>> The agenda included a resolution

20:51

directing a search process to fill the

20:53

position of county administrator

20:55

permanently. County staff explained the

20:57

significance of that resolution. If this

21:00

is approved tonight, I will prepare a

21:02

documentation with what we will ask from

21:05

the search company to to focus on. Of

21:08

course, that will be uh it would need to

21:11

be approved by all of you. So, depending

21:14

on what steps we add to this, it it

21:17

could change the timeline, but in the

21:18

draft, I am considering roughly by the

21:21

end of the year.

21:23

>> The end of the year.

21:24

>> Yeah.

21:25

>> Do you have a do you have a date in

21:26

mind?

21:27

>> I'm sorry. Do you have a date in mind?

21:29

>> No.

21:30

>> Okay. Well, I guess for corp counsel, I

21:32

I think it is appropriate to have a

21:35

timeline in the contract for

21:39

when the contract starts and ends, and

21:42

we can always extend it, but I think we

21:44

have to have an end date in the

21:46

contract.

21:47

>> The appointment and the search process

21:48

were approved unanimously.

21:51

The next scheduled meeting of the board

21:52

of commissioners is Wednesday, August

21:54

5th. The board will hold a work session

21:56

at 5:30 p.m. ahead of their regular

21:59

meeting at 7:00 p.m. Like and subscribe

22:01

if you'd like to see more content like

22:03

this.

Interactive Summary

The Washtenaw County Board of Commissioners met on July 1st, 2026, to discuss pressing county issues, including winter sheltering strategies, a proposal for a 911 surcharge increase to support emergency dispatch services, and a potential healthcare millage for the November ballot. The board also honored outgoing county administrator Greg Dill, appointed Derek Jackson as the interim replacement, and moved forward with a search for a permanent administrator. Additional approvals included funding for Planned Parenthood and support for establishing a historic district at the Woodlawn Cemetery.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts