HomeVideos

Prepare for the Great Bubble Burst Part 1 of 2

Now Playing

Prepare for the Great Bubble Burst Part 1 of 2

Transcript

508 segments

0:01

[Music]

0:10

The stock market is very expensive. We

0:13

are in a bubble about to burst. At least

0:16

that's what most people are saying. So a

0:18

few notable people have said that stock

0:20

prices are way over valued starting with

0:22

Jerome Powell, the Fed chair. He said

0:25

recently that equity prices are fairly

0:27

highly valued. And then Lisa Cook, a Fed

0:30

governor, also said valuations are

0:32

elevated. Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JP

0:34

Morgan, said

0:35

asset prices are

0:37

at the top 10% or 15% of historic

0:40

valuations. We have got Jeff Bezos,

0:43

founder of Amazon, recently saying that

0:44

we are in an industrial bubble. And of

0:46

course, if you look at YouTube, almost

0:48

every mother, father, son is using the

0:51

word, you know, bubble, right? AI market

0:53

bubble, lots of bubble in US tech. We

0:56

have got early days of a bubble, AI

0:58

bubble about to burst. History tells us

1:01

this bubble stocks will not end well.

1:03

So, million-dollar question, is the

1:06

stock market in a bubble? Is it

1:08

overvalued? The answer is yes and no.

1:13

So, why? So, yes, there are certain

1:16

parts of the stock market that are in a

1:18

bubble. They are way over priced,

1:20

certain parts of the market. But then

1:22

again, there are also some other parts

1:23

of the market that are actually very,

1:25

very cheap. They're very undervalued.

1:28

But as a whole, I would say the market

1:30

is not cheap. It is not cheap.

1:33

But it's also not in a bubble.

1:35

Overall, okay? So, let me first talk

1:37

about the overall market why I don't

1:39

think it's in a bubble.

1:41

And then I'll talk about the parts that

1:42

are in a bubble and the parts that are

1:44

really cheap right now.

1:46

So, first reason, why isn't the market

1:49

uh in a bubble?

1:51

So, people who say the market is very

1:53

expensive, they are looking at certain

1:54

metrics,

1:56

uh like the PE ratio. And they're saying

1:57

that the PE ratio is now

2:00

uh higher than its average in the last

2:02

10, 15 years. But I've said many, many

2:04

times that PE ratio um

2:08

can be very misleading. Why? Because

2:11

whether a PE is high or low doesn't

2:13

matter

2:14

unless you look at the growth of the

2:16

earnings, okay? And it doesn't make

2:18

sense to compare today's market PE ratio

2:22

with the PE ratio 10, 20, 30 years ago.

2:25

Because companies are now growing their

2:27

earnings with higher profit margins,

2:30

which are in fact triple the profit

2:32

margins of companies 20, 30 years ago.

2:36

So, a more accurate way to measure the

2:38

overall value of the market is to use

2:41

the PEG ratio. I've said this many, many

2:43

times. So, the PEG ratio is actually the

2:45

PE ratio divided by the growth of the

2:49

earnings. That is a better comparison.

2:52

And if you take the PEG ratio, where are

2:54

we today? So, today the S&P 500, the PEG

2:57

ratio is at 1.36.

3:01

Right there.

3:02

Which says it is not cheap, but it's

3:05

also not at the bubble territory, okay?

3:09

So, to give you some comparisons, you

3:11

can see that the PEG ratio was in fact

3:13

above two

3:16

about 2 years ago, right? And just after

3:19

COVID, the PEG ratio is was above 2.4.

