HomeVideos

You Need To Move To Linux Today - WAN Show July 17, 2026

Now Playing

You Need To Move To Linux Today - WAN Show July 17, 2026

Transcript

6887 segments

0:00

on. Happy Friday.

0:02

It's Friday.

0:05

Welcome to the WAN show. We've got a

0:06

great show lined up for you guys today.

0:08

Microsoft admits that every Windows 11

0:13

install has a secret unique ID for

0:17

tracking. Not only that, but they use it

0:21

and so does law enforcement. Um, it

0:23

might be time to switch to Linux like

0:26

now. like like today, like go start your

0:29

download and then let it come down while

0:32

you watch the rest of the show. Uh we'll

0:34

also be talking about the class action

0:36

that's hitting YouTube over false

0:39

advertising around YouTube Premium. They

0:43

are alleging that Google advertises it

0:46

as having no interruptions. And yet,

0:49

right now, here on the WAN show, right

0:52

now, you could have premium and hear me

0:54

tell you about our highquality true spec

0:56

cables available now at ltstore.com.

0:58

That's right. We've got almost all

1:00

lengths and connector ends in stock, and

1:02

there's not a darn thing that YouTube

1:05

can do to prevent me from telling you

1:06

about it. What else we got going on this

1:08

week, Mr. Left Friier?

1:10

>> Uh, we got a topic I'm really confused.

1:13

you had the whole time that I was

1:15

talking to find two.

1:17

>> Did I pick yours again? [laughter]

1:19

>> Yeah, one of them. Uh, Proton 11 is

1:22

here. That's exciting considering we're

1:24

talking about how you might want to

1:25

switch over. That's uh I mean a pretty

1:28

important thing for a lot of people in

1:29

this audience. And 75%

1:32

of all PlayStation 3 games are now

1:35

playable on PC.

1:38

>> That's a pretty big deal in the

1:39

emulation space.

1:41

>> Yeah.

2:00

The show is [music] brought to you today

2:01

by Vessie Op manager Nexus Cape and

2:06

Whisper Flow alongside our usual rap

2:08

partner Dbrand, our laptop partner Razer

2:11

and our chair partner also Razer. Let's

2:14

jump right into our headline topic which

2:17

is of course Microsoft admitting to the

2:20

existence of a secret global device

2:23

identifier or GDI that was revealed

2:27

after US prosecutors unsealed a federal

2:30

complaint regarding alleged hacker Peter

2:33

Stokes who was wanted in connection with

2:35

the 2025 breach of a US luxury jewelry

2:38

retailer. According to the complaint,

2:41

Microsoft provided the FBI with a way to

2:44

trace Stokes's Windows PC across VPNs

2:49

and proxy servers through three

2:52

countries.

2:55

This is [ __ ] crazy.

2:59

Seriously, guys, I'm I'm not I'm not

3:02

being all hyperbolic here. I'm not being

3:06

all like like uh conspiracy theory.

3:09

Where's my tinfoil hat? Keep the radio

3:11

waves out of my brain. This is a serious

3:15

problem. A Microsoft representative

3:18

explained GDID in the complaint as this

3:22

is a quote a persistent device level

3:26

identifier that is designed to uniquely

3:29

identify an installation of Windows

3:32

operating system on a device either a

3:35

physical device eg mobile phone or

3:37

laptop or virtual machine across certain

3:41

Microsoft services and scenarios. End of

3:45

quote. According to the story posted by

3:48

Windows latest, Microsoft uses it to

3:51

manage software licensing and Windows

3:53

Store apps. But because it links all

3:58

your online activities on that computer

4:00

back to one single identity, law

4:04

enforcement can use it to track a

4:05

devices's true owner across the

4:09

internet.

4:10

Now,

4:12

reinstalling Windows does generate a new

4:16

global device identifier, so it doesn't

4:18

stay with you forever.

4:21

But because all of this is being fed

4:23

back to Microsoft, the second that you

4:26

sign in to another account that you were

4:29

signed into on the old machine, it's

4:32

linked and they would be able to resolve

4:35

both of those GDIDs to one individual

4:39

person.

4:40

>> Is this like a huge GDPR problem?

4:44

>> Oh, I'm not sure. Hold on. Not quite

4:46

done yet. The story states that when

4:48

investigators hit a dead end tracing IPs

4:51

to VPN providers, Microsoft themselves

4:55

provided the FBI with records showing

4:57

what Stokes's device was doing. The

5:00

Windows latest story has some

5:02

suggestions on how you might maintain

5:04

your privacy. And there's a full reverse

5:06

engineering analysis from GitHub user

5:08

sometimes wonder if you really want to

5:10

get into the weed. So Dan, if you could

5:12

throw that link into the chat for all

5:13

the wonderful folks who are watching

5:15

today. And now it's time for us to us to

5:18

discuss like look, I am not a nerdwell

5:23

in general. I have taken a pretty loose

5:27

approach to the trackability of my

5:28

devices. I'm a public figure. I mean, it

5:31

just kind of comes with the territory.

5:35

This

5:37

is different because it was not

5:40

disclosed at any time and there was no

5:44

implicit tracking.

5:46

Like in the modern age, if I sign into a

5:50

web service, using a credit card or

5:53

using an email that I that I use across

5:56

various services, there there's at least

5:59

as a technical user, there's some level

6:02

of understanding that there's some

6:05

tracking here. you know, if I'm if I'm

6:07

doing anything on a cellular phone,

6:10

right, where I know that my location can

6:12

be triangulated from the towers that I'm

6:14

nearest and that's that's the best case

6:16

scenario, right? Then then I get that.

6:19

Here we're talking about devices that

6:21

don't have a cellular radio. We're

6:23

talking about devices that, you know,

6:27

never that don't need any reason to keep

6:30

track of where I am and what I'm doing.

6:33

that inherently like I assume that if

6:36

I'm not enabling something like Windows

6:38

recall that what I'm doing on my device

6:40

is actually not visible to my operating

6:44

system.

6:45

And m guys, maybe I'm like maybe I'm

6:50

overreacting. That's possible, but I

6:53

don't know, Luke. I don't think so.

6:57

>> Yeah, I don't really

6:59

I don't really think so either. I I'm

7:03

quite on the train of

7:07

just pushing more to Linux. Um I do

7:10

think it's not going to be perfect for

7:12

every scenario. You know, if you're

7:13

doing video editing stuff, it's still

7:15

really rough, but there is an option

7:19

where you can, you know, work if if you

7:21

need to do something like video editing,

7:22

you could work in Windows just for that

7:24

and then jump off the second you do

7:26

basically anything else. and you end up

7:28

using a dual booting scenario is like

7:30

your your Windows portion as an

7:32

appliance, which is interesting because

7:34

years ago it would have been seen as

7:35

kind of the other way around. Maybe you

7:36

use the Linux portion as an appliance,

7:38

but now yeah, if you have something like

7:40

like video editing, which really isn't,

7:43

>> in my opinion, solved on Linux yet,

7:45

there are some ways to make it work. Um,

7:48

but it's still kind of funky. Uh, there

7:51

there's also things outside of just

7:52

video editing, you know, right? Like

7:53

certain games might not be super

7:55

compatible or whatever, but

7:56

>> professional applications.

7:58

>> Yep. Do that thing, whatever that thing

8:01

is, and then you can jump back and go go

8:03

back to Linux. I am astronomically more

8:06

comfortable on Linux right now, which is

8:08

which is really weird to me. Um, it's

8:10

also weird how fast that happened, but

8:12

it feels very true. I also wanted to

8:14

point out on the subreddit right now,

8:17

and let me just throw this in the dock.

8:20

Uh, I didn't actually think it was going

8:21

to end up being applicable on the show

8:23

today, and then it was like immediately.

8:26

Uh but I I posted it in the discussion

8:28

questions here. Um there's a community

8:31

member uh

8:33

Gil

8:35

Gil

8:36

>> Dwif

8:38

>> sorry

8:39

>> is my best guess.

8:40

>> Sure. Let's go with that. Um I am

8:42

building a tool to fix the in quotes LT

8:45

Linux challenge pain points uh which

8:48

they're identifying as a zero hassle

8:49

migration from Windows. Super

8:52

interesting. There's some other tools

8:53

like this as well. Um, there's, you

8:56

know, I'm I'm assuming we're going to be

8:57

keep making some amount of Linux content

8:59

and I think that's going to be including

9:01

trying to make it easier and easier for

9:03

people to move over and have a

9:07

successful migration. Um, so I don't

9:10

know, take a look at this. I I haven't

9:13

spent a ton of time looking it up, but

9:16

open source. Um, and

9:19

>> what it actually does right now

9:21

>> solution

9:21

>> data and profile migration. So, copies

9:23

your files and maps them directly over

9:25

to your new home directories. Browser

9:27

migration automatically carries over

9:29

your browser profile. So, when you boot

9:30

into Linux for the first time, your tabs

9:32

and active website sessions open up

9:34

right where you left them on Windows.

9:35

System configuration sync. Okay, this is

9:37

pretty cool because this is something

9:39

where not only is not everything the

9:41

same, but the place to go find and

9:43

change it might be a little bit

9:44

different. So, it grabs your current

9:46

Windows keyboard layouts and localized

9:48

Wi-Fi configuration, so you don't have

9:49

to input passwords or settings during

9:50

setup. and no USB drive required. So, it

9:53

should install natively without forcing

9:55

the user to flash a bootable thumb drive

9:57

or change physical boot priorities in

9:59

the BIOS.

10:00

>> He seems to have a bunch of DRO options

10:02

as well. Like, this is a pretty cool

10:03

project. And one thing I noticed is just

10:07

that Linux is moving really fast right

10:10

now. Um, so if there's a problem, if

10:12

there's a reason why you can't use it, I

10:14

wouldn't write it off long term. Just

10:17

wait a little bit. Like even the we

10:19

we've pointed out during the challenge

10:20

that the changes from the first time we

10:22

did the Linux challenge and the most

10:23

recent time we did the Linux challenge

10:25

were just completely night and day.

10:27

Yeah.

10:27

>> And then literally since we started the

10:30

most recent one to now

10:32

>> there's been dramatic change. A topic

10:34

for later on in the show is Proton 11.

10:36

Someone's working on this right now.

10:38

Like it's a very very lively space. So,

10:41

if you have some form of issue, um, you

10:45

know, maybe it'll it gets solved or

10:47

improved at least soon. Literally, my

10:50

install of Cashy has improved since I

10:53

installed it. Like, it's it's so cool.

10:55

>> In my uh in my dailying Steam Machine

10:58

video, I I make a I make a very strong

11:01

appeal to someone to fix the middleclick

11:05

uh autoscrolling issue that you and I

11:06

have, Luke.

11:07

>> Yeah. And honestly, it's it's one of

11:10

those things where I I found plenty of

11:12

Linux people who were, you know, doing

11:15

that classic thing where they tell you,

11:17

you don't actually want that. Paste is

11:20

better. You want middle click to be

11:21

paste text. And it's like, no, actually,

11:25

I definitely do not prefer that. And I

11:28

do want it to be autoscroll. And I lay

11:31

out kind of the ergonomic reason for it.

11:33

like it will be within just a couple

11:36

weeks of dailying Steam OS, some of my

11:39

old RSI pain and tightness started to

11:42

come back from having to use the scroll

11:44

wheel so much. And I had to kind of

11:46

remind myself, don't do that. Move the

11:49

mouse, go find the stupid little thing,

11:51

and drag the page back up. Like, I'm

11:53

someone who reads at my computer a lot,

11:57

and it's just plain better. Autoscroll

12:00

is just better. And for me, when I read

12:05

a lot, it's way more useful than middle

12:07

click being paste text. Um, especially

12:10

when my left hand is usually on my

12:12

keyboard in the left home row position

12:14

anyway, where I can just as easily click

12:16

controlV. Um, and so hopefully an

12:20

enterprising Linux person will will help

12:23

help us out. Uh, Bookhorse, yes, it is a

12:26

browser setting in Firefox, but not in

12:28

every browser, and it's a little bit

12:30

clunky. It's a little clunky. It is It

12:33

is not the same. Um I I ran into the

12:36

same advice.

12:37

>> It's better than not having it in my

12:39

opinion, but it it is not the same.

12:40

>> Yeah. So, we need to get it like And

12:42

like why why settle for worse?

12:46

>> Like that's

12:46

>> Well, no. I mean, I can understand

12:48

someone who who might prefer the other

12:50

way.

12:51

>> No, I just mean the clunky current

12:52

solution.

12:53

>> Oh, yeah. Yeah.

12:54

>> Yeah. I think, you know, I I I

12:57

appreciate that there are opinionated

12:59

portions of Linux, but I also think at

13:00

its core, Linux is a customizable

13:03

optionheavy thing. And I think it would

13:05

be great if there was the option for

13:06

either one. I want the people who like

13:08

pasting that way to be able to keep

13:09

pasting. Of course, they should like to

13:11

be able to use the scroll wheel the way

13:12

that I want to use the scroll [laughter]

13:14

wheel. I want both to be uh why not

13:16

both?

13:18

>> And and that's the that's the always the

13:20

funny thing to me. I don't encounter it

13:21

as much with Linux people. It's if I had

13:24

to if I had to pick a community to kind

13:26

of put that stereotype on more than any

13:28

other, it would be the Apple community

13:30

where you kind of say, "Hey, I'd really

13:32

love it to work this way." And they say,

13:33

"Well, you shouldn't." And I go, "Well,

13:35

yeah, but I do though." And they go,

13:36

"Well, I like it working the way it

13:38

does." And I go, "Good. Then it should

13:39

keep working the way it does, and also

13:40

it should work the way that I'd like it

13:42

to work. This is these are not mutually

13:44

exclusive." Um, but it's something that

13:46

I don't know, some people really seem to

13:49

to struggle with. Um, one thing I will I

13:52

will say is that when I was dinking

13:55

around in the terminal a bunch trying to

13:58

get um Adysius working, PewDiePie's

14:01

thing, I ended up using middle click to

14:04

paste a lot. And I was like, okay, I get

14:08

it. But that was a that was a weird

14:09

situation where I wasn't really like at

14:12

a desk. I was at like uh like I was on

14:14

like a test bench and my keyboard was

14:16

like way over there because I had the

14:19

5090 with the weird power modification

14:21

that I was like fixing the soldering job

14:24

on in the middle of the de. So, like my

14:26

keyboard was not super convenient and I

14:28

was uh using a bunch of like AI

14:30

assistants to help set up like to help

14:33

with like Linux terminal commands and

14:35

stuff because no, I don't want to go do

14:38

a six-month course on Linuxing in order

14:41

to, you know, set up this program that I

14:43

just want to use. Um, so it was a bit of

14:45

an unusual situation, but I but it was

14:47

enough for me to see the utility of it.

14:49

I could definitely see it.

14:52

I do think uh terminalheavy users are

14:56

probably where a lot of that is coming

14:58

from. The people who like the the scroll

15:00

wheel paste definitely.

15:02

>> I um

15:03

>> and and and I get it for that use case.

15:05

Again, it's just kind of like I could

15:07

actually see myself getting used to it

15:11

>> during certain workflows and potentially

15:13

wanting to switch back and forth. Um,

15:16

cuz again, I I like doing what you do

15:19

when I'm reading something really long

15:20

or trying to load a ton of comments or

15:22

or do whatever, which is a very common

15:24

thing for me on in a browser. I like to

15:26

just middle click, scroll down. Um,

15:29

>> or when you're done reading and you want

15:30

to go back up to the top and get to the

15:32

navigation,

15:32

>> whip right back up.

15:34

>> I like that scroll wheel stuff. So,

15:36

yeah. But, but I there are times where

15:39

like I've I've been like, "Okay, I think

15:40

I get it with liking scroll wheel

15:42

paste." uh because of needing to jump

15:44

back and forth between a bunch of

15:45

terminals. Um so yeah, I mean I if in my

15:50

perfect world I would have some funky

15:52

keybind where I could switch between the

15:54

two.

15:55

>> Hey Xfin 724 brings up something that

15:58

was actually driving me kind of nuts and

16:00

I could go look it up, but hey, why

16:02

don't we have it as a live conversation

16:04

on W show. What's up with controlV in

16:07

the terminal on Linux adding extra crap

16:09

to the beginning and end of what I

16:11

copied? Can someone explain that to me?

16:14

>> I thought

16:15

>> because if you right click paste it's

16:16

fine or if you middle click then it's

16:19

fine but if you controlV then there's

16:21

just a bunch of like [ __ ] in it and

16:23

I I don't understand that. Does anybody

16:25

know

16:28

>> it's uh [sighs]

16:30

yeah it's it's not paste. I remember

16:32

looking it up at one point in time

16:33

because but it's like extreme

16:35

>> you have to control shift V. No, I don't

16:37

want to because that's another key. Why

16:38

would I do that? Okay. No, someone

16:40

explain it to me in a way that like it

16:43

it it like has a purpose adding extra

16:45

crap to the thing that I'm pasting

16:47

because it does past C andrl +V were

16:49

assigned to system functions like

16:51

stopping active programs long before

16:53

graphic windows and clipboards existed.

16:55

So it's it's old stuff that has carried

16:58

forward

16:59

about terminal stuff for like a a long I

17:01

remember years ago.

17:03

>> Yeah. Like when I'm trying to exit a

17:05

program running on Windows, it's control

17:07

C to like stop the running execution.

17:09

>> Yeah.

17:10

>> Yeah.

17:10

>> Yeah. This is not a Linux unique thing.

17:12

>> Yeah.

17:13

>> Um it's just command lines.

17:15

>> It's older than copy and paste.

17:17

>> Interesting. All right.

17:18

>> It gets to win.

17:20

>> Yeah.

17:20

>> Interesting.

17:20

>> Yeah. I remember like I think I looked

17:22

this up when I was in like university.

17:24

I'm not talking like a couple years ago.

17:26

[laughter] Like a long time ago. So why

17:30

does it put

17:32

200 whatever till the some crap and then

17:36

till the like what function did that

17:38

serve

17:40

>> that I have I have no idea what you're

17:41

talking about to be honest

17:42

>> and if it doesn't serve a function then

17:45

could it just

17:47

>> not

17:49

I feel like that's the kind of thing

17:50

that there's got to be like it there's

17:52

got to be a way I could make Linus Linux

17:54

and that could be like the one thing I

17:56

change that be like my fork of like

17:59

Mint. It would it would just change

18:00

that. ControlV would just work in the

18:02

terminal [laughter] and then it would be

18:04

fine.

18:05

>> It could be a box in the settings that

18:08

you got to pick.

18:11

>> Yeah. Yeah. Mac OS users are just

18:14

freaking out for me even suggesting

18:16

that. [laughter]

18:18

>> Sorry guys.

18:19

>> I can hear them screaming.

18:22

>> Oh, that's amazing.

18:24

>> What the heck is an [clears throat]

18:25

option?

18:26

>> [laughter]

18:27

>> No.

18:30

[clears throat]

18:31

>> Anyways, uh should we talk about another

18:33

topic?

18:33

>> Yeah, sure. You want to pick one?

18:36

>> Yeah. I want to keep it kind of on topic

18:39

a bit though because I want to jump to

18:41

>> you show. Who are you and what have you

18:43

done with the WAN show? [laughter]

18:46

>> I've been I've been I've been around San

18:48

Francisco for too long. I want to talk

18:50

about uh AI.

18:52

>> Oh no, THEY GOT HIM. [laughter] THEY GOT

18:55

HIM.

18:57

LOOK HOW THEY MASSACRED my boy.

19:00

[laughter]

19:02

>> Um, it is it is, dude. I You know what?

19:05

Okay, we'll take a quick aside before we

19:06

go into there. We're back to normal

19:08

show.

19:08

>> WE'RE BACK.

19:09

>> WE'RE BACK, BABY. [laughter]

19:12

>> UM, it is so weird being here, man. Oh,

19:16

you like you drive around for a little

19:18

bit and all the billboards are like this

19:20

is the AI to rule all the AI. uh use

19:24

this for your CI/CD development

19:26

pipeline. Like it's where am I?

19:29

>> Even the airport there's always like an

19:30

alien space.

19:31

>> You walk through the airport and it's

19:32

like advertisements for like hosting

19:35

stuff and like

19:36

>> Yeah.

19:37

>> Like there was a there was a digital

19:38

ocean billboard.

19:40

>> Yeah.

19:40

>> Like

19:42

>> billboards, man. Sure thing, man.

19:44

>> Like there's there's probably a tiny

19:47

amount of people in BC at all that even

19:48

know what Digital Ocean is.

19:50

>> [laughter]

19:51

>> like, oh man, it's it's very interesting

19:54

being here. It's very like you are

19:56

palpably in nerdland. Uh oh, yeah,

19:59

brother.

19:59

>> Which is kind of cool, but it's a it's a

20:02

weird space. And then you're you're

20:03

driving around and you see like just

20:06

Adobe,

20:07

>> Oracle building.

20:09

>> Yeah.

20:09

>> Nvidia building. I remember the first

20:11

time like years ago the first time you

20:13

and I were down here I remember seeing

20:15

the Zinga building um and being like

20:18

what [laughter] like the Facebook game

20:21

company really I guess I guess they

20:23

would have a headquarters somewhere.

20:24

>> Why not here? I guess sure.

20:27

>> Anyways um okay back on topic uh Proton

20:32

11. Yeah,

20:34

>> Valve has released Proton 11, expanding

20:36

some game compatibility, which is

20:38

awesome. Uh, with certain titles,

20:40

including Uni Universe Generator, the

20:42

Golden Sword, DCS World Steam Edition,

20:45

that will get some more nerds over to

20:47

Linux for sure. Uh, Resident Evil,

20:49

Resident Evil 2, Dino Crisis, Dino

20:51

Crisis 2, From Dust, Metal Gear Survive,

20:53

Warhammer, Vermentide 2, Gothic 1

20:54

Classic,

20:56

and XPlane 12. What's a bigger deal is

20:58

it includes an integration to FEX FEX,

21:02

I'm not sure. Uh 2605

21:05

for ARM 64 EC. Oh, that's cool. Uh as

21:08

well as several core dependencies.

21:11

I'm going to call it FEX. Uh FEX is the

21:13

compatibility layer responsible for the

21:15

ability to play x86 games on ARM like we

21:18

talked about in our initial Steam Frame

21:20

coverage. That is exciting. So, I'm

21:25

going to say this because I don't know

21:27

anything yet. Um, but I hope that this

21:32

means Steam Frame is coming really soon.

21:35

Um,

21:36

>> oh, I didn't see this necessarily as a

21:37

time frame thing, but that makes sense.

21:39

>> Well, they recently started updating

21:41

some games with a works on frame badge.

21:45

Okay. Proton 11 is here with effects

21:48

update.

21:49

>> There's a new Steam uh VR UI update.

21:52

>> Yeah. So there things are like things

21:55

are firing like every week there's a new

21:58

um a new prerequisite for the Steam

22:01

Frame launch that seems to kind of land

22:04

and it's all kind of working its way up

22:06

to but a lot of the a lot of the initial

22:09

Steam Machine stuff seems to be mostly

22:11

resolved like they've got that red bar

22:13

thing um that's getting patched really

22:16

shortly. Uh, like we're the dust is

22:20

settling on Steam Machine and it looks

22:22

like we're gearing up for Steam Frame. I

22:24

am legit so excited for this thing. Uh,

22:29

once I actually know anything, then I

22:31

I'll have to I'll have to clam up, but I

22:33

don't have a shipping date. I don't have

22:35

an availability date. People keep asking

22:36

me, dude, it's crazy how much hype there

22:40

is about Steamframe. I literally Googled

22:43

Steam Frame release date rumor. I'm

22:47

gonna I'm gonna see if I can find this

22:49

again. Um

22:52

frame coming in July. Is this the one?

22:54

Hold on.

22:56

Uh no, this doesn't seem to be the one.

22:59

But I came across uh I came across a uh

23:02

a discussion on Reddit where something

23:06

was pretty strongly upvoted that it must

23:08

be coming pretty soon because Lionus had

23:12

marks on his face in a video that seemed

23:15

to be indicative of that he was wearing

23:19

the steam frame recently for testing.

23:21

I'm like, "Bro, I just had a mark on my

23:24

face. You need to calm down. I do not

23:26

have a steam frame." I think it was an

23:28

early release version of Steam Frame.

23:30

>> Yeah. Yeah, sure. Sure thing.

23:32

>> I think they're right. I think they're

23:33

right.

23:34

>> Sure. Sure thing.

23:37

>> Now, what about our information on

23:38

Halfife 3?

23:40

>> Yeah. Yeah, for sure.

23:41

>> Well, that's releasing on

23:47

>> um Okay. Are you pretending to be

23:49

looking current?

23:50

>> No. Uh Linus and Luke, how are your

23:53

current Linux experiences been going

23:56

since the Linux challenge? I think it's

23:57

actually been a while since we've talked

23:58

about this. Are you still

23:59

>> Okay, we should. But I found it. Hold on

24:01

one sec. [snorts]

24:02

>> Any rumors about YouTubers reviewing the

24:05

frame right now? This is from 8 days

24:06

ago. Are there currently any rumors

24:08

before the Steam? Okay,

24:10

>> I like how the questions not even are

24:11

the rumors true, just do they exist?

24:13

Like, people are so freaking hyped for

24:16

this thing.

24:18

>> I heard LTT has it and loves it. Uh I

24:22

also heard he's convincing Valve to wait

24:23

another month to stick it to the fans

24:25

like

24:27

Uh, only leak I found is Lionus having

24:29

some VR headset imprints on his

24:31

forehead. Might have been the Pimax

24:33

Dream Air. I It wasn't that either. Like

24:35

what what are you guys What are you guys

24:37

talking about? You're just the And to be

24:39

clear, like it's fine. Sure. Like, you

24:41

know, as far as rumors about me go,

24:43

those are pretty those are pretty tame.

24:45

>> Maybe it was the big screen Beyond 3. I

24:47

>> I Yeah, it must have been. Must have

24:48

been. I'm going to get my Big Screen

24:50

Beyond 3 before Luke even wears his Big

24:52

Screen Beyond 2. It's going to be great.

24:54

Um, but just like seeing how how rapidly

25:00

excited people are just to to talk about

25:02

this, just to even even meme and [ __ ]

25:05

post about it, like I I think I think

25:08

The Frame is going to completely eclipse

25:11

the already smash hit success of the

25:13

Steam Machine. Like Valve has another

25:16

winner on their hands here. This is

25:17

crazy.

25:18

>> Mhm.

25:21

>> Anyway, what are you going to But yeah.

25:22

Are you are you So are you still running

25:25

you still running Linux anywhere, bro?

25:27

>> Uh yeah. So I've been I've been I have

25:32

>> off of Pop OS. Well, it depends what you

25:34

mean.

25:35

>> I am running a Steam machine and I am

25:38

also dailying a Steam machine.

25:44

Yeah, see he's having a real hard time

25:45

with this. That's why I'm gonna remind

25:48

him oh

25:51

of an ad. Okay. No, I'm switching away

25:54

from that. I'm not endorsing roundup.

25:58

>> Yeah.

26:00

>> Why does the WAN account always get

26:02

Roundup ads? Oh, what is this? I got two

26:06

ads. Okay, we're going to have to buy

26:09

premium for the W show accounts. Don't

26:11

do that. I'm not spending money on that.

26:13

I use it once a week. It's fine.

26:17

Oh man, two unskipables. Get out of

26:19

here. Okay, so Jordan and Justin with

26:25

some guidance and a little bit of help

26:27

from me. This was a this was a team

26:29

effort uh alongside I think it was was

26:32

it Disappearing Inc. that flagged this

26:35

thing for us or was it FreeGeek? I don't

26:37

remember, but one of the local like like

26:40

computer antiquity/recycler

26:43

people. I'm pretty sure it was

26:44

Disappearing Inc. got their hands on one

26:46

of the original Steam machines that

26:49

Valve seated out to media, not including

26:52

us, but that's fine. I can wait. I'm

26:55

patient. And then we built like the

26:58

sickest little small form factor build

27:01

in it. Um, that ended up just oh man,

27:06

being so good. Like, it's so good. And

27:09

the specs are so good. I think we ended

27:12

up with what was it a 7800 X3D and then

27:15

a um

27:17

I want to say it was a 9070 or a 9070 XT

27:21

or something like that. So that's what

27:22

I'm actually using for my my daily

27:24

driver machine right now. I'm running

27:26

Steam OS. Uh it just gets like normal

27:30

Steam OS updates. Everything's working

27:31

great. The only thing that I don't have

27:34

that a Steam machine has is I don't have

27:37

the built-in dongle for the Steam

27:39

controller. But frankly, I don't really

27:41

care about that. I I like the Steam

27:43

controller for what it is. I think that

27:45

Valve did an outstanding job of

27:46

executing on their vision for it, but

27:49

it's not something that I need at my

27:50

desk where I already have a keyboard and

27:51

mouse. It's just not necessary for me.

27:53

So, I don't care about that. And then it

27:55

also doesn't have support for CC, but

27:57

I'm using it as a desktop PC anyway, so

27:59

that also doesn't matter for me. So,

28:01

it's way more powerful. It's louder. Um,

28:04

but that doesn't matter because remember

28:06

I have fiber optic cabling running

28:07

through my home. So I just put it in the

28:09

basement and then I don't have to look

28:10

at it or think about it or listen to it.

28:12

It's just it's just a a pristine

28:15

immaculate Steam OS experience and I am

28:17

freaking loving it. It's a Steam machine

28:19

but faster and better and uh and I' I've

28:22

been

28:22

>> How was the install of Steam OS?

28:24

>> Uh it was kind of a pain in the butt but

28:26

I didn't have to do it. Jordan did it.

28:27

That machine has literally just been

28:29

sitting there ready for me and uh and

28:33

I'm I'm loving it. So, for the first

28:35

week of my daily driving steam machine

28:38

challenge, I was actually carrying my

28:40

steam machine in my backpack to and from

28:42

work so that it was the only computer I

28:44

was using. And then I wanted to like

28:47

ride my motorcycle one day and I was

28:48

like, it's such a pain with the steam

28:51

machine cuz it's like it's like on your

28:52

back and my the posture on my bike is

28:54

like

28:56

>> Yeah. Yeah.

28:57

>> Yeah. It's It's not comfortable to have

28:58

a ton of weight on your back. And I

28:59

already have my tech sack in my bag and

29:01

I was like, "Oh, I really don't want to

29:02

wait. Why am I doing this? I should just

29:06

have Steam Machine at home."

29:08

>> Cuz now now you're it's it's almost less

29:10

of dailying Steam Machine now. It's more

29:12

just dailying Steam OS.

29:13

>> Yeah. And I And I spent the first week

29:15

>> still spending a lot of time with Steam

29:17

Machine. Yeah, for

29:17

>> sure. I still spent the first week only

29:19

with the Steam Machine, which did make

29:21

me notice some things I missed in my

29:23

review.

29:24

>> Yeah. And and honestly, I think, you

29:26

know, Steam OS is the truly interesting

29:29

part of this whole situation in my

29:31

opinion. So, like that seems fine%. But

29:34

>> yeah, that's wicked. Yeah.

29:37

>> Yeah. I was like, especially after

29:39

hearing your feedback about it, I was

29:41

pretty tempted to get one, but man,

29:43

they're so expensive and I kind of

29:46

wanted like a little bit more power.

29:48

>> Yeah. And I I'm kind of in the just use

29:53

the OS, build your own computer again

29:56

camp. So

29:58

>> CEC is an interesting thing because you

30:01

have a desktop computer. So there ain't

30:03

no way you're planning to use your Steam

30:05

OS machine as your desktop. I'm thinking

30:07

this would be a console, right?

30:08

>> Yeah. Home theater. Yeah. So, um, we're

30:11

actually sourcing pretty much every CEC

30:15

adapter that we can get our hands on

30:17

right now for Short Circuit because I

30:20

really want to solve this once and for

30:22

all in my theater room. I'm playing

30:25

around right now with the CEC adapter

30:27

that Jordan got for this video um, that

30:31

we did not get working properly on Steam

30:34

OS at the time. It works pretty well on

30:37

Windows for me,

30:39

but it's like it's not a silver bullet

30:42

either. Like I ran into a situation

30:45

where something I'd never heard of

30:47

before called a CEC storm was causing my

30:50

computer to wake up when other devices

30:53

were chatting over CEC. So, it turns out

30:56

it's a it's a really weird architecture.

30:58

It's like it's like a ring topology or

31:00

something or it's like it's more like a

31:03

it's less like a switching uh

31:05

architecture and it's more like a hub

31:07

architecture where it just like blasts

31:09

out and then if the right hits the right

31:14

fan then gets real. Like it's just CEC

31:18

is a mess. It's an absolute mess. And so

31:22

I'm I'm still kind of struggling with

31:24

it. And and every device has different

31:27

degrees of customizability and control.

31:31

Like a device that does it really well

31:32

is the Nvidia Shield. It lets you really

31:35

get in there and say, "Okay, allow this

31:37

device to turn on other devices. Allow

31:40

other devices to turn on this device.

31:42

Wake other devices when this one turns

31:44

on. Wake this device when other devices

31:47

turn on. Or don't do those things. You

31:49

can you can configure all of those with

31:51

a pretty significant degree of

31:52

granularity. But then my AV receiver is

31:55

just like CC ON

31:58

CC OFF.

32:01

[snorts] What does that mean? And you

32:03

can't tell it on which inputs and

32:05

outputs. It's just easy. [screaming]

32:08

[laughter]

32:09

Like you got to be kidding me. You guys

32:11

do this for a living.

32:13

This box costs like $4,000. Are Have you

32:16

Have you gone mad?

32:21

So, it's just it's pretty um yeah, it's

32:23

pretty annoying. Uh Sharf 2K says, "Just

32:26

use the Silverstone key fob." Shaf 2K,

32:29

tell me you're not married without

32:30

telling me you're not married. Like,

32:33

it's got to be kid-friendly. It's got to

32:36

be like the wife and the girls want to

32:38

watch a movie. Otherwise, literally, no

32:41

one will use it. That's the whole point

32:45

of CEC is that it took this whole crappy

32:48

multi- remote thing and solved it except

32:53

that it's a giant piece of [ __ ] Um,

32:58

man, what a life goal that would be to

33:01

like fix CEC.

33:04

If someone wants to do that, like I'll

33:07

invest. I'm gonna say it right now. If

33:10

you can give me like a credible plan and

33:13

like like show you've done the work, I I

33:15

think I'm in. I think that could be my

33:17

third investment.

33:20

Crystal says, you know, girls can figure

33:22

that out. Um I'm I'm I'm going to let

33:25

you in on a little secret, Crystal. It's

33:27

not that they can't figure it out. It's

33:29

just that most of them don't give a [ __ ]

33:31

and don't want to in my life. And I got

33:35

to I got to work around the people in my

33:37

life. I can't change what people what

33:39

people are and what they're interested

33:41

in and what their preferences are.

33:43

>> They have the intelligence to do so.

33:45

They just don't

33:47

>> those particular ones don't care.

33:49

>> That's right. And in general, if our

33:51

demographics are anything to go by,

33:53

they're not they're not weird freaks.

33:55

So, we do need to have solutions for

33:57

people who don't care and don't want to

33:59

figure this stuff out and don't want to

34:00

deal with multiple remotes. It's it's

34:03

just that simple. I I I know some people

34:05

do care, but I don't get to pick. And I

34:08

know the names and I know the

34:09

preferences of everybody my wife would

34:11

have over for a girls night, and none of

34:13

them include determining which HDMI

34:15

input is correct. Literally zero.

34:19

They're not interested. And so, so I got

34:22

to, you know, I that that's the thing.

34:24

That's how that's how consideration

34:27

works, right? Is I don't the golden rule

34:29

is not really that great. you know, do

34:32

unto others as you would have others do

34:34

unto you. It's like, no, actually, do

34:36

unto others as they would have you do

34:38

unto them. Like, that's the that's the

34:40

right way.

34:41

>> As a reminder, just in case people get

34:43

confused, he's talking about the the

34:45

women in his life.

34:47

>> Of course.

34:47

>> Yeah.

34:48

>> Of course.

34:50

>> And also the demographics on the

34:52

channel. Again, it's not like it's not a

34:54

great

34:54

>> Doesn't mean there's zero.

34:56

>> Doesn't mean there's zero.

34:57

>> Not as common,

34:58

>> but it means the odds. It means the the

35:01

odds are and remember I mentioned like

35:03

my kids too and some kids are super

35:05

techsavvy too and don't mind

35:08

>> Emma's better with the TV than I am cuz

35:10

I watch so little TV.

35:12

>> That actually doesn't surprise me at

35:14

all.

35:15

>> Yeah.

35:15

>> Not one bit, Luke.

35:17

>> Yeah.

35:19

>> Like I I would be [laughter]

35:21

I would actually be surprised if you

35:23

could even find the TV remote in your

35:25

house.

35:26

>> Uh

35:26

>> do you know where she keeps it? The only

35:29

reason why I can is because she got this

35:31

really cool manipulatable like sculpture

35:34

of two hands that where you can move the

35:36

fingers and she has it like positioned

35:38

so that the remote like beautifully gets

35:41

held by the hands.

35:42

>> Holy [ __ ]

35:44

I just had the coolest idea.

35:49

Okay. No. No. Wait.

35:51

>> Oh boy.

35:51

>> Hear me out. Okay. You know how Ivonne

35:53

does like craft night sometimes?

35:56

>> Okay.

35:57

>> Okay. You know those things that you can

35:59

do like with kids or like as a couple

36:02

where you create like a mold of your

36:04

hands and then you like you put plaster

36:07

in it and you like make your hands. You

36:09

and Emma should make your hands like

36:12

like a next level one of those

36:14

>> holding a TV remote

36:16

>> HOLDING FOR THE REMOTE [laughter] CUZ

36:18

cuz that way that way you could have

36:20

like a like a piece of decor that's also

36:24

like a like a special like memory thing

36:28

and then Yeah. And then Yeah. Luke can

36:29

and then Luke can find the remote.

36:31

That'd be Dude, that'd be so freaking

36:33

cool.

36:34

>> Uh yeah, I mean it sounds like a fun

36:37

craft night. I I I just feel like

36:39

>> I knew we were going to get Luke to

36:41

craft night at some point. [laughter]

36:44

>> I have to be there cuz my hand has to be

36:45

molded. That's clever. Um I I was going

36:48

to say like it's it's I feel like she

36:51

would just immediately use the like Oh,

36:53

if I ask where the remote is, she's

36:54

like, "It's in your hand."

36:56

>> Nice. That's hilarious.

36:58

>> Yeah,

36:58

>> that's great. You're already holding it,

36:59

smart guy. [laughter]

37:03

>> That's not bad. All right. Yeah, sure.

37:05

That sounds fun. Uh,

37:06

>> just be happy that she didn't ask you to

37:08

mold your butt.

37:11

>> Where's the remote? [snorts]

37:16

>> Okay, that would be a pretty funny

37:17

remote holder, too. Just like a cheek

37:20

that that [laughter] fits

37:26

[laughter]

37:26

>> just on the side table. Just a pair of

37:29

cheeks.

37:29

>> You know what? You know what that could

37:30

end up being is like a a um like a dirty

37:35

cooking spoon holder.

37:37

>> Oh yeah.

37:39

Yeah.

37:39

>> Just a It like shrinks down.

37:42

>> That'd be sick.

37:44

Oh, dude. Okay. So, we make like instead

37:48

of just doing like sentimental hand

37:50

things, we make like we make like hand

37:52

things that do stuff.

37:55

>> Yeah.

37:56

>> Oh,

37:56

>> yeah. Okay.

37:57

>> It's actually not bad. I'm I'm actually

37:59

I'm actually messaging Ivonne now.

38:01

>> I'm messaging Ivonne.

38:03

>> Okay. All right. You want to pick a You

38:05

want to pick a new topic?

38:06

>> I I just wanted to say I realized while

38:08

sitting here saying that like, "Oh,

38:10

yeah. I'd rather kind of build my own

38:12

steam machine just to make it a little

38:13

bit stronger that this finally gives me

38:15

an excuse to build in a Fractal Terra.

38:18

This isn't in no way sponsored by

38:20

Fractal, but I I always loved the

38:22

Fractal North and the Fractal Terra's.

38:24

Super cool. And the green fractal terra

38:27

with the wood accent is just like

38:30

>> Yeah, that looks nice.

38:31

>> Beautiful.

38:33

And has that, you know, appeal that we

38:36

were just talking about. Like I think

38:38

Emma would be much more okay with one of

38:39

these sitting in the the home theater

38:43

like center console thing than uh most

38:47

other options. It's so funny how the the

38:49

Terra with wood accents went from being

38:52

like unique to being the case that

38:55

everyone buys. I had actually built in

38:57

like four of them before I even realized

39:00

that I had built in four of them just

39:01

cuz everyone in their dog was picking

39:03

them for their ultimate upgrades.

39:05

>> Oh yeah, that makes sense.

39:06

>> It's a really nice case.

39:07

>> So cool. Yeah,

39:09

>> it's a great case

39:10

>> and I love the North, but the North is

39:12

huge. Um

39:15

so I don't want it in this case. I I I

39:18

generally don't mind computers that are

39:19

decently large, but like at the home

39:22

theater setup, man, no. If I can avoid

39:24

it, no.

39:25

>> Yeah. No, you don't want you don't want

39:27

something that big for like a living

39:29

room. It's like what are you in college

39:31

still? Like, come on.

39:32

>> Yeah.

39:33

>> Even with the wood accents, it's just

39:35

it's not for it doesn't go in the living

39:37

room. If it was next to a computer desk

39:39

that is in a shared space, 100% valid.

39:43

>> But I've got one as my workstation PC.

39:45

You can't put a giant thing like that.

39:47

It ain't going in the living room.

39:48

>> No.

39:49

>> Hell no.

39:50

>> Beautiful case though.

39:52

>> But yeah, I agreed. Anyways, okay. You

39:53

said next topic.

39:55

>> Um,

39:58

let's see. Well, okay. Yeah. What? What?

40:01

No. No. No. I'm not going to do it. I

40:04

don't even understand why it's in the

40:05

doc, so I'm not going to

40:06

>> No. Do it. Do it. Do it.

40:07

>> No. I want to know.

40:07

>> Do it. Come on.

40:08

>> Okay. Cuz I'm confused, but I haven't

40:10

read the whole topic. Intel releases

40:12

major driver update for Windows 11. How

40:14

is this? How is this a bland topic?

40:16

>> This is a land topic.

40:18

>> Intel released new Wi-Fi and Bluetooth

40:20

drivers. Wow. That include enhancements

40:23

aligned with wind Microsoft's driver

40:25

quality initiative initiative or DQI.

40:28

>> Yeah.

40:29

>> Microsoft recently told Intel, AMD,

40:31

Qualcomm, and other partners that

40:32

drivers need to stop hurting Windows

40:34

11's reliability and reputation down.

40:37

>> Yeah, we talked about this on W show.

40:41

>> I do remember this now. DQI is

40:42

Microsoft's attempt to raise the floor.

40:44

It includes Microsoft authored class

40:47

drivers. Uh,

40:49

>> less unnecessary kernel mode

40:51

interference and more user mode drivers

40:52

where possible. This is good.

40:55

>> That is good.

40:56

>> This is real progress. This is actual

40:58

shipping drivers from Intel that are

41:01

designed to make Windows 11 less of a

41:03

steaming pile of This is good.

41:05

>> No, that is good. Okay. Yeah, sure.

41:07

>> That was it. I just want to

41:08

>> So the so the the the point of note is

41:10

that

41:10

>> someone actually did it.

41:12

>> Yeah.

41:12

>> Which is great.

41:13

>> Real action that matters.

41:15

>> Concrete action is happening and it's

41:18

fast. I mean they announced this driver

41:20

quality initiative what like a couple

41:21

months ago or something like that.

41:22

>> Yeah. That was pretty quick.

41:23

>> So we are already getting it's it's the

41:26

only question is why did it take you so

41:29

long Microsoft to care about this? You

41:30

know no I'm not going to dwell on the

41:32

past. Good job progress. Okay. Sorry. Go

41:34

ahead Luke.

41:35

>> Good job progress. Also, we figured out

41:36

what you're tracking, so see you later.

41:39

Um,

41:41

[snorts]

41:44

you know, the the DQI group probably had

41:47

no idea. I don't know. You know, maybe

41:50

they're cool. [clears throat]

41:52

>> Companies like that. It's

41:54

>> yeah, you'll get these groups or these

41:56

individuals that really do have the best

41:58

intentions and like really deeply care

42:00

about the user experience

42:02

>> and then I'm sure they are reading stuff

42:04

like that over on Windows latest

42:07

>> and making the exact same face that we

42:09

are. Like what what is even the point of

42:12

the good work that I'm doing over here

42:14

when you're going to go and do that with

42:15

it? Like come on, man.

42:18

>> Yeah.

42:20

Um, hotspot temperature sensor on

42:22

Nvidia's Blackwell GPUs is still

42:25

accessible if you have access to

42:26

Nvidia's internal mods tool.

42:29

>> Okay, since that headline was written,

42:32

uh, this has gotten a little bit more

42:34

complicated.

42:35

>> Uh, let me do the read for this one just

42:37

in case they missed something. When the

42:38

RTX50 series came out, reviewers noticed

42:42

that hotspot temperatures were missing

42:44

from tools like Hardware Info and MSI

42:46

Afterburner. And while it looked like

42:48

Nvidia had gotten rid of the feature,

42:51

like it was no longer reported by the

42:53

die, turns out the sensor was still

42:56

there, it just wasn't accessible through

42:59

the usual software. Well, Paulo Gomez, I

43:03

assume, a Brazilian repair technician

43:06

and YouTuber, investigated a customer's

43:08

Gigabyte RTX 570 Ti that was

43:11

mysteriously throttling despite showing

43:13

normal GPU temperatures in Windows. In

43:17

Linux, Gomez was able to use Nvidia's

43:19

internal mods, so modular diagnostic

43:23

software, to discover the hidden hotspot

43:26

sensor was hitting 107° C, even though

43:29

the standard tools reported only around

43:31

68° C average GPU temperatures. And this

43:36

was exactly why enthusiasts cared so

43:39

much about being able to access hotspot

43:42

temperatures because it would reveal if

43:44

a bad mount or a bad pace job was making

43:48

it so that overall the die was cool

43:50

enough but the hottest zones the the

43:54

most compute intensive parts of the chip

43:56

were overheating. He disassembled the

43:59

card found poor thermal paste coverage.

44:01

Okay. Yeah, there you go. So that's

44:02

exactly what I was talking about. He

44:04

reapplied the paste and confirmed that

44:06

the hotspot temperature dropped and the

44:08

throttling disappeared. Uh Lionus

44:11

comment. Oh, okay. So, they did put that

44:12

in here. Uh this seems to have been

44:14

starting to make its way into regular

44:17

tools. So, I think hardware info 50

44:21

series hotspot. Hold on. I'm just going

44:22

to Google this live.

44:25

I think yes, hardware info. This is two

44:28

days ago. according to video cards adds

44:31

RTX50 hotspot temperature reporting,

44:34

RTSS can display it now, too.

44:38

So, I'm a little frustrated because

44:41

while I'm not sure that Nvidia ever said

44:44

formally that it was removed, they

44:47

certainly didn't do anything to

44:53

correct the speculation that it had been

44:56

removed. Um, and it's a really useful

45:00

tool

45:02

>> for for diagnosing, especially if you're

45:04

if you're doing aftermarket cooling,

45:06

like mounting something like a full

45:07

coverage water block can can be a little

45:10

bit hazardous because there's so many

45:14

surface level components like it'll

45:17

it'll directly it'll directly cover uh,

45:19

you know, with thermal pads. Although

45:21

again, that's a great example of why

45:23

this matters cuz if you have too thick

45:24

of a thermal pad, right, it's making

45:26

contact with all these other components

45:27

on the board like your memory modules uh

45:30

with your uh VRM. And if you screw up

45:34

something or you put on too thick of a

45:35

thermal pad or you don't tighten

45:37

something down enough, it can contact

45:40

the die enough. Remember, this is a

45:42

water block, so it's moving heat away

45:44

really fast. So it can contact the die

45:46

enough to carry heat away, but it can

45:49

not be in good contact with one small

45:52

area that could be a very crucial spot

45:54

that you know uh like Paul like Paulo

45:57

saw that could cause the car to thermal

46:00

throttle. And if we don't have access to

46:01

that temperature sensor, then we have no

46:03

way of that knowing if that's happening.

46:05

So taking away useful tools that help us

46:10

diagnose hardware is just like

46:13

not cool.

46:15

>> Apparently roughly twoish years ago, um

46:21

Roman from Derbau asked Nvidia about it

46:24

not being there anymore and got a

46:27

response of saying it was no longer

46:29

accurate

46:30

and no longer relevant.

46:33

He obviously, you know,

46:37

had thoughts about that, but that was

46:40

what they said.

46:42

>> Oh man.

46:45

Yeah, there's some comments saying

46:47

effectively exactly this, but I had the

46:49

thought of like, man, telling telling

46:51

Derbower that some thermal measurement

46:53

doesn't matter is a

46:55

wonder if they knew who he was.

46:57

[laughter]

46:58

>> I mean, if it's not accurate, then

47:01

that's one thing.

47:02

But this this proves though that they're

47:06

taking action on the behavior of the GPU

47:10

based on this number.

47:12

>> Yeah.

47:13

>> Well, okay. Which one is it, Nvidia? Is

47:16

it inaccurate and irrelevant or is it

47:19

actionable? Because it cannot be both.

47:22

>> There's a lot of speculation.

47:23

>> Yeah.

47:25

>> But it makes sense to me. Uh but it is

47:27

still obviously speculation saying that

47:30

maybe you know the the modern cards run

47:32

really hot and maybe it would have been

47:34

bad for

47:36

um perceptions or sales or or marketing

47:40

or whatever to have these hotspot

47:42

sensors blasting out crazy high numbers.

47:44

>> Bad for marketing is the only real

47:46

reason that I can think of for them to

47:49

>> no longer relevant

47:52

to the interest of selling more graphics

47:53

cards.

47:56

maybe not no longer relevant to the

47:58

user.

48:00

>> I see.

48:00

>> But yeah, I this is just one thing I

48:02

found. I don't know if they've had a

48:03

more recent statement on that.

48:05

>> I think everyone just kind of accepted

48:07

it and moved on.

48:08

>> Moved on. Yeah.

48:09

>> Well, either way, I'm glad to see that

48:11

this is out in the open now because it's

48:14

a very useful tool.

48:19

Mhm.

48:23

>> Speaking of useful tools. Oh, never

48:26

mind. I will do this after. Um, but it's

48:31

really cool. I'll tell you in a minute.

48:32

First, I'm supposed to do the CW

48:34

announcement.

48:36

D.

48:38

This week, we launched the investment

48:41

disclosure t-shirt. Oh boy. How do I I'm

48:44

not going to be able to screen share.

48:45

And also,

48:47

there it is. It's the one I'm wearing.

48:50

It's pretty cool. It's designed to save

48:53

me time and effort because if I just

48:56

wear this shirt, then surely uh the

48:58

investment disclosure will be all done.

49:01

Amazing.

49:01

>> You going to do that?

49:02

>> Uh no, no, I'm still going to try and

49:04

remember. I just I very occasionally do

49:07

forget. So,

49:08

>> yeah.

49:08

>> Uh we were like, haha, why don't we just

49:10

do a shirt that's like investment

49:13

disclosure and then if you forget, then

49:15

whatever. This is great. [laughter]

49:19

went and got a framework laptop for the

49:21

shoot. Anywh who, uh, now available

49:23

ltdstore.com. Printed on our classic

49:26

poly blend te soft, breathable, everyday

49:28

fit, high quality print that lasts. Uh,

49:30

this is a shirt about investment

49:31

disclosure. That's it. That's the bit.

49:36

Fantastic. Uh, thank you CW team. And if

49:39

you guys were looking for an excuse to

49:41

pick one up, then hey, while we're live

49:45

is a great time to do it. All you got to

49:47

do is add an item to your cart and

49:49

you'll see checkout messages. These are

49:51

the way to interact with the WAN show.

49:54

We don't do Twitch bits or super chats

49:55

or anything like that because we think

49:57

when you throw money at your screen, you

49:59

should get highquality merchandise and

50:01

apparel in return, not just, you know,

50:05

internet peen. So, when you go ahead and

50:08

enter your message here and check out,

50:10

it will go to producer Dan. There he is.

50:13

who will curate your message or who will

50:16

reply to it or who will pop it up on the

50:19

stream. Uh, do you want to show them

50:20

what it looks like when you curate it,

50:21

Dan?

50:22

>> Yeah, sure. I u Well, I mean, I can't

50:24

show it to them, but I can demonstrate

50:26

it.

50:27

>> Nice. I think solid.

50:29

>> Hi, DL. What's something the audience

50:31

thinks is easy about running LMG? That's

50:33

actually quite hard. And conversely,

50:35

what looks hard, but is easy. P.S. UV

50:37

hoodie so good in UK Heatwave. more

50:40

colors, please.

50:42

>> Scheduling. Uh, scheduling is is by far

50:48

the least intuitively difficult or in

50:51

intuitive difficulty aspect of LMG, like

50:55

all the moving pieces, camera operators,

50:58

uh, you know, getting the getting the

51:00

the hardware, you know, tested and in

51:03

the right place with the right software

51:06

loaded on it. Um, like a perfect example

51:09

is this. This is the Razer Fold. We shot

51:11

a short circuit for this today. And

51:14

compared to when we used to do a short

51:16

circuit for our phone a couple of years

51:18

ago, like back then, we would just have

51:20

the phone, it would come in and it would

51:23

just like appear on set and then when we

51:26

sat down to shoot the video, it would

51:28

like not be set up. It wouldn't be

51:30

logged into the Wi-Fi. So you'd waste

51:33

like 20 minutes just dinking around like

51:37

signing into Google accounts or in some

51:39

cases it wouldn't have any battery left.

51:42

Um so you'd have to like plug it in and

51:44

wait around for it to charge or like go

51:46

shoot something else. So getting all

51:48

those all those little pieces um

51:51

pre-organized like nowadays

51:54

when this phone arrives on set it's

51:56

signed in, it's connected to the Wi-Fi.

51:59

It's got a couple apps on it that you

52:01

might want to run. Like if you decide to

52:02

run a game on it, it has like Fortnite

52:04

on it so that we can just, you know,

52:06

have some over the shoulder gaming, you

52:08

know, to to cut in while we talk about

52:10

our uh like our gaming performance

52:12

measurements and stuff like that. Um I

52:15

think that's the I think that's the

52:16

biggest challenge that people kind of

52:19

take for granted and it's always in

52:21

flux. It's always thrown for a loop.

52:24

Like a perfect example of this would be

52:26

when our Steam machine arrived. We we

52:28

had a bunch of other stuff on the go,

52:30

but it just arrived. Like brands do not

52:34

consider that maybe you have a life.

52:39

You just you're just I don't know.

52:42

You're just a thing.

52:43

>> And they might be right, but like come

52:45

on, bro.

52:47

>> You don't have to tell me like that. You

52:48

send it over and magically content

52:53

appears and that's all they kind of

52:56

know. A lot of them, some of some are

52:58

really good. Others just completely kind

53:01

of take what you do for granted and the

53:03

difficulties of what you do for granted.

53:05

It's like, well, we did all the hard

53:06

work. We made the product. All you have

53:07

to do is glaze it. Like, come on. How

53:10

how long could that take? Right. Um,

53:15

so that's um, yeah, I'm going to go with

53:17

that. I'm going to go with that. Yeah.

53:19

So, we just had to drop everything we

53:20

were doing so that we could put together

53:22

and execute on a content plan for Steam

53:24

Machine. And actually, I don't think

53:25

I've said this publicly yet, but like

53:28

bravo to our team like putting that

53:31

together. We had one Steam Machine.

53:33

Sometimes for like a really big launch,

53:36

we're we managed to get our hands on

53:37

more than one so that like labs can be

53:40

testing it while we're shooting the

53:41

short circuit unboxing and then it can

53:43

that one can make its way to someone to

53:45

have like, you know, the experiential

53:47

daily driving experience with it and

53:49

then we get the labs numbers in and then

53:51

that one goes in for B-roll while the

53:53

host is holding the other one for

53:54

A-roll. Like when you have a lot going

53:56

on, it can be really useful to have more

53:57

than one. But we managed to get a short

53:59

for LT, a long form for LT, a follow-up

54:02

long form where we did like a Steam

54:04

Machine killer and compared it against

54:05

it for LTT, and a short and a long form

54:08

short circuit. All like within a day or

54:11

two of launch. It was pretty crazy. The

54:13

team did an outstanding job.

54:15

>> Yeah, Chad has a good question. Why is

54:17

the smiley face in disclosure like

54:21

dead or something?

54:23

>> I don't know. Don't worry about it.

54:25

Don't overthink it. [laughter]

54:27

Okay.

54:28

>> Why is this a dollar sign? Who knows?

54:29

It's a mystery.

54:30

>> Also, when when did Well, I mean, that

54:33

would make sense.

54:33

>> Strongs.

54:34

>> Uh why why did the um

54:38

when was this first released on the

54:40

store?

54:41

>> Today.

54:43

>> Wow. I think am I reading this right?

54:45

Your regular large is already sold out.

54:48

Uh,

54:51

I don't know.

54:55

Maybe.

54:59

Good chat.

55:01

>> Nice.

55:02

>> Nice. How about another

55:04

>> uh Oh, not on the global store. Large is

55:06

in stock on the global store.

55:07

>> I'm on the global store.

55:09

>> Okay. I don't know then.

55:11

>> It says it will not be restocked.

55:14

Oh, it won't be restocked, but that

55:16

doesn't mean they're all gone. I think

55:18

>> it doesn't say they won't be restocked

55:20

on everything.

55:22

>> Um, all right. Well, I will flag that

55:25

for the team.

55:27

>> Okay,

55:28

>> good chat.

55:29

>> Nice.

55:30

>> Nice.

55:30

>> All right, Dan.

55:32

>> Uh, oh, yeah. This one's for Luke.

55:35

>> Yo,

55:35

>> what exhibit or creator are you most

55:38

excited to see this year at Open Sauce?

55:40

Did you bring anything to show off

55:42

yourself? hoping to be there Sunday

55:44

myself.

55:45

>> I didn't bring anything to show off

55:46

myself, but the creator warehouse team

55:48

is here and they brought um some cool

55:50

stuff.

55:51

>> Fire.

55:52

>> They brought Yeah, they brought some

55:53

pretty sick stuff. They they brought I

55:55

think uh two different super large

55:59

screwdrivers. I think they might both be

56:01

3x scale. I'm not sure. I think one of

56:03

them is a translucent one and one of

56:05

them is the just normal screwdriver. Uh

56:08

they also brought my favorite thing that

56:10

they brought really is they have like

56:13

the history of the the normal standard

56:17

screwdriver, the scribe driver,

56:20

>> the pen,

56:21

>> a pen. Uh and then also the precision

56:23

screwdriver. Um and they have those on

56:26

like big boards where you can see the

56:28

different prototype versions along the

56:29

way.

56:30

>> And not pictures of them like they have

56:32

>> the actual ones.

56:33

>> Yeah. They have the They have the like

56:36

the like lathed out shaft that Sebastian

56:40

put a plastic like generic pen top on

56:43

and just taped it on.

56:45

>> It's

56:45

>> the like proof of concept.

56:46

>> I had never seen that before. I saw that

56:48

today. That prototype is actually sick.

56:51

>> It's the actual It's the actual one that

56:54

he handed me

56:56

>> and said, "Hey, what do you think?"

56:58

>> Yeah.

56:58

>> Which is pretty cool. It's the one.

57:01

There was not two. Yeah, very cool.

57:03

>> Yeah, they're there. They're literally

57:05

physically there. So, like if you talk

57:06

to them about it, they might even like

57:07

pull it out and kind of show you more up

57:09

close and stuff. Uh so that's wicked.

57:11

They have some of the actual engineers

57:13

there. Um

57:15

uh which is which is cool cuz you can

57:17

talk to them. It kind of fits the theme

57:19

of the show a little bit. And then

57:20

they're selling a shirt and the like

57:23

nuclear

57:25

green UV reactive screwdriver. And then

57:28

they have some deal going on. I don't

57:30

remember the exact details. I think it's

57:32

if you spend over 50 bucks, you get a

57:34

coupon for free shipping on the store.

57:37

And the reason why they did that would

57:39

totally makes sense to me. They didn't

57:41

want to bring down every freaking

57:42

product we have because that's kind of

57:44

unfeasible.

57:45

>> It's like a thousand SKs or something. I

57:46

forget what

57:47

>> So they were like, "Okay, well we'll

57:48

make it so you can like

57:51

kind of have shopped everything by, you

57:54

know, you can just get free shipping

57:55

instead." Um, so that was a cool seemed

57:59

like a pretty smart idea. Um yeah, so I

58:02

I did not personally bring anything but

58:05

LMG did through through C creator

58:07

warehouse. Um

58:11

particular booth or particular creator

58:13

I'm excited to meet. Honestly, every

58:15

year I meet random new creators that

58:18

I've never heard of sometimes that are

58:20

like massive. Like gone is the time

58:23

where as like a casual YouTube viewer

58:26

you would just know the top 100

58:27

YouTubers. like not only does is the top

58:31

100 YouTubers completely irrelevant to

58:32

me at this point in time [laughter]

58:34

but because who cares but but also

58:37

there's like huge creators doing amazing

58:39

things that I've just never heard of all

58:41

the time and I spend a lot of time on

58:42

YouTube and there's not huge creators

58:44

doing amazing things that I've never

58:45

heard of. So I just have fun meeting

58:48

people doing cool stuff on YouTube. Um,

58:51

in terms of favorite booth, my favorite

58:53

area tends to be the like hobbyest

58:55

rocketry area. Um, which apparently NASA

59:00

is just here officially this year. Uh,

59:03

and they brought heat shielding from I

59:05

think it's Artemis 1 and Artemis 2,

59:08

which is like super cool. So, I'm

59:09

excited to check that out. Yeah, usually

59:11

it's the like rocketry stuff. Last year

59:14

there was a really really cool booth

59:15

where you played Counterstrike but they

59:17

made it so that a bunch of the grenade

59:19

effects were had like a real life

59:22

equivalent

59:24

things and smoke machines and

59:27

flashbangs. Yeah.

59:29

>> Yeah, that was that was a lot of fun. Um

59:32

they they did like the inverse for an

59:34

incendiary grenade. So if you walked

59:36

into an incender grenade they would

59:37

spray water on you. [laughter]

59:40

Um, I if I remember correctly, if you

59:42

walked into a smoke grenade, it would

59:44

shoot a leaf blower in your face and you

59:46

had to like deal with that. Um, what was

59:48

Flashbang? Do you remember Flashbang?

59:50

>> There's a big strobe light like xenon

59:52

discharge pulse.

59:52

>> It's this crazy light that like makes it

59:54

difficult to look at your screen. That

59:56

was fun. Um, but yeah, man. I I don't

59:58

know. I I think it's impossible to like

60:02

look forward to anything in particular

60:04

at Open Sauce other than just Open

60:06

Sauce. Um, it's just so different every

60:08

time. I've never been. This will be my

60:10

first one.

60:11

>> I think you'll have fun if you can move

60:13

at all. You might want to bring like

60:15

some form of uh disguise for your face.

60:19

There are multiple creators that do that

60:20

here. I'm not kidding.

60:22

>> Really? Yeah.

60:23

>> There's just a ton of fans around,

60:24

right?

60:24

>> You won't be able to go anywhere.

60:26

>> Yeah.

60:27

>> I don't even really like do like maker

60:29

stuff as much.

60:30

>> No, but this is

60:31

>> It's not going to matter. I can't move.

60:33

>> Yeah.

60:33

>> Oh,

60:34

>> yeah. You're You're not going to be able

60:36

to move. [laughter] You You might want

60:37

You might want to bring something.

60:39

[clears throat]

60:39

>> I need to be able to move. I'm down. I'm

60:41

down for just the one day. We're

60:42

shooting a video. We actually have kind

60:44

of a fun uh we have kind of a fun video

60:46

concept.

60:46

>> It's going to be like a like a break my

60:49

cable

60:50

>> sort of concept and not like like use a

60:52

hammer. No, no, no, no, no. Relax. It's

60:54

okay. Um but basically, I'm going to go

60:56

find cool the coolest stuff I can find

60:59

that people brought that needs a USB

61:02

cable. And then I'm gonna like see

61:04

[snorts] if my cable can

61:06

can make it work, which it should

61:08

because it's true spec. Um, and then

61:11

basically it's just an excuse to

61:13

highlight like a half a dozen cool

61:15

projects at open source

61:16

>> that need a cable.

61:17

>> Sounds like a great idea. And

61:19

legitimately we have had multiple

61:22

>> booth people cuz it was an industry day

61:24

today run up to the booth being like,

61:26

"Can I buy a cable?" [laughter]

61:28

>> Really?

61:29

>> Oh, yeah.

61:29

>> Do did anyone keep track of who any of

61:31

them are? Cuz it'd be great for me to

61:33

pop in on them tomorrow. I think I think

61:35

uh one of you guys was uh I know I was

61:38

like they were having a bunch of issues

61:40

with the creator shuttles today. So this

61:42

morning when I went to the event I got

61:43

an Uber and I just stuffed a bunch of

61:45

random other creators in it and when I

61:47

had to come back to do land shut which

61:49

I'm I'm obviously not at the creator

61:50

hotel but when I had to go back to get

61:52

my laptop and stuff I did the same thing

61:54

cuz the shuttles were also not working

61:56

again. And while I'm in there I'm just

61:57

like whipping stuff out of my pockets

61:59

like we make all these different things.

62:01

[laughter]

62:02

Look at our pens. work on our fidget

62:04

spinners. [laughter]

62:07

I mean, you have you trapped in the car.

62:10

Uh, but it's I mean it's it's

62:12

interesting because the you know I I was

62:15

talking to someone earlier today about

62:17

this of the like 2010s era of like every

62:20

single YouTuber is selling one to two

62:22

shirts and one to two hoodies at a time.

62:24

They're all probably from Teespring.

62:26

Like that is over and lots of people are

62:28

getting into products now. So, every

62:30

single year since I've been coming to

62:32

open source,

62:33

>> the like behind the-scenes conversations

62:35

from the creators has been for everyone,

62:38

not just for for me or us, has been like

62:41

what's going on in the product space?

62:42

What are you working on? What are you

62:44

thinking about? How are you approaching

62:45

it? How do you work with uh

62:47

manufacturers? How do you like it's a

62:49

ton of it is product stuff? Because

62:50

that's where the external funding seems

62:52

to be going for a ton of creators. And

62:54

it's really interesting because I I was

62:56

talking to someone recently about like,

62:58

you know, if you tried to make if you

63:00

weren't a YouTuber and you tried to make

63:02

the LT screwdriver and get it on the

63:04

market,

63:04

>> oh my god, I don't know how I would do

63:05

it.

