HomeVideos

Why OpenAI Bought a 17-Month-Old Podcast

Now Playing

Why OpenAI Bought a 17-Month-Old Podcast

Transcript

1584 segments

0:00

Why did OpenAI buy you? [music]

0:02

>> We had a very interesting history with

0:04

OpenAI in that we were sort of

0:07

contrarian supporters when [music]

0:10

it was initially rumored that OpenAI was

0:13

going to put ads in ChatGpt. The general

0:17

response was this [music] is bad. We

0:20

don't like ads. But we are the guys who

0:22

love ads and we think ads are a really

0:24

powerful business model and we think ads

0:26

can make things free. If you want to be

0:28

open AI, you're going to need an [music]

0:29

adup supported version of your product.

0:36

All right, let's first right into it. Uh

0:38

we're joined today by John Kugan and

0:41

Jordi Hayes, who are the creators of

0:42

TBPN, a popular daily show covering the

0:44

biggest stories in tech and business.

0:47

[snorts] Uh so you both host TBPN, the

0:51

daily live show that became OpenAI's

0:53

first ever acquisition this spring.

0:55

You've hosted names from Zuckerberg to

0:57

Alman to Nadella. Before we get to the

1:00

OpenAI deal, take us back to the

1:02

beginning. Give us go all the way back

1:04

17 months and give us your backstory.

1:06

[laughter]

1:07

>> Long time ago.

1:09

>> We met through a mutual friend who

1:11

connected us because we were in a

1:15

similar stage of life. I guess we'd both

1:18

started companies uh in Silicon Valley,

1:20

raised money from actually two of the

1:22

same venture capital firms. uh never

1:25

met, but we both were living in Los

1:28

Angeles, had kids, and were sort of

1:30

looking for what was next.

1:32

>> And LA is a terrible place to live if

1:34

you work in tech outside of hard tech.

1:37

Uh and we didn't see ourselves building

1:39

a hard tech business. We both had some

1:41

media background. I built a influencer

1:44

marketing company in college. John had a

1:46

big YouTube channel.

1:47

>> Yeah.

1:48

>> And we did what what had never really

1:50

been done before. Two guys in tech

1:52

decided to start a podcast. It was

1:54

revolutionary.

1:55

>> Um, no. So, uh, we met, we we just loved

2:00

talking. Uh, we would call each other,

2:03

even though we didn't even know each

2:04

other that well, and just talk about

2:06

different ideas and

2:07

>> what was happening. Uh, and eventually

2:10

decided to record one of the

2:11

conversations. We sent it to uh, a guy

2:15

named David Senra, who has David Senra

2:18

by David Senra, popular podcast, and

2:20

also the founders podcast. if you've uh

2:23

>> uh listened to that.

2:24

>> And he's one of the strongest believers

2:26

in the power of podcasting that like

2:28

we're still early, that it's not too

2:30

late to start a podcast if you have a

2:32

good idea, something fresh to offer. And

2:35

so he was extremely encouraging, told us

2:37

that we should uh take it deadly

2:39

seriously.

2:40

>> Yeah, we hadn't published an episode,

2:41

but we sent him a a Google Drive file.

2:43

He listened to it. I was shocked that he

2:45

listened to it

2:46

>> because who has time for another

2:48

podcast? And uh but he did and he yeah

2:50

he said like you know take this 10 times

2:53

>> as seriously. He saw something in us and

2:55

you know we kept going from there.

2:56

>> And so he sort of encouraged us to treat

2:59

it like a business like a startup not

3:02

like a side project. And that's

3:04

something that we quickly uh identified

3:07

as one of our key differentiators was

3:10

that we had lots of friends and we'd

3:13

been in these situations before. My

3:14

YouTube channel I was running it on the

3:16

side while I was also doing a business.

3:18

And there's a lot of people that have

3:20

investment firms that also have podcasts

3:22

or they have a company and then they

3:24

start a podcast to promote that company.

3:26

And there weren't that many people

3:27

outside of uh the the traditional media.

3:31

Uh there weren't that many insiders that

3:33

had transitioned and become full-time

3:36

creators. uh Dark Cesh Patel obviously

3:38

in that group, David Senra, there's a

3:41

few others, but it was a smaller group

3:43

than I think the podcast charts let on.

3:46

When you scrolled through and you saw

3:48

hundreds of hundreds of podcasts, most

3:50

of those folks were not spending 40

3:52

hours a week.

3:53

>> It was and and still is low status to

3:56

some degree. Like there's there uh I

3:59

remember when we would tell our friends

4:01

in the early days cuz we told people

4:02

with like a handful of episodes we were

4:04

like we're going full-time on a podcast

4:07

and like we have supportive friends

4:09

thankfully. They were like yeah like

4:10

that excited for you. That's awesome.

4:12

But you know in their head they were

4:13

just thinking

4:14

>> like wow they're down on their

4:16

>> completely lost.

4:17

>> Couldn't come up with a single sass

4:19

idea. What are they thinking? Um and so

4:22

we started taking it really seriously

4:24

and that unlocked a lot of things that

4:26

unlocked uh interviews with bigger

4:29

>> Well, yeah. Before we get there, we

4:30

should talk about like why we initially

4:32

got any traction at all is because we

4:34

weren't doing interviews. We did

4:36

>> like 150 hours with just the two of us

4:39

talking before we had done

4:41

>> a single guest. And instead of having

4:45

there were shows that we love like

4:46

acquired is is you know uh an amazing

4:51

product but it's like one topic and we

4:54

would have uh you know we would talk for

4:56

90 minutes but we'd cover 50 topics.

4:58

>> Yes. 30 50.

4:59

>> So we'd read the whole Wall Street

5:00

Journal, the Financial Times. We'd pull

5:02

from random headlines. We'd pull up uh

5:05

tweets and posts on different social

5:07

media sites. We'd print out the posts.

5:10

So, we'd typically have a stack of posts

5:13

and we would uh pull them up and and

5:15

through them. Uh, and Jordy has one

5:18

there. Uh, we would discuss it.

5:20

Sometimes we'd just be laughing about

5:22

it. Sometimes we it would take us on a

5:24

tangent. We'd talk for 10 minutes, but

5:26

then we would clip that reaction to that

5:30

post and then quote tweet the original

5:32

post. And so, that was sort of a do

5:35

things that don't scale moment. It was a

5:38

a love letter to whoever uh posted that

5:41

original idea or that take or whatever

5:44

they posted. And uh as you know from

5:47

posting oftent times the numbers get

5:49

really big. You get a thousand likes on

5:50

something and it all kind of just melts

5:52

into the background and it becomes just

5:54

noise and you see the number go up. But

5:56

if someone quotes your post with a

6:00

thoughtful commentary that's filmed in

6:03

4K with cinema cameras and the hosts are

6:06

wearing suits and they print it. They

6:08

took the time to print out your post.

6:09

It's just wow. These people went a lot

6:11

further to say something. I'm at least

6:13

going to see what they had to say about

6:15

the thing that I fired off in the

6:17

shower. Right. And so that just told

6:20

individual people, maybe 50 people a

6:23

day, got a little message from us. Hey,

6:25

we exist. We liked what you said and

6:29

here's our commentary. And then they

6:30

followed us. They reposted it. They

6:33

quote tweeted and said, I can't believe

6:34

this happened. What is this? This is

6:35

weird. This is interesting. And so that

6:37

was interesting like 0ero to1 moment.

6:39

>> Yeah. Early lessons in going to zero to

6:41

one was, you know, need some element of

6:44

format innovation. Like podcasts are

6:46

incredibly noisy, incredibly powerful,

6:49

but we came in with something that was a

6:51

truly unique product because one, there

6:52

was no one else that had us talking

6:54

about crazy ideas for 90 minutes. We had

6:56

a monopoly on that.

6:58

>> And then a real focus on marketing the

7:01

show, treating the show like a product

7:02

that we make every day, but we were

7:04

incredibly fixated on on marketing that

7:07

product. And I think that and that that

7:10

that happened through clips and and and

7:14

um you know the love letters concept,

7:16

things like that.

7:18

>> So also I think you guys recognized a

7:20

real gap in the market and that is two

7:22

white guys hosting a podcast.

7:24

[laughter]

7:25

>> Exactly.

7:25

>> I've heard nothing you said the last

7:26

five minutes. I was so excited about

7:28

that joke. Um

7:30

[laughter]

7:32

>> what did you guys do? What did you guys

7:33

do before this?

7:35

Uh, I grew up in LA, studied economics

7:39

in college, moved out to Silicon Valley

7:41

as soon as I graduated, joined.

7:42

>> Where you Where did you grow up? I'm

7:43

from LA. Where did you grow up in LA?

7:46

>> I grew up in Pasadena. I live there now,

7:48

actually.

7:48

>> And where'd you go to college?

7:50

>> I went to Nor Eastern in Boston and then

7:52

I went out to Silicon Valley. Was was

7:55

sort of on a finance track post uh great

7:58

financial crisis. was very interested in

7:59

that but then uh got uh bitten by the Y

8:03

cominator bug reading Paul Graham's blog

8:06

uh reading hacker news wanted to move

8:08

out to Silicon Valley maybe join a tech

8:10

company realized that a lot of the big

8:13

tech companies I wouldn't be fit for the

8:15

corporate ladder wanted to start a

8:16

company uh started one company teamed up

8:19

with a Y combinator company uh the first

8:21

business I started was called Soilent it

8:23

was a meal replacement shake

8:26

>> you probably had a couple soilents over

8:27

the years Yeah. You heard about that? It

8:29

was like a decade ago.

8:30

>> That was one of my favorite viral Soil

8:32

and Green.

8:32

>> Yeah. Yeah. I'm not sure name for a food

8:35

product, but

8:36

>> that was the point. The point was like

8:39

it was it was rage bait. It was rage

8:41

bait. Like everyone had

8:43

>> liquid death, that kind of thing.

8:45

>> Yeah, liquid death. Same thing. Um and

8:48

so and so, uh yeah, I was like I was

8:51

interested in technology and working on

8:53

software startups, but then we got

8:56

pulled into uh this consumer package

8:59

goods direct to consumer boom and grew

9:02

that company a bunch, raised a bunch of

9:03

money, eventually sold that company,

9:05

started another company with basically

9:07

the same team. uh but then got that

9:09

company to scale and um had the

9:12

opportunity during COVID to sort of

9:16

think about what was next. Started a

9:18

YouTube channel and then eventually went

9:20

over to Founders Fund to become an

9:22

entrepreneur in residence and that gave

9:24

me a lot of free time to explore what

9:27

was next and that sort of set me up to

9:29

be ready to go full-time on something uh

9:32

completely new when the right when the

9:34

right pitch came my way. We're not very

9:36

good at uh being concise as you can

9:39

tell. We talk we do this for three hours

9:40

a day. We'll we'll have we'll have hit

9:42

the 4 hour mark uh by by the end of the

9:45

day of of podcasting. We really love

9:46

this. But uh I grew up in the Bay in the

9:49

Bay Area. Was always obsessed with uh

9:52

the idea of building companies, building

9:53

startups. I I built a first ever company

9:56

was a skateboard company when I was 12

9:59

because I figured out that the boards

10:01

that I was buying in California for $35

10:04

would be a blank Canadian maple board, I

10:07

could get them made with my logo for

10:09

$17.50 in the Midwest. And so I I went

10:13

and raised like $500 to do my first run.

10:16

Uh and so started selling skateboards.

10:18

That was kind of when I caught the bug.

10:21

took me about a decade from there to

10:23

build like a real business that could

10:25

support my life. But I started uh I

10:28

actually met a number of podcasts while

10:29

in college. And this was at a time where

10:31

you'd have like a podcast with an

10:33

incredibly loyal fan base, tons and tons

10:36

of downloads. Uh and they'd be in the

10:40

top 10 of, you know, whatever category

10:41

they were in. And they'd be running like

10:43

zero ads, which sounds uh which sounds

10:46

insane, but they would just be doing it

10:48

for the love of the game. and maybe they

10:49

had another bid business. And so I went

10:51

to them and I was like, if I can bring

10:52

you advertisers, can I take a cut? And

10:54

so I started doing that. And that uh

10:56

over time turned into a company called

10:58

Branded Native, which is still running

11:00

today, but uh does like YouTube, you

11:02

know, creator advertising for uh a bunch

11:05

of different brands. And so I didn't

11:07

raise money for that business. It got

11:09

profitable uh quite quickly. And I

11:12

started taking the profits and investing

11:13

those in other startups. So then over

11:16

the last however many years I guess

11:20

eight years invested in like 70ome

11:22

startups eventually started a fintech

11:23

company uh I started maybe the most 2021

11:27

zerp company ever company called party

11:29

round which was Venmo for fundraising

11:31

and investing because I would get

11:33

invited to invest in a startup and then

11:35

I remember the first time somebody said

11:37

like well I'll I'll send you the docs

11:40

and then you can just wire after that

11:41

and I was like wire transfer I'd never

11:43

actually done [laughter] a wire. I had

11:45

never actually done a wire transfer at

11:47

the time myself, like a like an outbound

11:50

um

11:51

>> push. And so I was like, why is this not

11:52

like Venmo? Uh a lot of VCs thought that

11:55

was a great idea in 2021. As you can

11:57

imagine, everyone in their, you know,

11:59

mom was was investing in startups. Um

12:02

and uh had built like a fairly viral

12:05

brand on on X for that business. Ended

12:08

up evolving it into a banking product

12:10

over time. uh that was building a

12:13

stablecoin basically a stablecoin bank.

12:16

Uh the month that we launched FTX

12:19

collapsed which uh killed a lot of

12:22

excitement that people had around crypto

12:24

as as you as you can uh imagine and then

12:27

a few months after that SVB collapsed

12:29

and people started really caring about

12:30

how much FDIC coverage they had. Uh we

12:34

at the time had standard like 250k of

12:37

coverage and uh our average customer

12:40

balance was like a million dollars

12:42

something like that. And so people are

12:43

like I was telling our customers like

12:45

yeah this there's a bank run that's

12:47

happening like you need to be practical

12:49

with your business. We ended up um

12:52

getting Aqua hired by a company called

12:54

Row in New York City uh and then work

12:56

there. And that's like when uh when I

12:58

met John um

13:00

>> ready for this. We we we had been like

13:02

both both of us had gone through

13:06

the sort of like Silicon Valley factory

13:09

had had some wins, had some some losses,

13:13

had been like I would say very humbled

13:15

by

13:15

>> Yeah.

13:16

>> by like work and life, right? Like I

13:19

went I went from being like, you know,

13:21

running a hot startup

13:22

>> Yeah. and uh to basically like having my

13:26

business blown up by like you know the

13:28

the the market dynamics and then I'm

13:31

sitting there I've got like a

13:32

one-year-old son at the time I've got

13:34

another on the way like that's like

13:37

deeply humbling and so I think that um

13:39

based on like what we do and what we

13:41

talk about they expect us to be like you

13:44

know maybe cocky or something like that

13:46

but I think we came at TBPN uh from a

13:50

very we had been humbled by Silicon

13:51

Valley been humbled by startups and I

13:53

think that has informed our coverage.

13:56

Right. Right. Like I think we give

13:57

people we always would give people the

13:59

benefit of the doubt. We we like took a

14:03

strategy early on which was called uh

14:05

golden retriever mode which is an idea

14:08

that you know John John can can uh has

14:12

described many times on the show but

14:15

like being in a golden retriever mindset

14:18

and trying to act show up in the world

14:20

and at least that was our role with TVPN

14:23

is showing up as like golden retrievers.

14:24

You're like happy

14:27

friendly and dumb.

14:28

>> Yeah. you know,

14:28

>> not trying to be, oh, I'm I I I got this

14:31

person. I'm smarter than them. I'm the

14:33

smartest one in the room, always. Uh

14:35

being, yeah, a little humble in some

14:36

ways.

14:42

Support for the show comes from

14:43

LinkedIn. If you're a small business

14:45

owner, you don't need me to tell you how

14:47

much hiring great people matters. But

14:49

the time and resources you have to spend

14:51

to get it right are precious [music]

14:52

commodities. Sourcing, connecting with,

14:54

and screening candidates can quickly eat

14:56

into time better spent on your

14:57

customers. That's where LinkedIn Hiring

15:00

Pro comes in. It's designed to be your

15:01

hiring partner, helping you source the

15:03

right candidates faster. That way, you

15:05

can hire with confidence without making

15:07

[music] it feel like a full-time job.

15:09

LinkedIn Hiring Pro simplifies the

15:11

entire process, all the way from writing

15:12

your job post to shortlisting candidates

15:14

and running AI powered initial [music]

15:15

interviews. Plus, it does it all through

15:18

a conversational interface where you can

15:19

just describe what you're looking for

15:20

[music] in plain language. LinkedIn says

15:23

nearly 60% of hirers find someone to

15:25

interview within a week. With Hiring

15:27

Pro, you spend less time searching and

15:28

more time connecting with the right

15:30

talent. So instead of sifting through

15:31

piles of RS, you get a tight,

15:34

highquality short list that actually

15:35

moves things forward. [music] Join the

15:37

2.7 million small businesses using

15:40

LinkedIn to hire. Get started by posting

15:41

your job for free at linkedin.com/pro.

15:43

[music]

15:44

Terms and conditions apply.

15:54

So, I I'm fascinated by and a little bit

15:58

jealous because I what I've seen is that

16:00

you guys this year are going to you're

16:01

tracking towards

16:04

and we I'm very open about our business

16:06

and transparent about the economics

16:08

because I want young people to learn

16:09

about money and building businesses. But

16:12

11 employees uh five million in ad

16:14

revenue in 2025. You're tracking past uh

16:18

from what I see here 30 million in 2026

16:22

bootstrapped profitable zero outside

16:24

capital show was 17 months old at

16:26

acquisition.

16:28

This is what struck me though around

16:29

70,000 viewers per episode across

16:31

platforms and 58,000 YouTube

16:33

subscribers.

16:35

So, here at PropG this year, we'll do I

16:39

think about 20 million and we do

16:41

substantially more downloads in video

16:44

views than that. And yet, you guys have

16:47

50% more revenue and my So, now granted,

16:51

I'm the idiot reading Zip Recruiter ads

16:53

or telling people to drink Ziotics

16:55

before they go get [ __ ] up.

16:56

>> I introduced them. I introduced the

16:58

founders of Ziotics. I love them.

17:01

>> I just ordered a bunch. It's a fantastic

17:02

product.

17:03

>> Yeah. connected the team.

17:04

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I connected the team.

17:05

Stephen, the one of the co-founders went

17:07

to high school with me. I absolutely

17:09

love that product. We sorted a bunch.

17:10

>> I spent a lot of money on it. Is it

17:12

because you guys are selling just

17:14

sponsorships as opposed to ad

17:15

insertions? Like how do I get the same

17:18

revenue per viewer that you guys

17:19

>> Yeah. So, it's a couple things. So, one,

17:21

because I started this company, Branded

17:23

Native, and I had done literally done

17:26

thousands of like influencer podcast,

17:28

YouTube, you know, deals. So, I was

17:31

obsessed with the commercial side. Uh,

17:34

and early on with that business, if I

17:37

would connect an advertiser with a

17:39

content creator and the first few ads

17:42

went well, I would immediately book out

17:43

like an annual deal because I thought it

17:45

was in the interest in both companies. I

17:47

was like, the advertiser wants to

17:49

allocate budget effectively. The content

17:51

creator wants predictable revenue. Uh,

17:54

and so I would do that when I could. Um,

17:57

and it and it worked well. And so for

17:59

this business, like you know, we had a

18:01

small team uh and the knowing that we

18:05

were having to show up and be live for

18:08

three hours a day. I knew that we

18:10

weren't going to have time to be doing a

18:12

lot of ad sales. So I basically wanted

18:14

to uh we only sold advertising on an

18:18

annual basis, which was good for us and

18:21

good for the companies. So for last

18:22

year, you know, we had kind of

18:24

projections. Since this was 2025, our

18:26

first like full year uh in business, we

18:30

had projections and we would show those

18:32

to advertisers and say like, "Hey, this

18:33

is what we think we can do for the

18:34

year." Uh they would sign on, but they'd

18:36

be on a fixed rate. So, they would be

18:39

committing to annual annual spend with

18:41

us, but they'd be on a fixed rate. So,

18:43

if we grew beyond what we were

18:44

projecting, it was just like, you know,

18:46

uh you know, free incremental uh

18:49

impressions or or reach. And so, that

18:51

was super important. uh also because we

18:54

wanted the ability to know how much

18:56

revenue we were going to have in the

18:57

month of March and April and and May and

19:00

things like that because we wanted to

19:01

hire a team. We wanted to invest in our

19:03

space. We have um what I would say one

19:05

of the most unique, you know, podcast

19:07

studios in in the world. that you know

19:10

it's not uh it's certainly like sub a

19:12

million dollars but uh you know we

19:15

invested a ton of ton of money into

19:16

equipment last year and part of that was

19:18

like having this predictable revenue

19:21

stream and then the other thing that the

19:23

other approach that we took was uh you

19:26

know I was pitching advertising with us

19:29

as like sponsoring a Formula 1 team. So,

19:31

you know, it wasn't like we were going

19:34

to we we would run ads for every every

19:36

company every day, but then we would put

19:39

their logo on like, you know, merch that

19:41

we would make. We would put their logo

19:43

on clips. If we did, you know, anything

19:45

IRL, we would show up for them there.

19:47

And so, it was like, you know, actually

19:50

like, you know, a big tech company

19:52

sponsoring a Formula 1 team. They know

19:54

they're going to be on the car. They

19:56

know they're going to be here. They know

19:57

they're going to be everywhere. And so

19:59

by having like, you know, basically one

20:02

contract and then we were very open and

20:05

upfront and it was part of the show that

20:07

we were we loved advertising. Like we

20:09

truly think it's amazing. I was like, I

20:11

love that somebody anywhere in the world

20:14

can listen to this content for free that

20:15

we put so much uh effort uh into making.

20:19

Uh and it doesn't matter who you are,

20:21

it's just free. Like it's uh it's truly

20:25

it's truly an incredible business model.

20:28

It's very aligned. Uh, and so we were

20:31

very I would say a lot of podcasts in

20:33

tech, not you, I think you're very

20:34

commercial. Um, and that's a that's a

20:38

compliment, but a lot of podcasts in

20:39

tech were like above above ads. They

20:43

were like doing ads would be low status

20:44

because I have a venture fund and I get

20:47

management fees and and things like

20:48

that. Um, and then the other thing is

20:51

like we had a focus early on and it's

20:54

still our focus which is we believe that

20:56

there's 200,000 people in the world max

21:00

that we make content for and these

21:02

people are running businesses. They're

21:05

investing in the companies that uh of of

21:08

the founders that we talk to. They

21:10

invest tens of billions of dollars a

21:12

year. They can, you know, run companies

21:15

that spend billions of dollars a year on

21:20

uh everything from advertising to to

21:22

software to cloud etc. And uh we always

21:27

believed that that was a big enough

21:29

audience for what we were trying to do

21:32

because we in this business you we go

21:36

live for three hours every day. We don't

21:38

we can't afford to talk about things

21:40

that we aren't interested in. We can't

21:41

afford to be explaining to people like

21:44

what AWS is. You know, we can't we don't

21:46

we don't have the time nor do we want to

21:49

take the time to explain SpaceX's

21:53

business in the year 2026 because we

21:57

assume that our audience has been

21:59

following SpaceX and understanding

22:01

SpaceX for a decade plus now.

22:04

>> Yeah. The other thing with uh the the

22:07

audience we found Yeah. Yeah, we just

22:09

found ways to get ad impressions to

22:11

people that don't normally don't see

22:14

ads. I I think you've talked about this

22:15

too uh about how certain powerful people

22:19

basically don't experience advertising.