3:23

And it was 1.7 here. It was one close to

3:27

1.6 here, close to 1.5

3:30

something, right? So, if you look at the

3:32

PEG ratio today, it's actually lower

3:35

than many times in the last couple of

3:37

years. So, that's why I say the market

3:38

is not

3:40

in a bubble, right? It's not cheap, but

3:42

it's not that expensive. So, don't be

3:44

fooled by all these "Oh, the market is

3:45

in a bubble, right?" And more and more

3:47

people are beginning to compare today's

3:49

market with the dot-com bubble in the

3:51

year 2000. And the funny thing is that I

3:53

would say more than half the people who

3:54

are who are comparing it were too young

3:57

to be in the market in 2000. Not me,

4:00

right? In the year 2000, I was already

4:02

in the market. I started investing in

4:03

the US markets in about 1997. So, yeah,

4:07

I saw it firsthand, so I can tell you

4:09

that this is very different from the

4:11

dot-com uh bubble. Why? Because, number

4:15

one, during the dot-com bubble, the

4:17

stocks that were going up

4:20

like crazy, they were all these dot-com

4:22

stocks that made no money. They had no

4:26

profits. And anything with the dot-com

4:29

name just went up purely on a hype that,

4:31

you know, the internet will change the

4:32

world. But today, many of the companies,

4:35

again, not all, but many of the

4:36

companies like the hyperscalers, your

4:38

Amazons, your Meta, Microsoft, your

4:40

Nvidia, are they making money? Hell

4:42

yeah. They're making huge amounts of

4:44

free cash flow. There's huge profit mar-

4:46

profit margin. So, it's a very different

4:48

case. So, let's put the dot-com bubble

4:50

and the current situation side by side.

4:53

So, the dot-com bubble actually started

4:55

with the idea of the internet, all

4:57

right? And that started sometime in '97,

5:00

just before I entered the market.

5:02

And this current moment started with the

5:04

AI revolution with the launch of

5:06

ChatGPT, which was back in November

5:08

2022. So, you can compare this with

5:11

this.

5:12

Now, remember, ultimately, what makes

5:14

the market to be in a bubble? What makes

5:16

stocks in a bubble? It's when the the

5:18

price, the share price

5:21

is not supported by the earnings or the

5:24

cash flow of the company. Very, very

5:26

simple. Remember, the value of a

5:28

business is based on how much cash it

5:31

can generate, how much profits it can

5:32

generate. So, if the stock price goes up

5:36

100%,

5:38

but the profits go up 100%, it's not

5:41

expensive, right? Because the price is

5:42

supported by the profits. But if the

5:44

stock price goes up 100%, but there's no

5:47

profits, then that's a bubble. So,

5:49

understand that distinction.

5:52

So, what you see in this dark line over

5:55

here, so the dark line is the market

5:57

price of tech stocks back in 2000 or or

6:02

leading to 2000, right? And this green

6:04

line are the earnings of the company.

6:06

So, see the big difference?

6:09

During the dot-com boom, you can see

6:11

stock prices were going up like crazy,

6:13

going up like crazy, going up like

6:14

crazy, but the profits that were

6:17

generated by the companies were either

6:19

there was no profits or the profits were

6:21

very little. So, this is what we call a

6:23

bubble. It's kind of like profits are

6:25

here, market price is here. It's like,

6:26

you know,

6:27

it's the the market price is going way

6:29

above what profits are created. So,

6:32

eventually, what happens?

6:33

It will snap and collapse.

6:36

But in today's market, you can see that,

6:38

yeah, the stock price, which again is in

6:40

the dark brown, is going up, going up,

6:42

going up, going up, going up, but it is

6:45

supported by the profits. Look at that.

6:46

Profits are going up,

6:49

supporting the market. So, it's a very

6:50

different situation. And that's why I

6:52

say the market is not cheap, but it's

6:53

also not super expensive. But Adam, the

6:56

Fed chair said it is very expensive.

6:59

What the hell does he know? Okay? Now,

7:01

by the way, that triggered some memories

7:03

for me. I remember that back in 1996

7:06

December, at the time the Fed chairman,

7:09

Alan Greenspan, he said the same thing.

7:12

In fact, he said, which was back in

7:14

December 1996, he said that investors

7:16

are undergoing a bout of irrational

7:19

exuberance. So, what does that mean?

7:21

He's saying that the investors are

7:22

crazy. The market is in a bubble. And he

7:26

said that when the S&P was at 750

7:29

points. Now, what happened after he said

7:31

that? The market continued to go up for

7:34

the next 4 years by another 100%.

7:38

When it eventually topped out

7:41

in February 2000 before the dot-com

7:44

bust. And the S&P reached 1,500 points.

7:48

So, what am I saying? I'm saying that

7:49

the Fed chairman can say that we are

7:51

expensive, and the market can still go

7:53

up for the next 4 years

7:55

by 100%, right? So,

7:58

it doesn't mean we're at the top.

8:01

Now, could this time be different? Of

8:02

course, everything is possible, but I'm

8:04

just looking at uh probabilities. And if

8:07

you ask me, are we near the top? I don't

8:10

think so.

8:11

Now, another thing that you can look at

8:13

would be the history of bull markets.

8:15

Now, some of you may feel that this bull

8:16

market has run too far and too long. No.

8:20

Now, recall something. This bull market

8:24

started in October 2022.

8:28

All right? So, from October 2022 to

8:32

October 2025, this bull market is only 3

8:37

years old. We're only in the third year

8:39

of the bull market. Now, on average, how

8:41

long do bull markets last? These are, by

8:43

the way, what we call cyclical bull

8:45

markets, not long-term bull markets.

8:47

Short-term bull markets last roughly

8:49

about 5 to 6 years. That is the average.

8:53

So, for example, this bull market over

8:55

here

8:57

lasted 5 years.

8:59

And this bull market over here lasted 6

9:01

years. This bull market lasted 5 years.

9:03

This bull market over here lasted

9:06

11 years. And this bull market over here

9:09

lasted

9:10

12 years. So, bull markets can last from

9:13

5 years to 12 years. And again, in this

9:17

current bull market, we are only in the

9:19

third year.

9:21

Which tells me, based on normal bull

9:23

market cycles, uh this bull market

9:26

should run another at least two to three

9:29

more years, at least, okay? Could it

9:31

last another 6 more years?

9:34

Yes, it is possible. That's what

9:35

happened in this bull market that

9:37

started in December '87. Everything is

9:40

possible. Now, like I said, while the

9:41

whole market may not be in a bubble yet,

9:44

maybe in 3, 4 years it will be in a

9:46

bubble, but not yet. But there are

9:48

certain areas of the market that are in

9:51

a freaking bubble. They are really

9:53

overpriced, okay? So, what are these

9:55

areas? Well, I've identified five of

9:57

these areas. First are certain parts of

9:59

the AI industry. Now again, people like

10:02

to give a broad stroke. All AI stocks

10:04

are expensive. No, there are some AI

10:06

stocks that are not that expensive. For

10:08

example, in my opinion, well not my

10:09

opinion, it's a fact, all right? Nvidia

10:13

is not that expensive. It is not cheap,

10:15

but it's not that expensive. If you look

10:17

at ASML, also not cheap, but not that

10:20

expensive. Why? Because the stock price

10:22

has gone up, but the profits have gone

10:24

up even more than the stock price. So it

10:27

is not that expensive. But there are

10:28

certain AI-related stocks that are in a

10:32

bubble. Why? Because the market price

10:33

has gone up like crazy, but the

10:35

companies are not making any money. So

10:36

people are basically paying for future

10:40

profits. Oh, one day he's going to make

10:41

a lot of money, but now no money, all

10:44

right? So that's what we call a bubble.

10:45

Always check the fundamentals of what

10:48

you are investing in or what you're

10:49

trading. So again, if you look at

10:50

Nvidia, you can see that it is making a

10:53

lot of money. It is very, very

10:54

profitable. Take a look at that. You can

10:56

see that, you know, the revenue is

10:58

growing, the profits are growing, the

10:59

free cash was going growing is actually

11:01

making a lot of money. And the intrinsic

11:04

value, which is based on the discount

11:06

rate of all the future cash flows, the

11:09

intrinsic value is 175.

11:12

And right now the stock price is at 185.

11:15

It is slightly overvalued, but it's not

11:17

like super overpriced, all right? So not

11:20

cheap, but again not super expensive.

11:22

And ASML, same thing. If you look at

11:23

ASML, you can look at the fundamentals.

11:26

You can see that again, revenue is

11:27

growing like crazy and profit growing as

11:30

well. Free cash flow is, you know,

11:32

growing as well. All right?

11:35

Um and

11:38

the intrinsic value is 948. Now if you

11:40

recall, not too long ago I did share my

11:42

video at a time that ASML was below the

11:44

intrinsic value. It was cheap, but now

11:47

it has gone up, all right? And now it's

11:49

about 1,000 dollars 43. So it's above

11:52

the intrinsic value. So again, it is not

11:55

cheap, but it's also not super

11:56

expensive.

11:58

But if you look at some AI stocks, which

12:00

are not profitable, which I call

12:03

speculative AI stocks, then yes, they

12:05

are in a bubble. They are very, very

12:07

overvalued. So a good example would be

12:08

Corweed. Another one would be Nvidea. If

12:11

you look at Corweed, you can see that

12:13

again, uh if you look at the financials,

12:17

if you don't like to look at lines, you

12:19

can look at charts, right? You can see

12:20

that yeah, so revenue is growing, but

12:23

the profit is negative. So it is still

12:25

losing money. It's not making any money,

12:26

right? It's losing money. And you can

12:28

see that the intrinsic value is 115.

12:31

And now it's 133,

12:34

the the share price. So it's also a bit

12:37

expensive, all right? If you look at

12:39

Nvidea, for example, NBIS,

12:43

same thing. You can see that uh the

12:46

intrinsic value is $49, but it's now

12:48

selling at $125. So it's selling at

12:51

double what it is actually worth. And

12:53

you can see that it is also not

12:55

profitable. It is not making any money.

12:58

It's it's losing money. In fact, the

13:00

revenue dropped. It is not profitable.

13:02

Okay?

13:04

Now, so these are what I call stocks

13:06

that are in a bubble. Now, having said

13:08

that, would I short these stocks? No.

13:11

Can you still make money from these

13:13

stocks? Yes. Why? Because remember that

13:16

in the short term, the market is not

13:18

rational. The market is emotional. So as

13:21

long as there's momentum, people are

13:22

excited, these stocks can keep going up.

13:25

So expensive can become even more

13:28

expensive. Bubble can grow bigger and

13:30

bigger and bigger. So am I saying that

13:32

you can't make money with these stocks?

13:33

No, you can make money. You can make

13:35

money. But to make money in these

13:37

stocks, you don't invest in them. You do

13:40

short-term swing trading. It is a big

13:42

difference, right? So the difference is

13:44

that when you do swing trading, you have

13:46

to watch it very carefully. You only

13:49

enter the trade when there's a low-risk

13:51

trade setup based on the price action.

13:54

That's what we teach in our stock

13:55

trading course, our swing trading

13:56

course, right? And these stocks are like

13:58

a one-night stand. When you enter, you

14:00

got to have protection. You got to have

14:02

a stop loss.

14:03

And you got to have clear profit

14:04

targets. So that as long as the momentum

14:07

goes up, yeah, you can make money, but

14:09

the moment it drops, hits the stop loss,

14:12

you got to cut and get out. Why? Because

14:14

these stocks that are not supported by

14:17

fundamentals, eventually when they drop,

14:20

they will never come back.

14:21

They will never come back. So these are

14:23

the ones where you have to cut loss

14:24

very, very fast. These are what I call

14:26

the one-night stand stocks, okay?

14:29

But on the other hand, if you look at

14:30

companies like ASML, Microsoft, Nvidia,

14:34

where they are supported by profits and

14:36

they are not that expensive, these are

14:39

what I call stocks for investing. Not

14:41

one-night stand. These are the stocks

14:43

that we can marry. And when we invest in

14:45

these stocks, we know that three, four,

14:47

five years from now, they're going to be

14:49

a lot higher. And yeah, the stock price

14:52

could drop temporarily, but we don't

14:54

need a stop loss. Or rather, I don't use

14:55

a stop loss. In fact, the more they

14:57

drop, the more I buy, because I know

14:58

that these stocks, when they drop like a

15:00

tennis ball, they will always bounce

15:02

back up, because they are supported by

15:03

fundamentals. But these kind of like

15:05

Nvidea and Corweed, where there's no

15:07

fundamentals yet, there's no profits,

15:09

you know, they can drop and never come

15:11

back. So you got to have a clear

15:13

distinction between investing stocks and

15:15

trading stocks. So like I said, these

15:17

bubble stocks, you can still make money

15:19

from it. It can still go a lot higher.

15:21

And basically, we enter as swing trades,

15:23

right? So but you want to enter when you

15:26

see a low-risk entry. So for example, if

15:29

you look at a stock right now, is it is

15:31

it on an uptrend? Yes, it is. You can

15:33

see right, wave up, wave down, wave up,

15:36

wave down, wave up. And now it's on a

15:38

bit of a wave down pattern. So if I was

15:41

trading this, for example, I would wait

15:43

for again, wave up, wave down, wave up,

15:45

wave down, wave up. When it waves down,

15:47

for example, and it finds a support, we

15:50

call this a trend retracement strategy,

15:52

and we've got a bullish candlestick

15:54

pattern over there. Guess what? We could

15:56

take the trade. We could enter here

15:59

and place a stop loss right below the

16:02

recent swing low. Or if you want to

16:04

widen the stop loss, you can even put a

16:05

stop loss here, depending on how

16:07

conservative you are. And you can ride

16:09

it all the way up, all right? And you

16:11

can of course take profit, risking 1R to

16:13

make 2R, 3R. So you can make money in

16:16

these bubble stocks as well. But like I

16:18

said, as they go up, you have to raise

16:20

your stop loss. So when they eventually

16:23

burst, you got to cut loss and get out

16:25

fast and take your profits and run, all

16:28

right? But for like Nvidia, ASML,

16:31

Microsoft, don't need all these funny

16:33

stuff. No stop loss, no profit target.

16:35

Buy, close your eyes through the ups and

16:37

downs, you'll be very rich in the long

16:39

run. So big difference. Second industry

16:41

in a bubble, quantum computing stocks.

16:44

Yeah, one day will quantum computing

16:46

change the world? Yes, but right now the

16:50

market price has run ahead of

16:52

fundamentals. Many of these quantum

16:53

computing stocks are not making any

16:55

money now. Will they make money in the

16:56

future? Yeah, but not yet, right? So

16:59

stocks like IonQ, like RGTI, they're in

17:03

a bubble. But like I said, would I short

17:05

it? No. Could you still make money from

17:07

it? Yes, but you got to enter as a trade

17:11

and not an investment, because they

17:12

could drop and never come back once the

17:14

bubble bursts. And when will it burst? I

17:16

don't know. Who the hell knows, right?

17:18

And of course, cryptocurrency stocks.

17:20

Anything linked linked to

17:21

cryptocurrency, like your your strategy,

17:24

which is MSTR, nuclear energy stocks,

17:26

also running ahead of fundamentals. Your

17:28

Oak Ridge SMR, not making money. Price

17:31

going up like crazy. Can make money, but

17:34

trading, not investing. Be very, very

17:36

clear. So again, some of you may say,

17:38

"Adam, I don't want to do trading. It's

17:39

too stressful. I just want to invest."

17:41

Then stay away from these stocks.

17:43

Nothing wrong. But if you want to trade

17:45

it, these are the stocks to trade,

17:47

right? Then again, put a stop loss and a

17:49

profit target. These are things that

17:51

you can learn. Next, uranium enrichment

17:54

stocks, which are again tied to the

17:55

nuclear energy thingy, right? So stocks

17:58

like your ticker symbol LU CCJ, high

18:01

momentum, but bubble. Just be very

18:05

careful. If you're in any of these, make

18:07

sure you've got a stop loss. Make sure

18:09

when the bubble bursts, when it bursts,

18:10

I don't know when, you got to get out

18:12

fast. Take your money and run. All

18:14

right, so that's the end of part one of

18:15

this video. Be sure to subscribe, so you

18:18

get alerted once part two is ready. And

18:20

in part two, I'll be talking about which

18:23

parts of the market are undervalued.

18:25

Where are the hidden gems right now in

18:26

the market? And I'll also talk about how

18:29

do how do we prepare for the eventual

18:31

bursting of the market bubble. It will

18:34

not burst right now, but it will burst

18:36

eventually. And when that happens, you

18:37

got to ensure that your portfolio will

18:40

do well even when it bursts. So all that

18:43

in part two.

18:46

If you want to catch my latest videos,

18:47

click on the subscribe button right now.

18:50

Click on the bell, so you get instant

18:51

notifications once I upload my latest

18:54

video. If you want to check out my

18:56

online courses, go on to

18:57

piranaprofits.com.

18:59

We're going to learn how to invest and

19:01

how to trade the financial markets and

19:03

create an income from all around the

19:04

world.

19:06

If you want to join my live Wealth

19:07

Academy program, go on to

19:09

wealthacademylive.com

19:11

and find out more about how you can

19:12

learn investing and trading live online.

19:15

This is Adam Khoo, and may the markets

19:17

be with you.

Interactive Summary

The video analyzes whether the current stock market is in a bubble, concluding that while it is not cheap, it is not in a universal bubble either. The presenter explains that relying solely on PE ratios can be misleading and suggests using the PEG ratio for a better valuation assessment. He differentiates between high-quality stocks supported by earnings and speculative stocks in bubble territory, advising investors to distinguish between long-term investments and short-term swing trades when managing these assets. Finally, he identifies specific sectors like certain AI, quantum computing, and nuclear energy stocks as potentially being in a bubble.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts