HomeVideos

2025 Predictions: Tech, Business, Media, Politics!

Now Playing

2025 Predictions: Tech, Business, Media, Politics!

Transcript

2951 segments

0:00

welcome back to the all-in podcast

0:01

everybody I'm your host Jason calacanis

0:03

I'll put in a bunch of plugs for the

0:05

projects I'm working on throughout the

0:06

show to annoy my co-hosts and continue

0:09

the grift but it is

0:10

2025 and we are doing our bestie Awards

0:14

it's going to be amazing today we've got

0:16

so much to do today with us again for

0:18

the second time a truly amazing bestie

0:21

Gavin Baker from at trees Capital am I

0:24

correct is it a treaty Capital you put

0:26

management tradies management oh a tradi

0:29

management

0:30

okay and uh just call it House of

0:32

treaties oh no let's not get him in

0:34

trouble I

0:36

P Gavin welcome back to the program let

0:39

us know um just briefly what does a

0:41

treaties do thanks for having me here

0:43

Jason

0:45

chamama and Dave a tradies we're a we're

0:48

crossover firm we invest publicly and

0:50

privately in consumer and Tech and we go

0:53

from series a to Mega cap got it okay so

0:56

you are a capital allocator you're place

0:58

bets on technology on the most important

1:01

new companies in the world we'll get

1:03

into that and this is our prediction

1:04

show we did our besti Awards how big is

1:07

your firm Gavin oh well you just met the

1:10

guy free brg you don't just ask him how

1:11

big his firm is the audience wants to

1:13

know is this guy a player like what's

1:15

the deal roughly $4 billion okay all

1:19

right so that's about a half an inch

1:21

bigger than shth he's really worried

1:24

now's not that he's the size queen or

1:27

anything let your winners ride

1:31

Rainman

1:34

David and instead we open sources to the

1:37

fans and they've just gone crazy

1:39

[Music]