63:06

>> It'd be so difficult. Yeah. And the

63:09

screwdriver is a little bit maybe more

63:11

like mass appeal, but there are some

63:13

YouTuber products that

63:15

if you were a standard company, it would

63:18

be so hard to make this like niche

63:21

product really make sense because it

63:23

would be so difficult to actually hit a

63:25

huge portion of the people in that

63:26

niche. But there's market data out right

63:28

now that as the generations progress,

63:31

um, more and more people are doing

63:33

purchasing decisions based on online

63:36

creators. Gen Z's at 41%. And

63:40

>> if you are a creator within a niche, you

63:44

already have the attention of the whole

63:45

niche. So it might make something that

63:47

that niche has wanted for a long time an

63:49

actually viable product because of your

63:52

existence, which is really cool.

63:53

>> Almost it's almost like

63:57

people followed you and glombmed on to

64:00

you because they had common interests.

64:04

>> Yeah. and alignment in terms of what

64:07

they want.

64:08

>> So if there's something

64:10

wants, yes, you might be able to make it

64:12

and because of your natural marketing of

64:16

already having that audience, you can

64:17

make products and product lines

64:19

potentially make sense that might not

64:21

have otherwise, which is just super

64:22

interesting. So it's a lot of the behind

64:24

the scenes conversations are are about

64:26

stuff like that. Um, genuinely most of

64:29

the conversations that people have with

64:31

me at OpenSauce are about like

64:34

our stuff that we make everything else,

64:37

which is interesting. So,

64:39

>> you know, it's funny. I actually shot a

64:41

video today

64:43

uh just doing a tier list of of science

64:46

and tech creator merch.

64:48

>> I And again, I shouldn't be using the

64:50

word merch. I don't want to use the word

64:52

merch to describe our products because

64:54

they're not merch anymore. And frankly,

64:56

none of the things that I checked out

64:58

today were merch.

65:00

>> Dude, and you go back 10 years ago, and

65:02

that would have been

65:02

>> unheard of.

65:03

>> T-shirts, hoodies, and maybe one water

65:05

bottle.

65:05

>> Yep.

65:06

>> And now it's a ton of really unique,

65:08

very interesting,

65:09

>> dude. I had a barbecue scrubber, a meat

65:12

thermometer. So, those were very those

65:15

were those aligned extremely well. I

65:17

cooked my meat and then I cleaned my

65:19

barbecue with Creator Products. Uh, I

65:22

had an end table that was in the shape

65:25

of a of a like a like a like a sewing

65:28

thread

65:29

>> uh spool.

65:31

>> I had

65:32

>> No, no, no, no, not a bottom. Bobbin's a

65:34

little one. Um, it was a it was the

65:36

shape of a spool.

65:37

>> Oh, the big one.

65:38

>> Yeah.

65:38

>> Um, I had although a bobin ottoman to go

65:42

with it would be amazing. Simone, if

65:44

you're watching.

65:45

>> Uh, what else did we What else did we

65:47

have going on? I I don't uh Oh, dude.

65:50

The the Green The Green Brothers are

65:52

involved in like laundry detergent. It

65:55

was like a collab with Technology

65:56

Connections. I was like, "Okay."

65:57

>> Oh, that's [laughter] amazing.

66:00

>> Yep.

66:01

>> That's perfect.

66:02

>> Yep.

66:06

>> Out. I remember hearing about that, but

66:08

it's released product.

66:10

>> Well, I have it. So,

66:13

[clears throat]

66:17

>> wait. Did I say Did I say I said

66:19

dishwasher, right?

66:21

>> I think I think you said laundry, but

66:23

>> Sorry, not laundry. Dishwasher.

66:24

Dishwasher detergent. Dishwasher

66:26

detergent. Sorry. Sorry, guys.

66:28

>> Dishwasher.

66:28

>> Dishwasher.

66:29

>> I said laundry. Sorry. Sorry. Oh,

66:31

apparently both are out. Okay, good.

66:32

Making sure I'm not getting that right.

66:34

Getting that wrong. Yeah. So, the one

66:35

that I checked out is the dishwasher

66:36

detergent.

66:38

>> Yeah. Very cool.

66:40

>> That's awesome.

66:41

>> Heck yeah.

66:43

Um, oh, I was supposed to say one more

66:45

thing for the creator warehouse, um,

66:48

part of the show, call outs. Uh, we have

66:50

our end of season apparel sale with

66:52

discounts up to 40% off running right

66:54

now. So, it's a great time to pick up

66:56

some underwear, the lightweight packable

66:59

jacket,

67:01

um, the lawsuit hoodie. This one's

67:03

particularly on topic right now.

67:09

Excuse me. Um,

67:11

yeah. So, go check it out. That's at

67:13

just if you go to LT store.

67:17

I think it's the Yep. It's the second

67:20

banner in the in the banner carousel

67:22

there. Just feel free feel free to

67:24

browse. There's lots of good stuff in

67:25

there.

67:28

All right. Oh, wait. Dan, was that only

67:30

one com?

67:31

>> No, you did, too.

67:32

>> Oh, nice. Okay.

67:33

>> Yay.

67:34

>> Uh, thank you.

67:35

>> You're actually ahead of schedule or

67:37

schedule. I don't know what you North

67:40

Americans say anymore. I have lost the

67:42

understanding of which is the wrong one.

67:44

>> It's jud.

67:46

>> Yes. Like GIF.

67:48

>> Gotcha.

67:48

>> Yeah. It's a silent beginning of the

67:50

whole word.

67:50

>> Yeah.

67:51

>> Thank you, Jod.

67:52

>> Uh, continue.

67:56

>> Oh, ow, that hurt. Okay.

67:59

>> What do you want to talk about next?

68:00

Should we talk about YouTube's class

68:02

action lawsuit?

68:03

>> I Yeah, honestly, I was looking at that.

68:06

Uh yeah, let's do it.

68:08

>> A new proposed class action has hit

68:10

Google stating that YouTube Premium is

68:12

false advertising because they market

68:14

adree, but you will still see sponsored

68:17

segments in videos.

68:20

Oh, specifically the bakedin ads that

68:22

creators include. The lawsuit is citing

68:24

other claims in YouTube's marketing such

68:26

as no interruptions or most videos are

68:29

adree in the case of premium light.

68:33

Hm.

68:37

So our discussion question is, do you

68:39

think there's an argument to be made

68:41

here for this class action? Because

68:43

clearly Google is not serving the ads

68:46

and not profiting from them, but they

68:49

are also representing

68:52

the service that they are providing as

68:58

an experience that people are not really

69:00

having. Like I just I with my built-in

69:04

ad block like I'm aware of, you know, if

69:07

I'm watching oversimplified or whatever,

69:08

I'm aware that there's like a giant

69:10

twominut ad read in the middle of it or

69:13

whatever and I'm like tap tap tap tap

69:15

tap tap tap tap tap and and like I don't

69:18

um like it doesn't bother me, but also

69:23

if you don't have bad ad block in your

69:25

brain um yeah, I can see I can see

69:30

encountering that and going, "Well, what

69:31

am I even paying for then?"

69:33

>> Well, YouTube premium has built-in ad

69:35

skip.

69:37

>> Yeah. But I don't think

69:38

>> and also I think the precedent here is

69:41

not that. And the re the argument that I

69:43

would make uh is that like on on

69:48

all ad free platforms that I know of,

69:51

there's still um what is it called?

69:55

product placement advertisements and

69:57

lots of other forms of advertisements.

70:00

Just because it's not full screen rolls

70:02

doesn't mean there isn't other forms of

70:04

advertisements. So that has been true

70:05

for a very long time. U there's also

70:08

been native integrations on other

70:10

platforms that are adree for a very long

70:12

time. Um or not non-native integrations

70:15

I guess. I don't know, I'm losing the

70:17

terminology, but when when the hosts

70:19

talk about a thing, um, instead of it

70:22

being like a cutaway to an ad, that has

70:24

been true on other platforms for a

70:25

while. Um,

70:26

>> like a plug, you mean?

70:28

>> Yeah. Yeah, exactly. And yeah, I don't

70:32

know. I I I

70:34

as a very long-term premium user myself,

70:40

ad skip, bro. Like, what's the problem?

70:42

Yeah, because it does the way that

70:45

YouTube does that is they they put up a

70:48

prompt to skip frequently skipped chunks

70:52

of the video, right?

70:53

>> Yeah. which generally corresponds to

70:56

>> almost always is because the way to do

70:58

it before that was if you looked at the

71:00

timeline of the video, it gave you this

71:03

like waveform and the waveform was

71:05

essentially a retention graph and you

71:07

would look at the dip and then this like

71:10

massive surge and the massive surge was

71:12

because people would click on that. So

71:14

that was just the old form of it was you

71:17

would just very clearly see where the ad

71:19

ended by looking at the waveform of

71:21

retention and then they added as people

71:23

are pointing out a little white dot

71:25

>> y

71:26

>> which is the end of the frequently

71:28

skipped area. So you can just click on

71:29

it on the timeline or there's also a

71:32

button that shows up in the corner that

71:34

says jump forward or jump whatever I

71:38

don't know uh and it'll just skip it for

71:41

you. So, like I don't know. I understand

71:44

the argument that the class action is

71:46

making is that the ad is there at all.

71:48

Not that it isn't easily skippable, but

71:50

I do think there's quite a bit of

71:52

precedent for it being the the type of

71:56

thing that they're talking about is

71:57

platform inserted unskippable

72:01

like pre-rolls, mid rolls, whatever.

72:04

not stuff that's baked into the cont

72:07

content naturally by the user that

72:10

generated that content. There isn't

72:12

platform ads.

72:13

>> I'm going to both sides this one. I like

72:15

if YouTube says in their marketing no

72:18

interruptions,

72:20

right? I I could see that both ways. On

72:22

the one hand, as a viewer who's, you

72:24

know, getting a twominut read for

72:28

oh man, I'm trying to think of what's a

72:30

what's a company that advertises on

72:32

YouTube a bunch. Uh, honey.

72:35

Thanks for that.

72:36

>> Sure. Let's go with honey. Um, you know,

72:39

I'm getting this this long read about,

72:41

you know, honey or whatever. I have been

72:43

I've been interrupted. But on the flip

72:46

side, YouTube has delivered the content

72:50

that that creator uploaded in its

72:52

entirety to you with no interruptions.

72:55

How is it how is it their problem or

72:58

even their role to decide what to serve

73:01

you and what not to serve you?

73:03

>> I think an interruption

73:06

in the perspective of YouTube is them

73:09

interrupting the video that you are

73:11

watching by inserting an ad.

73:15

>> They're not doing that technically.

73:17

>> They're not

73:17

>> the video that you are watching is just

73:19

becoming an ad that is very easily

73:22

skippable.

73:23

>> Yep. Um, so I I don't think the

73:25

interruption thing I I think a lot of it

73:28

depends on like where are you placing

73:30

the perspective in this conversation.

73:33

Um,

73:34

>> yeah.

73:35

>> I mean, flow plane isn't adree then cuz

73:37

you know WAN show has sponsors and

73:39

product placements. Got to get that

73:40

dough for for me. Yeah,

73:42

>> exactly. Just like I mean I could tell

73:44

you all about true spec cables on

73:47

ltstore.com

73:49

and that's on full now.

73:50

>> They they're super flexible. uh they

73:52

support, you know, very high power and

73:55

data rates and are designed to be

73:58

durable and and and UV resistant if you

74:01

like using them in your car for

74:03

instance. Uh true spec cables,

74:05

ltttore.com,

74:08

right? Like should should YouTube cut

74:09

that out? If somebody pays for premium

74:12

on YouTube, should they not see that?

74:15

And this is actually a really good

74:17

question from Sydney Brokit over in

74:18

float plane chat. If the entire video is

74:21

a sponsored video, should YouTube not

74:23

serve it then to premium viewers?

74:27

What is it? What exactly is it that

74:29

they're asking for? Like what should

74:32

Google do?

74:36

>> You know, this is interesting. I don't

74:39

know if we say anywhere that float plane

74:41

is adree actually. No, we don't.

74:43

>> It doesn't tend to have ads. Like

74:45

there's usually a float plane cut. Not

74:47

usually. It's always I think

74:49

>> there's a full plane cut that doesn't

74:51

have the sponsor spot in it to the point

74:53

where some people have actually

74:54

complained because they think the more

74:56

creative ones

74:58

>> uh they actually want to see it which is

75:00

kind of funny. Um but I'm looking

75:02

through and you know I might be wrong.

75:05

Someone might have it somewhere.

75:07

>> Well, we leave it up to the creator.

75:09

>> Yeah, because the platform wouldn't say

75:11

it. Yeah, because we leave it up to the

75:12

creator like you said. But then I don't

75:14

think the Linus Tech Tips plans actually

75:16

say, "Hey, there's no ads." Even though

75:18

we we do cut them out.

75:20

>> Um

75:20

>> well, we've tended towards a a promise

75:23

less, deliver more approach because we

75:26

ran into trouble in the earlier days

75:28

sometimes when we would promise more and

75:30

then we someone would make a mistake or

75:33

it would not be viable for some reason

75:36

or another. Uh or we would the business

75:39

reality would change and we'd have to

75:40

backtrack. And it's a lot easier for us

75:42

to just

75:44

underpromise and overd deliver as best

75:46

we can um versus like promising the

75:49

world and then [ __ ] it up sometimes.

75:52

>> Yeah.

75:54

>> Uh it's

75:54

>> unless it's full sponsor videos like AMD

75:56

upgrades. Yeah, that might be why we

75:57

just don't use the verbiage.

75:59

>> And this is really interesting just

76:01

seeing now obviously there's a bit of a

76:03

sampling bias here because this is

76:04

coming from people who subscribe on

76:06

float plane which is like a very support

76:09

the creators platform. like you you get

76:11

extras and well actually we've got some

76:13

really good extras this week. So, we'll

76:14

talk about that a little bit later, but

76:16

you get extras, but other than that,

76:17

it's just like throwing coffee money at

76:20

us to help us support the team and and

76:22

build the platform. Um, but but seeing

76:25

the conversation in here, like, man,

76:27

this this blows. This is a dumb lawsuit.

76:30

This are they trying to, you know,

76:32

destroy creators. It's like, way to go.

76:35

This is dumb. YouTube doesn't create

76:38

sponsor spots. This is basically just

76:40

saying, you know, screw the creators,

76:42

but I don't know. Like, it's uh it's

76:44

really interesting seeing the the

76:46

hostility toward this this lawsuit when

76:51

I mean, you must remember this, Luke,

76:53

from back in the garage days. How

76:55

[laughter]

76:56

how angry people in the community would

77:00

be that we had the audacity to try to

77:02

make a living at this

77:03

>> literally any form of advertisement

77:05

whatsoever or the video being monetized

77:07

at all. Yeah,

77:10

>> if YouTube monetization was on because

77:11

you used to be able to just turn it off

77:12

and there would actually be no ads,

77:14

which was psychotic that that was

77:17

possible on the platform. I just want to

77:19

say that was crazy. [laughter] I don't

77:22

know how they ever thought that was

77:23

going to work, but whatever. Sounds

77:26

good. Thanks, Google. Uh, yeah,

77:30

>> but yeah, Mr. Assisttor makes a really

77:32

good point. Like as much as I am

77:33

obviously coming at this from a

77:35

procreator standpoint, I've got three

77:38

children. Oh, he's not there to ding me.

77:40

Whatever. He said it. He said, "Oh,

77:42

whoops. I pressed a button. Good lord.

77:44

What am I doing?" Um, so yeah, I'm

77:46

coming at it from a procreator like

77:48

perspective. Um, but I actually agree

77:51

with Mr. Aister here. This feels like

77:54

when cell phone companies advertise

77:56

unlimited data. It's like, yeah, it's

77:59

not actually unlimited. And everyone

78:01

understands what they mean by that. And

78:03

there's an argument to be made that it's

78:05

unlimited. But like no one forced them

78:06

to say that. Nobody forced YouTube to

78:08

say no interruptions. They could have

78:10

just they could have just said it in a

78:13

because by the time YouTube premium

78:14

existed, so did

78:18

invide sponsor reads. So it's not like

78:20

this was some new thing that came about.

78:23

>> This is a perspective conversation. And

78:25

I understand the argument you're making,

78:26

but

78:28

>> from their perspective, there is no

78:29

interruption. No, I get it. I see both

78:31

sides 100%.

78:33

>> But I don't think the unlimited data

78:35

thing is

78:37

to me the unlimited data thing feels

78:38

more egregious. I understand the

78:40

comparison you're making.

78:41

>> In a lot of cases, it's unlimited. It's

78:44

just at a it throttles to such a speed

78:46

that effectively you could figure out

78:48

how much data it is because it would be

78:50

the maximum data rate over the amount of

78:52

time.

78:52

>> They just actually don't interrupt

78:54

videos. Like actually, it's not that it

78:56

like it's not that they don't interrupt

78:59

>> 80 videos a week and then they'll start

79:02

interrupting them a little bit. Like no,

79:03

they just actually never interrupt

79:05

videos.

79:05

>> I get it.

79:06

>> The the interruption is coming from the

79:08

UGC on their platform.

79:09

>> But they don't say they don't say we

79:12

won't interrupt the video. They say no

79:14

interruptions,

79:17

which is a is a broader statement than

79:19

they had to make. So he he's right that

79:22

they didn't have to make such a broad

79:25

sweeping statement. They could have said

79:28

no YouTube ads and that would have been

79:31

true. So I I totally I totally I can

79:35

both sides this one pretty pretty

79:36

comfortably. I could sit and argue with

79:38

myself about this for the next 10

79:40

minutes

79:41

>> pretty easily.

79:42

>> Um to be clear, I don't think this

79:45

lawsuit's going anywhere. Like I don't

79:46

think you're going to be able to to to

79:49

make this argument in court that YouTube

79:51

is somehow liable for the user generated

79:53

content that they are to your point not

79:56

interrupting

79:57

right

79:58

>> like yeah like Google isn't so archangel

80:02

of death hell of a name in full plane

80:03

chat said no interruptions added to the

80:05

creator's videos. Yeah they could add

80:07

some like they could make it a longer

80:09

qualifying sentence.

80:10

>> Yeah. Uh to me I personally I think

80:15

you know I don't think anyone actually

80:17

thinks Red Bull gives you wings.

80:19

>> I mean that was a problem though.

80:22

>> Yeah. But like

80:24

>> maybe we don't need to worry about that.

80:26

>> Did someone get hurt or something?

80:28

>> Hold on. What's the actual history? Cuz

80:30

I don't know how much of that is just

80:31

like urban legend gives you wings

80:34

lawsuit. Here we go.

80:37

Oh wow. AI overview. But hear me out. In

80:41

2014, Red Bull agreed to pay $13 million

80:46

to settle a class action false

80:48

advertising lawsuit

80:50

>> filed by consumer Benjamin Kathther in

80:54

2013. The suit claimed the slogan Red

80:56

Bull gives you wings and the drinks

80:58

marketing misled customers about the

81:01

beverages energy and performance

81:02

benefits compared to standard caffeine

81:04

sources.

81:06

So, like

81:11

[sighs]

81:12

>> that's insane.

81:14

>> They didn't admit any admit any fault.

81:16

And this is one of those cases where

81:18

yeah, the corporation should even if

81:20

they settle, they should not have to

81:22

admit any fault. But

81:27

>> if Red Bull can get in trouble for Red

81:29

Bull gives you wings, then I think

81:31

YouTube might be maybe could be in more

81:33

trouble than I thought here. Maybe.

81:35

Well, I think the safest thing is to

81:37

just never say anything.

81:38

>> Well, I think the safest thing is for

81:40

YouTube to say YouTube Premium gives you

81:41

wings and then anyone stupid enough to

81:44

believe it can go jump off a building.

81:46

[laughter]

81:47

>> I like that.

81:48

>> It solves itself really if you think

81:49

about it.

81:50

>> I do think they could, you know, I think

81:52

they could have more clarifying

81:53

language. I just I I also worry about

81:56

like okay is every advertisement going

81:58

to be a

81:59

>> I don't have a bleep button here but a a

82:02

legal document at this point like

82:05

>> uh

82:06

>> I mean yeah I don't think anyone wants

82:08

that. Like that's the thing that I think

82:09

people got to ask themselves like do you

82:11

want that? Like there's a there's a

82:13

there's a balancing act here. We don't

82:16

want misleading advertising but we also

82:18

don't want to read a 30page legal

82:20

document just to understand what a

82:22

product is. There's got to be

82:24

>> There's got to be something in between.

82:27

We got to make this happen.

82:31

All right, why don't we jump into Oh,

82:34

yes, Dan. He moved the mic toward

82:35

himself, so he's preparing to say

82:36

something.

82:38

>> Dan, speak.

82:39

>> Okay, that's a good point from flow

82:41

plane chat. Why Why am I resisting this?

82:43

And I think the Red Bull gives you wings

82:45

thing is really stupid, but I also think

82:47

that the Pepsi jet is legendary.

82:52

I don't know.

82:55

>> Feel free to unravel this one for us.

82:57

>> Is it?

82:57

>> I feel like I feel like it is different

83:00

>> because in the Pepsi Jet thing, they

83:02

they like

83:05

>> they gave it a point amount that you

83:07

would need to get to.

83:08

>> Mhm.

83:09

>> They were very specific and it was like

83:12

commercial specific. It was in there.

83:14

>> I think it's different.

83:16

>> Really?

83:17

>> I think it's I think so.

83:24

I mean, YouTube you Pepsi promised a jet

83:27

and YouTube promised no interruptions.

83:30

>> No interruptions.

83:31

>> No interruptions.

83:37

I could we you I think we really could

83:39

both sides this one for like the rest of

83:41

the show.

83:42

>> Maybe maybe I'll just shut up and we'll

83:44

move on. [laughter]

83:47

>> All right. Why don't we have another

83:49

just kind of free flowing conversation

83:50

topic? This came up in writer meeting

83:52

actually last week and I was like yeah I

83:55

don't know if it's a video essay for the

83:56

main channel but what I really think it

83:59

is is a really interesting conversation

84:03

on Wow. Elijah brought this up. Um there

84:06

was a post on the subreddit and I'm

84:09

relying on the writers to bring it to

84:10

me. I think I'm actually I'm actually

84:12

one month sober from even looking at our

84:14

subreddit at this point and quite

84:16

frankly I'm I'm happier for it.

84:18

>> Um,

84:20

>> this topic comes courtesy of user Zizen

84:26

553

84:27

saying we should review more mid-range

84:31

tech. It sparked some conversation both

84:33

in the comments as well as here

84:35

internally

84:37

asking like what exactly is mid-range?

84:41

And we saw people debating things like

84:43

whether the $200 TV that we just did a

84:46

video on is mid-range or entry level. on

84:50

a recent short circuit. Elijah referred

84:53

to the Nothing 4a as nothing's budget

84:56

slash entry-level phone, and some people

84:59

got quite upset in the comments saying

85:01

that's not budget, that's mid-range. So,

85:04

I guess the the question here is like,

85:07

you know, what what does the community

85:11

want or like what is our team's

85:15

understanding

85:17

of mid range? And I think this answer is

85:21

going to really vary depending on the

85:23

product category. Like a perfect example

85:27

of a product category that I no longer

85:30

like I'll admit to you as somebody who

85:31

does this for a living for my profession

85:34

for like 15 plus years now total going

85:38

back to when I was at NCIX.

85:41

Something I don't understand right now

85:43

is how to classify GPUs.

85:47

What the [ __ ] is a mid-range GPU

85:51

anymore? Cuz I can tell you how I used

85:53

to do it, right? Like back when I was at

85:55

NCX, entry level was the like the the

85:59

actual like garbage. Total waste of

86:01

money like like GT 610

86:06

literally is worse than just upgrading

86:10

your motherboard to something with

86:11

better onboard graphics. Why are you

86:12

even buying this? That was entry level.

86:15

It was like, I need a secondary display

86:17

output. That was entry level. And that

86:20

made its way up to like probably about

86:23

$100.

86:26

Nowadays, you can't buy [ __ ] for under

86:28

$100. So, what what even So, entry level

86:32

doesn't exist. And you know what? That

86:33

even started to happen throughout my

86:36

time at NCIX where the entry level went

86:38

from being something that even made any

86:40

sense to buy to being something that was

86:42

just manufactured e-waste. Then your

86:46

mid-range would have been like your $100

86:51

to I would say like $200 because as soon

86:55

as you went beyond that, you got into

86:58

like, no, this is a serious discrete GPU

87:02

for like serious gamers. It wasn't a

87:05

given that everybody put a graphics card

87:07

in their system. If you weren't gaming,

87:09

you didn't put a GPU in your system.

87:11

There was no purpose for it in general

87:14

use software. Not everybody was a a

87:16

content creator and using the Adobe

87:18

suite. Like I I feel like I'm very old

87:21

man yelling at clouds right now, but it

87:24

really was a totally different

87:26

environment. And so by the time you got

87:28

up to, you know, I'm buying something

87:30

like a GTX 460 or something like that.

87:33

I'm spending 220, 250, $300. like that

87:38

was starting that was getting into like

87:40

mid to high mid to high-end, you know,

87:43

and then by the time you got up to like

87:45

a 70 class card, that was high-end. But

87:48

here's the kicker, that 70 class card

87:51

was like $350, $400,

87:54

right? And that was high-end. And then

87:56

anything above that, you had like almost

87:58

like you would have in like your DDR

88:00

rankings where you've got your alphabet

88:02

and then you got S tier. So you had like

88:04

your enthusiast tier where basically

88:07

everyone in in putting it in that

88:09

category, everyone's acknowledging that

88:11

nobody needs this, that this is not

88:13

necessary. This is like we know we're

88:16

spending twice as much to get 10% better

88:18

performance or, you know, whatever the

88:19

numbers work out to. You're buying an

88:20

extreme edition, you're buying an 8800

88:22

Ultra. Nobody needs this. This is an

88:24

enthusiast here. You just want to spend

88:25

the money because you want the biggest

88:27

eick. That's fine and that's totally

88:29

valid. But let's all be honest with each

88:30

other about what it is nowadays. $1,000

88:33

Canadian dollars, right? Cuz I'm talking

88:35

CAD back then. 1,000 Canadian dollars

88:38

buys you what in terms of like the like

88:41

the class, like the numbers attached to

88:43

the back of the GPU. I I I would have

88:46

called like a mid-range GPU back then.

88:48

Okay, maybe not quite, but like mid

88:50

high, you know, somewhere in that range.

88:52

Like a,000 Canadian dollars barely gets

88:54

you like a 5070 now.

88:57

>> And so I have no idea. for graphics

88:59

cards. For graphics cards, RAM, a lot of

89:02

modern compute. Uh to me, it feels like

89:07

um

89:10

there maybe isn't an answer.

89:12

>> Yeah, 5070 is about $650.

89:15

So, times 1.4. So, that's four to so

89:19

around 900 Canadian dollars.

89:22

>> I think mid-range is now used. [snorts]

89:26

H I don't think you I don't think you

89:28

can say that though. That's such a hack.

89:29

That's a cheat because people are still

89:32

buying something. People are still

89:34

buying brand new across the entire range

89:36

of Nvidia's products.

89:39

So, there has to be an entry level. But

89:42

it seems like the answer is just no.

89:44

There just isn't. Nvidia stopped making

89:47

GT.

89:48

>> They stopped making anything that wasn't

89:50

GT. Like they it used to be that GT and

89:52

GTX denoted like gaming cards.

89:55

Now, I don't think they have a product

89:58

that isn't RTX, that that isn't that

90:01

isn't gaming. Like, their their product

90:04

line starts for the 5060 at like $300,

90:09

is it not? Actually, I think it's a

90:11

little more than that. What's a 5060 8

90:14

gig? Yeah, it's higher. 5060. Oh, no.

90:17

These are TI's. Hold on. 5060

90:20

uh 8 gig. Got to double check.

90:24

I can't find any non-TI's right now.

90:26

What's going on here? 568 gig. Yeah,

90:29

well, it's because the TI's are the same

90:30

price. So, yeah, their product line

90:33

starts

90:35

at the cost of a secondhand PlayStation

90:37

5, which is

90:39

freaking insane. Like, there's no other

90:41

way to describe that. And people are

90:43

like, uh, Lionus is just discovering

90:45

inflation. But it's it's not that,

90:47

right? Like you can look you can look at

90:49

the look at the die sizes and look at

90:51

what those die sizes are available for

90:53

in other product categories. Like an

90:56

Intel, you know, K series gaming CPU or

91:00

whatever still costs the same in dollars

91:02

today pretty much as it did back when I

91:04

was working at NCX 15 years ago. So no,

91:08

this is not just that. Obviously, it

91:10

plays a role. Absolutely. and the and

91:12

the memory ramageddon crisis price

91:15

crisis that's going on right now. That's

91:16

obviously a factor as well. Um,

91:21

but I'm just I'm looking at this going I

91:24

don't understand how to classify this

91:26

because if I looked you in the eye right

91:28

now and I said, "Yeah, I'm building a

91:31

system with an entry-level GPU, a 5060

91:34

Ti 8 gig for $370."

91:39

You'd be like, "What the [ __ ] you you

91:41

you're out of touch.

91:43

But I I'm I'm not out of touch. It's

91:46

it's the it's the children who are

91:48

wrong. [snorts] And Nvidia is the one

91:51

who's out of touch. I don't make the

91:52

rules. That's their entry level product.

91:54

>> It's the shareholders who are wrong.

91:56

>> Like is it I is does entry level mean an

92:00

amount to spend? Cuz I think that that

92:02

aligns with what you said where you're

92:03

like, okay, secondhand is entry level or

92:05

it's mid-range, right? or or is it or is

92:08

it based on what the price bands are of

92:10

products you can actually buy?

92:12

>> I know it's like a meme on the show that

92:14

I'm I'm cheap boy, but like I was

92:18

talking to some people lately and

92:20

looking into some of my own stuff for

92:22

buying computer hardware and like my

92:26

god, man, it's a wasteland. Um, I was

92:30

trying to look into some decently

92:31

high-end stuff because I want to start

92:33

running some pretty good hardware at

92:35

home for running local LLMs and in

92:37

Canada

92:39

it just doesn't exist. So, that's cool.

92:43

U, like the used market is just not a

92:45

thing. Uh, you can go on eBay.ca,

92:49

you can say I want it to come from

92:51

Canada. You can do the search term and

92:53

it will say, well, you can get it from

92:55

the States or China. Good luck. there's

92:58

like it like literally shows no results

93:00

for a bunch of the stuff I was looking

93:01

up in Canada. Very disappointing. Um,

93:05

and when looking at other people wanting

93:08

to build user systems and like if I want

93:10

to build this steam machine that I'm

93:13

talking about,

93:15

I'm I I'm not getting new stuff, man.

93:18

like I I I was looking at the stuff that

93:20

I could find on Facebook Marketplace or

93:22

whatever else compared to retail prices

93:25

and I mean it's terrible. There's a

93:28

reason why Scrapard Wars is not very

93:30

interesting right now. Um I I agree with

93:32

not making Scrapford Wars this year.

93:34

It's just

93:36

terrible out there. It's still better on

93:39

the used market than it is for retail.

93:42

especially if you're cool with it, and

93:44

you probably should be cuz it's actually

93:46

probably fine, going back to like DDR4

93:49

platforms and accepting some stuff that

93:53

would probably feel weird if you're used

93:55

to building computers over the course of

93:57

the last 10 minus 2 or 3 years. Um, but

94:03

yeah,

94:03

>> this is go back a gen, deal with some

94:06

stuff. Some of the old Zen platforms

94:08

that were DDR4 are still smoking. Uh

94:11

>> we actually um Labs is working on an

94:14

article that they sent me the first

94:15

draft of and I wrote up a script um on

94:18

the on the plane on my last trip. I've

94:19

just got to tweak it and then we're

94:20

going to probably record it on Monday

94:22

when I'm back in office. But um it's

94:24

like a retrospective looking back on the

94:27

goat um the 1080 and 1080 Ti

94:31

>> and uh and talking about now that driver

94:35

support has been dropped, it's no longer

94:37

getting new feature drivers. Um, now

94:39

that there are games that exist that

94:42

literally will not launch on these cards

94:45

because they don't support ray tracing

94:47

and the games require ray tracing, how

94:49

viable are these cards still in 2026?

94:53

And I was [laughter] actually I was like

94:56

kind of blown away by the answer. It

94:58

turns out they're actually still pretty

95:01

viable. It was uh it was a pretty cool

95:04

little exploration. I've been saying

95:06

forever now that my my buddy's son was

95:09

playing Arc Raiders on a 1080, not even

95:12

Ti and he like actually was and it was

95:14

actually really good

95:16

>> and and they're and they're they're

95:18

okay. Don't bite on the first eBay deal

95:20

you see because there's a lot of people

95:22

out there going, I know what I got. Uh

95:25

but there's a lot of people too that are

95:26

more realistic. I found on Facebook

95:28

Marketplace uh deals. There were deals

95:31

to be had like 1080s for under a hundred

95:34

uh US dollars, 1080 Ti under $150, like

95:39

1201 130.

95:40

>> I was when I was perusing stuff pre that

95:43

article being worked on, I was finding

95:46

1080s at like the $80 Canadian range.

95:49

Yeah. When you were like kind of lucky.

95:52

>> Yep.

95:52

>> You know, not all of them. Usually

95:54

they're around 100, but you can find

95:55

them down to the 80 range.

95:57

>> Um, and I didn't spend as much time

95:59

looking for the Ti's, but

96:01

>> yeah, like

96:02

>> the TI has 11 or 11 12 gigs of No, yeah,

96:06

11 u of VRAM. Like it's

96:10

>> it's pretty wicked card.

96:13

>> It's relatively slow by modern

96:15

standards. So, you got to understand

96:16

that VRAM is not the be all and end all,

96:19

but it's it's a viable gaming card for

96:23

>> literally tens and tens of thousands of

96:26

games on Steam.

96:28

>> You don't have to play

96:30

>> very likely a lot of if not all of the

96:32

games that you're playing. [snorts]

96:33

>> Yes, there that that's key, especially

96:36

if you're coming from, you know, if

96:38

you're if you're upgrading from

96:39

something older, right? Although, I

96:41

don't know if too many people are

96:42

upgrading to a 10 series at this point.

96:44

It's been 10 years. I wrote a really fun

96:46

intro for that video. Uh it was like um

96:50

>> Oh, wait. Did you read it?

96:51

>> No, I'm just I had a conversation.

96:54

>> Yeah, let's not get into it, but I'm I

96:56

am not surprised. Yeah, we can talk

96:58

about it more later.

96:59

>> Oh, okay. Whatever. The point is uh I I

97:01

wrote up it was like a thing where like

97:03

talking about the GOAT in GPUs is a lot

97:06

like talking about the GOAT in women's

97:08

tennis. like there's there's room for

97:11

outlier opinions, but there's no way

97:13

that the 1080 sisters and the Williams

97:16

sisters are not in the conversation. And

97:18

it just kind of it kind of builds on

97:19

that. And there's actually like some fun

97:21

parallels in that uh you know, the one

97:24

of them came first and blazed the trail

97:26

that the other one, you know, surpassed

97:29

anyone's expectations for what could be

97:30

done. Like the older sister um you know,

97:34

set a bar for greatness that only the

97:36

younger sister could surpass. Like I

97:37

don't know. It's kind of It's kind of

97:38

fun. Um,

97:39

>> honestly, I went to uh Steam stats, most

97:44

played top 100 games by current players,

97:48

>> and I feel like the 1080 would do

97:53

totally fine in the vast majority of

97:57

this.

97:57

>> Yeah. What are we looking at here? Okay,

97:58

we got PAL World, CS2, Dota 2. Are you

98:02

kidding me? Taskbar here. some idol

98:05

game.

98:07

Uh PUBG

98:08

>> 5 is GTA 5.

98:10

>> It'll play PUBG no problem, right? Like

98:12

GTA 5 is literally from that era.

98:15

>> Mhm.

98:16

>> Like what are Yeah. What are we even

98:19

What are we even talking about here? I

98:21

mean I I don't know. Uh Football Club 26

98:24

uh

98:25

>> might have some tech that would be weird

98:26

or something. I don't know.

98:27

>> That might be demanding.

98:29

>> Probably fine. I still feel like

98:31

>> its rating is also 49% with 91,000

98:35

reviews. So maybe just save spare

98:37

yourself the frustration.

98:41

Destiny 2 is pretty demanding, but

98:44

should run like overall I think. And

98:47

it's not like you're not going to be

98:48

able to play Mecca Chameleon, right?

98:49

Like

98:50

>> apparently a GTX 1080 uh gets 64 fps at

98:54

1080p ultra in EA Sports FC26.

98:57

>> There [laughter] you go.

98:59

THERE YOU GO.

99:00

>> WHAT A crazy card, man. It just doesn't

99:03

care. [laughter] It just goes forever.

99:06

They're amazing. There's there's this

99:08

clip and we we link uh I think it's a

99:11

video cards article or something like

99:12

that in the in the labs article that

99:15

links to I think that article then links

99:17

to a video that's from Computex from

99:20

this year when someone hands Jensen I

99:22

think it's a 1080 Ti. And you can see in

99:26

his face that like I think he actually

99:31

really cared about like that generation

99:33

of cards cuz and he talks about like

99:35

when he receives it he's like a this was

99:36

a good one. [snorts] And you can tell

99:38

like there's probably a little bit of

99:39

hamming up. There's 10 trillion cameras

99:41

around or whatever but you can tell he

99:43

was actually kind of like really

99:44

reminiscing on it

99:46

>> and it's man

99:47

>> unfortunately that's all we can do is

99:49

reminisce about it. Yeah, I do miss the

99:52

pretx era. But yeah, seriously scrolling

99:54

through this top 100 games by current

99:57

players. It it you're going to be fine

100:00

with most of this. There's a couple

100:02

standouts where I'm like, "Oo, yeah,

100:03

that might be kind of rough."

100:05

>> Um I remember running Tarov on a 1080.

100:10

>> Yeah,

100:10

>> I remember it kind of sucked and I

100:12

remember I was happy when I moved on.

100:13

Tarov is number 79 on this list.

100:16

>> Nice. But man,

100:19

>> the Oh, man. Civ five is there. That's

100:22

so funny. [laughter]

100:27

>> Is there any other civilization?

100:29

>> Six is there. Five and six are both

100:31

there. Seven is not. [laughter]

100:35

>> Yikes.

100:36

>> Oh man. Say yikes. [laughter]

100:40

>> Both [clears throat] of your older games

100:41

being in the top 100 is sick. Your

100:44

newest game not is

100:47

That's unfortunate.

100:48

>> Um, I got a question that I've been

100:50

holding on to for a little bit here from

100:51

Aan Immortal, and this is going to break

100:53

your brain. Um, Aan asks, "What is the

100:57

modern equivalent to something like just

100:59

a Matrox? I just need a display card."

101:02

Well, it's funny you should ask because

101:05

the modern equivalent is just the

101:08

equivalent. We have not moved on to this

101:12

day from the GeForce 210, which no

101:16

longer carries the GT uh modifier.

101:19

Apparently, I think it used to, although

101:22

I could be wrong. It's been a while.

101:24

This is a card

101:26

that has, I [ __ ] you not, PCIe

101:31

2.0

101:32

[laughter]

101:34

and 1 GBTE of DDR3.

101:38

All for the low low price of $45 US

101:43

reinos.

101:48

What the actual [ __ ] Nvidia just

101:51

straight up stopped making entry-level

101:54

GPUs, which honestly kind of makes sense

101:56

because they were stupid and onboard

101:58

graphics is so much better than them

101:59

already, but also just

102:04

what? Like, when did the when did the

102:07

GeForce 210 come out?

102:11

Release date. Hold. I'm looking it up.

102:13

I'm looking it up. Get your loud

102:14

keyboard out of here.

102:17

200

102:19

>> 9

102:21

2009

102:24

>> So are you saying they're making new

102:25

ones still?

102:26

>> As far as I can tell, that was an

102:28

instock item, brand new. So there ain't

102:31

no way that it's leftover inventory from

102:35

17 years ago. So

102:38

that answers your question.

102:40

>> Uh drivers for it.

102:43

>> I mean, there must be

102:46

It's a brand new card you can still buy.

102:53

2009.

102:58

That's insane.

103:01

You know what's really crazy about that?

103:03

Uh Linus entrylevel GPUs. Remember we've

103:06

done that video twice where we basically

103:08

just call out don't buy entrylevel GPUs.

103:11

They're a waste of money.

103:14

Uh, so here's one of the times.

103:17

Okay, I don't even know what card

103:21

we were talking about.

103:25

Cheap does not mean good value. Okay,

103:27

this was a 1030.

103:29

Okay, so we called out that. There was

103:31

one we did way way earlier

103:35

that like what does this have to do? Oh,

103:37

sponsored like search, man. Search on

103:40

freaking YouTube. What is even the point

103:43

of using it at all? I swear I can't find

103:47

like anything on YouTube anymore.

103:51

Okay, I'm going to have to try and find

103:52

this and then

103:55

part of it this this is another

103:56

interesting conversation at at um

104:00

at open sauce with with different

104:02

creators and stuff, but part of it's

104:03

just modern packaging. Um you know, I'm

104:06

gonna I'm gonna complain about it. We

104:10

have to do it. So, it is what it is.

104:12

But, uh, title and thumbnail, it title

104:17

and thumbnail needing to be the way that

104:20

they kind of need to be makes search

104:23

atrocious,

104:26

but it's it's so heavily promoted. The

104:28

the impact like I mean, creators have

104:30

been talking about, okay, I understand

104:32

you don't want clickbait thumbnails, but

104:34

if I put up a non-clickbait thumbnail, I

104:36

get freaking owned. And if I put up a

104:38

clickbait thumbnail, or not even a

104:39

clickbait thumbnail, if I put up an

104:41

enticing thumbnail, um, then it actually

104:43

works and you guys actually watch the

104:44

videos. Um, but it's like way more real

104:47

now. Talking to creators here even about

104:50

like, oh yeah, I put up a better

104:52

thumbnail and my retention went up by

104:55

8%. And it's like, what? Like just

104:59

viewer behaviors are

105:01

wild. And yeah. Yeah. Someone said,

105:03

"Nah, it's clickbait." I'm like, "Yeah,

105:04

you can call it clickbait all you want.

105:05

it's completely necessary and it's not

105:07

going anywhere. [laughter] That's that's

105:08

that's the problem that I'm pointing out

105:10

here. Um,

105:13

>> but what's dumb about it is YouTube has

105:15

so much metadata on these videos that

105:18

there is no reason, and I'm about to

105:20

prove it that they couldn't release the

105:22

right that they couldn't give me the

105:24

right result. What was the Linus Tech

105:25

Tips video where he said entry-le GPUs

105:27

are a waste of money. Boom. Here's one

105:29

of them. If you're thinking of an older

105:31

video, Linus and Luke ranted about it in

105:33

this video. Oh my god, it's another ad

105:34

for roundup. You've got to be kidding.

105:35

Does the ad pause if you switch tabs? It

105:39

does. That's That's demonic.

105:42

>> See, they don't do that with premium.

105:45

Let's go.

105:47

>> Hold on. There's an older one. Low-end

105:48

video cards. Rant. Okay. So, that was

105:52

based on the R seven240.

105:54

your one from 10 years ago

105:58

called out the GT210, which oh my god

106:03

was cheaper then than it is today.

106:07

[clears throat and laughter]

106:12

Is it time for another one?

106:14

Do you have to do another video?

106:16

[laughter]

106:17

Do we need to make it like a fourth or

106:18

whatever it is now?

106:20

>> No.

106:21

[laughter]

106:24

This video is from 2016.

106:27

>> Yeah.

106:30

>> I mean, it's been a lot of years.

106:32

>> Bang on. I guess

106:34

>> been a decade.

106:36

>> Oh, man.

106:37

>> Yeah. So, inflation would have brought

106:38

that up by 10 bucks.

106:42

Crazy.

106:45

But let's see. Okay, so I searched for

106:47

low-end video cards Lionus on YouTube.

106:51

Okay. And it literally finds the one.

106:56

>> It brings up 50/50. I guess that answers

106:58

our question about what entry level is

107:00

according to YouTube. And then what is

107:01

this?

107:04

Okay. YouTube made me review this budget

107:06

GPU. That's actually a pretty on topic

107:08

one. Terrible news. Cloud gaming is good

107:10

now. What are you talking about? People

107:12

also watch. What is this?

107:13

>> Can you do an experiment for me? Can you

107:14

take the exact term uh phrase whatever

107:17

sentence you typed into Google?

107:19

>> Well, that's what I was trying

107:20

>> into YouTube.

107:21

>> Okay. So, low-end video cards was

107:23

exactly what I searched for. Low-end

107:25

video cards minus. It couldn't bring up

107:27

that video.

107:27

>> What you put into Google search?

107:29

>> Oh, sure.

107:30

>> Copy the entire thing.

107:32

>> Uh, no, it's gone. Sorry.

107:35

>> Uh,

107:36

>> yeah, I closed that tab already.

107:38

>> History.

107:39

>> Uh,

107:42

oh no, you're going to find all my

107:44

stuff.

107:44

>> Uh, okay. I've apparently reused that

107:46

tab.

107:48

>> Okay.

107:49

>> Uh,

107:50

>> darn. Alt left arrow does not Oh yeah.

107:53

Okay.

107:53

>> Yeah. Control shift T. People are saying

107:55

that should bring a tab back if you

107:56

close a tab.

107:57

>> Yeah, but I didn't. I reused it. This is

107:58

Red Bull gives you wings lawsuit. Sorry

108:00

guys. I I computed wrong.

108:02

>> Maybe. Don't worry about it then. I've

108:04

just I've been wondering if uh and I

108:06

haven't actually tried it myself, but

108:08

I've been wondering if YouTube has been

108:09

moving more towards natural language

108:11

search as they uh you know insert Gemini

108:15

into everything.

108:16

>> Okay, here's the original. Finally found

108:19

it.

108:20

Oh, [sighs]

108:24

sorry. Another ad came up. Low-land

108:27

video cards rant. Radeon R seven240

108:31

unboxing and review. And our thumbnail

108:34

for this literally was a stupid product.

108:38

No one buy it. And here we are all these

108:42

years later. Do you think you can still

108:43

buy an R seven 240?

108:46

I

108:46

>> feel like that one.

108:47

>> I hope not.

108:49

Holy [ __ ] [ __ ]

108:52

>> Wow.

108:53

>> Okay. Okay. Hold on. Hold on. Hold on.

108:54

Though this looks like This has got to

108:56

be an old listing. These are just like

108:58

old old garbage.

109:01

You got to be kidding me.

109:04

I can buy a new one from Elmo Proing

109:08

brand

109:10

that's not as bad as the Nvidia one

109:12

that's like still available from actual

109:14

authorized AIBs.

109:17

>> [sighs]

109:18

>> I'm dead here. Can you imagine back

109:20

then, back in 2016,

109:23

anyone with a straight face trying to

109:26

sell a GPU from 2006,

109:30

like trying to sell you like a like a

109:33

like an X800 Pro or something?

109:35

>> I was going to say, what would that even

109:36

be? Dear God,

109:38

>> like a like a a 70. Yeah. Well, 2006.

109:44

What would that even be?

109:47

That would be like

109:49

GeForce

109:51

6.

109:56

When did the 6800 GT come out? I feel

110:01

like that must have been around then.

110:03

Oh, 2004. So, that would be like a

110:06

707,000.

110:08

That would be like a 7000 series.

110:12

>> But this is,

110:12

>> right, I'm looking at like a timeline of

110:14

Nvidia releases.

110:16

Yeah.

110:18

And then what would have been current in

110:20

2016? That would have been like 780

110:24

series.

110:24

>> And it would and it would have been a

110:26

low-end card from back then too,

110:30

>> which is crazy.

110:31

>> No, that would have been later. That

110:33

would have been like 980.

110:36

Uh GPU. Hold on. Let me double check.

110:39

No, dude. That was the 1080. So, that

110:43

would have been like someone trying to

110:45

sell you a 6800 GT when the 1080 existed

110:51

for $4.99.

110:54

[snorts]

110:55

That's crazy. And now that I think about

110:59

it, the 10 series also happened to be

111:02

the last generation to get a decent

111:05

entry-level GPU. The 1030 in the right

111:07

RAM configuration was actually not crap.

111:11

the the 10 the 10's just the goat. It's

111:14

just the goat. You look at it you look

111:16

at the 10 series compared to what came

111:18

10 years before it

111:19

>> and you look at it compared to what came

111:21

10 years after it and the difference is

111:23

just staggering in both cases. Like how

111:26

well it kept up with what came 10 years

111:29

later and how far ahead it was of what

111:32

was 10 years before.

111:36

>> I think 8800 GTX

111:39

technically launched in 2006. I think it

111:43

was November.

111:43

>> Oh, did it? All right. All right. I'll

111:45

allow it. I'll allow it.

111:47

>> But I mean, for most of that year, it

111:49

would have been 7000 series.

111:51

>> Crazy.

111:52

>> Yeah. Yeah. November 8, 2006. How much

111:54

do you think it was?

111:56

>> The 8800. Uh, which one?

111:59

>> GTX.

111:59

>> The GTX. Hold on. I might actually

112:01

remember this. I think it was uh I think

112:03

it was $699 if I recall correctly.

112:06

>> Yeah, 66 600 bucks is what I'm saying.

112:08

>> Is it 599? But it's probably

112:10

>> the Ultra was $9.99 though.

112:13

>> Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Also, that was 600

112:15

US. So, you might be remembering

112:17

Canadian prices.

112:18

>> I I I probably just forget. I I would

112:20

you I would have been thinking in US

112:22

prices back then as well cuz all of our

112:24

pricing at NCX was just derived from US

112:26

pricing anyway cuz we were buying in US

112:28

dollars but then selling in Canadian

112:30

dollars. So, we constantly had to be

112:31

like hedging for exchange and stuff. It

112:32

was a whole thing.

112:35

The 8800 GT though, that was goated

112:41

for value. That thing was incredible. It

112:43

was almost the performance of an 8800

112:45

GTX, but it was like 350 or something

112:48

like that when it first came out, or

112:49

like 299 or something. It was crazy.

112:52

It's crazy.

112:54

Like if if you talk to people who have

112:57

been in Nvidia long enough, they'll like

112:59

still remember the trauma of

113:02

accidentally releasing a product for

113:04

like $150 less than what they should

113:07

have been charging for it because you

113:09

don't actually like win because the

113:12

handful of people that were able to get

113:13

their hands on them, like they're happy,

113:16

but everyone else who's getting it

113:18

scalped or just who can't get one is

113:21

just mad at you. Like it's actually not

113:24

good to price something too low. It can

113:28

end up causing more backlash than it

113:30

causes goodwill with customers, which is

113:33

a really unintuitive thing that I think

113:36

consumers

113:37

if they just focus on sort of their own

113:40

feelings and forget that there's like a

113:43

lot of other customers out there and not

113:45

all of them are going to be able to get

113:46

one at that price. uh can easily forget.

113:49

Like I I don't envy, you know, my my

113:51

girl Taylor Swift, right? She she has

113:54

her concert ticket prices. If she goes

113:57

too low, nobody can get one. Everyone's

113:59

mad. Scalpers rejoice. If she goes too

114:02

high, she's a money grubbing [ __ ] And

114:05

how dare she price it so high? Like

114:08

nailing the exact right price. And then

114:10

back to our what's entry level, what's

114:11

mid-range. Uh part of that conversation

114:13

we haven't even gotten into yet is that

114:15

it's all relative. It's all relative to

114:18

your income, which by the way, whether

114:21

you have an entry level or a high-end

114:22

income, is super relative to where you

114:24

live and your cost of living. And so,

114:27

everyone's got their completely

114:28

different perspective on it. So, no

114:29

matter where you price something,

114:31

someone's going to be mad because you're

114:33

pricing it like a premium offering. And

114:35

someone else is going to be mad because

114:37

if you just charged a little more for

114:39

it, then I wouldn't have to stand next

114:41

to all the riff raff in line at Disney

114:42

or, you know, well, like whatever their

114:44

perspective is, right?

114:46

Yeah,

114:48

man. I

114:48

>> would that would be a hell of a move for

114:51

the Disney theme parks to have like one

114:54

day a month where the ticket is like

114:56

$2,000 and they're just like, "Yeah,

114:58

whatever. You the the park is

115:00

practically empty. You basically walk on

115:02

to every ride." I bet people would pay

115:05

it. You know, they would.

115:07

>> I promise you they would. Yeah.

115:09

>> Oh, man.

115:10

>> Back to the 8800, though. It's one of my

115:13

favorite generations of graphics cards.

115:14

>> Yeah. I I I just looked up the Ultra cuz

115:17

I remember I like I think it was just so

115:20

obviously never going to happen that I

115:22

just like almost erased this from my

115:24

memory

115:26

because I remember being like when I was

115:28

shopping for cars at that time like I

115:29

was not going to be able to afford an

115:30

Ultra. So I think I just kind of forgot

115:32

about it. The Shroud version which might

115:35

have been all of them I don't think so

115:36

but the Shroud version that had like the

115:38

bump

115:38

>> that's the Ultra

115:39

>> for the fan. Yeah. Was that every Ultra?

115:42

Was every Ultra like that?

115:44

uh every I believe so because that was

115:46

one of the early examples of Nvidia

115:49

having almost like a founders or

115:50

reference cooler and their AIBs were not

115:53

allowed to really modify it. So all you

115:55

really got was um like kind of stickers

116:00

on this. They all

116:01

>> they all looked like this with the

116:04

>> first time I saw one of these in person

116:06

was when I started working with you.

116:08

>> Oh yeah. Okay. I remember being like,

116:10

"Damn,

116:12

>> she was a she was a thick girl."

116:15

>> Yeah.

116:16

>> By the standards then like extending

116:18

>> like small

116:19

>> extending beyond the top of the PCIe

116:21

slot bracket thing was crazy at the

116:25

time. Two power connectors. Like for

116:29

contrast, uh here's what the 8800 GTX,

116:32

which was basically the same damn thing,

116:35

just not clocked as high. Here's what

116:37

the GTX looked like, which was pretty

116:39

cool, but it didn't have

116:41

>> This was like, that's a big card,

116:43

>> but it didn't have that big full

116:44

coverage shroud on it.

116:47

[clears throat]

116:52

>> So sweet.

116:53

>> What a time to be alive. Anyway, um,

116:56

cool. That was a cool, fun conversation.

116:58

We still don't have an answer as to what

117:00

exactly the crap mid-range tech is. Um,

117:03

>> I don't think it exists right now. I

117:04

think it's a a lie.

117:06

>> No, it does exist.

117:08

>> I think it's completely contextual based

117:10

on whether you're willing to buy used

117:13

stuff, where you live right now, cuz

117:15

there's actually surprisingly different

117:17

pricing uh geographically right now.

117:20

>> And the product category, mid-range TVs,

117:22

100% exist.

117:24

>> Entry level TVs that are worth buying

117:26

100% exist.

117:28

But not every category has a functioning

117:32

entry level or mid-range.

117:34

>> Um, and so I don't know what us covering

117:37

more mid-range tech necessarily even

117:39

looks like. It's good.

117:40

>> It also doesn't work. We We've talked

117:41

about this a bunch. It It doesn't

117:43

>> It can.

117:44

>> Yes. So, one formula that I've been

117:47

bugging the writing team for us to like

117:49

get on is I want to make a habit of

117:51

going to Costco like once every quarter.

117:53

And if we don't have a video on a tech

117:56

item that's in Costco, we basically

117:58

consider that a failure because if it's

118:00

mainstream enough that Costco carries

118:02

it, people need information about it.

118:04

And if people need information about it

118:06

and we're not providing it, then we

118:07

suck. And that's sort of the mentality I

118:09

want us to have about it.

118:10

>> You know what? I'd watch Lionus helping

118:15

uh somebody buy a TV at Costco.

118:19

>> I watch you taking you taking like some

118:22

employee from LMG that's like thinking

118:25

of pro like they want to buy a TV.

118:28

>> Yeah.

118:28

>> And you just taking them on a trip to

118:29

Costco and then they can ask what

118:31

different TVs. Oh, I think I like this

118:32

one. You can tell them like why it's,

118:33

you know, good or not.

118:34

>> Yeah, sure.

118:35

>> That I would I would love that.

118:36

>> You don't like that one. That one has

118:37

Tyizen.

118:38

>> What's a Tyson?

118:39

>> Yeah, sure.

118:41

But seriously,

118:42

>> it's the devil. [laughter]

118:46

>> In all seriousness though, man, I hate

118:48

that some of Samsung's TVs are so good

118:50

because I do find myself recommending

118:51

them sometimes, even though you I know

118:54

that you're going to have to deal with

118:56

that. But like at the end of the day,

118:58

image quality is king for me and that.

118:59

So, it might be hard for me to recommend

119:02

something necessarily because my

119:03

priorities are not the same as someone

119:05

else's. But what I can do is demystify.

119:06

like if they ask a question, I can

119:08

explain like, oh yeah, it has that or it

119:10

doesn't have that. Um the the whole just

119:13

like Linus Go shopping with people

119:15

format has actually been really

119:17

successful and going in and reviewing

119:20

the videos like I can see why. It's

119:22

really enjoyable and I also just I

119:24

really enjoy teaching people. This gets

119:27

us really well into the float plane

119:28

announcement. So we can get that out of

119:30

the way. But, uh, we did a a float plane

119:32

exclusive this week that is probably the

119:36

most fun that I've had shooting one in

119:38

quite a while. Um, oh, actually, there's

119:42

a couple banger float plane exclusives

119:44

this week. We have episode two of pull

119:47

the trigger if you get a tech question

119:49

wrong. Uh, catchy name, Sammy. Good job.

119:52

But basically, it's like tech tech

119:54

roulette, and you have to take a chance

119:57

at soaking yourself if you uh if the

120:01

other person gets the answer first. So,

120:02

it was Luke versus Nick Harris from the

120:05

lab. And then the other one is episode

120:08

two of LMG turn uh LMG learns life

120:11

skills. So, episode one, I think, was

120:13

Elijah learning to ride a bike. And

120:15

episode two is uh Colton and Nicole, who

120:19

I did not know, did not know how to

120:21

swim. Um, but I give them a swimming

120:25

lesson.

120:27

Um, and it was it was actually really

120:30

fun. It's been it's been fun reading

120:31

through the comments. Um, just cuz like

120:37

this reminds me of how Lionus can be

120:39

awesome at teaching stuff to people. We

120:41

don't get to see him do this very often,

120:42

but we can clearly see how professional

120:44

he is while doing this. Um, that's

120:48

literally my job is to teach people

120:50

about tech. I think you just it's one of

120:52

those funny things where it's like if

120:53

you saw your school teacher teaching

120:55

someone piano, you might go, "Wow,

120:57

you're a really good piano teacher." Um,

120:59

but like teaching anything follows very

121:04

very similar principles and it's a

121:06

really similar process. Um, so like when

121:09

you're teaching a physical skill, it's

121:10

just demo, describe, do, correct? Um,

121:14

and you just you just repeat that cycle.

121:16

And as long as you understand how to do

121:18

it pretty well and you have an

121:19

analytical eye, it's it's actually okay,

121:23

maybe this is this is me then. Uh maybe

121:26

not everyone feels this way, but it's

121:28

actually really fun. It's really

121:29

rewarding. Um, and it's

121:34

it tickles exactly the same part of my

121:38

brain as like Luke, you describe the joy

121:40

of like troubleshooting a tech problem

121:43

um or like uh like uh like debugging

121:46

something and like like that aha moment

121:48

of like getting it working. It's exactly

121:51

the same thing. It's the aha moment of

121:53

getting someone to uh process that they

121:56

need to be blowing bubbles and kicking

121:58

at the same time otherwise they are

122:00

going to sink and they are going to die

122:02

and seeing that now that will no longer

122:04

be the case and they might have a chance

122:05

of not unalivving themsel if they you

122:08

know fall into water at some point like

122:10

it's it's exciting it's fun um and I I

122:13

had a lot of I had a lot of fun with it

122:15

and um it's just one of those things

122:17

that is funny for me too because I

122:20

talked about it a lot more in early days

122:22

of the channel, but I often forget that

122:23

a lot of people watching today were not

122:26

born um when we started this channel. I

122:29

literally am a very professional

122:32

swimming lessons teacher because I

122:34

literally did it for a job. Like that

122:36

was my first job was to teach swimming

122:38

lessons. I'm I'm a professionally

122:40

trained uh water safety instructor. So

122:42

yeah, it's not it's not that crazy for

122:44

me to be able to teach people to swim.

122:47

[snorts]

122:48

But yeah, I I don't know. It's it's fun

122:50

though. It's fun. I had a really good

122:51

time. Uh, but yeah, Happy Merlin says,

122:54

"I really like this video, especially

122:56

that this time the instructor actually

122:57

had a plan how to instruct them and

122:59

seemed competent doing it." It's like,

123:01

"Yeah, I have like like many I have like

123:03

hundreds of hours under my belt teaching

123:05

swimming lessons. I know how to do it."

123:07

I was just I was a little rusty. Um, but

123:10

actually because I had planned to teach

123:11

my kids and then I never got around to

123:13

it. I ended up hiring someone. Um, I

123:15

went and I got my hands on like an old

123:19

WSI

123:20

um, like workbook. It wasn't the same

123:22

one. It was like the American one and I

123:23

had taught the Canadian one. Uh, but the

123:26

the principles are pretty much the same.

123:27

So, I was able to follow it along and

123:30

uh, and put together a nice little

123:31

program for Colton and Nicole. It was

123:33

good though. And like Sammy did a great

123:36

job of filming. We've got like this

123:37

underwater footage and everything. It's

123:39

a It's a fun little exclusive.

123:42

Uh, what else am I supposed to say about

123:43

Float Plane? Um, blah blah blah. Open

123:46

link. First one being tech roulette.

123:48

Show the thumbnail. Uh, Sammy's got a

123:51

bunch of instructions in here. I don't

123:52

follow the instructions, but whatever.

123:55

Uh, and we have some mouthwatering early

123:57

access. Sell the video, Lionus. Sell the

124:01

video. What does he mean? Ooh.

124:04

Oh, this is a fun one. Uh, this was

124:06

actually a uh media team labs

124:10

collaboration. So, we tested a bunch of

124:13

the top gaming dros to determine, hey,

124:17

is there a gaming advantage for one over

124:20

the others? And uh it was it actually

124:24

has a companion article over on the LT

124:26

Labs website where they get into some of

124:29

the more um daily driver like setupy

124:33

details in addition to just the

124:36

performance benchmark. So, it's a really

124:37

nice little one two um content piece

124:40

that I think you guys are really going

124:42

to enjoy. So, that's live on floatplane.

124:44

Now, you guys can uh get wet with us at

124:48

lmg.ggfpwan.

124:52

All righty then, Sammy. Thank you. Oh, I

124:54

get it. Because both of the exclusives

124:55

were water themed. All right, sure.

124:57

Fine. I'll allow it.

124:59

All right. What are we supposed to be

125:00

doing next?

125:03

>> Sponsors.

125:05

>> Sponsors. No, I think we should do a

125:06

topic or two before we do sponsors

125:07

again.

125:08

>> THEN WHY DO YOU ASK?

125:09

>> WAIT, have we done any sponsors yet?

125:11

>> No.

125:12

>> Holy crap, Dan. You got to you got to

125:14

tell me earlier. We've been we've been

125:16

we've been live for 2 and 1/2 hours.

125:20

>> Uh the show is brought to you by Vessie.

125:23

>> Just because it's summer doesn't mean

125:25

you

125:26

don't want to be caught in a surprise

125:29

storm with soggy socks.

125:31

>> Uh Vessie. Ah, Vessie. Stormbursts are a

125:33

great summer adventure companion. And as

125:35

always, Vessie claims they're 100%

125:37

waterproof like the rest of their shoes.

125:39

Since they come in a variety of colors,

125:41

and they have low and high top options,

125:43

you're going to be able to find a

125:44

perfect pair that goes great with your

125:46

wardrobe. Something we don't talk about

125:48

often when it comes to Vessie shoes is

125:50

they're actually vegan. Every pair of

125:51

shoes is made with eco-conscious

125:52

materials that are animalfriendly, and

125:55

every pair of Stormbursts is built to

125:57

handle all environments. Whether you're

125:58

traveling in a new city or spending some

126:00

time away in nature, Vessie offers a

126:03

year warranty on everything they sell,

126:04

as well as a great 30-day return policy

126:06

if you're not happy with your purchase.

126:08

And all orders over $110 come with free

126:10

shipping in North America. A little rain

126:13

shouldn't be the reason you stay home.

126:14

Get 15% off your first pair of Vessies

126:16

at vessi.com/wanshow.

126:19

Show's also brought to you by Op manager

126:21

Nexus. It's a full stack observability

126:24

platform that gives you and your IT team

126:26

a single clear view of your entire

126:28

infrastructure. There's no need to build

126:30

everything out from the beginning

126:31

either. It plugs right into the manage

126:33

engine ecosystem with the tools your

126:34

team already uses. If your team prefers

126:37

to work from the cloud, you're set. But

126:39

even if you prefer on-site servers or a

126:40

hybrid approach, OP Manager meets you

126:43

where you are. It's built to be deployed

126:45

quickly and uses customizable dashboards

126:47

so each member of your team gets the

126:49

reports and information they need the

126:51

most. Plus, with a global network of

126:53

localized to data centers, everything

126:54

stays highly available because they know

126:56

reliability is extremely important. It's

126:59

backed with strong data encryption,

127:00

adhering to indust industry and regional

127:02

compliance rules so your data stays

127:04

protected. And uh well, I wasn't really

127:06

going anywhere with that sentence. So,

127:08

OP Manager Nexus, stop guessing and

127:10

start knowing with full stack

127:11

visibility. We'll have a link for you in

127:13

the video [music] description.

127:16

Are you meditating over there?

127:18

>> No. I was just Well, I was thinking I

127:21

don't know.

127:22

>> Okay, so then yes,

127:23

>> maybe that's kind of the same thing.

127:24

>> Don't hurt yourself.

127:26

Back to more topics.

127:28

>> Strain of strain of brain brain cell.

127:30

>> Strain of thought.

127:32

>> I used the brain cell for too long.

127:34

>> Mom says it's my turn.

127:36

>> No,

127:36

>> I used it out. It's burnt up. Ah

127:40

[groaning]

127:41

>> uh topics I guess.

127:42

>> Sure. Yeah, why not?

127:44

>> This is

127:47

Yeah, let's do this one. 75% of all

127:49

PlayStation 3 games are now playable on

127:51

PC as RPCS3

127:54

nears full preservation. The open-

127:56

source PS3 emulator RPS RPCS3.

128:01

>> It's like designed to there earlier.

128:04

That one's tough. uh just announced that

128:07

75% of the entire PlayStation 3 catalog.

128:11

I I by the way I read that I think like

128:13

four times before I got there. Never saw

128:15

the C. [laughter]

128:17

Anyways, makes sense that it's there.

128:20

PC, but whatever. Anyway, CS3.

128:22

>> Um yeah. Yeah. Um the Yeah,

128:28

>> of the entire catalog is now playable on

128:29

PC. That's 2681

128:32

of the 3559 games it tracks. marked

128:36

playable, meaning they run start to

128:38

finish with acceptable performance and

128:40

no gamebreaking bugs up from 70% in

128:43

January. This is an aside,

128:46

>> that might be a nicer way for Proton DB

128:50

to talk about things cuz I'm at the

128:53

point where I just assume gold means not

128:55

worth my time. But anyways, moving

128:58

forward,

129:00

uh, a a few big exclusives like The Last

129:03

of Us, God of War II, and Metal Gear

129:05

Solid 4 are still in the, uh, in-game

129:08

tier, which in-game tier, which makes

129:11

sense since those pushed the original

129:13

hardware hardest.

129:14

>> Yeah, in-game just means you can get

129:16

past the menu, but you can't rely on it

129:19

to be stable or not have any bugs.

129:22

>> Okay, sure.

129:23

>> So, they can get in game, but you can't

129:25

>> game. Yeah. Yeah. You can't play all the

129:27

way through for sure just fine. This

129:29

comes right after Sony confirmed is

129:31

shutting down the PS3 and VA stores by

129:34

2027, which turns RPCS3

129:38

into the de facto preservation tool for

129:40

a generation Sony is actively suns

129:42

setting. The team also just

129:44

re-implemented a chunk of the PS3 system

129:46

software in open- source code, inching

129:49

towards the goal of running games

129:50

without needing Sony's firmware at all.

129:54

Wow.

129:56

Wow.

129:58

>> Our discussion question's a hot one.

130:00

Every time a company pulls the plug on

130:02

old hardware, it feels like it's the

130:04

volunteer emulator scene that actually

130:07

saves the games. Should preservation

130:10

really be falling entirely on unpaid

130:12

communities? Uh, no.

130:16

>> Yeah.

130:16

>> Yep. Not much of a discussion question,

130:18

but certainly a good point for us to

130:20

talk about. Um, and our other discussion

130:23

question is, if emulation is the only

130:25

thing keeping some of these games alive,

130:26

is it still fair to call it a legal gray

130:29

area? Yes.

130:32

Yes, it is.

130:34

>> Unfortunately.

130:35

>> Unfortunately. Yeah.

130:36

>> Also, this is this is

130:42

>> Does this make complete sense the

130:44

argument that we're making? Because most

130:45

PS3 games had physical releases.

130:48

>> Did I make an argument?

130:50

Well, no. Every time a company pulls a

130:52

plug on old hardware, they pull the plug

130:54

on the old hardware.

130:55

>> The thing about the old hardware though

130:57

they do, but does Sony provide

130:59

replacement parts for them?

131:01

>> Uh, okay. But that's a different thing.

131:04

That's not open source communities.

131:06

>> There's a finite amount of hardware that

131:09

will and and there's a finite lifespan

131:12

of that hardware before sometime in the

131:14

future when it will all be gone. there

131:17

is other than emulation and other than

131:19

preservationists

131:21

no other way to use that aforementioned

131:24

disc. And so I think no I I think I

131:27

don't think it's that I don't think it's

131:28

a disingenuous point to make because

131:30

that's exactly what they're raising is

131:32

when the plug gets pulled on the

131:34

hardware and there's various stages of

131:36

plug pulling. Like one of the plugs that

131:38

gets pulled is we're not selling it

131:40

anymore. Another plug that gets pulled

131:42

is there's no longer any under warranty.

131:43

Then there's no replacement parts. And

131:45

there's and so on and so on and so on

131:47

and so forth until someday there will

131:50

not be a single PlayStation 3 that is

131:53

left functioning.

131:54

>> I just I just don't know if it's the

131:56

same

131:58

argument like there's um

132:01

>> like okay when when we're talking about

132:03

like should it be entirely up to unpaid

132:05

communities? So what are we expecting

132:07

them to do

132:08

>> I guess is my question. So they they

132:10

made this console. Yeah,

132:12

>> they didn't they didn't stop it from

132:14

working.

132:15

>> I mean,

132:17

>> they they sold these games with physical

132:20

copies, lots of them. I still suspect

132:23

the majority of PS3 games were sold

132:24

physical. I don't think most people had

132:26

switched over at that time. So, there's

132:28

an incredible amount of physical copies

132:30

out there. There's 80 million PS3s out

132:32

there. What is the company supposed to

132:34

do when they you are expected to create

132:38

an emulation port for a completely

132:40

separate system? also known as the pl

132:42

the the computer. Does that make sense?

132:45

>> Um,

132:45

>> is that fair?

132:46

>> I think we've talked about this in the

132:48

past and I think that you and I kind of

132:50

both settled on, well, if I have some

132:52

way to buy it at a somewhat reasonable

132:55

price

132:57

and forever, then yeah, we we consider

133:02

the the emulation a lot less necessary.

133:06

Like if

133:06

>> Oh, I'm not against the emulation. Like

133:08

if the PlayStation store still if you

133:12

were still able to buy those games and

133:14

run them on modern hardware, then I

133:16

don't think there's any preservationist

133:17

argument to be made. But in a lot of

133:19

cases, you can't.

133:21

>> That's not that's not what I'm arguing.

133:22

Okay.

133:23

>> Be super clear. I'm not against the

133:24

preservation here in the slightest. My

133:26

my specific line is the

133:29

>> Yeah.

133:29

>> Where where it says, should it be fully

133:31

on unpaid communities? That that's the

133:34

line that I'm looking at is like what

133:35

are we by saying that what do we expect?

133:38

What is the action we're looking for

133:39

PlayStation to have taken here?

133:41

>> Well, that's what I'm that's what I'm

133:42

saying. The action that I think you and

133:44

I have talked about in the past and that

133:45

we agreed that they could take and that

133:48

would make all of this unnecessary is if

133:50

you could still buy these titles and

133:52

still play them on modern hardware

133:54

because that would completely get around

133:56

any kind of future where PlayStation 3

133:59

hardware is no longer viable or no

134:01

longer available.

134:02

But a lot of in a lot of cases that

134:04

doesn't happen. It doesn't go down like

134:06

that. And so in those cases, you know, I

134:09

look at something like a Chrono Trigger

134:12

for SNES and I go, "Okay, well, like

134:14

[ __ ] you Nintendo. Like you don't make

134:16

this available to me in any other way.

134:19

So like you're not it's not like you're

134:22

profiting if I go buy a secondhand SNES

134:24

cartridge anyway. So what are we even

134:25

talking about here?" Um, actually, I

134:28

don't know if Chrono Trigger is a great

134:29

example. Is that available on other

134:30

platforms? Chrono Trigger

134:34

Buy like can you can you buy it today

134:36

for any other Oh no it's on Steam. Okay

134:39

so bad example but there there are many

134:41

titles that were never ported to future

134:44

platforms. And if it was me today and I

134:47

was like I want to play Chrono Trigger I

134:50

would I would buy it for 15 bucks. I

134:52

would I would think it is no I would

134:54

think it's not great to to pirate that

134:57

for for me. And everyone can make their

134:58

own choice. I'm not passing a judgment

135:00

if you decide to download a ROM of

135:01

Chrono Trigger and play it that way.

135:02

>> We're talking about different things.

135:05

>> Well, I'm what I'm the only thing I'm

135:07

trying to answer is should it be falling

135:09

entirely on unpaid communities? And I'm

135:11

saying if the paid people like the

135:14

software engineers at Sony were making

135:16

it so that I you could play these games

135:18

on the modern hardware, then it wouldn't

135:20

be falling on unpaid communities. Sony

135:22

would be doing it. But if they don't do

135:25

that, then it is falling on unpaid

135:27

communities because otherwise nobody's

135:28

doing it.

135:31

>> Yeah.

135:32

>> Yeah.

135:33

>> I I think we're I think we're on I think

135:35

we're having different conversations.

135:37

>> So what do you mean then?

135:38

>> So I was never questioning like if this

135:41

isn't happening then this happens. If

135:43

this doesn't happen or if this does

135:45

happen then this doesn't happen. Like

135:46

yeah sure it's the should. So that's why

135:50

I keep coming back to like what should

135:52

Sony do in this case? So, are we

135:54

expecting them

135:56

as a company to permanently emulate

135:58

every single game that ever gets

136:00

released on their on any console they've

136:01

ever had?

136:06

>> Is that the action? I think

136:07

>> like the the thing that I'm questioning

136:08

is what is the action that we're asking

136:10

from them?

136:12

>> Cuz you're saying it should be

136:13

available. So, okay. So Sony, not

136:16

necessarily the individual studios, but

136:18

Sony needs to emulate 3559 games forward

136:23

to every single console or PC and make

136:26

it compatible until the end of time and

136:29

then do that for PlayStation one and

136:31

PlayStation 2 and PlayStation 3 and four

136:33

and everything.

136:36

Um,

136:38

I mean, I think that a lot of people

136:40

would also settle for

136:43

>> maybe they can contribute.

136:44

>> Yeah, I think a contribution would go a

136:46

long way. Yeah.

136:47

>> Maybe there's some threshold where like

136:50

if you sell a certain amount of consoles

136:52

or something.

136:53

>> Sure.

136:54

expected to contribute

136:56

uh once you sunset that console, you're

136:59

expected to contribute some amount of uh

137:01

software development uh hours or or some

137:05

something towards at the very least at

137:07

the very least they could just like

137:09

screw off and not like make life

137:12

miserable for the people who are doing

137:14

it.

137:15

>> Are they doing that? um they they can be

137:18

very ligious around certain things like

137:21

the firmware for instance is one of the

137:23

ways that Sony fights uh emulation by by

137:28

going after anybody hosting firmware

137:30

files which are copyrightable even if

137:32

there's other aspects of emulation that

137:34

are considered to be um you know a

137:36

separate independent work and

137:38

non-infringing. Um, so it's it's,

137:43

you know, in response to our other

137:45

discussion question here, it's

137:46

absolutely a legal gray area because you

137:50

can download an emulator and it's not

137:52

illegal to host an emulator download

137:54

that no one's going to be able to go

137:56

after you for that. But as soon as

137:57

you're hosting like the SCPH or whatever

138:00

like firmware files, then you're in real

138:02

trouble. So tracking those down is just

138:04

like a it's like an endless maze of

138:08

cross- refferencing Reddit posts to

138:10

where there's an active download link

138:12

for it because it all ultimately gets

138:13

pulled down. And if it wasn't Sony doing

138:15

it, then I don't know who it would be.

138:17

Um

138:19

I don't know. I think I think there's

138:21

given the financial incentive to like

138:24

keep making these games available and

138:26

how [snorts]

138:29

with all the tools that Sony has to

138:32

build forward and backward compatibility

138:34

which they clearly you know have done so

138:38

that no I actually don't think it's that

138:40

unreasonable to ask them to continue to

138:42

do that. I mean they have done it.

138:49

>> Yeah. I think there's actions that could

138:51

make sense. I uh I like the idea. It's

138:55

it's it's interesting

138:59

interesting approaches. Yeah. I'm

139:01

wondering like like one thing I'm

139:02

wondering is okay if the firmware is a

139:04

problem like all right once they once

139:06

they get rid of the store. So, okay,

139:10

they're could they're shutting down the

139:11

PS3 store in 2027,

139:13

>> the VA too, I think.

139:14

>> So, on on the date that they ditched the

139:17

store if they open sourced the firmware,

139:21

>> I like is that is that an action that

139:23

would like work for people?

139:25

>> That'd be that'd be a pretty bro move. I

139:28

mean, I think there's a lot more

139:29

documentation that um would be extremely

139:33

helpful so that it didn't all have to be

139:35

reverse engineered.

139:36

>> No, they would never. Guys, we're not

139:37

talking about if they would do it. I'm

139:38

I'm talking ah I feel like I'm not

139:40

communicating this clearly. We're we're

139:41

we're talking should preservation be

139:44

falling on the unpaid communities. Okay,

139:46

everyone's effectively being like okay

139:47

no. So then it's like all right then in

139:49

that case what action do we want them to

139:51

take?

139:51

>> And then I'm trying to figure out what

139:53

thing not what they would do but what

139:55

action do we want them to take? Maybe

139:58

the firmware is too much.

140:00

>> Okay, maybe they don't want to do that.

140:02

It's trademarkable. It's a little bit

140:03

too far. What other step is then going

140:06

to work? I would accept

140:07

>> them contributing to the open source

140:09

code.

140:11

>> I'd accept Sony doing the work and

140:14

continuing to commercialize it. And if

140:16

they aren't going to do that, then I

140:19

think that's where we get into some of

140:20

the solutions you're talking about where

140:22

they contribute to a preservationist

140:25

society or they uh or or

140:28

do do something they they they they even

140:33

if it's cost prohibitive, right? like I

140:36

okay, here's a compromise that I could

140:38

see someone like a Sony potentially

140:40

agreeing to is they basically go, okay,

140:43

well, here's the cell architecture and

140:46

you can port it to an FPGA if you really

140:49

want to.

140:50

>> Um, by the way, that FPGA is going to be

140:53

like an $8,000,

140:55

you know, thing because cell

140:57

architecture was ridiculous or whatever.

141:00

um

141:02

you know, good luck doing anything with

141:04

this because at least what that would do

141:07

is it would create a future 20, 30 years

141:11

from now when again it comes down to

141:13

when are all those PS3s going to die?

141:15

When all of those are actually starting

141:17

to die, maybe it becomes viable by that

141:20

point to to do an affordable FPGA PS3.

141:24

Like

141:24

>> you're making it more reasonably

141:26

possible. give us some point on the

141:27

horizon that we could look toward and

141:30

go, "Okay, there's our target. That's

141:33

what we're sailing toward to to ensure

141:36

that this entire generation of gaming

141:38

history isn't lost."

141:40

>> But right now, they're doing nothing.

141:42

They're actively working against those

141:44

efforts. And and quite frankly, I mean,

141:47

I understand why because in a lot of

141:49

cases, this is software that is still

141:52

available and does still contribute

141:55

commercially to the endeavors that Sony

141:57

is undertaking. Like, I I get that

141:59

obviously they're going to be

142:00

antipiriracy. They make money selling

142:02

software. Um, but there's got to be

142:06

there's [snorts] got to be an eye

142:07

toward, okay, tens of years in the

142:11

future, how do we make sure that the

142:14

efforts today to block piracy don't

142:16

prevent it from being preserved? Where's

142:18

the middle ground?

142:22

>> Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Uh, a fun topic.

142:27

>> Oh,

142:28

>> PC Gamer turns Steam games into Do you

142:30

want to talk about something?

142:31

>> I knew you were going to love this. So,

142:32

I picked this just for you. I didn't

142:33

really care about

142:34

>> Dude, it's so sick. I I actually like

142:36

kind of even just want to do this myself

142:38

cuz it sounds incredible.

142:40

>> I I knew it. I knew it.

142:43

>> Even just having like Oh man,

142:47

I wonder how absurd they would become.

142:49

But if you could make like an e- in

142:52

display that shows the art of the game

142:55

because the these are 128 gig SSDs. Like

142:57

I don't I don't want to have a trillion

142:59

of them. But if I had like maybe five

143:01

that were some of my more recent games

143:03

and then I could update the art on it,

143:06

[laughter] that would be so sweet.

143:08

>> Okay. Okay. Luke, do you want to read

143:09

the thing? Uh W. Calderini says, um,

143:12

tell us the topic.

143:13

>> Fair enough. I got too excited. My bad.

143:15

Uh, Redditor Jabril Sama built a Steam

143:19

game cartridge system by loading

143:21

individual games onto used uh, 2 and a

143:24

half inch SATA SSDs, then 3D printing

143:27

custom cartridge shells with cover art,

143:30

so they look like oversized Switch

143:32

carts. It works by triggering a script

143:35

that autoes the game when it detects the

143:37

SSD has been put into the dock, or

143:39

alternatively just drops you on the

143:42

correct Steam page. So then you can

143:44

click play. The whole thing runs on

143:46

Linux using uh UDEV using a UDEV rule to

143:49

detect the drive and a systemd

143:53

service to run the script. No, you don't

143:55

care about any of that kind of stuff.

143:56

But it's recreatable on Windows with the

143:59

without the auto launch part. But I

144:01

mean, you're probably switching to Linux

144:02

anyway, so you can make it the coolest

144:04

version. Uh it's a novelty more than a

144:06

practical setup. The the notes say this

144:10

doesn't seem that impractical to me. Um,

144:12

and and the games are still digitally

144:14

licensed, so it's not true preservation.

144:16

Yeah, it's not preservation. It's just

144:17

fun. Uh, but the timing struck a nerve.

144:20

It's landing. Yeah, that's a good point.

144:22

It's landing right as the PlayStation

144:24

disc news has everyone talking about

144:26

physical media again, and it scratches

144:27

the itch of physically picking a game

144:29

off the shelf. One of the reasons why I

144:31

would want to do this is it would be fun

144:35

to like I don't know once a quarter or

144:38

something be like you know what these

144:40

are the games I I would I would love to

144:42

like get off the backlog.

144:43

>> Yeah. And then you're intentful about

144:45

it.

144:46

>> Yeah. I sit down the computer. What do I

144:47

want to play? Well, I've got these four

144:49

or five in front of me.

144:50

>> Y

144:51

>> which one do I want to put in? I put the

144:53

card in. It just starts the game and I'm

144:55

going. There's there's not the like

144:57

Steam library fatigue that you run into.

145:00

Yeah, this is freaking

145:00

>> paralysis.

145:01

>> You want to hear the best news? You want

145:03

to hear the best part?

145:05

>> 128 gig like old SATA SSDs can be had

145:09

for like as little as 15 bucks.

145:13

>> Yeah,

145:14

>> here's some old SanDisks,

145:16

you know. So, you could you could get

145:18

your five games for 19 Canadian dollars

145:25

each. So, it would be a grand total,

145:27

Here we go, of 115 Canadian dollars for

145:32

all your game carts if you wanted to

145:34

build something like this.

145:36

>> I think it's cooler to have the game on

145:38

there and then that keeps some, you

145:40

know, some storage off your actual

145:42

drives that are in your system and stuff

145:43

like that. So, it's like very likely

145:44

worth it. But realistically, if you

145:47

already have a big game drive, you don't

145:49

have to have an SSD for each one of

145:52

these. You just need the launch script.

145:54

So you you could have some really tiny

145:57

storage. Um it could probably be like an

146:00

SD card effectively.

146:02

>> You know, you wouldn't like it as much

146:03

that way.

146:04

>> No, I want to do the SSD. That is sick.

146:06

That is fant.

146:08

>> I'm not even talking for me. I'm just

146:10

talking if somebody's like, you know, I

146:12

don't I don't necessarily want to do

146:14

that. Or maybe used SSDs are more

146:15

expensive where I am. Or

146:16

>> I knew you were going to love this. I

146:18

just I saw this headline and I was like

146:20

I was looking into it. I'm just like,

146:22

"All right, I got I got to put this on

146:23

the way show, doc. I'm going to bring

146:24

this to Luke.

146:26

>> Yeah. Yeah. Somebody said USB drives.

146:27

Yeah. You could use like old USB drives.

146:30

It was just a little tiny auto launch

146:32

script. You could put on like anything.

146:33

>> You could use an RFID chip.

146:35

>> You could just you could just put a card

146:37

on on you could like boop a card in

146:40

order to launch the game. Like you could

146:41

do this with anything.

146:42

>> But having the fun having it actually

146:45

chunk in and actually has the data on

146:46

the drive. That's it's cool. I like that

146:48

a lot.

146:50

>> Yeah. That's that's that's wicked.

146:52

>> Cool. Um,

146:54

>> this paired with the the operating

146:56

systems that that dude at Whaleand did.

146:59

>> Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

147:02

>> Yeah. He had Windows and Linux operating

147:04

systems on SSD cartridges for his like

147:06

old school modded system. It was so

147:08

cool.

147:08

>> So based,

147:09

>> didn't he make it look like uh like NES

147:11

carts or something?

147:12

>> Yeah. No, I think it was for an NES uh

147:15

modded system.

147:16

>> So then they looked like NES carts and

147:18

they like went in, but they were like

147:19

U.2 drives. Like they were like crazy. I

147:22

have to do that for my server.

147:23

>> No, you don't have to do anything.

147:25

>> No, I have to do that.

147:26

>> You have to do that.

147:27

>> Can you explain? He actually was just

147:29

sitting there like this. He wasn't even

147:30

on camera.

147:30

>> Oh my god. I got to

147:33

[laughter]

147:34

>> I'm leaving. Um, have a good time.

147:37

>> I have work to do. I must go. [laughter]

147:40

I have been compelled. Um

147:43

on topic um you know to do with

147:46

PlayStation and game preservation

147:49

um Sony is planning to stop producing

147:52

physical game discs in 2028. Okay, we

147:54

know this. This points to a digital only

147:56

PlayStation 6. Um unfortunately that's a

147:59

huge problem for like a big chunk of the

148:02

world.

148:03

Today 121 countries cannot officially

148:08

create PSN accounts or access the

148:10

PlayStation store.

148:12

So, in a disc-free future, players in

148:15

those regions would have no official way

148:18

to buy PlayStation 6 games at all.

148:22

>> So, this is the same problem that we had

148:23

with Hell Divers, right? I'm I'm I'm

148:26

remembering I think this is the exact

148:28

same problem that Hell Divers had.

148:32

This whole discussion about how 62% of

148:37

countries are locked out of PlayStation

148:40

was kicked off from a Reddit user

148:42

pointing out that Georgia has no

148:43

PlayStation store, meaning that

148:45

Georgians would not be able to buy games

148:48

after 2028. It is important context on

148:51

that 62% number though that this is

148:53

counting countries not players and not

148:55

revenue. Uh so the excluded list

148:57

Estonia, Jamaica, Kenya, Pakistan,

148:59

Vietnam, Zimbabwe, Venezuela and others

149:02

is mostly smaller markets and roughly

149:04

70% of Sony's gaming revenue already

149:06

comes from North America and Europe

149:07

where access to the PSN or PlayStation

149:10

Network and PlayStation Store is not a

149:11

problem. Um but these other regions have

149:15

historically leaned on physical media

149:17

precisely because PSN isn't available.

149:20

So losing discs is going to hit them the

149:22

hardest, even if they're a small slice

149:24

of Sony's balance sheet. This lands

149:27

while Sony is already under pressure on

149:29

the digital ownership front, facing a

149:30

$450 million lawsuit from a Dutch

149:32

nonprofit and a planned antirust

149:35

complaint from Mexican lawmakers. Sony

149:37

has not announced any plan to expand PSM

149:41

to those 121 countries before the 2028

149:43

cutoff. And there's unconfirmed

149:45

speculation that the PS6 could offer an

149:49

optional external disc drive. Our

149:52

discussion question is Sony is asking

149:55

the whole world, well, not really

149:57

asking, demanding that the whole world

149:59

go digital when a big chunk of the world

150:02

quite literally can't. Is dropping discs

150:05

a reasonable business call? Or is it a

150:09

giant FU to the gamers who relied on

150:11

physical media the most? By the way, I'm

150:14

doing a really quick tally of

150:16

populations.

150:17

>> Can it be both?

150:18

>> And it's billions of people.

150:21

>> We're talking about smaller countries.

150:22

It is billions of people.

150:24

>> From a business

150:26

>> from a business standpoint,

150:29

I see the logic.

150:33

But from a human standpoint,

150:36

it's very clear how problematic the

150:38

behavior is. I think I think both of

150:40

those things can be equally true.

150:42

>> Yeah. Sure.

150:44

Because maybe Yeah, there are billions

150:46

of people, but how many of them are

150:47

getting PlayStations? There are billions

150:49

of people,

150:50

>> especially PlayStation 6's.

150:52

>> How's the PS6 going to cost?

150:55

>> Yeah. How reduced are the prices they're

150:57

playing they're paying on those stores

150:59

because of currency stuff, blah blah

151:00

blah blah blah. That that all converts

151:04

into business value, whatever. But like,

151:06

oh my god,

151:09

just have physical freaking discs, bro.

151:12

Well, wasn't it like almost 20% of

151:15

PlayStation sales were still physical?

151:16

Like, do we really have to cut this off?

151:19

>> I mean, it was less that it was still

151:21

20% or 25 or something like that. And it

151:24

was more how quickly it was trending

151:26

towards all digital,

151:28

>> right? That's right. That's right.

151:29

>> Yeah. Like, it's it's it's

151:32

moving fast. Gamers are making a lot of

151:34

noise about losing physical media and

151:36

then

151:37

>> a lot of action about buying

151:38

>> lining up to buy digital media.

151:40

>> Yeah.

151:42

And I am I am an an early adopter of

151:47

digital media. I basically like stopped

151:49

buying physical games when Steam became

151:51

>> You didn't have a choice.

151:53

>> I know.

151:54

>> Computer games. Computer games stopped

151:56

being available physically.

151:57

>> I still had a choice. I I I switched

151:59

over well before I didn't have a choice.

152:02

>> Oh, well, you're a fart then.

152:04

>> Well, I'll deal with it.

152:05

>> Yeah.

152:05

>> What are you What are you gonna do about

152:07

it? I do I do miss my old Warcraft 3

152:09

Reign of Chaos box. That was like the

152:11

last

152:11

>> Maybe you should have kept buying them.

152:13

>> That was the last cool full-sized game

152:15

box that I bought and I like had it up

152:17

on my shelf. It was that was cool.

152:20

>> I I kept buying them when I could.

152:23

>> The the PC games disappeared from stores

152:26

really fast.

152:27

>> Oh yeah.

152:27

>> Like really really

152:29

>> overnight, man. I went from like when we

152:31

were at Future Shop, I wanted to like go

152:32

see the PC game aisle to like what is

152:34

even the point? Why is this even here?

152:36

Like

152:37

>> I only stopped buying physical games

152:39

because they just literally were not

152:41

available. And then for a while there

152:42

you could only get them if you bought

152:44

the collector's edition and then even

152:46

the collector's edition just turned into

152:47

digital goats.

152:49

>> Yeah. I don't know. [snorts]

152:52

>> Gambler says, "I also switched over.

152:54

Digital seemed so much more convenient.

152:56

That was before I knew the evil that

152:58

would then happen."

153:01

I mean, evil is a strong word, but

153:03

anti-consumer I could get behind.

153:06

Yeah.

153:09

>> Um,

153:11

okay. Okay. Well, I'll do the sponsor

153:13

spots in a minute. Dan, first I want to

153:15

do this. I have something called Lionus

153:17

bonus topic.

153:20

I got tagged in a tweet this week um

153:25

from something that

153:29

almost certainly is the most AI thing

153:33

that I have encountered in quite some

153:35

time. Uh so here's some AI person.

153:40

That's about the most AI profile picture

153:42

I think I've ever seen with a generic um

153:46

you know

153:48

handle how an NCX dropout built Linus

153:51

tech tips into YouTube's biggest tech

153:52

channel. Uh that's pretty debatable but

153:54

sure whatever. Um and basically

153:57

basically it's like uh it's like just

153:59

like an like an ego thing. So they

154:01

generate these pages, tag the person and

154:04

then presumably try to get you to talk

154:06

about them. And it's like a lot of

154:07

awards are like this where you like you

154:09

pay to be considered for an award and

154:13

then because no one like pays for it,

154:15

you like win the award and then you get

154:16

write ups about yourself and it's like

154:19

ick. Anyway, the point is I was like,

154:21

okay, what is this? I'll bite. Let's

154:24

have a look.

154:26

And basically what I came away from this

154:30

with is that this is

154:34

in a nutshell the the death of the

154:39

internet. Luke, the end of being able to

154:42

find reliable information on the

154:46

internet because this is like

154:49

snake eating its own tail

154:53

content generation that is ultimately

154:56

only designed to feed into LLMs,

155:00

>> which is going to create more content,

155:03

which is going to So, so let's go

155:05

through here for fun and find some of

155:08

the things that are wrong uh in this in

155:11

this article that if you if you dig into

155:14

who these guys

155:16

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. If you dig

155:18

into who these guys are

155:20

um they are

155:22

claimable and collectible. So you'll

155:25

you'll uh are one true page for everyone

155:29

making something real, claimable,

155:31

correctable, and built to be found. This

155:34

is really important. built to be found

155:37

by AI. Okay. And then so who the crap

155:40

were you guys again? I forget. I forget.

155:42

I looked it up and basically it was like

155:46

two it was two people from I want to say

155:51

you know what I'm not going to say where

155:53

they were from because I forget. Hold

155:55

on. Where are they? Uh so the company is

155:58

based in Peter Peterbr Peter Peterbr or

156:02

something like that. And yeah, it's uh

156:04

it's two it's two um uh Pakistani

156:08

nationals that maybe are related because

156:10

they have the same last name that are

156:12

listed as the founders over on Indul

156:15

open. So make of that what you will. Who

156:16

knows? Maybe everything's fake. Um but

156:19

let's uh let's go ahead and let's have a

156:21

look at just how many things are wrong

156:23

here before we even have to go too far.

156:25

At the very top, not too bad. Negotiated

156:28

a YouTube channel worth millions for

156:29

exactly $1. Actually, I lied. That's

156:31

pretty terrible because it wasn't worth

156:33

millions at the time. Uh, built a media

156:35

company from the garage with his wife.

156:36

That's a nice name for you, Luke. No,

156:38

just kidding. My wife was involved at

156:39

the beginning. Okay, I'll give them a

156:40

pass on this clause. And still gets on

156:43

camera to handle the hardware himself.

156:44

Okay, fair enough. The most famous tech

156:46

reviewer on the internet. Not sure about

156:47

that. Is also the one who drops the most

156:50

gear. Okay, so it's AI generated, but it

156:52

got what, like 70% right, which I guess

156:54

is about on par. Some of this

156:56

>> 70%. How do you How do This Okay, here's

156:58

a fun question. How [snorts] are you

157:01

quantifying that?

157:02

>> By words. By word count,

157:05

>> character or sentence.

157:06

>> I'm giving. If they have the word 'the'

157:08

and it's in the right spot in a

157:09

sentence, that is mostly correct, then

157:12

I'm counting that.

157:12

>> To me, that isn't a fact.

157:15

>> Here, here, hold on. I'm going to

157:17

>> The word 'the' is not a fact. So, I

157:19

would go based on how many facts they

157:21

stated.

157:21

>> Okay. Here. All right. We'll work we'll

157:23

work on this together. We'll we'll mark

157:24

it up together. Okay. Here. Here we go.

157:26

Okay. So, I've got my I've got my stat.

157:28

This is actually a very interesting

157:29

debate cuz it was people talk about

157:31

error rate and it's a it's an

157:34

interesting conversation.

157:35

>> So he did negotiate a YouTube channel

157:39

for exactly I'll argue against myself

157:42

real quick.

157:43

>> Yeah,

157:44

>> he could even be wrong. The word he

157:47

could be wrong,

157:48

>> but it isn't. It's right. I did

157:51

>> right. But it's something that could be

157:53

wrong.

157:54

>> Okay. Okay.

157:54

>> So, the fact that they got it right

157:56

could like it's it's it's the whole

157:58

error. It's a very complicated

158:00

conversation.

158:01

>> So, actually, I think I was going your

158:04

way because it's more than 70% right if

158:07

we just look at it by word count. Uh I

158:10

disagree the most famous reviewer on the

158:13

internet, but

158:15

he drops the most gear. So, what I give

158:17

them? I give them a 70%. So maybe

158:20

they're a little bit um closer to 50 if

158:24

we do it by

158:25

>> a YouTube channel worth millions for

158:26

exactly $1. If we encapsulate that as

158:28

one thing incorrect.

158:30

>> Yes.

158:31

>> Built a media company from the garage

158:32

with his wife.

158:33

>> Yes. Correct.

158:34

>> That is not entirely correct.

158:37

>> But it's it's not it's it's maybe

158:41

>> I would say I would say that's a solid

158:43

like 66% right. I could agree with

158:47

>> they got two out of the three people.

158:49

[laughter]

158:51

>> What? [gasps]

158:53

>> Oh no, Ed. Ed.

158:55

>> So 50 at least 50% right. We can give

158:57

them 50% credit for that one.

158:59

>> Okay.

159:00

>> And and I mean realistically like if

159:02

they're if they're talking in terms of

159:05

like the the shareholders, then they're

159:07

not wrong.

159:07

>> Then it's correct.

159:08

>> Then it's correct. Still

159:10

>> on camera to handle hardware himself.

159:11

Totally

159:12

>> totally correct.

159:13

>> Most famous tech reviewer.

159:15

No.

159:16

>> Pretty debatable. I'd say it's probably

159:17

Marquez if I had to pick one.

159:21

>> I mean, oh man, there's a there's an

159:22

argument to be made for Aaron at this

159:24

point, but it's like, are we talking

159:26

lifetime or are we talking active? Like,

159:28

what are we talking about?

159:29

>> The boss.

159:29

>> Yeah.

159:31

>> Yeah. I think I think in regards to like

159:33

household name, you're still going to be

159:34

Marquez.

159:35

>> You think so?

159:36

>> I think so. Cuz he gets in front of more

159:38

mainstream media stuff.

159:42

>> Anyway,

159:43

>> I think so. It's tough. They're both

159:46

huge.

159:47

>> Um, is also the one who drops the most

159:49

area. I mean, we got to give them that

159:50

one.

159:52

>> I either way, I think we can agree that

159:54

there's a lot of ways you can break it

159:55

down, and it's I'd say it's more correct

159:57

than incorrect,

159:58

>> but there are already some glaring

160:00

issues.

160:01

>> I think that's a pretty low bar, but

160:02

yeah,

160:03

>> this is pretty pretty good. Um, but I

160:06

think this is just like taken from

160:07

Wikipedia probably. This is a BS number

160:10

that means nothing. anytime you've ever

160:12

read like a Forbes thing or like how

160:15

much the top creators are making or

160:17

whatever. Remember guys, these are

160:18

people that I know in a lot of cases and

160:21

also I know myself. Um

160:24

>> what?

160:25

>> Yeah, y'all not even y'all not even

160:27

close. Y'all guessing, so don't even

160:28

worry about that.

160:29

>> Yeah, add a couple zeros, idiots.

160:31

>> Well, no, I didn't say that. Um some of

160:34

this is some of this is pretty good. You

160:36

know, combined whatever negotiated the

160:38

IP from NCX for $1 when he left to start

160:40

LMG. Yeah, like some of this is pretty

160:42

good, but this is where things go

160:44

absolutely crazy. [snorts]

160:47

>> Cameraman, [laughter]

160:51

>> that's wrong on like multiple levels.

160:54

[laughter]

160:54

>> What?

160:57

>> What are you talking about?

161:00

Right. Um,

161:02

>> that's awesome. I like that. Yeah,

161:06

>> that's wrong because there was someone

161:08

called

161:09

the cameraman

161:11

>> that was like

161:12

>> yes

161:12

>> a nickname for an a specific person and

161:15

it's wrong because he wasn't a

161:18

cameraman.

161:18

>> Oh yeah,

161:20

>> it's it's wrong for both reasons. And it

161:22

has the classic AI issue of being like

161:27

just right enough to make you

161:31

um to make you feel like it's all got to

161:34

be right. Like this whole paragraph

161:37

actually nails it better than almost any

161:39

other summary I've seen. Sebastian grew

161:41

up on a hobby farm in Maple Ridge,

161:42

British Columbia. The kind of childhood

161:44

that doesn't suggest YouTube

161:45

billionaire. Okay, first of all, your ve

161:47

your own your own value here. Uh,

161:51

whoops. But anyway,

161:52

>> you just need more zeros. It's not that

161:54

big of a

161:54

>> problem. He was he was named after

161:56

Lionus Pauling, the only scientist in

161:58

history to win two unshared Nobel

161:59

prizes, which either set an impossible

162:01

benchmark or a very Canadian one. Not

162:03

sure what that last bit means, but

162:04

whatever. [laughter]

162:06

>> We're pretty close.

162:08

Diagnosed with ADHD as a child, he

162:10

channeled it into a restless curiosity

162:12

about how things work. The kind that

162:13

gets you hired at a computer retailer. I

162:15

mean, that's that's probably fair

162:16

enough. the like hyperfocus on on

162:18

electronics and then you know the touch

162:21

of the tism that made me prefer

162:22

computers to people. It probably

162:24

resulted in in my future career.

162:27

But here's here's where things get a

162:31

little bit stupid. Uh you know all of

162:33

this kind of yeah mostly made sense.

162:38

October 12th Minus Media Group

162:39

Incorporated. January 2013 operations

162:42

launched from a garage in British

162:43

Columbia. The co-founder on the business

162:45

side was his wife, Ivonne Hoe. So far so

162:48

good. A former a

162:52

>> a former Hong Kong actress with

162:54

approximately 50 TV appearances who

162:58

pivoted to become CFO of a tech media

163:01

company.

163:02

>> Mhm.

163:04

>> Really

163:04

>> good so far. Good so far.

163:06

>> What's the Nicholas Cage meme? You don't

163:08

say. [laughter]

163:11

I didn't know that I married an older

163:13

lady.

163:16

>> So, we're a TV star.

163:17

>> Yeah, we're a TV star. So, Ivonne Ho,

163:19

the actress is over here. Totally

163:23

different person. Uh oh. Okay. I was

163:26

hoping for a picture so that we could

163:27

see.

163:32

Okay. Ivon Ho, the actress. Completely

163:36

different person, not to be confused

163:37

with Ivanho, my wife.

163:41

Ivanho actress. Ivanho actress. Ivonne

163:45

my wife. Ivonne my wife.

163:51

And this is like this is a piece of

163:53

misinformation that only exists on like

163:58

weird message boards and stuff like

164:00

that. Like it's uh

164:04

where is it getting this stuff? And then

164:06

and then so anyway, I don't think we

164:07

have to like keep going down this whole

164:10

down this whole thing, but like

164:14

the fact that this kind of quote unquote

164:17

resource

164:19

is being built with the goal of being AI

164:25

findable and AI searchable, whether

164:26

they'll achieve that goal or not, at

164:28

that I don't know. [sighs]

164:32

But I just feel like we're doomed, man.

164:34

How are we going to find How are we How

164:36

are we going to find accurate

164:38

information, man?

164:40

>> Yeah.

164:44

Yeah.

164:46

I'm interested in

164:51

if it's going to come up. Um,

164:58

okay. So, I search it up. I get a Reddit

165:01

thread. I get Wikipedia.

165:04

other random junk. I mean, it's not

165:07

surfacing that high on uh

165:13

on Google. So, maybe they're not

165:15

succeeding in that part.

165:17

>> This is amazing. [ __ ] posted this in uh

165:20

in the chat. How to confuse machine

165:21

learning.

165:23

This is so cursed.

165:26

Thanks. I hate it. [laughter]

165:29

>> That's brutal.

165:30

>> All right. Anyho,

165:32

um, all right. Well, we can we can move

165:35

on. I just I came across that and I was

165:37

just like, "Oh my gosh, we're doomed."

165:39

Like, we're so we're so done.

165:44

Cuz that is for a lot of people that is

165:46

actually cannon that I am married to a

165:49

Hong Kong actress

165:52

who is I think like 10 or 15 years my

165:54

senior.

165:55

>> Mhm. That was a good move.

165:58

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, it's it was really

165:59

helpful to leverage her experience in

166:01

show business. Uh yeah, she was born in

166:03

1974, so she's 12 years older than me

166:06

and also I don't think has ever lived in

166:08

Canada. So, uh that's uh it's a long

166:11

distance long relationship. We have

166:13

there's there's challenges, but we make

166:14

it work, you know.

166:17

Uh hey, oh, I never talked about the Mac

166:21

app. Okay, this is so cool. What cable

166:25

is a free Mac app that lets you figure

166:28

out what your mystery USBC cables are.

166:31

You just plug one into your Mac and it

166:33

shows you things like charging limits,

166:35

data speeds, and display support.

166:38

Unfortunately, the app's creator, Daryl

166:41

Mley, told Beverge that he doesn't plan

166:42

to make a Windows version because quote

166:45

Windows APIs don't expose what what

166:47

cable needs. But I just thought that

166:49

this was super cool and I just wanted to

166:52

highlight it for Mac people so that they

166:54

could just like see this. Look at this.

166:57

How great is this port connected?

167:00

Carrying both data and display. Device

167:02

runs at 10 Gbit per second. Video is

167:04

going through an HDMI adapter. Here's

167:05

all this like really whoopsy doodles.

167:08

Here's all the Damn it. Here's all this

167:10

really

167:11

>> that's for nerds but about USB cables.

167:13

>> Yeah. So then if you, you know, don't

167:16

have true spec cables or you have a

167:18

bunch of cables already, then you can go

167:20

through, find out what their

167:21

capabilities are and label everything.

167:24

Freaking awesome. I love it. That was

167:27

it. That was all I just wanted to talk

167:29

about that. And I believe the free

167:31

version is free.

167:33

And you can unlock advanced diagnostics

167:35

with what cable pro?

167:38

>> Oh, this is what advanced diagnostics

167:40

means in case your monitor is stuck at

167:42

30 Hz. The doc's charging at half speed.

167:44

Pro tells you which part is lying,

167:47

[laughter]

167:48

which part of the link is

167:49

underperforming. And apparently, uh, Mac

167:52

reports all of this in like a plain

167:54

text, easy to read fashion that, uh,

167:57

that he was able to turn into this

167:59

really useful little application.

168:01

Love it.

168:02

>> Awesome.

168:03

>> Yeah. Yeah. Super cool.

168:05

Um,

168:06

>> some someone tried to roast you in chat

168:08

said, "I believe the free version is

168:10

free. Is great analysis, Linus. Thanks."

168:12

>> Yeah. That's funny.

168:13

>> It sometimes is great analysis though

168:15

because not everything labeled as free

168:17

actually really is.

168:18

>> Yeah.

168:19

>> Maybe it ends up being free for a time

168:21

or it's free but there's

168:22

microtransaction.

168:23

>> Yeah. It's free to download but if you

168:25

want to have any like like go try and

168:27

find a data recovery software or like a

168:29

partition manager that's free that

168:31

actually does anything before you put in

168:34

a credit card.

168:35

>> Is the uh is the expression free as in

168:37

beer? I think that's kind of like

168:40

>> I've heard that before. I haven't heard

168:41

that before. What does that mean?

168:42

>> That's basically what you're saying is

168:44

like it's free as it and as it's free,

168:46

which mean it really is free as in beer

168:48

would be like the data recovery software

168:50

where it's kind of like

168:53

you know there's a catch

168:55

>> like you're you're you know

168:56

>> it's like a time share

168:59

that way. Interesting.

169:00

>> Yeah, I might be wrong. That's kind of

169:02

how I I know it.

169:03

>> I think I just interpreted it. So I

169:05

don't know that I'm right either. But

169:06

the way I've interpreted it was usually

169:08

like, you know how like if you get your

169:10

friends to come help you move, you

169:13

provide

169:13

>> free beer,

169:14

>> pizza, and snacks.

169:15

>> It's got free beer. Of course. No,

169:17

you're moving a couch up 15 flights of

169:19

stairs. It's free. It's free beer.

169:21

>> Yeah. Free.

169:21

>> You want to come over and have some

169:23

beers and pizza? And they're like,

169:24

"Yeah, and like also I need you half my

169:26

stuff, [laughter]

169:28

>> right?"

169:29

>> Yeah.

169:30

>> Uh yeah, maybe maybe that's right. But

169:32

yeah,

169:33

>> I don't know. I'm not sure.

169:36

One press the button.

169:38

Um,

169:40

>> OnePlus

169:44

>> no longer making phones for North

169:45

America and the EU.

169:47

>> See you later, markets.

169:49

>> Wow. OnePlus and parent company Oppo

169:52

confirmed the brand will stop launching

169:54

new phones in those locations. This will

169:56

end a run that began in 2014 with the

169:58

OnePlus 1.

170:01

Wow.

170:03

Existing owners won't be cut off right

170:04

away since Oppo says warranty, after

170:06

scale support, and software updates are

170:08

all guaranteed. But over the coming

170:10

months, OnePlus phones will drop their

170:11

Oxygen OS software for Oppo's Color OS

170:15

starting with the Android 17 update.

170:17

Yeah, but why are they leaving though?

170:19

OnePlus framed this as a global strategy

170:22

adjustment, but RS Technica is trying

170:24

>> tying

170:25

>> tying the retreat to the memory crunch

170:28

with RAM alone now accounting for more

170:31

than a quarter of the phone's bill of

170:32

materials. And I suspect if you're not

170:36

selling in at least the states, you

170:40

might be able to use Chinese RAM. M

170:43

yeah, even dude, apparently people are

170:47

lined up out the door for CXMT memory at

170:50

this point. Like it's any supply that

170:53

they can build is getting immediately

170:56

absorbed. I think it was Apple's asking

170:58

for an exemption to use it for global

171:00

devices and like things are things are

171:03

getting things are getting crazy.

171:06

It is very interesting with SKH Highix

171:08

and Samsung making so much money on

171:10

memory right now because it kind of

171:12

feels like and Micron. Yeah. It kind of

171:14

feels like they're um

171:17

>> they're almost inviting a feast.

171:19

>> They're almost inviting their own demise

171:22

here.

171:22

>> Like there's a known famine coming and

171:25

they're just sitting gorging themselves.

171:28

Uh

171:29

it's interesting.

171:31

>> Yeah. I think that the ultimate winners

171:34

are not going to be them, but that's not

171:38

financial advice. And I have no idea how

171:41

long you'll have to stay solvent in

171:44

order for the market to become rational.

171:46

Um, memory is still a commodity even if

171:52

today it's an expensive commodity.

171:56

This is going to get interesting at some

172:00

point.

172:02

Yeah, Scrappy DP says they're inviting

172:03

competition. And the competition was

172:06

like waiting in the wings and freaking

172:10

ready.

172:11

>> They're not just inviting it, man.

172:13

>> When anytime there's that much money

172:16

involved,

172:18

someone will see it and go, "Hey,

172:21

investing in chasing this unicorn is

172:25

worth it." And they'll try. And they

172:27

like they cooked like steak and garlic

172:30

bread and potatoes and then they put a

172:32

fan that blew out the window and they

172:34

put a big glowing sign and they're like

172:36

there's also free money in here uh and

172:38

everything else you ever wanted and all

172:40

you have to do is just do the thing

172:42

you're already doing and we'll

172:44

completely honestly get out of your way

172:46

and leave the house and you can just

172:48

have the house as well. That's that's

172:50

that feels honestly like I don't even

172:52

think I'm exaggerating.

172:53

>> By the way, my wife's a great cook.

172:55

Yeah,

172:56

>> you'll like her. Like just

172:58

>> Yeah,

172:59

>> it's it's wild. [laughter] I' I've

173:02

personally never seen something like

173:03

this. And I mean, there's a great book I

173:06

recommended to Mr. Brandon Lee recently.

173:08

I don't remember the name of it. Dan

173:09

Seagull recommended it to me. Um, but

173:12

it's on how like Apple basically sold

173:17

uh, you know, American IP, how to make

173:21

modern electronics and stuff to China.

173:25

They they exported making phones and

173:27

stuff there and then also protected

173:30

Chinese interests for like years by

173:33

lobbying to the American government so

173:34

they could keep making all of their

173:36

stuff there and then basically teaching

173:39

them how to make all this stuff. And

173:41

it's it's a very it's a very interesting

173:43

like right for over a decade Apple was

173:46

like yeah come on make sure you get

173:48

better at making all of these things and

173:50

having all of these uh skills and

173:52

production lines and and everything all

173:54

over there. U is it just called Apple in

173:56

China? Yeah. I don't know. It's it's a

173:58

fascinating book but I mean

174:02

it's been not just asked for it's been

174:05

begged.

174:06

>> When's the sequel about Tesla?

174:09

>> Yeah. No, seriously though, like it's

174:11

and I mean we we talked about this

174:12

recently like the the Chinese model

174:14

where companies over there have to be

174:16

predominantly owned by Chinese companies

174:17

and like if you want to sell there, you

174:19

have to produce there and you have to

174:20

basically teach them how to do it. It's

174:22

all um it's

174:26

fascinating, man. Yeah. There's this um

174:31

it's a quote I I got it from something

174:34

within the last few weeks. I don't know

174:37

if it was an audio book or a podcast or

174:39

a YouTube video or what, but it was from

174:41

something. Um, but it's chaos is a

174:44

ladder and it's just been in my head a

174:48

lot lately. Um, because you see you see

174:52

what's happening right now. Like there

174:53

is more chaos than I have personally

174:56

experienced in my lifetime right now

174:59

concentrated in the right now. Um, wars

175:03

all over the planet, very active.

175:06

>> Are you sure you're not just more aware

175:08

of it?

175:09

>> I don't think so. I think I think

175:16

when has there been more sustained

175:19

economic chaos than now in our

175:21

lifetimes?

175:22

>> I mean, 2008 was a pretty wild ride.

175:25

>> The thing was huge.

175:26

>> Millennials really did

175:28

>> Millennials really did get to ride the

175:30

roller coaster, man. Oh yeah. Yeah. But

175:32

I feel like 2008 was very concentrated.

175:34

>> Um

175:36

>> the right now seems persistent. The

175:38

right now seems like a new future.

175:40

>> Remember that. Remember though that we

175:42

were in Canada for the 2008 financial

175:44

crisis and it was a much softer blow

175:48

here. Like the US got shreked during the

175:52

2008 crisis whereas we like especially

175:56

in Vancouver we barely even saw our

175:57

property values dip. like it was totally

176:00

>> am I remembering this wrong? It was a

176:02

massive massive hit and then it was

176:05

growing out of that hit. Right.

176:08

>> Yeah. It was a relatively short-term

176:10

hit. Whereas like

176:11

>> right now

176:11

>> co plus the a particularly tumultuous

176:17

period in American politics. Um which

176:20

>> so I'm not talking this is the most

176:22

chaotic moment. We also live through

176:25

911.

176:26

>> Sure.

176:26

>> I'm talking this is the most chaotic

176:29

like large period of time. And I could

176:33

be wrong. It just kind of feels like it

176:35

that way. It might be recency bias. It

176:36

might be a lot.

176:37

>> Yeah. I wonder if every generation feels

176:38

that way. I mean, like from my

176:39

understanding, the period around like

176:41

the Vietnam War was like

176:42

>> No, in in my lifetime.

176:43

>> Oh, in your lifetime.

176:44

>> In my lifetime. In my lifetime. There's

176:46

way way more chaotic things in history.

176:48

>> I mean, didn't the [clears throat]

176:50

didn't the Berlin Wall fall within our

176:52

lifetimes or No, that might only be me.

176:53

When did the when did the Berlin Wall

176:55

fall?

176:57

Um,

176:59

>> date uh 1989. So were Yeah, I don't

177:01

think you were born yet. I was.

177:03

>> Nope.

177:04

>> Okay. So in your lifetime, like trying

177:05

to think, man,

177:08

>> most chaos in your Yeah, probably. Then

177:10

>> there there's war all over the place

177:12

right now. There's extreme instability

177:14

geopolitically.

177:16

Um I mean, we've got we've got countries

177:18

talking about taking over other

177:19

countries like constantly right now. And

177:22

both of the really big ones are doing

177:23

so. I remember having this conversation

177:25

with you like a while back, like years

177:29

ago on WAN show where I came across um a

177:33

risk map um like a risk game board that

177:37

my friend Tyson had in high school and

177:40

it had like it had like Persia on it or

177:43

something or like the Ottoman Empire or

177:45

something and I was like what the [ __ ]

177:47

like

177:49

like the countries change

177:52

>> because post World War II

177:54

That's like not a thing. It's like

177:56

illegal, you know. And um and it

178:00

occurred to me uh I think this must have

178:02

been around the time that Russia annexed

178:04

Crimea. It occurred to me that like that

178:07

was all just kind of

178:10

not normal. That constant conquest and

178:15

and and war was not a thing. like this

178:18

period of relative global stability that

178:21

our generation enjoyed for a while was

178:23

not the normal and it almost feels like

178:27

although you and I might describe what's

178:29

happening now as chaos it almost feels

178:31

like a return to how it like you know

178:34

really worked for a really long time

178:36

like you look at you look at you know

178:39

what happened in the lifetime of someone

178:40

like a Napoleon

178:42

right like how you know within one and

178:46

remember people didn't live that long.

178:49

>> Inventor of Total War is maybe not

178:51

[laughter] maybe not the fairest

178:52

example, but yeah, I I

178:54

>> within one short French guy's lifetime,

178:58

there were like multiple campaigns that

179:01

were attempts to take over the known

179:03

world, you know.

179:04

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

179:05

>> The fact that that we've made it to, you

179:08

know, almost 40 here and what, you're

179:11

35, 36? I can never remember how many

179:14

years younger you are. somewhere in that

179:16

range.

179:17

>> I'm I'm 90.

179:19

>> Okay. Yeah. So, four years younger than

179:21

me. Um, so the the fact that like

179:25

we've made it this far and there hasn't

179:28

been like like a like a gigantic land

179:30

war in Europe. Um,

179:34

it is kind of insane. To be clear, there

179:37

is a land war in Europe right now. But

179:39

the fact we made it this far and there

179:40

wasn't one was

179:42

kind of wild.

179:44

And I don't think, dude, I don't think

179:46

it's ever going back. I I don't I don't

179:49

see a path to it right now,

179:53

>> man. We're getting way off like tech

179:55

topics right now.

179:57

[laughter]

179:58

>> How did we even get here? What were we

180:00

talking about?

180:01

>> OnePlus.

180:03

>> Hell yeah. Oh, right. Because of

180:06

sanctions and whatever else.

180:09

>> I I don't know. I could I could see a

180:11

future where we get away from this. Um,

180:13

>> could you Will the middle powers unite?

180:16

Will that actually work?

180:17

>> The middle powers might unite. I think

180:19

there's I mean there's there's been a

180:21

lot of talk about like China taking um

180:25

Taiwan, but I've been looking into that

180:28

more recently and how how a lot of the

180:30

people on the mainland feel about that.

180:32

And it's actually quite nuanced where a

180:34

lot of the people of the mainland do

180:37

want Taiwan back, but they don't want

180:39

Taiwan back with bombs.

180:41

>> Mhm. Uh, which is which is interesting

180:45

because with my previously even more

180:50

external and ignorant position than I

180:51

now have, which is highly external and

180:53

highly ignorant, um, it felt like they

180:55

were just trying to find an excuse to

180:57

just roll the tanks in, but it it feels

181:00

like they want to do it politically.

181:02

>> Here's my problem.

181:03

>> They might they might uh, you know,

181:06

cloak and dagger politically.

181:07

>> Here's my problem with that.

181:10

Xiinping is 73.

181:14

>> Yeah, he might want to get it before he

181:15

goes away. It's the same thing as Putin.

181:17

But then that's the other thing you

181:18

said. I don't know if we'll go back.

181:19

Xiinping old, Putin old, Trump old.

181:22

[laughter]

181:25

They they there may be an expiry date on

181:28

some of these problems.

181:29

>> Okay, let's start with Russia. You know,

181:33

Russia has been Russia since long before

181:36

Putin was involved.

181:38

>> [laughter]

181:39

>> Yeah,

181:39

>> Russia be doing Russia things. I I I I

181:42

think all bets are off.

181:43

>> I do think there could be a lot of

181:45

pressure though if say Putin did pass

181:48

away for someone coming in to

181:50

economically turn that place around by

181:52

not doing the stuff that they're

181:54

currently.

181:54

>> But the most Russia thing ever would be

181:56

for someone to promise to economically

181:58

turn Russia around,

181:59

>> throw more people at the wall anyway,

182:00

>> and then support the oligarchy.

182:02

[laughter]

182:03

>> Yeah. Yeah, that's true. So,

182:07

sure. Um, [laughter]

182:10

>> hey, I can be hopeful.

182:11

>> China, China, I have no idea. China, I

182:14

don't understand the history well enough

182:16

to make any kind of useful prediction.

182:19

The only thing for me is

182:23

Xiinping is 73. He

182:27

has from my understanding said pretty

182:30

clearly that his plan is to reunify

182:33

China.

182:34

he that he will do it. And so that gives

182:38

us not a lot of time.

182:40

>> Maybe a bit of a timeline. Yeah. Yeah. I

182:42

just I don't know. I don't I don't give

182:44

up hope that uh people might be tired of

182:47

the bad. Um and bring in some good. It

182:50

does seem to be that things have to get

182:52

really really really really bad before

182:54

that happens. Um so we'll see what that

182:58

is.

182:59

>> Yeah. Or we won't.

183:00

>> I mean there's stuff happens like every

183:02

week. It feels like that would have

183:04

qualified as really really really really

183:06

bad within our lifetimes. I mean I don't

183:09

know if you I don't know if you saw this

183:10

but there the plan for Truth Social is

183:14

to sell API access to the banks to get

183:18

market moving Truth Social tweets

183:21

earlier than they are posted publicly

183:23

through the

183:25

Yeah. like that that should be like

183:29

administration ending

183:32

um

183:34

>> that's just open blatant fraud.

183:36

>> Well, it's insider trading

183:37

>> more so than all of the other open

183:39

blatant fraud.

183:40

>> Well, corruption. I don't know if it's

183:41

specifically fraud, but it's certainly

183:43

corruption.

183:43

>> Insider trading fraud.

183:44

>> It's certainly insider trading. Um

183:48

>> probably I'm probably using the word

183:50

incorrectly. Oh, no. Insider trading is

183:52

securities fraud.

183:53

>> Okay, there you go then. It's it's

183:56

literally

183:58

openly selling market moving

184:01

information.

184:03

Um, and nobody

184:07

I it's it's been

184:10

it's been remarkable watching the

184:14

transition that has taken place

184:17

in my lifetime. Um,

184:21

like I'm trying to imagine

184:24

if Obama did this instead of wore a

184:27

beige suit, for instance, what the uh

184:30

what the reaction might have been. It's

184:35

Yeah, it's remarkable.

184:36

>> Remember Bill Clinton's uh the the work

184:39

that was going on under his desk? Like I

184:41

I think that would last for a day or two

184:43

right now.

184:44

>> I don't even know if it would. I mean,

184:46

>> or a couple hours.

184:48

>> Yeah.

184:49

Maybe I I don't I don't even know if it

184:52

would register. I mean, remember this is

184:54

the grab them by the candidate, right?

184:56

Like it's

184:58

it wouldn't even be it wouldn't even be

184:59

surprising at this point.

185:05

Oh, want to see something? Want to see

185:07

something disheartening?

185:09

[cough and clears throat]

185:10

>> Yeah.

185:11

>> All right. Here. I got this for you. I

185:13

got this for you.

185:16

Uh, hold on. Hold on. Hold on. Okay,

185:19

we're going to go [groaning]

185:22

US. We're going to go past 5 years.

185:28

Um,

185:29

[clears throat]

185:33

and we're going to go like this. Here we

185:36

go. Guess what people forgot about

185:39

already?

185:43

>> I can't through my screen. I can't see

185:46

this.

185:47

>> I know. You're supposed to guess.

185:48

>> Oh. Uh, [laughter]

185:51

Epstein.

185:52

>> You better believe it.

185:53

>> Yeah.

185:55

>> Like, okay.

186:00

>> Cool name. [sighs]

186:03

>> I remember when people didn't like

186:05

pedophiles.

186:06

>> I do too. I remember it fondly.

186:09

>> Yeah.

186:11

>> It was pretty cool.

186:13

>> It was a good That was a good time, you

186:14

know. It was a pretty good time.

186:16

>> That was a pretty good time.

186:18

>> Like I remember when an affair with a a

186:20

a grown ass woman was a scandal.

186:25

>> Yeah.

186:25

>> Um

186:27

>> Yeah.

186:32

Anyway, Microsoft is testing a co-pilot

186:35

feature called PC Insights that can

186:38

answer questions by reading your CPU,

186:40

RAM, GPU, and storage.

186:44

It's spotted by Windows latest and it

186:46

lets the AI um tell you things like uh

186:50

why is my PC slow or what GPU do I have

186:53

or do I have room for a 100 GB game and

186:57

then it taps Windows APIs to check usage

187:00

along with storage, battery info,

187:02

antivirus status, connected devices like

187:04

printers or USB drives. It is optin

187:08

uh requires permission each time and it

187:10

can't read the contents of your files

187:11

unless you specifically allow it. It is

187:14

however Yeah. Okay. So, that was a that

187:17

was a W. Are you ready for the L side?

187:20

>> It's worth pointing out that Copilot for

187:22

Windows now ships as a standalone

187:24

spin-off of the Edge browser and can eat

187:26

close to 1 GB of RAM while sitting

187:28

completely idle, regularly showing up

187:31

among the top memory users in Task

187:32

Manager.

187:34

So it can tell you why you're out of

187:36

memory, but the answer might be

187:39

[laughter]

187:40

>> running.

187:44

>> So it would be really funny if you could

187:45

tell it can like, oh, can you solve the

187:47

problem with why I have no memory left

187:49

and it just closes itself. [laughter]

187:53

>> That would be awesome. This is rolling

187:54

out slowly in the US only with no

187:57

timeline for a wider release and lands

187:59

right as Microsoft is separately

188:00

promising to cut Windows 11's baseline

188:03

memory usage.

188:05

>> Honestly, as long as it's opt in

188:07

specifically and has the option uh to

188:11

uninstall it. If it has both of those

188:14

things sounds great.

188:16

>> Like to be clear, I'm not actually

188:17

hating on this. I think it's pretty

188:19

cool. Uh, but the fact that

188:21

>> it's in if this was default all the time

188:24

and it's reporting back to Microsoft

188:25

because of course it is and it's being

188:27

tied to your whatever the the GD ID

188:31

whatever thing blah blah blah blah blah

188:33

it's going to blow and I'm going to be

188:35

pissed off but

188:37

opt in. People can make their own

188:39

choices.

188:41

>> By the way, just the last follow- on

188:43

point to our discussion of the Epstein

188:44

files. Uh Luke, I'm not feeling

188:46

suicidal. Are you?

188:48

>> No. Okay,

188:50

>> I'm chilling.

188:51

>> I would ask Dan, but I'm afraid of the

188:53

answer.

188:54

[laughter]

189:00

>> What?

189:01

>> Maybe I'm feeling murderous. [laughter]

189:03

>> Ah, there you go. There you go.

189:05

>> See, you never know what he's going to

189:06

say. Luke,

189:08

>> he's right.

189:09

>> I see. He might have trolly answers. I

189:11

[gasps and laughter] I was like, what do

189:12

you mean?

189:13

>> My goodness.

189:15

Uh New York has banned new hypers scale

189:19

data centers for one and one year. They

189:23

became the first US state to hit pause

189:25

on new hypers scale data centers with

189:27

Governor Kathy Hochel signing an

189:29

executive order that blocks state

189:31

environmental permits for up to a year.

189:33

It applies to any campus that draws 50

189:36

million watts or more, which for a

189:38

modern data center actually isn't that

189:39

much since all the big flagships ones

189:41

are running into the hundreds of

189:42

megawatts or even gigawatt. Projects

189:45

that are already approved do keep going.

189:47

This only hits new ones. The reason

189:50

comes down to push back on the AI

189:52

building boom. People are worried about

189:54

rising utility bills, strained power

189:56

grids, and the enormous amount of water

189:59

that these places use for Okay, this

190:01

says for cooling, but that's not

190:02

actually all of it. A lot of the water

190:04

is actually in the construction process.

190:07

Um, but yes, they they can use a lot for

190:09

cooling, especially if they use

190:11

evaporative cooling, but not all of them

190:12

do. There is a nuanced conversation

190:16

around the water usage. So I want to

190:18

make sure that we are properly

190:20

representing that a lot of them do use a

190:22

butt ton of water and a lot of them once

190:25

they're running actually use very

190:26

little. Um anyway during the pause the

190:30

state is going to write up a proper

190:31

regulatory framework and hotel is also

190:34

pushing to make data centers either

190:35

supply their own power or pay more for

190:37

it so regular customers aren't stuck

190:39

covering the cost. Okay.

190:40

>> Yeah.

190:41

>> This is one that

190:42

>> that should be obvious.

190:43

>> Blows my mind is not the default. Okay.

190:46

So, Luke, I I don't I don't know if I've

190:48

I I don't have I talked to you about

190:51

when I tried to get into like uh crypto

190:54

mining at some point.

190:57

Yeah. Okay. So, I was

190:59

>> I don't know if you've talked about it

191:00

super publicly.

191:00

>> I was blown away like uh uh when I was

191:04

looking into it, I was blown away that

191:07

it is cheaper to get power to an

191:12

industrial property.

191:14

cheaper.

191:17

Literally,

191:18

>> it's a it's a business subsidy.

191:20

>> Nothing else in life is cheaper for the

191:24

business version. Oh, it's pronounced

191:26

hocul. Sorry, guys. I I I don't know

191:28

American names. Um,

191:31

what? Business laptop? More expensive.

191:35

Business windows more expensive.

191:38

Business camera more expensive. Business

191:41

electricity

191:43

that's cheap.

191:44

It's not from the All the things you

191:46

listed before electricity were not from

191:47

the government though.

191:48

>> Okay, fine. Um, let me think.

191:54

Business land not cheaper. Business

191:57

permit not cheaper

192:00

there. Okay. Also from government. Uh,

192:04

>> land from the government.

192:05

>> Uh, my taxes sure are.

192:08

>> Property taxes. I don't think those are

192:09

cheaper.

192:10

>> Okay.

192:13

What? What? What's going on here?

192:16

>> Cheaper and also a tax claim. Yeah, it

192:19

gets weird.

192:20

>> Yeah, business TV not cheaper, says

192:22

Etszy or Zelm, whatever that is.

192:24

>> I know a lot of people in BC that do

192:26

crypto mining basically just scam farm

192:28

power.

192:29

>> Oh, that makes sense. Is that's even

192:30

cheaper than industrial, isn't it?

192:32

>> I think so. I'm not certain.

192:34

>> Is crypto mining still a thing?

192:37

>> Uh, a lot of people Well, I shouldn't

192:40

say a lot. Some people, especially that

192:42

have more modern cards for mining, have

192:44

just pivoted to AI training.

192:48

>> AI training. But is there like crowd?

192:50

>> You rent it out.

192:51

>> Crowd AI training. Really?

192:54

>> Shut up.

192:54

>> Uh, crowd AI.

192:59

>> They're now mining pearl. What is pearl?

193:01

Curious bread,

193:05

man.

193:08

Pearl mining

193:10

GPU like is this GPU?

193:12

>> Well, there's a bunch of these

193:14

>> proof of useful work for AI compute. No

193:16

way.

193:19

>> Something instead of like crypto mining

193:21

where you can just run it for like

193:22

however long you want, usually you rent

193:24

out like a block of time.

193:26

uh because if you wanted to do something

193:28

like training or a a big working task,

193:32

you can't have it just, you know, be

193:35

taken from a random pool. It needs to

193:37

actually complete the job,

193:39

>> right?

193:39

>> So, it's it's a little bit different.

193:41

And now there's a little bit more

193:42

pressure on like, you know, do you have

193:44

a UPS, do you have a backup generator,

193:48

do you have whatever to make sure that

193:49

this person's task actually completes.

193:51

>> Oh, interesting.

193:53

And there's like reputations tied to

193:55

things and um it's funky. Yeah.

194:00

>> Curious Brad says the Pearl crypto is

194:03

just doing useless AI inference matrix.

194:05

It's not actually useful AI training

194:07

work. There's a paper exposing Pearl.

194:10

Just doing random math for no reason.

194:12

>> Okay. Yeah. I mean I mean I maybe

194:14

>> did either of us name Pearl. I don't

194:16

>> Oh, no. I I did because I was uh because

194:19

someone mentioned it in chat. Um,

194:23

yeah. No, it was Curious Bread who is

194:25

posting that now that that flagged Pearl

194:28

to us. Um, okay.

