Dario actually made this argument in the

context of trying to ban export of

chips. And the argument was that we want

to have a data center full of geniuses

in the US. And that eventually, you

know, what AI is going to be used for is

you're going to be able to create all

these agents that are basically Nobel

Prize-winning level scientists. And if

we have thousands or millions of those

and China has only dozens or a hundred,

whatever, then we're going to win

everything. And that was the whole

argument. But now,

we're basically banning the data

centers. We're not going to have those

data centers full of geniuses. And he's

done his best to restrict sale of chips

to our allies as well. So, I guess our

allies aren't going to have the data

centers, either. So, we are totally

shooting ourselves in the foot. And

probably it would be a good thing if

Dario really does believe in the data

centers full of geniuses

idea that he was arguing for last year,

he should come forward and say, "We're

making a big mistake by over-regulating

data centers. Here's how we should do

it." I haven't heard him step up in that

way. And it makes you kind of question,

do you only fight for the doomer side of

the argument? Or are there versions of

the positive side that you're willing to

fight for politically?