HomeVideos

NVIDIA’s New CPU Makes Me Excited Again - WAN Show July 24, 2026

Now Playing

NVIDIA’s New CPU Makes Me Excited Again - WAN Show July 24, 2026

Transcript

7357 segments

0:00

Friday and welcome to the land show.

0:04

We've got a great show lined up for you

0:06

guys this week. Actually, this there's

0:08

lots of fun stuff. Nvidia has provided

0:11

new details on their Vera data center

0:14

CPUs and this raised Luke's eyebrows

0:17

just a bit. Yeah, see he did it. You

0:19

couldn't see it because it was the one

0:20

that was closer to me, but he did it. He

0:22

did it again.

0:23

I am really really excited about them

0:27

and what they might mean for the future

0:30

of CPU micro architectures that will I I

0:35

will lay out a case for this hopefully

0:36

make their way to gamers and be a major

0:39

benefit. In other news,

0:42

Framework had a bit of a rough week,

0:46

investment disclosure,

0:48

um,

0:50

with respect to pricing of memory

0:52

modules in their laptops. We'll get into

0:54

that a little bit more later. What else

0:55

we got?

0:56

>> Uh, Microsoft introduces Xbox backwards

0:59

compatibility program on PC. Exciting.

1:03

Interesting

1:04

>> for Xbox games.

1:05

>> Kind of confusing. We'll get into it.

1:07

Um, also Fallout 5,

1:11

Fallout 3 and New Vegas remasters. Also

1:13

a new Obsidian Fallout. All of this

1:15

stuff was announced. Maybe Bethesda will

1:17

use an IP for the first time in I don't

1:20

know, over a decade, I think. Cool. I

1:24

heard you're supposed to do that as a

1:25

company.

1:26

>> Yeah, I heard you're supposed to IP

1:27

freely. Oh, I pressed the wrong one.

1:30

Damn. [laughter]

1:31

>> What the

1:34

Oh, good. The foot cam is there.

1:41

I just got jump scared by my own feet.

1:48

My feet are so touching [music] the

1:50

floor. The show is brought to you by

1:51

Shocks, AMD, Squarespace, and XSplit,

1:55

alongside our rap partner Dbrand, our

1:57

laptop partner Razer, and our chair

1:59

partner who is also Razer. Why don't we

2:02

jump right into our headline topic for

2:05

the day, which is of course I actually

2:07

forget which one we picked.

2:08

>> Nvidia CPU.

2:09

>> Oh yes, I want to talk about that. Okay,

2:12

so the original source here was actually

2:15

some analysis from my old buddy Mr. Ryan

2:18

Shrout who used to run PC perspective

2:21

and then was working at Intel for a

2:23

little while and then now is kind of

2:25

doing this whole like analyst thing. And

2:27

so I was looking at his analysis and he

2:33

kind of laid out a bunch of the details

2:34

that Nvidia is providing about their new

2:37

Vera CPUs. Vera is built on the Olympus

2:40

core which is Nvidia's first custom

2:43

core. So, while Grace was a

2:46

custom-designed

2:47

CPU, um it was a partnership between

2:50

Nvidia and MediaTek, the actual cores

2:53

themselves were offthe-shelf pretty much

2:56

ARM cores. It's a matter of laying them

2:59

out and uh you know, figuring out all of

3:01

your IO and how to integrate it into

3:02

your bigger system. This time around,

3:05

we're looking at a custom a custom core.

3:07

This is an Nvidia design from the ground

3:10

up. And this is what gets me excited.

3:14

It's 88 cores on a monolithic compute

3:18

die running 176 threads using what

3:21

Nvidia calls spatial multi-threading.

3:26

Okay. Where is he going with this?

3:29

>> Yeah. Meanwhile, companies like AMD have

3:33

upcoming epic CPUs that are going to

3:36

have as much as 256

3:40

Zen 6C cores. What could possibly make

3:44

me excited about 88 cores uh on some ARM

3:49

CPU that is destined for the data

3:51

center?

3:54

>> You still don't know where I'm going

3:55

with this.

3:55

>> This is still the question I had.

3:57

>> Wonderful. Okay.

3:59

What I'm excited about is that for the

4:03

last

4:07

20 years, okay, everything has been

4:12

okay, we'll give you some singlethreaded

4:15

improvements, but really what we're

4:17

building is better power efficiency and

4:20

better multicore for the data center so

4:23

that they can take all those cores and

4:25

they can slice them all up into cloud

4:28

instances for all of their customers.

4:30

Big fating deal for my Counter-Strike

4:33

frame rate. Nvidia is coming in and

4:37

going, "No, what the market actually

4:40

needs is big, strong cores and not as

4:44

many of them." Now, the reason is not

4:46

one that's likely to excite you guys.

4:48

The reason is that Nvidia is looking for

4:51

huge performance uplifts in agentic AI

4:55

and and right now what the data centers

4:58

what the hyperscalers are running into

4:59

is they've got these super super

5:01

expensive GPU farms

5:03

>> and for agentic workloads you actually

5:07

need a ton of CPU to coordinate work or

5:10

those GPU farms are sitting idle and

5:13

Nvidia's solution is hey we need not

5:15

only a ton of CPU cores but we actually

5:18

need an absolute butt ton of performance

5:21

per core. Now, why does this excite me

5:24

as a gamer? Because again, this this

5:26

product is not for me. Vera is not for

5:28

me. I'm getting there. Grace

5:32

already made its way into a desktop PC

5:35

in the form of the DGX Spark.

5:37

>> True.

5:37

>> The DGX Spark chip was repurposed

5:41

already announced. Coming in Q4, I think

5:44

Nvidia announced I I forget. I forget

5:46

the details, but coming this year, they

5:48

already announced RTX Spark, which uses

5:51

those same gray CPU cores that were in

5:55

the data center and then made their way

5:56

to a workstation and then to a desktop

5:59

and then to laptops.

6:02

I think we can draw a pretty straight

6:04

line to Vera is going to be in the data

6:06

center, is going to be in workstations,

6:08

is going to be in desktops and laptops.

6:11

And

6:13

from what I saw at Computex, I mean, did

6:15

you did you see the Nvidia demos?

6:16

>> No.

6:17

>> They were just like running Fortnite and

6:20

like running Alen Wake and like running

6:23

the software that you would want to run.

6:25

>> Yeah.

6:26

>> On ARM.

6:27

>> It's what

6:28

>> it is. It is nice that Qualcomm did this

6:30

for everybody. [laughter]

6:33

>> Don't Don't get yourself Don't don't kid

6:35

yourself. Nvidia is putting in the work

6:37

too

6:38

>> on the gaming side in particular. Like

6:40

that was the first slide they brought up

6:41

at least for me was hey we have more

6:44

gaming relationships than quite

6:45

literally anybody

6:47

>> did a lot of work on the gaming side

6:49

>> they did

6:50

>> I think they opened the door I'm not

6:52

saying Nvidia is not doing anything

6:54

that's not my point

6:55

>> depending on how far back you want to go

6:58

Nvidia opened the door first actually

7:00

you want to talk 2

7:01

>> okay

7:02

>> yeah I know that's fair

7:03

>> it's clear that Qualcomm has been

7:05

putting in a lot of work that's very

7:06

clear but it's also clear that nobody

7:08

but Nvidia has the weight

7:10

>> to throw behind the major gaming studios

7:13

and go, "No, but actually you will

7:14

support this."

7:15

>> Yeah.

7:16

>> Period.

7:16

>> I think that's valid. Yeah.

7:17

>> And so there I was looking at real

7:21

actual games that real actual gamers

7:22

want to play running on ARM.

7:25

Now with this custom core, somebody

7:29

finally after all these freaking years

7:31

is going, "You know what would actually

7:33

be pretty great? if somebody made a CPU

7:36

that had a more powerful core instead of

7:39

more and more and more of them. And so

7:42

in in response to your excuse me WTF,

7:46

that's why I'm the and and it still

7:49

sounds like a lot of cores, but it's

7:50

clearly not the the primary uh

7:54

>> just going for just more cores is not

7:57

the primary focus.

7:58

>> Correct. Yeah.

7:59

>> And when Nvidia does it, it it's like

8:01

Apple. It's like how how I'm always

8:03

industry follows

8:04

>> bemoning when Apple does something

8:06

horrible and applauding when Apple does

8:08

something great. Regardless of whether

8:09

I'm going to buy the product, everybody

8:12

else is going to do it. When Nvidia does

8:15

it, everybody else is going to start

8:17

looking at IPC.

8:19

Everyone else is going to start looking

8:20

at, okay, okay, can we can we boost

8:22

clock speeds? Can we make a more

8:24

powerful core? Because we got to compete

8:26

with that now. So, I'm I'm really

8:28

excited. Vera uses LPDDR5X memory with

8:31

ECC and full telemetry. NVIDIA claims

8:33

roughly 3x the memory bandwidth per

8:34

core. So, um, here's some bad news. This

8:38

could mean that either we need to go

8:40

like cam style memory on the desktop or

8:43

we could be looking at soldered memory

8:44

on the desktop. I know, right? Um, but

8:49

tell me something. If you could get like

8:51

a real like like actually for the first

8:54

time in many years generational

8:56

performance increase on your CPU, would

8:59

you consider a motherboard with soldered

9:00

memory on it?

9:01

>> As of right now, no.

9:02

>> Well, as of tomorrow then? Like

9:05

>> I still feel like I feel like there

9:08

there is a version of tomorrow where the

9:10

answer is yes. Um like there there's a

9:13

way where I could see that happening. Um

9:16

>> CAM would be a more ideal scenario. Cam

9:19

is a lot more ideal.

9:20

>> It's still a compromise though. I was

9:21

looking at So, uh Oh. Oh, yeah. Okay. I

9:26

Hold on.

9:28

I just need to make sure that I'm not

9:30

saying something that I'm not supposed

9:32

to. Uh, no. Okay. Well, I've been

9:35

working on a review of a product that

9:38

involves cam memory

9:42

anyway, which is why I was looking more

9:44

closely at the exact specs of it. And

9:46

when I'm comparing it to other products

9:48

that don't use cam style memory, it

9:50

doesn't it still doesn't run quite as

9:52

fast as soldered memory. It just plain

9:53

doesn't.

9:54

>> I don't actually know what the answer to

9:55

that is, but I have I have multiple

9:57

ideas and I'm very curious. Um

10:01

>> yeah, I don't know. So my reason for

10:02

that is what am I using the individual

10:06

core performance for right now?

10:08

>> Well, what I assume

10:10

>> what I assume you want to use it for is

10:12

gaming,

10:13

>> right? But then I look at the games that

10:14

I'm playing and it's like

10:16

>> we're a number of years off of this

10:18

mattering.

10:18

>> I'm on that's so that's where my current

10:20

stance is. Why would I give up

10:22

>> the the you know

10:24

>> the flexibility

10:25

>> the flexibility of of memory being the

10:27

repility

10:28

>> and the repairability of memory being

10:29

removable? Easily removable.

10:32

>> It is removable either way, but but

10:33

easily removable.

10:34

>> Sure. Anything's removable if you pull

10:36

hard enough.

10:37

>> I'm not that guy, right? So like it's

10:38

not removable for me.

10:40

>> So be careful. [laughter]

10:43

Um jeez. So it's like I and and I look

10:47

at what I'm I'm doing. Honestly, I've

10:48

been playing less and less competitive

10:50

multiplayer. It's just a cesspool out

10:53

there. Uh that might be part of it to be

10:55

honest. Um I I do think there's just a

10:58

the ease of access to cheating is

11:00

insane. The fact that I have received

11:02

YouTube ads for game cheats is just

11:04

crazy. Um so it's it's

11:07

>> you are you need all the help. I wonder

11:10

I wonder if they do target people that

11:12

are in like their mid mid30s plus cuz

11:15

you know your gaming performance is

11:16

starting to decline and if they're like

11:19

you know

11:20

>> you could just just just take one of

11:21

these

11:22

>> uncbot 9000

11:23

>> just take one of these.

11:24

>> Yeah yeah yeah. Um

11:26

>> so so hear me out. Here's what here's

11:28

where I think we're going to land there

11:29

because we know that the next cycle of

11:32

consoles is going to be based on like

11:35

currentish CPU architectures now because

11:37

it's just the way the development cycle

11:39

works. So, we're going to get uh I I

11:40

think it's I think it's planned to be

11:42

Zen 4 or Zen 5. PS6, Zen 4 or 5. What

11:47

What's it going to be? Blah blah blah.

11:50

Oh, is heavily rumored to use Zen 6.

11:53

Okay, so the best case scenario is that

11:56

the PlayStation 6 uses Zen 6. Did I say

11:59

PS5 before? Sorry. PS5 uses like Zen 2

12:02

or something like this. Zen 2, Zen 3, I

12:04

can't remember. Uh the point is that

12:05

PlayStation 6 apparently is heavily

12:07

rumored to use AMD's Zen 6 architecture.

12:10

So what that tells us is that we're not

12:13

getting you know a a paradigm shift in

12:18

per core performance on the next line on

12:21

the next family of consoles. What that

12:24

tells us is that every game developed

12:26

for the next 6 7 years after the

12:29

PlayStation 6 launched stop it. uh after

12:32

the PlayStation 6 launches is going to

12:34

be targeting modest CPU cores.

12:38

But the next one, assuming Nvidia is

12:42

releasing Vin now, assuming that CPU

12:45

companies have a 2 to threeyear

12:46

development cycle that it will take them

12:48

to catch up, that means more performance

12:50

CPU cores could be coming around

12:52

PlayStation 7 time

12:54

just in time for your early 40s. you

12:57

could be looking at, okay,

13:00

it may be worth considering that I need

13:02

more CPU performance on my desktop. That

13:05

that that would be the that would be the

13:06

most sort of [laughter]

13:08

makes sense big picture timeline that I

13:12

could put forward for when it would

13:13

actually matter

13:14

>> and like really matter.

13:15

>> Yeah.

13:16

>> Until then, I think you'll see

13:18

motherboard options with CAM. I think

13:21

you might even see desktop platforms

13:23

that that use soldered memory, but they

13:26

might not feel necessary for if you're

13:28

not trying to squeeze every last frame

13:30

out.

13:32

Yeah. Um

13:37

I don't know.

13:41

I don't know where I'll be at in that

13:43

many years. I do know like looking at

13:45

what's happening in the industry right

13:47

now um it is a pretty freaking big nerf

13:50

not being able to move your memory

13:52

around. Um, I have heard more and more.

13:54

There was a there was a panel at open

13:56

source. It was building a PC in 2026 and

13:58

there was a lot. It was a I when we were

14:00

prepping for the panel.

14:02

>> Were there veils and and and

14:05

handkerchiefs that everyone could get on

14:07

their way in?

14:11

>> There was a Discord thread uh of the of

14:13

the panelists and the host prepping for

14:15

the panel. And my first post was like, I

14:17

can just like cry in the corner if you

14:19

want. [laughter]

14:20

like I don't know what you want us to

14:22

cover. Um

14:25

>> I I think the panel ended up actually

14:26

being pretty good. There was some

14:28

repetition to it though. But one of the

14:30

things that was mentioned was just

14:31

moving memory around

14:33

>> is like a thing that people are actually

14:35

doing. Condensing, you know, you have

14:37

you have you had maybe two systems. You

14:39

condense the memory into one to get more

14:41

capacity into one of them. Maybe you had

14:43

one system that when RAM was really

14:45

cheap, you're just like, I don't know,

14:46

64 gigs sounds pretty neat. I'll just

14:48

get that. It's pretty cheap anyways. Now

14:50

that maybe turns into two systems that

14:52

are at 32 because it's probably fine.

14:54

>> I used to um I used to on a semi-regular

14:58

basis uh back before we even had like a

15:02

digital inventory system.

15:04

>> I would I would write down I actually

15:06

have a notebook that has pages of me

15:08

doing this in it. I would write down all

15:10

of our inventory so that I could balance

15:13

all of the specs across all of our

15:15

various workstations in the company and

15:17

make sure that the people who needed

15:19

things the most had the best stuff and

15:21

that everyone else kind of got the

15:23

handme-downs and I was constantly

15:26

balancing against the hardware that we

15:28

needed to make our videos so that that

15:30

would be free. Uh like back when we were

15:32

in the Langley house I would do that on

15:33

a fairly regular [laughter] basis. Yeah.

15:36

And to your point,

15:38

how now? I I can't even move like uh

15:41

DDR5 uh is the first generation that I

15:46

can think of. I actually it there might

15:48

have been something before before, but

15:50

it's the first generation I can think of

15:52

where the registered DIMs have a

15:55

completely different notch. So,

15:57

literally, you cannot

16:00

use them in the same motherboards as as

16:02

an unbuffered DIM. Um, on DDR4 you

16:05

could, and there were certain platforms

16:07

that would allow like ECC and

16:10

unbuffered. Um, and then, man, were

16:13

there any that did registered and

16:15

unbuffered? That I'm not sure. That I'd

16:17

have to like go and look up. But, but

16:19

there's definitely less flexibility now

16:21

even in the socketed stuff than than we

16:24

had before.

16:26

>> Yeah. So like I that is a very

16:29

significant

16:31

you know uh damage to the value

16:35

proposition of the thing that you're

16:36

buying in my opinion is you can't part

16:38

it out as easily. Um

16:43

you are you are losing there. It feels

16:46

kind of like the whole physical media

16:47

thing.

16:48

You you buy a digital version. Yeah. You

16:50

can play it just fine while you have it.

16:52

It will probably be okay. As long as

16:54

you're using it for the thing you want

16:55

to use it for. you're probably good. But

16:57

then once that's over, if someone bought

16:59

a physical one, they can resell it or do

17:01

something else with it. Um,

17:04

memory is something that is I mean,

17:07

especially when I was kind of first

17:09

getting into computers, people would

17:10

always talk about how much memory you

17:12

had. I remember when the first person I

17:13

knew got one gig, it was like, whoa,

17:16

that's crazy.

17:17

>> A gigabyte.

17:19

>> Yeah.

17:19

>> Like a billion bytes.

17:21

>> Wild. Incredible. I I remember the first

17:25

time I I think I've even told you the

17:26

story before. The first time I ever saw

17:28

one terabyte hard drive was at PAX and

17:32

someone stood up on top of a thing and

17:33

held it up above their head and was

17:34

like, "I bet you've never seen a

17:35

terabyte before." And everybody was

17:37

like, "Whoa,

17:39

[laughter] it's crazy." Um, anyways, I'm

17:42

freaking old. This is why I'm bad at

17:44

video games. Um [laughter]

17:48

uh anyways um but yeah I don't know that

17:51

that that would seriously affect the the

17:55

calculation being made on the value of

17:57

the product and I could definitely see

17:59

myself taking a slightly lower

18:02

performance CPU if it came with memory

18:04

that I could more easily remove. Um, but

18:08

I could also see myself in a situation

18:10

where there's some form of

18:12

>> minus gives you all your computers

18:13

anyway, so it'll use whatever's in it.

18:15

[laughter]

18:17

>> That's kind of fair. Uh,

18:21

I was I was explaining that to someone

18:23

recently. They asked like how much

18:25

something cost and I was like, I don't

18:27

know. And they're like, what do you

18:28

mean? [laughter]

18:30

I was like, what? I don't like I haven't

18:32

built I haven't bought the components

18:35

for my own personal computer in a very

18:37

long time. And they're like, "How what

18:38

do you mean? You haven't refreshed in a

18:40

while." I was like, "No, [laughter] I

18:41

mean I haven't refreshed since high

18:43

school." Like you you don't understand.

18:47

>> That's when I peaked. [laughter]

18:48

>> Well, there Yeah, there was uh I

18:50

remember the last time I technically

18:52

bought PC components was uh Intel Retail

18:56

Extreme.

18:57

>> Retail Edge. But yes,

18:58

>> Retail Edge. Sure. And they had extreme

19:00

editions.

19:00

>> Yeah. And that's the one that went in

19:02

the mineral oil tank. That's the last

19:04

one I bought.

19:05

>> Nice.

19:06

>> Cuz even before we had our agreement

19:08

thing, you had me with different parts,

19:10

I think, so I could do like editing

19:11

better at home or something.

19:12

>> Yeah, cuz it was sad what he was trying

19:15

to edit on. [laughter]

19:17

>> It was It was out of pity.

19:21

>> That system was getting a little old.

19:24

>> All right, why don't we jump into

19:25

another topic? You want to pick one?

19:27

>> Yeah. Where's this? Uh, I want to figure

19:31

out more about this. Where did it go? Oh

19:33

no, I lost it.

19:35

>> He lost it. He's lost it.

19:37

>> Oh no.

19:39

>> Are we going to address the foot cam at

19:41

all or is it pretty

19:44

>> kind of It's strange. I think people are

19:46

going to see how much I fidget.

19:48

[laughter]

19:49

Uh, Microsoft introduces Xbox backwards

19:51

compatibility program on PC. Four

19:54

original Xbox games with more to come.

19:56

uh will be available for purchase on PC

19:58

via Game Pass. This is one part that

20:00

confuses me. Or for free if you already

20:04

have a console digital license. So I

20:06

guess you log in with the same account

20:07

and then you get access to it on the

20:08

computer which is actually that's cool.

20:10

That makes sense.

20:11

>> Okay.

20:11

>> The initial offerings are Blinks the

20:14

Time Sweeper.

20:16

>> Okay.

20:17

>> Conquer Live and Reloaded. Heard of that

20:18

one. Crimson Skies High Road to Revenge.

20:21

And Fusion Frenzy. I love Fusion Frenzy.

20:25

That's actually genuinely pretty

20:26

exciting. Especially if they man if they

20:28

had online multiplayer Fusion Frenzy, I

20:31

would pay the I would play the heck out

20:32

of that. The The part that confuses me

20:34

is they will be available for purchase

20:37

on PC via Game Pass. What does that

20:40

mean?

20:40

>> It means that Wait. Yeah. What does that

20:43

mean?

20:44

>> What does that mean?

20:44

>> So, if you have Game Pass, then you can

20:47

buy it.

20:49

>> But Game Pass is like a rental.

20:51

>> No, no, no. It's a comma, Luke. They'll

20:53

be available for purchase on PC,

20:55

available via Game Pass, or free if you

20:58

already have a console digital license.

20:59

Three options.

21:01

>> Okay,

21:01

>> that makes way more sense.

21:02

>> Okay.

21:02

>> Okay, cool.

21:03

>> So, how much are they? Are they

21:04

available now? When do they become

21:05

available?

21:06

>> I I don't know.

21:08

>> I want to see how much it'll cost me to

21:09

buy Fusion Frenzy.

21:10

>> Okay,

21:11

>> so these are all Yeah, these are all

21:12

like original Xbox games. Um, some

21:15

outlets have said the experience is

21:17

mostly good with some minor frame timing

21:19

and jutdder issues. And

21:24

>> dude, it's $249.

21:28

>> Really?

21:29

>> It's on sale. 75% off.

21:31

>> Okay. So,

21:32

>> for the next like 6 days

21:34

>> included in Essential Game Pass or you

21:36

can buy it for 250.

21:37

>> 250. Can I play this multiplayer?

21:41

>> Not local.

21:44

single player shared split screen. Xbox

21:45

One is

21:46

>> okay. Well, I could do the Cuz like I'm

21:48

thinking on Steam. Yeah,

21:50

>> you could just remote play.

21:51

>> Is that what uh is that what Xbox Play

21:53

Anywhere is?

21:54

>> Xbox Play Anywhere.

21:56

>> Xbox Play Anywhere is playing your your

21:59

Xbox games streamed to something.

22:02

>> I will probably buy this.

22:04

Fusion Frenzy was a lot of fun and I

22:07

only had the the trial disc that came

22:09

with some like magazine.

22:11

I never even got to play like the whole

22:13

game. Um,

22:15

>> okay. Well, our discuss that answers our

22:16

first discussion question. Which of

22:18

these four games are you most likely to

22:19

play?

22:19

>> Oh, Fusion Frenzy for sure. And I will

22:21

like actually probably buy it. I

22:22

remember one time I was at Microsoft

22:24

hanging out for something. I don't

22:25

remember what it was. And they had like

22:27

all the media people that were visiting

22:30

uh hanging out in this like random room

22:31

for a while while they did something.

22:33

And they had a bunch of Xboxes set up

22:34

and they had Fusion Frenzy in the

22:36

machines. And I like that was one of the

22:39

games that you could play. And I like

22:40

recruited some random media people that

22:42

were there to start playing Fusion

22:43

Frenzy on one of them and people started

22:45

watching and then people naturally

22:46

started playing on the other Xbox and

22:48

then the whole room and it just people

22:50

playing Fusion Frenzy this like ancient

22:51

game and people were having a lot of

22:53

fun. It Fusion Frenzy is great.

22:55

>> Cool. I've ne I've never tried it.

22:57

>> It's like uh Xbox's take on like a Mario

23:00

Party.

23:00

>> Oh, okay. So like lots of mini games.

23:03

>> Lots of mini games.

23:04

>> Oh, cool.

23:04

>> It's been forever since I've played it,

23:06

but I remember having a ton of fun. They

23:08

have like I mean the the thing on the

23:10

box art uh there we go.

23:14

>> Yeah, that's not a great sales pitch,

23:17

honestly.

23:18

>> Nope, it's not. But it's like it's like

23:20

that uh that like platform game. I don't

23:22

know if they have it here.

23:23

>> Oh, where you bump each other off.

23:25

>> Yeah, I don't know if one of these is

23:26

actually going to show it.

23:28

>> I saw right at the beginning there. Is

23:30

that not to No, to the right. To the

23:31

right. Everything you own in a box to

23:32

the Oh, no. That's something else. Okay.

23:34

>> Some burgers or something.

23:35

>> Yeah, sure. I mean, hamburgers. Again, I

23:36

I haven't played the actual

23:39

>> 45 mini games.

23:40

>> So, this is a race thing. Yeah, 45 mini

23:42

games. Yeah, sounds good. Whatever. It

23:44

was It was like uh if I remember

23:46

correctly, most people played it through

23:48

the the demo disc,

23:49

>> right?

23:50

>> Um

23:51

>> maybe that was their mistake,

23:53

>> making the game demo too good.

23:55

>> Yeah, it was actually like there there

23:58

was a few different mini game. There was

23:59

enough mini games on it that you and

24:00

your friends could like play Fusion

24:02

Frenzy and then be done with it and it

24:04

would be fine. Um, like it was it was a

24:06

little bit too much.

24:07

>> Way to go, guys. Um, our other

24:09

discussion question is, do you think

24:11

Xbox has a vision for the future? I feel

24:13

like we go back and forth on this every

24:15

freaking week because it's like there

24:17

will be some news will come out and

24:19

you'll go like, okay, we're so back. And

24:22

then some other news will come out and

24:24

we'll be like, they're doomed. Uh,

24:26

clearly they're just going to sell it or

24:28

spin it off. And then the next week it's

24:30

like, wait, they're actually doing

24:31

really cool stuff.

24:34

Can you handle this degree of whiplash,

24:36

Luke?

24:37

>> I [laughter] mean, that's life right

24:39

now. Um, I think as much like obviously

24:42

layoffs are bad. I think that can be

24:44

universally just been like, okay,

24:46

layoffs are bad. People losing jobs are

24:47

bad. 14 layers of management also

24:51

unacceptable,

24:52

>> right?

24:52

>> So, like

24:55

they might also be on a really brutal

24:57

timer,

24:59

>> right? They might not have a lot of

25:01

runway to like figure this out. When

25:02

you're doing layoffs at the scale that

25:04

they're doing, you're going to end up

25:06

like this isn't even like, oh, big

25:08

brain. This is just very obvious. You're

25:11

going to end up taking people out that

25:13

shouldn't have been removed.

25:15

>> You're you're going to have mistakes

25:17

with a layoff of that is very sad.

25:20

Really good people trying to do really

25:22

good things are going to lose their jobs

25:24

over this. That's a a a you know that's

25:28

a 14 layers of management failure. Um

25:31

which sucks, but

25:34

it feels like something that really

25:35

needed to happen. Halo Infinite costing

25:38

$800 million to make is just not okay.

25:41

It's not a good enough game for that

25:43

output. Um they have to figure something

25:45

out. They have these old ancient

25:49

legendary studios outputting just like I

25:52

don't know in Bethesda's case

25:54

practically nothing. Like something's

25:57

got to give. When uh oh man, I can

26:00

barely even remember his name.

26:01

Starfield. When Starfield came out, the

26:04

conversation was largely around like

26:06

this game failed largely because of

26:08

management failure. Like this stuff

26:10

needed to get addressed. There was

26:12

conversations about like apparently Todd

26:14

wasn't even happy about it because like

26:17

it was structured where every single

26:19

decision had to go through Todd and Todd

26:21

was basically like this is nuts. Like I

26:24

this isn't how Morowind was made. This

26:26

isn't how Oblivion was made. A lot of

26:28

writers and creatives in the in the

26:32

creation of the game had more autonomy

26:34

which is one of the reasons why those

26:35

games can feel kind of disconnected

26:37

sometimes. You can be in an area doing

26:39

something and it has like a certain kind

26:40

of tone and feel

26:41

>> and then you go on another quest

26:42

>> and it's like very different.

26:43

>> It's like this is like you it went from

26:45

like oh spooky scary to like this is

26:48

kind of funny and whimsical.

26:49

>> Yeah.

26:49

>> Like I remember I I never was able to

26:51

put my finger on it but I remember that

26:53

from Oblivion.

26:54

>> Yeah. Oh yeah.

26:55

>> Where the Yeah. Big time in Oblivion. I

26:57

I never ever put my finger on exactly

27:03

what I was noticing or even and because

27:05

I didn't do that, I never thought about

27:07

thinking about why

27:09

>> old Elder Scrolls games

27:10

>> so much sense.

27:11

>> The the various developers around the

27:13

company, I believe even Todd would talk

27:14

about like after the game came out, they

27:16

would play it and discover things,

27:19

>> right?

27:19

>> Like it was a lot of very strong

27:21

contributors. And that's one of the

27:22

reasons why they're able to make them so

27:24

fast. The gap between Mororrow and

27:26

Oblivion is really short. The gap

27:28

between Oblivion and Skyrim isn't even

27:31

really that long. And then now we're

27:33

looking at like just enormous gaps where

27:36

like I don't know, someone will have not

27:39

been alive when Skyrim came out and be

27:41

old enough to enjoy the next game.

27:43

>> Elder Scrolls Arena.

27:45

>> Mhm.

27:46

>> March 25th, 94.

27:50

Daggerfall, September 20th, 96.

27:54

Mororrowind. That was a that was a

27:56

pretty big gap. Six years.

27:58

>> Morowind was like the biggest map in a

28:00

video game ever when it released.

28:01

>> May 1st, 2002.

28:03

>> Yeah.

28:04

>> Oblivion. March 20th, 2006.

28:08

Only four years. Then

28:12

>> 2011

28:12

>> to Skyrim,

28:13

>> November 11th,

28:14

>> 2011.

28:16

>> And then crickets.

28:19

>> Freaking crickets, dude. It's 2026, bro.

28:22

It's been 15 years. Okay. Okay. Put to

28:25

put that in context. To put that in

28:27

context, from the Elder Scrolls Arena to

28:31

The Elder Scrolls 5 Skyrim was

28:37

17 years. Since The Elder Scrolls 5

28:40

Skyrim, it has been

28:41

>> It's almost been the entire duration of

28:43

the entire Elder Scrolls series since we

28:46

got another Elder Scrolls.

28:48

>> Like, that doesn't work. I don't like so

28:52

something has to break. So some breakage

28:55

there as painful it is is as brutal as

28:57

it is for the people losing their jobs

28:59

as especially brutal as it is for the

29:00

people that are really doing great work

29:02

and are also losing their jobs

29:03

>> and as brutal as it is for the people

29:05

staying behind

29:06

>> 100%. the uh level of demoralization has

29:09

to be insane and you have to try to

29:11

figure out how to keep going on or else

29:12

your job isn't going to continue to

29:14

exist and there's a lot of threat

29:16

looming because there's another layoff

29:18

coming soon and you don't know that

29:19

there won't be more because there

29:20

something is going to have to change for

29:22

there to not be more. Uh but the

29:25

management structures there and I'm sure

29:27

tons of other things are a problem. 14

29:29

layers of management doesn't work when

29:32

you're trying to do a creative process

29:33

especially. Oh my god. way to get out

29:36

the most bland vanilla Starfield crap

29:38

ever. Uh, that's how it's gonna work.

29:41

But, but yeah, it's it's it's

29:42

interesting. You watch you watch like I

29:45

don't know how can you have a lot of the

29:47

generally quite serious tones of a lot

29:51

of the Elder Scrolls games and then also

29:53

have Shiogarth in the world throwing

29:55

cheese wheels at you for fun. Like it's

29:57

it's

29:58

>> it's because it's a creative super.

30:00

>> Someone had lunch with Phil Schaefer or

30:01

something like like that's the only

30:03

possible explanation. Yeah. And he was

30:05

like, you know, would be funny,

30:08

[laughter]

30:09

>> let's make a cheese dimension. Uh, yeah.

30:12

It's there like it's I I remember in

30:14

Skyrim I had I had no idea this was

30:17

coming. Um I I think it was in

30:19

Winterfell, you you do like a drinking

30:21

competition with some dude and then you

30:23

wake up and like everything is just

30:26

mess. you like black out and then you

30:28

wake up and everything's just messed up

30:29

and it turns out the drinking

30:30

competition was with Shiiorath and you

30:32

have to uncover like what you did while

30:34

you were blacked out and it's just like

30:36

what just happened? It it went from like

30:38

Skyrim I'm a Dragon Lord to like hang

30:41

over the movie um in the middle of the G

30:43

but it was like actually really fun and

30:45

engaging and the story of it was really

30:46

good. Um and that was so great and now

30:50

it's

30:52

you know uh what is the hue of this pot?

30:55

I don't know. Better talk to Todd. Um,

31:00

and that that doesn't work and makes it

31:03

take 17 trillion years to make another

31:06

game. So, yeah, something has to change

31:08

at Xbox. It sounds like there's a lot of

31:10

change. Change is really really chaotic.

31:13

I don't think we are even sort of close

31:16

>> to the end of the painful chaotic

31:18

change. And I hope they find a way out

31:21

of it because there's a lot of really

31:22

cool IPs there and a lot of really cool

31:24

people working there. I'm sure.

31:25

>> You know what's really funny is we've

31:27

had some painful chaotic change here

31:29

lately

31:30

>> and I actually going around the world

31:32

right now.

31:32

>> I I actually like gave an impromptu kind

31:35

of talk to uh the writing team like an

31:39

hour ago where I was basically just like

31:43

you I think actually said it better than

31:45

I did. So I kind of wish that I had said

31:47

it better. I don't even know what this

31:48

is, but

31:49

>> it was basically just like um [snorts]

31:52

you know, you know, am I stressed? Yes.

31:57

>> Yeah, super stressed. Um but there's a

32:01

difference. This is a this is a stress

32:03

that is not a it's not an external

32:07

stress. It's a like it's kind of an it's

32:10

kind of a like like it's time to lock in

32:12

and there's work to be done and it can

32:15

be really exciting and it's it's it's

32:19

stress about it's stress about like a

32:21

new opportunity because um you know I

32:24

think I think internally we have a lot

32:25

of things that we do really well and I

32:27

think we have a lot of stuff that hasn't

32:30

been working as well and and and I think

32:33

that some of the upheaval that we've had

32:36

is going to force force us

32:38

>> to re-evaluate and do things

32:40

differently. I've seen a growing

32:43

sentiment over the last little while

32:46

that the content is starting to feel

32:48

more classic LTT. And it's not because

32:51

there's different people working on it.

32:53

In a lot of cases, it's some of our it's

32:55

some of our oldest timers that are

32:58

working on a lot of that content, but

33:00

the processes are changing and we're

33:03

getting

33:05

out of necessity slash out of because

33:08

we're bored of being bored, we're

33:10

getting scrappier again. Um, actually

33:12

had a ton of fun today. Like uh Elijah

33:15

Elijah was here before the show and he's

33:16

like exhausted because we shot all day,

33:19

but we shot two LTs today that were both

33:22

just

33:23

>> just fun.

33:25

>> Amazing.

33:25

>> You know, I I

33:26

>> it's actually so important and I'm very

33:29

happy to hear that.

33:30

>> Yeah. Like uh one of them one of them

33:32

doesn't sound fun. Uh Elijah and I were

33:35

having a conversation and realized uh

33:38

separate from the the video se that both

33:41

of us needed a printer right now.

33:43

>> Our reasons for needing a printer were

33:46

completely different. So he's got a lot

33:48

more like business administration that

33:50

he's got to do because of his like

33:52

streaming side hustle

33:53

>> and he needs a printer. And my kids are

33:56

getting to like high school age and they

33:59

need to surprisingly they still need to

34:01

hand things in. Whether it's like

34:03

>> putting things on a poster board or

34:05

whether it's like handing in an

34:07

assignment, they actually still need to

34:08

hand stuff in on paper. Um more often

34:11

than I expected and so we kind of went,

34:17

"Is Is that a video? [laughter]

34:19

>> Is us going shopping for a printer?

34:21

>> Is honestly, yeah. is us going printer

34:24

shopping a video

34:26

>> and uh and and we made the decision and

34:29

it turns out that was easy. Um yeah.

34:31

Yeah, it's a video. And so today, Elijah

34:34

and I having done zero research, neither

34:37

of us having bought a printer. So to

34:38

give you context, Elijah hadn't bought a

34:40

printer ever. And my current most

34:43

up-to-date printer that I bought is made

34:45

by Samsung.

34:47

>> They haven't made printers in a in a

34:49

minute, I think.

34:49

>> So uh how long do you think a minute is?

34:52

Don't look at the chat. Don't look at

34:54

the chat. They're not going to help you.

34:55

>> I don't know. I So I when I worked at

34:56

Geek Squad, they sold Samsung printers.

34:59

So they definitely made them as of when

35:02

would that have been? 2011, I think. So

35:06

I'm going to guess that they stopped in

35:10

2015.

35:12

>> You're actually super close. HP

35:14

announced the acquisition of Samsung's

35:17

printer business in 2016. Poo. That was

35:21

That was pretty good, actually.

35:22

>> So, it's been almost 10 years since

35:26

Samsung printers have even been a thing.

35:30

>> And you definitely bought yours notably

35:31

before they stopped being

35:33

>> Oh, yeah, brother.

35:34

>> I'm pretty sure yours was old by that

35:35

time.

35:35

>> Uh, it wasn't new.

35:38

>> So,

35:40

you know. [laughter]

35:42

>> Yeah.

35:42

>> So, we we basically went in like, "Oh,

35:45

yeah. We'll uh you know, how about the

35:47

eco tank? Is is that a is that a good

35:50

thing?

35:52

And and it's it's it's really

35:55

it's really interesting getting

35:57

>> Oh man, that's actually got to be so

35:58

much fun. Watching Lionus and Elijah go

36:00

into a store and just try to figure out

36:02

what the heck all the terms are on the

36:03

label for a tech product actually sounds

36:05

hilarious.

36:06

>> And the most frustrating part is how

36:07

many terms were not on the label. Like

36:10

there there's a part in the video where

36:11

I'm like, see see this is why

36:13

everybody's turning to AI because

36:15

instead of having standardized labels

36:17

that all have the same specs so that I

36:19

can easily compare them, they all have

36:22

the different things on them. One of

36:23

them says how many pages per minute and

36:25

the next one over says whether it has a

36:28

fax function or not, but does this one

36:29

have a fax function? How many pages a

36:30

minute does that one do? I don't know.

36:32

That wasn't easy.

36:35

Okay, I I'll ask the AI and Oh, then now

36:38

I have to go and cross check every

36:40

>> verify everything it says.

36:41

>> Bloody stupid thing it says because I

36:43

can't trust it at all.

36:44

>> Especially the Google one. Well,

36:46

especially the uh search integrated

36:48

ones. They're all loadier.

36:50

>> It's It's very frustrating. And uh I

36:53

actually also it was another shopping

36:55

video which was like they were both in

36:57

the same place. So we shot Linus buys on

36:59

a phone

37:00

>> as well and that was frustrating for a

37:02

completely different reason. How many

37:04

options do you think there were for

37:06

buying a printer

37:10

>> these days?

37:12

Like eight.

37:14

>> Oh, dude. I kid you not. Like 50.

37:17

>> Whoa.

37:18

>> Tons.

37:19

>> You're in.

37:20

>> We're in stables.

37:22

>> Ah, okay.

37:24

>> Tons. Okay. We got your

37:25

>> You did say the whole easy button thing.

37:26

All right. Yeah. Yeah.

37:27

>> We got your Epson. We got your HP. We

37:30

got We Hey, come on up here. We got your

37:33

brother. We got your inkjet.

37:36

Got your toner. Uh, deco tank. They got

37:40

They got so many options.

37:41

Multi-function.

37:43

[laughter]

37:43

>> They got everything, man.

37:46

>> Business grade, consumer grade. Do you

37:49

want the free?

37:50

>> So, okay. I didn't I was basically only

37:52

thinking like consumer grade, if that

37:55

helps at all.

37:56

>> They got everything.

37:56

>> They probably still had way more than

37:58

eight.

37:58

>> They They got everything. Okay. Okay.

38:00

How many options do you think Ivonne had

38:02

for phones?

38:05

>> I feel I don't shop for things. No.

38:08

Okay. Uh, is she excluding any?

38:11

>> She is not buying an iPhone again.

38:14

>> Okay. So, nothing on the iPhone side of

38:16

things.

38:17

>> We got to look probably a couple

38:18

generations.

38:20

>> Uh,

38:22

15.

38:23

>> You're not even close. But the other way

38:27

at the store, what

38:29

>> there was, and I kid you not, there was

38:32

the S25 FE.

38:33

>> Okay,

38:34

>> there S26, 26 Plus, 26 Ultra. They had

38:38

the Flip and both of the new folds, so

38:41

we're up to seven. And then they had

38:42

like the Pixel 10, 10, and 10 Pro.

38:45

>> They had the Flip and the two folds.

38:47

>> Well, they were just installing them

38:49

today,

38:49

>> but not like a bajillion other things,

38:52

>> dude. There was like

38:54

>> that seems wild. was an absolute desert

38:58

of choice.

38:59

>> They Okay. Okay. You know what? You're

39:01

actually really close. No, I forgot.

39:02

There were two Motoras as well. There

39:04

was like two Motorola, so it was like

39:05

there was like 12 phones.

39:07

>> So, actually, you're you're close, but I

39:10

was just

39:11

>> Was that Staples again?

39:13

>> No, that was Best Buy. So, like where's

39:15

the you know, and I know LG doesn't make

39:17

them anymore, right? But like where's

39:19

the LG? Where's the Sony? Where's the

39:21

Asus ROG? And and to be clear, I know

39:24

those also don't exist, but like where's

39:25

the Xiaomi and real media?

39:27

>> That's kind of your point, isn't it?

39:29

They're all kind of falling off.

39:30

>> Everything's gone.

39:31

>> OnePlus just left North American

39:32

markets.

39:33

>> No OPPO, no Vivo.

39:36

>> Is I mean, you can

39:38

>> Are they Japan exclusive now?

39:39

>> I think you can get like international

39:41

ones shipped to you, but I don't think

39:43

they're in retail stores in North

39:44

America.

39:45

>> Yeah,

39:45

>> Dan probably knows.

39:46

>> Just this one that I have is the what,

39:49

the six or something like that. It was

39:51

available in America. There's an

39:52

American variant. The previous

39:54

generation did not have a North American

39:55

variant.

39:56

>> Do you have that cool new one?

39:57

>> Uh, not the newest one. No, I just I

39:59

just upgraded this. I'm I'm good with

40:01

this one.

40:02

>> Um, but I still buy the Chinese variants

40:05

cuz they have unlocked bootloadader.

40:06

They're locked in America.

40:08

>> The Xperia phones right now are like my

40:12

favorite phones on paper. If you don't

40:14

include the price as a line of item and

40:16

then you include the price as a line

40:17

item and it's like never mind. I got to

40:19

go and prepare your the other one for

40:21

you.

40:22

>> It's It's fine.

40:22

>> I am so dumb.

40:24

>> Um anyways, anyway, I was just like I

40:27

was I was blown away. Your options are

40:29

pretty much Pixel, iPhone, Samsung, or

40:33

go yourself.

40:34

>> And the difference between those these

40:35

days, I think, is also less than like

40:38

ever before.

40:38

>> So boring. Oh, Pinetics. Okay, Pinetics

40:41

in the chat. It's like, I miss when HTC

40:42

made good phones, dude. I found an HTC1

40:45

mini in like my seat cushions the other

40:47

day.

40:47

>> Those were nice. And I was like, man,

40:50

>> those felt good. Those felt really good.

40:52

>> Like that. Damn, that's nice. You know,

40:54

like,

40:55

>> where are the freaking options, man?

40:57

>> Yeah.

40:58

>> So, yeah, it was really disappointing.

41:01

>> Oh, there there was some phones from

41:03

like best phone

41:04

>> that era plus or minus like 3 years that

41:08

were just incredible.

41:09

>> I was a big Droid Turbo guy. I freaking

41:12

loved the Droid Turbo with the ballistic

41:14

nylon backing.

41:16

>> Yeah. Actually, you know what?

41:18

>> Yeah.

41:19

>> Um, they didn't have it at Best Buy

41:20

today, so it wasn't an option for Yvon's

41:22

purchase, but Motorola has a really nice

41:25

fold. Now,

41:26

>> the Razor, check out the backing

41:28

material.

41:28

>> I was looking at the backing material

41:30

before I even felt it. It looks really

41:32

sharp. I don't know if you guys

41:35

>> Which one? That one.

41:37

>> Yeah, it's not that close.

41:40

>> I don't think they're going to be able

41:41

to really see.

41:42

>> Yeah, they're not going to be able to

41:42

see.

41:44

>> Uh, really nice pattern. It feels great

41:46

in the hand actually.

41:47

>> So, I'm probably not going to daily that

41:50

just because the um I just got my hands

41:53

on this. And then like immediately the

41:56

uh the ZFold 8 arrived and I am very

42:00

curious to see if I can get used to the

42:02

form factor. I actually shot the short

42:04

circuit unboxing of it like right before

42:06

I came down here. Yeah.

42:08

>> Of just like a normal foot. Oh, it's not

42:11

normal.

42:13

I see.

42:14

>> [laughter]

42:15

>> Yes.

42:15

>> It's like super wide and kind of short.

42:20

>> What did you call me?

42:21

>> Right after I said it.

42:24

>> The did you just say to me?

42:26

>> I I said it and then just stared at the

42:28

phone and was like, "We're [laughter]

42:29

going to just move on."

42:34

Oh my Oh yeah, that's kind of weird.

42:39

>> One of these days he will become the

42:41

experienced on camera personality that

42:43

he was born to be. And he will not hold

42:45

the camera out of sight or the phone out

42:47

of sight.

42:48

>> Let Let me Let me look Let me look at

42:49

this real quick. [laughter]

42:52

>> It's uh

42:53

>> I'm dying.

42:53

>> I was not born to be this. We shaped me

42:57

into this weird amoeba. Um

43:00

it's it's it's it's a strange form

43:02

factor. Okay, here's my 8 Pro for

43:05

example.

43:05

>> Yeah.

43:07

>> Yeah.

43:07

>> It's very short. It's like

43:09

>> very lukew.

43:11

[laughter]

43:13

But then if I open it up,

43:17

>> it's enormous.

43:19

>> Yeah. Flip. Flip it 90°.

43:22

No. No. Oh god. No. The other

43:25

>> Don't even

43:29

I'll I'll wait. I can wait.

43:31

What? That's Stop.

43:35

>> Clockwise. [clears throat]

43:36

There you go. That's right.

43:38

>> Good enough. There you go. Now you can

43:40

see the height difference. Okay. Are you

43:42

actually not going to hold it like that?

43:43

>> There you go.

43:44

>> There. [laughter]

43:45

>> Crying out loud like that.

43:46

>> I thought I had already shown that.

43:47

Sorry.

43:48

>> No.

43:49

>> So, it's got it's like the

43:51

>> So, I guess Yeah, you could turn it to

43:52

the side.

43:53

>> So, I was interesting.

43:54

>> When I was shooting the short circuit, I

43:56

was actually like

43:59

I was doing the thing where I list all

44:01

the positives about it

44:04

so that I can ultimately go, "Yeah, but

44:08

like come on.

44:11

And then I went

44:14

>> and I held it like this

44:16

>> and I went, "Holy crap, they might be on

44:19

to something."

44:21

It's like

44:23

like that is that's big, you know, and

44:27

it's like and it's light. It's only 201

44:30

g. It's very like

44:32

>> battery life

44:33

>> holdable. I think it has a Don't quote

44:35

me on this. It's in the short circuit.

44:36

46

44:38

or 4,800 mAh. Um,

44:41

>> that's a Samsung.

44:42

>> I've gotten shockingly good battery life

44:44

out of the Fold 7. I've been extremely

44:46

happy with it.

44:47

>> Are they doing battery in each

44:49

whatever you call it? I don't know

44:51

section.

44:51

>> Actually, not sure. Haven't done a tear

44:53

down. Wouldn't surprise me if they did,

44:55

>> but I'm not sure.

44:56

>> Yeah.

44:59

>> Yeah.

45:00

>> Interesting. All All yours for the low

45:03

low price of $2500

45:07

for the one TB model.

45:08

>> No longer interesting.

45:09

>> Yeah, I didn't think so. $1,900 for the

45:12

I think it's a Is it the 256 or one? I

45:14

think it's a 256.

45:16

>> My old my old 8 Pro is still chooching.

45:19

I uh I am planning on probably doing a

45:21

battery replacement because the battery

45:22

on it at this point is brutal. It's uh

45:27

>> Yeah, that's the 256 for

45:29

>> Yeah.

45:29

>> 1900. Anyone

45:35

want to pick a topic?

45:37

How did we end up on this after Xbox

45:40

backward compatibility? This show is

45:42

can't even

45:42

>> Sometimes we do be doing stuff uh who

45:45

isn't going to be doing stuff is under

45:47

15s in France are not going to be social

45:50

mediaing unless they find a very obvious

45:52

way around the law. Uh French lawmakers

45:54

approved a bill on Tuesday banning

45:56

social media access for children under

45:57

15. The measure must still pass the

45:59

Constitutional Council before it can

46:01

take effect. What's the right age for

46:05

this kind of outright ban?

46:07

>> That was pretty much all I had to say

46:08

about it. I mean, I guess we could do

46:10

the discussion topic.

46:10

>> Yeah, it's interesting. I mean, I think

46:12

we've kind of talked this to death a

46:13

little bit, but we can talk about the

46:15

right age, I guess.

46:17

>> I have no idea.

46:20

>> Helpful.

46:21

>> Yeah. I'm trying to think like, you

46:23

know, what would you know like what was

46:25

my maturity level then? And but the

46:27

world was so different.

46:29

>> Very very very different.

46:30

>> Like if you had told me at 15 or if you

46:33

told me at 14 that I'm not allowed to

46:34

have my MSN Messenger to talk to my

46:36

friends, I'd been like you're crazy.

46:38

>> Yeah.

46:38

>> Like of of course I should. And looking

46:40

back at it, I don't I don't think that

46:42

was a problem. But the access to it

46:44

>> access to it was very different.

46:46

>> Way more limited.

46:47

>> Had to be on your desktop.

46:48

>> And probably at that time you had a

46:51

single shared computer for the entire

46:52

household.

46:53

>> Yeah.

46:54

>> So it was Yeah. Yeah, it was a it was a

46:57

it was a different time. Um,

47:01

yeah, I could see I don't know. Crystal

47:04

says under 13. I could I could see that.

47:06

I I could see 13 as a as a threshold.

47:09

With that said, like 13year-olds are no

47:12

offense 13-year-olds, but like they're

47:14

not they're not mentally mature yet,

47:17

like at all. Um,

47:19

>> yeah.

47:21

And social media

47:24

there I guess for me social media tends

47:26

to assume that everyone is an adult.

47:28

>> There's two different conversations

47:30

here, right? I think there's one

47:32

conversation around what should be the

47:35

age limit of social media and then I

47:38

think there's almost a separate

47:39

conversation about what should be the

47:41

age limit of the like hypertuned hyper

47:45

addictive hook you forever like monster

47:50

that social media morphed into because I

47:52

don't think there's any reason that a

47:53

13-year-old couldn't have been on say

47:55

what Facebook was in the early days. I

47:58

would potentially even argue Discord

48:00

now.

48:01

>> Yeah, Discord is

48:03

>> somewhat monitored. Discord now I think

48:05

is more similar to old social media

48:07

platforms

48:08

>> in that you are the the the Discord

48:11

server with your buddies,

48:12

>> it's kind of like having an MSN

48:14

messenger from back in the day.

48:15

>> Yeah. And so and so I I don't see a

48:19

problem with that. But you know when you

48:22

talk about like like if one of my kids

48:25

asked me, "Hey, can I install

48:26

Instagram?" I'd be like, "No."

48:30

>> Or or Twitter X, whatever.

48:33

>> Yeah, that's a hard no.

48:35

>> Tik Tok

48:36

>> hard no.

48:36

>> Yeah, those like infinite scrolling

48:38

freaking billions of dollars spent in

48:40

mind control type things is is is a

48:44

different threshold. And and it it like

48:45

feels weird being like, "Yeah, Discord's

48:47

the good one." I think there are

48:49

obviously, as we saw when when Discord

48:51

did some not cool things recently, there

48:54

are other similar alternatives. The line

48:56

for me and the reason why I'm saying

48:58

Discord is

49:01

yeah, it can be used poorly. You can end

49:03

up on really bad communities on Discord.

49:06

There's uh there was some stuff in the

49:07

news recently of some like really

49:09

terrible things going through Discord.

49:11

That's going to be true for everything.

49:13

Um but I think in general when when used

49:16

fairly appropriately, it'll be direct

49:18

messaging with your friends, very

49:19

similar to MSN. Yep. and a a potential

49:23

like server thing that you could just

49:25

have with your friends from school that

49:27

should theoretically do a decent job of

49:29

of uh having some amount of wall in

49:32

between just the whole open internet and

49:35

thing. Our rule with our kids is, hey,

49:37

you're a minor and the deal is if you're

49:40

allowed to use a platform that enables

49:43

you to communicate broadly with the

49:45

world, we're allowed to look at it and

49:48

we'll tell you, we're going to come look

49:50

at it and we'll do it together. We're

49:52

not going to snoop on you. There will be

49:53

no cloak and daggering in this

49:55

relationship.

49:56

>> That's nice. That's cool.

49:57

>> But that's the deal.

49:58

>> Yeah. Um,

50:01

>> and some people might look at that and

50:03

go helicopter parenting. Um,

50:06

>> knock on wood, my kids all seem like

50:09

they're turning out really good so far.

50:10

So, no regrets.

50:12

>> And there's

50:12

>> I'll stay in my little helicopter.

50:14

>> You know, just like every single thing,

50:16

if the if the kids are I like that.

50:18

That's amazing. Uh,

50:20

>> not even what a helicopter sounds like.

50:22

>> Nope. That's fantastic. uh riding in the

50:25

Linus copter.

50:26

>> If they really want to, if they're

50:27

really motivated enough, they could just

50:29

memorize the server ID and just leave it

50:32

every time.

50:34

>> Like there there is

50:36

if the kids really want to y

50:38

>> are super motivated, there will be a way

50:40

around it. That's how I feel like with

50:42

all of these laws, too. It's like, yeah,

50:44

okay, until I go on to like some

50:46

realistic looking video game and make a

50:48

character and then do some AI altering

50:51

to the character and make it look like I

50:53

create a persona. Um, and then create

50:56

that digital persona online and now I'm

50:58

an adult who's able to get onto these

50:59

social media platforms. Like there are

51:01

ways around it, but I think even putting

51:03

up a little bit of a barrier to try to

51:05

dissuade and effectively communicate to

51:08

parents like, "Hey, this is dangerous

51:11

for your kids genuinely." U I think can

51:14

be a good thing.

51:14

>> Glow says, "As someone that was raised

51:17

by the internet with no parental

51:19

guidelines, thank you for watching out

51:21

for them."

51:26

[laughter]

51:28

All right.

51:32

>> [sighs]

51:32

>> Okay. Um, maybe I'll pick the next one

51:34

here.

51:35

>> Sure.

51:36

>> Should we get all the Xbox stuff out of

51:38

the way? Oh, you know what? No, I'm

51:39

going to I'm going to go with this one.

51:41

Um, the tariff saga continues. And I'm

51:45

not talking about the most recent

51:47

retaliatory tariffs for wildfire smoke,

51:50

which is wild. Uh, no. I'm talking about

51:53

Nintendo filing a motion to dismiss the

51:57

class action from gamers who say that

51:59

Nintendo would be double dipping by

52:01

keeping its tariff refund after they

52:04

passed tariff costs on to customers.

52:07

Nintendo's argument in its lawyer's

52:09

words is that buyers, this is a quote,

52:12

received exactly what they bargained and

52:14

paid for when they bought this price

52:16

hiked hardware. And this is another

52:18

quote, "Plaintiffs are not entitled to a

52:20

rebate simply because of intervening

52:22

legal developments related to tariffs."

52:25

In other words, Nintendo's version of

52:28

events says, "The sticker said $499

52:31

for one Switch 2, please. You paid $499.

52:36

We gave you a Switch 2. The deal is now

52:39

done."

52:41

The reason this is coming up is that

52:43

Nintendo raised prices actually on both

52:45

the original Switch and Switch 2

52:47

accessories citing tariffs. Uh the

52:50

Supreme Court struck those tariffs down

52:52

in February. Nintendo sued the

52:54

government for its own refund in March

52:56

and then gamers filed the class action

52:58

in April. Nintendo's filing argues that

53:01

it has no legal duty to retroactively

53:05

adjust prices on completed sales, saying

53:07

that's not how commercial transactions

53:09

work.

53:10

Game Files Steven Tatilo was first to

53:13

report the motion. Our discussion

53:16

question is Nintendo blamed tariffs for

53:19

price increases. Then they sued to get

53:22

their tariff money back while telling

53:24

customers a deal is a deal. Legally they

53:28

might be right. So why do some people

53:31

feel that they are so wrong? And I I

53:34

this is one of those ones I think I both

53:36

sides to this the last time we talked

53:38

about it. And I'll let you talk first

53:41

because spoiler alert I'm going to both

53:43

sides it again. So get ready.

53:45

>> Yeah. I mean there are other costs

53:47

involved as we talked about this last

53:48

time. Um

53:51

>> it's not

53:53

like I mean there's even legal fees with

53:55

them trying to sue the government to get

53:56

their tariff money back. Like there's

53:58

there are other costs involved. It

54:00

doesn't just magically evaporate like

54:01

that. Uh,

54:02

>> the tariffs are also going away. The

54:05

tariff cost is being taken or refunded

54:08

to Nintendo because the tariffs were

54:10

found to be illegal. There's nothing

54:12

illegal about Nintendo putting a $4.99

54:15

price tag on something and you paying

54:17

it. That's that's legal. Um,

54:20

>> it's not necessarily nice.

54:22

>> That sucks.

54:23

>> Yeah. [snorts]

54:24

>> Yeah. No one's saying this doesn't suck.

54:26

It's just it's not illegal. They're I

54:30

think the people suing Nintendo are

54:31

going to lose. Um

54:34

>> I mean, yes.

54:36

>> Yeah.

54:37

>> Yes, they will.

54:38

>> Yeah.

54:40

>> But what about the moral question?

54:43

Morally speaking,

54:47

>> do you think they're right? Should

54:48

Nintendo pass the tariff refund back

54:51

along?

54:52

>> I think part of it would be nice. Um, I

54:54

think if if they could somehow figure

54:57

out what a reasonable portion is because

55:00

again there's

55:01

>> turning L's into W's.

55:04

Sorry, I I'll I'm going to let you

55:06

finish, but I have a I have an idea that

55:08

I will pitch to Nintendo free of charge

55:09

in a moment.

55:10

>> Okay, cool. Um, is like obviously the

55:12

legal fees involved with this cost

55:15

something. um pivoting the whole

55:17

company, the amount of wasted time that

55:19

they could have been doing, other cool

55:20

things, trying to figure out what is an

55:22

appropriate rate that we can set it at

55:24

with these literally constantly changing

55:26

tariffs. What are what are these counter

55:28

measures we can do to move manufacturing

55:30

or do other things to dodge these

55:31

tariffs? All of that has actually very

55:34

substantial cost. So, if you work that

55:35

out and then figure out how much is

55:37

remaining in the increased pot, then you

55:39

could

55:41

>> Okay, here's my pitch. Here's my pitch

55:42

to Nintendo free of charge. Okay. as a

55:46

as an act of as an act of goodwill, you

55:49

guys take your tariff refund, which is

55:51

going to be all done out in public,

55:53

right? So, everyone's going to know how

55:54

much tariff refund you get, and you

55:57

basically go, "Okay, here's the here's

56:00

here's the deal. everyone who bought a

56:03

Switch 2 or a a Everyone who bought a

56:06

Switch 2 so far and everyone who bought

56:08

a Switch One since, you know, some date

56:11

uh gets $5 off a game over some amount

56:15

in the Nintendo eShop. At the end of the

56:17

day, it actually costs you nothing

56:20

because you are incentivizing a

56:22

purchase. So, you you will make money on

56:25

the transaction. You could think of it

56:27

as a marketing expense and it's still an

56:30

act of goodwill. Realistically, you

56:32

know, in terms of what class action

56:34

settlements ultimately end up being,

56:36

still giving something back to the

56:38

entire Nintendo Switch customer base and

56:40

Nintendo community. It's a way to it's a

56:43

way to kind of be a good guy and and

56:47

spend the money that that you got after

56:50

the fact, but on something that

56:52

ultimately benefits you and your

56:54

customers. We take a big L, we turn it

56:57

into a W, everybody wins.

56:59

>> You're welcome.

57:00

>> Yeah. I was I was also potentially

57:01

thinking some like uh Nintendo online

57:04

time or something like that.

57:06

>> Yeah.

57:06

>> Yeah. Something like that could be cool.

57:08

>> Yeah. Some some kind of some way to to

57:11

turn this this crappy situation

57:13

>> doing something for the customers makes

57:15

sense. A a full refund of the entire

57:17

difference of the cost doesn't because

57:19

Nintendo still incurred a lot of cost

57:21

trying to deal with this situation. Um

57:24

but but yeah, there's something some

57:28

form of uh making the lives better of

57:30

the people who bought it at the inflated

57:32

price would be really cool. I mean, I

57:34

don't even know if it has to be

57:38

[sighs]

57:39

because, okay, because if you make it

57:40

the people who specifically bought at

57:42

the inflated cost, then then that's

57:45

basically that's setting a really

57:47

dangerous precedent for Nintendo because

57:50

now all of a sudden you are opening the

57:52

door to the conversation of like, you

57:54

know, if there's ever like like if if

57:56

Nintendo gets a rebate from their their

57:58

battery OEM, like

58:02

is everybody going to get Is everybody

58:03

who bought a switch going to get a

58:06

refund? Like, come on.

58:07

>> Ben, it comes back down to what you were

58:08

kind of saying, though. The tariffs were

58:10

illegal tariffs. Um, and they said that

58:13

they raised the price specifically for

58:14

that. So, did they raise the price

58:15

because of an illegal activity from

58:17

their battery manufacturer that they

58:19

then got refunded for?

58:20

>> We'd never know.

58:21

>> That's true.

58:22

>> Maybe.

58:23

>> We would never know that, right? So, so

58:25

they're setting like a really weird

58:27

precedent if they go and alter the deal

58:29

after the fact. Whereas if they just

58:31

say, "Hey, here's a windfall. We love

58:33

our Switch community so very huggy muggy

58:36

much. Here's something." Then I think

58:38

that diffuses

58:41

a a lot of the anger and maybe even goes

58:43

more broadly than just the people who,

58:45

you know, paid more than they would have

58:46

liked for for a game console.

58:48

>> Yeah, I think that's cool.

58:49

>> I I And look, I'm not saying, you know,

58:51

$5 logistical absolute freaking

58:53

nightmare, just to be clear.

58:55

>> Which one? Gift cards.

58:56

>> Refunding.

58:57

>> Oh, that Yeah,

58:58

>> that's insane.

58:58

>> Yeah. Whereas like an like like running

59:00

a promo basically saying, "Yeah, for the

59:02

next week, you know,

59:04

>> I I I bought my Switch from Nintend from

59:06

uh Willow. Let's say I bought it during

59:08

the tariff increase."

59:10

>> You think Nintendo's going to

59:11

specifically talk with Willow to get in

59:13

contact with me to give me money back?

59:15

Like how any of this happens? I I don't

59:17

even know.

59:18

>> Um

59:19

>> there's probably a simpler way. They

59:22

could set up some site and you can try

59:24

to like submit a receipt or something

59:27

and then they have to do like OCR stuff

59:29

on figuring out if the receipt is

59:30

legitimate and

59:32

>> ain't any of that happening.

59:34

>> Yeah, probably not. So, I I I I like the

59:36

idea of of the the something. I think

59:38

that's pretty cool.

59:40

>> Um

59:41

>> ehop gift card, free Nintendo online,

59:44

something like that would be pretty

59:45

sweet.

59:45

>> All right, speaking of online shops,

59:47

>> don't they do this all the time with

59:48

rebates? No, cuz the ones you're

59:51

thinking of is a rebate that you get on

59:53

the purchase of the product. So you

59:55

would get some form of information that

59:57

you then submit in order to get a rebate

59:58

back. This is retroactive.

60:00

>> Yeah.

60:01

>> So it it would not

60:02

>> So we weren't planning ahead for it this

60:04

time.

60:04

>> Yes. Which is actually a huge problem in

60:06

this case.

60:08

>> They're finally here. The last socks

60:10

you'll ever want to buy, the LTT forever

60:13

socks. Oh, dang it. It moved right as I

60:16

tried to click. [laughter] available in

60:18

well sort of available some of the um

60:21

some of the colors are already out man

60:24

we one of these days we're going to nail

60:26

our forecasting but it is not this day

60:30

uh the point is on the is this the US

60:33

site yeah on the US site we still have

60:35

one color in one size and I think the

60:37

global site still has uh yes the global

60:40

site actually still has uh pretty decent

60:42

socks uh stock socks stock so sock

60:46

>> they're pretty decent so

60:46

>> socks

60:47

stock. The Forever Sock is finally

60:51

freaking here after 6 years. Uh we have

60:55

dropped our much anticipated Forever

60:57

sock. We obsessed over everything from

61:01

the premium marino wool blend to the

61:03

copper infused odor control to the

61:05

reinforced heel and toe construction.

61:08

The result, a longlasting sock that I

61:12

think is the last socks you'll want to

61:14

wear. And yes, we are even backing them

61:16

with our limited lifetime warranty. So

61:18

my notes here say, "Go make your feet

61:20

happy at lmg.gg/forever

61:22

sock." And then it says, "Note, high

61:25

chance US site will be sold out by 4."

61:27

Oh, okay. Well, that was a while ago.

61:30

Uh, cool. But the global site global

61:33

site still has stock and

61:35

>> USite still has smalls. I think

61:37

>> our forever sock is a great opportunity

61:39

for you guys to send in a checkout

61:40

message. We on the WAN show believe that

61:43

if you're going to throw money at your

61:44

screen at live streamers that you should

61:46

get something great in return for that

61:49

money. So we don't do uh Twitch bits. We

61:52

don't do super chats. What we do is coms

61:55

a checkout message. All you got to do to

61:57

send one is while we're streaming, head

61:59

over to ltstore.com,

62:01

add something to your cart, and you will

62:03

see in the checkout one of these. You

62:06

click this button and you can type a

62:08

message. You can change the color. You

62:10

can decide whether to display your name

62:12

or not display your name. And then all

62:14

you got to do is go to the checkout and

62:16

your message will go to producer Dan.

62:19

There he is. Who will, I don't know, pop

62:22

it up here or he'll reply to it or he

62:25

might curate it for me and Luke to

62:28

respond to. So, producer Dan, do you

62:30

want to show the folks what that might

62:32

look like when you curate a message?

62:33

>> Yeah, I've got a bunch here. The first

62:34

one here is actually about the socks, so

62:36

that works great.

62:37

>> That makes sense.

62:38

>> Hope you're swell. DLL, can you explain

62:40

how you choose SKUs for your first items

62:44

uh for your items? Why three colorways

62:47

and not two styles for socks? It feels

62:49

like variety should beat out colors to

62:51

my novice noggin.

62:54

That is a great great question.

63:02

We do our best. We actually we we

63:06

actually like agonize over this kind of

63:10

thing.

63:10

>> You're you're

63:11

>> Yeah. Go ahead.

63:12

>> Just genuinely trying to predict the

63:13

future.

63:14

>> Yeah.

63:15

>> And in a lot of ways because you're

63:16

trying to predict the future of what

63:18

colors people want. You're trying to

63:19

predict the future of what sizes people

63:20

want and you're trying to predict the

63:22

future of that in different geographical

63:24

locations cuz now we have two stores,

63:26

>> what styles they want to. Uh so we we

63:29

were going to launch with a half crew

63:32

and then we ultimately made the decision

63:34

to launch with a full crew because we

63:37

kind of figured okay well the trend

63:41

right now is that um you know kind of

63:44

like how how hemlines rise and fall with

63:46

with trends. Sock heights rise and fall

63:49

with trends. Ankle socks are out and

63:52

longer socks are trending back. So we

63:54

wanted to get out ahead of that. This is

63:56

where I'm This is probably the thing I

63:58

am most unk about. I I can't do it.

64:02

>> Which?

64:02

>> The tall socks.

64:03

>> Oh, you can't do it.

64:04

>> Drives me crazy.

64:05

>> You're an ankle sock guy?

64:06

>> Oh, yeah. But literally always

64:08

>> Oh, that's crazy.

64:09

>> Yeah. I have never once liked like even

64:14

when I'm trying to go like as warm as

64:15

possible in a snow boot.

64:17

>> You'll wear an ankle sock in a snowboard

64:19

boot.

64:20

>> I believe I have done so.

64:21

>> That's insane. Okay, so we can safely

64:24

ignore him. Yeah.

64:25

>> Um, [laughter]

64:26

you know what's funny is 5 years ago I

64:29

was the UNK guy because ankle socks were

64:32

in and I was wearing crew

64:34

>> tall socks.

64:35

>> Yeah. So, uh, that was another thing

64:36

that that shifted us towards the full

64:39

crew for the launch. Um, and so, so,

64:43

right, so in response, why not two

64:45

styles instead of three colors? So for

64:48

one thing, two styles in two colors

64:50

would have been four lines, which would

64:53

have been 33% more. So four doesn't

64:55

sound like a lot more than three, except

64:57

that four is 33% more. And already with

65:02

the three, we have three sizes times

65:04

three colors. So that's 9* two

65:07

locations. So that is 18 discrete

65:10

bins

65:12

somewhere in order to have a sock. If we

65:15

had gone with two colors in two styles,

65:18

that would have been what did I just

65:19

what number did I just say? 18.

65:21

>> So, it would have been 33% more. So, it

65:22

would have been another six. It would

65:23

have been 24.

65:26

>> It's insane.

65:28

>> Really, really fast. How many SKs do you

65:29

guys have? It's thousands. I

65:31

>> I don't know.

65:31

>> Yeah, I know it's thousand. It's

65:32

thousands.

65:33

>> It's thousands. I know it's thousands. I

65:35

literally don't know exactly how many it

65:36

is.

65:36

>> Yeah, I can check if you'd rather not

65:39

know.

65:39

>> Doesn't matter. You do not want to know.

