HomeVideos

NVIDIA’s New CPU Makes Me Excited Again - WAN Show July 24, 2026

Now Playing

NVIDIA’s New CPU Makes Me Excited Again - WAN Show July 24, 2026

Transcript

7357 segments

0:00

Friday and welcome to the land show.

0:04

We've got a great show lined up for you

0:06

guys this week. Actually, this there's

0:08

lots of fun stuff. Nvidia has provided

0:11

new details on their Vera data center

0:14

CPUs and this raised Luke's eyebrows

0:17

just a bit. Yeah, see he did it. You

0:19

couldn't see it because it was the one

0:20

that was closer to me, but he did it. He

0:22

did it again.

0:23

I am really really excited about them

0:27

and what they might mean for the future

0:30

of CPU micro architectures that will I I

0:35

will lay out a case for this hopefully

0:36

make their way to gamers and be a major

0:39

benefit. In other news,

0:42

Framework had a bit of a rough week,

0:46

investment disclosure,

0:48

um,

0:50

with respect to pricing of memory

0:52

modules in their laptops. We'll get into

0:54

that a little bit more later. What else

0:55

we got?

0:56

>> Uh, Microsoft introduces Xbox backwards

0:59

compatibility program on PC. Exciting.

1:03

Interesting

1:04

>> for Xbox games.

1:05

>> Kind of confusing. We'll get into it.

1:07

Um, also Fallout 5,

1:11

Fallout 3 and New Vegas remasters. Also

1:13

a new Obsidian Fallout. All of this

1:15

stuff was announced. Maybe Bethesda will

1:17

use an IP for the first time in I don't

1:20

know, over a decade, I think. Cool. I

1:24

heard you're supposed to do that as a

1:25

company.

1:26

>> Yeah, I heard you're supposed to IP

1:27

freely. Oh, I pressed the wrong one.

1:30

Damn. [laughter]

1:31

>> What the

1:34

Oh, good. The foot cam is there.

1:41

I just got jump scared by my own feet.

1:48

My feet are so touching [music] the

1:50

floor. The show is brought to you by

1:51

Shocks, AMD, Squarespace, and XSplit,

1:55

alongside our rap partner Dbrand, our

1:57

laptop partner Razer, and our chair

1:59

partner who is also Razer. Why don't we

2:02

jump right into our headline topic for

2:05

the day, which is of course I actually

2:07

forget which one we picked.

2:08

>> Nvidia CPU.

2:09

>> Oh yes, I want to talk about that. Okay,

2:12

so the original source here was actually

2:15

some analysis from my old buddy Mr. Ryan

2:18

Shrout who used to run PC perspective

2:21

and then was working at Intel for a

2:23

little while and then now is kind of

2:25

doing this whole like analyst thing. And

2:27

so I was looking at his analysis and he

2:33

kind of laid out a bunch of the details

2:34

that Nvidia is providing about their new

2:37

Vera CPUs. Vera is built on the Olympus

2:40

core which is Nvidia's first custom

2:43

core. So, while Grace was a

2:46

custom-designed

2:47

CPU, um it was a partnership between

2:50

Nvidia and MediaTek, the actual cores

2:53

themselves were offthe-shelf pretty much

2:56

ARM cores. It's a matter of laying them

2:59

out and uh you know, figuring out all of

3:01

your IO and how to integrate it into

3:02

your bigger system. This time around,

3:05

we're looking at a custom a custom core.

3:07

This is an Nvidia design from the ground

3:10

up. And this is what gets me excited.

3:14

It's 88 cores on a monolithic compute

3:18

die running 176 threads using what

3:21

Nvidia calls spatial multi-threading.

3:26

Okay. Where is he going with this?

3:29

>> Yeah. Meanwhile, companies like AMD have

3:33

upcoming epic CPUs that are going to

3:36

have as much as 256

3:40

Zen 6C cores. What could possibly make

3:44

me excited about 88 cores uh on some ARM

3:49

CPU that is destined for the data

3:51

center?

3:54

>> You still don't know where I'm going

3:55

with this.

3:55

>> This is still the question I had.

3:57

>> Wonderful. Okay.

3:59

What I'm excited about is that for the

4:03

last

4:07

20 years, okay, everything has been

4:12

okay, we'll give you some singlethreaded

4:15

improvements, but really what we're

4:17

building is better power efficiency and

4:20

better multicore for the data center so

4:23

that they can take all those cores and

4:25

they can slice them all up into cloud

4:28

instances for all of their customers.

4:30

Big fating deal for my Counter-Strike

4:33

frame rate. Nvidia is coming in and

4:37

going, "No, what the market actually

4:40

needs is big, strong cores and not as

4:44

many of them." Now, the reason is not

4:46

one that's likely to excite you guys.

4:48

The reason is that Nvidia is looking for

4:51

huge performance uplifts in agentic AI

4:55

and and right now what the data centers

4:58

what the hyperscalers are running into

4:59

is they've got these super super

5:01

expensive GPU farms

5:03

>> and for agentic workloads you actually

5:07

need a ton of CPU to coordinate work or

5:10

those GPU farms are sitting idle and

5:13

Nvidia's solution is hey we need not

5:15

only a ton of CPU cores but we actually

5:18

need an absolute butt ton of performance

5:21

per core. Now, why does this excite me

5:24

as a gamer? Because again, this this

5:26

product is not for me. Vera is not for

5:28

me. I'm getting there. Grace

5:32

already made its way into a desktop PC

5:35

in the form of the DGX Spark.

5:37

>> True.

5:37

>> The DGX Spark chip was repurposed

5:41

already announced. Coming in Q4, I think

5:44

Nvidia announced I I forget. I forget

5:46

the details, but coming this year, they

5:48

already announced RTX Spark, which uses

5:51

those same gray CPU cores that were in

5:55

the data center and then made their way

5:56

to a workstation and then to a desktop

5:59

and then to laptops.

6:02

I think we can draw a pretty straight

6:04

line to Vera is going to be in the data

6:06

center, is going to be in workstations,

6:08

is going to be in desktops and laptops.

6:11

And

6:13

from what I saw at Computex, I mean, did

6:15

you did you see the Nvidia demos?

6:16

>> No.

6:17

>> They were just like running Fortnite and

6:20

like running Alen Wake and like running

6:23

the software that you would want to run.

6:25

>> Yeah.

6:26

>> On ARM.

6:27

>> It's what

6:28

>> it is. It is nice that Qualcomm did this

6:30

for everybody. [laughter]

6:33

>> Don't Don't get yourself Don't don't kid

6:35

yourself. Nvidia is putting in the work

6:37

too

6:38

>> on the gaming side in particular. Like

6:40

that was the first slide they brought up

6:41

at least for me was hey we have more

6:44

gaming relationships than quite

6:45

literally anybody

6:47

>> did a lot of work on the gaming side

6:49

>> they did

6:50

>> I think they opened the door I'm not

6:52

saying Nvidia is not doing anything

6:54

that's not my point

6:55

>> depending on how far back you want to go

6:58

Nvidia opened the door first actually

7:00

you want to talk 2

7:01

>> okay

7:02

>> yeah I know that's fair

7:03

>> it's clear that Qualcomm has been

7:05

putting in a lot of work that's very

7:06

clear but it's also clear that nobody

7:08

but Nvidia has the weight

7:10

>> to throw behind the major gaming studios

7:13

and go, "No, but actually you will

7:14

support this."

7:15

>> Yeah.

7:16

>> Period.

7:16

>> I think that's valid. Yeah.

7:17

>> And so there I was looking at real

7:21

actual games that real actual gamers

7:22

want to play running on ARM.

7:25

Now with this custom core, somebody

7:29

finally after all these freaking years

7:31

is going, "You know what would actually

7:33

be pretty great? if somebody made a CPU

7:36

that had a more powerful core instead of

7:39

more and more and more of them. And so

7:42

in in response to your excuse me WTF,

7:46

that's why I'm the and and it still

7:49

sounds like a lot of cores, but it's

7:50

clearly not the the primary uh

7:54

>> just going for just more cores is not

7:57

the primary focus.

7:58

>> Correct. Yeah.

7:59

>> And when Nvidia does it, it it's like

8:01

Apple. It's like how how I'm always

8:03

industry follows

8:04

>> bemoning when Apple does something

8:06

horrible and applauding when Apple does

8:08

something great. Regardless of whether

8:09

I'm going to buy the product, everybody

8:12

else is going to do it. When Nvidia does

8:15

it, everybody else is going to start

8:17

looking at IPC.

8:19

Everyone else is going to start looking

8:20

at, okay, okay, can we can we boost

8:22

clock speeds? Can we make a more

8:24

powerful core? Because we got to compete

8:26

with that now. So, I'm I'm really

8:28

excited. Vera uses LPDDR5X memory with

8:31

ECC and full telemetry. NVIDIA claims

8:33

roughly 3x the memory bandwidth per

8:34

core. So, um, here's some bad news. This

8:38

could mean that either we need to go

8:40

like cam style memory on the desktop or

8:43

we could be looking at soldered memory

8:44

on the desktop. I know, right? Um, but

8:49

tell me something. If you could get like

8:51

a real like like actually for the first

8:54

time in many years generational

8:56

performance increase on your CPU, would

8:59

you consider a motherboard with soldered

9:00

memory on it?

9:01

>> As of right now, no.

9:02

>> Well, as of tomorrow then? Like

9:05

>> I still feel like I feel like there

9:08

there is a version of tomorrow where the

9:10

answer is yes. Um like there there's a

9:13

way where I could see that happening. Um

9:16

>> CAM would be a more ideal scenario. Cam

9:19

is a lot more ideal.

9:20

>> It's still a compromise though. I was

9:21

looking at So, uh Oh. Oh, yeah. Okay. I

9:26

Hold on.

9:28

I just need to make sure that I'm not

9:30

saying something that I'm not supposed

9:32

to. Uh, no. Okay. Well, I've been

9:35

working on a review of a product that

9:38

involves cam memory

9:42

anyway, which is why I was looking more

9:44

closely at the exact specs of it. And

9:46

when I'm comparing it to other products

9:48

that don't use cam style memory, it

9:50

doesn't it still doesn't run quite as

9:52

fast as soldered memory. It just plain

9:53

doesn't.

9:54

>> I don't actually know what the answer to

9:55

that is, but I have I have multiple

9:57

ideas and I'm very curious. Um

10:01

>> yeah, I don't know. So my reason for

10:02

that is what am I using the individual

10:06

core performance for right now?

10:08

>> Well, what I assume

10:10

>> what I assume you want to use it for is

10:12

gaming,

10:13

>> right? But then I look at the games that

10:14

I'm playing and it's like

10:16

>> we're a number of years off of this

10:18

mattering.

10:18

>> I'm on that's so that's where my current

10:20

stance is. Why would I give up

10:22

>> the the you know

10:24

>> the flexibility

10:25

>> the flexibility of of memory being the

10:27

repility

10:28

>> and the repairability of memory being

10:29

removable? Easily removable.

10:32

>> It is removable either way, but but

10:33

easily removable.

10:34

>> Sure. Anything's removable if you pull

10:36

hard enough.

10:37

>> I'm not that guy, right? So like it's

10:38

not removable for me.

10:40

>> So be careful. [laughter]

10:43

Um jeez. So it's like I and and I look

10:47

at what I'm I'm doing. Honestly, I've

10:48

been playing less and less competitive

10:50

multiplayer. It's just a cesspool out

10:53

there. Uh that might be part of it to be

10:55

honest. Um I I do think there's just a

10:58

the ease of access to cheating is

11:00

insane. The fact that I have received

11:02

YouTube ads for game cheats is just

11:04

crazy. Um so it's it's

11:07

>> you are you need all the help. I wonder

11:10

I wonder if they do target people that

11:12

are in like their mid mid30s plus cuz

11:15

you know your gaming performance is

11:16

starting to decline and if they're like

11:19

you know

11:20

>> you could just just just take one of

11:21

these

11:22

>> uncbot 9000

11:23

>> just take one of these.

11:24

>> Yeah yeah yeah. Um

11:26

>> so so hear me out. Here's what here's

11:28

where I think we're going to land there

11:29

because we know that the next cycle of

11:32

consoles is going to be based on like

11:35

currentish CPU architectures now because

11:37

it's just the way the development cycle

11:39

works. So, we're going to get uh I I

11:40

think it's I think it's planned to be

11:42

Zen 4 or Zen 5. PS6, Zen 4 or 5. What

11:47

What's it going to be? Blah blah blah.

11:50

Oh, is heavily rumored to use Zen 6.

11:53

Okay, so the best case scenario is that

11:56

the PlayStation 6 uses Zen 6. Did I say

11:59

PS5 before? Sorry. PS5 uses like Zen 2

12:02

or something like this. Zen 2, Zen 3, I

12:04

can't remember. Uh the point is that

12:05

PlayStation 6 apparently is heavily

12:07

rumored to use AMD's Zen 6 architecture.

12:10

So what that tells us is that we're not

12:13

getting you know a a paradigm shift in

12:18

per core performance on the next line on

12:21

the next family of consoles. What that

12:24

tells us is that every game developed

12:26

for the next 6 7 years after the

12:29

PlayStation 6 launched stop it. uh after

12:32

the PlayStation 6 launches is going to

12:34

be targeting modest CPU cores.

12:38

But the next one, assuming Nvidia is

12:42

releasing Vin now, assuming that CPU

12:45

companies have a 2 to threeyear

12:46

development cycle that it will take them

12:48

to catch up, that means more performance

12:50

CPU cores could be coming around

12:52

PlayStation 7 time

12:54

just in time for your early 40s. you

12:57

could be looking at, okay,

13:00

it may be worth considering that I need

13:02

more CPU performance on my desktop. That

13:05

that that would be the that would be the

13:06

most sort of [laughter]

13:08

makes sense big picture timeline that I

13:12

could put forward for when it would

13:13

actually matter

13:14

>> and like really matter.

13:15

>> Yeah.

13:16

>> Until then, I think you'll see

13:18

motherboard options with CAM. I think

13:21

you might even see desktop platforms

13:23

that that use soldered memory, but they

13:26

might not feel necessary for if you're

13:28

not trying to squeeze every last frame

13:30

out.

13:32

Yeah. Um

13:37

I don't know.

13:41

I don't know where I'll be at in that

13:43

many years. I do know like looking at

13:45

what's happening in the industry right

13:47

now um it is a pretty freaking big nerf

13:50

not being able to move your memory

13:52

around. Um, I have heard more and more.

13:54

There was a there was a panel at open

13:56

source. It was building a PC in 2026 and

13:58

there was a lot. It was a I when we were

14:00

prepping for the panel.

14:02

>> Were there veils and and and

14:05

handkerchiefs that everyone could get on

14:07

their way in?

14:11

>> There was a Discord thread uh of the of

14:13

the panelists and the host prepping for

14:15

the panel. And my first post was like, I

14:17

can just like cry in the corner if you

14:19

want. [laughter]

14:20

like I don't know what you want us to

14:22

cover. Um

14:25

>> I I think the panel ended up actually

14:26

being pretty good. There was some

14:28

repetition to it though. But one of the

14:30

things that was mentioned was just

14:31

moving memory around

14:33

>> is like a thing that people are actually

14:35

doing. Condensing, you know, you have

14:37

you have you had maybe two systems. You

14:39

condense the memory into one to get more

14:41

capacity into one of them. Maybe you had

14:43

one system that when RAM was really

14:45

cheap, you're just like, I don't know,

14:46

64 gigs sounds pretty neat. I'll just

14:48

get that. It's pretty cheap anyways. Now

14:50

that maybe turns into two systems that

14:52

are at 32 because it's probably fine.

14:54

>> I used to um I used to on a semi-regular

14:58

basis uh back before we even had like a

15:02

digital inventory system.

15:04

>> I would I would write down I actually

15:06

have a notebook that has pages of me

15:08

doing this in it. I would write down all

15:10

of our inventory so that I could balance

15:13

all of the specs across all of our

15:15

various workstations in the company and

15:17

make sure that the people who needed

15:19

things the most had the best stuff and

15:21

that everyone else kind of got the

15:23

handme-downs and I was constantly

15:26

balancing against the hardware that we

15:28

needed to make our videos so that that

15:30

would be free. Uh like back when we were

15:32

in the Langley house I would do that on

15:33

a fairly regular [laughter] basis. Yeah.

15:36

And to your point,

15:38

how now? I I can't even move like uh

15:41

DDR5 uh is the first generation that I

15:46

can think of. I actually it there might

15:48

have been something before before, but

15:50

it's the first generation I can think of

15:52

where the registered DIMs have a

15:55

completely different notch. So,

15:57

literally, you cannot

16:00

use them in the same motherboards as as

16:02

an unbuffered DIM. Um, on DDR4 you

16:05

could, and there were certain platforms

16:07

that would allow like ECC and

16:10

unbuffered. Um, and then, man, were

16:13

there any that did registered and

16:15

unbuffered? That I'm not sure. That I'd

16:17

have to like go and look up. But, but

16:19

there's definitely less flexibility now

16:21

even in the socketed stuff than than we

16:24

had before.

16:26

>> Yeah. So like I that is a very

16:29

significant

16:31

you know uh damage to the value

16:35

proposition of the thing that you're

16:36

buying in my opinion is you can't part

16:38

it out as easily. Um

16:43

you are you are losing there. It feels

16:46

kind of like the whole physical media

16:47

thing.

16:48

You you buy a digital version. Yeah. You

16:50

can play it just fine while you have it.

16:52

It will probably be okay. As long as

16:54

you're using it for the thing you want

16:55

to use it for. you're probably good. But

16:57

then once that's over, if someone bought

16:59

a physical one, they can resell it or do

17:01

something else with it. Um,

17:04

memory is something that is I mean,

17:07

especially when I was kind of first

17:09

getting into computers, people would

17:10

always talk about how much memory you

17:12

had. I remember when the first person I

17:13

knew got one gig, it was like, whoa,

17:16

that's crazy.

17:17

>> A gigabyte.

17:19

>> Yeah.

17:19

>> Like a billion bytes.

17:21

>> Wild. Incredible. I I remember the first

17:25

time I I think I've even told you the

17:26

story before. The first time I ever saw

17:28

one terabyte hard drive was at PAX and

17:32

someone stood up on top of a thing and

17:33

held it up above their head and was

17:34

like, "I bet you've never seen a

17:35

terabyte before." And everybody was

17:37

like, "Whoa,

17:39

[laughter] it's crazy." Um, anyways, I'm

17:42

freaking old. This is why I'm bad at

17:44

video games. Um [laughter]

17:48

uh anyways um but yeah I don't know that

17:51

that that would seriously affect the the

17:55

calculation being made on the value of

17:57

the product and I could definitely see

17:59

myself taking a slightly lower

18:02

performance CPU if it came with memory

18:04

that I could more easily remove. Um, but

18:08

I could also see myself in a situation

18:10

where there's some form of

18:12

>> minus gives you all your computers

18:13

anyway, so it'll use whatever's in it.

18:15

[laughter]

18:17

>> That's kind of fair. Uh,

18:21

I was I was explaining that to someone

18:23

recently. They asked like how much

18:25

something cost and I was like, I don't

18:27

know. And they're like, what do you

18:28

mean? [laughter]

18:30

I was like, what? I don't like I haven't

18:32

built I haven't bought the components

18:35

for my own personal computer in a very

18:37

long time. And they're like, "How what

18:38

do you mean? You haven't refreshed in a

18:40

while." I was like, "No, [laughter] I

18:41

mean I haven't refreshed since high

18:43

school." Like you you don't understand.

18:47

>> That's when I peaked. [laughter]

18:48

>> Well, there Yeah, there was uh I

18:50

remember the last time I technically

18:52

bought PC components was uh Intel Retail

18:56

Extreme.

18:57

>> Retail Edge. But yes,

18:58

>> Retail Edge. Sure. And they had extreme

19:00

editions.

19:00

>> Yeah. And that's the one that went in

19:02

the mineral oil tank. That's the last

19:04

one I bought.

19:05

>> Nice.

19:06

>> Cuz even before we had our agreement

19:08

thing, you had me with different parts,

19:10

I think, so I could do like editing

19:11

better at home or something.

19:12

>> Yeah, cuz it was sad what he was trying

19:15

to edit on. [laughter]

19:17

>> It was It was out of pity.

19:21

>> That system was getting a little old.

19:24

>> All right, why don't we jump into

19:25

another topic? You want to pick one?

19:27

>> Yeah. Where's this? Uh, I want to figure

19:31

out more about this. Where did it go? Oh

19:33

no, I lost it.

19:35

>> He lost it. He's lost it.

19:37

>> Oh no.

19:39

>> Are we going to address the foot cam at

19:41

all or is it pretty

19:44

>> kind of It's strange. I think people are

19:46

going to see how much I fidget.

19:48

[laughter]

19:49

Uh, Microsoft introduces Xbox backwards

19:51

compatibility program on PC. Four

19:54

original Xbox games with more to come.

19:56

uh will be available for purchase on PC

19:58

via Game Pass. This is one part that

20:00

confuses me. Or for free if you already

20:04

have a console digital license. So I

20:06

guess you log in with the same account

20:07

and then you get access to it on the

20:08

computer which is actually that's cool.

20:10

That makes sense.

20:11

>> Okay.

20:11

>> The initial offerings are Blinks the

20:14

Time Sweeper.

20:16

>> Okay.

20:17

>> Conquer Live and Reloaded. Heard of that

20:18

one. Crimson Skies High Road to Revenge.

20:21

And Fusion Frenzy. I love Fusion Frenzy.

20:25

That's actually genuinely pretty

20:26

exciting. Especially if they man if they

20:28

had online multiplayer Fusion Frenzy, I

20:31

would pay the I would play the heck out

20:32

of that. The The part that confuses me

20:34

is they will be available for purchase

20:37

on PC via Game Pass. What does that

20:40

mean?

20:40

>> It means that Wait. Yeah. What does that

20:43

mean?

20:44

>> What does that mean?

20:44

>> So, if you have Game Pass, then you can

20:47

buy it.

20:49

>> But Game Pass is like a rental.

20:51

>> No, no, no. It's a comma, Luke. They'll

20:53

be available for purchase on PC,

20:55

available via Game Pass, or free if you

20:58

already have a console digital license.

20:59

Three options.

21:01

>> Okay,

21:01

>> that makes way more sense.

21:02

>> Okay.

21:02

>> Okay, cool.

21:03

>> So, how much are they? Are they

21:04

available now? When do they become

21:05

available?

21:06

>> I I don't know.

21:08

>> I want to see how much it'll cost me to

21:09

buy Fusion Frenzy.

21:10

>> Okay,

21:11

>> so these are all Yeah, these are all

21:12

like original Xbox games. Um, some

21:15

outlets have said the experience is

21:17

mostly good with some minor frame timing

21:19

and jutdder issues. And

21:24

>> dude, it's $249.

21:28

>> Really?

21:29

>> It's on sale. 75% off.

21:31

>> Okay. So,

21:32

>> for the next like 6 days

21:34

>> included in Essential Game Pass or you

21:36

can buy it for 250.

21:37

>> 250. Can I play this multiplayer?

21:41

>> Not local.

21:44

single player shared split screen. Xbox

21:45

One is

21:46

>> okay. Well, I could do the Cuz like I'm

21:48

thinking on Steam. Yeah,

21:50

>> you could just remote play.

21:51

>> Is that what uh is that what Xbox Play

21:53

Anywhere is?

21:54

>> Xbox Play Anywhere.

21:56

>> Xbox Play Anywhere is playing your your

21:59

Xbox games streamed to something.

22:02

>> I will probably buy this.

22:04

Fusion Frenzy was a lot of fun and I

22:07

only had the the trial disc that came

22:09

with some like magazine.

22:11

I never even got to play like the whole

22:13

game. Um,

22:15

>> okay. Well, our discuss that answers our

22:16

first discussion question. Which of

22:18

these four games are you most likely to

22:19

play?

22:19

>> Oh, Fusion Frenzy for sure. And I will

22:21

like actually probably buy it. I

22:22

remember one time I was at Microsoft

22:24

hanging out for something. I don't

22:25

remember what it was. And they had like

22:27

all the media people that were visiting

22:30

uh hanging out in this like random room

22:31

for a while while they did something.

22:33

And they had a bunch of Xboxes set up

22:34

and they had Fusion Frenzy in the

22:36

machines. And I like that was one of the

22:39

games that you could play. And I like

22:40

recruited some random media people that

22:42

were there to start playing Fusion

22:43

Frenzy on one of them and people started

22:45

watching and then people naturally

22:46

started playing on the other Xbox and

22:48

then the whole room and it just people

22:50

playing Fusion Frenzy this like ancient

22:51

game and people were having a lot of

22:53

fun. It Fusion Frenzy is great.

22:55

>> Cool. I've ne I've never tried it.

22:57

>> It's like uh Xbox's take on like a Mario

23:00

Party.

23:00

>> Oh, okay. So like lots of mini games.

23:03

>> Lots of mini games.

23:04

>> Oh, cool.

23:04

>> It's been forever since I've played it,

23:06

but I remember having a ton of fun. They

23:08

have like I mean the the thing on the

23:10

box art uh there we go.

23:14

>> Yeah, that's not a great sales pitch,

23:17

honestly.

23:18

>> Nope, it's not. But it's like it's like

23:20

that uh that like platform game. I don't

23:22

know if they have it here.

23:23

>> Oh, where you bump each other off.

23:25

>> Yeah, I don't know if one of these is

23:26

actually going to show it.

23:28

>> I saw right at the beginning there. Is

23:30

that not to No, to the right. To the

23:31

right. Everything you own in a box to

23:32

the Oh, no. That's something else. Okay.

23:34

>> Some burgers or something.

23:35

>> Yeah, sure. I mean, hamburgers. Again, I

23:36

I haven't played the actual

23:39

>> 45 mini games.

23:40

>> So, this is a race thing. Yeah, 45 mini

23:42

games. Yeah, sounds good. Whatever. It

23:44

was It was like uh if I remember

23:46

correctly, most people played it through

23:48

the the demo disc,

23:49

>> right?

23:50

>> Um

23:51

>> maybe that was their mistake,

23:53

>> making the game demo too good.

23:55

>> Yeah, it was actually like there there

23:58

was a few different mini game. There was

23:59

enough mini games on it that you and

24:00

your friends could like play Fusion

24:02

Frenzy and then be done with it and it

24:04

would be fine. Um, like it was it was a

24:06

little bit too much.

24:07

>> Way to go, guys. Um, our other

24:09

discussion question is, do you think

24:11

Xbox has a vision for the future? I feel

24:13

like we go back and forth on this every

24:15

freaking week because it's like there

24:17

will be some news will come out and

24:19

you'll go like, okay, we're so back. And

24:22

then some other news will come out and

24:24

we'll be like, they're doomed. Uh,

24:26

clearly they're just going to sell it or

24:28

spin it off. And then the next week it's

24:30

like, wait, they're actually doing

24:31

really cool stuff.

24:34

Can you handle this degree of whiplash,

24:36

Luke?

24:37

>> I [laughter] mean, that's life right

24:39

now. Um, I think as much like obviously

24:42

layoffs are bad. I think that can be

24:44

universally just been like, okay,

24:46

layoffs are bad. People losing jobs are

24:47

bad. 14 layers of management also

24:51

unacceptable,

24:52

>> right?

24:52

>> So, like

24:55

they might also be on a really brutal

24:57

timer,

24:59

>> right? They might not have a lot of

25:01

runway to like figure this out. When

25:02

you're doing layoffs at the scale that

25:04

they're doing, you're going to end up

25:06

like this isn't even like, oh, big

25:08

brain. This is just very obvious. You're

25:11

going to end up taking people out that

25:13

shouldn't have been removed.

25:15

>> You're you're going to have mistakes

25:17

with a layoff of that is very sad.

25:20

Really good people trying to do really

25:22

good things are going to lose their jobs

25:24

over this. That's a a a you know that's

25:28

a 14 layers of management failure. Um

25:31

which sucks, but

25:34

it feels like something that really

25:35

needed to happen. Halo Infinite costing

25:38

$800 million to make is just not okay.

25:41

It's not a good enough game for that

25:43

output. Um they have to figure something

25:45

out. They have these old ancient

25:49

legendary studios outputting just like I

25:52

don't know in Bethesda's case

25:54

practically nothing. Like something's

25:57

got to give. When uh oh man, I can

26:00

barely even remember his name.

26:01

Starfield. When Starfield came out, the

26:04

conversation was largely around like

26:06

this game failed largely because of

26:08

management failure. Like this stuff

26:10

needed to get addressed. There was

26:12

conversations about like apparently Todd

26:14

wasn't even happy about it because like

26:17

it was structured where every single

26:19

decision had to go through Todd and Todd

26:21

was basically like this is nuts. Like I

26:24

this isn't how Morowind was made. This

26:26

isn't how Oblivion was made. A lot of

26:28

writers and creatives in the in the

26:32

creation of the game had more autonomy

26:34

which is one of the reasons why those

26:35

games can feel kind of disconnected

26:37

sometimes. You can be in an area doing

26:39

something and it has like a certain kind

26:40

of tone and feel

26:41

>> and then you go on another quest

26:42

>> and it's like very different.

26:43

>> It's like this is like you it went from

26:45

like oh spooky scary to like this is

26:48

kind of funny and whimsical.

26:49

>> Yeah.

26:49

>> Like I remember I I never was able to

26:51

put my finger on it but I remember that

26:53

from Oblivion.

26:54

>> Yeah. Oh yeah.

26:55

>> Where the Yeah. Big time in Oblivion. I

26:57

I never ever put my finger on exactly

27:03

what I was noticing or even and because

27:05

I didn't do that, I never thought about

27:07

thinking about why

27:09

>> old Elder Scrolls games

27:10

>> so much sense.

27:11

>> The the various developers around the

27:13

company, I believe even Todd would talk

27:14

about like after the game came out, they

27:16

would play it and discover things,

27:19

>> right?

27:19

>> Like it was a lot of very strong

27:21

contributors. And that's one of the

27:22

reasons why they're able to make them so

27:24

fast. The gap between Mororrow and

27:26

Oblivion is really short. The gap

27:28

between Oblivion and Skyrim isn't even

27:31

really that long. And then now we're

27:33

looking at like just enormous gaps where

27:36

like I don't know, someone will have not

27:39

been alive when Skyrim came out and be

27:41

old enough to enjoy the next game.

27:43

>> Elder Scrolls Arena.

27:45

>> Mhm.

27:46

>> March 25th, 94.

27:50

Daggerfall, September 20th, 96.

27:54

Mororrowind. That was a that was a

27:56

pretty big gap. Six years.

27:58

>> Morowind was like the biggest map in a

28:00

video game ever when it released.

28:01

>> May 1st, 2002.

28:03

>> Yeah.

28:04

>> Oblivion. March 20th, 2006.

28:08

Only four years. Then

28:12

>> 2011

28:12

>> to Skyrim,

28:13

>> November 11th,

28:14

>> 2011.

28:16

>> And then crickets.

28:19

>> Freaking crickets, dude. It's 2026, bro.

28:22

It's been 15 years. Okay. Okay. Put to

28:25

put that in context. To put that in

28:27

context, from the Elder Scrolls Arena to

28:31

The Elder Scrolls 5 Skyrim was

28:37

17 years. Since The Elder Scrolls 5

28:40

Skyrim, it has been

28:41

>> It's almost been the entire duration of

28:43

the entire Elder Scrolls series since we

28:46

got another Elder Scrolls.

28:48

>> Like, that doesn't work. I don't like so

28:52

something has to break. So some breakage

28:55

there as painful it is is as brutal as

28:57

it is for the people losing their jobs

28:59

as especially brutal as it is for the

29:00

people that are really doing great work

29:02

and are also losing their jobs

29:03

>> and as brutal as it is for the people

29:05

staying behind

29:06

>> 100%. the uh level of demoralization has

29:09

to be insane and you have to try to

29:11

figure out how to keep going on or else

29:12

your job isn't going to continue to

29:14

exist and there's a lot of threat

29:16

looming because there's another layoff

29:18

coming soon and you don't know that

29:19

there won't be more because there

29:20

something is going to have to change for

29:22

there to not be more. Uh but the

29:25

management structures there and I'm sure

29:27

tons of other things are a problem. 14

29:29

layers of management doesn't work when

29:32

you're trying to do a creative process

29:33

especially. Oh my god. way to get out

29:36

the most bland vanilla Starfield crap

29:38

ever. Uh, that's how it's gonna work.

29:41

But, but yeah, it's it's it's

29:42

interesting. You watch you watch like I

29:45

don't know how can you have a lot of the

29:47

generally quite serious tones of a lot

29:51

of the Elder Scrolls games and then also

29:53

have Shiogarth in the world throwing

29:55

cheese wheels at you for fun. Like it's

29:57

it's

29:58

>> it's because it's a creative super.

30:00

>> Someone had lunch with Phil Schaefer or

30:01

something like like that's the only

30:03

possible explanation. Yeah. And he was

30:05

like, you know, would be funny,

30:08

[laughter]

30:09

>> let's make a cheese dimension. Uh, yeah.

30:12

It's there like it's I I remember in

30:14

Skyrim I had I had no idea this was

30:17

coming. Um I I think it was in

30:19

Winterfell, you you do like a drinking

30:21

competition with some dude and then you

30:23

wake up and like everything is just

30:26

mess. you like black out and then you

30:28

wake up and everything's just messed up

30:29

and it turns out the drinking

30:30

competition was with Shiiorath and you

30:32

have to uncover like what you did while

30:34

you were blacked out and it's just like

30:36

what just happened? It it went from like

30:38

Skyrim I'm a Dragon Lord to like hang

30:41

over the movie um in the middle of the G

30:43

but it was like actually really fun and

30:45

engaging and the story of it was really

30:46

good. Um and that was so great and now

30:50

it's

30:52

you know uh what is the hue of this pot?

30:55

I don't know. Better talk to Todd. Um,

31:00

and that that doesn't work and makes it

31:03

take 17 trillion years to make another

31:06

game. So, yeah, something has to change

31:08

at Xbox. It sounds like there's a lot of

31:10

change. Change is really really chaotic.

31:13

I don't think we are even sort of close

31:16

>> to the end of the painful chaotic

31:18

change. And I hope they find a way out

31:21

of it because there's a lot of really

31:22

cool IPs there and a lot of really cool

31:24

people working there. I'm sure.

31:25

>> You know what's really funny is we've

31:27

had some painful chaotic change here

31:29

lately

31:30

>> and I actually going around the world

31:32

right now.

31:32

>> I I actually like gave an impromptu kind

31:35

of talk to uh the writing team like an

31:39

hour ago where I was basically just like

31:43

you I think actually said it better than

31:45

I did. So I kind of wish that I had said

31:47

it better. I don't even know what this

31:48

is, but

31:49

>> it was basically just like um [snorts]

31:52

you know, you know, am I stressed? Yes.

31:57

>> Yeah, super stressed. Um but there's a

32:01

difference. This is a this is a stress

32:03

that is not a it's not an external

32:07

stress. It's a like it's kind of an it's

32:10

kind of a like like it's time to lock in

32:12

and there's work to be done and it can

32:15

be really exciting and it's it's it's

32:19

stress about it's stress about like a

32:21

new opportunity because um you know I

32:24

think I think internally we have a lot

32:25

of things that we do really well and I

32:27

think we have a lot of stuff that hasn't

32:30

been working as well and and and I think

32:33

that some of the upheaval that we've had

32:36

is going to force force us

32:38

>> to re-evaluate and do things

32:40

differently. I've seen a growing

32:43

sentiment over the last little while

32:46

that the content is starting to feel

32:48

more classic LTT. And it's not because

32:51

there's different people working on it.

32:53

In a lot of cases, it's some of our it's

32:55

some of our oldest timers that are

32:58

working on a lot of that content, but

33:00

the processes are changing and we're

33:03

getting

33:05

out of necessity slash out of because

33:08

we're bored of being bored, we're

33:10

getting scrappier again. Um, actually

33:12

had a ton of fun today. Like uh Elijah

33:15

Elijah was here before the show and he's

33:16

like exhausted because we shot all day,

33:19

but we shot two LTs today that were both

33:22

just

33:23

>> just fun.

33:25

>> Amazing.

33:25

>> You know, I I

33:26

>> it's actually so important and I'm very

33:29

happy to hear that.

33:30

>> Yeah. Like uh one of them one of them

33:32

doesn't sound fun. Uh Elijah and I were

33:35

having a conversation and realized uh

33:38

separate from the the video se that both

33:41

of us needed a printer right now.

33:43

>> Our reasons for needing a printer were

33:46

completely different. So he's got a lot

33:48

more like business administration that

33:50

he's got to do because of his like

33:52

streaming side hustle

33:53

>> and he needs a printer. And my kids are

33:56

getting to like high school age and they

33:59

need to surprisingly they still need to

34:01

hand things in. Whether it's like

34:03

>> putting things on a poster board or

34:05

whether it's like handing in an

34:07

assignment, they actually still need to

34:08

hand stuff in on paper. Um more often

34:11

than I expected and so we kind of went,

34:17

"Is Is that a video? [laughter]

34:19

>> Is us going shopping for a printer?

34:21

>> Is honestly, yeah. is us going printer

34:24

shopping a video

34:26

>> and uh and and we made the decision and

34:29

it turns out that was easy. Um yeah.

34:31

Yeah, it's a video. And so today, Elijah

34:34

and I having done zero research, neither

34:37

of us having bought a printer. So to

34:38

give you context, Elijah hadn't bought a

34:40

printer ever. And my current most

34:43

up-to-date printer that I bought is made

34:45

by Samsung.

34:47

>> They haven't made printers in a in a

34:49

minute, I think.

34:49

>> So uh how long do you think a minute is?

34:52

Don't look at the chat. Don't look at

34:54

the chat. They're not going to help you.

34:55

>> I don't know. I So I when I worked at

34:56

Geek Squad, they sold Samsung printers.

34:59

So they definitely made them as of when

35:02

would that have been? 2011, I think. So

35:06

I'm going to guess that they stopped in

35:10

2015.

35:12

>> You're actually super close. HP

35:14

announced the acquisition of Samsung's

35:17

printer business in 2016. Poo. That was

35:21

That was pretty good, actually.

35:22

>> So, it's been almost 10 years since

35:26

Samsung printers have even been a thing.

35:30

>> And you definitely bought yours notably

35:31

before they stopped being

35:33

>> Oh, yeah, brother.

35:34

>> I'm pretty sure yours was old by that

35:35

time.

35:35

>> Uh, it wasn't new.

35:38

>> So,

35:40

you know. [laughter]

35:42

>> Yeah.

35:42

>> So, we we basically went in like, "Oh,

35:45

yeah. We'll uh you know, how about the

35:47

eco tank? Is is that a is that a good

35:50

thing?

35:52

And and it's it's it's really

35:55

it's really interesting getting

35:57

>> Oh man, that's actually got to be so

35:58

much fun. Watching Lionus and Elijah go

36:00

into a store and just try to figure out

36:02

what the heck all the terms are on the

36:03

label for a tech product actually sounds

36:05

hilarious.

36:06

>> And the most frustrating part is how

36:07

many terms were not on the label. Like

36:10

there there's a part in the video where

36:11

I'm like, see see this is why

36:13

everybody's turning to AI because

36:15

instead of having standardized labels

36:17

that all have the same specs so that I

36:19

can easily compare them, they all have

36:22

the different things on them. One of

36:23

them says how many pages per minute and

36:25

the next one over says whether it has a

36:28

fax function or not, but does this one

36:29

have a fax function? How many pages a

36:30

minute does that one do? I don't know.

36:32

That wasn't easy.

36:35

Okay, I I'll ask the AI and Oh, then now

36:38

I have to go and cross check every

36:40

>> verify everything it says.

36:41

>> Bloody stupid thing it says because I

36:43

can't trust it at all.

36:44

>> Especially the Google one. Well,

36:46

especially the uh search integrated

36:48

ones. They're all loadier.

36:50

>> It's It's very frustrating. And uh I

36:53

actually also it was another shopping

36:55

video which was like they were both in

36:57

the same place. So we shot Linus buys on

36:59

a phone

37:00

>> as well and that was frustrating for a

37:02

completely different reason. How many

37:04

options do you think there were for

37:06

buying a printer

37:10

>> these days?

37:12

Like eight.

37:14

>> Oh, dude. I kid you not. Like 50.

37:17

>> Whoa.

37:18

>> Tons.

37:19

>> You're in.

37:20

>> We're in stables.

37:22

>> Ah, okay.

37:24

>> Tons. Okay. We got your

37:25

>> You did say the whole easy button thing.

37:26

All right. Yeah. Yeah.

37:27

>> We got your Epson. We got your HP. We

37:30

got We Hey, come on up here. We got your

37:33

brother. We got your inkjet.

37:36

Got your toner. Uh, deco tank. They got

37:40

They got so many options.

37:41

Multi-function.

37:43

[laughter]

37:43

>> They got everything, man.

37:46

>> Business grade, consumer grade. Do you

37:49

want the free?

37:50

>> So, okay. I didn't I was basically only

37:52

thinking like consumer grade, if that

37:55

helps at all.

37:56

>> They got everything.

37:56

>> They probably still had way more than

37:58

eight.

37:58

>> They They got everything. Okay. Okay.

38:00

How many options do you think Ivonne had

38:02

for phones?

38:05

>> I feel I don't shop for things. No.

38:08

Okay. Uh, is she excluding any?

38:11

>> She is not buying an iPhone again.

38:14

>> Okay. So, nothing on the iPhone side of

38:16

things.

38:17

>> We got to look probably a couple

38:18

generations.

38:20

>> Uh,

38:22

15.

38:23

>> You're not even close. But the other way

38:27

at the store, what

38:29

>> there was, and I kid you not, there was

38:32

the S25 FE.

38:33

>> Okay,

38:34

>> there S26, 26 Plus, 26 Ultra. They had

38:38

the Flip and both of the new folds, so

38:41

we're up to seven. And then they had

38:42

like the Pixel 10, 10, and 10 Pro.

38:45

>> They had the Flip and the two folds.

38:47

>> Well, they were just installing them

38:49

today,

38:49

>> but not like a bajillion other things,

38:52

>> dude. There was like

38:54

>> that seems wild. was an absolute desert

38:58

of choice.

38:59

>> They Okay. Okay. You know what? You're

39:01

actually really close. No, I forgot.

39:02

There were two Motoras as well. There

39:04

was like two Motorola, so it was like

39:05

there was like 12 phones.

39:07

>> So, actually, you're you're close, but I

39:10

was just

39:11

>> Was that Staples again?

39:13

>> No, that was Best Buy. So, like where's

39:15

the you know, and I know LG doesn't make

39:17

them anymore, right? But like where's

39:19

the LG? Where's the Sony? Where's the

39:21

Asus ROG? And and to be clear, I know

39:24

those also don't exist, but like where's

39:25

the Xiaomi and real media?

39:27

>> That's kind of your point, isn't it?

39:29

They're all kind of falling off.

39:30

>> Everything's gone.

39:31

>> OnePlus just left North American

39:32

markets.

39:33

>> No OPPO, no Vivo.

39:36

>> Is I mean, you can

39:38

>> Are they Japan exclusive now?

39:39

>> I think you can get like international

39:41

ones shipped to you, but I don't think

39:43

they're in retail stores in North

39:44

America.

39:45

>> Yeah,

39:45

>> Dan probably knows.

39:46

>> Just this one that I have is the what,

39:49

the six or something like that. It was

39:51

available in America. There's an

39:52

American variant. The previous

39:54

generation did not have a North American

39:55

variant.

39:56

>> Do you have that cool new one?

39:57

>> Uh, not the newest one. No, I just I

39:59

just upgraded this. I'm I'm good with

40:01

this one.

40:02

>> Um, but I still buy the Chinese variants

40:05

cuz they have unlocked bootloadader.

40:06

They're locked in America.

40:08

>> The Xperia phones right now are like my

40:12

favorite phones on paper. If you don't

40:14

include the price as a line of item and

40:16

then you include the price as a line

40:17

item and it's like never mind. I got to

40:19

go and prepare your the other one for

40:21

you.

40:22

>> It's It's fine.

40:22

>> I am so dumb.

40:24

>> Um anyways, anyway, I was just like I

40:27

was I was blown away. Your options are

40:29

pretty much Pixel, iPhone, Samsung, or

40:33

go yourself.

40:34

>> And the difference between those these

40:35

days, I think, is also less than like

40:38

ever before.

40:38

>> So boring. Oh, Pinetics. Okay, Pinetics

40:41

in the chat. It's like, I miss when HTC

40:42

made good phones, dude. I found an HTC1

40:45

mini in like my seat cushions the other

40:47

day.

40:47

>> Those were nice. And I was like, man,

40:50

>> those felt good. Those felt really good.

40:52

>> Like that. Damn, that's nice. You know,

40:54

like,

40:55

>> where are the freaking options, man?

40:57

>> Yeah.

40:58

>> So, yeah, it was really disappointing.

41:01

>> Oh, there there was some phones from

41:03

like best phone

41:04

>> that era plus or minus like 3 years that

41:08

were just incredible.

41:09

>> I was a big Droid Turbo guy. I freaking

41:12

loved the Droid Turbo with the ballistic

41:14

nylon backing.

41:16

>> Yeah. Actually, you know what?

41:18

>> Yeah.

41:19

>> Um, they didn't have it at Best Buy

41:20

today, so it wasn't an option for Yvon's

41:22

purchase, but Motorola has a really nice

41:25

fold. Now,

41:26

>> the Razor, check out the backing

41:28

material.

41:28

>> I was looking at the backing material

41:30

before I even felt it. It looks really

41:32

sharp. I don't know if you guys

41:35

>> Which one? That one.

41:37

>> Yeah, it's not that close.

41:40

>> I don't think they're going to be able

41:41

to really see.

41:42

>> Yeah, they're not going to be able to

41:42

see.

41:44

>> Uh, really nice pattern. It feels great

41:46

in the hand actually.

41:47

>> So, I'm probably not going to daily that

41:50

just because the um I just got my hands

41:53

on this. And then like immediately the

41:56

uh the ZFold 8 arrived and I am very

42:00

curious to see if I can get used to the

42:02

form factor. I actually shot the short

42:04

circuit unboxing of it like right before

42:06

I came down here. Yeah.

42:08

>> Of just like a normal foot. Oh, it's not

42:11

normal.

42:13

I see.

42:14

>> [laughter]

42:15

>> Yes.

42:15

>> It's like super wide and kind of short.

42:20

>> What did you call me?

42:21

>> Right after I said it.

42:24

>> The did you just say to me?

42:26

>> I I said it and then just stared at the

42:28

phone and was like, "We're [laughter]

42:29

going to just move on."

42:34

Oh my Oh yeah, that's kind of weird.

42:39

>> One of these days he will become the

42:41

experienced on camera personality that

42:43

he was born to be. And he will not hold

42:45

the camera out of sight or the phone out

42:47

of sight.

42:48

>> Let Let me Let me look Let me look at

42:49

this real quick. [laughter]

42:52

>> It's uh

42:53

>> I'm dying.

42:53

>> I was not born to be this. We shaped me

42:57

into this weird amoeba. Um

43:00

it's it's it's it's a strange form

43:02

factor. Okay, here's my 8 Pro for

43:05

example.

43:05

>> Yeah.

43:07

>> Yeah.

43:07

>> It's very short. It's like

43:09

>> very lukew.

43:11

[laughter]

43:13

But then if I open it up,

43:17

>> it's enormous.

43:19

>> Yeah. Flip. Flip it 90°.

43:22

No. No. Oh god. No. The other

43:25

>> Don't even

43:29

I'll I'll wait. I can wait.

43:31

What? That's Stop.

43:35

>> Clockwise. [clears throat]

43:36

There you go. That's right.

43:38

>> Good enough. There you go. Now you can

43:40

see the height difference. Okay. Are you

43:42

actually not going to hold it like that?

43:43

>> There you go.

43:44

>> There. [laughter]

43:45

>> Crying out loud like that.

43:46

>> I thought I had already shown that.

43:47

Sorry.

43:48

>> No.

43:49

>> So, it's got it's like the

43:51

>> So, I guess Yeah, you could turn it to

43:52

the side.

43:53

>> So, I was interesting.

43:54

>> When I was shooting the short circuit, I

43:56

was actually like

43:59

I was doing the thing where I list all

44:01

the positives about it

44:04

so that I can ultimately go, "Yeah, but

44:08

like come on.

44:11

And then I went

44:14

>> and I held it like this

44:16

>> and I went, "Holy crap, they might be on

44:19

to something."

44:21

It's like

44:23

like that is that's big, you know, and

44:27

it's like and it's light. It's only 201

44:30

g. It's very like

44:32

>> battery life

44:33

>> holdable. I think it has a Don't quote

44:35

me on this. It's in the short circuit.

44:36

46

44:38

or 4,800 mAh. Um,

44:41

>> that's a Samsung.

44:42

>> I've gotten shockingly good battery life

44:44

out of the Fold 7. I've been extremely

44:46

happy with it.

44:47

>> Are they doing battery in each

44:49

whatever you call it? I don't know

44:51

section.

44:51

>> Actually, not sure. Haven't done a tear

44:53

down. Wouldn't surprise me if they did,

44:55

>> but I'm not sure.

44:56

>> Yeah.

44:59

>> Yeah.

45:00

>> Interesting. All All yours for the low

45:03

low price of $2500

45:07

for the one TB model.

45:08

>> No longer interesting.

45:09

>> Yeah, I didn't think so. $1,900 for the

45:12

I think it's a Is it the 256 or one? I

45:14

think it's a 256.

45:16

>> My old my old 8 Pro is still chooching.

45:19

I uh I am planning on probably doing a

45:21

battery replacement because the battery

45:22

on it at this point is brutal. It's uh

45:27

>> Yeah, that's the 256 for

45:29

>> Yeah.

45:29

>> 1900. Anyone

45:35

want to pick a topic?

45:37

How did we end up on this after Xbox

45:40

backward compatibility? This show is

45:42

can't even

45:42

>> Sometimes we do be doing stuff uh who

45:45

isn't going to be doing stuff is under

45:47

15s in France are not going to be social

45:50

mediaing unless they find a very obvious

45:52

way around the law. Uh French lawmakers

45:54

approved a bill on Tuesday banning

45:56

social media access for children under

45:57

15. The measure must still pass the

45:59

Constitutional Council before it can

46:01

take effect. What's the right age for

46:05

this kind of outright ban?

46:07

>> That was pretty much all I had to say

46:08

about it. I mean, I guess we could do

46:10

the discussion topic.

46:10

>> Yeah, it's interesting. I mean, I think

46:12

we've kind of talked this to death a

46:13

little bit, but we can talk about the

46:15

right age, I guess.

46:17

>> I have no idea.

46:20

>> Helpful.

46:21

>> Yeah. I'm trying to think like, you

46:23

know, what would you know like what was

46:25

my maturity level then? And but the

46:27

world was so different.

46:29

>> Very very very different.

46:30

>> Like if you had told me at 15 or if you

46:33

told me at 14 that I'm not allowed to

46:34

have my MSN Messenger to talk to my

46:36

friends, I'd been like you're crazy.

46:38

>> Yeah.

46:38

>> Like of of course I should. And looking

46:40

back at it, I don't I don't think that

46:42

was a problem. But the access to it

46:44

>> access to it was very different.

46:46

>> Way more limited.

46:47

>> Had to be on your desktop.

46:48

>> And probably at that time you had a

46:51

single shared computer for the entire

46:52

household.

46:53

>> Yeah.

46:54

>> So it was Yeah. Yeah, it was a it was a

46:57

it was a different time. Um,

47:01

yeah, I could see I don't know. Crystal

47:04

says under 13. I could I could see that.

47:06

I I could see 13 as a as a threshold.

47:09

With that said, like 13year-olds are no

47:12

offense 13-year-olds, but like they're

47:14

not they're not mentally mature yet,

47:17

like at all. Um,

47:19

>> yeah.

47:21

And social media

47:24

there I guess for me social media tends

47:26

to assume that everyone is an adult.

47:28

>> There's two different conversations

47:30

here, right? I think there's one

47:32

conversation around what should be the

47:35

age limit of social media and then I

47:38

think there's almost a separate

47:39

conversation about what should be the

47:41

age limit of the like hypertuned hyper

47:45

addictive hook you forever like monster

47:50

that social media morphed into because I

47:52

don't think there's any reason that a

47:53

13-year-old couldn't have been on say

47:55

what Facebook was in the early days. I

47:58

would potentially even argue Discord

48:00

now.

48:01

>> Yeah, Discord is

48:03

>> somewhat monitored. Discord now I think

48:05

is more similar to old social media

48:07

platforms

48:08

>> in that you are the the the Discord

48:11

server with your buddies,

48:12

>> it's kind of like having an MSN

48:14

messenger from back in the day.

48:15

>> Yeah. And so and so I I don't see a

48:19

problem with that. But you know when you

48:22

talk about like like if one of my kids

48:25

asked me, "Hey, can I install

48:26

Instagram?" I'd be like, "No."

48:30

>> Or or Twitter X, whatever.

48:33

>> Yeah, that's a hard no.

48:35

>> Tik Tok

48:36

>> hard no.

48:36

>> Yeah, those like infinite scrolling

48:38

freaking billions of dollars spent in

48:40

mind control type things is is is a

48:44

different threshold. And and it it like

48:45

feels weird being like, "Yeah, Discord's

48:47

the good one." I think there are

48:49

obviously, as we saw when when Discord

48:51

did some not cool things recently, there

48:54

are other similar alternatives. The line

48:56

for me and the reason why I'm saying

48:58

Discord is

49:01

yeah, it can be used poorly. You can end

49:03

up on really bad communities on Discord.

49:06

There's uh there was some stuff in the

49:07

news recently of some like really

49:09

terrible things going through Discord.

49:11

That's going to be true for everything.

49:13

Um but I think in general when when used

49:16

fairly appropriately, it'll be direct

49:18

messaging with your friends, very

49:19

similar to MSN. Yep. and a a potential

49:23

like server thing that you could just

49:25

have with your friends from school that

49:27

should theoretically do a decent job of

49:29

of uh having some amount of wall in

49:32

between just the whole open internet and

49:35

thing. Our rule with our kids is, hey,

49:37

you're a minor and the deal is if you're

49:40

allowed to use a platform that enables

49:43

you to communicate broadly with the

49:45

world, we're allowed to look at it and

49:48

we'll tell you, we're going to come look

49:50

at it and we'll do it together. We're

49:52

not going to snoop on you. There will be

49:53

no cloak and daggering in this

49:55

relationship.

49:56

>> That's nice. That's cool.

49:57

>> But that's the deal.

49:58

>> Yeah. Um,

50:01

>> and some people might look at that and

50:03

go helicopter parenting. Um,

50:06

>> knock on wood, my kids all seem like

50:09

they're turning out really good so far.

50:10

So, no regrets.

50:12

>> And there's

50:12

>> I'll stay in my little helicopter.

50:14

>> You know, just like every single thing,

50:16

if the if the kids are I like that.

50:18

That's amazing. Uh,

50:20

>> not even what a helicopter sounds like.

50:22

>> Nope. That's fantastic. uh riding in the

50:25

Linus copter.

50:26

>> If they really want to, if they're

50:27

really motivated enough, they could just

50:29

memorize the server ID and just leave it

50:32

every time.

50:34

>> Like there there is

50:36

if the kids really want to y

50:38

>> are super motivated, there will be a way

50:40

around it. That's how I feel like with

50:42

all of these laws, too. It's like, yeah,

50:44

okay, until I go on to like some

50:46

realistic looking video game and make a

50:48

character and then do some AI altering

50:51

to the character and make it look like I

50:53

create a persona. Um, and then create

50:56

that digital persona online and now I'm

50:58

an adult who's able to get onto these

50:59

social media platforms. Like there are

51:01

ways around it, but I think even putting

51:03

up a little bit of a barrier to try to

51:05

dissuade and effectively communicate to

51:08

parents like, "Hey, this is dangerous

51:11

for your kids genuinely." U I think can

51:14

be a good thing.

51:14

>> Glow says, "As someone that was raised

51:17

by the internet with no parental

51:19

guidelines, thank you for watching out

51:21

for them."

51:26

[laughter]

51:28

All right.

51:32

>> [sighs]

51:32

>> Okay. Um, maybe I'll pick the next one

51:34

here.

51:35

>> Sure.

51:36

>> Should we get all the Xbox stuff out of

51:38

the way? Oh, you know what? No, I'm

51:39

going to I'm going to go with this one.

51:41

Um, the tariff saga continues. And I'm

51:45

not talking about the most recent

51:47

retaliatory tariffs for wildfire smoke,

51:50

which is wild. Uh, no. I'm talking about

51:53

Nintendo filing a motion to dismiss the

51:57

class action from gamers who say that

51:59

Nintendo would be double dipping by

52:01

keeping its tariff refund after they

52:04

passed tariff costs on to customers.

52:07

Nintendo's argument in its lawyer's

52:09

words is that buyers, this is a quote,

52:12

received exactly what they bargained and

52:14

paid for when they bought this price

52:16

hiked hardware. And this is another

52:18

quote, "Plaintiffs are not entitled to a

52:20

rebate simply because of intervening

52:22

legal developments related to tariffs."

52:25

In other words, Nintendo's version of

52:28

events says, "The sticker said $499

52:31

for one Switch 2, please. You paid $499.

52:36

We gave you a Switch 2. The deal is now

52:39

done."

52:41

The reason this is coming up is that

52:43

Nintendo raised prices actually on both

52:45

the original Switch and Switch 2

52:47

accessories citing tariffs. Uh the

52:50

Supreme Court struck those tariffs down

52:52

in February. Nintendo sued the

52:54

government for its own refund in March

52:56

and then gamers filed the class action

52:58

in April. Nintendo's filing argues that

53:01

it has no legal duty to retroactively

53:05

adjust prices on completed sales, saying

53:07

that's not how commercial transactions

53:09

work.

53:10

Game Files Steven Tatilo was first to

53:13

report the motion. Our discussion

53:16

question is Nintendo blamed tariffs for

53:19

price increases. Then they sued to get

53:22

their tariff money back while telling

53:24

customers a deal is a deal. Legally they

53:28

might be right. So why do some people

53:31

feel that they are so wrong? And I I

53:34

this is one of those ones I think I both

53:36

sides to this the last time we talked

53:38

about it. And I'll let you talk first

53:41

because spoiler alert I'm going to both

53:43

sides it again. So get ready.

53:45

>> Yeah. I mean there are other costs

53:47

involved as we talked about this last

53:48

time. Um

53:51

>> it's not

53:53

like I mean there's even legal fees with

53:55

them trying to sue the government to get

53:56

their tariff money back. Like there's

53:58

there are other costs involved. It

54:00

doesn't just magically evaporate like

54:01

that. Uh,

54:02

>> the tariffs are also going away. The

54:05

tariff cost is being taken or refunded

54:08

to Nintendo because the tariffs were

54:10

found to be illegal. There's nothing

54:12

illegal about Nintendo putting a $4.99

54:15

price tag on something and you paying

54:17

it. That's that's legal. Um,

54:20

>> it's not necessarily nice.

54:22

>> That sucks.

54:23

>> Yeah. [snorts]

54:24

>> Yeah. No one's saying this doesn't suck.

54:26

It's just it's not illegal. They're I

54:30

think the people suing Nintendo are

54:31

going to lose. Um

54:34

>> I mean, yes.

54:36

>> Yeah.

54:37

>> Yes, they will.

54:38

>> Yeah.

54:40

>> But what about the moral question?

54:43

Morally speaking,

54:47

>> do you think they're right? Should

54:48

Nintendo pass the tariff refund back

54:51

along?

54:52

>> I think part of it would be nice. Um, I

54:54

think if if they could somehow figure

54:57

out what a reasonable portion is because

55:00

again there's

55:01

>> turning L's into W's.

55:04

Sorry, I I'll I'm going to let you

55:06

finish, but I have a I have an idea that

55:08

I will pitch to Nintendo free of charge

55:09

in a moment.

55:10

>> Okay, cool. Um, is like obviously the

55:12

legal fees involved with this cost

55:15

something. um pivoting the whole

55:17

company, the amount of wasted time that

55:19

they could have been doing, other cool

55:20

things, trying to figure out what is an

55:22

appropriate rate that we can set it at

55:24

with these literally constantly changing

55:26

tariffs. What are what are these counter

55:28

measures we can do to move manufacturing

55:30

or do other things to dodge these

55:31

tariffs? All of that has actually very

55:34

substantial cost. So, if you work that

55:35

out and then figure out how much is

55:37

remaining in the increased pot, then you

55:39

could

55:41

>> Okay, here's my pitch. Here's my pitch

55:42

to Nintendo free of charge. Okay. as a

55:46

as an act of as an act of goodwill, you

55:49

guys take your tariff refund, which is

55:51

going to be all done out in public,

55:53

right? So, everyone's going to know how

55:54

much tariff refund you get, and you

55:57

basically go, "Okay, here's the here's

56:00

here's the deal. everyone who bought a

56:03

Switch 2 or a a Everyone who bought a

56:06

Switch 2 so far and everyone who bought

56:08

a Switch One since, you know, some date

56:11

uh gets $5 off a game over some amount

56:15

in the Nintendo eShop. At the end of the

56:17

day, it actually costs you nothing

56:20

because you are incentivizing a

56:22

purchase. So, you you will make money on

56:25

the transaction. You could think of it

56:27

as a marketing expense and it's still an

56:30

act of goodwill. Realistically, you

56:32

know, in terms of what class action

56:34

settlements ultimately end up being,

56:36

still giving something back to the

56:38

entire Nintendo Switch customer base and

56:40

Nintendo community. It's a way to it's a

56:43

way to kind of be a good guy and and

56:47

spend the money that that you got after

56:50

the fact, but on something that

56:52

ultimately benefits you and your

56:54

customers. We take a big L, we turn it

56:57

into a W, everybody wins.

56:59

>> You're welcome.

57:00

>> Yeah. I was I was also potentially

57:01

thinking some like uh Nintendo online

57:04

time or something like that.

57:06

>> Yeah.

57:06

>> Yeah. Something like that could be cool.

57:08

>> Yeah. Some some kind of some way to to

57:11

turn this this crappy situation

57:13

>> doing something for the customers makes

57:15

sense. A a full refund of the entire

57:17

difference of the cost doesn't because

57:19

Nintendo still incurred a lot of cost

57:21

trying to deal with this situation. Um

57:24

but but yeah, there's something some

57:28

form of uh making the lives better of

57:30

the people who bought it at the inflated

57:32

price would be really cool. I mean, I

57:34

don't even know if it has to be

57:38

[sighs]

57:39

because, okay, because if you make it

57:40

the people who specifically bought at

57:42

the inflated cost, then then that's

57:45

basically that's setting a really

57:47

dangerous precedent for Nintendo because

57:50

now all of a sudden you are opening the

57:52

door to the conversation of like, you

57:54

know, if there's ever like like if if

57:56

Nintendo gets a rebate from their their

57:58

battery OEM, like

58:02

is everybody going to get Is everybody

58:03

who bought a switch going to get a

58:06

refund? Like, come on.

58:07

>> Ben, it comes back down to what you were

58:08

kind of saying, though. The tariffs were

58:10

illegal tariffs. Um, and they said that

58:13

they raised the price specifically for

58:14

that. So, did they raise the price

58:15

because of an illegal activity from

58:17

their battery manufacturer that they

58:19

then got refunded for?

58:20

>> We'd never know.

58:21

>> That's true.

58:22

>> Maybe.

58:23

>> We would never know that, right? So, so

58:25

they're setting like a really weird

58:27

precedent if they go and alter the deal

58:29

after the fact. Whereas if they just

58:31

say, "Hey, here's a windfall. We love

58:33

our Switch community so very huggy muggy

58:36

much. Here's something." Then I think

58:38

that diffuses

58:41

a a lot of the anger and maybe even goes

58:43

more broadly than just the people who,

58:45

you know, paid more than they would have

58:46

liked for for a game console.

58:48

>> Yeah, I think that's cool.

58:49

>> I I And look, I'm not saying, you know,

58:51

$5 logistical absolute freaking

58:53

nightmare, just to be clear.

58:55

>> Which one? Gift cards.

58:56

>> Refunding.

58:57

>> Oh, that Yeah,

58:58

>> that's insane.

58:58

>> Yeah. Whereas like an like like running

59:00

a promo basically saying, "Yeah, for the

59:02

next week, you know,

59:04

>> I I I bought my Switch from Nintend from

59:06

uh Willow. Let's say I bought it during

59:08

the tariff increase."

59:10

>> You think Nintendo's going to

59:11

specifically talk with Willow to get in

59:13

contact with me to give me money back?

59:15

Like how any of this happens? I I don't

59:17

even know.

59:18

>> Um

59:19

>> there's probably a simpler way. They

59:22

could set up some site and you can try

59:24

to like submit a receipt or something

59:27

and then they have to do like OCR stuff

59:29

on figuring out if the receipt is

59:30

legitimate and

59:32

>> ain't any of that happening.

59:34

>> Yeah, probably not. So, I I I I like the

59:36

idea of of the the something. I think

59:38

that's pretty cool.

59:40

>> Um

59:41

>> ehop gift card, free Nintendo online,

59:44

something like that would be pretty

59:45

sweet.

59:45

>> All right, speaking of online shops,

59:47

>> don't they do this all the time with

59:48

rebates? No, cuz the ones you're

59:51

thinking of is a rebate that you get on

59:53

the purchase of the product. So you

59:55

would get some form of information that

59:57

you then submit in order to get a rebate

59:58

back. This is retroactive.

60:00

>> Yeah.

60:01

>> So it it would not

60:02

>> So we weren't planning ahead for it this

60:04

time.

60:04

>> Yes. Which is actually a huge problem in

60:06

this case.

60:08

>> They're finally here. The last socks

60:10

you'll ever want to buy, the LTT forever

60:13

socks. Oh, dang it. It moved right as I

60:16

tried to click. [laughter] available in

60:18

well sort of available some of the um

60:21

some of the colors are already out man

60:24

we one of these days we're going to nail

60:26

our forecasting but it is not this day

60:30

uh the point is on the is this the US

60:33

site yeah on the US site we still have

60:35

one color in one size and I think the

60:37

global site still has uh yes the global

60:40

site actually still has uh pretty decent

60:42

socks uh stock socks stock so sock

60:46

>> they're pretty decent so

60:46

>> socks

60:47

stock. The Forever Sock is finally

60:51

freaking here after 6 years. Uh we have

60:55

dropped our much anticipated Forever

60:57

sock. We obsessed over everything from

61:01

the premium marino wool blend to the

61:03

copper infused odor control to the

61:05

reinforced heel and toe construction.

61:08

The result, a longlasting sock that I

61:12

think is the last socks you'll want to

61:14

wear. And yes, we are even backing them

61:16

with our limited lifetime warranty. So

61:18

my notes here say, "Go make your feet

61:20

happy at lmg.gg/forever

61:22

sock." And then it says, "Note, high

61:25

chance US site will be sold out by 4."

61:27

Oh, okay. Well, that was a while ago.

61:30

Uh, cool. But the global site global

61:33

site still has stock and

61:35

>> USite still has smalls. I think

61:37

>> our forever sock is a great opportunity

61:39

for you guys to send in a checkout

61:40

message. We on the WAN show believe that

61:43

if you're going to throw money at your

61:44

screen at live streamers that you should

61:46

get something great in return for that

61:49

money. So we don't do uh Twitch bits. We

61:52

don't do super chats. What we do is coms

61:55

a checkout message. All you got to do to

61:57

send one is while we're streaming, head

61:59

over to ltstore.com,

62:01

add something to your cart, and you will

62:03

see in the checkout one of these. You

62:06

click this button and you can type a

62:08

message. You can change the color. You

62:10

can decide whether to display your name

62:12

or not display your name. And then all

62:14

you got to do is go to the checkout and

62:16

your message will go to producer Dan.

62:19

There he is. Who will, I don't know, pop

62:22

it up here or he'll reply to it or he

62:25

might curate it for me and Luke to

62:28

respond to. So, producer Dan, do you

62:30

want to show the folks what that might

62:32

look like when you curate a message?

62:33

>> Yeah, I've got a bunch here. The first

62:34

one here is actually about the socks, so

62:36

that works great.

62:37

>> That makes sense.

62:38

>> Hope you're swell. DLL, can you explain

62:40

how you choose SKUs for your first items

62:44

uh for your items? Why three colorways

62:47

and not two styles for socks? It feels

62:49

like variety should beat out colors to

62:51

my novice noggin.

62:54

That is a great great question.

63:02

We do our best. We actually we we

63:06

actually like agonize over this kind of

63:10

thing.

63:10

>> You're you're

63:11

>> Yeah. Go ahead.

63:12

>> Just genuinely trying to predict the

63:13

future.

63:14

>> Yeah.

63:15

>> And in a lot of ways because you're

63:16

trying to predict the future of what

63:18

colors people want. You're trying to

63:19

predict the future of what sizes people

63:20

want and you're trying to predict the

63:22

future of that in different geographical

63:24

locations cuz now we have two stores,

63:26

>> what styles they want to. Uh so we we

63:29

were going to launch with a half crew

63:32

and then we ultimately made the decision

63:34

to launch with a full crew because we

63:37

kind of figured okay well the trend

63:41

right now is that um you know kind of

63:44

like how how hemlines rise and fall with

63:46

with trends. Sock heights rise and fall

63:49

with trends. Ankle socks are out and

63:52

longer socks are trending back. So we

63:54

wanted to get out ahead of that. This is

63:56

where I'm This is probably the thing I

63:58

am most unk about. I I can't do it.

64:02

>> Which?

64:02

>> The tall socks.

64:03

>> Oh, you can't do it.

64:04

>> Drives me crazy.

64:05

>> You're an ankle sock guy?

64:06

>> Oh, yeah. But literally always

64:08

>> Oh, that's crazy.

64:09

>> Yeah. I have never once liked like even

64:14

when I'm trying to go like as warm as

64:15

possible in a snow boot.

64:17

>> You'll wear an ankle sock in a snowboard

64:19

boot.

64:20

>> I believe I have done so.

64:21

>> That's insane. Okay, so we can safely

64:24

ignore him. Yeah.

64:25

>> Um, [laughter]

64:26

you know what's funny is 5 years ago I

64:29

was the UNK guy because ankle socks were

64:32

in and I was wearing crew

64:34

>> tall socks.

64:35

>> Yeah. So, uh, that was another thing

64:36

that that shifted us towards the full

64:39

crew for the launch. Um, and so, so,

64:43

right, so in response, why not two

64:45

styles instead of three colors? So for

64:48

one thing, two styles in two colors

64:50

would have been four lines, which would

64:53

have been 33% more. So four doesn't

64:55

sound like a lot more than three, except

64:57

that four is 33% more. And already with

65:02

the three, we have three sizes times

65:04

three colors. So that's 9* two

65:07

locations. So that is 18 discrete

65:10

bins

65:12

somewhere in order to have a sock. If we

65:15

had gone with two colors in two styles,

65:18

that would have been what did I just

65:19

what number did I just say? 18.

65:21

>> So, it would have been 33% more. So, it

65:22

would have been another six. It would

65:23

have been 24.

65:26

>> It's insane.

65:28

>> Really, really fast. How many SKs do you

65:29

guys have? It's thousands. I

65:31

>> I don't know.

65:31

>> Yeah, I know it's thousand. It's

65:32

thousands.

65:33

>> It's thousands. I know it's thousands. I

65:35

literally don't know exactly how many it

65:36

is.

