HomeVideos

DOGE vs USAID, Crypto Framework, Google's $75B AI Spend, US Sovereign Wealth Fund, GLP-1s

Now Playing

DOGE vs USAID, Crypto Framework, Google's $75B AI Spend, US Sovereign Wealth Fund, GLP-1s

Transcript

2598 segments

0:00

I have four pieces of advice for people

0:02

number one get good sleep number two

0:04

exercise number three diet number four

0:06

meditation and if you want to do that

0:08

it's very simple you get the calm

0:10

meditation app you get the eight sleep

0:12

sleep you get the fitbod for fitness and

0:15

then you

0:16

get G what a gri he's just talking about

0:20

his

0:21

Investments those are the four things

0:23

you focus

0:24

on the four Essentials you get a good

0:28

Athena assistant all this is brought to

0:30

you by my NGO which is Allin NGO USA

0:34

gave us18 Million last year guys I

0:35

forgot to tell you about it but don't

0:38

worry it's an offshore account for all

0:39

of us when we get back to Ethiopia and

0:42

Vietnam we have an all-in castle built

0:44

there

0:46

okay let your winners

0:48

[Music]

0:49

ride

0:53

David and instead we open source it to

0:55

the fans and they've just gone crazy

0:57

with it love queen of I'm going all in

1:02

all right everybody welcome back to the

1:03

Allin podcast the number one Maga

1:07

Finance business

1:10

and personal optimization Health yes we

1:13

are now larger in the health space then

1:16

huberman Tim

1:17

Ferris and uh Peter AA combined yes

1:21

we've really started to grow the Pod and

1:24

uh if you want to you can subscribe to

1:27

the podcast on x.com YouTube Spotify and

1:30

all those other

1:32

places especially if you want to have an

1:35

incredibly positive

1:37

World enlightening conversation with Ray

1:40

doio you can tune in too fredberg and

1:42

Ray doio on the channel great

1:44

conversation it's gotten three or

1:46

400,000 views already on YouTube how's

1:49

the feedback been Dave got so much great

1:51

feedback on your ray Doo is it the end

1:53

of the Empire or were we coming back

1:55

what's awesome is a lot of the

1:57

recommendations he shared is becoming

2:00

policy it seems for the Trump

2:01

Administration

2:03

Elon and bessent and others in the

2:06

administration have echoed trying to get

2:08

government deficit below 3% of GDP that

2:11

seems to be the economic magical number

2:14

and if you can do that rates drop I

2:15

think that's resonated it was great to

2:17

have him publish that a couple of weeks

2:18

ago talk with us about it it's great

2:20

great bonus content from the team at

2:22

Allin today we're super excited to have

2:25

our friend Antonio graas joining the

2:27

show Antonio is

2:30

the CEO of Valor Equity partners and

2:34

he's made some he's made some solid

2:36

Investments he was one of the First

2:37

Investors in Tesla SpaceX Athena uh tons

2:41

of great or he's a second investor in

2:43

Athena after me uh welcome to the

2:45

program Antonio he put slightly more in

2:48

thank you Jason I was also in Uber with

2:49

you too by the way yes yes I did the you

2:52

did the series a I believe or the bay

2:54

what did you do right behind you we were

2:55

in the bay behind yes you were in the

2:57

shervin round okay well welcome to the

3:00

program Antonio graas and uh we've got a

3:04

full docket today and we might even have

3:06

a special caller from the White House

3:09

today no promises but you never know we

3:11

are 17 days into the Trump 2.0

3:14

presidency and seems like the main

3:17

character gentleman is Doge the

3:19

department of government

3:21

efficiency and uh they seem to have

3:23

found a little known agency us a let's

3:27

unpack it and talk about us Aid and Doge

3:30

maybe in three acts the first one let me

3:33

just uh educate the audience on what US

3:35

Aid is and then get y'all's General

3:38

reaction to it most Americans probably

3:40

haven't heard of us Aid it stands for

3:43

the United States agency for

3:44

International Development was

3:46

established by JFK by an executive order

3:48

back in 1961 Wall Street Journal summed

3:51

up its purpose as quote make friends and

3:53

influence countries in the American

3:55

interest according to the US gov website

3:58

the purpose of us Aid is to extend

4:00

assistance to countries recovering from

4:02

disaster got a budget of about $45

4:05

billion a year under Biden and uh that's

4:08

about 150 bucks per American per year

4:11

they have at least 10,000 employees or

4:13

did and as of 2023 they had programs in

4:16

130 countries obviously there's 195

4:19

countries in the

4:21

world and uh the budget doubled under

4:24

Biden from 26 to 45 the budget was

4:27

between 15 and 20 billion during Trump's

4:30

first

4:31

term but the White House and uh I guess

4:34

Elon and the Doge team found out about

4:38

this us aid went in there and found all

4:41

kinds of interesting spend $2.5 million

4:44

to fund EV charging station in Vietnam 2

4:47

million for sex changes in

4:49

lgbtq activism in Guatemala 1.5 million

4:53

to a Serbian lgbtq group 70k for a Dei

4:57

musical 47k for a trans gender Opera in

5:00

Columbia uh the Dei musical by the way

5:03

is in Ireland so if you get if you you

5:05

make it to Galloway you can see that Dei

5:07

musical this went on and on and it has

5:10

become quite a

5:12

story Antonio you're our guest here this

5:15

week you and I and saxs and Elon spent a

5:19

little time at Twitter during the

5:21

Takeover where I think a lot of these

5:23

techniques were first put into action

5:27

your thoughts on what's happening with

5:28

Doge

5:30

I mean look Jason first want to thank

5:32

you guys for having me um it's great to

5:33

see

5:34

everyone you g see the musical I like to

5:37

see music no I booked it we're all going

5:39

to the what is it

5:41

called is there actually a name of the

5:44

musical yeah it's Dei comma the

5:48

musical oh man it's a heartwarming story

5:51

I apologize getting a job sorry guys

5:54

you're not qualified for I apologize

5:56

yeah so I I think the I think the Doge

5:58

uh story Maybe starts with the Twitter

6:00

takeover yeah right so Twitter was

6:03

spewing the woke mind virus in the world

6:05

which is why you did it to begin with

6:08

and you know when we got there as you

6:09

know it was uh basically breaking even

6:11

and there's there was going to be 12 and

6:13

halfish billion dollars a 10 of the

6:14

company so a billion half dollar in

6:15

interest costs that there was no money

6:17

to pay um which led to the turnaround I

6:19

think which was the biggest turnaround

6:20

like of all time literally the biggest

6:22

turnaround I think ever in history

6:24

second biggest Tech deal ever

6:25

done 80% of the people gone that doesn't

6:29

include all the contractors that were

6:30

there and you know the company's now

6:31

servicing its debt and they just priced

6:34

yesterday their one of their Bank deals

6:37

at 97 cents so this is a huge win means

6:40

the company's doing extremely well other

6:42

people bought the bank debt and that

6:44

then the bank debt traded up to a little

6:46

over 98 so 98 and 58 you know a giant

6:50

business success a rousing business

6:51

success and Jason you were there for

6:53

part of it you saw it it was a disaster

6:55

U this place was you know it was tampons

6:57

in the bathrooms and every woke thing

6:58

you could possibly imagine and no one in

6:59

the office uh that the it was so bad

7:01

that the pens had gone dry in the

7:03

conference rooms which is is incredible

7:05

and I think that you know that's how the

7:07

so you mean the pens had gone dry

7:08

because they were never being used or

7:10

because they were being used so much

7:11

they were never been used we got there

7:13

on the yeah the Halloween weekend and we

7:16

started whiteboarding and you know

7:20

no next 10 no ink yeah I mean everything

7:23

it was it's incredible and but but uh

7:26

flowers were impeccable food being made

7:28

fresh every day for thousands of people

7:29

and thrown away um three times a day

7:31

toss in the garbage we didn't give it to

7:33

the homeless it was just it was

7:34

shockingly bad bureaucracy gone mad bad

7:37

Inc is people don't care so it was both

7:41

I think this turned into two things one

7:42

was just stop the W mine virus you know

7:44

the interesting thing is U the the they

7:46

do external brand safety checks there

7:48

now and they have 99% rating in brand

7:50

safety U now right so stock the wus

7:53

going in the world number one number two

7:54

fix the company and both have happened

7:57

it's been a couple years now right three

7:58

years now and both have happened

8:00

um not even three years two and a half

8:01

years really and both have happened and

8:02

I think you take that that that was sort

8:04

of the warm-up act for what's going on

8:06

at Doge which is you know the president

8:08

United States um president Trump wants

8:10

to make America great again and that I

8:12

think begins with making the government

8:13

great and you got to fix it it's a

8:15

turnaround this is the biggest

8:16

turnaround of all time and president

8:18

Trump has the uh courage to do it and

8:20

he's got a great Ally in Elon to make it

8:22

happen in Doge and so the numbers are

8:24

pretty easy right um we're spending uh 6

8:27

and half trillion we bring in 4 and half

8:29

trillion we got to find $2 trillion

8:31

somewhere interest cost a trillion doll

8:32

a year the bond markets were going up

8:34

the the long Bond was going up a lot

8:36

because people did believe that we

8:37

couldn't stop spending creating

8:38

inflation you see those trading down now

8:40

as doge is starting to take effect

8:41

people see it's real the stuff you're

8:42

talking about it's sort it's sort of

8:44

extraordinary what's happening and the

8:46

you know El said this public right fraud

8:48

waste and abuse he think it's kind of

8:49

10% of the budget is probably fraud I

8:52

think it might be low actually so you're

8:55

talking about you know 6 650 billion a

8:57

trillion in waste I think that's

8:59

probably about right that alone fixes

9:00

the problem but really serious about it

9:02

Jason for me and what scared me when I

9:04

when we first started thinking about

9:06

this look and I'm not there full-time

9:07

you know I'm uh in and out a little bit

9:09

and and trying to help where I can but

9:10

I'm not there fulltime um when I thought

9:13

when this started I thought we had a

9:14

democracy that it turned into

9:15

bureaucracy

9:17

okay what I'm afraid of now is we have a

9:21

bureaucracy that is about to turn into a

9:24

kleptocracy I mean a Latin American

9:26

style kleptocracy okay the stuff you're

9:27

talking about that is pure fraud and

9:30

you're make making some jokes out of it

9:31

the DI musical but if you go into the

9:33

data that's coming out of usid what you

9:35

find is you know there's a lot of

9:37

political contributions going on their

9:38

Politico itself being funded by usaid I

9:41

mean that is pure corruption that's like

9:43

a lad style autocracy and we cannot let

9:46

it go there I mean I think we I think

9:48

this happened just in a good time and

9:49

I'm super grateful to all the people

9:51

there there's you know 80 plus people

9:53

there all Patriots gone full-time okay

9:55

so chamath you've been watching this you

9:57

hear from Antonio what's your general

9:59

take on what we saw in the first I don't

10:02

know 20 days of

10:04

Doge or no 15 days sorry it's 15 days of

10:07

Doge so let me try to give you a little

10:10

bit of historical context because I

10:12

think that that's important I think

10:15

whenever I hear so many people

10:17

breathlessly saying some version of

10:21

WTF as if this is totally new it's not

10:25

new and I'll give you two examples but

10:28

one that I really want to double click

10:29

on the two examples I'll give you is

10:32

that in

10:33

1941 The Truman committee was formed

10:38

because there was a fear that the

10:41

spending by the defense department was

10:45

completely out of

10:46

whack and over the next six or seven

10:49

years and this is really what gave

10:51

Truman The credibility to them become

10:53

Roosevelt's vice president was they

10:56

found incredible levels of waste Fraud

11:00

and Abuse during the war before the war

11:03

effort and then after Pearl Harbor

11:05

during the war process over seven years

11:09

that committee and this is in$

11:12

1941 they were tasked and budgeted with

11:15

only 20 or

11:17

$30,000 okay over the next six years

11:19

they spent less than a million inflation

11:22

adjusted to 2023 this is where I found

11:25

the data was about 65 million they spent

11:28

you know how much they SA

11:30

it's estimated they saved somewhere

11:32

between1 to 15 billion in

11:36

1941 that's a quarter of a trillion

11:40

2023 the second example is we did this

11:44

under President Clinton and that was

11:46

called the National Partnership for

11:48

Reinventing government so the first

11:51

thing that I think it's important to

11:53

acknowledge is this is not new we've

11:56

done Doge twice before both have been

11:59

successful the Harry Truman one was

12:01

incredibly important because it really

12:03

set guardrails for how this can be done

12:06

everything in that committee it was a

12:07

senate committee was unanimous so it was

12:10

Republicans and Democrats that found

12:12

waste Fraud and Abuse everywhere they

12:15

saved an enormous amount of

12:17

money the second which is interesting is

12:20

these last two versions of Doge were

12:22

driven and led by democrats the same

12:24

people today who are basically saying

12:27

hey hold on a second we have congression

12:29

committees or we have inspector

12:32

generals and they lack the awareness to

12:35

know that their own party was the

12:37

driving force for this two times before

12:40

and I think it's important to just

12:42

acknowledge that those methods are not

12:44

good anymore right because I think what

12:47

we're finding early days is the rot is

12:49

super pervasive there's no

12:52

accountability and so I think you need

12:53

people to look at it with fresh eyes and

12:56

what is Doge at the end of the day what

12:57

they are are read only Auditors of the

13:00

truth and the press secretary in the

13:03

White House made this very clear it's

13:05

incredible the power that readon access

13:08

gives you all it allows you to do is

13:10

just take the data and present the data

13:13

they can't manipulate it and what

13:15

they're able to do is publish all of

13:17

this stuff in real time and that's why

13:18

this is so important because if it went

13:20

into a congressional committee to be

13:22

honest with you it would sit there and

13:26

stew for six seven eight nine months you

13:29

would maybe get small little tidbits of

13:31

it but now instead you're just getting

13:33

