Prepare for the Great Bubble Burst Part 1 of 2
508 segments
[Music]
The stock market is very expensive. We
are in a bubble about to burst. At least
that's what most people are saying. So a
few notable people have said that stock
prices are way over valued starting with
Jerome Powell, the Fed chair. He said
recently that equity prices are fairly
highly valued. And then Lisa Cook, a Fed
governor, also said valuations are
elevated. Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JP
Morgan, said
asset prices are
at the top 10% or 15% of historic
valuations. We have got Jeff Bezos,
founder of Amazon, recently saying that
we are in an industrial bubble. And of
course, if you look at YouTube, almost
every mother, father, son is using the
word, you know, bubble, right? AI market
bubble, lots of bubble in US tech. We
have got early days of a bubble, AI
bubble about to burst. History tells us
this bubble stocks will not end well.
So, million-dollar question, is the
stock market in a bubble? Is it
overvalued? The answer is yes and no.
So, why? So, yes, there are certain
parts of the stock market that are in a
bubble. They are way over priced,
certain parts of the market. But then
again, there are also some other parts
of the market that are actually very,
very cheap. They're very undervalued.
But as a whole, I would say the market
is not cheap. It is not cheap.
But it's also not in a bubble.
Overall, okay? So, let me first talk
about the overall market why I don't
think it's in a bubble.
And then I'll talk about the parts that
are in a bubble and the parts that are
really cheap right now.
So, first reason, why isn't the market
uh in a bubble?
So, people who say the market is very
expensive, they are looking at certain
metrics,
uh like the PE ratio. And they're saying
that the PE ratio is now
uh higher than its average in the last
10, 15 years. But I've said many, many
times that PE ratio um
can be very misleading. Why? Because
whether a PE is high or low doesn't
matter
unless you look at the growth of the
earnings, okay? And it doesn't make
sense to compare today's market PE ratio
with the PE ratio 10, 20, 30 years ago.
Because companies are now growing their
earnings with higher profit margins,
which are in fact triple the profit
margins of companies 20, 30 years ago.
So, a more accurate way to measure the
overall value of the market is to use
the PEG ratio. I've said this many, many
times. So, the PEG ratio is actually the
PE ratio divided by the growth of the
earnings. That is a better comparison.
And if you take the PEG ratio, where are
we today? So, today the S&P 500, the PEG
ratio is at 1.36.
Right there.
Which says it is not cheap, but it's
also not at the bubble territory, okay?
So, to give you some comparisons, you
can see that the PEG ratio was in fact
above two
about 2 years ago, right? And just after
COVID, the PEG ratio is was above 2.4.
And it was 1.7 here. It was one close to
1.6 here, close to 1.5
something, right? So, if you look at the
PEG ratio today, it's actually lower
than many times in the last couple of
years. So, that's why I say the market
is not
in a bubble, right? It's not cheap, but
it's not that expensive. So, don't be
fooled by all these "Oh, the market is
in a bubble, right?" And more and more
people are beginning to compare today's
market with the dot-com bubble in the
year 2000. And the funny thing is that I
would say more than half the people who
are who are comparing it were too young
to be in the market in 2000. Not me,
right? In the year 2000, I was already
in the market. I started investing in
the US markets in about 1997. So, yeah,
I saw it firsthand, so I can tell you
that this is very different from the
dot-com uh bubble. Why? Because, number
one, during the dot-com bubble, the
stocks that were going up
like crazy, they were all these dot-com
stocks that made no money. They had no
profits. And anything with the dot-com
name just went up purely on a hype that,
you know, the internet will change the
world. But today, many of the companies,
again, not all, but many of the
companies like the hyperscalers, your
Amazons, your Meta, Microsoft, your
Nvidia, are they making money? Hell
yeah. They're making huge amounts of
free cash flow. There's huge profit mar-
profit margin. So, it's a very different
case. So, let's put the dot-com bubble
and the current situation side by side.
So, the dot-com bubble actually started
with the idea of the internet, all
right? And that started sometime in '97,
just before I entered the market.
And this current moment started with the
AI revolution with the launch of
ChatGPT, which was back in November
2022. So, you can compare this with
this.
Now, remember, ultimately, what makes
the market to be in a bubble? What makes
stocks in a bubble? It's when the the
price, the share price
is not supported by the earnings or the
cash flow of the company. Very, very
simple. Remember, the value of a
business is based on how much cash it
can generate, how much profits it can
generate. So, if the stock price goes up
100%,
but the profits go up 100%, it's not
expensive, right? Because the price is
supported by the profits. But if the
stock price goes up 100%, but there's no
profits, then that's a bubble. So,
understand that distinction.
So, what you see in this dark line over
here, so the dark line is the market
price of tech stocks back in 2000 or or
leading to 2000, right? And this green
line are the earnings of the company.
So, see the big difference?
During the dot-com boom, you can see
stock prices were going up like crazy,
going up like crazy, going up like
crazy, but the profits that were
generated by the companies were either
there was no profits or the profits were
very little. So, this is what we call a
bubble. It's kind of like profits are
here, market price is here. It's like,
you know,
it's the the market price is going way
above what profits are created. So,
eventually, what happens?
It will snap and collapse.
But in today's market, you can see that,
yeah, the stock price, which again is in
the dark brown, is going up, going up,
going up, going up, going up, but it is
supported by the profits. Look at that.
Profits are going up,
supporting the market. So, it's a very
different situation. And that's why I
say the market is not cheap, but it's
also not super expensive. But Adam, the
Fed chair said it is very expensive.
What the hell does he know? Okay? Now,
by the way, that triggered some memories
for me. I remember that back in 1996
December, at the time the Fed chairman,
Alan Greenspan, he said the same thing.
In fact, he said, which was back in
December 1996, he said that investors
are undergoing a bout of irrational
exuberance. So, what does that mean?
He's saying that the investors are
crazy. The market is in a bubble. And he
said that when the S&P was at 750
points. Now, what happened after he said
that? The market continued to go up for
the next 4 years by another 100%.
When it eventually topped out
in February 2000 before the dot-com
bust. And the S&P reached 1,500 points.
So, what am I saying? I'm saying that
the Fed chairman can say that we are
expensive, and the market can still go
up for the next 4 years
by 100%, right? So,
it doesn't mean we're at the top.
Now, could this time be different? Of
course, everything is possible, but I'm
just looking at uh probabilities. And if
you ask me, are we near the top? I don't
think so.
Now, another thing that you can look at
would be the history of bull markets.
Now, some of you may feel that this bull
market has run too far and too long. No.
Now, recall something. This bull market
started in October 2022.
All right? So, from October 2022 to
October 2025, this bull market is only 3
years old. We're only in the third year
of the bull market. Now, on average, how
long do bull markets last? These are, by
the way, what we call cyclical bull
markets, not long-term bull markets.
Short-term bull markets last roughly
about 5 to 6 years. That is the average.
So, for example, this bull market over
here
lasted 5 years.
And this bull market over here lasted 6
years. This bull market lasted 5 years.
This bull market over here lasted
11 years. And this bull market over here
lasted
12 years. So, bull markets can last from
5 years to 12 years. And again, in this
current bull market, we are only in the
third year.
Which tells me, based on normal bull
market cycles, uh this bull market
should run another at least two to three
more years, at least, okay? Could it
last another 6 more years?
Yes, it is possible. That's what
happened in this bull market that
started in December '87. Everything is
possible. Now, like I said, while the
whole market may not be in a bubble yet,
maybe in 3, 4 years it will be in a
bubble, but not yet. But there are
certain areas of the market that are in
a freaking bubble. They are really
overpriced, okay? So, what are these
areas? Well, I've identified five of
these areas. First are certain parts of
the AI industry. Now again, people like
to give a broad stroke. All AI stocks
are expensive. No, there are some AI
stocks that are not that expensive. For
example, in my opinion, well not my
opinion, it's a fact, all right? Nvidia
is not that expensive. It is not cheap,
but it's not that expensive. If you look
at ASML, also not cheap, but not that
expensive. Why? Because the stock price
has gone up, but the profits have gone
up even more than the stock price. So it
is not that expensive. But there are
certain AI-related stocks that are in a
bubble. Why? Because the market price
has gone up like crazy, but the
companies are not making any money. So
people are basically paying for future
profits. Oh, one day he's going to make
a lot of money, but now no money, all
right? So that's what we call a bubble.
Always check the fundamentals of what
you are investing in or what you're
trading. So again, if you look at
Nvidia, you can see that it is making a
lot of money. It is very, very
profitable. Take a look at that. You can
see that, you know, the revenue is
growing, the profits are growing, the
free cash was going growing is actually
making a lot of money. And the intrinsic
value, which is based on the discount
rate of all the future cash flows, the
intrinsic value is 175.
And right now the stock price is at 185.
It is slightly overvalued, but it's not
like super overpriced, all right? So not
cheap, but again not super expensive.
And ASML, same thing. If you look at
ASML, you can look at the fundamentals.
You can see that again, revenue is
growing like crazy and profit growing as
well. Free cash flow is, you know,
growing as well. All right?
Um and
the intrinsic value is 948. Now if you
recall, not too long ago I did share my
video at a time that ASML was below the
intrinsic value. It was cheap, but now
it has gone up, all right? And now it's
about 1,000 dollars 43. So it's above
the intrinsic value. So again, it is not
cheap, but it's also not super
expensive.
But if you look at some AI stocks, which
are not profitable, which I call
speculative AI stocks, then yes, they
are in a bubble. They are very, very
overvalued. So a good example would be
Corweed. Another one would be Nvidea. If
you look at Corweed, you can see that
again, uh if you look at the financials,
if you don't like to look at lines, you
can look at charts, right? You can see
that yeah, so revenue is growing, but
the profit is negative. So it is still
losing money. It's not making any money,
right? It's losing money. And you can
see that the intrinsic value is 115.
And now it's 133,
the the share price. So it's also a bit
expensive, all right? If you look at
Nvidea, for example, NBIS,
same thing. You can see that uh the
intrinsic value is $49, but it's now
selling at $125. So it's selling at
double what it is actually worth. And
you can see that it is also not
profitable. It is not making any money.
It's it's losing money. In fact, the
revenue dropped. It is not profitable.
Okay?
Now, so these are what I call stocks
that are in a bubble. Now, having said
that, would I short these stocks? No.
Can you still make money from these
stocks? Yes. Why? Because remember that
in the short term, the market is not
rational. The market is emotional. So as
long as there's momentum, people are
excited, these stocks can keep going up.
So expensive can become even more
expensive. Bubble can grow bigger and
bigger and bigger. So am I saying that
you can't make money with these stocks?
No, you can make money. You can make
money. But to make money in these
stocks, you don't invest in them. You do
short-term swing trading. It is a big
difference, right? So the difference is
that when you do swing trading, you have
to watch it very carefully. You only
enter the trade when there's a low-risk
trade setup based on the price action.
That's what we teach in our stock
trading course, our swing trading
course, right? And these stocks are like
a one-night stand. When you enter, you
got to have protection. You got to have
a stop loss.
And you got to have clear profit
targets. So that as long as the momentum
goes up, yeah, you can make money, but
the moment it drops, hits the stop loss,
you got to cut and get out. Why? Because
these stocks that are not supported by
fundamentals, eventually when they drop,
they will never come back.
They will never come back. So these are
the ones where you have to cut loss
very, very fast. These are what I call
the one-night stand stocks, okay?
But on the other hand, if you look at
companies like ASML, Microsoft, Nvidia,
where they are supported by profits and
they are not that expensive, these are
what I call stocks for investing. Not
one-night stand. These are the stocks
that we can marry. And when we invest in
these stocks, we know that three, four,
five years from now, they're going to be
a lot higher. And yeah, the stock price
could drop temporarily, but we don't
need a stop loss. Or rather, I don't use
a stop loss. In fact, the more they
drop, the more I buy, because I know
that these stocks, when they drop like a
tennis ball, they will always bounce
back up, because they are supported by
fundamentals. But these kind of like
Nvidea and Corweed, where there's no
fundamentals yet, there's no profits,
you know, they can drop and never come
back. So you got to have a clear
distinction between investing stocks and
trading stocks. So like I said, these
bubble stocks, you can still make money
from it. It can still go a lot higher.
And basically, we enter as swing trades,
right? So but you want to enter when you
see a low-risk entry. So for example, if
you look at a stock right now, is it is
it on an uptrend? Yes, it is. You can
see right, wave up, wave down, wave up,
wave down, wave up. And now it's on a
bit of a wave down pattern. So if I was
trading this, for example, I would wait
for again, wave up, wave down, wave up,
wave down, wave up. When it waves down,
for example, and it finds a support, we
call this a trend retracement strategy,
and we've got a bullish candlestick
pattern over there. Guess what? We could
take the trade. We could enter here
and place a stop loss right below the
recent swing low. Or if you want to
widen the stop loss, you can even put a
stop loss here, depending on how
conservative you are. And you can ride
it all the way up, all right? And you
can of course take profit, risking 1R to
make 2R, 3R. So you can make money in
these bubble stocks as well. But like I
said, as they go up, you have to raise
your stop loss. So when they eventually
burst, you got to cut loss and get out
fast and take your profits and run, all
right? But for like Nvidia, ASML,
Microsoft, don't need all these funny
stuff. No stop loss, no profit target.
Buy, close your eyes through the ups and
downs, you'll be very rich in the long
run. So big difference. Second industry
in a bubble, quantum computing stocks.
Yeah, one day will quantum computing
change the world? Yes, but right now the
market price has run ahead of
fundamentals. Many of these quantum
computing stocks are not making any
money now. Will they make money in the
future? Yeah, but not yet, right? So
stocks like IonQ, like RGTI, they're in
a bubble. But like I said, would I short
it? No. Could you still make money from
it? Yes, but you got to enter as a trade
and not an investment, because they
could drop and never come back once the
bubble bursts. And when will it burst? I
don't know. Who the hell knows, right?
And of course, cryptocurrency stocks.
Anything linked linked to
cryptocurrency, like your your strategy,
which is MSTR, nuclear energy stocks,
also running ahead of fundamentals. Your
Oak Ridge SMR, not making money. Price
going up like crazy. Can make money, but
trading, not investing. Be very, very
clear. So again, some of you may say,
"Adam, I don't want to do trading. It's
too stressful. I just want to invest."
Then stay away from these stocks.
Nothing wrong. But if you want to trade
it, these are the stocks to trade,
right? Then again, put a stop loss and a
profit target. These are things that
you can learn. Next, uranium enrichment
stocks, which are again tied to the
nuclear energy thingy, right? So stocks
like your ticker symbol LU CCJ, high
momentum, but bubble. Just be very
careful. If you're in any of these, make
sure you've got a stop loss. Make sure
when the bubble bursts, when it bursts,
I don't know when, you got to get out
fast. Take your money and run. All
right, so that's the end of part one of
this video. Be sure to subscribe, so you
get alerted once part two is ready. And
in part two, I'll be talking about which
parts of the market are undervalued.
Where are the hidden gems right now in
the market? And I'll also talk about how
do how do we prepare for the eventual
bursting of the market bubble. It will
not burst right now, but it will burst
eventually. And when that happens, you
got to ensure that your portfolio will
do well even when it bursts. So all that
in part two.
If you want to catch my latest videos,
click on the subscribe button right now.
Click on the bell, so you get instant
notifications once I upload my latest
video. If you want to check out my
online courses, go on to
piranaprofits.com.
We're going to learn how to invest and
how to trade the financial markets and
create an income from all around the
world.
If you want to join my live Wealth
Academy program, go on to
wealthacademylive.com
and find out more about how you can
learn investing and trading live online.
This is Adam Khoo, and may the markets
be with you.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The video analyzes whether the current stock market is in a bubble, concluding that while it is not cheap, it is not in a universal bubble either. The presenter explains that relying solely on PE ratios can be misleading and suggests using the PEG ratio for a better valuation assessment. He differentiates between high-quality stocks supported by earnings and speculative stocks in bubble territory, advising investors to distinguish between long-term investments and short-term swing trades when managing these assets. Finally, he identifies specific sectors like certain AI, quantum computing, and nuclear energy stocks as potentially being in a bubble.
Videos recently processed by our community