HomeVideos

Stocks Rise, Fed Hike Bets Ease After Tame US CPI | Bloomberg Daybreak: Asia Edition

Now Playing

Stocks Rise, Fed Hike Bets Ease After Tame US CPI | Bloomberg Daybreak: Asia Edition

Transcript

450 segments

0:00

[music]

0:02

Bloomberg Audio Studios podcasts radio

0:06

news.

0:08

[music]

0:10

Welcome to the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia

0:12

podcast. I'm Doug Krer. Equity markets

0:15

in the Asia-Pacific are poised for gains

0:17

in the Thursday session. This is after

0:19

the latest print on US inflation matched

0:22

expectations and that seemed to ease

0:24

concern about an imminent rate hike from

0:26

the Fed. We had the S&P 500 coming

0:28

within striking distance of a record

0:30

high. Chipmakers rallied and that seemed

0:32

to lift the NASDAQ 100 to a one-mon

0:34

high. Coming up, we'll hear from Aaron

0:37

Sai, senior multiasset strategist at

0:39

Pictt Asset Management. But we begin in

0:42

the Lion City. Joining me now is Mark

0:44

Cranfield, Bloomberg Mive Strategist. He

0:47

joins from our studio in Singapore. I

0:50

appreciate you being here and can I ask

0:53

for you to give me a kind of your sense

0:55

of what's going on with with the

0:56

Japanese yen? I mean, it seems like two

0:58

weeks ago we had the US and Japan

1:02

essentially surprising the market with a

1:04

coordinated intervention. It's is it too

1:06

much to say that this has failed?

1:09

>> Um, I wouldn't say failed. They bought

1:11

some time. I mean there was a

1:13

possibility that if they had done

1:14

nothing that dollar yen would have just

1:17

continued to grind higher and and who

1:19

knows where the the top side could could

1:21

be under those circumstances if you

1:23

allow traders to think that a market's

1:26

become a one-way bet uh you could risk

1:29

sending it to unprecedented levels and

1:32

and of course the contagion risk as well

1:34

it may have spread across Asia other

1:35

currencies may have got involved it may

1:37

even gone global um it may have stirred

1:39

up markets in Europe Europe and and

1:42

South America as well. So certainly the

1:44

consequences of doing nothing could have

1:46

been quite extreme if the let's say the

1:48

yen had drifted on to 170 180 something

1:51

like that you could have had a global

1:53

crisis on your hands. So certainly they

1:56

bought themselves some time. Clearly

2:00

from a a big picture point of view,

2:01

unless monet monetary authority comes

2:04

alongside currency intervention, you

2:07

will not get a long-term impact on the

2:08

currency unless the Bank of Japan steps

2:11

up and does its job and convinces

2:14

investors [snorts] that it is ready to

2:15

really take rates to the neutral level

2:17

to address the inflationary problems in

2:19

Japan. Then people will start to say,

2:21

"Okay, both hands are clapping together

2:24

here. We've got full commitment from the

2:26

central bank, from the monetary

2:27

authorities. Everything is coming

2:29

together. Here we are. It's a change in

2:31

direction of the yen. Until you see

2:32

that, then the yen will basically stay

2:35

as an undervalued currency.

2:36

>> So, speaking of hands, what if the Fed

2:39

were to essentially sit on its hands and

2:42

do nothing in a rate environment that

2:44

may argue for higher interest rates? If

2:48

the Fed were to just remain on hold for

2:50

a while longer, does that necessarily

2:52

provide a little bit more support?

2:54

>> Um maybe not that much. The the issue is

2:58

that the markets can see there's a bit

3:00

of a disconnect here. We just just last

3:02

night we had the um US the budget

3:06

deficit numbers came out above 400

3:08

billion for July when it was forecast to

3:10

be 300 something more than 25% above

3:13

forecast. That number is extraordinary

3:16

and it doesn't seem to have a cap. It

3:18

just investors are not convinced that

3:20

the US authorities are trying their best

3:23

to rein in the deficit in the United

3:26

States. That means that the long end of

3:27

the Treasury curve will continue to be

3:30

under upward yield pressure. We saw

3:31

yesterday the 10-year auction needed the

3:34

highest yield since 2007 to get the

3:37

bonds cleared. And we have a 30-year

3:39

auction coming today. prospects are not

3:41

great for that 30-year auction today. As

3:44

long as you have that continuous upward

3:46

pressure in the long end of the US

3:49

Treasury yield curve, it will gradually

3:50

filter through even towards the shorter

3:53

maturities regardless of whether the Fed

3:55

is on hold or not on hold. The bond

3:57

vigilantes will decide for themselves

3:59

where they think interest rates should

4:01

be. And of course, at a certain level,

4:03

high yields will support the the US

4:06

currency. So that makes the carry trade

4:08

more attractive again for the Japanese

4:10

and other currencies as well, not just

4:12

the the Swiss Frank we're seeing under

4:14

pressure as well, relative pressure at

4:16

the moment as well. So whether the Fed

4:19

keeps on hold for the rest of this year

4:20

or not, the Treasury yield curve will

4:23

decide for itself where it thinks is the

4:26

fair compensation based on the inflation

4:28

data it sees, based on the budget

4:30

deficit in the United States and other

4:32

factors which will always affect the

4:35

bond market regardless of what the

4:36

central bank does.