65:36

>> Yeah, I can check if you'd rather not

65:39

know.

65:39

>> Doesn't matter. You do not want to know.

65:40

>> Yeah, rather not know. Uh Ben Bob says,

65:42

"Why not excel size?" because we didn't

65:44

we had to start somewhere. This was our

65:46

first fora into socks. We were pretty

65:49

bullish on this. Uh clearly we were not

65:51

bullish enough. We did not order enough.

65:54

Um but we will we will order more and uh

65:58

when we do so you can expect that we are

66:01

going to be looking at uh over the next

66:03

little while. Hey, do we do a half crew?

66:05

Do we do an ankle? Do we do expanded

66:07

sizing? Because to say that the launch

66:10

has been successful would be uh an

66:13

understatement. One of the things that

66:15

we struggle with though, and I'm just

66:16

going to I'm just going to be real with

66:17

you guys right now, is maintaining

66:19

momentum on our products. We will have

66:22

these like amazing product launches and

66:25

we'll sell, you know, a few socks

66:28

>> in a day and then a couple months later

66:32

the the buzz is kind of like died down

66:35

and we really struggle. We're doing

66:38

better. We're at like to be clear, we're

66:39

doing better at it and we're always

66:41

improving, but we kind of struggle with

66:43

the ongoing marketing of our products.

66:45

>> There is

66:47

Yeah.

66:51

>> Yeah. Uh

66:53

>> and

66:53

>> I'll I'll I'll go I do think sometimes

66:56

it's we make such a varied set of things

66:59

>> Oh, we do.

67:00

>> that it can be

67:00

>> minus lead development. It's not it's

67:02

actually they're getting better about

67:03

that, too. the fashion team is really

67:05

putting a lot of pressure on me to have

67:08

a cohesive,

67:10

you know, product road map. Uh, rather

67:12

than just like like, okay, okay, I was

67:15

in the middle of the meeting where

67:16

they're literally going through the fall

67:18

winter 27 plan with me. Like to give you

67:21

some idea how far out ahead they are on

67:23

this stuff because they're like

67:24

organized real like organized people.

67:27

Um, and and I'm like, "Okay, wait, wait,

67:29

wait, hold on. I just had a I just had a

67:31

brainstorm. Okay. I uh can we do a

67:33

t-shirt that just has like a pie symbol

67:35

and then like a picture of a rat because

67:38

I think our audience would just freaking

67:39

love that. And they're like, "Yeah,

67:42

well, yeah, we'll put it in the pile

67:43

just so you got you got to have a

67:45

balance of both. You got to have just

67:46

like the creative dragon energy and then

67:48

you've also got to have the like the

67:50

structure." Um and so so what you're

67:53

seeing here is creative dragon energy.

67:55

Hey, we need to make this thing and like

67:56

here's all the like cool stuff it should

67:57

have and this is it's going to be

67:59

awesome. And then it's like okay, we

68:01

need to start somewhere. So here's how

68:02

we pair down the offerings to something

68:04

reasonable and and here's how we kind of

68:06

like go to market and then expand it.

68:08

But then where Luke is going with this

68:10

is like, okay, as we take that slow and

68:12

steady approach in the background, how

68:14

exactly is it that you can tell what

68:16

kind of store this is?

68:17

>> Well, okay, here's my question.

68:19

>> Yeah,

68:20

>> without the banner,

68:21

>> how did I not wear that shirt for the

68:22

video anyway? Go ahead. without this

68:24

banner. So, let's pretend this banner is

68:27

not in rotation. Let's go forward a few

68:29

weeks, a couple months, whatever.

68:30

>> Where are the socks?

68:32

>> They are under apparel.

68:34

>> Nope.

68:35

>> Really?

68:40

>> Okay. Well, um

68:43

Okay, I'll I'll ask for that to be

68:45

moved.

68:47

>> We [snorts] make so many different

68:49

things that sometimes the categorization

68:51

of stuff gets kind of weird. Um, like if

68:54

I go under tools and I click on

68:55

screwdrivers.

68:57

Um,

68:59

oh, it has improved.

69:01

Someone listened to me. Thank you very

69:03

much. Uh, but it's it's sometimes

69:05

finding stuff on the store is like kind

69:07

of hard. And part of that is cuz we just

69:10

make so much stuff. I don't know that

69:14

many stores other than like a freaking I

69:18

don't know,

69:20

Target.

69:22

that sells like some of the the variety

69:24

of different things that we have. We

69:26

have apparel, both tops, bottoms,

69:28

loungewear, underwear, jackets, vests,

69:31

hats, everything you can imagine for

69:33

apparel. We have screwdrivers. We have

69:34

tape. We have bit cases. We have bits.

69:37

We have cables. We have cable

69:38

management. We have uh thermal pads. We

69:41

have uh hand slider things for mouse

69:44

pads. We have cable management. We have

69:46

keychains, pins, stickers, toys.

69:47

>> You haven't even mentioned water

69:48

bottles. Pet caves, water balls, desk

69:50

pads, stationary.

69:53

What is happening?

69:54

>> Well, it doesn't move

69:55

>> and it just it just keeps going. So,

69:57

it's it's difficult to I sympathize with

70:00

the problem, but it's difficult to like

70:02

kind of decide where things are going to

70:05

go and make them discoverable. But, um,

70:09

also some people don't necessarily

70:10

realize that these are clickable things

70:12

that are categories. M um so like it's

70:17

it's the whole thing is it's all very

70:20

it's very tough. See like backpacks is

70:21

like that right now. There's no

70:22

subcategory for backpacks. It's just the

70:25

backpacks category but then like

70:27

screwdriver there's screwdrivers but

70:29

then position and ratcheting and

70:34

>> for what it's worth

70:35

>> it's so hard.

70:36

>> Don't take this the wrong way. the team

70:38

that works on the website, we we know

70:41

that it's a difficult challenge.

70:43

>> Yes.

70:44

>> And no matter what we do, it's not going

70:46

to be perfect.

70:48

>> It's a very difficult problem to solve

70:50

when you have this many different

70:54

things. Um,

70:56

>> I mean, I think what I'm discovering is

70:58

like as much as like like remember when

71:01

uh remember when like ASUS would get all

71:03

buttth hurt when we would say when we

71:06

would just call their ROG monitor an

71:08

ASUS monitor and we'd be like, "Oh my

71:10

god, just relax. You're you're ASUS. You

71:13

you make ROG. Just chill." Right?

71:15

>> It's cuz they make so many things. They

71:16

need their categorization.

71:18

>> I'm beginning to understand why you need

71:20

subbrands. It's it's this is a big part

71:23

this problem is a big part of the reason

71:25

why I gave so much props to the Forever

71:28

sock name and the True Spec name is

71:32

because

71:33

>> giving them

71:34

>> something more searchable like that is

71:36

like helpful.

71:38

>> Uh the search on the store is starting

71:40

to become significantly more important,

71:41

right?

71:42

>> Uh because like just finding things is

71:44

tough.

71:45

>> Yeah. Simpleton says, "I did not realize

71:48

the title was of the categories that

71:50

were like clickable." Yeah. Yes. Yeah.

71:54

So, if that's true, how do you find a

71:56

backpack?

71:58

So, it's like it's Oh, so ah I I I I'm

72:02

very interested in uh I was talking to

72:04

Taran about this the other day, having

72:07

um like mouse behavior stuff on the

72:10

site.

72:11

>> I'm trying to figure out like how Yeah.

72:13

how people actually use the site. Um

72:16

because I'm interested in what people

72:18

click on and I I wonder like how much of

72:21

that like recency bias in product

72:24

releasement for releasement

72:26

in product releases for sales is the

72:29

banner because the banner is really

72:31

effective at, you know, getting

72:33

something out in front of you. The the

72:35

shop products down here, these these

72:37

categories, it all looks nice. Like the

72:39

store looks great, but there's just so

72:41

many different things. If we just sold

72:43

t-shirts, it would be fine. But we

72:45

don't. We also sell everything.

72:48

[laughter]

72:48

>> Tools.

72:49

>> It's like, where do we put all this

72:51

stuff?

72:51

>> Cable management.

72:52

>> Uh, yeah.

72:54

>> Yeah.

72:55

>> Pens.

72:56

>> Pens.

72:56

>> Where are pens? Accessories.

72:59

>> Accessories. Nope. Home and decor.

73:02

>> You also do accessories for the

73:03

screwdriver like grip tape,

73:06

>> extensions.

73:07

>> There we go. We got it.

73:08

>> There we go. Floppy disc, notebook,

73:09

notebook, and also

73:11

>> children's toys.

73:12

>> Mechanical pencil and pen.

73:15

Yeah. Yeah. I forgot about the

73:18

children's toys.

73:19

>> Books. Home of decor.

73:21

>> All right. All right, Dan. We get it. We

73:23

get it.

73:24

>> Decor.

73:25

>> What do we have under decor?

73:27

>> Okay. We need to just blow those away.

73:30

>> There's eight left.

73:31

>> There's eight.

73:31

>> There's eight small ones left.

73:32

>> Can you guys do me a favor and just buy

73:34

those, please? That would be great. Then

73:36

we could get it off the site.

73:37

>> Yeah. We can reprint them. No, we're not

73:39

reprinting them. What are the reviews on

73:41

this? There people left reviews on this.

73:43

[laughter] This has five stars.

73:45

>> It's all five stars. This product is

73:47

perfect. What the Go away. Um

73:51

but like they get sticker bombed.

73:54

>> I just wanted something to fill some

73:56

space on my wall. Once again, LTT

73:58

delivered with this masterpiece. It's a

74:01

damn good print. Creator Warehouse seems

74:03

to only be able to deliver at 110%. I

74:06

can't wait to see what new products are

74:07

released. [laughter] Absolutely

74:09

beautiful accent to my drab room.

74:13

>> It [laughter] really really should have

74:14

looked at the specs. Thought the print

74:16

would be way larger, but that's my fault

74:18

for not paying attention. I will apply a

74:20

thick epoxy coat the same way I coat my

74:23

stickers and other printbased decor.

74:26

Huh? I don't know what that means.

74:28

>> Me neither.

74:30

>> Did was that one com?

74:33

>> Yes.

74:33

>> Okay, hit me, Dan. We're we're on one

74:36

today.

74:37

>> Uh you're you're still doing good for

74:38

time.

74:39

>> Okay.

74:39

>> Uh

74:41

dear Lionus, what would you change about

74:43

the Canadian school system as a father

74:45

and company founder? As the principal of

74:48

a German primary school, I always enjoy

74:50

looking beyond my own system. Cheers.

74:53

Are you trying to get me in trouble? I

74:55

feel like I feel like you're trying to

74:56

get me in trouble in trouble

74:58

>> because I'm because I'm going to like

75:00

there's no way that I'm going to be able

75:02

to talk about the school system without

75:03

it there being a bunch of hot takes.

75:05

>> Nice.

75:06

>> Like I I I've I've probably got already

75:09

in my mind I've probably already got

75:11

three things that like could get me

75:13

cancelled.

75:14

>> Oh.

75:15

>> So first of all, bring back letter

75:17

grades at every stage.

75:20

>> They got rid of letter grades.

75:21

>> What is it? Yeah.

75:22

>> You guys don't know about this?

75:23

>> No.

75:24

>> No. We're old.

75:25

>> We're back in my day.

75:26

>> Childless dungeon nerds.

75:28

>> One terabyte hard drive was cool.

75:31

[laughter]

75:32

>> I mean, right

75:33

>> now I have that in RAM.

75:35

>> Um

75:36

>> Oh my god. Do you?

75:37

>> I can't. I don't have a house. I just

75:39

have the RAM. [laughter]

75:42

>> So, so yeah. So, grades are done from

75:47

emerging to developing to proficient to

75:51

extending. Uh that's how grading is done

75:54

up until I it depends on the school the

75:57

exact school and the exact school

75:59

district. But in the province of British

76:01

Columbia that's been the guidance for

76:03

quite some time now. As long as my kids

76:05

have been in school

76:06

>> I don't like it.

76:08

>> So So it's like

76:08

>> kids are wrong.

76:09

>> It's all graded out of five instead of

76:11

100.

76:11

>> It's also the kids' fault even though

76:13

it's my generation.

76:14

>> I blame the children.

76:16

>> So you don't get you don't get uh you

76:19

don't get a letter grade. you just get

76:22

this like you get this word that

76:24

describes um your your mastery of the

76:28

material and

76:31

um the way that it was defended. I

76:33

remember reading what to me and again

76:36

this is just take this for my ignorant

76:38

boomer take that it is um you know maybe

76:41

maybe they're right maybe it's a better

76:42

system I am I am not a professional

76:45

studier of this but

76:48

to me I read what seemed like pretty

76:50

much the most asinine possible defense

76:53

of this system um from some minister of

76:57

something or some big wig of some sort

76:59

in the newspaper to give you some idea

77:00

how long ago I was reading about this

77:02

And basically they were like this system

77:05

is designed to facilitate communication

77:09

between the school and the parents to

77:12

really give them an idea of how their

77:15

kids are doing.

77:17

And I'm like that's what the

77:19

letter grade was for.

77:20

>> I I could actually see kind of both used

77:22

in combination cuz I could see one being

77:24

a trend line and one being the state.

77:26

>> Or how do you do like GPA? Like

77:28

everybody's like I have a 4.0 GPA. like

77:30

yeah but

77:31

>> I I got exemplaries

77:33

>> Luke that's why we had work that's why

77:35

we had like the effort grade

77:38

>> okay

77:38

>> so there were when I was in elementary

77:39

school we had two grades for every

77:41

subject we had your your like your score

77:45

on your assignments grade ABC C or ABC

77:50

plus C and C minus and then like uh like

77:54

a like a basically I forget what what it

77:56

was like incomplete or something like we

77:58

didn't have Fs already they already we

78:00

done away with Fs because Fs are bad.

78:03

Um, and then we also had uh a GSN,

78:08

so good, satisfactory, and needs

78:09

improvement for like your effort and

78:11

your attitude.

78:12

>> So, we like already had that.

78:14

>> I don't remember if that was a thing for

78:16

me or not. Um,

78:18

>> my elementary school was also kind of

78:19

weird, but

78:21

>> so I'm just I So anyway, so first thing

78:24

I would do is I would say, "Hey, um, why

78:28

don't we just why don't we just keep

78:29

giving everyone a letter?" Because

78:31

everybody just boils this new system

78:33

down to letters anyway.

78:35

>> Yeah.

78:35

>> Um, and then we just have a more

78:38

granular system where within the letter,

78:40

you also have an exact number. Okay.

78:43

Yay. We already had that. Cool.

78:44

Wonderful. Um, number two, and this is

78:48

this is one that's probably going to get

78:50

me into a lot more trouble, but the BCTF

78:53

is way too powerful.

78:54

>> BC Teacher Foundation,

78:56

>> Federation,

78:56

>> Federation,

78:57

>> the Union.

78:57

>> I was guessing.

78:59

>> Um, I had terrible teachers. I had

79:03

really good teachers, but I also had

79:06

terrible teachers. And when you could

79:08

get the good teachers, you know,

79:12

talking and, you know, building rapport,

79:15

like I had some some of my teachers I

79:17

was not inappropriately, but like I was

79:19

I was pretty close to. I was Yeah, me

79:21

too.

79:21

>> Like I I there were a couple of my

79:23

teachers that I hung out with after I

79:25

graduated and like, you know, went to

79:27

see and and and talk with and say, "How

79:29

are you doing? Here's how we're doing."

79:31

Um and and that was cool. It was like

79:34

not weird. Like it was cool. And um you

79:36

know when you get them talking they are

79:39

as frustrated as anyone that terrible

79:44

terrible teachers are stuck in the

79:46

system and instead of being able to fire

79:48

them because the union is so powerful

79:51

they just end up getting shuffled around

79:53

from school to school or worsta worst

79:56

case from district to district and you

79:58

can't get rid of them. You can't drain

80:01

the sludge. And at the same time, you've

80:03

got new, freshly trained, like freshly

80:06

out of school with all the latest

80:08

educational methods, freshly educated,

80:11

want to teach. They're so excited to

80:14

teach young minds and they can't get a

80:16

freaking job because you've got this

80:18

dead weight in the system that quite

80:20

frankly shouldn't be anywhere near our

80:22

our youngest our most valuable resource

80:25

as as a country. Like if we're looking

80:27

at it from from like a very macro

80:31

standpoint, you know, every every hour

80:34

of a student's time in the classroom

80:36

that is wasted is is such a such a

80:39

squandering of the most important part

80:42

of that person's young life that is

80:45

laying the foundation of the rest of

80:46

their time here on this earth. And I it

80:50

just it offends me there. Period. It it

80:52

offends me. And this is one of those

80:55

ones that's a tough conversation because

80:57

I am not against worker protections

81:00

either. Uh an an abusive employer should

81:04

should should not exist. And

81:07

unfortunately that's why we that's why

81:09

we have collective bargaining because

81:11

the time before collective bargaining

81:13

was bad. That was bad. That was not a

81:16

good that was not a good solution. Um,

81:20

in the case of the BCTF,

81:22

not a fan. To be clear, I've been out of

81:24

the school system for a long time, but I

81:28

have had kids in the school system much

81:29

more recently than that, and I have

81:31

certainly encountered similar issues.

81:33

So, I'm not convinced that it has been

81:36

uh meaningfully changed. Um, the other

81:40

thing, the la the last thing, and this

81:41

one, this one's probably the least, um,

81:46

Andre Andre B says, "The big positive of

81:48

the BCTF is the fighting they do for

81:50

class size and composition limits." That

81:51

is absolutely true.

81:53

>> Yeah, he's not against all of it. I I

81:55

don't think there's been any point in my

81:56

life where I thought the level of uh

81:58

tenure protections that they have there

82:00

makes sense. And I thought that when I

82:01

was in

82:03

high school. Um, yeah. But I also

82:07

thought in high school that some of the

82:08

class sizes were a little freaking

82:10

silly. Um,

82:13

so I don't know. There can be good and

82:15

bad things about a a department.

82:18

>> Aquarius babe says, "Me cracking up.

82:20

Went to the same school as Lionus and

82:22

there were some horrible teachers. One

82:24

was shuffled around and ended up setting

82:26

fire to the science room at the new

82:27

school. I did hear about that." Um, and

82:30

this is this is one of those things

82:32

where uh, you know, someone's all mad at

82:33

me. Anti-UN rhetoric again. Yeah, get

82:36

over it. No system is perfect. Every

82:39

system has flaws. Yes, even that one.

82:42

And I've been up close and personal with

82:44

some of the flaws of this specific

82:46

organization in this specific region,

82:48

which by the way, you probably know

82:50

nothing about. Get over it. I'm not

82:54

saying this broadly, and I'm not saying

82:56

that they shouldn't exist.

82:57

>> He literally also said that they do good

82:58

stuff as well.

82:59

>> Absolutely. Um, but not everything about

83:03

it generates a positive outcome. And if

83:06

you cannot handle that, then you're

83:09

probably your your your view is probably

83:11

too narrow. I'm sorry. You got to

83:14

broaden your view.

83:15

>> What's your last point?

83:16

>> Last point is I think that we focus too

83:19

much on pure academics.

83:21

>> Yeah. I think that in our desperation to

83:24

make sure that nobody gets left behind,

83:28

we actually hold back the brightest

83:32

pupils when it comes to academics and we

83:35

end up completely wasting the time of

83:39

people that

83:41

don't need to be able to do advanced

83:44

algebra that where it will literally

83:46

never help.

83:46

>> Maybe there's something else that might

83:48

help them a lot more. This is I think

83:49

this question came from came from

83:51

someone in the in the German program. I

83:53

remember when I was in high school, I

83:54

took I took German and we would learn

83:57

different things about Germany. I

83:58

remember hearing about and I'm going to

84:00

screw up a lot of these details, but I

84:01

remember hearing about um some of the

84:04

details of how the German school system

84:06

works where once you're at some grade, I

84:09

don't remember which one. I remember

84:11

thinking that it was like either really

84:13

early high school or like kind of middle

84:14

schoolish,

84:15

>> switch to a vocational stream,

84:16

>> you would pick a road and I remember

84:18

thinking like, man, that's cool.

84:21

>> And I and I remember hearing some of the

84:22

other kids in the class pushing back

84:24

being like, I don't know what I want to

84:25

do yet. But in my mind, I was like,

84:28

damn, dude. I do. Like, if I could go

84:31

down a path that was more tailored for

84:33

that, like, my god, I would love that.

84:35

>> It's also tailored to your skill level,

84:37

you know?

84:38

>> And to be clear, some schools some

84:41

schools actually do a pretty good job of

84:43

these types of programs. Like,

84:44

>> fourth grade,

84:45

>> my school wasn't perfect. Like to to I I

84:48

forget their username, but to their

84:49

point, there were there were some really

84:51

really bad teachers in our school. And

84:55

but there were also some really cool

84:57

programs. Uh we had an incredible

85:00

automotive shop. Um very well equipped

85:04

and like we would we would actually work

85:06

on people's cars and and so in much the

85:09

same way that you'll have like a like a

85:12

student dentistry at like the university

85:14

or whatever and like the the high school

85:17

students were learning real

85:20

>> real mechanic skills. Awesome

85:22

>> in high school.

85:22

>> That is very cool. um like all support

85:25

that

85:26

>> all that I know about you know changing

85:28

oil and doing alignment and anything to

85:30

do with cars was the the one term I took

85:32

of it and I was like okay this isn't for

85:34

me uh which is good for me to know but

85:37

we were like we were learning real

85:39

>> and and the theory and it was and it was

85:42

freaking awesome and the people who

85:44

enjoyed that stream loved it and were

85:46

bored senseless in English class.

85:49

>> Yeah. To be clear, I'm not saying that

85:51

people should graduate high school

85:52

without being able to read a book.

85:54

>> I think you need certain minimums. I

85:55

think you should take a certain minimum

85:57

of math so you don't just get scammed

85:59

for the rest of your life. I think you

86:01

should take certain minimums,

86:02

>> but that math should be focused. It

86:04

should be focused on like how practical

86:06

skills,

86:06

>> how to how to run a small business.

86:08

>> Sure, that would be awesome.

86:10

>> Like, dude, I I wicked I I went all the

86:12

way through to math 12 and I still don't

86:14

know what practical application there

86:16

was for most of what I learned.

86:17

>> Yeah. Well, there isn't.

86:20

>> And so,

86:20

>> unless you go down a like if you if you

86:23

go down engineering, if you go down

86:24

something else, there absolutely is. But

86:25

if you

86:26

>> Sure, but what percentage of the

86:27

population is that?

86:28

>> But you do I understand wanting to

86:31

cultivate more people into STEM and all

86:33

that kind of stuff. But if you're just

86:35

forcing people down the line and they

86:38

know they don't want to go that route

86:39

anyways,

86:39

>> they don't want to be there.

86:41

>> Yeah. And they're just going to fail out

86:43

or struggle and just be pissed off

86:44

anyways. I think allowing them to go do

86:46

something else is totally fine. That

86:47

being said, I don't think math 12 is

86:49

required.

86:49

>> No, math 12 is not required, but you

86:51

have to do up to I think it's like 10

86:53

essentials or something like that or

86:54

nine nine essentials.

86:55

>> I thought you even had to do 11, but

86:57

>> uh that that may be true. I don't

86:58

remember the words.

86:59

>> I don't remember either. It's probably

87:00

changed by now.

87:00

>> It's been a minute. But basically what

87:02

happened was and this was true at the

87:05

time was you had to reach a certain

87:07

level of math according to the grade

87:09

level attached to it. So what they did

87:12

was they created different levels of the

87:14

class and I forget what it was if it was

87:16

9 or 10 or 11 but there was like there

87:18

was there was principles which was the

87:20

mainstream one.

87:21

>> There was enriched at our school anyway.

87:24

There was, I believe, enriched, which

87:25

was the like more like university prep

87:28

one. And then there was um

87:31

essentials, which was basically, from my

87:34

understanding, it was grade 8 math, but

87:36

like you're taking it in grade 10 or

87:39

grade 11 or whatever it was. And as long

87:42

as it had that number on it, then like

87:44

we taught them grade 11 math. But but

87:47

you didn't. So what are we even what are

87:50

we even all doing here? What were you?

87:51

>> But then again, if it's a business level

87:53

thing or like a tax or you know how to

87:56

not get bamboozled.

87:59

>> No, it was just lower level math.

88:01

>> Yeah, that's a little sad. Um, but I I

88:03

can definitely understand like, okay,

88:06

you know what? Uh, I'm in X course. I

88:10

don't care about the English. Your

88:11

example that you just gave was

88:12

automotive. I don't care about English

88:14

now. Okay. Well, you're going to need to

88:17

write sometimes. It's just a fact of

88:19

life. So, we'll get you to a certain

88:21

point where you can like write

88:22

coherently and you know, you should be

88:24

able to prove that you can do an essay

88:26

so you can kind of bundle your thoughts

88:28

and and uh form an argument. Um, so that

88:31

if if you know, if your automotive shop

88:33

that you end up having ever gets in like

88:35

legal trouble or something, you can

88:37

organize your thoughts and defend your

88:38

case.

88:39

>> Cool. You don't need English 12 for

88:41

that. But, but we'll get you to like

88:44

some functional level. Sweet. I like the

88:46

idea of at least getting people to these

88:47

functional levels in in a variety of

88:49

different areas.

88:50

>> And the other the other thing that you

88:52

know

88:55

the biggest the best argument I think I

88:57

could even give for why we should change

89:01

cuz I I could see some people hearing,

89:03

you know, what I what I say. I'm

89:05

actually I'm actually pretty passionate

89:07

about about education in general. I um

89:10

it's really funny. We had that exclusive

89:12

on float plane last week and people were

89:14

like, "Wa, L is a really good swimming

89:16

teacher." I was like, "Yeah, cuz I've

89:18

I've basically spent my whole life

89:20

teaching people stuff in one form or

89:23

another, whether it's about computers or

89:26

um aquatic exercise or painting houses

89:30

or whatever. I've I've functionally

89:32

always been a trainer or teacher in some

89:36

form. Um, it's something that I get joy

89:38

from. It's something that I I

89:39

legitimately actually enjoy. And the

89:42

best argument I can give for why we need

89:44

to change this is not that, you know,

89:47

I'm some elitist who's like, "Oh, yeah,

89:49

only, you know, the smart kids deserve a

89:50

chance or whatever." No, it's about

89:52

giving everybody their best possible

89:54

chance. And the current system is not

89:56

working. Like every every every year

90:00

there's a fresh batch of articles with

90:03

college professors lamenting the fact

90:05

that kids are arriving at university in

90:08

college and don't know how to read. And

90:10

it's like rubber stamping everybody

90:13

through this system is clearly not

90:16

working. I think also like and this this

90:19

seems to be a fairly obvious thing in

90:21

like almost every realm, but like real

90:24

feedback. So you can and not you know

90:28

mean punitive feedback, but real

90:30

feedback can be really useful for people

90:33

to try to kind of shape things.

90:36

You might want to know if you're kind of

90:39

capable of going down a certain path,

90:41

right? or or maybe you're capable, but

90:44

how difficult will it be for you? And if

90:47

something else feels natural and you're

90:50

getting good responses, your grades are

90:52

going well, whatever, that might be a

90:53

good path for you to follow.

90:56

Um, but some of these courses that I'm

90:58

hearing where people can't read when

91:01

they get into it are like, "Yeah, maybe

91:04

you should have known this wasn't going

91:06

to work out for you before you got a

91:09

massive student loan." maybe if they had

91:10

proper letter grades. This is what I'm

91:12

saying. Like it feels like we're we're

91:15

not only not necessarily setting them up

91:17

for success, but then how the whole

91:19

student loan system works and how

91:22

important that part of your life is for

91:24

setting up your future. You're you're

91:26

not just not setting them up for

91:28

success. You are specifically also

91:30

setting them up for failure. I think

91:31

both things are happening.

91:33

>> I am starting to get very curious who

91:35

exactly Aquarius Babe 86 is. The 86

91:38

would seem to indicate not only we went

91:39

to the same school, but we were the same

91:41

age. And you say, "Metal art and jewelry

91:43

was one of my fave classes ever. It

91:44

turned into one of my hobbies." Did we

91:46

take metal art and jewelry together?

91:49

[snorts] Shout out Mr. Russell.

91:51

[laughter] Um, or was it Sour? I think

91:52

Sauerbe taught mine. Um, anyway,

91:57

shout out Mr. Sauerby, too. Anyway,

92:01

>> are you done with the merch question?

92:06

Uh, excuse me.

92:08

>> Excuse me. What did you just call it?

92:10

>> So, how to do the support topics?

92:11

>> What did you just call it?

92:12

>> Merch question.

92:13

>> Excuse me.

92:15

>> This I I I I I heard the question. What

92:19

was it? There's there's a word he said

92:21

that I don't understand.

92:23

>> Question.

92:26

>> The pro the product question. The

92:28

>> That's not even what it's called either.

92:30

>> Well, it's not called that. Okay.

92:31

>> No. No. Are you done with the com?

92:32

>> Yes. I'm [laughter] done. I'm done. How

92:34

about some more topics?

92:36

>> Sure. You want to pick one? Should we do

92:37

the LG one?

92:38

>> Sure.

92:39

>> Sure.

92:40

>> Yeah. LG abuses.

92:42

>> Oh, hold on, hold on, hold on, hold on,

92:43

hold on. Uh, the the the the person in

92:47

float plane chat is upset. They did not

92:48

say I was spewing anti-UN rhetoric. They

92:50

were saying a lot of comments on float

92:52

plane were Okay. All right. All right.

92:54

All right. Okay. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I

92:56

assumed because you did not address

92:58

anybody that you were talking about what

93:00

I was talking about. And and I really

93:02

I'm not I'm not trying to be anti- it.

93:05

There's really good things about it. Uh

93:07

it's just that I've seen bad outcomes up

93:10

close both through my involvement with

93:13

one back when I was teaching lifeguard,

93:15

back when I was teaching swimming and

93:17

when I was a lifeguard and through

93:20

just

93:21

especially hearing my parents talk about

93:23

it. My parents were both teachers and

93:25

it's it's really frustrating for your

93:28

your star and for your star team members

93:32

when the losers get paid the same

93:36

and you can't get rid of them. It's uh

93:38

it's so demoralizing. Anyway, okay,

93:41

Luke, carry on.

93:41

>> Aquarius babe responded, "LOL wouldn't

93:44

expect Linus to remember me. I was a

93:46

student aid for his grade 8 computer

93:48

class.

93:54

And we only had computers for a third of

93:56

a term. I really don't remember that.

93:59

All right.

94:02

Well, was worth a shot.

94:04

>> Yeah. Okay. Carry on. LG abuses Windows

94:07

update driver install to push

94:11

Macaffy.

94:12

After numerous user complaints on the LG

94:15

OLED subreddit, a Gamers Nexus

94:17

investigation found that LG has been

94:19

taking advantage of a Windows feature

94:21

that allows a hardware support app. In

94:24

this case, the LG monitor app installer.

94:27

Yikes. Wow. Uh to be automatically and

94:31

silently installed alongside the device

94:33

drivers when a new device is plugged

94:34

into Windows 11 machine and drivers are

94:36

automatically installed via Windows

94:38

update. That blows. These hardware

94:41

support apps are apparently granted

94:44

significant privacy breaking permissions

94:46

without any form of user consent or even

94:49

notice. Why does Windows suck so much?

94:54

Oh my god. In this case, the LG Monitor

94:57

app, among other things, shows uh large

95:00

popup ads for trials of Macaffy

95:03

Antivirus. Some users report that this

95:05

has been happening since 2024. Um, since

95:08

this came to light, Microsoft stepped in

95:10

and Windows chief Pavan told the Verge

95:14

that LG has agreed to immediately

95:15

disable the Macaffy popup uh and pledged

95:18

that Microsoft will keep improving here

95:22

with our ecosystem prov partners. No,

95:24

you need I think you just need to change

95:25

the rules on that one. Um,

95:29

LG attempted to defend their behavior

95:32

with an uncredited statement to Windows

95:36

latest. LG Electronics reiterates that

95:39

Macaffy is not installed automatically.

95:43

It is never installed without a user's

95:45

explicit consent. The LG monitor app

95:47

installer is distributed through

95:48

Microsoft's official Windows

95:50

distribution process,

95:52

which included Macaffy as an option.

95:55

>> Yeah, we know that's the problem.

95:56

Macaffy will be installed only if a user

95:59

actively chooses to proceed with the

96:00

installation and provides consent. Under

96:03

no circumstances is Macaffy installed

96:05

automatically or without user authentic

96:07

authorization. The LG monitor app

96:10

installer does not access, collect, or

96:12

transmit any user. I don't want you to

96:14

tell me that. I want it to not be

96:16

possible.

96:18

>> To be clear, I like drivers

96:21

automatically appearing. So, I'm I'm I'm

96:24

actually just I'm going to push back on

96:25

just that part. I like the idea of that

96:29

I plug something in and it just works.

96:32

Um, what I don't like is when it's

96:34

allowed to have a parasitic payload.

96:37

>> That's my point.

96:38

>> Yeah. Well, no, no. I just I just want

96:39

to be really clear that I that if there

96:41

is a a monitor like driver that I need

96:44

so that I can use a hotkey to change my

96:46

brightness or like whatever, right? Like

96:48

if there's something that enhances the

96:49

user experience, yay. Um uh ma mcafee

96:54

prompt. Uh no.

96:56

>> Yeah.

96:58

>> Um and also to Luke's point that

97:01

shouldn't be possible. What are the what

97:03

like what are the punitive measures that

97:06

someone like a Microsoft could take if

97:08

somebody does this? Like let's let's get

97:10

creative here. What can Microsoft do to

97:13

police this?

97:14

>> Uh make it so that violations have a

97:17

huge cost.

97:18

>> How could they how can they enforce

97:20

that?

97:21

What do you mean?

97:23

>> Okay, you send MSI a bill for a million

97:25

dollars. What makes them or MSI? Excuse

97:27

me. No. Uh LG. You send LG a bill for $1

97:30

million. Why Why would they pay it?

97:34

>> Stop supporting their devices.

97:36

>> That will hurt them more.

97:38

>> That will hurt the customer, though. I I

97:40

don't think any solution should hurt the

97:42

customer.

97:42

>> I would stop supporting their devices in

97:44

this way. And I would give the the users

97:46

a flag, some type of notification that's

97:49

like LG was found to be distributing

97:54

>> what is arguably malware. Um, in order

97:57

to get driver updates, please follow

97:58

this manual process and then link them

98:00

to some documentation.

98:01

>> But then would that

98:03

I mean in order to get LG drivers,

98:06

presumably they would have to be linking

98:09

them to an LG source. How would

98:12

Microsoft then ensure that that LG

98:14

source does not include a McAfee

98:15

installer?

98:18

>> So, how how exactly is this Windows

98:20

update that it goes through? It's not.

98:21

>> Yeah, it goes through Windows update, I

98:22

believe.

98:24

>> Uh, it h it happens silently in the

98:26

background though.

98:26

>> Yeah.

98:27

>> Yeah. I don't know. I mean, I think

98:28

that's still worth it because at least

98:30

you're flagging to the user that LG was

98:34

like abusing systems and is not cool.

98:36

>> Charge nuclear goes Linus thinks they

98:39

care about the customer. I didn't say

98:41

that. What I said was it the solution

98:44

should not harm the customer. That's

98:45

what I said. I didn't say that anyone

98:47

agreed with me. I just said that I feel

98:49

that. [sighs and snorts]

98:51

>> Yeah.

98:52

>> Uh

98:54

um yeah, mine paradox says, "How about a

98:56

check that we must be notified before

98:58

software is installed and only if we

99:00

actively say yes to install it?" Okay.

99:02

Okay. Counterpoint. Counterpoint. Users

99:05

will often to their own detriment put

99:07

off installing updates. I mean, that's a

99:09

huge part of why actually, you know,

99:12

it's fun. We just did a Windows tier

99:15

list. We shot it earlier this week. And

99:18

we were we were we we made a joke about

99:21

the first Windows that introduced

99:23

automatic updating and talked about how

99:25

it's, hey, so Microsoft can break your

99:28

computer every patch Tuesday. Uh but

99:30

also here's why it was necessary because

99:32

in especially the early days of

99:34

connected devices and and the broader

99:37

internet just kind of coming online

99:41

people not updating their shiz was a big

99:44

problem. It was a huge huge vector and

99:49

any vector that the user refuses to

99:52

patch is by definition an unpatched

99:56

vector. Right? So, automatic updates, I

99:59

I I think in the modern world, I don't

100:01

think you can get away from that. I

100:02

don't I don't think I would advocate for

100:04

that. And if you give the user a choice,

100:08

they're going to dismiss it some number

100:10

of times out of 10.

100:14

Okay, let's see. Let's see if anybody

100:15

else has to force automatic updates. I

100:18

think you could make it up to the user.

100:19

>> Um, but then the more compromised

100:22

devices there are, the worse everything

100:24

is for everybody.

100:29

More zombie devices is bad.

100:31

>> Yeah, but I should still be able to

100:32

control my system. Like in Linux, I

100:35

mean, we're pushing everyone to go to

100:36

Linux.

100:38

You can do whatever the hell you want.

100:40

>> You can.

100:40

>> I don't think either of my systems are

100:42

running automatic updates. I just also

100:44

update them.

100:46

I also find updating in Linux to be like

100:49

fun and rewarding and updating in

100:51

Windows to be horrible and slow and not

100:53

rewarding and scary and just generally

100:56

bad. So like they're there are very

100:57

different experiences. The Linux one is

100:59

really fast for some reason.

101:02

>> Really fast. And then Windows one will

101:04

genuinely take very long often.

101:07

>> So what would your solution be if we

101:10

didn't force people to update? cuz I

101:11

like I think part of the reason it works

101:13

so well for Linux is that Linux people

101:16

generally skew more techy.

101:18

>> I think I would be okay with it just

101:19

being an opt out. Can you do that on

101:21

Windows update?

101:22

>> Uh not forever. Eventually it will force

101:25

you to install especially security

101:27

updates.

101:28

>> Um and so so like what would be what if

101:31

Linux went more normie because that like

101:33

it's there's a there's a selection bias

101:35

in the people who are who are running

101:37

these operating systems. So I would

101:39

actually agree with you that right now

101:41

the approach on most mainstream Linux

101:43

distros is not a problem because

101:45

>> you're hoping that that kind of fades

101:47

over time.

101:48

>> Exactly.

101:48

>> So let's imagine that it does happen.

101:50

You want Linux to be forcing automatic

101:52

updates now.

101:53

>> So what well no what I'm asking you is

101:56

what's your solution then? Because I

101:58

think everyone I hope pretty much agrees

102:01

that a massive army of unpatched devices

102:04

is super super mega bad. Um, and I think

102:08

you guys know from administering even a

102:10

very tech-savvy company that people will

102:13

put off updates as long as humanly

102:15

possible, as often as humanly possible

102:17

once you get into the broader

102:19

population. So, what's your solution

102:20

then, I guess, is what I'm asking.

102:24

Um, I don't know that I necessarily have

102:26

one. On a business level, the businesses

102:28

can enforce updates. We enforce updates.

102:30

Um, on a personal level though, like I I

102:34

want control over my computer. Um,

102:36

>> I know you do,

102:39

but like my my aunt I think lost her

102:42

control over whether she's allowed to

102:44

decide to update privileges when she

102:46

decided not to update and and her

102:48

>> as like the the like family

102:50

administrator as it were. I think you

102:52

can make that choice. It's not that I

102:54

don't want the option for automatic

102:55

updates.

102:56

>> Sure.

102:57

>> It can even be in my opinion default on

103:00

which will mean that 90 plus% of people

103:02

are never going to turn it off. Well,

103:04

then I mean that's

103:05

>> I want the ability to control my

103:06

computer.

103:08

>> I know, but I'm not talking about you.

103:11

So, I feel like we're both kind of I

103:13

think we're both kind of talking each

103:14

other.

103:14

>> It could be default on though is what

103:16

I'm saying.

103:16

>> No, no. I I I get it. I just mean um h

103:21

like it's uh like like there like

103:24

there's two angles here because the the

103:26

problem here is that I agree with you. I

103:28

want to control my computer too. If I

103:30

say, "No, I'm actually in the middle of

103:32

something right now." And you rip away

103:34

control and take away my ability to do

103:37

something for 3 minutes, 5 minutes, 10

103:41

minutes,

103:42

>> sometimes a really long time. We were

103:43

literally in the middle of that Windows

103:46

tier list shoot and Jordan's computer

103:50

forced him to apply an update and it was

103:53

the computer that he was using for the

103:55

web-based like uh you can you can run

103:58

any version of Windows in a web browser

104:00

like like background that I had behind

104:02

me that we were changing with every

104:03

version of Windows and we had to pause

104:06

the bloody shoot because of Windows

104:07

updates.

104:08

>> We I mean we have this on W show all the

104:10

time. uh our our like Google sessions

104:13

will log us out cuz we only use these

104:15

once a week.

104:15

>> I can't agree with you more that I want

104:19

to control my computer

104:21

>> and I want to decide when I want to

104:23

update but that is kind of separate from

104:28

the conversation that I'm having which

104:30

is what is the broader solution so that

104:33

we don't have a giant army of insecure

104:37

computers. I think the product solution

104:38

is default on

104:39

>> default on and we just we hope that

104:42

people don't get they stay techsavvy

104:45

enough to they don't get techsavvy

104:48

enough to disable that while not getting

104:50

also techsavvy enough to understand that

104:52

they should update. We hope that

104:53

>> I genuinely think over 90% of people

104:55

will never even go to the control panel

104:57

option to do anything with it in the

104:58

first place.

104:59

>> I think that's probably I mean I look

105:03

95% of statistics are made up. Oh yeah.

105:06

Mine was extremely made up based on

105:09

>> however

105:10

>> stardust.

105:11

>> I suspect you're not that far off.

105:13

>> I think so.

105:14

>> I just I I'm fretting

105:16

>> because because to me the the risk of of

105:20

many many many

105:22

unsecured devices is is very scary.

105:26

>> Yeah. The risk of uh malware being able

105:29

to deploy that way is also scary though.

105:31

We just saw that with Linux. um the AUR

105:34

got compromised. Um if those updates

105:37

were forced down my throat, I'd be

105:38

pretty pissed about it. So like it's

105:40

it's the whole I don't remember exactly

105:41

how the phrase goes, but it's like if

105:43

you sacrifice liberty for security,

105:45

you'll have neither or whatever, blah

105:46

blah blah.

105:46

>> So apparently that gets misqued a lot.

105:48

So I'm going to make I'm going to I'm

105:50

going to help us get it right this time.

105:51

>> Let's see what it is.

105:52

>> If you something liberty, freedom, etc.

105:57

Uh, security.

105:59

Uh, security. You deserve neither. Like,

106:02

I can remember enough of the words that

106:04

I can kind of Okay, here we go. Um,

106:08

oh, okay. We've got an NPR article. Ben

106:10

Franklin's famous liberty safety quote

106:12

lost its context in the 21st century.

106:14

So, he he once said, "Those who would

106:17

give up essential liberty to purchase a

106:19

little temporary safety deserve neither

106:22

liberty nor safety." And this often

106:25

comes up. This is from NPR uh in the

106:27

context of new technology and concerns

106:29

about government surveillance. Um but

106:33

Benjamin Witz, senior fellow at the

106:35

Brookings Institute and editor of

106:37

Lawfair tells NPR's Robert Seagull that

106:39

it wasn't originally meant to mean what

106:41

most people think. Uh Franklin was

106:45

basically, and so he's paraphrasing

106:47

here, basically said those who would

106:49

trade privacy for a bit of security

106:51

deserve neither. Um what is the exact Oh

106:55

my. Okay. Well, this is a lot longer

106:57

unfortunately than

106:58

>> just like a conversation

106:59

>> I can read right now. Um, you know,

107:03

there's all these quotations. Think of

107:05

kill all the lawyers, right, from

107:06

Shakespeare.

107:08

Nobody really remembers what the

107:10

characters in question were saying at

107:11

that time. Okay. Uh, you know what? I'm

107:13

going to have to look at this again

107:14

later. I'm not going to take a stance on

107:16

on the quote for right now. I think

107:18

either way is basically my my point

107:20

whatever the heck the quote even is

107:22

there are

107:24

>> as we're literally talking about right

107:26

now ways that that can be used

107:28

maliciously

107:29

>> and I would like to be able to choose

107:30

how to defend myself. I do think for the

107:33

vast majority of people the right

107:34

approach is going to be automatic cord.

107:37

Oh, sorry. Go ahead. [laughter]

107:38

>> I I think I think I think for the vast

107:40

majority of people automatic UPDATES IS

107:42

RIGHT.

107:43

>> INTERNET'S OVER. I even think the

107:46

annoying persistence that Windows have

107:48

has might even be the right approach for

107:50

most people.

107:52

>> Sure.

107:53

>> That being said, if someone wants to go

107:55

in and try to do something manually to

107:58

change how their computer works, I think

107:59

they should be able to do so.

108:02

>> And it

108:03

>> Good luck everybody.

108:04

>> And there will be bad there. But there's

108:05

already bad, dude.

108:07

>> There's the

108:08

>> Luke, there's bad everywhere. the the

108:09

like that insane worm that's out there

108:11

that's controlling like a crazy amount

108:13

of computers right now.

108:14

>> Is that the one in RFK Junior's brain?

108:18

>> Dan was so ready for that.

108:20

>> Well, cuz I had the same joke. As soon

108:21

as you started [laughter] as soon as you

108:23

started that worm, I was like, "Here it

108:25

comes."

108:27

Um,

108:30

[snorts] let's see.

108:33

Uh,

108:43

let's see. Okay, Mind Paradox summarized

108:46

it. Thanks, Mind Paradox in float plane

108:48

chat. from the article. He was writing

108:51

about a tax dispute between the

108:53

Pennsylvania General Assembly and the

108:55

family of the Pens, the proprietary

108:58

family of the Pennsylvania colony who

109:00

ruled it from afar.

109:01

>> The proprietary family.

109:02

>> Yeah. Like like a

109:03

>> proprietary proprietor. Yeah.

109:04

>> Um the legislature was trying to tax the

109:07

Penn family lands to pay for frontier

109:10

defense during the French and Indian

109:12

War. And the Penn family kept

109:14

instructing the governor to veto.

109:16

Franklin felt that this was a great

109:18

affront to the ability of the

109:19

legislature to govern. And so he

109:22

actually meant purchase a little

109:25

temporary safety. Very literally, the

109:27

Penn family was trying to give a lump

109:29

sum of money in exchange for the general

109:31

assembly's acknowledging that it did not

109:32

have the authority to tax it. So, okay,

109:37

he didn't mean it like like just like

109:40

broadly necessarily. He was talking

109:42

about something very specific. I mean,

109:44

it's a it's a banger quote one way or

109:47

another, and it's a sentiment that even

109:50

outside of the context, I think

109:52

resonates with a lot of people. And

109:54

>> I think sometimes it can be taken too

109:55

far.

109:56

>> Uh uh yes,

109:58

>> pretty often maybe. But but I think in

110:01

like in in this case, uh I think

110:04

security vulnerabilities are are going

110:05

to security vulnerability and it it is

110:07

what it is. like the

110:09

the the that whole thing of like every

110:12

lock can be picked is just more true

110:15

than a lot of people are comfortable

110:16

with and every form of security can also

110:20

be used as offense is another thing that

110:22

people also need to be aware of and it's

110:24

just yeah I don't know I

110:29

uh the the shy halud uh worm that was

110:33

distributed through npm is also like

110:36

huge and terri ing and the the AUR hack

110:39

was huge and terrifying and these things

110:41

are like very real

110:42

>> and happening really fast right now.

110:45

>> Say it what you want about

110:46

>> and I don't think it's going to slow

110:47

down

110:48

>> useless, you know, AI search results or

110:50

whatever, but AI is definitely

110:54

making some stuff happen in terms of

110:57

security right now.

110:58

>> You know, you know how I said that I I

111:00

kind of like updating on Linux.

111:02

>> Yeah. Yeah.

111:02

>> Part of that process right now is in

111:03

Cache OS when I do the update, it will

111:06

read Arch News. It will check Arch News

111:09

to see if there's anything going on.

111:11

>> Oh yeah.

111:11

>> And if there's nothing going on, I'll be

111:14

okay. I'll update. I think it was

111:15

yesterday I checked like I'm going to do

111:19

some updates and it was like there's

111:20

some things happening in Arch News. I

111:22

didn't even look. I was just like never

111:24

mind [laughter]

111:26

everything's fine. I closed it. I'll

111:28

wait for that to resolve. I'll come back

111:30

soon.

111:31

>> [laughter]

111:32

>> we'll figure it out. Um, there are other

111:35

times where I've read it and then

111:36

decided from there if I want to move

111:38

forward or not, but in this particular

111:39

case, I was like I was going to be

111:42

leaving the computer shortly and was

111:43

like, I could run an update real quick

111:44

and then it was like, nah, I'll just do

111:46

that later. Uh, like that's really nice.

111:49

Windows does not do that. There has been

111:51

a lot of times where a Windows update

111:52

has gone out and the internet

111:54

collectively has been like, oh my god,

111:56

do not update to this. Um, and

111:59

>> it's been happening a lot. Yeah. And and

112:02

I really appreciate that that that level

112:04

of safeguard is there on the cachy side

112:06

where it's like

112:07

>> there's some news going on.

112:08

>> Yeah.

112:09

>> Here's the ways you can find it. You can

112:11

go read it, make your own decision, and

112:12

go from there. And the window side is

112:14

just like LA, have fun. Here's your

112:15

update. It might break everything.

112:17

>> I mean, yes and no. They do do them in a

112:19

rolling fashion. So they they don't

112:21

actually just go to everybody at once.

112:23

>> So it's a dice roll of whether or not

112:24

it's a

112:25

>> Sure [laughter] is.

112:27

I'm just I'm just It is better.

112:30

>> It is better. It's not perfect.

112:33

>> Russian roulette with production

112:35

hardware.

112:35

>> I just want to make sure that if we're

112:38

going to dunk on them, we are dunking on

112:40

them accurately. They deserve the dunk.

112:43

They just maybe didn't deserve that last

112:45

little bit of razledazzle. Okay, that's

112:47

that that's all I'm going to say about

112:49

it. It's extremely reasonable.

112:50

>> Catos linked this, which is actually

112:52

really cool. Windows patch scanner,

112:54

Windows update regression feed for CIS

112:56

admins. That's neat. This is probably

112:59

Dan. Uh, let me know what you think on

113:00

this one. This is probably one of the

113:02

most vibecoded looking websites I've

113:04

seen in a while.

113:05

>> I

113:05

>> Is that a Vista icon?

113:07

>> It is.

113:08

>> It is. It has all the like Telltale

113:11

design signs.

113:12

>> I don't really know anything about

113:15

vibecoded websites.

113:17

>> It's just different color palettes that

113:18

they use, different kind of like styles.

113:20

Yeah, that like orangey kind of

113:24

>> this is like give give me a web 3.0

113:27

Silicon Valley website.

113:28

>> Yeah,

113:29

>> which is a hacker focused and uses

113:31

terminal font

113:32

>> and Electrobot in chat said it's a nice

113:34

design. I'm not even pointing out the

113:36

design is bad. I think the design's

113:37

great. U if this isn't a vibecoded AI

113:42

designed website, then this website was

113:44

trained upon. I guarantee it because it

113:46

looks it looks really good.

113:47

>> I love this style. Yeah, I I think it

113:49

looks great personally, but it's just it

113:52

it immediately jumped out at me as like

113:53

the the way that they did the boxes, the

113:55

way they did they chose the color

113:56

palette and stuff like that. It's it's

113:58

either been heavily trained upon, which

114:00

is quite likely, or it's uh vibeed.

114:05

Yeah,

114:06

>> we should probably do a couple sponsors.

114:09

Uh first, our float plane announcement.

114:13

Luke gets cancelled on float plane this

114:15

week.

114:16

>> Nah. didn't happen.

114:18

>> It do. Is there any context for that or

114:21

should do I just need to

114:22

>> genuinely no idea.

114:23

>> Do do you have flow plane logged in?

114:26

Like Okay. Do you want to do that?

114:28

>> Do you want to show what I'm supposed to

114:30

be showing right now? Cuz I can't read

114:31

the notes. And also uh screen share.

114:34

>> Okay. It's going to take me a second cuz

114:36

I got to But I can get there.

114:38

>> He's cooking. Let him cook

114:39

>> cuz I'm logged into my account, not that

114:40

one.

114:41

>> But I can get there.

114:43

>> Can't you just open up the exclusives

114:45

tab?

114:45

>> Oh, it's already released. Yeah.

114:47

>> Oh, my bad.

114:48

>> Nice. Okay.

114:50

>> Oh, that's what he's talking about.

114:52

>> Okay. It's Sammy versus Luke where they

114:55

fight with tasers.

114:57

>> Yeah.

114:57

>> Which, um, is not something that I

115:00

personally would have approved on work

115:02

time

115:03

>> uh, as a work activity.

115:05

>> This is the same reason why I I I just

115:07

think the Windows update shouldn't be

115:09

automatic. You know, sometimes you just

115:10

you need to improve some things

115:12

yourself. We So, at Open Sauce,

115:15

>> is this what all the screaming was?

115:16

[laughter]

115:17

>> Maybe. At Open Sauce, they had taser

115:19

knife fights. Uh, so Sammy and I had a

115:21

taser knife fight. Uh, it was great.

115:25

>> Okay.

115:26

>> I don't know what part of the video it's

115:28

in.

115:30

>> Yeah, there was a lot of stuff at Open

115:32

Sauce that would not have passed the

115:34

safety checks to get into our office.

115:36

>> I thought Sammy had uh bought taser

115:38

knives. And you were doing this in like

115:40

the lab.

115:41

>> No. No. I would not put that.

115:42

>> Oh, yeah. There was also like a turret

115:44

that would lock on to your your junk and

115:47

try to shoot you in the junk. Uh

115:49

>> yeah.

115:50

>> Here. Yeah. When does it go?

115:56

>> Hey, at least you're wearing goggles.

115:58

>> Yeah. Yeah.

116:00

Yeah. Anyways, uh where's the

116:03

>> junk track? Junk.

116:04

>> Here we go. Here's the taser knife

116:06

fight. You don't get to see the whole

116:08

thing, but

116:10

um

116:12

it's like you're not allowed to kick,

116:13

Sammy. That's not really the point.

116:17

>> That's it. No more.

116:19

>> Um and there there's another there's

116:21

another one. Uh you get the full You get

116:23

the I Is it full uncut?

116:27

>> Uh it's 36 minutes. Might actually be

116:29

full uncut. Yeah, it ended up being a

116:32

whole saga trying to figure out if we

116:36

were getting high voltage, high wattage

116:39

output cuz in order to do 240 watts, the

116:43

float plane power brick um goes up to 48

116:47

volts.

116:48

>> The float plane power brick

116:49

>> does say float framework. Okay.

116:51

>> The framework power brick goes up to 48

116:53

volts. And we didn't have a voltmeter or

116:58

any way to put an ammeter in line or

117:01

even like uh like a kilowatt like a

117:04

wall-mounted power meter. We had

117:05

nothing. And the laptop itself was not

117:09

reporting the power correctly, which we

117:12

knew because we had like a total of I

117:15

think it was 150 watts of power

117:18

consumption between the CPU and GPU

117:19

alone. [snorts] Um, and it would say it

117:22

was charging at 20 watts and the total

117:25

power coming over the power brick was 65

117:28

watts, which

117:30

clearly does not actually add up. And so

117:34

it was a whole saga determining whether

117:36

or not an LT truepec cable was actually

117:41

working properly with Nurovv's laptop.

117:43

Um, so you've got you've got the whole

117:46

and there was like by the end of it

117:47

there was like probably 20 30 people

117:49

watching and the pressure was

117:50

>> I I didn't actually I ran into you a

117:54

couple times, but I didn't actually see

117:55

you doing this video in particular, but

117:57

I like heard about it

118:02

in in positive ways, but I just thought

118:04

it was really interesting cuz we've been

118:05

like, you know, passing ships at the

118:08

night at events for years.

118:10

>> Yeah, we don't actually see each other

118:11

at events almost at all. Not usually.

118:13

We're usually working on other things.

118:14

Even when we were both doing video

118:16

stuff, we'd probably even see each other

118:17

less.

118:18

>> Well, it was divide and conquer.

118:19

>> Yeah, exactly. So, like, but and like I

118:22

knew you were off doing things and we'd

118:23

maybe meet up at night for dinner or

118:25

something and check notes, but like

118:26

other than that, I never really heard

118:28

about what you were doing. I heard about

118:29

what you're doing at this event. I heard

118:31

other people talking about it, which was

118:34

just very interesting. Dude, that video

118:38

and the people that we went around and

118:40

talked to was the like I couldn't if I

118:44

went and I hired an amazing marketing

118:48

firm and gave them a giant bucket of

118:51

money and asked them to come up with use

118:54

cases and customer testimonial like

118:57

scenarios to help sell our product. They

119:00

they never would have come up with Did

119:03

you watch that video? I haven't seen the

119:05

whole I've skimmed through a couple

119:06

parts of it.

119:07

>> Have you watched the end with the

119:09

autonomous RC cars?

119:10

>> No.

119:11

>> Watch it.

119:12

>> I heard about that.

119:14

>> That's one of the things that I heard

119:15

about.

119:16

>> It like they're I'm trying to like close

119:20

out the video and they're sitting there

119:22

in the background going like, are you

119:24

guys seeing this? The latency is so much

119:26

lower. It it turned out that not only

119:28

did having a proper length cable, so

119:31

having less loss, um probably this is

119:34

the hypothesis for now, but having less

119:36

loss contribute to um less voltage drop,

119:40

which contributed to the the the real

119:42

sense camera running more stably, but

119:45

also the data rate was higher and also

119:50

also that we expected. The part we

119:52

didn't expect was when they switched to

119:54

our cable, their wireless started

119:56

working better because and Buddy was

119:59

talking about how a lot of the time um

120:02

like crappy unshielded USB or something

120:05

>> can actually emit broadspectctrum 2.4

120:08

GHz RF that can jam Wi-Fi.

120:12

And because of some other limitation in

120:15

their little autonomous car platform

120:17

that they were building, they had to use

120:19

wireless for one of the communication

120:21

links. And it turns out that they didn't

120:24

realize that part of their problem was

120:26

that the RF interference maybe, this is

120:29

the hypothesis, we don't know this for

120:31

sure yet, but was jamming it because as

120:33

soon as we put in our cable,

120:35

>> it just started working. Um, and we're

120:38

using a bit of a different style of

120:40

construction. Not that it's not to spec,

120:42

it's to it's true spec. It's to spec,

120:44

but it's like a more expensive coaxial

120:47

cable rather than a than a traditionally

120:49

constructed cable. That's part of why

120:50

they're so thick.

120:52

>> Yeah. And we've been making an argument

120:53

forever that they're not for every

120:55

single application under the sun. But

120:56

this is a that's a cool argument of like

120:59

there was a tangible benefit for it in

121:01

that situation. That's cool.

121:02

>> Yeah. So, I already told the shorts team

121:04

and I told uh Dave from CW, I was like,

121:07

"Y'all need to get that content. Y'all

121:09

need to chop it up. Y'all need to get it

121:11

out there because I I literally I

121:14

couldn't write a [clears throat] better

121:15

endorsement for the product than that.

121:17

That's crazy.

121:17

>> Here's a Here's a derailment for a

121:19

second. What did you think? Cuz I've

121:20

been singing open sourc's praises for

121:22

years, but you've never been before.

121:25

What do you think?

121:25

>> It's super fun.

121:26

>> Yeah, it's amazing event.

121:27

>> Yeah, it was like I am not sure if I

121:30

understand the economics of it.

121:32

>> No.

121:32

>> And I hope that that's not a problem for

121:35

them. I like sincerely because it is

121:38

like maker mecca man like incredible. If

121:42

you are a I I don't think I could

121:45

endorse open sauce enough. If you are a

121:48

creator type like tech tech curious uh

121:52

or or you want like somewhere to just

121:54

take your kids man to get them inspired

121:57

about STEM and and creating and just

122:00

building something

122:02

>> rocketry robotics

122:03

>> think

122:04

>> textiles clothing

122:05

>> I don't think there's a better place

122:06

that you could take them I don't think

122:08

there's a a better place that you could

122:10

go that I've seen

122:12

>> woodworking metal working hacking

122:13

>> everything everything I mean Buddy

122:15

>> you can make a thing

122:16

>> Buddy built a VR headset with CRT

122:19

displays. Did you see that?

122:21

>> No.

122:21

>> You missed that?

122:22

>> I I missed a lot of stuff.

122:23

>> That's tragic. I missed a lot.

122:25

>> You know those little handheld TVs with

122:27

the little antenna and everything? So,

122:29

those those really old ones had CRTs in

122:31

them.

122:32

>> So, Buddy took two of them,

122:34

>> disassembled them, and made a VR

122:36

headset. Why? Because he could.

122:39

[laughter]

122:40

>> I saw a booth where they they took uh

122:43

what was it like

122:47

classified nuclear documents or

122:49

something and turn them into candy.

122:53

>> Sorry, what?

122:54

>> They they they would let like some form

122:56

of mold like eat it and then they they

123:00

just kept doing this like multiple

123:02

chemical processes and then just

123:03

eventually turn it into a sour candy. I

123:06

don't remember the exactly how it works.

123:08

I think it's in

123:08

>> Sounds like a Nile Red video.

123:10

>> Yeah, I think it's in that full plane

123:11

exclusive. I'm not sure that it is. I

123:13

know we filmed it for that, but I don't

123:15

know if it actually ended up um in the

123:18

video or not. But yeah, just

123:21

I don't know. Who knows? Just crazy

123:23

stuff. U they had like examples of what

123:26

the candy was supposed to taste like

123:28

there. They didn't have um the the

123:31

actual like nuclear secret candy, but

123:33

they showed how they did the process. Um

123:36

and I talked to Oh, it didn't end up in

123:38

the video, unfortunately. Damn. Okay. I

123:40

I talked to them for a while about like

123:42

like Okay. So, it's it's an inspiration

123:46

of it that you did make yourself is here

123:48

to try. I will try one of those. Cool. I

123:50

will take unlabeled candy from a

123:52

stranger. Uh that was silly, but

123:54

whatever. And I tried it and was like,

123:56

"All right, this tastes like slightly

123:58

odd candy. Sounds good. How did the

124:00

Nuclear Secrets candy taste?" And he was

124:02

like, "Kind of terrible. [laughter]

124:05

It was really really sour like right off

124:08

the hop and then it was just like after

124:11

that it's like yeah okay that makes

124:12

sense. Okay. It's like mold excrement

124:14

sour candy. [laughter]

124:19

Not exactly what you're probably aiming

124:21

for. Uh but they talked about like the

124:25

stuff they had to go through to learn

124:26

how to do that and it's very

124:27

interesting. They also had a VR headset

124:30

that was um like AI powered IRL ad

124:34

block. So you walk around with a quest

124:37

on and if it thinks the thing that it's

124:39

looking at is ad block it'll like blur

124:41

it out or something. I don't remember

124:42

what it actually did.

124:43

>> So tell me this. You're on the Vegas

124:44

strip. There's a big van with girls

124:47

girls on the side.

124:49

>> Do you just not see it? And it

124:51

>> Yeah, probably.

124:52

>> Okay, just checking.

124:53

>> Yeah, they they were also saying like I

124:54

don't know. It's some crappy little

124:55

model. So, like the the the the chick

124:58

that worked at the booth had a shirt on

125:00

and she was like, "Yeah, it thinks it's

125:01

an ad for some reason." It like totally

125:03

wasn't. It was just some pattern.

125:04

>> I mean, a lot of shirts are ads.

125:06

>> This one wasn't though. It was just, you

125:08

know, some some pattern. Uh, very

125:10

interesting booth to hang out at. Man,

125:12

there's a lot of really cool stuff. The

125:13

taser knife fighting was like amazing.

125:16

So much fun to watch. Just how everyone

125:19

would fight in like different ways. And

125:21

>> how much did it hurt compared to uh when

125:24

we had the dog collars? Oh, did Sammy

125:26

never even hit you?

125:28

>> You didn't You weren't curious. You

125:30

didn't try it on yourself.

125:31

>> I didn't bother.

125:31

>> I'm actually really surprised. I I'm I'm

125:34

actually a little disappointed.

125:36

>> I thought he was going to get me.

125:38

>> I I just I'm I'm I'm a little

125:40

disappointed that you hit yourself to

125:42

the point where I got him in the leg one

125:43

time. When you get someone in the leg,

125:45

you have to start hopping on the other

125:46

leg and he was like, "Oh, you should

125:48

make it fair." And I like

125:50

>> sacrificed my own leg. But you didn't

125:52

touch yourself. No,

125:54

>> I'm I'm just I'm kind of let down.

125:55

>> I wanted I wanted the surprise of

125:58

getting hit and then I just

126:00

>> You'll have to watch the footage. The

126:01

guy running the thing said we were one

126:03

of the most entertaining duo he had the

126:05

whole event.

126:06

>> And that was like

126:08

later on on the Sunday, I think. Is that

126:12

accurate? Is that accurate?

126:14

>> What day were you there? Saturday.

126:16

>> I was there Saturday.

126:16

>> Later on on the Saturday,

126:17

>> I I found out that I wasn't on the site.

126:20

There was a while when there like people

126:22

were lined up to do selfies.

126:23

>> I don't think you were like a speaker or

126:25

anything.

126:26

>> Uh, okay.

126:27

>> I think I think you go on the site if

126:28

you're doing like a panel because then

126:30

there is like a meet and greet thing

126:33

>> and stuff.

126:33

>> Oh, cuz I I wasn't sure if I was

126:36

supposed to be. I was like, well, I I

126:37

don't know. I I I I have a badge. I'm

126:39

here. But I I was just standing in in

126:41

one of the halls and there was like a

126:43

lineup to get selfies or whatever. And

126:46

like there was a point there was like a

126:48

period for a while where

126:51

two out of every three people were like

126:53

I didn't know you were going to be here.

126:54

I'm like did you not hear the last per

126:56

you were standing right there when the

126:58

last person said that to me but people

127:00

would they just walked up and said

127:01

exactly the same thing every time. Like

127:03

well here I am.

127:04

>> I just thought it was funny

127:06

>> honestly.

127:08

Yeah. I'm a little disappointed too. I

127:11

think after we were done the fight, I

127:13

had

127:14

gotten him in a particular way that I

127:16

was busy apologizing for, which you'd

127:18

have to watch the video to go see. Nice.

127:20

>> Um, but it was the balls.

127:22

>> I was I think balls are tainted.

127:24

>> I think I was [laughter]

127:27

>> I think I [clears throat] think I was

127:29

focused on apologizing for that and just

127:30

never really thought about it. But yeah,

127:32

I wanted it to be like kind of a

127:33

surprise. I didn't want I didn't want to

127:35

just cuz I think he had

127:37

>> had he demoed it before? No, I don't

127:39

know. I don't remember. But yeah, I was

127:41

expecting it to be a surprise. Um, yeah,

127:44

it was fun. Uh, also was really cool.

127:47

NASA was there. NASA had an actual full

127:50

booth. They brought heat shield samples

127:52

from Artemis 1 and Artemis 2 to show the

127:54

difference between like the entry skip

127:56

versus the the through and through and

127:58

how that affected the the the heat

128:00

shields. They had an actual moon rock.

128:02

>> Um, what?

128:03

>> So, I said like, "Wow, this is the

128:05

closest I've ever been to the moon." And

128:07

then I got corrected is the closest the

128:09

moon has ever been to me.

128:12

Interesting

128:13

>> thinking. Hold on. I'm going to get

128:15

there.

128:16

>> Oh, secondhand embarrassment.

128:19

>> Closest the moon has ever been to me.

128:21

>> That's really cool. Okay.

128:22

>> The argument was that in this scenario,

128:25

I was the one with more mass.

128:27

>> Right. That makes sense

128:29

>> because it was just a little rock, not

128:31

the whole. Uh they also had a wind

128:34

tunnel model of the Orion capsule and

128:38

they talked about like the difficulties

128:40

of doing scaled models in wind tunnels

128:42

because the smaller you get the tighter

128:44

the tolerances get,

128:45

>> right?

128:46

>> And like how insane that can get.

128:48

>> I'm like I mean is is there a certain

128:50

point where the size of the model

128:52

relative to like the size of an air

128:54

molecule matters?

128:57

>> It didn't sound like it.

128:58

>> Okay.

128:58

>> There was a couple questions going back

129:00

and forth. I I hope I didn't get that

129:01

wrong. But there was um

129:05

so NASA gave Luke a massive correction.

129:09

That's pretty funny. That's a good one.

129:11

>> They also moved him.

129:14

>> Um but yeah, no, like one of the things

129:16

he was saying was they had done all

129:19

these different wind tunnel tests and

129:20

then on Artemis one it was fine, but

129:24

there was anomaly detected during the

129:26

launch and they were surprised by it.

129:28

They took it back to the wind tunnel,

129:29

tried to recreate that exact scenario,

129:32

were able to recreate the problem, came

129:34

up with a solution, tested it a bunch,

129:36

implemented it for Artemis 2. Problem

129:38

solved.

129:39

>> That's pretty cool.

129:40

>> Pretty sick.

129:42

>> Pretty sick.

129:43

>> I I learned about an uh they have an

129:45

arcjet that they test the heat shielding

129:48

for

129:49

>> and hearing some of the like specs for

129:51

the arcjet was crazy. It's like a plasma

129:54

cutter, but instead of like a little

129:55

dot, it's like a freaking pipe.

129:58

It's [laughter] just wild. He was

130:00

talking about like the air intake that

130:01

they use for it, which is apparently uh

130:04

the way he was describing it, it sounded

130:05

like it was basically the side of a

130:07

building. Um,

130:09

crazy. I don't know. I want to look more

130:11

into that stuff.

130:15

>> Let me see if I can find um

130:19

Okay. Anyway, there are a ton of other

130:21

booths like Hot Dog Racing and Real

130:23

Steel the Movie IRL. All of which are

130:25

exactly what they sound like. Uh, you

130:27

can go cancel Luke at lmg.gg/fpan

130:30

or over on our YouTube members. Now I'm

130:32

supposed to do sponsors.

130:36

Uh, Dan wants me to do all four. I'm

130:38

going to leave it up to float plane

130:40

chat. Okay. You guys can tell Dan if

130:41

that's okay or not.

130:42

>> Yeah. Do you want an un uninterrupted

130:44

rest of the show or do you want me to

130:46

break it up later?

130:47

>> By the way, I think I'm mistaking the

130:49

intake for the arcjet and the intake for

130:51

the win tunnel.

130:52

>> All right. Win tunnel intakes.

130:53

>> Okay. Most of float plane is saying get

130:56

all four out of the way now. All four.

130:59

Do three. Ooh, I like that. That's

131:02

pretty funny.

131:02

>> Oh, that feels gross. Why don't I like

131:04

that?

131:05

>> Uh, all right. Okay. All right. Sure. Mo

131:08

most of Float Plane Chat says do all

131:10

four. Okay, let's do it. The show is

131:11

brought to you by Shocks.

131:13

>> You shouldn't have to choose between

131:14

listening to the new Madonna album or

131:16

hearing your boss invite you to the

131:17

company barbecue. With Shocks, you don't

131:20

have to. They're open dots, too. Clip

131:22

over the ear canal. clip or their open

131:24

dots, too. Clip over the ear canal

131:26

rather than going directly in or

131:27

covering your entire ear, so you get a

131:29

comfortable fit that keeps you in tune

131:31

with your surroundings, whether that's

131:32

at the gym or at work, while still

131:34

providing clear quality audio. This is

131:37

thanks to Shocks's base 2.0 with Dolby,

131:41

a spherical acoustic system that's built

131:43

around two custom 11.8 mm drivers that

131:46

perform like a single 16 mm one. And

131:48

because they've been designed to

131:50

essentially clip onto your ears, there's

131:52

no dedicated left bud or right bud.

131:54

They're totally interchangeable. And the

131:56

Open Dots 2 will automatically detect

131:58

left from right when outputting sound.

131:59

Oh, that's kind of cool. You'll get 10

132:01

hours of playback on a single charge or

132:02

up to 40 hours with the case. And with

132:04

fast charging, 5 minutes plugged in will

132:07

net you two whole hours of music. That's

132:09

roughly into the groove on repeat 30

132:11

whole times. uh you use our link to go

132:15

grab yourself a pair just in time for

132:17

that company barbecue. Use code when at

132:19

checkout to get $15 off as well. So

132:22

that's that QR code right there. The

132:24

show is also brought to you by

132:26

Squarespace. Whether

132:29

you're trying to start a business,

132:31

promote your music, or start up an

132:34

underwater hockey club.

132:37

>> What?

132:40

What is this? Is this real?

132:44

>> It doesn't look like AI.

132:45

>> I think it's underwater polo.

132:48

Or is that something completely?

132:49

>> No, that's definitely a hockey pug.

132:51

>> Really?

132:52

>> Almost certainly. Look at it.

132:55

It's like a green hockey pug.

132:58

>> Okay,

132:58

>> that's crazy. And they're playing with

132:59

like butter knives or something. What am

133:01

I looking at here? Okay, the point is

133:02

>> you got to get some of this stuff.

133:04

>> An easy to navigate website is

133:06

important. With Squarespace, you'll have

133:08

everything you need to build a great

133:10

website without the fuss or confusion.

133:12

You don't even need to know how to code.

133:14

You just need to know how to drag and

133:16

drop. You can piggyback off of one of

133:18

several templates or use Squarespace's

133:20

design intelligence tool by answering a

133:22

couple of prompts to create something

133:24

unique. They even help with things like

133:25

SEO to ensure that your website is

133:27

easier to discover. If something isn't

133:29

working, you can use data that they

133:31

provide to make any needed adjustments

133:33

to your page. On top of that, you'll get

133:34

real-time updates about website traffic,

133:36

revenue, sales, so you can make better

133:38

decisions for your business. And as I'm

133:41

sure that our listeners know well, we've

133:44

used Squarespace for many years for our

133:46

aligned media.com website. So, if you're

133:48

ready to dive in, build your website

133:50

today and get 10% off your first

133:52

purchase by visiting squarespace.com/w.

133:56

The show is brought to you by XSplit.

133:58

Streaming can seem like a lot of fun,

134:00

even if the field feels heavily

134:03

saturated. But there's no better way to

134:04

learn than by well, just jumping in. Our

134:07

sponsor, XSplit, gets you right into it

134:09

with tools for recording and streaming

134:11

on the most popular platforms like

134:12

YouTube and [music] Twitch. And if you

134:14

want to add a little more character to a

134:15

stream or a presentation, you can choose

134:18

from several preset layouts and

134:19

transitions to keep [music] your

134:21

audience engaged. They use a

134:23

customizable drag and drop interface,

134:25

too, so you can resize gameplay or

134:26

camera footage based on what you think

134:28

is most important to your video. And

134:30

Premium offers a ton of extra tools like

134:32

watermark removal, multiplatform [music]

134:34

streaming, and higher resolutions.

134:36

There's even beginnerfriendly editing

134:38

and mixing tools that are built [music]

134:39

right into the platform. So, go to

134:41

lmg.gg/xsplitwan

134:44

or use our link in the description or

134:46

scan this QR code to get 30% off your

134:48

first purchase or subscription with code

134:50

WAN show30. I mean, what's the worst

134:52

that could happen? You have some fun and

134:54

make some friends. Actually, that does

134:56

sound terrible. Do I have to make the

134:57

friends?

134:58

>> No. Nice. You're okay.

135:00

>> Finally, the show is brought to you by

135:01

AMD. It's AMD ultimate tech upgrade

135:04

time. And this month, it was our product

135:06

designer, Robert Laauo's turn. Not only

135:08

was there a secret prototype in the

135:11

video, but for his upgrade, he got a new

135:13

espresso machine floor mats, a new seat

135:14

for his bike, PC that can play Excel at

135:16

60 fps, and even a welding lesson.

135:19

That's right. We got to weld something,

135:20

Luke. [music] It was pretty cool.

135:22

>> Nice.

135:23

>> And if you want a giveaway of your own,

135:25

check out the link in this week's video

135:29

or on tonight's show for a chance to win

135:32

one of two power color Redevil AMD

135:34

Radeon RX970 XT GPUs.

135:38

Uh Luke, as you know, AMD always gives

135:41

us a topic to discuss and uh so here it

135:44

is. With modern GPUs leaning harder into

135:46

features like upscaling and frame

135:48

generation to deliver smoother gameplay,

135:50

are we entering an era where the best

135:53

GPU is defined more by software versus

135:56

raw performance alone?

135:58

>> Was this this was AMD's question?

136:00

>> I doubt it, but uh I guess that's where

136:02

we're at. I don't make the rules. That's

136:04

what's in there. And as you know, I'm

136:07

not going to tell you to say anything

136:08

you don't want to say. So,

136:10

>> no, I know.

136:10

>> Yeah.

136:12

>> Luke, what do you think? How should

136:14

people weigh native performance versus

136:16

the real world experience with these

136:18

features enabled?

136:19

>> Wow. Uh

136:23

[sighs]

136:24

I think it somewhat depends on.

136:25

>> Keep in mind AMD is never going to give

136:27

you an upgrade. So what do you owe them?

136:29

>> Yeah, true.

136:30

>> Are you eligible? I can't remember.

136:31

>> Technically, yes.

136:32

>> Oh, are you now? Okay. Well, then they

136:33

might.

136:34

>> I

136:34

>> So tread carefully. No.

136:36

>> No. Uh sorry. Um I think it depends on

136:40

the type of games you're playing or the

136:42

applications you're using it for.

136:44

Oh, Dan, someone said the AMD link is

136:46

broken. Do you mind answering that

136:48

>> dodging?

136:49

>> Uh, sure.

136:50

>> Thanks, Dan.

136:52

>> But yeah, I mean, it it depends if

136:54

you're trying to play uh some game that

136:59

super highly benefits from just like,

137:02

you know, Frame Gen 4X, whatever, then

137:05

you're going to want the software

137:07

features. If you're not, then maybe you

137:09

won't.

137:09

>> How would you define a game that

137:10

benefits from that? Because no matter

137:12

what game it is, if you're running frame

137:15

gen at 4x for instance, you you will be

137:20

um

137:22

generating a lot of frames that do not

137:24

come with the the latency benefit of

137:26

actually rendering more frames.

137:30

>> I don't know. I would assume uh you know

137:34

I don't know train simulator.

137:38

>> Train sim Oh, okay. So, you're talking

137:41

games where there actually is straight

137:44

up less real-time interactivity and you

137:48

could benefit from just much smoother

137:50

animations,

137:52

even if it does come at the cost of some

137:54

latency.

137:55

>> Yeah.

137:55

>> Okay. And then I I'm going to throw in

137:57

on the other side, if you have a pretty

137:58

decent base frame rate already, adding a

138:01

little bit of frame gen,

138:05

[sighs]

138:05

>> I generally don't do it.

138:06

>> I'm still not doing much,

138:07

>> but it's not that bad. I'm 4080. I'm

138:10

still not doing much. Pretty strong

138:11

card.

138:13

Not really needed.

138:14

>> I think that's um

138:18

I I I mean I think the answer I think

138:20

the answer is simple. It's like both

138:22

both. Yes, both.

138:23

>> That's why I kind of said like it

138:24

depends on your games, depends on what

138:26

you're playing, depends on what you need

138:27

it for.

138:27

>> You're going to need raw perform. I

138:29

mean, we're seeing this as

138:30

>> depends on operating system to a certain

138:32

degree. They said uh that I think the

138:34

question was specifically around

138:35

software, but I think compatibility and

138:38

ease of use comes in under the software

138:40

umbrella. If I can throw AMD a bone,

138:43

most of the people I know that are

138:44

having a better time switching to Linux

138:46

right now are running AMD cards.

138:47

>> Um I have a lot of the problems that

138:50

I've had switching to Linux is the fact

138:51

that I'm running a 4080. Um it's

138:53

directly tied into the Nvidia drivers

138:56

and the issues that that come with that.

138:58

Um, I know this was a problem for uh

139:01

Forza where I was trying to figure out

139:03

why the heck I couldn't play Forza on

139:04

Linux very easily and then I was talking

139:06

to multiple other people that were all

139:07

having no problem with it

139:09

>> and ended up figuring out that all of

139:11

those people were running AMD cards uh

139:14

and it seems to be a consistent problem.

139:16

So that might play into it. A lot of

139:18

people are moving over to Linux. At the

139:20

same time, the software solutions on the

139:22

Nvidia side seem really strong right

139:24

now. And if you want framework gen, if

139:26

you want DLSS, if you want that stuff,

139:28

that stuff is really strong on green

139:29

team.

139:30

>> The latest FSR is getting better. Um,

139:32

and but I also think that that's one way

139:34

that our discussion question was almost

139:36

uh like incomplete because

139:40

running the newest models of upscaling

139:44

uh does require faster hardware. So you

139:46

you are going to need both and not not

139:50

just you know compute units like your

139:52

more your more traditional um like like

139:55

render cores you're also going to need

139:57

um like machine dedicated machine

140:00

learning acceleration

140:02

um dedicated ray tracing hardware. Say

140:05

what you want about you know whether you

140:07

like ray tracing or not. It's not going

140:08

anywhere. It's here to stay and you're

140:11

going to need dedicated acceleration for

140:12

that too. It's going to have to be a

140:14

combination. So

140:16

>> rest rest rest rest rest rest rest rest

140:16

rest rest rest rest rest rest rest rest

140:16

rest rest rest rest rest rest rest rest

140:16

rest rest rest rest rest rest rest rest

140:16

rest rest rest rest rest rest rest rest

140:16

rest ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass

140:16

ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass

140:16

ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass

140:16

ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass

140:16

assured plane chat said I got a 9070 XT

140:19

and my issues went away on Linux Last of

140:21

Us was unplayable on Nvidia. So like

140:24

>> there's a lot of it depends on your

140:26

setup, it depends on your use case, it

140:28

depends on the games, the applications,

140:30

all that kind of stuff. Um I think it

140:33

varies more right now than a lot of

140:35

times whatever uh than a lot of times in

140:38

the past uh because of Linux being much

140:40

more viable for a wider amount of

140:44

people. depends on your mom. You know

140:45

what else depends on your mom?

140:47

>> Uh, underwater hockey is totally a

140:49

thing.

140:50

>> Really?

140:51

>> Oh, yeah. Uh, Turkey beats Great Britain

140:55

6 years ago. So, it's before this would

140:57

have been generatable.

140:59

>> 800,000 views.

141:01

>> Um, yep.

141:03

>> Was that an ad?

141:04

>> That was an ad.

141:05

>> Nice ad for a screwdriver. I think

141:06

>> Why did it just freeze?

141:08

>> Uh, okay. All right. Yeah, they do be

141:12

playing. There's a club in Vancouver

141:16

called the Ninjas. Yeah.

141:18

>> No way. So you have fins. So you're like

141:21

ripping

141:21

>> really fast. Actually,

141:26

>> there's a bunch of people in the

141:27

audience

141:28

>> watching this as an audience in an

141:30

arena. Must [laughter] be nuts.

141:37

>> This is crazy. Apparently there's like a

141:40

a decent amount of contact that's

141:41

allowed even like Yeah, they just ran

141:43

into each other. Like apparently it's

141:45

like not uh not a super passive sport.

141:49

Uh I was reading that the 3D elements of

141:52

it get really interesting cuz like you

141:54

can be you can think you're on a

141:56

breakaway but someone can come from like

141:57

above you and check you.

142:00

>> Right. But c can can you

142:01

>> strange can you juggle and if you flip

142:04

then can you touch it again and then be

142:06

able to boost again? Like is it

142:08

>> rocket [laughter] launcher

142:11

>> underwater?

142:12

>> I don't know. My son was explaining it

142:13

to me at some point like you can do a

142:15

reset or something so that you can like

142:17

go against. Sure. Yeah.

142:18

>> Yeah. Yeah.

142:19

>> Uh all right. [snorts]

142:21

>> This is crazy.

142:23

>> I eat plastic says it's the closest

142:25

thing we have to actual Quidditch.

142:30

Now you just need like uh uh like I

142:34

don't know a tiny little tiny little sea

142:36

entity that one person has to go try to

142:39

catch and if they catch it every single

142:41

other thing that happened in the entire

142:42

game is completely irrelevant.

142:44

[laughter]

142:44

>> Yeah.

142:46

[gasps]

142:46

Yeah.

142:49

The whole Quidditch thing was very

142:51

distracting for me in the Harry Potter

142:53

verse.

142:55

>> [snorts]

142:55

>> Someone told me at some point that

142:58

Rowling like hated sports and

143:00

intentionally made a sport that was

143:02

stupid because like the point was that

143:05

sports are stupid. I'm not sure if I

143:06

believe that though.

143:08

>> I don't care.

143:11

Is Quidditch intentionally stupid?

143:15

I'm uh Oh.

143:18

Uh yes. AI says JK Rowling intentionally

143:22

designed Quidditch to be frustrating and

143:24

absurd as a direct subversion of logical

143:27

sports culture. [snorts]

143:29

>> Cool.

143:30

>> Uh,

143:32

okay.

143:32

>> Good job. You really stuck it to him.

143:35

Nobody does a sport anymore.

143:40

She wanted to create a sport that would

143:42

deliberately infuriate men who cared

143:44

deeply about the rigid statistics and

143:46

logical scoring systems of real world

143:48

sports. Um, and then and then the men

143:52

made Quidditch in real life and gave it

143:54

better rules and get freaking [laughter]

143:57

owned.

144:02

Get dunked on [laughter]

144:05

Elbo Bozo. Uh anyways,

144:13

>> [snorts]

144:13

>> uh speaking of getting dunked on, India

144:17

finded HP $14.4 million for rigging

144:20

government bids and fixing ink and toner

144:22

prices. Jeez. Wow. Uh India's

144:25

Competition Commission hit HP India with

144:29

that fine that we just mentioned across

144:31

two separate rulings. one covering PCs,

144:33

laptops, desktops, workstations,

144:35

accessories, the other one covering

144:37

printer supplies, ink, toner,

144:39

consumables. The scheme ran on the

144:41

government e marketplace from 2017 to

144:44

2020, where HP coordinated with its

144:47

resellers to pre-arrange bids and submit

144:49

fake cover bids, making tenders look

144:52

competitive, while a prepicked HP

144:55

partner won and taxpayers overpaid. The

145:00

strange part is that HP India reported

145:02

the whole thing itself.

145:04

Huh. It filed under India's leniency

145:07

program, basically self snitching before

145:09

regulators had any evidence, hoping to

145:12

get full immunity. Uh, really? The

145:15

investigation that followed turned up

145:17

WhatsApp chats, emails, and even a 2019

145:19

video from a reseller meeting laying out

145:21

who would submit fake bids and who

145:24

should win each contract. HP's defense

145:27

was that it wasn't the mastermind just

145:30

commercially forced

145:32

into propping up the scheme because its

145:35

own ink prices were so high that

145:37

resellers were threatening to switch to

145:38

cheaper counterfeit products.

145:41

>> Okay, so HP I think I found the part

145:43

where you screwed up.

145:46

>> It even wrote in its filing that it

145:48

humbly objects to being called the

145:50

kingpin of the arrangement. The

145:52

commission called it a cartel anyway and

145:56

named HP India as the central architect.

146:00

So it got a partial penalty cut for

146:02

coming forward but was denied the full

146:04

immunity it wanted.

146:05

>> This story is so funny.

146:08

>> I just I I saw the headline and I was

146:10

like moderately interesting

146:13

>> and then I read even a couple minutes

146:15

further into it and I was like

146:17

>> what?

146:17

>> Meanwhile in India what? Sorry, what's

146:20

going on?

146:22

We object to be calling the kingpin, but

146:24

I guess you can call us uh you know the

146:27

central architect. Uh that would that

146:29

would be fine.

146:29

>> And cartel

146:30

>> and the the central architect of the

146:32

cartel. That's okay. We just don't want

146:33

to be called the kingpin

146:35

>> that's associated with a villain in the

146:37

in the Marvel universe over Speaking of

146:39

legal trouble, just weeks after Dbrand

146:42

had to kill its companion cube case over

146:44

the Valve um intellectual property

146:49

problem, a printables user named Jiren

146:53

rebuilt the whole thing from scratch as

146:55

a free 3D printable project and it is

146:58

already passed 10,000

147:02

downloads. He worked entirely off of

147:04

photos of Dbrand's design, used none of

147:07

Dbrand's files, and put up 39 files for

147:10

assembly videos in a full parts list

147:12

down to the screws and magnets. It is

147:14

doable on a single extruder uh single

147:17

extruder printer with filament swaps.

147:19

And he has since added prepainted files

147:21

for multiolor printers. There's even a

147:24

plain weighted storage cube variant if

147:27

you just want the version without the

147:28

heart. Dbrand got shut down for using

147:31

Valve's IP without permission. And now

147:33

this recreation is based on Dbrand's

147:35

design without Dbrand's permission.

147:39

>> That's pretty funny.

147:41

That's it.

147:43

And because there's no commercial

147:44

endeavor here, um Valve is extremely

147:48

unlikely to do anything unless Buddy

147:50

starts charging for the files or

147:52

something like that.

147:52

>> It doesn't look like he is right now. I

147:54

was wondering about that.

147:55

>> Are you Are you on it right now? Yeah.

147:56

Okay. Here. Here you go, guys. You can

147:58

have a look at him. How cool is that?

147:59

>> I mean, it looks awesome.

148:00

>> Looks freaking awesome. Yeah, it does.

148:03

That's amazing,

148:05

man. I just I love

148:09

the maker community and 3D printing

148:12

community and just the the the way

148:15

people so selflessly give of their own

148:17

time so that other people can just have

148:19

a little bit more joy. How cool is that?

148:22

>> Yeah. Like out of 10,

148:27

>> I think genuinely 10. What else would be

148:29

a 10? What What do we What What are some

148:32

some

148:33

>> puppies?

148:34

>> 10.

148:35

>> Yeah, puppies are a 10.

148:37

>> Yeah, I think this is a 10.

148:38

>> Yeah, I think it's on par with puppies.

148:40

>> Yeah,

148:40

>> that's why Open Sauce is so awesome.

148:42

>> Yeah, cuz everyone there is just this.

148:45

>> Yeah.

148:45

>> Yeah.

148:46

>> Amazing.

148:46

>> Okay, but tell me this though. What if

148:50

Open Sauce had puppies? Can you exceed

148:52

10?

148:53

>> Did you miss the puppy room?

148:55

>> Shut up. There's no puppy room. Was

148:56

there a puppy room?

148:57

>> I I don't think so.

148:58

>> Oh, stop.

148:59

>> They're 3D printed.

149:00

>> This guy [laughter]

149:02

3D printed puppies. Um,

149:05

>> what if it was both? There you go. Open-

149:09

source puppies.

149:10

>> Um,

149:11

>> you wouldn't download a puppy.

149:12

>> Okay, this is cool. Speaking of makers

149:16

and STEM, Northwestern University

149:18

engineers have unveiled Phantom Twist.

149:21

Uh Luke, do you want to bring up the

149:23

video of it taking off?

149:24

>> Sure. One sec.

149:25

>> A drone that makes itself roughly 10

149:28

times harder to see than a same-sized

149:30

quadcopter by spinning its entire body

149:34

15 to 25 times per second.

149:37

It debuted

149:39

July 16th at the Robotics Science and

149:42

Systems Conference in Sydney.

149:44

>> Jeez.

149:45

>> And in flight, it kind of dissolves into

149:49

a faint semi-transparent smudge.

149:53

>> And remember guys, we're looking at it

149:55

now against like dark high contrast

150:00

objects. This is like the worst case

150:03

scenario. If this thing was in the sky,

150:05

just like up against the blue in the

150:08

dazzling light of the sun, I do not know

150:12

how you could see it.

150:14

The way it works is the body spins or

150:18

sorry, the body sits still while only

150:19

the Oh, sorry. The way it works is it

150:22

has one motor and one propeller. The

150:25

prop spins one way and the entire rest

150:28

of the aircraft counterrotates the other

150:31

way. So no part of it ever holds still.

150:35

It stays stable through the gyroscopic

150:37

effect and steers by varying its motor

150:41

thrust mid rotation.

150:43

>> People are commenting that apparently

150:46

it's like super loud.

150:48

>> It's super loud.

150:48

>> But

150:49

>> but if it was high enough, it wouldn't

150:50

matter.

150:51

>> Fly higher.

150:52

>> According to the researcher's paper, the

150:54

disappearing act works because of the

150:56

persistence of human vision. Our eyes

150:58

accumulate light over a window of

151:00

roughly 50 to 150 milliseconds, sort of

151:02

like a camera's exposure time. Anything

151:04

spinning faster than that gets averaged

151:06

into the background, which is the same

151:08

reason that fan blades uh look

151:10

transparent. The paper points out that

151:11

the drone spin rate is comparable to the

151:14

24 frames per second that movies are

151:15

shot at. I don't actually know how

151:16

relevant that is here, but sure, that's

151:18

nice. Uh the team did not design the

151:20

layout by hand. They had a computational

151:22

model generate around 20,000 stable

151:25

configurations, then used AI

151:26

optimization to shuffle the motor,

151:28

battery, circuit board, and

151:29

counterweights around until visibility

151:31

bottomed out. That is okay. Something

151:35

that's actually very cool use of

151:38

AI. Before anyone gets too excited or

151:41

worried, it currently relies on an

151:43

external optical tracking system to fly.

151:46

So, it's indoors only for now. The thin

151:48

carbon fiber rods and wires are still

151:50

faintly visible up close, and it is just

151:52

as loud as any other small drone, so

151:54

your ears will catch it even if your

151:55

eyes didn't. The team's pitch is

151:57

wildlife monitoring, okay, and

152:00

infrastructure inspection with future

152:02

versions aiming for transparent

152:03

materials and quieter props. Um, it's

152:06

going to have to be a lot quieter to be

152:08

useful for wildlife monitoring, I think.

152:10

But hey, um, neat. Our discussion

152:12

question is, do you have any uses for an

152:14

invisible drone? Maybe don't answer

152:15

that.

152:22

>> [laughter]

152:24

>> I know who does.

152:28

>> No, I don't.

152:33

>> I talked to my lawyer.

152:36

Who?

152:38

>> Oh, you know people.

152:41

>> Gross. [laughter]

152:44

>> I'm going to move on.

152:46

>> [laughter]

152:48

>> This one's just funny. Author Dave

152:51

Edgars, best known for the memoir A

152:54

Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius

152:57

and the novel The Circle, criticized

153:00

chat GPT

153:02

directly to OpenAI employees. And uh

153:07

this is especially funny because he was

153:09

invited to speak to the OpenAI employees

153:13

by the company's CEO, Sam Alman.

153:16

after Edgars publicly criticized AI

153:19

generated fiction. So he used the

153:21

opportunity to challenge employees over

153:23

AI's impact on education and creativity.

153:26

And this is a quote saying, "Why don't

153:28

you leave your house, leave the screen,

153:30

meet some people, get yourself in a

153:32

writing group, and also said or also

153:36

warned them that AI could be silencing

153:39

an entire generation or two." And what

153:41

he meant by that was that by making

153:43

teachers jobs more difficult and

153:45

preventing students from developing

153:47

their own writing skills and authentic

153:48

voices that they would not have the

153:51

skill set to tell their stories in an

153:53

authentic personal way.

153:55

>> I heard there was a there was a teacher

153:57

who put

153:57

>> I just thought this was badass. That's

153:59

all. There was a teacher who put some uh

154:02

text in a assignment like how to do this

154:06

assignment thing that was I don't know

154:08

uh transparent text or something. So

154:11

when it was copy pasted it grabbed it.

154:13

>> Oh,

154:14

>> but if you were just trying to read it

154:15

yourself, you wouldn't see it. Uh and it

154:17

said something along the lines of like

154:18

um

154:20

>> I don't know use this strange word in a

154:22

context that wouldn't make any sense. It

154:24

specifically says that wouldn't make any

154:26

sense. Uh, and it w it was something

154:28

like

154:29

these numbers gonna be wrong, but the

154:31

scale I think is pretty correct. Yeah,

154:33

Madagascar. That was it. You used the

154:35

word Madagascar in a way that wouldn't

154:36

make any sense. And the assignment had

154:38

nothing to do with it at all.

154:39

>> Okay.

154:39

>> Uh, and maybe the person who said the

154:42

word Madagascar will know, but if I

154:43

remember correctly, it was like 40

154:44

students and like two of them didn't do

154:46

it. Like

154:47

>> two of them didn't have Madagascar in

154:49

the final,

154:49

>> some something like that. It was some

154:50

insane ratio. But I the the numbers

154:53

don't don't listen to the numbers. I

154:54

don't remember exactly what the numbers

154:55

were, but it was like some insanely high

154:57

percentage of people. There was also

154:59

another teacher who did a

155:02

um take-home do-it-yourself midterm and

155:06

then an in-person no computer final.

155:08

>> Yeah, that one was a little while ago. I

155:09

think we talked about that on my show.

155:10

>> Oh, was that when?

155:11

>> Yeah, that was uh that was college, I

155:12

think.

155:13

>> Very interesting.

155:14

>> Yeah. where like uh the everyone aced

155:16

the midterm and then when he said it was

155:18

going to be an in-person final like a

155:20

whole bunch of people dropped out of the

155:22

class and it turned out that like again

155:23

two of the students had consistent

155:25

grades across the midterm and the final.

155:27

One of them was just a just an honest

155:30

>> Chad.

155:30

>> Well, one of them was a Chad who got

155:32

like 98 both times or something and then

155:34

uh another one of them was just a just

155:36

an honest person and got

155:39

>> and that's their redeeming quality.

155:40

>> 60s something both times. [laughter]

155:44

All right, nice nice work.

155:46

>> You know what? There's I I Man,

155:49

>> 32 out of 35 failed apparently.

155:50

>> This is going to be I I don't know. This

155:52

might ruffle some feathers, but I think

155:54

I would rather have in terms of who I'd

155:56

rather work with day-to-day, I think I'd

155:59

point I'd rather work with someone

156:00

honest with integrity than a genius.

156:04

>> Yeah, I

156:06

I I think LMG community said it well,

156:08

though. Uh, Mr. Chewy.

156:12

>> Oh, he's like totally not our like

156:14

community. You should get You should get

156:16

a new

156:17

>> You really need a different tag, Chewy.

156:19

>> Yeah. Yeah, you do. uh

156:20

>> your job title has actually changed

156:22

twice since then

156:24

>> and also quite significantly. Uh he

156:26

said, "I just don't know how kids could

156:28

possibly resist the temptation of using

156:30

AI." And honestly, I agree.

156:32

>> That's uh that's an unfortunate but like

156:38

pretty based take. I I hate it. Thanks.

156:42

I hate it basically. Yeah.

156:43

>> I think it's I think it comes down to

156:45

>> Would you have been able to resist?

156:47

>> No, I would have used it. options would

156:48

have been

156:50

>> play Marow wind

156:54

>> or sit and do homework.

156:56

>> I'm already cooking.

156:56

>> See, that's what I'm talking about. As

156:57

soon as I as soon like

157:00

as soon as I put you back at I give I

157:03

give you a temptation that is irrelevant

157:06

today. You wouldn't play Morowind today.

157:08

If I was like, "Oh, Luke, here I

157:09

installed Morowind on your computer. Are

157:11

you going to be able to focus on Wow?"

157:13

You're like, "What are you talking

157:14

about?"

157:16

There's no way you're going to play

157:17

Morowind during Land Show. There's no

157:19

way you will disrespect our viewers that

157:21

way. See, now I've already turned them

157:23

off it.

157:24

>> I'm updating Steam.

157:25

>> You're not.

157:30

>> Unbelievable. Actual child. You're an

157:33

actual child. [laughter]

157:34

>> I mean, that's why I have three

157:35

monitors. You can't see what I'm doing.

157:37

>> You can't see that he's playing Morwind.

157:39

Uh,

157:39

>> but as soon as as soon as I pull out the

157:42

like period appropriate temptation.

157:44

>> No, I think I think I

157:45

>> I think it's an easy choice. You play

157:47

Morowind.

157:48

>> I'm really trying to wonder. I

157:49

definitely would have used it as a

157:50

shortcut. I don't know if I would have

157:53

used its output.

157:54

>> There's different times in my life that

157:55

I think I would have used it more or

157:56

less.

157:57

>> Yeah.

157:57

>> And by using it at all, I think I might

158:00

have stunted

158:02

>> the growth that would have led to the

158:04

higher probability of using it at other

158:06

times. If that makes sense. I think

158:08

especially with some of the the really

158:10

big problems I had in high school of the

158:12

like grammar and punctuation and stuff.

158:16

>> Oh, if you could have I wonder you're

158:19

the the dangerous thing about being

158:21

smart with a learning disability is that

158:25

>> you're invisible

158:27

>> if you want to be. You can you can fake

158:29

it and you have better tools for faking

158:32

it.

158:32

>> I would have found a way to hide that

158:34

with that. So, I probably would have

158:36

used my own words, but I would have used

158:38

it to give me the correct punctuation.

158:41

>> Interesting.

158:41

>> But I probably would I I I don't know.

158:44

I'm looking at how I've approached it so

158:46

far, and I believe very strongly in the

158:48

you have to own the output thing, and I

158:51

think I would have been

158:53

informed enough to know that you could

158:56

do things like hiding text. Maybe it was

158:58

onepoint font or something, hiding text

159:01

somewhere or or doing other little

159:03

tricks. I would have known that there

159:05

are ways for teachers to detect it like

159:07

m dashes and all this other kind of

159:08

stuff and I wouldn't have wanted to risk

159:10

that.

159:11

>> Yeah.

159:12

>> But I would have definitely used it as a

159:14

proofreader

159:15

>> and would have adjusted my handins based

159:18

on it and would have used it as a

159:19

shortcut. I'm like fairly certain that

159:21

would have happened especially when

159:23

Morowind is calling. Uh

159:25

>> I didn't really learn to enjoy writing

159:29

until after high school. Um,

159:32

>> the wacky thing for me was I I enjoyed

159:35

writing. I just couldn't get good grades

159:36

because I would just butcher spelling,

159:39

grammar, punctuation.

159:40

>> Interesting. The only reason I learned

159:41

to enjoy it was because I had a teacher

159:44

who pushed me to become more proficient

159:47

at it.

159:47

>> See, that's so interesting because I

159:49

almost had the opposite. Mr. Mr. Mr.

159:52

Thompson said that he actually really

159:54

liked my writing and I was getting just

159:57

kneecapped by uh because my previous

160:01

teacher would take a point away for

160:02

every single mistake.

160:04

>> So he liked the writing but my

160:05

punctuation would be weird. So I just

160:07

get 50% like all the time.

160:08

>> Yeah. We had my Mr. Horn was exactly the

160:11

same. I think it was five of a point off

160:13

and we this was out of 10.

160:15

>> Yeah.

160:15

>> So if you made a handful of mistakes

160:18

>> it's just gone. So I just couldn't I

160:19

couldn't perform. So he capped it at

160:21

10%.

160:22

>> Right?

160:23

>> So if I like wrote something really

160:25

good, but the structure of it was bad,

160:27

the punctuation was bad, stuff like

160:28

that, um I could still get 90. And then

160:31

I got like very close to 90 in the

160:33

course. And I I started really enjoying

160:36

it.

160:36

>> Mr. Horn had no such accessibility mode

160:39

that I'm aware of. [laughter]

160:41

>> Yeah.

160:42

>> I don't think most do.

160:43

>> But what we were allowed to do um was we

160:45

were allowed to pick a partner before we

160:47

handed in our assignments and do a proof

160:49

reading pass. See, that would have

160:50

helped a ton.

160:51

>> So, what he taught us like I forgot

160:54

about that.

160:54

>> That's actually really cool. I actually

160:55

really like that.

160:56

>> That's one of the reasons I'm so good at

160:57

editing. I just realized

160:58

>> that's a really really cool solution.

161:00

>> That's hilarious. [laughter] Um

161:02

>> I really like that.

161:03

>> Although it did it did mean that the

161:05

winners won more and the losers won and

161:07

the losers lost more.

161:09

>> You get paired with someone who's

161:10

>> Well, no, you picked your partner. So I

161:12

would go and pick another ace in the

161:15

class and we would check each other's

161:17

work and we would both get 9 and a half

161:19

or 10 out of 10.

161:19

>> That happened kind of naturally for me

161:21

in university. There was a there was a

161:23

crew of people at BCIT that I'm still

161:25

friends with the the boys. Um and we

161:28

would all help each other study with

161:30

stuff and I really think it like raised

161:32

the whole group to uh another level.

161:35

There's a lot of dropouts in that course

161:38

and that crew stayed together and didn't

161:39

drop out the whole way through. Uh, I

161:42

mean until I did, I guess. [laughter]

161:44

Oops. Uh, but like that was for

161:46

different reasons. Um,

161:51

>> Zy asks, "Does school need to be fair?"

161:56

>> Nothing is fairusion,

161:59

but we should strive for fairness, if

162:01

that makes sense.

162:02

>> Best we can.

162:03

>> Yeah.

162:03

>> I still think teaching people the value

162:05

of editing and like caring about someone

162:07

else's work and trying to help each

162:08

other succeed is very valuable. I don't

162:10

think there's necessarily a way you can

162:12

possibly make that purely fair because

162:14

you can't make every single pairing

162:15

perfect. Maybe you don't do the pick

162:18

your partner. Maybe you rotate through

162:20

somehow. I'm not sure.

162:22

>> Yeah, I'm probably has it flaws.

162:25

[sighs and gasps]

162:26

>> Yeah.

162:28

>> Um

162:32

what else? What else we got here?

162:35

>> What's What's something cool?

162:36

>> Oh, that one's not cool. That one's not

162:38

cool. That one's interesting.

162:40

>> Oh, I've got a pretty cool one.

162:41

>> Go for it.

162:43

>> Uh, do you want to do Oh, I was I was

162:44

that you I thought it was kind of your

162:46

turn. I I picked a cool one for you,

162:48

though. Here, I highlighted it.

162:48

>> I'll do it. Um Oh, man. This whole We

162:52

stopped doing it for a while and we're

162:53

back to it. The um title is the same as

162:56

the first.

162:56

>> Yeah, I just stopped reading the titles.

162:58

>> Okay, I will stop doing that as well.

163:00

Uh, a federal judge has given final

163:02

approval to Anthropic's $ 1.5 billion

163:05

copyright settlement with authors and

163:07

publishers, which the court called the

163:09

largest copyright class action

163:11

settlement in history.

163:13

>> A billion and a half. Yeah. I mean,

163:14

>> that is massive.

163:15

>> That's pretty big.

163:16

>> It covers uh that's what Yeah. Uh it

163:19

covers about uh 482,000

163:22

books that Enthropic downloaded from

163:24

piracy sites like LibGen while building

163:27

training data for Claude and works out

163:29

to roughly $3,000 per book before fees.

163:34

I don't necessarily know what that

163:35

means. Before fees, legal fees,

163:37

>> I I assume so.

163:39

>> Oh god. Is it going to be like $3 at the

163:41

end of it?

163:42

>> Uh no, no, no, no, no. The the authors

163:44

get $3,000 per book, I think. Oh, before

163:47

Oh, I hope not.

163:49

>> We'll see. Hopefully, I'm reading that

163:51

wrong. Over 91% of covered authors have

163:54

already claimed their share.

163:55

>> That tells me it's more than $3 if

163:56

people bothered to do

163:57

>> it. Sure does. And it sounds like a lot

163:58

of them did. Um, and Anthropic is also

164:00

required to destroy its pirated copies.

164:03

Yeah, sure. It's already trained on it.

164:05

Um, Judge Alup ruled last year that

164:08

Enthropic buying physical books,

164:10

scanning them, and destroying the

164:11

originals was fair use. Nice. We can buy

164:14

Blu-rays and uh and rip them and then

164:17

it's totally legal now. Thank you. Uh

164:19

and that training AI on books is legal.

164:22

What wasn't legal was downloading

164:24

millions of pirated copies to build a

164:26

permanent library. And that's the part

164:27

anthropic paid to settle before a jury

164:29

could set damages because it settled

164:32

instead of appealing. None of this

164:34

becomes a binding precedent. Damn it.

164:36

>> No, that's actually maybe good.

164:37

>> Is it?

164:38

>> Yes.

164:38

>> So the Okay, we'll talk about that in a

164:40

second. So, the dozens of similar suits

164:42

against Google Meta, MidJourney, and

164:43

OpenAI are still live with judges free

164:46

to rule differently. But wasn't this a

164:47

good

164:48

>> or rule the same? Because at least one

164:51

of these is bound to go through and not

164:53

get settled is kind of where my head's

164:54

at on this.

164:55

>> I see. Okay.

164:55

>> So, so what's nice is that this is

164:57

>> you just don't want one to go a totally

164:59

different direction and

165:00

>> sure go through.

165:01

>> This is true. But this is resolved for

165:03

now and the authors get something which

165:05

is not enough in my opinion.

165:07

>> I don't think it's enough. Um, it's man

165:12

it's something.

165:14

>> It's something though.

165:15

>> It's something.

165:15

>> So, I see what you're saying. You didn't

165:17

want the precedent set with this because

165:18

it might be too low. I

165:19

>> I I just want to I

165:22

this is a this is this is a start. It's

165:26

it's a it's a it's if if these are my

165:29

possible outcomes, right? And everything

165:32

to this side of the middle is bad and

165:35

everything to this side of the middle is

165:36

good. We're kind of like We're like

165:39

here. Yeah. You know, we're like a It's

165:41

It's

165:41

>> It's good. I

165:42

>> I could hope for better still.

165:44

>> Yeah,

165:44

>> that's where I'm at for

165:45

>> sure. So, you're holding out hope for

165:47

better.

165:47

>> I'm holding out I'm holding out for a

165:49

hero.

165:49

>> Man, Wendle's Turnstone video is still

165:52

not up. Come on, Wendle. Come on, Raid.

165:54

>> What's Turnstone?

165:55

>> Turnstone is cool. I the the answer to

165:59

like all of this stuff for me is run

166:01

stuff locally. Um

166:03

I I think that is the right way to get

166:05

back at them. Dude, the dude, the latest

166:07

the latest Chinese models look

166:11

>> crazy.

166:11

>> They also look very hard to run, but

166:13

they'll be quantized down and and

166:15

whatnot. But

166:15

>> they look crazy.

166:16

>> Turnstone is like Odysius,

166:20

PewDiePie's thing, but more tuned for

166:23

Enterprise.

166:24

>> Oh, okay.

166:26

>> And Wendle's building it. Oh,

166:28

>> and he hasn't said a ton else publicly

166:31

yet, but he has said publicly that there

166:33

is a video on Turnstone that is coming,

166:36

and I'm excited because it's very cool.

166:39

>> That sounds very cool.

166:40

>> It is very cool. Um,

166:44

next topic.

166:46

Aan Immortal says, "As a publisher, it

166:49

feels a bit like robbery where they got

166:51

to keep what they stole and I was

166:53

offered a market value. I was still

166:54

robbed." Yes.

166:56

>> Yeah. Yes.

166:58

Yeah, that's totally fair.

167:01

>> If this was a person,

167:03

they wouldn't have to pay $3,000 per

167:07

book. They would go to jail.

167:09

>> Yeah,

167:11

which is crazy, right?

167:13

>> Anyways,

167:14

>> oh, that was actually something that

167:15

didn't make it into our notes about the

167:18

um about the India uh like inc price

167:22

fixing deal thing. uh is that apparently

167:26

there executives are actually like like

167:29

we're we're personally punished for this

167:32

>> which is like I can't believe I'm saying

167:35

this but like hey maybe India has

167:38

something to teach us about how to

167:39

punish like antitrust stuff.

167:43

>> Yeah, I'm trying to look it up. Um

167:47

Reddit co-founder Aaron Schwarz

167:50

uh

167:52

pirated stole whatever you want to call

167:54

it. I think it was like what I'm seeing

167:57

here is 4.8 million uh Jtore documents

168:01

from MIT which is I think like uh

168:03

published papers and stuff. Um and yeah,

168:08

Reddit co-founder accused of stealing

168:10

4.8 million Jtore documents from MIT

168:12

>> repeated visits to access network and

168:14

download documents for distribution

168:16

distribution on file sharing sites.

168:18

Okay,

168:18

>> and this is like for context. As far as

168:20

my understanding goes, if you email the

168:22

authors of a lot of these papers, they

168:24

will just send it to you because in how

168:27

their system works, they're they're

168:29

probably employed by like a school or

168:30

whatever else. They like have to publish

168:32

these papers this way, but they don't

168:33

actually want to charge people for it.

168:35

So, he's like trying to make it so these

168:36

papers can get out more easily because

168:38

that scientific progress, open learning,

168:39

all that kind of stuff. Um, he did not

168:43

get dealt with in the same way. Oh man,

168:47

I just had it on screen and then lost

168:49

it. Sorry, here it is. Um, the charges

168:52

were filed in Boston on Tuesday by

168:54

attorney district

168:56

>> uh carried a penalty of 35 years in

168:58

prison and a $1 million fine.

169:02

>> What?

169:02

>> So, we seem to be a lot harder on a

169:06

random individual dude than

169:08

>> float plane chat is being pretty based.

169:10

Here's the deal. When corporations can

169:13

go to jail, then they can be people.

169:15

>> Yeah. No, I agree. That's actually like

169:17

how about they just have to Dude, if you

169:21

if the punishment was that if the

169:24

corporation commits a crime that would

169:26

have resulted in a six-month prison

169:29

sentence, if they have to actually get

169:32

just like their one phone call a day

169:34

[clears throat] for 6 months, [laughter]

169:38

you man, we would all of a sudden they'd

169:42

be on it. They'd be they'd be so

169:44

adherent to the law, like it'd be wild.

169:49

Um, [sighs]

169:52

speaking about a postc corporate world,

169:55

uh, Fallout 5, Fallout 3 and New Vegas

169:57

remasters and the most interesting part,

170:01

the very most interesting part that

170:03

people have a lot of mixed opinions on,

170:05

>> new Obsidian Fallout is official. So, I

170:09

am amazed that you picked this topic as

170:12

one of our headline topics at the

170:13

beginning of the show. Usually, I have a

170:15

pretty good idea of what you're going to

170:17

pick. I know that you love Fallout, but

170:20

I can't believe that after all the news

170:23

that has come out of

170:24

>> Bethesda and Microsoft and it and all of

170:30

that mess right now.

170:31

>> Sometimes I'm just a dumb little boy who

170:33

likes his old video games. that you're

170:35

not looking at this through a cynical

170:37

lens going here's this is obviously just

170:40

a shiny distraction.

170:43

Hey, ignore all the bad news right now.

170:45

Fallout. [screaming]

170:47

Is it I mean am I am I just being too

170:50

cynical?

170:50

>> The part that is interesting to me is

170:52

Obsidian's involvement.

170:54

>> No, it looks like it's not me. LRFTW

170:57

says Luke smoking that copium hard.

171:00

>> Hurt me again, Todd.

171:03

>> I'm ready. that

171:04

>> I will get excited.

171:06

>> I'm ready for the pain. Lovotar, take

171:09

me.

171:11

>> It never goes away.

171:12

>> Um, yeah, obsidian is the interesting

171:14

part to me.

171:15

>> Yeah, that's the good.

171:16

>> Um, it's a little questionable. It's

171:18

been a hot minute. The obsidian of the

171:20

now is not the obsidian of the then. So,

171:23

it's it's interesting.

171:26

>> Black and glassike.

171:28

[laughter]

171:29

>> And now it's black and glass-like and

171:32

older.

171:34

No, you deserve the second one.

171:36

[laughter]

171:36

>> Isn't that like the main guy coming

171:37

back?

171:38

>> I've heard yes, but all the structure

171:41

around him is changed.

171:43

>> No man is an island.

171:44

>> Maybe not completely gone. I don't I

171:47

don't I can't claim to know, but it's

171:49

interesting because I mean, if you look

171:51

at Fallout, I liked Fallout 3. Fallout 3

171:53

was all right. Uh Fallout New Vegas was

171:56

incredible. has a lot of like the best

171:58

quotes in games ever in it and is still

172:01

a cult classic to today. Fallout 4.

172:08

>> More like Fallout for the Birds.

172:12

>> I didn't play it. I don't know.

172:13

>> Yeah. Um, Fallout 5 is uh

172:19

I don't know if Fallout 5 is the

172:21

Obsidian Fallout or if Fallout 5 is

172:23

Bethesda Fallout. If Fallout 5 is

172:26

Bethesda Fallout, if they keep going

172:28

down the path they have been going

172:30

lately, uh, it's probably going to suck.

172:33

>> It's just all settlement building.

172:35

>> Yeah, something like that.

172:36

>> Uh, Fallout 5 was Bethesda.

172:39

>> Was Bethesda is Bethesda.

172:41

>> Is Bethesda. Okay. Excuse me.

172:42

>> Yeah. So, whatever the obsidian one is

172:44

is the one that I'm more interested in.

172:47

But,

172:48

you know,

172:50

fool me roughly seven times or something

172:54

and maybe I'm the fool. But,

172:56

>> shame on Dan.

172:57

>> Maybe maybe

172:58

>> catching strays.

172:59

>> Maybe Todd can can sit in a immersion

173:02

sensory deprivation chamber or something

173:06

become what he once was and revitalize

173:08

all of Bethesda and give us a good Elder

173:11

Scrolls and good follow. Maybe maybe has

173:12

a midlife crisis and just goes like,

173:14

"Wait, what if we made good games?"

173:16

>> Wait, what if they were fun?

173:20

>> Sounds stupid.

173:21

>> Uh, yeah, probably.

173:23

>> Well, I got my tanks recharged of

173:25

copium, so I'm all ready to go.

173:29

>> Let's go.

173:30

>> Um, I owe Sammy something, and I think

173:32

he's expecting me to do this on my

173:34

phone, but I'm not going to.

173:35

>> Huh?

173:36

>> Weak.

173:38

>> Okay, Dan. Sammy needs that time stamp.

173:41

Sure. We don't have uh we don't have

173:44

Noki in the chat today. That's

173:45

>> Hi. Hi.

173:47

>> Do you mind filming a horizontal video

173:49

of you saying weak?

173:50

>> I forgot to ask. I was too stunned by

173:52

the feet. Cam. Thank you,

173:54

>> Sammy. Sammy. Sammy. Sammy. 2 hours 58

173:57

minutes 48 seconds. 30. Can I get a

174:00

clap?

174:03

>> Thank you. Editor's note. Uh

174:07

yeah, whatever. All right.

174:11

>> [snorts]

174:12

>> Man, it's been a long week.

174:13

>> Do we talk about the the craziness now?

174:16

>> Yeah, sure. Let's talk about the

174:17

craziness.

174:18

>> Fallout 5 is currently in pre-production

174:20

and will use the Creation Engine 3 also

174:22

used for Elder Scrolls 6.

174:24

>> Note from David.

174:25

>> Which which one had which one was

174:26

Starfield?

174:27

>> What?

174:27

>> Creation Engine

174:29

>> three,

174:29

>> two, two and a half with

174:32

>> I think that um what version of

174:35

>> So does that mean also Starfield

174:37

>> two?

174:39

Two. Yes. Two.

174:41

>> Okay. So, there's hope. There's more

174:43

hope. Well, I got to talk to my dealer

174:45

and order more copium.

174:49

>> Yeah, maybe Creation Engine will save

174:50

us. Maybe they'll scoop up all the

174:52

people ID just lost.

174:56

>> I mean,

174:57

>> it would kind of make sense.

174:58

>> Their engine is so based.

175:00

>> Yeah.

175:00

>> But then, wait, but these are both under

175:02

the Microsoft umbrella. No way.

175:05

>> Yeah. Okay. I want to make the list are

175:06

also extremely related. You are you are

175:09

not even sitting on and then they're

175:11

going to get all the stuff right now and

175:14

then we're going to get video games.

175:17

[laughter]

175:20

>> That is their worst take

175:22

>> in all the many years that we have

175:25

hosted this show together.

175:27

>> You expected good takes from me about

175:28

Bethesda.

175:29

>> I look I take you I take you seriously.

175:33

I respect you as a friend and

175:35

collaborator. I can't be I can't be

175:38

>> THAT WAS

175:40

>> YOU'RE AS YOU'RE as [laughter]

175:44

>> Oh my god.

175:45

>> Like it took me a second. I I [laughter]

175:46

I didn't manage to connect the dots for

175:49

how stupid that was because I

175:52

expect so much better [laughter] from

175:53

you.

176:01

[laughter]

176:06

>> [laughter]

176:08

>> Okay. What are we? Pick another topic.

176:10

My god.

176:13

[laughter]

176:15

>> I have no whimsy. No whimsy in this man.

176:18

>> Yeah. See? Yeah.

176:19

>> You're whimsyless.

176:20

>> You can't have magical pixie dust

176:22

thoughts in there. Um,

176:24

>> let us dissociate. That's all we have

176:26

left. Okay,

176:30

now let's go into a insane whiplash of a

176:32

topic. Uh, Framework cuts Laptop 13 Pro

176:36

pre-order RAM in half.

176:38

>> Yeah, investment disclosure. I'll let

176:39

Luke do this one.

176:40

>> Massive increases in cost have forced

176:42

Framework to alter pre-orders for the

176:45

upcoming Laptop 13 Pro.

176:47

>> Laptop Pro 13. Framework Pro 13.

176:49

Whatever. Keep going. You could do your

176:50

thing.

176:51

>> Okay.

176:51

>> Yeah, it's just written wrong in here.

176:53

It's not Luke's fault. The uh pre-order

176:55

holders report RAM allocations being cut

176:57

in half and pricing for the pre-orders

176:59

being updated. The company announced in

177:01

a blog post that their LP CAM 2 supplier

177:03

has more than doubled RAM pricing over

177:06

their existing inventory. Framework

177:08

chief exec and truepec cable enthusiast

177:11

Nurav Patel wrote that this cost

177:14

increase goes beyond far beyond anything

177:17

we had predicted and anything we're able

177:19

to absorb without placing our ability to

177:21

operate at real financial risk.

177:25

Framework says they have enough LP CAM 2

177:27

modules on hand to cover existing

177:30

pre-orders

177:32

but not in capacities that match the

177:35

pre-order. So no they don't.

177:36

>> So no no they so LPAM 2 modules it's one

177:40

module per system. It's not like sodium

177:43

where you would have two. So they have

177:46

in terms of the quantity of LP CAM 2

177:49

modules, they have enough of them, but

177:52

not with the right number of dyes on

177:54

them.

177:55

>> I see. So not the right uh Yeah.

177:58

>> Yes, I see. I get it.

178:02

>> That was a good one.

178:04

>> That was actually pretty good. Uh the

178:06

blog post breakdown uh breaks down the

178:08

pre-order changes. TLDDR. If there

178:10

aren't enough modules for your order,

178:12

it's being downgraded to the next lower

178:14

RAM configuration at the original price

178:16

for that configuration. Okay,

178:20

that's a little better than I thought.

178:21

Uh, the blog also warns of cost

178:24

increases on other hardware which will

178:26

impact new orders as well.

178:28

>> Yeah, I I didn't put it in the dock for

178:30

this week, I think, but uh TSMC it's

178:33

rumored that TSMC is increasing wafer.

178:35

Oh, no, it is in here. TSMC plans chip

178:38

price hikes in 2027 of um

178:43

uh baseline 5 to 10% with some AI and

178:46

HPC customers facing effective cost

178:48

increases of up to 25% through

178:51

additional search charges. These

178:52

reported increases are tied to rising

178:54

manufacturing costs, overseas fab

178:56

investments, and just plain old strong

178:59

you pay me demand.

179:01

>> It's honestly wild. They could be,

179:04

this might sound like an insane

179:05

statement.

179:07

>> They could crank it so much more.

179:10

>> I know.

179:10

>> So much more.

179:11

>> I know.

179:12

>> They literally came out and and pointed

179:14

at like SKH Highix and Samsung and we're

179:16

like, we're not doing that.

179:18

>> They could though.

179:19

>> And it's kind of wild that they're not.

179:21

And there's a lot of theories as to why.

179:24

>> Is it just down to like Taiwanese

179:25

culture? Like I What are the other

179:28

theories? I think it's down to the

179:29

defense of Taiwan because if they crank

179:32

it too high, you're incentivizing

179:34

development elsewhere.

179:36

>> Yeah,

179:37

>> that's my theory. The same guy that

179:39

brought to you maybe Bethesda should

179:41

just hire the id guys to make Creation

179:43

[laughter] Engine.

179:49

>> Yeah. I mean, the other part too is I

179:51

could I could see valuing the long-term

179:53

partnership. I mean, you look at the way

179:56

you can you can uh uh like uh Okay, look

179:59

at what's going on with um

180:00

>> well, look at how hungry everyone is to

180:02

switch to Chinese RAM.

180:03

>> What's that what's that thing Oracle bot

180:05

that everyone's all mad about? Uh or

180:07

hold on. Who who Oh, no, no, no. I

180:09

remember. Uh who owns VMware right now?

180:12

Broadcom. That's right. Everyone's super

180:14

mad at Broadcom because they bought uh

180:16

they bought VMware in 2023 and have just

180:19

been like

180:20

>> cranking the screws. In fact, did that

180:22

not make it into W show last week that

180:24

uh it was the a really cool article I

180:26

read. I think it was on RS Technica

180:27

about a company that found a solution.

180:30

It was like a restaurant chain that

180:32

found a solution to converting all of

180:34

their VMs restaurant or retail. Retail,

180:37

sorry, retail. It was a retail chain

180:38

that converted all of their VMs off of

180:41

VMware and just kind of like told the

180:44

story of the very difficult, painful

180:46

migration that they had to go through.

180:48

and um and how just and just just the

180:54

comments was hilarious on this article

180:56

because everyone was talking about how

180:57

much they just hate what

181:00

Broadcom is doing with VMware, but they

181:01

feel so locked in and they can't wait to

181:05

jump ship. And I mean maybe part of it

181:07

is also just prudent business

181:08

management. Just because you're on top

181:10

today and you have all these

181:12

partnerships today doesn't mean that and

181:14

and you want to benefit from being a

181:16

technology leader. So they're TSMC is

181:18

clearly increasing pricing, but if you

181:22

turn the screws too hard, you're

181:24

incentivizing

181:26

outside demand or outside um

181:28

>> competition. You are, you know, just,

181:32

you know, I don't know, you're being

181:34

kind of a jerk and also you're making

181:36

your partner's eye rate. You're making

181:38

them look for the exit. So maybe it's a

181:40

little bit of all of them.

181:42

>> I mean, I don't sit on their board. I

181:44

don't know. But

181:44

>> yeah,

181:45

>> just guessing. Just guessing. Uh, what

181:47

else? While this is going on, Nvidia is

181:49

reportedly raising GeForce GPU kit

181:52

prices. Nvidia board partners are said

181:54

to be paying more for both GDDR6 and

181:57

GDDR7 GeForce GPU kits. However, the

182:00

reports do not confirm whether these

182:02

higher component costs will directly

182:03

translate into higher retail GPU prices.

182:05

But, but how could they do anything

182:07

other than that? That Okay, so GPU

182:10

prices are going up. There you go. You

182:11

heard it here first.

182:14

Um, [sighs]

182:15

our discussion question is PC building

182:18

feels like a luxury hobby right now, but

182:20

has it always been this way?

182:22

>> No.

182:23

>> Um,

182:24

>> I would argue no. The reason why I would

182:26

argue no,

182:27

>> I think it's cyclical.

182:30

At least to a degree.

182:33

>> When's the last time it felt like a

182:34

luxury hobby?

182:37

>> Oh, [sighs]

182:39

man. And I

182:40

>> for me it would like basically go to

182:43

before I was functional as a human.

182:47

>> No, I wouldn't I wouldn't say that. I'd

182:49

say it felt man it felt very luxury

182:51

hobby in like the early SLI days.

182:54

Although it didn't have to be. I mean I

182:56

think that's the I think that's the

182:58

difference is that

182:59

>> premium options does not mean luxury

183:01

hobby.

183:02

>> No, that's true. And and but I mean

183:03

working in the department that I was

183:05

working in I had a lot of exposure to

183:07

the people who treated it like a luxury

183:09

hobby.

183:10

There was a player on the Vancouver

183:12

Conucks who I mean I'm probably removed

183:15

from this ad

183:21

once in a while just to see what kind of

183:22

crazy he bought cuz he would just

183:24

buy the highest end everything the

183:26

second it came out and like it it it

183:29

just really surprised me the first time

183:32

he like showed up on my radar because he

183:34

bought like an over $1,000 high-capacity

183:38

SSD and I was like wait

183:41

that guy cuz I I don't see that as like

183:44

the as like the professional athlete

183:47

thing to do. I mean obviously he has the

183:49

money, right? You know, guy had a nearly

183:53

100 mph slapshot. He's getting paid for

183:56

it, but like he Sorry. He's super into

183:59

like gaming and computers. He buy No,

184:01

and he would buy things one at a time.

184:03

So he's clearly doing it himself.

184:06

>> Yeah. which is like based AF.

184:09

>> That's cool.

184:09

>> You could obviously afford to have

184:11

somebody else build him an extreme

184:12

edition computer with a, you know,

184:14

highcapacity Vertex 3 SSD, whatever,

184:18

whatever the exact specs were. Um,

184:20

>> my my argument, someone someone uh

184:23

Insomniac in chat said, "Luke taking the

184:25

stance when Linus has refreshed his

184:27

computer last how many times?" I I

184:29

understand where you're coming from. I

184:30

don't think that's a valid argument at

184:31

all. The reason why I would say that is

184:33

looking at how I got into the hobby. A

184:36

big part of the reason why I got into

184:37

the hobby was cuz oh my god, it is so

184:39

much cheaper and more accessible than

184:41

cars.

184:43

It was like, can I go down one of these

184:45

two paths, cars or computers? And it was

184:47

like, well, one is hilariously

184:49

expensive, requires tons of room, lots

184:51

of kind of expensive tools or access to

184:54

them, and oh my god, things break all

184:56

the time and they cost a lot and blah

184:57

blah blah blah blah. And the other one I

184:59

can enter

185:02

with no tool costs,

185:04

>> right,

185:05

>> at all.

185:06

>> Well, you could buy a bougie screwdriver

185:08

to do it.

185:09

>> Maybe. Yeah. Or just borrow your dad's,

185:12

which he like almost certainly has at

185:14

least a like Phillips screwdriver. It's

185:17

like the most common thing ever to work

185:18

on computers. And then when I first got

185:21

into it, like my stuff wasn't nice, but

185:24

it played games just fine. Dude, the

185:26

entrylevel I can play Friend slop games

185:30

computer right now is still very cheap.

185:36

>> Yeah, I'm actually I'm I'm I'm on here

185:39

right now like uh one of our discussion

185:41

questions that we hadn't got to yet. I

185:43

was I was prepping for it is like, "Hey,

185:46

how cheaply could you do just like like

185:49

an Optiplex build these days?" And it's

185:51

it's still actually not that bad. I

185:55

don't like this one. I don't like just 8

185:57

gigs of RAM. So, hold on.

185:58

>> Also more expensive than

186:00

>> another one I liked better. Well, okay.

186:02

Remember though, I'm I'm looking for

186:03

eighth gen.

186:04

>> Yeah.

186:05

>> So,

186:06

eighth gen, 16 gigs of RAM. You got to

186:09

watch out for the shipping though. It's

186:10

a $100 shipping on this bad boy. But

186:12

that's to us. That's to us. That's

186:14

international shipping.

186:15

>> Yeah. Okay.

186:15

>> If this was domestic shipping in the US,

186:17

it would be considerably cheaper.

186:19

>> $0 import. I wonder if part of the

186:21

shipping is that the imports included.

186:22

>> It is. It's it's part of eBay's whole

186:25

they uh they have depots that US sellers

186:28

ship to and then they handle all of the

186:31

paperwork so that the international

186:33

shipping goes smoothly. It's a whole

186:34

thing. Um but anyway, it's 16 gigs RAM,

186:36

250 gigs SSD, so you're still going to

186:38

need to pro probably pop a hard drive in

186:40

there. You're going to need a GPU, but

186:42

we actually have a like a 1080

186:44

retrospective coming soon. And we found

186:48

that the 1080 Ti in particular is

186:50

actually still very usable. So, for

186:52

probably around 250 bucks, you could you

186:57

could friend slop it with all your

186:59

friends. Um,

187:01

>> and that's just like grabbing a pretty

187:02

quick eBay listing. There's a lot of the

187:05

stuff that I got when I was first

187:07

starting was helping people fix their

187:09

computers. Um,

187:12

I don't know. I' I' a friend would want

187:14

to build a computer. So, I'd help them

187:16

build the computer. They would want to

187:17

upgrade the fans that came that came

187:19

with the case. So, they'd replace the

187:21

fans that came with the case. They have

187:22

a few computer fans now. They don't have

187:24

any use for it. Okay, those are my

187:25

computer fans now. Um, just little

187:28

little things like that as you're going

187:29

along. It's a it's a hobby that is very

187:33

effective for flipping parts.

187:36

You you haveund 100 bucks more than you

187:39

had before. You can go on Facebook

187:41

Marketplace, you can sell your GPU

187:44

um for some cash, combine that with the

187:47

100 extra bucks you had um and get a

187:49

very significant increase in GPU and

187:52

just plug that into the system you

187:53

currently have most likely. You can keep

187:56

using things like your case for a very

187:59

long time. Apparently Jeff Gearling

188:01

still has like one of his first ones and

188:03

still uses it. Um, yeah, even right now

188:06

when it's like the worst. I was saying

188:08

the the I think I slightly misspoke,

188:10

which got people to dive on me

188:12

immediately again, which is confusing to

188:14

me, but whatever. Um, I I think I said

188:16

something I was surprised by that price.

188:18

That isn't what I meant. I meant I was

188:20

shopping for Dell Optiplexes or Dell

188:22

somethings during last Scrapyard Wars.

188:24

And what I was trying to point out is

188:26

that that is even those systems are

188:28

significantly more expensive than they

188:29

were. Um, and still

188:32

that's not a crazy amount to get into a

188:35

fresh new hobby.

188:37

>> No, I don't think I would put this in

188:39

the in the category of luxury hobby. I

188:41

think that's a big jump.

188:42

>> No, I think I think that's actually

188:43

fair. And uh, Pancrats posted in chat,

188:46

you're not fitting a 1080 in there, lol.

188:49

To which I will reply, not not with that

188:51

attitude.

188:53

>> Not with that attitude,

188:55

>> but with a with a bit of with a bit of

188:57

handiwork. anything.

188:59

>> Yeah. Engage with the part of the hobby

189:00

that's really fun.

189:02

>> Anything can fit in anything.

189:03

>> Yeah, you can figure it out. I believe

189:06

in you.

189:07

>> Oh man.

189:08

>> Um, and yes, I did not factor I did not

189:11

factor in an extra power supply though.

189:13

So, you you will need a better power

189:14

supply in order to run a 1080 or a 1080

189:16

Ti or something like that.

189:18

>> But the power draw of just that card

189:20

isn't going to be super high. So, you

189:21

could get a fairly low cap power supply

189:23

for not a crazy amount of money

189:25

>> as long as it has the connectors. Or you

189:27

can

189:28

>> [snorts]

189:29

>> figure out a way to get conductors

189:31

connected to

189:32

>> which is fun

189:32

>> which is cool unless you break it and

189:35

$100 is a lot of money to you like it

189:38

was in the early days of us pursuing

189:39

this hobby.

189:40

>> Oh dude, the panic attacks I had at

189:42

times.

189:42

>> But the but the

189:45

panic and the stress

189:47

>> is part of the fun

189:48

>> is what makes the payoff so worth it.

189:52

[laughter]

189:52

>> Yeah. And like trust me guys, I get it.

189:55

I understand what you're trying to

189:56

project. It sucks right now. It's

189:58

expensive right now.

190:00

>> Yeah,

190:00

>> it's still

190:02

a hobby that people can get into with

190:04

not a ton of cash. No, you're not going

190:06

to have some sick 5090 water cooled uh

190:11

amazing, you know, it has that screen

190:14

thing from Corsair that you can mount

190:16

anywhere and all this other fancy crazy.

190:18

>> But you know what? Nobody has that

190:20

stuff. I think this is something that

190:21

like

190:22

>> Yeah. I I think people really really

190:25

don't realize how rare the customers for

190:29

this stuff are because it's all over

190:31

like your your your Instagram feed or

190:33

whatever, but stations,

190:35

>> but I worked at the computer store. Do

190:38

you know how few people buy thousand

190:40

CPUs?

190:41

>> Yeah.

190:42

>> Like that's rare. Do you know how few

190:45

people are buying top-of-the-line GPUs

190:47

in the grand scheme of things? how what

190:50

a tiny tiny percentage of the market

190:53

they make up. Most people are just like

190:56

running a regular computer.

190:58

When I was when I was building a bunch

191:00

of computers for myself, for my friends,

191:03

all that kind of stuff, everybody was

191:05

sitting on 60 series. It was bougie if

191:08

you got a 70. No one got an 80. 90s were

191:12

absurd.

191:14

>> Was 90 even a thing yet?

191:15

>> Probably not even. Yeah. I think they

191:17

had other nomenclature for their

191:18

>> 88 ultra was a thing for a bit and then

191:21

Oh, yeah. No, no, hold on. There were

191:23

90s. So, uh I think a a 590 was a dual

191:26

GPU. Yeah. So, 90s.

191:27

>> I was still building computers for

191:28

friends in that era. So, yeah. Okay.

191:30

>> And it's like nobody got those cards.

191:34

>> Yeah. I'm trying to think. The first

191:35

dual GPU was the 5950

191:39

X2, was it? I Oh, man. I Wow. I used to

191:42

know this stuff. 5950

191:44

X2 GPU. Is that right? Oh man. No, no,

191:50

no. The 7950

191:52

something. 7950

191:56

X2. What was it called? 7950 GX2. Man,

192:00

that thing was so cool.

192:04

[laughter]

192:06

Look how cool it is.

192:09

It's got the whole two stacked PCBs, two

192:12

whole separate coolers, internal SLI

192:15

bridge. There's PCB one. Here's PCB2.

192:19

You got the Oh, man. You got the Hold

192:21

on. Where's the Where' the bridge chip

192:22

go? There it is. Look at it go. Why does

192:25

it keep changing which picture I'm

192:27

looking at? Can I zoom? Oh, come on.

192:30

Touchpad, don't let me down. It let me

192:33

down. I'm over it. Uh, the point is very

192:35

cool. Very expensive. Almost literally

192:39

nobody bought them.

192:41

>> Yeah, they're unheard of. It also

192:44

depends on like the circles you're in

192:45

and if and if the only

192:48

people you're hearing talk about

192:50

computer stuff is dudes on the internet

192:52

that only get views on their videos when

192:54

they show the super fancy expensive

192:56

cards, then you're just going to see the

192:58

super fancy expensive cards.

193:00

>> And also that's but that's what

193:01

companies market too because it's it's

193:03

Halo marketing. That's what and it

193:05

works. You don't and you see it across

193:09

so many industries, PCs, fashion, um

193:13

like the the amount of of effort and

193:16

money and time that companies spend

193:19

promoting their their topofthe-line

193:22

experience that almost nobody will

193:24

actually buy, but because it's cool and

193:27

sexy, it creates brand appeal and then

193:30

you go in and you actually buy the thing

193:32

you can actually afford. It's it's

193:34

marketing 101. So,

193:37

>> I have talked on this show almost as

193:39

many times as I possibly can since I

193:41

learned this piece of information that a

193:43

buddy of mine's son was using a 1080 to

193:46

play on decently high settings at

193:47

decently solid frame rates. Arc Raiders.

193:50

>> Yeah,

193:50

>> I've pointed that out like as many times

193:52

as I reasonably can.

193:54

>> And and it's worth

193:55

>> because I'm trying to promote the idea

193:56

that you don't have to upgrade. You

193:58

don't have to spend crazy amounts of

193:59

money. And it's worth noting that

194:00

compared to like our previous $69 gaming

194:03

PCs that we've done in the past, um,

194:05

this Optiplex was quite a bit more

194:07

expensive, but that's because I went out

194:08

of my way to pick something with a six

194:10

core processor. Like I was I was going

194:12

for something that wasn't

194:13

>> a decent machine

194:14

>> that wasn't quite just, you know, barely

194:18

usable today and unusable tomorrow. Like

194:20

this, you could actually get a couple

194:22

years out of this thing. Um, it's worth

194:24

putting a little bit of work into fixing

194:26

it up. So I I did that on purpose. you

194:29

could get something cheaper.

194:32

>> Um,

194:33

>> hey, speaking of getting things cheaper,

194:35

according to Bloomberg's Mark German,

194:37

Apple is preparing an Apple upgrade

194:40

leasing program with CLA that wouldn't

194:42

help you get things cheaper at all, but

194:45

would let you pay a monthly fee for

194:47

devices instead of buying them outright

194:49

with the option to upgrade at the end of

194:51

the lease.

194:53

So, so what is Apple just a financial

194:55

engineering company now? Like, what are

194:57

what are we talking about here? Apple

194:58

already offers an iPhone upgrade program

195:00

that lets customers finance and

195:01

eventually own an iPhone, but this new

195:03

program is a broader leasing program

195:05

which would reportedly include iPhones,

195:07

Apple Watches, iPads, and Macs. iPhones

195:10

and Apple watches would have 2-year

195:11

leases, while Macs and iPads would be

195:13

leased for 3 years before customers

195:14

could upgrade or return the device. The

195:18

program is aimed at making Apple

195:19

products more affordable upfront by

195:21

spreading payments over time while also

195:23

encouraging customers to upgrade to

195:24

newer devices on a regular schedule. Um,

195:29

our discussion question, this is kind of

195:31

funny, is I'm not sure how they do this

195:33

in, you know, America and the rest of

195:35

the world, but how is this any different

195:36

from a Canadian phone plan where you

195:38

just slowly pay off your phone over the

195:40

course of your plan? What makes this

195:42

different slash special?

195:44

I don't know.

195:48

you get to give Apple the money

195:50

>> and Florida even though there's

195:55

no would you lease a piece of tech? I

195:57

mean I think we've talked about that

195:58

enough on the show. I don't think we

195:59

have to do that particular um discussion

196:01

topic but like here's a crazy idea Apple

196:06

free of charge. What if if you're

196:09

reaching the point where your customers

196:11

literally can't afford it anymore.

196:14

What if you just like and I I mean as

196:17

someone who loves technology and loves

196:18

progress, this might this might be out

196:20

of character for me, but what if you

196:22

just chillax for a second?