22:21

Uh we figured out how to get ads to

22:23

them. One of the ways uh during our

22:25

inter before our interview with Mark

22:27

Zuckerberg, I read him a ramp ad

22:29

directly because our ads are integrated.

22:31

put the headphones on and John started

22:34

>> cuz I have to do an ad read before the

22:36

interview starts and with with what

22:38

we're doing right now. I'm sure the ads

22:39

will be sliced in later. Uh although

22:42

shout out Ziotics, they did get a

22:44

freebie in here. But uh our ads are

22:47

integrated. So uh there might be a

22:48

Fortune 500 CEO is coming on and right

22:51

as they're coming on they hear an ad

22:53

right uh throughout the interview

22:55

they're looking at our screen which has

22:56

all the corporate logos including the

22:58

RAM sponsorship right there. Uh, so

23:00

there's ad integrations and logo

23:02

placement there. And then after they hop

23:04

off, they might still hear us read the

23:07

next ad. And then every time we share

23:09

one of their clips, um, a lot of a lot

23:12

of, uh, media companies and shows and

23:15

podcasts have a clipping strategy, but

23:18

they don't monetize the clips very well.

23:21

So all of our clips have brands on them,

23:24

logos, and then at the end of every one

23:27

minute clip is a full ad read. And so,

23:31

you know, of course, some people scroll

23:32

to the next video by then, but a lot of

23:34

people do stick around and they do see

23:36

that ad impression. And so the actual ad

23:38

impressions goes much further. and these

23:41

clips if it's if it's some you know AI

23:45

for legal company that's on that's going

23:48

to get sent to the competitor company

23:50

even if it's a very small audience it's

23:52

going to get sent around that small

23:54

community and so that clip might only

23:56

get a few thousand views but it's going

23:58

to be with the right people because it's

24:01

essentially trade trade media.

24:03

>> Yeah. The other thing that we did, we

24:05

realized early on that if we were going

24:08

to be doing live podcast style ads, we

24:11

weren't going to be able to do a 90-cond

24:12

ad. Like people would just immediately

24:14

bail.

24:15

>> Uh and so we we pitched advertisers on

24:18

instead of giving you a smaller number

24:21

of 90-cond ads, we'll give you, you

24:25

know, 250

24:27

20 second ads. And uh really selling

24:30

that like repetition and frequency. So,

24:33

I've memorized all the ad reads. We have

24:35

buttons that we can pull up and and they

24:38

take over the screen to show you the

24:39

graphic really quickly, but it's not

24:41

long enough that you want to pull out

24:43

your phone and tap tap tap tap tap.

24:45

>> And just to give you an idea of how the

24:47

how how the advertisers get like sort of

24:51

like strange incremental reach, we made

24:54

a bunch of merch early on that people

24:56

were really excited about. And we never

24:59

sold merch because it's not our core

25:01

business. and and it wouldn't really

25:03

move the needle from a revenue

25:05

standpoint. Uh but we would there were

25:08

websites that were making fake TVPN

25:11

merch. They're still out there and

25:13

putting our advertisers all over the

25:15

merch in the way that we did. So they

25:17

were building a business selling our

25:20

advertisers

25:21

>> uh you know basically like impressions

25:23

for our advertisers. And so

25:26

>> um

25:26

>> so yeah and I think I think it was you

25:28

know I I think like the TBPN story is as

25:32

much around like marketing innovation

25:34

and business model innovation and format

25:36

innovation

25:37

>> as it is timing right the timing of of

25:40

launching a show like this during

25:43

>> one of you know the most historic

25:44

technology cycle of our lifetimes

25:47

certainly plays a part as well. Yeah, I

25:50

think that's really interesting

25:53

construct or model. Think of it as a

25:54

Formula 1 team because I find that our

25:57

most lucrative deals and it sounds like

25:59

you figured this out sooner than us or

26:01

we'll just say to um you know an AI

26:04

company uh you're we're going to use

26:07

your data. We're going to talk about you

26:08

all the time. We'll disclose that you're

26:10

an advertiser, but we want X dollars and

26:13

we're not going to get into this whole

26:14

impression CPM game. We kind of managed

26:17

to bust out of that.

26:18

>> No. and and you're you're instantly

26:21

losing when you do that because if

26:23

you're advertising enterprise products,

26:25

one customer can pay for the entire

26:28

>> Yeah.

26:28

>> ad like placement, the entire deal,

26:31

right? And so that was something we

26:32

recognized early on with RAMP. I was

26:34

like, yeah, we're going to get you or at

26:36

least help you close a public company

26:39

and if that is the only customer that we

26:41

get you for the entire year,

26:42

>> job's finished.

26:43

>> The everything else is free. Everything

26:45

else is free. And so, yeah, we we had a

26:48

couple of consumer partners early on,

26:50

but we realized that like like the

26:52

people in our audience can actually go

26:54

and buy $5 million a year of this SAS

26:58

company or or they can spend $20 million

27:00

on cloud or they can spend

27:02

>> $50 million on on inference, but they

27:05

can only buy like one aid sleep, right?

27:07

Or maybe two.

27:08

>> Yeah.

27:08

>> Right. And so we realize like the best

27:11

use of our ad inventory is should be

27:14

entirely and so our friends with

27:15

consumer companies we'll just support

27:17

them like John's drinking Andrew

27:19

Huberman's you know yerba mate company

27:21

and we don't even charge money for that

27:23

because

27:24

>> yeah we just we just like them. Let's

27:27

talk a little bit about I I hadn't heard

27:28

of you guys and then I heard about you

27:30

all the time because you're my

27:31

understanding is your first acquisition

27:33

or media acquisition of OpenAI

27:36

and the rumor is you guys got sold for

27:39

the low hundreds of millions which is I

27:42

don't think any company any podcast at

27:44

least less than two years old has ever

27:45

gotten sold for nine figures much less

27:47

what sounds like more than that call it

27:48

a 20x plus revenue multiple which media

27:52

businesses never trade at. So my first

27:55

question is why did OpenAI buy you?

27:57

>> I think they saw what we were doing

28:00

online and wanted to partner with us in

28:03

the way that our brands had. So we we

28:08

had a very interesting history with

28:10

OpenAI in that we were sort of

28:13

contrarian supporters. So going back to

28:16

the fact that the show is very pro-

28:18

advertising when

28:22

it was initially rumored that OpenAI was

28:24

going to put ads in ChatGpt.

28:28

The general response was this is bad. We

28:32

don't like ads. But we're the guys who

28:34

love ads and we think ads are a really

28:36

powerful business model and we think ads

28:38

can make things free. And it was like if

28:40

you want to be open AI, you're going to

28:41

need an adup supported version of your

28:43

product. Otherwise, like that like

28:45

Silicon Valley, we were like looking

28:46

around being like you guys think that

28:48

everyone in the world can spend $20 a

28:50

month on on software. And you don't

28:53

realize that like there most American

28:56

households will like cancel a $10 a

28:59

month streaming product if they don't

29:00

have a show that they love in that very

29:02

very moment. We were we were very pro-

29:04

ad and so we were celebrating milestones

29:07

along that path in a very sort it was

29:11

like half ironic sort of funny but also

29:13

we did believe it was a real model and

29:15

we had done a number of stunts on the

29:18

internet. Uh we ran a Super Bowl ad uh

29:21

that that did shoutouts for everyone in

29:23

our community. We had launched a product

29:26

called clawed with ads that was sort of

29:28

making fun of the anthropic ad that was

29:31

targeted at it was punching at open AAI

29:33

and OpenAI couldn't really punch back

29:35

and so we were laughing about that and

29:37

so we' done a couple of these like viral

29:40

marketing campaigns and to be able to

29:43

work with us this was the deal that made

29:45

the most sense to to help on the

29:48

marketing side and that and that

29:49

includes things from billboards to the

29:51

next Super Bowl ad. I hope we can have a

29:53

really strong voice in.

29:54

>> Yeah, we had been very loud about, you

29:57

know, the need to it it felt like before

30:00

AI was like real and before it was

30:02

something that we used every single day,

30:04

the technology industry and the labs

30:08

like needed to use fear-based marketing

30:10

to raise the necessary capital to build

30:14

a lot of these models. and and it

30:16

basically by like the midpoint of last

30:18

year we were seeing that like

30:21

this sort of like fear-based approach to

30:23

selling the product is going to just go

30:25

really really really badly and it has

30:28

right like you know look at public

30:30

opinion around AI people are scared of

30:33

it even though they find it very useful

30:34

in their in their day-to-day life and so

30:37

>> we had been we had been unofficially

30:40

giving open AI advice

30:43

>> every single day through the show being

30:45

like, hey, like, where's our Steve Jobs?

30:47

Like,

30:48

>> we just going to be like, and I'm not

30:50

saying that's just talk about like just

30:52

talk about what the product can do for

30:54

you. Cuz there'll be a model release and

30:56

they'll talk about the stats and the

30:57

benchmarks. Instead of just being like,

30:59

well, now you can go and ask for a

31:01

custom piece of furniture and it will

31:03

just give you exactly the image of the

31:05

piece of furniture that you want, you

31:06

can just go get it made for cheaper than

31:08

what you would get somewhere else or

31:09

something like that. Like there's all

31:10

these different use cases that come up

31:12

and they always come with like a blog

31:13

post and metrics and it's not just like

31:15

hey you can go use this thing for this

31:17

particular problem now.

31:19

>> Yeah. And the other thing is that we

31:20

were always we were sort of ironically

31:23

and unironically pro technology

31:25

throughout the entire

31:27

>> throughout the entire show. We still

31:30

are. We think that there's so many

31:32

companies that that you know compete

31:34

with OpenAI that are that are fantastic.

31:37

like SpaceX is one of the greatest

31:39

American companies in history.

31:42

>> Anthropic is one of the greatest

31:43

American companies in history. Uh

31:45

Google, you know, all all these players

31:47

like we generally

31:50

>> just want the American technology sector

31:53

to do well. We have friends at at at all

31:56

of these companies.

31:57

>> Well, thank God you guys are here

31:58

because they're they're they could use

32:00

the help. It's uh

32:02

>> Thank you.

32:02

>> It's been pretty rough there. Um

32:04

>> yeah, and I'll give you another example.

32:06

So like I when there was rumor that that

32:10

OpenAI was going to do an adult mode and

32:14

and again like uh this was in Q Q3 Q4 of

32:17

last year.

32:18

>> I thought announced that. No, that was a

32:20

rumor.

32:21

>> He he you well he announced that that

32:24

they were planning on working on it or

32:26

rolling it out under a certain umbrella

32:29

that would be maybe age gated or

32:31

something, but it never launched. But

32:33

there was

32:34

>> and that's the kind of thing that that's

32:36

the kind of thing that like I was very

32:39

>> I I was like there's no way to there's

32:42

no in my view there was no way to defend

32:44

that kind of action in the same way that

32:45

I don't think there's a way you can

32:46

defend Zuckerberg launching you know

32:49

prediction markets you know integrating

32:52

gambling into into

32:55

it gambling

32:56

>> I think the defense is it's good for

32:57

shareholder value but I I appreciate

33:00

what you're saying um

33:01

>> I don't think that's going to get I

33:03

would I would bet that both of those

33:05

will launch both, but you guys are

33:07

closer to it than I am.

33:08

>> You think Meta will launch a a a

33:11

gambling product that includes

33:12

prediction prediction product that

33:14

includes cash and money? Because if

33:17

because there there was some rumors in

33:18

the reporting that it might be all for

33:20

like social points and I think that's a

33:22

much more nuanced discussion. Like I I I

33:26

I'm not pro gambling, but also I've

33:29

played role playing games where I've

33:30

been like, I want my score to be really

33:32

high. And I don't know that trying to

33:35

get the highest score on Tetris is the

33:36

same thing as being at a Vegas casino

33:38

until 4 a.m. with real money.

33:40

>> It's fun to from a commentator to talk

33:42

to other commentators and feel free to

33:44

push back because, you know, as you get

33:46

older, you've start kind of figure out

33:48

what you you know, you don't know what

33:49

you don't know. My sense is the business

33:52

story that's unfolding in our world

33:53

right now is I think we're going to find

33:54

out post World Cup that there was more

33:57

money wagered on World Cup games on

33:59

calcium poly market than have ever been

34:00

wagered on anything before in history.

34:03

And I think Zuckerberg who is a

34:06

brilliant business person and only has

34:08

one concern and one brand association

34:11

and that is delivering shareholder

34:12

value. It's not protecting youth. It's

34:15

not start you know stopping young girls

34:17

from cutting themselves. It's not

34:19

concern about radicalizing young men.

34:21

It's not the polarization of our country

34:23

or coursing of our discourse. It's about

34:25

shareholder value. And to be blunt,

34:28

that's kind of what private companies

34:29

are supposed to do, right? Uh and I

34:32

think he looks at calcium poly market

34:34

and says, I know I'm going to take a two

34:35

billion person hose and fire it at this

34:38

and potentially take some of that 1050

34:41

hundred billion dollars in value that

34:43

these guys are creating. So I think

34:45

it'll be a direct ripoff. Yeah,

34:47

>> I don't know. I don't know. I just look

34:48

at it as like if he really cared about

34:50

shareholder

34:52

value, he would be running what is the

34:54

greatest business in the world, which is

34:55

Meta Platforms.

34:57

>> So stay focused. You think he should

34:58

just stay focus?

34:59

>> Yeah. Yeah. I think Meta would tra I

35:00

personally think Meta is like a a $3

35:02

trillion company and is going to

35:05

permanently have a discount on it

35:07

because of the metaverse, because of AI.

35:10

>> Well, the metaverse is basically gone.

35:12

He's basically shut that down.

35:14

>> No, no, I know. But I'm but I'm just

35:15

saying like

35:15

>> as a shareholder like at any moment

35:18

could disappear.

35:19

>> Yeah. The business

35:21

>> it's like it's like the the goose eggs

35:24

but then the eggs get taken by the goose

35:25

and get sent off to a different farm and

35:27

you're like ah where am I where's my

35:28

golden egg? I I I do always wonder about

35:31

the feedback loop of like you identified

35:33

a bunch of problems with the with the

35:34

platforms. Um and I and I do wonder like

35:38

there sometimes there is a there's a

35:40

flywheel there where uh you know kids

35:44

get addicted to social media, the next

35:46

generation doesn't let their kids use

35:49

the platforms, they don't get addicted,

35:52

then that destroys shareholder value.

35:54

And so if you're thinking long term,

35:57

you're suggesting that

35:59

>> you think

36:00

>> he owns 100% of the voting stock or

36:02

whatever, you know, he can think long

36:03

term. You think he's thinking, "Oh, I'm

36:06

I'm I'm not going to publish. I'm going

36:09

to be more thoughtful and uh measured

36:12

around potential harms to young people,

36:14

including evidence internally that show

36:17

Hold on. Show depression because their

36:19

parents because their parents

36:21

>> are going to see that and when these

36:23

kids grow up and realize that they had

36:25

eating disorders

36:26

>> and anxiety that they're not going to

36:28

let their kids do it. Do you think

36:29

that's actually influencing him right

36:31

now?"

36:32

>> That's that wasn't my claim. My claim

36:33

was that he has a long-term economic

36:35

incentive.

36:36

>> Agreed.

36:37

>> He might be ignoring that incentive to

36:39

>> the terminal but the terminal value 25

36:41

years out is pretty is pretty low,

36:42

right? I

36:43

>> Yeah, maybe.

36:44

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

36:45

>> I like this. So, let me let me bounce a

36:47

thesis off of you guys and then I want

36:48

>> one more one more thing guys I wanted to

36:51

close the loop on. Uh, I think the

36:53

simple the simple explanation is like it

36:57

is culturally in Meta's DNA to launch a

37:01

version of the hot thing regardless of

37:03

what it is. And so it doesn't in in

37:06

consumer yeah in consumer it's like it

37:07

doesn't matter that it's gambling and

37:09

that it is objectively harmful. It's the

37:13

new hot thing in consumer, so we're

37:15

going to do it. And and uh

37:17

>> if it's photos, it's photos. If it's

37:19

videos, it's videos. You acquire or you

37:20

build internally.

37:22

>> They're the they're the largest second

37:24

mouse in history, maybe beside Apple. I

37:26

think I think Zuckerberg is a genius at

37:28

looking at something that's working and

37:29

saying reverse engineer it and then

37:31

again, let's get our two billion people

37:33

on it. A couple just business stories. I

37:35

like this game where, you know, we we go

37:38

back and forth on something. I'm curious

37:40

what you guys think of. So, a tech IPO,

37:44

I think it's pricing tomorrow that it

37:46

hasn't gotten a lot of attention, but JP

37:48

Morgan and Goldman are taking them out.

37:51

>> Spoons.

37:51

>> Yeah. The the Bergkshire Hathaway of

37:54

forgotten but beloved brands, 88%

37:56

recurring revenue. You guys are probably

37:58

too young for this, but AOL, Vimeo, we

38:01

transfer, you know, some some pretty

38:03

good businesses. Basically, buy these

38:06

things. I don't know if they buy them on

38:07

the cheap, but buy them at what they

38:08

probably think are reasonable prices.

38:10

use AI or whatever it is they do to kind

38:13

of quite frankly get efficiency.

38:15

>> Italians.

38:17

>> There you go. And then lay [laughter]

38:18

off.

38:18

>> No, that's literally that's that's

38:20

that's the view. It's like it salaries

38:22

are much cheaper in Italy than in the US

38:24

if you buy an American

38:25

>> and they hire really young people. They

38:26

they claim it's brilliant young people,

38:28

but they hire young young inexpensive

38:30

people out in Napoli that went to

38:31

wherever the Bone or whatever.

38:33

>> Anyway, I'm just curious what you guys

38:35

think of this IPO. What is your

38:36

prediction on it? Do you like the

38:38

company? Uh

38:40

thoughts bending spoons pricing

38:42

tomorrow.

38:42

>> So we've had we've had uh Mr. Ferrari on

38:45

the show. I think he might be coming on

38:47

tomorrow.

38:48

>> I have not tracked the price. We don't

38:50

give like specific financial advice and

38:52

like buy sell ratings. Um I I don't

38:56

know. I don't know what's your take on

38:58

it. Let me think.

38:58

>> Yeah, because so we our origins are in

39:01

the private markets, right? Yeah,

39:03

>> like John and I don't really do a lot of

39:05

public markets investing outside of

39:07

index funds. Like we

39:10

>> uh the the DNA and the the core of the

39:12

show is that we're

39:13

>> trying to understand markets and

39:16

strategies.

39:18

We don't have to talk about valuation. I

39:20

think it's a good company.

39:21

>> I I have no I have no idea. I I think

39:24

that uh you would like let's go let's go

39:28

actually line by line with their with

39:31

with uh

39:32

>> what what's the market cap what's the PE

39:35

ratio I think that's the biggest

39:36

question

39:36

>> Q1 2025 there's a lot of growth there

39:39

only 13% organic it's mostly a roll up

39:41

but the Q1 2025 was uh about 270 million

39:47

and they lost 120 million Q126

39:50

they're now at 625 and they pivoted to

39:52

profitability like 27 million. So call

39:54

it $2.5 billion run rate and the

39:56

valuation I think is somewhere between

39:57

18 and 20 billion. So

39:59

>> about eight times revenues. The bull

40:01

case is this is a SAS company at a

40:04

decent valuation with great brands,

40:06

consumer brands, 88% recurring revenue.

40:09

The bare case is that it's highly

40:10

levered. It's four it's its debt is four

40:12

times which is pretty large leverage.

40:15

Um, and I'm trying to figure out I like

40:19

the company because I love these brands

40:20

and I love the idea of consolidating the

40:22

back end.

40:22

>> What do you love about what do you love

40:23

about the brands though? Is it just like

40:26

nostalgic for you?

40:28

>> Cuz I look at these brands and I'm like

40:29

I've used almost every one of them once

40:32

over the years.

40:32

>> You have since churned,

40:33

>> but I I churned and I don't like I like

40:37

going and working with a company where I

40:39

know that the founder is spending 14

40:42

hours a day obsessing. I think the

40:43

problem here is that you're an early

40:45

adopter and you move on to the next

40:46

thing to early adopt. I look at it and I

40:49

say they're making a single dollar from

40:52

AOL. That dollar is going to be around a

40:55

thousand years from now because if

40:58

they're still able to make money from a

41:00

company that's so old and like they've

41:03

already faced disruption from cloud,

41:05

disruption from mobile, disruption from

41:07

AI is probably not going to hurt those

41:09

companies either because these are very

41:11

resilient. if they've made it through so

41:13

many transitions, I feel like the the

41:16

the risk of like getting eaten by the

41:18

big labs or getting slopped by some

41:21

competitor that just clones you with

41:23

vibe coding, that's much more of a risk

41:25

when you're a young company that's

41:28

growing and everyone's like, "Oh,

41:29

they're making a lot of money. We should

41:30

copy that." No one's thinking, "Let's

41:33

copy Vimeo. Let's copy AOL or whatever

41:36

else they have in the portfolio." And as

41:39

we've talked to some of the people that

41:40

run those legacy brands, they're built

41:43

on relationships at this point and

41:45

advertiser partnerships. And it's not

41:48

the same go to market motion that you

41:50

see in some high growth hot startup in

41:53

Silicon Valley in 2026. So I don't know.

41:56

>> Let me give you another one. I want to

41:58

get through two more before you guys

42:00

start your daily three-hour podcast,

42:01

which sounds like torture to me.

42:03

>> Why don't we just stay Why don't we stay

42:05

on and you open the show with us.

42:08

here.

42:09

>> Polygamy pol wait podcast polygamy. So

42:13

>> something

42:13

>> the uh curious on your take on Snap and

42:18

I this this comment is pregnant with a

42:20

or this question is pregnant with a

42:21

comment. I think I'm actually thinking

42:23

about buying some Snap. I think the

42:24

biggest unlock in the tech market right

42:26

now would be if Snap spuned Spectacles

42:28

Group. Um

42:29

>> that yeah that's the big looming

42:30

question.

42:31

>> Well yeah you have a business they did a

42:33

one and a half billion in Q1. So they'll

42:36

do somewhere north of six this year

42:37

trading at a $7 billion market cap.

42:39

Again, it has like the ult if if Zuck

42:42

has like a, you know, a 30 to 50%

42:45

discount on his business because he's

42:47

kind of erratic and just does what he

42:48

wants. Like, you know, Snap has like,

42:51

you know, maybe uh 80% discount on it

42:56

because

42:57

>> stocks down 93% in five years. Yeah, I'm

43:01

saying 80% relative to where maybe maybe

43:04

it should trade. Y

43:05

>> um

43:06

>> still zero marginal cost and network

43:08

effect. So even if someone vibe codes a

43:11

direct competitor, it's not going to

43:13

have the liquidity pool of content. I

43:15

agree with you. Um but the question is

43:17

people have been asking for the spa the

43:20

specs spin out for years. Is it going to

43:23

happen or company? We don't know.

43:27

>> Yeah, it's hard it's hard to tell. There

43:29

is something where I think you get in

43:31

that seat and you enjoy the life of

43:33

being the CEO of this company and

43:35

handsome billionaire model.

43:38

>> Yeah.

43:38

>> You think it's okay?

43:40

>> I think it might be good.

43:41

>> It's like being the dictator. It's like

43:43

the the dictator of an online nation of

43:46

of you know Zoomers.

43:48

>> Yeah. It's a pretty good gig.

43:50

>> Yeah. And I think if you're a

43:51

shareholder, you just have to know that

43:52

you're going into that.

43:56

Support

43:59

for the show comes from Jevity. Most

44:01

people who get blood work done hit the

44:02

same wall. Results come back. You get a

44:04

nod and everything looks fine. And then

44:06

you go about your day. But what happens

44:08

when something does come up [music] and

44:09

you're still left to your own devices?

44:11

Your blood work flags something, but now

44:13

you need to figure out what to do about

44:14

it. Jevity was made to close that gap.

44:17

It's the first all-in-one precision

44:18

health membership. As a member, you get

44:20

access to a dedicated threeperson care

44:22

team, including a functional health

44:23

expert and longevity clinician. They

44:26

review your blood work and build a plan

44:28

personalized to you. [music] Then,

44:30

whatever you need, such as supplements

44:32

or prescriptions, are shipped to your

44:33

door every month. And their full body

44:35

testing goes beyond blood work. For

44:37

example, you can get gut microbiome

44:39

analysis, genetic testing, cancer

44:41

screening, and more. It's testing plus

44:43

clinical support plus intervention

44:45

allin-one membership. Here's some data.

44:48

[music] 93% of members see meaningful

44:50

improvements from their first to second

44:51

round of blood work. [music] Right now,

44:54

listeners can get 20% off membership at

44:56

govity.com/proofg.

44:58

That's goggi.com/propg

45:03

[music] for 20% off your membership.

45:11

Another thesis I want to test the

45:13

independence that's supposedly in your

45:15

acquisition. I've never seen a flipping

45:18

like what's happened with OpenAI and

45:19

Anthropic. I've never seen Hertz or Avis

45:23

overtake Hertz the way Anthropic has

45:25

overtaken a Open AI. Your thoughts?

45:27

>> Didn't happen with Apple and Microsoft a

45:29

bunch

45:29

>> that it didn't happen in 90 days. I my

45:31

sense is this has been the most vicious

45:33

number two to number one I've ever seen

45:34

in the corporate world. And you may not

45:36

even agree that they've superseded them.

45:38

Thoughts?

45:39

>> I mean I I I think that's clear on the

45:41

ARR numbers that have been leaking out.

45:43

Um

45:44

>> what are those? I haven't seen those.

45:45

>> I mean, there was a like a lot of this

45:47

comes from like complete anons, but uh I

45:49

think

45:50

>> yeah, the state the state of the state

45:52

of news is like very funny where like

45:54

one account with 60 followers on X will

45:57

just say something and then that that

45:59

suddenly has taken us back. I I agree

46:01

with you. It's it's one of the most

46:03

remarkable stories in history. It's a

46:06

story about

46:07

>> the value of focus, right? like that

46:10

that to me is the is the um it's it's uh

46:14

we had never seen be because I I think

46:17

it will be imprinted in like we're in a

46:21

situation where like the market for

46:23

intelligence is growing so quickly that

46:25

there's so many companies that are doing

46:27

well like the number seven codegen

46:30

startup is like crushing it and raising

46:32

it like a billion multi-billion dollar

46:34

valuation because because like there's

46:37

just so much demand and so that is part

46:39

of it and then I think this story will

46:42

be imprinted on a bunch of founders

46:45

today which is that like don't get

46:47

complacent you got to focus like you

46:49

have to respect your you have to give

46:51

ultimate respect to all of your

46:54

competitors and I think there people

46:56

couldn't imagine something like this

46:59

because it hadn't h like it hadn't

47:01

happened before so it wasn't

47:03

>> or at least at least in this way like

47:05

historically it's like well you had a

47:07

few years to see this kind of thing

47:08

coming. So like ultimately both

47:10

companies are doing incredibly well.

47:12

They both have amazing products and I'm

47:15

I'm we again we are glad that uh I am

47:19

just glad that that uh both these

47:22

companies are here in the United States.

47:24

Uh and and that we have a third and a

47:27

fourth and a fifth and a sixth and a

47:29

seventh and an eighth that are here in

47:31

the US as well. Um I do have one one for

47:34

you. I want to get your take. I don't

47:37

know if you saw Masa's slides from last

47:40

week. He put out a new deck. Uh and he

47:44

had some uh he had some pretty

47:47

interesting slide. He says he's talking

47:49

about the value of like soft how you

47:51

should value Soft Bank. He says what

47:54

matters is not the eggs, it is the goose

47:57

itself. Because he's saying like

47:59

SoftBank is being valued at three eggs,

48:02

but the goose is not valued. And he

48:06

says, "What matters is not the eggs. It

48:08

is the goose itself. The true value

48:10

>> is the power to keep

48:12

>> the power of memes."

48:13

>> Yeah. Do you think because he had

48:14

another slide and I'm going to pull this

48:16

up. He had a slide in 2019

48:19

that just said SPG shareholder value and

48:22

it had a bunch of unicorns and an arrow

48:24

that said toward further growth. And I

48:26

think the stock is up like 5x since

48:29

then. Uh he said it was because of AI

48:32

traffic that's why it's going to go up.

48:34

So, he's actually had some pretty good

48:35

calls, but the real question that we've

48:37

been debating is like, is he aware of

48:40

the power of just like silly goofy

48:41

memes? Because it it does pretty

48:43

accurately convey like the idea he's

48:45

trying to get across, which is like,

48:47

you're valuing me based on my eggs, but

48:49

why aren't you valuing the goose that's

48:51

producing those eggs? [laughter] But

48:53

>> ridiculous.

48:54

>> I'm curious what you think.

48:55

>> Whenever I read his decks, I think,

48:56

okay, you know, our uncle's back on

48:58

meth. I don't [laughter]

49:01

I I don't I just don't get them. And I'm

49:04

convinced that he's actually an agent of

49:08

the CIA who's been charged with

49:10

transferring oil capital back from the

49:12

Gulf to America with crazy [ __ ] ideas

49:14

that PIFF and Mubalaba fund and then

49:18

transfers it to US entrepreneurs. So I

49:20

think he's an agent of the CIA charged

49:22

with reallocating capital or

49:24

repatriating capital back from the Gulf.

49:25

>> We have a tinfoil hat in the uh in in

49:28

our studio.

49:30

>> If you were here if we were here well

49:32

>> no that's the problem. goose.

49:34

>> I'm [laughter] listening.

49:35

>> The goose.

49:36

>> He's the goose. He's the golden goose.

49:37

He's our He's our golden goose. Uh I

49:40

just think I just have to give him I I I

49:42

give him credit for for putting together

49:44

the silliest slide ever in 2019 that

49:46

that you know, years and years, you

49:49

know, four years before Chad GBT that he

49:51

was like AI traffic is going to cause

49:54

our stock to go up a lot. And he called

49:56

it perfectly.

49:58

>> Yeah. So, last question. You guys have

50:00

been very generous. First off, let me

50:01

say I'm really happy for you guys. What

50:04

are you doing with all this money? And

50:06

you can't say nothing. And I never

50:08

really thought about the money. Like,

50:10

give me

50:12

>> Have you heard of a Nissan Morano Cross

50:14

Cabriolet? It's a convertible SUV

50:18

of them.

50:19

>> No. Mo uh we It's a It's a process. I

50:23

think next house for most of us.

50:26

>> Well, I would say this. When I started

50:28

working when I started working

50:30

>> when I started working on companies like

50:32

all like

50:33

>> all I wanted was a was a was a

50:37

like a fourbedroom house in a

50:39

fourbedroom h I mean I just wanted a

50:41

fourbedroom house in California.

50:43

>> Yeah. So 10 off.

50:46

>> No, no. Yeah. Well, it's crazy, but no,

50:49

I think I was lucky to to have built,

50:51

you know, built my first company and

50:53

done done well with that. And so I think

50:56

we're we started the show doing it for

50:59

the love of the game. Like John and I,

51:01

we get off the show, like we get in the

51:04

car to go home, we call each other, we

51:06

just keep doing the show. Well, we just

51:09

like we we genuinely just love talking

51:11

about this stuff and it's uh it's a

51:13

blessing to be able to do it every day.

51:15

>> Yeah, that comes through. And you guys

51:17

you guys are both dads. How how old are

51:19

your kids?

51:20

>> I have a 5-year-old and then twin

51:21

two-year-olds basically

51:23

>> Vietnam.

51:25

>> Exactly. Which is why the money is odd

51:27

because the things I want money can't

51:30

buy. You know, like you want time with

51:33

your kids, you want peace and quiet, you

51:35

want to end a tantrum gracefully, you

51:38

want to educate the 5-year-old properly,

51:41

you want to, you know, get better at

51:43

chess and not win by too much of a

51:46

margin, but win every once in a while.

51:48

Right. Exactly. These things are

51:50

important and money can help, but it's a

51:53

it's a small piece of the puzzle in my

51:55

>> Yeah. I think I think we we built the we

51:58

built the business around our family

52:01

life. We see our kids. We see our kids

52:03

every single day. I have a four-year-old

52:04

and a 2-year-old and another on the way.

52:07

And um

52:08

>> but a third on the way.

52:09

>> We spend a lot of

52:10

>> third on the way.

52:11

>> Good for you guys.

52:12

>> We're going to have six between us.

52:14

>> That's another edge that we have. Like

52:15

we have something to work for. Most male

52:17

podcasters don't have children if you

52:20

look at the top of the charts.

52:22

>> I didn't think of that. They don't have

52:24

[clears throat] kids. So, uh, what a lot

52:27

of young men listen to this podcast,

52:29

what advice would you have for for guys

52:31

who are just about are kind of thinking

52:33

about having kids?

52:34

>> I don't know. Early on, we we recorded

52:37

in in that test episode that we uh did,

52:40

we we we were kind of playing this

52:43

exaggerated character and Jordy had this

52:45

quote where he was quoting Deval

52:47

Ravocant saying, "Work like a lion." And

52:50

it was very funny because the way he

52:52

delivered that line was was like so

52:55

overthe-top pathy and thoughtful and so

52:58

like high on his own supply with that

53:01

line. But I do think that's a little bit

53:03

of the story here.

53:04

>> You mean Nval was

53:05

>> No, you you were you were playing like

53:07

an exaggerated character.

53:08

>> Oh, I was in I was in character.

53:10

>> You were in character and you were and

53:12

you were saying work like a lion like

53:14

you had coined it even though it was

53:16

clearly a quote. And it was anyway um I

53:19

do think that's a little bit of the

53:20

story here which is that we there's a

53:22

lot of time to explore a lot of time to

53:24

build skills in a bunch of different

53:26

areas. And like we didn't even really go

53:29

into this but I spent like years

53:30

learning every single piece of camera

53:32

equipment every single piece of

53:34

microphone equipment and all the

53:36

different tools that we needed lighting.

53:38

So that on day one I was able to bring

53:40

that and then coach the team and hire

53:42

great people that could advance that.

53:44

And now they know a lot more than me but

53:45

it took a while. I also spend a lot of

53:47

time programming. So if we have someone

53:49

on who's working on a software company,

53:52

which most of people are, I'm a little

53:54

bit more fluent there. Jordy had done

53:56

all sorts of things in branding and and

53:58

you know, marketing strategies and and

54:01

actually building fintech company and

54:02

he's deep in crypto and there's all

54:04

these different areas that came together

54:05

through these like little sprints that

54:08

finally came together into like the

54:09

right.

54:10

>> Yeah. I think I think uh credit to

54:13

credit to our our spouses like at least

54:15

personally like my my wife is an amazing

54:18

entrepreneur. She actually she went to

54:20

NYU and would would sit in on your

54:22

class.

54:22

>> Oh yeah.

54:23

>> Back in the day. She never she said she

54:24

could never like actually get into the

54:26

class, but uh she would just go. Um, but

54:30

we, you know, we, you know, once we had

54:32

kids, we established like one of us,

54:35

like we were like, it's time to divide

54:36

and conquer because if we're going to

54:38

be, if we're going to be great parents

54:41

and and uh have a great like it's hard

54:43

to it's hard to excel at two things at

54:46

once. And so the focus was like you're

54:48

going to my wife made, you know,

54:51

sacrifices with her career, which was to

54:53

just because she could be, you know,

54:55

raising venture and she's invested in a

54:57

ton of great companies and all that

54:58

stuff. She locked in on on the household

55:02

and I locked in on on work and we had

55:05

very clearly established that at least

55:08

for a few years that was going to be how

55:09

we were going to operate. And that

55:10

allowed me to be the best version of

55:13

myself and be, you know, overly obsessed

55:15

with the work that we were doing. And it

55:18

allowed our kids to to be uh to get all

55:21

the love and attention that that they

55:23

need that they've needed to thrive. And

55:25

that means when I go home over the last

55:28

few years, it's like I get to be there

55:29

with them. I get to be present. I get to

55:31

be as great of a dad as I can. But I

55:34

wasn't worried about like, oh, what what

55:36

what exact preschool are they going to

55:39

or or when is music class? Like we had

55:41

fully divided and conquered. And again,

55:44

that's like a temporary sacrifice. Um,

55:47

but has delivered, you know, great

55:49

results for us. And I think you only get

55:51

that by like really clearly establishing

55:54

that versus just assuming things or or

55:57

hoping that that it'll end up that way.

56:00

The other the other piece of advice

56:03

for young people is probably around like

56:07

where to live, where to go. There are

56:10

these cities that are complete vortexes.

56:12

San Francisco is like this AGI vortex

56:14

right now. It's a vortex for venture

56:17

capital and startup energy. And I'm

56:20

extremely glad that I moved to San

56:22

Francisco right after college because I

56:23

was exposed to a ton of different

56:25

aspects of the industry just naturally.

56:28

I don't think I would have done well if

56:30

I had stayed there permanently. I think

56:32

that by leaving San Francisco, it gave

56:34

me a completely different perspective on

56:36

the world. That has then allowed me to

56:39

succeed even in tech, even though I'm

56:42

outside of the vortex and and more than

56:45

anything, it's just good for my life

56:46

personally and my well-being, I think.

56:48

But um I think that as a young person

56:51

there's uh there definitely is some a

56:55

lot of value to if you want to be in

56:57

finance going to New York City is

56:59

probably good early on burning the

57:01

ships. My first I lived in a I I lived

57:04

in a one-bedroom apartment. The

57:06

tenderloin with three people. It was

57:08

$1,500 a month. We it was complete

57:10

squalor, but we were in the mix and we

57:12

got exposed to a lot of things and that

57:14

was extremely valuable. And I think that

57:17

uh just putting yourself in the action

57:20

very early on, no matter what the cost,

57:23

if you're if you're early in your

57:24

career, can have a lot of benefits.

57:26

>> John Kugan and Jordy Hayes are the

57:27

creators of TBPN, a popular daily show

57:30

covering the biggest stories in tech and

57:31

business. I'm really I'm h it's it's

57:34

your story is such a nice story. You're

57:36

impressive young men who did something

57:38

you're good at and you had a great exit.

57:40

But more than anything, I'm just really

57:43

glad that young, [music] talented men

57:46

are having a lot of kids. I think it's

57:48

wonderful to have kids being raised

57:50

[music] in households, loving, secure

57:53

households with very present fathers.

57:55

So, I I think that's actually the nicest

57:57

thing about your story. Very much

57:59

appreciate your time today and

58:00

congratulations on your success. [music]

58:02

>> Thanks for having us, Scott.

58:09

>> [music]

Interactive Summary

The podcast features John Kugan and Jordy Hayes, creators of TBPN, discussing their journey from meeting through a mutual friend to selling their daily tech and business show to OpenAI. They share how they built TBPN by treating it as a serious business, focusing on format innovation, and a unique marketing strategy involving quoting and commenting on social media posts. A significant portion of the conversation revolves around their successful advertising model, which involved securing annual deals with a focus on a high-value, enterprise-level audience, and integrating short, frequent ads with strong brand visibility. They also delve into the reasons behind OpenAI's acquisition, attributing it to their contrarian pro-advertising stance and viral marketing stunts, which aligned with OpenAI's need for marketing assistance. The hosts share insights into their personal lives, emphasizing the importance of balancing work with family and the diverse skill sets they developed before launching TBPN.

Suggested questions

5 ready-made prompts