4:37

>> So I'm curious as to whether or not you

4:39

suspect that we could see another

4:41

intervention on the part of monetary

4:44

authorities in Japan. maybe not in

4:47

coordination with US authorities. And if

4:50

we wind up in that situation, is there

4:52

the risk that Japan could essentially

4:55

sell US treasuries to raise dollars?

4:58

>> Um, they already really already appear

5:00

to have sold some treasuries to help

5:02

with the most recent intervention that

5:04

seems to have already happened. So, you

5:06

would expect that should they need to um

5:08

intervene again, that's the first piece

5:10

that we go. They haven't. Um although

5:12

Scott Besson was talking about this uh

5:14

FEMA situation where they could go to

5:16

the to borrow essentially money through

5:20

SOP arrangements to to get the US

5:22

dollars they need without needing to

5:24

sell US treasuries. That issue was

5:26

raised. The Japanese don't seem to have

5:28

taken any advantage of that so far.

5:30

Maybe they will be pushed into into the

5:32

future but traditionally they will wear

5:35

down their their sovereign investments

5:37

before they get to such issues. So from

5:40

the Japanese point of view, yes, if they

5:43

if they need to do aggressive

5:44

intervention again, you would expect the

5:46

first place they will go is to reduce

5:49

some of their holdings of US bonds.

5:51

>> So in terms of the macro story in Japan,

5:53

we have a lot of economic data in the

5:55

coming week, including second quarter

5:57

GDP figures. Give me a sense of your

6:00

read on the Japanese economy right now.

6:02

How are things holding up?

6:03

>> Uh it's going well. I mean Sane Takichi

6:06

the prime minister has got a clear

6:08

objective of reflating the Japanese

6:11

economy. They're getting fantastic

6:12

investments because of they do have some

6:15

AI sectors which are very attractive at

6:17

the moment. So you got companies like

6:18

Taiwan Semiconductor biggest chip maker

6:21

in the world making huge investments

6:23

into Japan to build plants to help to

6:27

maintain its its amazing production. is

6:29

already production levels. People are

6:31

buying whatever chips they make and

6:33

their order books are full well into

6:35

2027. They they can make as many chips

6:37

as the world can take and Japan is now

6:40

becoming a big base for them there. So

6:42

you're seeing and that's just one

6:43

example of companies who are going to

6:45

the specialized kind of um AI products

6:48

which Japan can produce. So that's very

6:51

very good for the economy and under

6:53

Takichi the government has a clear sense

6:55

of what is needs to be done to get the

6:58

the Japanese economy back on track and

7:00

we're beginning to see signs of it

7:01

already. Japanese companies are making

7:03

very good profits. Company stock market

7:05

is pretty bulliant and of course the

7:08

relatively weak yen helps their

7:10

situation. The I think that's partly

7:12

what investors can see is that Japan

7:15

doesn't have a very big incentive to

7:17

change the direction of the yen. If they

7:19

can keep it relatively weak but stable,

7:22

that's the ideal environment for Japan.

7:24

So for them to to really change the

7:27

mindset that the yen is suddenly a

7:29

strong currency that doesn't really suit

7:31

them at the time this time anyway.

7:32

>> All right, Mark, good stuff. Always a

7:34

pleasure. Thank you. Bloomberg's Mark

7:36

Cranfield M live strategist joining from

7:38

our studios in Singapore here on the

7:40

Daybreak Asia podcast.

7:48

[music] Welcome back to the Daybreak

7:50

Asia podcast. I'm Doug Krer. Information

7:53

tech shares are higher in early Asian

7:55

trading. That's after the Philadelphia

7:57

semiconductor index rose 2.5% in the US

8:01

session. There were some disappointments

8:03

after the US close. Cisco systems

8:05

earnings failed to impress and Cerebra

8:08

Systems reported a decline in sales for

8:10

its hardware business. For a closer look

8:13

at the AI trade and markets more

8:15

broadly, we spoke with Aaron Sai. He is

8:18

senior multiasset strategist at Pictet

8:20

Asset Management. Aaron spoke with

8:23

Bloomberg TV host Heidi Straoud Watson.

8:25

Sherry on on the Asia trade.

8:27

>> Aaron, really great to have you with us.

8:29

Uh let's start off with these sort of AI

8:32

heavy markets. We're seeing that

8:34

recovery in the Korean markets again.