196:26

What if the new iPhone doesn't cost more

196:28

than the last iPhone

196:30

for one try it for one year

196:34

just to see what it's like? You might

196:36

like it.

196:36

>> You know, as crazy as that sounds,

196:41

I might have learned something from the

196:42

Neo.

196:44

Well, they increased the price of the

196:45

Neo.

196:46

>> But wasn't it like relatively reasonable

196:49

based on memory prices going?

196:50

>> It's still pretty reasonable.

196:52

>> Yeah,

196:52

>> maybe they maybe they did. But then why

196:54

do they need all the why do they need a

196:56

device leasing pro partnership with

196:58

>> full name is MacBook Neo, right?

197:00

>> I believe so.

197:01

>> iPhone Neo.

197:02

>> iPhone Neo the one. But then what cut

197:06

down processor would they put in an

197:08

iPhone Neo? A watch chip. Like what are

197:10

we what are we talking about here? Why

197:13

not? I

197:14

>> mean, yeah, why not? Sure. Thanks, Dan.

197:15

[laughter]

197:16

>> They got those. Um,

197:18

>> no. I mean, like, seriously.

197:19

>> Okay. Then, what do they put in a cheap

197:21

watch, Dan?

197:22

>> What do they put in the Apple Watch?

197:24

Neo, Dan.

197:27

>> Time. Just Just put the watch pit. Wait,

197:30

your feet actually aren't touching.

197:32

>> Sorry. They are. They're hitting here.

197:36

I'm hitting the floor. You can look. You

197:38

can verify if you'd like.

197:42

>> All right.

197:43

All right.

197:44

>> For them to not be touching would look

197:47

would look like this.

197:51

>> I don't know. It doesn't look that

197:52

different. But the point is the point is

197:53

they're definitely touch.

197:55

>> The point is they're definitely touch.

197:56

>> All right. [snorts and laughter]

197:58

>> Whatever's in a TI 84.

198:02

>> Yeah. Get a Casio. You can write Apple

198:05

on it with a Sharpie.

198:06

>> Okay. Um, hey, LTT Labs had some new

198:10

articles this week. I haven't I haven't

198:11

read them yet, but you want to talk

198:12

about it.

198:12

>> New stuff. Yeah. Um, there's there's

198:16

multiple. I don't know if

198:17

[clears throat] we talked about on the

198:18

show last week, but there was the 1080

198:20

article, and ever since then, there's

198:22

been three. Uh, we be pumping out

198:25

articles right now. Uh, it's been really

198:27

fun.

198:28

>> I've been really enjoying this series,

198:29

the LLM quantization. I've I've read

198:32

part one and two and all the

198:33

supplementary material and videos.

198:36

has really been running with this. It's

198:37

been it's been cool to see him um

198:41

>> do this. It's been it's been awesome. Uh

198:44

Labs article released from the LLM

198:46

quantization series. That was 2.5,

198:48

right? Y

198:48

>> is that correct? Yeah. Uh this is an

198:50

unplanned

198:52

part. Oh, right. The.5 is unplanned, I

198:54

guess. Unplanned part/ article to focus

198:56

on the floatingoint number format and

198:57

how it works. Uh this one has some may,

199:00

but it's fun. You should go check it

199:01

out. Um,

199:02

>> I found the the the math to be not too

199:06

over the top so far. Like it's dumbed

199:08

down enough that

199:09

>> I was going to say that's that's largely

199:11

the the writing, baby.

199:13

>> Yep.

199:13

>> Um, good job, Ukash. But, uh, also Labs

199:16

article looking at Intel's intelligent

199:18

bias control 3.5 announced with the ARC

199:22

G3 series of chips. It advertises that

199:26

it will not operate the PC cores under

199:28

14 watts. We found that it is actually

199:31

more complicated and interesting than

199:33

that. Turning off some of the E and LP

199:36

cores as well. Uh there's almost zero

199:39

information about IBC available online.

199:41

So we thought we'd try to characterize

199:43

it. Uh we showed Intel our results and

199:45

they said that it is behaving as

199:48

expected.

199:48

>> Yeah. Uh Tom Peterson was very

199:52

very smug about um about in intelligent

199:56

bias control even though it's something

199:58

that on the surface did not really sound

200:01

that different from what anyone else had

200:02

been doing with um sharing power budgets

200:06

between CPUs and GPUs. But he seemed to

200:09

be and he would know under the

200:12

impression that this was quite different

200:14

and betterer. And so apparently it's uh

200:18

quite different which is which is pretty

200:19

cool to see. I wish they would have just

200:22

communicated you know more of it more

200:25

directly but sure. Yeah. I guess leaving

200:27

it to us to discover is fun too. Uh

200:30

finally Microsoft is experimenting with

200:32

ADUP supported Xbox game streaming.

200:34

They're testing a free tier with Xbox

200:37

insiders allowing players to stream

200:39

select owned games in 1hour sessions

200:42

without a cloud gaming subscription.

200:45

Microsoft says that ads will appear

200:47

before gameplay, not during it. The test

200:50

is meant to keep gameplay uninterrupted

200:52

while paid cloud gaming options remain

200:54

adree. So

200:56

>> that's the most boil the frog thing. So,

200:58

they kind of contradict themselves here

201:00

because it's in 1-hour sessions

201:04

after which time they will not put up an

201:07

ad that interrupts your game play,

201:10

>> but you will have to reauthenticate

201:13

>> and they will put an ad before you start

201:15

a session, which presumably if you've

201:17

been gaming for an hour would be in the

201:19

middle of your gameplay. Maybe I'm

201:20

missing something here. Um, according to

201:22

the Xbox folks, ads should provide

201:24

value,

201:27

avoid interrupting gameplay,

201:29

meet Xbox's quality standards, clearly

201:33

identify what is being advertised, and

201:36

fit player expectations on each

201:38

platform. The goal is to make cloud

201:41

gaming more accessible by giving more

201:42

players a lowerc cost way to stream the

201:45

games they own.

201:49

>> Mhm. H. So I think the most interesting

201:52

discussion question we have here is

201:54

Microsoft says ads should create value.

201:57

In your experience, what does that look

201:59

like? What ads might you like to see

202:03

before a gaming session or before the

202:05

next hour of your gaming session that

202:07

could add value to you?

202:14

I'm trying to I'm trying to I'm trying

202:17

to really genuinely

202:19

uh [laughter]

202:20

>> his I can actually hear I can actually

202:23

hear the gears turning in his in his

202:25

headc case right now. Like I [laughter]

202:29

>> I was really

202:30

>> He's thinking so hard.

202:31

>> I was genuinely trying to find like is

202:33

there anything is there possibly

202:35

>> is there some charitable interpretation

202:37

of this?

202:38

>> Yeah. And I don't think so. Uh, I got I

202:41

have to imagine the ad value is like to

202:44

Microsoft. They don't mean to the Do

202:45

they mean to the user?

202:46

>> They mean to the user, Luke.

202:49

>> They're not going to say add value to

202:50

Microsoft. I mean, that would be easy.

202:53

>> There's no I don't

202:59

[laughter]

203:00

>> I mean there there is Oh man, I think

203:03

that just means high success rate.

203:05

>> I think so too

203:06

>> because if which highly targeted

203:08

carefully targeted which obviously means

203:11

beneficial for the company, beneficial

203:14

for Microsoft, but they're just

203:15

packaging it in a different way.

203:17

>> And look, get ready for the 1800th

203:22

hot take from me so far this win show.

203:25

>> But I believe that

203:28

>> more of them.

203:29

>> If we can get an ad for one of our

203:32

products that we think is really great

203:34

in front of someone who buys it and

203:36

enjoys it, that's actually not terrible

203:38

for them.

203:42

The primary holder of value in that

203:46

scenario is not the consumer though.

203:48

>> No, I'd say it's the ad serving

203:50

platform.

203:51

>> I think you could argue that there like

203:53

if you genuinely see something and

203:55

you're like, "Oh, cool. That like solves

203:57

a problem or looks like a thing I've

203:59

been wanting

204:01

>> or inspires me in whatever way." And

204:03

then you buy it and your feet not

204:05

>> sting. Sure. And you're happy about the

204:07

result.

204:08

>> Then Sure. I can I can say there was

204:11

added value.

204:11

>> We stacked three W's.

204:13

>> I still think the primary W holder is,

204:17

you know,

204:19

>> the the ad the person serving the ads.

204:21

>> Oh, yeah.

204:22

>> Obviously,

204:22

>> they're the they're the they're W prime.

204:25

They're the top W

204:28

>> WW Prime. [laughter]

204:32

Oh man. Um,

204:36

>> sarcastic question. What are some

204:38

examples?

204:38

>> It does. W Prime is still a thing.

204:42

That's so cool, man. When's the last

204:45

time you went on Major Geeks?

204:46

>> Oh, it's been 10 years. When's the last

204:48

time this was updated?

204:50

>> Yeah, I was going to say I don't know if

204:53

this is really a thing still.

204:54

>> W Prime is a leading multi-threaded

204:56

benchmark for x86 processors.

204:59

>> Sorry, is that a Black Friday ad

205:01

>> here? What the

205:04

what? Okay, I'm clicking it. Uh,

205:06

>> maybe it will generate value for me.

205:08

>> I don't know what that is.

205:09

>> Good luck, Sean.

205:10

>> Uh, okay.

205:12

>> Summer sale on iobit.com.

205:15

[sighs]

205:15

>> Driver booster pro keeps over 18 million

205:20

drivers up to

205:22

>> I need that many drivers.

205:23

>> Uh, none of this is an endorsement.

205:24

>> No,

205:25

>> just throwing that out there.

205:28

>> Whoa, but hold on. I have to order now,

205:30

Luke. That in it's 500 milliseconds.

205:33

Wait. No, that it's going down. I've

205:35

never seen milliseconds before.

205:37

>> I've never seen milliseconds on the

205:38

counter before.

205:40

>> 15 minutes.

205:41

>> Yeah,

205:41

>> that's so much time.

205:43

>> I have 15 minutes and 24 sec 23 seconds

205:47

and 300 millconds. I'm going to see what

205:49

happens. Yeah, I will 100%.

205:51

>> Yeah, thank you.

205:51

>> Are both of these in sync?

205:55

>> Are they not?

205:55

>> They're too far away for me to see them

205:57

both with my gaze.

206:00

>> Okay. Well, we'll we'll let them go.

206:01

We'll let them go. Okay. This would be

206:04

so funny if they weren't. I think they

206:06

are though. Um,

206:09

>> Exxon Fang says, "No, you're going to

206:10

lose the discount if you leave it open.

206:13

[laughter]

206:18

Adported game streaming makes me want to

206:20

die." Okay, next topic. Uh, um, oh,

206:23

>> it's time for After Dark.

206:24

>> Okay,

206:25

>> we made it.

206:26

>> Good job.

206:26

>> Hooray. I will choose to

206:29

>> another W show. Uh, consume less but buy

206:33

the things I own as much as possible.

206:36

Hooray.

206:39

Hopefully soon you get to keep doing one

206:42

of those

206:44

and it just doesn't become impossible.

206:46

>> Oh.

206:47

>> Oh, well, yeah, that

206:50

wamp wamp.

206:52

>> All right, calms lld. Any guesses on

206:56

when we will see the Steam Deck 2?

206:59

Amazing. It's not a question about the

207:02

frame. I know Valve will likely wait for

207:04

components to get cheaper first. And

207:07

Luke, has anyone told you you look a

207:09

little like Will Riker from Star Trek:

207:11

The New Generation?

207:12

>> Is he white? And does he have a beard?

207:15

>> Dan, unacceptable.

207:19

What?

207:21

Unacceptable.

207:25

Are you trying to trigger me?

207:29

Star Trek the new generation.

207:33

>> I I thought he said next. [snorts]

207:35

No, I said new.

207:36

>> You said new. My brain.

207:39

>> He knew what he did. Did you see? No.

207:42

Get back on here. Did [laughter] you see

207:44

Did you see what he did?

207:47

>> Nobody on both planes seems to be upset.

207:49

>> Unacceptable.

207:50

>> They will be now that Lionus has pointed

207:52

out.

207:52

>> Unacceptable. Daniel just auto correct.

207:54

>> Not okay. Not okay. No. Nope. No

207:57

rebuttal. You're done. You're off.

208:00

[laughter]

208:01

>> I don't even know what the question was

208:03

anymore. I'm so upset right now. Star

208:06

Trek the New Generation.

208:07

>> Yeah. What was it?

208:08

>> He's so easy. He's so easy to upset.

208:10

>> They need to They need to

208:11

>> I got to not do that. He gets upset.

208:14

>> Um any guesses on when we'll see the new

208:16

Steam Deck, too? I'm sorry, Lionus.

208:18

>> I do I do feel like personally that

208:21

Valve feels a little burned on hardware

208:23

prices right now.

208:24

>> I know, right? Um they so I think they

208:27

are probably even if they were planning

208:29

on releasing one in like late 2027,

208:31

which was an idea that I had in my brain

208:34

a while ago. Um I suspect they might be

208:36

pushing that plan back cuz I I think

208:38

they don't want to release anything in

208:40

the hardware environment that we're

208:41

currently in.

208:43

>> Straight up 100% agree. However, I do

208:46

think that the pressure is going to

208:48

build over the next couple of years when

208:50

the PlayStation 6 launches.

208:52

What's going to happen is games that are

208:55

targeting PlayStation 6 are going to

208:57

start coming out

208:57

>> and they're going to suffer

208:59

>> straight up not going to run on this on

209:01

the Steam Deck.

209:02

>> Yeah,

209:03

>> straight up not going to happen.

209:04

>> Yeah. Yeah.

209:06

>> Hello DLL. Question for Luke. Maybe tips

209:10

on motivating developers on testing more

209:13

and being proud of their work. I

209:16

>> feel like our team is like so like takes

209:18

pride in their work so much. Hire

209:21

developers who take pride in their work

209:22

maybe is step one, but I'll let you I'll

209:24

let you carry on.

209:25

>> Um, yeah, I mean that's that's tough.

209:27

Testing more is interesting. Um,

209:30

>> I don't know if you can train people to

209:32

take pride in their work.

209:34

>> You have to inspire, not train. Um, it

209:38

might be better for them if you let them

209:40

do some like developer experience style

209:42

stuff where you uh make sure that you're

209:45

giving them cycles of time where they

209:46

can

209:49

make things that already exist better,

209:51

make them easier to maintain, improve

209:53

the user experience. It's a little bit

209:55

hard to tell without knowing what you're

209:57

building. Um,

210:00

how many tests do you actually need? Um,

210:05

if you if you do need

210:07

>> that depends what you're doing. Is it an

210:08

MRI machine or is it a, you know, fun

210:10

little web game.

210:14

>> Yeah, you may still need a certain Yeah,

210:17

>> like I guarantee you this wasn't tested.

210:19

>> Zoom said 80% code coverage and it's

210:21

like, yeah, I mean, I doubt it.

210:26

>> Damn. Damn. I discovered this when I was

210:28

doing an audit.

210:30

[laughter] I think I told you about

210:31

this, Luke. I had no idea that this

210:33

existed and I

210:35

>> Yeah, you told me how you found it.

210:36

>> Don't get hit by the red cameras.

210:38

>> Yeah.

210:39

>> Crazy. Ah crap. NO.

210:43

>> NO.

210:45

>> YOU GOT OWNED.

210:47

>> NO.

210:48

>> WE SHOULD UPDATE THIS. [screaming]

210:49

>> NO.

210:50

>> WE SHOULD UPDATE THIS to computer

210:51

components and make it so that RAM is

210:53

the really bad one.

210:55

>> I'd be so down. Bring back a classic LTT

211:00

reference.

211:03

Um, yeah. I don't know. It it it it

211:05

doesn't I don't think it comes down to

211:07

convincing. I think it comes down to

211:08

inspiring.

211:09

>> Man, these MacBooks are getting me.

211:11

>> Set certain benchmarks. Find uh user

211:14

feedback. Um, show the impact of

211:17

actions. Make sure that they understand,

211:20

you know, what they're doing matters and

211:22

and why. Um,

211:26

>> yeah. I'm not sure. Sorry. I don't think

211:30

that's an incredible answer. Honestly,

211:31

without knowing the thing that you're

211:32

building, it becomes a little bit more

211:33

difficult. If I knew the thing you're

211:34

building, I could probably answer more

211:36

thoroughly.

211:38

>> I have spent almost a million dollars.

211:42

>> Ah, [screaming]

211:45

damn. Next question. He just got roasted

211:47

by a red camera.

211:48

>> Hi, DLL. What's a piece of tech you've

211:51

trained yourself to work around rather

211:53

than just replace?

211:57

Oh. Um, okay. This is going to be about

212:01

the biggest first world problem ever,

212:03

but the 115inch TCL TV in my home

212:07

theater does not have dedicated IR

212:10

signals for power on and power off.

212:13

>> Oh, my steak. It's just so juicy.

212:16

>> Yeah. You know what?

212:18

>> My lobster.

212:19

>> When you're trying to

212:20

>> Why is my lobster

212:21

>> I have to eat it out of the bowl? when

212:23

you're trying to make a setup

212:26

that is

212:26

>> it's so tender. My knife just [laughter]

212:29

>> I don't even need it. I bought this

212:30

amazing knife. I can't even use it.

212:32

>> Do you guys want to hear the answer or

212:34

not? [laughter]

212:35

>> Sorry. Sorry. I wasn't even listening.

212:38

So, the issue is that um it doesn't have

212:41

IR signals for power on and power off.

212:44

It only has a power toggle signal. And

212:48

the idea there is that well whenever

212:52

it's off you should press the power

212:54

toggle button and it will turn on like

212:56

you would want it to. And when it's on,

212:58

you should press the power toggle button

213:00

and it will turn off like you'd want it

213:01

to. But many other TV manufacturers,

213:05

even if their remote only has a toggle,

213:08

and even if they do have an IR code for

213:10

toggle, they also still maintain power

213:12

on and power off. Now, in theory, in a

213:17

perfect world, CEC is the solution. You

213:21

just power on your other device and it

213:23

passes through CEC commands and your TV

213:27

magically powers on. But in the real

213:30

world, if you happen to have more than a

213:32

couple of devices and especially if one

213:35

of them happens to be a PC,

213:39

CEC, it either isn't a thing or it

213:42

doesn't work very well. even have a $50

213:44

CC dongle connected to my PC right now

213:46

in that room that it just

213:49

>> it so what will happen is the most

213:51

recent version of trying to get this

213:53

working is that any of the other devices

213:56

with CEC if I'm using CEC to rely on it

214:00

to turn on the TV will create what's

214:02

called a CC storm which can accidentally

214:05

wake up the PC which then because it

214:07

also has CEC will then grab the input

214:10

and switch it over into the wrong thing.

214:12

It's a whole mess. And if TCL

214:16

just had power on and power off IR

214:19

commands, then I could just use my old

214:21

Harmony remote and I could press one

214:23

button and it would turn everything on

214:25

in sync, turn everything off in sync.

214:27

And see the problem with the toggle. So,

214:29

so you can use the toggle as well, but

214:32

the issue is that if anybody is like

214:33

standing in the wrong spot or does

214:36

something or or a command doesn't go

214:38

through for whatever reason, they can

214:40

end up out of sync. So, your receiver

214:42

and your computer will turn on and your

214:44

TV will turn off and then you press the

214:46

button again and your TV turns on and

214:47

your computer and your receiver turn

214:49

off. And if you're trying to set up a

214:52

setup that is family userfriendly and

214:56

that you want people to actually be able

214:58

to use, like we have a karaoke setup in

215:00

there and if my little kids can't figure

215:02

out how to turn it on, they're never

215:03

going to use it. And like that sucks.

215:05

Like why why even have it then? Um like

215:08

I'm not here. It's Friday night. I'm not

215:11

at home. If nobody can use it, if dad's

215:13

not here, that's that's stupid. That's

215:15

not technology making our lives better.

215:17

That's technology just being present and

215:20

being a cost and taking up space. It

215:22

sucks. Um and so figuring this out um

215:27

has has actually caused me many many

215:31

lost hours. Uh because CC is just ah

215:34

it's such a nightmare. Like my Nvidia

215:36

Shield actually has very granular

215:38

controls of CEC. So you can go and you

215:40

can say turn it on and when the shield

215:42

turns on um tell tell other things to

215:46

switch the input turn other things on

215:48

when other things turn on do wake the

215:50

shield you do do the do do this do do

215:52

that it's got like six different toggles

215:53

for all the Thank you for that uh it's

215:56

got six different toggles for all the

215:58

different potential triggers from either

215:59

side. Meanwhile, my AV receiver just has

216:03

one thing. C on CC off. That's it.

216:09

Great.

216:11

Thank you. Not actually helpful. And

216:15

then the same with the this useless TV

216:17

that doesn't have power on and power off

216:19

commands because so of course it

216:21

wouldn't have proper granular controls

216:23

in the CC for it as well. So you'll end

216:25

up with stupid stuff like one thing. Uh

216:28

oh, and oh, don't even get me started on

216:29

the deplorable mess that Logitech left

216:32

Harmony in when they EOLled everything.

216:35

Like if I could just get the Harmony

216:37

software to do exactly what I told it to

216:39

do. Like I I came up with this one crazy

216:42

solution where I was going to use the

216:44

Shield. I'll turn on the Shield first

216:46

and have it turn on the TV and then turn

216:50

on the PC, switch the input, and then

216:53

turn the Shield off. And I could set the

216:55

Shield to turn things on but not turn

216:58

them off. Or no, what was it? Turn

216:59

things on but not be turned off by other

217:01

things. And then I wanted to create a

217:03

power down sequence that would actually

217:04

power up the Shield, turn off the PC and

217:07

the receiver. No, turn off the PC, then

217:10

have the shield turn off, which would

217:11

turn off the receiver and the TV. Like I

217:13

had like figured it out. This is the

217:15

kind of stupid workaround that

217:19

no one should have to do. But like I I

217:21

was at the end of my I was at the end of

217:23

my freaking rope. And then that

217:25

ultimately didn't work because the

217:27

harmony software doesn't allow you to

217:29

just arbitrarily turn this on and then

217:31

turn that on, then put a delay anywhere

217:32

you want. You can only put delays in

217:34

certain spots. And I'm like, if it just

217:36

completely got out of my way and let me

217:38

do whatever I wanted, then I would have

217:40

automations that would work. And yes, I

217:42

know that there are replacements to the

217:43

Harmony, but none of them solve the

217:45

underlying issue of that my TLC

217:48

TV doesn't have dedicated power on and

217:51

power off commands, and I don't want to

217:53

replace it because to replace it would

217:55

cost me like anywhere between 20 and

217:57

$30,000. So, so, so that and it still

218:01

looks pretty good.

218:02

>> Will work.

218:02

>> Well, it's a pain in the butt.

218:03

>> Yeah, it's huge. You got to haul it out

218:06

of there and Yeah, kind of a nightmare

218:09

um for me. me, I don't think I have an

218:12

amazing answer. I think mine is more

218:15

just that the Bluetooth in my car has

218:16

become unreliable. Um, I don't really

218:20

want to do surgery on my car and replace

218:22

the media console. Um, so what I have

218:28

done is I bought one of these things.

218:30

Let me see. Uh, I'm aware of the

218:33

unfolded circle. I actually have one at

218:34

home and I'm going to try it out. I

218:36

don't know if it's going to help though.

218:38

So the best ca the the best solution I

218:40

can come up with now is that I need to

218:42

create a Jarvis at home kind of thing

218:45

that uses the camera view uh in the in

218:48

the home theater to determine if the TV

218:51

is on or off

218:53

>> and then

218:54

>> you try to do that with Adysius

218:55

>> and then try to figure out some kind of

218:57

an automation so that it will reync it

218:59

if it gets out of sync. That's like

219:00

that's the the only solution I can come

219:02

up with right now that has

219:04

>> knowing that the problem exists but that

219:05

sounds pretty cool. Um, but yeah, I I

219:08

bought one of these

219:10

um off of UG Green's actual website

219:12

because I didn't want to get off Amazon.

219:14

Um, and I, you know, my phone can

219:18

connect to two different Bluetooth

219:20

devices. So, while it's sitting there

219:22

repeatedly trying to actually connect to

219:23

my actual car and failing over and over

219:25

and over again, I can just connect to

219:27

the UG Green adapter. It doesn't sound

219:29

quite as good as just natural Bluetooth

219:31

right to the car, I'm assuming, because

219:32

of the ox connector, but it sounds

219:34

pretty all right. Um, it's not the end

219:36

of the world or anything.

219:37

>> It's actually probably more to do with

219:38

just like lowquality Bluetooth.

219:41

>> Okay. I never really dove into it. I

219:42

just assumed it was the ox, but yeah, I

219:44

don't know. Um,

219:48

um, and I will I will hear there's like

219:52

a slight amount of lag that will happen

219:54

when it finally connects the the other

219:56

Bluetooth connection to my car. So, I'll

219:58

hear the song just kind of like and then

220:01

keep playing. Oh, yeah. And I'll be

220:02

like, "Okay, cool. I can switch to the

220:03

Bluetooth my car now." And like usually

220:05

it's not a problem. Usually the

220:06

Bluetooth will just connect

220:07

automatically. But every once in a while

220:09

it'll take like 10 minutes

220:12

and it's like nah I could have been

220:13

listening to music or a podcast or

220:14

whatever and that's just kind of

220:15

annoying. This was like an $18 Canadian.

220:18

Plug it in once. It has worked every

220:20

single time forever since then. Sure,

220:23

why not?

220:27

Cheers DLL. Regarding our luggage weight

220:31

chat 6 months back, it's OSHA limits for

220:34

baggage handlers. That's why the cap is

220:36

per bag, not total. Um, it's like I

220:40

think it's 50 lb per bag, which is the

220:42

maximum single person carry.

220:44

>> Yes. So, Flare,

220:47

totally aware. So then why is it that

220:50

what they actually wanted me to do was

220:52

just pay more

220:57

if they're not allowed to lift the bag

220:59

at the weight that I had. I'm aware of

221:00

that.

221:03

>> That was not why I that was not why I

221:05

lost it. Why I lost it was that my bag

221:08

was well within the limit of what they

221:11

are allowed to carry. It was just over

221:14

the weight allowance before you have to

221:15

pay a bit more for it. And my partner's

221:19

bag was like 20 lb under the limit while

221:22

I was like 2 1/2 lb over it.

221:26

They would have been fine.

221:33

Howdy, DLO. Could we get a material cost

221:36

breakdown for the socks? I'm an AV tech

221:39

and these socks would have been magical,

221:41

but $15 a sock is tough. Side note, the

221:44

screwdriver has been a reliable tool.

221:48

Um,

221:49

material breakdown, I think it's

221:51

actually right on the packaging. 33%

221:53

polyester, 30% marino wool, 18% nylon,

221:58

13% acrylic, 6% spandex. They almost had

222:03

60% marino wool. Um but what we actually

222:06

found was that there was a significant

222:09

amount more pilling on the 60% marino

222:13

wool uh due to the natural fibers and we

222:16

have enough of it

222:19

in the current composition to this is

222:23

this is an area where we actually have

222:24

to be really careful because we did

222:27

independent third party testing and

222:29

found that because of the thickness of

222:31

it um which is like due to the cushion

222:34

which is like a desirable thing that we

222:36

don't want to get rid of because of the

222:37

thickness. It doesn't actually dry very

222:40

fast. Like I will not I will not

222:42

advertise this as a quick drying sock.

222:45

But what I can say subjectively as the

222:48

person who's been doing a a lot of the

222:50

wear testing for it is that when and if

222:53

my feet do get exposed to moisture

222:55

either through their own

222:59

secretion of moisture or outside

223:01

factors, um they still do subjectively a

223:06

good job of making my feet not feel

223:08

super wet. So they still have that

223:09

natural wicking quality. Um, and that

223:13

was something that we weren't really

223:14

sure how to sell. Um, so we didn't so we

223:17

just don't really talk about it in any

223:19

of the marketing on the site or or on

223:20

the packaging. Um, but we what I found

223:23

was that with the 30% marino wool, you

223:25

still get that benefit. Um, and so not

223:29

having the ugly pilling and having

223:32

something that kind of looks a little

223:34

nicer, um, and, you know, feels more

223:36

reassuringly quality after a few washes,

223:39

um, and still having all the the

223:41

benefits of the natural fiber. As far

223:43

as, you know, my wear testing goes, um,

223:47

that was why we ultimately landed on

223:49

this composition. As for why it's so

223:50

expensive,

223:52

I don't know if you noticed, but

223:54

everything has gone up in price. And we

223:57

are not like outside of the price band

224:00

for like a like a a a high quality

224:04

marino wool sock. And we've got the

224:07

copper infusion

224:09

um that helps with odors. I'm not

224:12

allowed to say antimicrobial,

224:14

but what I can say is that everyone

224:17

knows where odors come from and it

224:19

reduces odors.

224:23

>> Wow, I didn't say nothing.

224:25

>> Stunning.

224:25

>> Uh, so it's it's a really cool it's a

224:27

really cool treatment.

224:29

>> Um,

224:31

and

224:35

I mean, creator warehouse teams got to

224:37

get paid.

224:38

uh lifetime a limited lifetime warranty

224:40

costs money. I mean that's something

224:42

that I feel like I've I've kind of

224:45

harped on before and people get mad at

224:46

me for it sometimes, but like there is

224:49

no free lunch. Ultimately, the consumer

224:52

pays for everything and we felt that in

224:55

terms of creating a total package around

224:59

these that was going to be competitive.

225:01

Um, it was going to be we we had to

225:04

weigh the cost of what that warranty is

225:07

likely to cost us against what our

225:10

positioning is going to be in the

225:11

market. And what we determined was that

225:14

it's probably going to if we didn't do

225:18

it, we would still be so close to

225:20

competitors who do offer it that the the

225:24

value proposition would not be as good.

225:27

So, we're better off baking some

225:30

warranty fulfillment into the cost

225:32

understanding that um you know that is

225:36

going to drive the price up a little

225:37

bit. Like it's all it's like boring.

225:39

It's boring business stuff. Um, but why

225:41

does it cost so much? Because things

225:43

have gotten freaking expensive. We

225:45

actually had a uh we had a quarterly um

225:48

financial meeting. Luke was in it um the

225:51

other day and uh one of the things that

225:54

came up is that due to tariffs and uh

225:58

fuel sir charges and just general

226:02

inflation, our cost of goods sold is up

226:06

by deep into double digit percentage uh

226:10

over the last honestly not that long of

226:12

a period of time. And we've done

226:15

everything in our power to try to keep

226:17

our our external prices reasonable as

226:21

much as we can for customers.

226:22

>> There's some

226:24

This might sound weird and my god am I

226:27

old and lame, but there's actually been

226:29

some really cool stuff that's been done

226:30

to try to keep that stuff down. There's

226:33

that team's been working.

226:35

>> I know. And it's and you know what? It's

226:38

been really uh it's been really

226:41

discouraging I think both for the team

226:43

and for and for ownership to be very

226:48

blunt with you guys right now. We're

226:49

deep in the WAN show. So, you know,

226:51

hopefully I'm not going to, you know,

226:53

say anything that's going to get me into

226:54

too much trouble here, but like

226:57

everyone in an org working like harder

227:02

for a worse result is super demoralizing

227:04

across the board. And especially when

227:07

the whole thing is so unnecessary,

227:10

um it's really frustrating. And so yeah,

227:12

I just want to take a moment, I guess,

227:14

then to to acknowledge the incredible

227:17

[snorts] work that the team is doing to

227:20

make this less

227:22

>> that's happening actually across the

227:24

board because

227:25

>> yeah,

227:26

>> CW is dealing with, you know,

227:29

>> oil issues, costs of everything going up

227:32

largely related to oil issues, but

227:33

sometimes not 100%. um tariff

227:36

nightmares. Uh the LMG side is dealing

227:40

with um from talking to a bunch of

227:42

creators recently, it feels like all of

227:43

VOD is slightly down and one of the

227:48

underlying assumptions is that it's just

227:51

watch time going to shorts.

227:52

>> Yeah. So all of VA is slightly down

227:54

right now and the PC space has hurt like

227:58

most of anything because everything's

228:00

just so expensive and the hobby is very

228:02

difficult to be interested in right now

228:03

because the stuff that's coming out

228:05

isn't all that interesting or new or

228:06

crazy or it's just for AI and it's all

228:11

mind-bogglingly expensive compared to

228:13

how expensive it used to be. Um so it's

228:16

it's tough to make content in that realm

228:18

that people want to watch and engage

228:19

with. And then you get on the flow plane

228:21

side. We have a similar problem. When

228:23

it's tough for people to be interested

228:25

and watch and engage with this type of

228:26

content, people are going to

228:27

unsubscribe. And also, we're dealing

228:30

with AI pressures where if we're in a in

228:33

a data center, that data center rack

228:36

space is going to have people that want

228:38

to bid on it for way more. Also, that

228:41

data center who has to constantly buy

228:43

and refresh their hardware is paying way

228:45

more for it now. So they are going to be

228:50

in some cases massively increasing their

228:52

prices and even just the services the

228:54

software as a services that we're using

228:56

they are running into the same problems

228:58

with their bills. Therefore they are

229:00

going to increase the prices on us. So

229:02

actually every single segment within the

229:05

umbrella organization is like under some

229:08

form of like effectively attack.

229:10

>> Want the kicker?

229:13

>> Yeah. badminton shuttles. [laughter]

229:18

>> No way. I think you told me this.

229:21

>> Mega inflation.

229:22

>> I never really thought about it. So,

229:24

yeah. I guess literally everything. Oh,

229:26

>> so this one's fun because um apparently

229:30

it's a it's a duck feather shortage that

229:33

comes down to changing dietary habits in

229:36

China.

229:38

[laughter]

229:40

>> Okay. And you can only use the feathers

229:42

from the left wing which really doesn't

229:44

help and it's it's a whole thing. Um

229:49

yeah basic [laughter]

229:51

>> so somebody somebody in in full plane

229:53

chat said full plane is sinking question

229:54

mark question mark question mark cat

229:56

said. So I want to address uh we are not

229:59

going quietly into the night. I I just

230:01

mentioned

230:02

>> we've got some cool ideas.

230:03

>> I just mentioned that the CW team has

230:05

been moving and shaking and and making

230:07

things happen and doing some really cool

230:09

creative stuff.

230:10

Don't count flow plane out. We've got

230:12

some strategies. AJ's been cooking up um

230:14

some stuff we can do that will likely

230:16

make it into videos. I'll say that much

230:19

so far. I don't want to commit to plans

230:21

cuz the plans are still being made. Um

230:23

but we're not just sitting here going

230:24

like, "Oh no, the bill's going up. I

230:26

guess we're just screwed." Um we're

230:29

we're working on on making a um

230:34

Full Plane's whole thing was that it was

230:36

supposed to be

230:38

defendable against sustainable and

230:41

defendable against the bill changes that

230:45

other companies might have. The idea was

230:47

that we were supposed to be uh able to

230:50

be free from lock in and all that kind

230:51

of stuff. So this is just our biggest

230:54

test. Rod uh posted in float plane chat,

230:58

"You could just fill the Smash Champs

231:01

building with water,

231:03

play underwater hockey, and call it

231:05

Splash Champs." We wouldn't even have to

231:07

make that many changes to the sign, just

231:09

the one letter. It's actually genius.

231:12

[laughter]

231:13

Two letters. Sorry.

231:15

>> My god.

231:16

>> I mean, you could take an M. Hold on. M.

231:19

You could make the L out of part of the

231:21

M. So, you just buy one more P and then

231:23

you're in good shape.

231:25

>> Yeah.

231:26

Yeah, that's fantastic.

231:30

>> Oh, this is interesting. Raiden 428

231:32

says, "Hawaii also imports lots of

231:34

Chinese feathers for making cloaks, etc.