1:42

with we're going to do a really great

1:45

prediction show today and we're going to

1:47

do some super predictions this year each

1:49

bestie gets to make a super prediction

1:50

or two during the show and we're going

1:53

to take those super predictions shamal

1:55

and we're going to put them on poly

1:57

Market yes that's right if you don't

1:59

know polyk Market there a prediction

2:01

Market where people can place a wager a

2:05

bet an investment in one or the other

2:07

side and uh they're p is my image good

2:09

it feels like it's

2:11

blurry it's a little blurry that's the

2:13

Avalanche coming and so I guess is that

2:15

the Maga Avalanche what is this

2:17

Avalanche is that people screaming

2:18

across the border what's the metaphor

2:20

here TR up is that the huge orgasm uh

2:23

that you're about to lay down in 2025

2:27

rocking my friend no no this is a shout

2:29

out to my friend Ruben Oland who's the

2:31

director of a bunch of really amazing

2:34

movies um including the one behind me

2:37

Force measure there you go all right we

2:39

did an amazing partnership with poly

2:41

Market freeberg you want to detail the

2:43

partnership and some way you I think you

2:44

helped work on it well we obviously have

2:46

talked to Shane at Poly market for some

2:48

time and we set up a a deal with them

2:51

where we could put our own markets up on

2:52

the on the site so we're going to talk

2:55

about a couple of our predictions this

2:56

year and then poly Market will post them

2:59

up on

3:00

on their site and people can can trade

3:02

them obviously xus and we're really

3:05

excited about it because it'll allow us

3:07

to kind of track how we're doing and

3:09

give us the opportunity on an ongoing

3:10

basis to create market so there'll be an

3:12

all-in section on poly Market where you

3:13

can kind of go in and see the all-in

3:15

market it's going to be really cool

3:16

awesome

3:18

fantastic and so uh we just got we're

3:21

all wrapping up our our uh ski trip here

3:23

Nick I understand there was some footage

3:25

some found footage from the bestie

3:27

skiing is that true

3:30

oh here we go look at this here I come

3:32

down the mountain Gavin I want you to

3:34

rate everybody skiing here I come

3:36

looking great there comes looking good

3:40

and then Here Comes somebody I think the

3:43

technical term Joe Lonsdale does for

3:45

that third person is a beep beep okay

3:48

here we go and look at this technique

3:50

coming down look at

3:52

chamama chamat you really Advanced since

3:55

last season look at him cutting those S

3:56

turns Gavin what do you think listen to

3:59

me I I made a very strategic decision to

4:03

stop snowboarding so I could learn to

4:05

ski with my kids it is so hard to learn

4:08

how to do something in your 40s no I

4:10

mean if you've never done it but I do

4:11

appreciate what you and your brother did

4:12

for me last season I learned a couple

4:14

things so it's been my thir there with

4:16

the black bomber my third season it was

4:18

great I am absolutely amazed at the

4:21

progress you're making freeberg I'm

4:22

amazed you made it onto the mountain you

4:25

you were out there a number of days

4:26

you're getting it done I needed new boot

4:29

and I tore my MCL last season so I'm in

4:32

it got really tweaked when I went out

4:33

there but I'm good it was great I had a

4:35

lot of fun I mean I four days yeah you

4:37

ski four days okay I finished my 16th

4:39

day yesterday but I took today off just

4:41

to get prepared here yeah I got 16 I do

4:43

the executive program Gavin I go off for

4:45

an hour and a half to three hours Zip

4:47

Zip Zip 10 runs and I'm done I only ski

4:49

in the morning yeah that's the way to do

4:51

same same same and and at 1215 have

4:54

lunch relax get a little work done need

4:57

a healthy healthy mix of AA ski and ski

5:00

Gavin how would you compare yourself to

5:02

what you just witnessed in that video

5:04

your skiing ability where would you rank

5:06

yourself clearly it's me chamath

5:08

freeberg in that ranking where would you

5:10

land in the ranking I well I would say

5:13

i' make two observations first like I'm

5:15

in the bottom percentile in terms of

5:16

natural athleticism but I do have many

5:19

many thousands of hours skiing great

5:23

okay and I would just leave I would just

5:24

leave that yes well then we'll be going

5:28

out with you next year new best

5:31

all right we got to get to it we're

5:33

going to start off with politics

5:35

gentlemen we got to keep this moving

5:36

because there's so many predictions

5:38

we're going to do our 2025 prediction

5:40

for biggest political winner now last

5:42

year well yeah I think we we got it kind

5:44

of wrong freedberg you said independent

5:47

third party in the US and we did see

5:49

some of that with you know the breakout

5:52

of Robert Kennedy maybe chamat you said

5:55

independent Centrist we didn't get there

5:57

with that one and I said Darkhorse

5:59

presidential candidates maybe I get a

6:01

quarter Point Credit there with wait

6:02

hold on what do you mean we didn't get

6:03

there independent centrists won the

6:05

election for mean independent Centrist

6:08

won the election really that's what you

6:09

believe yeah okay I didn't think that it

6:12

was the Independence but okay I think

6:13

independent Centrist swung the election

6:15

for Biden in

6:17

2020 and then I think they swung the

6:20

election for Trump in 2024 huh is that

6:23

statistically correct you think freeberg

6:25

you about that independent centrus did

6:27

the election or Gavin what do you think

6:29

I think it's right like I think a lot of

6:32

there were a lot of people not just

6:33

cists but a lot of people who had been

6:35

lifelong Democratic voters who voted for

6:39

Trump so I do think Trump won the cists

6:42

I mean Trump trump won

6:45

everything essentially yeah okay shabat

6:48

who's your prediction for the biggest

6:49

political winner of 2025 my biggest

6:51

political winner for 2025 are fiscal

6:56

conservatives I think that we are going

6:59

to Ted a very important Concept in

7:03

2025 and I hope it works which is that

7:06

of

7:07

austerity and the reason why austerity

7:09

has to work is that the only thing left

7:11

after austerity is to cut

7:13

entitlements and I think that in doing

7:17

this we are going to figure out how much

7:19

waste Fraud and Abuse exists in the

7:22

United States federal government I think

7:25

that that's going to spill over to a lot

7:27

of State elections

7:30

and I think that the fiscal

7:31

conservatives that have been clamoring

7:33

for a more restrained approach to

7:37

spending will have their Day in 2025

7:40

okay fiscal conservatives from schoth

7:42

freeberg who's your prediction for the

7:44

biggest political winner of 2025 I also

7:47

took a a class-based approach I chose

7:50

young candidates so Trump cabinet picks

7:54

have an average age of 40 to 45 years

7:57

old compared to the Biden cabinet the

7:59

average age is a little over 59 almost

8:02

60 years old and I do think that this

8:04

marks the beginning of a new trend in

8:07

the kind of age range of political

8:09

candidates shifting younger so I think

8:12

that this is something we should expect

8:14

as candidates start to emerge for the

8:15

midterms by the end of 2025 we'll start

8:18

to see younger new names start to pop up

8:21

that deliver resident messages and

8:23

aren't part of kind of the Old Guard of

8:26

you know the Aging political class so I

8:28

think that's a trend kind of underway

8:30

now excellent young candidates so we got

8:32

fiscal conservatives young candidates

8:33

Gavin what do you got for the 2025

8:35

prediction for biggest political winner

8:37

I would say Trump and centrism for my

8:40

choice for 202's biggest political

8:41

winner I went with something similar to

8:44

you freedberg I said Gen X and the Elder

8:48

Millennials if you look at the notable

8:50

Gen X appointments you got Elon with do

8:52

you got saxs obviously Marco Rubio my

8:56

God it just goes down and then if you

8:57

look at the Elder Millennials JD Vance V

8:59

fake Tuli just a lot of young people and

9:03

this is going to be absolutely fantastic

9:05

I think because they're going to start

9:06

thinking not just about themselves uh as

9:09

the boomers are doing with Social

9:11

Security taxes real estate all the

9:13

different issues that they tend to pick

9:15

for themselves they're going to start

9:16

thinking about maybe their own kids and

9:18

themselves so yeah it's obviously a sea

9:20

change is underway so they have a folks

9:23

for our predictions for political winner

9:26

let's go with political loser here

9:27

prediction for political loser we start

9:29

off with You Gavin we'll do this a

9:30

little round robin here we'll snake it

9:32

around Gavin what do you think who'll be

9:34

the biggest political loser of

9:36

2025 I think Putin I think Putin is

9:39

going to lose bigly um so if you are

9:44

xiin ping you know xim Russia is a

9:47

client state of China at this point and

9:50

if you're xiin ping what is happening is

9:53

now a disaster for you because Europe is

9:55

starting to rearm and which is which

9:57

will only accelerate this year

10:01

that will allow America to take

10:02

resources out of Europe and put them in

10:05

uh Japan and South

10:07

Korea and all over the Pacific and that

10:10

makes it a lot harder for you to do what

10:12

you most want to do which

10:14

is reunify um China and Taiwan or invade

10:18

Taiwan uh let's call it what it is and I

10:21

just think X is going to begin

10:24

decoupling from Putin if you're Trump

10:27

you want to show that you're independent

10:30

that you're not um inthrall to Putin in

10:33

any way so I think Trump is going to be

10:35

a lot tougher on Putin than people think

10:39

and I think he's going to get a very

10:42

very uh a deal that's very very bad for

10:45

Russia and Ukraine and you know you've

10:47

lost half a million people and for what

10:51

for what exactly yeah and it's a

10:53

thousand over a thousand days into this

10:55

nobody from the West H you know in the

10:58

NATO or America no no soldiers have lost

11:01

their lives from our side we've just

11:03

given them weapons and so it's a

11:04

humiliating defeat so far for Putin I

11:06

agree with you freeberg your prediction

11:08

for the biggest political loser of 2025

11:11

friberg's prediction I'm gonna predict

11:13

the proar neocons who are going to go

11:17

head-to-head with the JD Vance and Elon

11:21

and others of the world and I think that

11:23

they're going to lose and I think that

11:24

there's going to be this kind of big

11:26

crack in the establishment of this this

11:28

neocon

11:30

movement that's been very Pro conflict

11:32

around the world and we've heard it in

11:34

the speeches and in the commentary from

11:36

JD and others and I think this is going

11:38

to be the year it's all gonna kind of

11:39

come to a head I think they're gonna end

11:41

up on the losing side can iav can I take

11:44

the other side just just a little bit so

11:46

I think that's why you're here yeah yeah

11:48

I think it's right in reality but I

11:51

think you know Trump said something very

11:52

interesting about John Bolton he said

11:54

the guy was absolutely crazy but it was

11:57

awesome having him in the room when you

11:58

negoti deals people looked at this guy

12:01

looking angry red in the face so excited

12:04

to hit the nuclear button so excited to

12:06

go to war and you ended up with much

12:08

better deals so I think you're going to

12:10

see probably a lot more bellicosity from

12:12

the Trump Administration than anyone

12:14

expects and that's just to get a good

12:17

deal for you know between Russia and

12:19

Ukraine and then it's to get China to

12:21

kind of decouple from Russia so I think

12:24

the um in reality I think you're right

12:26

David but I think there will be a lot of

12:28

rhetoric that is at odds with what

12:30

you're saying before you end up being

12:32

right we already see it with Canada with

12:35

NATO with Taiwan there's a lot you know

12:37

we're gonna do this or this the tariffs

12:40

obviously there's just a lot of very

12:42

aggressive posturing leading up to the

12:44

negotiations that are hopefully going to

12:46

get the US good deals we'll see shamat

12:49

you have a prediction for your 2025

12:51

biggest political loser predictions hard

12:53

to do the uh biggest political loser of

12:56

2025 is going to be progress iism so

13:01

November of last year right after the

13:03

election I flew to London and went up to

13:06

Oxford and I spoke at the Oxford Union

13:08

and very impressive my speech was a

13:10

full-throated defense of

13:13

Maga but it was mostly an explanation of

13:16

Maga and it was sort of

13:21

the antidote to Progressive instincts

13:25

that had been riddling the Western G8

13:28

countries and was starting to basically

13:30

come on gun and when you look at what's

13:33

about to happen in 2025 in Canada Justin

13:36

Trudeau is going to lose massively to

13:38

Pier

13:40

POV in Germany afd looks like they will

13:43

win in France if there's a deadlock and

13:46

it goes into an election more than

13:48

likely Marine Leen is going to win and

13:50

then in the UK where you see this

13:53

unfolding child rape scandal where

13:56

allegedly upwards of hundreds of

13:58

thousands of young girls over the course

14:00

of 20 plus years were being raped by

14:03

organizations of Pakistani Muslim men

14:06

who were then not

14:08

prosecuted for Fears of stoking

14:12

islamophobia as it turns out by the

14:15

current prime minister Kier

14:16

starmer and if all of that comes to pass

14:19

in the UK I think you're going to see

14:21

the labor government fall and I think

14:23

you're going to see Nigel farage win so

14:25

what do all of these countries look like

14:29

like by the end of

14:31

25 it's very much a repudiation of this

14:34

class-based identity politics and I

14:37

think that has enormous Ripple effects

14:39

all throughout the world and so I think

14:41

the biggest political loser for 2025 I

14:43

think stands to be progressivism quote

14:45

unquote what they what we labeled

14:48

progressivism I I took something very

14:50

similar I said the racist vocal minority

14:53

of each one of these parties and there's

14:56

a little bit of this on either side you

14:58

have Dei on one side and then you just

15:00

have outright racism on the other side

15:03

and it's probably 5% of Maga and 5% of

15:05

the left and just to recap last year's

15:07

political predictions for 2024 our

15:09

predictions for political loser was I

15:11

said Netanyahu freeberg you said Ukraine

15:14

and shath you said the coke family the

15:16

GOP nailed that one I nailed that one

15:19

freeberg any thoughts on last year's or

15:22

anything on the Republican side more

15:24

than the Koch family do you think I mean

15:26

explain for the audience who maybe

15:28

aren't as into it well I think

15:31

essentially 2024 was the end of the

15:33

Republican party as we knew it and I

15:37

think what stands in its place is what I

15:39

would call the Maga reflection of a

15:42

coalition of people that will be housed

15:45

under the label of republicanism which

15:49

is to say that these folks aren't

15:50

necessarily Republicans these folks are

15:53

believers of the Maga philosophy they're

15:55

just using the Republican vessel in

15:57

order to run their candidates and get

16:00

elected and in that overturning of the

16:03

status quo what you had was this one

16:06

family who was at the center for the

16:09

last few Decades of political

16:12

Machinery that essentially decided

16:15

candidates that it decided agenda that

16:17

it decided policy and that was the coch

16:19

family and they spent an enormous amount

16:20

of money to get

16:22

that which they stood up frankly

16:25

literally the day after citizens united

16:27

happened in the Supreme Court and I

16:29

think that in that

16:31

lens those billions of dollars of

16:33

investment have essentially gone to zero

16:35

because I don't think it means much of

16:37

anything anymore and if you look at the

16:39

new class of donors who will

16:42

decide quote unquote Republican policy

16:45

it's going to be the the muriam Adon of

16:48

the world the Elon musks of the world

16:50

and that's very different than how I

16:52

think the cokes used to decide things do

16:54

you think there's too much money in

16:55

politics now Gavin do I think there's

16:58

too much money in politics now

17:04

um it's it's a good

17:08

question you know I might feel very very

17:11

differently if I didn't agree so

17:13

profoundly with with the largest owner

17:15

in this political cycle

17:17

yeah I I would say the reality is is

17:21

like the the the money as long as the

17:24

money raised on each side is roughly

17:27

equivalent I don't think it really

17:29

matters that would that would be my take

17:32

you just want some equivalence that's

17:34

all all right let's do our 2025

17:36

predictions for biggest business winner

17:38

freeberg why don't you start us off

17:40

biggest business winner for 2025 what's

17:42

your prediction so I feel like we're at

17:45

a really interesting inflection

17:48

point that is going to make 2025 the

17:51

year of autonomous Hardware or robotics

17:55

if 2024 was the year of kind of compute

17:58

build out and the roll out of AI systems

18:01

in software I think 2025 will be the

18:03

year of the

18:05

robot you know there's a company I we

18:07

just placed an order today actually out

18:10

of China called

18:12

unry Gavin have you looked at this

18:14

company yeah it's pretty wild actually

18:17

it's an incredible business incredible

18:20

product so their go2 robot is $1600 has

18:23

an API here it is you can run a payload

18:26

on it it's got lar on it it's got kind

18:28

of intelligence guidance systems on it

18:30

this is the robot system that was used

18:33

on some of those videos we looked at

18:34

earlier this year where there were

18:35

machine guns mounted to the back and it

18:37

was basically a new kind of field

18:39

Soldier it's an autonomous field Soldier

18:41

but really you can use it in scientific

18:43

applications we're looking at using them

18:44

in our uh on our on our test Farms where

18:47

it can wander the farm and take images

18:48

and Report data back to us and it's such

18:50

a low cost that like less than $3,000

18:53

you can do some incredible things with

18:54

it so this business just raised a couple

18:57

hundred million dollar last month

18:59

from Mostly Chinese investors it's a

19:01

Chinese company and I think that there's

19:03

going to be you know other similar type

19:06

businesses you know it kind of takes a

19:07

long time for things to work and then

19:09

all of a sudden they happen faster than

19:10

you could have ever imagined I think

19:12

this is going to be the year where we're

19:13

all going to look at humanoid robots and

19:15

autonomous systems and be like oh my God

19:18

I can't believe this is here um so this

19:19

could be the

19:20

year such a great strong choice for the

19:23

biggest winner and I think the quote

19:25

you're looking for is how did you go

19:26

bankrupt slowly and then all at once

19:28

that's how these technology changes and

19:30

man I would love to have one of these

19:31

for the ranch to just run around and do

19:33

the perimeter security sorry Nick pull

19:35

up the you guys got to watch this if you

19:36

haven't seen it Nick find the video of

19:38

the go2 with the wheels on it U managing

19:40

terrain and everyone thought this was a

19:42

BS video that it was like CGI wasn't

19:45

real it was AI generated but like this

19:47

thing is just incredible here it is this

19:50

is a real video of this thing yeah and

19:54

it could learn from an llm too right

19:56

like a large language model could teach

19:58

it how to do so yeah Gavin is this real

20:01

like what's your abely real yeah yeah I

20:03

want to get the G1 which is their

20:05

humanoid robot yeah so pull up the

20:07

humanoid it's really cool yeah a little

20:10

more expensive yeah yeah I mean $166,000

20:13

is the cost of a used Prius let's be

20:15

honest that's in spitting distance of

20:17

being affordable mid look at this thing

20:19

16 Grand and this thing you can you know

20:22

you can basically command it to do

20:24

things for you in your house or in your

20:27

factory or place oh come on I knew you

20:31

would do it oh come on I was going to

20:33

say maybe we could get a poker dealer

20:35

maybe B you know I wonder if this thing

20:37

could deal do you guys remember that

20:39

robot that was on stage for our all-in

20:42

Holiday Spectacular One so my my brother

20:45

made an observation he said as soon as

20:48

that robot came out it's like everyone

20:50

just wanted to abuse it he's like humans

20:52

have this very interesting nature where

20:54

like the robot emerges and all that

20:56

humans want to do is like hurt the robot

20:58

it's like

21:00

ration of behavior yeah like just it's

21:03

like oh here's something I dominate

21:04

here's something I can tell we're so

21:07

threatened by it we want to make sure

21:08

that we're the top of the species here

21:10

and it doesn't feel like it's going to

21:11

be for much longer I mean these things

21:13

will kick our ass pretty soon anyway

21:15

these things are amazing I think this is

21:17

going to be the year of the robots

21:18

that's my pred year of the robots is

21:19

your prediction I love it uh Gavin what

21:21

do you got profoundly agree I think

21:23

you're the robots um inclusive of FSD

21:28

you know I think FSD works today and

21:30

it's

21:31

gonna it's it's going to cross into

21:33

mainstream adoption where I already

21:37

notice particularly if I'm taking an

21:39

Uber late at night I really really

21:41

prefer to have a Tesla just sometimes

21:43

you get an Uber driver who's who's

21:47

tired and I just feel a lot safer if

21:49

they have the FSD running and then

21:51

obviously using it for yourself is

21:54

amazing but I think it's going to

21:55

continue compounding at an accelerating

21:58

rate

21:59

I think the in a lot of ways what I'd

22:02

say broadly is I think for a while it's

22:05

going to be big businesses are winners

22:08

big businesses that use Ai

22:10

thoughtfully and the reason is is that

22:13

with what is happening what what 03

22:16

showed us open ai's new model the

22:19

combination of reasoning and test time

22:22

compute like I think you're if you're a

22:24

big business and you can pay a million

22:27

dollars to let let an AI think for 6

22:30

weeks about the most important question

22:32

for your

22:33

business that's going to be a profound

22:36

Advantage relative to small businesses

22:39

that can't afford that and by the way we

22:41

are the other like inference compute is

22:44

going to be the the kind of derivative

22:46

when of that we're going to run out of

22:48

gpus accelerators

22:50

compute in

22:52

20125 the same way we did in

22:55

23 okay so you're also long Nvidia and

22:58

chip makers grock Etc because we're

23:01

finding new uses for all that compute

23:05

absolutely okay very good chth do you

23:08

have a prediction for your biggest

23:10

business winner of 2025 sir I think the

23:13

biggest business winner of 2025 are

23:16

going to be dollar denominated stable

23:19

coins oh I'll make two points in 2024

23:23

two critical things

23:25

happened the first is that

23:29

stable

23:30

coins

23:33

essentially became uncoupled from crypto

23:37

volatility and it started to be used for

23:41

wholesale useful functions in running

23:44

businesses and there's an image here

23:47

that starts to show that so independent

23:49

of crypto volatility what you saw were

23:51

stable coin usage just rising up and to

23:53

the

23:54

right that's an incredibly important

23:57

decoupling that happened in 24 the

23:59

second and this data is still just

24:01

trickling in but it's an incredible

24:05

stat stablecoin

24:08

usage at the end of the second quarter

24:10

of 2024 was about 1.1 billion

24:14

transactions that summed to

24:18

8.5 trillion do of transaction volume if

24:23

you compare that to Visa over the same

24:27

period it was more than double visas

24:31

transaction

24:32

volume so I think what we have now is

24:35

something that has fundamentally

24:38

crossed a point of no return similar to

24:42

how last year I thought that the big

24:43

Trend was going to be Bitcoin in 2024 I

24:47

would say that the big Trend in 25 is

24:49

stable coin usage I think we're going to

24:51

finally attack the duopoly of visa and

24:55

MasterCard I think you're going to see

24:58

an inal number of use

25:01

cases that sit and use stable coin rails

25:06

I think when Donald Trump becomes

25:07

president I think you're going to see

25:09

him go after incredibly High credit card

25:12

transactions and

25:14

costs you're already seeing cacks in

25:18

consumer credit anyways because of these

25:20

high aprs all of this stuff is going to

25:22

come to a head in 2025 I think and I

25:25

think stable coins could quadruple or

25:28

quintuple by the end of 25 I think it's

25:31

just going to be an enormous Market

25:33

great choice should they be regulated

25:35

chamath we saw at some of these

25:37

Congressional hearings tether was kind

25:39

of dragged for being the

25:41

primary transfer and and monetary tool

25:45

for terrorism for getting around

25:47

sanctions and for human trafficking

25:49

should it be regulated and how I I don't

25:53

think I'm qualified to say how it should

25:56

but I think the point is that there are

25:57

these IM logs that

26:00

sit in between and on either side of all

26:02

of these transactions and so I think the

26:05

knowledge is there and there are a whole

26:07

bunch of third party services that add

26:09

that intelligence

26:11

layer I think the the thing to really

26:13

question is if you just took 300 basis

26:17

points of

26:18

drag yes out of the global economy

26:22

massive gain how valuable would that be

26:25

and I think it would be valuable just in

26:27

the United States alone to the tune of a

26:29

trillion dollars so the idea that you

26:31

wouldn't do it at this point

26:34

is somewhat quizzical to me so I just

26:37

think that the economic justification

26:39

for this now is just so profound Gavin

26:42

let me ask you a hard question there as

26:43

well should the United States government

26:45

give up the let's face it you know they

26:49

they have a bit of a strangle hold

26:51

they've got a bit of a monopoly on US

26:53

Dollars these things are a competitor

26:56

and we were sitting here on this program

26:58

over the last couple years talking about

26:59

the bricks and them starting their own

27:02

currency aren't these in some way

27:04

similar to that and they would take

27:05

people off the USD standard how do you

27:07

look at that because that is the

27:09

criticism that some people in power have

27:12

put forward I do I do think that they

27:14

might be very good for the

27:16

world but I do think they would be very

27:19

bad for America if they replaced if some

27:23

constellation of stable coins became the

27:25

new Reserve currency it is such a an

27:29

advantage to be able to borrow in your

27:32

own

27:33

currency and to give that up lightly

27:35

that just that means you

27:37

control you have you you control the

27:40

real size of your debt at all times oh

27:44

wow we have a big big debt I mean this

27:46

is a little bit like what we just did

27:48

let's just have let's just let inflation

27:50

run hot and oh wow that debts a lot

27:51

smaller than it

27:54

was effectively so I think it would be a

27:56

big mistake freeberg you have any

27:58

thoughts on it we we've been talking

27:59

about currency here and a whole bunch

28:01

over the last couple years any thoughts

28:03

on stable coins and and just the uh

28:06

Monopoly we have on it I I don't know

28:09

enough about stable coins well that'll

28:11

be one of our big topics for the year

28:12

and we should uh definitely invite jir

28:14

from USD on or usdc usdc Geremy

28:19

air I mentioned by the way that I had

28:23

this small little product that

28:28

I exposed to the world which is just our

28:30

research and we sit it on top of

28:32

substack again the tools aren't very

28:33

good and we use stripe and Jeremy

28:37

reached out to me and he's like I'll

28:39

just rebuild all of your payment rails

28:41

on using US dollar stable coins and it's

28:45

a no-brainer because I'm spending

28:46

hundreds of thousands of dollars in

28:49

transaction costs that now I can just

28:51

save and use to hire somebody else or

28:53

just pay the team more and so I you're

28:56

paying 10% to suback in the 3% yeah if

28:59

it's obvious for me it's obvious for

29:00

everybody else all right my biggest

29:02

business winner prediction for 2025 is

29:05

Tesla and Google I think this is going

29:07

to be the year of AI and Robotics

29:10

obviously but I am just absolutely

29:12

amazed at the comeback that Google has

29:15

made with AI and I'm absolutely in awe

29:17

of what Elon did with Colossus if those

29:19

of you don't know Jensen Wong Michael D

29:22

they all obviously participated in

29:24

building out xai and they were shocked

29:27

they couldn't believe that they stood up

29:29

a 100,000 gpus in under 45 days was it

29:34

Gavin something in that neighborhood it

29:37

was a tremendous effort and uh you

29:39

that's not Tesla right is that Tesla

29:41

well Elon Tesla xai and Google that

29:44

cohort who are investing heavily in AI

29:47

those two specifically those two three

29:49

names I think are going to be the

29:50

biggest winners next year they're going

29:51

to come out with some things that people

29:53

didn't anticipate I don't I don't think

29:56

people are anticipating what Google

29:58

Google is going to come out with because

29:59

Gemini deep research I keep telling

30:01

people this and I'm using the app is so

30:04

impressive drop what you're doing right

30:06

now pause the podcast download Gemini

30:08

and just start playing with deep resarch

30:10

on your desktop pay the 20 bucks for it

30:12

it is mindblowing it blows anything else

30:15

in the market out of the water period

30:18

full stop it is a step function

30:21

higher all right I'll just leave it at

30:23

that Jason shouldn't you uh just go with

30:25

the vibe of the podcast shouldn't you

30:26

explain what it is what sorry okay so

30:30

what it does is good call good call if

30:33

you wanted to create a model let's say

30:34

and I did this where I said hey make me

30:36

a model based upon what it would take to

30:38

replace all the cars and trips in the

30:40

United States with full self-driving

30:43

cars what would that cost to do and if

30:46

you ask that to chat GPT or grock or you

30:50

know Claude it's going to give you a

30:51

decent answer what deep research does is

30:54

it goes and it figures out what the

30:55

subcomponents of each of those questions

30:57

would be and then it fires off multiple

30:59

threads and then it searches the web in

31:01

real time which Google is extremely good

31:03

at and then it summarizes it gives

31:06

citations and it produces a report that

31:08

looks like something that Gartner group

31:09

McKenzie Boston Consulting Group would

31:11

have spent I don't know 30 days on Gavin

31:14

and a million dollars a half million

31:16

dollars it's Bonkers how good

31:19

this is but the amount of compute it

31:21

takes is extraordinary that's why chat

31:23

GPT released something similar that's

31:25

200 bucks a month the 01 Pro I think

31:27

they call it

31:28

and then this one is like 20 bucks from

31:30

Gemini anyway given what Google has

31:33

access to YouTube your G drive your

31:36

Google Docs Etc your Gmail it's going to

31:39

do things that you wouldn't anticipate

31:41

like if you were asking this question it

31:43

might look in your Gmail for

31:45

possibilities to answer those questions

31:47

or YouTube videos of channels you

31:49

subscribe to so this is going to I think

31:52

knock people's socks off and solve

31:53

problems that people didn't know they

31:55

had is that a pretty good explanation

31:57

Gavin yeah think it's great for last

31:59

year our predictions for business winner

32:02

chamat said bootstrapped or Endor

32:03

profitable startups I think that's a

32:04

really great pick and that came to pass

32:06

we're seeing some of those go public and

32:07

raise money at higher valuations or not

32:10

go out of business freeberg you said

32:12

Commodities businesses I'm not sure how

32:13

that did do you know did you Che pretty

32:16

flat yeah we didn't have a lot of the

32:19

inflationary pressures that I think were

32:21

underlying that pie so got it it ended

32:24

up being I'd say a loser relative to

32:27

other indices you could bought this year

32:29

I said training data owners like Reddit

32:31

New York Times Google Etc Reddit stock

32:33

up 24% in 2024 and they launched their

32:36

own Reddit answer call yeah I think I

32:38

got that one uh New York Times stock is

32:40

up as well and they uh fired off that

32:42

lawsuit with open AI all right now we're

32:44

going to move on to the 2025 biggest

32:46

business loser predictions in 2024

32:49

shamat said pro sports teams because

32:52

they hit Peak valuations that's looking

32:53

like a pretty good prediction free perg

32:55

you said vertical SAS companies because

32:57

of AI disrupt

32:58

that's another one that seems like a

32:59

great prediction I said smartphone

33:01

manufacturers Apple stock was up 30% in

33:04

2024 but I think we've all seen that

33:06

these uh smartphones aren't advancing

33:09

and people are taking their times the

33:10

sales of those are down services are up

33:12

I would take the other side on pro

33:13

sports teams it feels like that market

33:15

is about to be

33:17

institutionalized and funds are going to

33:20

start buying pro sports teams okay that

33:23

ultimately and ultimately Capital

33:25

markets have way more resources than

33:26

kind of the wealthy individual ual

33:28

who've done it for to date so I just

33:31

think it's the amount of money that can

33:34

go after pro sports teams is about uh

33:37

you know 10x 100x no I think I think

33:39

you're totally right the the reason I

33:41

said that last year was it was pretty

33:43

clear to me at the time and the NBA was

33:45

the canary and the coal mine that there

33:47

was a viewership problem in professional

33:49

sports and specifically in the NBA the

33:53

game has devolved into essentially

33:55

rebounds and dunks or three point ERS

33:58

and the issue with that is that it

34:01

becomes just meaningfully less

34:02

interesting to watch at the same time

34:05

because of the the fact that the TV

34:07

deals are really what determines the

34:09

discounted value of these sports

34:11

franchises the TV deal was so enormous

34:15

that it creates

34:17

no reliable rivalries anymore because

34:21

people will hop scotch teams almost

34:23

every year because the compensation that

34:25

they can get is just so obscene quite

34:27

honestly

34:28

and I think what happens is sports will

34:31

have a decent run until the next TV

34:33

deals get done and I think if you for

34:36

example take Pharma ads outside of TV so

34:40

like that pool shrinks if you have less

34:44

viewership and so you can sell the

34:46

remaining ads less effectively because

34:49

there's just fewer of them and then

34:50

there's fewer buyers and it shrinks yet

34:52

again then the dollar pool that the

34:55

television networks and the Stream are

34:58

going to be willing to pay for sports

35:00

will go down and the group that will be

35:03

the most price sensitive are exactly who

35:05

you said Gavin meaning the non trophy

35:08

buyer so like you know when I bought

35:10

into the Warriors I bought it purely as

35:11

a trophy asset and I was pricing

35:13

sensitive but I agree with you that now

35:15

that you have the PE firms on the cap

35:17

tables of these sports franchises those

35:20

folks are all DCFS those folks are all

35:22

Excel models I don't think that they're

35:24

buying things for emotion I don't think

35:26

they've grown up thinking I want to own

35:28

this thing not using institutional LP

35:30

dollars so I just think that's why

35:33

that's why I said that in 24 so I just

35:34

on behal of Phil Huth and I we

35:36

appreciate you made that vanity

35:37

investment for the number of times we

35:39

got to sit in your court side seats yeah

35:42

because I never we made with NBA players

35:44

I never went to the games I should have

35:46

gone to more games I went to your games

35:47

and almost got thrown out of your seats

35:49

I got a red card one time it's true is

35:51

it true you did oh you don't I got a I

35:54

got a call I got a call I think it was

35:56

from the Warriors or it's from from the

35:57

NBA something to the effect of chouth

36:00

this guy that was sitting in your seats

36:01

was almost kicked out and I said excuse

36:03

me because I knew that it was Game In

36:05

fairness and and he was like jawboning

36:08

our own players I was getting into it

36:11

with bogot and with David Lee because I

36:14

told it was unbelievable I told Steve

36:16

cerr listen you're up 30 on my Knicks

36:18

sit these guys down this is Bush League

36:20

what if Steph Curry gets hurt out there

36:21

like and uh you know Boga told me to

36:24

shut up Andre boa told him to basically

36:27

go pound in a basically did it was the

36:29

funniest thing ever Gavin this is what

36:31

happens when you get's one of our

36:33

friends he's one of our good friends so

36:34

that's why it's so funny but they can't

36:36

they come over freeberg and they tap you

36:38

on the shoulder I'm with my wife she's

36:41

mortified and the guy hands you a card

36:44

and the card says you've been warned one

36:47

time and one time only about abusive you

36:50

know uh Behavior if we have to warn you

36:53

one more time you will be escorted out

36:55

rid so I look at the guy and I say but

36:57

he goes read the card I read the card I

37:00

say he goes giv me a thumbs up that was

37:03

it I never that was it you're not

37:05

supposed to then three years later I'm

37:07

sitting in the same seats I'm

37:08

interacting with Draymond during the

37:10

finals games and everybody's hokey doie

37:12

with it when you say interacting what do

37:14

you mean when you say interacting wa

37:15

hold on G Gavin wanted to make a point

37:17

about what I no I just want to just just

37:19

come back to chath because for sure

37:20

these private Equity guys there DCFS the

37:22

NBA has been terribly managed I think

37:24

even LeBron said they have a big problem

37:28

you know and I'd separate the NBA is the

37:30

worst managed NFL is probably the best

37:31

managed but the one kind of CounterPoint

37:33

I would say on the TV rights is Google

37:36

bought Sunday Ticket and are extremely

37:39

happy with

37:40

it Amazon and Netflix also bought you

37:44

know both bought NFL games and are

37:46

really happy with them and so I just

37:48

think those three companies it doesn't

37:50

really matter to them if Pharma ads go

37:53

away in 18 months you're going to be

37:55

able to dynamically create an ad

37:58

for each individual person and show it

38:00

to them and if you're a high value user

38:02

with a you know that Google knows that

38:04

you're about to book a vacation you know

38:06

they'll dynamically generate you know

38:08

whatever you know Hotel destinations you

38:10

want and show click here so I just think

38:14

Sports as long as they command the

38:16

eyeballs that they do and I for sure if

38:19

the NBA doesn't fix it the value of

38:22

those franchises will start to decline

38:24

but um just the fact that all of the

38:28

biggest tech companies are so happy with

38:30

the sports kind of rights that they

38:32

bought they're going to buy them all

38:34

every sport understand Gavin maybe maybe

38:37

you're closer to this but why wouldn't

38:40

Apple Amazon or Google just back up the

38:42

truck to the NBA and say well take the

38:44

whole thing and then anybody who's got

38:46

an iPhone gets the NBA for free and then

38:49

everybody else has to pay and they

38:50

figure it out in the back and they lose

38:52

a you know 5 billion they make two

38:54

billion who cares it's a rounding error

38:56

for Apple I agree

38:57

and they you know I mean they all all

39:00

except for Apple really and apple they

39:02

have I think an MLs deal but they all

39:04

kind of stuck their toe in the water and

39:06

I think they feel like wow the water's

39:08

warm let's dive in um okay yeah and the

39:12

New Deal is an 11year deal for the NBA

39:14

so these things don't come up that often

39:16

but we'll see over time maybe somebody

39:18

will buy one of these media companies

39:20

and inherit them okay biggest business

39:23

loser for 2025 what's your prediction

39:25

Gavin Baker government service providers

39:29

you do not you do not want to have the

39:31

United States government at any level is

39:33

over 35% of your

39:35

Revenue good choice yes obviously in the

39:38

age of Doge they might not be spending

39:40

wildly and they might actually look at

39:41

the bill they might check the bill crazy

39:44

thought crazy thought yeah crazy thought

39:46

to actually check the bill you never

39:47

know chth who do you predict will be the

39:49

biggest business loser of

39:52

2025 well this is a a little bit

39:57

precarious

40:00

but I don't know what the percentage

40:03

draw down from here will be but I think

40:06

when we look

40:07

back the

40:10

absolute dollar draw down of the mag s

40:14

will be in the trillions of dollars okay

40:17

and the reason is not necessarily

40:20

because of the underlying fundamentals

40:22

of these

40:23

companies but I am a little bit worried

40:26

and I tweeted this a few days ago about

40:28

just the general

40:30

concentration of the top seven 8 nine 10

40:33

companies in the

40:36

indices I think it's approaching

40:39

40% and I think that when you look at

40:41

these historic

40:43

concentrations they've generally

40:45

foreshadowed a big draw down okay and

40:47

unfortunately I don't see how you

40:52

can sort of you know inoculate yourself

40:55

from that risk so independent of the

40:57

quality of these companies because I

40:59

think these companies are exceptional

41:01

businesses I do think you've just had

41:03

too much concentration and I think it it

41:05

is a setup to retrade and give back and

41:09

in that it could even be 10% but 10% in

41:13

the mag 8 will be a couple trillion

41:15

bucks and so on absolute would be a lot

41:18

yeah an absolute dollar a lot okay

41:19

freeberg who do you predict you predict

41:21

Max 7 government service providers for

41:23

You Gavin Free who do you predict will

41:24

be the biggest business loser of 202 I'm

41:27

sort of on the same vein as Gavin I went

41:29

with the kind of old defense and

41:31

Aerospace providers Boeing loed Martin

41:34

Ron defense 1.0 driven by kind of China

41:38

dominance driven by us defense budgets

41:40

that I think are going to need to shift

41:41

towards a more kind of tech oriented and

41:43

Roid driven rationalization and pricing

41:46

and spend so the Palante and Andals

41:48

obviously the world will benefit and I

41:50

also just think like there's a lot of

41:51

failure at scale with these businesses

41:53

they've gotten too clunky and too

41:55

bureaucratic as we've seen with boing

41:57

from their space program failure in 2024

42:01

uh to the challenges with their their

42:04

airplane business but I think that this

42:05

government contracting business across

42:07

the board is going to be deeply

42:08

challenged this year with all the new

42:10

blood so the Cost Plus are going to

42:13

suffer is what you're saying and the

42:14

andrs will Thrive would you guys add

42:17

just a question would you guys add the

42:20

traditional Consulting companies then to

42:22

the mix as well like if you that's a

42:24

good point too that's a great one yeah

42:26

we think what we talked

42:27

like the Y Pros the tatas the hcls the

42:31

accent cogn the Emy all these folks in

42:35

are in real trouble if that if that also

42:37

happens that's right yeah you the

42:39

efficiency that they'll gain will also

42:42

be felt by their customers and their

42:43

customers might not hire them when you

42:45

got a bunch of software entrepreneurs

42:47

that are now advising and informing the

42:48

federal government on how to run their

42:50

their operations I'm pretty sure that

42:52

some of these service providers are

42:53

going to get washed out so it's a good

42:55

idea the thing to keep in mind is like

42:57

plus is a fancier way of saying time and

43:00

materials and time and materials is a

43:03

fancy way of saying human labor

43:05

Arbitrage and I think that all of that

43:08

stuff will get extremely scrutinized in

43:12

2025 because if you are buying you know

43:14

$800 waste baskets and you know $9,000

43:18

uh umbrella hangers because of time and

43:21

materials and all of this other crazy

43:24

stuff that's in the system and all of

43:25

that gets washed out then a lot of these

43:27

folks in their business models will will

43:29

get put under severe stress the

43:30

alignments you know you show me an

43:32

incentive I'll show you the outcome the

43:34

alignment of Cost Plus is to just keep

43:37

being inefficient and and waste and and

43:40

these defense contractors are taking 60

43:42

70 80% off the price of each piece of

43:45

Munitions or

43:47

vehicle yeah Cost Plus is terrible no

43:51

just cost is terrible that's all all

43:53

right for my biggest business loser

43:54

prediction I had to go through a lot of

43:57

the uh people I've uh criticized on in

44:01

started fights with over the past year

44:03

commercial real estate came to mind

44:04

because these leases are going to keep

44:06

coming up and I think like they kick the

44:08

can down the road a little bit so I

44:09

started there then I looked at micro

44:12

strategies and that made no sense to me

44:14

that they were trading at two three four

44:15

times the book value of their Bitcoin

44:17

and I think that's not sustainable I

44:20

looked at truth social which is like

44:22

doing four or5 million in revenue and is

44:25

valued at 7 billion that makes Absol no

44:27

logical sense but I think the one that

44:29

is the most overpriced of of all of this

44:31

and I think is going to

44:34

see their Peak valuation is open AI I

44:38

think the headwinds for open AI are

44:40

being

44:42

absolutely

44:44

underappreciated like I said before in

44:46

my previous one uh my previous

44:47

prediction Google is kicking ass xai is

44:50

just getting started and building out so

44:52

much big Iron Microsoft was basically on

44:57

another

44:58

podcast almost like laughing at open a

45:01

for selling them the source code and

45:03

that they didn't even need open AI

45:04

anymore because they had it all they

45:05

don't need them and they own all the Big

45:07

Iron I think open ai's valuation made no

45:10

sense I don't think they're going to be

45:12

able to keep charging the prices are

45:13

charging and I think AWS Apple Google

45:18

xai this cohort are going

45:21

to really take that $57 billion

45:25

valuation and make it the peak valuation

45:29

of the company and I do I do think that

45:31

there's a nonzero chance they could lose

45:34

their process and these court cases of

45:37

transferring $157 billion dollar in

45:41

value from a nonprofit into a for-profit

45:43

I think that whole thing could blow up

45:45

is that your super prediction is open AI

45:47

will not be able to convert from

45:48

nonprofit to for-profit in 2025 I think

45:50

that that's a small piece of it but

45:52

that's a really interesting super

45:53

prediction insert poly Market graphic

45:56

here

45:58

super prediction will open AI convert is

46:01

that's a good in 2025 yeah by the way

46:03

you know they're projecting I think in

46:05

the the the leaked financials 12 billion

46:08

Revenue next year jkl so unlike a lot of

46:10

the other things you were talking about

46:11

this is a real business with real

46:13

Revenue real scale real growth real

46:15

technology it's it's a little bit

46:17

distinct from kind of being a meme stock

46:19

or being a exactly that's why I'm

46:21

picking it because I think it's easy to

46:22

pick a meme stock it's harder to pick a

46:25

real company but I do think think that

46:27

that Revenue which you know a lot of it

46:29

is consumer and a lot of it is

46:31

developers the developers I know all

46:33

want to do open source they don't want

46:35

to have to be beholden to open Ai and

46:38

Sam mman they would much rather and

46:40

they're already setting their queries

46:42

across multiple different sacks and

46:44

trying different ones I don't think

46:45

there's any loyalty to open AI or gemini

46:48

or any of these Services I think they'll

46:49

just go with eventually open source in

46:52

many cases so anyway that's my thought

46:53

on open AI 2025 biggest business deal

46:57

what do you got shth what's your biggest

46:59

business deal for 2025 prediction shth

47:01

what do you got you said starlink to go

47:03

public last

47:04

year that one yeah totally whiffed on

47:07

that one I think that this is the year

47:10

that we will see the collapse of the

47:12

traditional Auto

47:14

oems and I think that

47:17

the the deal that happened at the end of

47:20

2024 with Honda Nissan I think is a bit

47:24

of a signal to what the industry has to

47:27

do which is to go through a massive wave

47:29

of consolidation I think that

47:32

Tesla is just in an

47:35

incredible position with the quality of

47:37

their vehicles and the quality of their

47:39

software and the qu quality of their

47:41

autonomy with FSD so I suspect that

47:46

after a couple of

47:48

more

47:51

meaningful product releases it's just

47:53

going to trigger the realization by the

47:56

public capital markets that these Auto

47:58

oems are uninvestable and I think the

48:01

result of that will be a wave of Auto

48:05

Mega

48:06

mergers and for people who don't know

48:08

Honda and Nissan signed an agreement to

48:11

merge and Mitsubishi is involved because

48:14

they're part of I think Nissan's

48:15

Alliance this would obviously get rid of

48:17

all of the

48:19

redundancy I think this is touch like

48:22

the European oems are in real trouble

48:24

you know what does Volkswagen do

48:26

not clear what does stantis do it's not

48:29

clear these are all businesses that are

48:30

effectively melting icebergs and so you

48:34

know typically melting Iceberg

48:36

businesses when they get put under

48:38

pressure from Smart investors like Gavin

48:41

and and and is ilk they're forced to

48:44

merge short gav Gavin you got a spread

48:46

trade are you short these names um I I

48:50

would rather not talk about specific

48:51

positions I would just say I agree 100%

48:53

with chamath I think there you go

48:56

they're going to lose their Chinese

48:57

business because they don't make

48:59

competitive products anymore if there's

49:02

not massive protectionism and we're

49:04

seeing signs that they'll be caught

49:06

between Tesla and the Chinese

49:08

oems and I think the only way that this

49:11

doesn't H chat's the only risk to chat's

49:14

prediction is just government

49:16

intervention because they's such big

49:18

employers and you know often seen as

49:20

national champions but absent really

49:24

significant government support they all

49:26

in deep

49:28

trouble okay well done freeberg last

49:32

year you said there'd be some

49:33

Blockbuster deals for right holders

49:35

licensing data for AI training and

49:37

Reddit did in fact sign two of those so

49:39

uh a great prediction from you for last

49:41

year on biggest business deal what do

49:42

you got this year see if you can go two

49:44

for two was it just

49:46

Reddit I should probably look it up what

49:50

you I'll just follow on my year of the

49:52

robot theme I do think that there's

49:54

going to be massive funding deals

49:57

similar to what we saw this past year

49:59

for compute buildout I think we're going

50:00

to see massive funding deals for

50:03

Hardware based Manufacturing buildout in

50:05

the United States and I think that those

50:07

deals may take the form of kind of

50:10

traditional Equity from private markets

50:13

or they may have some component that

50:15

includes government support to to kind

50:18

of motivate and drive and accelerate

50:20

onshore manufacturing we're not going to

50:22

go in the US to making stuff that is

50:25

like last century I think we're going to

50:27

need to move manufacturing to the next

50:29

decade Next Century of of production and

50:32

I think that's going to mean making some

50:34

of these autonomous and robotic type

50:36

systems that are going to become really

50:37

critical for us particularly with China

50:40

doing this massive ramp up and buildout

50:43

for both drones and robots and

50:46

autonomous vehicles so I think we're

50:47

going to need to kind of onshore a lot

50:48

of this and so that'll be a big amount

50:50

of capital that's going to move and so

50:52

you'll see a bunch of these big

50:53

Blockbuster deals for Hardware buildout

50:54

in the US Gavin what do you think to be

50:56

the biggest business deal in 2025 I

50:59

think the biggest business deal is that

51:01

they're going to be deals I think

51:03

there's you're going to see a Title Wave

51:04

of m&a after four years of not being

51:07

able to get anything done I think

51:09

there's an enormous amount of pinup

51:12

demand so kind of Point number one point

51:14

number two something will happen with

51:15

Intel and that will be big and hopefully

51:18

it's good for

51:19

America and

51:21

then I do think you will see a lot of

51:23

these Frontier AI Labs that are

51:25

independent be quiet

51:28

you know I thought your points were well

51:29

taken Jason about you know everything

51:31

that uh you know Google is bringing to

51:33

Bear an ex xai owns their own compute

51:37

and you guys can choose whichever one of

51:38

these three you like but the ultimate AI

51:41

winner will be the one with the lowest

51:44

cost of infrastructure cost the lowest

51:46

cost of compute and definitionally you

51:49

can't be the lowcost provider if you're

51:51

ring your compute from someone else

51:53

because of markups yeah because there's

51:55

a markup if you're buy your compute from

51:57

Azure or

51:59

AWS or Google you were at a disadvantage

52:02

relative to their internal Services over

52:05

time so the full stack wins great

52:08

prediction for

52:10

me last year my prediction was that bite

52:13

dance would go public or Tik Tok would

52:16

get divested or some version of this we

52:18

are but 18 days away from figuring out

52:20

if the Supreme Court will do just that

52:22

my prediction for this year I was

52:24

looking at all the media companies

52:25

gentlemen there were so many

52:27

possibilities there Warner Brothers we

52:29

talked about Apple and Disney you know

52:32

couple years ago but I think the age of

52:34

autonomy is here and I think there is

52:37

going to be some Partnerships that will

52:40

happen between Amazon door- Uber Tesla

52:44

weo and that cohort and I would not be

52:47

surprised to see Tesla could buy Uber

52:49

right now for but 10% of its market cap

52:52

and weo could spin out and partner with

52:55

Uber Amazon could buy door Dash fairly

52:58

easily and with the wrath of KH being

53:00

over the wrath of lenina con being over

53:03

Gavin it is possible that Mega deals

53:06

like these could go through and if a

53:08

couple of Mega deals go through like

53:10

this whoever uh you know teams up here

53:13

could win autonomy delivery food

53:16

delivery and e-commerce this is a

53:18

ginormous space and I think listen I

53:21

don't I haven't spoken to uh obviously

53:24

my friend about it but Tesla buying door

53:26

Dash and Uber or Amazon buying door Dash

53:29

and Uber could be the greatest service

53:31

ever created if you wanted to build a

53:33

super app the only thing I would add and

53:35

I think dovet tales with what you said

53:36

and and um friberg's kind of year of the

53:40

robot is autonomous drones there's a

53:43

company called zipline which my firm is

53:44

an investor in fantastic yeah but

53:48

autonomous drones they really are the

53:50

best way to deliver almost anything to

53:53

Suburban America and then I think

53:57

over time it will be sorted out so that

53:59

they could deliver in cities as

54:01

well so I just think that that might be

54:04

a little bit of a wild card for some of

54:06

these delivery services well and Amazon

54:08

in I believe it's Texas is actually

54:11

doing these now they've got 60,000 SKS

54:14

is my understanding already being

54:15

delivered and they just drop it in your

54:17

backyard and it's there in 45 minutes I

54:20

do this like two weeks ago I um you know

54:22

Matan in China's got this and they they

54:24

F have food delivery happening with

54:26

these Dr

54:26

by the way um just kind of dovetailing

54:28

off of this I think the other big deal

54:30

potential in 2025 just to be very

54:32

specific is a deal with weo you know weo

54:35

launched n SF in August 2023 in kind of

54:38

an open market way Uber and Lyft were 66

54:41

and 34% market share at the time and in

54:43

15 months in November of 2024 weo is now

54:47

a 22% market share of rides in SF which

54:51

is the same as Lyft and Uber is now down

54:52

to 55 so weo Aid in both Uber and lifts

54:56

market share by on the order of 12

54:58

points um in just 15 months and now

55:01

they're launching in LA in Austin all

55:03

over the country they're already in

55:05

Phoenix so I think you could see a

55:07

massive and by the way you know they

55:08

also just moved the the hardware

55:09

platform over to a new d new device that

55:12

supposedly going to bring the capex

55:13

significantly down for new launches so

55:16

you'll see much improved roic metrics

55:18

which means that there's a much kind of

55:20

more efficient way to use Capital to

55:22

scale so the system works it is scaling

55:25

they are opening up a new markets you

55:27

could see something happen with weo this

55:28

year that could either be something like

55:30

a massive financing an IPO or a merger

55:33

or acquisition with one of the big right

55:34

sharing companies I don't know if that

55:36

makes as much strategic sense as I've

55:37

thought about it a little bit but I do

55:39

think you could see a big deal with wayo

55:40

this company is if you guys have not

55:43

been in AO uh I think we all talked

55:45

about this but it's an incredible

55:46

experience and everyone I know of every

55:48

age group that has been for a ride in wh

55:51

comes out of it saying that is the

55:52

future this is going to absolutely

55:53

dominate how I'm going to get around I'm

55:56

most people say it's slow right now and

55:58

monotonous and they don't like it but

56:00

you know because it does take weird

56:02

routes but that'll be fixed over time

56:03

obviously tot and uh just in case

56:05

anybody thinks I'm talking my book here

56:07

I have exposure to all these almost all

56:09

these companies in a in a significant

56:11

way because I believe in the entire

56:12

space one and a half% of rides in the US

56:16

and globally it's less than 1% are done

56:18

by ride sharing the Tam is going to go

56:20

to 20% in a very short period of time

56:23

and it's going to be across the board

56:25

there's going to be a lot of winners

56:26

here and to my favorite Uber obviously

56:30

they have deals with eight people and

56:31

it's a global market byd produces cars

56:34

for half the price of any other car

56:36

manufacturer and they have full self

56:38

driving and it's pretty darn good from

56:39

what I understand so this is going to be

56:41

a global competition and that means if

56:44

you want to win that Global competition

56:46

something like uber and doores weo

56:49

Amazon byd you're going to see some

56:51

interesting Partnerships happen very

56:52

quickly I believe because there's so

56:54

much at stake all right and final

56:56

thoughts on biggest business deals I

56:58

think I maybe have a good one here

57:00

consolidation in the transportation

57:01

space okay moving on to 2025 most

57:06

contrarian

57:08

belief last year Enterprise value of

57:10

open AI goes down from chth it roughly

57:12

doubled but I just picked it as my

57:15

prediction so I think we're s we're

57:17

sympatico on uh what we think long term

57:19

freeberg you said increased probability

57:21

of a nuclear weapon being used for the

57:23

first time since World War II thank the

57:25

Lord that that didn't happen again this

57:27

is contrarian beliefs people are going

57:29

out there I I didn't predict it was

57:30

gonna happen I just said the probability

57:31

went up it was it's a tough it's a tough

57:33

thing to call well this is most

57:34

contrarian belief I think it's fine Dr

57:36

Doom strikes again it's all good I

57:39

picked Apple would become the player in

57:40

Ai and they did launch Apple

57:42

intelligence but it sucks I mean it

57:46

sucks it's terrible I just bought the

57:49

Google pixel fold

57:51

n and the Gemini works perfectly it does

57:56

everything that Ser is supposed to do if

57:57

you say please play this song If you say

58:00

please download this app if you say add

58:02

this to my calendar it does it and it

58:04

does it in one or tenth the amount of

58:08

time that Apple takes and apple gets it

58:11

wrong every time it's a piece of garbage

58:15

it's a disgrace disad apple apple

58:19

intelligence is even worse than co-pilot

58:21

which is saying something Jason would

58:23

you like to

58:24

announce you B the domain dad.com I own

58:29

it I'm not selling it right now it it

58:32

redirects to J Paul Gavin Gavin do you

58:35

have any idea what word he's even saying

58:38

when he says that disad disad it's disg

58:42

graad is what people used to say in

58:45

Brooklyn for somebody who is disgraceful

58:48

it is a Italian American slang how do

58:52

you spell

58:53

it you don't even know you own the

58:55

domain you don't even know d i s g r a z

58:59

i a d disg

59:01

graad yes and if you type in disg graad

59:04

it goes to Jake Paul I bought it when I

59:06

was watching the Tyson fight it was so

59:09

disgraceful I was saying to my brother

59:11

Josh the black bomber this is and he

59:14

just said disg graad and I just said I

59:16

wonder if that's available as a domain

59:18

I'm redirecting disg graad right now Tim

59:21

Cook to Apple intelligence the website

59:24

do you guys think Tyson through that

59:26

that it was part of the deal

59:29

th% I would love I think somebody said

59:32

Saudi Arabia was offering to host a

59:34

remake or or whatever a redo a rematch a

59:37

rematch of the fight where the winner

59:40

would make 50 million and then we'll see

59:42

what's what and the loser gets zero yes

59:44

and the loser gets zero this is a good

59:46

use of the Kingdom's money the people

59:49

want to know we will all fly out there

59:51

and do an Allin episode from you guys

59:53

see this did you see this thing where is

59:55

it is it Logan Paul is fighting Conor

59:57

McGregor in India and Conor McGregor is

60:01

gonna get $250 million what yeah it's

60:06

like a

60:07

whole stunt I I think it's boxing and

60:10

it's meant to sort of like bring a bunch

60:12

of tourists into India to show them the

60:14

country but it's a quarter of a billion

60:17

dollars to Conor MC how do we get in on

60:18

this grift freeberg versus Baker poly

60:22

hoaa versus kakanis oh my gosh we need

60:25

to get our own celebrity box and who

60:27

would we do come on keep going I got to

60:29

drive home let's go come on too much fun

60:31

this episode chth what's your most

60:33

contrarian belief prediction for 2025

60:36

we're going out on a limb here this is

60:37

going out in a limb folks don't judge us

60:40

the the spicier to take the better here

60:42

this is where you can go

60:43

freestyle I think that you're going to

60:45

see a banking crisis in one of the major

60:48

Mainline Banks a banking crisis wow

60:52

there is a it's a small chance it

60:54

happens but that's a contrar belief okay

60:57

why Jam why Black Swan well I think if I

61:00

had to kind of build the the case for

61:05

this it would be along the following

61:07

lines if you added up the total

61:10

indebtedness of pax America which is US

61:14

Government

61:16

debt plus corporates plus Mortgage

61:21

Debt and you actually sensitize it to

61:27

rates that are around call it

61:30

5% what you quickly realize is on a

61:34

dollar

61:35

basis that because the amount of debt

61:38

that we have has just massively

61:41

exploded that 5% rates today on 70 odd

61:46

trillion dollars is actually equivalent

61:50

to 10% rates 25 or 30 years ago because

61:54

we only had a fraction of that debt on a

61:57

dollar basis and so the pain that you

62:00

feel at 5 or 6% can very quickly Ripple

62:03

through the economy the way that it did

62:06

when rates 25 or 30 years ago were

62:09

10% and so I think that when people look

62:12

at rates they forget the actual total

62:16

dollar impact because when somebody or

62:18

collectively when we have to come up

62:20

with three or four trillion dollars how

62:22

do you do that and so I think that there

62:25

is a

62:26

non-trivial risk I think it's small this

62:28

is why it's contrarian but I think it's

62:30

a it's a risk where if you have a

62:32

marketto market

62:35

problem if you have a credit default

62:38

problem amongst the corporates or

62:40

amongst enough individual

62:43

consumers what I think that happens more

62:47

than anything else is that it triggers a

62:49

reserve issue and I think that the

62:52

reserve issue in one of these Mainline

62:55

Banks

62:57

I have two that I think are more obvious

62:59

than others but I don't want to name

63:00

them okay fair enough I love this

63:03

contrarian take this is great I think

63:05

that there's a there's a small but

63:07

reasonable chance that that happens I

63:09

love it it's a great great contrarian

63:10

take small chance but big impact Gavin

63:14

what do you got well first Gemini deep

63:16

research to um just ask it to look at

63:19

the total you know Pax Americana debt

63:22

outstanding apply the current Market

63:26

interest rate to it and then look at

63:28

that you know interest expense relative

63:31

to GDP and generate that chart over time

63:33

that would be a cool chart that would be

63:37

interesting I don't I I don't I don't

63:39

disagree with

63:41

chamath you know

63:43

any anything is possible and um you know

63:47

there there could for sure be be a

63:49

problem at a big

63:51

bank I don't know that I would say it's

63:53

likely but you anything is possible my

63:55

most cont belief so I think that America

63:58

over the next at some point over the

64:00

next four years will print at least one

64:02

year of greater than 5% GDP growth real

64:06

GDP growth I think productivity is going

64:09

to go vertical because of AI and

64:12

deregulation and I think there could be

64:14

a world where this is the late 90s and

64:18

it doesn't sound like a big difference

64:19

you know five or 6% versus 2 or 3% but

64:21

it is a massive difference

64:25

you know at five or 6% you know the

64:27

economy is

64:29

doubling you'll call it every 12 years

64:32

roughly versus 24 years at 3% I mean

64:35

it's just it's a massive difference in

64:38

terms of kind of the wealth of the

64:39

country and individual Americans as far

64:42

as a specific prediction for 25 uh

64:44

because I don't know when when that will

64:45

happen I think you will see the frontier

64:47

Labs stop releasing their Leading Edge

64:49

models to prevent knowledge distillation

64:53

and their IP effectively being stolen

64:55

you know seek from China it was really

64:57

impressive but it thinks it's gp4 you

65:00

know yeah so I just think you will

65:03

you'll see the labs keep their best

65:05

models in house distill them and put

65:07

small small models

65:09

out over time fber do you have a

65:12

contrarian belief and I did put into

65:14

Gemini Advanced 1.5 Pro with deep

65:16

research the question which banks have

65:18

the great biggest chance of being

65:19

insolvent or having a financial collapse

65:21

or crisis so it's doing its research

65:23

right now it'll be done in about 10

65:24

minutes I think

65:26

which gives you an idea of how much

65:27

research it does it's

65:29

nuts freeberg what do you got I think

65:32

that the the party line is that

65:34

socialism was defeated in this election

65:38

cycle and that there was a resounding

65:41

kind of vote from the American populace

65:44

against socialism and I actually think

65:46

my my contrarian belief is that we'll

65:47

see a rise a dramatic rise in socialist

65:51

movements in 2025 in the United States

65:54

okay and I think that we going to see as

65:56

Gavin pointed out an acceleration of

65:58

progress we're going to see an

65:59

unleashing of economic growth because of

66:03

deregulation and AI but I do think that

66:05

some markets we've also talked about the

66:08

the the the downfall of us autom

66:10

manufacturing and some other Industries

66:13

there's going to be a real significant

66:15

shift in 2025 some Industries and some

66:18

companies are going to be huge winners

66:19

and some companies are going to be huge

66:21

losers there's going to be some parts of

66:23

the economy that are going to be big

66:24

Winners and some parts of the economy

66:25

that are going to be big losers when you

66:27

have this sort of a change this fast

66:29

there are often large contingents of

66:31

people that are left behind and when

66:33

that happens I do think that the

66:34

Socialist policies and the Socialist

66:36

movements gain steam when um Peron came

66:39

to power in

66:41

Argentina in the mid1 1940s that country

66:44

was experiencing 8% GDP growth to

66:47

Gavin's point about accelerating growth

66:49

growth does not mean that it benefits

66:51

everyone equally and I think that some

66:53

folks will see people go from being

66:55

billionaires to 100 billionaires to the

66:56

world's first trillionaire and it will

66:59

also start to fuel this rise so I think

67:01

that we will see an increase in the

67:03

breadth and depth of socialist movements

67:04

in the United States by the way

67:06

particularly with Doge cutting

67:08

Government funding to programs that

67:10

benefit individuals employment being cut

67:12

in in the federal government and through

67:14

Federal contractors there's just a lot

67:16

of Rapid change that's about to kind of

67:18

really upset a lot of people I totally

67:21

agree I think AI you know people are

67:24

fond of saying that what in a world of

67:26

AGI or ASI money will be

67:29

meaningless but for a short period of

67:31

time money will matter more than it's

67:33

ever mattered before because the amount

67:36

of money you can spend on AI on test

67:40

time compute is going to give you a

67:43

massive Advantage whether you're a

67:44

company or an individual so I just think

67:46

AI is going to really amplify inequality

67:49

for some period of time yeah I hope I'm

67:53

wrong like I hope you know AI leads to

67:55

you know all sorts of you know

67:56

opportunities being created for low

67:59

there's a lot of there's just going to

68:00

be a lot of employment and income

68:02

disruption in 2025 and it's going to

68:05

fuel socialist movements and I think

68:07

that this is going to be a more

68:09

difficult Year everyone thinks it's kind

68:10

of rosy red because we're all working in

68:12

the tech industry in Silicon Valley but

68:15

the reality on the ground for most

68:16

Americans could be a lot harsher than

68:18

any of us anticipate and that could make

68:20

for a very difficult political

68:22

environment and social environment this

68:23

is a great contrarian prediction free I

68:25

would build on it that I don't think

68:27

this is just going to hit blue collar I

68:30

seeing in the Venture industry and in

68:32

entrepreneurs all over the place people

68:34

who are super qualified who had six

68:37

figure salaries even to Mid six figure

68:39

salaries not be able to find work we not

68:41

find work at previous compensation

68:43

levels why because people are doing more

68:45

with less it's much better to invest and

68:48

do deep research and Ai and automate

68:51

stuff or deprecate stuff or delegate

68:54

stuff to to other regions than to hire

68:57

Americans in some cases and that

69:00

philosophy that's happening isn't just

69:01

going to hit truck drivers it's going to

69:03

hit developers potentially designers

69:06

writers what the contrar part of what

69:08

you guys are saying what's the

69:10

contrarian part socialism socialism ISM

69:13

On The Rise I it's pretty interesting

69:17

because I think you don't think it's

69:18

contrarian you think it's obvious I

69:19

think the party line has been that

69:21

socialism was getting knocked back this

69:24

year with this

69:26

it was a mandate against socialism and

69:28

some of the Socialist policies that were

69:29

being put forth and I think that the

69:32

contrarian view is that we're actually

69:33

got this really wrong and socialism is

69:36

going to be on a big rise but just to

69:37

build on what you said earlier like w

69:39

wokeism and progressivism will decouple

69:42

from socialism I think wokeism and

69:46

progressivism you know will be on a

69:48

declining Trend but socialism in terms

69:50

of the

69:52

government like policy more role yeah

69:55

yeah why have Universal why don't we

69:58

have Universal healthare why don't we

70:00

have prek or you know in every state and

70:02

and you know these kind of things I

70:04

think Americans are right to ask those

70:06

questions now other behaviors are

70:09

obviously appor but you do have the

70:10

right to ask why we can't figure this

70:12

out and why our government has failed Us

70:14

in something as basic as you know

70:16

providing after school programs or

70:19

universal healthcare or Universal Child

70:21

Care these things are easy to do and

70:23

when you see everybody getting rich and

70:25

and the polarization of wealth I can

70:26

understand people saying why don't we

70:28

have these basic things when other

70:30

countries have them it's a reasonable

70:31

you're making the assumptive statement

70:33

that these things are easy to do which

70:34

was what was said about education it's

70:36

like let's give everyone access to

70:37

college education with the uh the

70:40

federal student loan programs and what

70:41

happened was when we introduced those

70:43

programs those schools started to charge

70:46

more and the tuition went up every year

70:48

and eventually the cost of Education

70:50

inflated away from the benefit you were

70:51

getting from it and this has happened

70:53

universally in healthcare it has

70:55

happened happed in housing it has

70:56

happened in education it has happened in

70:58

every Market where the unit states where

71:01

the government has stepped in to provide

71:03

Capital to support that market is that

71:05

the market basically no longer operates

71:07

in a free way I appreciate the challenge

71:09

to it and I'll explain to you why I

71:11

believe it's easy if you just put this

71:13

down to the States and you make it more

71:14

competitive I think you solve the

71:16

problem if you introduce School vouchers

71:17

and you create competition if you take

71:19

universal healthcare and maybe you run

71:21

some experiments where different states

71:23

get that money from the federal

71:24

government and let them run 50 different

71:27

experiments I think we could actually

71:28

solve some of these problems but you're

71:30

correct anything that the federal

71:31

government does it eventually becomes

71:32

corrupt and inefficient my most

71:34

contrarian belief was open AI loses its

71:36

lead loses its nonprofit to for-profit

71:41

transition and becomes the number four

71:43

player in AI the total collapse of open

71:47

AI is my most contrarian prediction for

71:49

20 that's a good one the total collapse

71:52

of dble double doubling and tripling

71:54

down hey man I'm trying to make this

71:56

spicy it's a spicy category let's do I

71:59

got got

72:00

it could still run for president Jal

72:03

maybe he's great I don't know everybody

72:04

who all his friends left the company

72:06

maybe he's great maybe he's a standup

72:09

guy I mean everybody quit but maybe he's

72:12

gav are you are you familiar with J K's

72:14

prediction that Jeff Bezos is gonna run

72:15

for president it was that was my I was

72:17

predicting I wanted him to I wanted him

72:19

to and he bought Washington Post and he

72:21

quit the Amazon job and he bought a

72:24

house in Washington d

72:25

and he went down to marago don't be

72:28

surprised if Bezos after he gets through

72:30

his uh midlife crisis and going to

72:33

Coachella and partying and having a

72:35

great time which he deserves if he comes

72:37

back and says you know what I want to

72:38

serve my country I still stand by

72:41

Washington Post or do you think he's

72:42

gonna hold on to it well let's stick

72:44

with that one because that's one

72:46

prediction Jeff Bezos will sell the

72:48

Washington Post in 2025 that's a good

72:49

poly Market yeah sell it to Caren swier

72:51

sell it to Karen swier

72:55

run it right into the ground they'll

72:57

Double

72:57

Down uh okay best performing asset

73:01

everybody loves this one best performing

73:02

asset hey we can you can put a price on

73:04

this best performing asset last year

73:07

chamat did a spread trade he was long

73:08

public tech stocks short private late

73:11

stage Tech stock index NASDAQ top 100

73:14

Tech stock ETF was up 10% 2024 freeberg

73:18

you went with your uranium ETF not

73:21

Uranus uranium ETF and you're a UR are a

73:25

was down 1% in 2024 I know sideway you

73:28

know what I I looked at the components

73:30

of that ETF last week when we were

73:32

preparing for this it has absolute junk

73:35

in it like it it was not the right the

73:38

right right way to kind of trade uranium

73:41

but anyway that was my My outcome for

73:44

the year I went with the on demand

73:47

economy with Uber Airbnb and door Dash

73:49

Uber was up 30% but now it's only up 3%

73:52

with the robo taxi hadwin Airbnb is

73:54

basically flat

73:56

and doorish up big 74% shout out to

73:58

Stanley Tang great job to the team over

74:00

there so jam get your flowers there

74:02

let's do our best performing asset let's

74:04

let our guests go first Gavin what would

74:06

be the best performing asset of

74:08

2025 I think the companies that make

74:10

high bandwidth memory going back to

74:13

we're we're going to run out of

74:16

compute it's it's

74:19

um it's actually a pretty shocking stat

74:22

high band with memory is a bigger part

74:24

of in cogs on gpus than Taiwan Simi is

74:28

and today there's two companies that can

74:29

make it h HX and Micron we'll see if

74:33

Samsung gets their act together but hbm

74:36

memory it's in Nvidia gpus AMD gpus

74:39

Amazon

74:42

terraniums and particularly in a world

74:44

of test time compute and inference being

74:47

so important H been with memory is

74:53

arguably more important than it ever was

74:55

and it's been um it's been sold out for

74:57

the last two years so high band with

74:59

memory would be my pick okay good pick

75:03

great pick in fact what do you got Jam

75:06

so let me preface this by saying that

75:08

this is a pick

75:10

that 92 times out of

75:14

100 goes to absolute zero

75:19

okay and six out of the remaining eight

75:23

times you make 10 extra money and then

75:28

the final two times you make anywhere

75:30

between a 100 to a thousand extra money

75:32

okay sounds like Bitcoin okay so this is

75:35

a loser trade okay but I would be long

75:41

CDs so what am I buying I am buying

75:44

insurance I'm buying

75:46

Insurance using credit default swaps I'm

75:49

buying what's called protection that

75:51

there is no default event in

75:55

25 again I'm not going to tell

75:58

you which companies or what maturities

76:03

but just the general idea for me is I

76:06

would like a little bit of an insurance

76:08

policy in

76:09

2025 so that the men and the women that

76:12

we have voted in have the chance to do

76:15

their work in peace I think that there

76:18

is a small

76:20

chance of some volatility next year I

76:24

hope it doesn't happen I hope that this

76:26

trade like I said 92 times out of 100

76:28

loses money I hope it loses

76:31

money but if it hits it will be the best

76:34

performing asset of 2025 it will be the

76:36

equivalent of acman buying

76:39

CDs right at the right at the beginning

76:41

of the covid crisis how does one buy

76:43

those you have to have an isda you talk

76:45

to the big investment Banks and they'll

76:47

price it out for you but again I and and

76:50

I just want to be clear this is not

76:51

something I think will happen it's not

76:52

something I want to happen but I do

76:55

think that if you look back in terms of

76:58

just the tonnage of dollars you can make

77:00

and the massive risk asymmetry that it

77:02

presents to you when you look at the

77:05

concentration of the S&P when you look

77:07

at just the total gross amount of debt

77:08

that we have when

77:10

you look at rate spiking all of these

77:14

things say having a little

77:16

Insurance may not be a bad thing so I

77:20

hope you're nodding Gavin you're nodding

77:22

you want to ask no no I was just I was

77:24

just thinking I mean if

77:25

if you know chat's prediction of a bank

77:27

failure is true you absolutely want to

77:29

own

77:30

CDs you I mean you'll you forget 100x

77:33

you'll a th000 x 10,000x what do you got

77:38

freeberg so I went

77:42

with Chinese tech stocks or Chinese Tech

77:46

ETFs wow I think that the market

77:49

everyone's kind of dumped Chinese tech

77:51

stocks over the last couple of years

77:52

everyone's taken this isolation stance

77:55

on positioning portfolios and saying hey

77:57

we can't do business with China it's

77:59

over but I do think that the Trump

78:02

Administration particularly with their

78:04

recent request on Tik Tok being the ban

78:06

on Tik Tok being kind of halted they're

78:09

trying to line up what I would call kind

78:10

of like the great deal with China so I

78:13

don't know anything about what they're

78:14

actually trying to do but I think that

78:17

Trump and leadership in the US

78:20

government want to kind of open up the

78:22

Chinese market to American companies in

78:24

order to give Chinese companies access

78:26

to the American market and I think that

78:27

they're going to get a deal done given

78:29

the position with China I think that

78:31

they're very likely to kind of get a

78:32

deal done that's one driver I think

78:34

there's three drivers the second driver

78:36

is that obviously the cost of build out

78:37

of electricity production in China is

78:39

unfathomable they recently approved $1

78:41

137 billion hydroelectric Dam facility

78:45

which is going to add another I think

78:46

couple hundred gigawatts of electricity

78:48

production in that country not to

78:51

mention all the nuclear build that we've

78:52

talked about in the past so the cost per

78:55

hours already lower the amount of

78:56

electricity available is going up and

78:58

then I think that the Chinese Communist

79:01

Party have this incredible ability to

79:03

throttle up and down free markets and

79:05

Entrepreneurship and this is a moment

79:07

where you could kind of see them making

79:09

the throttle go the way towards enabling

79:11

more Innovation more free market

79:13

activity and it's going to be one of the

79:14

motivators for them to do a deal so when

79:16

you put all of this together I do think

79:18

that there's a lot of Chinese tech

79:20

companies that have been beat up under

79:22

the assumption that this is going to be

79:23

a a very difficult conflict with the US

79:25

in the years ahead and I think that that

79:27

may not be the case going into 25 and I

79:29

think that their these stocks look

79:31

pretty cheap I was just looking at

79:32

Alibaba and it trades at a pretty decent

79:34

multiple it seems like these stocks

79:37

could be poised for a pretty good run in

79:39

25 if the macro works out this feels

79:41

like a contrarian take I mean Trump I

79:44

don't think is going to find uh a way to

79:47

balance the relationship with China very

79:49

well and I don't think you can rattle up

79:51

entrepreneurship after you cut

79:52

everybody's knees out the last time plus

79:55

I don't trust any accounting statement

79:57

coming out of China because they could

79:58

fudge whatever they want but wow what a

80:01

great uh potential you know Buy Low sell

80:04

High the good thing is you'll know if

80:06

I'm right you'll know if I'm right or

80:08

wrong in a year you can exactly we'll

80:10

know exactly that's right pull the ETF

80:12

absolutely I mean Gaffin what do you

80:13

think of this hot take here from from Mr

80:15

freeberg really cheap I've had a I call

80:18

it a no China guideline ever since the

80:21

longtop financial fraud more than 15

80:24

years

80:25

ago or it was just amazing it was you

80:28

know uh a lot of great

80:30

investors owned it and you know they

80:34

they talked a great

80:36

game and they had a western auditor but

80:38

then it turned out that the fraud was

80:41

happening at the local post office where

80:44

they were opening up the documents that

80:46

the local Auditors had signed off on

80:48

changing them and then sending different

80:50

documents you know you know whatever

80:52

fedexing them yeah so I just think it's

80:55

it's a hard place if you're I think if

80:57

you're not Chinese to make

81:00

money but I tend to agree with a a lot

81:03

of what David said I think Trump and G

81:05

both want to deal I think there's a deal

81:07

to be done that leaves Putin out in the

81:09

cold as I

81:12

referenced and if that happens Katie bar

81:14

theor I mean there are really really

81:16

high quality companies you know that are

81:19

some of them are mid single digit

81:20

multiples and there and it's a big

81:22

market so if if you did get it right and

81:24

you by the way the Chinese the Chinese

81:26

companies serve a global market it's not

81:28

just the US they serve uh you know

81:31

Africa South America a mean the whole

81:33

southern hemisphere Well yeah if you

81:35

look at byd that it's all over Europe

81:38

it's yeah it's it's hug look I mean I I

81:41

mean the the Chinese companies and they

81:43

have the best unit economics they have

81:45

the best cost of production I mean

81:47

everything is advantaged particularly if

81:50

you believe it's the year of the robot

81:52

there's going to be a kind of a massive

81:54

demand around the world for

81:57

Automation and for rebuilding

81:59

manufacturing capacity all over the

82:00

world and I think that China could

82:02

service those markets more efficiently

82:04

than any other kind of country of origin

82:06

so it's a pretty pretty powerful set of

82:09

macro drivers as well I think the max 7

82:11

is going to be the best performing asset

82:13

I'm taking the other side chamat I think

82:14

in an earlier prediction said maybe not

82:16

so much I think that what they've

82:19

learned in the last couple years is that

82:21

there is an incredible earnings

82:23

expansion you can do

82:25

by not hiring people and Outsourcing

82:27

jobs to other parts of the world and

82:29

automating and the gains we'll see from

82:32

AI which they're producing for other

82:34

companies and for consumers they're

82:37

applying first internally so the

82:39

internal application of AI will allow

82:41

these companies to have earnings growth

82:44

that people will not be able to

82:46

comprehend over the next couple of years

82:48

so I'm going with Max s we got a lot of

82:51

different takes here going different

82:53

directions what a great episode so far

82:56

all right worst performing asset last

82:58

year chamat said late stage Tech stock

83:01

index mostly SAS freeberg you put in a

83:03

brilliant spread trade short vertical

83:05

SAS long AI Cloud providers SAS has come

83:08

had a little bit of a rebound but Google

83:11

up 36% for AI Cloud Microsoft 14% Amazon

83:15

46% all in 2024 I said llm startups like

83:20

open AI anthropic too many players open

83:22

sourcing will kill pricing obviously the

83:25

one valuation we can track is open Ai

83:27

and it doubled but I do think I'll

83:29

longterm have that one work worst

83:31

performing asset of 2025 Gavin

83:35

Enterprise application software okay

83:37

this is basically just about like 2025

83:41

is going to be I think the year of

83:42

Agents particularly in the second half

83:43

agents just

83:45

being AI models that can take action on

83:47

your behalf that can do anything online

83:50

that a human can do

83:51

online and if the lab ABS and the big

83:55

cloud providers dominate agents which

83:58

seems likely going back to you know the

84:01

the lowcost producers going to

84:03

win Enterprise application software I

84:06

think is going to be in a lot of pain

84:08

and you know some of these companies are

84:10

talking a big big game about agents but

84:13

at the end of the day they don't have

84:14

their own models they don't own their

84:16

own

84:18

compute and I just don't see them being

84:21

ultimate winners in the world of Agents

84:23

you know I could easily I could be wrong

84:26

because they do you know they they they

84:29

have some customer data maybe a little

84:31

bit of a data mode and they do you know

84:34

have strong customer relationships but

84:36

you know most companies have

84:37

relationships with AWS Google or

84:38

Microsoft as well so I think Enterprise

84:40

application software will be in

84:43

pain okay and chth what do you got I

84:47

think Gavin just absolutely nailed it

84:49

I'm going to double down on what he

84:52

said I think that there's a term that

84:56

that we will start to use more I started

84:58

to use it internally at 890 over this

85:01

last year in 2024 which is the software

85:03

industrial complex these are these

85:07

large bloated in many cases enterprise

85:11

software companies that effectively have

85:14

convinced incredible numbers of

85:16

organizations to spend a tremendous

85:19

amount of money essentially

85:22

wrapping a bunch of heuristics and

85:24

business rules around the crud database

85:27

and along with that what they have

85:29

perfected really is a go to market and

85:31

sales motion the golf trips the steak

85:34

dinners you know we mentioned this

85:36

before what Alex karp railed

85:40

against none of those things equate to

85:43

product value and increasingly in the

85:46

world of agentic software and AI I think

85:50

that you can rebuild a lot of these

85:51

workflows in very efficient ways M and I

85:54

think the go to market is going to be

85:56

driven by CEOs and CFOs Who start to

86:00

exert a little bit more pressure on

86:02

their cios to manage spend and in that

86:06

world I just think that these next

86:08

Generation AI businesses are built

86:10

frankly an order of magnitude

86:13

cheaper than the companies that they

86:15

compete against and so even if it's just

86:17

feature for feature the same I think the

86:20

software industrial complex these old

86:22

Mainline

86:24

traditional enterprise software

86:26

companies I think you're going to start

86:28

to see fissures in those businesses in

86:30

2025 so I I agree with Gavin different

86:32

words but same result and you put your

86:34

time and money where your mouth is on

86:37

this one 11 months ago you found it

86:38

88090 to get 80% the the traction in in

86:44

less than a year to me is shocking and I

86:47

don't think it speaks necessarily I I

86:49

think we're decent we're very good we

86:51

have great

86:52

Engineers but my 30% engineer in team I

86:54

think does the work of 300 people by

86:56

next year it'll be doing the work of

86:58

3,000 people maybe it will only grow by

87:00

10 or 20% so and the reason is we use

87:04

these tools we're productive to an order

87:06

of magnitude that I didn't think was

87:08

possible and as a result we're just able

87:11

to price it differently so even if it's

87:13

the exact same product its cost

87:16

structure is just meaningfully lower and

87:18

so this is what I mean where the ROI

87:21

calculators get blown up all of the

87:23

traditional go to market mod get blown

87:24

up because in an RFP or in any other

87:27

sales environment what you do is

87:29

somebody says it's $100 and you show up

87:31

and you say 10 okay and at 10 it's still

87:35

hugely profitable for you and and just

87:38

to add just one last thing is just you

87:40

know fundamentally these Enterprise

87:42

application software companies the

87:43

software industrial complex and I agree

87:45

with everything jamat said you know

87:47

they're they're fundamentally based on

87:49

making white collar human employees more

87:52

efficient and what the AI companies are

87:54

going to do is just say hey we're just

87:56

going to replace that worker and it's

87:57

just a fundamentally different

88:00

mentality par shift yeah and it goes to

88:03

like there may may be a lot of pain that

88:05

a companies this and you know David's

88:07

points around the you know potential

88:08

rise of of

88:10

socialism what do you got for worst

88:12

performing asset Mr freeberg 2020 I'm

88:15

probably just going to Triple underline

88:17

vertical sass again perc pricing model

88:19

being challenged pricing being

88:21

compressed as companies explore inhouse

88:24

tools built with AI that replaces these

88:27

kind of traditional business

88:29

practices be

88:31

destroyed this is it was an obvious it

88:34

was an yeah it was an obvious one on my

88:36

list but I want to make a different one

88:38

I want to make a different one how about

88:40

do you have anything open Ai No open is

88:42

great all the talented people left but

88:45

you know I don't know where they are

88:47

where do all the where are they all the

88:48

other open AI employees are they on

88:50

vacation they're skiing too right no

88:51

they've all started competitors oh right

88:53

that's what happened correct yeah they

88:55

all left to compete and have Revenge

88:57

startups wow that's an interesting Trend

88:59

okay so consumers make five big

89:02

decisions in their life as we all know

89:03

college still doing 12 billion Revenue I

89:05

mean well that's that's a

89:08

projection sometimes meet reality six

89:10

billion in losses too David against that

89:12

12 billion in Revenue yeah six billion

89:14

this year or six billion next year I

89:16

think the six is for next year but I

89:19

yeah I don't know I guess it makes sense

89:21

why they're trying to charge 200 bucks a

89:22

month now

89:24

they got some headwinds okay listen

89:26

consumers make five big decisions in

89:28

their life we know college spouse kids

89:30

are uh the obvious ones and then cars

89:33

and homes and the consumer is up against

89:35

it with record debt so since you can't

89:38

trade College spouse kids really I think

89:41

Legacy car companies in real estate are

89:44

going to face continued headwinds and be

89:46

terrible assets because listen we've

89:49

overbuilt in some cases there's tons of

89:51

cars on lots and people can't afford

89:53

homes with these mortgages so I think

89:55

these are going to be the two worst

89:57

performing asset people in the Legacy

89:59

oems as chth pointed out in a previous

90:01

prediction and then I just think real

90:03

estate is the same if you look at a

90:04

place like Texas two years in a row

90:06

housing values have gone down rent has

90:08

gone down two years in a row same things

90:09

happening in other states where they

90:11

allowed you to build and people are

90:12

leaving states where they don't allow

90:13

you to build so that's my worst

90:15

performing asset trade Enterprise was my

90:17

other choice but I'll go with something

90:19

slightly different most anticipated

90:20

trend for 2025 last year chamath

90:23

congratulations you said last year that

90:25

Bitcoin would hit 100K for the first

90:27

time nailed it half court shot well done

90:30

I think at the time you made that

90:31

prediction it was probably trading at it

90:33

felt like a layup felt like a layup to

90:35

you up 112% uh freeberg you said

90:37

predictive models in AI driven Discovery

90:39

and farma and bioengineering how did

90:41

that do that prediction well there was a

90:43

lot of funding and Demus won the Nobel

90:46

priz Noel prize there you go so it

90:48

worked out I picked efficiency in the

90:50

form of AI advancements in labor and

90:52

Outsourcing and I've seen that Bunch

90:54

with our investment in Athena go to

90:56

Athena w.com okay got my plugin there

90:59

let's go for most anticipated 2025 Trend

91:01

what do he got Chim off I think that

91:04

there are a handful of not to overuse an

91:08

overuse term but canaries in the coal

91:09

mine for the end of the deep

91:12

State and I would like to point to one

91:16

which is

91:18

this

91:20

obscure thing called the supplemental

91:22

loss ratio

91:24

and essentially what it is is a

91:28

mechanism

91:29

that the banks can

91:32

use to include or not include treasuries

91:35

and how they calculate reserves etc etc

91:37

now why is this an interesting thing

91:39

it's not interesting for many people

91:40

it's very

91:42

Arcane but if we are

91:46

unable to manage the debt

91:49

situation in

91:52

2025 I think what you're going going to

91:54

see is maneuvering at the edges of these

91:57

Arcane regulations that effectively Kick

92:02

the Can down the road and there is a

92:05

chance that that could happen to help

92:07

the banks because you know we believe

92:10

that we meaning collectively America

92:13

that maybe Doge won't be as effective as

92:15

it needs to be that there's still going

92:17

to need to be you know 1020 trillion

92:19

dollars of debt issuance to refinance

92:21

the 10 that's maturing this year and to

92:23

plug holes in the coming

92:26

years my point in all of this is we

92:28

don't need to understand the details

92:30

except that if we don't move the

92:35

goalpost

92:36

here it is a great sign

92:41

that the folks that are running the show

92:43

are the ones that we all elected okay so

92:46

that is my most anticipated Trend small

92:49

Arcane regulatory changes that allow us

92:52

to Kick the Can down the road stop in

92:54

its tracks this is an example okay

92:56

freeberg you got a most anticipated

92:57

trend for 2025 my most anticipated trend

93:00

is around the announcement of buildout

93:04

of nuclear power in the United States in

93:07

2025 as a function of deregulation and

93:10

some new

93:11

technologies I do think that this new

93:13

government is going to be U much more

93:16

accommodating and it's going to as I've

93:18

said in the past I think it's a

93:19

necessity just because of the the the

93:22

rate at which we have to do power build

93:24

outs to meet kind of competitive demand

93:27

against China the United States is going

93:29

to need to add more power electricity

93:31

production capacity than we can scale up

93:34

with any other renewable source so I do

93:36

believe that nuclear is an inevitability

93:39

I think that the deregulation will

93:40

happen in 25 and I do know a lot of very

93:42

smart people who are actually starting

93:44

nuclear power companies and have left

93:48

very good jobs to go and do this in

93:50

anticipation of this happening in 25 so

93:53

I'm very bullish

93:54

that's a leading indicator for sure when

93:56

smart people do something with their

93:58

time that's a great indicator Gavin what

93:59

do you got uh I think Ai and Nick I sent

94:02

you a chart I don't know if you can

94:04

Flash it up but um I think AI is going

94:08

to make more progress per quarter in

94:12

2025 than it did per year in 23 and 24

94:17

and the reason is just with um with 01

94:20

and 03 this is rcgi it's designed you we

94:23

keep we keep changing the goalposts for

94:26

the touring test and

94:28

AGI and I'm sure we're going to change

94:30

them again as we're going to blow

94:32

through this and I just think what has

94:34

happened is we were scaling around

94:36

around one on one axis which was

94:39

pre-training and then we started scaling

94:41

around in Fritz time compute and it's

94:44

very clear that we have now added a

94:46

third axis of scaling performance and

94:49

that is reasoning and what this is is

94:52

these models the internet is composed of

94:55

answers people giving answers and what

94:58

the models really benefit

95:00

from is kind of the internal monologue

95:04

of somebody getting to that answer and

95:07

this is you know in in AI terms they

95:09

call it a reasoning trace and it's one

95:11

reason you know 18 months ago everybody

95:12

was like oh wow the more code you train

95:14

a model on the better it does and all

95:15

sorts of things that have seemingly

95:18

nothing to do with code but all code you

95:21

see kind of the reasoning the internal

95:24

monologue the thought process the step

95:26

by step and so what's happening is

95:28

you're using models to generate

95:31

synthetic data that contains these

95:34

reasoning traces so you ask a model you

95:36

know solve this problem it has to be a

95:38

problem that is functionally verifiable

95:40

that has an answer or we know the answer

95:42

and we say show your work and we have it

95:44

do that many many different ways and

95:46

times and then you pick the best ones

95:48

and you kind of feed those back into the

95:50

model you apply some reinforcement

95:52

learning to it and so now you're scaling

95:54

along three axes that are multiplicative

95:57

with each other and I

96:00

just I you know a guy on the Google team

96:04

said tweeted maybe five days ago it's

96:07

going to be a straight shot to ASI

96:10

artificial super intelligence and I

96:11

think that might be right Ilia gave a

96:14

talk at NPS Ilia Suk um one of kind of

96:17

the original pioneers of this field and

96:19

he said something that I thought was

96:21

scary and he said these models that

96:24

reason are inherently unpredictable so

96:27

the best reasoning models in the world

96:29

today are the ones that play games the

96:30

kind of alphago alpha zero style models

96:33

and they are constantly making

96:36

unpredictable moves that no human

96:38

Grandmaster ever could have come up with

96:41

and now these models are going to be

96:43

making similarly unpredictable leaps in

96:45

all sorts of

96:48

domains which you know hopefully will be

96:50

awesome but you know might not be yeah

96:53

well they're going to go around corners

96:54

that people might not have considered

96:55

that are non-intuitive and then just to

96:58

Circle back and do a little call back

96:59

here remember I asked which banks would

97:02

have the biggest chance of being

97:04

insolvent uh or having Financial

97:06

collapse or crisis tons of misspellings

97:08

in there as I typed it while we were

97:09

talking and you can see what deep M uh

97:11

deep research did here it went and said

97:14

here's what we're going to do we're

97:15

going to research a bunch of websites

97:16

and find a list of banks in the US find

97:18

top banks by us by asset for each one of

97:20

these Banks find their latest Financial

97:21

savings for each of these Banks find

97:23

their Capital adequacy ratios for each

97:26

of these Banks find their loan loss you

97:27

get the idea and then it went and it

97:29

analyzed and then it created a report

97:32

this took about 10 minutes and when you

97:34

look it created this final report here

97:36

where it gave a list chth of JP Morgan

97:39

Bank of America City Group yada yada it

97:42

did a an analysis of each one and at the

97:45

end you can see all the different

97:47

websites it pulled it was well over a

97:50

hundred websites that it pulled that's

97:51

inred live data

97:54

162 websites and you have to pay for

97:57

this but it's only $20 a month and it's

97:59

conclusion this analysis has provided a

98:01

snapshot of the financial health of some

98:02

of the largest US Banks while all banks

98:05

face inherent risk City Group in Wells

98:07

Fargo appear to be the highest risk of

98:08

insolvency of financial collapse

98:10

compared to JP mortgage Chase Bank of

98:12

America Goldman Sachs City groups recent

98:13

net loss lower c one ratio and high

98:16

exposure I mean just try looking at this

98:18

now I don't know how much of this is

98:19

correct I'm no expert on this but it

98:21

does seem like it's a pretty good start

98:23

of where it's getting to and if you

98:24

haven't used 1.5 Pro with deep research

98:27

just go to gemini.com I'm not being paid

98:30

to say this I just think it's the best

98:31

product in the

98:33

market and it's pretty darn impressive

98:36

okay my most anticipated trend for 2025

98:41

was alluded to in an earlier prediction

98:43

I think by Gavin himself mine is that uh

98:46

exits and DPI shower down uh and we'll

98:49

have this incredible uh distribution as

98:51

the wrath of lenina con ends and m&a and

98:53

and IPOs will surge that is my

98:57

prediction my most anticipated Trend

98:59

okay let's go to most anticipated media

99:02

I had two that I was working back and

99:04

forth from Jame James guns DC Universe

99:07

with Superman coming out this year I

99:09

think it's going to be amazing Andor

99:11

season 2 could be amazing I predict

99:13

they're going to do a clone wars live

99:15

action series if you don't know the

99:16

Clone Wars watch it with your kids it's

99:17

amazing animated series that takes place

99:19

during the prequels but I went with a a

99:22

little of a weird Choice here I think my

99:25

most anticipated media is seeing what

99:27

happens with Legacy Media Outlets owned

99:30

by billionaires Andor people who no

99:32

longer want to pick aide Washington Post

99:35

CNN and LA Times specifically are

99:37

steering towards the middle and trying

99:39

to get back to Classic journalism the

99:42

editors are revolting Karen swisser is

99:44

upset and uh they're adding some

99:47

rightwing voices it is going to be

99:49

popcorn time for everybody so enjoy

99:53

whatever you want to enjoy Star Wars I

99:55

got a little Star Wars for you with

99:56

Andro season 2 I got a little Superman

99:58

or you can watch the chaos in the

100:00

editorial newsrooms at Washington Post

100:02

and LA Times what do you got from most

100:04

anticipated media chath it is the

100:08

enormity of the files that are going to

100:12

get Declassified and released by the

100:13

Trump Administration I think it's going

100:16

to be unbelievably interesting salacious

100:21

useful good

100:24

Earnest all all of the above so the

100:28

JFK files the Epstein FES Diddy files

100:33

the moon landing who knows what they

100:36

find across all of these other Fringe

100:38

quote unquote conspiracy theories that

100:39

may turn out actually to have some shred

100:41

of truth but all of that let's call it

100:44

content for lack of a better word that

100:45

gets released in 2025 by the Trump

100:47

Administration I think will be

100:49

incredibly interesting what do you got

100:51

Dave media any anticipated media for you

100:53

what do you got I'm into AI video games

100:56

the cost of production comes way down

100:58

when you use Ai and you can have Dynamic

101:00

story lines you can have new gameplay

101:02

Concepts things that don't exist today I

101:05

think that the creative Talent Plus the

101:07

technical talent that you typically find

101:08

at development houses can be kind of

101:10

Unleashed with tools that have come to

101:12

come to Market recently we've seen a lot

101:13

of the generative video stuff but

101:15

there's also ways structurally that

101:17

video games can kind of be rebuilt where

101:18

the video game engine can run kind of

101:20

locally it can be generating parameters

101:23

that can then use an existing rendering

101:24

engine so you can have entirely new

101:26

story lines and entirely new kind of

101:28

plot sequences so I do think that

101:30

there's going to be a rewrite of video

101:32

games in the video game industry with

101:35

the V variety of AI kind of capabilities

101:37

that are hitting market now and uh it's

101:39

going to be incredible it's going to be

101:40

incredible entertainment people are GNA

101:42

people that don't play video games are

101:44

going to find stuff that they're going

101:45

to love Gavin most anticipating media

101:48

2025 unquestioned 1923 season 2 I'm

101:52

normally a science

101:54

fiction kind of fantasy or you

101:58

spy kind of guy when it comes to TV but

102:01

1883 and 1923 were the first TV shows

102:04

that kind of hit me the way Game of

102:05

Thrones did and I'm crazy excited for

102:07

that to come out fantastic are you

102:10

watching land man I'm enjoying landman

102:12

with I haven't watched it yet I'm

102:13

excited to try it it's quite fun quite

102:15

fun turns out this guy Taylor sharidan

102:17

he's I mean it's incredible he's in the

102:21

zone I highly Rec Day of the Jackal I

102:24

know chamath also loved Day of the

102:26

Jackal oh that was really good that was

102:28

really was a good that was a good J Sugg

102:30

for stre yeah I'm Jackal sakario yeah

102:34

absolutely what was our predictions for

102:37

for this last year last year shth

102:39

predicted Mr Beast freeberg AI generated

102:42

news I predicted Gladiator 2 and the

102:45

three body problem Gladiator 2 was mid

102:48

but okay three body problem I didn't

102:51

finish so I guess mid Jimmy

102:54

show on Amazon Prime the Mr Beast thing

102:56

was the top unscripted drama in 140 of

103:00

180 countries wow incredible all right

103:03

we're going to do our prediction markets

103:05

here I'm going to put up a prediction

103:07

Market which is based upon immigration

103:11

and the promise that Trump made to have

103:13

15 million people be deported from the

103:16

country I think in the first year I'm

103:18

going to set the over under at 5% of

103:20

that stated number which is 750,000

103:23

so after one year in office will Trump

103:28

have deported

103:31

750,000 less or more that's my first

103:33

prediction how are you going to measure

103:34

that you have to there has to be like a

103:36

a source of truth on these things right

103:38

well do it based on the White House's

103:40

reporting of deportations yeah it's

103:42

reasonable and we'll check with the poly

103:44

Market team if there's a way to do that

103:46

prediction Market obviously but I think

103:47

that was the biggest issue of the

103:48

election so I'm putting it up there with

103:50

just 5% in the first year yeah it is

103:52

interesting Obama deported I think more

103:54

than two million people it's like people

103:57

have forgotten but he was actually

103:59

really really tough on the border yeah

104:01

chamat do you have a prediction Market

104:02

you want to put up the magate

104:04

representation in the S&P 500

104:08

shrinks

104:10

below 30% oh that's a good one that's a

104:14

good one so dispersion would happen to

104:16

the other stocks less concentration

104:19

that's a good one so we'll finalize

104:20

these you'll be able to

104:23

I wanted to kind of play with was

104:25

Microsoft AWS and Google Cloud Revenue

104:27

growth who's going to win in growth in

104:30

2025 I don't know how closely you guys

104:32

crack but um I get a sense that Google

104:35

is kind of accelerating ahead Gavin I

104:37

don't know how much you've SP I mean

104:39

Google

104:41

is I wouldn't say they're a lot smaller

104:43

which makes it easier for them to grow

104:47

faster yeah

104:49

[Music]

104:50

um we talk about yeah I mean I I guess

104:54

um who has the largest gain dollar

104:57

dollar gain in Revenue in Cloud Revenue

105:00

in 2025 is it Google Amazon or

105:04

Microsoft well it probably won't be

105:06

Google because if they had the largest

105:07

dollar gain it would mean they were

105:08

growing at at insane rates but I think

105:12

Azure versus AWS will be

105:14

interesting oh I know the other one I

105:16

want you do which was the national debt

105:19

the national debt has grown about two

105:21

trillion per year

105:23

in each of the previous two

105:27

presidential administrations right so

105:29

over the last eight years we've gone up

105:30

over 16 trillion two trillion per year

105:32

average so I'm going to set it at

105:36

and Trump said he would not increase the

105:39

national debt I'll just set it at the

105:40

national debt increases 1 trillion in

105:43

the next year over under is that a good

105:46

prediction Market or is it should be two

105:48

trillion um yeah so what I would do is I

105:51

would set the Federal debt for December

105:54

the US Treasury Market report on federal

105:56

debt in

105:57

2025 and I would set it at 30 37

106:00

trillion and so you basically the US

106:02

Treasury um market report 20 December

106:06

2025 above or below 37 trillion it's

106:09

going to be above I mean let's just call

106:10

it 38 trillion then yeah you want to

106:13

basically in order to make this when you

106:16

set a line Dave it's got to be one where

106:19

people take either side of it it can't

106:20

be everybody takes we'll we'll do the US

106:22

Treasury Market market report December

106:24

2025 federal debt above 38 trillion or

106:27

below 38 trillion perfect which would be

106:30

how much added in the year about one and

106:31

a half yeah I love that I love that

106:34

that's a perfect one we'll see if he can

106:36

make any he can control the spending or

106:38

if it'll just be the same Gavin what's

106:40

your sense on federal debt next year I

106:41

think like most things it'll take like

106:43

immigration will'll take up time to get

106:44

going yeah it just it's going to take a

106:47

little bit of time but I think they will

106:49

make progress by the way at some point

106:52

if I'm here on the Allin again I want to

106:54

talk about UFOs and the

106:57

drones let's talk about it now do it

106:59

right now are you going full conspiracy

107:01

theorist are you are you trying to get

107:03

your seat here by being a little more

107:04

Alex Jones do you believe those drones

107:07

were aliens what's going on so I don't

107:09

know and I think it's very clear if you

107:11

look at all the um you know statements

107:13

from the New Jersey Mayors and governors

107:16

you know who've met with the police the

107:18

FBI the defense department that they

107:21

don't know now

107:23

you know Trump said someone in the

107:25

government knows what they are he also

107:27

said he was not going to go to

107:28

Bedminster anytime soon his Resort there

107:32

I just think over the last I'd say eight

107:35

years every 18 months there's a big

107:37

story in the New York Times the

107:39

Washington posts the New Yorker the

107:42

Atlantic very credible media

107:44

sources with dozens of interviews with

107:47

fighter pilots and commercial pilots

107:49

talking about seeing things with

107:50

Advanced sensors that made no sense to

107:52

them

107:54

and there's kind of a taboo that went

107:57

away there was an article in the New

107:59

Yorker where they quoted from a bunch of

108:02

people who were

108:04

at you know kind of the the Skunk Works

108:07

Laboratories in the 1950s and said they

108:09

absolutely

108:11

saw

108:12

extraterrestrial materials that have

108:14

been recovered from a crash it's one

108:16

reason the US made such big leaps in

108:18

Material

108:19

Science and um you know there was Mona

108:23

thing where essentially a lot of you

108:25

know astronomist said hey this is this

108:27

is clearly a UFO of some sort including

108:31

the head of astronomy at Harvard and

108:34

then just the conspiracy theory I would

108:37

have is if if if if

108:41

if these are actually UFOs and not you

108:45

know government drones either from the

108:48

United States or

108:49

China you know it seems like the most

108:51

likely explanation in New Jersey is at

108:53

some sort of a

108:55

drill and obviously once this hysteria

108:58

gets going people um you know

109:00

misidentify commercial airplanes as

109:04

drones and like why would UFOs have

109:06

blinking green and red lights but it is

109:09

just interesting that there was you know

109:11

a big concentration of these

109:14

reports as we were scaling into nuclear

109:16

technology 1945 to

109:19

1960 and then now that AI is getting

109:22

going which is the next kind of

109:23

technological phase shift for Humanity

109:26

there's another

109:27

big b of reports you can come back come

109:31

back next week you you won

109:34

congratulations we have our winner for

109:35

all in Idol Gavin is now the fourth best

109:39

I love this kind of

109:40

conspiracy but I mean come on I we how

109:42

do we make a poly Market out of this

109:44

freed I don't know

109:46

we are there are there documents that

109:49

you think Trump will release about the

109:51

past in terms if UFOs there must be just

109:53

an

109:54

entire spectrum of stuff that that could

109:57

be subject to Foya if we went after it

110:00

no yeah I mean I think it depends how

110:02

deeply it's classified and you know I'm

110:04

sure if the government doesn't want to

110:06

give it up um they won't give it

110:09

up but you know there's all the you know

110:11

there's all but you think but look let's

110:12

be honest you think that there are docks

110:15

like there there's documentation that

110:17

the US government has that there are

110:19

UFOs that there have been we just can't

110:21

explain it

110:23

yeah and you know they they call it uaps

110:25

now to make it you know not flying

110:27

saucers but it just feels like something

110:30

F what percentage chance do you put on

110:33

we have actual knowledge on a percentage

110:36

basis what percentage chance you put on

110:37

the government US government is sitting

110:39

on knowledge of extral 20% at least 20%

110:42

from chath what do you say gav I would

110:44

say 25 I would take the over on the 20

110:47

okay great so you think there's a a non

110:50

a significant small chance that this is

110:52

the case free ber sultant of science

110:54

what chance do you think there is this

110:57

government sitting on some

110:59

extraterrestrial life or proof of it

111:02

it's a longer conversation I don't have

111:03

time for this but I I gotta be honest I

111:05

don't um I I don't generally align with

111:07

the idea that like our very narrow range

111:11

of like understanding of technology and

111:14

biology kind of is what visits us or

111:19

would visit us I think that there's an

111:21

extension of information gathering that

111:25

doesn't require moving physical

111:27

biological life forms from one part of

111:29

the galaxy to another so I think that

111:31

the whole premise of like UFOs moving

111:34

bodies around is rooted in the current

111:36

state of Technology of

111:38

humanity which is the basis of Arthur

111:41

Clark's treatment of 2001 A Space

111:44

Odyssey not which was done before the

111:46

screenplay which was done before the

111:48

book and the treatment which you can buy

111:50

I think highlights this the best which

111:52

is eventually every civilization reaches

111:54

a sufficiently advanced level of

111:56

technology that you no longer need to

111:58

physically move the bodies of the the

112:01

biological organisms around that you

112:03

simply are gathering information and

112:05

affecting information because once you

112:06

have the ability to convert any molecule

112:08

into any other molecule and you have

112:10

access to sufficient energy which you

112:12

will eventually evolve to be able to do

112:14

you can basically turn your local part

112:15

of the universe into anything you want

112:16

it to turn into and then you're simply

112:18

gathering information from all over the

112:20

rest of the universe so I would argue

112:23

that there doesn't really make a lot of

112:25

basic sense in why alien bodies would

112:27

want to move around the

112:28

Galaxy I'm just saying it right now if

112:31

Trump releases information on

112:34

extraterrestrial life I voting for him

112:37

to have a third ter I'm putting it out

112:38

there I'm going full Maga he gets a

112:40

third term for me with changing the

112:41

Constitution this has been another

112:43

amazing episode of the all in one last

112:45

question for Gavin one oh well forg okay

112:48

do you think extraterrestrial life built

112:51

the pyramids

112:53

is that the most plausible explanation

112:55

to the accuracy I don't know it is it is

112:59

so strange the way there are you know in

113:03

so many I would say cultures all over

113:05

the world

113:07

pre you know we are closer in

113:10

time to Cleopatra than she was to the

113:13

time of the Great Pyramids like there

113:14

was a long time ago but it's just weird

113:17

that in so many cultures all over the

113:19

world there are these depictions of what

113:21

looked like astronauts

113:24

and then there's all these Renaissance

113:26

Era paintings that clearly show what we

113:29

would call UFOs in the Skies over

113:34

cities so I don't know I just think it's

113:36

I'm with you I love conspiracy Gavin

113:39

this has

113:42

been if you're if you're Jason if you're

113:45

a questioning person these things create

113:47

these weird un you know open Loops that

113:50

it's like hard simulation so fully I'm

113:53

fully vested in this anyway Free's got

113:55

to drive back free BG's driving home I

113:57

think the pyramids the best most

113:58

credible thing I saw on the pyramids was

114:00

that they used water and they raised

114:02

water in channels so they put them on

114:04

wood slats or something and then they

114:06

would raise like um in like the um

114:09

Panama Canal they would do canals and

114:11

Float them up and then place them and

114:13

then release the water which you know

114:15

sounds great to me this has been another

114:17

amazing episode of the Allin podcast and

114:21

thank you to everybody let's have an

114:23

amazing 2025 to

114:25

everybody all kick let's kick ass 2025

114:28

let's take all we'll see you all next

114:31

time byebye bye

114:34

bye let your winners

114:37

ride Rainman

114:41

David and in said we open source it to

114:43

the fans and they've just gone crazy

114:45

with it love queen of

114:50

[Music]

114:55

besties

114:55

[Music]

114:57

are my dog taking your

115:00

driveway man oh man myit will meet me we

115:05

should all just get a room and just have

115:07

one big huge orgy cuz they're all this

115:09

useless it's like this like sexual

115:10

tension that they just need to release

115:18

somehow we need to get mer

115:22

[Music]

115:28

I'm going all in

Interactive Summary

The "All-In" podcast hosts and guest Gavin Baker from Altamira Management discuss their 2025 predictions across various categories, including politics, business, media, and contrarian beliefs. They cover who they anticipate will be the biggest political winners and losers, with predictions ranging from fiscal conservatives and young candidates to Putin and progressivism. Business winner predictions include autonomous hardware/robotics, big businesses leveraging AI, dollar-denominated stablecoins, Tesla, and Google, while potential losers are identified as government service providers, the 'Mag 7' due to market concentration, traditional defense contractors, and Open AI. The discussion extends to potential mega-mergers in the auto and autonomy/delivery sectors, the rise of socialist movements, the future of AI progress, and even an engaging debate on UFOs and government secrets. The episode also highlights a partnership with Poly Market for their predictions and includes a live demo of Google Gemini's deep research capabilities.

Suggested questions

9 ready-made prompts