the full thrust of it and what is the

13:35

biggest thing that I find concerning I

13:39

think it's what Antonio said which is

13:41

that the

13:43

media who are supposed to be this

13:46

intermediary layer that's totally

13:49

objective between the government and the

13:52

people were not independent at all but

13:55

had all kinds of hidden incentives $8

13:57

million to politicos several million

13:59

dollars to the BBC I think it's

14:02

important to ask what's going on and by

14:04

the way that also has historical context

14:08

this is exactly what happened in the 60s

14:10

and 70s where it turned out that record

14:13

companies were paying DJs to pay songs

14:16

there was a huge set of lawsuits and

14:19

trial cases and the result was a change

14:21

in the law right and we call that Peola

14:24

now which is you cannot take this money

14:25

without disclosing it and so had this

14:28

money been absorbed these

14:30

entities and actually disclosed maybe

14:32

we'd be okay but Nick I sent you a link

14:34

maybe you can throw it on the screen for

14:35

these guys it's is a very simple

14:37

manifestation of this cycle we talked

14:40

about this guys and we didn't realize

14:44

how connected it all was but we were

14:46

asking ourselves during the election

14:48

cycle last year why are all these

14:49

articles buried why aren't we really

14:51

getting the truth and it turns out that

14:53

the people who were responsible for

14:55

telling the truth somewhere along the

14:58

chain were koled or just told not to

15:00

tell the truth influenced by all of this

15:03

back Channel money that was going back

15:04

and forth from the government to these

15:06

folks okay yeah let me just give some

15:09

numbers to uh what you were referencing

15:11

there the US Aid organization has been

15:16

giving money uh as have other agencies

15:19

to journals databases and subscriptions

15:22

there's probably some amount of that

15:23

that makes sense however when we look at

15:26

this during Trump 1 spend on political

15:29

was averaging around 1.3 million a year

15:31

but it suddenly ballooned up to 8

15:32

million a year under Biden and you can

15:34

see the quarterly payments here on this

15:36

chart so there's some normal amount to

15:39

spend on Publications or for a library

15:42

at an organization and so what we're

15:44

looking here is all federal agencies and

15:47

suddenly during Biden there is a very

15:49

suspicious ramp up in spend to Politico

15:53

all of this is breaking a lot of this

15:54

hasn't been verified yet so we'll we'll

15:57

put that caveat on it

15:59

and then there is a number of 34 million

16:02

that's been floating around that's all

16:04

years back to 2008 not just 2024 less

16:07

people have that

16:09

number ju supposed or or or um

16:13

misattributed when political was

16:15

acquired back in 2021 they were doing

16:16

about 200 million in Revenue so this

16:19

would be about 4% of their revenue it's

16:21

pretty significant the BBC also received

16:23

2.7 million in funding from us Aid in

16:26

2023 that was 8% of their annual income

16:29

that's a little suspicious Thompson

16:32

Reuters which is the Consulting arm of

16:34

Reuters they've received 120 million

16:37

dollar from the federal government since

16:38

2011 that's got to be looked at and

16:40

double clicked on and uh half of that

16:42

came during the Biden Administration New

16:44

York

16:45

Times hasn't actually received all that

16:48

much 370k from the federal government

16:49

last year under Biden it went from 100K

16:51

a year to like 300 so the the New York

16:54

Times data has been cleaned up a little

16:56

bit all of this is to say

16:59

there's spending going on with the press

17:02

that certainly doesn't look good and

17:03

should be verified and challenged

17:07

obviously and we are in a breaking news

17:09

environment so we'll see how that

17:11

information shakes out over time which

17:14

is one of the great things I think about

17:16

Doge is they're getting this information

17:18

out there and citizen journalists are uh

17:20

looking at public databases freedberg

17:23

and uh we're having a conversation about

17:25

this a conversation two years ago

17:26

freedberg when you kept harping on every

17:29

episode about our debt and uh you know

17:31

about the interest payments two or three

17:33

years ago you were way ahead of the

17:35

curve and now here we are we didn't

17:38

think anybody would ever take this cause

17:39

up and now it is the cause of the moment

17:42

what are your thoughts on the first two

17:44

weeks of Doge Friedberg magnificent okay

17:48

magnificent I mean what else is there to

17:50

say emoi yeah this is the eggplant Emoji

17:54

it's what we needed if you zoom out on

17:55

what doge is doing I think the best way

17:57

to describe it is zero BAS budgeting and

18:00

in organizations that go through zerob

18:02

based budgeting you do a cycle typically

18:03

annually where you take all of your

18:05

opacs all of your expenses and running a

18:07

company or running an organization down

18:09

to the studs you take it down to zero

18:11

and you rebuild it up and you say what

18:12

are we trying to achieve this year from

18:13

first principles based on that set of

18:16

objectives those goals what do we need

18:17

to do what's the minimal expense we need

18:19

to run you don't start with last year's

18:21

numbers and say what else do we need to

18:23

do and start to add on top of that you

18:24

really do a hard level high degree of

18:26

scrutiny on every dollar move out and

18:29

that's what doge is effectively doing

18:30

they're doing a zero based budgeting on

18:32

the federal government they're looking

18:34

at every line item and they're asking

18:35

the fundamental question which I don't

18:37

think we talk about in the public

18:39

discourse enough which is what is the

18:41

essential role of government and there

18:43

is a great debate to be had around that

18:45

point should government be providing

18:48

humanitarian Aid in international

18:50

markets that's a good debate to be had

18:53

should the government be providing

18:54

security to Nations that can't provide

18:56

security for themselves does the US

18:58

government have a role in that should

18:59

the government be providing loans for

19:01

people to go to sh universities should

19:03

the government be providing loans for

19:04

people to buy homes that are overpriced

19:07

etc etc etc and as we start to ask the

19:10

questions of how we're spending money I

19:12

think it ends up leading to the most

19:13

important questions which is what is the

19:15

essential role of government which I

19:17

think is the debate that needs to be had

19:19

in order for the Democracy to last so

19:21

I'm very happy to see the effort of Doge

19:23

and I think that it's the beginning of

19:24

what I hope will be kind of a long-term

19:26

process of asking the fundamental

19:28

questions about essential government and

19:30

and Antonio zerob based budgeting was

19:32

the first thing you sort of introduced

19:35

when the Twitter takeover happened just

19:38

what do we need in terms of design what

19:39

does the sales team need to hit these

19:41

sales numbers how many servers do we

19:43

need and my Lord the waste Fraud and

19:47

Abuse at that company was shocking they

19:50

had buildings that were $100 a square

19:53

foot if I remember correctly that were

19:55

used for storage of the furniture from

19:58

the previous building that had been

19:59

upgraded and were storing them in class

20:02

A office space you reference the

20:06

commissary 20 people were having lunch a

20:09

day but they had never ratcheted down

20:12

the amount of food they were making so

20:13

each meal was about $800 on average when

20:16

you when you did the math for those 20

20:18

meals just in the San Francisco office

20:21

maybe you could talk a little bit about

20:23

how the the shock and awe

20:26

campaign of just freezing spending and

20:29

then seeing hey what actually is

20:32

necessary to accomplish this task worked

20:35

out at at Twitter and then how you see

20:37

that being executed uh you know inside

20:40

of our

20:41

government yeah thanks Jason it was I

20:43

was pretty extraordinary actually the um

20:46

you know the Twitter experience the

20:47

first thing you do in a turn like that

20:48

is try and get the checkbook and just

20:49

turn payments off and then see what

20:51

happens because there are lot of people

20:53

that shouldn't be getting paid and

20:55

sometimes they complain and sometimes

20:56

you find the people that complain the

20:57

loudest are the ones who are could in

20:58

the worst fraud they're the worst

21:00

frauders in the whole in the whole game

21:01

right the worst grifters are the ones

21:02

who are saying they're crying uh the

21:05

most Amar of foul and the problem at

21:08

least in Twitter there were financial

21:10

statements like we could actually there

21:11

was an audit financial statement and

21:12

they were basically you know they were't

21:14

some ways correct I would say uh there

21:16

were some issues with the with the user

21:18

growth Dows Etc the incen plans but the

21:20

actual like you know the cash FL numbers

21:21

were pretty much correct here the

21:23

problem is much much deeper and it makes

21:26

this zero based budgeting question much

21:28

harder which is the way the government

21:31

works uh a department just basically

21:33

asks for money from Treasury and they

21:35

send it out we all run businesses

21:37

there's a Reconciliation process you you

21:39

have a contract you isue a PO against it

21:42

something comes in you check that it

21:44

came in Services is rendered and then

21:46

you issue a payable and then you know

21:48

some a month later you pay it right that

21:50

doesn't happen to the US government

21:51

there is that that process is broken it

21:53

used to happen it's broken now and so

21:56

literally money is Flowing out I used to

21:58

ask myself question why are the numbers

22:00

always revised why are they always wrong

22:01

how can the government know how much

22:02

money it's SP just hit the button in the

22:03

computer and figure it out problem is

22:05

that button doesn't exist you know we

22:07

spent time early on I was uh Mar with

22:09

trying to track through like how does

22:11

the money actually flow we no one could

22:13

tell us how it actually flows where is

22:14

it going out people didn't know and it's

22:17

totally crazy and it's the reason all go

22:19

through treasury Antonio or like can you

22:21

just explain that to us well so I will

22:24

try to explain to you I'm not sure I

22:25

have full command of it I'm not sure

22:26

anyone does quite yet it goes to

22:28

treasury ultimately but it was supposed

22:30

to flow through the way it was supposed

22:32

to work in the it was changed in the 70

22:35

in the 70s in 1973 the Nixon

22:37

administration at in 71 let me go back

22:39

they came off the gold standard which

22:40

allowed deficits in 73 at the nater of

22:43

the Nixon presidency Congress took away

22:45

from the presidency the executive power

22:47

this thing called the porit which was

22:49

the power of the executive to stop

22:50

spending so Nixon was abusing it by

22:52

stoping he didn't want and so Congress

22:54

took away from him what that means today

22:55

is the executive as he reaches in it's

22:58

very hard to just stop payments so

23:01

what's happening is the the government

23:04

is is put in a process where they would

23:06

just have an an authorized executive

23:09

kind of stamp a bill that got paid that

23:11

broke and I don't know when it broke but

23:13

it broke sometime so the money flow now

23:16

department gets a budget authorized to

23:18

it uh by Congress it goes to om om

23:21

allocates the budget that department

23:24

then just sends a money request to

23:26

treasury to pay it is reconciled against

23:29

what happened this is one of the reasons

23:32

and that's it there's no there's no

23:33

there's no controller there's no

23:35

controller function like there is in a

23:36

normal company 100% there is no control

23:38

there is no controller there's no

23:40

reconciliation the reason they can't

23:42

pass audits okay there the reason this

23:45

happens is because you can't audit

23:46

something you haven't reconciled you the

23:49

only audit that I've seen is actually

23:50

from the Social Security Administration

23:52

and when you read it I've got one of

23:53

pars who have read the thing uh it has

23:56

it's just riddled material weaknesses

23:58

that you think there are individuals

23:59

that have made like millions or billions

24:02

of dollars from Mis payments overseas

24:04

like is this kind of what's gone on in

24:06

the missing money in Ukraine do you

24:08

think like it's kind of found its way to

24:10

the wrong places yeah I mean so what I

24:12

would I don't know what happened Ukraine

24:13

I don't crazy story yeah it is shocking

24:15

about Ukraine I will say that I have

24:17

business experience trying to work in

24:19

businesses that had Medicaid and

24:21

Medicaid medicare's payments I wanted to

24:23

make that better right we Weist to make

24:24

the world better and we just stopped cuz

24:27

we sound we found so much fraud I mean

24:29

I'm I'm certain we literally have a rule

24:32

here a government pay or in in those

24:34

areas if it's more than like a third of

24:35

the business we don't do it and in the

24:37

services space this is this is why we

24:39

just s we found continuous fraud in the

24:42

companies we're looking at investing in

24:44

yeah just threading these things

24:45

together you know you the really

24:47

interesting thing with the Twitter

24:50

pausing of payments was you know at some

24:52

point we were in a meeting you know at

24:54

1:00 a.m. on a Saturday and it was like

24:56

hey let's turn the credit cards off to

24:58

see what bounces and uh you know what

25:02

happens and then of course we start

25:04

getting calls and people started routing

25:06

obviously because they knew saaks was

25:08

there you were there I was there hey you

25:10

know a company who I shared an investor

25:13

with or you know in another company said

25:16

hey you know we're not getting paid for

25:17

this and it was like some SAS software

25:19

that nobody was using Etc so you start

25:21

figuring out to your point okay is this

25:24

software even being used there was so

25:26

much software and services that had been

25:28

paid that nobody had ever logged in to

25:31

set up so it was just being paid as pure

25:34

graph now you said Antonio correctly the

25:37

people who come first like they're

25:39

probably the ones who are in on the

25:41

biggest grift because hey you know I I

25:42

figured out how to grift this money how

25:45

us Aid got to the top of the Doge list I

25:48

think is one of the most interesting

25:49

aspects of this story so if you remember

25:53

on January 21st Trump decided he would

25:56

do a bunch of executive orders right and

25:58

one of them was to pause foreign aid for

26:00

90 days okay this seems reasonable we

26:03

got to take care of our country that was

26:04

part of his mandate for becoming the

26:07

47th president of the United States so

26:09

couple of days later the White House

26:11

said hey this us a leadership is trying

26:14

to circumvent the executive order

26:16

they're in other words they're just

26:17

going to keep paying people even though

26:19

the executive order came out that

26:21

alerted the Doge team so Elon confirmed

26:24

this on X he said quote all Doge did was

26:27

check to see which federal organizations

26:29

were violating the president's executive

26:31

orders the most turned out to be us Aid

26:35

so that became our focus and according

26:37

to NBC security officials at USA tried

26:40

to prevent Doge from even getting into

26:42

the building or accessing the systems to

26:45

your point Antonio the person probably

26:47

who's got the most to hide is the one

26:49

who's going to fight the most over the

26:51

weekend Doge gained access to us Aid and

26:55

then people started tweeting out all of

26:57

this

26:58

you know crazy spend and things that any

27:01

American who looks at it and says wait a

27:04

second if we haven't fixed the goddamn

27:05

water in Flint Michigan why are we

27:08

sending money to gallway or in Ireland

27:10

to do a Dei musical this makes no sense

27:13

and that's I think the key piece of this

27:14

Antonio is can you win the hearts and

27:17

minds of

27:18

Americans because some of this stuff I

27:21

don't know if it's legal or it's not

27:23

legal or it's against protocol or it is

27:26

protocol we're going to find out there's

27:27

been tons of of legal um cases and

27:30

lawsuits that have been filed but to

27:33

your point this is how Elon found out

27:35

about usaid J let me ask you a question

27:38

where where does that place you in

27:41

your political philosophy around the

27:43

importance of Human Rights

27:45

abroad great great

27:48

question you know I've always felt that

27:51

uh the West should act in unison and if

27:53

the United States is the greatest

27:54

economy or the strongest we should lead

27:57

there is something called the Universal

27:58

Declaration of Human Rights the United

28:00

States Elanor Roosevelt uh wrote this at

28:03

the UN and everybody tries to hit those

28:05

notes I think it's great that we try to

28:07

reduce suffering in the world but I

28:09

think we should be doing it not

28:11

unilaterally and not to try to

28:13

manipulate governments and that's the

28:14

piece of this that us Aid is obviously a

28:17

grift where people are trying to steal

28:19

money for their pet projects and I don't

28:22

think they're acting in unison and above

28:24

board to look and say okay where's the

28:27

most suffering in the world how can we

28:29

help that you know that that to me seems

28:31

like a noble thing to do and if the

28:32

United States has the budget to help

28:34

fight AIDS in Africa or you know poverty

28:38

you there's a chance that some of these

28:40

human rights

28:41

issues were embellished to try to get

28:44

more money well I do think the you know

28:47

I I did this tweet recently so yes is

28:49

the answer if you look at Amnesty

28:51

International Amnesty International

28:52

where I worked was one of my first jobs

28:54

they were work working on people who

28:56

were imprisoned tortured

28:58

raped murdered systematic murder of

29:02

dissidents for freedom of speech freedom

29:04

of assembly religion Etc and then

29:06

somewhere along the line you know the

29:09

Amnesty International was tweeting about

29:10

trans rights and that's the big Focus

29:12

this is a very small amount of you know

29:15

people on the planet and I don't think

29:17

that those human rights violations in

29:19

any way relate to the tragedy we're

29:21

seeing of people being murdered tortured

29:23

raped and caned and and beheaded in

29:26

certain places in the world so

29:28

there there

29:30

is a way to look at suffering and say we

29:34

should handle this first and yes

29:36

somebody who you know uh feels they got

29:38

misgendered maybe that's way down the

29:41

priority list compared to systematic

29:44

rape of women in these you know War

29:46

zones those will be the high order bits

29:48

and so this thing has gotten the other

29:52

fascinating thing I think about USA

29:53

which I like to get your thoughts on too

29:55

jamath is at what point did this switch

29:59

from being the the left saying we should

30:03

not intervene right the left's position

30:05

always in the 8S 90s when we were

30:06

growing up was we shouldn't be doing

30:08

these operatives in other countries we

30:10

should let democracy flow let these

30:12

countries figure it out for themselves

30:14

we shouldn't be doing Empire building we

30:15

shouldn't be doing imperialism and then

30:18

all of a sudden now it's just such a

30:20

Griff that I think everybody's got their

30:21

hands in the pie lindsy Grahams on some

30:24

nonprofit that gets money from this I

30:25

don't know if that's above board or not

30:28

everybody a lot of people who are

30:30

formally in government seem to be part

30:32

of this NGO train so the whole thing

30:34

just turned out to be a grift and it's a

30:36

bipartisan grift

30:39

obviously I think the INF I think the

30:41

biggest thing that we will have to

30:44

confront is that many of the things that

30:46

we

30:48

thought were issues or

30:51

problems may have actually been somewhat

30:55

embellished because of this money cycle

30:58

sure and I think that that's going to

31:00

cause a lot of people to feel really

31:04

they'll probably feel really foolish

31:05

about some of the decisions they made

31:07

all the attempts at cancellation are

31:09

going to look really dumb in hindsight

31:12

yeah all right ni some gra to our friend

31:14

David saaks here who's coming online

31:15

okay here he is

31:16

David and and the one thing I want to uh

31:19

point out this goes way back I think

31:22

maybe more than a decade ago David tried

31:25

to explain to me that neocons had taken

31:27

over American foreign policy and they

31:29

were well your question about why did

31:31

the Democrats change Why did Republicans

31:33

change Etc the neocons took over foreign

31:35

policy in both sides Democrats and

31:37

Republicans and populated out this very

31:39

activist muster stance which is bad for

31:41

America and I think Jason that answerers

31:42

your question as to why the Democrat

31:44

shifted all right with us is David Sachs

31:47

how you doing brother are are you

31:48

literally in the white house I'm in the

31:51

uh

31:52

EOB ah okay there's like a podcast

31:55

Studio actually in the EOB oh fantastic

31:58

and you're wearing a suit every day yeah

32:00

know you're right I have to wear a suit

32:01

and tie every day I was just listening

32:03

on your your conversation about Doge

32:05

jakeob I'm surprised that you never

32:07

figured out a way to get involved in

32:08

this

32:09

USA I mean everybody's on the take

32:11

except you what's going I had known I

32:14

would have started an NGO where's my NGO

32:17

you had everything except the money

32:18

laundering you had the grip you had the

32:20

virtue signaling you had it all except

32:22

act money let me uplevel this for a

32:25

second okay so we knew the US government

32:28

runs a $2 trillion deficit every year

32:31

we're in debt almost $40 trillion and we

32:34

also knew that anytime anyone tries to

32:36

cut anything in Washington the whole

32:37

city screams bloody murder okay so the

32:39

question is just Why well now we know

32:42

the money is all going to them it's like

32:44

round tripping to them New York Times

32:46

getting paid Politico getting paid bill

32:50

Crystal perennial warmonger getting paid

32:54

Ukraine getting paid like 11 out of 12

32:56

Publications Ukraine getting paid

32:58

incredible Victor Orban who's the Prime

33:00

Minister of Hungary was saying that he's

33:02

very popular in Hungary his political

33:04

opposition funded by usaid in Poland the

33:09

leftwing political opposition funded by

33:11

usaid and on and on and on it goes BBC

33:14

BBC you wonder why everyone in the UK so

33:17

yeah yeah believe the BBC is getting

33:19

paid every leftwing organization in the

33:22

world seems to be getting paid by this

33:25

slush fund at usaid which disperses

33:28

about 50 billion a year that's a billion

33:29

dollars a week that's actually a lot of

33:32

money and so it it just it makes you

33:34

wonder you know the left in general

33:36

tries to portray itself as a movement of

33:39

the people that it's Grassroots this is

33:41

the exact opposite this is AstroTurf

33:43

this is basically money coming from the

33:45

top down out of Washington to fund all

33:47

these groups maybe not even in the

33:49

United States like all over the world so

33:51

it makes you wonder what is the real

33:53

level of local support for these

33:56

leftwing policies all over the world

33:59

yeah crazy so you did a big announcement

34:01

this week on

34:02

crypto and creating a framework finally

34:06

I I caught some of it maybe you could

34:08

just tell us you know from the bottom up

34:10

what is the Mandate from the president

34:13

and what is your advice to him on how to

34:16

make crypto move out of the Shadows

34:19

offshore icos craziness to legitimacy

34:23

what's the plan here to legitimize and

34:25

regulate crypto well the the plan was

34:28

really spelled out by President Trump

34:29

and his week one EO on crypto and it's

34:32

all spelled out in there the principal

34:34

Administration on crypto the president

34:36

said he wants to support the responsible

34:37

use and growth of digital assets and

34:41

blockchains across every sector of the

34:43

economy so the principles are all there

34:46

and yesterday I was invited up to

34:48

Capitol Hill to meet with the the

34:51

chairman of the important committees

34:53

that will be that basically govern

34:55

crypto and so we had a conference there

34:58

to announce the legislative plan you can

35:01

see there there's chairman Tim Scott

35:03

who's the chair of the Senate Banking

35:05

Committee to my left and then to my

35:07

right is french hill who's the chairman

35:09

of the house Financial Services

35:11

committee and then to his right is John

35:15

Boseman who's the chair of the Senate

35:17

agriculture committee and then to the

35:20

left of Tim Scott is um GT Thompson

35:23

who's the chair of the house agriculture

35:25

committee he's out of frame right now

35:27

now but those are the four committees

35:29

that govern crypto and you may ask why

35:31

is the agriculture Committee involved in

35:32

crypto and the reason is because the ad

35:35

committee supervises the cftc the

35:38

Commodities Futures Trading Commission

35:40

because Commodities all came out of

35:42

Agriculture so it's interesting you need

35:45

four committees across the House and

35:47

Senate to get legislation done on crypto

35:50

it's not just House and Senate it's

35:52

actually two committees in each of the

35:53

House and Senate and so this is the

35:56

first time where we've had had four

35:58

chairman of the four key committees all

36:00

come together and say that they're ready

36:02

to support crypto legislation there were

36:04

a lot of people on a who felt like this

36:06

wasn't you know a mind-blowing

36:08

announcement they wanted something that

36:09

they could trade on right away that's

36:11

not what this was this was basically a

36:14

statement of commitment from the chairs

36:16

of the four committees that we're going

36:17

to get legislation done this year maybe

36:20

in the next six months I mean that's

36:21

really the goal and we've never had that

36:23

before so that is pretty Monumental I

36:25

used to work in this because when I

36:28

first launched climate Court back in the

36:29

day we actually were selling commodity

36:31

contracts online so we we set ourselves

36:33

up as an exempt

36:36

commodity trading platform and I so I I

36:39

remember all this old legislation there

36:41

was the commodity Futures modernization

36:43

act if I remember when they deregulated

36:46

the energy Market but one of the

36:48

features of the commodity features

36:50

modernization Act was that they created

36:52

this concept of an exempt commodity

36:54

contract which was where you're not

36:56

delivering a physical good

36:58

and that's basically what weather

36:59

derivatives were and energy derivatives

37:01

and other kind of indices were created

37:04

that didn't have a tangible physical

37:06

Supply and it was still kind of shoveled

37:08

in the uh in the Commodities world

37:10

that's why the legacy of all this stuff

37:11

kind of sitting with agriculture is that

37:14

the way this is likely going to move

37:15

forward is it's going to look like a new

37:16

extension of exempt Commodities and kind

37:18

of treated like that versus being

37:20

Securities the question you're

37:22

describing is called Market structure

37:25

you know what are the definitions going

37:26

to be because digital assets can be many

37:28

things you can have some digital assets

37:31

are cryptocurrencies they're actually

37:32

currencies then there's things that are

37:35

crypto Securities then there's things

37:37

that are Commodities Bitcoin actually is

37:38

regulated as a commodity right now and

37:41

then you've got things that aren't

37:43

Securities or Commodities they're like

37:45

Collectibles you know like nfts things

37:46

like that so there's all these different

37:49

categories and one of the things that

37:50

the market needs is just Clarity around

37:52

the definition so that Founders know

37:54

what the rules of Road are and they can

37:56

actually just comply with that

37:58

so giving them those definitions and

38:01

describing how a crypto project could

38:04

start for example as a security and

38:07

eventually the protocol could become

38:09

decentralized enough or maybe it becomes

38:11

a commodity that whole idea that's

38:15

called Market structure and there was a

38:17

bill in the last Congress by french hill

38:19

who is the chair of the house Financial

38:21

Services committee now that passed the

38:24

house with 71 Democratic um votes so was

38:27

fairly bipartisan but then it went

38:30

nowhere in the Senate because frankly

38:32

the bank committee at that time was run

38:34

by shered Brown who was anti- crypto so

38:36

it got stopped in the Senate right away

38:39

now we have Republican control of the

38:41

Senate and Tim Scott's the new chair of

38:42

the Senate Banking Committee and he's

38:44

expressed support so I think now we

38:46

could get a bill on Market structure

38:48

like fit21 again which was fren shills

38:50

Bill last Congress I think we could do a

38:53

revised and updated version this

38:54

Congress and that was one of the things

38:56

they all that the chairman expressed

38:58

support for so I think there's a pretty

39:00

good chance we could get this done in

39:01

the next six months what's the

39:02

opposition sax I guess it feels to me

39:05

like with the market structure question

39:06

being addressed and answered you would

39:09

have also more protection for consumers

39:11

because now businesses know the rules of

39:12

the road they follow them the structure

39:14

that protects consumers etc etc why

39:17

would people be opposed to moving this

39:18

forward moving the legislation forward

39:20

getting this all behind us well I think

39:22

this is an area where there's a really

39:24

good chance of having bipartison support

39:28

we did in the last Congress like I

39:30

mentioned that the house bill got over

39:32

70 Democratic votes I think in the

39:34

Senate we're going to need seven votes

39:37

seven Democrat votes to get to 60 right

39:39

which is the number you need if you

39:40

don't go through the reconciliation

39:42

process and I think there's a good

39:44

chance this passes with significant

39:46

Democratic support as well as Republican

39:49

it's not going to be unanimous or

39:50

anything like that because there are

39:52

still forces that are hostile to crypto

39:56

in Washington and do you think it's

39:58

going to be a discret bill or do you I I

40:00

mean it seems

40:02

like you're going to have to get a

40:04

border security and energy and budget

40:08

bill passed so it seems like

40:10

everything's looking towards

40:12

reconciliation in which case would this

40:15

be an ad junk like a like an add-on the

40:18

the question is what you can get through

40:19

reconciliation so in order for a bill to

40:21

go through the reconciliation process

40:23

where you only need basically 50 votes

40:25

it has to have a budgetary impact or

40:28

predominantly a budgetary impact I think

40:30

it's called the bird Rule and that rule

40:34

was definitely pushed pretty hard in the

40:36

last Administration you remember that

40:38

the bid Administration got the inflation

40:40

reduction Act passed through

40:43

reconciliation and all those subsidies

40:45

for clean energy or whatever so they've

40:47

opened the window pretty wide on what

40:49

can go through reconciliation but that's

40:51

the question there's one other bill that

40:54

I think is going to move pretty quickly

40:55

here too so I just mentioned the market

40:57

structure Bill the other area is stable

40:59

coins and Senator Hagerty he's on the

41:02

Banking Committee he just released a

41:04

stable coin bill there's counterparts in

41:06

the house and what the four chairman

41:09

indicated is actually they're going to

41:10

take up stable coins first and then

41:12

Market structure will follow very

41:14

quickly so I think we could see a stable

41:16

coin

41:17

bill pass Congress in the next several

41:20

months sax I guess the question is the

41:22

SEC was and Gary Gensler were the

41:26

blocker

41:28

previously with crypto and they just

41:30

said Hey listen there's an existing set

41:31

of rules here just follow those rules

41:33

obviously those rules don't exactly

41:35

apply to the Innovation happening in

41:37

crypto so the question I think after

41:40

stable coins which feels like a layup

41:41

and and a great place to start that'll

41:43

be a great early win and it just makes

41:45

people I guess that would just reinforce

41:47

the dollar Supremacy right if it's tied

41:49

to the dollar so that's good for

41:51

America but maybe you could talk to

41:54

protecting consumers because we all saw

41:56

in the first couple of generations of

41:59

crypto all kinds of griffs and icos and

42:01

things that were never delivered so how

42:03

do you balance those two things

42:04

protecting consumers who may get really

42:07

enthusiastic about this versus you know

42:11

people who might try to Prey Upon them

42:14

well the first thing you want to do if

42:15

you're going to protect consumers is you

42:16

want to bring the activity on Shore okay

42:19

because obviously when all the activity

42:21

gets driven offshore then it's hard for

42:24

Regulators to supervise it and moreover

42:26

it's hard for the market to know who's a

42:29

good actor who's a bad actor what's a

42:30

good project what's a bad project so the

42:32

first thing you want to do is have the

42:34

Innovation happen onshore in the United

42:36

States by the way it's probably not a

42:37

coincidence that the biggest fraud in

42:39

the history of crypto which was FTX was

42:42

based in the Bahamas yeah probably

42:44

little bit of a tell a little bit of a

42:45

tell and it'll be an even stronger tell

42:48

when the good projects feel like they

42:49

can come back into the United States and

42:51

then you've got the Shady ones in the

42:53

Bahamas or in other countries that

42:54

they're going to stick out like a sore

42:55

thumb everyone's going to be able to

42:56

understand that oh those guys are too

42:58

shady to operate in the United States so

43:01

the number one thing we need to do is

43:02

just bring the Innovation on Shore in

43:05

terms of the framework I think the

43:07

market structure bill is going to Define

43:08

here's a security here's a commodity

43:10

here's what you have to do here are the

43:12

disclosure requirements around creating

43:15

a crypto project so all of that will be

43:18

in the bill and then in the meantime the

43:20

SEC has created a new task force under

43:24

Hester Pur who's a sec commissioner and

43:27

she is already starting to do work in

43:29

that regard to define a better regime at

43:32

the SEC for crypto

43:34

projects you mentioned that gendler said

43:37

that the sec's doors were open to crypto

43:40

companies and they should come in and

43:42

talk to us and work with us that was

43:44

very

43:44

disingenuous crypto companies would tell

43:46

me they would go see the SEC the SEC

43:49

would tell them nothing about what the

43:50

rules were but they would have

43:52

enforcement people in those meetings

43:53

just writing down everything they would

43:55

say and the next day they would get sent

43:56

a well notice so the truth is the SEC

43:59

was not cooperating they were not

44:01

providing any Clarity they were just

44:02

honeypotting Founders basically to come

44:04

in and then they would immediately

44:06

investigate them I mean it was really

44:08

terrible look we expect Founders to play

44:10

by the rules and abide by the law and be

44:13

compliant but when you won't tell them

44:15

what the rules are and then you

44:16

prosecute them there's no fair way for

44:18

them to comply so the most important

44:21

thing is to give them a framework I

44:22

think the SEC now is doing that they're

44:24

starting to do that already and then

44:26

legislatively we're going to have a bill

44:27

that does that uh moving through

44:30

Congress over the next few months this

44:32

is absolutely awesome we're super

44:34

encouraged that you're doing this and uh

44:36

we really appreciate you coming on the

44:37

Pod uh wish you could participate in the

44:40

other three or four crazy discussions

44:41

we're about to have but we understand

44:43

you've got to stay focused on the

44:44

mission uh anything on the AI front that

44:47

we can look forward to in the coming

44:49

weeks that you're working on I know

44:50

that's the other part of your

44:52

mission well the big thing is like I

44:54

talked about last time the president

44:56

rescinded the Biden EO which was this

44:58

100 page monstrosity of burn some

45:00

regulation on our AI companies I think

45:03

that decision's been proven even more

45:05

right in the wake of deep seek because

45:06

we know that China has basically caught

45:09

up or they're very very close to

45:10

catching up it felt like that Biden EO

45:12

is written in a vacuum in which the US

45:14

was the only player in Ai and that if we

45:17

imposed a bunch of burns some rules on

45:19

our companies that somehow that wouldn't

45:21

allow China to catch up right and I

45:23

think it's pretty clear that China is

45:24

very very competitive if we R AI

45:27

companies is going to run down to

45:29

China's benefits so I think that was a

45:31

very good decision and what the

45:33

president said in his EO is that we

45:36

should devise a new AI action plan to

45:38

replace that by Neo and we're working on

45:40

that right now all right d any fun

45:43

anecdotes from Doge you want to share

45:45

I'll give you one anecdote which is I've

45:47

been working late here a number of

45:48

nights at the EOB and I won't tell you

45:51

where the Doge guys are based but you

45:52

know I know where their office is so I

45:54

just went by there to say hi the whole

45:56

room was full

45:57

of young coders I think they were

46:00

engineers but they're wearing like suits

46:01

and ties so that's a little different

46:03

but they were all working really late I

46:05

mean they're working there late up

46:07

Friday night and the facilities people

46:10

don't know what to do because they've

46:12

never had people like asked to stay late

46:14

on before so they've had to create new

46:17

uh new facilities access for for these

46:19

guys they're like you're coming to the

46:21

office and doing work we don't have a

46:23

protocol for that what how does that

46:25

work we gonna need to get you a he

46:27

you're a badge to come to the building

46:29

yeah uh well it's absolutely awesome to

46:31

see the progress you're making in the

46:33

first two weeks and continued success

46:35

we're so proud of the

46:37

effort all right thanks guys all right

46:41

do you guys think the Democrats are

46:43

going to lose people over their

46:46

opposition to Doge like is Doge really

46:49

viewed as oppositional to Democrat party

46:51

interests this is for the average person

46:54

it's a war Shack TK I think the thing is

46:57

that there was a coalition that the

46:59

Democrats had and there was a coalition

47:01

that the Republicans had the Republicans

47:03

did a better job of reforming that

47:06

Coalition and now I think what you're

47:08

going to see is a shrinking I actually

47:11

got this totally wrong I don't know if

47:12

you remember a couple years ago but my

47:14

thought at the time was if the

47:17

Republicans don't figure out how to fix

47:19

themselves they were going to go and

47:22

lose for the next 10 or 15 years and the

47:24

reason I said that was they would walk

47:26

into every M term and they would just

47:27

get their ass handed to them but I think

47:30

they figured it out that this is sort of

47:32

this thing that I've been thinking about

47:33

a lot is there's a fight in Western

47:37

societies and it's a pendulum between

47:39

labor and capital and it used to be the

47:42

thought the conventional wisdom was that

47:44

the

47:45

Republicans were Pro capital and

47:48

Democrats were pro- labor and the

47:50

Brilliance of trump is he took over the

47:53

Republican party and made it totally

47:55

populist which is to say Pro

47:57

labor and the crazy thing about the

48:00

Democrats is that they are the most

48:04

sophisticated

48:05

Liars because if you look at what

48:08

happened under

48:09

Biden you had record high stock markets

48:12

so it was purely in favor of asset

48:15

owners record high deficits record high

48:18

illegal immigration record high wage

48:21

suppression all of these things are

48:23

massively Pro Capital but they tried to

48:25

present themselves as Pro labor

48:27

that entire ruse is now being undone and

48:31

all of this data what that does is it'll

48:33

it'll consolidate the Democrats to a

48:35

shell of their former self it'll take a

48:37

year or 18 months but I think unless

48:40

they figure out how to totally hard

48:42

reset they're going to be in a really

48:44

difficult struggle to find a cohort of

48:46

people Beyond 15 or 20% of the

48:49

population for a long time well and it's

48:51

so dumb to come out against waste Fraud

48:54

and Abuse so the best argument that

48:56

Democrats had it seems was that oh my

49:00

God people's Social Security numbers or

49:03

people's privacy was being violated

49:06

because they went in and looked at the

49:08

data and how the money was raed wasted

49:10

this is the like height of not getting

49:13

the point and not reading the room 100%

49:16

of Americans don't want their tax

49:17

payments stolen they don't care if you

49:20

looked at their social security number

49:22

this isn't a privacy issue that doge is

49:24

looking at some database and that's

49:26

that's what AOC and Schumer were doing

49:29

oh my God these people are looking at

49:31

your social security number they have

49:33

access to your records who cares what

49:35

matters is how much money is being

49:37

stolen from the American public and

49:40

anyone at any point in time could have

49:42

picked up this issue this has been going

49:44

on I think you pointed out the last time

49:46

somebody really addressed this in

49:47

Earnest was Clinton so this has been

49:49

going on Obama Trump 1.0 Biden everybody

49:55

has been raising the debt all of this

49:57

grift has been going on and it's only

49:58

this time around that somebody picked up

50:00

the free money and said here's an issue

50:03

now we uh we see what happens when

50:06

somebody picks up the issue of stop

50:09

wasting money it is a popular issue this

50:11

is only going to make Trump more popular

50:13

so Jason I I um G add what you and Jamal

50:17

said I think you're both right I'm give

50:18

you a very concrete example Ram Emanuel

50:20

is now back from Japan okay he was Chief

50:22

of Staff in both the Democratic white

50:24

houses post uh Rose

50:27

um Clinton and Obama and he wrote an

50:29

oped this weekend this past weekend um

50:32

that basically said the Democrats have

50:33

lost their way because they have

50:35

forgotten what he calls kitchen table

50:37

issues the things people regular people

50:39

care about and jamat you're right I mean

50:42

the the reality is um they forgot about

50:44

inflation they forgot that inflation is

50:46

terrible for the average person it's

50:48

terrible for middle class America it's

50:50

okay for people that own productive

50:52

assets because they just go up in value

50:54

but it's terrible for people that are

50:55

wage earners and that have any savings

50:57

it's terrible for older people that are

50:58

living off savings terrible you know Rob

51:01

makes this point that if the Democrats

51:02

are going have to are going to

51:03

reconformation

51:24

[Music]

51:26

because of all of these other issues so

51:28

they have no home there is no base from

51:31

which to build from right now unless

51:32

they go through a great reset and part

51:35

of it is that they have to understand

51:37

that they are actually not pro labor

51:40

they are have been Pro Capital but that

51:43

requires such a Schism from the deepest

51:46

Believers of the democratic party who

51:48

thought you know Eat the Rich you wear

51:51

it on your dress it's so important to

51:52

you in fact actually you were feeding

51:54

the rich you just and the that you

51:57

didn't even know that is just pathetic

51:59

yeah what's funny is that you know Marg

52:01

thater famous has said that the problem

52:02

of socialism you eventually run out of

52:04

other people's money and you run

52:06

deficits right and you destroy the

52:07

country this happened in Venezuela this

52:08

is always the end of socialism it's how

52:09

it it's how it finishes it's how the

52:11

movie ends we've seen it around the

52:12

world just look look South into South

52:15

America we were heading that direction

52:16

that's what I said earlier we I was I'm

52:19

afraid we might become a kleptocracy if

52:21

this doesn't stop and I'm so grateful to

52:23

all the great Patriots of Doge and the

52:24

government the president for making it

52:25

happen cuz we were heading that

52:27

direction so the Democratic party is

52:29

lost they'll continue to be lost

52:31

interesting thing came up this week on

52:34

Monday president Trump signed an

52:35

executive order laying out a plan to

52:37

establish the first Sovereign wealth

52:40

fund for the United States for those of

52:41

you who don't know a sovereign wealth

52:43

fund is essentially an investment fund

52:46

for a country it's almost universally

52:48

based on natural resources so Norway

52:52

Saudi UAE they all have uh Australia

52:55

sovereign weal funds based upon minerals

52:58

or typically oil the United States is

53:00

not known for having the oil reserves of

53:03

the Saudis or UAE or Norway this public

53:08

investment

53:09

fund would be

53:12

apparently anchored by

53:15

potentially The Tick Tock shares that

53:18

Trump said he wanted to get half of by

53:21

giving a

53:23

license a lot of that is uh unclear what

53:27

this license would be it's never existed

53:30

but this is the concept the treasury

53:33

secretary and Commerce Secretary have

53:35

been tasked with developing a plan over

53:37

the next 90 days and uh the plan should

53:40

include quote recommendations for

53:42

funding mechanisms investment Strategies

53:44

Fund structure and a governance model

53:47

chamath you were tweeting about this

53:49

what is the point of having a sovereign

53:53

wealth Fund in the United States if

53:55

we're 36 trillion in debt shouldn't we

53:57

just pay

53:59

down I I think it's not where this money

54:02

going to come from yeah well it's not an

54:04

either or thing and I think the point is

54:05

that if there are assets that are minted

54:08

effectively overnight which I think the

54:10

50% share of Tik Tok would be so call

54:13

it1 $150 billion doar the question is

54:16

what should you do with it and who

54:18

should govern it and I think this idea

54:19

that if you had a group of five Elder

54:22

Statesmen so I'm just going to throw

54:23

some names out there David terer Stan

54:26

ruen Miller Ken Griffin John dor or Mike

54:29

morritz Bill gross or some other Bond

54:32

guy my point is what you get are five

54:34

people that are very sophisticated

54:36

across all Market

54:38

categories one of them could be the

54:40

rotating CEO for some number of years

54:42

people should rotate in and rotate out

54:44

these are unpaid jobs because everybody

54:46

that has these slots should be Mega

54:49

billionaires so they shouldn't be doing

54:50

it for their own personal advancement

54:52

and they should deploy that Capital so

54:54

as you sell down the Tik Tok shares

54:56

maybe as you sell Federal lands and you

54:58

generate more oil Revenue take it all

55:01

and invest it on behalf of America into

55:04

American companies I think that's a

55:06

great incredible idea Antonio you think

55:09

the government should be in this

55:11

business so I have I I think it I think

55:14

it should but and I agree with shth uh

55:16

that the governance is very very

55:17

important I think he's got a good idea

55:20

there I think it for a different reason

55:22

is that we don't have an industrial

55:24

policy in America uh many of our

55:26

competitors around the world in

55:27

particular China have a long-term

55:30

industrial policy and they put enormous

55:32

amounts of capital behind the industrial

55:34

policy uh a sovereign wealth fund I

55:36

think would be a stealthy way to create

55:38

industrial policy in America so rather

55:40

mean industrial policy in this context

55:42

so example in China they want to they

55:46

want to build chip Fabs and they want to

55:47

catch up to to uh

55:49

tsmc so what do they do they take the

55:53

dollars of Trade Surplus they get from

55:54

US every year and they pour back into

55:56

making that stuff inside their country

55:58

and for decades part of the problem

56:00

we've had with China is that capital is

56:02

free because the banking system just

56:04

pushes money out to manufacturers and

56:05

they move the manufacturing because the

56:06

WTO from the US to China that's the

56:08

industrial policy people say the Chinese

56:10

have a long-term 100-year Vision the way

56:12

it's it manifests is this industrial

56:14

policy we don't have that here at all

56:16

and we try to do it we do like the chips

56:18

act and it goes through Commerce we have

56:20

government bureaucrats deciding how to

56:22

spend $200 billion to modernize Intel

56:25

which needs to happen I mean I'd much

56:27

rather have Ken Griffin Bill gross any

56:30

of the guys choth mentioned deciding

56:32

okay we have five Industries in America

56:34

we want to invest in let's make great

56:35

Investments right I mean let's make

56:37

great Investments for America they got

56:38

to be economic they got they got to make

56:40

money for us but they got to be good for

56:41

the country I think that's what most

56:42

these Sovereign wealth funds do some of

56:44

them make portfolio Investments but many

56:45

of them like the The Sovereign wealth

56:47

Fund in Saudi Arabia the piff they're

56:48

making enormous Investments domestically

56:50

to remake the economy you know toward

56:52

tourism example and I think this is a

56:54

great idea they're literally building CI

56:56

in neom they've got you know a dozen

56:58

cities being

57:00

constructed and trying to take an oil

57:02

economy and shift it to a tourism

57:05

economy a technology economy a private

57:07

Equity economy Antonio is totally right

57:09

like Scott bessent part of his

57:12

Congressional testimony you guys

57:14

probably saw this was he laid out this

57:16

thing that he has that's called the 333

57:18

plan right in the 333 plan says we want

57:21

to see GDP growth of 3% we want to see

57:24

deficits that are no greater than 3%

57:27

and we want to have 3 million Bears of

57:28

oil right produced domestically in the

57:30

United States but if you double click on

57:33

that if you look at the total energy

57:35

reserves in the United States they're

57:37

three times greater than the total

57:39

energy reserves of Saudi Arabia three

57:41

times across all forms so not just oil

57:44

if you oil not gas plus

57:45

coal if we actually go as Antonio said

57:49

towards an industrial policy that's

57:51

pro-energy where the incremental cost of

57:54

energy is effectively zero where we want

57:56

just a gross abundance of electrons

57:58

flowing in America for all the great

58:01

ideas that could pop up it is by

58:04

definition going to generate an enormous

58:06

amount of revenue for the federal

58:08

government and so I think having the

58:10

Sovereign wealth fund be the rainy day

58:12

fund if you will right that can Bank a

58:15

percentage of all of that I think starts

58:17

to do a lot of really good for the

58:19

long-term strategic guidance of the US

58:22

freberg what do you think here is this

58:24

something where we're making the

58:25

government too big and now we've got the

58:27

government competing with black rock and

58:29

seoa and Andre and harowitz and they're

58:32

going to be on the board of technology

58:34

companies and energy companies and

58:35

investing in it and then what happens

58:37

when you know Obama Biden Trump Bush you

58:41

get different people running these

58:42

things and then they want to do their

58:43

pet projects it seems to me like this

58:45

could be get awfully conflicted awfully

58:47

quick what do you think should this be a

58:49

business or government's in I think one

58:51

of the things the government sucks at is

58:53

capitalism so I wouldn't make capitalis

58:56

the Mandate of a sovereign wealth fund

58:58

certainly not when we have $4 trillion

59:00

of federal debt it doesn't make economic

59:02

sense our cost of capital is 5% that's

59:05

how much the interest is on this 10 to

59:07

30e debt right now so it's very hard to

59:11

actually make real risk adjusted returns

59:13

when our cost of capital is so high so I

59:15

don't think the Mandate should be hey

59:16

let's put a bunch of capital in a pool

59:18

go and invest it and try and make money

59:20

for the United States that seems silly

59:23

but my point about the government being

59:25

really bad at capital is is that the

59:26

United States government owns and has

59:30

access to and will acquire through other

59:32

means significant assets and resources

59:35

that should be monetized in a smarter

59:37

way and so I would kind of think about

59:39

the Sovereign wealth fund as being more

59:40

of a strategic vehicle for monetization

59:44

of high value government assets so for

59:46

example if Trump does actually negotiate

59:48

a 50% Equity position in Tik Tock us

59:51

that needs to sit somewhere it should

59:53

not sit in the department of whatever it

59:55

should sit with a capitalist manager

59:58

that then ultimately makes the decision

59:59

on when and how to monetize that asset

60:02

return that cash to the treasury and pay

60:03

down the debt similarly the US has large

60:06

amounts of land has access to other

60:10

large assets that get transferred in

60:12

seizures etc etc so you know I don't

60:14

know if you guys remember all this but

60:15

there was like bit Bitcoin seizures that

60:17

have happened over the years is the

60:19

government has cracked down on criminal

60:21

Enterprises then the government owns

60:22

this Bitcoin do you think the smartest

60:24

people are making the decisions on where

60:25

and how to sell down that Bitcoin I

60:27

guarantee you not I would much rather

60:28

have a capitalist making that decision

60:30

so I would view the you know the The

60:32

Sovereign wealth fund being less about

60:34

raise capital from other means in the

60:35

government which effectively means

60:37

borrowing money through treasuries

60:38

because of the the debt level we have

60:40

and trying to invest it and much more

60:43

being about okay what strategic assets

60:45

can the US government monetize and use

60:47

this as the mechanism for doing that and

60:49

then ultimately I think the objective

60:51

should be to return that capital I I do

60:53

think there's also an opportunity for

60:54

managing

60:56

Social Security in a smarter way so

60:58

Social Security's functionally going to

61:00

be bankrupt in eight years the way the

61:03

trust is set up the cash that's there

61:05

the assets that are there and the demand

61:07

on Social Security given the Aging

61:09

population and the rising payouts every

61:12

year so one of the other ways to think

61:15

about this is what are the long-term

61:17

debt obligations which is ultimately the

61:18

point of these Sovereign wealth funds

61:20

and can they be invest in a smarter way

61:21

why is the Social Security entities

61:23

ultimately owning you know 3% yielding

61:26

bonds when they could be owning interest

61:28

in in equities so I would kind of think

61:31

about that strategic pool of capital

61:33

being managed by this as well and less

61:35

about the Mandate of go be a capitalist

61:37

investor for the United States raise

61:39

money and make money I think leave that

61:41

to the markets but when it comes to

61:43

strategic assets I think this could be a

61:44

good vehicle for when the got shut down

61:48

yeah we seized 144,000 Bitcoin and

61:51

that's sitting somewhere in some

61:53

Department of Justice off yeah they sold

61:56

I I think they sold sold it yeah no I

61:58

think we still have it I think that was

62:00

like the idea was that was going to

62:01

become the Bitcoin Str Reserve I mean

62:03

you could also come up with the doj the

62:06

doj sells these so like who do you think

62:08

of the doj is making the Bitcoin Market

62:10

decisions and is that the right person

62:12

to be monetizing these assets I mean d

62:14

made an interesting point security I I

62:16

just want to follow up on which

62:17

is when when you think about social

62:21

security it's six uh $6 trli of our 36

62:24

TR debt and it's actually a fake

62:26

treasury bill so just to one of the

62:29

things we figured out in early days

62:31

before the inauguration I is like that 6

62:33

trillion dollar sits on The Ledger it's

62:35

just a paper Ledger over so actually if

62:37

it gets paid out it's also be very

62:38

inflationary it's just a fake treasury

62:39

got ledged over at that pays a very low

62:41

rate and here at valer with my partners

62:44

John shulin has been reading to try to

62:47

help the the only the only thing we find

62:49

that's audit in the government the the

62:51

Social Security Administration actually

62:52

has an audit it has an audit and when

62:54

you go through the audit it's crazy the

62:57

material weaknesses going by to Doge

62:58

that you find yeah it' be way better to

63:01

have that invested in a way that was

63:02

economic for people with real money by

63:05

way as for this guys as we're speaking

63:08

the federal judge just put a temporary

63:10

restraining order on Doge and has barred

63:13

Elon and his team from accessing US

63:15

Treasury payments data all right so now

63:19

we're gonna

63:20

have a real grudge match between the

63:24

public the Federal which judge was it

63:26

federal judge federal judge yeah would

63:28

you know why jamat do it say why no but

63:31

Elizabeth Warren is doing a Victory lap

63:34

so I'm sure that you

63:36

know she's part of it so the government

63:38

agency set up by the president can't

63:40

look at

63:41

the database of the treasury so just to

63:45

be u double click here

63:47

doge is not a new agency it's the

63:50

renaming of existing agency I can't

63:51

remember the name of it we def find it

63:53

Elon tweeted about this uh some weeks

63:54

ago

63:56

that was set up under Obama actually to

64:00

do this to accredit an audit function to

64:02

the government what's crazy about this

64:04

ruling to me is uh Congress basically is

64:08

the Constitution delegates to to the

64:09

executive the um the ability to spend

64:12

the money and they go through Congress

64:13

it gets actually appropriate in Congress

64:14

and the executive spends it how can you

64:17

spend money if you don't know where it

64:19

went I how can you be responsible right

64:21

you have the authority to spend it but

64:22

not the and how can you responsibly

64:23

spend it if you actually can't go look

64:25

and see where it goes guys this is

64:27

flying Fast and Furious president Trump

64:29

just unveiled his framework for his tax

64:33

plan no tax on tips no tax on senior

64:36

social security no tax on overtime pay

64:39

renew the middle class tax cuts adjust

64:42

the salt cap so again very Pro as I said

64:44

Pro labor Pro populist eliminate all

64:47

special tax breaks for billionaire

64:48

sports team owners oh all right I'm no

64:51

longer I already sold a team I already

64:53

sold my fees I already sold my fees

64:57

oops oops close the carried interest

65:01

close the carried interest tax deduction

65:03

loophole which allowed you to claim

65:04

carried interest as sorry

65:07

Antonio I better run oh no I'll be back

65:11

in a few hours it's sell some

65:15

things isn't that incredible I mean he

65:17

is really going for the jugular

65:19

wow amazing I support this 100% the Suk

65:23

deductions coming back is that right

65:25

marginally though I don't think he's

65:26

going to give it the way that it was

65:28

before but isn't this incredible I

65:31

mean how who's going to stand up and lay

65:34

on the railroad tracks for being able to

65:37

amortise a multi-billion dollar sports

65:39

team purchase or that when you make a

65:42

fund investment you should get long-term

65:44

kept gains treatment who is going to be

65:46

that person in this ad nobody's going to

65:48

stand up for these things I think we

65:50

should just stop doing Ventra and just

65:52

start NOS we just start a whole Rats

65:54

nness of NOS to ship money around you

65:57

could have an incubator yeah absolutely

66:00

incubator incubator come if you've got a

66:02

great idea for an NGO why why didn't you

66:05

launch launch in every single random

66:08

developing country in the world I mean

66:10

if I had known you would have had 8

66:12

billion of AUM because of a USA ID just

66:15

launch one in Vietnam and we could have

66:18

yeah I could launch go launch I love it

66:21

we we could have had a yeah a launch

66:23

accelerator in Vietnam for transgender

66:26

yeah the Jason calanis launch fun of

66:28

Equatorial

66:31

Guinea it is so crazy though to come out

66:35

and you know watching the Democrats just

66:38

the self-own of coming out and being

66:40

like we have to stop people from

66:44

stopping wasteful spend like they just

66:46

don't seem to understand how unpopular

66:50

these are kitchen table issues like Rah

66:51

said I mean everyone cares about that

66:53

and if you don't care about that if you

66:54

care about these Fring isues and not the

66:56

things people care about on the kitchen

66:57

table well and if you think about the

67:01

transgender Sports issue biological

67:04

males playing in female sports leagues

67:08

that issue that Trump just did an EO

67:09

yesterday for was such an obvious issue

67:13

of fairness and just has nothing to do

67:15

with transgender it just has to do with

67:17

like biology if a if a biological male

67:21

plays basketball on a on a a biological

67:24

female team some somebody's going to get

67:26

hurt and that person's going to score

67:27

100 points it's just obvious and the

67:30

fact that the Democrats couldn't see

67:32

that issue being 100% for or

67:37

95% makes no sense like it's just such

67:40

an obvious litus test of logic I mean

67:44

look man the Constitution is is a is a

67:46

document about fairness the people that

67:48

found this country the Patriots found

67:50

this country they they did it cuz they

67:51

treated unfilly at home all of us here

67:54

um are one generation away right or two

67:56

generations away from immigration and

67:58

the reality is that's why people come

67:59

here man it's it's unamerican it's un

68:01

amican deg we got two people here who

68:03

are immigrants yes I'm reading the TR

68:05

and it looks like this TR means

68:07

temporary restraining order and it and

68:09

it's actually Narrows who from Doge yeah

68:13

can get read access down to two people

68:15

Tom kuss and Marco

68:17

elz oh okay so they don't want to have

68:22

the whole team be able to see what's at

68:24

treasury they just to have a process and

68:26

some sign off okay that sounds not

68:29

unreasonable I just want to point out

68:31

two people to to look at no matter how

68:33

good they are I'm she we're at 24/7 look

68:35

at all the payments in the US government

68:37

is not a lot yeah it does seem like it

68:39

needs to be more than two but it doesn't

68:41

seem like they're saying you can't look

68:42

at it they just want to have some

68:44

controls in

68:45

place I mean feels to me like that's an

68:47

administrative block that's like the

68:49

narrowest thing you could do two okay

68:51

yeah you can come in but you can just

68:52

send two people and just these two

68:54

people so if they get sick or something

68:56

happens no one else comes in that seems

68:58

to me to be truly dis mystery block to

69:00

slow it

69:01

down yeah H well we're interpreting this

69:04

in real time the facts will come out

69:06

over time let's wrap up on uh Google

69:09

Google dropped 7% after reporting

69:11

earnings on Tuesday chath Revenue up 12%

69:14

year-over-year to 96.5 billion wow Cloud

69:18

revenue is up 30% year-over-year 12

69:20

billion YouTube ads surging 14% to 10.5

69:24

billion net profit was around 26.5

69:28

billion up 28% year-over-year so they

69:30

are really focusing on profitability

69:33

obviously full year numbers this is just

69:36

extraordinary total revenue 350 billion

69:39

with a 100 billion in net profit cloud

69:42

and YouTube finished 2024 with a

69:44

combined run rate of $110 Billion

69:47

YouTube is basically Netflix inside of

69:50

uh inside of Google and their Google

69:52

cloud is essentially AWS inside of

69:55

Google

69:56

the thing that made investors get

69:58

concerned shth is that Google said it

70:00

would invest 75 billion in capex in

70:04

2025 42% jump over 2024 29% more than

70:09

analysts expect obviously this has to do

70:11

with data center servers and the AI

70:14

buildout what do you think about that

70:16

number 75 billion obviously in relation

70:20

to what we saw with deep seek doing it

70:24

with maybe a little bit less maybe

70:25

they're lying is this just an

70:30

absolute waste of money or gargantuan

70:32

number or is it something they can

70:35

easily with that amount of profitability

70:36

and cash they have absorb and use in the

70:38

future I think I should stipulate that

70:40

Google's models are probably the best of

70:42

all the models across a broad base

70:45

of capabilities if you test for them and

70:49

so let's start there which is whatever

70:51

they're doing is working the thing that

70:53

they need to do is be able to translate

70:55

those models now into better

70:58

products and I think that that will

71:00

happen slowly like for example if you

71:02

look at Deep

71:03

research most of the people online that

71:06

are evaluating deep research would now

71:07

say that open AI is both faster and just

71:11

better on the margins all of these

71:13

things can be improved I don't think

71:15

that's a comment on the base model I

71:16

think it's a comment on post trining and

71:18

how they're attempting to productize

71:20

these things

71:22

so the other thing that Google has is a

71:24

money machine that directly benefits

71:27

from these Aid driven optimizations on

71:30

ad targeting the only other company that

71:32

has anywhere close to the same

71:34

credibility as meta so I think what both

71:37

of these two companies need to do is do

71:40

a better job of explaining how that 75

71:42

billion gets segregated how much of that

71:45

goes to these AI enabled models that

71:47

actually do better ads optimization

71:49

there was a there was a really

71:51

interesting discussion by a former meta

71:52

machine learning engineer on X about how

71:54

they did it it's pretty amazing it's

71:56

staggering but if they could say half

71:58

the money goes to that and the other

72:00

half goes to more speculative you know

72:02

pre-training and post training I think

72:04

the market would have eaten it up so

72:07

it's probably more of a disclosure issue

72:09

for Google because I would say right now

72:10

their model quality is the

72:12

best you have thoughts on this buildout

72:15

Antonio obviously I think you've been

72:17

involved with xai uh and obviously

72:19

involved with Twitter and X previously

72:22

and colossus's colossal buildout that

72:24

was EX to watch a period of time do you

72:27

have concerns that like some people do

72:29

that this build out is too expensive and

72:32

would be too hard to monetize all that

72:35

expense or is it uh maybe a little bit

72:38

of hand ringing and the opportunity in

72:40

AI is so obviously huge that you just

72:43

got to take the leap of faith and and

72:45

and if you build it the revenue will

72:48

come yeah I think chath has the right

72:50

framework here which is return invest of

72:52

capital and what he's saying by you know

72:53

if Google had said hey half the money is

72:56

for ad and half the money is for much

72:57

bued post training the market would have

72:59

seen that half the money has a higher

73:01

return of capital and goog's return of

73:02

capital is actually going up uh after

73:04

the impation of of AI models into their

73:07

into their company and I I think that

73:08

sort of abstracts the entire Market

73:10

which is people are waking up that

73:13

return invested capital in data s will

73:14

matter that the models are basic

73:16

Commodities and super competitive in the

73:19

best case it's kind of a a land worn

73:21

Asia it's a melee in in a worst case

73:23

just total Commodities what does matter

73:25

is the return on Capital data center

73:27

which is influenced by how good the data

73:29

centers are so you mention the X data

73:31

center it's 100,000 GP cluster it's the

73:34

most dense coherent cluster in the world

73:36

and it will just train faster and better

73:38

than other clusters and it's also built

73:40

for the most cheaply and the fastest so

73:44

XI will have the highest train on

73:45

Capital and I also think the best train

73:46

data and therefore will win I think

73:48

Google will also win because they have U

73:50

their tensor flow chips they make their

73:52

own some of their own chips they do

73:54

focus on RC and they have a great

73:57

Monopoly to kind of fund it all so I

73:59

don't think it's over blown I think that

74:00

I think this is going to be as you guys

74:01

have said before in the podcast you know

74:02

bigger than Industrial Revolution but uh

74:05

it's also true that you need to have a

74:08

good roic and if you don't you're not

74:10

transparent about it you can see what

74:12

happens I I would argue Google's

74:14

probably been the most frugal thoughtful

74:17

and well-managed Computing

74:19

infrastructure investor of all time you

74:22

know the 98 to 2005 era Google it was

74:25

all about just cheap throwaway racks

74:27

that that was the big Advantage they had

74:28

is they weren't using the expensive

74:30

Oracle servers and they had a two to

74:33

three-year kind of depreciation timeline

74:35

on those but they were super cheap and

74:37

so the the roic was quite good then they

74:40

got into Energy Efficiency which they

74:42

realized was a big driving cost they

74:43

started to build systems that that were

74:46

more energy efficient as a result they

74:47

lasted

74:48

longer and then their their depreciation

74:51

schedule moved up to 3 to four years

74:53

meaning they could kind of write down

74:54

the value of the servers over 3 to four

74:56

years and then from 2010 to 2015 era

75:00

their Hardware system for cloud allowed

75:04

them to kind of extend through

75:06

repurposing the utilization and they

75:08

increased their depreciation from to

75:10

four to five years and then in 2021 I

75:12

don't know if you guys remember this

75:13

they made this kind of big change to

75:15

their depreciation schedule on data

75:18

center infrastructure to six years so

75:20

when they invest capex in a data center

75:23

they would write down the servers over a

75:25

six-year cycle because of AI

75:26

optimization on maintenance so they he

75:28

started using AI just for internal

75:31

management of the infrastructure so I

75:33

would view the $75 billion capex

75:37

actually as a very positive signal for

75:39

the company I think that it means that

75:41

they have a really strong line of sight

75:43

on how they're going to have full

75:45

utilization and great return on this if

75:48

you do the math Ric math on this $75

75:50

billion assume a 20% roic you've got to

75:55

generating call it roughly an

75:56

incremental $15 billion of profit a year

76:00

plus the amortization of the 75 billion

76:02

so take the 75 billion divided by six

76:04

that's 12 billion plus 15 billion so

76:07

what they're so basically they would

76:08

need to make an incremental 27 billion

76:10

of operating profit a year on the 75

76:13

billion for this to meet their roic

76:15

performance that doesn't seem crazy

76:17

because that's just under 20% of their

76:19

in of their annual operating profit this

76:21

is a very kind of I think important

76:22

point which is Google doesn't just do

76:25

this to to build out AI in the future

76:27

they have a really strong line of sight

76:29

on how this can kind of increment and

76:30

you don't have a huge hurdle for them

76:32

for this to pay back so I don't know I

76:34

would kind of take Antonio's point I'd

76:35

view this as a positive I think if you

76:37

use their historical ability to manage

76:39

infrastructure and make predictions on

76:41

Investments as an indicator of the

76:43

future this is a strong and positive

76:45

indicator and I do think that for all

76:47

the naysayers out there that think that

76:48

search is going to evolve to chat you

76:50

could look at this as being a really

76:52

important proof point that Google has

76:53

the confidence that they're going to be

76:54

able to move from search to chat and as

76:57

jamat points out they've got great

76:58

performative models and I would view

77:00

this more of as a positive than a

77:02

negative if they were under investing I

77:03

would be worried that they didn't know

77:04

where to invest but to see them make

77:06

this degree of investment highlights the

77:07

confidence in the strategy and turny I

77:10

don't know if you've been watching the

77:11

agent space or deep research that came

77:13

out from Google and then closed AI I

77:16

mean open AI launched their copycat

77:18

version of this product sorry I don't

77:22

short feelings on it I'm curious your

77:24

thoughts on on job displacement we're

77:27

looking at self-driving obviously wh's

77:29

got cars on the road obviously uh Tesla

77:32

which you were previously on the board

77:33

of and I know you were the First

77:35

Institutional Investor in Tesla self-

77:38

driving is pretty good I only get like

77:39

one or two disengagements per hour and

77:42

they tend to be the ones where I just

77:43

want to take the turn a little sharper

77:44

kind of thing so that's getting pretty

77:46

close byd is very close you got a A lot

77:50

of job displacement that aocc millions

77:52

and millions of drivers in 10 years

77:55

could lose their jobs researchers

77:58

working at Gartner Group whatever Boston

78:00

Consultant Group like it feels like

78:02

there could be massive job displacement

78:05

do you have concerns about that in the

78:07

American economy and globally there's a

78:09

lot of hand ring about this and it's

78:10

real in Prior moments of LW disruption

78:15

that there have been uh job

78:16

displacements because there's you know

78:17

generous people get retrained for

78:18

something else you can't retrain so you

78:20

know I think uh there were studies mon

78:22

fre did of the steel industry in

78:24

Pittsburgh in the '70s that the cost of

78:27

each steel worker job loss was about a

78:29

million dollars to the economy because

78:30

these people couldn't be retrained and

78:32

that might happen here but I'm going I

78:34

have a more benign Outlook personally

78:36

what I think is going to happen is that

78:38

you will have job loss uh but the amount

78:41

of productivity that will be released in

78:42

the US economy is going to be

78:44

extraordinary right so so GDP growth is

78:47

a function of the numberal people

78:48

working times productivity it's very

78:50

simple economists want to make it more

78:52

complex than that but it's the number of

78:53

people working times productivity

78:55

if you go if prty goes up to 5 6 7 8%

78:59

you get a massive boost in GDP growth

79:02

and then what happens well people can

79:05

get retrained they can get different

79:06

jobs different Services happen people

79:08

start companies the application layer of

79:11

LMS is just starting the the barrier to

79:13

start a company is quite low things like

79:15

launch probably explode because there's

79:17

all these people who have don't have

79:18

jobs anywh that were accountants and

79:19

want to start something it's hard to

79:21

know what happens you know I believe in

79:22

American agility I believe in in this

79:24

country I believe that we will figure

79:26

out figure out a way that make this all

79:28

work and if there's enough productivity

79:30

and money in the economy that's flowing

79:32

people will find new jobs they will find

79:35

new business to start they will find new

79:36

things to do we have to get out of the

79:37

way take regulation down and let

79:40

Americans be creative and unleash the

79:42

American productivity machine Let's make

79:45

that happen yeah that's I think really

79:47

strong thoughts and I mean that's the

79:49

game we're seeing on the field how many

79:50

companies are we seeing hit a million

79:52

dollars in Revenue with five employees

79:54

where that used to take yeah 25 so the

79:57

efficiency is there trath your your

79:59

outlook on this issue since it seems to

80:01

be coming up again specifically with

80:03

truck drivers and Uber drivers and all

80:06

kinds of other research jobs that seem

80:09

to be be doing pretty well um or can be

80:11

done pretty well by AI where where do

80:14

you stand on this issue today I think

80:15

it's a process Buffett wrote about this

80:18

in an annual letter and what he

80:20

described was the changing nature of

80:23

jobs during The Agrarian

80:26

Revolution and what you saw was a large

80:29

cohort of people who supported

80:31

themselves through

80:32

farming and then the total Quantum of

80:36

those jobs shrank by 90% when you had

80:38

industrialized farming and tractors and

80:41

whatnot but the economy to Antonio's

80:44

Point grew around that business and

80:45

added other kinds of businesses that

80:47

didn't make sense in that moment and I

80:50

think what you see is that when

80:52

economies get more and more evolved you

80:54

see the growth of services businesses

80:57

that sort of are these things that can

80:59

only happen when you have excess right

81:03

the person that you pay for closet

81:04

organizing would not have had a job in

81:06

the turn of the agrarian Revolution or

81:09

the Industrial Revolution but they can

81:11

they can exist in 202 something and

81:13

frankly they can make a good job the

81:14

life coach there are all these jobs that

81:16

just kind of come out of nowhere

81:17

podcaster influencer all of that Venture

81:20

venture capitalist vure Capital

81:22

allocator absolutely

81:25

mutant strawberry Creator yeah so I

81:27

think that I think that you're cut that

81:30

waiting for this next turn of creativity

81:33

like the big problem that we all have

81:36

maybe I'll take the more glass half

81:38

empty version of what Antonio said is we

81:40

really haven't been unlocking people's

81:42

creativity over the last 15 years we've

81:45

been trundling around except safe of a

81:48

few companies which we all know and we

81:50

can just repeat them endlessly but we

81:52

know which ones they are that are truly

81:54

innovating and at the edge everybody

81:57

else is kind of diddling around Naval

82:00

casing so the real problem is that we

82:02

have not had a lot of reps in being

82:04

creative I'll give you just a very

82:05

simple example Nick can you find this

82:08

even extremely state industries did you

82:10

see the byd clip of the car that and I

82:14

thought myself Park yes with a little

82:16

swipe it's how tragic is it that you

82:21

look at this and you're blown away yeah

82:24

and you're blown blown away for two

82:25

reasons one is a I didn't think that

82:28

that was possible and B why doesn't it

82:31

exist in America but the reality

82:33

underneath the hood is extremely benign

82:36

how this is

82:37

implemented and so I think that the

82:39

problem is we spent so much

82:42

time losing the

82:44

script I think Antonio is right when you

82:47

unshackle people to not focus on the

82:50

mental load of getting the pronouns

82:52

right or the this or the that

82:55

you won't be so overwhelmed by things

82:58

like this because you will have already

82:59

been pushing the boundaries of human

83:00

creativity we need to get back to that

83:02

we need to let these creative people

83:04

cook and I hope I hope that that happens

83:07

and I think that that will happen

83:09

freeberg can you do a science corner on

83:11

the FDA approval for the nonopioid

83:14

painkiller right not today no no I know

83:17

but could you do it like in a couple

83:18

weeks

83:20

yeah by the one I wanted to do is that

83:23

new macro study on gp1s which I think is

83:26

super interesting oh tell us you guys

83:29

remember I talked a while ago about how

83:31

they were able to mine VA data so the VA

83:34

right they they take care of veterans

83:37

and they have all the medical records

83:39

and on an anonymized basis they can make

83:41

that data available to researchers and

83:43

so if you guys remember this this is how

83:45

they identified that the Epstein bar

83:47

virus or the virus that causes mono as

83:49

being statistically certain to be the

83:51

trigger for multiple sclerosis in the

83:53

cohort of hundreds of thousands of

83:54

patients that were in this this data set

83:58

no

83:59

one got Ms that didn't get Epstein bar

84:03

virus if you did not get Epstein bar

84:05

virus you did not get Ms I don't know if

84:07

you guys remember I did the science

84:08

Corner a while ago anyway so the data

84:10

set that you can mine at the VA is

84:11

incredible so they pulled all the data

84:13

from everyone that's been on the gp1

84:15

agonists and they identified all of the

84:17

health effects across multiple

84:18

indications the statistical difference

84:20

between the cohorts okay so this

84:22

research team out of St Louis pulled all

84:25

the data from the VA database and

84:28

basically they looked at you know 1.2

84:30

million people with diabetes that didn't

84:32

take anything compared to 215,000 that

84:36

took the glp1 receptor agonists and

84:39

another 600,000 people that took other

84:41

drugs for diabetes so basically this

84:45

cohort

84:47

segmentation allows them to isolate the

84:49

effect of the glp1 drugs um and as you

84:52

can see here this shows across hundreds

84:55

of thousands of patients the effect of

84:57

the glp1 on a hazard ratio which means

85:00

like How likely are you to have the

85:01

following health condition versus the

85:04

population that's not taking the glp

85:06

ones and then uh on the right if you

85:09

scroll to the right Nick are the

85:11

increase in risk and on the left are the

85:13

things that go down so the increase the

85:15

only thing that increased is like you

85:16

know 8% or 10% increase in nausea and

85:19

vomiting y confirm uh musculoskeletal

85:22

complications grd which is you know

85:25

gastric reflux from sleep indigestion

85:30

yeah and sleep disturbances related to

85:31

indigestion so it's all abdominal stuff

85:33

now if you go over here to the benefit

85:35

side so the benefit side is what

85:38

conditions did you see a decrease in so

85:40

you have a decrease in shock a decrease

85:42

in uh he hepatic failure so liver

85:45

failure respiratory failure cardiac

85:48

arrest in fact on cardiac arrest you see

85:50

a 30% decrease in the probability of

85:52

having cardiac arrest from the cohort

85:55

that's on the

85:57

glp1 Bia wow schizophrenia so so this

86:01

goes to the point if you guys remember

86:03

the interview I did a couple months ago

86:05

with the CEO of Eli Lily that they have

86:07

all these clinical trials going on right

86:09

now for different indications for the

86:11

glp1 receptor agonists that they're

86:13

seeing that there's health benefits

86:15

Beyond just the weight loss in reducing

86:17

things like kidney disease obviously

86:19

liver problems mental problems and so on

86:22

do we know why and and if we don't know

86:25

why do you think it's

86:27

because this is suppressing the food and

86:29

it's the the lack of food or the change

86:32

in the food consumption that's creating

86:33

this do you know what I'm asking like do

86:35

you think the drug is actually yeah y so

86:38

um you should watch the interview I did

86:40

with RS in fact this is a good moment to

86:41

call it out if you Haven seen it yeah I

86:43

think he highlights that this class of

86:45

drugs there are you know genes get

86:48

turned on and off so there's a you know

86:50

what's called a gene expression Cascade

86:52

that occurs with certain compounds so we

86:55

know that the gp1 receptor Agonist means

86:58

that it binds to these gp1 sites and

87:00

there's a cascading effect of genes that

87:03

then get expressed and what that seems

87:05

to do is turn off things like

87:07

inflammatory markers it turns on things

87:09

like C two genes which can actually

87:11

increase cellular repair so there seem

87:13

to be other benefits from these drugs

87:15

Beyond just the appetite control and

87:17

it's not the appetite control itself but

87:19

there seems to be other effects let me

87:21

ask you a question from these these

87:22

receptors being activated you put your

87:25

kids on this no okay would you put your

87:29

wife on this I would consider it and I

87:32

would consider it for myself too just

87:34

for the anti-inflammatory effects how

87:36

will you make that decision well for me

87:38

personally and the thing that I weigh

87:40

against is the muscle loss and uh the

87:43

the bone density loss so I think that if

87:45

you look at the the biggest kind of

87:46

effect on these on a on the downside

87:48

basis is you should increase your

87:50

protein in your diet you have to do

87:52

weightlifting there's things that you

87:54

would do and frankly if you do those

87:55

things anyway if you increase protein in

87:57

your diet and do more weightlifting

87:59

you're actually going to see very good

88:00

health benefits from just doing those

88:02

things that may actually outweigh the

88:04

benefits you get the I have a question

88:06

you Dave which is and this is the

88:07

question is when when you look at that

88:08

data and you talk to the

88:10

cosos how much you think really longterm

88:13

when the longterm sies are out is going

88:14

to be that it was the drug or just that

88:17

being obese is very bad for you and so

88:19

when you take your body fat down

88:21

dramatically all these other Gene

88:23

Expressions happen anyway right so you

88:25

think which one will it well this is

88:26

this is what they're starting to isolate

88:27

and I will say Antonio they are starting

88:29

to see that there are other Expressions

88:33

that are not related to the Obesity and

88:34

people that don't have obesity that

88:36

they're using that are using these drugs

88:37

so they're they're seeing that cohort

88:39

data now a clinical studies uh phase two

88:41

were published and I think we're going

88:42

to see phase three and some of these

88:44

indications soon but it is looking very

88:47

positive that it's not just the loss of

88:49

obesity now to your point being obese

88:52

not exercising eating poorly destroys

88:54

your health you stop that right right

88:57

everything gets better um if you lift

88:59

weights freeberg can you tell us when

89:00

you decide to do this I will yeah if I

89:02

if I do do a glp1 um receptor Agonist I

89:06

will let you guys know right now I'm I I

89:08

actually feel like I want to go through

89:10

a process of

89:11

increasing uh my weightlifting routine

89:13

more I I you know I've been trying to

89:16

create a more kind of rigorous my

89:17

schedule just sucks so that's been the

89:19

hardest thing for me but I actually want

89:20

to go through that first before making

89:22

that decision

89:24

cool David oh I'm sorry no I was just

89:26

curious why why that order I don't

89:28

understand I want to measure the effects

89:29

because I do think that if you actually

89:31

get into a a regular weightlifting

89:33

routine and you increase protein in your

89:35

diet which is another thing I've been

89:37

making a a concerted measured effort to

89:39

do which is hard as a vegetarian by the

89:42

way you see pretty significant uh health

89:46

effects and so I'm trying to get through

89:47

the process of increasing muscle

89:49

composition before I'll make the

89:51

decision on whether or not to add G one

89:52

I don't want to kind of confound the two

89:54

factors you know what I did that made it

89:55

super easy for me um is I got uh egg

89:59

whites in a carton and I have and I have

90:02

this incredible uh

90:04

crunchy spicy garlic thing that

90:07

everybody muku and everybody makes and

90:09

everybody's crazy about just in the

90:10

mornings I'll eat whatever it is 10

90:13

ounces 12 ounces of egg whites with that

90:16

spicy stuff it's delicious it's awesome

90:18

and I just try to you know get that

90:20

whatever 30 40 grams of protein first

90:22

thing in the morning and then doing the

90:25

rocking well this is is easy like you

90:27

just wear a 35 pound weight vest

90:29

freeberg and you walk a mile or two and

90:32

you will get like my problem Jason with

90:34

all of this is that every time I see

90:37

something so I saw Gary Brea on the Sha

90:39

Ryan podcast recently and Sean Ryan asks

90:43

him like what are a handful of things

90:45

that you recommend for everybody right

90:47

and he recommends mineral salt and then

90:49

he recommends a methylated vitamin he

90:51

recommends amino acids whatever there's

90:53

a protocol

90:54

then if you happen to catch a clip on X

90:56

of Andrew huberman he'll have a protocol

90:58

and then Brian Johnson has a protocol

91:01

and the problem is all these Protocols

91:03

are slightly the same but they're just

91:05

different enough where it creates a huge

91:07

cognitive load in a normal person like

91:09

myself to your point freeberg Who's busy

91:11

who's got a job who's got kids how do

91:14

you decide and so I would really love

91:18

something to be sort of like I don't

91:20

want to say gold standard because you

91:21

can't say that but that is like what's

91:24

the real bank for your buck what Antonio

91:27

said you know are you just better off

91:28

just losing the 50 pounds and then this

91:31

is why these products are successful and

91:33

I think will be continue to grow pretty

91:36

dramatically Antonio is because it is

91:38

pop a pill and it solves all those

91:39

problems it doesn't require a cognitive

91:41

load it will be in a pill format soon

91:43

right I mean the pills are almost here

91:46

it would be very cool actually DAV if

91:47

you do this U to jamar's point about you

91:50

know people being confused if you did

91:52

the every the every person's um kind of

91:55

story around this journey and you

91:58

documented itally you know like you you

91:59

did like this is my weight I did

92:01

weightlifting first and I did the gop1

92:02

and you actually did like a weekly thing

92:04

where you checked in and even it was 10

92:06

minutes up on X or something where you

92:07

just gave people the journey um in a way

92:11

that wasn't so complicated because I

92:12

think people are confused Jam right mean

92:14

I have I have very good doctors you guys

92:15

are good doctors but if you don't you

92:17

don't know what to do by the way that

92:19

the problem for me just to give you a

92:20

sense of it I had a doctor in LA I had a

92:24

doctor in San Francisco I would have

92:26

them do their own versions of things

92:27

then I would have somebody else help me

92:30

compare it cost me way too much money

92:32

and all that complexity did was make the

92:34

quality of my healthare actually go down

92:37

yeah and instead what I really wanted

92:38

was just a very simple protocol that

92:41

said take the metformin because it's

92:43

good for you take the vitamin D take the

92:45

omega-3 fatty acids otherwise just eat

92:47

this meal plan and it would help me a

92:50

lot more than than I've had to Cobble it

92:52

together myself because by the way when

92:53

you see something like you know Gary

92:55

Brea is very very articulate very smart

92:58

but when I see him on the Sha Ryan

92:59

podcast the first thing I do is I go and

93:02

populate an Amazon cart with all the

93:03

things that he said because my instinct

93:06

is well I should do the right thing for

93:07

myself this is a couple hundred bucks

93:09

it's worth the investment but then the

93:11

day after somebody else say something

93:13

else you know so I'll be really you have

93:16

a little OCD though Jamal I've known you

93:17

for a long time you get very obsessive

93:20

with my father died because of poor

93:22

health my best friend died of Po health

93:24

I feel like you you should at least do

93:27

the things that are preventable have you

93:29

guys seen that that post jat did with

93:31

you he was like half naked in the mirror

93:33

he looks great what are you talking

93:34

about he looks great if if you you could

93:36

look like that you you'd do it too no no

93:38

no I'm talking about like when you had

93:40

the glucose monitor I'm sitting with him

93:42

at the poker table he's got the glucose

93:43

monitor and he's taking a sip of wine

93:45

he's checking the glucose he's Tak he's

93:48

having like a piece of BJ then he's

93:49

checking the glucose monitor it's just

93:52

like literally becomes upset

93:57

me come on

94:00

thisi so funny about this picture all

94:02

these clown all these clowns on the

94:05

internet are like they don't understand

94:07

that when you're 6'2 these are big legs

94:09

when you're those are not

94:13

big when you're a short King when you're

94:16

a short King when you're like my chck I

94:19

lost my chti when you're 57 58 I get I

94:23

get it while you cuz you guys are all

94:24

stubby and short I don't get it this is

94:26

the problem with generative AI you can

94:27

tell it's a fake photo you can tell that

94:29

that was generative AI because nobody

94:31

has legs that th how could you have

94:34

biceps and then legs that th doesn't

94:36

make sense

94:38

blushing unbelievable what a thirst trap

94:41

now you guys are going to find photos of

94:42

Antonio and I we're gon to throw

94:46

themar four pieces of advice for people

94:48

number one get good sleep number two

94:51

exercise number three diet number four

94:53

for meditation and if you want to do

94:55

that it's very simple you get you get

94:57

the calm meditation app you get the

94:59

eight sleep sleep you get the fitbot for

95:02

fitness and then you get Nutri

95:08

forut your diet those are the four

95:10

things you focus

95:12

on make sure you have a good Athena you

95:15

get a good Athena assistant all this is

95:17

brought to you by my NGO which is Allin

95:20

NGO USA gave us$1 18 million last year

95:23

guys I forgot to tell you about it but

95:25

don't worry it's in an offshore account

95:27

for all of us when we get back to

95:29

Ethiopia Vietnam we have an all-in

95:31

castle built there okay we built uh with

95:34

our NGO we'll see everybody next week

95:37

love you boys we love you good see you

95:39

guys man great job

95:43

Antonio let your winners

95:46

ride Rain Man

95:50

David and in said we open source it to

95:53

the hands and they've just gone crazy

95:55

with it love queen

95:59

[Music]

96:03

of

96:05

[Music]

96:06

Besties my dog taking

96:09

[Music]

96:11

driveway oh

96:14

man we should all just get a room and

96:16

just have one big huge ory cuz they're

96:18

all this useless it's like this like

96:19

sexual tension that they just need to

96:21

release

96:22

somehow what

96:26

[Music]

96:28

we need to get

96:31

[Music]

96:36

merch I'm going all in

Interactive Summary

The podcast discusses the Trump 2.0 presidency's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), focusing on its investigation into US Aid, which revealed significant wasteful spending on projects like EV charging stations in Vietnam, sex changes in Guatemala, and DEI musicals. The hosts compare DOGE's approach to the Twitter takeover, emphasizing zero-based budgeting and the need for government accountability, addressing issues of potential kleptocracy and media funding. They also cover recent developments in crypto regulation, including a new legislative framework and stablecoin bills, and Trump's proposed sovereign wealth fund. The conversation extends to Google's massive AI infrastructure investment and its potential impact, as well as the broad health benefits discovered from GLP-1 agonists based on VA data.

Suggested questions

7 ready-made prompts