231:37

Same shortage. We use the entire bird,

231:40

though. Uh, price is up and can't get

231:42

some types at all. I guarantee you it's

231:43

the left wing you can't get get any of

231:47

>> for making cloaks, they said. Yeah, I I

231:50

don't know what a Hawaiian cloak looks

231:52

like, but what I do know is that we need

231:53

to drop in on this timer and find out if

231:56

I can still get my $3 off. Get it before

231:59

it's gone. It's Oh my god, that this is

232:01

so like early 2000's web. Look at it

232:04

turning my cursor into a popsicle.

232:07

>> Look, it's it's 310.

232:10

I don't

232:11

>> I don't want 92% off expired. Okay. So,

232:15

if

232:16

>> you actually lose it,

232:17

>> I mean, can I just refresh it?

232:20

>> It's $30 now. So, it's just

232:23

>> That's crazy. There's no way.

232:25

>> Hold on. There's no way. Okay. Buy now.

232:28

Hold on. Can I still get my $3 off? I

232:31

want my $3 off. Where's my $3 off,

232:35

>> dude? Scammer gets scammed. You took too

232:37

long.

232:38

>> I got wrecked.

232:38

>> That's actually crazy. I can't believe

232:40

they actually followed through on it.

232:41

>> Wow. They They're committed. [laughter]

232:44

commit. Commit to the grift.

232:46

>> I'm also surprised by just refreshing

232:47

you can't like get through it. That's

232:49

wild.

232:50

>> Everyone's like, "Clear cookie. Clear

232:51

cookie."

232:52

>> We know it's a cookie.

232:54

>> Yeah. It's just It's I'm just surprised

232:56

they actually like did it.

232:57

>> Yeah. Me, too.

232:59

>> I thought it was going to hit zero and

233:01

they're going to be like, "We're going

233:01

to be nice to you this time."

233:03

>> Last chance. Last chance.

233:04

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

233:06

>> Yes, Conrad. We know.

233:09

[laughter and snorts]

233:10

>> All right, Dan. Hit me.

233:12

>> Uh, sure.

233:13

Would you recommend the Steam Cube for

233:15

people that are moving off consoles and

233:17

looking for their first PC?

233:21

>> It's hard for me to recommend the Steam

233:24

Machine at the price that it's at.

233:27

>> Yeah.

233:28

>> Um,

233:29

and right now I would say that you just

233:35

shouldn't move off your console. Like I

233:37

think the timing is so bad.

233:39

>> Okay, here's a question. When do you

233:41

think the timing would be better?

233:43

>> It's hard for me to say because I don't

233:45

know what PlayStation 6 pricing is going

233:47

to be.

233:47

>> TSMC is going up.

233:48

>> Yeah, but

233:49

>> memory is not signaling that it's going

233:51

down.

233:51

>> Right now, I can buy a PlayStation 5 for

233:54

like under $500. This is literally half

233:57

the price.

233:57

>> That's a way better deal.

233:59

>> This is half the price of a Steam

234:00

Machine,

234:01

>> dude. PC is so cooked right now.

234:03

>> Yeah. $470.

234:05

I mean, the last Scrapyard Wars, I

234:07

literally won it by buying a used

234:08

PlayStation 5,

234:09

>> and it wasn't even that bad then.

234:13

Wow. That equation just got way better.

234:15

How much was yours? Do you remember?

234:17

>> Uh um I I want to say three.

234:19

>> I remember it being like a crazy deal.

234:22

>> 375

234:23

>> even back then, meaning that those

234:24

prices are probably decently similar to

234:26

where they used to be.

234:27

>> Yeah. I mean, this is this is not a bad

234:28

deal. No. $425 bucks plus $35 shipping.

234:32

You get a controller, an HDMI cable, a

234:35

USB charging cable, and a PlayStation 5.

234:38

Um, 98.6%

234:41

positive ratings out of 9.2,000

234:43

ratings. Like, just this is the disc

234:45

edition, too. Just buy it. Like, no,

234:48

don't buy a Steam machine.

234:50

>> Kind of depends on what console they're

234:51

on.

234:52

>> Um, and and and you'll be able to play

234:54

GTA 6, which you will not be playing on

234:57

a Steam machine. This is a This is a

234:59

more performant

235:01

computer. Like for for the for the

235:03

difference. You could buy this

235:04

PlayStation, you could buy a $500 PC, do

235:07

all your computing on the PC, do your

235:08

gaming on the PlayStation. Like look,

235:09

I'm obviously I'm I'm a very pro PC guy.

235:12

I freaking love PC. I love PC gaming,

235:15

but

235:15

>> PlayStations are a ripping deal.

235:17

>> I'm also not out here to give you bad

235:19

advice.

235:19

>> Yeah.

235:24

Rod Rosenber.

235:32

Okay, Rod is forwarding a message from

235:38

>> uh the the guy who Yeah, thank you Jill.

235:41

Uh the guy who made the Linux migration

235:43

tool um we talked about on WAN last

235:46

week. It it helps you migrate from

235:47

Windows over to over to Linux. Supports

235:49

a whole bunch of dros. Does some really

235:50

cool stuff. I'm currently doing a

235:52

quadruple dual boot test because this

235:56

tool was originally not built to install

235:58

multiple Linux distros. Also, kudos for

236:00

getting the first part of my name

236:02

correct. Good job, Linus. Uh the second

236:04

part is Dutch for pigeon.

236:08

>> Sick.

236:08

>> Okay, cool.

236:09

>> Nice.

236:10

>> Keep up the good work.

236:11

>> That's awesome. That's a It's a cool

236:13

tool, man. Um

236:16

hell yeah. Sweet. Thanks for forwarding

236:18

that, Rod.

236:19

>> Dan, hit me. Hi, DL. I am a university

236:22

professor and I'm getting

236:23

>> Oh, speaking of Dan, hit me. I ran into

236:25

the guy who made the thing.

236:26

>> Me, too.

236:27

>> At open.

236:28

He specifically requested that I come

236:31

and find it.

236:31

>> Yeah, it's uh it's over there. Show it

236:33

again.

236:34

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

236:36

>> I uh

236:42

>> So, he just he made a little plugged in

236:44

right now. Yeah. Yeah.

236:45

>> I told him I told him that I uh that I

236:48

kept it on a shelf behind me and he he

236:50

assumed that we had thrown it out

236:51

immediately.

236:52

>> No. And I was like, "No, shut up. You're

236:54

wrong, dude. It's so funny.

236:55

>> That's amazing.

236:56

>> This is art, man."

236:57

>> Oh, yeah.

236:57

>> Why would we throw it away? This is This

236:59

is like This is one for the archive.

237:01

>> Yeah.

237:01

>> Yeah. We're keeping this forever. I'm so

237:03

sorry.

237:03

>> That's fantastic.

237:05

>> Anyway, sorry. Hit me, Dan.

237:06

>> Hi, DL. I'm a university professor and

237:09

I'm getting iPad kids in my first year

237:12

programming. We were talking about this

237:14

earlier.

237:15

>> One couldn't even type. Just two

237:18

fingerpacking.

237:20

>> With AI tools,

237:22

>> will the next gener I mean Oh yeah.

237:24

Again,

237:26

what they don't understand as well is

237:27

file systems are a big one, right?

237:29

>> Yeah.

237:30

>> With AI tools, will the next generation

237:33

even need keyboards?

237:34

>> I mean, they'll need them, but will they

237:35

know how to use them? That's the

237:37

question.

237:37

>> Can't they just talk to like uh Copilot,

237:40

Siri, Google? There's a meme. There's a

237:43

It's I'm pretty sure it's just a meme,

237:45

but there is a Silicon Valley meme where

237:48

programmers are getting rid of their

237:49

keyboards because they're just speaking

237:50

to their agents.

237:52

>> I don't I don't see that as as too much

237:54

of a meme, honestly, given another 6

237:56

months.

237:57

>> I don't want to sit there and freaking

237:59

talk all the time. I want to type. Does

238:01

that make me all the kids are wrong?

238:02

Boomer.

238:03

>> Boomer.

238:07

>> Sometimes you just want to relax. It's

238:09

not relaxing. Yeah, but you can sit on

238:11

the couch with your eyes closed and just

238:12

go like

238:14

>> It's It's also

238:14

>> center me a div.

238:15

>> It's always funny to me how obviously

238:19

forever alone certain developments are.

238:21

Like the fact that you can be talking

238:23

and not disturb anybody tells me so much

238:25

about you. [laughter]

238:27

Just jabbering at your computer all day

238:29

like, "Okay, tell me you don't share a

238:33

space with someone without telling me

238:34

you don't share a space with someone."

238:36

>> That's a good point. [laughter] Like, oh

238:39

man,

238:41

>> I'm stuck.

238:42

>> Unintentional self own

238:45

>> going into university.

238:46

>> Yeah,

238:47

>> for software development, not knowing

238:48

how to type is wild.

238:50

>> That's crazy, man. And the fact that

238:52

nobody at any point told this kid, maybe

238:56

don't go into software development.

238:58

>> Yeah. Or like spend a weekend

239:00

>> Yeah.

239:01

>> on on uh what is it called? Um, a lot of

239:05

a lot of people I think just go into

239:07

software development because they think

239:09

it's got good money in it. And I think

239:11

one of

239:11

>> still [laughter]

239:13

>> one of I don't know.

239:14

>> Yeah. I mean, it's it's like it's what

239:17

you read about. I think maybe one of the

239:18

reasons why it's so nice working here

239:21

and maybe why your developers are so

239:23

good is because they like like it. It's

239:26

kind of like fun and it's their hobby

239:28

and they just happen to have gone to

239:31

school for something they enjoy.

239:33

>> Some of them Some of them didn't go to

239:35

school. They just skipped that part.

239:37

[laughter]

239:38

>> Started working professionally.

239:40

>> Yeah. I think a lot of

239:43

>> Yeah. I didn't I didn't go to school for

239:44

this really. [laughter] Uh

239:48

which is it's interesting.

239:51

What are they going to do? What are they

239:53

going to do? Are we cooked?

239:56

like as a species I think quite

239:58

literally like we're we're past the one

240:00

and a half degrees threshold, right?

240:02

>> Uh yeah, quite quite far.

240:04

>> Yeah.

240:06

>> Yeah.

240:06

>> Cooked and

240:07

>> But that's okay. The solution is to turn

240:08

on more air conditioning, right?

240:10

>> Yeah.

240:11

>> That's how it works.

240:12

>> Mhm.

240:12

>> Well, we just had a record of power use

240:14

for all time in BC.

240:16

>> Just build more nuclear power. What are

240:18

you guys talking about?

240:18

>> I said to

240:19

>> I mean, I'm actually kind of pro-

240:20

nuclear power, but everybody should be.

240:23

I said I like just we

240:25

>> I'm more green than both of you. I said

240:27

we should add another ocean.

240:28

>> Could you maybe virtue signal harder?

240:31

>> Just make another ocean. [laughter]

240:33

>> Yeah, because we're we're hydroelectric.

240:34

We don't use stinky buildings. Um

240:37

>> yeah, but hydroelectric only works. So

240:38

So uh

240:39

>> so just build another mountain.

240:41

>> We just import Mount Baker.

240:43

>> I think this is before your time. Did

240:45

you No, you're post B, right?

240:48

>> We did a company workation to B.

240:50

>> I'm five. allowed. So I I also don't I'm

240:54

>> post post.

240:55

>> So we did an LMG work to

240:57

>> B [laughter]

240:59

>> and uh we went to see a glacier and they

241:03

showed us like like an actual walking

241:07

stepping up the hill the like spikes in

241:11

the ground for how much it was receding

241:13

every year. And we were like

241:17

oh well that's not good. Um what's the

241:21

solution? And they're like, "There isn't

241:24

one." And we're like, "Okay, so

241:29

what's the outcome?" And they're like,

241:32

"Well, this glacier has water runoff,

241:36

which is, you know, how it like melts

241:38

and stuff that fills these bodies of

241:41

water, which powers all this hydroele

241:43

electricity. When it's gone,

241:47

there will be no electricity." And I was

241:49

like, "Oh,

241:53

>> time for nuclear enrichment."

241:59

>> Well, I mean, if we're already over 1.2,

242:01

then can we just like go back to dirty

242:04

coal?

242:05

>> No, we just give up.

242:06

>> We just need we just need to make an air

242:07

conditioner for the Earth.

242:11

>> So, giant mirrors.

242:12

>> Just put the heat.

242:14

>> Just put the heat.

242:15

>> Data centers in space.

242:17

>> Yeah. Well, we just get a big ice cube

242:19

and then put it in the ocean.

242:22

>> Maybe we should cool the data centers in

242:24

space with ACs that dump the data

242:26

centers and space heat on Earth.

242:28

>> Put a big peltier outside in

242:31

geocynchronous orbit.

242:33

>> Yeah.

242:33

>> Watching the data centers in space

242:35

debate has been

242:38

fascinating.

242:40

I don't know if I can remember the last

242:43

time that both sides of an argument were

242:45

so effectively arguing past each other.

242:49

It's like you've got the one side that's

242:52

like they did the math. It's totally

242:54

possible. They have a ton of experience

242:56

with building satellites and cooling

242:59

things in space. And then you've got the

243:01

other side saying there's a lot of

243:04

practical problems like how do you swap

243:06

a RAM stick and also like the costs of

243:10

the launches which by the way fuel is

243:12

not getting cheaper and also

243:14

>> like it's impractical and

243:17

stupid. Not that it's impossible. Not

243:19

that the math doesn't work, but the real

243:20

world is not just math. And they're just

243:22

going, "Oh,

243:24

>> what we really need to do is not use use

243:28

uh uh uh traditional launching

243:31

mechanisms. What we really need to do is

243:32

just spin stuff." Really, really cool.

243:34

>> That thing's cool. I love spin.

243:36

>> I hope if it ever works, it's really

243:38

cool.

243:39

>> If it ever works, for sure.

243:41

>> It's Do you guys know what this is?

243:43

Basically, you just rip it around this

243:46

like thing. You spin it and then it goes

243:48

boom.

243:50

>> Yeah,

243:50

>> theoretically it's like a throwing

243:52

speed.

243:52

>> I think it makes a lot more sense on the

243:54

moon to launch things away from the

243:56

moon.

243:57

>> On Earth,

243:59

>> I don't know.

244:00

>> It's just you just push stuff to Mars if

244:02

you were on the moon.

244:06

[laughter]

244:07

>> I mean, compared to here, you know, you

244:09

give it a hard kick.

244:11

>> Yeah.

244:13

Uh, okay. Let's see. [laughter]

244:16

D I recently helped someone connect to

244:18

Wi-Fi eighth gen Intel laptop and it

244:22

couldn't find the couldn't find any of

244:26

the wireless bands from the newer router

244:29

and could only connect to the stock

244:33

at router

244:33

>> AT&T. Stop at stop pretending.

244:36

>> I'm not pretending. This one's actually

244:37

really difficult. Uh ever heard of this

244:40

before?

244:41

>> AT&T.

244:42

>> AT&T. There's no amperand. Oh, it's a

244:43

it's a Mars Attacks reference.

244:47

[laughter]

244:53

God, I love that movie. [laughter]

244:56

Um,

244:58

yeah, wireless is Blackmagic. Um,

245:06

one of my one of my ongoing problems,

245:08

boy, am I ever leaning into the first

245:11

world problems on this stream, is that

245:13

this laptop, my Stricks Halo laptop,

245:17

cannot connect to the Wi-Fi access point

245:19

on the Falcon. It's pretty annoying.

245:22

Actually, I should have gone with that

245:23

for my workound. So, what I have to do

245:25

is I have to connect my ZFold 7 to the

245:30

Wi-Fi in the air [laughter] and then I

245:33

have to enable my mobile hotspot and

245:35

then I have to hotspot to my laptop

245:39

>> at 38,000 ft.

245:41

>> Can we add more things? Can we add more

245:44

things?

245:45

>> Oh, no.

245:47

>> My fruit is too vibrant.

245:50

My my steak is too juicy. My lobster is

245:52

too buttery.

245:53

My internet not working down here is

245:57

actually not a my my fruit is too

245:59

delicious problem.

246:00

>> My whisy's too oy [laughter]

246:03

>> my boo has too no my my laqua has too

246:06

much fruit flavor.

246:08

[laughter]

246:09

>> I mean that would be a problem. It's

246:12

supposed to be basically unpleasant.

246:16

>> Oh man.

246:16

>> Uh but yes, I've I've heard of randomly

246:19

Wi-Fi things that supposedly are

246:21

interoperable. just not working with

246:24

each other. Yes, I've heard of that. Uh

246:26

it sucks basically.

246:29

Um

246:31

yeah, sorry to hear that.

246:34

>> Hi l John says my heavy dick drags on

246:38

the floor. [laughter]

246:41

[clears throat]

246:44

[laughter]

246:51

>> [laughter]

246:52

>> Oh man. Okay.

246:58

[laughter]

246:59

>> Oh no. Did I say Lacro? Is Lacroy? I

247:02

don't know.

247:02

>> I think I said Lacroy. I don't know.

247:05

I think it's I don't buy TV static.

247:09

>> Oh man. Do people even know what that is

247:11

anymore? Oh my god. I am old.

247:12

>> TV static.

247:13

>> Yeah, you're probably old.

247:15

>> All right. Hit me, Dan.

247:17

>> Uh, hi LLDD. Darn tough socks aren't

247:20

available in Australia, so I've been

247:22

waiting for the LD socks forever.

247:25

>> Why not?

247:25

>> Luke, what does a typical leg day look

247:28

like for you? I can't wait to work out

247:31

and travel in these good socks.

247:33

>> You really have been waiting for them.

247:34

You bought five pairs. [laughter] That's

247:36

crazy. Four black/gray.

247:39

And then just to spice it up, that one

247:41

day a week, you got the magenta. Very

247:44

nice.

247:44

>> I like that.

247:45

>> Very nice. That's a That's actually a

247:46

pretty

247:47

>> kind of makes sense to me.

247:48

>> Yep. Okay.

247:50

>> Business in the lots and party in the

247:52

few.

247:52

>> All right. Tell us about leg day.

247:54

>> Uh so I have knee problems. So I start

247:56

mine by reverse walking on a treadmill

247:58

where I I

247:59

>> Wouldn't you start by waiting a bit?

248:01

>> Oh my god.

248:08

>> That that reverse walk is awesome.

248:10

>> Okay.

248:10

>> I really really liked that. Yeah. I've

248:13

>> never You look like How do you How do

248:14

you keep the food in it, though?

248:17

>> Oh, that's good. I like that one. That's

248:20

like a top 10 2026 right there.

248:22

>> It is. It is. It is tough on the uh

248:26

[laughter]

248:28

>> It is social anxiety scale cuz you look

248:31

psychotic.

248:32

>> Oh, yeah. Okay. Well, if you have a

248:34

buddy and you're both doing it,

248:35

>> if you have a buddy, it helps a lot.

248:37

>> That's easy.

248:37

>> Even if the buddy's just like chatting

248:38

with you while you do it or something,

248:40

it helps a ton. You could be doing any

248:41

stupid thing in the gym and if someone

248:43

else is doing it, you feel totally fine

248:45

about it. I've totally experienced that

248:47

exact same thing.

248:48

>> I don't think you've done stupid things

248:49

on the level that some people do in the

248:51

>> No, that's and that's totally true. But

248:53

I'm also very shy and I worry about

248:56

pictures of me on Reddit. So, I

248:58

definitely have

249:01

>> anxiety about doing stupid things in the

249:03

gym. And if someone else is doing it, it

249:05

like goes away.

249:07

>> Yeah. Unless it's cross. Okay. So the

249:09

the the thing is that you're fighting

249:11

the resistance of the treadmill. So you

249:13

actually don't want to turn the

249:13

treadmill on. You leave it off and you

249:15

you face backwards on the treadmill and

249:18

you kind of brace yourself on the arms

249:20

of the treadmill and then push the

249:22

treadmill like

249:25

>> the

249:26

right direction. Yeah. U but yourself

249:29

with it unpowered. And then that can

249:32

help warm up your knees. You'll feel it

249:33

in your quads a little bit as well, but

249:34

that can help warm up your knees. For

249:36

me, that's very important. If I don't

249:38

start my leg days with that, the chance

249:40

that I end up with some form of injury

249:44

like genuinely skyrockets. This is very

249:46

important for me. Um, depending on the

249:49

day, I will also do these weird lunges

249:51

that I don't know the name of. Um, where

249:54

the goal is to get your knee kind of

249:56

like as far over your toe as you can

249:59

without bringing your heel off the

250:00

ground on your lead leg and then your

250:03

back leg goes like very very far back.

250:06

Um, I I also I don't know if you're

250:08

supposed to do this. I allow myself to

250:09

go a little wide with the stance on

250:11

that. Um, so I don't fall over. Um, but

250:14

yeah, I I will often do those things

250:16

maybe while I'm like waiting for someone

250:17

to do something. Um, from there once I'm

250:20

warmed up again for knee stuff for me, I

250:24

will go and I will do a bunch of quite

250:27

low weight hamstring curls um to to kind

250:31

of wake the hamstrings up and stuff.

250:33

Once I'm done those, I will go and bang

250:35

out just a bunch of squats because hell

250:37

yeah. Uh, and then I will go and torture

250:40

my quads in some way by either doing

250:42

lunges until I can't or

250:45

>> do you do weighted lunges or regular

250:46

lunges? Well, or both like like

250:49

>> usually

250:50

>> start low weight and then work a way up

250:52

or

250:53

>> uh I really have so traditionally I

250:56

would I would do some pyramid thing

250:58

where I'd start on lower weights and

250:59

work my way up. Uh, what I've been

251:01

enjoying lately is the bags

251:03

>> because the bags are kind of like weird

251:05

to hold. And one of the things I like

251:07

from lunges is just the stability aspect

251:09

of like moving with weight. So, I'll

251:10

carry the bags and usually the bags are

251:12

kind of more annoying to deal with. So,

251:14

I I will stay fixed, but I'll carry a

251:16

decently heavy bag.

251:18

>> Um,

251:19

so it's either that or leg extensions.

251:22

And again, I'm just like trying to burn

251:23

down my quads basically. So, I'll just

251:25

go really hard and then I'll end it

251:27

again with light hamstring curls because

251:29

heavy hamstring curls have a tendency to

251:31

really

251:33

wreck my knees. So, a lot of leg day is

251:35

like dodge the knee problems, but train

251:37

the legs.

251:39

>> Sounds like the biggest ones is the

251:41

squats and lunges.

251:42

>> Yeah.

251:42

>> Okay.

251:43

>> I really like squats and lunges. Squats

251:45

squats and lunges are good.

251:46

>> Cool.

251:47

>> Yeah.

251:48

>> Hey, weigh people. What? Hot take

251:49

>> one. One quick second. Sorry. Gas Racing

251:51

said bags help with balance. Change

251:53

shoulders too. Yeah, I'll carry the bags

251:55

in a variety of ways. Kind of like zer

251:57

by holding it like this or go on one

251:59

shoulder or go on the other shoulder. I

252:00

will tend to move them around a decent

252:02

amount. Uh because I am trying to shift

252:04

how the balance works. Um it's

252:07

interesting that it said help with

252:08

balance. Um maybe with training balance.

252:11

I found uh dumbbells or kettle bells to

252:14

be the best for balance for me, but I

252:18

don't actually know what like the answer

252:19

to that is. One of the reasons why I

252:21

went to bag was actually because I found

252:22

it was less stable.

252:23

>> I can uh I can tell you that the only

252:26

professional badminton players who have

252:28

ever showed me how they practice

252:29

weighted lunges used dumbbells.

252:31

>> Yeah.

252:32

>> So that's the only piece of information

252:34

I can provide.

252:34

>> I don't think you guys have weighted

252:36

bags though.

252:37

>> Uh no, but that's what they do.

252:38

>> Oh yeah.

252:39

>> Yeah. In their own gym, that would be

252:40

what they do.

252:41

>> Weighted lunges are fantastic.

252:43

>> Yeah.

252:44

>> And I like I started doing it. He's

252:46

like, "No, no, you have to push off

252:47

explosively with the weight." And I'm

252:49

like,

252:49

>> nice.

252:50

>> Oh,

252:50

>> well that's cuz you guys are trying to

252:51

go for like pome pometric movement and

252:53

stuff.

252:54

>> Sure.

252:54

>> Which is awesome. That's very cool. I

252:56

like that type of training.

253:00

>> Get me Dan.

253:01

>> Hey Wan [snorts] people, what hot take

253:03

of yours from the past 5 years turned

253:05

out to be totally on the money or turned

253:07

out to be totally wrong?

253:08

>> Adblock is fundamentally piracy. I have

253:11

seen the uh I've seen the conversation

253:14

dramatically change as people have

253:16

developed more of a relationship with

253:20

the creators that they follow and

253:21

understand the economics of the creator

253:23

economy better. Um as people just have

253:27

become more familiar with the idea. It's

253:29

not so shocking anymore. There's still

253:31

people who are like super offended by

253:33

that and that's nice. Um doesn't really

253:36

matter. I mean, at the end of the day, I

253:39

never said, "Don't pirate."

253:40

>> You're drawing your own line.

253:41

>> What I said was, you know, decide what's

253:43

right for you, but understand the

253:45

impact. That's all I ever said. And um

253:49

one of the one of the funniest and it's

253:51

it's been interesting watching the way

253:52

the the dieards who have not given in on

253:55

this have kind of moved the goalpost.

253:56

Like one of the big arguments at the

253:58

beginning was, you know, Google doesn't

254:00

define it that way on the YouTube

254:01

platform. And then it was like shortly

254:03

after that YouTube did update their

254:05

terms of service and was like, "Yeah,

254:08

like doing anything that counters our

254:11

our ad delivery mechanisms is against

254:13

toos." And like, yeah, it's like super

254:15

against toos. It's the form of payment

254:18

for the the content that you are

254:20

consuming. And if it's not worth it to

254:22

you, then the not pirate version of that

254:25

is you don't consume it or you do

254:28

consume it. Or option number three,

254:30

conveniently in the shape of a hat, uh,

254:33

is you just own it. And I never said

254:36

don't do it. Don't own it. All right. I

254:38

never said don't do it. I just said own

254:40

it. That's all. And uh, as for ones that

254:45

turned out to be totally wrong. I mean,

254:46

I always go back to this one. Back when

254:48

that first guy uh, bought a house with

254:50

Bitcoin, I was like, "This is stupid.

254:52

This will go absolutely nowhere." And

254:54

now I wish I had had Bitcoin at that

254:56

time.

254:57

>> [laughter]

254:59

>> Uh yeah, I I forgot about the wrong

255:02

side. So I'll kind of steal similarly

255:04

from that. I remember very early days

255:06

when we were both still at NCX. Uh we

255:08

were looking around at a bunch of GPUs

255:10

in the room and I was like maybe we

255:11

should put these on benches and mine

255:13

coins and then just kind of like

255:14

shrugged and didn't bother.

255:16

>> Yeah. We both were like maybe we should

255:18

and we both just didn't bother.

255:20

>> Yeah. We looked at like how much it took

255:21

to mine a whole coin and we were like

255:24

>> that would take too many weeks.

255:27

>> Yeah. Or days even.

255:29

>> You only get 10.

255:31

>> Yeah. [laughter]

255:32

>> Oh, no. It was way more than that in a

255:34

block, wasn't it? Like 50 to 100.

255:36

>> It was crazy.

255:38

>> So that's that's I think about that

255:40

surprisingly often cuz we had so much

255:42

access to hardware.

255:44

>> We could have free power. We could have

255:46

just left it running there. Nobody

255:47

cared.

255:48

>> No, not at all.

255:50

um thing that ended up being true.

255:54

>> I mean, I think the most the most like

255:59

Luke just crystal balling the future has

256:03

was probably drone warfare, but I don't

256:04

know if that was on WAN.

256:06

>> Maybe not on WAN.

256:08

>> Like

256:08

>> I've been talking about that for a long

256:10

time.

256:10

>> Like really long time. Like basically

256:13

going back like years before the Russia

256:17

Ukraine conflict. like talking about how

256:20

like when is everybody going to figure

256:23

out that swarms of cheap drones with C4

256:26

on them is going to completely

256:30

completely invalidate any kind of at the

256:33

time modern air defense um this is a

256:36

huge problem. How is nobody paying

256:38

attention to this? We had like a ton of

256:39

conversations about it. Do you see the

256:41

Do you see uh do you see Britain's laser

256:43

gun?

256:44

>> Yeah, that's pretty cool. Very

256:45

interesting

256:46

>> because rate of fire is now however much

256:49

power you can feed it.

256:50

>> Yeah.

256:51

>> Um that that one's pretty cool. The

256:53

range looked actually pretty decent on

256:54

it. But like I mean it's only it's

256:58

literally an arms race.

257:01

>> Like

257:01

>> I wonder how a really rapidly spinning

257:03

drone that you can't really see will

257:05

apply to that.

257:05

>> Yeah. But it wouldn't be able to What

257:06

kind of a payload could it carry?

257:08

>> Tiny. Tiny.

257:09

>> Right. But then how big of a payload do

257:11

you need to assassinate a person?

257:13

>> If you're shape charging a single

257:15

person, you might be able to get away

257:16

with it. It's it's the whole thing is

257:18

very interesting, but it's my argument

257:20

and this was a very very long time ago,

257:21

but my argument was that the industrial

257:24

might has always been an incredibly

257:27

[snorts] important part of war,

257:29

especially going back to like the

257:31

origins of Total War with Napoleon and

257:33

stuff. And if you look at industrial

257:34

right might right right now, it's pretty

257:37

centralized, bruh. And that centralized

257:40

place is really good at making

257:44

>> what?

257:45

>> Batteries.

257:45

>> Lots of small cheap

257:47

>> motors.

257:48

>> Yeah. All of those things,

257:50

>> plastics, like pretty much everything

257:53

involved. Cameras, honestly. Um like

257:56

like honestly everything involved.

257:57

>> Chemicals.

257:58

>> Yeah. Yeah. Lit literally everything

258:00

involved. Critical minerals. Do you want

258:02

us to keep listing things?

258:03

>> Particularly really good at making. And

258:05

I'm looking [snorts] at the the the

258:07

equations for how something would go

258:09

with what kind of volume they could

258:11

output if China went on a total war path

258:14

and was just like, "Okay, every single

258:16

factory in the country is now doing

258:17

this." Like,

258:21

cool. Nice laser, bro. [laughter]

258:25

I don't know, man. I think uh [snorts]

258:30

I think we would all be lucky little

258:32

people if the Russia Ukraine war is the

258:35

end of it's I mean it's literally not

258:37

even the end. We saw we've been watching

258:40

this with Iran.

258:42

It's Anyways, yeah.

258:44

>> Do you see that Ukrainian drone that's

258:46

just like made out of plywood?

258:48

>> You knew the one I was talking about

258:49

immediately.

258:50

>> Yeah. [laughter]

258:51

>> That thing is sick.

258:52

>> That is wild.

258:55

It's uh

258:56

>> the second rev of it that had the like

258:58

way extended range is crazy.

259:01

>> Yep.

259:03

>> The climate wars are going to be nuts.

259:10

>> Jamon says China's building a dozen

259:12

nuclear reactors. Uh I don't maybe 10x

259:15

that number. I have no idea how many

259:16

they're actually building, but China's

259:18

working on some really cool like small

259:20

modular ones that look sick. And I

259:23

guarantee you they're building more than

259:24

a dozen of them. You might be right

259:26

about the like large scale ones though.

259:27

>> There was some interview. I think it was

259:29

between Zalinsky and Trump, but I

259:31

actually don't remember. I didn't really

259:33

care about who he was sitting next to.

259:34

The quote

259:35

>> Oh, yeah. Yeah. Do you want to go to

259:36

Moscow to meet with Putin?

259:39

>> Uh I I won't go to Moscow. Too many

259:41

Ukrainian drones there.

259:43

>> So funny, [laughter] dude. Oh my god.

259:46

And it was fast.

259:48

>> Yeah. Well, it's almost like he was a

259:50

comedian in Another Life.

259:51

>> Yeah. M yeah,

259:53

>> dude's sharp.

259:54

>> That was That was like Oh [laughter] my

259:56

god.

260:00

>> Will you Will you go to Yeah. Anyways,

260:03

wild. Last one I got for you today.

260:05

Yeah.

260:06

>> Also for Luke,

260:07

>> I know you're not super impressed with

260:08

your Switch 2, but was just wondering if

260:11

you're going to pick up Splatoon

260:12

Raiders. Seems to be Nintendo's take on

260:15

Looter Shooter.

260:16

>> Really?

260:19

A looter shooter.

260:20

>> Splatoon Raiders.

260:22

by Nintendo in current year.

260:26

>> It's out already.

260:31

>> What is this? I actually really enjoyed

260:33

the first Splatoon. I actually I

260:35

genuinely thought it was a good game.

260:37

Um, if it's multiplayer only, honestly,

260:39

I'm I'm not interested at all. Um, and

260:42

honestly, if it's single player, the

260:43

game

260:44

>> scour the spiralite islands,

260:46

>> search for treasure, fighting big. Okay,

260:48

so there's PvE stuff involved.

260:51

Fight Salmonoids. Gather salvage and

260:54

uncover mysteries of the islands.

260:58

>> Is this PvP? How does this work? Tink

261:00

with your gear, man. Tarov, but you're

261:04

actually uh squid is

261:07

>> single player in this single player

261:09

focused game. Play as a mechanic.

261:11

>> Huh.

261:11

>> Can you play co-op though?

261:13

>> If you can play co-op,

261:14

>> this seems like it would be super fun

261:16

co-op. probably just going to get it if

261:18

if you can play a co-op. Um,

261:21

>> with your gear, something something.

261:24

Speed tank, power tank, tactical tank.

261:28

>> The gameplay looks pretty fun. Moving

261:30

swim ink.

261:32

>> Okay. Okay. Okay. The mechanic. Anyone?

261:35

Anyone?

261:35

>> Different archives.

261:38

>> Co-op. Anyone?

261:40

I'm going with chat because this is not

261:42

telling us nothing.

261:44

Dialing.

261:45

>> Call our friends for help. You can also

261:46

join up with up to three other players

261:49

online or via local wireless.

261:51

>> If do you not need an like the Nintendo

261:54

thing?

261:54

>> The game will scale power automatically

261:56

to make sure everyone has a good time.

261:58

Okay, that looks pretty fun.

262:00

>> That genuinely looks really fun.

262:02

>> Very cool.

262:03

>> Uh there was a double asterisk on the

262:05

Okay. Additional games and systems

262:08

required for multiplayer mode sold

262:09

separately. It doesn't say that you need

262:12

>> Yeah,

262:12

>> that's pretty cool.

262:13

>> That is so wicked. Every once in a

262:15

while, Nintendo does something pretty

262:17

cool.

262:17

>> This genuinely looks sick. I will

262:18

probably get this. I didn't know this

262:20

existed. Thank you for the heads up.

262:22

>> All right, I think that's uh pretty much

262:25

it for today.

262:26

>> Wicked.

262:26

>> We'll see you guys again next week. Same

262:28

bad time. Same bad channel.

262:31

>> Bye.

262:33

It's not doing it. It's not doing it.

262:36

>> Oh. Oh no.

262:37

>> Okay, I guess show goes forever now.

262:39

>> Oh no, we got to wait another week.

262:42

Yeah, the the physical version [music]

262:44

being so much more expensive is so like

262:47

>> what do I do?

262:48

>> $15 Canadian for 10 US. I don't know.

262:52

It's worth the ref.

262:53

>> Let's watch him panic.

262:54

>> Be able to get at least $10 off flipping

262:56

the physical version.

262:57

>> What do I do?

263:00

Oh, there it is. Bye.

263:02

>> Oh, now he's stuck there. [laughter]

263:07

>> I uh I had it. Um it's an invisible.

263:10

This is all invisible over it. Uh, and I

263:13

had it disabled because of the feet cam.

263:15

So,

Interactive Summary

Loading summary...