8:37

What do you make of the volatility and

8:39

where do you see the opportunities in in

8:41

these AI heavy spaces like Korea by

8:44

extension also a bit in Japan, Taiwan

8:46

for example?

8:48

Yeah, I mean the good thing is that uh

8:50

we have managed to digest a historical

8:53

unwind in the the momentum uh trade and

8:57

um part of the reason why we've why

8:59

equities are back at an all-time high.

9:02

Um despite that is there is an element

9:04

of a rotation within the AI space. If

9:07

you if you look at the AI trade um we

9:09

think we're already in the in the third

9:11

phase of the trade. The first phase was

9:13

the rising tide lifted all AI boats.

9:16

anything with uh an AI in the ticker

9:19

went up. Uh the more capex the better.

9:22

Um that then um transitioned into a

9:24

phase where we saw rotations between

9:27

hyperscalers and capex beneficiaries and

9:30

that has played out for pretty much the

9:32

last year. Where we are today we think

9:34

is going to be a more nuanced phase

9:36

where single stock differentiation and

9:39

dispersion matters. We think uh if you

9:41

take the the Hypixcalers for instance,

9:44

they're going to tread a very fine

9:46

balance between keeping capex up but

9:48

still because they're now relying on the

9:51

market for additional capex spending,

9:53

they would have to continue to to

9:55

provide evidence for monetization. So

9:57

it's a fine balance and we don't think

9:59

all companies can pull that off equally

10:02

well. So that's why we are kind of

10:04

seeing the dispersion between names at a

10:06

single stock level and we think that

10:08

would uh continue. But overall by and

10:11

large we still think that we are in the

10:13

early innings of the capex buildout. We

10:15

are going to have cycles around it. Of

10:18

course we have digested a fair bit of

10:20

uncertainty in the AI ecosystem and

10:23

we're reasonably constructive now but

10:25

it's important to be selective. Does the

10:27

broader monetary policy backdrop uh

10:29

particularly if we have inflation

10:31

staying benign as this most re recent

10:33

reading seems to suggest does that paint

10:36

a longer runway when it comes to how

10:38

much more we could see from the AI

10:40

rally?

10:41

>> Absolutely. So in a way we had the the

10:44

perfect print um yesterday. It was a is

10:46

in a way a dull print, but sometimes

10:48

boring is good because what that lets

10:50

you do is then focus on the um on the

10:53

micro on the fundamentals of um the the

10:56

AI ecosystem and that we think is still

10:59

very strong, right? So we're still in

11:01

the middle of uh the first genuine

11:04

earnings uh upcycle since the commodity

11:07

super cycle. Um we are in a phase where

11:10

demand is high when supply is

11:12

constrained and companies are earning

11:15

what we can call supernormal

11:16

profitability. um so what you don't need

11:20

is for the macro picture to muddle that

11:22

story too much. Um which is why it's

11:25

important that um the the the US long

11:28

end bond deals remain contained. Um so

11:31

we were getting a little worried about

11:33

uh the the Fed um kind of withdrawing

11:35

forward guidance and the bond market not

11:37

digesting that very well. But given that

11:40

we've had a couple of soft prints um as

11:42

you say that kind of definitely is a is

11:45

a sigh of relief for the market and that

11:47

lets the focus go back to the micro

11:50

fundamentals.

11:53

You we spoke a little bit about you know

11:55

obviously not not all companies are

11:56

going to thrive in this new era of more

11:59

scrutiny on AI spending. Where do you

12:01

prefer to place your bets then? Is it

12:03

still overweight when it comes to the

12:05

yield birth? Are you looking more at

12:07

diversification in China for example

12:09

because that's obviously where that

12:11

major threat is also coming from.

12:14

>> Yeah. So we still are relatively

12:16

constructive the US. We think uh the

12:18

earnings uh upswing is is quite strong.

12:21

We expect about 30% earnings growth this

12:23

this year. That's uh that's quite a

12:26

powerful tailwind. But the real

12:28

differentiator for of performance within

12:30

equity markets would be uh along sector

12:33

lines we think not so much between

12:35

regions because if you think of a theme

12:37

if you if you're constructive memory u

12:40

you would probably consider Micron and

12:42

SKH highex uh if you're constructive

12:44

broadening out of the the AI theme into

12:47

data centers and spending of data

12:49

centers. If you're looking for cap goods

12:51

uh names, we wouldn't differentiate too

12:54

much between a Schneider in Europe or a

12:56

um or or or a Caterpillar in the US for

12:59

instance. So for us, it's not really uh

13:02

regional um diversification, but more

13:05

about uh being in the right sector. So

13:07

we're still selectively constructive

13:09

tech. Um we think that the AI ecosystem

13:12

broadens out from here. Um but we're

13:14

also constructive banks, banks both

13:17

across emerging markets and uh the US.