194:32

Trey is interesting. People are always

194:33

going to be looking for something to do

194:35

with all of the extra GPUs they have, I

194:37

guess.

194:38

>> Yeah. Yeah. I also know there's like um

194:42

some people uh even even independent

194:45

miners that have like pretty solid

194:48

clusters of GPUs are doing like

194:51

individual contracts with certain

194:53

companies and stuff.

194:55

companies that want a um like this thing

195:00

we've been talking about of like a

195:01

siloed like local LLM

195:05

>> but they don't necessarily have the

195:07

knowhow or access to the hardware or

195:11

whatever else. Um,

195:13

>> man, do you remember, Luke, when I found

195:15

that uh that property in like White Rock

195:18

that was zoned data center and I was

195:20

like, we should buy it and build like a

195:22

tiny data center.

195:23

>> That would have actually been that would

195:25

have actually been like a banger

195:27

business move.

195:28

>> That's that's the extra zeros you

195:30

needed, man. [laughter]

195:32

>> You would have made it.

195:37

>> It might have been fun, too, though,

195:38

actually. like building a I wouldn't

195:40

have wanted to do anything large scale

195:42

but building like a small data center. I

195:45

feel like people are so desperate for

195:47

compute these days that they would rent

195:49

anything anyway. So you could be a small

195:51

player and probably still

195:53

>> be functional. Noki says we bought a

195:55

data center might be the next April

195:57

Fools.

196:00

[snorts]

196:00

>> Nice. I mean maybe I like just to be

196:03

transparent with people float plane

196:04

staring down the barrel of a lot of

196:06

price increases in regards to okay our

196:09

infrastructure costs and what

196:10

>> so hear me out we move it on prem

196:14

>> didn't didn't I already pitch this to

196:15

you talked about this though

196:17

>> I mean I'm down

196:18

>> um so AJ's AJ's been doing work

196:21

>> there's a potential plan where um our

196:26

have we have we named our ISP publicly

196:29

>> probably

196:29

>> I think so yeah I tell Yeah. Okay. So,

196:31

itel has apparently some like fiber

196:35

that's basically direct from us. Yeah.

196:37

>> into Vancouver into a collocation data.

196:39

>> No, that's that's like that's like what

196:41

we pay for like we have so that's why

196:44

our internet connection is so expensive.

196:47

>> It's because we effectively not quite

196:50

but effectively because of the

196:52

provisioning it's it is an unshared link

196:55

>> effectively. Yeah. So that link

196:57

>> so we are 10 gig

196:59

>> connects with a collocation data center

197:01

that we could put servers into.

197:02

>> Yes.

197:03

>> Um so we are looking at and this isn't

197:06

even like I'm not to be clear I'm not

197:09

mad at

197:09

>> OVH

197:11

when we go into this

197:12

>> but OVH's prices

197:15

are being postured to like erupt and

197:21

>> because of normal business things. Just

197:24

to be completely honest, the the cost of

197:26

new hardware for them is absolutely

197:27

skyrocketing and there are big clients

197:30

wanting to spend lots of money that want

197:31

to come in. Yep. So, it's this is normal

197:34

business stuff, but we're looking at

197:35

what could happen. We don't know that

197:37

it's going to happen yet. OVH has not

197:38

said this is going to happen to us or

197:39

anything, but we're looking at what

197:41

could happen and going like, okay, well,

197:43

we're closed. Um, so trying to figure

197:47

out how we can be not closed. And one of

197:49

the ways we might be able to be not

197:50

closed is to

197:53

>> put something on prem at vanics.

197:55

>> Yeah,

197:56

>> that'd be kind of cool actually.

197:57

>> And and AJ started looking through a lot

198:00

of our hardware and apparently some of

198:02

these servers were just inventoried as

198:05

the name of the server without all of

198:07

the individual details of the hardware.

198:10

So, there's actually been a ton of

198:11

hardware that's been like found uh and

198:14

it's becoming much more

198:18

real.

198:19

>> I'm down

198:20

>> as a possibility. There are

198:24

major problems that I need to talk to

198:26

you about.

198:27

>> We We would need like a like a proper

198:29

like diesel generator. Like we'd need a

198:32

proper backup.

198:34

We'd need

198:35

>> Well, it would be at the Colo Center.

198:37

>> Oh, so you wouldn't put anything here. I

198:38

thought you meant like take advantage of

198:40

the 10 gig pipe. I think

198:42

>> it might end up being it might end up

198:44

being a three- tier system.

198:45

>> Okay.

198:46

>> Some's at the colo center, sums at LMG.

198:49

>> I think we'd leave some spill at OVH.

198:51

>> Yeah.

198:52

>> Yes. So, the main thing that we would

198:54

want from OVH is probably their public

198:56

cloud.

198:57

>> So, the idea would be that we could

198:59

spill over to resources that are at LMG,

199:01

but then if we need to spill over even

199:03

more, we would spill over into scalable

199:05

stuff at OVH. Yeah. Um, and that, you

199:08

know, that's going to be expensive. But

199:09

if we just minimize the

199:11

>> Yeah, we're minimizing the views and if

199:13

we're spilling over that much, hopefully

199:15

it's something good that's happening and

199:16

then it's okay and scale up the stuff we

199:18

have and it'll be all right.

199:20

>> Um, and that'll just be a a strong

199:22

indicator to like, hey, up your

199:24

hardware.

199:24

>> Um,

199:25

>> but yeah, there are there are there are

199:29

problems we should chat about off

199:30

camera, but there there's there's

199:32

things. Um, but it's it's a plan

199:34

basically.

199:36

You know, it's uh man trying to make

199:40

opportunity out of the bad.

199:42

>> We just have to not throw a USB drive at

199:44

it and then everything's good.

199:46

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

199:48

>> That's crazy.

199:49

>> Um, you know, I mean, our our server

199:52

rooms on prem are

199:56

pretty okay at this point.

199:58

>> They're actually less trash than they

200:00

used to be. The one here in studio

200:02

sucks. It's just really hard to work in.

200:05

Um, but the one over at Labs, I think

200:08

really all I would all I would want to

200:10

do with that one is I would want to

200:11

double up the cooling so that if one of

200:14

them fails, you still have cooling.

200:16

>> And then the other thing that I would

200:18

want to do there is

200:21

um I I we lose power here so much and

200:25

sometimes for like an hour, 5 hours at a

200:27

time is we would need to have like

200:30

on-site diesel generation backup. But

200:33

then we might not because if the primary

200:38

hardware is at the colo and we still

200:42

have this spillover at OVH,

200:44

>> is it more economically reasonable to

200:47

buffer LMG that much and make it that

200:50

resilient or should we just rely on the

200:53

spill over to OVH? And then you have to

200:54

do a calculation of like how often do we

200:56

expect the colo to go down? The colo is

200:58

not as reliable as OVH is.

201:01

>> Yeah. But then

201:02

>> it's pretty good.

201:04

>> You've also got to factor in

201:06

>> you got to factor in the economics that

201:07

are unique to us where anything that we

201:10

build to

201:12

>> change our infrastructure is content,

201:14

baby.

201:15

>> Like if you

201:15

>> this is this is it's a it's a

201:17

surprisingly complicated question that

201:19

AJ's working on.

201:20

>> So if you come to me and you say, "Hey,

201:22

I want to buy a a $30,000 diesel

201:24

generator." I tell you that you can

201:26

right off. And then if you tell me,

201:28

"Hey, I need a $30,000 diesel generator

201:30

and we're going to do a two series two

201:32

two-part video series and oh, by the

201:36

way, we've got a great sponsor who wants

201:38

to come in and sponsor it for us." I'm

201:40

like, "Let'sing go." Like, it's a

201:42

completely different.

201:43

>> We're going to turn off the main's power

201:46

and see if anyone in the building can

201:47

notice for an hour.

201:48

>> Yeah.

201:49

>> And that'll that'll be like the

201:50

challenge of the video.

201:52

>> That's banger content, dude.

201:54

>> Yeah.

201:54

>> Like that's so cool. Yeah. There are

201:57

there are more questions than that, but

201:58

we'll we'll we'll get into it's a longer

202:00

conversation. Um it's a little little

202:03

dead conversation for WHO, but

202:05

>> it get it gets less interesting the

202:06

video ideas.

202:07

>> Hear me out.

202:08

>> Hear me out.

202:13

>> For the backup power generation, we use

202:15

the fire truck that we still haven't

202:17

managed to sell.

202:20

>> So, we permanently we permanently wire

202:23

the fire truck into the building.

202:25

[laughter]

202:26

Did you Did you guys ever read that book

202:28

where the old steam uh the old steam

202:31

digger that like dug in the the big uh

202:35

skyscraper and then when it couldn't get

202:37

out of the hole they like turned it into

202:39

the steam boiler and it powered the

202:40

building.

202:41

>> No way.

202:42

>> That's basically what

202:43

>> That's what we're talking about.

202:44

>> That's what we're talking about.

202:45

>> That's what we're talking about.

202:46

[laughter] That's awesome. Let's go.

202:52

>> That is kind of sick. I don't I don't

202:54

know how I'd feel about losing all that

202:56

parking permanently.

202:58

[laughter]

202:58

>> Put on the roof.

203:00

>> This man.

203:02

>> This man.

203:03

>> Are you stupid? We'd have to reinforce

203:05

the roof again. We already did.

203:06

>> That would be the coolest building.

203:09

[laughter]

203:09

This is this huge fire truck on the

203:12

roof. Everybody's like, why?

203:14

>> I mean, we could gut it and shell it and

203:16

then No. Yeah, it's worth it. No, you

203:18

should definitely make it that you could

203:19

climb up a ladder to the roof and then

203:21

go into a fully functioning fire truck.

203:23

>> No, we have that we have that roof uh

203:25

that roof top thing. It could open up

203:27

into the middle of the fire truck and so

203:29

you you go up into the fire truck on the

203:32

roof and then to get on the roof you

203:33

have to exit the fire truck. [laughter]

203:37

>> Oh lordy. Um anyway, yeah, I I fully

203:42

support moving more on prem. Um

203:46

>> on top of prem

203:48

>> also I have no idea how viable it would

203:51

be, but um you know you know Hner,

203:53

right? We've done some sponsor spots for

203:55

them. How much do you know about them?

203:58

>> No, I mean I'm aware of them. I don't I

204:00

don't actually know like a ton.

204:02

>> Okay. I was in Germany this week. I

204:04

don't know if you know that. Um,

204:06

>> yep. I often don't know where the heck

204:08

you are, [laughter]

204:10

but I did know about that trip just

204:11

because we were talking about the 1080

204:13

video.

204:13

>> Yeah. So, I was in Germany and um I went

204:16

to see Hner's flagship location in Oh

204:20

god, I'm going to I'm going to butcher

204:23

this. Hner DC location

204:27

uh Falenstein. Falen Yeah, Falcon. No,

204:31

Falenstein.

204:32

>> Sick. Falenstein

204:34

Fal Falenstein. So I was in absolutely

204:39

[ __ ] nowhere Germany this week

204:42

checking out the Hner data center and as

204:45

I toured the place I didn't actually say

204:47

this in the video. Um, I don't know if

204:49

it would have come across the right way

204:51

to them, but as I toured the place, the

204:54

one thought that I could not get out of

204:57

my mind was

205:00

this feels like how LT would build a

205:02

data center.

205:06

So, no, no, but I mean that in the best

205:09

possible way. So,

205:11

>> what Yeah, what does that mean?

205:12

>> Okay. Okay. So, you know how

205:14

[clears throat] most people would build

205:16

a data center with 19inch racks and

205:19

probably Dell's or HP servers, right?

205:22

>> Sure.

205:22

>> Okay. Well, they thought, why would I

205:25

buy uh a 19-in rack from a 19-in rack

205:28

supplier who needs to make money for

205:31

building 19in racks when instead I could

205:34

buy four posts and sheet metal?

205:38

>> Yeah. [laughter]

205:41

>> Okay, hold on. Hold on.

205:42

>> Yeah. Okay, that's cool. Hold on. It

205:44

gets better.

205:45

Why would I use loud, obnoxious 40 mm

205:49

shrieking fans

205:52

on like like super skinny on super

205:55

skinny uh builds when instead I could do

205:58

like a 2 and 1/2 U so that I could just

206:01

put a standard 80 or 92 mm fan on the

206:04

back of it, pull that air from the cold

206:07

aisle directly through the CPU heat sink

206:10

and just make the racks taller.

206:17

Why would I use enterprise hardware when

206:20

I could just put Ryzen 3600's in the

206:22

rack and people can rent a bare metal

206:25

Ryzen 3600. In fact, it's up to them if

206:27

they even want ECC memory. I just let

206:30

them choose.

206:32

[laughter]

206:33

Get this. Get this. The cooling

206:36

the cooling for the entire building. So,

206:39

I asked this right when I came in. So

206:41

the building instead of being like

206:43

square with a flat top roof is like

206:46

steeply inclined.

206:49

So it goes to a high point on one side.

206:52

And the reason for that is that they

206:55

actually have that entire end of the top

206:58

of the building open to the air.

207:02

And the way they get away with this is

207:04

they have four stair intake that goes

207:07

down into the the raised floor in the

207:10

bottom of the raised floor that's

207:12

chilled that comes up into your cold

207:14

aisle which exhausts out into your I

207:16

I'll call it a warm aisle cuz it's not

207:18

that hot and then that heat naturally

207:21

through convection makes its way to the

207:23

top of the building

207:23

>> right out

207:24

>> and it farts it out. Is how much like I

207:27

is that amount of force of that air able

207:31

to keep like rain out? Yes. How does

207:34

that work?

207:34

>> Keeps out the rain, keeps out the snow.

207:37

Um it gets better. Like so by having the

207:39

building shaped like that about they say

207:42

about four to five days out of the year

207:44

they have to turn on the um the

207:47

evaporative coolers, but those sit in

207:50

the lee of the building. They sit under

207:52

the high side and they're on the north

207:53

side so that the sun never hits them.

207:56

It's just like

207:58

there's so they they designed their own

208:00

HVAC systems because I don't know they

208:04

could because buying it from someone

208:07

else would have been expensive.

208:09

Like it's just the whole thing. It was

208:12

the most it was the most LT

208:15

>> that's cool

208:16

>> data center that I've ever seen and it

208:18

just it made me happy touring it. It's

208:20

going to be a really great video, you

208:21

guys. Uh,

208:24

it I I I hope you enjoy the heck out of

208:26

it. I had a ton of fun checking out

208:28

their data center.

208:29

>> That's sweet.

208:30

>> Oh, yeah. Here's a good shot of the

208:32

shape of the buildings.

208:34

>> Oh, yeah. Okay. So instead of doing

208:36

crazy things like building their data

208:38

centers in like a densely populated

208:41

metropolitan area and then building them

208:43

up, they just built it in the absolute

208:47

farmland countryass countryside and

208:50

they're just like, "Yeah, land is cheap,

208:52

so we just put up these structures next

208:55

to each other and anytime we need

208:57

another one, we just build another one."

208:58

It's honestly the most based approach to

209:02

data center building that I've ever

209:03

seen. It's not necessarily like the most

209:06

cutting edge. Like they're doing almost

209:07

nothing with GP multiGPU servers yet.

209:10

Um, so you know, there's a lot of

209:12

customers that are going to look at this

209:13

and go, "Yeah, that doesn't make sense

209:15

for me." But in terms of just bare metal

209:19

hosting, you and you can get an Epic

209:22

server if you want or a Zeon or

209:24

whatever, they'll they'll they'll put

209:25

anything in your shelf, right? And I

209:28

just I don't know. I think it's I think

209:29

it's really cool. Uh, so they I don't

209:31

know. they might be worth us worth us

209:32

looking at cuz the rates looked really

209:34

reasonable when I was checking them out.

209:37

>> Yeah.

209:37

>> So, if we needed something in Europe,

209:39

then that may be a way to go.

209:43

>> Like the like the collocation at Vanex,

209:46

it would have the challenge of maybe not

209:48

being as reliable as something like an

209:51

OVH. I mean, to be clear, they have

209:52

redundant power. Uh they have redundant

209:54

cooling. Like, it doesn't

209:55

>> We've We've had actually like I don't

209:57

know. I don't want to get away too into

210:00

stuff, but yeah, it'll be it'll be if it

210:03

happens, which I think it's pretty

210:05

likely because costs everywhere, not

210:07

just OVH, everywhere are projected to

210:10

like in a lot of cases just double when

210:13

contract renews this year. Um,

210:16

it's

210:19

it's likely we're going to have to be

210:20

pulling stuff inhouse. And it's also

210:22

interestingly likely a a defund of

210:24

places will will need to in order to

210:26

keep costs reasonable because you know

210:29

just because there's a lot of AI money

210:31

floating around does not mean that a lot

210:33

of companies

210:34

have anything to do with that at all.

210:36

>> Yeah.

210:37

>> Um and if their cost of sales in regards

210:40

to their infrastructure is just doubling

210:41

out of nowhere um that's going to hurt

210:45

some people. So we'll see how it goes.

210:47

>> All right. Cool. Sounds like a uh sounds

210:49

like a business meeting later that we

210:51

can continue. Not on W show. People love

210:53

it when we do business meeting on W show

210:55

though.

210:56

>> That's true.

210:57

>> I think they do. I actually haven't

210:58

checked how viewership is tracking.

211:01

>> People used to like it when we did

211:03

business show.

211:04

>> Um hey, I thought this was another fun

211:06

one for you. On Saturday, Japan space

211:08

agency JAXA successfully launched and

211:11

landed its experimental RVX rocket in

211:13

the country's first ever reusable rocket

211:15

test flight. I assume you saw this.

211:18

Yeah,

211:18

>> the flight was pretty short with the

211:20

rocket rising about 11 m, moving 16 m

211:22

sideways, and then touching back down in

211:24

under a minute. The goal is a cheaper,

211:27

reusable successor to Japan's current

211:29

single-use H3 rocket. Jaxa is

211:32

co-developing the RVX with Mitsubishi

211:34

Heavy Industries and is separately

211:35

working on reusable rockets with France

211:37

and Germany. Jax's next test flight is

211:39

aiming for a much higher 100 meters.

211:42

discussion question. Do you think

211:43

government agencies like Jacksonville

211:45

will be able to catch up with the likes

211:46

of Blue Origin and SpaceX? I mean, I

211:49

think this is

211:50

>> uh speaking of Blue Origin and SpaceX,

211:52

check that link out.

211:53

>> Oh,

211:57

Chinese engineers using wires to

211:59

perfectly catch rocket booster.

212:02

>> Oh, hello.

212:10

Oh, that's actually like super smart.

212:13

>> Yep.

212:16

>> But hey, $3 trillion company, right?

212:20

>> I mean, this is one of those things.

212:21

It's almost like what we were talking

212:22

about earlier with the memory memory

212:24

manufacturers. It's like when you

212:28

when you put a big enough target on

212:30

yourself,

212:32

don't be surprised when everybody takes

212:34

a shot.

212:35

>> Well, and it's like it's interesting.

212:37

There's there's some questions on like

212:38

did Elon know and is that why they

212:41

pushed for IPO when they did? Um,

212:45

who knows? I have no idea. Um, the

212:48

concept actually just kind of makes a

212:49

lot of sense. Apparently, it had been

212:50

like theorized by a variety of people in

212:54

the past because it's like it's like

212:56

almost 3D printer logic,

212:58

>> right?

212:58

>> Yeah.

212:59

>> Like it kind of does actually make a lot

213:01

of sense if you go as far as to think of

213:04

catching a freaking rocket.

213:06

which is crazy.

213:08

>> Yeah.

213:09

>> At all. Once you go that far and you

213:11

think about how would I do this?

213:14

>> Huge chopsticks coming in actually feels

213:17

kind of crazier

213:19

than wires on like effectively 3D

213:22

printer rails.

213:23

>> Yeah.

213:24

>> And that also allows you to do it at sea

213:26

instead of um on land, which there are

213:31

benefits to doing it on land.

213:33

>> Mhm. [clears throat] because you could

213:35

theoretically reuse that rocket faster.

213:39

It's in place. Other good things about

213:42

it. Um, but this is a potentially very

213:46

cheap route and failures should also be

213:48

cheaper. Blah bloop. Um,

213:51

>> Bedhead says, "Lol, Chinese using

213:53

string, Americans using chopsticks."

213:59

>> Oh my god, guys. I was not okay. You

214:02

need to know like with the stuff that's

214:03

going on. The SpaceX thing is called

214:05

Chopsticks. Uh anyways, whatever.

214:11

>> Way to go, Luke.

214:11

>> But yeah, it's there's I mean there's a

214:13

lot of interesting stuff happening in

214:14

space. I was talking to someone at uh

214:17

Open Sauce last night who's in a hobby

214:20

rocketry club in BC, which

214:23

>> go figure. All right. Small.

214:24

>> I didn't even know there like was any.

214:26

So that's interesting. and he was

214:28

talking about how their school is

214:31

planning on defunding their hobby

214:35

rocketry club.

214:38

And the thing that was interesting to

214:39

them was they were saying, you know, I'm

214:41

getting one side of the story or

214:42

whatever, but they were saying that um

214:44

and hopefully I'm quoting this all

214:45

correctly, but they were saying that

214:46

they were willing to fund themselves and

214:48

the school was like, "No."

214:52

And that seems crazy to me because I'm

214:54

going to do that thing again where I say

214:55

at any point in time in my life,

214:58

but it feels like space stuff is getting

215:02

so extremely active right now, including

215:05

globally. Um,

215:08

>> I mean, did you see this? Uh, this

215:09

wasn't in the dock, but did you see the

215:12

uh leak slash report slashinvestigation,

215:15

whatever you want to call it, that

215:17

apparently since 2023, the Chinese and

215:19

Russians have been working on a way to

215:22

disable or worst case scenario, destroy

215:24

Starlink.

215:27

>> I mean, I'm not surprised.

215:28

>> No, it makes sense. If you look at

215:31

what's happening in Ukraine, it's like

215:32

one of the most important uh you know

215:36

accessories to war

215:38

in that arena at all.

215:40

>> Yeah.

215:41

>> Uh

215:43

yeah.

215:46

Yeah. Crazy. Why would they defund that?

215:49

Like my local robotics club that I did

215:51

in school just not supported by the

215:53

school either, which is crazy. Yeah. I

215:55

don't know. It's it's just the the thing

215:56

that stood out to me was specifically

215:58

that they've like had it for a while and

216:01

they want to defund it now of all times.

216:04

And I'm just like, man, what are you

216:05

doing? [laughter]

216:06

Look at the stock market. Look at

216:08

whatever. What are you? You're a school.

216:09

You're supposed to be preparing people

216:11

for like the jobs they might get into.

216:13

This is highly applicable. Like what

216:15

what are you doing? It seems like such a

216:18

weird time to do that. I don't know.

216:20

Maybe the school's on hard times or

216:21

something, but then at least let the the

216:24

people involved um self-fund and still

216:28

like support it as a as a thing in the

216:30

school. I don't know, whatever. Which is

216:32

very frustrating.

216:34

>> Um

216:35

>> space race back. Space race is back. I

216:37

mean, China and the US have both

216:39

proposed dates for when they're going to

216:40

be boots on the ground on Mars again. Um

216:43

the states is currently falling behind

216:46

their timelines. Um China's pushing.

216:49

There's it's it's it's

216:51

interesting to me because neither of the

216:53

countries seem to want to like really

216:56

like declare it or acknowledge it, but

216:58

we are absolutely in a space race right

217:00

now. Like it is no question. It it is

217:02

absolutely fully active.

217:04

>> Too bad only one of the competitors is

217:07

increasing funding for space and the

217:10

other one is decreasing it, which is

217:12

>> yeah,

217:13

>> sort of seems like it's going to

217:14

determine the outcome, but uh

217:16

>> yeah,

217:17

>> hey, maybe it'll

217:19

Maybe maybe they'll get lucky.

217:21

[laughter]

217:22

>> Yeah, we'll see how it goes. But it's

217:24

it's it's a very interesting time.

217:27

>> Hey, you know what else is interesting?

217:29

Our sponsors for the show. Just about

217:32

every major North American cellular

217:33

provider has faced some sort of data

217:35

breach or surveillance scandal. And just

217:37

because you're tired of hearing about

217:38

breaches doesn't mean that you should be

217:40

okay with them. Our sponsor Cape is a

217:44

privacy first mobile carrier that puts

217:46

you, not your carrier, in control of

217:48

your number. With the same reliable

217:50

service that you'd expect from any of

217:51

the household name carriers, Cape offers

217:54

privacycentric features like rotating

217:57

your ISMI number every 24 hours, which

217:59

means every day you're going to look

218:01

like a new subscriber to the network.

218:03

This can make it harder for your usage

218:04

to be tracked. They also don't hold on

218:07

to any metadata collected for more than

218:09

a day. The average provider will store

218:11

that information for as long as they

218:12

possibly can. Each Cape plan comes with

218:15

two additional phone numbers as well.

218:17

These are real numbers. They're

218:19

encrypted and are perfect for use for

218:21

account verification or banking

218:22

services. Then your primary primary

218:25

number can be saved for friends and

218:26

family. During onboarding, they don't

218:28

ask for your name, your social security

218:30

number, or your address. They only

218:32

collect what's necessary to provide you

218:33

with service. If that sounds pretty

218:35

good, it gets better. You can click the

218:37

link below or scan this QR code right

218:39

here to get 33% off your first 6 months

218:42

with code WAN. The show is also brought

218:46

to you by Whisper Flow. Voiceto text

218:48

apps and devices are full of the same

218:50

issues that we've seen time and time and

218:53

time again. Spelling names wrong,

218:55

recording too many ums and h or straight

218:58

up not working with specific apps.

219:00

Whisper Flow strives to be so much more

219:02

than that bare minimum. It can record

219:04

what you meant to say rather than just

219:05

the literal sounds that came out of your

219:08

face hole. It adapts to the way that you

219:10

speak in real time, and it can learn

219:12

less than conventional names as well.

219:13

Plus, it formats everything

219:14

automatically, so no obnoxious single

219:17

walls of text in your messages. It's

219:19

built to work with any app, including

219:21

the big players like Gmail, Slack, or

219:23

the LLM of your choice. Doesn't matter

219:25

how fast you write or type. Whisper Flow

219:27

just works better, [music] or faster,

219:29

excuse me. No more getting lost in

219:30

thought in the middle of trying to write

219:31

down your best ideas. And if you're like

219:33

so many others and you do your best

219:34

thinking on a walk or while commuting or

219:36

even in the shower, Whisper Flow can

219:38

help record fully fleshed out thoughts

219:40

in seconds. So [music] try your first

219:42

month of Whisper Flow Pro totally free.

219:44

We're going to have a link for you in

219:45

the description as we always do. All

219:48

right, I think it's time for After Dark,

219:50

Mr. Luke and Mr. Dan.

219:53

>> All right, you're not going to do your

219:56

I'll do that next week.

219:57

>> Okay.

220:04

Nice.

220:04

>> There we go. Solid. I was unprepared.

220:08

Let's do this one as well. I just have a

220:10

couple for you. Actually, it's it's more

220:13

than it was earlier. Wow, look at that.

220:15

Hello, com one, com two, and com three.

220:18

Luke, on a past WAN show, you said you

220:20

were considering using Kaggi. Kaji. Do

220:23

you have any updates?

220:24

>> Kaggi. Ki.

220:25

>> I was right the first time.

220:26

>> Kaggi. Uh, I have dabbled with it

220:29

honestly.

220:31

I've been not actually searching an

220:33

incredible amount over the last bit. Uh,

220:35

and I have it set up at home. I don't

220:38

have it set up on this laptop, but I

220:39

have used it a little bit. Um, I've also

220:42

used it um

220:49

I've been I've been poking around. Um,

220:54

I've been trying something recently

220:55

called Waterfox. and waterfox recently

220:58

switched to

221:00

um some open- source something search uh

221:04

that I've had some success with. Um I

221:07

feel like I might end up right now going

221:11

the coggy direction. Um it does kind of

221:16

hurt my brain paying for search, but at

221:18

the same time not paying for search kind

221:21

of hurts my brain a little bit. Um

221:26

cuz again the whole like if you're not

221:27

paying are you the product? Um I don't

221:30

know if there's other alternatives

221:31

outside of Kogi. Kogi was just

221:33

recommended to me by um I don't know if

221:36

he wants the fact that he recommended it

221:38

public so I'll just say a buddy. Um

221:42

so I I' I've been enjoying it so far. I

221:45

don't have a ton of experience with it.

221:46

It's not duck. Go. Uh Waterfox has been

221:48

using something else. I got a

221:50

notification saying like, "Oh, we're

221:52

going to start using this whatever

221:53

search engine." And it's it's actually

221:55

been pretty good inside of there. Um,

221:58

but I have personally found like the

222:01

best quality search and this is not this

222:04

is not a comprehensive review of all the

222:06

different search engines, whatever.

222:08

Relax. Quant, that's it. Yeah, Qwant.

222:12

That's the one that uh Waterfox has

222:15

switched to.

222:17

Quant search. I to be clear, I know

222:19

nothing about this, but um

222:23

a search engine that values you as a

222:25

user, not a product. Oh, cool. Um

222:32

Okay, I need to look up.

222:34

>> Whoa.

222:37

Okay. Well, it managed to

222:41

>> it managed to find one of the Oh my god,

222:44

this Roundup commercial again. [ __ ]

222:47

sakes.

222:49

It managed to find the 10 year ago one,

222:52

but not the 12 year ago one and not the

222:54

three year ago one. That's better than

222:58

YouTube search.

222:59

>> So, Kuant uh I I looked up how does

223:02

Quant make money? It's in their FAQ.

223:04

Quant is a free search engine open to

223:06

anyone. Our main source of revenues

223:08

comes from ads displayed in Quant result

223:11

pages. Mhm.

223:12

>> Therefore, every ad that Quant displays

223:14

fully adheres to the values we defend

223:16

and our quality standards blah blah

223:17

blah. New use Quant. No personal

223:19

information whatsoever is uh neither

223:21

captured or transmitted to advertisers

223:24

in details. No third party cookies, no

223:25

track errors, no behavioral targeting,

223:28

etc. Um, so I suspect a lot of people

223:31

watching this might align with Quant

223:34

faster than they would align with

223:36

current Google search. And I've actually

223:38

had pretty good luck with the results

223:40

from Guanti

223:49

because of the lack of those ads. Um,

223:55

it's it's pretty nice. I I've been a

223:58

YouTube Premium user for a long time. I

224:01

was trying to watch something with

224:03

somebody the other day and we were

224:04

skipping through a few YouTube videos

224:06

and it was on their phone and they did

224:08

not have YouTube Premium and I was like,

224:10

I don't know how you survive. [laughter]

224:12

I don't like watching tons of ads all

224:15

the time drives me freaking insane. And

224:17

I I think I'm just really not down with

224:21

the amount of ads that are everywhere.

224:23

And if I can pay YouTube Premium to have

224:26

uh no interruptions,

224:28

uh maybe I'll do that. If I can pay for

224:30

Kogi and not get ads in my search

224:32

results, maybe I'll do that. Um

224:34

>> uh Quant actually did pretty well. I've

224:36

been evaluating that search result.

224:39

>> So pretty happy.

224:40

>> This is the one from 10 years ago. This

224:43

is returning our channel, which is

224:44

pretty reasonable for a search that

224:46

starts with the channel name. This is

224:49

the forum thread for the one from 3

224:52

years ago. This is another page of that

224:54

same thread. Reasonable enough. Here's

224:57

Watch Plex TV season 2016 episode 64. I

225:02

didn't even know this was a thing. Uh

225:05

like I know Colton was working on like

225:09

free ad supported what what is it fast?

225:12

So free adup supported television. Um,

225:16

I I I didn't even know this was a thing,

225:18

but apparently that's a thing. Anyway,

225:20

it found that and then

225:24

here it found a Reddit thread that got

225:27

the one from 12 years ago.

225:31

So, it managed in the first six or so

225:34

results to surface every video in some

225:37

way about low-end GPUs suck from LT.

225:40

Whereas, I was really struggling earlier

225:42

with uh with Google and with um YouTube

225:45

search. So,

225:46

>> again, this is not this is not a

225:48

comprehensive thing on search engine.

225:49

Quant just because I happened to install

225:51

Waterfox and Waterfox was like, "Hey,

225:53

we're using Quant." And I was like,

225:54

"What the heck is Quant?" And then I did

225:56

a few searches and I was like, "Hey,

225:57

Quant is pretty good [laughter]

225:59

right now." I would rank quant above

226:02

Google search just by default and quant

226:04

is free. So I mean I would just do that

226:08

automatically and then uh if you want to

226:12

be a super premium boy uh maybe you go

226:15

the the cogi search direction and pay

226:18

and then just not have any of the ads.

226:20

Um which I'm I'm currently leaning

226:23

towards. I think it seems pretty sweet.

226:25

But quant quant I'm you know you never

226:28

know how long these things will last.

226:30

Um, seems to be really good right now.

226:32

>> Yeah, you know, Duck.Go was the thing

226:34

for years and then I don't know

226:37

necessarily. Someone asked in chat like

226:38

why doesn't DuckGo get recommended as

226:40

much these days? I don't remember what

226:41

happened. I feel like we talked about on

226:43

W show like a a hot minute ago. Um,

226:47

but

226:49

yeah, they're just not recommended as

226:52

much. I don't know what it was.

226:56

Um, yeah, quant.com. Good stuff. Okay,

227:00

>> more.

227:01

>> Yes, Dan.

227:02

>> Hello, sir. Danlot and Co., you are

227:05

passionate about your jobs. What keeps

227:07

you engaged and coming back for the long

227:09

days? Thanks for the cables and threads.

227:14

I feel like I've answered this enough

227:15

times. Uh, I can let you guys go.

227:21

>> Uh, there's a there's an old meme, I

227:24

don't want peace, I want problems. Um,

227:29

[laughter]

227:29

>> well, we got those.

227:32

>> I think that's part of it. I I don't

227:34

want to just sit at home and do nothing.

227:36

Um, I want to work on stuff. I want to

227:39

try to make things better. Um, and also

227:41

the people. I I really like my teams. I

227:45

like I like working with the people I

227:47

work with and I would like to try to

227:49

keep working with them best I can.

227:52

And then in order to do that, you need

227:54

to try to create an environment that is,

227:57

you know, cohesive with that. So

228:02

yeah, I don't know. I think I I've, you

228:04

know, there's been topics of

228:06

conversation with my parents recently

228:08

about what like what does retiring look

228:10

like? And I've had this question to

228:12

myself for a long time. Not that I'm

228:13

anywhere close, but like what would I

228:16

want my retirement to look like? And I

228:18

there's there's a there's a bunch of

228:19

different versions of it. Um,

228:23

one that I really like is like an an a

228:27

uh an inverse week. And I don't remember

228:30

whose idea this was. I think it was my

228:31

mom's, but

228:32

>> where you you work two days.

228:34

>> Yeah.

228:35

>> And you have five days off. So your your

228:38

weekend is when you work now and then

228:40

your entire week is off because you know

228:43

the all the weekend always feels so

228:44

short. It's like, okay, well now the

228:46

work week is super short. You have these

228:48

like really long weekends. I think

228:50

>> it's kind of a cool cool way of like

228:52

retiring because I really think it's

228:54

it's good cognitively to keep active and

228:56

stuff, right? But then

228:57

>> you have to know what day of the week it

228:58

is, you know?

228:59

>> Yeah. It's a I think that's actually

229:01

pretty important. Yeah. But then do I

229:04

need to do minimum 40 hours every week

229:07

for the entire rest of my entire life?

229:10

Maybe not.

229:11

>> That seems like if you could avoid it,

229:15

it' be nice not to. The other idea I've

229:18

heard of that sounds pretty cool is the

229:21

like seasonal focus,

229:23

but maybe I work

229:25

>> and fully work

229:26

>> like three months of the year

229:29

>> and then I take nine months off.

229:33

>> That'd be that'd be tougher to schedule

229:35

though cuz like inverse work week is

229:38

like yeah, you could have a part-time

229:39

job where you work weekends and you know

229:42

everyone else who doesn't want to work

229:44

on the weekend easy. we'll have Luke do

229:46

it, right? Whereas like, yeah, you know,

229:50

I'm thinking, yeah, maybe October,

229:53

November, December, I'll come in this

229:55

year and then see you later for nine

229:57

month. Like, that seems like a tougher

229:59

conversation.

230:00

>> There there are some like, you know, BC,

230:02

this doesn't happen enough. But I I used

230:04

to know a guy I I played games with a

230:06

long time ago, um, who would do

230:09

landscaping in the warm months, okay,

230:11

>> and we do snow plowing in the cold

230:13

months. Well, I don't think you're going

230:14

to do landscaping, but sure, do go on.

230:17

>> But I think you could I think you could

230:19

snowplow

230:19

>> some kind of seasonal work, though.

230:21

>> There are there are some routinely

230:23

seasonal jobs.

230:24

>> Okay.

230:24

>> Um,

230:26

>> yeah, I don't know how relevant this is

230:28

with online shopping, but I remember

230:30

when I was growing up, you could get a

230:32

job in high school in the summer or uh

230:35

in the like holiday season, not the

230:37

summer at all, in the holiday season at

230:39

retail stores because they, you know,

230:41

stores would just sell way more stuff.

230:43

So they they would hire seasonal

230:44

employees.

230:44

>> No, there's still seasonality to retail

230:46

for sure. Yeah.

230:47

>> No, for sure. I just don't know how much

230:49

how many more. Okay.

230:51

>> Yeah.

230:51

>> Oh, yeah. Definitely still a thing.

230:53

>> Yeah, that was my first entrance into

230:55

Best Buy. I started as seasonal

230:57

>> Lwick the Mad.

230:58

>> They kept me on

230:59

>> post. Uh, ski instructors are often also

231:01

river rafting instructors.

231:04

>> That actually honestly makes sense.

231:06

>> Makes sense. So you ski on the snow

231:08

until it melts and then you raft on the

231:09

snow.

231:11

>> [laughter]

231:12

>> Yeah,

231:14

yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

231:15

>> Okay.

231:16

>> Yeah. Yeah. So, I I mean that's an an

231:19

interesting idea. Um I think there's a

231:21

variety of interesting ideas. Someone

231:22

said freelancing. I I think for me

231:26

um the problem with something like

231:29

freelancing is m maybe if you've like

231:31

absolutely made a name for yourself and

231:34

then you can get work easily but if

231:37

you're not super active in the

231:38

freelancing space like that might not be

231:40

the easiest thing to keep doing

231:42

>> no

231:43

>> when you're only doing it two days a

231:44

week

231:44

>> people's memories are very short and

231:46

like people expect communication

231:49

>> pushing that too

231:50

>> you can't just be like radio like 5 days

231:53

of Radio silence in the modern era. Come

231:56

on.

231:57

>> I mean, if you're super famous in a

231:59

space, you might be able to demand the

232:02

the the the patience or whatever, but

232:04

like

232:05

>> anyone else,

232:05

>> that's tough. That's tough. I think I

232:07

think that's tough.

232:09

>> Been a board of directors going to

232:10

politics politics.

232:14

>> Uh I don't know if I'm made of the right

232:16

metal for that world. Um

232:18

>> no, but I think that's the problem,

232:20

right? is the kinds of people who are

232:22

attracted to politics are generally not

232:24

the kinds that we want involved in it.

232:27

>> Yeah.

232:27

>> So, you know, maybe you should just do

232:29

it anyway.

232:31

>> Yeah. I I I do think there's there is a

232:33

variety of options though. I think I

232:35

mean I would at that point in time I

232:38

would see volunteering

232:40

routinely and at a place that had like

232:43

fixed goals and and whatnot like it

232:45

would it would need to be a fairly

232:47

serious position of volunteering. Um,

232:50

but I could see you finding some form of

232:53

nonprofit where you're contributing

232:54

quite heavily in your effort. Yeah, I

232:56

think and you're working two days a week

232:58

or something as as the same level of

233:00

applicable thing. You need something

233:02

external to yourself that you could pour

233:04

a lot of care into that needs it and

233:06

takes effort and has problems and has

233:09

problems that are naturally created and

233:12

are important and impactful to overcome.

233:14

All of those things are important to

233:16

keep the brain juices flowing. We're

233:18

wired so hard to care about things that

233:22

we invest our own time and our own

233:24

energy in.

233:25

>> And the more time and energy we invest

233:28

in them, the more we care about them.

233:30

It's like

233:33

>> you can fight it, but it's there.

233:36

>> I I talked about this, I think, on the

233:38

last WAN show, but uh Emma and I have

233:42

been doing this thing where uh at night

233:45

we'll go for a walk.

233:46

>> Yeah. and we walk around this really

233:48

nice park and uh there's chest tables at

233:52

the park and we've tied bags to the

233:56

chest tables and put chest sets inside

233:59

the bags and at night we'll go by and

234:03

I'll set the chest pieces back up and

234:04

we'll make sure that they're all there

234:06

and if they're not there we'll we'll

234:07

fill the chest pieces back in. one of

234:10

the thought processes that got us to do

234:12

this because the the park never provided

234:13

the chest pieces because obviously

234:15

people are going to steal them or lose

234:17

them and then they'll be gone forever so

234:18

it's impossible but you still want to

234:20

put a chest table there but it's such a

234:22

classic problem. I' I've genuinely seen

234:23

this a bunch of times where like play

234:26

areas or parks will have chest tables or

234:28

one I've seen too is like the chest

234:30

thing where it's on the floor. It's like

234:31

painted on the floor and it's huge as if

234:33

you had like peopleized chest pieces as

234:35

if anyone's ever actually really going

234:36

to engage with that properly. So I was

234:38

like, man,

234:40

>> actually there's one at the Fraser

234:42

Heights Rec Center that is like a giant

234:44

chess set that people

234:46

>> they actually have the set there.

234:47

>> They actually have it and it's amazing

234:49

>> outdoors.

234:50

>> No, it's I've seen one outdoors and you

234:54

have to go and like request them from

234:55

the office and they give you like one of

234:57

those little garbage picker uper things.

234:58

You can grab the pieces by the neck and

235:00

move them around. But

235:01

>> that's pretty cool.

235:02

>> But [snorts]

235:03

>> that could work. I could see that

235:04

working. supervised, so you can't

235:06

>> Yeah, this place doesn't have an office,

235:08

so like it's not going to But anyways,

235:09

yeah, we we tie the chest pieces there.

235:11

They're there. We go by every night just

235:12

to make sure. The first couple days

235:15

there were a few minor problems. We've

235:17

had some really cool moments where like

235:19

we lost a bishop, for example. Um, and

235:23

we couldn't find it in the dirt or

235:24

anything. So,

235:25

>> did you ask the cardinal where he went?

235:27

[laughter]

235:29

>> So, we we replaced the bishop with one

235:31

of the ones that we had in the bag and

235:33

we went home. And then we come back the

235:34

next day and we check all the pieces and

235:35

there's an extra bishop.

235:37

>> Nice.

235:38

>> So someone found

235:39

>> faith in faith in humanity restored.

235:42

>> It's actually it's actually been

235:43

fascinating. Like the very first day

235:45

some kids tried to steal the bag uh and

235:48

then Emma caught them cuz she had just

235:50

put it there

235:52

>> and gave them a little like don't do

235:54

that. And they were like oh it's my

235:55

friends. And they're like she's like no

235:57

it's not. Um, and then but then after

236:01

that day, no one seems to have tried to

236:02

steal them and they've basically just

236:04

been, you know, probably some little kid

236:06

accidentally hit them and they went

236:07

flying and there's

236:09

>> there's some dirt near it. So the

236:10

especially the black pieces just kind of

236:12

get lost in there, whatever. But like

236:14

it's been pretty consistent. And a big

236:17

part of the idea that spawned this was

236:20

is that was super old. I think it's

236:22

Chinese or whatever the uh you should

236:25

plant trees you'll never sit in the

236:27

shade of.

236:27

>> Yeah. Part of the idea is that we don't

236:33

we do it at night. We're replacing the

236:35

pieces when nobody's there. Nobody knows

236:36

this is us,

236:37

>> right?

236:38

>> We're just trying to make the park

236:40

better.

236:42

I've never actually played chess at

236:44

those tables. To be honest, I basically

236:45

only play chess on my phone. Whenever I

236:47

play chess over the board, it feels very

236:49

strange. So, [laughter] I'm just used to

236:51

seeing it digitally.

236:53

Um, but it's like I want to do more

236:57

stuff like that. I don't know what

236:58

opportunities there are for that, but I

237:00

want to try to do more stuff like that

237:02

cuz it's really cool.

237:02

>> I mean, never forget that what you do

237:05

here is uh very important for that. I

237:08

got this message today which is pretty

237:10

much pretty much made my day. Uh, dear

237:13

Lionus, hi. I know you'll probably never

237:15

read this, but I wanted to thank you for

237:17

the role you've played in my career. One

237:19

of the first videos I've ever watched

237:20

from you was when you unboxed a quantum

237:22

computer at D-Wave for Holy.

237:25

Um, well,

237:26

>> that was cool.

237:27

>> Last week was my first day as an intern

237:29

at D-Wave. I'm currently working on

237:31

multicolor annealing, their most cutting

237:34

edge uh cubit control technology, and

237:36

I'm really excited for where this

237:37

industry is going. Without you and your

237:39

team, I would not have had as much

237:41

passion for technology as I do now, let

237:43

alone even know what a D-Wave was. Thank

237:45

you so much. Like, that's

237:48

Uh, we're we're I'm going to I'm going

237:49

to send that to HR. I'm going to have

237:51

them print it and put it on the fridges

237:53

and stuff because I think that um I

237:56

think that a lot of the time it's really

237:57

easy for us around here to forget. Like

238:01

I I always say it. I'm like our job is

238:03

to go around and start little fires and

238:05

if even a handful of them burn then then

238:08

we've succeeded, right? But we have so

238:11

little visibility like like your chess

238:13

sets you don't see who's playing with

238:16

them. don't actually know.

238:18

>> Yeah. The one just to jump in, one of

238:21

the things that's really cool about

238:24

doing it at night, too, is we always

238:25

have this question of like, is anyone

238:27

even playing with them?

238:28

>> Yeah.

238:29

>> Every single day, the bags are mixed up.

238:34

>> That's cool. And you'd think it's like a

238:36

little bit annoying because I have to

238:37

reset the bags and like sort everything

238:39

out, but it's actually just amazing

238:42

because every single day I It's not

238:45

like, you know, one person played with

238:47

it one time. It probably got played with

238:48

a bunch

238:50

>> and that is how they ended up getting

238:53

mixed up. And it's just I don't know.

238:55

It's cool. I I've been thinking

238:58

>> I want to do like some you know I'm

239:00

doing pretty well for myself. I want to

239:01

do some type of like

239:04

budget of sorts because I'm so happy

239:05

with this chess thing we've been doing

239:07

of like you know a yearly or monthly

239:10

thing where we try to like do something

239:12

like that where we just try to improve

239:13

the community in some way some tiny

239:15

little tiny little way

239:18

>> I mean you don't

239:18

>> small stuff genuinely small stuff

239:21

>> every day someone is touching grass

239:25

getting some cognitive exercise and

239:28

interacting with another human being

239:32

that is you have no idea

239:37

what that might snowball into compared

239:39

to what they could have been doing in

239:41

that time. I

239:42

>> Yeah. And then realistically

239:43

>> Yeah. small. Like you talk about how

239:45

small it is, but I I guess what I'm

239:46

trying to say is like

239:48

>> I don't think random acts of kindness

239:49

are ever small.

239:51

>> But I think that's why I want it to be

239:53

small,

239:54

>> right?

239:54

>> You know what I mean? Like I I do

239:56

recognize that too. But I I think it's

239:58

why I want it to be small is because I

239:59

want to do the stuff that I think like a

240:01

large organization like a government or

240:03

a huge charity or whatever would never

240:05

think of cuz it's a $15

240:08

>> cheapo Amazon chess set.

240:10

>> Yeah.

240:11

>> It's whatever's aren't even taking the

240:14

pieces. Sorry.

240:15

>> There's no way you bought it on Amazon.

240:16

>> I think Well, Emma bought it, so

240:18

>> All right. Yeah. [laughter]

240:20

>> Okay.

240:21

>> Yeah, I did not. Um

240:23

>> you know what? It still counts. It still

240:24

counts. still making the world a little

240:26

better. [laughter]

240:28

>> Um I I was [snorts] thinking about being

240:31

able to get away from that by by 3D

240:32

printing them or something, but I'm not

240:34

>> Yeah, right.

240:35

>> Um I I I'm not stoked on that part, but

240:37

it is what it is. Um it's

240:40

>> But it's like that plus the combination

240:43

of the fact that people aren't taking

240:45

them.

240:45

>> Yeah. is like this was effectively

240:49

a $30 investment and it's been like

240:54

incredible, man. Like I just I don't

240:56

know. It's been it's been super it's

240:57

been very fulfilling. Selfishly, it has

241:00

made me feel very good. [laughter]

241:02

>> So, it's like worth the 30 bucks. Like,

241:04

dude, absolutely. I have I have met

241:07

people that take that to a toxic level

241:09

where like their whole like it gets to

241:13

the point where the charity they do is

241:16

all about being the best at charity and

241:19

that's their like whole identity. To be

241:21

clear, I'm not saying you're anywhere

241:22

near that. I'm just saying

241:24

>> but I I'm sure I can imagine the person

241:26

>> growing up in the church. You you find

241:28

some of those people where the whole

241:30

point of it is how much more Jesus loves

241:33

them than anyone else. is just like,

241:34

"Oh, man." Dude, it's not about that for

241:36

crying out loud. [laughter]

241:37

>> It's actually, I think, like very not

241:40

about that.

241:42

[laughter]

241:44

>> Yeah.

241:45

>> Yeah.

241:46

>> Not the point.

241:48

>> Anyway, hit us up, Dan.

241:50

>> Happy Friday, Dan, Luke, and Lionus. Why

241:53

does the future keep being worse than we

241:55

were promised instead of better? Sad

241:57

face. Let's turn it around. [laughter]

242:03

I blame the internet.

242:06

I think I think to a degree

242:11

the connectivity and the communication

242:14

and the interaction online has

242:16

turbocharged our process our our

242:19

progress. I also think that it has

242:21

turbocharged our worst in our worst

242:23

instincts and our

242:27

um ability to harm each other. I think

242:30

that it has amplified everything that's

242:33

great about humanity and at the same

242:34

time amplified everything that's bad.

242:37

And unfortunately,

242:40

um,

242:42

cancer grows faster than healthy cells.

242:44

And I think we're we're

242:47

reaching the point where that is

242:50

becoming uh it's re it's hitting like a

242:53

tipping point of being extremely

242:55

problematic. There, that's my you asked.

242:58

That's the only reason I'm talking about

242:59

it.

243:03

>> Hello, Dune. Lunas and Lake. Okay.

243:06

>> Okay. Apparently, I'm the only one who's

243:08

going to answer that. Sure, fine.

243:09

>> Oh, sorry. Was Luke going to butt in?

243:12

>> Uh, honestly, I was so focused on Lus's

243:15

answer. I don't remember the core

243:16

question at the beginning.

243:17

>> Why is everything garbage now? And uh,

243:20

was that

243:21

>> I mean, the internet was a really good

243:22

answer. [laughter]

243:25

I think it's cuz people aren't like Luke

243:27

and they're not giving people chest.

243:29

>> Oh my god.

243:30

>> No, if we had more of that.

243:32

>> Um,

243:33

>> just do one thing.

243:35

>> We should do a new shirt. Be more like

243:36

Luke.

243:37

>> Oh my god.

243:38

>> I'll wear it. I

243:39

>> to 99% of the stuff that he does.

243:42

>> I still wear my Luke Nukem shirt very

243:45

regularly. It's like one of my weekend

243:47

shirts. [laughter]

243:49

>> I've seen you wear it before. I um

243:52

>> Oh, yeah. I ran into you at Bubble World

243:54

and I was wearing it, right?

243:55

>> Yeah. Yeah. Nice.

243:56

>> Yeah. Yeah. Um Bubble Bubble World is

243:59

great. Um crap. What was I going to say?

244:02

Yeah. I think it's I think it's not I

244:04

mean this is so true for so many things.

244:06

It's not inherently the internet. It's

244:07

what the internet has kind of become. Um

244:10

like the I remember the

244:19

my first feray onto the internet. It was

244:24

so much goodness. There was all there

244:27

was pretty much always bad stuff on the

244:29

internet, but there was so much

244:30

goodness. And now with like the mass

244:32

commercialization, with the amount of

244:34

insane amounts of money being poured

244:36

into trying to control your brain um as

244:39

much as they possibly can with infinite

244:41

scrolling and physical addiction to hand

244:44

movement and uh you know maximizing

244:48

humanity's constant draw towards anger

244:51

and hatred um and how that has killed

244:55

a lot of journalism to be completely

244:58

honest and how we're I mean we talked

244:59

earlier in the

245:01

about how even what remains of good

245:04

information on the internet is rotting

245:05

away because of AI generated articles

245:07

and stuff

245:07

>> and the erosion of trust in experts

245:09

which is has been a fascinating one for

245:11

me to to watch like I tr I believe my

245:13

dentist when they tell me when she tells

245:15

me about something about teeth

245:17

>> and that's like

245:18

>> not to be taken for granted anymore I

245:21

believe my doctor when she tells me

245:24

about a vaccine or about a treatment um

245:28

and it's like that doesn't mean that

245:30

she's perfect or whatever or that she'll

245:33

always get it right. But like in

245:35

general, I'm I'm asking her, not a

245:37

podcaster. And that's [clears throat]

245:38

not to be taken for granted anymore. And

245:40

it's been wild for me to watch that in

245:42

my lifetime.

245:44

Jay Schmeed says, "I miss Good News,

245:47

Wan." Okay. Okay. We'll bring it back a

245:49

little more good news next week. Sorry

245:50

you guys went

245:51

>> this. Yeah. Yeah. There was some bad

245:54

parts earlier in the show, but this was

245:55

this was a question. We just, you know,

245:57

>> not much we can do about that.

245:58

>> We're doing what we can. But yeah, I

246:00

think I think I'll still say the

246:01

internet, but I'll say what the internet

246:02

became. Not necessarily how it started.

246:08

Okay. Hello, Dune Lunison Lake. What if

246:11

your whole game was your NFT that you

246:14

could buy and resell on a marketplace

246:16

like an online GameStop? Would this help

246:19

the ownership problem that we are

246:21

facing?

246:22

>> Okay, I'm going to let you finish, but

246:24

why does it have to be an NFT?

246:26

>> Yeah. What?

246:27

>> Oh, no, no, no. I understand what

246:28

they're saying. Basically, they're

246:29

asking for a transferable digital

246:31

license. It doesn't have to be an NFT,

246:33

and there's no way that, you know, the

246:35

Microsofts and Sony's of the world would

246:37

would allow it to be managed off, you

246:41

know, their own authentication chain, so

246:43

to speak. But, um, no, I mean, if if a

246:46

digital asset was transferable,

246:49

>> yeah, sure. If a digital asset was was

246:51

tracked and transferable in a central

246:53

location versus a decentralized or

246:55

whatever, I don't think that matters.

246:56

And yeah, it would totally help the

246:58

ownership problem we're facing, but it

247:01

also sort of wouldn't because you still

247:03

wouldn't own the zeros and the ones that

247:06

would still be um

247:09

inactive without a central

247:11

authentication server, at least in the

247:12

current sort of way of things working.

247:14

So I kind of talked around it, but yes,

247:18

but also no, but also yes, kind of, but

247:22

also no, not really. Does that make

247:24

sense?

247:28

Last one I've got for you today. Hello,

247:30

Lionus, Luke, and Dan. Love the DMS home

247:32

theater video. Uh, this one is mostly

247:34

for Luke. When is it a When is a

247:37

non-essential tool or tech purchase

247:40

worth it just because it makes life

247:42

easier?

247:44

>> Oh. Uh, makes life easier

247:48

if you can afford it often.

247:50

>> Yeah, I think they kind of answered

247:51

their own question. Yeah, if it

247:54

genuinely makes life easier.

247:57

Yeah. Sick. I mean, I've done a bunch of

247:59

that. I mean, a a a guilty

248:02

a guilty purchase that I have. Would I

248:04

say that I have an eight sleep? I don't

248:06

recommend an eight sleep because of a

248:09

variety of things we've talked about on

248:10

a way show very extensively. So, I'm not

248:11

going to go over over everything again,

248:13

but um it makes my life easier. Uh

248:18

when it's when it's not set up, I am sad

248:22

and I don't sleep as well. And when it

248:24

is set up, I am happier and I sleep

248:26

better. It's Yeah, that thing was

248:29

expensive as hell.

248:30

>> Yeah.

248:31

>> And deeply problematic.

248:34

>> And very deeply problematic. I don't

248:36

think I'd buy another one. Uh I would

248:39

search for alternatives immediately

248:41

though because it's like they're pretty

248:43

sick. Um,

248:46

yeah. I don't know. Making

248:49

making life easier is a pretty strong

248:51

reason to buy something to be honest.

248:53

You you made it sound like it's like so

248:56

minor. That's huge.

248:58

>> Why you should buy something?

248:59

>> That's like what it's all about, man.

249:01

[laughter] You just you just got to make

249:03

sure you can afford those things.

249:04

>> Like if you ask Luke like, "When can I

249:06

justify a plastic dad?" uh you know,

249:11

he'll be like, "Never put away your

249:14

wallet, [laughter] brother."

249:16

>> But when when can I justify something

249:18

that makes my life easier? It's like,

249:21

>> yeah, you're not going to get a lot of

249:22

push back around here.

249:24

>> $20,000, $40,000, you're worth it,

249:26

sister. I'm even like again people call

249:28

me cheap man but like if you can buy

249:30

like

249:32

there's some expensive things where like

249:34

if it's a if it's um

249:38

I don't know like my grandpa used to

249:39

talk about boots all the time.

249:41

>> Yeah, boots theory is pretty pretty

249:43

traditional

249:43

>> where he's like you know buy a good pair

249:46

of shoes. Buy a really good pair of

249:48

shoes because you know not only should

249:51

they be comfortable but you also want

249:52

them to last for a long time and yada

249:54

yada yada. goes into all these different

249:56

things like have a good pair of shoes.

249:58

Don't cheap out on your shoes. Buy like

250:01

expensive, but he doesn't mean expensive

250:03

go buy Louis Vuitton thingies with the

250:06

red bottoms or whatever. He means like

250:07

buy a good quality well- constructed

250:09

pair of boots or shoes.

250:11

>> You know what's really funny is uh I

250:12

leaned really heavily on um what is it?

250:16

Sam Vimes.

250:20

Yeah, I I I leaned really heavily on

250:23

that um for the launch video for our

250:26

socks.

250:28

>> Oh, yeah.

250:29

>> Yeah. I was talking about how um like

250:33

being able to afford better socks up

250:35

front was saving me overall on socks

250:37

back when the uh the Champion ones that

250:40

I used to get at Costco became ini.

250:44

>> People are calling me out cuz I have

250:45

ratty shoes. I do have ratty shoes, but

250:47

those are the most shoes I've ever had.

250:49

That's a whole thing.

250:51

>> You can't reby them.

250:53

>> It's there. I

250:54

>> He would buy 10 of them today if he

250:56

could. It's not a question of whether

250:58

he'd spend the money. It's

251:00

>> I was quite genuinely on eBay last week

251:02

trying to find more of them. Y

251:04

>> um because they're they're not new. You

251:06

can't buy them. I have a newer pair of

251:08

shoes. I do wear them. I find them very

251:11

annoying in a variety of ways. Um and I

251:14

often go back to my older ones because

251:15

they are significantly more comfortable.

251:17

So really what it comes down to is Luke

251:19

wouldn't mind buying things, but nobody

251:22

builds anything that lives up to his

251:23

standards.

251:25

>> Yeah. Yes. I'm [laughter] just I'm just

251:28

too discerning.

251:29

>> He'd rather buy He'd rather owe nothing

251:32

and be happy than buy something

251:34

inadequate, something lesser.

251:36

>> I think that's

251:37

>> to be completely honest, that is often

251:38

kind of true.

251:39

>> I know. Lower your

251:41

>> standards. Dude, I was like 8% joking.

251:43

Like not negative. Yeah,

251:45

>> it's like a little bit joking, but it's

251:47

it's not that much. That is that is that

251:49

is pretty real. Um I would I would I'm

251:52

pretty happy buying like a quality

251:54

craftsman whatever nice thing that I can

251:57

keep basically forever. If I have to buy

252:00

something that's junk, I'd really rather

252:02

not. I'd really rather like Okay, can I

252:04

like rent this thing or borrow this

252:06

thing or

252:07

>> always? Uh

252:08

>> go ahead, Dan. Sorry.

252:09

>> Yeah. The the other nice thing is the

252:11

generally the more expensive or high

252:13

quality something is the more repairable

252:15

it becomes.

252:16

>> Yep.

252:16

>> They're easier to service there's more

252:18

parts available.

252:20

>> Not a rule that always works. That is a

252:22

rule that sometimes works.

252:23

>> Never a rule. Like washing machines, you

252:25

get industrial stuff. We were talking

252:26

about this. You were looking for a

252:27

fridge or something like that. I was

252:29

like there's a there is a repable fridge

252:32

that will last for 400 years. It's

252:35

probably $40,000.

252:37

>> Yeah, they exist. you just probably

252:40

can't afford them.

252:42

>> Yeah, I found this uh our washer and

252:44

dryer was having issues and it's it's

252:46

fine right now. So, I'm no longer in the

252:48

market, but I was trying to find like,

252:50

okay, what's a very reputable, high

252:53

quality, repairable washer and dryer?

252:56

Nope, they do exist.

252:57

>> Oh, yeah, they do.

252:58

>> Yeah. How much you want to spend,

252:59

though?

252:59

>> It's a lot of money.

253:01

>> And I'll tell you, working on them,

253:02

>> it's a lot of money.

253:04

>> A dream. They're like designed like you

253:06

you undo two screws and then you pull

253:08

the thing out and all the circuit boards

253:10

like fold down and lock and all the

253:12

wires are long enough so you can get to

253:14

the whole thing

253:15

>> and the company support is amazing and

253:18

they'll just

253:19

>> tons of people in chat.

253:20

>> Speed queen.

253:21

>> Yeah, I'm looking this up.

253:22

>> Sorry, Dan. I was listening. I just

253:24

>> No, no, totally. I'm just rambling.

253:25

>> Built better to last longer.

253:28

>> They do exist. I didn't even say the

253:31

name of the brand and like four people

253:32

got it in a row and no one said any

253:34

other brand.

253:37

>> Okay,

253:38

>> but okay, scroll all the way down.

253:40

>> No, the way down

253:41

>> cuz I'm in a I'm in a condo. I need

253:43

vertical stacking units. So, scroll all

253:44

the way down.

253:45

>> Okay, all the way down. Stacked washer

253:47

tires. Okay, so I mean Okay, so these

253:50

are dogs for scale, but then also

253:52

sometimes a cat. Oh, these are just

253:54

different colors anyway.

253:55

>> So, let's go electric. Electric wire,

253:57

>> I think.

253:58

>> Yeah. Okay. Only four stars. I guess

254:01

depends on what people are expecting

254:02

from.

254:04

>> Is this Is this US dollars?

254:06

>> Uh, probably.

254:07

>> That's actually less than I

254:08

>> That's less than I thought.

254:09

>> Yeah. Oh, I mean, is this a dollar?

254:11

>> This is still about double what you

254:13

would pay for like a regular one. Double

254:16

to triple.

254:16

>> Mine was made in 1970, so it's going to

254:18

outlast me.

254:19

>> Nice.

254:19

>> So, I I don't know. Doesn't have

254:21

anything electronic in it. I also don't

254:24

know 100% like is the is the stacked are

254:28

the stacked versions of as high regard

254:31

as the individual units or whatever.

254:33

>> Never get a front loader ever.

254:36

>> Yeah. And this is a front loader.

254:38

>> Wait, these top loads are not even like

254:40

that bad. Here's their top load washer.

254:42

It's like 1,600 bucks.

254:44

>> It's American. I don't think they sell

254:45

them in Canada. You'd have to import it.

254:48

So, you're paying duties and everything

254:49

else on top of it. Oh,

254:51

>> I'm fairly certain they're not in

254:52

Canada. They might be, but I don't think

254:54

so.

254:54

>> You must allow functional cookies. Okay,

254:57

functional cookies. Confirm my choice.

255:01

>> No, you weren't looking at the good one.

255:02

What's the good one then?

255:03

>> Okay, what's the good one? Well, why do

255:05

they why do even these guys have a bad

255:08

one?

255:09

>> That's the TR7. That's the like

255:11

>> That was the one on the far left.

255:14

I don't know 100% know if I

255:18

uh you know

255:20

>> like higher number more better, right?

255:23

>> I mean I think so.

255:25

>> Am I missing something here? Okay, TR3.

255:27

No, that's like the same price.

255:30

>> Yeah, Ross, I I think people just import

255:33

them.

255:39

>> Surf and Sam asks, "Hey Dan, why never

255:41

get a front loader? Just cuz they leak,

255:42

right?" Uh, and if there's a problem and

255:45

it's full of water and the drain is

255:47

broken where the pump goes very

255:50

traditionally on a washer, now it's full

255:55

of water. What do you do?

255:56

>> Oh, I see.

255:57

>> Can't get a bucket in there or a wet dry

256:00

vac and suck it all out. It's uh not a

256:03

good idea.

256:04

>> Got it.

256:04

>> Not a good idea. Um,

256:08

there's a there's a brand that we used

256:10

to work with a bunch. They're called

256:11

Splendid.

256:13

They're very expensive. Um,

256:17

they're like compact spaces. So, it's a

256:19

washerd dryer combo, but it doesn't have

256:21

an exhaust hose.

256:24

So, you can put it like in a cupboard

256:28

cuz it recondenses the like drier

256:30

exhaust and so you can fit them in like

256:34

a space that's the size of it.

256:37

>> Oh, this is like for boats or something,

256:39

right?

256:39

>> Yeah. But I mean they're they're in

256:40

they're in uh like the domestic places

256:43

too, but they're like really high-end.

256:46

Um

256:46

>> that's crazy.

256:47

>> Splendid. S P L E N D I D E.

256:54

Splendid.

256:56

Splendid. Laundry centers.

256:59

Designed to fit where others won't. I

257:02

don't know what accent that's supposed

257:03

to be. Don't worry about it.

257:06

Well,

257:06

>> I mean, they are your great [laughter]

257:10

Okay, that's probably not how I would do

257:12

it, but sure.

257:15

Our collection premium detergent

257:18

vented combo

257:21

compact washer.

257:25

Okay. All right.

257:29

Most reliable. Okay. Whoops. That was a

257:32

mistake. All right.

257:35

Anyways, we can probably stop talking

257:37

about washers and dryers now. Sorry,

257:38

hyper focus.

257:39

>> We can stop talking about everything.

257:41

Um, we'll see you again next week, guys.

257:44

Same bad time, same bad channel.

257:46

>> Bye. [clears throat]

257:47

[laughter]

257:50

>> So, sudden.

257:53

>> Conversation over.

257:58

>> This was a nice visit. Get the [ __ ] out

257:59

of [music] my house. [laughter]

258:04

I start saying that in my guest.

Interactive Summary

Loading summary...