65:40

>> Yeah, rather not know. Uh Ben Bob says,

65:42

"Why not excel size?" because we didn't

65:44

we had to start somewhere. This was our

65:46

first fora into socks. We were pretty

65:49

bullish on this. Uh clearly we were not

65:51

bullish enough. We did not order enough.

65:54

Um but we will we will order more and uh

65:58

when we do so you can expect that we are

66:01

going to be looking at uh over the next

66:03

little while. Hey, do we do a half crew?

66:05

Do we do an ankle? Do we do expanded

66:07

sizing? Because to say that the launch

66:10

has been successful would be uh an

66:13

understatement. One of the things that

66:15

we struggle with though, and I'm just

66:16

going to I'm just going to be real with

66:17

you guys right now, is maintaining

66:19

momentum on our products. We will have

66:22

these like amazing product launches and

66:25

we'll sell, you know, a few socks

66:28

>> in a day and then a couple months later

66:32

the the buzz is kind of like died down

66:35

and we really struggle. We're doing

66:38

better. We're at like to be clear, we're

66:39

doing better at it and we're always

66:41

improving, but we kind of struggle with

66:43

the ongoing marketing of our products.

66:45

>> There is

66:47

Yeah.

66:51

>> Yeah. Uh

66:53

>> and

66:53

>> I'll I'll I'll go I do think sometimes

66:56

it's we make such a varied set of things

66:59

>> Oh, we do.

67:00

>> that it can be

67:00

>> minus lead development. It's not it's

67:02

actually they're getting better about

67:03

that, too. the fashion team is really

67:05

putting a lot of pressure on me to have

67:08

a cohesive,

67:10

you know, product road map. Uh, rather

67:12

than just like like, okay, okay, I was

67:15

in the middle of the meeting where

67:16

they're literally going through the fall

67:18

winter 27 plan with me. Like to give you

67:21

some idea how far out ahead they are on

67:23

this stuff because they're like

67:24

organized real like organized people.

67:27

Um, and and I'm like, "Okay, wait, wait,

67:29

wait, hold on. I just had a I just had a

67:31

brainstorm. Okay. I uh can we do a

67:33

t-shirt that just has like a pie symbol

67:35

and then like a picture of a rat because

67:38

I think our audience would just freaking

67:39

love that. And they're like, "Yeah,

67:42

well, yeah, we'll put it in the pile

67:43

just so you got you got to have a

67:45

balance of both. You got to have just

67:46

like the creative dragon energy and then

67:48

you've also got to have the like the

67:50

structure." Um and so so what you're

67:53

seeing here is creative dragon energy.

67:55

Hey, we need to make this thing and like

67:56

here's all the like cool stuff it should

67:57

have and this is it's going to be

67:59

awesome. And then it's like okay, we

68:01

need to start somewhere. So here's how

68:02

we pair down the offerings to something

68:04

reasonable and and here's how we kind of

68:06

like go to market and then expand it.

68:08

But then where Luke is going with this

68:10

is like, okay, as we take that slow and

68:12

steady approach in the background, how

68:14

exactly is it that you can tell what

68:16

kind of store this is?

68:17

>> Well, okay, here's my question.

68:19

>> Yeah,

68:20

>> without the banner,

68:21

>> how did I not wear that shirt for the

68:22

video anyway? Go ahead. without this

68:24

banner. So, let's pretend this banner is

68:27

not in rotation. Let's go forward a few

68:29

weeks, a couple months, whatever.

68:30

>> Where are the socks?

68:32

>> They are under apparel.

68:34

>> Nope.

68:35

>> Really?

68:40

>> Okay. Well, um

68:43

Okay, I'll I'll ask for that to be

68:45

moved.

68:47

>> We [snorts] make so many different

68:49

things that sometimes the categorization

68:51

of stuff gets kind of weird. Um, like if

68:54

I go under tools and I click on

68:55

screwdrivers.

68:57

Um,

68:59

oh, it has improved.

69:01

Someone listened to me. Thank you very

69:03

much. Uh, but it's it's sometimes

69:05

finding stuff on the store is like kind

69:07

of hard. And part of that is cuz we just

69:10

make so much stuff. I don't know that

69:14

many stores other than like a freaking I

69:18

don't know,

69:20

Target.

69:22

that sells like some of the the variety

69:24

of different things that we have. We

69:26

have apparel, both tops, bottoms,

69:28

loungewear, underwear, jackets, vests,

69:31

hats, everything you can imagine for

69:33

apparel. We have screwdrivers. We have

69:34

tape. We have bit cases. We have bits.

69:37

We have cables. We have cable

69:38

management. We have uh thermal pads. We

69:41

have uh hand slider things for mouse

69:44

pads. We have cable management. We have

69:46

keychains, pins, stickers, toys.

69:47

>> You haven't even mentioned water

69:48

bottles. Pet caves, water balls, desk

69:50

pads, stationary.

69:53

What is happening?

69:54

>> Well, it doesn't move

69:55

>> and it just it just keeps going. So,

69:57

it's it's difficult to I sympathize with

70:00

the problem, but it's difficult to like

70:02

kind of decide where things are going to

70:05

go and make them discoverable. But, um,

70:09

also some people don't necessarily

70:10

realize that these are clickable things

70:12

that are categories. M um so like it's

70:17

it's the whole thing is it's all very

70:20

it's very tough. See like backpacks is

70:21

like that right now. There's no

70:22

subcategory for backpacks. It's just the

70:25

backpacks category but then like

70:27

screwdriver there's screwdrivers but

70:29

then position and ratcheting and

70:34

>> for what it's worth

70:35

>> it's so hard.

70:36

>> Don't take this the wrong way. the team

70:38

that works on the website, we we know

70:41

that it's a difficult challenge.

70:43

>> Yes.

70:44

>> And no matter what we do, it's not going

70:46

to be perfect.

70:48

>> It's a very difficult problem to solve

70:50

when you have this many different

70:54

things. Um,

70:56

>> I mean, I think what I'm discovering is

70:58

like as much as like like remember when

71:01

uh remember when like ASUS would get all

71:03

buttth hurt when we would say when we

71:06

would just call their ROG monitor an

71:08

ASUS monitor and we'd be like, "Oh my

71:10

god, just relax. You're you're ASUS. You

71:13

you make ROG. Just chill." Right?

71:15

>> It's cuz they make so many things. They

71:16

need their categorization.

71:18

>> I'm beginning to understand why you need

71:20

subbrands. It's it's this is a big part

71:23

this problem is a big part of the reason

71:25

why I gave so much props to the Forever

71:28

sock name and the True Spec name is

71:32

because

71:33

>> giving them

71:34

>> something more searchable like that is

71:36

like helpful.

71:38

>> Uh the search on the store is starting

71:40

to become significantly more important,

71:41

right?

71:42

>> Uh because like just finding things is

71:44

tough.

71:45

>> Yeah. Simpleton says, "I did not realize

71:48

the title was of the categories that

71:50

were like clickable." Yeah. Yes. Yeah.

71:54

So, if that's true, how do you find a

71:56

backpack?

71:58

So, it's like it's Oh, so ah I I I I'm

72:02

very interested in uh I was talking to

72:04

Taran about this the other day, having

72:07

um like mouse behavior stuff on the

72:10

site.

72:11

>> I'm trying to figure out like how Yeah.

72:13

how people actually use the site. Um

72:16

because I'm interested in what people

72:18

click on and I I wonder like how much of

72:21

that like recency bias in product

72:24

releasement for releasement

72:26

in product releases for sales is the

72:29

banner because the banner is really

72:31

effective at, you know, getting

72:33

something out in front of you. The the

72:35

shop products down here, these these

72:37

categories, it all looks nice. Like the

72:39

store looks great, but there's just so

72:41

many different things. If we just sold

72:43

t-shirts, it would be fine. But we

72:45

don't. We also sell everything.

72:48

[laughter]

72:48

>> Tools.

72:49

>> It's like, where do we put all this

72:51

stuff?

72:51

>> Cable management.

72:52

>> Uh, yeah.

72:54

>> Yeah.

72:55

>> Pens.

72:56

>> Pens.

72:56

>> Where are pens? Accessories.

72:59

>> Accessories. Nope. Home and decor.

73:02

>> You also do accessories for the

73:03

screwdriver like grip tape,

73:06

>> extensions.

73:07

>> There we go. We got it.

73:08

>> There we go. Floppy disc, notebook,

73:09

notebook, and also

73:11

>> children's toys.

73:12

>> Mechanical pencil and pen.

73:15

Yeah. Yeah. I forgot about the

73:18

children's toys.

73:19

>> Books. Home of decor.

73:21

>> All right. All right, Dan. We get it. We

73:23

get it.

73:24

>> Decor.

73:25

>> What do we have under decor?

73:27

>> Okay. We need to just blow those away.

73:30

>> There's eight left.

73:31

>> There's eight.

73:31

>> There's eight small ones left.

73:32

>> Can you guys do me a favor and just buy

73:34

those, please? That would be great. Then

73:36

we could get it off the site.

73:37

>> Yeah. We can reprint them. No, we're not

73:39

reprinting them. What are the reviews on

73:41

this? There people left reviews on this.

73:43

[laughter] This has five stars.

73:45

>> It's all five stars. This product is

73:47

perfect. What the Go away. Um

73:51

but like they get sticker bombed.

73:54

>> I just wanted something to fill some

73:56

space on my wall. Once again, LTT

73:58

delivered with this masterpiece. It's a

74:01

damn good print. Creator Warehouse seems

74:03

to only be able to deliver at 110%. I

74:06

can't wait to see what new products are

74:07

released. [laughter] Absolutely

74:09

beautiful accent to my drab room.

74:13

>> It [laughter] really really should have

74:14

looked at the specs. Thought the print

74:16

would be way larger, but that's my fault

74:18

for not paying attention. I will apply a

74:20

thick epoxy coat the same way I coat my

74:23

stickers and other printbased decor.

74:26

Huh? I don't know what that means.

74:28

>> Me neither.

74:30

>> Did was that one com?

74:33

>> Yes.

74:33

>> Okay, hit me, Dan. We're we're on one

74:36

today.

74:37

>> Uh you're you're still doing good for

74:38

time.

74:39

>> Okay.

74:39

>> Uh

74:41

dear Lionus, what would you change about

74:43

the Canadian school system as a father

74:45

and company founder? As the principal of

74:48

a German primary school, I always enjoy

74:50

looking beyond my own system. Cheers.

74:53

Are you trying to get me in trouble? I

74:55

feel like I feel like you're trying to

74:56

get me in trouble in trouble

74:58

>> because I'm because I'm going to like

75:00

there's no way that I'm going to be able

75:02

to talk about the school system without

75:03

it there being a bunch of hot takes.

75:05

>> Nice.

75:06

>> Like I I I've I've probably got already

75:09

in my mind I've probably already got

75:11

three things that like could get me

75:13

cancelled.

75:14

>> Oh.

75:15

>> So first of all, bring back letter

75:17

grades at every stage.

75:20

>> They got rid of letter grades.

75:21

>> What is it? Yeah.

75:22

>> You guys don't know about this?

75:23

>> No.

75:24

>> No. We're old.

75:25

>> We're back in my day.

75:26

>> Childless dungeon nerds.

75:28

>> One terabyte hard drive was cool.

75:31

[laughter]

75:32

>> I mean, right

75:33

>> now I have that in RAM.

75:35

>> Um

75:36

>> Oh my god. Do you?

75:37

>> I can't. I don't have a house. I just

75:39

have the RAM. [laughter]

75:42

>> So, so yeah. So, grades are done from

75:47

emerging to developing to proficient to

75:51

extending. Uh that's how grading is done

75:54

up until I it depends on the school the

75:57

exact school and the exact school

75:59

district. But in the province of British

76:01

Columbia that's been the guidance for

76:03

quite some time now. As long as my kids

76:05

have been in school

76:06

>> I don't like it.

76:08

>> So So it's like

76:08

>> kids are wrong.

76:09

>> It's all graded out of five instead of

76:11

100.

76:11

>> It's also the kids' fault even though

76:13

it's my generation.

76:14

>> I blame the children.

76:16

>> So you don't get you don't get uh you

76:19

don't get a letter grade. you just get

76:22

this like you get this word that

76:24

describes um your your mastery of the

76:28

material and

76:31

um the way that it was defended. I

76:33

remember reading what to me and again

76:36

this is just take this for my ignorant

76:38

boomer take that it is um you know maybe

76:41

maybe they're right maybe it's a better

76:42

system I am I am not a professional

76:45

studier of this but

76:48

to me I read what seemed like pretty

76:50

much the most asinine possible defense

76:53

of this system um from some minister of

76:57

something or some big wig of some sort

76:59

in the newspaper to give you some idea

77:00

how long ago I was reading about this

77:02

And basically they were like this system

77:05

is designed to facilitate communication

77:09

between the school and the parents to

77:12

really give them an idea of how their

77:15

kids are doing.

77:17

And I'm like that's what the

77:19

letter grade was for.

77:20

>> I I could actually see kind of both used

77:22

in combination cuz I could see one being

77:24

a trend line and one being the state.

77:26

>> Or how do you do like GPA? Like

77:28

everybody's like I have a 4.0 GPA. like

77:30

yeah but

77:31

>> I I got exemplaries

77:33

>> Luke that's why we had work that's why

77:35

we had like the effort grade

77:38

>> okay

77:38

>> so there were when I was in elementary

77:39

school we had two grades for every

77:41

subject we had your your like your score

77:45

on your assignments grade ABC C or ABC

77:50

plus C and C minus and then like uh like

77:54

a like a basically I forget what what it

77:56

was like incomplete or something like we

77:58

didn't have Fs already they already we

78:00

done away with Fs because Fs are bad.

78:03

Um, and then we also had uh a GSN,

78:08

so good, satisfactory, and needs

78:09

improvement for like your effort and

78:11

your attitude.

78:12

>> So, we like already had that.

78:14

>> I don't remember if that was a thing for

78:16

me or not. Um,

78:18

>> my elementary school was also kind of

78:19

weird, but

78:21

>> so I'm just I So anyway, so first thing

78:24

I would do is I would say, "Hey, um, why

78:28

don't we just why don't we just keep

78:29

giving everyone a letter?" Because

78:31

everybody just boils this new system

78:33

down to letters anyway.

78:35

>> Yeah.

78:35

>> Um, and then we just have a more

78:38

granular system where within the letter,

78:40

you also have an exact number. Okay.

78:43

Yay. We already had that. Cool.

78:44

Wonderful. Um, number two, and this is

78:48

this is one that's probably going to get

78:50

me into a lot more trouble, but the BCTF

78:53

is way too powerful.

78:54

>> BC Teacher Foundation,

78:56

>> Federation,

78:56

>> Federation,

78:57

>> the Union.

78:57

>> I was guessing.

78:59

>> Um, I had terrible teachers. I had

79:03

really good teachers, but I also had

79:06

terrible teachers. And when you could

79:08

get the good teachers, you know,

79:12

talking and, you know, building rapport,

79:15

like I had some some of my teachers I

79:17

was not inappropriately, but like I was

79:19

I was pretty close to. I was Yeah, me

79:21

too.

79:21

>> Like I I there were a couple of my

79:23

teachers that I hung out with after I

79:25

graduated and like, you know, went to

79:27

see and and and talk with and say, "How

79:29

are you doing? Here's how we're doing."

79:31

Um and and that was cool. It was like

79:34

not weird. Like it was cool. And um you

79:36

know when you get them talking they are

79:39

as frustrated as anyone that terrible

79:44

terrible teachers are stuck in the

79:46

system and instead of being able to fire

79:48

them because the union is so powerful

79:51

they just end up getting shuffled around

79:53

from school to school or worsta worst

79:56

case from district to district and you

79:58

can't get rid of them. You can't drain

80:01

the sludge. And at the same time, you've

80:03

got new, freshly trained, like freshly

80:06

out of school with all the latest

80:08

educational methods, freshly educated,

80:11

want to teach. They're so excited to

80:14

teach young minds and they can't get a

80:16

freaking job because you've got this

80:18

dead weight in the system that quite

80:20

frankly shouldn't be anywhere near our

80:22

our youngest our most valuable resource

80:25

as as a country. Like if we're looking

80:27

at it from from like a very macro

80:31

standpoint, you know, every every hour

80:34

of a student's time in the classroom

80:36

that is wasted is is such a such a

80:39

squandering of the most important part

80:42

of that person's young life that is

80:45

laying the foundation of the rest of

80:46

their time here on this earth. And I it

80:50

just it offends me there. Period. It it

80:52

offends me. And this is one of those

80:55

ones that's a tough conversation because

80:57

I am not against worker protections

81:00

either. Uh an an abusive employer should

81:04

should should not exist. And

81:07

unfortunately that's why we that's why

81:09

we have collective bargaining because

81:11

the time before collective bargaining

81:13

was bad. That was bad. That was not a

81:16

good that was not a good solution. Um,

81:20

in the case of the BCTF,

81:22

not a fan. To be clear, I've been out of

81:24

the school system for a long time, but I

81:28

have had kids in the school system much

81:29

more recently than that, and I have

81:31

certainly encountered similar issues.

81:33

So, I'm not convinced that it has been

81:36

uh meaningfully changed. Um, the other

81:40

thing, the la the last thing, and this

81:41

one, this one's probably the least, um,

81:46

Andre Andre B says, "The big positive of

81:48

the BCTF is the fighting they do for

81:50

class size and composition limits." That

81:51

is absolutely true.

81:53

>> Yeah, he's not against all of it. I I

81:55

don't think there's been any point in my

81:56

life where I thought the level of uh

81:58

tenure protections that they have there

82:00

makes sense. And I thought that when I

82:01

was in

82:03

high school. Um, yeah. But I also

82:07

thought in high school that some of the

82:08

class sizes were a little freaking

82:10

silly. Um,

82:13

so I don't know. There can be good and

82:15

bad things about a a department.

82:18

>> Aquarius babe says, "Me cracking up.

82:20

Went to the same school as Lionus and

82:22

there were some horrible teachers. One

82:24

was shuffled around and ended up setting

82:26

fire to the science room at the new

82:27

school. I did hear about that." Um, and

82:30

this is this is one of those things

82:32

where uh, you know, someone's all mad at

82:33

me. Anti-UN rhetoric again. Yeah, get

82:36

over it. No system is perfect. Every

82:39

system has flaws. Yes, even that one.

82:42

And I've been up close and personal with

82:44

some of the flaws of this specific

82:46

organization in this specific region,

82:48

which by the way, you probably know

82:50

nothing about. Get over it. I'm not

82:54

saying this broadly, and I'm not saying

82:56

that they shouldn't exist.

82:57

>> He literally also said that they do good

82:58

stuff as well.

82:59

>> Absolutely. Um, but not everything about

83:03

it generates a positive outcome. And if

83:06

you cannot handle that, then you're

83:09

probably your your your view is probably

83:11

too narrow. I'm sorry. You got to

83:14

broaden your view.

83:15

>> What's your last point?

83:16

>> Last point is I think that we focus too

83:19

much on pure academics.

83:21

>> Yeah. I think that in our desperation to

83:24

make sure that nobody gets left behind,

83:28

we actually hold back the brightest

83:32

pupils when it comes to academics and we

83:35

end up completely wasting the time of

83:39

people that

83:41

don't need to be able to do advanced

83:44

algebra that where it will literally

83:46

never help.

83:46

>> Maybe there's something else that might

83:48

help them a lot more. This is I think

83:49

this question came from came from

83:51

someone in the in the German program. I

83:53

remember when I was in high school, I

83:54

took I took German and we would learn

83:57

different things about Germany. I

83:58

remember hearing about and I'm going to

84:00

screw up a lot of these details, but I

84:01

remember hearing about um some of the

84:04

details of how the German school system

84:06

works where once you're at some grade, I

84:09

don't remember which one. I remember

84:11

thinking that it was like either really

84:13

early high school or like kind of middle

84:14

schoolish,

84:15

>> switch to a vocational stream,

84:16

>> you would pick a road and I remember

84:18

thinking like, man, that's cool.

84:21

>> And I and I remember hearing some of the

84:22

other kids in the class pushing back

84:24

being like, I don't know what I want to

84:25

do yet. But in my mind, I was like,

84:28

damn, dude. I do. Like, if I could go

84:31

down a path that was more tailored for

84:33

that, like, my god, I would love that.

84:35

>> It's also tailored to your skill level,

84:37

you know?

84:38

>> And to be clear, some schools some

84:41

schools actually do a pretty good job of

84:43

these types of programs. Like,

84:44

>> fourth grade,

84:45

>> my school wasn't perfect. Like to to I I

84:48

forget their username, but to their

84:49

point, there were there were some really

84:51

really bad teachers in our school. And

84:55

but there were also some really cool

84:57

programs. Uh we had an incredible

85:00

automotive shop. Um very well equipped

85:04

and like we would we would actually work

85:06

on people's cars and and so in much the

85:09

same way that you'll have like a like a

85:12

student dentistry at like the university

85:14

or whatever and like the the high school

85:17

students were learning real

85:20

>> real mechanic skills. Awesome

85:22

>> in high school.

85:22

>> That is very cool. um like all support

85:25

that

85:26

>> all that I know about you know changing

85:28

oil and doing alignment and anything to

85:30

do with cars was the the one term I took

85:32

of it and I was like okay this isn't for

85:34

me uh which is good for me to know but

85:37

we were like we were learning real

85:39

>> and and the theory and it was and it was

85:42

freaking awesome and the people who

85:44

enjoyed that stream loved it and were

85:46

bored senseless in English class.

85:49

>> Yeah. To be clear, I'm not saying that

85:51

people should graduate high school

85:52

without being able to read a book.

85:54

>> I think you need certain minimums. I

85:55

think you should take a certain minimum

85:57

of math so you don't just get scammed

85:59

for the rest of your life. I think you

86:01

should take certain minimums,

86:02

>> but that math should be focused. It

86:04

should be focused on like how practical

86:06

skills,

86:06

>> how to how to run a small business.

86:08

>> Sure, that would be awesome.

86:10

>> Like, dude, I I wicked I I went all the

86:12

way through to math 12 and I still don't

86:14

know what practical application there

86:16

was for most of what I learned.

86:17

>> Yeah. Well, there isn't.

86:20

>> And so,

86:20

>> unless you go down a like if you if you

86:23

go down engineering, if you go down

86:24

something else, there absolutely is. But

86:25

if you

86:26

>> Sure, but what percentage of the

86:27

population is that?

86:28

>> But you do I understand wanting to

86:31

cultivate more people into STEM and all

86:33

that kind of stuff. But if you're just

86:35

forcing people down the line and they

86:38

know they don't want to go that route

86:39

anyways,

86:39

>> they don't want to be there.

86:41

>> Yeah. And they're just going to fail out

86:43

or struggle and just be pissed off

86:44

anyways. I think allowing them to go do

86:46

something else is totally fine. That

86:47

being said, I don't think math 12 is

86:49

required.

86:49

>> No, math 12 is not required, but you

86:51

have to do up to I think it's like 10

86:53

essentials or something like that or

86:54

nine nine essentials.

86:55

>> I thought you even had to do 11, but

86:57

>> uh that that may be true. I don't

86:58

remember the words.

86:59

>> I don't remember either. It's probably

87:00

changed by now.

87:00

>> It's been a minute. But basically what

87:02

happened was and this was true at the

87:05

time was you had to reach a certain

87:07

level of math according to the grade

87:09

level attached to it. So what they did

87:12

was they created different levels of the

87:14

class and I forget what it was if it was

87:16

9 or 10 or 11 but there was like there

87:18

was there was principles which was the

87:20

mainstream one.

87:21

>> There was enriched at our school anyway.

87:24

There was, I believe, enriched, which

87:25

was the like more like university prep

87:28

one. And then there was um

87:31

essentials, which was basically, from my

87:34

understanding, it was grade 8 math, but

87:36

like you're taking it in grade 10 or

87:39

grade 11 or whatever it was. And as long

87:42

as it had that number on it, then like

87:44

we taught them grade 11 math. But but

87:47

you didn't. So what are we even what are

87:50

we even all doing here? What were you?

87:51

>> But then again, if it's a business level

87:53

thing or like a tax or you know how to

87:56

not get bamboozled.

87:59

>> No, it was just lower level math.

88:01

>> Yeah, that's a little sad. Um, but I I

88:03

can definitely understand like, okay,

88:06

you know what? Uh, I'm in X course. I

88:10

don't care about the English. Your

88:11

example that you just gave was

88:12

automotive. I don't care about English

88:14

now. Okay. Well, you're going to need to

88:17

write sometimes. It's just a fact of

88:19

life. So, we'll get you to a certain

88:21

point where you can like write

88:22

coherently and you know, you should be

88:24

able to prove that you can do an essay

88:26

so you can kind of bundle your thoughts

88:28

and and uh form an argument. Um, so that

88:31

if if you know, if your automotive shop

88:33

that you end up having ever gets in like

88:35

legal trouble or something, you can

88:37

organize your thoughts and defend your

88:38

case.

88:39

>> Cool. You don't need English 12 for

88:41

that. But, but we'll get you to like

88:44

some functional level. Sweet. I like the

88:46

idea of at least getting people to these

88:47

functional levels in in a variety of

88:49

different areas.

88:50

>> And the other the other thing that you

88:52

know

88:55

the biggest the best argument I think I

88:57

could even give for why we should change

89:01

cuz I I could see some people hearing,

89:03

you know, what I what I say. I'm

89:05

actually I'm actually pretty passionate

89:07

about about education in general. I um

89:10

it's really funny. We had that exclusive

89:12

on float plane last week and people were

89:14

like, "Wa, L is a really good swimming

89:16

teacher." I was like, "Yeah, cuz I've

89:18

I've basically spent my whole life

89:20

teaching people stuff in one form or

89:23

another, whether it's about computers or

89:26

um aquatic exercise or painting houses

89:30

or whatever. I've I've functionally

89:32

always been a trainer or teacher in some

89:36

form. Um, it's something that I get joy

89:38

from. It's something that I I

89:39

legitimately actually enjoy. And the

89:42

best argument I can give for why we need

89:44

to change this is not that, you know,

89:47

I'm some elitist who's like, "Oh, yeah,

89:49

only, you know, the smart kids deserve a

89:50

chance or whatever." No, it's about

89:52

giving everybody their best possible

89:54

chance. And the current system is not

89:56

working. Like every every every year

90:00

there's a fresh batch of articles with

90:03

college professors lamenting the fact

90:05

that kids are arriving at university in

90:08

college and don't know how to read. And

90:10

it's like rubber stamping everybody

90:13

through this system is clearly not

90:16

working. I think also like and this this

90:19

seems to be a fairly obvious thing in

90:21

like almost every realm, but like real

90:24

feedback. So you can and not you know

90:28

mean punitive feedback, but real

90:30

feedback can be really useful for people

90:33

to try to kind of shape things.

90:36

You might want to know if you're kind of

90:39

capable of going down a certain path,

90:41

right? or or maybe you're capable, but

90:44

how difficult will it be for you? And if

90:47

something else feels natural and you're

90:50

getting good responses, your grades are

90:52

going well, whatever, that might be a

90:53

good path for you to follow.

90:56

Um, but some of these courses that I'm

90:58

hearing where people can't read when

91:01

they get into it are like, "Yeah, maybe

91:04

you should have known this wasn't going

91:06

to work out for you before you got a

91:09

massive student loan." maybe if they had

91:10

proper letter grades. This is what I'm

91:12

saying. Like it feels like we're we're

91:15

not only not necessarily setting them up

91:17

for success, but then how the whole

91:19

student loan system works and how

91:22

important that part of your life is for

91:24

setting up your future. You're you're

91:26

not just not setting them up for

91:28

success. You are specifically also

91:30

setting them up for failure. I think

91:31

both things are happening.

91:33

>> I am starting to get very curious who

91:35

exactly Aquarius Babe 86 is. The 86

91:38

would seem to indicate not only we went

91:39

to the same school, but we were the same

91:41

age. And you say, "Metal art and jewelry

91:43

was one of my fave classes ever. It

91:44

turned into one of my hobbies." Did we

91:46

take metal art and jewelry together?

91:49

[snorts] Shout out Mr. Russell.

91:51

[laughter] Um, or was it Sour? I think

91:52

Sauerbe taught mine. Um, anyway,

91:57

shout out Mr. Sauerby, too. Anyway,

92:01

>> are you done with the merch question?

92:06

Uh, excuse me.

92:08

>> Excuse me. What did you just call it?

92:10

>> So, how to do the support topics?

92:11

>> What did you just call it?

92:12

>> Merch question.

92:13

>> Excuse me.

92:15

>> This I I I I I heard the question. What

92:19

was it? There's there's a word he said

92:21

that I don't understand.

92:23

>> Question.

92:26

>> The pro the product question. The

92:28

>> That's not even what it's called either.

92:30

>> Well, it's not called that. Okay.

92:31

>> No. No. Are you done with the com?

92:32

>> Yes. I'm [laughter] done. I'm done. How

92:34

about some more topics?

92:36

>> Sure. You want to pick one? Should we do

92:37

the LG one?

92:38

>> Sure.

92:39

>> Sure.

92:40

>> Yeah. LG abuses.

92:42

>> Oh, hold on, hold on, hold on, hold on,

92:43

hold on. Uh, the the the the person in

92:47

float plane chat is upset. They did not

92:48

say I was spewing anti-UN rhetoric. They

92:50

were saying a lot of comments on float

92:52

plane were Okay. All right. All right.

92:54

All right. Okay. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I

92:56

assumed because you did not address

92:58

anybody that you were talking about what

93:00

I was talking about. And and I really

93:02

I'm not I'm not trying to be anti- it.

93:05

There's really good things about it. Uh

93:07

it's just that I've seen bad outcomes up

93:10

close both through my involvement with

93:13

one back when I was teaching lifeguard,

93:15

back when I was teaching swimming and

93:17

when I was a lifeguard and through

93:20

just

93:21

especially hearing my parents talk about

93:23

it. My parents were both teachers and

93:25

it's it's really frustrating for your

93:28

your star and for your star team members

93:32

when the losers get paid the same

93:36

and you can't get rid of them. It's uh

93:38

it's so demoralizing. Anyway, okay,

93:41

Luke, carry on.

93:41

>> Aquarius babe responded, "LOL wouldn't

93:44

expect Linus to remember me. I was a

93:46

student aid for his grade 8 computer

93:48

class.

93:54

And we only had computers for a third of

93:56

a term. I really don't remember that.

93:59

All right.

94:02

Well, was worth a shot.

94:04

>> Yeah. Okay. Carry on. LG abuses Windows

94:07

update driver install to push

94:11

Macaffy.

94:12

After numerous user complaints on the LG

94:15

OLED subreddit, a Gamers Nexus

94:17

investigation found that LG has been

94:19

taking advantage of a Windows feature

94:21

that allows a hardware support app. In

94:24

this case, the LG monitor app installer.

94:27

Yikes. Wow. Uh to be automatically and

94:31

silently installed alongside the device

94:33

drivers when a new device is plugged

94:34

into Windows 11 machine and drivers are

94:36

automatically installed via Windows

94:38

update. That blows. These hardware

94:41

support apps are apparently granted

94:44

significant privacy breaking permissions

94:46

without any form of user consent or even

94:49

notice. Why does Windows suck so much?

94:54

Oh my god. In this case, the LG Monitor

94:57

app, among other things, shows uh large

95:00

popup ads for trials of Macaffy

95:03

Antivirus. Some users report that this

95:05

has been happening since 2024. Um, since

95:08

this came to light, Microsoft stepped in

95:10

and Windows chief Pavan told the Verge

95:14

that LG has agreed to immediately

95:15

disable the Macaffy popup uh and pledged

95:18

that Microsoft will keep improving here

95:22

with our ecosystem prov partners. No,

95:24

you need I think you just need to change

95:25

the rules on that one. Um,

95:29

LG attempted to defend their behavior

95:32

with an uncredited statement to Windows

95:36

latest. LG Electronics reiterates that

95:39

Macaffy is not installed automatically.

95:43

It is never installed without a user's

95:45

explicit consent. The LG monitor app

95:47

installer is distributed through

95:48

Microsoft's official Windows

95:50

distribution process,

95:52

which included Macaffy as an option.

95:55

>> Yeah, we know that's the problem.

95:56

Macaffy will be installed only if a user

95:59

actively chooses to proceed with the

96:00

installation and provides consent. Under

96:03

no circumstances is Macaffy installed

96:05

automatically or without user authentic

96:07

authorization. The LG monitor app

96:10

installer does not access, collect, or

96:12

transmit any user. I don't want you to

96:14

tell me that. I want it to not be

96:16

possible.

96:18

>> To be clear, I like drivers

96:21

automatically appearing. So, I'm I'm I'm

96:24

actually just I'm going to push back on

96:25

just that part. I like the idea of that

96:29

I plug something in and it just works.

96:32

Um, what I don't like is when it's

96:34

allowed to have a parasitic payload.

96:37

>> That's my point.

96:38

>> Yeah. Well, no, no. I just I just want

96:39

to be really clear that I that if there

96:41

is a a monitor like driver that I need

96:44

so that I can use a hotkey to change my

96:46

brightness or like whatever, right? Like

96:48

if there's something that enhances the

96:49

user experience, yay. Um uh ma mcafee

96:54

prompt. Uh no.

96:56

>> Yeah.

96:58

>> Um and also to Luke's point that

97:01

shouldn't be possible. What are the what

97:03

like what are the punitive measures that

97:06

someone like a Microsoft could take if

97:08

somebody does this? Like let's let's get

97:10

creative here. What can Microsoft do to

97:13

police this?

97:14

>> Uh make it so that violations have a

97:17

huge cost.

97:18

>> How could they how can they enforce

97:20

that?

97:21

What do you mean?

97:23

>> Okay, you send MSI a bill for a million

97:25

dollars. What makes them or MSI? Excuse

97:27

me. No. Uh LG. You send LG a bill for $1

97:30

million. Why Why would they pay it?

97:34

>> Stop supporting their devices.

97:36

>> That will hurt them more.

97:38

>> That will hurt the customer, though. I I

97:40

don't think any solution should hurt the

97:42

customer.

97:42

>> I would stop supporting their devices in

97:44

this way. And I would give the the users

97:46

a flag, some type of notification that's

97:49

like LG was found to be distributing

97:54

>> what is arguably malware. Um, in order

97:57

to get driver updates, please follow

97:58

this manual process and then link them

98:00

to some documentation.

98:01

>> But then would that

98:03

I mean in order to get LG drivers,

98:06

presumably they would have to be linking

98:09

them to an LG source. How would

98:12

Microsoft then ensure that that LG

98:14

source does not include a McAfee

98:15

installer?

98:18

>> So, how how exactly is this Windows

98:20

update that it goes through? It's not.

98:21

>> Yeah, it goes through Windows update, I

98:22

believe.

98:24

>> Uh, it h it happens silently in the

98:26

background though.

98:26

>> Yeah.

98:27

>> Yeah. I don't know. I mean, I think

98:28

that's still worth it because at least

98:30

you're flagging to the user that LG was

98:34

like abusing systems and is not cool.

98:36

>> Charge nuclear goes Linus thinks they

98:39

care about the customer. I didn't say

98:41

that. What I said was it the solution

98:44

should not harm the customer. That's

98:45

what I said. I didn't say that anyone

98:47

agreed with me. I just said that I feel

98:49

that. [sighs and snorts]

98:51

>> Yeah.

98:52

>> Uh

98:54

um yeah, mine paradox says, "How about a

98:56

check that we must be notified before

98:58

software is installed and only if we

99:00

actively say yes to install it?" Okay.

99:02

Okay. Counterpoint. Counterpoint. Users

99:05

will often to their own detriment put

99:07

off installing updates. I mean, that's a

99:09

huge part of why actually, you know,

99:12

it's fun. We just did a Windows tier

99:15

list. We shot it earlier this week. And

99:18

we were we were we we made a joke about

99:21

the first Windows that introduced

99:23

automatic updating and talked about how

99:25

it's, hey, so Microsoft can break your

99:28

computer every patch Tuesday. Uh but

99:30

also here's why it was necessary because

99:32

in especially the early days of

99:34

connected devices and and the broader

99:37

internet just kind of coming online

99:41

people not updating their shiz was a big

99:44

problem. It was a huge huge vector and

99:49

any vector that the user refuses to

99:52

patch is by definition an unpatched

99:56

vector. Right? So, automatic updates, I

99:59

I I think in the modern world, I don't

100:01

think you can get away from that. I

100:02

don't I don't think I would advocate for

100:04

that. And if you give the user a choice,

100:08

they're going to dismiss it some number

100:10

of times out of 10.

100:14

Okay, let's see. Let's see if anybody

100:15

else has to force automatic updates. I

100:18

think you could make it up to the user.

100:19

>> Um, but then the more compromised

100:22

devices there are, the worse everything

100:24

is for everybody.

100:29

More zombie devices is bad.

100:31

>> Yeah, but I should still be able to

100:32

control my system. Like in Linux, I

100:35

mean, we're pushing everyone to go to

100:36

Linux.

100:38

You can do whatever the hell you want.

100:40

>> You can.

100:40

>> I don't think either of my systems are

100:42

running automatic updates. I just also

100:44

update them.

100:46

I also find updating in Linux to be like

100:49

fun and rewarding and updating in

100:51

Windows to be horrible and slow and not

100:53

rewarding and scary and just generally

100:56

bad. So like they're there are very

100:57

different experiences. The Linux one is

100:59

really fast for some reason.

101:02

>> Really fast. And then Windows one will

101:04

genuinely take very long often.

101:07

>> So what would your solution be if we

101:10

didn't force people to update? cuz I

101:11

like I think part of the reason it works

101:13

so well for Linux is that Linux people

101:16

generally skew more techy.

101:18

>> I think I would be okay with it just

101:19

being an opt out. Can you do that on

101:21

Windows update?

101:22

>> Uh not forever. Eventually it will force

101:25

you to install especially security

101:27

updates.

101:28

>> Um and so so like what would be what if

101:31

Linux went more normie because that like

101:33

it's there's a there's a selection bias

101:35

in the people who are who are running

101:37

these operating systems. So I would

101:39

actually agree with you that right now

101:41

the approach on most mainstream Linux

101:43

distros is not a problem because

101:45

>> you're hoping that that kind of fades

101:47

over time.

101:48

>> Exactly.

101:48

>> So let's imagine that it does happen.

101:50

You want Linux to be forcing automatic

101:52

updates now.

101:53

>> So what well no what I'm asking you is

101:56

what's your solution then? Because I

101:58

think everyone I hope pretty much agrees

102:01

that a massive army of unpatched devices

102:04

is super super mega bad. Um, and I think

102:08

you guys know from administering even a

102:10

very tech-savvy company that people will

102:13

put off updates as long as humanly

102:15

possible, as often as humanly possible

102:17

once you get into the broader

102:19

population. So, what's your solution

102:20

then, I guess, is what I'm asking.

102:24

Um, I don't know that I necessarily have

102:26

one. On a business level, the businesses

102:28

can enforce updates. We enforce updates.

102:30

Um, on a personal level though, like I I

102:34

want control over my computer. Um,

102:36

>> I know you do,

102:39

but like my my aunt I think lost her

102:42

control over whether she's allowed to

102:44

decide to update privileges when she

102:46

decided not to update and and her

102:48

>> as like the the like family

102:50

administrator as it were. I think you

102:52

can make that choice. It's not that I

102:54

don't want the option for automatic

102:55

updates.

102:56

>> Sure.

102:57

>> It can even be in my opinion default on

103:00

which will mean that 90 plus% of people

103:02

are never going to turn it off. Well,

103:04

then I mean that's

103:05

>> I want the ability to control my

103:06

computer.

103:08

>> I know, but I'm not talking about you.

103:11

So, I feel like we're both kind of I

103:13

think we're both kind of talking each

103:14

other.

103:14

>> It could be default on though is what

103:16

I'm saying.

103:16

>> No, no. I I I get it. I just mean um h

103:21

like it's uh like like there like

103:24

there's two angles here because the the

103:26

problem here is that I agree with you. I

103:28

want to control my computer too. If I

103:30

say, "No, I'm actually in the middle of

103:32

something right now." And you rip away

103:34

control and take away my ability to do

103:37

something for 3 minutes, 5 minutes, 10

103:41

minutes,

103:42

>> sometimes a really long time. We were

103:43

literally in the middle of that Windows

103:46

tier list shoot and Jordan's computer

103:50

forced him to apply an update and it was

103:53

the computer that he was using for the

103:55

web-based like uh you can you can run

103:58

any version of Windows in a web browser

104:00

like like background that I had behind

104:02

me that we were changing with every

104:03

version of Windows and we had to pause

104:06

the bloody shoot because of Windows

104:07

updates.

104:08

>> We I mean we have this on W show all the

104:10

time. uh our our like Google sessions

104:13

will log us out cuz we only use these

104:15

once a week.

104:15

>> I can't agree with you more that I want

104:19

to control my computer

104:21

>> and I want to decide when I want to

104:23

update but that is kind of separate from

104:28

the conversation that I'm having which

104:30

is what is the broader solution so that

104:33

we don't have a giant army of insecure

104:37

computers. I think the product solution

104:38

is default on

104:39

>> default on and we just we hope that

104:42

people don't get they stay techsavvy

104:45

enough to they don't get techsavvy

104:48

enough to disable that while not getting

104:50

also techsavvy enough to understand that

104:52

they should update. We hope that

104:53

>> I genuinely think over 90% of people

104:55

will never even go to the control panel

104:57

option to do anything with it in the

104:58

first place.

104:59

>> I think that's probably I mean I look

105:03

95% of statistics are made up. Oh yeah.

105:06

Mine was extremely made up based on

105:09

>> however

105:10

>> stardust.

105:11

>> I suspect you're not that far off.

105:13

>> I think so.

105:14

>> I just I I'm fretting

105:16

>> because because to me the the risk of of

105:20

many many many

105:22

unsecured devices is is very scary.

105:26

>> Yeah. The risk of uh malware being able

105:29

to deploy that way is also scary though.

105:31

We just saw that with Linux. um the AUR

105:34

got compromised. Um if those updates

105:37

were forced down my throat, I'd be

105:38

pretty pissed about it. So like it's

105:40

it's the whole I don't remember exactly

105:41

how the phrase goes, but it's like if

105:43

you sacrifice liberty for security,

105:45

you'll have neither or whatever, blah

105:46

blah blah.

105:46

>> So apparently that gets misqued a lot.

105:48

So I'm going to make I'm going to I'm

105:50

going to help us get it right this time.

105:51

>> Let's see what it is.

105:52

>> If you something liberty, freedom, etc.

105:57

Uh, security.

105:59

Uh, security. You deserve neither. Like,

106:02

I can remember enough of the words that

106:04

I can kind of Okay, here we go. Um,

106:08

oh, okay. We've got an NPR article. Ben

106:10

Franklin's famous liberty safety quote

106:12

lost its context in the 21st century.

106:14

So, he he once said, "Those who would

106:17

give up essential liberty to purchase a

106:19

little temporary safety deserve neither

106:22

liberty nor safety." And this often

106:25

comes up. This is from NPR uh in the

106:27

context of new technology and concerns

106:29

about government surveillance. Um but

106:33

Benjamin Witz, senior fellow at the

106:35

Brookings Institute and editor of

106:37

Lawfair tells NPR's Robert Seagull that

106:39

it wasn't originally meant to mean what

106:41

most people think. Uh Franklin was

106:45

basically, and so he's paraphrasing

106:47

here, basically said those who would

106:49

trade privacy for a bit of security

106:51

deserve neither. Um what is the exact Oh

106:55

my. Okay. Well, this is a lot longer

106:57

unfortunately than

106:58

>> just like a conversation

106:59

>> I can read right now. Um, you know,

107:03

there's all these quotations. Think of

107:05

kill all the lawyers, right, from

107:06

Shakespeare.

107:08

Nobody really remembers what the

107:10

characters in question were saying at

107:11

that time. Okay. Uh, you know what? I'm

107:13

going to have to look at this again

107:14

later. I'm not going to take a stance on

107:16

on the quote for right now. I think

107:18

either way is basically my my point

107:20

whatever the heck the quote even is

107:22

there are

107:24

>> as we're literally talking about right

107:26

now ways that that can be used

107:28

maliciously

107:29

>> and I would like to be able to choose

107:30

how to defend myself. I do think for the

107:33

vast majority of people the right

107:34

approach is going to be automatic cord.

107:37

Oh, sorry. Go ahead. [laughter]

107:38

>> I I think I think I think for the vast

107:40

majority of people automatic UPDATES IS

107:42

RIGHT.

107:43

>> INTERNET'S OVER. I even think the

107:46

annoying persistence that Windows have

107:48

has might even be the right approach for

107:50

most people.

107:52

>> Sure.

107:53

>> That being said, if someone wants to go

107:55

in and try to do something manually to

107:58

change how their computer works, I think

107:59

they should be able to do so.

108:02

>> And it

108:03

>> Good luck everybody.

108:04

>> And there will be bad there. But there's

108:05

already bad, dude.

108:07

>> There's the

108:08

>> Luke, there's bad everywhere. the the

108:09

like that insane worm that's out there

108:11

that's controlling like a crazy amount

108:13

of computers right now.

108:14

>> Is that the one in RFK Junior's brain?

108:18

>> Dan was so ready for that.

108:20

>> Well, cuz I had the same joke. As soon

108:21

as you started [laughter] as soon as you

108:23

started that worm, I was like, "Here it

108:25

comes."

108:27

Um,

108:30

[snorts] let's see.

108:33

Uh,

108:43

let's see. Okay, Mind Paradox summarized

108:46

it. Thanks, Mind Paradox in float plane

108:48

chat. from the article. He was writing

108:51

about a tax dispute between the

108:53

Pennsylvania General Assembly and the

108:55

family of the Pens, the proprietary

108:58

family of the Pennsylvania colony who

109:00

ruled it from afar.

109:01

>> The proprietary family.

109:02

>> Yeah. Like like a

109:03

>> proprietary proprietor. Yeah.

109:04

>> Um the legislature was trying to tax the

109:07

Penn family lands to pay for frontier

109:10

defense during the French and Indian

109:12

War. And the Penn family kept

109:14

instructing the governor to veto.

109:16

Franklin felt that this was a great

109:18

affront to the ability of the

109:19

legislature to govern. And so he

109:22

actually meant purchase a little

109:25

temporary safety. Very literally, the

109:27

Penn family was trying to give a lump

109:29

sum of money in exchange for the general

109:31

assembly's acknowledging that it did not

109:32

have the authority to tax it. So, okay,

109:37

he didn't mean it like like just like

109:40

broadly necessarily. He was talking

109:42

about something very specific. I mean,

109:44

it's a it's a banger quote one way or

109:47

another, and it's a sentiment that even

109:50

outside of the context, I think

109:52

resonates with a lot of people. And

109:54

>> I think sometimes it can be taken too

109:55

far.

109:56

>> Uh uh yes,

109:58

>> pretty often maybe. But but I think in

110:01

like in in this case, uh I think

110:04

security vulnerabilities are are going

110:05

to security vulnerability and it it is

110:07

what it is. like the

110:09

the the that whole thing of like every

110:12

lock can be picked is just more true

110:15

than a lot of people are comfortable

110:16

with and every form of security can also

110:20

be used as offense is another thing that

110:22

people also need to be aware of and it's

110:24

just yeah I don't know I

110:29

uh the the shy halud uh worm that was

110:33

distributed through npm is also like

110:36

huge and terri ing and the the AUR hack

110:39

was huge and terrifying and these things

110:41

are like very real

110:42

>> and happening really fast right now.

110:45

>> Say it what you want about

110:46

>> and I don't think it's going to slow

110:47

down

110:48

>> useless, you know, AI search results or

110:50

whatever, but AI is definitely

110:54

making some stuff happen in terms of

110:57

security right now.

110:58

>> You know, you know how I said that I I

111:00

kind of like updating on Linux.

111:02

>> Yeah. Yeah.

111:02

>> Part of that process right now is in

111:03

Cache OS when I do the update, it will

111:06

read Arch News. It will check Arch News

111:09

to see if there's anything going on.

111:11

>> Oh yeah.

111:11

>> And if there's nothing going on, I'll be

111:14

okay. I'll update. I think it was

111:15

yesterday I checked like I'm going to do

111:19

some updates and it was like there's

111:20

some things happening in Arch News. I

111:22

didn't even look. I was just like never

111:24

mind [laughter]

111:26

everything's fine. I closed it. I'll

111:28

wait for that to resolve. I'll come back

111:30

soon.

111:31

>> [laughter]

111:32

>> we'll figure it out. Um, there are other

111:35

times where I've read it and then

111:36

decided from there if I want to move

111:38

forward or not, but in this particular

111:39

case, I was like I was going to be

111:42

leaving the computer shortly and was

111:43

like, I could run an update real quick

111:44

and then it was like, nah, I'll just do

111:46

that later. Uh, like that's really nice.

111:49

Windows does not do that. There has been

111:51

a lot of times where a Windows update

111:52

has gone out and the internet

111:54

collectively has been like, oh my god,

111:56

do not update to this. Um, and

111:59

>> it's been happening a lot. Yeah. And and

112:02

I really appreciate that that that level

112:04

of safeguard is there on the cachy side

112:06

where it's like

112:07

>> there's some news going on.

112:08

>> Yeah.

112:09

>> Here's the ways you can find it. You can

112:11

go read it, make your own decision, and

112:12

go from there. And the window side is

112:14

just like LA, have fun. Here's your

112:15

update. It might break everything.

112:17

>> I mean, yes and no. They do do them in a

112:19

rolling fashion. So they they don't

112:21

actually just go to everybody at once.

112:23

>> So it's a dice roll of whether or not

112:24

it's a

112:25

>> Sure [laughter] is.

112:27

I'm just I'm just It is better.

112:30

>> It is better. It's not perfect.

112:33

>> Russian roulette with production

112:35

hardware.

112:35

>> I just want to make sure that if we're

112:38

going to dunk on them, we are dunking on

112:40

them accurately. They deserve the dunk.

112:43

They just maybe didn't deserve that last

112:45

little bit of razledazzle. Okay, that's

112:47

that that's all I'm going to say about

112:49

it. It's extremely reasonable.

112:50

>> Catos linked this, which is actually

112:52

really cool. Windows patch scanner,

112:54

Windows update regression feed for CIS

112:56

admins. That's neat. This is probably

112:59

Dan. Uh, let me know what you think on

113:00

this one. This is probably one of the

113:02

most vibecoded looking websites I've

113:04

seen in a while.

113:05

>> I

113:05

>> Is that a Vista icon?

113:07

>> It is.

113:08

>> It is. It has all the like Telltale

113:11

design signs.

113:12

>> I don't really know anything about

113:15

vibecoded websites.

113:17

>> It's just different color palettes that

113:18

they use, different kind of like styles.

113:20

Yeah, that like orangey kind of

113:24

>> this is like give give me a web 3.0

113:27

Silicon Valley website.

113:28

>> Yeah,

113:29

>> which is a hacker focused and uses

113:31

terminal font

113:32

>> and Electrobot in chat said it's a nice

113:34

design. I'm not even pointing out the

113:36

design is bad. I think the design's

113:37

great. U if this isn't a vibecoded AI

113:42

designed website, then this website was

113:44

trained upon. I guarantee it because it

113:46

looks it looks really good.

113:47

>> I love this style. Yeah, I I think it

113:49

looks great personally, but it's just it

113:52

it immediately jumped out at me as like

113:53

the the way that they did the boxes, the

113:55

way they did they chose the color

113:56

palette and stuff like that. It's it's

113:58

either been heavily trained upon, which

114:00

is quite likely, or it's uh vibeed.

114:05

Yeah,

114:06

>> we should probably do a couple sponsors.

114:09

Uh first, our float plane announcement.

114:13

Luke gets cancelled on float plane this

114:15

week.

114:16

>> Nah. didn't happen.

114:18

>> It do. Is there any context for that or

114:21

should do I just need to

114:22

>> genuinely no idea.

114:23

>> Do do you have flow plane logged in?

114:26

Like Okay. Do you want to do that?

114:28

>> Do you want to show what I'm supposed to

114:30

be showing right now? Cuz I can't read

114:31

the notes. And also uh screen share.

114:34

>> Okay. It's going to take me a second cuz

114:36

I got to But I can get there.

114:38

>> He's cooking. Let him cook

114:39

>> cuz I'm logged into my account, not that

114:40

one.

114:41

>> But I can get there.

114:43

>> Can't you just open up the exclusives

114:45

tab?

114:45

>> Oh, it's already released. Yeah.

114:47

>> Oh, my bad.

114:48

>> Nice. Okay.

114:50

>> Oh, that's what he's talking about.

114:52

>> Okay. It's Sammy versus Luke where they

114:55

fight with tasers.

114:57

>> Yeah.

114:57

>> Which, um, is not something that I

115:00

personally would have approved on work

115:02

time

115:03

>> uh, as a work activity.

115:05

>> This is the same reason why I I I just

115:07

think the Windows update shouldn't be

115:09

automatic. You know, sometimes you just

115:10

you need to improve some things

115:12

yourself. We So, at Open Sauce,

115:15

>> is this what all the screaming was?

115:16

[laughter]

115:17

>> Maybe. At Open Sauce, they had taser

115:19

knife fights. Uh, so Sammy and I had a

115:21

taser knife fight. Uh, it was great.

115:25

>> Okay.

115:26

>> I don't know what part of the video it's

115:28

in.

115:30

>> Yeah, there was a lot of stuff at Open

115:32

Sauce that would not have passed the

115:34

safety checks to get into our office.

115:36

>> I thought Sammy had uh bought taser

115:38

knives. And you were doing this in like

115:40

the lab.

115:41

>> No. No. I would not put that.

115:42

>> Oh, yeah. There was also like a turret

115:44

that would lock on to your your junk and

115:47

try to shoot you in the junk. Uh

115:49

>> yeah.

115:50

>> Here. Yeah. When does it go?

115:56

>> Hey, at least you're wearing goggles.

115:58

>> Yeah. Yeah.

116:00

Yeah. Anyways, uh where's the

116:03

>> junk track? Junk.

116:04

>> Here we go. Here's the taser knife

116:06

fight. You don't get to see the whole

116:08

thing, but

116:10

um

116:12

it's like you're not allowed to kick,

116:13

Sammy. That's not really the point.

116:17

>> That's it. No more.

116:19

>> Um and there there's another there's

116:21

another one. Uh you get the full You get

116:23

the I Is it full uncut?

116:27

>> Uh it's 36 minutes. Might actually be

116:29

full uncut. Yeah, it ended up being a

116:32

whole saga trying to figure out if we

116:36

were getting high voltage, high wattage

116:39

output cuz in order to do 240 watts, the

116:43

float plane power brick um goes up to 48

116:47

volts.

116:48

>> The float plane power brick

116:49

>> does say float framework. Okay.

116:51

>> The framework power brick goes up to 48

116:53

volts. And we didn't have a voltmeter or

116:58

any way to put an ammeter in line or

117:01

even like uh like a kilowatt like a

117:04

wall-mounted power meter. We had

117:05

nothing. And the laptop itself was not

117:09

reporting the power correctly, which we

117:12

knew because we had like a total of I

117:15

think it was 150 watts of power

117:18

consumption between the CPU and GPU

117:19

alone. [snorts] Um, and it would say it

117:22

was charging at 20 watts and the total

117:25

power coming over the power brick was 65

117:28

watts, which

117:30

clearly does not actually add up. And so

117:34

it was a whole saga determining whether

117:36

or not an LT truepec cable was actually

117:41

working properly with Nurovv's laptop.

117:43

Um, so you've got you've got the whole

117:46

and there was like by the end of it

117:47

there was like probably 20 30 people

117:49

watching and the pressure was

117:50

>> I I didn't actually I ran into you a

117:54

couple times, but I didn't actually see

117:55

you doing this video in particular, but

117:57

I like heard about it

118:02

in in positive ways, but I just thought

118:04

it was really interesting cuz we've been

118:05

like, you know, passing ships at the

118:08

night at events for years.

118:10

>> Yeah, we don't actually see each other

118:11

at events almost at all. Not usually.

118:13

We're usually working on other things.

118:14

Even when we were both doing video

118:16

stuff, we'd probably even see each other

118:17

less.

118:18

>> Well, it was divide and conquer.

118:19

>> Yeah, exactly. So, like, but and like I

118:22

knew you were off doing things and we'd

118:23

maybe meet up at night for dinner or

118:25

something and check notes, but like

118:26

other than that, I never really heard

118:28

about what you were doing. I heard about

118:29

what you're doing at this event. I heard

118:31

other people talking about it, which was

118:34

just very interesting. Dude, that video

118:38

and the people that we went around and

118:40

talked to was the like I couldn't if I

118:44

went and I hired an amazing marketing

118:48

firm and gave them a giant bucket of

118:51

money and asked them to come up with use

118:54

cases and customer testimonial like

118:57

scenarios to help sell our product. They

119:00

they never would have come up with Did

119:03

you watch that video? I haven't seen the

119:05

whole I've skimmed through a couple

119:06

parts of it.

119:07

>> Have you watched the end with the

119:09

autonomous RC cars?

119:10

>> No.

119:11

>> Watch it.

119:12

>> I heard about that.

119:14

>> That's one of the things that I heard

119:15

about.

119:16

>> It like they're I'm trying to like close

119:20

out the video and they're sitting there

119:22

in the background going like, are you

119:24

guys seeing this? The latency is so much

119:26

lower. It it turned out that not only

119:28

did having a proper length cable, so

119:31

having less loss, um probably this is

119:34

the hypothesis for now, but having less

119:36

loss contribute to um less voltage drop,

119:40

which contributed to the the the real

119:42

sense camera running more stably, but

119:45

also the data rate was higher and also

119:50

also that we expected. The part we

119:52

didn't expect was when they switched to

119:54

our cable, their wireless started

119:56

working better because and Buddy was

119:59

talking about how a lot of the time um

120:02

like crappy unshielded USB or something

120:05

>> can actually emit broadspectctrum 2.4

120:08

GHz RF that can jam Wi-Fi.

120:12

And because of some other limitation in

120:15

their little autonomous car platform

120:17

that they were building, they had to use

120:19

wireless for one of the communication

120:21

links. And it turns out that they didn't

120:24

realize that part of their problem was

120:26

that the RF interference maybe, this is

120:29

the hypothesis, we don't know this for

120:31

sure yet, but was jamming it because as

120:33

soon as we put in our cable,

120:35

>> it just started working. Um, and we're

120:38

using a bit of a different style of

120:40

construction. Not that it's not to spec,

120:42

it's to it's true spec. It's to spec,

120:44

but it's like a more expensive coaxial

120:47

cable rather than a than a traditionally

120:49

constructed cable. That's part of why

120:50

they're so thick.

120:52

>> Yeah. And we've been making an argument

120:53

forever that they're not for every

120:55

single application under the sun. But

120:56

this is a that's a cool argument of like

120:59

there was a tangible benefit for it in

121:01

that situation. That's cool.

121:02

>> Yeah. So, I already told the shorts team

121:04

and I told uh Dave from CW, I was like,

121:07

"Y'all need to get that content. Y'all

121:09

need to chop it up. Y'all need to get it

121:11

out there because I I literally I

121:14

couldn't write a [clears throat] better

121:15

endorsement for the product than that.

121:17

That's crazy.

121:17

>> Here's a Here's a derailment for a

121:19

second. What did you think? Cuz I've

121:20

been singing open sourc's praises for

121:22

years, but you've never been before.

121:25

What do you think?

121:25

>> It's super fun.

121:26

>> Yeah, it's amazing event.

121:27

>> Yeah, it was like I am not sure if I

121:30

understand the economics of it.

121:32

>> No.

121:32

>> And I hope that that's not a problem for

121:35

them. I like sincerely because it is

121:38

like maker mecca man like incredible. If

121:42

you are a I I don't think I could

121:45

endorse open sauce enough. If you are a

121:48

creator type like tech tech curious uh

121:52

or or you want like somewhere to just

121:54

take your kids man to get them inspired

121:57

about STEM and and creating and just

122:00

building something

122:02

>> rocketry robotics

122:03

>> think

122:04

>> textiles clothing

122:05

>> I don't think there's a better place

122:06

that you could take them I don't think

122:08

there's a a better place that you could

122:10

go that I've seen

122:12

>> woodworking metal working hacking

122:13

>> everything everything I mean Buddy

122:15

>> you can make a thing

122:16

>> Buddy built a VR headset with CRT

122:19

displays. Did you see that?

122:21

>> No.

122:21

>> You missed that?

122:22

>> I I missed a lot of stuff.

122:23

>> That's tragic. I missed a lot.

122:25

>> You know those little handheld TVs with

122:27

the little antenna and everything? So,

122:29

those those really old ones had CRTs in

122:31

them.

122:32

>> So, Buddy took two of them,

122:34

>> disassembled them, and made a VR

122:36

headset. Why? Because he could.

122:39

[laughter]

122:40

>> I saw a booth where they they took uh

122:43

what was it like

122:47

classified nuclear documents or

122:49

something and turn them into candy.

122:53

>> Sorry, what?

122:54

>> They they they would let like some form

122:56

of mold like eat it and then they they

123:00

just kept doing this like multiple

123:02

chemical processes and then just

123:03

eventually turn it into a sour candy. I

123:06

don't remember the exactly how it works.

123:08

I think it's in

123:08

>> Sounds like a Nile Red video.

123:10

>> Yeah, I think it's in that full plane

123:11

exclusive. I'm not sure that it is. I

123:13

know we filmed it for that, but I don't

123:15

know if it actually ended up um in the

123:18

video or not. But yeah, just

123:21

I don't know. Who knows? Just crazy

123:23

stuff. U they had like examples of what

123:26

the candy was supposed to taste like

123:28

there. They didn't have um the the

123:31

actual like nuclear secret candy, but

123:33

they showed how they did the process. Um

123:36

and I talked to Oh, it didn't end up in

123:38

the video, unfortunately. Damn. Okay. I

123:40

I talked to them for a while about like

123:42

like Okay. So, it's it's an inspiration

123:46

of it that you did make yourself is here

123:48

to try. I will try one of those. Cool. I

123:50

will take unlabeled candy from a

123:52

stranger. Uh that was silly, but

123:54

whatever. And I tried it and was like,

123:56

"All right, this tastes like slightly

123:58

odd candy. Sounds good. How did the

124:00

Nuclear Secrets candy taste?" And he was

124:02

like, "Kind of terrible. [laughter]

124:05

It was really really sour like right off

124:08

the hop and then it was just like after

124:11

that it's like yeah okay that makes

124:12

sense. Okay. It's like mold excrement

124:14

sour candy. [laughter]

124:19

Not exactly what you're probably aiming

124:21

for. Uh but they talked about like the

124:25

stuff they had to go through to learn

124:26

how to do that and it's very

124:27

interesting. They also had a VR headset

124:30

that was um like AI powered IRL ad

124:34

block. So you walk around with a quest

124:37

on and if it thinks the thing that it's

124:39

looking at is ad block it'll like blur

124:41

it out or something. I don't remember

124:42

what it actually did.

124:43

>> So tell me this. You're on the Vegas

124:44

strip. There's a big van with girls

124:47

girls on the side.

124:49

>> Do you just not see it? And it

124:51

>> Yeah, probably.

124:52

>> Okay, just checking.

124:53

>> Yeah, they they were also saying like I

124:54

don't know. It's some crappy little

124:55

model. So, like the the the the chick

124:58

that worked at the booth had a shirt on

125:00

and she was like, "Yeah, it thinks it's

125:01

an ad for some reason." It like totally

125:03

wasn't. It was just some pattern.

125:04

>> I mean, a lot of shirts are ads.

125:06

>> This one wasn't though. It was just, you

125:08

know, some some pattern. Uh, very

125:10

interesting booth to hang out at. Man,

125:12

there's a lot of really cool stuff. The

125:13

taser knife fighting was like amazing.

125:16

So much fun to watch. Just how everyone

125:19

would fight in like different ways. And

125:21

>> how much did it hurt compared to uh when

125:24

we had the dog collars? Oh, did Sammy

125:26

never even hit you?

125:28

>> You didn't You weren't curious. You

125:30

didn't try it on yourself.

125:31

>> I didn't bother.

125:31

>> I'm actually really surprised. I I'm I'm

125:34

actually a little disappointed.

125:36

>> I thought he was going to get me.

125:38

>> I I just I'm I'm I'm a little

125:40

disappointed that you hit yourself to

125:42

the point where I got him in the leg one

125:43

time. When you get someone in the leg,

125:45

you have to start hopping on the other

125:46

leg and he was like, "Oh, you should

125:48

make it fair." And I like

125:50

>> sacrificed my own leg. But you didn't

125:52

touch yourself. No,

125:54

>> I'm I'm just I'm kind of let down.

125:55

>> I wanted I wanted the surprise of

125:58

getting hit and then I just

126:00

>> You'll have to watch the footage. The

126:01

guy running the thing said we were one

126:03

of the most entertaining duo he had the

126:05

whole event.

126:06

>> And that was like

126:08

later on on the Sunday, I think. Is that

126:12

accurate? Is that accurate?

126:14

>> What day were you there? Saturday.

126:16

>> I was there Saturday.

126:16

>> Later on on the Saturday,

126:17

>> I I found out that I wasn't on the site.

126:20

There was a while when there like people

126:22

were lined up to do selfies.

126:23

>> I don't think you were like a speaker or

126:25

anything.

126:26

>> Uh, okay.

126:27

>> I think I think you go on the site if

126:28

you're doing like a panel because then

126:30

there is like a meet and greet thing

126:33

>> and stuff.

126:33

>> Oh, cuz I I wasn't sure if I was

126:36

supposed to be. I was like, well, I I

126:37

don't know. I I I I have a badge. I'm

126:39

here. But I I was just standing in in

126:41

one of the halls and there was like a

126:43

lineup to get selfies or whatever. And

126:46

like there was a point there was like a

126:48

period for a while where

126:51

two out of every three people were like

126:53

I didn't know you were going to be here.

126:54

I'm like did you not hear the last per

126:56

you were standing right there when the

126:58

last person said that to me but people

127:00

would they just walked up and said

127:01

exactly the same thing every time. Like

127:03

well here I am.

127:04

>> I just thought it was funny

127:06

>> honestly.

127:08

Yeah. I'm a little disappointed too. I

127:11

think after we were done the fight, I

127:13

had

127:14

gotten him in a particular way that I

127:16

was busy apologizing for, which you'd

127:18

have to watch the video to go see. Nice.

127:20

>> Um, but it was the balls.

127:22

>> I was I think balls are tainted.

127:24

>> I think I was [laughter]

127:27

>> I think I [clears throat] think I was

127:29

focused on apologizing for that and just

127:30

never really thought about it. But yeah,

127:32

I wanted it to be like kind of a

127:33

surprise. I didn't want I didn't want to

127:35

just cuz I think he had

127:37

>> had he demoed it before? No, I don't

127:39

know. I don't remember. But yeah, I was

127:41

expecting it to be a surprise. Um, yeah,

127:44

it was fun. Uh, also was really cool.

127:47

NASA was there. NASA had an actual full

127:50

booth. They brought heat shield samples

127:52

from Artemis 1 and Artemis 2 to show the

127:54

difference between like the entry skip

127:56

versus the the through and through and

127:58

how that affected the the the heat

128:00

shields. They had an actual moon rock.

128:02

>> Um, what?

128:03

>> So, I said like, "Wow, this is the

128:05

closest I've ever been to the moon." And

128:07

then I got corrected is the closest the

128:09

moon has ever been to me.

128:12

Interesting

128:13

>> thinking. Hold on. I'm going to get

128:15

there.

128:16

>> Oh, secondhand embarrassment.

128:19

>> Closest the moon has ever been to me.

128:21

>> That's really cool. Okay.

128:22

>> The argument was that in this scenario,

128:25

I was the one with more mass.

128:27

>> Right. That makes sense

128:29

>> because it was just a little rock, not

128:31

the whole. Uh they also had a wind

128:34

tunnel model of the Orion capsule and

128:38

they talked about like the difficulties

128:40

of doing scaled models in wind tunnels

128:42

because the smaller you get the tighter

128:44

the tolerances get,

128:45

>> right?

128:46

>> And like how insane that can get.

128:48

>> I'm like I mean is is there a certain

128:50

point where the size of the model

128:52

relative to like the size of an air

128:54

molecule matters?

128:57

>> It didn't sound like it.

128:58

>> Okay.

128:58

>> There was a couple questions going back

129:00

and forth. I I hope I didn't get that

129:01

wrong. But there was um

129:05

so NASA gave Luke a massive correction.

129:09

That's pretty funny. That's a good one.

129:11

>> They also moved him.

129:14

>> Um but yeah, no, like one of the things

129:16

he was saying was they had done all

129:19

these different wind tunnel tests and

129:20

then on Artemis one it was fine, but

129:24

there was anomaly detected during the

129:26

launch and they were surprised by it.

129:28

They took it back to the wind tunnel,

129:29

tried to recreate that exact scenario,

129:32

were able to recreate the problem, came

129:34

up with a solution, tested it a bunch,

129:36

implemented it for Artemis 2. Problem

129:38

solved.

129:39

>> That's pretty cool.

129:40

>> Pretty sick.

129:42

>> Pretty sick.

129:43

>> I I learned about an uh they have an

129:45

arcjet that they test the heat shielding

129:48

for

129:49

>> and hearing some of the like specs for

129:51

the arcjet was crazy. It's like a plasma

129:54

cutter, but instead of like a little

129:55

dot, it's like a freaking pipe.

129:58

It's [laughter] just wild. He was

130:00

talking about like the air intake that

130:01

they use for it, which is apparently uh

130:04

the way he was describing it, it sounded

130:05

like it was basically the side of a

130:07

building. Um,

130:09

crazy. I don't know. I want to look more

130:11

into that stuff.

130:15

>> Let me see if I can find um

130:19

Okay. Anyway, there are a ton of other

130:21

booths like Hot Dog Racing and Real

130:23

Steel the Movie IRL. All of which are

130:25

exactly what they sound like. Uh, you

130:27

can go cancel Luke at lmg.gg/fpan

130:30

or over on our YouTube members. Now I'm

130:32

supposed to do sponsors.

130:36

Uh, Dan wants me to do all four. I'm

130:38

going to leave it up to float plane

130:40

chat. Okay. You guys can tell Dan if

130:41

that's okay or not.

130:42

>> Yeah. Do you want an un uninterrupted

130:44

rest of the show or do you want me to

130:46

break it up later?

130:47

>> By the way, I think I'm mistaking the

130:49

intake for the arcjet and the intake for

130:51

the win tunnel.

130:52

>> All right. Win tunnel intakes.

130:53

>> Okay. Most of float plane is saying get

130:56

all four out of the way now. All four.

130:59

Do three. Ooh, I like that. That's

131:02

pretty funny.

131:02

>> Oh, that feels gross. Why don't I like

131:04

that?

131:05

>> Uh, all right. Okay. All right. Sure. Mo

131:08

most of Float Plane Chat says do all

131:10

four. Okay, let's do it. The show is

131:11

brought to you by Shocks.

131:13

>> You shouldn't have to choose between

131:14

listening to the new Madonna album or

131:16

hearing your boss invite you to the

131:17

company barbecue. With Shocks, you don't

131:20

have to. They're open dots, too. Clip

131:22

over the ear canal. clip or their open

131:24

dots, too. Clip over the ear canal

131:26

rather than going directly in or

131:27

covering your entire ear, so you get a

131:29

comfortable fit that keeps you in tune

131:31

with your surroundings, whether that's

131:32

at the gym or at work, while still

131:34

providing clear quality audio. This is

131:37

thanks to Shocks's base 2.0 with Dolby,

131:41

a spherical acoustic system that's built

131:43

around two custom 11.8 mm drivers that

131:46

perform like a single 16 mm one. And

131:48

because they've been designed to

131:50

essentially clip onto your ears, there's

131:52

no dedicated left bud or right bud.

131:54

They're totally interchangeable. And the

131:56

Open Dots 2 will automatically detect

131:58

left from right when outputting sound.

131:59

Oh, that's kind of cool. You'll get 10

132:01

hours of playback on a single charge or

132:02

up to 40 hours with the case. And with

132:04

fast charging, 5 minutes plugged in will

132:07

net you two whole hours of music. That's

132:09

roughly into the groove on repeat 30

132:11

whole times. uh you use our link to go

132:15

grab yourself a pair just in time for

132:17

that company barbecue. Use code when at

132:19

checkout to get $15 off as well. So

132:22

that's that QR code right there. The

132:24

show is also brought to you by

132:26

Squarespace. Whether

132:29

you're trying to start a business,

132:31

promote your music, or start up an

132:34

underwater hockey club.

132:37

>> What?

132:40

What is this? Is this real?

132:44

>> It doesn't look like AI.

132:45

>> I think it's underwater polo.

132:48

Or is that something completely?

132:49

>> No, that's definitely a hockey pug.

132:51

>> Really?

132:52

>> Almost certainly. Look at it.

132:55

It's like a green hockey pug.

132:58

>> Okay,

132:58

>> that's crazy. And they're playing with

132:59

like butter knives or something. What am

133:01

I looking at here? Okay, the point is

133:02

>> you got to get some of this stuff.

133:04

>> An easy to navigate website is

133:06

important. With Squarespace, you'll have

133:08

everything you need to build a great

133:10

website without the fuss or confusion.

133:12

You don't even need to know how to code.

133:14

You just need to know how to drag and

133:16

drop. You can piggyback off of one of

133:18

several templates or use Squarespace's

133:20

design intelligence tool by answering a

133:22

couple of prompts to create something

133:24

unique. They even help with things like

133:25

SEO to ensure that your website is

133:27

easier to discover. If something isn't

133:29

working, you can use data that they

133:31

provide to make any needed adjustments

133:33

to your page. On top of that, you'll get

133:34

real-time updates about website traffic,

133:36

revenue, sales, so you can make better

133:38

decisions for your business. And as I'm

133:41

sure that our listeners know well, we've

133:44

used Squarespace for many years for our

133:46

aligned media.com website. So, if you're

133:48

ready to dive in, build your website

133:50

today and get 10% off your first

133:52

purchase by visiting squarespace.com/w.

133:56

The show is brought to you by XSplit.

133:58

Streaming can seem like a lot of fun,

134:00

even if the field feels heavily

134:03

saturated. But there's no better way to

134:04

learn than by well, just jumping in. Our

134:07

sponsor, XSplit, gets you right into it

134:09

with tools for recording and streaming

134:11

on the most popular platforms like

134:12

YouTube and [music] Twitch. And if you

134:14

want to add a little more character to a

134:15

stream or a presentation, you can choose

134:18

from several preset layouts and

134:19

transitions to keep [music] your

134:21

audience engaged. They use a

134:23

customizable drag and drop interface,

134:25

too, so you can resize gameplay or

134:26

camera footage based on what you think

134:28

is most important to your video. And

134:30

Premium offers a ton of extra tools like

134:32

watermark removal, multiplatform [music]

134:34

streaming, and higher resolutions.

134:36

There's even beginnerfriendly editing

134:38

and mixing tools that are built [music]

134:39

right into the platform. So, go to

134:41

lmg.gg/xsplitwan

134:44

or use our link in the description or

134:46

scan this QR code to get 30% off your

134:48

first purchase or subscription with code

134:50

WAN show30. I mean, what's the worst

134:52

that could happen? You have some fun and

134:54

make some friends. Actually, that does

134:56

sound terrible. Do I have to make the

134:57

friends?

134:58

>> No. Nice. You're okay.

135:00

>> Finally, the show is brought to you by

135:01

AMD. It's AMD ultimate tech upgrade

135:04

time. And this month, it was our product

135:06

designer, Robert Laauo's turn. Not only

135:08

was there a secret prototype in the

135:11

video, but for his upgrade, he got a new

135:13

espresso machine floor mats, a new seat

135:14

for his bike, PC that can play Excel at

135:16

60 fps, and even a welding lesson.

135:19

That's right. We got to weld something,

135:20

Luke. [music] It was pretty cool.

135:22

>> Nice.

135:23

>> And if you want a giveaway of your own,

135:25

check out the link in this week's video

135:29

or on tonight's show for a chance to win

135:32

one of two power color Redevil AMD

135:34

Radeon RX970 XT GPUs.

135:38

Uh Luke, as you know, AMD always gives

135:41

us a topic to discuss and uh so here it

135:44

is. With modern GPUs leaning harder into

135:46

features like upscaling and frame

135:48

generation to deliver smoother gameplay,

135:50

are we entering an era where the best

135:53

GPU is defined more by software versus

135:56

raw performance alone?

135:58

>> Was this this was AMD's question?

136:00

>> I doubt it, but uh I guess that's where

136:02

we're at. I don't make the rules. That's

136:04

what's in there. And as you know, I'm

136:07

not going to tell you to say anything

136:08

you don't want to say. So,

136:10

>> no, I know.

136:10

>> Yeah.

136:12

>> Luke, what do you think? How should

136:14

people weigh native performance versus

136:16

the real world experience with these

136:18

features enabled?

136:19

>> Wow. Uh

136:23

[sighs]

136:24

I think it somewhat depends on.

136:25

>> Keep in mind AMD is never going to give

136:27

you an upgrade. So what do you owe them?

136:29

>> Yeah, true.

136:30

>> Are you eligible? I can't remember.

136:31

>> Technically, yes.

136:32

>> Oh, are you now? Okay. Well, then they

136:33

might.

136:34

>> I

136:34

>> So tread carefully. No.

136:36

>> No. Uh sorry. Um I think it depends on

136:40

the type of games you're playing or the

136:42

applications you're using it for.

136:44

Oh, Dan, someone said the AMD link is

136:46

broken. Do you mind answering that

136:48

>> dodging?

136:49

>> Uh, sure.

136:50

>> Thanks, Dan.

136:52

>> But yeah, I mean, it it depends if

136:54

you're trying to play uh some game that

136:59

super highly benefits from just like,

137:02

you know, Frame Gen 4X, whatever, then

137:05

you're going to want the software

137:07

features. If you're not, then maybe you

137:09

won't.

137:09

>> How would you define a game that

137:10

benefits from that? Because no matter

137:12

what game it is, if you're running frame

137:15

gen at 4x for instance, you you will be

137:20

um

137:22

generating a lot of frames that do not

137:24

come with the the latency benefit of

137:26

actually rendering more frames.

137:30

>> I don't know. I would assume uh you know

137:34

I don't know train simulator.

137:38

>> Train sim Oh, okay. So, you're talking

137:41

games where there actually is straight

137:44

up less real-time interactivity and you

137:48

could benefit from just much smoother

137:50

animations,

137:52

even if it does come at the cost of some

137:54

latency.

137:55

>> Yeah.

137:55

>> Okay. And then I I'm going to throw in

137:57

on the other side, if you have a pretty

137:58

decent base frame rate already, adding a

138:01

little bit of frame gen,

138:05

[sighs]

138:05

>> I generally don't do it.

138:06

>> I'm still not doing much,

138:07

>> but it's not that bad. I'm 4080. I'm

138:10

still not doing much. Pretty strong

138:11

card.

138:13

Not really needed.

138:14

>> I think that's um

138:18

I I I mean I think the answer I think

138:20

the answer is simple. It's like both

138:22

both. Yes, both.

138:23

>> That's why I kind of said like it

138:24

depends on your games, depends on what

138:26

you're playing, depends on what you need

138:27

it for.

138:27

>> You're going to need raw perform. I

138:29

mean, we're seeing this as

138:30

>> depends on operating system to a certain

138:32

degree. They said uh that I think the

138:34

question was specifically around

138:35

software, but I think compatibility and

138:38

ease of use comes in under the software

138:40

umbrella. If I can throw AMD a bone,

138:43

most of the people I know that are

138:44

having a better time switching to Linux

138:46

right now are running AMD cards.

138:47

>> Um I have a lot of the problems that

138:50

I've had switching to Linux is the fact

138:51

that I'm running a 4080. Um it's

138:53

directly tied into the Nvidia drivers

138:56

and the issues that that come with that.

138:58

Um, I know this was a problem for uh

139:01

Forza where I was trying to figure out

139:03

why the heck I couldn't play Forza on

139:04

Linux very easily and then I was talking

139:06

to multiple other people that were all

139:07

having no problem with it

139:09

>> and ended up figuring out that all of

139:11

those people were running AMD cards uh

139:14

and it seems to be a consistent problem.

139:16

So that might play into it. A lot of

139:18

people are moving over to Linux. At the

139:20

same time, the software solutions on the

139:22

Nvidia side seem really strong right

139:24

now. And if you want framework gen, if

139:26

you want DLSS, if you want that stuff,

139:28

that stuff is really strong on green

139:29

team.

139:30

>> The latest FSR is getting better. Um,

139:32

and but I also think that that's one way

139:34

that our discussion question was almost

139:36

uh like incomplete because

139:40

running the newest models of upscaling

139:44

uh does require faster hardware. So you

139:46

you are going to need both and not not

139:50

just you know compute units like your

139:52

more your more traditional um like like

139:55

render cores you're also going to need

139:57

um like machine dedicated machine

140:00

learning acceleration

140:02

um dedicated ray tracing hardware. Say

140:05

what you want about you know whether you

140:07

like ray tracing or not. It's not going

140:08

anywhere. It's here to stay and you're

140:11

going to need dedicated acceleration for

140:12

that too. It's going to have to be a

140:14

combination. So

140:16

>> rest rest rest rest rest rest rest rest

140:16

rest rest rest rest rest rest rest rest

140:16

rest rest rest rest rest rest rest rest

140:16

rest rest rest rest rest rest rest rest

140:16

rest rest rest rest rest rest rest rest

140:16

rest ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass

140:16

ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass

140:16

ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass

140:16

ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass ass

140:16

assured plane chat said I got a 9070 XT

140:19

and my issues went away on Linux Last of

140:21

Us was unplayable on Nvidia. So like

140:24

>> there's a lot of it depends on your

140:26

setup, it depends on your use case, it

140:28

depends on the games, the applications,

140:30

all that kind of stuff. Um I think it

140:33

varies more right now than a lot of

140:35

times whatever uh than a lot of times in

140:38

the past uh because of Linux being much

140:40

more viable for a wider amount of

140:44

people. depends on your mom. You know

140:45

what else depends on your mom?

140:47

>> Uh, underwater hockey is totally a

140:49

thing.

140:50

>> Really?

140:51

>> Oh, yeah. Uh, Turkey beats Great Britain

140:55

6 years ago. So, it's before this would

140:57

have been generatable.

140:59

>> 800,000 views.

141:01

>> Um, yep.

141:03

>> Was that an ad?

141:04

>> That was an ad.

141:05

>> Nice ad for a screwdriver. I think

141:06

>> Why did it just freeze?

141:08

>> Uh, okay. All right. Yeah, they do be

141:12

playing. There's a club in Vancouver

141:16

called the Ninjas. Yeah.

141:18

>> No way. So you have fins. So you're like

141:21

ripping

141:21

>> really fast. Actually,

141:26

>> there's a bunch of people in the

141:27

audience

141:28

>> watching this as an audience in an

141:30

arena. Must [laughter] be nuts.

141:37

>> This is crazy. Apparently there's like a

141:40

a decent amount of contact that's

141:41

allowed even like Yeah, they just ran

141:43

into each other. Like apparently it's

141:45

like not uh not a super passive sport.

141:49

Uh I was reading that the 3D elements of

141:52

it get really interesting cuz like you

141:54

can be you can think you're on a

141:56

breakaway but someone can come from like

141:57

above you and check you.

142:00

>> Right. But c can can you

142:01

>> strange can you juggle and if you flip

142:04

then can you touch it again and then be

142:06

able to boost again? Like is it

142:08

>> rocket [laughter] launcher

142:11

>> underwater?

142:12

>> I don't know. My son was explaining it

142:13

to me at some point like you can do a

142:15

reset or something so that you can like

142:17

go against. Sure. Yeah.

142:18

>> Yeah. Yeah.

142:19

>> Uh all right. [snorts]

142:21

>> This is crazy.

142:23

>> I eat plastic says it's the closest

142:25

thing we have to actual Quidditch.

142:30

Now you just need like uh uh like I

142:34

don't know a tiny little tiny little sea

142:36

entity that one person has to go try to

142:39

catch and if they catch it every single

142:41

other thing that happened in the entire

142:42

game is completely irrelevant.

142:44

[laughter]

142:44

>> Yeah.

142:46

[gasps]

142:46

Yeah.

142:49

The whole Quidditch thing was very

142:51

distracting for me in the Harry Potter

142:53

verse.

142:55

>> [snorts]

142:55

>> Someone told me at some point that

142:58

Rowling like hated sports and

143:00

intentionally made a sport that was

143:02

stupid because like the point was that

143:05

sports are stupid. I'm not sure if I

143:06

believe that though.

143:08

>> I don't care.

143:11

Is Quidditch intentionally stupid?

143:15

I'm uh Oh.

143:18

Uh yes. AI says JK Rowling intentionally

143:22

designed Quidditch to be frustrating and

143:24

absurd as a direct subversion of logical

143:27

sports culture. [snorts]

143:29

>> Cool.

143:30

>> Uh,

143:32

okay.

143:32

>> Good job. You really stuck it to him.

143:35

Nobody does a sport anymore.

143:40

She wanted to create a sport that would

143:42

deliberately infuriate men who cared

143:44

deeply about the rigid statistics and

143:46

logical scoring systems of real world

143:48

sports. Um, and then and then the men

143:52

made Quidditch in real life and gave it

143:54

better rules and get freaking [laughter]

143:57

owned.

144:02

Get dunked on [laughter]

144:05

Elbo Bozo. Uh anyways,

144:13

>> [snorts]

144:13

>> uh speaking of getting dunked on, India

144:17

finded HP $14.4 million for rigging

144:20

government bids and fixing ink and toner

144:22

prices. Jeez. Wow. Uh India's

144:25

Competition Commission hit HP India with

144:29

that fine that we just mentioned across

144:31

two separate rulings. one covering PCs,

144:33

laptops, desktops, workstations,

144:35

accessories, the other one covering

144:37

printer supplies, ink, toner,

144:39

consumables. The scheme ran on the

144:41

government e marketplace from 2017 to

144:44

2020, where HP coordinated with its

144:47

resellers to pre-arrange bids and submit

144:49

fake cover bids, making tenders look

144:52

competitive, while a prepicked HP

144:55

partner won and taxpayers overpaid. The

145:00

strange part is that HP India reported

145:02

the whole thing itself.

145:04

Huh. It filed under India's leniency

145:07

program, basically self snitching before

145:09

regulators had any evidence, hoping to

145:12

get full immunity. Uh, really? The

145:15

investigation that followed turned up

145:17

WhatsApp chats, emails, and even a 2019

145:19

video from a reseller meeting laying out

145:21

who would submit fake bids and who

145:24

should win each contract. HP's defense

145:27

was that it wasn't the mastermind just

145:30

commercially forced

145:32

into propping up the scheme because its

145:35

own ink prices were so high that

145:37

resellers were threatening to switch to

145:38

cheaper counterfeit products.

145:41

>> Okay, so HP I think I found the part

145:43

where you screwed up.

145:46

>> It even wrote in its filing that it

145:48

humbly objects to being called the

145:50

kingpin of the arrangement. The

145:52

commission called it a cartel anyway and

145:56

named HP India as the central architect.

146:00

So it got a partial penalty cut for

146:02

coming forward but was denied the full

146:04

immunity it wanted.

146:05

>> This story is so funny.

146:08

>> I just I I saw the headline and I was

146:10

like moderately interesting

146:13

>> and then I read even a couple minutes

146:15

further into it and I was like

146:17

>> what?

146:17

>> Meanwhile in India what? Sorry, what's

146:20

going on?

146:22

We object to be calling the kingpin, but

146:24

I guess you can call us uh you know the

146:27

central architect. Uh that would that

146:29

would be fine.

146:29

>> And cartel

146:30

>> and the the central architect of the

146:32

cartel. That's okay. We just don't want

146:33

to be called the kingpin

146:35

>> that's associated with a villain in the

146:37

in the Marvel universe over Speaking of

146:39

legal trouble, just weeks after Dbrand

146:42

had to kill its companion cube case over

146:44

the Valve um intellectual property

146:49

problem, a printables user named Jiren

146:53

rebuilt the whole thing from scratch as

146:55

a free 3D printable project and it is

146:58

already passed 10,000

147:02

downloads. He worked entirely off of

147:04

photos of Dbrand's design, used none of

147:07

Dbrand's files, and put up 39 files for

147:10

assembly videos in a full parts list

147:12

down to the screws and magnets. It is

147:14

doable on a single extruder uh single

147:17

extruder printer with filament swaps.

147:19

And he has since added prepainted files

147:21

for multiolor printers. There's even a

147:24

plain weighted storage cube variant if

147:27

you just want the version without the

147:28

heart. Dbrand got shut down for using

147:31

Valve's IP without permission. And now

147:33

this recreation is based on Dbrand's

147:35

design without Dbrand's permission.

147:39

>> That's pretty funny.

147:41

That's it.

147:43

And because there's no commercial

147:44

endeavor here, um Valve is extremely

147:48

unlikely to do anything unless Buddy

147:50

starts charging for the files or

147:52

something like that.

147:52

>> It doesn't look like he is right now. I

147:54

was wondering about that.

147:55

>> Are you Are you on it right now? Yeah.

147:56

Okay. Here. Here you go, guys. You can

147:58

have a look at him. How cool is that?

147:59

>> I mean, it looks awesome.

148:00

>> Looks freaking awesome. Yeah, it does.

148:03

That's amazing,

148:05

man. I just I love

148:09

the maker community and 3D printing

148:12

community and just the the the way

148:15

people so selflessly give of their own

148:17

time so that other people can just have

148:19

a little bit more joy. How cool is that?

148:22

>> Yeah. Like out of 10,

148:27

>> I think genuinely 10. What else would be

148:29

a 10? What What do we What What are some

148:32

some

148:33

>> puppies?

148:34

>> 10.

148:35

>> Yeah, puppies are a 10.

148:37

>> Yeah, I think this is a 10.

148:38

>> Yeah, I think it's on par with puppies.

148:40

>> Yeah,

148:40

>> that's why Open Sauce is so awesome.

148:42

>> Yeah, cuz everyone there is just this.

148:45

>> Yeah.

148:45

>> Yeah.

148:46

>> Amazing.

148:46

>> Okay, but tell me this though. What if

148:50

Open Sauce had puppies? Can you exceed

148:52

10?

148:53

>> Did you miss the puppy room?

148:55

>> Shut up. There's no puppy room. Was

148:56

there a puppy room?

148:57

>> I I don't think so.

148:58

>> Oh, stop.

148:59

>> They're 3D printed.

149:00

>> This guy [laughter]

149:02

3D printed puppies. Um,

149:05

>> what if it was both? There you go. Open-

149:09

source puppies.

149:10

>> Um,

149:11

>> you wouldn't download a puppy.

149:12

>> Okay, this is cool. Speaking of makers

149:16

and STEM, Northwestern University

149:18

engineers have unveiled Phantom Twist.

149:21

Uh Luke, do you want to bring up the

149:23

video of it taking off?

149:24

>> Sure. One sec.

149:25

>> A drone that makes itself roughly 10

149:28

times harder to see than a same-sized

149:30

quadcopter by spinning its entire body

149:34

15 to 25 times per second.

149:37

It debuted

149:39

July 16th at the Robotics Science and

149:42

Systems Conference in Sydney.

149:44

>> Jeez.

149:45

>> And in flight, it kind of dissolves into

149:49

a faint semi-transparent smudge.

149:53

>> And remember guys, we're looking at it

149:55

now against like dark high contrast

150:00

objects. This is like the worst case

150:03

scenario. If this thing was in the sky,

150:05

just like up against the blue in the

150:08

dazzling light of the sun, I do not know

150:12

how you could see it.

150:14

The way it works is the body spins or

150:18

sorry, the body sits still while only

150:19

the Oh, sorry. The way it works is it

150:22

has one motor and one propeller. The

150:25

prop spins one way and the entire rest

150:28

of the aircraft counterrotates the other

150:31

way. So no part of it ever holds still.

150:35

It stays stable through the gyroscopic

150:37

effect and steers by varying its motor

150:41

thrust mid rotation.

150:43

>> People are commenting that apparently

150:46

it's like super loud.

150:48

>> It's super loud.

150:48

>> But

150:49

>> but if it was high enough, it wouldn't

150:50

matter.

150:51

>> Fly higher.

150:52

>> According to the researcher's paper, the

150:54

disappearing act works because of the

150:56

persistence of human vision. Our eyes

150:58

accumulate light over a window of

151:00

roughly 50 to 150 milliseconds, sort of

151:02

like a camera's exposure time. Anything

151:04

spinning faster than that gets averaged

151:06

into the background, which is the same

151:08

reason that fan blades uh look

151:10

transparent. The paper points out that

151:11

the drone spin rate is comparable to the

151:14

24 frames per second that movies are

151:15

shot at. I don't actually know how

151:16

relevant that is here, but sure, that's

151:18

nice. Uh the team did not design the

151:20

layout by hand. They had a computational

151:22

model generate around 20,000 stable

151:25

configurations, then used AI

151:26

optimization to shuffle the motor,

151:28

battery, circuit board, and

151:29

counterweights around until visibility

151:31

bottomed out. That is okay. Something

151:35

that's actually very cool use of

151:38

AI. Before anyone gets too excited or

151:41

worried, it currently relies on an

151:43

external optical tracking system to fly.

151:46

So, it's indoors only for now. The thin

151:48

carbon fiber rods and wires are still

151:50

faintly visible up close, and it is just

151:52

as loud as any other small drone, so

151:54

your ears will catch it even if your

151:55

eyes didn't. The team's pitch is

151:57

wildlife monitoring, okay, and

152:00

infrastructure inspection with future

152:02

versions aiming for transparent

152:03

materials and quieter props. Um, it's

152:06

going to have to be a lot quieter to be

152:08

useful for wildlife monitoring, I think.

152:10

But hey, um, neat. Our discussion

152:12

question is, do you have any uses for an

152:14

invisible drone? Maybe don't answer

152:15

that.

152:22

>> [laughter]

152:24

>> I know who does.

152:28

>> No, I don't.

152:33

>> I talked to my lawyer.

152:36

Who?

152:38

>> Oh, you know people.

152:41

>> Gross. [laughter]

152:44

>> I'm going to move on.

152:46

>> [laughter]

152:48

>> This one's just funny. Author Dave

152:51

Edgars, best known for the memoir A

152:54

Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius

152:57

and the novel The Circle, criticized

153:00

chat GPT

153:02

directly to OpenAI employees. And uh

153:07

this is especially funny because he was

153:09

invited to speak to the OpenAI employees

153:13

by the company's CEO, Sam Alman.

153:16

after Edgars publicly criticized AI

153:19

generated fiction. So he used the

153:21

opportunity to challenge employees over

153:23

AI's impact on education and creativity.

153:26

And this is a quote saying, "Why don't

153:28

you leave your house, leave the screen,

153:30

meet some people, get yourself in a

153:32

writing group, and also said or also

153:36

warned them that AI could be silencing

153:39

an entire generation or two." And what

153:41

he meant by that was that by making

153:43

teachers jobs more difficult and

153:45

preventing students from developing

153:47

their own writing skills and authentic

153:48

voices that they would not have the

153:51

skill set to tell their stories in an

153:53

authentic personal way.

153:55

>> I heard there was a there was a teacher

153:57

who put

153:57

>> I just thought this was badass. That's

153:59

all. There was a teacher who put some uh

154:02

text in a assignment like how to do this

154:06

assignment thing that was I don't know

154:08

uh transparent text or something. So

154:11

when it was copy pasted it grabbed it.

154:13

>> Oh,

154:14

>> but if you were just trying to read it

154:15

yourself, you wouldn't see it. Uh and it

154:17

said something along the lines of like

154:18

um

154:20

>> I don't know use this strange word in a

154:22

context that wouldn't make any sense. It

154:24

specifically says that wouldn't make any

154:26

sense. Uh, and it w it was something

154:28

like

154:29

these numbers gonna be wrong, but the

154:31

scale I think is pretty correct. Yeah,

154:33

Madagascar. That was it. You used the

154:35

word Madagascar in a way that wouldn't

154:36

make any sense. And the assignment had

154:38

nothing to do with it at all.

154:39

>> Okay.

154:39

>> Uh, and maybe the person who said the

154:42

word Madagascar will know, but if I

154:43

remember correctly, it was like 40

154:44

students and like two of them didn't do

154:46

it. Like

154:47

>> two of them didn't have Madagascar in

154:49

the final,

154:49

>> some something like that. It was some

154:50

insane ratio. But I the the numbers

154:53

don't don't listen to the numbers. I

154:54

don't remember exactly what the numbers

154:55

were, but it was like some insanely high

154:57

percentage of people. There was also

154:59

another teacher who did a

155:02

um take-home do-it-yourself midterm and

155:06

then an in-person no computer final.

155:08

>> Yeah, that one was a little while ago. I

155:09

think we talked about that on my show.

155:10

>> Oh, was that when?

155:11

>> Yeah, that was uh that was college, I

155:12

think.

155:13

>> Very interesting.

155:14

>> Yeah. where like uh the everyone aced

155:16

the midterm and then when he said it was

155:18

going to be an in-person final like a

155:20

whole bunch of people dropped out of the

155:22

class and it turned out that like again

155:23

two of the students had consistent

155:25

grades across the midterm and the final.

155:27

One of them was just a just an honest

155:30

>> Chad.

155:30

>> Well, one of them was a Chad who got

155:32

like 98 both times or something and then

155:34

uh another one of them was just a just

155:36

an honest person and got

155:39

>> and that's their redeeming quality.

155:40

>> 60s something both times. [laughter]

155:44

All right, nice nice work.

155:46

>> You know what? There's I I Man,

155:49

>> 32 out of 35 failed apparently.

155:50

>> This is going to be I I don't know. This

155:52

might ruffle some feathers, but I think

155:54

I would rather have in terms of who I'd

155:56

rather work with day-to-day, I think I'd

155:59

point I'd rather work with someone

156:00

honest with integrity than a genius.

156:04

>> Yeah, I

156:06

I I think LMG community said it well,

156:08

though. Uh, Mr. Chewy.

156:12

>> Oh, he's like totally not our like

156:14

community. You should get You should get

156:16

a new

156:17

>> You really need a different tag, Chewy.

156:19

>> Yeah. Yeah, you do. uh

156:20

>> your job title has actually changed

156:22

twice since then

156:24

>> and also quite significantly. Uh he

156:26

said, "I just don't know how kids could

156:28

possibly resist the temptation of using

156:30

AI." And honestly, I agree.

156:32

>> That's uh that's an unfortunate but like

156:38

pretty based take. I I hate it. Thanks.

156:42

I hate it basically. Yeah.

156:43

>> I think it's I think it comes down to

156:45

>> Would you have been able to resist?

156:47

>> No, I would have used it. options would

156:48

have been

156:50

>> play Marow wind

156:54

>> or sit and do homework.

156:56

>> I'm already cooking.

156:56

>> See, that's what I'm talking about. As

156:57

soon as I as soon like

157:00

as soon as I put you back at I give I

157:03

give you a temptation that is irrelevant

157:06

today. You wouldn't play Morowind today.

157:08

If I was like, "Oh, Luke, here I

157:09

installed Morowind on your computer. Are

157:11

you going to be able to focus on Wow?"

157:13

You're like, "What are you talking

157:14

about?"

157:16

There's no way you're going to play

157:17

Morowind during Land Show. There's no

157:19

way you will disrespect our viewers that

157:21

way. See, now I've already turned them

157:23

off it.

157:24

>> I'm updating Steam.

157:25

>> You're not.

157:30

>> Unbelievable. Actual child. You're an

157:33

actual child. [laughter]

157:34

>> I mean, that's why I have three

157:35

monitors. You can't see what I'm doing.

157:37

>> You can't see that he's playing Morwind.

157:39

Uh,

157:39

>> but as soon as as soon as I pull out the

157:42

like period appropriate temptation.

157:44

>> No, I think I think I

157:45

>> I think it's an easy choice. You play

157:47

Morowind.

157:48

>> I'm really trying to wonder. I

157:49

definitely would have used it as a

157:50

shortcut. I don't know if I would have

157:53

used its output.

157:54

>> There's different times in my life that

157:55

I think I would have used it more or

157:56

less.

157:57

>> Yeah.

157:57

>> And by using it at all, I think I might

158:00

have stunted

158:02

>> the growth that would have led to the

158:04

higher probability of using it at other

158:06

times. If that makes sense. I think

158:08

especially with some of the the really

158:10

big problems I had in high school of the

158:12

like grammar and punctuation and stuff.

158:16

>> Oh, if you could have I wonder you're

158:19

the the dangerous thing about being

158:21

smart with a learning disability is that

158:25

>> you're invisible

158:27

>> if you want to be. You can you can fake

158:29

it and you have better tools for faking

158:32

it.

158:32

>> I would have found a way to hide that

158:34

with that. So, I probably would have

158:36

used my own words, but I would have used

158:38

it to give me the correct punctuation.

158:41

>> Interesting.

158:41

>> But I probably would I I I don't know.

158:44

I'm looking at how I've approached it so

158:46

far, and I believe very strongly in the

158:48

you have to own the output thing, and I

158:51

think I would have been

158:53

informed enough to know that you could

158:56

do things like hiding text. Maybe it was

158:58

onepoint font or something, hiding text

159:01

somewhere or or doing other little

159:03

tricks. I would have known that there

159:05

are ways for teachers to detect it like

159:07

m dashes and all this other kind of

159:08

stuff and I wouldn't have wanted to risk

159:10

that.

159:11

>> Yeah.

159:12

>> But I would have definitely used it as a

159:14

proofreader

159:15

>> and would have adjusted my handins based

159:18

on it and would have used it as a

159:19

shortcut. I'm like fairly certain that

159:21

would have happened especially when

159:23

Morowind is calling. Uh

159:25

>> I didn't really learn to enjoy writing

159:29

until after high school. Um,

159:32

>> the wacky thing for me was I I enjoyed

159:35

writing. I just couldn't get good grades

159:36

because I would just butcher spelling,

159:39

grammar, punctuation.

159:40

>> Interesting. The only reason I learned

159:41

to enjoy it was because I had a teacher

159:44

who pushed me to become more proficient

159:47

at it.

159:47

>> See, that's so interesting because I

159:49

almost had the opposite. Mr. Mr. Mr.

159:52

Thompson said that he actually really

159:54

liked my writing and I was getting just

159:57

kneecapped by uh because my previous

160:01

teacher would take a point away for

160:02

every single mistake.

160:04

>> So he liked the writing but my

160:05

punctuation would be weird. So I just

160:07

get 50% like all the time.

160:08

>> Yeah. We had my Mr. Horn was exactly the

160:11

same. I think it was five of a point off

160:13

and we this was out of 10.

160:15

>> Yeah.

160:15

>> So if you made a handful of mistakes

160:18

>> it's just gone. So I just couldn't I

160:19

couldn't perform. So he capped it at

160:21

10%.

160:22

>> Right?

160:23

>> So if I like wrote something really

160:25

good, but the structure of it was bad,

160:27

the punctuation was bad, stuff like

160:28

that, um I could still get 90. And then

160:31

I got like very close to 90 in the

160:33

course. And I I started really enjoying

160:36

it.

160:36

>> Mr. Horn had no such accessibility mode

160:39

that I'm aware of. [laughter]

160:41

>> Yeah.

160:42

>> I don't think most do.

160:43

>> But what we were allowed to do um was we

160:45

were allowed to pick a partner before we

160:47

handed in our assignments and do a proof

160:49

reading pass. See, that would have

160:50

helped a ton.

160:51

>> So, what he taught us like I forgot

160:54

about that.

160:54

>> That's actually really cool. I actually

160:55

really like that.

160:56

>> That's one of the reasons I'm so good at

160:57

editing. I just realized

160:58

>> that's a really really cool solution.

161:00

>> That's hilarious. [laughter] Um

161:02

>> I really like that.

161:03

>> Although it did it did mean that the

161:05

winners won more and the losers won and

161:07

the losers lost more.

161:09

>> You get paired with someone who's

161:10

>> Well, no, you picked your partner. So I

161:12

would go and pick another ace in the

161:15

class and we would check each other's

161:17

work and we would both get 9 and a half

161:19

or 10 out of 10.

161:19

>> That happened kind of naturally for me

161:21

in university. There was a there was a

161:23

crew of people at BCIT that I'm still

161:25

friends with the the boys. Um and we

161:28

would all help each other study with

161:30

stuff and I really think it like raised

161:32

the whole group to uh another level.

161:35

There's a lot of dropouts in that course

161:38

and that crew stayed together and didn't

161:39

drop out the whole way through. Uh, I

161:42

mean until I did, I guess. [laughter]

161:44

Oops. Uh, but like that was for

161:46

different reasons. Um,

161:51

>> Zy asks, "Does school need to be fair?"

161:56

>> Nothing is fairusion,

161:59

but we should strive for fairness, if

162:01

that makes sense.

162:02

>> Best we can.

162:03

>> Yeah.

162:03

>> I still think teaching people the value

162:05

of editing and like caring about someone

162:07

else's work and trying to help each

162:08

other succeed is very valuable. I don't

162:10

think there's necessarily a way you can

162:12

possibly make that purely fair because

162:14

you can't make every single pairing

162:15

perfect. Maybe you don't do the pick

162:18

your partner. Maybe you rotate through

162:20

somehow. I'm not sure.

162:22

>> Yeah, I'm probably has it flaws.

162:25

[sighs and gasps]

162:26

>> Yeah.

162:28

>> Um

162:32

what else? What else we got here?

162:35

>> What's What's something cool?

162:36

>> Oh, that one's not cool. That one's not

162:38

cool. That one's interesting.

162:40

>> Oh, I've got a pretty cool one.

162:41

>> Go for it.

162:43

>> Uh, do you want to do Oh, I was I was

162:44

that you I thought it was kind of your

162:46

turn. I I picked a cool one for you,

162:48

though. Here, I highlighted it.

162:48

>> I'll do it. Um Oh, man. This whole We

162:52

stopped doing it for a while and we're

162:53

back to it. The um title is the same as

162:56

the first.

162:56

>> Yeah, I just stopped reading the titles.

162:58

>> Okay, I will stop doing that as well.

163:00

Uh, a federal judge has given final

163:02

approval to Anthropic's $ 1.5 billion

163:05

copyright settlement with authors and

163:07

publishers, which the court called the

163:09

largest copyright class action

163:11

settlement in history.

163:13

>> A billion and a half. Yeah. I mean,

163:14

>> that is massive.

163:15

>> That's pretty big.

163:16

>> It covers uh that's what Yeah. Uh it

163:19

covers about uh 482,000

163:22

books that Enthropic downloaded from

163:24

piracy sites like LibGen while building

163:27

training data for Claude and works out

163:29

to roughly $3,000 per book before fees.

163:34

I don't necessarily know what that

163:35

means. Before fees, legal fees,

163:37

>> I I assume so.

163:39

>> Oh god. Is it going to be like $3 at the

163:41

end of it?

163:42

>> Uh no, no, no, no, no. The the authors

163:44

get $3,000 per book, I think. Oh, before

163:47

Oh, I hope not.

163:49

>> We'll see. Hopefully, I'm reading that

163:51

wrong. Over 91% of covered authors have

163:54

already claimed their share.

163:55

>> That tells me it's more than $3 if

163:56

people bothered to do

163:57

>> it. Sure does. And it sounds like a lot

163:58

of them did. Um, and Anthropic is also

164:00

required to destroy its pirated copies.

164:03

Yeah, sure. It's already trained on it.

164:05

Um, Judge Alup ruled last year that

164:08

Enthropic buying physical books,

164:10

scanning them, and destroying the

164:11

originals was fair use. Nice. We can buy

164:14

Blu-rays and uh and rip them and then

164:17

it's totally legal now. Thank you. Uh

164:19

and that training AI on books is legal.

164:22

What wasn't legal was downloading

164:24

millions of pirated copies to build a

164:26

permanent library. And that's the part

164:27

anthropic paid to settle before a jury

164:29

could set damages because it settled

164:32

instead of appealing. None of this

164:34

becomes a binding precedent. Damn it.

164:36

>> No, that's actually maybe good.

164:37

>> Is it?

164:38

>> Yes.

164:38

>> So the Okay, we'll talk about that in a

164:40

second. So, the dozens of similar suits

164:42

against Google Meta, MidJourney, and

164:43

OpenAI are still live with judges free

164:46

to rule differently. But wasn't this a

164:47

good

164:48

>> or rule the same? Because at least one

164:51

of these is bound to go through and not

164:53

get settled is kind of where my head's

164:54

at on this.

164:55

>> I see. Okay.

164:55

>> So, so what's nice is that this is

164:57

>> you just don't want one to go a totally

164:59

different direction and

165:00

>> sure go through.

165:01

>> This is true. But this is resolved for

165:03

now and the authors get something which

165:05

is not enough in my opinion.

165:07

>> I don't think it's enough. Um, it's man

165:12

it's something.

165:14

>> It's something though.

165:15

>> It's something.

165:15

>> So, I see what you're saying. You didn't

165:17

want the precedent set with this because

165:18

it might be too low. I

165:19

>> I I just want to I

165:22

this is a this is this is a start. It's

165:26

it's a it's a it's if if these are my

165:29

possible outcomes, right? And everything

165:32

to this side of the middle is bad and

165:35

everything to this side of the middle is

165:36

good. We're kind of like We're like

165:39

here. Yeah. You know, we're like a It's

165:41

It's

165:41

>> It's good. I

165:42

>> I could hope for better still.

165:44

>> Yeah,

165:44

>> that's where I'm at for

165:45

>> sure. So, you're holding out hope for

165:47

better.

165:47

>> I'm holding out I'm holding out for a

165:49

hero.

165:49

>> Man, Wendle's Turnstone video is still

165:52

not up. Come on, Wendle. Come on, Raid.

165:54

>> What's Turnstone?

165:55

>> Turnstone is cool. I the the answer to

165:59

like all of this stuff for me is run

166:01

stuff locally. Um

166:03

I I think that is the right way to get

166:05

back at them. Dude, the dude, the latest

166:07

the latest Chinese models look

166:11

>> crazy.

166:11

>> They also look very hard to run, but

166:13

they'll be quantized down and and

166:15

whatnot. But

166:15

>> they look crazy.

166:16

>> Turnstone is like Odysius,

166:20

PewDiePie's thing, but more tuned for

166:23

Enterprise.

166:24

>> Oh, okay.

166:26

>> And Wendle's building it. Oh,

166:28

>> and he hasn't said a ton else publicly

166:31

yet, but he has said publicly that there

166:33

is a video on Turnstone that is coming,

166:36

and I'm excited because it's very cool.

166:39

>> That sounds very cool.

166:40

>> It is very cool. Um,

166:44

next topic.

166:46

Aan Immortal says, "As a publisher, it

166:49

feels a bit like robbery where they got

166:51

to keep what they stole and I was

166:53

offered a market value. I was still

166:54

robbed." Yes.

166:56

>> Yeah. Yes.

166:58

Yeah, that's totally fair.

167:01

>> If this was a person,

167:03

they wouldn't have to pay $3,000 per

167:07

book. They would go to jail.

167:09

>> Yeah,

167:11

which is crazy, right?

167:13

>> Anyways,

167:14

>> oh, that was actually something that

167:15

didn't make it into our notes about the

167:18

um about the India uh like inc price

167:22

fixing deal thing. uh is that apparently

167:26

there executives are actually like like

167:29

we're we're personally punished for this

167:32

>> which is like I can't believe I'm saying

167:35

this but like hey maybe India has

167:38

something to teach us about how to

167:39

punish like antitrust stuff.

167:43

>> Yeah, I'm trying to look it up. Um

167:47

Reddit co-founder Aaron Schwarz

167:50

uh

167:52

pirated stole whatever you want to call

167:54

it. I think it was like what I'm seeing

167:57

here is 4.8 million uh Jtore documents

168:01

from MIT which is I think like uh

168:03

published papers and stuff. Um and yeah,

168:08

Reddit co-founder accused of stealing

168:10

4.8 million Jtore documents from MIT

168:12

>> repeated visits to access network and

168:14

download documents for distribution

168:16

distribution on file sharing sites.

168:18

Okay,

168:18

>> and this is like for context. As far as

168:20

my understanding goes, if you email the

168:22

authors of a lot of these papers, they

168:24

will just send it to you because in how

168:27

their system works, they're they're

168:29

probably employed by like a school or

168:30

whatever else. They like have to publish

168:32

these papers this way, but they don't

168:33

actually want to charge people for it.

168:35

So, he's like trying to make it so these

168:36

papers can get out more easily because

168:38

that scientific progress, open learning,

168:39

all that kind of stuff. Um, he did not

168:43

get dealt with in the same way. Oh man,

168:47

I just had it on screen and then lost

168:49

it. Sorry, here it is. Um, the charges

168:52

were filed in Boston on Tuesday by

168:54

attorney district

168:56

>> uh carried a penalty of 35 years in

168:58

prison and a $1 million fine.

169:02

>> What?

169:02

>> So, we seem to be a lot harder on a

169:06

random individual dude than

169:08

>> float plane chat is being pretty based.

169:10

Here's the deal. When corporations can

169:13

go to jail, then they can be people.

169:15

>> Yeah. No, I agree. That's actually like

169:17

how about they just have to Dude, if you

169:21

if the punishment was that if the

169:24

corporation commits a crime that would

169:26

have resulted in a six-month prison

169:29

sentence, if they have to actually get

169:32

just like their one phone call a day

169:34

[clears throat] for 6 months, [laughter]

169:38

you man, we would all of a sudden they'd

169:42

be on it. They'd be they'd be so

169:44

adherent to the law, like it'd be wild.

169:49

Um, [sighs]

169:52

speaking about a postc corporate world,

169:55

uh, Fallout 5, Fallout 3 and New Vegas

169:57

remasters and the most interesting part,

170:01

the very most interesting part that

170:03

people have a lot of mixed opinions on,

170:05

>> new Obsidian Fallout is official. So, I

170:09

am amazed that you picked this topic as

170:12

one of our headline topics at the

170:13

beginning of the show. Usually, I have a

170:15

pretty good idea of what you're going to

170:17

pick. I know that you love Fallout, but

170:20

I can't believe that after all the news

170:23

that has come out of

170:24

>> Bethesda and Microsoft and it and all of

170:30

that mess right now.

170:31

>> Sometimes I'm just a dumb little boy who

170:33

likes his old video games. that you're

170:35

not looking at this through a cynical

170:37

lens going here's this is obviously just

170:40

a shiny distraction.

170:43

Hey, ignore all the bad news right now.

170:45

Fallout. [screaming]

170:47

Is it I mean am I am I just being too

170:50

cynical?

170:50

>> The part that is interesting to me is

170:52

Obsidian's involvement.

170:54

>> No, it looks like it's not me. LRFTW

170:57

says Luke smoking that copium hard.

171:00

>> Hurt me again, Todd.

171:03

>> I'm ready. that

171:04

>> I will get excited.

171:06

>> I'm ready for the pain. Lovotar, take

171:09

me.

171:11

>> It never goes away.

171:12

>> Um, yeah, obsidian is the interesting

171:14

part to me.

171:15

>> Yeah, that's the good.

171:16

>> Um, it's a little questionable. It's

171:18

been a hot minute. The obsidian of the

171:20

now is not the obsidian of the then. So,

171:23

it's it's interesting.

171:26

>> Black and glassike.

171:28

[laughter]

171:29

>> And now it's black and glass-like and

171:32

older.

171:34

No, you deserve the second one.

171:36

[laughter]

171:36

>> Isn't that like the main guy coming

171:37

back?

171:38

>> I've heard yes, but all the structure

171:41

around him is changed.

171:43

>> No man is an island.

171:44

>> Maybe not completely gone. I don't I

171:47

don't I can't claim to know, but it's

171:49

interesting because I mean, if you look

171:51

at Fallout, I liked Fallout 3. Fallout 3

171:53

was all right. Uh Fallout New Vegas was

171:56

incredible. has a lot of like the best

171:58

quotes in games ever in it and is still

172:01

a cult classic to today. Fallout 4.

172:08

>> More like Fallout for the Birds.

172:12

>> I didn't play it. I don't know.

172:13

>> Yeah. Um, Fallout 5 is uh

172:19

I don't know if Fallout 5 is the

172:21

Obsidian Fallout or if Fallout 5 is

172:23

Bethesda Fallout. If Fallout 5 is

172:26

Bethesda Fallout, if they keep going

172:28

down the path they have been going

172:30

lately, uh, it's probably going to suck.

172:33

>> It's just all settlement building.

172:35

>> Yeah, something like that.

172:36

>> Uh, Fallout 5 was Bethesda.

172:39

>> Was Bethesda is Bethesda.

172:41

>> Is Bethesda. Okay. Excuse me.

172:42

>> Yeah. So, whatever the obsidian one is

172:44

is the one that I'm more interested in.

172:47

But,

172:48

you know,

172:50

fool me roughly seven times or something

172:54

and maybe I'm the fool. But,

172:56

>> shame on Dan.

172:57

>> Maybe maybe

172:58

>> catching strays.

172:59

>> Maybe Todd can can sit in a immersion

173:02

sensory deprivation chamber or something

173:06

become what he once was and revitalize

173:08

all of Bethesda and give us a good Elder

173:11

Scrolls and good follow. Maybe maybe has

173:12

a midlife crisis and just goes like,

173:14

"Wait, what if we made good games?"

173:16

>> Wait, what if they were fun?

173:20

>> Sounds stupid.

173:21

>> Uh, yeah, probably.

173:23

>> Well, I got my tanks recharged of

173:25

copium, so I'm all ready to go.

173:29

>> Let's go.

173:30

>> Um, I owe Sammy something, and I think

173:32

he's expecting me to do this on my

173:34

phone, but I'm not going to.

173:35

>> Huh?

173:36

>> Weak.

173:38

>> Okay, Dan. Sammy needs that time stamp.

173:41

Sure. We don't have uh we don't have

173:44

Noki in the chat today. That's

173:45

>> Hi. Hi.

173:47

>> Do you mind filming a horizontal video

173:49

of you saying weak?

173:50

>> I forgot to ask. I was too stunned by

173:52

the feet. Cam. Thank you,

173:54

>> Sammy. Sammy. Sammy. Sammy. 2 hours 58

173:57

minutes 48 seconds. 30. Can I get a

174:00

clap?

174:03

>> Thank you. Editor's note. Uh

174:07

yeah, whatever. All right.

174:11

>> [snorts]

174:12

>> Man, it's been a long week.

174:13

>> Do we talk about the the craziness now?

174:16

>> Yeah, sure. Let's talk about the

174:17

craziness.

174:18

>> Fallout 5 is currently in pre-production

174:20

and will use the Creation Engine 3 also

174:22

used for Elder Scrolls 6.

174:24

>> Note from David.

174:25

>> Which which one had which one was

174:26

Starfield?

174:27

>> What?

174:27

>> Creation Engine

174:29

>> three,

174:29

>> two, two and a half with

174:32

>> I think that um what version of

174:35

>> So does that mean also Starfield

174:37

>> two?

174:39

Two. Yes. Two.

174:41

>> Okay. So, there's hope. There's more

174:43

hope. Well, I got to talk to my dealer

174:45

and order more copium.

174:49

>> Yeah, maybe Creation Engine will save

174:50

us. Maybe they'll scoop up all the

174:52

people ID just lost.

174:56

>> I mean,

174:57

>> it would kind of make sense.

174:58

>> Their engine is so based.

175:00

>> Yeah.

175:00

>> But then, wait, but these are both under

175:02

the Microsoft umbrella. No way.

175:05

>> Yeah. Okay. I want to make the list are

175:06

also extremely related. You are you are

175:09

not even sitting on and then they're

175:11

going to get all the stuff right now and

175:14

then we're going to get video games.

175:17

[laughter]

175:20

>> That is their worst take

175:22

>> in all the many years that we have

175:25

hosted this show together.

175:27

>> You expected good takes from me about

175:28

Bethesda.

175:29

>> I look I take you I take you seriously.

175:33

I respect you as a friend and

175:35

collaborator. I can't be I can't be

175:38

>> THAT WAS

175:40

>> YOU'RE AS YOU'RE as [laughter]

175:44

>> Oh my god.

175:45

>> Like it took me a second. I I [laughter]

175:46

I didn't manage to connect the dots for

175:49

how stupid that was because I

175:52

expect so much better [laughter] from

175:53

you.

176:01

[laughter]

176:06

>> [laughter]

176:08

>> Okay. What are we? Pick another topic.

176:10

My god.

176:13

[laughter]

176:15

>> I have no whimsy. No whimsy in this man.

176:18

>> Yeah. See? Yeah.

176:19

>> You're whimsyless.

176:20

>> You can't have magical pixie dust

176:22

thoughts in there. Um,

176:24

>> let us dissociate. That's all we have

176:26

left. Okay,

176:30

now let's go into a insane whiplash of a

176:32

topic. Uh, Framework cuts Laptop 13 Pro

176:36

pre-order RAM in half.

176:38

>> Yeah, investment disclosure. I'll let

176:39

Luke do this one.

176:40

>> Massive increases in cost have forced

176:42

Framework to alter pre-orders for the

176:45

upcoming Laptop 13 Pro.

176:47

>> Laptop Pro 13. Framework Pro 13.

176:49

Whatever. Keep going. You could do your

176:50

thing.

176:51

>> Okay.

176:51

>> Yeah, it's just written wrong in here.

176:53

It's not Luke's fault. The uh pre-order

176:55

holders report RAM allocations being cut

176:57

in half and pricing for the pre-orders

176:59

being updated. The company announced in

177:01

a blog post that their LP CAM 2 supplier

177:03

has more than doubled RAM pricing over

177:06

their existing inventory. Framework

177:08

chief exec and truepec cable enthusiast

177:11

Nurav Patel wrote that this cost

177:14

increase goes beyond far beyond anything

177:17

we had predicted and anything we're able

177:19

to absorb without placing our ability to

177:21

operate at real financial risk.

177:25

Framework says they have enough LP CAM 2

177:27

modules on hand to cover existing

177:30

pre-orders

177:32

but not in capacities that match the

177:35

pre-order. So no they don't.

177:36

>> So no no they so LPAM 2 modules it's one

177:40

module per system. It's not like sodium

177:43

where you would have two. So they have

177:46

in terms of the quantity of LP CAM 2

177:49

modules, they have enough of them, but

177:52

not with the right number of dyes on

177:54

them.

177:55

>> I see. So not the right uh Yeah.

177:58

>> Yes, I see. I get it.

178:02

>> That was a good one.

178:04

>> That was actually pretty good. Uh the

178:06

blog post breakdown uh breaks down the

178:08

pre-order changes. TLDDR. If there

178:10

aren't enough modules for your order,

178:12

it's being downgraded to the next lower

178:14

RAM configuration at the original price

178:16

for that configuration. Okay,

178:20

that's a little better than I thought.

178:21

Uh, the blog also warns of cost

178:24

increases on other hardware which will

178:26

impact new orders as well.

178:28

>> Yeah, I I didn't put it in the dock for

178:30

this week, I think, but uh TSMC it's

178:33

rumored that TSMC is increasing wafer.

178:35

Oh, no, it is in here. TSMC plans chip

178:38

price hikes in 2027 of um

178:43

uh baseline 5 to 10% with some AI and

178:46

HPC customers facing effective cost

178:48

increases of up to 25% through

178:51

additional search charges. These

178:52

reported increases are tied to rising

178:54

manufacturing costs, overseas fab

178:56

investments, and just plain old strong

178:59

you pay me demand.

179:01

>> It's honestly wild. They could be,

179:04

this might sound like an insane

179:05

statement.

179:07

>> They could crank it so much more.

179:10

>> I know.

179:10

>> So much more.

179:11

>> I know.

179:12

>> They literally came out and and pointed

179:14

at like SKH Highix and Samsung and we're

179:16

like, we're not doing that.

179:18

>> They could though.

179:19

>> And it's kind of wild that they're not.

179:21

And there's a lot of theories as to why.

179:24

>> Is it just down to like Taiwanese

179:25

culture? Like I What are the other

179:28

theories? I think it's down to the

179:29

defense of Taiwan because if they crank

179:32

it too high, you're incentivizing

179:34

development elsewhere.

179:36

>> Yeah,

179:37

>> that's my theory. The same guy that

179:39

brought to you maybe Bethesda should

179:41

just hire the id guys to make Creation

179:43

[laughter] Engine.

179:49

>> Yeah. I mean, the other part too is I

179:51

could I could see valuing the long-term

179:53

partnership. I mean, you look at the way

179:56

you can you can uh uh like uh Okay, look

179:59

at what's going on with um

180:00

>> well, look at how hungry everyone is to

180:02

switch to Chinese RAM.

180:03

>> What's that what's that thing Oracle bot

180:05

that everyone's all mad about? Uh or

180:07

hold on. Who who Oh, no, no, no. I

180:09

remember. Uh who owns VMware right now?

180:12

Broadcom. That's right. Everyone's super

180:14

mad at Broadcom because they bought uh

180:16

they bought VMware in 2023 and have just

180:19

been like

180:20

>> cranking the screws. In fact, did that

180:22

not make it into W show last week that

180:24

uh it was the a really cool article I

180:26

read. I think it was on RS Technica

180:27

about a company that found a solution.

180:30

It was like a restaurant chain that

180:32

found a solution to converting all of

180:34

their VMs restaurant or retail. Retail,

180:37

sorry, retail. It was a retail chain

180:38

that converted all of their VMs off of

180:41

VMware and just kind of like told the

180:44

story of the very difficult, painful

180:46

migration that they had to go through.

180:48

and um and how just and just just the

180:54

comments was hilarious on this article

180:56

because everyone was talking about how

180:57

much they just hate what

181:00

Broadcom is doing with VMware, but they

181:01

feel so locked in and they can't wait to

181:05

jump ship. And I mean maybe part of it

181:07

is also just prudent business

181:08

management. Just because you're on top

181:10

today and you have all these

181:12

partnerships today doesn't mean that and

181:14

and you want to benefit from being a

181:16

technology leader. So they're TSMC is

181:18

clearly increasing pricing, but if you

181:22

turn the screws too hard, you're

181:24

incentivizing

181:26

outside demand or outside um

181:28

>> competition. You are, you know, just,

181:32

you know, I don't know, you're being

181:34

kind of a jerk and also you're making

181:36

your partner's eye rate. You're making

181:38

them look for the exit. So maybe it's a

181:40

little bit of all of them.

181:42

>> I mean, I don't sit on their board. I

181:44

don't know. But

181:44

>> yeah,

181:45

>> just guessing. Just guessing. Uh, what

181:47

else? While this is going on, Nvidia is

181:49

reportedly raising GeForce GPU kit

181:52

prices. Nvidia board partners are said

181:54

to be paying more for both GDDR6 and

181:57

GDDR7 GeForce GPU kits. However, the

182:00

reports do not confirm whether these

182:02

higher component costs will directly

182:03

translate into higher retail GPU prices.

182:05

But, but how could they do anything

182:07

other than that? That Okay, so GPU

182:10

prices are going up. There you go. You

182:11

heard it here first.

182:14

Um, [sighs]

182:15

our discussion question is PC building

182:18

feels like a luxury hobby right now, but

182:20

has it always been this way?

182:22

>> No.

182:23

>> Um,

182:24

>> I would argue no. The reason why I would

182:26

argue no,

182:27

>> I think it's cyclical.

182:30

At least to a degree.

182:33

>> When's the last time it felt like a

182:34

luxury hobby?

182:37

>> Oh, [sighs]

182:39

man. And I

182:40

>> for me it would like basically go to

182:43

before I was functional as a human.

182:47

>> No, I wouldn't I wouldn't say that. I'd

182:49

say it felt man it felt very luxury

182:51

hobby in like the early SLI days.

182:54

Although it didn't have to be. I mean I

182:56

think that's the I think that's the

182:58

difference is that

182:59

>> premium options does not mean luxury

183:01

hobby.

183:02

>> No, that's true. And and but I mean

183:03

working in the department that I was

183:05

working in I had a lot of exposure to

183:07

the people who treated it like a luxury

183:09

hobby.

183:10

There was a player on the Vancouver

183:12

Conucks who I mean I'm probably removed

183:15

from this ad

183:21

once in a while just to see what kind of

183:22

crazy he bought cuz he would just

183:24

buy the highest end everything the

183:26

second it came out and like it it it

183:29

just really surprised me the first time

183:32

he like showed up on my radar because he

183:34

bought like an over $1,000 high-capacity

183:38

SSD and I was like wait

183:41

that guy cuz I I don't see that as like

183:44

the as like the professional athlete

183:47

thing to do. I mean obviously he has the

183:49

money, right? You know, guy had a nearly

183:53

100 mph slapshot. He's getting paid for

183:56

it, but like he Sorry. He's super into

183:59

like gaming and computers. He buy No,

184:01

and he would buy things one at a time.

184:03

So he's clearly doing it himself.

184:06

>> Yeah. which is like based AF.

184:09

>> That's cool.

184:09

>> You could obviously afford to have

184:11

somebody else build him an extreme

184:12

edition computer with a, you know,

184:14

highcapacity Vertex 3 SSD, whatever,

184:18

whatever the exact specs were. Um,

184:20

>> my my argument, someone someone uh

184:23

Insomniac in chat said, "Luke taking the

184:25

stance when Linus has refreshed his

184:27

computer last how many times?" I I

184:29

understand where you're coming from. I

184:30

don't think that's a valid argument at

184:31

all. The reason why I would say that is

184:33

looking at how I got into the hobby. A

184:36

big part of the reason why I got into

184:37

the hobby was cuz oh my god, it is so

184:39

much cheaper and more accessible than

184:41

cars.

184:43

It was like, can I go down one of these

184:45

two paths, cars or computers? And it was

184:47

like, well, one is hilariously

184:49

expensive, requires tons of room, lots

184:51

of kind of expensive tools or access to

184:54

them, and oh my god, things break all

184:56

the time and they cost a lot and blah

184:57

blah blah blah blah. And the other one I

184:59

can enter

185:02

with no tool costs,

185:04

>> right,

185:05

>> at all.

185:06

>> Well, you could buy a bougie screwdriver

185:08

to do it.

185:09

>> Maybe. Yeah. Or just borrow your dad's,

185:12

which he like almost certainly has at

185:14

least a like Phillips screwdriver. It's

185:17

like the most common thing ever to work

185:18

on computers. And then when I first got

185:21

into it, like my stuff wasn't nice, but

185:24

it played games just fine. Dude, the

185:26

entrylevel I can play Friend slop games

185:30

computer right now is still very cheap.

185:36

>> Yeah, I'm actually I'm I'm I'm on here

185:39

right now like uh one of our discussion

185:41

questions that we hadn't got to yet. I

185:43

was I was prepping for it is like, "Hey,

185:46

how cheaply could you do just like like

185:49

an Optiplex build these days?" And it's

185:51

it's still actually not that bad. I

185:55

don't like this one. I don't like just 8

185:57

gigs of RAM. So, hold on.

185:58

>> Also more expensive than

186:00

>> another one I liked better. Well, okay.

186:02

Remember though, I'm I'm looking for

186:03

eighth gen.

186:04

>> Yeah.

186:05

>> So,

186:06

eighth gen, 16 gigs of RAM. You got to

186:09

watch out for the shipping though. It's

186:10

a $100 shipping on this bad boy. But

186:12

that's to us. That's to us. That's

186:14

international shipping.

186:15

>> Yeah. Okay.

186:15

>> If this was domestic shipping in the US,

186:17

it would be considerably cheaper.

186:19

>> $0 import. I wonder if part of the

186:21

shipping is that the imports included.

186:22

>> It is. It's it's part of eBay's whole

186:25

they uh they have depots that US sellers

186:28

ship to and then they handle all of the

186:31

paperwork so that the international

186:33

shipping goes smoothly. It's a whole

186:34

thing. Um but anyway, it's 16 gigs RAM,

186:36

250 gigs SSD, so you're still going to

186:38

need to pro probably pop a hard drive in

186:40

there. You're going to need a GPU, but

186:42

we actually have a like a 1080

186:44

retrospective coming soon. And we found

186:48

that the 1080 Ti in particular is

186:50

actually still very usable. So, for

186:52

probably around 250 bucks, you could you

186:57

could friend slop it with all your

186:59

friends. Um,

187:01

>> and that's just like grabbing a pretty

187:02

quick eBay listing. There's a lot of the

187:05

stuff that I got when I was first

187:07

starting was helping people fix their

187:09

computers. Um,

187:12

I don't know. I' I' a friend would want

187:14

to build a computer. So, I'd help them

187:16

build the computer. They would want to

187:17

upgrade the fans that came that came

187:19

with the case. So, they'd replace the

187:21

fans that came with the case. They have

187:22

a few computer fans now. They don't have

187:24

any use for it. Okay, those are my

187:25

computer fans now. Um, just little

187:28

little things like that as you're going

187:29

along. It's a it's a hobby that is very

187:33

effective for flipping parts.

187:36

You you haveund 100 bucks more than you

187:39

had before. You can go on Facebook

187:41

Marketplace, you can sell your GPU

187:44

um for some cash, combine that with the

187:47

100 extra bucks you had um and get a

187:49

very significant increase in GPU and

187:52

just plug that into the system you

187:53

currently have most likely. You can keep

187:56

using things like your case for a very

187:59

long time. Apparently Jeff Gearling

188:01

still has like one of his first ones and

188:03

still uses it. Um, yeah, even right now

188:06

when it's like the worst. I was saying

188:08

the the I think I slightly misspoke,

188:10

which got people to dive on me

188:12

immediately again, which is confusing to

188:14

me, but whatever. Um, I I think I said

188:16

something I was surprised by that price.

188:18

That isn't what I meant. I meant I was

188:20

shopping for Dell Optiplexes or Dell

188:22

somethings during last Scrapyard Wars.

188:24

And what I was trying to point out is

188:26

that that is even those systems are

188:28

significantly more expensive than they

188:29

were. Um, and still

188:32

that's not a crazy amount to get into a

188:35

fresh new hobby.

188:37

>> No, I don't think I would put this in

188:39

the in the category of luxury hobby. I

188:41

think that's a big jump.

188:42

>> No, I think I think that's actually

188:43

fair. And uh, Pancrats posted in chat,

188:46

you're not fitting a 1080 in there, lol.

188:49

To which I will reply, not not with that

188:51

attitude.

188:53

>> Not with that attitude,

188:55

>> but with a with a bit of with a bit of

188:57

handiwork. anything.

188:59

>> Yeah. Engage with the part of the hobby

189:00

that's really fun.

189:02

>> Anything can fit in anything.

189:03

>> Yeah, you can figure it out. I believe

189:06

in you.

189:07

>> Oh man.

189:08

>> Um, and yes, I did not factor I did not

189:11

factor in an extra power supply though.

189:13

So, you you will need a better power

189:14

supply in order to run a 1080 or a 1080

189:16

Ti or something like that.

189:18

>> But the power draw of just that card

189:20

isn't going to be super high. So, you

189:21

could get a fairly low cap power supply

189:23

for not a crazy amount of money

189:25

>> as long as it has the connectors. Or you

189:27

can

189:28

>> [snorts]

189:29

>> figure out a way to get conductors

189:31

connected to

189:32

>> which is fun

189:32

>> which is cool unless you break it and

189:35

$100 is a lot of money to you like it

189:38

was in the early days of us pursuing

189:39

this hobby.

189:40

>> Oh dude, the panic attacks I had at

189:42

times.

189:42

>> But the but the

189:45

panic and the stress

189:47

>> is part of the fun

189:48

>> is what makes the payoff so worth it.

189:52

[laughter]

189:52

>> Yeah. And like trust me guys, I get it.

189:55

I understand what you're trying to

189:56

project. It sucks right now. It's

189:58

expensive right now.

190:00

>> Yeah,

190:00

>> it's still

190:02

a hobby that people can get into with

190:04

not a ton of cash. No, you're not going

190:06

to have some sick 5090 water cooled uh

190:11

amazing, you know, it has that screen

190:14

thing from Corsair that you can mount

190:16

anywhere and all this other fancy crazy.

190:18

>> But you know what? Nobody has that

190:20

stuff. I think this is something that

190:21

like

190:22

>> Yeah. I I think people really really

190:25

don't realize how rare the customers for

190:29

this stuff are because it's all over

190:31

like your your your Instagram feed or

190:33

whatever, but stations,

190:35

>> but I worked at the computer store. Do

190:38

you know how few people buy thousand

190:40

CPUs?

190:41

>> Yeah.

190:42

>> Like that's rare. Do you know how few

190:45

people are buying top-of-the-line GPUs

190:47

in the grand scheme of things? how what

190:50

a tiny tiny percentage of the market

190:53

they make up. Most people are just like

190:56

running a regular computer.

190:58

When I was when I was building a bunch

191:00

of computers for myself, for my friends,

191:03

all that kind of stuff, everybody was

191:05

sitting on 60 series. It was bougie if

191:08

you got a 70. No one got an 80. 90s were

191:12

absurd.

191:14

>> Was 90 even a thing yet?

191:15

>> Probably not even. Yeah. I think they

191:17

had other nomenclature for their

191:18

>> 88 ultra was a thing for a bit and then

191:21

Oh, yeah. No, no, hold on. There were

191:23

90s. So, uh I think a a 590 was a dual

191:26

GPU. Yeah. So, 90s.

191:27

>> I was still building computers for

191:28

friends in that era. So, yeah. Okay.

191:30

>> And it's like nobody got those cards.

191:34

>> Yeah. I'm trying to think. The first

191:35

dual GPU was the 5950

191:39

X2, was it? I Oh, man. I Wow. I used to

191:42

know this stuff. 5950

191:44

X2 GPU. Is that right? Oh man. No, no,

191:50

no. The 7950

191:52

something. 7950

191:56

X2. What was it called? 7950 GX2. Man,

192:00

that thing was so cool.

192:04

[laughter]

192:06

Look how cool it is.

192:09

It's got the whole two stacked PCBs, two

192:12

whole separate coolers, internal SLI

192:15

bridge. There's PCB one. Here's PCB2.

192:19

You got the Oh, man. You got the Hold

192:21

on. Where's the Where' the bridge chip

192:22

go? There it is. Look at it go. Why does

192:25

it keep changing which picture I'm

192:27

looking at? Can I zoom? Oh, come on.

192:30

Touchpad, don't let me down. It let me

192:33

down. I'm over it. Uh, the point is very

192:35

cool. Very expensive. Almost literally

192:39

nobody bought them.

192:41

>> Yeah, they're unheard of. It also

192:44

depends on like the circles you're in

192:45

and if and if the only

192:48

people you're hearing talk about

192:50

computer stuff is dudes on the internet

192:52

that only get views on their videos when

192:54

they show the super fancy expensive

192:56

cards, then you're just going to see the

192:58

super fancy expensive cards.

193:00

>> And also that's but that's what

193:01

companies market too because it's it's

193:03

Halo marketing. That's what and it

193:05

works. You don't and you see it across

193:09

so many industries, PCs, fashion, um

193:13

like the the amount of of effort and

193:16

money and time that companies spend

193:19

promoting their their topofthe-line

193:22

experience that almost nobody will

193:24

actually buy, but because it's cool and

193:27

sexy, it creates brand appeal and then

193:30

you go in and you actually buy the thing

193:32

you can actually afford. It's it's

193:34

marketing 101. So,

193:37

>> I have talked on this show almost as

193:39

many times as I possibly can since I

193:41

learned this piece of information that a

193:43

buddy of mine's son was using a 1080 to

193:46

play on decently high settings at

193:47

decently solid frame rates. Arc Raiders.

193:50

>> Yeah,

193:50

>> I've pointed that out like as many times

193:52

as I reasonably can.

193:54

>> And and it's worth

193:55

>> because I'm trying to promote the idea

193:56

that you don't have to upgrade. You

193:58

don't have to spend crazy amounts of

193:59

money. And it's worth noting that

194:00

compared to like our previous $69 gaming

194:03

PCs that we've done in the past, um,

194:05

this Optiplex was quite a bit more

194:07

expensive, but that's because I went out

194:08

of my way to pick something with a six

194:10

core processor. Like I was I was going

194:12

for something that wasn't

194:13

>> a decent machine

194:14

>> that wasn't quite just, you know, barely

194:18

usable today and unusable tomorrow. Like

194:20

this, you could actually get a couple

194:22

years out of this thing. Um, it's worth

194:24

putting a little bit of work into fixing

194:26

it up. So I I did that on purpose. you

194:29

could get something cheaper.

194:32

>> Um,

194:33

>> hey, speaking of getting things cheaper,

194:35

according to Bloomberg's Mark German,

194:37

Apple is preparing an Apple upgrade

194:40

leasing program with CLA that wouldn't

194:42

help you get things cheaper at all, but

194:45

would let you pay a monthly fee for

194:47

devices instead of buying them outright

194:49

with the option to upgrade at the end of

194:51

the lease.

194:53

So, so what is Apple just a financial

194:55

engineering company now? Like, what are

194:57

what are we talking about here? Apple

194:58

already offers an iPhone upgrade program

195:00

that lets customers finance and

195:01

eventually own an iPhone, but this new

195:03

program is a broader leasing program

195:05

which would reportedly include iPhones,

195:07

Apple Watches, iPads, and Macs. iPhones

195:10

and Apple watches would have 2-year

195:11

leases, while Macs and iPads would be

195:13

leased for 3 years before customers

195:14

could upgrade or return the device. The

195:18

program is aimed at making Apple

195:19

products more affordable upfront by

195:21

spreading payments over time while also

195:23

encouraging customers to upgrade to

195:24

newer devices on a regular schedule. Um,

195:29

our discussion question, this is kind of

195:31

funny, is I'm not sure how they do this

195:33

in, you know, America and the rest of

195:35

the world, but how is this any different

195:36

from a Canadian phone plan where you

195:38

just slowly pay off your phone over the

195:40

course of your plan? What makes this

195:42

different slash special?

195:44

I don't know.

195:48

you get to give Apple the money

195:50

>> and Florida even though there's

195:55

no would you lease a piece of tech? I

195:57

mean I think we've talked about that

195:58

enough on the show. I don't think we

195:59

have to do that particular um discussion

196:01

topic but like here's a crazy idea Apple

196:06

free of charge. What if if you're

196:09

reaching the point where your customers

196:11

literally can't afford it anymore.

196:14

What if you just like and I I mean as

196:17

someone who loves technology and loves

196:18

progress, this might this might be out

196:20

of character for me, but what if you

196:22

just chillax for a second?

196:26

What if the new iPhone doesn't cost more

196:28

than the last iPhone

196:30

for one try it for one year

196:34

just to see what it's like? You might

196:36

like it.

196:36

>> You know, as crazy as that sounds,

196:41

I might have learned something from the

196:42

Neo.

196:44

Well, they increased the price of the

196:45

Neo.

196:46

>> But wasn't it like relatively reasonable

196:49

based on memory prices going?

196:50

>> It's still pretty reasonable.

196:52

>> Yeah,

196:52

>> maybe they maybe they did. But then why

196:54

do they need all the why do they need a

196:56

device leasing pro partnership with

196:58

>> full name is MacBook Neo, right?

197:00

>> I believe so.

197:01

>> iPhone Neo.

197:02

>> iPhone Neo the one. But then what cut

197:06

down processor would they put in an

197:08

iPhone Neo? A watch chip. Like what are

197:10

we what are we talking about here? Why

197:13

not? I

197:14

>> mean, yeah, why not? Sure. Thanks, Dan.

197:15

[laughter]

197:16

>> They got those. Um,

197:18

>> no. I mean, like, seriously.

197:19

>> Okay. Then, what do they put in a cheap

197:21

watch, Dan?

197:22

>> What do they put in the Apple Watch?

197:24

Neo, Dan.

197:27

>> Time. Just Just put the watch pit. Wait,

197:30

your feet actually aren't touching.

197:32

>> Sorry. They are. They're hitting here.

197:36

I'm hitting the floor. You can look. You

197:38

can verify if you'd like.

197:42

>> All right.

197:43

All right.

197:44

>> For them to not be touching would look

197:47

would look like this.

197:51

>> I don't know. It doesn't look that

197:52

different. But the point is the point is

197:53

they're definitely touch.

197:55

>> The point is they're definitely touch.

197:56

>> All right. [snorts and laughter]

197:58

>> Whatever's in a TI 84.

198:02

>> Yeah. Get a Casio. You can write Apple

198:05

on it with a Sharpie.

198:06

>> Okay. Um, hey, LTT Labs had some new

198:10

articles this week. I haven't I haven't

198:11

read them yet, but you want to talk

198:12

about it.

198:12

>> New stuff. Yeah. Um, there's there's

198:16

multiple. I don't know if

198:17

[clears throat] we talked about on the

198:18

show last week, but there was the 1080

198:20

article, and ever since then, there's

198:22

been three. Uh, we be pumping out

198:25

articles right now. Uh, it's been really

198:27

fun.

198:28

>> I've been really enjoying this series,

198:29

the LLM quantization. I've I've read

198:32

part one and two and all the

198:33

supplementary material and videos.

198:36

has really been running with this. It's

198:37

been it's been cool to see him um

198:41

>> do this. It's been it's been awesome. Uh

198:44

Labs article released from the LLM

198:46

quantization series. That was 2.5,

198:48

right? Y

198:48

>> is that correct? Yeah. Uh this is an

198:50

unplanned

198:52

part. Oh, right. The.5 is unplanned, I

198:54

guess. Unplanned part/ article to focus

198:56

on the floatingoint number format and

198:57

how it works. Uh this one has some may,

199:00

but it's fun. You should go check it

199:01

out. Um,

199:02

>> I found the the the math to be not too

199:06

over the top so far. Like it's dumbed

199:08

down enough that

199:09

>> I was going to say that's that's largely

199:11

the the writing, baby.

199:13

>> Yep.

199:13

>> Um, good job, Ukash. But, uh, also Labs

199:16

article looking at Intel's intelligent

199:18

bias control 3.5 announced with the ARC

199:22

G3 series of chips. It advertises that

199:26

it will not operate the PC cores under

199:28

14 watts. We found that it is actually

199:31

more complicated and interesting than

199:33

that. Turning off some of the E and LP

199:36

cores as well. Uh there's almost zero

199:39

information about IBC available online.

199:41

So we thought we'd try to characterize

199:43

it. Uh we showed Intel our results and

199:45

they said that it is behaving as

199:48

expected.

199:48

>> Yeah. Uh Tom Peterson was very

199:52

very smug about um about in intelligent

199:56

bias control even though it's something

199:58

that on the surface did not really sound

200:01

that different from what anyone else had

200:02

been doing with um sharing power budgets

200:06

between CPUs and GPUs. But he seemed to

200:09

be and he would know under the

200:12

impression that this was quite different

200:14

and betterer. And so apparently it's uh

200:18

quite different which is which is pretty

200:19

cool to see. I wish they would have just

200:22

communicated you know more of it more

200:25

directly but sure. Yeah. I guess leaving

200:27

it to us to discover is fun too. Uh

200:30

finally Microsoft is experimenting with

200:32

ADUP supported Xbox game streaming.

200:34

They're testing a free tier with Xbox

200:37

insiders allowing players to stream

200:39

select owned games in 1hour sessions

200:42

without a cloud gaming subscription.

200:45

Microsoft says that ads will appear

200:47

before gameplay, not during it. The test

200:50

is meant to keep gameplay uninterrupted

200:52

while paid cloud gaming options remain

200:54

adree. So

200:56

>> that's the most boil the frog thing. So,

200:58

they kind of contradict themselves here

201:00

because it's in 1-hour sessions

201:04

after which time they will not put up an

201:07

ad that interrupts your game play,

201:10

>> but you will have to reauthenticate

201:13

>> and they will put an ad before you start

201:15

a session, which presumably if you've

201:17

been gaming for an hour would be in the

201:19

middle of your gameplay. Maybe I'm

201:20

missing something here. Um, according to

201:22

the Xbox folks, ads should provide

201:24

value,

201:27

avoid interrupting gameplay,

201:29

meet Xbox's quality standards, clearly

201:33

identify what is being advertised, and

201:36

fit player expectations on each

201:38

platform. The goal is to make cloud

201:41

gaming more accessible by giving more

201:42

players a lowerc cost way to stream the

201:45

games they own.

201:49

>> Mhm. H. So I think the most interesting

201:52

discussion question we have here is

201:54

Microsoft says ads should create value.

201:57

In your experience, what does that look

201:59

like? What ads might you like to see

202:03

before a gaming session or before the

202:05

next hour of your gaming session that

202:07

could add value to you?

202:14

I'm trying to I'm trying to I'm trying

202:17

to really genuinely

202:19

uh [laughter]

202:20

>> his I can actually hear I can actually

202:23

hear the gears turning in his in his

202:25

headc case right now. Like I [laughter]

202:29

>> I was really

202:30

>> He's thinking so hard.

202:31

>> I was genuinely trying to find like is

202:33

there anything is there possibly

202:35

>> is there some charitable interpretation

202:37

of this?

202:38

>> Yeah. And I don't think so. Uh, I got I

202:41

have to imagine the ad value is like to

202:44

Microsoft. They don't mean to the Do

202:45

they mean to the user?

202:46

>> They mean to the user, Luke.

202:49

>> They're not going to say add value to

202:50

Microsoft. I mean, that would be easy.

202:53

>> There's no I don't

202:59

[laughter]

203:00

>> I mean there there is Oh man, I think

203:03

that just means high success rate.

203:05

>> I think so too

203:06

>> because if which highly targeted

203:08

carefully targeted which obviously means

203:11

beneficial for the company, beneficial

203:14

for Microsoft, but they're just

203:15

packaging it in a different way.

203:17

>> And look, get ready for the 1800th

203:22

hot take from me so far this win show.

203:25

>> But I believe that

203:28

>> more of them.

203:29

>> If we can get an ad for one of our

203:32

products that we think is really great

203:34

in front of someone who buys it and

203:36

enjoys it, that's actually not terrible

203:38

for them.

203:42

The primary holder of value in that

203:46

scenario is not the consumer though.

203:48

>> No, I'd say it's the ad serving

203:50

platform.

203:51

>> I think you could argue that there like

203:53

if you genuinely see something and

203:55

you're like, "Oh, cool. That like solves

203:57

a problem or looks like a thing I've

203:59

been wanting

204:01

>> or inspires me in whatever way." And

204:03

then you buy it and your feet not

204:05

>> sting. Sure. And you're happy about the

204:07

result.

204:08

>> Then Sure. I can I can say there was

204:11

added value.

204:11

>> We stacked three W's.

204:13

>> I still think the primary W holder is,

204:17

you know,

204:19

>> the the ad the person serving the ads.

204:21

>> Oh, yeah.

204:22

>> Obviously,

204:22

>> they're the they're the they're W prime.

204:25

They're the top W

204:28

>> WW Prime. [laughter]

204:32

Oh man. Um,

204:36

>> sarcastic question. What are some

204:38

examples?

204:38

>> It does. W Prime is still a thing.

204:42

That's so cool, man. When's the last

204:45

time you went on Major Geeks?

204:46

>> Oh, it's been 10 years. When's the last

204:48

time this was updated?

204:50

>> Yeah, I was going to say I don't know if

204:53

this is really a thing still.

204:54

>> W Prime is a leading multi-threaded

204:56

benchmark for x86 processors.

204:59

>> Sorry, is that a Black Friday ad

205:01

>> here? What the

205:04

what? Okay, I'm clicking it. Uh,

205:06

>> maybe it will generate value for me.

205:08

>> I don't know what that is.

205:09

>> Good luck, Sean.

205:10

>> Uh, okay.

205:12

>> Summer sale on iobit.com.

205:15

[sighs]

205:15

>> Driver booster pro keeps over 18 million

205:20

drivers up to

205:22

>> I need that many drivers.

205:23

>> Uh, none of this is an endorsement.

205:24

>> No,

205:25

>> just throwing that out there.

205:28

>> Whoa, but hold on. I have to order now,

205:30

Luke. That in it's 500 milliseconds.

205:33

Wait. No, that it's going down. I've

205:35

never seen milliseconds before.

205:37

>> I've never seen milliseconds on the

205:38

counter before.

205:40

>> 15 minutes.

205:41

>> Yeah,

205:41

>> that's so much time.

205:43

>> I have 15 minutes and 24 sec 23 seconds

205:47

and 300 millconds. I'm going to see what

205:49

happens. Yeah, I will 100%.

205:51

>> Yeah, thank you.

205:51

>> Are both of these in sync?

205:55

>> Are they not?

205:55

>> They're too far away for me to see them

205:57

both with my gaze.

206:00

>> Okay. Well, we'll we'll let them go.

206:01

We'll let them go. Okay. This would be

206:04

so funny if they weren't. I think they

206:06

are though. Um,

206:09

>> Exxon Fang says, "No, you're going to

206:10

lose the discount if you leave it open.

206:13

[laughter]

206:18

Adported game streaming makes me want to

206:20

die." Okay, next topic. Uh, um, oh,

206:23

>> it's time for After Dark.

206:24

>> Okay,

206:25

>> we made it.

206:26

>> Good job.

206:26

>> Hooray. I will choose to

206:29

>> another W show. Uh, consume less but buy

206:33

the things I own as much as possible.

206:36

Hooray.

206:39

Hopefully soon you get to keep doing one

206:42

of those

206:44

and it just doesn't become impossible.

206:46

>> Oh.

206:47

>> Oh, well, yeah, that

206:50

wamp wamp.

206:52

>> All right, calms lld. Any guesses on

206:56

when we will see the Steam Deck 2?

206:59

Amazing. It's not a question about the

207:02

frame. I know Valve will likely wait for

207:04

components to get cheaper first. And

207:07

Luke, has anyone told you you look a

207:09

little like Will Riker from Star Trek:

207:11

The New Generation?

207:12

>> Is he white? And does he have a beard?

207:15

>> Dan, unacceptable.

207:19

What?

207:21

Unacceptable.

207:25

Are you trying to trigger me?

207:29

Star Trek the new generation.

207:33

>> I I thought he said next. [snorts]

207:35

No, I said new.

207:36

>> You said new. My brain.

207:39

>> He knew what he did. Did you see? No.

207:42

Get back on here. Did [laughter] you see

207:44

Did you see what he did?

207:47

>> Nobody on both planes seems to be upset.

207:49

>> Unacceptable.

207:50

>> They will be now that Lionus has pointed

207:52

out.

207:52

>> Unacceptable. Daniel just auto correct.

207:54

>> Not okay. Not okay. No. Nope. No

207:57

rebuttal. You're done. You're off.

208:00

[laughter]

208:01

>> I don't even know what the question was

208:03

anymore. I'm so upset right now. Star

208:06

Trek the New Generation.

208:07

>> Yeah. What was it?

208:08

>> He's so easy. He's so easy to upset.

208:10

>> They need to They need to

208:11

>> I got to not do that. He gets upset.

208:14

>> Um any guesses on when we'll see the new

208:16

Steam Deck, too? I'm sorry, Lionus.

208:18

>> I do I do feel like personally that

208:21

Valve feels a little burned on hardware

208:23

prices right now.

208:24

>> I know, right? Um they so I think they

208:27

are probably even if they were planning

208:29

on releasing one in like late 2027,

208:31

which was an idea that I had in my brain

208:34

a while ago. Um I suspect they might be

208:36

pushing that plan back cuz I I think

208:38

they don't want to release anything in

208:40

the hardware environment that we're

208:41

currently in.

208:43

>> Straight up 100% agree. However, I do

208:46

think that the pressure is going to

208:48

build over the next couple of years when

208:50

the PlayStation 6 launches.

208:52

What's going to happen is games that are

208:55

targeting PlayStation 6 are going to

208:57

start coming out

208:57

>> and they're going to suffer

208:59

>> straight up not going to run on this on

209:01

the Steam Deck.

209:02

>> Yeah,

209:03

>> straight up not going to happen.

209:04

>> Yeah. Yeah.

209:06

>> Hello DLL. Question for Luke. Maybe tips

209:10

on motivating developers on testing more

209:13

and being proud of their work. I

209:16

>> feel like our team is like so like takes

209:18

pride in their work so much. Hire

209:21

developers who take pride in their work

209:22

maybe is step one, but I'll let you I'll

209:24

let you carry on.

209:25

>> Um, yeah, I mean that's that's tough.

209:27

Testing more is interesting. Um,

209:30

>> I don't know if you can train people to

209:32

take pride in their work.

209:34

>> You have to inspire, not train. Um, it

209:38

might be better for them if you let them

209:40

do some like developer experience style

209:42

stuff where you uh make sure that you're

209:45

giving them cycles of time where they

209:46

can

209:49

make things that already exist better,

209:51

make them easier to maintain, improve

209:53

the user experience. It's a little bit

209:55

hard to tell without knowing what you're

209:57

building. Um,

210:00

how many tests do you actually need? Um,

210:05

if you if you do need

210:07

>> that depends what you're doing. Is it an

210:08

MRI machine or is it a, you know, fun

210:10

little web game.

210:14

>> Yeah, you may still need a certain Yeah,

210:17

>> like I guarantee you this wasn't tested.

210:19

>> Zoom said 80% code coverage and it's

210:21

like, yeah, I mean, I doubt it.

210:26

>> Damn. Damn. I discovered this when I was

210:28

doing an audit.

210:30

[laughter] I think I told you about

210:31

this, Luke. I had no idea that this

210:33

existed and I

210:35

>> Yeah, you told me how you found it.

210:36

>> Don't get hit by the red cameras.

210:38

>> Yeah.

210:39

>> Crazy. Ah crap. NO.

210:43

>> NO.

210:45

>> YOU GOT OWNED.

210:47

>> NO.

210:48

>> WE SHOULD UPDATE THIS. [screaming]

210:49

>> NO.

210:50

>> WE SHOULD UPDATE THIS to computer

210:51

components and make it so that RAM is

210:53

the really bad one.

210:55

>> I'd be so down. Bring back a classic LTT

211:00

reference.

211:03

Um, yeah. I don't know. It it it it

211:05

doesn't I don't think it comes down to

211:07

convincing. I think it comes down to

211:08

inspiring.

211:09

>> Man, these MacBooks are getting me.

211:11

>> Set certain benchmarks. Find uh user

211:14

feedback. Um, show the impact of

211:17

actions. Make sure that they understand,

211:20

you know, what they're doing matters and

211:22

and why. Um,

211:26

>> yeah. I'm not sure. Sorry. I don't think

211:30

that's an incredible answer. Honestly,

211:31

without knowing the thing that you're

211:32

building, it becomes a little bit more

211:33

difficult. If I knew the thing you're

211:34

building, I could probably answer more

211:36

thoroughly.

211:38

>> I have spent almost a million dollars.

211:42

>> Ah, [screaming]

211:45

damn. Next question. He just got roasted

211:47

by a red camera.

211:48

>> Hi, DLL. What's a piece of tech you've

211:51

trained yourself to work around rather

211:53

than just replace?

211:57

Oh. Um, okay. This is going to be about

212:01

the biggest first world problem ever,

212:03

but the 115inch TCL TV in my home

212:07

theater does not have dedicated IR

212:10

signals for power on and power off.

212:13

>> Oh, my steak. It's just so juicy.

212:16

>> Yeah. You know what?

212:18

>> My lobster.

212:19

>> When you're trying to

212:20

>> Why is my lobster

212:21

>> I have to eat it out of the bowl? when

212:23

you're trying to make a setup

212:26

that is

212:26

>> it's so tender. My knife just [laughter]

212:29

>> I don't even need it. I bought this

212:30

amazing knife. I can't even use it.

212:32

>> Do you guys want to hear the answer or

212:34

not? [laughter]

212:35

>> Sorry. Sorry. I wasn't even listening.

212:38

So, the issue is that um it doesn't have

212:41

IR signals for power on and power off.

212:44

It only has a power toggle signal. And

212:48

the idea there is that well whenever

212:52

it's off you should press the power

212:54

toggle button and it will turn on like

212:56

you would want it to. And when it's on,

212:58

you should press the power toggle button

213:00

and it will turn off like you'd want it

213:01

to. But many other TV manufacturers,

213:05

even if their remote only has a toggle,

213:08

and even if they do have an IR code for

213:10

toggle, they also still maintain power

213:12

on and power off. Now, in theory, in a

213:17

perfect world, CEC is the solution. You

213:21

just power on your other device and it

213:23

passes through CEC commands and your TV

213:27

magically powers on. But in the real

213:30

world, if you happen to have more than a

213:32

couple of devices and especially if one

213:35

of them happens to be a PC,

213:39

CEC, it either isn't a thing or it

213:42

doesn't work very well. even have a $50

213:44

CC dongle connected to my PC right now

213:46

in that room that it just

213:49

>> it so what will happen is the most

213:51

recent version of trying to get this

213:53

working is that any of the other devices

213:56

with CEC if I'm using CEC to rely on it

214:00

to turn on the TV will create what's

214:02

called a CC storm which can accidentally

214:05

wake up the PC which then because it

214:07

also has CEC will then grab the input

214:10

and switch it over into the wrong thing.

214:12

It's a whole mess. And if TCL

214:16

just had power on and power off IR

214:19

commands, then I could just use my old

214:21

Harmony remote and I could press one

214:23

button and it would turn everything on

214:25

in sync, turn everything off in sync.

214:27

And see the problem with the toggle. So,

214:29

so you can use the toggle as well, but

214:32

the issue is that if anybody is like

214:33

standing in the wrong spot or does

214:36

something or or a command doesn't go

214:38

through for whatever reason, they can

214:40

end up out of sync. So, your receiver

214:42

and your computer will turn on and your

214:44

TV will turn off and then you press the

214:46

button again and your TV turns on and

214:47

your computer and your receiver turn

214:49

off. And if you're trying to set up a

214:52

setup that is family userfriendly and

214:56

that you want people to actually be able

214:58

to use, like we have a karaoke setup in

215:00

there and if my little kids can't figure

215:02

out how to turn it on, they're never

215:03

going to use it. And like that sucks.

215:05

Like why why even have it then? Um like

215:08

I'm not here. It's Friday night. I'm not

215:11

at home. If nobody can use it, if dad's

215:13

not here, that's that's stupid. That's

215:15

not technology making our lives better.

215:17

That's technology just being present and

215:20

being a cost and taking up space. It

215:22

sucks. Um and so figuring this out um

215:27

has has actually caused me many many

215:31

lost hours. Uh because CC is just ah

215:34

it's such a nightmare. Like my Nvidia

215:36

Shield actually has very granular

215:38

controls of CEC. So you can go and you

215:40

can say turn it on and when the shield

215:42

turns on um tell tell other things to

215:46

switch the input turn other things on

215:48

when other things turn on do wake the

215:50

shield you do do the do do this do do

215:52

that it's got like six different toggles

215:53

for all the Thank you for that uh it's

215:56

got six different toggles for all the

215:58

different potential triggers from either

215:59

side. Meanwhile, my AV receiver just has

216:03

one thing. C on CC off. That's it.

216:09

Great.

216:11

Thank you. Not actually helpful. And

216:15

then the same with the this useless TV

216:17

that doesn't have power on and power off

216:19

commands because so of course it

216:21

wouldn't have proper granular controls

216:23

in the CC for it as well. So you'll end

216:25

up with stupid stuff like one thing. Uh

216:28

oh, and oh, don't even get me started on

216:29

the deplorable mess that Logitech left

216:32

Harmony in when they EOLled everything.

216:35

Like if I could just get the Harmony

216:37

software to do exactly what I told it to

216:39

do. Like I I came up with this one crazy

216:42

solution where I was going to use the

216:44

Shield. I'll turn on the Shield first

216:46

and have it turn on the TV and then turn

216:50

on the PC, switch the input, and then

216:53

turn the Shield off. And I could set the

216:55

Shield to turn things on but not turn

216:58

them off. Or no, what was it? Turn

216:59

things on but not be turned off by other

217:01

things. And then I wanted to create a

217:03

power down sequence that would actually

217:04

power up the Shield, turn off the PC and

217:07

the receiver. No, turn off the PC, then

217:10

have the shield turn off, which would

217:11

turn off the receiver and the TV. Like I

217:13

had like figured it out. This is the

217:15

kind of stupid workaround that

217:19

no one should have to do. But like I I

217:21

was at the end of my I was at the end of

217:23

my freaking rope. And then that

217:25

ultimately didn't work because the

217:27

harmony software doesn't allow you to

217:29

just arbitrarily turn this on and then

217:31

turn that on, then put a delay anywhere

217:32

you want. You can only put delays in

217:34

certain spots. And I'm like, if it just

217:36

completely got out of my way and let me

217:38

do whatever I wanted, then I would have

217:40

automations that would work. And yes, I

217:42

know that there are replacements to the

217:43

Harmony, but none of them solve the

217:45

underlying issue of that my TLC

217:48

TV doesn't have dedicated power on and

217:51

power off commands, and I don't want to

217:53

replace it because to replace it would

217:55

cost me like anywhere between 20 and

217:57

$30,000. So, so, so that and it still

218:01

looks pretty good.

218:02

>> Will work.

218:02

>> Well, it's a pain in the butt.

218:03

>> Yeah, it's huge. You got to haul it out

218:06

of there and Yeah, kind of a nightmare

218:09

um for me. me, I don't think I have an

218:12

amazing answer. I think mine is more

218:15

just that the Bluetooth in my car has

218:16

become unreliable. Um, I don't really

218:20

want to do surgery on my car and replace

218:22

the media console. Um, so what I have

218:28

done is I bought one of these things.

218:30

Let me see. Uh, I'm aware of the

218:33

unfolded circle. I actually have one at

218:34

home and I'm going to try it out. I

218:36

don't know if it's going to help though.

218:38

So the best ca the the best solution I

218:40

can come up with now is that I need to

218:42

create a Jarvis at home kind of thing

218:45

that uses the camera view uh in the in

218:48

the home theater to determine if the TV

218:51

is on or off

218:53

>> and then

218:54

>> you try to do that with Adysius

218:55

>> and then try to figure out some kind of

218:57

an automation so that it will reync it

218:59

if it gets out of sync. That's like

219:00

that's the the only solution I can come

219:02

up with right now that has

219:04

>> knowing that the problem exists but that

219:05

sounds pretty cool. Um, but yeah, I I

219:08

bought one of these

219:10

um off of UG Green's actual website

219:12

because I didn't want to get off Amazon.

219:14

Um, and I, you know, my phone can

219:18

connect to two different Bluetooth

219:20

devices. So, while it's sitting there

219:22

repeatedly trying to actually connect to

219:23

my actual car and failing over and over

219:25

and over again, I can just connect to

219:27

the UG Green adapter. It doesn't sound

219:29

quite as good as just natural Bluetooth

219:31

right to the car, I'm assuming, because

219:32

of the ox connector, but it sounds

219:34

pretty all right. Um, it's not the end

219:36

of the world or anything.

219:37

>> It's actually probably more to do with

219:38

just like lowquality Bluetooth.

219:41

>> Okay. I never really dove into it. I

219:42

just assumed it was the ox, but yeah, I

219:44

don't know. Um,

219:48

um, and I will I will hear there's like

219:52

a slight amount of lag that will happen

219:54

when it finally connects the the other

219:56

Bluetooth connection to my car. So, I'll

219:58

hear the song just kind of like and then

220:01

keep playing. Oh, yeah. And I'll be

220:02

like, "Okay, cool. I can switch to the

220:03

Bluetooth my car now." And like usually

220:05

it's not a problem. Usually the

220:06

Bluetooth will just connect

220:07

automatically. But every once in a while

220:09

it'll take like 10 minutes

220:12

and it's like nah I could have been

220:13

listening to music or a podcast or

220:14

whatever and that's just kind of

220:15

annoying. This was like an $18 Canadian.

220:18

Plug it in once. It has worked every

220:20

single time forever since then. Sure,

220:23

why not?

220:27

Cheers DLL. Regarding our luggage weight

220:31

chat 6 months back, it's OSHA limits for

220:34

baggage handlers. That's why the cap is

220:36

per bag, not total. Um, it's like I

220:40

think it's 50 lb per bag, which is the

220:42

maximum single person carry.

220:44

>> Yes. So, Flare,

220:47

totally aware. So then why is it that

220:50

what they actually wanted me to do was

220:52

just pay more

220:57

if they're not allowed to lift the bag

220:59

at the weight that I had. I'm aware of

221:00

that.

221:03

>> That was not why I that was not why I

221:05

lost it. Why I lost it was that my bag

221:08

was well within the limit of what they

221:11

are allowed to carry. It was just over

221:14

the weight allowance before you have to

221:15

pay a bit more for it. And my partner's

221:19

bag was like 20 lb under the limit while

221:22

I was like 2 1/2 lb over it.

221:26

They would have been fine.

221:33

Howdy, DLO. Could we get a material cost

221:36

breakdown for the socks? I'm an AV tech

221:39

and these socks would have been magical,

221:41

but $15 a sock is tough. Side note, the

221:44

screwdriver has been a reliable tool.

221:48

Um,

221:49

material breakdown, I think it's

221:51

actually right on the packaging. 33%

221:53

polyester, 30% marino wool, 18% nylon,

221:58

13% acrylic, 6% spandex. They almost had

222:03

60% marino wool. Um but what we actually

222:06

found was that there was a significant

222:09

amount more pilling on the 60% marino

222:13

wool uh due to the natural fibers and we

222:16

have enough of it

222:19

in the current composition to this is

222:23

this is an area where we actually have

222:24

to be really careful because we did

222:27

independent third party testing and

222:29

found that because of the thickness of

222:31

it um which is like due to the cushion

222:34

which is like a desirable thing that we

222:36

don't want to get rid of because of the

222:37

thickness. It doesn't actually dry very

222:40

fast. Like I will not I will not

222:42

advertise this as a quick drying sock.

222:45

But what I can say subjectively as the

222:48

person who's been doing a a lot of the

222:50

wear testing for it is that when and if

222:53

my feet do get exposed to moisture

222:55

either through their own

222:59

secretion of moisture or outside

223:01

factors, um they still do subjectively a

223:06

good job of making my feet not feel

223:08

super wet. So they still have that

223:09

natural wicking quality. Um, and that

223:13

was something that we weren't really

223:14

sure how to sell. Um, so we didn't so we

223:17

just don't really talk about it in any

223:19

of the marketing on the site or or on

223:20

the packaging. Um, but we what I found

223:23

was that with the 30% marino wool, you

223:25

still get that benefit. Um, and so not

223:29

having the ugly pilling and having

223:32

something that kind of looks a little

223:34

nicer, um, and, you know, feels more

223:36

reassuringly quality after a few washes,

223:39

um, and still having all the the

223:41

benefits of the natural fiber. As far

223:43

as, you know, my wear testing goes, um,

223:47

that was why we ultimately landed on

223:49

this composition. As for why it's so

223:50

expensive,

223:52

I don't know if you noticed, but

223:54

everything has gone up in price. And we

223:57

are not like outside of the price band

224:00

for like a like a a a high quality

224:04

marino wool sock. And we've got the

224:07

copper infusion

224:09

um that helps with odors. I'm not

224:12

allowed to say antimicrobial,

224:14

but what I can say is that everyone

224:17

knows where odors come from and it

224:19

reduces odors.

224:23

>> Wow, I didn't say nothing.

224:25

>> Stunning.

224:25

>> Uh, so it's it's a really cool it's a

224:27

really cool treatment.

224:29

>> Um,

224:31

and

224:35

I mean, creator warehouse teams got to

224:37

get paid.

224:38

uh lifetime a limited lifetime warranty

224:40

costs money. I mean that's something

224:42

that I feel like I've I've kind of

224:45

harped on before and people get mad at

224:46

me for it sometimes, but like there is

224:49

no free lunch. Ultimately, the consumer

224:52

pays for everything and we felt that in

224:55

terms of creating a total package around

224:59

these that was going to be competitive.

225:01

Um, it was going to be we we had to

225:04

weigh the cost of what that warranty is

225:07

likely to cost us against what our

225:10

positioning is going to be in the

225:11

market. And what we determined was that

225:14

it's probably going to if we didn't do

225:18

it, we would still be so close to

225:20

competitors who do offer it that the the

225:24

value proposition would not be as good.

225:27

So, we're better off baking some

225:30

warranty fulfillment into the cost

225:32

understanding that um you know that is

225:36

going to drive the price up a little

225:37

bit. Like it's all it's like boring.

225:39

It's boring business stuff. Um, but why

225:41

does it cost so much? Because things

225:43

have gotten freaking expensive. We

225:45

actually had a uh we had a quarterly um

225:48

financial meeting. Luke was in it um the

225:51

other day and uh one of the things that

225:54

came up is that due to tariffs and uh

225:58

fuel sir charges and just general

226:02

inflation, our cost of goods sold is up

226:06

by deep into double digit percentage uh

226:10

over the last honestly not that long of

226:12

a period of time. And we've done

226:15

everything in our power to try to keep

226:17

our our external prices reasonable as

226:21

much as we can for customers.

226:22

>> There's some

226:24

This might sound weird and my god am I

226:27

old and lame, but there's actually been

226:29

some really cool stuff that's been done

226:30

to try to keep that stuff down. There's

226:33

that team's been working.

226:35

>> I know. And it's and you know what? It's

226:38

been really uh it's been really

226:41

discouraging I think both for the team

226:43

and for and for ownership to be very

226:48

blunt with you guys right now. We're

226:49

deep in the WAN show. So, you know,

226:51

hopefully I'm not going to, you know,

226:53

say anything that's going to get me into

226:54

too much trouble here, but like

226:57

everyone in an org working like harder

227:02

for a worse result is super demoralizing

227:04

across the board. And especially when

227:07

the whole thing is so unnecessary,

227:10

um it's really frustrating. And so yeah,

227:12

I just want to take a moment, I guess,

227:14

then to to acknowledge the incredible

227:17

[snorts] work that the team is doing to

227:20

make this less

227:22

>> that's happening actually across the

227:24

board because

227:25

>> yeah,

227:26

>> CW is dealing with, you know,

227:29

>> oil issues, costs of everything going up

227:32

largely related to oil issues, but

227:33

sometimes not 100%. um tariff

227:36

nightmares. Uh the LMG side is dealing

227:40

with um from talking to a bunch of

227:42

creators recently, it feels like all of

227:43

VOD is slightly down and one of the

227:48

underlying assumptions is that it's just

227:51

watch time going to shorts.

227:52

>> Yeah. So all of VA is slightly down

227:54

right now and the PC space has hurt like

227:58

most of anything because everything's

228:00

just so expensive and the hobby is very

228:02

difficult to be interested in right now

228:03

because the stuff that's coming out

228:05

isn't all that interesting or new or

228:06

crazy or it's just for AI and it's all

228:11

mind-bogglingly expensive compared to

228:13

how expensive it used to be. Um so it's

228:16

it's tough to make content in that realm

228:18

that people want to watch and engage

228:19

with. And then you get on the flow plane

228:21

side. We have a similar problem. When

228:23

it's tough for people to be interested

228:25

and watch and engage with this type of

228:26

content, people are going to

228:27

unsubscribe. And also, we're dealing

228:30

with AI pressures where if we're in a in

228:33

a data center, that data center rack

228:36

space is going to have people that want

228:38

to bid on it for way more. Also, that

228:41

data center who has to constantly buy

228:43

and refresh their hardware is paying way

228:45

more for it now. So they are going to be

228:50

in some cases massively increasing their

228:52

prices and even just the services the

228:54

software as a services that we're using

228:56

they are running into the same problems

228:58

with their bills. Therefore they are

229:00

going to increase the prices on us. So

229:02

actually every single segment within the

229:05

umbrella organization is like under some

229:08

form of like effectively attack.

229:10

>> Want the kicker?

229:13

>> Yeah. badminton shuttles. [laughter]

229:18

>> No way. I think you told me this.

229:21

>> Mega inflation.

229:22

>> I never really thought about it. So,

229:24

yeah. I guess literally everything. Oh,

229:26

>> so this one's fun because um apparently

229:30

it's a it's a duck feather shortage that

229:33

comes down to changing dietary habits in

229:36

China.

229:38

[laughter]

229:40

>> Okay. And you can only use the feathers

229:42

from the left wing which really doesn't

229:44

help and it's it's a whole thing. Um

229:49

yeah basic [laughter]

229:51

>> so somebody somebody in in full plane

229:53

chat said full plane is sinking question

229:54

mark question mark question mark cat

229:56

said. So I want to address uh we are not

229:59

going quietly into the night. I I just

230:01

mentioned

230:02

>> we've got some cool ideas.

230:03

>> I just mentioned that the CW team has

230:05

been moving and shaking and and making

230:07

things happen and doing some really cool

230:09

creative stuff.

230:10

Don't count flow plane out. We've got

230:12

some strategies. AJ's been cooking up um

230:14

some stuff we can do that will likely

230:16

make it into videos. I'll say that much

230:19

so far. I don't want to commit to plans

230:21

cuz the plans are still being made. Um

230:23

but we're not just sitting here going

230:24

like, "Oh no, the bill's going up. I

230:26

guess we're just screwed." Um we're

230:29

we're working on on making a um

230:34

Full Plane's whole thing was that it was

230:36

supposed to be

230:38

defendable against sustainable and

230:41

defendable against the bill changes that

230:45

other companies might have. The idea was

230:47

that we were supposed to be uh able to

230:50

be free from lock in and all that kind

230:51

of stuff. So this is just our biggest

230:54

test. Rod uh posted in float plane chat,

230:58

"You could just fill the Smash Champs

231:01

building with water,

231:03

play underwater hockey, and call it

231:05

Splash Champs." We wouldn't even have to

231:07

make that many changes to the sign, just

231:09

the one letter. It's actually genius.

231:12

[laughter]

231:13

Two letters. Sorry.

231:15

>> My god.

231:16

>> I mean, you could take an M. Hold on. M.

231:19

You could make the L out of part of the

231:21

M. So, you just buy one more P and then

231:23

you're in good shape.

231:25

>> Yeah.

231:26

Yeah, that's fantastic.

231:30

>> Oh, this is interesting. Raiden 428

231:32

says, "Hawaii also imports lots of

231:34

Chinese feathers for making cloaks, etc.

231:37

Same shortage. We use the entire bird,

231:40

though. Uh, price is up and can't get

231:42

some types at all. I guarantee you it's

231:43

the left wing you can't get get any of

231:47

>> for making cloaks, they said. Yeah, I I

231:50

don't know what a Hawaiian cloak looks

231:52

like, but what I do know is that we need

231:53

to drop in on this timer and find out if

231:56

I can still get my $3 off. Get it before

231:59

it's gone. It's Oh my god, that this is

232:01

so like early 2000's web. Look at it

232:04

turning my cursor into a popsicle.

232:07

>> Look, it's it's 310.

232:10

I don't

232:11

>> I don't want 92% off expired. Okay. So,

232:15

if

232:16

>> you actually lose it,

232:17

>> I mean, can I just refresh it?

232:20

>> It's $30 now. So, it's just

232:23

>> That's crazy. There's no way.

232:25

>> Hold on. There's no way. Okay. Buy now.

232:28

Hold on. Can I still get my $3 off? I

232:31

want my $3 off. Where's my $3 off,

232:35

>> dude? Scammer gets scammed. You took too

232:37

long.

232:38

>> I got wrecked.

232:38

>> That's actually crazy. I can't believe

232:40

they actually followed through on it.

232:41

>> Wow. They They're committed. [laughter]

232:44

commit. Commit to the grift.

232:46

>> I'm also surprised by just refreshing

232:47

you can't like get through it. That's

232:49

wild.

232:50

>> Everyone's like, "Clear cookie. Clear

232:51

cookie."

232:52

>> We know it's a cookie.

232:54

>> Yeah. It's just It's I'm just surprised

232:56

they actually like did it.

232:57

>> Yeah. Me, too.

232:59

>> I thought it was going to hit zero and

233:01

they're going to be like, "We're going

233:01

to be nice to you this time."

233:03

>> Last chance. Last chance.

233:04

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

233:06

>> Yes, Conrad. We know.

233:09

[laughter and snorts]

233:10

>> All right, Dan. Hit me.

233:12

>> Uh, sure.

233:13

Would you recommend the Steam Cube for

233:15

people that are moving off consoles and

233:17

looking for their first PC?

233:21

>> It's hard for me to recommend the Steam

233:24

Machine at the price that it's at.

233:27

>> Yeah.

233:28

>> Um,

233:29

and right now I would say that you just

233:35

shouldn't move off your console. Like I

233:37

think the timing is so bad.

233:39

>> Okay, here's a question. When do you

233:41

think the timing would be better?

233:43

>> It's hard for me to say because I don't

233:45

know what PlayStation 6 pricing is going

233:47

to be.

233:47

>> TSMC is going up.

233:48

>> Yeah, but

233:49

>> memory is not signaling that it's going

233:51

down.

233:51

>> Right now, I can buy a PlayStation 5 for

233:54

like under $500. This is literally half

233:57

the price.

233:57

>> That's a way better deal.

233:59

>> This is half the price of a Steam

234:00

Machine,

234:01

>> dude. PC is so cooked right now.

234:03

>> Yeah. $470.

234:05

I mean, the last Scrapyard Wars, I

234:07

literally won it by buying a used

234:08

PlayStation 5,

234:09

>> and it wasn't even that bad then.

234:13

Wow. That equation just got way better.

234:15

How much was yours? Do you remember?

234:17

>> Uh um I I want to say three.

234:19

>> I remember it being like a crazy deal.

234:22

>> 375

234:23

>> even back then, meaning that those

234:24

prices are probably decently similar to

234:26

where they used to be.

234:27

>> Yeah. I mean, this is this is not a bad

234:28

deal. No. $425 bucks plus $35 shipping.

234:32

You get a controller, an HDMI cable, a

234:35

USB charging cable, and a PlayStation 5.

234:38

Um, 98.6%

234:41

positive ratings out of 9.2,000

234:43

ratings. Like, just this is the disc

234:45

edition, too. Just buy it. Like, no,

234:48

don't buy a Steam machine.

234:50

>> Kind of depends on what console they're

234:51

on.

234:52

>> Um, and and and you'll be able to play

234:54

GTA 6, which you will not be playing on

234:57

a Steam machine. This is a This is a

234:59

more performant

235:01

computer. Like for for the for the

235:03

difference. You could buy this

235:04

PlayStation, you could buy a $500 PC, do

235:07

all your computing on the PC, do your

235:08

gaming on the PlayStation. Like look,

235:09

I'm obviously I'm I'm a very pro PC guy.

235:12

I freaking love PC. I love PC gaming,

235:15

but

235:15

>> PlayStations are a ripping deal.

235:17

>> I'm also not out here to give you bad

235:19

advice.

235:19

>> Yeah.

235:24

Rod Rosenber.

235:32

Okay, Rod is forwarding a message from

235:38

>> uh the the guy who Yeah, thank you Jill.

235:41

Uh the guy who made the Linux migration

235:43

tool um we talked about on WAN last

235:46

week. It it helps you migrate from

235:47

Windows over to over to Linux. Supports

235:49

a whole bunch of dros. Does some really

235:50

cool stuff. I'm currently doing a

235:52

quadruple dual boot test because this

235:56

tool was originally not built to install

235:58

multiple Linux distros. Also, kudos for

236:00

getting the first part of my name

236:02

correct. Good job, Linus. Uh the second

236:04

part is Dutch for pigeon.

236:08

>> Sick.

236:08

>> Okay, cool.

236:09

>> Nice.

236:10

>> Keep up the good work.

236:11

>> That's awesome. That's a It's a cool

236:13

tool, man. Um

236:16

hell yeah. Sweet. Thanks for forwarding

236:18

that, Rod.

236:19

>> Dan, hit me. Hi, DL. I am a university

236:22

professor and I'm getting

236:23

>> Oh, speaking of Dan, hit me. I ran into

236:25

the guy who made the thing.

236:26

>> Me, too.

236:27

>> At open.

236:28

He specifically requested that I come

236:31

and find it.

236:31

>> Yeah, it's uh it's over there. Show it

236:33

again.

236:34

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

236:36

>> I uh

236:42

>> So, he just he made a little plugged in

236:44

right now. Yeah. Yeah.

236:45

>> I told him I told him that I uh that I

236:48

kept it on a shelf behind me and he he

236:50

assumed that we had thrown it out

236:51

immediately.

236:52

>> No. And I was like, "No, shut up. You're

236:54

wrong, dude. It's so funny.

236:55

>> That's amazing.

236:56

>> This is art, man."

236:57

>> Oh, yeah.

236:57

>> Why would we throw it away? This is This

236:59

is like This is one for the archive.

237:01

>> Yeah.

237:01

>> Yeah. We're keeping this forever. I'm so

237:03

sorry.

237:03

>> That's fantastic.

237:05

>> Anyway, sorry. Hit me, Dan.

237:06

>> Hi, DL. I'm a university professor and

237:09

I'm getting iPad kids in my first year

237:12

programming. We were talking about this

237:14

earlier.

237:15

>> One couldn't even type. Just two

237:18

fingerpacking.

237:20

>> With AI tools,

237:22

>> will the next gener I mean Oh yeah.

237:24

Again,

237:26

what they don't understand as well is

237:27

file systems are a big one, right?

237:29

>> Yeah.

237:30

>> With AI tools, will the next generation

237:33

even need keyboards?

237:34

>> I mean, they'll need them, but will they

237:35

know how to use them? That's the

237:37

question.

237:37

>> Can't they just talk to like uh Copilot,

237:40

Siri, Google? There's a meme. There's a

237:43

It's I'm pretty sure it's just a meme,

237:45

but there is a Silicon Valley meme where

237:48

programmers are getting rid of their

237:49

keyboards because they're just speaking

237:50

to their agents.

237:52

>> I don't I don't see that as as too much

237:54

of a meme, honestly, given another 6

237:56

months.

237:57

>> I don't want to sit there and freaking

237:59

talk all the time. I want to type. Does

238:01

that make me all the kids are wrong?

238:02

Boomer.

238:03

>> Boomer.

238:07

>> Sometimes you just want to relax. It's

238:09

not relaxing. Yeah, but you can sit on

238:11

the couch with your eyes closed and just

238:12

go like

238:14

>> It's It's also

238:14

>> center me a div.

238:15

>> It's always funny to me how obviously

238:19

forever alone certain developments are.

238:21

Like the fact that you can be talking

238:23

and not disturb anybody tells me so much

238:25

about you. [laughter]

238:27

Just jabbering at your computer all day

238:29

like, "Okay, tell me you don't share a

238:33

space with someone without telling me

238:34

you don't share a space with someone."

238:36

>> That's a good point. [laughter] Like, oh

238:39

man,

238:41

>> I'm stuck.

238:42

>> Unintentional self own

238:45

>> going into university.

238:46

>> Yeah,

238:47

>> for software development, not knowing

238:48

how to type is wild.

238:50

>> That's crazy, man. And the fact that

238:52

nobody at any point told this kid, maybe

238:56

don't go into software development.

238:58

>> Yeah. Or like spend a weekend

239:00

>> Yeah.

239:01

>> on on uh what is it called? Um, a lot of

239:05

a lot of people I think just go into

239:07

software development because they think

239:09

it's got good money in it. And I think

239:11

one of

239:11

>> still [laughter]

239:13

>> one of I don't know.

239:14

>> Yeah. I mean, it's it's like it's what

239:17

you read about. I think maybe one of the

239:18

reasons why it's so nice working here

239:21

and maybe why your developers are so

239:23

good is because they like like it. It's

239:26

kind of like fun and it's their hobby

239:28

and they just happen to have gone to

239:31

school for something they enjoy.

239:33

>> Some of them Some of them didn't go to

239:35

school. They just skipped that part.

239:37

[laughter]

239:38

>> Started working professionally.

239:40

>> Yeah. I think a lot of

239:43

>> Yeah. I didn't I didn't go to school for

239:44

this really. [laughter] Uh

239:48

which is it's interesting.

239:51

What are they going to do? What are they

239:53

going to do? Are we cooked?

239:56

like as a species I think quite

239:58

literally like we're we're past the one

240:00

and a half degrees threshold, right?

240:02

>> Uh yeah, quite quite far.

240:04

>> Yeah.

240:06

>> Yeah.

240:06

>> Cooked and

240:07

>> But that's okay. The solution is to turn

240:08

on more air conditioning, right?

240:10

>> Yeah.

240:11

>> That's how it works.

240:12

>> Mhm.

240:12

>> Well, we just had a record of power use

240:14

for all time in BC.

240:16

>> Just build more nuclear power. What are

240:18

you guys talking about?

240:18

>> I said to

240:19

>> I mean, I'm actually kind of pro-

240:20

nuclear power, but everybody should be.

240:23

I said I like just we

240:25

>> I'm more green than both of you. I said

240:27

we should add another ocean.

240:28

>> Could you maybe virtue signal harder?

240:31

>> Just make another ocean. [laughter]

240:33

>> Yeah, because we're we're hydroelectric.

240:34

We don't use stinky buildings. Um

240:37

>> yeah, but hydroelectric only works. So

240:38

So uh

240:39

>> so just build another mountain.

240:41

>> We just import Mount Baker.

240:43

>> I think this is before your time. Did

240:45

you No, you're post B, right?

240:48

>> We did a company workation to B.

240:50

>> I'm five. allowed. So I I also don't I'm

240:54

>> post post.

240:55

>> So we did an LMG work to

240:57

>> B [laughter]

240:59

>> and uh we went to see a glacier and they

241:03

showed us like like an actual walking

241:07

stepping up the hill the like spikes in

241:11

the ground for how much it was receding

241:13

every year. And we were like

241:17

oh well that's not good. Um what's the

241:21

solution? And they're like, "There isn't

241:24

one." And we're like, "Okay, so

241:29

what's the outcome?" And they're like,

241:32

"Well, this glacier has water runoff,

241:36

which is, you know, how it like melts

241:38

and stuff that fills these bodies of

241:41

water, which powers all this hydroele

241:43

electricity. When it's gone,

241:47

there will be no electricity." And I was

241:49

like, "Oh,

241:53

>> time for nuclear enrichment."

241:59

>> Well, I mean, if we're already over 1.2,

242:01

then can we just like go back to dirty

242:04

coal?

242:05

>> No, we just give up.

242:06

>> We just need we just need to make an air

242:07

conditioner for the Earth.

242:11

>> So, giant mirrors.

242:12

>> Just put the heat.

242:14

>> Just put the heat.

242:15

>> Data centers in space.

242:17

>> Yeah. Well, we just get a big ice cube

242:19

and then put it in the ocean.

242:22

>> Maybe we should cool the data centers in

242:24

space with ACs that dump the data

242:26

centers and space heat on Earth.

242:28

>> Put a big peltier outside in

242:31

geocynchronous orbit.

242:33

>> Yeah.

242:33

>> Watching the data centers in space

242:35

debate has been

242:38

fascinating.

242:40

I don't know if I can remember the last

242:43

time that both sides of an argument were

242:45

so effectively arguing past each other.

242:49

It's like you've got the one side that's

242:52

like they did the math. It's totally

242:54

possible. They have a ton of experience

242:56

with building satellites and cooling

242:59

things in space. And then you've got the

243:01

other side saying there's a lot of

243:04

practical problems like how do you swap

243:06

a RAM stick and also like the costs of

243:10

the launches which by the way fuel is

243:12

not getting cheaper and also

243:14

>> like it's impractical and

243:17

stupid. Not that it's impossible. Not

243:19

that the math doesn't work, but the real

243:20

world is not just math. And they're just

243:22

going, "Oh,

243:24

>> what we really need to do is not use use

243:28

uh uh uh traditional launching

243:31

mechanisms. What we really need to do is

243:32

just spin stuff." Really, really cool.

243:34

>> That thing's cool. I love spin.

243:36

>> I hope if it ever works, it's really

243:38

cool.

243:39

>> If it ever works, for sure.

243:41

>> It's Do you guys know what this is?

243:43

Basically, you just rip it around this

243:46

like thing. You spin it and then it goes

243:48

boom.

243:50

>> Yeah,

243:50

>> theoretically it's like a throwing

243:52

speed.

243:52

>> I think it makes a lot more sense on the

243:54

moon to launch things away from the

243:56

moon.

243:57

>> On Earth,

243:59

>> I don't know.

244:00

>> It's just you just push stuff to Mars if

244:02

you were on the moon.

244:06

[laughter]

244:07

>> I mean, compared to here, you know, you

244:09

give it a hard kick.

244:11

>> Yeah.

244:13

Uh, okay. Let's see. [laughter]

244:16

D I recently helped someone connect to

244:18

Wi-Fi eighth gen Intel laptop and it

244:22

couldn't find the couldn't find any of

244:26

the wireless bands from the newer router

244:29

and could only connect to the stock

244:33

at router

244:33

>> AT&T. Stop at stop pretending.

244:36

>> I'm not pretending. This one's actually

244:37

really difficult. Uh ever heard of this

244:40

before?

244:41

>> AT&T.

244:42

>> AT&T. There's no amperand. Oh, it's a

244:43

it's a Mars Attacks reference.

244:47

[laughter]

244:53

God, I love that movie. [laughter]

244:56

Um,

244:58

yeah, wireless is Blackmagic. Um,

245:06

one of my one of my ongoing problems,

245:08

boy, am I ever leaning into the first

245:11

world problems on this stream, is that

245:13

this laptop, my Stricks Halo laptop,

245:17

cannot connect to the Wi-Fi access point

245:19

on the Falcon. It's pretty annoying.

245:22

Actually, I should have gone with that

245:23

for my workound. So, what I have to do

245:25

is I have to connect my ZFold 7 to the

245:30

Wi-Fi in the air [laughter] and then I

245:33

have to enable my mobile hotspot and

245:35

then I have to hotspot to my laptop

245:39

>> at 38,000 ft.

245:41

>> Can we add more things? Can we add more

245:44

things?

245:45

>> Oh, no.

245:47

>> My fruit is too vibrant.

245:50

My my steak is too juicy. My lobster is

245:52

too buttery.

245:53

My internet not working down here is

245:57

actually not a my my fruit is too

245:59

delicious problem.

246:00

>> My whisy's too oy [laughter]

246:03

>> my boo has too no my my laqua has too

246:06

much fruit flavor.

246:08

[laughter]

246:09

>> I mean that would be a problem. It's

246:12

supposed to be basically unpleasant.

246:16

>> Oh man.

246:16

>> Uh but yes, I've I've heard of randomly

246:19

Wi-Fi things that supposedly are

246:21

interoperable. just not working with

246:24

each other. Yes, I've heard of that. Uh

246:26

it sucks basically.

246:29

Um

246:31

yeah, sorry to hear that.

246:34

>> Hi l John says my heavy dick drags on

246:38

the floor. [laughter]

246:41

[clears throat]

246:44

[laughter]

246:51

>> [laughter]

246:52

>> Oh man. Okay.

246:58

[laughter]

246:59

>> Oh no. Did I say Lacro? Is Lacroy? I

247:02

don't know.

247:02

>> I think I said Lacroy. I don't know.

247:05

I think it's I don't buy TV static.

247:09

>> Oh man. Do people even know what that is

247:11

anymore? Oh my god. I am old.

247:12

>> TV static.

247:13

>> Yeah, you're probably old.

247:15

>> All right. Hit me, Dan.

247:17

>> Uh, hi LLDD. Darn tough socks aren't

247:20

available in Australia, so I've been

247:22

waiting for the LD socks forever.

247:25

>> Why not?

247:25

>> Luke, what does a typical leg day look

247:28

like for you? I can't wait to work out

247:31

and travel in these good socks.

247:33

>> You really have been waiting for them.

247:34

You bought five pairs. [laughter] That's

247:36

crazy. Four black/gray.

247:39

And then just to spice it up, that one

247:41

day a week, you got the magenta. Very

247:44

nice.

247:44

>> I like that.

247:45

>> Very nice. That's a That's actually a

247:46

pretty

247:47

>> kind of makes sense to me.

247:48

>> Yep. Okay.

247:50

>> Business in the lots and party in the

247:52

few.

247:52

>> All right. Tell us about leg day.

247:54

>> Uh so I have knee problems. So I start

247:56

mine by reverse walking on a treadmill

247:58

where I I

247:59

>> Wouldn't you start by waiting a bit?

248:01

>> Oh my god.

248:08

>> That that reverse walk is awesome.

248:10

>> Okay.

248:10

>> I really really liked that. Yeah. I've

248:13

>> never You look like How do you How do

248:14

you keep the food in it, though?

248:17

>> Oh, that's good. I like that one. That's

248:20

like a top 10 2026 right there.

248:22

>> It is. It is. It is tough on the uh

248:26

[laughter]

248:28

>> It is social anxiety scale cuz you look

248:31

psychotic.

248:32

>> Oh, yeah. Okay. Well, if you have a

248:34

buddy and you're both doing it,

248:35

>> if you have a buddy, it helps a lot.

248:37

>> That's easy.

248:37

>> Even if the buddy's just like chatting

248:38

with you while you do it or something,

248:40

it helps a ton. You could be doing any

248:41

stupid thing in the gym and if someone

248:43

else is doing it, you feel totally fine

248:45

about it. I've totally experienced that

248:47

exact same thing.

248:48

>> I don't think you've done stupid things

248:49

on the level that some people do in the

248:51

>> No, that's and that's totally true. But

248:53

I'm also very shy and I worry about

248:56

pictures of me on Reddit. So, I

248:58

definitely have

249:01

>> anxiety about doing stupid things in the

249:03

gym. And if someone else is doing it, it

249:05

like goes away.

249:07

>> Yeah. Unless it's cross. Okay. So the

249:09

the the thing is that you're fighting

249:11

the resistance of the treadmill. So you

249:13

actually don't want to turn the

249:13

treadmill on. You leave it off and you

249:15

you face backwards on the treadmill and

249:18

you kind of brace yourself on the arms

249:20

of the treadmill and then push the

249:22

treadmill like

249:25

>> the

249:26

right direction. Yeah. U but yourself

249:29

with it unpowered. And then that can

249:32

help warm up your knees. You'll feel it

249:33

in your quads a little bit as well, but

249:34

that can help warm up your knees. For

249:36

me, that's very important. If I don't

249:38

start my leg days with that, the chance

249:40

that I end up with some form of injury

249:44

like genuinely skyrockets. This is very

249:46

important for me. Um, depending on the

249:49

day, I will also do these weird lunges

249:51

that I don't know the name of. Um, where

249:54

the goal is to get your knee kind of

249:56

like as far over your toe as you can

249:59

without bringing your heel off the

250:00

ground on your lead leg and then your

250:03

back leg goes like very very far back.

250:06

Um, I I also I don't know if you're

250:08

supposed to do this. I allow myself to

250:09

go a little wide with the stance on

250:11

that. Um, so I don't fall over. Um, but

250:14

yeah, I I will often do those things

250:16

maybe while I'm like waiting for someone

250:17

to do something. Um, from there once I'm

250:20

warmed up again for knee stuff for me, I

250:24

will go and I will do a bunch of quite

250:27

low weight hamstring curls um to to kind

250:31

of wake the hamstrings up and stuff.

250:33

Once I'm done those, I will go and bang

250:35

out just a bunch of squats because hell

250:37

yeah. Uh, and then I will go and torture

250:40

my quads in some way by either doing

250:42

lunges until I can't or

250:45

>> do you do weighted lunges or regular

250:46

lunges? Well, or both like like

250:49

>> usually

250:50

>> start low weight and then work a way up

250:52

or

250:53

>> uh I really have so traditionally I

250:56

would I would do some pyramid thing

250:58

where I'd start on lower weights and

250:59

work my way up. Uh, what I've been

251:01

enjoying lately is the bags

251:03

>> because the bags are kind of like weird

251:05

to hold. And one of the things I like

251:07

from lunges is just the stability aspect

251:09

of like moving with weight. So, I'll

251:10

carry the bags and usually the bags are

251:12

kind of more annoying to deal with. So,

251:14

I I will stay fixed, but I'll carry a

251:16

decently heavy bag.

251:18

>> Um,

251:19

so it's either that or leg extensions.

251:22

And again, I'm just like trying to burn

251:23

down my quads basically. So, I'll just

251:25

go really hard and then I'll end it

251:27

again with light hamstring curls because

251:29

heavy hamstring curls have a tendency to

251:31

really

251:33

wreck my knees. So, a lot of leg day is

251:35

like dodge the knee problems, but train

251:37

the legs.

251:39

>> Sounds like the biggest ones is the

251:41

squats and lunges.

251:42

>> Yeah.

251:42

>> Okay.

251:43

>> I really like squats and lunges. Squats

251:45

squats and lunges are good.

251:46

>> Cool.

251:47

>> Yeah.

251:48

>> Hey, weigh people. What? Hot take

251:49

>> one. One quick second. Sorry. Gas Racing

251:51

said bags help with balance. Change

251:53

shoulders too. Yeah, I'll carry the bags

251:55

in a variety of ways. Kind of like zer

251:57

by holding it like this or go on one

251:59

shoulder or go on the other shoulder. I

252:00

will tend to move them around a decent

252:02

amount. Uh because I am trying to shift

252:04

how the balance works. Um it's

252:07

interesting that it said help with

252:08

balance. Um maybe with training balance.

252:11

I found uh dumbbells or kettle bells to

252:14

be the best for balance for me, but I

252:18

don't actually know what like the answer

252:19

to that is. One of the reasons why I

252:21

went to bag was actually because I found

252:22

it was less stable.

252:23

>> I can uh I can tell you that the only

252:26

professional badminton players who have

252:28

ever showed me how they practice

252:29

weighted lunges used dumbbells.

252:31

>> Yeah.

252:32

>> So that's the only piece of information

252:34

I can provide.

252:34

>> I don't think you guys have weighted

252:36

bags though.

252:37

>> Uh no, but that's what they do.

252:38

>> Oh yeah.

252:39

>> Yeah. In their own gym, that would be

252:40

what they do.

252:41

>> Weighted lunges are fantastic.

252:43

>> Yeah.

252:44

>> And I like I started doing it. He's

252:46

like, "No, no, you have to push off

252:47

explosively with the weight." And I'm

252:49

like,

252:49

>> nice.

252:50

>> Oh,

252:50

>> well that's cuz you guys are trying to

252:51

go for like pome pometric movement and

252:53

stuff.

252:54

>> Sure.

252:54

>> Which is awesome. That's very cool. I

252:56

like that type of training.

253:00

>> Get me Dan.

253:01

>> Hey Wan [snorts] people, what hot take

253:03

of yours from the past 5 years turned

253:05

out to be totally on the money or turned

253:07

out to be totally wrong?

253:08

>> Adblock is fundamentally piracy. I have

253:11

seen the uh I've seen the conversation

253:14

dramatically change as people have

253:16

developed more of a relationship with

253:20

the creators that they follow and

253:21

understand the economics of the creator

253:23

economy better. Um as people just have

253:27

become more familiar with the idea. It's

253:29

not so shocking anymore. There's still

253:31

people who are like super offended by

253:33

that and that's nice. Um doesn't really

253:36

matter. I mean, at the end of the day, I

253:39

never said, "Don't pirate."

253:40

>> You're drawing your own line.

253:41

>> What I said was, you know, decide what's

253:43

right for you, but understand the

253:45

impact. That's all I ever said. And um

253:49

one of the one of the funniest and it's

253:51

it's been interesting watching the way

253:52

the the dieards who have not given in on

253:55

this have kind of moved the goalpost.

253:56

Like one of the big arguments at the

253:58

beginning was, you know, Google doesn't

254:00

define it that way on the YouTube

254:01

platform. And then it was like shortly

254:03

after that YouTube did update their

254:05

terms of service and was like, "Yeah,

254:08

like doing anything that counters our

254:11

our ad delivery mechanisms is against

254:13

toos." And like, yeah, it's like super

254:15

against toos. It's the form of payment

254:18

for the the content that you are

254:20

consuming. And if it's not worth it to

254:22

you, then the not pirate version of that

254:25

is you don't consume it or you do

254:28

consume it. Or option number three,

254:30

conveniently in the shape of a hat, uh,

254:33

is you just own it. And I never said

254:36

don't do it. Don't own it. All right. I

254:38

never said don't do it. I just said own

254:40

it. That's all. And uh, as for ones that

254:45

turned out to be totally wrong. I mean,

254:46

I always go back to this one. Back when

254:48

that first guy uh, bought a house with

254:50

Bitcoin, I was like, "This is stupid.

254:52

This will go absolutely nowhere." And

254:54

now I wish I had had Bitcoin at that

254:56

time.

254:57

>> [laughter]

254:59

>> Uh yeah, I I forgot about the wrong

255:02

side. So I'll kind of steal similarly

255:04

from that. I remember very early days

255:06

when we were both still at NCX. Uh we

255:08

were looking around at a bunch of GPUs

255:10

in the room and I was like maybe we

255:11

should put these on benches and mine

255:13

coins and then just kind of like

255:14

shrugged and didn't bother.

255:16

>> Yeah. We both were like maybe we should

255:18

and we both just didn't bother.

255:20

>> Yeah. We looked at like how much it took

255:21

to mine a whole coin and we were like

255:24

>> that would take too many weeks.

255:27

>> Yeah. Or days even.

255:29

>> You only get 10.

255:31

>> Yeah. [laughter]

255:32

>> Oh, no. It was way more than that in a

255:34

block, wasn't it? Like 50 to 100.

255:36

>> It was crazy.

255:38

>> So that's that's I think about that

255:40

surprisingly often cuz we had so much

255:42

access to hardware.

255:44

>> We could have free power. We could have

255:46

just left it running there. Nobody

255:47

cared.

255:48

>> No, not at all.

255:50

um thing that ended up being true.

255:54

>> I mean, I think the most the most like

255:59

Luke just crystal balling the future has

256:03

was probably drone warfare, but I don't

256:04

know if that was on WAN.

256:06

>> Maybe not on WAN.

256:08

>> Like

256:08

>> I've been talking about that for a long

256:10

time.

256:10

>> Like really long time. Like basically

256:13

going back like years before the Russia

256:17

Ukraine conflict. like talking about how

256:20

like when is everybody going to figure

256:23

out that swarms of cheap drones with C4

256:26

on them is going to completely

256:30

completely invalidate any kind of at the

256:33

time modern air defense um this is a

256:36

huge problem. How is nobody paying

256:38

attention to this? We had like a ton of

256:39

conversations about it. Do you see the

256:41

Do you see uh do you see Britain's laser

256:43

gun?

256:44

>> Yeah, that's pretty cool. Very

256:45

interesting

256:46

>> because rate of fire is now however much

256:49

power you can feed it.

256:50

>> Yeah.

256:51

>> Um that that one's pretty cool. The

256:53

range looked actually pretty decent on

256:54

it. But like I mean it's only it's

256:58

literally an arms race.

257:01

>> Like

257:01

>> I wonder how a really rapidly spinning

257:03

drone that you can't really see will

257:05

apply to that.

257:05

>> Yeah. But it wouldn't be able to What

257:06

kind of a payload could it carry?

257:08

>> Tiny. Tiny.

257:09

>> Right. But then how big of a payload do

257:11

you need to assassinate a person?

257:13

>> If you're shape charging a single

257:15

person, you might be able to get away

257:16

with it. It's it's the whole thing is

257:18

very interesting, but it's my argument

257:20

and this was a very very long time ago,

257:21

but my argument was that the industrial

257:24

might has always been an incredibly

257:27

[snorts] important part of war,

257:29

especially going back to like the

257:31

origins of Total War with Napoleon and

257:33

stuff. And if you look at industrial

257:34

right might right right now, it's pretty

257:37

centralized, bruh. And that centralized

257:40

place is really good at making

257:44

>> what?

257:45

>> Batteries.

257:45

>> Lots of small cheap

257:47

>> motors.

257:48

>> Yeah. All of those things,

257:50

>> plastics, like pretty much everything

257:53

involved. Cameras, honestly. Um like

257:56

like honestly everything involved.

257:57

>> Chemicals.

257:58

>> Yeah. Yeah. Lit literally everything

258:00

involved. Critical minerals. Do you want

258:02

us to keep listing things?

258:03

>> Particularly really good at making. And

258:05

I'm looking [snorts] at the the the

258:07

equations for how something would go

258:09

with what kind of volume they could

258:11

output if China went on a total war path

258:14

and was just like, "Okay, every single

258:16

factory in the country is now doing

258:17

this." Like,

258:21

cool. Nice laser, bro. [laughter]

258:25

I don't know, man. I think uh [snorts]

258:30

I think we would all be lucky little

258:32

people if the Russia Ukraine war is the

258:35

end of it's I mean it's literally not

258:37

even the end. We saw we've been watching

258:40

this with Iran.

258:42

It's Anyways, yeah.

258:44

>> Do you see that Ukrainian drone that's

258:46

just like made out of plywood?

258:48

>> You knew the one I was talking about

258:49

immediately.

258:50

>> Yeah. [laughter]

258:51

>> That thing is sick.

258:52

>> That is wild.

258:55

It's uh

258:56

>> the second rev of it that had the like

258:58

way extended range is crazy.

259:01

>> Yep.

259:03

>> The climate wars are going to be nuts.

259:10

>> Jamon says China's building a dozen

259:12

nuclear reactors. Uh I don't maybe 10x

259:15

that number. I have no idea how many

259:16

they're actually building, but China's

259:18

working on some really cool like small

259:20

modular ones that look sick. And I

259:23

guarantee you they're building more than

259:24

a dozen of them. You might be right

259:26

about the like large scale ones though.

259:27

>> There was some interview. I think it was

259:29

between Zalinsky and Trump, but I

259:31

actually don't remember. I didn't really

259:33

care about who he was sitting next to.

259:34

The quote

259:35

>> Oh, yeah. Yeah. Do you want to go to

259:36

Moscow to meet with Putin?

259:39

>> Uh I I won't go to Moscow. Too many

259:41

Ukrainian drones there.

259:43

>> So funny, [laughter] dude. Oh my god.

259:46

And it was fast.

259:48

>> Yeah. Well, it's almost like he was a

259:50

comedian in Another Life.

259:51

>> Yeah. M yeah,

259:53

>> dude's sharp.

259:54

>> That was That was like Oh [laughter] my

259:56

god.

260:00

>> Will you Will you go to Yeah. Anyways,

260:03

wild. Last one I got for you today.

260:05

Yeah.

260:06

>> Also for Luke,

260:07

>> I know you're not super impressed with

260:08

your Switch 2, but was just wondering if

260:11

you're going to pick up Splatoon

260:12

Raiders. Seems to be Nintendo's take on

260:15

Looter Shooter.

260:16

>> Really?

260:19

A looter shooter.

260:20

>> Splatoon Raiders.

260:22

by Nintendo in current year.

260:26

>> It's out already.

260:31

>> What is this? I actually really enjoyed

260:33

the first Splatoon. I actually I

260:35

genuinely thought it was a good game.

260:37

Um, if it's multiplayer only, honestly,

260:39

I'm I'm not interested at all. Um, and

260:42

honestly, if it's single player, the

260:43

game

260:44

>> scour the spiralite islands,

260:46

>> search for treasure, fighting big. Okay,

260:48

so there's PvE stuff involved.

260:51

Fight Salmonoids. Gather salvage and

260:54

uncover mysteries of the islands.

260:58

>> Is this PvP? How does this work? Tink

261:00

with your gear, man. Tarov, but you're

261:04

actually uh squid is

261:07

>> single player in this single player

261:09

focused game. Play as a mechanic.

261:11

>> Huh.

261:11

>> Can you play co-op though?

261:13

>> If you can play co-op,

261:14

>> this seems like it would be super fun

261:16

co-op. probably just going to get it if

261:18

if you can play a co-op. Um,

261:21

>> with your gear, something something.

261:24

Speed tank, power tank, tactical tank.

261:28

>> The gameplay looks pretty fun. Moving

261:30

swim ink.

261:32

>> Okay. Okay. Okay. The mechanic. Anyone?

261:35

Anyone?

261:35

>> Different archives.

261:38

>> Co-op. Anyone?

261:40

I'm going with chat because this is not

261:42

telling us nothing.

261:44

Dialing.

261:45

>> Call our friends for help. You can also

261:46

join up with up to three other players

261:49

online or via local wireless.

261:51

>> If do you not need an like the Nintendo

261:54

thing?

261:54

>> The game will scale power automatically

261:56

to make sure everyone has a good time.

261:58

Okay, that looks pretty fun.

262:00

>> That genuinely looks really fun.

262:02

>> Very cool.

262:03

>> Uh there was a double asterisk on the

262:05

Okay. Additional games and systems

262:08

required for multiplayer mode sold

262:09

separately. It doesn't say that you need

262:12

>> Yeah,

262:12

>> that's pretty cool.

262:13

>> That is so wicked. Every once in a

262:15

while, Nintendo does something pretty

262:17

cool.

262:17

>> This genuinely looks sick. I will

262:18

probably get this. I didn't know this

262:20

existed. Thank you for the heads up.

262:22

>> All right, I think that's uh pretty much

262:25

it for today.

262:26

>> Wicked.

262:26

>> We'll see you guys again next week. Same

262:28

bad time. Same bad channel.

262:31

>> Bye.

262:33

It's not doing it. It's not doing it.

262:36

>> Oh. Oh no.

262:37

>> Okay, I guess show goes forever now.

262:39

>> Oh no, we got to wait another week.

262:42

Yeah, the the physical version [music]

262:44

being so much more expensive is so like

262:47

>> what do I do?

262:48

>> $15 Canadian for 10 US. I don't know.

262:52

It's worth the ref.

262:53

>> Let's watch him panic.

262:54

>> Be able to get at least $10 off flipping

262:56

the physical version.

262:57

>> What do I do?

263:00

Oh, there it is. Bye.

263:02

>> Oh, now he's stuck there. [laughter]

263:07

>> I uh I had it. Um it's an invisible.

263:10

This is all invisible over it. Uh, and I

263:13

had it disabled because of the feet cam.

263:15

So,

Interactive Summary

The video covers several tech news topics, starting with Nvidia's new Vera data center CPUs, which the hosts believe could eventually influence consumer CPUs towards stronger individual cores. Framework faced issues with memory pricing for its laptops, leading to pre-order adjustments. Microsoft introduced a backwards compatibility program for original Xbox games on PC via Game Pass. The hosts critiqued Xbox/Bethesda's management for stagnant game development and long release cycles, while also expressing excitement for a new Obsidian Fallout game. Nintendo is facing a class-action lawsuit for not refunding customers after blaming tariffs for price increases, despite receiving its own tariff refund. LTTStore launched "Forever Socks," discussing product challenges. There was a strong critique of the Canadian school system regarding grading, teacher unions, and academic focus. LG was found pushing McAfee bloatware via Windows Update, sparking debate on automatic driver installs. The discussion also touched on AI's impact on education, whether PC building is a luxury hobby, and Apple's new device leasing program. Finally, the potential release of Steam Deck 2 was discussed.

Suggested questions

10 ready-made prompts