13:20

Um and finally, we like areas of

13:22

industrials as well.

13:24

>> I wanted to also ask about what we're

13:26

seeing with Treasury markets. We've got

13:28

that 30-year auction coming up soon.

13:30

Where do you see yields are? You've

13:32

talked about the potential for becoming

13:33

unanchored from here,

13:35

>> right? So, thankfully, we've got a

13:37

couple of soft prints. We had a a soft

13:39

labor market print and we had a pretty

13:41

benign CPI print. So that kind of takes

13:44

the heat of um uh what was the central

13:47

debate in the bond market which was the

13:49

sudden withdrawal of forward guidance

13:51

essentially means that bond managers now

13:54

have to continue doing their job with

13:56

one less tool in their toolkit something

13:59

they've relied on uh for for pricing um

14:02

for pricing bonds and especially if you

14:04

think of the long duration they're

14:06

demanding and I think rightfully so an

14:09

additional uncertainty premium given

14:12

that it's not obvious what the new

14:14

framework is going to be or even what

14:16

the new uh right data series is going to

14:19

be in terms of inflation for them to to

14:21

look at. So I think in a way um uh we

14:25

were it's it's a sigh of relief that we

14:28

had a couple of soft prints because the

14:29

conversation moves away from what is

14:32

happening in the long end in terms of uh

14:34

the term premier um and the data is

14:37

letting uh some of these hikes which

14:39

were previously priced in unwind. Um so

14:42

that's giving some relief to the bond

14:44

market. So um we would be a bit more

14:47

uncomfortable if the the data picks up

14:50

again and then it's back to uh how the

14:53

wash fed um decides to to to signal

14:58

their framework going forward.

15:00

>> You've talked about outdated notions of

15:02

sector and styles. How does that play

15:04

into how you're investing at the moment?

15:06

Can you give us an example?

15:08

>> Right. So um coming back to the

15:09

hyperscalers I mean if you think of the

15:11

the traditional um definition of how

15:14

benchmarks like MCI look at it you you

15:17

have Amazon for instance in consumer

15:20

discretionary you have meta in

15:22

communication services you have

15:24

Microsoft in software in information

15:26

technology so if you if you're following

15:28

a strictly topdown approach of um

15:31

selecting asset allocation first and

15:34

then regions and then sectors what you

15:37

often do you're going into buckets which

15:40

don't very well capture the opportunity

15:42

set. So if you want to be constructive

15:45

hyperscalers and if you wanted

15:47

diversified basket you you need the

15:50

ability to to invest across a few

15:52

different sectors. So the world has

15:55

moved on, markets have moved on in terms

15:58

of um these definitions, these labels

16:01

not really being fit for purpose

16:03

anymore. um but uh we are still catching

16:06

up in terms of um how the nomenclature

16:08

works. So that's why it's important not

16:10

to be straight jacketed by some of these

16:12

definitions. And uh as another kind of

16:16

point there is uh the importance of

16:19

value versus growth we think is uh

16:22

overestimated today. I mean in the past

16:24

this used to be the single different uh

16:27

single biggest differentiator of

16:29

performance within equities. We think

16:31

that'll be uh no longer the case. If you

16:33

think of AI, if you think of

16:34

electrification, these are broad mega

16:38

themes which have winners on both the

16:41

value side and the growth side of the

16:43

market. So it's no longer about just

16:45

picking one style definition or sticking

16:48

strictly to sector definitions, but

16:50

having the ability to be flexible and

16:53

nimble and not be straight jacketed by

16:56

uh by outdated labels. That was Aaron

16:59

Sai, senior multiasset strategist at

17:01

Picttet Asset Management in conversation

17:04

with Bloomberg TV host Sheron and Heidi

17:07

Strad Watts bringing you their

17:09

conversation here on the Daybreak Asia

17:11

podcast.

17:14

Thanks for listening to [music] today's

17:15

episode of the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia

17:18

Edition podcast. Each weekday we [music]

17:20

look at the stories shaping markets,

17:22

finance, and geopolitics in the

17:24

Asia-Pacific. You can find us on Apple,

17:26

Spotify, the Bloomberg Podcast YouTube

17:29

channel, or anywhere else you listen.

17:31

Join us again tomorrow for insight on

17:33

the market moves from Hong Kong to

17:35

Singapore [music]

17:36

and Australia. I'm Doug Krer, and this

17:39

is Bloomberg.

Interactive Summary

This Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast discusses the current state of equity markets, focusing on the impact of recent US inflation data, the Japanese yen's valuation, and the evolving landscape of AI-related investments. Experts analyze the role of monetary policy, the impact of US Treasury yields, and why traditional investment classifications, such as sector or growth/value labels, are becoming less relevant in the current economic environment.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts