HomeVideos

My Family Left Me - WAN Show August 7, 2026

Now Playing

My Family Left Me - WAN Show August 7, 2026

Transcript

6948 segments

0:00

Happy Friday and welcome to the WAN

0:02

show. We've got a great show lined up

0:05

for you guys today. I have been alone

0:08

for one week.

0:10

It's been [laughter]

0:13

uh Yeah, my family they they left me.

0:16

They are overseas right now without me

0:18

for the first time since I entered

0:20

matrimonial bliss. [laughter]

0:24

>> And it's been a way to describe it.

0:25

>> Yeah, it's been it's been kind of an

0:27

adventure. I've been taking care of the

0:29

chickens and

0:30

>> Oh, yeah.

0:31

>> Yep. And working on some tech stuff,

0:33

playing a lot of badinton. So, I'll be

0:35

talking about a little bit about that.

0:36

Uh, we've also got Oh, [groaning]

0:40

of course, the biggest news of this

0:43

week. Going to pause to let them think

0:46

about what is the biggest news of this

0:47

week. It is, of course, that Rockstar

0:50

will be previewing the GTA 6 trailer

0:54

exclusively on Netflix.

0:58

What?

0:59

>> Right. See, Dan appreciates what a big

1:02

deal this is.

1:03

>> No, I'm not. I I'm just confused.

1:06

>> Same.

1:06

>> Why?

1:08

>> Well, yeah, that's what's funny about

1:09

it.

1:10

>> Did ne Did Netflix Pick Pick Pick two

1:14

topics. Pick two topics. It'll be great.

1:15

You'll love it.

1:16

>> Uh my brain's too fried from that.

1:19

[laughter]

1:19

Uh in in continued Xbox conversation,

1:22

Halo Studios sees layoffs after shipping

1:25

campaign evolved. Um, and let's see

1:28

here.

1:29

>> I put so much good news in this week and

1:31

that's what you find.

1:32

>> Yeah,

1:33

>> classic Luke. What a Luke move.

1:35

>> Uh, should I find another bad one? I'm

1:37

sure I can. And BMD BMW BMV is on a

1:41

trailblazer of Nification.

1:47

Bad news show is back, baby. Time to be

1:51

negative. Yeah.

2:10

The show is brought to you today by

2:12

Factor Meals, Squarespace, Odo, and

2:16

XSplit, alongside [music] our rap

2:17

partner Dbrand, our laptop partner,

2:19

Razer, and our chair partner who is also

2:21

Razer. Fun fact, by the way, the chairs

2:24

not sharp.

2:29

>> Laptop's a little bit. Not that much

2:31

though.

2:31

>> Not much. There's a chamfer there.

2:33

>> Yeah,

2:33

>> they got the chamfer. Mhm.

2:35

>> Anyway, why don't we jump right into our

2:37

headline topic, which

2:40

>> full admission, yeah, it's kind of

2:42

clickbait,

2:43

>> but I've been alone for the week.

2:45

>> It's been It's been kind of It's been

2:46

kind of fun. I've

2:47

>> You know what's weird? Yeah.

2:48

>> I had a surprisingly similar week.

2:51

>> Emma got sick and I was looking at my

2:53

work schedule and I was like, I

2:54

literally can't afford to get sick. So,

2:56

popped uh set up a air mattress in the

2:59

computer room thing and have been hiding

3:01

from [laughter]

3:05

So, I have I have been like, "Hold up.

3:08

There is no space. I have to deflate the

3:11

mattress when I wake up so I can walk

3:12

around. [laughter] I'm just like stuck

3:14

in this little room."

3:15

>> You do know what a strange man you are,

3:17

right? [laughter]

3:20

What a solution. LIKE, THAT'S ALMOST

3:22

LIKE that's almost 80s sitcom level of

3:25

like, "Well, Mr. Hurley is not going to

3:28

let me you get s if I get sick I won't

3:31

be able to pay the rent so I'm going to

3:32

have to quarantine myself and then they

3:35

set up a quarantine and then of course

3:36

there's hy jinks and people break the

3:38

quarantine and a dog gets involved

3:40

somehow like it it actually sounds like

3:43

a sitcom episode.

3:44

>> Yeah.

3:45

>> Um

3:45

>> I just can't get sick right now.

3:47

>> Yeah. Well, don't get too close to me. I

3:49

don't know if you

3:50

>> No, I'm fine.

3:51

>> Good.

3:51

>> Yep.

3:52

>> No, I mean I'm sick.

3:54

>> Oh my god. [laughter]

3:59

NO. COME ON.

4:00

>> Do you not notice me like clearing my

4:02

throat? [clears throat and laughter]

4:03

>> I just thought you I don't know. But you

4:05

said you play a lot of Babon. Who knows?

4:07

>> Maybe you're uh sure been through a lot

4:10

of

4:10

>> causes respiratory issues.

4:11

>> Activity.

4:12

>> Yeah. So, so man, I got to say I am not

4:16

ready to be an empty neester.

4:18

>> Oh yeah,

4:18

>> dude.

4:19

>> I I could have told you that.

4:20

>> I texted Ivonne this. I texted Ivonne

4:23

this. Um, so she's she's over in China

4:26

right now because my son is

4:27

participating in uh an academic

4:29

competition called World Scholars Cup.

4:33

Um, and

4:34

>> round two is in one of like a handful of

4:38

cities and you have to like go there.

4:40

Your whole team your whole team of three

4:42

has to go there which is like crazy. So

4:44

basically it's privileged kid scholars

4:46

cup essentially right. Um but they they

4:48

they won

4:49

>> any such cases. I suspect

4:50

>> they won the first round and then they

4:52

had to go somewhere and they picked uh

4:53

Shanghai uh of all places. It's

4:56

apparently super hot like just horribly

4:59

horribly hot there and there's a typhoon

5:01

incoming. So it's a whole thing. But

5:03

that's besides the point. The point is

5:05

that she's overseas right now and I

5:07

texted her and I was like I did

5:09

something today that I haven't done in

5:13

the 13 years that Linus Media Group has

5:16

existed. And she's like, "Yeah, what?

5:19

You can't can't lead with something like

5:21

that and not just immediately tell me

5:22

what it is." And I was like,

5:24

>> "I came home after work. I got a snack

5:28

and I fell asleep watching TV on the

5:30

couch. [laughter]

5:35

I'm in the like I'm in the like latter

5:37

half of Solar Opposites where the show

5:39

gets kind of bad.

5:40

>> I don't even know." And I was just like

5:43

I I woke up at like 5 after 8 and I was

5:47

like, "Oh, oh my god, I'm supposed to It

5:49

was on Tuesday. I was supposed to be at

5:51

LMG badminton 5 minutes ago. Oh,

5:53

[laughter] okay. Go go go get some

5:56

clothes on and go, but I I I passed out

5:58

for like an hour.

6:00

>> Like uh, you know, dadcoded thing ever.

6:02

[gasps]

6:03

>> Crazy.

6:04

>> Yeah,

6:05

>> crazy.

6:06

>> I don't have something to do. Time to

6:07

fall asleep exactly where I currently

6:09

am. [laughter]

6:11

Oh man. And the chickens have been a

6:13

trip this week.

6:14

>> Okay. Yeah. So, so,

6:15

>> okay. So, we're still working on

6:17

training them to to like go in their

6:19

coupe.

6:20

>> Uh, we still haven't decided whether

6:22

we're going to do like a run, like a

6:23

fully enclosed run

6:25

>> or if we're just going to let them kind

6:26

of like free range in the backyard.

6:29

>> And then you got to round them up.

6:30

>> During the day, it's actually not really

6:34

a problem. Like most of the chicken

6:35

predators are going to be things like

6:37

raccoons, uh, coyotes, that sort of

6:40

thing. I mean, a bear got into our yard

6:42

once. I'm sure that would take out a

6:43

chicken pretty easily,

6:45

>> but it's all more active at night.

6:47

>> This is more nocturnal threats. And we

6:49

have had some some kitty cats in our

6:51

yard, but the chickens are at the point

6:52

now where honestly my cats are more

6:54

scared of them than anything else. U,

6:56

they were they were watching them

6:57

through the window yesterday. I got this

6:58

really cute video of them like like

7:00

jumping up on a window and then the

7:01

chickens would go over here and they'd

7:02

like hop down. They jump up on a

7:03

different window. We're watching them

7:04

and I get I grab Brownie. I pick him up

7:06

and I'm like, "Okay, do you want to see

7:07

the chickens?" And I take him outside

7:08

and he was an outdoor cat uh when he was

7:10

a kitten and he's been real clear about

7:13

that. That was good. [laughter] He's

7:16

good on outside.

7:17

>> Done with that.

7:17

>> Yeah, that's that's actually the biggest

7:20

difference. We We've like so catproofed

7:22

our whole situation and we finally have

7:25

cats that have no interest whatsoever in

7:27

going outside. Like we lost cats to the

7:29

outdoors before and like I'm talking

7:31

skate artist

7:32

>> everything they could to sneak out

7:34

>> everything they could to get out. They

7:35

would open door handles the freaking

7:36

Bengals. Like it was crazy. Um

7:39

>> and and these guys don't want to go

7:40

outside. But I was like, "Okay, come on.

7:42

Come on, Brandy. Let's go." And so I

7:43

grab him. I kind of like bundle him up.

7:45

Grab his legs. I go and I take him. I

7:46

show them the chickens and he's like And

7:48

he looks up at me all airplane ears.

7:50

[laughter]

7:50

Okay. All right. We're going back

7:51

inside, buddy. Let's go. You're good.

7:53

You're good. And we like we had one cat

7:55

in the yard that was kind of scoping

7:57

them out and I kind of watched them, but

7:58

they're big enough now that like four

8:01

chickens I don't think a cat's going to

8:03

like go in there.

8:06

>> Aggressive enough cat

8:07

>> find a particularly murderous cat. But

8:10

in most cases, probably not.

8:11

>> But they tend to kind of herd together

8:13

and all four of them get all

8:15

[clears throat] puffy and up in your

8:16

face. And we think one of them is a

8:17

rooster, which you're technically not

8:19

allowed to have in our city, but you can

8:21

apparently get collars for them that

8:23

make it so that they can't like

8:26

and like do the big crow, but are not

8:28

like uncomfortable or anything. I

8:30

haven't really looked into it. Maybe

8:31

it's like super inhumane and it's better

8:33

to like send them to the chicken sausage

8:35

factory. I'm I'm actually not sure yet,

8:36

so don't get too mad at me yet. I

8:38

haven't I haven't looked it up yet, but

8:39

uh that is maybe a possibility to keep

8:41

our keep our R, which we'd like to do

8:44

cuz they're like they got so much

8:46

personality, man. Uh here I I sent this

8:49

to um actually hold on. I'm not sure if

8:51

I can

8:52

>> someone someone bring up a previous WAN

8:53

[clears throat] show where uh Lionus

8:56

mentions like why would you have a bird?

8:57

They're so boring.

8:59

>> Um I don't think I said birds are

9:01

boring.

9:02

>> I might be. Uh

9:03

>> maybe you're just very sensitive.

9:05

>> I might. Yeah, I might be. So, I can't I

9:07

can't show this one on uh I can't show

9:09

this one on stream, but I took this

9:10

video and I sent it to uh to everyone

9:12

overseas. I was like, "The the chickens

9:14

are are uh they miss you." But

9:16

basically, I'm coming home and they all

9:18

come they all come dashing over to me.

9:21

How you doing? How you doing? What's up?

9:23

What's up? What's up? And they come hang

9:24

around and I'll go I'll be around in the

9:25

yard. They're like following me around.

9:27

It's so cute. Um, so anyway, the

9:30

chickens have been kind of a bear

9:31

because I forget if it was Wednesday or

9:33

Thursday. So, they've got the coupe and

9:35

I'm getting pretty good at like rounding

9:37

them all up and getting them into the

9:38

coupe. And we're going to I'm going to

9:39

get some meal worms which apparently you

9:41

can use to they it's like a really

9:43

really um high reward treat. Um, and I'm

9:47

going to try and train them to like get

9:48

them up on the ramp and then a little

9:50

closer on the ramp and then inside the

9:51

coupe when we kind of get to dusk cuz

9:53

they want to be in there. They actually

9:55

go near it.

9:55

>> Are you pairing it with a noise? I know

9:57

chickens respond to that really

9:58

effectively.

9:59

>> I make I like make, you know, animal dad

10:02

noises at them, but other than that, not

10:03

yet.

10:04

>> Sure. I know a lot of people do like a

10:05

bell when it's feeding time and they

10:07

respond really effectively to the bell

10:08

or whatever, but

10:09

>> yeah, Pavlov, I think, was one of the

10:11

pioneers [laughter] that concept.

10:15

>> Thank you, Dan. Um, timely. So, so

10:18

they're they're pretty good about

10:20

wanting to go into their coup. They like

10:21

their coupe, actually. So,

10:22

>> yeah, birds are Yeah,

10:23

>> good job. Um, and but but coming out of

10:28

their coupe in the morning, it's

10:30

actually been really great so far. They

10:31

they go down their little ramp, they

10:33

they go hang out in the yard, except one

10:34

morning, I forget if it was Wednesday or

10:36

Wednesday, I think it was. I went out,

10:38

I'm like, "Jickeys, where are you guys?

10:40

Come on." I shake their their food

10:41

container. Oh, I guess I do make that

10:43

noise. So, I shake their food container.

10:44

I'm like, "Okay, come on. Come on,

10:47

Jacens. Where are you?"

10:49

>> Uhoh.

10:51

So, I like lap the whole yard cuz I

10:53

found them in weird places. Um like we

10:55

were uh we were um you call them whipper

10:58

snippers, but we were using a hedge or

11:01

not a hedge trimmer. Like a grass

11:02

trimmer.

11:03

>> I don't think you remember that.

11:04

[laughter]

11:06

[gasps]

11:06

>> I was using a grass trimmer, you know,

11:08

with the little strings on the end. I

11:09

forget what they're actually called now.

11:10

I only know his stupid name for them.

11:12

[laughter]

11:12

>> Um weed whacker.

11:13

>> Weed whacker. Thank you. And

11:14

>> a lot better than Whipper Snipper.

11:16

>> Sure. [laughter]

11:17

>> And

11:18

>> I like that. I'm calling them from from

11:19

now on. And they they were all like

11:21

hiding in like a far corner of the yard

11:23

that they never go to. So like sometimes

11:25

they go weird places, but I I lap the

11:27

whole place. I'm like, I'm late for work

11:29

now. Later. And I'm like, this is

11:32

ridiculous. Where are they? And I go,

11:34

okay, they didn't. There's no way they

11:37

did. And I go, the coupe is like right

11:40

next to the fence with our neighbor.

11:43

And from the ground, they can't get to

11:45

the fence. But from the ramp to the

11:47

coupe, I bet they could. Not one, not

11:52

two, not three, all four of them. I look

11:55

over the fence [laughter] and they're

11:57

right there. They're right under the

12:00

fence. They've been frantically trying

12:02

to get to me the whole time. But when

12:05

they went over, they ended up in like a

12:08

in like a like a a plant bed of some

12:11

sort that has ground cover that's about

12:14

this deep. and they're too scared of it.

12:17

So, they're in this little track right

12:19

next to the fence. That's the only place

12:21

where nothing's growing. And they're

12:23

stuck and they can't get out. And my

12:25

neighbor apparently has been violating

12:28

the watering ban right now cuz when I

12:31

went into their yard to go get them, um,

12:34

everything was soaking wet. So, I like

12:36

get my pants all wet. I have to go get

12:38

them one by one. I have to catch them,

12:40

which, you know, they're chicken.

12:42

They're and they're panicked. They're

12:43

scared. I have to go get them and then I

12:46

I was I had to make a choice. Either I

12:48

have to hike all the way back around to

12:50

the other side or I'm just going to put

12:52

them on the fence and hope that they

12:54

don't hop back down here while I gather

12:56

all the rest of them. But they're flock

12:58

animals, so as soon as you separate one,

13:00

IT'S LIKE

13:02

IT WANTS to get to the other ones.

13:04

Anyway, uh the point is I managed to get

13:06

them. Uh I love that chicken chaser.

13:09

Wasn't that one of the fable uh

13:10

nicknames or was that chicken I

13:13

can't remember. No, that that was self

13:15

park. Doesn't matter. The point is we

13:17

got the chicken. No, I'm not going to

13:18

toss them over the fence.

13:20

>> Um, [clears throat]

13:21

where was I going with this? Right. So,

13:24

caring for the chickens. That's been

13:25

interesting. Um, I've found a little

13:27

more time to do tech stuff.

13:28

>> Caring for the chickens and sleeping on

13:30

the couch. Okay. Tech stuff. Can you

13:31

finish your

13:32

>> No.

13:33

>> Okay.

13:33

>> I got distracted. So, he was going to

13:35

ask if I've finished setting up my my

13:38

local LLM AI stuff. If I want to do some

13:42

um like object vehicle person

13:44

recognition stuff, I have played around

13:46

a little bit more with home assistant.

13:48

So, I have some more kind of automations

13:50

going like I can make it so that if

13:52

Ivonne's at her desk for half an hour,

13:54

it plays music. I think I talked about

13:56

that.

13:56

>> Um there's a really cool feature of the

13:59

like project Lionus

14:01

>> um

14:03

>> switches from

14:04

>> Oh, right. Yeah.

14:07

>> Uh bloody bloody hell. It's on the tip

14:09

of my tongue is in. Um there's a there's

14:12

a really cool feature on the the the

14:14

Inavlli millimeter wave. I think they're

14:16

the red series or the ones that I have,

14:17

the Z-Wave ones. Um that allows you to

14:20

handle lights that can go really dim,

14:24

but only if they start bright.

14:27

So, so if so, if you want them, so like

14:30

say in a in your bathroom, your on suite

14:32

bathroom, right? Like if you want to

14:34

create a rule where late at night it

14:36

only turns on at like 2%. Right? You

14:38

can't do that.

14:39

>> Would it have to like flash up and then

14:41

come down?

14:42

>> Well, okay. So, you could do that or or

14:45

Inve

14:49

a burst of power for this many

14:51

milliseconds

14:53

and then go to this. So, you can

14:55

overcome that um that inability to start

14:58

up at a really low dimness or a really

15:00

low brightness and but but go straight

15:04

to it kind of thing. It's kind It's

15:06

almost like pixel overdrive on a gaming

15:08

monitor.

15:08

>> Does it still create a a flash?

15:10

>> No. If you tune it exactly right, so

15:12

I've been working on stuff like that.

15:13

But the big one I've gotten distracted

15:15

by is actually the script that I was

15:17

working on. That is the reason the show

15:18

is on time instead of early today.

15:20

>> And that is, did you know that there's

15:23

like a secret Netflix for billionaires?

15:28

>> No. Why? Why?

15:30

>> It's been around since 2001.

15:33

25

15:34

years this has existed.

15:37

>> What

15:37

>> it started out as like a bougie sort of

15:42

semiofficial way to back up real

15:46

physical media libraries and make them

15:49

streamable. And then over time, they

15:52

actually did deals with the major

15:55

studios to not only allow you to access

15:59

like AAA movies, like I'm talking Star

16:01

Wars, Disney, freaking uh Universal,

16:05

20th Century Fox, you name it, right? Um

16:09

Paramount, like all this stuff. But

16:11

these guys managed to completely survive

16:14

the like streamer fragmentation wars and

16:17

have just continued to be their own own

16:19

thing. Not only that, but you can

16:21

actually for many films get the highest

16:25

quality available version of it

16:27

exclusively on this platform.

16:29

>> Rest assured in full plane chat that's

16:30

where a lot of movie rips on the web

16:32

come from.

16:32

>> No, it sure isn't.

16:34

>> Huh.

16:35

>> 100% isn't. It has never their

16:38

encryption has still not been broken. Uh

16:41

and we would know if it had because

16:43

there would be like 120 megabit per

16:46

second rips of films and they don't

16:48

exist.

16:49

So, I watched uh Top Gun Maverick uh on

16:53

the Kaleid Escape Strato uh K. This is a

16:58

$5,000,

17:00

as far as I can tell, Android box

17:03

that Oh, no, it gets better. Can hold

17:06

anywhere from 7 to 10 movies at once.

17:10

>> That's it. If you want to hold more, you

17:13

get their server box that is going to

17:15

cost you anywhere from thousands to tens

17:18

of thousands more.

17:20

>> Jesus.

17:20

>> And then and then you still don't own

17:22

any movies [laughter]

17:25

because it's less of a of a streaming

17:27

platform and more of a like digital

17:30

movie ownership platform except that the

17:34

only place you can watch it is on their

17:36

box. And that's a big part of why they

17:38

have been able to maintain their

17:40

encryption is that you can only stream

17:42

it from their server. You can only watch

17:45

it on their box. The whole thing's

17:47

locked down. And they even

17:51

>> um and they even have um like kind of

17:55

like like pixel uh pixel tagging or like

17:59

some kind of uh like like image

18:01

watermark baked into the film that you

18:03

stream that you can't see. um that will

18:06

out you if you are the one who manages

18:09

to who

18:10

>> yeah so an identifier

18:11

>> gets like an HTCP stripper and does like

18:13

an extremely high quality rip of it for

18:15

instance they will be able to identify

18:17

you and I can pretty much guarantee you

18:20

they will prosecute you because this is

18:23

like a huge part of their business model

18:25

is having this locked down so that they

18:27

can deliver the highest fidelity version

18:29

of the film I didn't think it would

18:31

matter at all going from like you know,

18:35

60ish megabit per second to like 100ish

18:38

megabit per second.

18:40

>> Noticeable. Very noticeable. Is it more

18:42

noticeable because you have an enormous

18:44

TV?

18:44

>> Oh, 100%.

18:45

>> Yeah.

18:46

>> Well, I mean, it's not the kind of thing

18:47

that you would buy unless you have like

18:49

a sick projection setup.

18:51

>> If you're if you can afford this thing,

18:53

you can probably afford the crazy TV.

18:55

>> You are not streaming it on your, you

18:57

know, insignia.

18:58

>> Yeah. Yeah.

18:59

>> Like that's not what it's for. And it

19:01

was one of those things where I I kind

19:03

of had to I kind of had to like, you

19:06

know, am I imagining this, you know? So,

19:08

cuz I'm I'm watching Maverick on this.

19:11

And it's not a film that I've actually

19:12

watched all the way through before. So,

19:14

I was like, maybe it just looks that

19:17

good on the 4K Blu-ray, but this is like

19:20

the best looking that I've ever seen a

19:21

movie ever. Um, and I couldn't really

19:24

put my finger on why. Like, it was shot

19:27

on Sony Venice. Great camera, lovely

19:30

camera, you know, but lots of films are

19:32

shot on Venice. Um, and obviously, you

19:36

know, the production values of it are

19:37

incredible, you know, like actual jets

19:39

and stuff.

19:40

>> Did you do like uh input switching?

19:43

>> So, at first I didn't At first I was

19:44

just like, "No, I'm just going to

19:45

experience it."

19:46

>> Sure.

19:46

>> And I kept just like seeing things that

19:49

were like like like blew my mind how

19:52

good they looked. like just the the sky

19:54

like or there's a there's a scene really

19:57

early on in the hanger where they've got

19:59

this like bright outdoor natural light

20:01

coming into the hanger. And I couldn't

20:03

put my finger on why it looked so real,

20:07

why it looked like looking through a

20:08

window instead of watching on a screen.

20:11

And so I did I I I grabbed a 4K Blu-ray

20:15

rip remix, like not not a re-encoded

20:18

one, and started switching back and

20:21

forth between the inputs. And the

20:24

difference is so subtle,

20:28

but there's a little bit of banding in

20:30

the 4K Blu-ray. Just a little bit, not

20:33

much, just a little bit, but the effect

20:37

is greater than

20:39

>> Yeah. the difference that I can that I

20:42

can pick out because it ma it takes

20:44

light from looking like

20:48

an encoded

20:50

color to looking like

20:52

>> window

20:53

>> light.

20:54

>> Yeah.

20:55

>> And the other one is film grain. So this

20:58

is something that I've really struggled

21:00

with in the transition from analog to

21:02

digital. Right. In analog, we all agreed

21:06

that things like CRT scan lines and film

21:10

grain looked like it was supposed to

21:13

look and looked natural. But as we've

21:16

transitioned to watching that an that

21:19

analog media on through digital players

21:22

over digital connections on digital

21:24

screens,

21:26

what we've ended up with is that film

21:29

grain in my opinion mostly just

21:31

contributes to more garbage in to be

21:34

misinterpreted by my encoder and my

21:37

decoder as garbage out.

21:41

But by pushing the bit rate so high,

21:44

it's kind of like what I first observed

21:46

when I used the first 5K LCD where I

21:50

went, "Oh, I can just run this at a

21:53

non-native resolution now and it

21:55

actually doesn't really matter." So,

21:58

this is the threshold for me where we're

22:00

encoding at a high enough fidelity that

22:03

film grain looks natural again instead

22:06

of just looking like crappy encoding and

22:08

decoding. So, those are the two big

22:11

things. Now, now, now, now, now now,

22:12

now, hold on. Spoiler for the video. So,

22:14

if you, you know, want to hear the

22:16

conclusion when you watch the actual

22:17

video, then then do this. Um,

22:21

is it worth it? Oh, hell no. Not I would

22:26

>> I mean, there's like no way.

22:27

>> I wouldn't pay that kind of, dude. I

22:28

found a movie on their service that was

22:30

45 dollars to buy. [laughter]

22:33

>> Nice.

22:34

>> Like,

22:36

>> how much? How? So,

22:38

>> Aladdin. Aladdin.

22:39

>> 1992's Aladdin was $30

22:42

US.

22:45

>> You can buy it on YouTube for five

22:46

bucks.

22:47

>> And that's not even the cinematic 4K

22:50

um format that has the like super high

22:52

bit rate. Oh yeah. So for Dan, just so

22:54

you know, it's 444.

22:56

Yeah. Right. So that's the difference in

22:59

like color banding that we're talking

23:01

about. You also said to buy so you can

23:05

>> you can rent some films for as little as

23:08

like seven bucks, eight bucks.

23:09

>> No, I was I was more interested that

23:11

there was the option to even just buy

23:12

them.

23:13

>> Me too. Me too. It's not just

23:15

subscription.

23:15

>> I thought it would be like 45 bucks to

23:17

rent.

23:18

>> However, you know, I think there's a

23:19

longer conversation to be had around

23:21

this because it does use a proprietary

23:23

DRM that when you're buying it,

23:28

are you do are you buying it? Is it

23:30

forever? And Collidoscope's been around

23:31

a long enough time now that I, you know,

23:34

I look at their model and I go, "Okay,

23:35

well, they haven't anybody over yet."

23:37

So, they at least have some credibility

23:39

there. But, I mean, companies don't last

23:42

forever. Companies that last for a

23:43

hundred years are are so few and far

23:46

between that they're a statistical

23:48

anomaly. You know

23:50

>> what?

23:51

>> I just I

23:51

>> I thought you were disagreeing with

23:52

that.

23:53

>> Sorry. Sorry. Sorry.

23:54

>> I don't think that's a controversial

23:55

state. I'm I'm poking through their

23:56

website and

23:57

>> dude testimonial [laughter] is crazy

23:58

testimonials and there's Martin

24:00

Scorsesei and you keep scrolling.

24:02

>> Oh, no, no, no. Look at this. Look at

24:03

this quote. Frankly, I don't know what I

24:05

would do without it says Martin

24:07

Scorsese.

24:10

>> Holy crap. What the heck? The next one

24:13

is Ben Affleck,

24:15

who they put as filmmaker. Sure. I mean,

24:18

he is.

24:19

>> Yeah, Goodwill Hunting he wrote.

24:21

>> No, I know. It's just that he does

24:22

everything. Why is he why is he getting

24:24

in a steady game? I

24:25

>> I think he's actually like done actually

24:27

basically every role.

24:29

>> That's cool.

24:29

>> Yeah. No, as far as my understanding

24:30

goes, that's true.

24:31

>> Super multi-talented guy. Casual Josh

24:33

Gad.

24:35

>> My goodness.

24:36

>> Yep.

24:38

>> Pretty incredible. It goes downhill

24:41

pretty fast from there.

24:42

>> Yeah.

24:43

>> Random cinema enthusiast.

24:44

>> Someone's first name.

24:46

>> Um

24:49

>> this guy,

24:50

>> rich dude. [laughter] Those

24:53

first two is wild though.

24:55

>> Crazy. Wait, the first three is pretty

24:57

wild. You don't know who Josh Gad is?

24:59

>> Uh, no.

24:59

>> Oh, that's Olaf from Frozen.

25:02

>> Oh, okay.

25:02

>> And also the lead of Book of Mormon when

25:05

it first uh hit Broadway, if I recall

25:07

correctly, and just various other

25:09

things. He's super talented guy.

25:12

>> Um, so yeah, I've been I've been working

25:14

on uh just kind of experiencing it. It's

25:17

It's a loner. nuts.

25:18

>> Um, I I only have it for I think like

25:21

three months or something like that. So,

25:22

I'm gonna going to, you know, get the

25:24

most out of it while I got it. The

25:26

interface is funky. I I'll wait to show

25:29

that in the video, but it reminds me of

25:31

like Final Fantasy 6.

25:33

>> Just to give you some idea.

25:36

I'm talking bright blue text boxes, big

25:38

old white text.

25:39

>> Whoa.

25:40

>> Very, very installer friendly.

25:44

And it took me a while to realize that.

25:46

I was like, "This does not feel very

25:49

premium." And then I went, "The customer

25:52

is never supposed to see this."

25:54

>> Oh,

25:57

>> yeah.

25:58

>> I see. All right.

25:59

>> Yeah. Yeah. Sure.

26:00

>> Uh, wy giraffe, we're talking about the

26:02

Strato K, not the E. That's the one for

26:05

poor people. WY giraffe. The K is the

26:08

new one.

26:08

>> He found He found the one for three

26:10

grand.

26:11

>> Oh, yeah. I love as well when you go to

26:13

their website under their more they list

26:16

Marine first home theater.

26:18

>> Oh yeah, buddy.

26:20

>> My goodness.

26:21

>> Got to put one on the yacht.

26:22

>> OH MY GOD.

26:23

>> YEAH, BUDDY.

26:30

>> This is classic if you have to ask. You

26:33

know what I'm saying?

26:35

>> Yep. Sheesh.

26:37

>> It's actually great for marine use

26:38

though because you don't stream it. You

26:41

c it locally

26:42

>> pre-downloaded.

26:43

>> Yep. So when you're not going to have

26:44

internet or whatever, especially in the

26:46

pre-S Starlink days, this would

26:48

>> How many movies could it store though?

26:49

You said

26:50

>> seven to 10.

26:50

>> Yeah. What?

26:52

>> On the on the box. But remember, you you

26:54

got to get the server. You got to get

26:56

the server. You got a yacht. You don't

26:58

have a server on your yacht.

26:59

>> Your yacht has a server.

27:01

>> Yeah. What are you even talking about?

27:04

[sighs]

27:07

>> Oh man. How much does their ultimate 4K

27:11

system performance meets luxury terra

27:13

server thing cost? You can buy it at

27:15

Best Buy. Oh, no. You buy it online at

27:16

Best Buy.

27:17

>> Yep. Yeah, you can buy stuff on Best

27:18

Buy. I have a feeling that most people

27:20

are not Okay, hold on a second. What is

27:23

Red Carpet Home Cinema? Okay. Oh my god.

27:26

Apparently, there's another secret.

27:28

There's another secret Netflix for

27:30

billionaires.

27:31

>> Hey, look. It's our ad, too.

27:33

>> Nice. Uh, sure. Whatever. Uh, okay. They

27:38

can they can rent current run movies.

27:40

Whoa.

27:42

>> Holy crap.

27:44

>> For 1,500 to $3,000 a pop

27:47

>> delivered and installed.

27:49

>> No, but Luke, that No, no, no. That's

27:50

current run though.

27:52

>> That's like stuff that I didn't know you

27:54

could do that.

27:54

>> I can watch OP. No, the Odyssey on my

27:57

phone before anybody else.

27:59

>> Crazy. [laughter]

28:01

>> Join now. $15,000 plus. What are we Oh,

28:04

wait. Hold on. Apparently, these guys

28:06

don't exist anymore.

28:08

Oh, red carpet homecine.com is uh L

28:11

gone. So that was just like a referral

28:14

link. Okay, maybe they're dead. Offers

28:17

first run.

28:19

This is why I'm broke.com.

28:21

Okay, hold on. What? What is this?

28:25

Rubber band gatling gun mini retro

28:27

external display TV. I know. Never mind.

28:30

Okay, check it out. Yeah, no, they're

28:31

gone. They're gone. Sorry, they're gone.

28:33

So, I guess Collide Escape is the only

28:34

game in town. Crazy.

28:41

>> Anyway, yeah, I'm trying to think if

28:42

there's anything else that I've really

28:43

been doing on my week off playing lots

28:45

of badminton.

28:46

>> Yeah, played the tournament that I was

28:48

going to miss. I was going to miss my

28:49

own annual tournament at Smash Champs,

28:51

but instead I was able to play it. So,

28:53

>> nice.

28:53

>> Yeah. Won the first uh first match, then

28:56

crashed out in the next two. So, that

28:57

was good. Yeah.

28:58

>> I don't know if you want to talk about

28:59

it. How did the thing go?

29:00

>> I don't want to talk about it. Okay.

29:01

>> I don't know what you're talking about.

29:03

Uh the the thing that other Dan did.

29:06

>> Oh. Uh good.

29:07

>> Nice.

29:07

>> Yeah. Oh, dude. Oh, man. Okay. That's

29:10

one of the other things I was working on

29:11

this afternoon that I'm really excited

29:12

about. So, if you're on float plane,

29:15

there's a float plane exclusive that

29:17

actually ended up being like a certified

29:19

mega banger. People freaking loved it.

29:22

Um it was originally supposed to be a

29:24

mainline video on LT, but it took so

29:27

long to come out

29:28

>> that it just didn't make sense to

29:30

release it publicly. But we did still

29:32

release it on float plane. It was me.

29:33

>> I think the non-flat plane audience

29:35

genuinely would have been very confused.

29:37

>> Yeah.

29:38

>> But the float plane audience is going to

29:39

be a little bit more dialed in. So it

29:40

was okay.

29:40

>> Yeah. So it was me vibe coding. Um

29:45

basically if you're if you're into

29:46

pickle ball, it's pretty much the um Oh,

29:50

what what what is this? Uh I think it's

29:53

called duper. Yeah, it's pretty much the

29:56

duper system for pickle ball, which is

29:58

pretty much the ELO system uh that is

30:01

used in chess. So, basically, you've got

30:04

uh a rating and they've kind of adapted

30:06

it to a narrower band of number values.

30:09

>> I swear every player rating system ever

30:12

can ultimately be boiled down to rating

30:15

with extra steps.

30:16

>> Yeah, Starcraft,

30:18

>> it's all it's all just chess rating with

30:20

extra steps.

30:20

>> It's all just ELO. It's all the ELO

30:22

system. So, so anyway, it's it's uh

30:24

basically I vibecoded just to see what

30:27

it would be like an an ELO rating system

30:30

and like tournament management

30:32

dashboard. um that ended up the simplest

30:36

way um to do it was just to use Google

30:39

Sheets and then a bunch of scripting and

30:42

automations uh and formulas in order to

30:45

have like a check-in sheet and uh manage

30:48

events uh print out little like match

30:50

cards that people could report their

30:52

scores on, create like a dashboard for

30:54

entering the scores, and then it was

30:55

able to track people's people's ELO

30:57

scores. As part of that video, the there

31:00

was like a challenge component where a

31:03

real developer in this case um sorry

31:06

does he use his name publicly?

31:08

>> Uh not his last one.

31:09

>> Cool. So a different Dan, not that Dan,

31:12

totally different Dan uh who works for

31:15

the company uh would get the sameish

31:18

number of hours to make something

31:21

actually good like a developer would

31:22

make it. And then we would compare my

31:24

solution to his. The real reason we did

31:27

any of this was because it's really hard

31:29

for me to get dev time from this guy

31:31

unless it's content.

31:33

>> Yeah. So it didn't even end up being

31:36

content except it's on float plane the

31:38

me vibe coding it saga including doing

31:40

some review of my finished product and

31:42

stuff

31:43

>> to to explain the reason why it didn't

31:45

end up launching is basically that uh

31:47

this whole like you know clawed code um

31:51

running it locally looping type thing uh

31:54

started happening in like the middle of

31:58

that. So this was purely an LLM and it

32:02

was purely before

32:04

>> pre-agentic era pretty much.

32:06

>> Yeah. And pre pre-cloud code and all

32:08

that kind of stuff. So it's like by the

32:09

time the video would have launched every

32:12

single freaking comment

32:15

>> would have been what the heck is this?

32:17

Why didn't you use this other thing?

32:19

>> Yeah.

32:19

>> So it was like ah

32:20

>> why didn't you use the good one

32:22

>> because we recorded it a while ago. Deal

32:24

with it. Um, so, so anyway, Dan's been

32:28

working on that and, uh, we got a new

32:31

version of it that he actually came out

32:33

to see working in person last night,

32:36

which was pretty great. And we found

32:38

some bugs in like queuing for who goes

32:41

on court. But compared to my system,

32:43

which was only able to do like open

32:46

doubles with fixed groups of four and

32:50

you just play your six matches and we

32:51

record the scores and that's it. uh he's

32:54

expanded it to be able to do ELO ratings

32:56

for open doubles, women's doubles, mixed

32:58

doubles, singles, uh in addition to

33:03

um like a really nice dashboard for

33:06

tracking your progress over time. Uh way

33:09

better setups for different formats. So

33:11

we don't have to do just like a

33:12

pod-based system, he calls it, where you

33:14

play with the same people all night.

33:15

We'll also be able to do just like a

33:17

ranked night. So over time during the

33:21

evening, you can actually be like

33:23

rerated more like you would in like

33:26

online matchmaking. Um he's working on

33:28

an interface where we'll be able to have

33:29

tablets beside every court so people can

33:32

just like boop their wristbands and then

33:34

start a match which is so freaking cool.

33:39

>> Um trying to think of like what else

33:41

he's uh he's done. Basically just the

33:43

admin and maintenance of it is going to

33:45

be so much better. And then I've

33:49

[clears throat] without speaking with

33:50

you also hinted to him that if this

33:54

thing is good enough, I see no reason

33:56

why other clubs couldn't potentially use

33:58

it.

34:01

>> There's a there's a few different things

34:03

we've made um that we should probably

34:05

have conversations about.

34:06

>> Like should we just productize them?

34:08

>> Yeah. The problem is that the rigor that

34:12

has to go into it once you do that

34:14

>> I know

34:15

>> is very high. There's also a lot of ways

34:17

that something that might uh might be

34:19

built that doesn't like

34:22

it's not portable. It works with the

34:24

systems that we have that's not

34:25

necessarily a system that everybody's

34:27

going to have. Um etc etc etc. But um

34:30

Scrappy also asked who gets to be

34:32

support. It's like yeah there's like

34:34

there's a lot more conversation that

34:36

starts to come up. Um, what I would like

34:38

to see first,

34:39

>> I can tell you there's a lot of money in

34:41

like

34:41

>> do you have customers

34:44

>> is would be what I would look for. And

34:46

who's going to sell it, Lionus?

34:48

>> Not me.

34:48

>> Who's going to [laughter]

34:50

not me?

34:51

>> We've seen that from float plane.

34:55

[laughter]

34:56

>> Uh, but yeah, maybe there's there's a

34:57

couple I mean, there's there's things

34:59

that other Dan has built that I think

35:01

there should be some pretty serious

35:02

conversations about that around. Uh

35:05

there's things from the lab that I think

35:07

could have a discussion there. Um but we

35:10

need people to sell it. We need to

35:12

figure out what the potential customer

35:14

base would be because it would take

35:16

upfront investment to move those things

35:18

to something that could be a product

35:20

instead of an internal tool.

35:21

>> Ongoing support and maintenance

35:22

budgeting. Yeah.

35:23

>> Which

35:26

>> is makes sense if you have customers.

35:27

>> A much bigger commitment than just

35:29

here's a tool we built. It works good

35:31

enough for us. Like, okay, I I remember

35:34

showing you the internal systems that we

35:35

used at NCIX, right? Did you do you

35:38

remember seeing that inter that

35:39

interface?

35:41

>> It was like hairy,

35:45

sweaty,

35:47

like sloppy ass. It was so bad. But man,

35:53

I could do my job. I could I could fly

35:56

through that thing. But if I ever had to

35:58

show anybody else how to use it, like it

36:01

it would the onboarding curve for like a

36:04

like a product manager like category

36:06

manager type of position was crazy. Like

36:09

I was years into my role and I would

36:12

still have to go to someone like uh you

36:14

know William the the the NCIX backend

36:18

whisperer if I wanted to figure out how

36:20

to do something or I'd have to create

36:22

like weird cludgy workarounds where it

36:25

actually mattered like exactly what

36:27

order you did all your stuff in and we

36:29

were only able to achieve this stuff

36:31

through trial and error. Like it was

36:33

there was no documentation for basically

36:35

any of it. And so I would sometimes

36:38

you'd have people uh you'd see like a

36:40

like a feature request and it would make

36:43

its way all the way to like even the

36:45

verge of being developed and literally

36:48

nobody remembered that we already had a

36:50

feature that did the same thing but it

36:52

was just called something else and there

36:53

was no documentation for it anywhere.

36:55

Like it was it was kind of crazy. Like

36:57

in some ways I get it because you know

37:00

you want to be agile and you want to you

37:02

know execute on an idea so you like make

37:04

a feature or whatever but the flip side

37:07

of that is okay if you don't keep track

37:09

of this stuff then at some point you're

37:11

going to have to pay the piper and the

37:14

piper wants your tech debt dollars.

37:16

[snorts and laughter]

37:17

So it was a it was a big challenge. Uh

37:19

Kirkland Signature in float plane chat

37:21

says the airline internal systems are

37:23

crazy. I believe that cuz like they've

37:25

been running since the mid 19th century

37:29

and in many cases

37:32

like they if you if it ain't broke.

37:35

>> Yeah. Some of them are ancient.

37:37

>> Yeah.

37:37

>> Some of those things are are very very

37:39

old.

37:39

>> Yeah. I've never I've never like looked

37:42

over an attendant's shoulder to, you

37:44

know, see what it looks like cuz that

37:46

would be a weird creepy thing to do. But

37:48

I don't know, maybe I should just to

37:50

kind of scope it out.

37:52

Um,

37:54

>> I don't even know what topic we're on.

37:56

>> We're on what you did this week.

37:58

>> Oh, okay.

37:58

>> And Babmonton was one of them, which is

38:00

why we're on that topic.

38:01

>> That's cool.

38:02

>> Yeah,

38:03

>> we can talk about something else now.

38:04

>> Sure.

38:05

>> That's all I have to say about that.

38:06

>> Uh, should we talk about the the main

38:09

topic of Samsung banned smart TV apps or

38:11

what was the first what is the Yeah, the

38:13

title was based around that. So, should

38:15

we talk about the Samsung thing?

38:17

>> Sure. Anything you like.

38:18

>> The move comes after Okay. Samsung bans

38:21

TV apps that share users internet

38:23

connections with others,

38:24

>> which sounds like the kind of thing that

38:26

just wouldn't be allowed in the first

38:28

place, but do go on.

38:30

>> Mhm.

38:31

>> The move comes after Norwegian cyber

38:33

security company Nemonic discovered that

38:35

at least one app featured as editor's

38:38

choice contained code that secretly

38:40

allows the TV to be used as a

38:42

residential proxy.

38:45

that is it allows strangers internet

38:48

traffic to be routed through the TV

38:50

making it appear to come from the user's

38:52

network which could be really bad

38:54

depending on what those people want to

38:55

use it for which is probably really bad

38:57

things. Uh residential proxies are

38:59

extremely valuable to web scrapers and

39:01

other bots. Yeah. and malicious actors

39:04

in general as it can make network

39:06

traffic appear to come from residential

39:07

IPs rather than a known data center or

39:10

VPN address which can cause servers to

39:12

let their guard down and allow traffic

39:14

that would they would normally try to

39:15

block. This is one of the reasons why if

39:17

you try to do basically anything on a

39:20

VPN, every single website is like, "Oh

39:22

my god, are you a bot?" Um because

39:24

they're seeing the same IP do a ton of

39:26

different things. Um, so it's that it's

39:28

you're avoiding that type of a problem

39:30

um

39:30

>> for your home personal connection.

39:33

>> Yeah. A number of well-known games and

39:35

IPs ported by developer Playworks, uh,

39:38

who reports installations in over 400

39:41

million homes, include an SDK from a

39:44

firm named Bright Data, who specialize

39:46

in online data collection. Impacted

39:48

titles include Pac-Man, Tetris, and

39:50

Space Invaders. Those are on

39:53

wild. I don't spend any time on TV. Uh

39:55

by default the SDK code is dormant but

39:58

on launch the games reach out to a

39:59

remote server for configuration which

40:01

can include enabling the code which in

40:03

this case offer the users uh ad free

40:06

gaming in exchange for using your

40:07

devices free resources and IP address to

40:10

download public data from the internet.

40:12

>> This is like

40:12

>> wo

40:13

>> dude it's this whole thing is crazy.

40:16

>> What

40:16

>> I know this blew my mind when I was

40:18

reading about I thought it was going to

40:19

be like uh ad free cuz you you know

40:22

bought the thing or paid a subscription

40:24

or did whatever.

40:25

>> No, these exit nodes are extremely

40:27

valuable.

40:28

>> What the hell?

40:29

>> So, and and the then I believe that's

40:32

like legal.

40:33

>> Developing a stupid Pac-Man clone costs

40:36

practically nothing.

40:37

>> You don't even have to pay the hosting

40:39

because the TV the TV vendor store is

40:41

going to host it for you. So, you're

40:43

just like, "Oh, okay. Here's some

40:46

absolute slop like you know random coded

40:50

by rando developers or realistically

40:53

these days AI slop developed game in

40:56

exchange

40:58

I get to download anything I like

41:00

through your internet connection and

41:02

then upload it to wherever I want.

41:05

That's this whole thing is so crazy.

41:08

Yeah. Um, okay. So, Bright Data

41:11

specializes in online data collection

41:12

and offers customers nearly 800

41:15

different curated data sets. Things like

41:17

LinkedIn data, product pricing and stock

41:19

info, product reviews, etc. Bright Data

41:22

is estimated to have more than 9 million

41:24

of these residential proxies around the

41:26

world. Wow. Bright Data was founded by

41:28

Illuminati Networks,

41:30

>> founded as

41:30

>> founded as Luminati Networks. Very close

41:33

to a different word.

41:34

>> What a name. um as as a division of

41:37

HolaVPN. Oh yeah, HolaVPN, which you may

41:41

recall made the news for turning client

41:43

devices into a massive botnet back in

41:45

2015. Yeah, I remember that. Um I think

41:47

they offered freeVPN, which is why so

41:50

many people used it and then yeah, they

41:52

just jacked people's devices like crazy.

41:54

Uh, Nemonic also called the Samsung App

41:57

Store an utter security nightmare and

42:00

reported finding hard-coded API keys,

42:03

developer certificates, and leftover AI

42:05

coding agent notes in many apps. Yeah,

42:07

that should surprise no one. Um, earlier

42:10

this summer, spur. US reported that

42:12

nearly half of LG smart TV apps had

42:15

hidden proxies built in. What's

42:18

happening?

42:19

Oh my god. Uh, shortly after LG

42:22

responded by banning residential proxies

42:24

from their app store,

42:28

uh, the way games like this are shipped

42:30

to app stores presents a significant

42:32

challenge to security auditors.

42:33

>> This one blew my mind because everything

42:35

we've said so far makes it sound like

42:38

complete and utter negligence on the

42:40

part of Samsung and LG,

42:42

and it is.

42:45

But

42:47

this changes the framing a little bit.

42:51

Yeah, someone I think someone thought I

42:53

misqued. Uh, no, this is LG.

42:55

>> This part is LG. We started talking

42:57

about Samsung. Uh, the last line that

42:59

we're talking about was LG, not Samsung.

43:01

>> Um,

43:03

yeah. The reason why I gave the like

43:05

thumbs up thing is because of what

43:07

they're going to say next, actually,

43:08

because I knew this was coming. Um, like

43:10

cool, you banned it. Yeah, sounds good.

43:12

Uh, the the Play D.Works or is that a

43:16

thing on my screen?

43:16

>> Yeah, playworks.

43:17

>> Play.Works works Pac-Man game is

43:19

presented to the store in just 20 lines

43:22

of HTML that create an empty frame with

43:24

game logic and assets are loaded on the

43:27

fly from a play.Works server, meaning it

43:29

can be completely changed at any time.

43:32

There's is it also very common for apps

43:34

to just load a base thing from the store

43:38

and then really download most the data

43:40

from some other server because while the

43:42

store will host your stuff unlike I

43:45

think steam Dan might know more about

43:47

this you get charged for your data flow.

43:50

Um so they actually want it to come from

43:52

some cheaper source. Um you also get uh

43:57

if your app is like huge you might get

43:59

downranked in the store.

44:01

>> Mhm. So, you generally want to hide the

44:03

size of your app, especially if it's

44:04

like a big game or big assets in the

44:06

game. So, you'll often have the initial

44:08

download be small so it doesn't get

44:09

flagged.

44:10

>> I actually didn't know this. I I thought

44:12

that they would just cover the hosting

44:14

costs like many other marketplaces, but

44:16

I guess they're just too cheap for

44:17

>> That's old information. It's possible

44:19

it's changed. Um, ours is not big enough

44:22

because most of the big data for

44:23

Flowplane is the videos themselves, um,

44:26

not the actual initial app itself. But I

44:29

know some games that have really big

44:30

like there was a game that was popular

44:32

for a while

44:34

game

44:35

>> and the asset sizes for each card was

44:39

like super high

44:40

>> cuz you could like zoom in and whatever

44:43

and they had hundreds and hundreds of

44:44

cards. So the game was massive,

44:48

but it would update to be massive.

44:50

>> Got it.

44:51

>> The initial download was not crazy high.

44:53

And when they'd add different packs to

44:54

the game and stuff, the the download was

44:56

enormous.

44:57

>> Got it. Um, and this is this is like

44:59

quite common, especially in the gaming

45:01

side of of app development, and I'm sure

45:02

it would be the same on TV, which is why

45:04

I did the whole thumbs up thing because

45:06

it's like they're probably going to get

45:07

data in some other way, either this

45:09

frame thing where it's streamed in or an

45:11

update after the fact that isn't

45:12

necessarily coming from your servers or

45:14

whatever. And then like are you really

45:15

do I really think the like Samsung or LG

45:19

app security teams are going to be like

45:21

super thoroughly going through every

45:22

single thing

45:23

>> and every update

45:24

>> and every update

45:25

>> and watching everything that's streaming

45:26

in. I mean

45:27

>> we I mean we see this on

45:31

>> I have firsthand witnessed the

45:36

amazing levels of security checking that

45:38

happens on like iOS and Android and

45:40

those are going to be way more advanced

45:43

than whatever is going on in TV land

45:45

>> probably orders of magnitude.

45:47

>> Yeah. So anyways, we'll keep going.

45:49

>> And and sorry, the the part that maybe

45:51

was missed because we kind of glossed

45:52

over it is if none of that network

45:55

sharing code is actually in the download

46:00

that is coming off of Samsung or LG's

46:02

store, then it's not immediately obvious

46:07

that that's that that it's there.

46:08

>> They might they might have manual

46:09

reviews or whatever where someone

46:11

actually does do the full download of

46:12

the app, but like

46:13

>> that's so optimistic of you. I love it.

46:14

>> It happens on Android and iOS. Yeah, I

46:16

just mean that

46:16

>> you have you have to give them long and

46:18

stuff. But again, we come back to the TV

46:19

thing. Do I actually expect that to

46:20

happen? It's like not really. Um, after

46:22

TechCrunch contacted Samsung, we're back

46:24

to Samsung again with a request for

46:26

comment about the research, the

46:27

electronics giant said in an emailed

46:30

statement that it was banning apps that

46:32

share their users internet connections

46:34

and will remove apps that contain the

46:36

functionality. Um, it's the follow

46:38

through. Yeah, it's the follow through

46:40

that I'm I'm like,

46:41

>> can they actually stop? Um,

46:44

>> how much faith do we have given that

46:46

they didn't stop it in the first place

46:48

and there's a millions strong bot army

46:52

>> thanks to

46:52

>> and tons of money behind making these

46:54

things happen. This is the whole problem

46:56

with all of this stuff like anti-che in

46:58

video games.

46:59

>> There's way more money behind exploiting

47:02

it than there is behind stopping it. It

47:04

>> is very difficult to measure the amount

47:06

of money that there is behind stopping

47:07

it. It is very easy to measure the vast

47:11

amounts of money that there is around

47:12

making the thing. Um, I don't know if

47:15

it's in the doc, but

47:18

there was I'm scrolling. I don't know if

47:22

I see it. There was a a data breach at

47:25

framework. Did you see that?

47:29

>> These types of things happen all the

47:30

time. Yeah,

47:31

>> I'm not blaming framework here.

47:34

>> I didn't I didn't I haven't actually

47:35

read the statement behind it. I don't

47:37

know the details yet. none of the

47:38

details behind it. Uh, we should

47:41

probably look that up now that I'm

47:42

looking it up now.

47:43

>> Um,

47:45

but it's just like, oh man, you do what

47:48

you can and then things are going to

47:51

break out from there.

47:53

>> Like how much h and I I can understand

47:56

the like

47:58

super proconsumer move is going to be

48:00

like, oh, it should just you should

48:01

there should just be no problems. It's

48:03

like, okay, sure.

48:06

But damn,

48:08

the best way to resolve this is just not

48:10

have a smart TV. That's pretty sick.

48:14

Oh, that is extremely inconvenient.

48:17

>> Um, we're seeing like the

48:19

>> names, email addresses, phone numbers,

48:21

and physical addresses due to an

48:23

incident at a company that provides

48:25

business intelligence.

48:26

>> Oh,

48:27

>> come on.

48:30

No payment information. So, that's

48:32

>> physical addresses is really

48:34

>> saving grace. But all of that other

48:36

stuff is not good.

48:39

Bottom line, not good.

48:42

>> Did they say who?

48:43

>> Uh I'm I All I have done is read this

48:46

Techrunch article.

48:47

>> I don't mean what users. I mean what

48:49

business were they partnered with?

48:51

>> Doesn't say.

48:52

>> Yeah, that blows. MTA base. Kataw said

48:57

>> MTA base. I don't know what that is.

49:02

All your MTA base are belong to us. Open

49:04

source AI analytics you can verify.

49:08

Oh, metabase.

49:10

Oh, okay.

49:13

Oh, okay. Okay. That's less scary than

49:17

what that sounded like initially.

49:19

>> You thought it was Facebook?

49:21

>> No, no, no, no, no. I mean, um, sorry,

49:23

hold on. Let me go back. Like just a uh

49:25

What? What was that?

49:26

>> No free clout. They they leaked

49:28

everyone's stuff. This is like the

49:29

opposite of cloud. [laughter]

49:32

So, someone in chat said, "Oh, no free

49:34

cloud." I'm like, "What? We're not

49:35

speaking positively of them." [laughter]

49:38

This is like the reverse of an

49:40

advertisement.

49:43

>> Anyways, what

49:44

>> a company that provides business

49:45

intelligence.

49:46

>> Oh, yeah.

49:47

>> Sounded really, really spooky.

49:49

>> That's why I wanted to figure out who it

49:50

was.

49:51

>> Um, analytics platform. They just jammed

49:54

AI into it for marketing. Yeah, of

49:56

course they did. Yeah. I mean, I even

49:57

noticed that kaleidoscope thing we were

49:59

talking about earlier

49:59

>> escape. But yes,

50:00

>> kaleidoscope thing. Um,

50:02

>> kaleidoscope is a totally different

50:03

thing.

50:04

>> No. Yeah, for sure. They they had um

50:07

they had they have some AI thing now. AI

50:10

movie recommendations.

50:12

Yeah, sure.

50:14

>> Why not? Um,

50:16

>> nice.

50:17

>> Because if the answer's going to be

50:18

wrong, it might as well be confident.

50:20

[laughter]

50:23

Um

50:25

uh yeah, so that blows. I don't even

50:28

know really why I thought to bring that

50:30

up, but just like

50:33

security is rough. Security tends to get

50:36

funded to a certain degree, but it's

50:39

hard to just keep pouring more and more

50:40

money into it. And I mean, this is a

50:44

this is a side topic.

50:45

>> We're not saying just stop locking your

50:46

doors cuz someone will break into it

50:48

anyway.

50:49

>> Yeah. No, not at all. But also there is

50:51

a degree to which the investment just

50:54

doesn't make sense to keep going

50:56

>> and that problem happens at basically

50:59

every company. So we are going to

51:00

constantly see these breaches. Um this

51:03

one seems pretty brutal. Physical

51:05

addresses is rough. Being able to tie

51:08

names to physical addresses is not cool.

51:11

Um but just do what you can. You know

51:13

separate password on all the different

51:15

websites etc etc. Parallelogram says, "I

51:18

leave my door unlocked so Santa can get

51:20

in easier."

51:20

>> That clearly would not have saved you in

51:22

this case. Um, but but do what you can,

51:26

>> but leaving your door open for Santa

51:28

wouldn't have saved you.

51:29

>> No, separate password. It wouldn't have

51:30

made a difference, but

51:34

>> All right, let's talk about Rockstar.

51:37

>> Yeah. What? Grand Theft Auto 6: An

51:40

Extended Look, will stream exclusively

51:43

on Netflix on August 27th before being

51:46

released, and this is the kicker,

51:48

[laughter]

51:49

on Rockstar's YouTube channel and

51:51

website,

51:53

6 hours later.

51:58

There are so many layers to unpack here,

52:01

Luke. I don't I I understand less now

52:05

than than [laughter] before you started

52:07

talking about it. Okay.

52:09

>> I thought it was going to be exclusive

52:11

at first and I was like ah maybe

52:12

>> for 6 hours.

52:14

>> I have no idea what money if any changed

52:20

hands.

52:22

But what I can tell you is that if there

52:24

was any media property that existed

52:28

in the entire world ever that could have

52:32

a 6-hour exclusive window that would

52:35

generate real meaningful FOMO, I cannot

52:40

miss this right now immediately.

52:43

Traffic,

52:44

it would be GTA 6. I think that Netflix

52:49

is going to be a huge winner for this.

52:51

So many ads had to load that it like

52:53

lagged the whole website out. But I am

52:55

now down at the comments. People are

52:57

definitely upset about this.

52:58

>> UH

53:00

I'M DOING 6 hours to do a to kind of

53:04

funny cuz it is 6 hours.

53:07

>> 6 hours.

53:08

>> It's a trailer like

53:10

>> Okay. The presentation is expected to

53:12

offer a closer look at GTA 6 than fans

53:15

have seen so far. Rockstar and Netflix

53:17

site will dive deeper into the game's

53:19

world, characters, and story ahead of

53:21

its November 19th launch. Naturally, GTA

53:25

fans have criticized the decision to

53:27

debut the extended look.

53:28

>> Yeah, seems dumb.

53:29

>> behind a Netflix subscription. It seems

53:32

wicked smart. People will buy Netflix

53:35

subscriptions in order to see this,

53:37

which

53:37

>> Well, not only that, too. You probably

53:39

have more people talking about the fact

53:41

that a trailer is coming than ever

53:42

before.

53:43

>> Can I Can I get out? Can I Can I for a

53:46

moment can I talk to you guys for a

53:48

second? Are you a GTA fan? Do you love

53:49

GTA? Okay. Don't buy a Netflix

53:52

subscription just to watch this.

53:54

>> Yeah, please.

53:55

>> You can speak with your wallet here. You

53:58

can just wait

54:00

>> realistically 6 minutes because that's

54:03

how long it's going to take for this to

54:05

be on every piracy site on the entire

54:07

earth there. Like don't don't do

54:11

anything crazy here. just appreciate a a

54:16

a a talented player playing the game and

54:20

don't participate in the game. Just be

54:22

like, you know what, good move. You got

54:25

they got us to talk about their stupid

54:27

trailer, so you know, game appreciate

54:31

game. Don't give them any money for it.

54:33

You don't have to. Okay? And you don't

54:37

even have to like the game, okay? You

54:39

can hate the game. And I don't mean the

54:41

game GTA. I mean them playing this

54:43

marketing game. You can hate that either

54:46

way. Just don't give them any money for

54:47

it. It's fine. Give them no money. Give

54:49

them no attention. And just watch it 6

54:51

hours later. Okay, that's it.

54:54

>> I I I just I love this. This is great.

54:57

Uh rocks after announcing [laughter]

54:59

announcement for an announcement and

55:01

then it just does the money printer

55:02

thing. Oh, so good. So good. So good. Um

55:06

>> love it.

55:08

>> Yeah. I Wow. Honestly,

55:11

I probably won't even watch this on the

55:14

day that it comes out.

55:16

>> And that's fine

55:16

>> cuz who cares?

55:17

>> Who cares? [laughter]

55:20

>> I don't know that I'll watch it at all

55:21

just in case it might have some spoiler

55:23

cuz I actually like the the GTA story

55:25

lines are usually pretty fun. I'm also

55:27

not going to play the game when it comes

55:28

out.

55:28

>> Are you not read the back of the book

55:29

guy? Uh, I'm not against it, but I

55:32

usually just don't like I don't actually

55:34

care too much about spoilers,

55:36

>> but I also don't feel a need to go out

55:38

of my way to find them, if that makes

55:40

sense.

55:41

>> Yeah. Okay.

55:41

>> Like, if I see a trailer, I'm like,

55:42

"Okay, cool." If I don't see a trailer,

55:44

it's also totally fine.

55:46

>> I I care like irrationally about

55:48

spoilers. Like, in the movie theater, I

55:50

will put on my AirPods, crank music, and

55:52

close my eyes until the preview.

55:54

>> Avoid the trailers.

55:55

>> Yeah. I I won't watch a trailer for a

55:56

film that I want to see. If it's just

55:58

like some crap slop thing that I don't

56:00

care about and I'm not going to watch,

56:02

then I'll I'll watch the trailer cuz

56:03

realistically it's probably got all the

56:05

best parts in it anyway and then I

56:06

really don't have to see it. Uh but if

56:08

it's something that I know I want to

56:10

watch, there's no way.

56:11

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I've had stuff spoiled

56:14

for me and I just didn't really care. I

56:16

think usually

56:16

>> it's not so much that I've had stuff

56:18

spoiled for me and I've cared so so so

56:20

much as that I've had experiences where

56:23

nothing was spoiled and it ended up

56:25

being so much more magical because of

56:27

it. So the best example I have is Thor

56:29

Ragnarok. Um I didn't know that Bruce

56:33

Banner the Hulk was in the film because

56:36

I hadn't even seen a poster.

56:38

>> Was it Was it Was he in the posters and

56:40

stuff?

56:40

>> Yeah, but I hadn't seen one.

56:41

>> Nice. That's cool. So, I managed to make

56:43

it all the way to the coliseum scene

56:46

>> going, "Who's going to come out? Who's

56:47

going to come out? Who's going to come

56:48

out?"

56:49

>> That seems like it might be a cool

56:50

moment.

56:50

>> And the film works you up to it for like

56:54

minutes, which feels so stupid. If you

56:57

knew who it was going to be, because if

56:58

I had even seen a poster, I would have

57:00

known.

57:02

But instead, I had no idea.

57:04

>> That's pretty sweet.

57:05

>> And Hulk comes out of there

57:06

[clears throat] and I'm like, "No way."

57:08

Blah blah. It's amazing. Tor said, "My

57:11

former spouse spoiled endgame for me."

57:13

And I I love that he included former.

57:15

[laughter]

57:18

>> Why did she tell you the good guys win?

57:20

>> I like

57:22

>> I like to imagine that's uh part of the

57:24

reason why. I think um I think the only

57:27

time I can really think of where a

57:29

spoiler like actually kind of pissed me

57:32

off was Hedwig Dies.

57:35

>> Do you remember that whole thing? And I

57:37

did hear about it before I read it and I

57:40

was like, "Bro, what?"

57:41

>> Yeah, that just sucks. It's so [snorts]

57:44

unnecessary cuz that's not even like

57:46

Dumbledore dies like like kind of,

57:49

>> you know, we knew it was coming.

57:51

>> Like that the old guard had to had to go

57:55

so that Harry could complete his arc.

57:57

Yeah,

57:58

>> that was just like

57:59

>> people yell in spoilers in chat

58:01

>> like uh you know the beloved bird which

58:05

is going to hit this man [laughter]

58:08

>> so hard a ton of bricks.

58:09

>> I didn't have birds yet.

58:11

>> He doesn't give a that the twins

58:13

die.

58:14

>> That doesn't matter to him.

58:16

>> Only one does.

58:17

>> Oh, one doesn't matter. The point is

58:20

that it's a meaningless human.

58:22

[laughter]

58:23

>> We're talking about a bird.

58:25

>> Animals in general. Yeah. A beautiful

58:27

white bird. An owl bird.

58:32

[laughter]

58:32

>> An owl.

58:33

>> The purest of creatures. An owl.

58:38

[laughter]

58:38

>> What are we talking about?

58:40

>> Birds that die.

58:41

>> Oh my god.

58:42

>> And avoiding them.

58:44

>> Fantastic birds and where to not kill

58:46

them. [laughter]

58:48

>> Fantastic birds and where to bury them.

58:51

>> Oh my god.

58:55

Hopefully all my chickens are alive

58:56

right now.

58:57

>> Spoiling movies while complaining about

58:59

spoilers. First of all, book and

59:01

>> second of all, that movie came out 10

59:03

years ago.

59:04

>> More than that, I think

59:05

>> the uh the one where Hedwig dies. No,

59:07

that might have been 10 years ago when

59:10

>> Oh my god, how long it was a lot more

59:12

than 10 years.

59:12

>> Was the first one 2001?

59:14

>> I think [laughter] I think we're a lot

59:15

closer to 20 years ago, dude. Not 10

59:18

years ago.

59:19

>> No, it was 10 years ago. Move on. Next

59:20

time, move on.

59:22

>> Uh when did

59:23

>> Don't Google it. Which one? Uh, which

59:24

one does Head uh which movie does Hedwig

59:26

die in?

59:30

>> Seventh. Deathly Hollows

59:32

>> part one. Okay. When did Deathly Hallows

59:35

part one come out? You on it?

59:37

>> Yeah.

59:38

>> Okay.

59:41

>> 2010.

59:43

>> Me

59:43

>> a lot clo not a lot closer but closer.

59:46

>> I'm closer without going over. Prices

59:47

right rules. I win.

59:50

>> Wait.

59:52

Yeah. Yes,

59:53

>> but that's Price's right rules, which is

59:55

dumb.

59:57

>> Them's fighting words.

59:58

>> That is dumb.

59:59

>> I think you've upset a lot of people

60:00

just now.

60:00

>> I think those people are fine to have

60:02

been upset.

60:04

>> I I don't think I I I think they're

60:07

justified. I think they're justified.

60:10

>> You didn't define the rules ahead of

60:11

time, which is why it's dumb.

60:13

>> It's always Price's right rules.

60:15

>> Nope.

60:15

>> Dan, back me up on this.

60:18

>> Linus is right.

60:19

>> No. No.

60:20

>> I'm the closest without going over.

60:22

You're the one that SAID THE RULES ARE

60:23

DUMB.

60:23

>> IT ROUNDS UP.

60:24

>> I'M GOING TO I'M going to leave, man.

60:26

>> But I I'll round up 16 years. I told you

60:30

not to Google it and you didn't listen

60:31

to me.

60:32

>> SO YOU'RE JUST UPSET ABOUT

60:34

>> SO NOW EVERYONE'S UPSET. [laughter]

60:36

WAY TO GO, DUDE.

60:40

[gasps]

60:40

>> WOW. This has really divided the

60:42

community. [laughter]

60:43

>> Headwig's dead and Lionus was right.

60:48

Friday's ruined. [laughter]

60:52

All right, I think it's time for us to

60:55

explain comms. Guys, if you are new to

60:58

the WAN show,

61:00

>> welcome.

61:01

>> Hey, thanks for watching the WAN show.

61:03

>> Yeah,

61:04

>> here on the WAN show, we don't do like

61:07

uh super chats or Twitch bits or any of

61:10

the kind of I'mma throw my money at the

61:12

screen and then I'm going to wait

61:13

eagerly to see if senpai will notice me.

61:16

Uh, we believe instead that if you're

61:18

going to throw money at your screen, you

61:19

should get high quality merchandise in

61:21

return. So, we created what we call

61:24

comms or checkout messages. All you got

61:26

to do to send one is head on over to

61:28

ltstore.com. Oh, look at that. We're

61:31

doing a notification list for the

61:32

nuclear LTD ratcheting screwdriver. It's

61:34

a cool new colorway, UV reactive.

61:35

Anyway, the point is, uh, all you got to

61:37

do is head over to ltstore.com. Uh, find

61:40

one of our wonderful products like the

61:42

percussive maintenance technician

61:44

t-shirt. Head on over to your cart and

61:46

when we're live, you will see the

61:47

checkout message interface. You can be

61:51

anonymous or you can show your name and

61:53

last initial and you can leave a little

61:55

message

61:57

and go ahead and place your order. It

61:59

will go to producer Dan who will either

62:02

just pop it up like that, a little

62:03

something like that or who there it is.

62:06

or who will reply to it himself or he

62:09

might curate your message for me and

62:12

Luke to respond to. Um, Dan, do you want

62:16

to show the folks what curated messages

62:19

look like or No, wait. No, I'm going to

62:20

do the I'm going to do the CW

62:22

announcements first so they know what

62:24

kind of cool things they're supposed to

62:25

be ordering. Uh, this Oh, yeah. Look, we

62:28

have one right here. Uh, is our limited

62:30

edition nuclear LTT ratcheting

62:33

screwdriver.

62:35

Oh, look at it go. This is celebrating a

62:38

pretty big milestone for us. Our newly

62:40

approved US patent.

62:46

>> Heck yeah.

62:47

>> What? That's exciting.

62:48

>> Sorry. No, I was there's a weird problem

62:49

with my computer, but I solved it. So,

62:51

yeah.

62:52

>> Yeah. We we co-owned the patent for this

62:55

ratchet with MegaPro.

62:56

>> Oh, cool.

62:57

>> Um, which is finally formal

62:59

acknowledgement that no, we did not in

63:02

fact rebrand MegaPro's product. We

63:04

worked with them, including on very real

63:07

patentable engineering, to make a better

63:10

freaking ratchet that people, hundreds

63:12

of thousands of people are enjoying

63:14

right now. It's a pretty freaking

63:16

awesome product. And now it glows under

63:18

UV light. UV light not included. Uh,

63:21

insider tip, by the way. If you sign up

63:23

at lmg.gg/nuclear

63:25

signup, that is nuclear, not nuclear,

63:28

you can get 10% off instantly or you can

63:31

save your discount for when the nuclear

63:32

screwdriver launches. you'll also be the

63:34

first to know when it drops. Uh, and if

63:36

you're looking for a deal right now and

63:38

you don't necessarily need the new

63:40

nuclear colorway, the mystery

63:41

screwdriver is $20 off this weekend

63:45

only. So, right now is a great time to

63:47

grab a mystery screwdriver. On the US

63:49

store, that's $49.99.

63:51

And on the global store, that is $69.99.

63:54

Nice. Uh, Canadian dollars, which is

63:57

actually a pretty pretty good deal. This

63:59

is perfect if you've been wanting an LT

64:01

screwdriver and you don't mind a little

64:02

bit of mystery in exchange for a great

64:04

deal. The pricing ends Monday at 9:00

64:06

a.m. I assume that's Pacific time. So,

64:08

oh, oh, look at that. And order any

64:10

ratcheting screwdriver and get free

64:11

screwdriver grip tape when both are

64:13

added to the cart. So, those are great

64:15

when you're using gloves.

64:17

>> Yeah. So, we've gotten a lot of feedback

64:18

from technicians who use gloves,

64:20

especially like aircraft folks,

64:22

automotive folks, um that they can find

64:25

the the smooth outer body a little bit

64:27

smooth with gloves

64:29

>> and and especially if you get some oils

64:31

going on

64:31

>> and like a canvas glove. Uh so, the grip

64:33

tape is like it's like a skateboard grip

64:35

tape. It's very grippy. Um and it's now

64:40

included free with your order of a

64:41

mystery screwdriver. So, great time to

64:43

go check that out. Dan, do you want to

64:44

show us a couple of coms that you cured?

64:47

>> Yeah, I've got a few here. Howdy, DLL.

64:49

With the RAM cartel staying for a while,

64:52

>> forever.

64:52

>> Do you think Framework or Valve plus

64:54

other OEMs should form a co-op or buyer

64:58

consortium or invest in fab memory and

65:01

open CXLPCM2?

65:06

Saving for socks.

65:08

>> Um,

65:10

they're welcome to try. I don't Yeah, I

65:12

don't think it's

65:13

>> it's uh no amount of

65:17

So, okay, it's all about leverage. Okay,

65:21

let's talk about leverage.

65:23

If Framework and Valve and let's say a

65:26

real player like Dell, okay, all got

65:29

together and went, "We're not going to

65:31

buy your memory, Micron, unless you give

65:35

us a better price." Do you know what

65:38

Micron would say?

65:41

That's nice. Go yourself. I'll sell

65:43

it to someone else. Because right now,

65:47

those companies have absolutely

65:49

>> way too many buyers.

65:50

>> No leverage. They have zero leverage

65:53

against quite literally all of the DRAM

65:56

players who have all of the leverage.

66:00

Making matters even more complicated. in

66:02

a situation where there is limited

66:04

supply, an alliance like the

66:06

aforementioned idea with framework valve

66:09

and Dell and you know whoever um

66:13

wouldn't last very long because the

66:15

second that Micron came back and said

66:17

hey Dell

66:20

you're not really that good friends with

66:22

these guys are you? I mean, these

66:24

framework guys, they're trying to make

66:25

you look bad. They're making their

66:27

laptops all upgradable and you don't

66:30

want any part of that. You want people

66:32

to buy a whole new XPS every time they

66:34

get a new laptop. Tell you what, you

66:37

just drop your friendship with them. You

66:39

unfriend them on Facebook. Make me your

66:42

new friend and uh I have all the

66:44

leverage, so you're just going to pay

66:46

the normal price, but I'll give you some

66:48

supply. That way, you'll have some

66:49

laptops to sell this quarter. Your

66:51

shareholders like that, right? when you

66:52

have laptops to sell. Cool. Cool. Cool.

66:56

That's how it works. And you can not

66:58

like it. You can be mad about it. Super

67:01

legit. Be mad about it, but it's not

67:03

going to change anything. So, um, you

67:05

know, I like the I always like the idea

67:08

of like little guys banding together. In

67:09

fact, our prime minister likes the idea

67:11

of, you know, middle powers banding

67:14

together for more leverage. But it only

67:17

works in situations where those middle

67:20

powers can increase each other's

67:23

strength by working together and trading

67:25

with each other. In a case like this

67:28

where we're suggesting that competitors

67:31

like direct competitors band together to

67:33

gain leverage against a much more

67:36

powerful entity

67:37

>> which can happen and does happen

67:39

>> isn't going to happen right now.

67:40

>> Not going to happen right now. Not in

67:42

this arena.

67:42

>> Yep.

67:44

But but is absolutely a thing because

67:46

there are there are people that will not

67:47

join that group which are going to buy

67:50

way dramatically more memory than the

67:53

people that you just mentioned.

67:54

>> And right now it's it's less even about

67:57

the price you're paying for it and it's

67:59

more about having product to sell at

68:02

all. Like that's why that's why the

68:06

contract prices are getting bid up

68:08

because if you're Dell, it is not an

68:10

option to get on your quarterly investor

68:13

call and say, "Well, there was no

68:16

memory, so I guess we didn't sell any

68:19

laptops."

68:21

[laughter]

68:22

Imagine it. So, they just have to buy

68:25

it.

68:29

All right. Yeah. Do you have a Do you

68:31

have a better news one, Dan?

68:35

Yes.

68:35

>> Nice. Solid.

68:37

>> Uh, well, that one isn't, but this one.

68:39

Uh, hello, Lenu Danu. I'm loving my

68:42

socks and I'm happy to be picking up

68:43

more. I do construction and they've been

68:46

excellent. Any plans for similar

68:48

products like wrist warmers or

68:50

fingerless gloves?

68:52

>> Wrist warmers.

68:53

>> I've never heard of wrist warmers.

68:55

>> I have never heard of wrist warmers.

68:58

>> What's a wrist warmer? We do shell sell

69:00

uh jackets.

69:02

>> That warms too many things.

69:04

>> Yeah,

69:04

>> we could cut the arms off.

69:06

>> Is it just as like a sweatb band?

69:08

>> I think I think [clears throat] so.

69:09

>> What's Is that a I mean, we did do those

69:11

once.

69:11

>> We did.

69:12

>> I still have at least one of them.

69:15

>> I I got a I got a bunch of them.

69:17

>> Yeah.

69:17

>> Uh wrist warmers. Okay. I'm I'm looking

69:19

this up. I'm looking this up. What are

69:20

wrist warmers? Oh. Oh, are we talking

69:22

like like pain relief? They look like

69:25

>> Okay, what are we talking? We talking

69:27

this

69:29

>> Oh,

69:33

>> I always just thought of those as emo

69:35

kid sleeves,

69:37

>> right?

69:38

>> Yeah.

69:40

>> I love the knitted ones. Those are sick.

69:42

>> Those actually those look nice.

69:44

>> Okay,

69:47

got it.

69:48

>> Is that Yeah.

69:50

>> Marino wool wrist warmers. Interesting.

69:54

>> This seems like a really neat thing that

69:58

probably is not going to be on our road

70:01

map anytime soon.

70:03

>> I wonder if you could market it as a way

70:06

to avoid the

70:08

the like wrist rub point that gamers

70:11

have.

70:15

>> Yeah.

70:18

I don't know if I would believe that

70:19

that's the best solution for that

70:21

though. No, it's probably a

70:22

>> we could do

70:23

>> whatever they're called.

70:24

>> A wrist warmer with a PTFE

70:27

bottom so that it doesn't affect your

70:30

mousing friction.

70:33

>> Okay, we'll look into it.

70:34

>> Pair them [snorts] with the programmer

70:36

socks.

70:37

>> Interesting.

70:39

[laughter]

70:40

>> Do a bundle deal.

70:42

>> Do a bundle deal with the programming

70:43

socks. You said please, for the love of

70:46

God, [laughter]

70:48

everyone wants them.

70:54

>> [laughter]

70:55

>> Oh my god.

70:57

>> I mean, Elijah also mentioned them

70:58

unprompted. Just just just say there's a

71:02

market plane. Do you want programmer

71:04

socks?

71:05

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. You don't need to ask

71:06

them. We already know the answer. Thank

71:07

you, Dan.

71:08

>> Okay, fine. [laughter]

71:09

>> Do you want Do you want little Do you

71:10

want your wist warmers to go along with

71:12

your programmer socks?

71:13

>> Match. It will be so cute.

71:15

>> Oh my goodness. All right, we're not

71:17

doing a pole float plane. Calm down.

71:19

>> Crop top. We already know the answer.

71:21

[laughter]

71:22

>> Uh, that's all I got. That's next. More

71:25

topics, please.

71:26

>> All right.

71:27

>> So, [laughter] so

71:29

>> multiple people in chat just start

71:31

yelling Firefox.

71:32

>> Firefox programming socks with

71:35

wristwatching [laughter]

71:36

crop top. Oh my god.

71:40

Lionus, you uh you like money, right?

71:42

[laughter]

71:47

>> Oh my god. I mean, I don't mind it. Um,

71:52

>> hold on. I've got to I've got to check

71:53

something because I I don't think you've

71:55

actually seen this, but we're working.

71:59

>> I don't see a lot of the product stuff

72:00

until it like lands on set for a W show.

72:03

>> Okay.

72:04

>> I get questions all the time about like,

72:06

are you guys ever going to make this or

72:08

are you guys currently making this

72:09

thing? And I'm like, dude, I don't know.

72:11

You'll know probably within an hour of

72:13

me knowing. [laughter]

72:14

>> That's why I have to curate so many of

72:16

these because I don't know. Yeah.

72:18

>> Who knows?

72:18

>> I know some of them, but very few.

72:20

>> Yeah.

72:23

>> Okay. I'm gonna see if I can get you a

72:25

picture of a thing. Um, it's borderline.

72:29

I think Ashley might still be on today

72:33

technically, but if she's not, then

72:35

we're not going to we're not going to

72:36

get this. Um,

72:41

but we we might be working on a plushy

72:44

that our audience might find extremely

72:46

cute.

72:48

That's all I'll say for now.

72:49

>> Is it a shark?

72:50

>> I'm not going to exist. I just told you

72:51

that's all I'm going to say. You're like

72:53

my kids. They're like, "Where's mom?" I

72:55

don't know. Is she upstairs? I don't

72:57

know. What part of I don't know

72:59

was not clear. Why would you ask me

73:01

further clarifying questions? I That's

73:03

one of those things I get just

73:04

irrationally triggered by. It's like,

73:06

[laughter]

73:10

"Ask me something, I say I don't know."

73:12

You ask me a follow-up question that is

73:15

more specific, but the same damn thing

73:17

that I just said I don't know.

73:19

>> If if you tend to give all the context

73:23

you have or not, and if you don't, and

73:25

if you just say that you don't know, you

73:27

might know that she's not upstairs

73:29

because you might have recently come

73:30

from upstairs. So, they could use that

73:33

to narrow their search. No, I No, I tend

73:36

to be an overcommunicator, so there

73:37

ain't no way that applies to me. Nope.

73:39

Nope. I reject it. [laughter] Consider

73:42

it rejected.

73:42

>> Uh, speaking of something that might get

73:44

rejected, so should we go into the next

73:46

topic?

73:47

>> Um, yeah, let's do it.

73:52

>> Is Nintendo a good company?

73:54

>> I mean, they're good at making money, so

73:57

yes. Nintendo is offering free repairs

73:59

on their consoles and accessories

74:00

damaged in the 2026

74:03

Kumamoto earthquake for people in

74:06

>> Kumamoto.

74:06

>> Kumamo, that makes more sense. Kumamoto

74:08

earthquake for people in eligible areas.

74:10

>> Hakumamoto.

74:12

>> That Nope, we're we're wrong now. Uh the

74:16

the company is also donating 50 million

74:18

yen, a roughly roughly around 340,000

74:21

USD to the Japanese Red Cross to help

74:24

with their relief efforts. The

74:25

discussion question is Nintendo takes a

74:27

ton of guff. So, how does this story

74:30

change your image of them if at all?

74:32

>> I don't think it changes my image at

74:34

all.

74:34

>> It does not

74:35

>> cuz like they've always

74:36

>> I'm happy they're doing it.

74:38

>> They've always done good guy being a

74:40

good company at making lots of money

74:43

stuff.

74:43

>> Yeah.

74:44

>> And like corporate sort of stewardship

74:47

of your community is part of that. I do

74:50

think this is very cool

74:51

>> and and that's a good thing, but I've

74:54

never not thought that Nintendo is like

74:56

that. Where where I really run into

74:59

issues with them is around, you know, IP

75:02

enforcement um rigidity and um just sort

75:08

of anti-consumer

75:11

behavior. Like to their to their credit,

75:13

they didn't lock multiplayer behind pay

75:15

walls until many many years after their

75:17

competitors did. But I will I will die

75:20

on this hill. Um, locking my ability to

75:24

back up a save game behind a monthly

75:27

subscription is evil.

75:29

>> Is it still like that?

75:30

>> As far as I know, yes, you still have to

75:32

have a Nintendo online subscription in

75:34

order to back up your save game. And

75:36

when I say back up, I don't mean

75:39

migrate. You can migrate it from one

75:41

Switch to another. That is currently

75:43

supported without an online

75:44

subscription, but you cannot back it up.

75:48

Even though our last two consoles, again

75:51

to their credit, have supported industry

75:53

standard uh micro SD or SD Express media

75:57

formats, which which is a good thing.

75:59

There is no way to put your save games

76:02

on them.

76:04

Wild.

76:08

Uh Deep Blue says, "Well, having to pay

76:10

for online backup seems reasonable."

76:11

Yeah, that's not the problem. I should

76:13

be able to do a local backup,

76:17

but you can not.

76:21

Wild.

76:23

Cuz like you can invest hundreds of

76:25

hours in a save file. Like if you told

76:28

some completionist on, you know, Tears

76:31

of the Kingdom or something like that

76:32

where they want to like they want to

76:34

complete complete the game that, oh

76:37

yeah, uh, someone stole your Switch.

76:39

Guess what? No save file.

76:42

You should have had a Nintendo online

76:43

subscription. Like, bro, I only play

76:45

this game. It's a single player game.

76:47

Why do I need that? You shouldn't. You

76:48

should not need that.

76:49

>> Yeah, I agree.

76:52

>> Boo

76:54

there. But, uh, helping people impacted

76:57

by earthquake.

76:59

Good.

77:00

>> Cool.

77:01

>> Um,

77:04

I had something that was only sort of

77:08

related.

77:09

Uh, oh, okay. I Oh man, whenever my

77:14

notes thing does not make its way into

77:16

the dock, I get very confused.

77:19

Um,

77:21

I had uh I had an interesting thought on

77:23

sort of customer support and like what

77:26

should or shouldn't be covered by a

77:28

warranty. So, I reached out to Ecobe

77:31

recently with an issue that I've got

77:32

with some of my smart thermostats that

77:35

are spontaneously disconnecting from my

77:38

Wi-Fi. And I've tried basically

77:40

everything under the sun. I've tried uh

77:43

reducing the number of 2.4 GHz

77:45

transmitting APs that I have, which did

77:47

help a little bit, but didn't make it go

77:49

away completely. Uh Ubiquiti has some

77:52

friendly like low power IoT device

77:55

specific modes that you can enable and

77:57

some kind of features that you can

77:59

activate to make it a little simpler.

78:00

Um, I've tried binding specific

78:03

thermostats to specific APs that I know

78:05

are close to them to make sure that uh

78:08

they won't

78:10

um accidentally roam to one that's too

78:12

far away and then lose the connection

78:13

completely. I've tried Oh, sorry. I'm

78:16

going to digress my digression here

78:18

really quick. Does anybody know how to

78:21

lock a device through the UniFi

78:23

interface to a specific AP that it is

78:27

not already connected to? I have been

78:30

beating my head against my phone trying

78:32

to figure that out. I haven't actually

78:34

looked at the desktop interface, but on

78:35

the mobile interface.

78:38

The only way that the the only way I've

78:40

seen to do it is you can select lock to

78:43

AP, but it will lock to whatever it's

78:45

connected to, which

78:48

I would say nine times out of 10 when

78:52

I'm going to try to lock something to a

78:54

specific AP, I'm doing that because it

78:57

is roamed to the wrong one. So, I would

79:01

think that that would be something that

79:03

I could do.

79:05

Anyone?

79:07

I have an IoT only AP blah blah blah.

79:09

Yeah, I tried that. I even tried having

79:10

a separate Ruckus one that was my IoT

79:12

only.

79:12

>> There's some people saying it might be

79:14

desktop appable.

79:15

>> Okay.

79:17

Uh, yes, VLAN groups. No, I'm not

79:19

setting up VLAN groups for that. That's

79:21

crazy. They already have a feature to

79:23

lock a device.

79:24

>> That's not the only person who said that

79:26

you can do it there. There's other

79:27

people that say you might be able to do

79:28

it on desktop. Yeah, you can do it on

79:30

desktop.

79:30

>> You can do it on desktop.

79:31

>> There's a variety of people saying you

79:32

can do it desktop.

79:33

>> Okay. All right. Hopefully that's good.

79:34

Now, someone else suggested using

79:36

apparently a selector. There's a

79:38

selector for the AP using the desktop

79:39

UI.

79:40

>> Cool. Okay. All right. I'll I'll look

79:42

into that. Anyway, what was I talking

79:43

about? Right. So, so these uh so these

79:45

EcoB lights that I installed at my house

79:46

ages ago. And so I reached out to Eco

79:49

about it finally cuz I was like, I'm at

79:50

I'm at the end of my ropes. And they're

79:52

like, okay, yeah, uh that's a known

79:54

issue. And I was like, okay, so

79:59

what do we do? And they're basically

80:01

like, "Okay, well, we'll send you all

80:02

new APs or not APs, excuse me,

80:05

thermostats, and you can you can have

80:08

like our like new equivalent of the the

80:10

EcoB3 light or whatever the one that I

80:12

have is." And I'm like, "Okay." But my

80:14

first question in a situation like that

80:17

>> is, "What if I wasn't me?" And they said

80:20

that under warranty, which is a

80:22

three-year period, they would support

80:25

the same swap for anyone.

80:29

But I guess my question is what is a

80:32

warranty? Which is a dangerous topic of

80:34

conversation on this show. Calm down. Um

80:38

because to me a warranty means

80:41

>> is this a warranty

80:43

>> like free of

80:45

like like premature failure. That to me

80:48

is a is warranty. And if it is a if it's

80:52

a fundamental design flaw that is in the

80:55

very nature of the Wi-Fi chip that is

80:58

integrated into a product and hasn't

81:02

been fixed,

81:05

should that be covered for anyone

81:07

outside of the 3 years? If it was like

81:10

broken from day one and will be broken,

81:14

it's maybe not forever cuz one of the

81:16

things

81:16

>> in this case like okay, let's let's

81:19

fundamentally flawed.

81:22

>> Self-inflating here.

81:23

>> Self-inflating.

81:24

>> And look at the backpack.

81:26

>> There was the zipper problem.

81:28

>> Yeah.

81:29

>> And you guys basically allowed anyone to

81:32

claim their zippers, right?

81:34

>> Well, I mean, that was we issued a

81:38

voluntary recall of the carabiner zipper

81:42

pulls is what we did.

81:44

We could have

81:45

>> you want would you have wanted them to

81:46

do a voluntary recall of their thing

81:48

that you bought thermostat?

81:50

>> Um,

81:51

so from my understanding it's not an

81:54

issue with every AP like with every

81:56

wireless access point. But it is an

81:59

issue with mine. So is that flawed

82:03

enough to merit a recall? I actually

82:06

don't know. I don't know if that's the

82:07

right answer.

82:08

>> That's interesting. But then if someone

82:10

upgrades their AP to a new Wi-Fi 8 AP or

82:14

something in the future and it does have

82:16

that issue and they contact EcoB, should

82:20

that be covered? I don't have a firm

82:22

because stuff can't be covered forever,

82:26

right? And it was free of material

82:28

defects and and worked throughout the

82:32

support period. But if it only worked

82:35

because someone got lucky and their

82:38

other stuff happened to be compatible

82:40

with it. Uh to be clear, I'm not giving

82:41

EOP a hard time here necessarily. Um and

82:44

I think my hope cuz I also just asked,

82:47

hey, it's actually kind of a hassle. I

82:48

actually don't want new thermostats.

82:50

What I want is for my thermostats to

82:52

work so that I don't have to have a

82:54

Saturday chore of going around and

82:55

replacing all my thermostats. Like maybe

82:56

that's a privileged thing or whatever to

82:58

like not want new thermostats. I have I

83:01

have I have too many thermostats,

83:03

>> but I actually don't I don't want

83:05

another chore to do.

83:06

>> I just want my thermostats to work. And

83:08

so what I asked them, I was like, "Look,

83:10

the solution is actually really simple.

83:12

I just have to pop it off the wall and

83:13

put it back on."

83:15

>> But when I'm doing that for like half of

83:17

my stupid thermostats every like week,

83:20

then it it becomes a bit of a hassle.

83:22

It's it's not something

83:22

>> that's your that's your individual it's

83:24

having a problem diagnostic step is

83:27

>> and then it it starts working within a

83:28

minute. So, I I asked them, I was like,

83:30

"Could you just push a software update

83:32

that has it like

83:33

>> restart

83:33

>> restart at 2 a.m. every day?"

83:35

>> Yeah.

83:35

>> Cuz I'd be okay with that.

83:36

>> Yeah.

83:37

>> And they're like, "We're working on a

83:40

fix, but we don't have a date for it.

83:41

So, here's new thermostats." And I'm

83:43

like,

83:44

>> "Okay, I really don't want to go run

83:47

around my house popping off and putting

83:48

thermostats back on.

83:50

>> Everything

83:50

>> more often than I have to." So, that

83:52

that's where I'm at.

83:53

>> Um, so, but it but I don't know. It just

83:57

it just raised this interesting question

83:59

for me. How defective is defective? And

84:03

at what point does something like uh

84:05

like a design flaw

84:08

reach the point where it's just like

84:10

yeah, we're aware of that, but like

84:11

you're out of warranty anyway. Um you

84:14

should have said something about it

84:15

sooner. Like I

84:17

>> What's your answer for this? I don't

84:18

know the right answer.

84:19

>> Cuz there's also certain products that

84:20

are like

84:22

>> my thermostats are too juicy.

84:24

>> Okay, stop.

84:27

[laughter and gasps] Uh there's also

84:28

some products that by design are very

84:29

like, you know, cutting edge and not

84:32

necessarily super reliable and you like

84:34

know that when you're buying it. Um but

84:37

a thermostat,

84:40

I don't know, as a person who has

84:42

genuinely never replaced a thermostat in

84:44

my entire life in any context,

84:46

uh I don't expect them to stop working.

84:48

>> Yeah. Like I was I was pretty annoyed

84:50

when my Nest thermostat at my that is

84:53

now at my in-laws house cuz they're

84:54

living in our old house

84:56

>> um like got like an end of life notice

84:59

and I was like what are you talking

85:00

about? It's a thermostat not happen.

85:02

>> That's insane.

85:03

>> House infrastructure stuff like that to

85:05

me should just basically just work.

85:08

>> Um so

85:09

>> like the ones that I replaced them with

85:11

literally had a I had a little glass

85:14

container full of mercury.

85:15

>> Yeah. And the way that they worked was

85:17

like according to where it tipped, the

85:21

mercury would flow and bridge a contact

85:23

and it would turn on or turn off that

85:25

zone. Like it was it would have worked

85:27

for another 150 years if I had not

85:29

replaced it with these stupid ones that

85:32

disconnect.

85:33

>> Yeah.

85:33

>> So, so like I I have I have a personal

85:37

expectation that that thing keeps

85:38

working and I would expect that company

85:41

to replace that thing beyond 3 years

85:43

personally. But I also don't know that

85:45

that applies to everything to something

85:48

that is like like I said when I look at

85:50

I don't know what you want to call it

85:52

house infrastructure things. I expect

85:54

them to just kind of keep working unless

85:56

there is a known situation where it's

85:58

like uh I can't even necessarily think

86:01

of one. I don't know hot water tanks

86:03

you're expected to replace them every

86:05

>> fixed amount of time.

86:06

>> Yeah. There appliances

86:08

>> usually that type of stuff. Even

86:10

appliances, like my god, the the rate at

86:12

which we're expected to replace

86:13

appliances these days is actually not

86:15

okay. I'm not down with that. Um, and

86:17

that's insane and a very modern thing.

86:19

But most things in your house like that

86:21

are like house infrastructure like

86:23

something like a hot water heater, you

86:25

have an expected replacement date.

86:27

You're not expecting it to fail before

86:29

that date. You're expecting to replace

86:31

it before it is going to do so. Um, and

86:33

this is like a normal thing for

86:35

homeowners. Okay. Sure. Um

86:40

>> yeah.

86:41

>> Yeah. The uh the the repair tech for our

86:44

um laundry like our washing machine

86:46

basically was like never replace this.

86:48

>> Yeah.

86:49

>> Cuz it's like some old '9s

86:52

>> just going to work forever. Take through

86:54

everything

86:55

>> will work and is very repable and stuff.

86:57

He was just like

86:59

>> cuz I as I asked I was like okay that's

87:01

a pretty expensive repair bill. Like

87:03

should I just get a new one? He's like,

87:05

"Uh-uh." [laughter]

87:08

>> Duly noted, sir. Thank you.

87:09

>> Yeah.

87:10

>> Thank you for your service.

87:11

>> Yeah.

87:12

>> Have a good one. [laughter]

87:15

Um,

87:17

all right. I

87:20

Sorry, I I feel like I'm obligated to

87:22

say this. Um, Amaria in Flame Chat said,

87:25

"All homeowners should be cat owners."

87:28

It's right there in the name. Home home

87:31

owner, but capitalize the meo w in the

87:33

middle. Home meowowner.

87:37

>> I could get behind that.

87:40

>> I'm something of a cat enthusiast

87:41

myself.

87:41

>> It's pretty good. [laughter]

87:43

lover.

87:45

>> Oh my god.

87:47

>> What?

87:47

>> I'm not dinging it cuz it's not a joke.

87:49

>> He's been alone. [laughter]

87:50

He's been alone for a week. Cat's out of

87:53

the bag.

87:53

>> I saw a hilarious tweet. It was just

87:55

like men who do not enjoy satisfying a

87:59

woman are objectively gay. And I was

88:02

like,

88:05

because there's like a manosphere thing

88:06

where it's like, yeah, it's all about

88:08

me. I don't enjoy, you know, helping

88:10

her.

88:12

And uh this was like a response to it. I

88:14

was like,

88:15

>> honestly,

88:16

>> can get behind that.

88:18

>> Yeah. I Wow, that's really interesting.

88:20

I didn't know that was a thing. I Yeah,

88:22

I I was sitting here being like, "Yeah,

88:23

I think that makes sense." I didn't

88:26

realize there was like a counter at all.

88:28

[laughter]

88:30

>> Anyway, moving on.

88:33

>> Moving on.

88:33

>> Speaking about progressing too fast, PS5

88:36

emulation is progressing faster than

88:37

expected with the upcoming console only

88:40

release of GTA 6. Programmers have been

88:42

working overtime to make PS5 games

88:45

playable on PC, and we're seeing big

88:47

breakthroughs in the two biggest

88:49

emulators. Uh, Kite PS5, I think is how

88:53

that's supposed to be said, and Sharp

88:55

Emu, Emu, whatever, with multiple fairly

88:58

primitive games finally being playable

89:00

on Windows, although we're a long way

89:02

from ripping around in Vice City on PC.

89:06

Discussion question. Do you think you

89:08

would run an emulator to play GTA 6 on

89:11

launch?

89:14

Yes, but I would not run out and buy a

89:18

console for it. And I honestly

89:24

play GTA.

89:26

No. Yeah, I don't think I'd want to play

89:27

a console for it at all because I'm

89:30

pretty sure I've always done GTA stuff

89:32

with hybrid keyboard, mouse, and

89:34

controller,

89:35

>> right? Wait, what?

89:37

>> Yeah.

89:37

>> So you what? You switch to a controller

89:39

like when you're driving?

89:40

>> Like in a car? Yeah.

89:41

>> Oh,

89:42

>> and like plane or helicopter or

89:43

whatever.

89:44

>> Okay. So, I literally have both plugged

89:45

in cuz most modern games, the second you

89:47

do any form of input on either one, it

89:51

will switch to that input device.

89:53

>> So, the second I press the button to get

89:55

into the car, I just pick up the

89:57

controller and go and it's perfectly

89:58

fine. Man, that's Dude, I don't think

90:01

I've ever taken a moment to appreciate

90:04

>> the fact that modern games will change

90:07

their onscreen prompts

90:09

>> according to which

90:10

>> control method you are currently using

90:12

like immediately these days. Do you

90:15

remember back when you had to care what

90:17

controller scheme the game was designed

90:19

for natively

90:21

>> because you'd get like PlayStation

90:23

prompts while you're playing with a

90:24

keyboard and mouse? You'd be like it'd

90:26

be like press whatever to perform a

90:27

quick dive. I have no idea what

90:29

button I'm supposed to press and I'm

90:30

dead. [laughter]

90:31

>> Do you know how many glyphs Steam has

90:33

currently? It's over 500.

90:37

>> No way. [laughter]

90:39

>> Oh, I guess that makes sense because

90:41

you'd have to have every possible

90:43

language of possible keyboard.

90:46

>> And there's Xbox Pro controller.

90:48

>> You could you could bind anything to

90:50

anything.

90:51

>> Switch JoyCons, Steam controller. Um, is

90:54

is there like would would would you ever

90:56

would one glyph be a combo key?

90:59

>> No, it's one button.

91:02

>> Okay.

91:02

>> Or action. Swiping up on the touchpad of

91:05

a PS5 controller has to has to go onto

91:08

screen somewhere because you could

91:09

rebind it to something else.

91:11

>> Oh man,

91:12

>> that's why not probably not a lot of

91:14

games allow you to do rebinds as well.

91:17

>> 500. There's too many controllers. Stop

91:19

making them.

91:20

>> That is wicked though. Yeah, I would I

91:21

would absolutely emulate GTA 6. That

91:24

would be wicked. Uh considering it's

91:26

going to take freaking forever. It's

91:28

probably be 2027. Oh, it will definitely

91:30

be 2027 cuz it's coming out in November,

91:32

right?

91:32

>> Tell me this.

91:33

>> Yeah.

91:36

>> Okay. I'm I'm going to try to present as

91:38

many angles of both sides of the

91:41

argument as I can in one go here.

91:43

>> Okay.

91:44

>> Okay. So, knowing that [clears throat]

91:47

it took countless developer and artist

91:50

hours to create it,

91:52

>> but knowing that Rockstar and Take 2

91:54

have enough money to buy The Earth and

91:56

All the Heavens,

91:57

>> Mhm. knowing that

92:01

um a decision was made to make it

92:04

console exclusive,

92:06

>> but knowing that

92:09

>> um you know it's something that we still

92:12

have the option to to buy a perpetual

92:15

license for at all, which is something

92:17

that should be encouraged.

92:18

>> Mhm.

92:20

If you emulated it before the PC launch,

92:24

would you also buy a disc or jewel case

92:28

to put on a shelf such that you

92:31

compensated

92:33

who whatever entity for that

92:36

>> at this point in time in my life?

92:37

>> At this point in time,

92:38

>> my income?

92:40

>> Yes, I would absolutely. And that would

92:41

be like if GTA

92:42

>> over 100 Canadian dollars.

92:44

>> Yeah. If I liked the game enough. Yeah.

92:46

>> So, you wouldn't do it ahead of time?

92:48

>> No.

92:50

Oh,

92:50

>> I would probably

92:52

>> So, you're a rent for free.

92:54

>> I would probably later if I feel like

92:56

it.

92:56

>> Steam's terms.

92:57

>> Steam's terms. Okay. Interesting.

92:59

>> So, I would play for like 2 hours.

93:01

>> Okay. All right.

93:01

>> And then if I'm like, "This isn't worth

93:03

me buying," I'd probably stop.

93:06

>> Uh because honestly, that's a good

93:07

indication that I should not waste my

93:09

time with this anyways. Um and if I'm

93:12

like, "This is awesome. I really want to

93:13

keep playing." I would happily put a

93:16

$100 in the $100 machine so I could play

93:19

the game more. Then I'd be like, "Okay,

93:22

cool." And then I would buy it when it

93:23

came out on PC.

93:24

>> Okay, interesting take.

93:27

>> That was all I really needed to

93:28

>> I had that so ready to go. Uh cuz this

93:31

scenario has more or less happened

93:33

before. [laughter]

93:34

>> What was the most recent?

93:35

>> I don't I don't even remember. I I knew

93:37

you were going to ask. I don't remember

93:38

specifically, but I know I've done that

93:40

thing where I'm like, "Okay, I'm going

93:42

to hold myself to Steam's

93:44

terms on this, which is I'll give myself

93:46

two hours,

93:46

>> right?

93:47

>> I've done that before, but I don't

93:48

remember the scenario. Um, I don't

93:50

remember the game. It hasn't been a long

93:52

time because usually the thing is just

93:54

on Steam.

93:55

>> Yeah.

93:56

>> Yeah.

93:56

>> I wish it was just going to be on Steam.

93:58

>> Yeah, that'd be a lot easier.

93:59

>> Then we wouldn't have to have these

94:01

conversations. We could just buy it on

94:02

Steam.

94:02

>> Also, probably not going to be

94:03

emulatable on launch anyways.

94:06

>> I don't know, man. The uh the

94:09

>> the community is a little voracious for

94:11

this one. And that and the community is

94:13

a little bit mad at Sony right now.

94:16

>> Yeah.

94:17

>> Like

94:17

>> that's true. I when we went over your

94:19

thing about how it's going to be on

94:20

Netflix, I looked on the trailer. You

94:22

mean the Yes. I looked at the tweeters

94:25

and almost all the comments were about,

94:28

"Oh, there's no physical editions. You

94:30

guys suck." Blah blah blah. People are

94:32

seem genuinely very angry.

94:34

>> However, we've seen people be pretty

94:36

genuinely angry about things before and

94:38

quite literally nothing changed. Think

94:40

back to the outrage over horse armor.

94:43

>> Mhm. Mhm.

94:44

>> The the first mainstream PC

94:47

microtransaction.

94:49

>> Most people don't even remember this,

94:52

but it was a cosmetic armor for your

94:54

horse that you could buy in Oblivion for

94:56

I think it wasn't even that much. Was it

94:58

five bucks?

94:58

>> It was pretty low. It was less less than

95:00

$10,

95:01

>> something like that.

95:02

>> Which at the time was also laughed at

95:03

for being so high.

95:04

>> Yes.

95:05

>> I would like to point that out. these

95:06

days that is that is like decently low

95:09

for a skin in a video game.

95:11

>> $2.50.

95:12

>> Back then people were like, "How the

95:14

heck could you pay $2.50 for a stupid

95:17

skin for your stupid horse?"

95:18

>> And it doesn't even make your horse less

95:20

likely to die. This is outrageous.

95:22

>> It's just cosmetic.

95:23

>> Mhm.

95:26

>> Yeah. Scrappy DP says, "We made fun of

95:28

that so much."

95:29

>> We did. And then so many people bought

95:31

it.

95:32

>> They did.

95:33

>> So many people.

95:33

>> There was so much horse armor.

95:35

>> Yeah. Piles of horse armor.

95:37

>> Tons and tons and tons of horse armor.

95:39

>> Exodonut [laughter]

95:40

says, "Looks cool as heck, though."

95:43

>> I don't even think it did.

95:45

[sighs]

95:47

>> You looking it up?

95:48

>> Um, I am trying to find a picture, but I

95:52

hate it when this happens. So, here's a

95:54

link to r/games on Reddit. And I click

95:59

it, and where is that picture that it

96:02

previewed?

96:04

Where's my darn picture? I want this

96:06

picture.

96:07

>> Here you go.

96:08

>> Killing me. Okay. Well, there's your

96:09

horse.

96:10

>> So, you've got the gold and the silver.

96:12

>> Yeah, buddy.

96:13

>> Here's the silver kind of. That's an

96:15

artistic rendition. Here's the gold.

96:20

Ridiculous.

96:24

>> Ridiculous.

96:24

>> Does look pretty cool.

96:26

>> Does it?

96:26

>> I wouldn't pay a dollar for it, but it

96:28

looks

96:28

>> You wouldn't pay anything for it?

96:29

>> I'd get I'd want it for free.

96:31

>> I would do a quest for these. I'd do a

96:33

quest for it. Yeah, 100%.

96:34

>> And then I'd use the silver one cuz the

96:35

gold one's

96:36

>> ironically I would be contributing so

96:39

much more of my time than $2.50.

96:42

>> But I but I'd get the sense of

96:43

accomplishment. I don't get a sense of

96:45

accomplishment from I found a I found a

96:47

tuni on the ground and I used it to buy

96:48

this pixels.

96:49

>> Do you get a sense of pride

96:51

>> from completing quests?

96:53

>> Yeah, it's it's the

96:54

>> Well, it's not lion armor. Pride,

96:56

>> I don't think so.

96:58

>> It's the sense of pride and

96:59

accomplishment quote from EA. Uh

97:02

>> oh. For what? For buying a

97:04

microtransaction.

97:05

>> What? Yeah. Wait, hold on.

97:06

>> I haven't seen I don't know what you're

97:07

talking about.

97:08

>> What? No, you have to.

97:10

>> I I actually don't.

97:11

>> Once I bring it up, you'll recognize it.

97:13

I guarantee it.

97:14

>> Don't you have phones? I mean, this one

97:15

I know.

97:17

>> Not EA. Hey, isn't EA owned by like the

97:19

Saudi [clears throat] Investment Fund

97:20

now?

97:21

>> Uh, did that close this week?

97:23

>> Something like that. Yeah.

97:25

>> Neat. I remember when EA used to be like

97:28

kind of Canadian or something.

97:31

Oh yeah, look at that. Saudi Arabia's

97:33

public investment fund alongside

97:34

Silverlake and Jared Kushner's Affinity

97:37

Partners. Ah,

97:38

>> Jared Kushner. Nice.

97:39

>> $55 billion leveraged buyout of

97:41

Electronic Arts.

97:43

>> You know this.

97:45

>> The intent is to provide players with a

97:48

sense of pride and accomplishment

97:50

minus 667,000

97:55

votes. That's crazy. I don't actually

97:58

don't I don't know if I remember this.

98:00

Is Oh, is this FIFA?

98:02

>> No, this is Battlefront. I think

98:04

>> Star Wars I think it took like

98:06

>> Star Wars Battlefront 400 hours of

98:08

in-game grinding to afford something

98:11

that you could buy for a

98:12

microtransaction.

98:13

>> Okay. I didn't remember the exact quote.

98:15

I do remember the Battlefront Vader

98:17

unlock thing where it was like literally

98:18

impossible or something like that.

98:20

>> Yeah. Hundreds of hours.

98:21

>> It wasn't impossible, but it was absurd.

98:23

>> Yeah. Okay.

98:24

>> It was very absurd. And I think that's

98:25

the most downvoted comment on Reddit in

98:27

history.

98:28

>> There was a bunch of stuff around that

98:29

era. I remember I was a huge fan of the

98:31

Shadow of Mordor games. I don't know if

98:33

they're done making those or not, but I

98:35

really like those.

98:36

>> Monolith doesn't exist anymore, so go

98:38

with Yes.

98:38

>> Did the IP go somewhere basically cuz

98:40

they they owned uh some form of like

98:43

patent or whatever for the uh themes.

98:47

Nemesis system. That was so sick.

98:50

>> Bring back something that has that. an

98:53

Assassin's Creed game with the Nemesis

98:54

system would be freaking wicked. Um,

98:57

anyways, the last one, the last Shadow

98:59

of Mordor, the last like I'm guessing

99:02

quarter of the game, I think basically

99:05

no one played because the campaign

99:07

effectially effectively wraps up and

99:10

you've been collecting these like

99:12

premium currencies the entire time. And

99:14

remember, I I streamed my whole

99:15

playthrough and I refused to spend any

99:18

of the premium currencies because I knew

99:20

this endgame thing was coming when I

99:22

knew a lot of the premium currencies

99:23

would be used.

99:25

>> Oh,

99:25

>> so I was like, I want to see if you

99:27

wholeheartedly and like thoroughly play

99:30

the game and never spend any of them if

99:32

you can do it

99:33

>> like play the whole game essentially.

99:35

>> And the answer was like effectively no.

99:37

So you wrap up the campaign and then you

99:38

go into this like post campaign thing

99:41

and they just

99:44

wreck you.

99:44

>> I can milk him.

99:45

>> Yeah. Like, he made it this far. Let's

99:48

go for it. And it was horrible. I

99:51

remember it was a great game up until

99:52

that point. And you can tell you can

99:54

tell when the polish drops. That's one

99:56

of my favorite things [laughter]

99:58

>> cuz the developers didn't care and they

100:00

didn't want to do it. So, you can tell

100:01

like the the game ends and then they

100:03

like really make it feel like the game

100:06

ends and then there's this whole other

100:07

thing and it's like quality just poof.

100:10

[laughter]

100:14

Oh man. Yeah,

100:18

dude. That's another Oh man. Oh, do I

100:21

talk about Black Flag for the third time

100:22

in a row?

100:23

>> Nope.

100:23

>> Okay,

100:26

fine.

100:26

>> Let's talk about Xbox doubling down on

100:28

backward compatibility. According to a

100:31

leaked memo, Microsoft is working with

100:33

developers to relist original Xbox and

100:36

360 games to reach the upcoming Helix

100:40

Xbox PCs and Xbox handhelds through a

100:45

Microsoft built emulator that will run

100:47

locally.

100:47

>> Cool.

100:48

>> Microsoft will, this is a quote, manage

100:50

all engineering, the bespoke emulator,

100:52

title bytitle certification and testing,

100:53

storefront merchandising, and player

100:55

support, while developers will keep

100:57

rights, pricing, and brand control.

100:59

Sick.

101:00

>> According to reports, this will work

101:02

similarly to the current implementation

101:03

of backwards compatibility on the Xbox

101:05

One and Series consoles, where users

101:07

will either buy a new digital copy or

101:10

put in the disc to verify the license

101:12

and allow them to download and run the

101:14

digital version of the game.

101:16

>> Wicked

101:17

>> discussion question. Why would a

101:19

developer not opt into this program?

101:22

>> They might not be able to sell the game

101:23

anymore. Yeah, they might have music in

101:26

the game that is too much work to

101:27

replace and that they no longer own a

101:29

license for. That's one I could think

101:31

of. Or or other IP licensing, speaking

101:33

of Lord of the Rings and the Mordor

101:35

games and Warner Brothers. Um,

101:38

>> other than that, I mean,

101:39

>> because they might have got the right to

101:41

distribute it on like a certain console,

101:44

like they might have gotten the right to

101:45

distribute it on the original Xbox, but

101:47

they might not have the right to

101:48

distribute it on this emulator

101:50

thingyamajiggy. Uh, yeah.

101:54

Yeah,

101:54

>> very cool though. Um,

101:56

>> which OG Xbox and 360 games do you want

101:59

to see on PC? And then, uh, Mr. Goautier

102:03

said, "Lost Odyssey and Blue Dragon are

102:05

my picks."

102:06

>> I have never owned an Xbox.

102:11

So, my my play time on Xbox exclusives

102:16

includes like a couple hours of Dead

102:18

Rising on the 360

102:22

and

102:24

like a little bit of Halo like at a

102:27

place where there happened to be an Xbox

102:29

at one point. I haven't I've This is

102:33

crazy, especially with the uh the new

102:35

one coming out soon. I've never actually

102:37

played a Gears title

102:39

>> really. I have played a grand total of

102:41

like four minutes of Gears of War. Any

102:44

Gears of War. Remember, Xbox basically

102:48

existed

102:50

inside the the period where I like had a

102:54

bunch of kids and was doing adulting

102:55

things and starting a company and all of

102:57

that. Uh, so I I didn't have consoles at

103:00

my my mom's house. Like there were no

103:02

consoles. Consoles were not a thing. And

103:04

then um I was a very busy adult, so I

103:07

just never really Xboxed.

103:10

Super Nintendo Kid.

103:12

>> I remember playing Bullet Storm. Um

103:15

>> Oh, yeah. We talked about that a little

103:17

while ago, I think.

103:18

>> Did we?

103:18

>> It came up at some point.

103:20

>> I didn't realize this was on Steam, to

103:22

be honest. I thought this was console

103:23

only. Um I think I would have played

103:26

this on console. I don't remember what

103:28

console this was for.

103:31

Maybe I played it on Steam,

103:34

but this game was sweet.

103:38

Oh, cool. New

103:40

>> campaign. Yeah, it it was wicked. Um,

103:42

but it says it's on Steam, so I don't

103:44

know. Maybe I'm remembering incorrectly.

103:46

The main thing that I would say it was

103:48

console only originally. Okay. Yeah. Um,

103:50

now that it's on Steam, I don't care

103:52

about it being brought uh to emulation,

103:56

but uh I guess I would have originally

103:58

said Fusion Frenzy, which they're

103:59

already doing. So, yeah. Cool.

104:04

>> How do I play Halo? No, that came out

104:06

for PC.

104:07

>> It did.

104:07

>> All right. Did I say Halo? Sorry. Fable.

104:09

>> Oh,

104:09

>> yeah. I I I think that How did I Yeah.

104:12

How did I play Fable?

104:14

>> Was it on a PC? Did Fable was Fable for

104:17

PC?

104:22

It's got to be

104:24

>> Maple. Eventually. Okay. I played it

104:27

eventually then.

104:29

>> Yeah.

104:29

>> Yeah.

104:29

>> Just like I'll eventually play GTA 6.

104:32

>> Nice. Cool.

104:33

>> Nice.

104:34

>> Solid. All right. Speaking of consoles.

104:39

>> Oh, uh,

104:41

>> sponsors real quick here.

104:43

>> Yeah.

104:44

>> Oh, float plane first. Early access for

104:47

this week's float plane is my favorite

104:50

videos of all time. Lionus didn't say

104:53

it, but I'm convinced he will once he

104:55

sees which videos they are. What are you

104:57

talking about, Sam?

104:58

>> Uh, classic Sammy things. Nobody knows.

105:01

[laughter]

105:01

Uh,

105:04

words put in order. Uh, this will be a

105:07

fun video, though. I uh my my daughter's

105:09

phone died, so her options were to have

105:14

a broken phone or fix it herself.

105:16

>> Awesome.

105:17

>> Um, so we ended up getting into it and

105:20

she she does all the work, which is

105:23

pretty cool.

105:25

>> That's sweet. I helped her with a little

105:26

bit of adhesive removal, but I made her

105:28

do all the surgery to do a uh to do a

105:31

battery replacement and I like showed

105:33

her things, but no, she she does the

105:36

work. It was actually a lot of fun. We

105:38

basically just kind of hung out and

105:39

repaired a phone together and you guys

105:41

can uh come along for the ride. We also

105:44

discovered that that's the look you're

105:45

seeing on my face here. Um that her

105:48

phone was broken in more ways than one.

105:50

Oh,

105:52

>> there was there was a flexible PCB that

105:56

was severed.

105:58

>> Wow.

105:58

>> Inside it, which is not the problem we

106:00

thought we had. It wasn't charging. It

106:02

needed a new battery cuz it's like Note

106:05

10. How old is the Note 10? How old is

106:08

Note 10? There you go. Ah, yes. 7 years

106:12

old. So, it was time for a new battery.

106:14

Um, but that yeah, there was a there was

106:16

a broken like essentially board in it

106:20

and um so I had to order a new one.

106:25

[laughter]

106:25

I don't know how it was working. I don't

106:27

know what that board did.

106:28

>> Break it when you were opening it up.

106:29

>> Nope. Huh.

106:31

>> Yeah.

106:34

>> You guys will I mean you guys will be

106:35

able to see it in the video.

106:36

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

106:37

>> So, what's what's your Yeah. What's

106:39

What's the favorite video?

106:40

>> I I I don't I don't know. I don't

106:42

understand Sammy's notes, but uh that

106:45

happens. Um

106:48

and then what? What? Look at these

106:51

notes, you guys. How am I supposed to

106:52

work with this? That's only one of two.

106:55

Lionus says in his head, the second one

106:57

is probably just as good to make it my

106:59

favorite video. F. What is he? He he

107:02

says without

107:03

>> fav fav.

107:05

>> He says without the typos. So he never

107:07

fixed the typos. He just added he says

107:09

without the typos. The second video is

107:11

the definitive ranking of

107:14

[clears throat] every Windows version

107:15

ever. Ah, yes. This is out on float

107:19

plane. Let's go. Oh, okay. So, I can set

107:22

that to public. Uh,

107:24

>> you know, change thumbnail

107:26

>> so you can watch this early. Sorry,

107:27

what?

107:28

>> You kept mousing over change.

107:29

>> It was a big blue button. How am I

107:32

supposed to not want to look at the big

107:33

blue button, Luke? Come on, man.

107:35

>> Whenever we do any UIUX things, we need

107:37

to have someone with ADHD in the room.

107:39

[laughter] Just

107:39

>> Yeah, you should

107:41

>> click bright color. Bright color. Right

107:43

color. Click.

107:44

>> I mean, it's right there. It's a big

107:45

bright button. [laughter]

107:47

>> I don't make the rules.

107:48

>> Button. Do thing. I wanted to do thing.

107:50

I came to do things.

107:52

>> Did I make it public? I made it I think

107:54

I made it public.

107:55

>> Oh, it just takes a sec.

107:56

>> Oh, okay. Well, do better.

107:59

>> Terrible us. Do better.

108:01

>> No, do better.

108:02

>> You know what else takes a sec?

108:03

>> Mhm.

108:03

>> YouTube.

108:05

>> Relax.

108:06

>> That is true. He's not wrong. Chill.

108:08

This is a lot better than YouTube. Just

108:11

[laughter] freaking

108:12

>> there. There are going to be some

108:15

controversial choices in this tier list.

108:18

I pretty much promise you we go all

108:20

>> skip through it to see how pissed I need

108:21

to be.

108:23

>> Okay, that is not how to watch it. You

108:25

have to watch all of them. [laughter]

108:27

>> Where is it? Oh, no. You don't. You

108:30

can't show me scrubbing it.

108:31

>> Windows XP better be on there.

108:33

>> Do you want to You want to show

108:34

everyone?

108:35

>> No, I don't want to show everyone the

108:36

answer.

108:37

>> All right. Exodonut says, "We only care

108:39

about one thing." Um,

108:41

>> I am looking for

108:42

>> digital digital matrix IO says, "I know

108:45

Lionus and I are both fans of Vista."

108:47

Yeah. Uh, Jordan and I, we didn't get to

108:48

the point of like almost throwing hands,

108:50

but we definitely didn't agree about

108:53

some Windows and Vista was one of them.

108:56

So, there's

108:56

>> I will fight you in hisstead if you like

108:58

Vista.

108:59

>> There's Dude, I don't like Vista.

109:03

I love Vista.

109:06

deal with it. [laughter]

109:10

>> He just ran into his mic.

109:11

>> He didn't even make it around the

109:13

corner. [laughter]

109:17

>> Yeah,

109:17

>> just wanted to disappear off camera.

109:19

>> Oh man, this uh

109:23

Moma nailed it. Vista was fine. Lol.

109:26

People's PCs sucked 100%.

109:28

>> So true.

109:29

>> If you had cutting edge hardware, Vista

109:31

was the bomb. It was actually super

109:33

stable and uh performed great. Arrow was

109:37

amazing. Game changer.

109:39

>> There's only

109:40

>> I would use Arrow today if I could.

109:44

>> I think there's only two changes I would

109:45

make here.

109:46

>> Really?

109:46

>> Yeah.

109:47

>> That's actually pretty surprising cuz I

109:49

think Jordan and I disagreed about more

109:51

than just two.

109:52

>> I would I would I would only up things.

109:55

I would up this personally to here

109:58

>> and I would up that to there

110:01

>> because I think this one's problem as

110:03

everybody is saying was having worked at

110:06

Best Buy at the time everyone was buying

110:08

512 meg RAM laptops

110:10

>> and obviously we're never going to be

110:12

able to run it.

110:13

>> I had to fight to get that elevated from

110:15

like a C.

110:16

>> Yeah.

110:16

>> So we Jordan and I we compromised. We

110:18

compromised. We we worked together.

110:20

>> I agree with most of this though. I'm

110:22

happy with that too. The two at the top

110:26

was the two things that I was coming in

110:28

worried about because if they weren't

110:29

there, [laughter] I was actually going

110:31

to be very upset.

110:32

>> And they're both there. So, I'm okay.

110:34

>> I'll give you a vista, but you can have

110:36

those. I'm happy.

110:37

>> I I was going to be not okay if those

110:39

weren't there. Good job. So, [laughter]

110:42

>> all right.

110:42

>> I am now fine. I can sleep properly.

110:45

[gasps]

110:45

>> All right. Your face will remain

110:47

unpunched. [laughter]

110:48

>> It's funny how much we care about other

110:50

people agreeing with us. Oh, I don't.

110:52

It's You would just be wrong. That's the

110:54

problem.

110:55

>> But But you could You're so angry about

110:57

it. [laughter]

111:00

>> I'd go to prison.

111:01

>> We're such pack creatures. It's so

111:03

funny. Like we just

111:05

>> It It would actually It

111:07

>> I think I think the reason is is cuz it

111:09

would it would feel like you were making

111:10

fun of my friend.

111:12

>> Yeah.

111:12

>> I can make fun of those.

111:14

>> Yeah.

111:14

>> I don't like it when other people make

111:16

fun of

111:16

>> It's your tribe. It's tribal mentality,

111:18

right? I think that's why Mac people

111:20

hate it so much when I criticize what

111:22

Apple does

111:23

>> probably

111:23

>> without like realizing that I am an

111:25

Apple user. I am an Apple customer

111:28

>> and objectively correct about how crap

111:30

their products are.

111:31

>> What's I'm so bad with this stuff.

111:33

What's your watch? Is that That's not an

111:35

Apple Watch. Okay.

111:37

>> No, I was holding up my AirPods.

111:38

>> No, I know. I was wondering if you had

111:40

even more stuff.

111:41

>> Um I'm trying to think. Is there any

111:42

other Apple in my life right now? I

111:44

really liked the MacBook Neo, but I have

111:46

just had to move on so that I can like

111:48

review other products and do this

111:50

challenge and stuff.

111:52

>> Um, yeah, I can't think of anything else

111:54

Apple in my life. Their monitors are

111:56

just so far behind, like just utterly

111:59

irrelevant,

112:00

>> which is kind of funky cuz they really

112:02

weren't. They really set

112:04

>> like the bar for quite a while.

112:06

>> Their desktops are like really great for

112:08

certain use cases that are not super

112:11

relevant to me right now. Like if you're

112:13

an AI guy, uh Mac Studio is well at

112:16

least was the bomb before they eolled

112:19

the top RAM configuration and adjusted

112:22

their pricing dramatically. And then

112:24

like the Mac Mini is one of the best

112:26

values in tech, even at the higher

112:28

pricing. Um but I I have like a really

112:30

nice desktop. I don't really need the

112:32

best value little tiny desktop. I don't

112:34

know. There's a lot of really good

112:35

things. Just uh mostly mostly doesn't

112:38

really work for me that much.

112:40

Uh what else am I supposed to be doing?

112:42

Oh my god, there's more. Um,

112:45

I personally wait what? I personally

112:47

love the bloatware and inane UI

112:50

decisions on Windows 11. # ad. This is

112:52

in my notes. What am I supposed to do

112:54

with this?

112:54

>> I think he means insane.

112:57

>> If you want more vibes, what about some

112:59

board games with team boomer and Riley

113:02

versus team Zoomers Peter and Ashley

113:04

where they play Wavelengths? Watch the

113:06

early access first at lmg.gg/fpan.

113:10

All right, good stuff. Now, let's talk

113:12

about some sponsors. The show is brought

113:14

to you today by Factor Meals. Throughout

113:16

history, things like a blue screen or a

113:18

red ring have struck fear into the

113:20

hearts of gamers. But nothing scares

113:23

everyone quite like the dreaded

113:24

question, "What are we having for

113:26

dinner?" Well, our sponsor, Factory

113:28

Meals, is going to make meal time a lot

113:30

less intimidating. They make chef

113:32

crafted, ready to eat meals with the

113:34

help of dietitians to ensure you're

113:36

giving something healthy to eat. They've

113:37

even internally banned over 175

113:41

ingredients that they deem not

113:43

beneficial to a balanced diet. So, uh,

113:46

you're out. Every week, you'll have over

113:48

100 nutrient-dense options to choose

113:50

from. Things like salmon burgers,

113:51

truffle butter chicken, and mushroom

113:53

risoto. Plus, they have add-ons that can

113:56

help when you have that sweet tooth, but

113:57

you don't want a whole mountain of

113:59

sugar, like pumpkin flavored cheesecakes

114:01

and protein shakes. Factor meals are

114:03

ready in 2 minutes and require no prep

114:05

and no cleanup. 97% of users agree that

114:08

factor meals have helped them free up

114:10

time and even change to a healthier

114:12

diet. You don't have to rely on

114:13

drive-throughs or delivery. Let's get

114:15

real. Head to factormeals.com/wan50

114:18

off and use code when50 off to get 50%

114:22

off and one free breakfast item per box

114:24

for 1 year while supplies last until

114:26

October 31st, 2026. That's code when50

114:30

off at factormeals.com.50

114:33

off at factormeals.com.

114:35

How many times is that? Okay, seriously

114:37

guys, once again, this is actually this

114:39

is actually in the notes. It's in there

114:42

that many times. The show is also

114:44

brought to you by Squarespace. Whether

114:47

it's a business, a band, or a hobby, if

114:50

you have something to show off, you

114:53

can I help you, Dan? Oh, what is is it?

114:55

That's not That's not Squarespace.

114:58

Get it.

115:00

>> Nice.

115:00

>> Get it.

115:04

>> This.

115:06

[laughter]

115:07

>> Oh no, my notes are wrong. Whether it's

115:09

a business or a band, is that what

115:11

you're reading?

115:12

>> Yeah. Is that okay?

115:16

[laughter]

115:19

>> And that's Squarespace.

115:20

>> Uhhuh.

115:20

>> This This could make sense.

115:22

>> Is it?

115:22

>> It's a news article about meta using

115:25

>> three. Okay, good. I'm good.

115:27

>> Okay.

115:28

>> It could make sense.

115:29

>> Whether it's a business, a band, is

115:32

there going to be a band here or Okay,

115:34

>> this makes sense. This makes sense.

115:35

>> Or a hobby. If you have something to

115:37

show off, you need a place to send

115:38

people to check out your work. And

115:40

relying solely on social media sites

115:42

comes with its own concerns. Well,

115:45

Squarespace is the all-in-one website

115:47

platform that helps you create a

115:49

personalized site to help your business

115:51

promote what it needs to succeed. There

115:54

are tons of templates to choose from. Or

115:56

you can get something that's even more

115:57

aligned with your brand thanks to their

115:58

design intelligence and blueprint tools.

116:01

It's as simple as answering a few basic

116:02

questions about your industry, your

116:04

business goals, what type of personality

116:06

you wish to convey. And from there, it

116:07

really is as easy as dragging and

116:09

dropping text and images. They'll even

116:11

help you grow your business with SEO

116:12

tools, payment processing, and sales

116:14

analytics. There's millions of URLs out

116:17

there for grabs, too. And Squarespace

116:18

can help you search for something that's

116:19

easy to remember to make sure that

116:21

people can find your site. So, start

116:23

building your website today and receive

116:25

10% off your first purchase by visiting

116:27

squarespace.com/wan, [music]

116:29

which we'll have at this QR code right

116:32

over here. See this QR code? Oh, man.

116:34

It's gone.

116:35

>> If you're interested in advertising with

116:37

the WAN show, uh, just know that we have

116:39

industryleading professionalism in our

116:41

ad reads and we'll [laughter]

116:44

>> shut up. This never happened to me

116:46

before.

116:47

The assets and the scripts are in the

116:50

right order, but the doc is is uh not.

116:53

>> Let's blame Sammy.

116:54

>> Yeah, it's probably Sammy.

116:56

>> Yeah, let's go with that.

116:57

>> Uh this is fun. PlayStation 5 boxes now

117:00

include a notice about games going

117:02

digital after January 2028. Uh at Behind

117:06

Tame posted a picture of the notice over

117:08

on Twitter. Here's the text. Important

117:11

notice. From January 2028, newly

117:13

released games on PlayStation will be

117:15

available for purchase on PlayStation

117:16

Store and at retailers in digital format

117:19

only. Discs for games released before

117:21

January 2028 can continue to be played

117:23

on this console. A similar notice

117:25

appears on the PlayStation 5 disc drive

117:27

and disc models of the PS5 from Sony's

117:30

online store. So, it seems like this

117:34

decision is very much not going to

117:37

change regardless of how much gamers are

117:39

upset about it and probably

117:42

um it will not affect Sony's business at

117:45

all other than some snarky tweets

117:49

and um

117:51

>> speaking of things that have affected

117:52

businesses.

117:53

>> Yeah, hit me.

117:54

>> Halo Studios sees layoffs after shipping

117:56

campaign evolved. Numerous employees

117:59

that had been on the project uh have

118:01

started posting on LinkedIn that they've

118:03

been laid off. Reviews of the game um

118:06

have been genuinely favorable with

118:09

Polygon calling it one of the best

118:10

remakes of all time. That's like that's

118:13

like

118:15

that's like it being a Monday night and

118:17

me telling Ivonne these are some of the

118:19

best reheated leftovers of all time.

118:22

Like I that is such a that is such a

118:25

backhanded compliment. You also just

118:27

like really struggle to agree with that

118:29

to be completely honest.

118:30

>> Sure. I mean either way I'm just

118:32

>> No, for sure.

118:33

>> Can you imagine? Can you imagine how

118:36

easy it would be to make out all five of

118:40

her finger marks on my face [laughter]

118:42

if I were to say something like that?

118:44

Cuz I've talked before about how Ivonne

118:46

and I have like a very honest

118:48

relationship. Like if something if she

118:50

makes food or if I do a job around the

118:53

house and it is not up to standard, we

118:56

will tell each other. We'll just be

118:57

like, "Yeah, it could be it's a little

118:59

too salty." Because without honest

119:01

feedback, how do you improve? How do you

119:03

do better for each other? But that is

119:05

such a passive aggressive

119:07

thing to say that I just

119:09

>> And I don't even think it's way, man.

119:12

Sales have been somewhat mediocre with

119:14

numbers at just 1.5 million copies sold,

119:17

900,000 on Xbox, 425,000 on PS5, 212,000

119:22

on Steam. The fact that it's on PS5 is

119:25

really the interesting part of this cuz

119:27

it's a Halo game that's on PlayStation.

119:29

>> Mhm.

119:30

>> That [clears throat] I think didn't get

119:31

talked about enough. Um, those numbers

119:34

seem really high and I think

119:36

>> do they

119:37

>> for 1.5 million games sold for a remake,

119:41

you didn't even have to.

119:42

>> Yeah, but for a Halo game.

119:44

>> No, for sure.

119:45

>> I mean, there's definitely different

119:46

perspectives on that number. That's

119:48

either like

119:49

>> I'm not looking at it in the context of

119:50

a Halo game.

119:51

>> Depending on who you are, a million and

119:53

a half copies is like completely

119:54

life-changing or absolute completeing

119:58

disaster close-up shop. I'm looking at a

120:00

million and a half copies sold for

120:02

something where you didn't have to come

120:04

up with a story. You didn't have to

120:06

think of different mechanics. It was all

120:08

kind of there. And honestly, it was

120:10

missing a lot of things from the

120:12

original game, which is one of the

120:14

reasons why I have honestly a kind of a

120:15

rough time accepting the one of the best

120:17

remakes of all time. Um,

120:19

>> of all time.

120:20

>> I mean, look, if the standards are like

120:22

Warcraft 3 Reforged, like what are we

120:24

what are we talking about here?

120:25

>> It's But that's not one of them.

120:27

>> Apparently, they fixed that, by the I

120:28

haven't I haven't tried it since.

120:29

>> Interesting.

120:30

>> Yeah, apparently it's better now.

120:31

>> I'd be interested in someone actually

120:33

trying to rank the best remakes cuz I I

120:36

have a hard time I have I don't think

120:38

it's one of the worst at all, but I have

120:40

a hard time saying that it would be one

120:42

of the best remakes. That seems uh

120:46

unlikely. Uh anyways, Xbox sales uh

120:50

numbers include Xbox Game Pass members

120:52

who bought the premium edition upgrade.

120:56

>> Okay. And we do have to remember that

120:58

there would be people who just had the

121:00

game pass and did not buy the upgrade.

121:02

So the numbers are actually a lot

121:03

higher,

121:03

>> right?

121:04

>> Uh but not in actual sales because haha,

121:06

you made the whole thing. Anyways, uh

121:09

Gamesbeat reports that an Xbox source

121:12

told them that no layoffs have occurred

121:14

at Halo Studios and there are often

121:16

external contractor shifts that happen

121:19

after a game ships.

121:21

>> This is what people are noticing. Okay,

121:24

>> that kind of makes sense. Games beat

121:25

also stated this was not an official

121:27

comment from Microsoft.

121:28

>> That does make sense, though.

121:29

>> So, okay,

121:30

>> a lot of contractors also do call it a

121:32

layoff when their contract ends, even

121:34

though it's not accurate.

121:35

>> I am I'm going to present a thing I

121:39

read. I'm not taking a position on it,

121:43

but I felt it was a very interesting

121:45

thing that I read and I just want to

121:48

talk about it. Basically, I came across

121:51

a post. I think it was on Reddit, but it

121:54

was from someone who allegedly claimed

121:58

to be like a bluecollar worker in the

122:01

construction industry and had been their

122:03

whole life. And their perspective on the

122:07

way that game studios

122:10

will release an acclaimed money-making

122:13

game and then lay off a bunch of the

122:16

people who worked on it was Yadoi.

122:20

When me and my bros build a bridge,

122:24

most of us don't hang around to maintain

122:26

the bridge. And sometimes there's

122:29

another bridge to work on immediately.

122:31

And sometimes there ain't. And that's

122:33

just the nature of the business. Why do

122:36

these white collar workers expect a

122:38

different standard than we get? And

122:42

I didn't have an immediate

122:45

gotcha

122:47

response to that.

122:48

>> I kind of do. Yeah, I I want to hear.

122:51

>> So my my counter to that would be that

122:53

you [sighs]

122:58

>> there might be a lot of ignorance in my

122:59

statement. I feel like if you're

123:01

building a bridge, you're hiring a bunch

123:03

of trades.

123:05

>> Yeah,

123:05

>> a lot of those trades will be people who

123:08

are like it's it's contractors and

123:10

subcontractors and things like that.

123:11

These are people working in the

123:12

industry. I know how it's a bridge. This

123:14

doesn't directly apply, but you're

123:16

hiring a journeyman plubber who knows

123:18

how to do his thing. If you're applying

123:20

him in a certain way, it's you're you're

123:23

following the job. You're building to

123:24

spec. When you're making a game, the

123:28

things that you're going to be doing is

123:30

weirder. And how that team works really

123:32

well together is going to change. I

123:33

know. I was watching like the rebuilding

123:36

of the um the trade center in New York.

123:40

>> Yeah. And they had squads that were

123:42

working on that that were like guys that

123:44

did go job to job, but they stayed

123:46

together as a unit.

123:47

>> Yeah.

123:48

>> And they had they had like the the iron

123:50

workers at the top. It was really

123:52

actually really fantastic to watch. It

123:53

was really cool watching these guys work

123:55

and seeing how like

123:57

>> well executed the build was and and the

123:59

trials and tribulations that they went

124:00

through and stuff. But this was a group

124:02

of people that like these two dudes

124:04

>> had been working together like basically

124:06

their entire professional lives.

124:08

>> Yeah. They went from job to job to job.

124:09

>> Yep. but they were as a unit as they

124:12

went through. And I think there's a lot

124:13

of that in the in the construction space

124:15

where you'll have people who kind of

124:17

float around together. Um, in the

124:20

software development space, that doesn't

124:21

necessarily happen

124:23

at all.

124:24

>> And if you have a team that you know can

124:26

execute, especially at these bigger

124:29

studios, there should be something else

124:30

that they can go work on. If you're

124:32

looking at Microsoft, they own so many

124:34

IPs that if you know that you have a

124:36

team that works well and executes well,

124:38

why aren't you just floating them off to

124:40

some other project?

124:42

>> I don't know. I literally I don't know.

124:44

It was it was an interesting perspective

124:46

and I I do see I do see a lot of

124:49

differences and I think you've

124:50

highlighted some of the ones that I that

124:52

occurred to me but I also see some more

124:55

similarities like just like in game

124:57

development where you'll have your uh

125:00

you you'll have your parent company that

125:01

owns multiple studios that each manage

125:04

multiple teams and that are working on

125:06

different IPs. uh in in much the same

125:08

way like you could in the again in the

125:11

construction industry you talk about how

125:13

your like your subcontractors might

125:15

actually be groups of people that work

125:17

really well as a cohesive team. uh but

125:19

in much the same way that a group of

125:23

developers who are working on a

125:24

particular project or IP um at a studio

125:28

that is under uh like a major you know

125:31

IP holder like a Microsoft or whoever um

125:34

just like those guys might be scattered

125:37

to the high winds if they run out of

125:40

stuff that they're assigned to the exact

125:41

same thing can happen in trades as well

125:43

where people will regularly get laid off

125:46

like sometimes even seasonally like like

125:48

on a on a cyclical basis from the

125:51

company and the people that they work

125:53

with very regularly and then the next

125:55

season comes around and buddy who runs

125:58

the company is like, "Hey, I know we

125:59

laid you off in September for the

126:01

winter, but guess what? The snow is a

126:04

fawn and I'm getting back to work. Are

126:06

you coming?"

126:06

>> It's pretty common that you even know

126:07

that contract is coming up cuz he'll be

126:10

like, "Well, I'll come back next summer,

126:11

whatever, next spring

126:13

>> or don't and we'll figure it out."

126:15

>> kind of thing. Yeah, I think I think

126:17

they're just very different. Um

126:21

>> I think like if you if you look at how

126:24

uh a pool of programmers might work,

126:27

>> um the different game engines and stuff,

126:30

whatnot, usually if if you're in like

126:33

Canada, you're going to have building

126:35

code for Canada.

126:40

If if I'm building a game,

126:43

if I worked on Battlefield and then I

126:46

want to go work on Doom.

126:48

>> Yeah.

126:49

>> It's different.

126:50

They're both shooter games.

126:52

>> Yeah. But it's not the same thing.

126:53

>> It's so different.

126:54

>> Yeah.

126:55

>> So, like I I don't know. I I I do find

126:58

it kind of weird.

126:59

>> Yeah. I don't know. I just I It was It

127:01

was an It was an interesting

127:03

perspective.

127:04

>> It is. It is an interesting perspective

127:05

>> that made me think about it in a

127:08

potentially slightly different way

127:12

because you know to me it was always

127:15

very black and white right you may

127:18

you're making so much money on this

127:20

project it was so successful and it was

127:22

so good how it felt like punishing the

127:26

people who contributed to the success

127:28

but also there are parallels in other

127:31

industries where it isn't seen that way

127:33

>> but here's And I just wanted to wrap my

127:35

brain around why we see it that way here

127:36

and we don't see it that way here and we

127:38

do here or we don't there.

127:39

>> I genuinely do think it's actually a

127:40

really good point to bring up. I one of

127:42

the big reasons why I don't think it

127:44

applies

127:44

>> is if the game does super well make

127:47

another one idiot is like the thing that

127:50

I would say and if you're going to make

127:51

another one

127:53

>> I I would say the same thing applies to

127:55

bridges.

127:56

>> No,

127:57

>> I mean that the the amount of economic

127:59

activity that they can contribute to

128:01

places that invest in infrastructure

128:03

They make bridges. So now are you

128:04

shipping around this like multiund

128:07

person team

128:08

>> and they can never have permanently

128:10

rooted homes? Like I think a lot of

128:11

times you're hiring local workers when

128:13

you're building a massive. Sometimes you

128:15

bring people from the outside.

128:16

>> Sometimes you're not. The guys the guys

128:18

who did our flooring at Smash Champs.

128:20

They came in from the interior. They

128:21

actually were staying in Airbnbs while

128:23

they worked on the project, which was

128:24

very surprising to me. And it's not

128:26

super far away, but like my um

128:29

>> isn't that a super specialized thing? So

128:31

my my brother-in-law is another example

128:34

um where they did like highly

128:37

specialized uh bridge painting actually

128:39

not bridge building um but like bridge

128:42

paint treatments and they were all over

128:44

the place.

128:46

>> I would guess if you were building a

128:48

bridge that you would have a specialized

128:50

team who has gone around and built a

128:51

bunch of bridges which is the smaller

128:53

core team and then you would hire a

128:55

bunch of local trades to support things.

128:58

would it would almost certainly be a

129:00

combination because especially on the

129:02

design side

129:03

>> like I would imagine there's like you

129:05

could probably count the firms who are

129:07

qualified to design gigantic large

129:10

bridges in the world on like your

129:12

digits.

129:13

>> Um but then in terms of like you know

129:16

who actually

129:17

>> you know

129:18

>> like I noticed this wow that was

129:20

horrible. Sorry. Sorry. I know. I was in

129:24

my

129:24

>> I was in Japan. And then

129:26

>> for those just listening, uh Luke

129:29

cracked his neck without even like using

129:32

his hands. He just like odd jobed it.

129:35

Like, oh my god. Anyway, sorry. Carry

129:37

on.

129:38

>> I was in Japan and then immediately went

129:40

to Taiwan afterwards and I noticed that

129:42

the train systems feel oddly similar.

129:45

>> Oh yeah. Okay. Not exactly the same, but

129:48

they're very similar to the point where

129:49

I was like, man, I bet you the same they

129:52

they share some amount of expertise

129:54

here. Maybe some maybe it wasn't the

129:57

same company, but maybe some people who

129:58

worked on one went and also worked on

130:00

the other. There's clearly they're

130:02

clearly sharing some of the same ideas.

130:04

But I bet you like someone mentioned,

130:06

well, there's union is a thing. I don't

130:07

remember who that was. Um there I I can

130:10

pretty much guarantee that they're

130:11

working with local expertise as well to

130:13

flush it out.

130:14

>> Yeah. Um, and you could compare that to

130:16

the video game thing.

130:17

>> Yeah. And and I mean, again, we're not

130:19

talking about that every single person

130:21

who worked on the project that is

130:23

successful just immediately gets laid

130:25

off. In some cases, it does happen where

130:27

like the studio just gets closed and you

130:28

look at you just kind

130:31

>> Microsoft is pretty well known for that.

130:33

>> But in many cases, it's not actually

130:34

like that. It is more like yeah, some

130:36

people we don't need anymore because the

130:38

project is done are now gone. And should

130:41

that just should that be something that

130:43

is expected that when the project is

130:46

complete like QA testers are one that

130:48

come up a lot? It's like okay the

130:50

project's done and and they immediately

130:52

laid off all the QA testers. What the

130:54

are the QA testers going to do for

130:55

the next 2 years while the next project

130:58

is in the early stages?

130:59

>> That's like at at at like Microsoft.

131:01

>> Yeah.

131:02

>> I would kind of expect you to have a QA

131:04

testing team that jumps from project to

131:05

project.

131:06

>> Would you though? Why?

131:07

>> Why not? Because I don't necessarily

131:09

want the same QA testers for a first

131:10

person shooter that I do for a strategy

131:12

game.

131:13

>> I think you could.

131:14

>> You could, but I don't necessarily want

131:15

that. What if I

131:16

>> I don't even think it's a bad idea. Why

131:17

wouldn't you want that?

131:18

>> Because I might want someone who's more

131:19

specialized in and more experienced in

131:21

QA testing a different type of game.

131:23

>> I don't think that's crazy.

131:25

>> I don't think that's needed.

131:26

>> It might not be needed, but it also

131:27

isn't crazy. I think it could be either

131:28

way.

131:29

>> I think you could drop off some people,

131:31

but I I think that's a way to lose. I I

131:34

I think those are not as specialized

131:36

different like

131:38

>> I don't think those are as different

131:39

specialties as you might think they are.

131:41

>> It's not a matter of how much I do or

131:43

don't think they are. If there is

131:44

literally any optimization if they are

131:46

10% different.

131:47

>> So this is my argument is I don't think

131:49

it's optimization. And my reason for

131:50

that is that I think you're losing a lot

131:54

in the process of rehiring these groups.

131:56

And that's why I said maybe you drop

131:58

some

131:59

>> but I think losing your core team can be

132:01

really brutal. I think this happens on

132:03

the development side. I'm sure it

132:04

happens on the QA side. I think it's

132:05

basically all over the place. The thing

132:06

that's most surprising to me is that if

132:09

you had a team that you know can

132:10

execute, maybe the window's too big,

132:13

maybe the windows years or whatever. Um

132:16

but if you have a team that you know can

132:17

execute the gamble of them not doing

132:20

that next time which we have seen

132:22

multiple times and the gamble of uh not

132:26

the gamble but the expense of needing to

132:28

go through hiring processes to re

132:30

rebuild this whole team I think is

132:32

sometimes not paid enough attention to

132:35

>> takes a long time to build the team

132:37

takes a long time to get that team

132:39

working cohesively together. Um you're

132:42

going to have a lot of duds.

132:44

Um,

132:46

I think people look at the software

132:48

development industry right now and go,

132:50

"Oh my god, there's been so many

132:51

layoffs. There's so many people looking

132:52

for jobs." Um, and go, "Wow, it must be

132:54

extremely easy to hire really good

132:56

people right now.

132:58

>> It's not actually really how that

132:59

works."

133:00

>> Yes. Just because there are good people

133:02

looking for work doesn't mean that

133:04

they're the right fit for a thousand

133:05

reasons. They might not be in the right

133:07

region. They might not have I I I'm I'm

133:11

sorry. I'm going to stand behind that. I

133:13

don't necessarily want the same people

133:14

doing QA on a strategy game in a shooter

133:16

game. Just full stop. Um, they might not

133:19

have the right specialties. And if I'm

133:20

hiring someone, I'm going to hire the

133:22

most qualified candidate. And if someone

133:25

has many years of experience working on

133:27

the same genre that I actually want them

133:29

testing, I'll take that one over the

133:30

other one.

133:30

>> I don't think that's usually how

133:32

division and testers works.

133:34

>> Um,

133:34

>> I I think I think you might not and I

133:37

don't either. I think you might know

133:39

less about how QA testing for games

133:41

works than I do. and I don't know a ton.

133:43

Usually, it's not based on I don't I

133:46

don't think it's generally based on

133:47

genre.

133:48

>> I mean, it depends on what you're doing.

133:49

I'm talking specifically about play

133:51

testing. Um, and there there are people

133:54

whose job is to like go around and try

133:56

to find invisible walls and stuff that

133:58

they can that they can go through and

134:00

they have to be very methodical. They

134:01

have to document everything. So, there's

134:03

definitely going to be aspects of the

134:04

skill set that are going to be common

134:07

across all of them. But if it's if it's

134:10

a puzzle game and someone's never done

134:13

QA for a puzzle game before, yeah, I'd

134:15

rather have someone who has.

134:17

>> Sorry. So, okay. I said QA. Play testing

134:21

is part of QA and that's specifically

134:23

the part that I had in my brain which I

134:25

never communicated.

134:26

>> Okay.

134:26

>> So, that's a really good point and I'm

134:29

glad we bridged that gap.

134:30

>> I no longer care. Yeah. Yeah. [laughter]

134:32

>> Because there's a big difference.

134:34

>> Yes. I'm glad we bridged that gap in QA.

134:36

It I don't give a

134:38

if someone's played basketball games

134:40

before or not. I care that they have

134:42

experience with the engine.

134:43

>> Sure.

134:44

>> Communicate appropriately with the

134:45

development team, stuff like that.

134:46

>> Sorry, I specifically meant the play

134:48

testing aspect of QA.

134:50

>> Play testing. You're going to want a

134:51

range. You're going to want people that

134:52

are super familiar. You're going to want

134:54

people that have never played this type

134:55

of game before. You're going to want a

134:56

bunch of different stuff.

134:57

>> So, Crystal brings up, think about your

134:59

own company. You wouldn't lay off your

135:00

editors after a video comes out. And

135:02

it's like that's true but also

135:04

completely irrelevant because our our

135:08

business model is built on a continuous

135:11

pipeline that has many projects that are

135:15

in various stages so that the second

135:17

that a project is completed a new

135:20

project has progressed through the

135:22

pipeline and is ready for that person to

135:24

work on which has its own issues because

135:27

there can be burnout from that because

135:28

there's always something to work on.

135:30

there's there's always a queue of things

135:32

that need to be worked on. So there's

135:33

there's problems both ways. Whereas like

135:36

the we work on this for many years and

135:39

then we have like a big launch and it's

135:41

finally done is just such a completely

135:44

different business model that I don't

135:46

think you can compare them.

135:47

>> Here's a here's a question for you.

135:48

>> Yeah. Um, I was trying to think like how

135:51

could we draw a parallel to here? And I

135:53

was thinking, okay, if you did like a

135:54

documentary or something, like a oneoff

135:57

documentary, and you'd had to staff up

135:58

for the documentary. When the

136:00

documentary was done,

136:02

>> you might not be planning on doing

136:03

another one.

136:04

>> So, you might let those people go. I

136:07

also thought in that case, you'd

136:08

probably just contract them.

136:10

>> We'd be upfront about it. Contracting is

136:12

complicated, though. It as you know,

136:14

>> but I think the construction industry

136:15

does a lot more of that, I think. Well,

136:17

they do because it's a lot of it is

136:20

about hiring a company to do something

136:23

versus hiring a person to do something.

136:26

So, when you hire a company to do

136:29

something, you maintain

136:31

uh a level of liability and HR and legal

136:38

distance from it uh and PR distance from

136:41

it. As far as I can tell, this is a huge

136:45

part of the reason that a multinational

136:47

like a like a Samsung or an LG, like

136:50

we're talking like huge companies,

136:52

although

136:53

ignore the ex the these specific names,

136:56

but most of the huge companies that I've

136:59

worked with, instead of just having all

137:02

of their internal PR and marketing

137:04

strategy handled by name badges, right,

137:08

they will hire external agencies because

137:10

what that does is it makes it so that if

137:13

something goes wrong, oh my god, they're

137:16

not like an employee with all of the red

137:18

tape and all of the hassle that goes

137:20

along with that. We can just terminate

137:22

our contract with the company that those

137:24

people do work for and then if

137:26

ultimately they have to perform layoffs,

137:28

well, that's not our problem. And if

137:31

this marketing campaign, you know, works

137:35

with like a known PDF file or something

137:38

like that or whatever, we can basically

137:40

go, "Oh, we didn't know that was our

137:43

third party digital agency and we we

137:45

terminated our relationship with them."

137:46

Like it it creates that firewall um

137:49

>> which is often intended to be used in

137:51

the in the way that you just described.

137:53

like they're planning that way ahead of

137:54

time and they want to point that finger.

137:56

>> In much the same way a major

137:58

construction project hires a company

138:00

whose job it is to provide benefits and

138:03

and gainful long-term employment for all

138:05

the people who work for it and they go,

138:07

"Yeah, this is our entire commitment to

138:08

you. You do this, we give you this

138:10

money, that's it."

138:11

>> It's interesting. I've wondered before

138:13

cuz I've noticed that there seems to be

138:14

a pattern. I don't think it happened

138:16

this time, but I or maybe they partnered

138:18

with some I don't remember how the Halo

138:19

one went, but I've noticed there seems

138:21

to be a pattern that remakes are often

138:22

made by outside studios.

138:24

>> Like I'm pretty sure Warcraft 3 Reforged

138:26

wasn't even Blizzard.

138:27

>> No, I don't think it was.

138:28

>> And this is like super common. And I

138:31

wonder if part of that reason is because

138:34

of what you're talking about. If you're

138:35

making a remake, you're probably not

138:36

planning on making another one right

138:38

afterwards.

138:38

>> No, Workforce was primarily Blizzard

138:40

Entertainment. You got to be kidding me.

138:42

>> I thought it was an outside thing

138:43

>> according to AI. Hold on. Hold on. No.

138:45

Developers Blizzard Entertainment, Lemon

138:47

Sky Studios. Oh, hold on. There was more

138:49

than one.

138:49

>> Lemon Sky Studios.

138:50

>> But the devil's a Lemon Sky Studios.

138:52

>> No idea.

138:53

>> Okay. Well, according to Wikipedia,

138:54

which I trust more than uh AI, there

138:58

were multiple developers.

139:00

Blizzard intended along with the design

139:02

from to develop Starcraft Remaster is a

139:04

generally pure remake. In contrast, this

139:05

was intended to be less pure. Oh, okay.

139:07

So, it was like bad by design.

139:08

Apparently, [laughter]

139:12

>> Lemon Sky Studios did most of the

139:13

remastered 3D art assets.

139:15

>> So, that's No, no, this is this one's on

139:17

Blizzard. Sorry. Yep.

139:18

>> Wild. Okay. Well, I had the wrong memory

139:21

of that. But I think this is a pattern

139:24

I've seen before. Maybe I'm just

139:26

incorrectly done by random third

139:29

parties.

139:29

>> Totally. But that's probably a one-off

139:31

thing. You don't necessarily want to

139:32

train your staff up to learn how to port

139:35

a game that you're going to do once real

139:37

quick and then move on. Um,

139:42

yeah, I don't know. It's It's an

139:44

interesting problem. I can definitely

139:46

understand a team reduction. Uh, if if

139:49

you're not doing a Call of Duty or what

139:52

they used to do with Assassin's Creed or

139:54

whatever else where it's basically like

139:56

every year, like Assassin's Creed for a

139:58

long time was every year. Call of Duty

139:59

still, I'm pretty sure, is every year.

140:01

>> I think so.

140:02

>> I know they rotate studios, so per

140:05

studio it's every two years, but still

140:07

that's a pretty quick

140:08

>> I think it was up to three at one point.

140:10

>> Was it really? I

140:11

>> I think so. Don't quote me on that.

140:12

>> I have no idea. Um, so like unless you

140:15

have a model like that where like

140:17

>> I don't I remember hearing I'm going to

140:19

get the the the years completely wrong,

140:21

so just insert any number here, but I

140:23

think it was like four or five years

140:25

ahead of time. They were planning the

140:26

next Assassin's Creed for a little bit

140:28

there. I'm sure they're doing similar

140:29

things with Call of Duty where they have

140:31

teams working on things like starting to

140:33

cook ideas, designing, planning, story,

140:37

pipeline full

140:38

>> and then once they're done that type of

140:39

stuff, then developers can start chewing

140:41

on the problem. Um, and and it's this

140:43

like big cyclical machine. Unless you

140:46

have something like that. If you're

140:47

launching a game, you have no plans for

140:49

a second one, the game goes super hard,

140:52

and then you're like, "Oh man, we should

140:53

do a second one." the time gap between

140:56

you can actually between when you can

140:59

actually really start development might

141:00

be really big, might also be really

141:02

short. It depends on what type of game

141:03

you're making

141:04

>> and what teams are needed at every

141:06

stage. With that said, I mean Nintendo

141:09

manages to make the model work where

141:11

they just keep super talented people

141:14

>> forever. With that said, I mean, part of

141:16

that just seems to be the very different

141:20

culture around workplace loyalty both

141:23

ways in Japan compared to in the West or

141:26

really anywhere else.

141:26

>> I mean, you've got you've got Japan.

141:28

>> Kataw keeps bringing up Valve. Yeah. I I

141:30

I really Valve is such

141:32

>> that is not a fair comparison.

141:33

>> Weird outlier. Like, they just don't

141:35

hire in the first place. So, who is that

141:37

supposed to

141:37

>> make money? They don't hire. They barely

141:39

even make games anymore.

141:40

>> Yeah. What are we even talking about?

141:42

Um, people work on self assigned

141:44

projects. Like it's just they're they're

141:46

not a real company in in that [snorts]

141:49

sense. Like they don't have a corporate

141:51

structure that would make sense or work

141:54

almost literally anywhere else. It's uh

141:57

yeah, they're they're the exception that

141:59

proves any other rule pretty much. Um,

142:02

carry on. Sorry.

142:05

Uh, sorry, Doc D. Hollinger, which I

142:07

often read as Dr. Hollinger. Um, I'll

142:10

reiterate, fine, but giving the

142:11

corporate CEO money bonus for the

142:13

success of a product they barely worked

142:15

on while letting go of

142:17

we're not sitting here saying that it's

142:20

a good thing.

142:21

>> No, not at all. We're having understand

142:23

why it happens and what the mechanisms

142:25

behind it might be. And I also think

142:28

that while there are corporate leaders

142:30

who do jack at all, um, assuming

142:34

that a CEO doesn't do anything or that

142:37

their work did not contribute in any way

142:40

to the game success, I don't think is

142:41

entirely fair either. With that said, I

142:44

think that I think that they were Yeah,

142:46

I saw their original comment earlier and

142:48

I think they were specifically talking

142:50

about

142:51

>> or something. So, uh, that particular

142:54

example,

142:54

>> I think he took like a massive 30

142:56

million.

142:57

>> I can't get behind that, but I wouldn't

143:00

make a blanket statement here. As

143:01

someone who has been a CEO at some point

143:04

and who has hired a CEO, um there could

143:08

be a situation where we executed a major

143:11

project, there were redundancies at the

143:13

end of it and that was the plan the

143:15

whole time and then the company made a

143:18

butt ton of money and the leadership who

143:20

guided that project through to

143:22

completion could be deserving of a

143:24

bonus. Yes, I actually could see

143:26

something like that. In that particular

143:28

case that you brought up, it didn't. The

143:30

optics weren't great at the very

143:32

>> I really think so much. So the the

143:34

Andrew Wilson Battlefield thing,

143:36

apparently his bonus was 8 million more

143:39

largely because of the success of

143:41

Battlefield 6. It was a $38.7 million

143:44

bonus in general. Oh my god, that's a

143:46

lot of money. Uh, for me, if I'm looking

143:48

at that, I want to apply the I know it's

143:51

six and Battlefield's been coming out

143:52

since I was a Wii lad, so it's not

143:54

coming out exactly as fast as Creed or

143:57

Call of Duty, but I'm looking at this

143:59

thinking, are you not going to do a

144:00

Battlefield 7?

144:03

If you're going to do a Battlefield 7

144:05

and it did super well, I would really

144:07

want to keep on a lot of the people. And

144:09

no, maybe not every single person can

144:11

directly contribute towards the release

144:13

of a game right now, but you can have

144:15

people working on improving systems,

144:17

ideulating things. Oh, your art teams,

144:19

you don't have specific things for them

144:21

to draw yet. Just have them try to come

144:23

up with cool ideas. Like, there are

144:25

things that you can do to try to help

144:26

people brain reset anyways and just kind

144:28

of get prepared for a Battlefield 7. And

144:31

I don't think you have to drop everyone

144:32

off. I think there are a lot of

144:33

unnecessary layoffs in the gaming

144:35

industry. I also think it is

144:38

way more cutthroat of an industry than

144:41

people that even think it's a cutthroat

144:42

industry even realize.

144:44

>> Oh, it's brutal.

144:45

>> It's insane. Um,

144:47

>> well, it's a passion industry.

144:49

>> Yeah.

144:49

>> Like

144:50

>> just tough.

144:51

>> Whenever there's an unlimited pipeline

144:54

of new young recruits who want to get

144:57

into it,

144:59

you're that's what you're competing

145:00

against. and and you you don't you know

145:03

necessarily want to see it that way or

145:06

you might wish it wasn't that way or you

145:08

know however it is that you kind of feel

145:10

about that won't change that there's a

145:14

finite number of jobs at these companies

145:17

and everyone who wants it is a potential

145:21

candidate for them

145:23

>> I genuinely think this is why a lot of

145:26

the quality of AAA games seems to be

145:28

kind of going down is because they keep

145:30

cycling these teams To be honest, I I

145:32

genuinely think it's a big part of the

145:33

reason why because this was not as

145:35

common in the past. Um

145:38

in in in as far as I can tell.

145:40

Obviously, I don't work in this

145:41

industry.

145:41

>> Ah, but in the past didn't have these

145:43

like mega mega mega Concord

145:46

sized projects.

145:47

>> That's true. Mega projects back in the

145:49

day were way smaller. But you see, like

145:52

one of the things I've talked about in

145:53

the in the like flip exclusive gaming

145:55

industry videos that I've made for Luke

145:57

Weeks, um, is

145:59

>> that a lot of the really sick games that

146:01

are coming out

146:02

>> are teams that are splintering off from

146:04

these companies and but staying

146:06

together.

146:06

>> Yep. Like 33 example.

146:10

>> And uh, uh, Arc Raiders.

146:12

>> Yep.

146:13

>> One of the biggest FPS games right now

146:14

is a split off from that.

146:16

>> Casually pretty successful game.

146:17

>> Yeah. And it's it's the these companies

146:19

that are that are these groups of people

146:22

that are kind of probably seeing the

146:23

writing on the wall of all these layoffs

146:25

and going, "Well, we can split off and

146:27

do our own thing and stick together."

146:29

And like the Arc Raiders guys, they

146:31

released the finals, didn't do a big

146:34

layoff, and then released Arc Raiders,

146:36

and the finals did pretty darn good, and

146:38

then Arc Raiders smashed. Uh, and it's

146:42

Yeah, I think the like

146:46

the what what do you call it? thesis

146:47

statement I guess of those two videos

146:49

that I did combined together is that

146:52

we've seen this exchange in the past. We

146:55

saw it with Atari as Atari was kind of

146:58

going under. Splinter teams from Atari

147:00

formed Activision and now it's kind of

147:03

Activision's time

147:05

where that age of company is getting to

147:07

the point where people are splintering

147:08

off and forming their own things and

147:10

it's going well and it's it kind of

147:12

sucks because of you know the IPs that

147:14

we grew up with are now in the hands of

147:15

companies that are that are floundering

147:17

in a lot of ways which is unfortunate

147:19

but this is the time of the expedition

147:21

33s the Balders's Gates the Arc Raiders

147:23

the all these other team all these other

147:25

games that are coming from not the super

147:28

big names. They might be now, but before

147:31

they released those games that I just

147:32

named were not super big names. If I've

147:35

talked about Larry and before Ballers

147:37

Gate 3 came out,

147:38

>> no one know what you're talking about.

147:38

>> Nobody knows.

147:40

>> So, here's a question. Is it inevitable

147:44

the fact that the cycle has repeated so

147:46

many times?

147:47

Is it just is it just is it the nature

147:50

of larger companies to become bloated

147:53

and become bureaucratic and and for

147:56

quality to take a hit and for people to

148:00

ultimately

148:02

become human resources and for them to

148:05

eventually split off? Like is it just is

148:07

it the nature of the beast?

148:10

>> I think somewhat. I also do wonder if it

148:14

has to be

148:16

um because if I try to look around for

148:19

cases where that doesn't seem to have

148:21

necessarily happened,

148:22

>> they're always weird outliers

148:24

>> and not North American.

148:27

>> I mean, Valve, [laughter]

148:29

>> again, Valve doesn't count. Um, sorry,

148:32

when's the last uh was the last Portal

148:35

that released?

148:35

>> Alex, I think was the last game from

148:37

Valve. Yeah.

148:38

>> Well, they have that new Deadlock thing.

148:41

>> Oh, that's right. Deadlock. Sorry, I

148:44

forgot about Deadlock.

148:45

>> Yeah.

148:45

>> Yeah. And there's some people here on on

148:47

the team who are like super into

148:48

Deadlock. I think Reese is like hardcore

148:49

into Deadlock.

148:50

>> Yeah.

148:51

>> I've got a buddy that plays all the

148:52

time. Um there you go.

148:53

>> But no, I think it comes back to one of

148:55

your other examples, which is Nintendo.

148:57

>> Yeah.

148:58

>> But they're also not doing this layoff

149:01

wave thing. Um they're they're almost

149:04

unfair in a Valve way. I don't think

149:07

they're quite as unfair as Valve is, but

149:09

they are almost unfair in a Valve way

149:11

where people will just buy Nintendo

149:13

stuff.

149:15

>> They have like basically guaranteed

149:17

money. [sighs]

149:20

>> Speaking of just buying stuff, um

149:23

the uh Nvidia RTX Spark, so those

149:27

laptops and the desktops, uh the CPU,

149:29

remember I was all excited about the

149:31

CPU. So somehow in all of the news about

149:33

this thing, I missed that even though

149:37

Nvidia is using the exact same

149:40

nomenclature, like the exact same code

149:42

names for their CPUs, the ones in the

149:45

data center product are not the same

149:47

cores at all. Somehow I missed this. RTX

149:50

Spark is based on Cortex X925s,

149:53

which are like used in some high-end

149:56

smartphones, which isn't to say they're

149:57

bad. There's very fast cores in

149:59

smartphones. They're just not what you

150:01

thought,

150:01

>> but they are not the same neoverse cores

150:03

like in the server processors, and I

150:05

missed that. Also, their SMT, so their

150:08

hyperthreading is not expected to be on

150:10

the same level as Intel or AMD. So, our

150:12

discussion question is, does this

150:15

dramatically change what you think of

150:18

the SOC and what it could be capable of?

150:21

Um, actually it encourages me more than

150:24

discourages me if that's if that doesn't

150:27

sound totally crazy cuz it's still going

150:29

to have 10 x925 cores which are very

150:31

fast cores and I was mostly worried

150:34

about the power efficiency of RTX 5.

150:37

>> Oh, so this addresses that.

150:38

>> So this addresses that in a very big way

150:40

cuz I just could not find a way to marry

150:44

what I knew so far.

150:45

>> You're thinking about it in laptop

150:46

format mostly probably.

150:48

>> Yeah. Yeah. I'm not that interested in

150:49

it as a compact desktop. I'm more

150:52

interested in it as a laptop right now.

150:54

Right now, although that may change. So,

150:56

uh, remains to be seen how RTX Spark

150:58

turns out. Uh, what I can say, I can't

151:01

say much right now, but what I can say

151:04

is that the buzz seems to be pretty

151:06

good.

151:07

>> Okay. Like the the the behind thescenes

151:11

sort of manufacturer buzz. It seems like

151:14

it seems like they think they're going

151:15

to sell a lot of these things, which

151:17

they usually know a lot more than we do

151:19

at this stage in the game.

151:22

Like, uh, that's that's one of my hacky

151:24

questions. Um, you know, cuz no one's

151:28

going to tell you like like a Gigabyte

151:29

or Asus or MSI or whatever, some some

151:32

tier one manufacturer is not going to

151:34

tell you in the leadup to a new Radeon

151:37

launch or GeForce launch, you know, how

151:39

many FPS it's going to get in Cyberpunk.

151:42

like that's not going to happen. Nobody

151:44

breaks an NDA that overtly. But what you

151:48

might be able to ask is like

151:52

how excited is the sales team,

151:55

you know,

151:56

>> right?

151:57

>> Yeah.

151:58

>> How how many SKUs are you anticipating

152:01

having of each uh of each stratum? Is

152:05

that the Is that the the singular of

152:08

>> I don't know

152:09

>> strata whatever at each at each layer

152:11

>> I think stratum is correct but I'm not

152:13

sure

152:13

>> whatever yeah each each uh each GPU

152:16

model how many SKs are you going to have

152:18

because if the plan is one or two that

152:21

basically tells you it's a giant

152:22

boatload of crap that wasn't worth

152:25

deving multiple boards and coolers uh

152:27

because there's that's an investment

152:28

that they have to make unless they're

152:30

going to move volume of this thing it's

152:31

not going to be worth it. So, there's

152:33

certain questions you can kind of poke

152:36

and prod at. And

152:39

what I'm gathering for RTX Spark so far

152:42

looks like people are bullish, but I

152:45

don't know if they're just bullish

152:47

because of all the AI messaging and the

152:49

fact that everyone is super hard on AMD

152:53

right now. AMD on uh on AI right now.

152:56

>> So, remains to be seen.

152:58

>> It might it might just be the latter,

153:00

but yeah, we'll see. Uh, I don't want to

153:02

get uh, in my opinion sad for a second,

153:04

but that might even be controversial.

153:06

>> Nope, I want happy.

153:07

>> Okay, let me dig for it. Those two both

153:10

suck.

153:12

>> We could talk about Valve.

153:13

>> Sure, let's talk about Valve.

153:14

>> We could talk about the Steam frame.

153:17

You want to talk about the Steam frame?

153:19

>> Yeah, let's talk about the Steam frame.

153:20

>> People love it when we talk about the

153:22

Steam frame.

153:23

>> You got to go like that real quick.

153:26

Little red marks. Yeah, there you go.

153:28

[laughter]

153:29

>> Hold on. Hold on. Let me get ready.

153:30

Okay, I just got to get some work on.

153:34

Okay, did take it. No, it didn't really

153:36

work. All right, Valve has quietly

153:39

published Leptton and FEX on Steam, the

153:42

two pieces of software that make the

153:44

ARMbased Steam Frame headset possible.

153:46

They're not games or anything that you

153:48

would browse to on purpose. Leptton's

153:50

store link literally bounces you back to

153:52

the Steam front page because it's a

153:53

background component. Uh, Leptton is

153:55

what lets Android games run on Linux.

153:57

And then FEX translates regular x86 PC

154:00

games so they can run on ARM chips. If

154:02

you add Proton on top of that for

154:04

Windows games, you've got the Frames

154:06

whole compatibility story there. The

154:09

launch signs, the other launch signs are

154:10

also stacking up. The Frame got FCC

154:13

certification on July 29th. Valve has

154:15

been assigning great onframe ratings to

154:18

games and a Steam Frame compatibility

154:21

list showed up as its own Steam app. The

154:24

headset runs a Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 on

154:26

Steam OS and it was delayed earlier this

154:28

year over the memory shortage. Valve

154:30

still hasn't given a date beyond

154:32

sometime this year. Um, but releasing

154:36

these publicly instead of hiding them in

154:37

the headsets firmware means that

154:39

developers and tinkerers can start

154:40

testing ARM compatibility right now,

154:42

which is the same open approach that

154:43

made Proton the backbone of the Steam

154:45

Deck and made it so successful. Um, so

154:49

I'm still able to talk about this

154:50

because I still don't know anything, but

154:54

the signs are

154:56

piling up to suggest that soon I will

155:00

know more than I will be able to say.

155:02

And I'm I am I am very excited for this.

155:07

>> Be using cover up makeup to cover up the

155:10

the red marks on his face. You notice he

155:12

didn't he didn't rub them. He just

155:14

pressed in which wouldn't really remove

155:16

the makeup too much.

155:17

>> Oh lordy.

155:17

>> Uh the his his uh he might have needed

155:20

help from Avon to do that.

155:23

>> Um

155:25

>> oh DANG

155:26

>> NEEDED HELP.

155:27

>> AH yeah he might have needed help from

155:29

Avon to do all the cover up makeup but

155:31

>> she's not here right now.

155:32

>> Her being away is actually just a cover

155:34

up because you guys might have might

155:35

have figured that out. Uh so she's

155:37

actually she's still here. She didn't go

155:39

on that trip.

155:41

>> 100%.

155:41

>> Yeah.

155:42

>> Thank you for that Luke.

155:43

>> Yeah. Some good conspiracy theorying.

155:45

>> Mhm.

155:46

>> Mhm. Mhm. Mhm.

155:47

>> Uh Dan wants us to do the other

155:49

sponsors. Um man, we still got a lot of

155:52

topics though. Good lord.

155:54

>> Fine Dan.

155:55

>> I don't even understand what we've

155:56

talked about so far. The show is brought

155:57

to you by ODO. If your business is

155:59

growing in size, you may find yourself

156:01

constantly having new needs. So, you end

156:03

up subscribing to a dozen different

156:04

services, and it can start to feel like

156:06

a too many quicks situation. ODO is

156:09

business management software that keeps

156:10

all the important aspects of running a

156:12

company in one place. They can help with

156:14

things like project management with

156:15

their CRM app, which lets you see where

156:17

a job is in the pipeline, or use it for

156:19

things like scheduling calls and

156:20

meetings. Their invoicing app takes some

156:22

of the headache out of the financial

156:23

side of your business thanks to

156:25

automated creating and sending of

156:26

invoices and following up with clients

156:28

regarding due dates. And they even have

156:29

a tool for inventory replenishment.

156:31

Simply set your minmax rules and ODU

156:33

will propose and trigger purchase orders

156:35

based on your guidelines. It has a

156:38

customizable interface so you can keep

156:39

everything in [music] an easy to find

156:41

spot. And if you only need one app, ODU

156:43

will give you access to that one app for

156:45

free. Use our link for a free [music]

156:47

15-day trial with no credit card

156:49

required. Or book a demo with one of

156:51

their expert specialists to learn how

156:54

ODU can help your business. The show is

156:57

also brought to you by XSplit. If you've

157:00

ever wanted to get into streaming or

157:01

recording game footage for personal

157:03

projects, but you didn't know where to

157:04

start, why not check out XSplit? They

157:07

offer a bunch of streaming and video

157:08

production tools that are easy enough to

157:10

use even without much experience. Plus,

157:12

they're set up to work right away with

157:14

platforms like YouTube or Twitch. It is

157:16

simple to create something personal and

157:18

custom to go with your stream or

157:20

presentation, thanks to different

157:21

templates and layouts, as well as

157:22

transitions to keep your audience and

157:24

friends engaged. It has a drag and drop

157:27

interface allowing you to make small

157:28

tweaks to the size of your gameplay or

157:29

camera. And their premium tools include

157:31

things like watermark removal,

157:33

multiplatform streaming, and better

157:35

resolutions. It's a great [music] place

157:36

to learn the basics of video editing as

157:38

well with the built-in editing and

157:40

audiomixing tools. So go to

157:41

lmg.gg/xsplitwan.

157:44

We're going to have that linked right

157:45

here and down below. Or use our link in

157:47

the description to get 30% off your

157:49

first purchase or subscription with code

157:51

wow 30.

157:53

All right. You want to pick one, Luke?

157:55

>> Sure.

157:58

Oh, man. Oh, man.

158:02

Oh, man. Yeah. This one. Google

158:05

Assistant is shutting down on Android

158:06

and W OS in September. Google emailed

158:09

users this week confirming that Google

158:11

Assistant is being discontinued on

158:12

mobile with removal starting September

158:15

4th. Once it's gone from your device,

158:17

there's no switching back and Gemin

158:19

Gemini becomes the only assistant

158:21

option. The shutdown covers Android

158:23

phones, tablets, where OS watches,

158:25

headphones, and Android Auto when it's

158:28

projected from your phone. Cars with

158:30

Google builtin keep assistant for now,

158:33

and home Google Home speakers and Google

158:35

TV aren't part of the timeline yet. The

158:37

transition was originally supposed to

158:39

happen by the end of 2025, but it got

158:42

pushed back because Gemini wasn't ready

158:43

yet. It handled questions and

158:46

conversations fine, but struggled with

158:47

the basic stuff Assistant nailed, like

158:49

device controls and simple commands.

158:50

assistant launched back in May of 2016.

158:54

So, this closes out a 10-year run, which

158:55

is pretty good for Google.

158:57

>> So far, the uh community response seems

159:00

to be universally terrible.

159:02

>> Good, because I hate this. I was

159:04

wondering what other people's take on

159:06

this is going to be.

159:07

>> Carpentractor says, I think we may have

159:10

witnessed one of the worst consumerf

159:12

facing product transitions of all time.

159:16

>> Still, says Annie, I feel Google

159:18

Assistant is superior in many things. It

159:20

is

159:20

>> just a few days back I was trying to

159:22

play a particular song and it couldn't.

159:24

>> Yeah.

159:26

>> Peter says Gemini was and continues to

159:28

be a bad joke. Like I actually cannot

159:33

find anyone who wants to use Gemini

159:37

under the 9 to5 Google article.

159:39

>> When I try to use Google Assistant on my

159:42

phone and Gemini comes up, I get so

159:44

pissed off cuz it never does it right.

159:46

>> It's slower.

159:47

>> It can't It's way slower. It can't even

159:50

do simple crap like set alarms. I asked

159:52

it to set an alarm. It set a timer.

159:54

>> Oh, I've actually had pretty okay

159:56

success with it for alarms.

159:57

>> Usually it does the alarm. Okay. I've

159:59

had it set timers though, which is never

160:01

correct.

160:01

>> I have had it do that. And somehow I

160:04

think I've talked to you about this

160:05

before, but somehow they still haven't

160:09

resolved the natural interaction

160:11

problem.

160:16

That was off camera. No one got to see

160:18

that.

160:18

>> [laughter]

160:18

>> That was so close. It was a very nice

160:21

catch as well. His laptop almost biffed

160:23

off the table. He caught it with his

160:25

forearm. Was able to recover. It was

160:27

good. It was good.

160:28

>> Uh, okay. Here it is. Here it is. Okay.

160:30

So, I'm hanging out with my sister on

160:32

the weekend. So, I set I actually set

160:35

three different alarms for one of the

160:37

days this weekend to make sure that I

160:39

get up early because I got to go meet

160:41

her cuz we're going to go somewhere and

160:42

then we're going to go get lunch

160:43

together. Okay. So I back to back to

160:48

back I did this the exact same way. I

160:51

talked to Gemini all three times the

160:52

exact same way. One of my alarms says go

160:56

see my sister's name. The other one says

160:59

go see my sister's name. The last one

161:02

says to go see my sister's name. This

161:06

has driven me crazy for years and it's

161:08

one of my like litmus tests for when

161:11

they figured out natural language

161:12

interaction because the way that I said

161:14

it was set an alarm for this time on

161:17

this day to go see my sister.

161:20

>> Why did one of them include the two?

161:23

>> Obviously, that's not how I wanted it to

161:26

be. Ah,

161:27

>> obviously

161:29

>> it's also like I I so I am cheesed that

161:33

literally the two things that I ever ask

161:35

it to do it is worse at in both cases

161:37

>> and slow.

161:39

>> The biggest probably problem is that

161:42

it's so so so slow. How is it that we

161:45

aren't just moving to like I thought the

161:47

whole point of having all these NPUs on

161:50

our devices was that when we just want

161:53

to do something simple like set a

161:55

alarm

161:57

>> change the song

161:58

>> happen immediately.

162:00

>> It's the only two things I ever ask it

162:03

is to change the song or set an alarm.

162:05

That's all I ever want.

162:07

>> I'm hearing that it doesn't do

162:08

automations well. Like I've got my

162:12

morning alarm that runs a whole bunch of

162:13

Google automations and I always say like

162:16

I'm getting into bed and then it does a

162:18

whole bunch of stuff and I'm not

162:20

entirely sure it'll still do that.

162:22

>> Look how sad he looks.

162:23

>> I'm going to get an iPhone.

162:24

>> He's adorable when you

162:25

>> actually I'm going to the forest. I'm

162:27

just going to run away.

162:28

>> Okay.

162:29

>> Cuz I can't automate my lights with my

162:32

phone. Yeah, I guess you you [laughter]

162:33

can't

162:36

if you can't do that, you might as well

162:37

just live in the forest.

162:38

>> Walk into the ocean.

162:42

unique username says at Lionus Google

162:45

demoed this at io years ago which means

162:47

it will never happen.

162:51

>> NO,

162:53

COME ON. [sighs]

162:55

It can't be that complicated.

162:59

It can, but it's I I feel like if it was

163:04

made a priority to have quick ondevice

163:08

processing of the most basic cuz you got

163:12

to imagine, Luke, that like the vast

163:15

majority of Google Assistant

163:17

interactions are tell me about some tell

163:21

me about the weather or some basic

163:24

thing. My kid asked me about black

163:26

bears. I don't know anything about them.

163:27

Tell me about black bears. So just that

163:31

setting alarms,

163:33

>> you know. Yeah, that's an interesting

163:34

thing. Assistant should just offload to

163:37

Gemini when it makes sense in the same

163:39

way that assistant used to offload to

163:40

Google search when it made sense.

163:42

>> How about that's the way Siri works.

163:43

>> How about just something like I don't

163:45

know what you mean. Do you want me to

163:46

try try Gemini for you?

163:48

>> Sure.

163:48

>> Yeah. Just ask and I can say yes and

163:51

then it turns into Gemini.

163:52

>> I would have been happy about that.

163:54

>> I would enable that yesterday.

163:56

>> Yeah, me too. Why not?

163:57

>> In other AI news,

163:58

>> I can just say no.

163:59

>> Reddit is introducing a new moderator,

164:02

AI. Reddit announced RulesHub on August

164:06

5th, an AI powered moderation suite that

164:09

uses LLM to judge whether posts and

164:11

comments violate the intent of a

164:12

subreddit's rules rather than just

164:14

matching keywords like the 13-year-old

164:16

automod does. Reddit's pitch here is

164:18

that an LLM can tell the difference

164:20

between an insult and a movie quote, and

164:22

mods choose which rules will get

164:24

autoinforced and what happens when

164:26

they're triggered. They can flag it for

164:28

review, filter, or remove it outright.

164:30

There's a sandbox to test rules against

164:32

old posts, plus logs showing why the AI

164:35

acted. It's been tested in over 700

164:37

communities, opens to all new subreddits

164:40

now, and rolls out to everyone later

164:42

this year. Reddit has said rules hub and

164:44

its newer systems can eventually Okay,

164:47

see this is the funny part. This is it's

164:48

always funny with AI, right? Because

164:50

that actually sounds pretty good. Okay,

164:52

here comes the other shoe. Reddit has

164:54

said RulesHub and its newer systems can

164:56

eventually replace many of the

164:58

enforcement workflows that Automod

165:00

handles, and that's what has veteran

165:02

mods pushing back since many have spent

165:04

years building elaborate automod setups

165:06

that they don't want swapped out from

165:08

under them. Reddit also says better

165:10

abuse prevention could let communities

165:12

rely less on karma and account age

165:14

gates, making it easier for genuine new

165:16

users to actually post.

165:19

Uh

165:20

yeah, but also I'd be very suspect of

165:24

new users quite frankly. And the better

165:26

the LLM's get, especially local like

165:29

cheap to run ones, the more sus

165:32

suspicious I would be of brand new users

165:35

and actually the more I would rely on

165:37

account age and karma. Buried in the

165:39

same announcement, old Reddit is now

165:41

restricted to logged in users, which

165:42

Reddit frames as an anti-scraping

165:45

protection.

165:50

>> Cool.

165:51

>> Yeah, initially it sounded kind of neat

165:52

though, didn't it? Yeah. Well, because I

165:54

the vibe that I got from the initial

165:56

initial

165:57

>> logging and everything and the sandbox,

165:59

>> I thought it could run alongside or be

166:01

an option.

166:02

>> Yeah.

166:03

>> If if I can choose between this or

166:05

automod as someone who's running a

166:07

subreddit, I feel like that's fine.

166:09

>> That'd be cool.

166:10

>> Yeah. Maybe I run both, but I run the

166:15

this new thing, whatever they're calling

166:16

it, rules hub. Maybe I run that in a way

166:19

that it doesn't actually take any

166:20

action, so I can see how it acts. And I

166:22

do that while I'm running automod. And

166:24

if I like it, I run it. If I don't like

166:26

it, I don't run it. And it is fine. Um,

166:31

>> yeah. I don't know. Maybe don't just

166:33

keep ripping out all these things that

166:34

definitely work and putting in stuff

166:37

that probably doesn't.

166:39

>> Hey, but here's something. Speaking of

166:41

not putting in stuff that maybe doesn't

166:43

work, Texas has paused new data center

166:46

grid connections and ordered audits as

166:49

AIdriven power demand surges. Texas is

166:52

dealing with a huge wave of new AI data

166:54

centers and the demand for electricity

166:56

is skyrocketing. Regulators are looking

166:59

at hundreds of gigawatts of proposed

167:02

power needs, mostly from these data

167:04

centers, which is way more than the grid

167:06

currently handles at its busiest times.

167:08

>> It's fine. Texas's grid is like rock

167:10

solid. Never has any problems.

167:12

>> It apparently has been a little bit

167:13

better lately thanks to the boogeyman

167:16

known as renewable energy. But hey,

167:18

don't talk about that. Um, this is way

167:21

more than the grid currently handles at

167:22

its busiest times, raising concerns

167:24

about power reliability, water use, and

167:26

the impact on local communities. Our

167:29

discussion question here. Oh, man. No,

167:31

I'm not touching that with the 10-ft

167:32

pull. Uh, hold on. Another one. Oh,

167:35

interesting.

167:36

Okay, I like this one. If an AI company

167:40

offered you a lifetime supply of free AI

167:42

in exchange for building a data center

167:45

right next to your house,

167:47

would you be willing to accept that

167:49

deal?

167:50

>> No.

167:50

>> What would you ask? What more would you

167:52

ask

167:53

>> to leave?

167:54

>> So, just straight up nimi.

167:56

>> Okay. No. One of the problems is that I

167:58

can't make that decision for everyone

168:00

else that lives near me.

168:00

>> Let's say it's just you. Let's say this

168:02

is a rural area. For whatever reason,

168:05

you can't move. This is your family's

168:07

homestead. has been since the dawn of

168:08

time. Whatever, whatever, whatever. Your

168:10

house is here. The data center is going

168:11

to go right there. It's just you. I'm

168:13

still saying no. But I Yeah. No, no. I

168:16

want I want to hear I want to have a

168:17

conversation, though. I I My reason

168:20

[laughter] my reason is because that

168:22

would make general dayto-day life a lot

168:25

worse.

168:25

>> Mhm.

168:26

>> And I don't want to use theirs anyways.

168:29

>> What if it was the best one?

168:31

>> What if What if it was Okay. Yeah.

168:33

There's I'm Yeah, I'm not going to win

168:34

this one. I I'm just I'm trying to come

168:35

up with a hypothetical situation.

168:37

>> That's totally fair. It's just where you

168:38

consider it.

168:39

>> I am still going to want to run local. I

168:41

find running local stuff to be very

168:44

interesting, very engaging. Lots of

168:46

opportunity there.

168:47

>> Oh, how's your build going?

168:49

>> I have CPU, GPU, and I'm Oh, I have CPU,

168:53

motherboard, GPU. I'm working on RAM.

168:56

>> Oh, that's tough.

168:57

>> Yep. And uh I'm working on the GPU

169:01

thing. Do we want to talk about that?

169:03

Knowing you, let's let's start with CPU

169:05

motherboard because knowing you,

169:08

>> you got a deal. [laughter]

169:10

>> Yeah, I got a pretty wicked deal. Okay.

169:12

>> Uh it took me over 3 months of shopping.

169:16

>> Okay.

169:17

>> Uh because, you know, prices have been

169:18

going up and stuff, but

169:20

>> I have and waiting doesn't seem like the

169:22

play when prices are going like this.

169:24

But

169:25

>> but I was trying to basically figure out

169:28

if there even is a used market for like

169:30

Thread Ripper Pros in Canada at all.

169:34

>> And it just seems like no.

169:36

>> Got it.

169:36

>> Is the answer unfortunately. You can get

169:39

them from the States.

169:40

>> You can get them from a little bit in

169:43

Europe. A lot in China.

169:44

>> China.

169:45

>> There's a medium amount in the States.

169:46

There's a ton in China.

169:48

>> Okay.

169:48

>> China seems to ship them chip in board.

169:52

>> That actually makes a lot of sense.

169:54

Totally does. Yeah,

169:55

>> because you might be concerned about

169:56

them being locked or whatever.

169:57

>> Yeah. And also just damage in those

169:59

sockets.

170:00

>> Some for for reference. Yes, completely.

170:03

For reference on why I said locked, some

170:05

of the I don't know exactly what

170:08

delineates the skews. I don't know if

170:09

it's all Thread Rippers. I don't know if

170:10

it's just Thread Ripper Pros, whatever.

170:12

But some of them are actually locked to

170:14

a vendor of motherboard. Yeah,

170:15

>> I know. I don't remember which ones, but

170:17

some of them released early just with

170:20

some companies and those are locked to

170:22

those boards

170:23

>> and the fuse actually blows and it will

170:25

only work with that one and stuff.

170:27

>> Yeah, it's like actually super bad. Um,

170:29

so ideally they send it to you.

170:33

[laughter]

170:34

>> They send it to you chip in board known

170:36

working and then that can help get away

170:38

from the pin issues and all this other

170:40

kind of stuff. Anyways, I went for a

170:41

super reputable seller. Um I there was a

170:45

crazy price like literally over a grand

170:48

off of everywhere else more than that

170:50

even on a 595.

170:54

>> That's a nice chip.

170:56

>> Yeah, I did some diving into it and

170:59

decided

171:00

>> 64

171:03

cores.

171:04

>> Yeah, I did some diving into it. Not

171:06

only was there pretty much no chance

171:08

that I was going to use it, but the

171:10

additional complications of heat and the

171:13

I believe

171:14

>> channel DDR4. Sorry.

171:17

>> I believe [laughter]

171:20

I believe it's someone pointed out DDR4.

171:23

Yeah, I wanted DDR4. I'm going for 5000

171:25

series because I wanted DDR4. That makes

171:27

sense.

171:28

>> Um

171:29

>> but there there's just some

171:30

complications that came with that chip

171:32

where I was like, "Okay, no, this is an

171:33

insane deal. I could literally flip it

171:35

and probably make money,

171:36

>> but

171:37

>> but I don't really want to deal with

171:38

>> I don't need all those CPU cores

171:39

necessarily.

171:39

>> I don't need all the CPU cores. I don't

171:41

want to deal with the heat. There's a

171:42

there's a few other things going on

171:44

there that I just didn't want to deal

171:44

with.

171:45

>> Right. The wife approval factor of this

171:46

build is going to be a thing.

171:47

>> It matters.

171:48

>> Okay, carry on.

171:49

>> Yep. Uh so I kept watching and I kept

171:52

watching that store on eBay.

171:55

>> Oh, okay.

171:55

>> Because of really high reputation and

171:57

they let this one 59.95 rip. Um, and I

172:01

also I I technically bought it and then

172:04

had immediate buyer remorse and spent

172:06

the next three hours researching and

172:08

then was like, "No, I don't want it."

172:10

And I put in a cancel request and they

172:11

were immediately like, "Yep, no problem.

172:13

>> That's cool."

172:13

>> So, I was like, "Okay, they seem kind of

172:15

cool. They have a really good

172:16

reputation." And they posted one way

172:19

cheap. So, I'm just going to watch. The

172:21

one that I really want is a 5975.

172:24

>> Yeah.

172:24

>> They don't have any up. I'm just going

172:26

to watch. I'm just going to sit and

172:27

watch. Sit and watch. Right. and they

172:29

didn't have any for a super super long

172:31

time. And then they posted a 5975WX and

172:33

a Sage 2 for the same price that I was

172:36

finding Sage 2s

172:38

and I was like, "Okay, [laughter] I'm

172:41

pretty sure I bought it in like 40

172:43

minutes from posting and I have it now

172:45

and it's all good."

172:47

>> Okay. Have you tested it with just some

172:49

some random RAM?

172:50

>> No, no real load. Yeah, but I've I've

172:52

turned it on and it works.

172:53

>> Pathos says, "Bad advice, but buying a

172:55

gun is actually cheaper than buying RAM.

173:00

>> [snorts]

173:01

>> I see where they're going with that.

173:03

Technically, if you're getting like high

173:04

points or something, buying a gun is

173:05

cheaper than a lot of things. [laughter]

173:11

>> This is not an endorsement [laughter]

173:13

of that strategy.

173:15

>> Yeah, especially that particular thing.

173:16

It might blow up in your hand. But

173:17

anyways, um

173:21

>> yeah, so I have some parts of it. Now,

173:22

do you want me to talk about the GPU

173:23

plan or do I hold that?

173:24

>> Let's hold that.

173:25

>> Okay. Yeah, cuz there it's going to be a

173:27

thing.

173:27

>> There's a plan with the GPUs.

173:29

>> Yeah. Yeah. But TBD

173:31

>> Y

173:32

>> um

173:33

Oh, man. Oh, okay. Let's go into talking

173:37

about the IC shortage. So, you know how

173:41

during COVID, it wasn't just GPUs that

173:43

were in short supply. It was like any

173:45

integrated circuit in general. Dude, I

173:47

remember USB cables being a problem

173:49

>> because the demand for for for anything

173:54

that needed a wafer

173:56

got so high because all of it was being

173:59

allocated to very lucrative thing. Well,

174:01

guess what?

174:03

I had a conversation with the creator

174:06

warehouse team cuz Oh, actually,

174:12

>> I haven't seen this version. Our power

174:16

bank is uh that's a that's a dev

174:19

connector.

174:20

>> There you go. That's a dev connector.

174:22

Ignore that. But um our power bank is in

174:26

a very very close to mostly completed

174:31

physically and actually very close to

174:33

completed firmware state. Uh Nate told

174:37

me that I'm allowed to that's for um

174:39

simple disassembly and swapping of

174:41

battery mags. So, is it like one screw

174:43

kind of deal or you

174:44

>> better believe it

174:46

other thing?

174:47

>> It's very close.

174:49

>> Um,

174:50

>> what's is this venting?

174:51

>> That is Oh, here can hold that up.

174:55

>> Uh, that is hard to see. That's what

174:57

we're calling the hat interface

174:59

internally for now. Uh, we'll come up

175:00

with branding for it, but it's a it's a

175:02

clip-on interface that will allow people

175:05

to mount accessories to the top of it.

175:08

And we're going to open up the

175:09

mechanical files for that. So, anything

175:11

that would accept a USB PD could be

175:15

adapted to live semi-permanently on one

175:18

of these power cells. Uh, which I

175:20

thought would be like a pretty cool use

175:22

case cuz we've implemented some kind of

175:23

optional aspects of USB PD that are not

175:25

necessarily that common, but could be

175:27

very helpful for enthusiasts and

175:29

hobbyists.

175:30

>> I have a question for you.

175:31

>> Yeah.

175:32

>> I see battery banks in basically two

175:34

general formats. There's like the wide

175:37

and flat.

175:38

>> Yep.

175:38

>> And there's the basically that. Yep.

175:41

>> Um

175:42

why

175:43

>> why this one?

175:44

>> Yeah.

175:45

>> Uh this one is because uh we wanted the

175:48

flexibility

175:49

>> type of cells or Okay.

175:51

>> Yeah. So we wanted the flexibility to

175:52

support multiple cell types in the

175:54

future and 18650 is the one where we're

175:58

most likely to get future development of

176:01

cells.

176:01

>> Got it. Um, and this made the power

176:05

routing back when we were actually this

176:07

decision was made back when we were

176:09

hoping to allow cells to be replaced,

176:12

but we were not able to find a battery

176:14

partner that was willing to sign off on

176:16

that, at least not at this stage. Um, it

176:18

made the routing of the power easier.

176:21

Um, so it's a single board design.

176:23

Everything's up here and it's a whole

176:24

it's a whole thing.

176:25

>> Yeah. Okay.

176:26

>> Um,

176:28

>> do [snorts] you want to talk about some

176:29

of the hats? I guess this isn't really a

176:31

product showcase of

176:32

>> what I want to talk about is the fact

176:34

that this isn't coming out for at least

176:36

a year.

176:37

>> Oh,

176:38

>> in spite of the fact that you guys can

176:40

see it. Watch.

176:43

>> Okay, watch this. I'm going to do this.

176:47

This is how this is how working it is.

176:50

I'm going to plug in an LTT true cable.

176:54

I'm going to plug it into my phone.

176:57

>> Boink. And my phone is now charging.

177:00

>> That's how working it is. It will not

177:03

come out for at least a year because we

177:06

were just quoted 44 weeks to get the

177:11

IC's that we need to go to mass

177:12

production.

177:13

>> Holy.

177:14

>> That's if we placed the order today.

177:18

>> Well, okay. So, remember how like we had

177:21

a GPU

177:22

>> price thing during the second great

177:25

crypto winter and like cars got more

177:28

expensive.

177:30

>> Yeah, but what

177:30

>> it's happening.

177:31

>> So, those

177:33

>> because we're using a similar enough I

177:36

for I think it's the buck booster that

177:38

we're using or something. We're using a

177:39

similar enough process node on that

177:41

particular chip that because every power

177:45

I see on the face of the bloody

177:47

earth is being allocated to data center

177:51

stuff, there's no fab time.

177:57

So, um, see you in a year.

178:04

>> Damn, bro.

178:05

>> Yeah.

178:06

>> Did you guys put the order in? I don't

178:08

know if we've actually placed the order

178:10

yet because we're still working because

178:12

the worst thing that could happen,

178:14

>> you place that order, you change

178:15

something about it,

178:16

>> would be if we knew we were working on,

178:18

say, for example, a gaming mouse

178:21

>> and we were to order thousands upon

178:23

thousands of mouse processors.

178:26

>> For people that don't understand

178:28

>> that happened,

178:29

>> yeah, they did

178:29

>> during the the second great crypto

178:32

winter. Uh if anyone wants to buy some

178:34

some mouse processors, by the way, in

178:37

the uh we actually did a video where we

178:38

get into the specific ones, it was um it

178:42

was like the products I couldn't release

178:44

or products that failed or something

178:45

like that on on LT. Uh and we talk about

178:48

it. I wasn't joking. If you want to buy

178:51

those processors, they're brand new in

178:53

box. I'd be happy to sell them to you.

178:54

I'll give you a great price. Although

178:56

maybe I should hold them [laughter]

178:58

because uh things are going to get

179:00

pretty rough.

179:05

Yeah,

179:06

>> mouse processor cat toy. Oh. Oh, that's

179:09

my alarm to Oh, I can't go super late

179:12

today. I have to put my chickens away.

179:16

They get scared when it's dark.

179:18

>> I love this Lionus. This is my favorite

179:21

Linus.

179:22

>> Now we're both bird dads, dude.

179:24

>> I know. It's crazy.

179:25

>> I'm so glad it's

179:26

>> just wait till you you know they hide

179:28

when they're sick, right? Chickens do

179:30

that, too.

179:31

Basically every bird does.

179:32

>> Terrible.

179:33

>> And they cuddle you.

179:34

>> Terrible.

179:35

>> Hair's all queued. Do Do have you

179:36

experienced the pecking order yet?

179:38

>> Uh,

179:39

>> do you have enough for a pecking order?

179:41

>> Um, we definitely have bully ones and

179:44

less bully one. There's someone who's at

179:45

the bottom. I can tell you which one's

179:47

the bottom of the group.

179:48

>> It changes every day normally.

179:49

>> Uh, there's one that's significantly

179:51

smaller than the rest.

179:53

>> So, she gets bullied pretty bad. I had a

179:56

silky that was like that, but there was

179:57

like a couple days a year where she was

179:59

top bird.

180:00

>> Really?

180:01

>> It was really funny. Yeah, it like

180:02

changes around if the more you have, the

180:05

more it shifts around. But so one thing

180:07

we did notice, I I loaded up a bunch of

180:10

like chicken coupe building videos

180:11

before a flight on my phone and I I

180:13

watched a bunch of them and they uh

180:15

there was one in particular that

180:17

suggested only having one perch in your

180:21

coupe and just having it be wide enough

180:23

that everyone goes on it so that they're

180:25

not allowed to like establish dominance

180:28

by sitting up higher than the other

180:29

ones. Um so we made ours removable.

180:33

Right now we have two. They all sit on

180:36

the top one together, but if that

180:37

changes, then we can actually remove one

180:39

of them and then they'll just have to

180:40

deal with that. But apparently it it

180:42

causes less fighting if they only have

180:44

one perch. Um, charge nuclei says no one

180:47

wants to be on. So you would never

180:49

put them directly above.

180:51

>> Yeah, you stag

180:52

>> cuz the ergonomics of that would be

180:54

terrible. How would they get from this

180:55

one to that one? They're flightless

180:56

birds. You would put them like this.

181:02

>> Anyway, looping order. BMW is

181:05

>> Wait, wait, wait, wait. Question. How

181:08

can someone buy Are you Are you piecing

181:10

out them the pro the mouse processors?

181:12

Do they all have to be bought at once?

181:13

>> Oh, I thought you meant the chickens.

181:14

Like, yeah, you could buy just a wing, I

181:16

guess. [laughter]

181:17

[snorts]

181:18

>> We're not eating them.

181:18

>> That would be so sad.

181:20

>> Um,

181:21

>> poor chicken.

181:22

>> Sorry. What was your question? Oh, the

181:24

the processors.

181:26

>> Someone wants to buy two.

181:28

>> No, we're not going to sell two

181:29

processors. Are you high?

181:30

>> So, do they have to buy the whole thing?

181:32

Uh well that I don't know but like I'd

181:34

say like at least a 100. I don't know

181:36

what they're worth. Like I was say how

181:37

much is a hundred?

181:38

>> I don't know.

181:39

>> I'll take the lot of maker space with a

181:42

decent electronics lab. How much for the

181:44

lot and how do I get in touch?

181:46

>> Uh info@linusmedia.com

181:48

is like our general purpose

181:50

>> inbox. Uh don't waste their time. But if

181:53

if you have a a real genuine inquiry

181:56

then that would be the that would be the

181:57

place to go. But they are legitimately

182:00

probably a pretty good thing for someone

182:03

to pick up right now because uh 44

182:06

weeks, baby.

182:08

>> Some genius needs to redesign the power

182:10

bank controller to use mouse processors.

182:13

[laughter]

182:15

>> Yeah, I'll talk to Nate about it.

182:16

>> Blue [snorts] Mark said that it's pretty

182:18

good. Anyways, all right.

182:19

>> BMW is a trailblazer of inification.

182:22

>> They sure are, man. From July 27th to

182:25

August 10th, BMW owners of select models

182:29

were shown Spider-Man banner ads that

182:32

could be tapped to display a full screen

182:35

commercial with audio.

182:38

Obviously, there has been a huge

182:40

backlash because one, this is pretty

182:44

brazenly a pretty crappy thing to do.

182:46

and two, a BMW executive in 2023, we're

182:52

not talking 10, 20, 50 years ago when

182:56

they couldn't have known what the world

182:57

will be like

182:59

3 years ago,

183:01

publicly rejected the idea of selling

183:04

ads on dashboard displays. BMW responded

183:08

by saying the ad was intended to

183:11

celebrate the film which also features

183:13

BMW vehicles and is onetime promotion

183:17

and probably also relax buddy.

183:21

Come on guy. Um

183:22

>> I don't think there's been a topic on

183:24

WAN show about cars in years that has

183:29

not made me appreciate my car even more.

183:33

You would think a show that covers like

183:37

the news and cool stuff in tech and is

183:39

really trying to lean towards good news.

183:41

You would talk about vehicles every once

183:43

in a while that would include like, "Oh,

183:46

that's really cool. I wish

183:47

>> AI cool open source hardware that can be

183:49

bolted onto your old car to help with

183:51

better lane keep assist.

183:52

>> That just makes me appreciate my car

183:54

even more

183:55

>> really

183:55

>> cuz I could just use it on my old car."

183:58

>> No, yours isn't new enough. It's too

184:01

old.

184:03

So, comma AI you it doesn't necessarily

184:06

work on the newest stuff because why is

184:08

that

184:08

>> requires development?

184:09

>> It needs uh

184:10

>> you need to have some lane keep assist

184:13

already cuz it's got to have the motors.

184:15

>> Oh, that makes sense. That makes total

184:17

sense. Yeah, my car would not do that.

184:18

>> It has to have the motors and the

184:19

sensors. So, so I that was something

184:21

that I thought was pretty cool.

184:22

>> That gives me a little bit

184:25

not enough to care. But but that is that

184:27

is fair though.

184:27

>> That's one you asked me to come up with

184:29

one. I was trying

184:30

>> AI. When did that launch?

184:32

>> 1,000 years ago. They have new hardware,

184:34

though. I I want to try it out. But

184:35

first, I'm actually finally doing a

184:38

hardware for Tesla um long-term

184:42

try out. I'm going to buy a

184:44

subscription. Colton and I are car

184:46

swapping for a month.

184:47

>> You're going to buy a subscription to

184:48

what?

184:49

>> Full self-driving.

184:50

>> Oh,

184:51

>> yeah.

184:51

>> Okay.

184:52

>> So, uh Colton has a hardware for Tesla.

184:54

I think it's a Model 3.

184:55

>> Yeah, dude. 11 years ago, by the way.

184:57

>> And then I'm I'm trading with him. Comma

184:59

AI was 11 years ago.

185:00

>> It wasn't good for a lot of that 11

185:02

years though.

185:03

>> I think it's good more recently, right?

185:04

>> Yeah. Yeah.

185:05

>> Yeah.

185:08

>> What bet did you lose? Says WY giraffe.

185:10

Uh it's not so much a bet that I lost

185:12

and more that um in the

185:13

>> I think it's a good thing for you to

185:14

try.

185:14

>> Yeah. In the video on the com. I've

185:16

wanted to try it forever. I just wasn't

185:18

going to like buy a car to do

185:19

it.

185:20

>> Yeah, screw that.

185:21

>> Right. Like I So I'm uh So I'm actually

185:24

genuinely pretty excited to try it

185:25

because

185:26

>> So wait, what car? Hold. I might have

185:27

missed this. What? What car is Colton

185:28

going to drive?

185:29

>> My car?

185:30

>> Your Porsche?

185:31

>> Yeah.

185:32

>> Damn. [laughter] Okay.

185:34

>> I don't know. What? He's a good driver.

185:36

He

185:36

>> No, probably. I don't know. I don't know

185:38

if I've ever

185:39

>> He asked me if it'll fit car seats in

185:40

it. I was like, "Yeah, yeah, no

185:42

problem."

185:43

>> Sweet.

185:44

>> Yeah, it should be fine.

185:45

>> That's pretty cool.

185:46

>> Um, yeah. He told me he's like scared to

185:48

drive it. I'm like, "What are you scared

185:49

of?" It's just this pedal make it go

185:51

forward. This pedal make it not go

185:53

forward so fast. It should be fine.

185:55

[laughter] Not that worried about it. Uh

185:57

because I think we just have to do

185:58

something with our insurance just to

185:59

make sure that like we're covered and

186:01

everything.

186:01

>> Yeah. You just add the person as a

186:02

driver.

186:02

>> Yeah. Yeah. It should be fine.

186:03

>> Should be fine.

186:04

>> Um anyway, our discussion questions. Is

186:07

this a bridge too far?

186:09

>> The uh the the the on dash. Yeah. Yes.

186:12

>> Yeah. But it's like,

186:15

you know, the 28th bridge in a row. That

186:19

is too far.

186:20

>> Virtual Sedai says you'll buy a

186:22

firetruck but not a cyber truck. Seems

186:24

sus. Okay. My fire truck cost way less

186:26

than a cyber truck, though. And we made

186:29

money on it.

186:30

>> Less glue, too.

186:32

>> Less glue. Yeah. Fewer panels glued on.

186:34

[laughter]

186:36

[snorts] Sorry.

186:39

[gasps] Uh oh, this is cool. How we

186:41

skipped this when we were looking for

186:42

cool stuff to talk about. The Steam Deck

186:44

OLED gains HDR streaming and

186:47

experimental AV1 support. Dude, Valve is

186:51

still making the Steam Deck better all

186:53

this time later. Cool. The latest beta

186:55

client released July 29th adds HDR

186:57

streaming to remote play on the Steam

186:59

Deck OLED, so games streamed from your

187:01

PC can finally use the display's full uh

187:05

dynamic range instead of being stuck in

187:07

SDR. The update also improves video

187:10

color range across the board, which

187:11

should fix some of the washed out look

187:12

that people have complained about. LCD

187:14

deck owners are out of luck on the HDR

187:16

side, though, since the screen doesn't

187:18

support it. But that's that's a hardware

187:19

thing. You can't blame Valve for that.

187:21

AV1 streaming is in there too, but it's

187:23

experimental on two levels. It requires

187:24

the beta client plus the experimental

187:27

Steam RT3 build on top. AV1 delivers the

187:30

same or better image quality than HVC

187:32

and H.264 at lower bandwidth, which is

187:34

exactly what you want for streaming over

187:36

Wi-Fi. Users have been asking Val for

187:38

AV1 in remote play since at least 2022.

187:42

Our discussion question here is, is

187:44

streaming from your own PC finally good

187:46

enough to skip buying a more powerful

187:49

handheld? And this is this is a question

187:51

that I would have reflexively said no

187:53

and also you're stupid um at some point

187:56

in the past, but I think you probably

187:59

remember this. My time with the Logitech

188:01

G-Cloud,

188:02

>> yeah,

188:03

>> changed my perspective.

188:04

>> It doesn't happen that often. I'm pretty

188:06

experienced reviewing tech. I usually

188:08

have a pretty good idea of what I'm

188:10

going to really like, what I'm going to

188:11

not like, and what I'm going to be

188:12

pretty tepid on. But that was one where

188:14

I got it completely wrong and it was a

188:19

way better experience to use than I

188:21

expected. It ended up being a commercial

188:23

failure, which is sort of a bummer. It

188:25

looks like Well, I don't know that for

188:26

sure, but I know that Logitech just said

188:28

they're not going to make another one.

188:29

So, make of that what you will. Um,

188:32

but it it really validated the idea of a

188:35

lightweight, super long battery life

188:38

handheld that is mega focused on

188:40

streaming in a way that I I didn't think

188:43

was going to happen. It made me way more

188:44

open to the PS portal, which has been a

188:46

success. Um, but as for

188:49

as for a Steam Deck OLED with the

188:52

intention of predominantly using it for

188:54

remote play, that's that's a bulkier

188:56

that's a heavier device. Although the

188:58

battery life will be really good if

189:00

you're just streaming,

189:04

it's going to be very personal. If you

189:06

mostly game around the house, which

189:07

actually is is most of what I do,

189:09

>> it's also probably most of what most

189:11

Steam Deck users do. The Steam Deck OLED

189:13

is still pretty compelling, although not

189:15

nearly as much as it used to be. Uh,

189:17

what's the price right now? And and are

189:19

there even any in stock?

189:22

How bad is it? Yeah. Yeah. 11.29

189:26

Canadian.

189:30

Uh, also here, we're going to do the 512

189:33

cuz I'm streaming, right? Oh, okay.

189:34

They're in stock. Okay. So, oh man, that

189:37

price though. Remember when they were

189:39

like somewhat attainable? Like half of

189:41

that. I remember uh not for the OLED cuz

189:43

remember this is Canadian dollars.

189:45

>> I didn't notice it. You looked OLED.

189:46

>> Yep.

189:48

>> Uh you want to talk about some

189:52

>> uh wait there was one more discussion

189:54

question. Does HDR actually matter on a

189:55

7in screen? Yes.

189:57

>> Yes, definitely. HDR looks fantastic

190:00

even on a small screen. It's not like uh

190:02

like resolution where just

190:03

>> Yeah. I don't know how at all. Yeah.

190:06

>> I just I was a question.

190:07

>> Fair enough question.

190:09

Okay. So, the thing that I Yeah.

190:15

BIOS upgrading your Legion L BIOS

190:18

upgrading. I'm just so pissed I can't

190:20

even talk. BIOS upgrade bricking Legion

190:22

Go handhelds. Lenovo quoting over $250

190:25

to fix it outside of warranty.

190:27

Oh, this was the one that I meant to

190:29

discuss the EcoB one on. It's in there.

190:32

All right. Great job, Lancho Doc prep

190:34

team. You guys did put it where it was

190:36

supposed to be. That's That's my bet.

190:37

Okay. Carry on.

190:38

>> Owners of Lenovo Legion Go handhelds are

190:40

reporting a recent BIOS update is

190:42

bricking their handhelds. The BIOS

190:44

update in question is version something

190:46

uh for the Len Legion Go 8A PU1. Uh it's

190:52

the original Legion Go

190:55

uh Go Z1 models running Ryzen 1 uh Z

190:58

Extreme APU.

191:00

>> Ryzen Z1 Extreme APUs.

191:02

>> There we go.

191:03

>> Yeah, the reading is very challenging.

191:05

Yeah, this BIOS update is not automatic.

191:08

Most

191:09

>> aren't.

191:10

>> Some are actually. A lot of pre-builts

191:12

these days.

191:12

>> A lot of pre-builts do.

191:13

>> Uh, yeah. Yeah, a lot of laptops will

191:16

just like apply it through their like

191:18

control system. The Lenovo thing does.

191:20

Yeah. It's applied manually via an .exe

191:23

install file downloaded from Lenovo's

191:25

technical support site. A Redditor

191:27

claims that when they tried to reach out

191:28

to Lenovo directly, the company

191:30

allegedly quoted them a little over uh

191:33

what? quoted them a little over quoted

191:35

them a little over

191:38

uh 237 pounds about 200 euros about 237.

191:45

>> Holy crap. Uh to repair their Lenovo Re

191:48

Leg Legion Go. I almost said region.

191:51

[laughter]

191:52

>> You did say region.

191:53

>> Hell yeah. I I I fixed it. Uh the

191:55

Redditor's device in question is out of

191:57

warranty. Lenovo is otherwise still

191:59

repairing or replacing handhelds free of

192:00

charge for device.

192:03

Another

192:04

[laughter]

192:05

Redditor wrote, "Had the same issue.

192:08

Just paid

192:10

around €120

192:12

to reactivate uh to reactivate the

192:14

warranty. I want them to repair it, not

192:16

at my cost. This is insane." Um, yeah.

192:20

Anyways, there's just more cases of this

192:22

happening over and over again. Uh, since

192:24

the story broke on August 4th, 2026,

192:26

Lenovo has completely removed any trace

192:28

of the problematic update from their

192:30

technical support page.

192:31

>> I should hope so. Hope so.

192:33

>> Um, one Redditor did manage to recover

192:35

their bricked Legion Go by soldering

192:37

directly to the SPI flash chip, reading

192:40

and then writing a 1.8 volt BIOS ROM and

192:42

modifying the image while preserving DMI

192:44

data. That's [laughter] paste. Pit stop

192:47

computers also reported on attempts to

192:49

find a fix. They too went the route of

192:51

external BIOS programming to recover the

192:53

device. That really shouldn't be

192:55

required. And you know, the funny thing

192:57

about it is that Gigabytes been doing

192:59

this for many, many years with their

193:00

dual BIOS concept. Um, it actually

193:03

doesn't cost that much to throw a second

193:05

BIOS chip on there that you can recover

193:07

from in the event that a BIOS update

193:08

does go wrong. It just costs a little

193:11

bit. And like so many things, at a scale

193:13

of selling a million units, saving a

193:16

dollar is a million dollars.

193:20

>> It's pretty good.

193:21

>> And that's the way that's the way the

193:24

wind blows. It's probably even cheaper

193:25

than a dollar, but that's the math still

193:28

math's pretty hard. Um, that's nuts. Uh,

193:32

if your software update bricks my

193:34

device, I don't think I care if I'm in

193:36

warranty or not.

193:38

>> That's going to piss me off.

193:39

>> Oh, yeah. Yeah. That that this is when I

193:42

had wanted to have that conversation

193:43

about like what is a warranty?

193:45

>> Yeah. you know, at a certain at a

193:47

certain point does it if if if but then

193:50

it is through some action of my own. And

193:51

almost every BIOS update file includes

193:53

like a doing this may break your device,

193:56

but that disclaimer really

193:58

>> Hey, we got a mouse again.

193:59

>> What?

194:00

>> Sorry.

194:01

>> Like a like a like a like like a like a

194:04

rodent.

194:05

>> I don't see him. I saw something just

194:08

and there was one time we had two of

194:09

them on set.

194:11

>> Hey, I want them. [laughter] I want them

194:14

for Cat TV. Oh, yeah.

194:15

>> No, you want them for the chickens.

194:17

>> No, I don't want them for the chickens.

194:19

What the What the devil would a chicken

194:20

do with a mouse?

194:21

>> Horrible things?

194:22

>> Yeah. Horrible things.

194:24

>> What? Really?

194:24

>> They'll peck it.

194:25

>> Oh, really?

194:26

>> Yeah, probably.

194:26

>> Oh, gross.

194:28

>> They don't want little invaders.

194:29

>> Um, okay. This is only sort of tech, but

194:33

I just wanted to talk about it because I

194:34

know Luke and I are both pretty

194:35

passionate about gambling. Um, several

194:38

senators have contacted the CFTC, the

194:41

Commodity Futures Trading Commission,

194:43

asking about the AY's goals or plans to

194:46

take on prediction markets, specifically

194:49

around the contracts for individuals to

194:52

bet on wildfires.

194:55

>> Yeah, I knew this was going to make your

194:56

brain break. Some of these contracts

194:59

currently include areas wildfires will

195:01

spread, total size of wildfires, new

195:04

wildfire locations, and more. prediction

195:07

markets, if you're not familiar, work

195:10

not by betting. And for those of you who

195:13

are listening, not watching, I'm doing

195:14

the gigantic finger quotes that you ever

195:17

did see and making a really stupid face.

195:20

Not by betting, uh, but rather by having

195:24

dynamic odds that can adjust to certain

195:27

criteria. For example, will LA Lakers

195:30

win the NBA championships? The chance of

195:34

it being a yes could change based on how

195:36

well they are playing that season. Uh

195:38

yes, totally not betting. These have had

195:41

multiple side effects like one story of

195:43

somebody betting on the temperature of

195:45

an airport sensor then driving over

195:47

there to hold a heat gun or it was like

195:49

a um a haird dryer or something next to

195:51

it. And then there was another example

195:54

of um Donald Trump's teleprompter

195:56

operator betting on what he was going to

195:58

say during a speech.

196:00

>> Oh wow.

196:00

>> Yeah. I know there was somebody who took

196:03

like listening devices of some kind, I

196:06

don't know what exactly, uh to stadiums

196:08

where the World Cup was being played to

196:10

figure out the like halftime show

196:11

performances cuz they would show up

196:14

during uh rehearsal times. I don't

196:16

remember they they said how they figured

196:18

out when rehearsals were and they would

196:20

bet on like the order that things would

196:22

happen, but they would know from the

196:23

rehearsal.

196:26

There's some surprisingly clever stuff.

196:28

So, these senators and many others have

196:30

started to express concerns particularly

196:33

around wildfires because um if someone

196:35

wanted to make a prediction on a

196:37

wildfire and then have it match, pun

196:41

intended, uh a real wildfire, they could

196:45

just go start fires, which um you know,

196:47

I don't know if you guys have seen the

196:48

air quality in general this year in like

196:52

North America.

196:52

>> Maybe a lot of people were were

196:54

predicting on northern Canada. Yeah,

196:56

it'd be it'd be great if there was no

196:59

financial incentive whatsoever for

197:01

anyone to be

197:03

doing anything to do with wildfires

197:05

other than do their very best to prevent

197:07

them. Uh, our discussion question here

197:09

with gambling so ingrained in our

197:10

society. Um, can you explain in further

197:13

detail why LMG has decided against using

197:16

them for sponsorships years ago? I don't

197:18

think we've ever taken a gambling

197:19

sponsorship. Did you and I talk about it

197:21

at the time? I don't remember.

197:23

>> Uh, we probably did on WAN. We talk

197:25

about a lot of things on WAN, but I

197:26

don't think we've I don't think we've

197:28

ever taken a gambling sponsor.

197:29

>> Um I don't know. I just think I think

197:32

it's pretty pretty much. I I don't

197:34

really have too much to say about it

197:35

other than that.

197:36

>> Is this a line that you could see

197:38

shifting?

197:40

Like we've seen we've seen the very

197:42

dramatic change in just the last 10

197:45

years. Uh

197:46

>> just the last two years

197:48

>> honestly probably that's like

197:49

>> it seems to be accelerating.

197:51

>> So let's say if it keeps going this path

197:54

and just the mainstream thing

197:56

>> in 10 20 years.

197:58

>> And I'm just like

197:59

>> genuinely no one cares other than

198:01

>> Okay, grandpa.

198:03

>> Um,

198:04

no, I don't I don't think so because I I

198:07

I think you could make a really similar

198:08

argument around like cannibids because

198:11

that's that's a generation earlier.

198:14

Taboo, no big deal. Like our I think our

198:17

generation in general, I I I don't

198:19

consume, but I don't judge people who

198:22

do. I don't really give a If you

198:24

know, you think it's cool or whatever,

198:25

that's fine. Um, and so my my stance on

198:29

it is it basically just comes down to

198:31

that I don't want our sponsorships

198:36

to be guided by what is legal. I want

198:40

our sponsorships and our involvement in

198:43

industries through our content to be

198:46

guided by what is not harmful for our

198:50

viewers. Yeah, I I I personally think

198:52

gambling is like genuinely a form of

198:54

like financial self harm. And

198:58

uh I don't know. I we we both know that

199:00

the like one person in at least my life

199:04

>> that gambles actively that I think does

199:06

it in a healthy way.

199:07

>> Yeah.

199:08

>> One person

199:09

>> cannabonoids. Apparently I pronounced it

199:11

wrong. I really don't give a about

199:12

that.

199:12

>> It's not not important. Uh there's one

199:15

person I know of and have ever known of

199:16

and have ever heard of that deals with

199:19

it in like a healthy way that I think is

199:21

genuinely fine and it's one and they're

199:23

an extreme outlier of a person

199:26

>> in so many ways. [laughter]

199:28

Love that guy.

199:29

>> So like it's this is not normal. I I've

199:32

told this story a bunch of times on WAN,

199:33

but I used to work at the bread factory

199:36

>> and dudes at the bread factory would

199:37

regularly get their paycheck, go to the

199:40

casino, miss out on rent, and not have a

199:42

place to stay for the next month. This

199:44

was like a normal thing that would

199:45

happen all the time.

199:47

>> Got some folks kind of mad at me, uh,

199:49

including Crystal. Cannabis isn't

199:51

harmful. It's like, yeah, you can like

199:53

actually scan people's brains. It

199:55

definitely changes your brain. As for,

199:57

you know, whether you consider that to

199:59

be harmful or not, um, we there could be

200:02

some subjectivity there, but in terms of

200:04

like does it have a very measurable

200:06

impact on the human body, it's like yes.

200:10

Once again, like our junk food

200:11

conversation last week, it's not really

200:13

like debatable.

200:14

>> There's also like I have I have a a

200:16

person that's quite close to me that um

200:18

had cancer six times.

200:20

>> There's people for whom the benefits can

200:21

outweigh the harm.

200:22

>> It's Oh, yeah. In this case, it's not

200:24

even close.

200:25

sleep properly without pain or for more

200:28

than I think it was like 2 hours at a

200:30

time for years and then they tried it

200:32

and they were able to actually sleep

200:33

which was like an obvious massive

200:34

benefit.

200:35

>> Um

200:38

yeah, so you know yeah it's just it's

200:40

it's one of those things where with that

200:42

said I mean there are areas where I've

200:45

been a little grayer. Uh personally I

200:47

think energy drinks are um terrible. I

200:50

think they're poison. Uh we've worked

200:52

with Red Bull.

200:54

That's something that is so mainly like

200:56

caffeine is something that I choose not

200:58

to consume.

200:59

>> It's like with every conversation we

201:01

seem to have on Wancho where you pick

201:02

your own line. For them, their line on

201:06

uh cannabonoids, hopefully I said it

201:08

right, uh is more on the okay and yours

201:12

is not. And for someone else, I know

201:14

there's the the drink water movement

201:17

which is not okay with uh which we're

201:20

both doing, but is not okay with the

201:22

energy drinks thing. and you're like,

201:23

"Ah, whatever. I don't know." You don't

201:25

like gambling. Everyone's going to have

201:27

their mix of what's okay and what isn't.

201:30

>> The one with Red Bull, the thing with

201:31

Red Bull for me is actually how much the

201:34

team loves it. Red Bull regularly sends

201:37

us like a pallet of drinks.

201:39

>> Oh, they're gone immediately.

201:40

>> No, dude. No. Over at Labs, there's

201:43

regularly like half pallets of Red Bull

201:46

sitting there. They put them in the

201:47

fridges and stuff.

201:47

>> No, no. What I'm saying is people

201:49

consume them.

201:49

>> Oh, yeah.

201:50

>> Like I'm agreeing with you.

201:51

>> Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. and and

201:52

they'll resug them

201:54

>> and they'll restock us.

201:55

>> Red Bull restocks it often

201:57

>> and it is it is it is a a meaningfully

202:01

contributing to the happiness of the

202:03

team thing that happens and I can sit

202:05

and I can be appreciative of that. Red

202:08

Bull Red Bull does that in spite of me

202:11

multiple times publicly saying that I

202:14

don't consume energy drinks. I wouldn't

202:15

consume energy drinks. I don't think

202:17

they're good for us. I I I I

202:21

a personal it's my personal choice that

202:23

I believe they are poison. Um and they

202:26

they do it anyway and I'm just like you

202:28

know what I got to kind of respect that

202:31

[laughter] the fact that they're just

202:33

like yeah that's your opinion.

202:34

>> We've talked about the same thing with

202:36

other companies before where like we

202:37

should be able to be critical about a

202:38

product and you should still work with

202:39

us.

202:40

>> Yeah. And so the fact that they can deal

202:42

with that and they will just still send

202:45

us all the Red Bull that our staff can

202:46

drink and they'll even work with us to

202:48

do and again like it comes down to what

202:50

we're doing like when we did those

202:52

builds for Alfonso Davies and Disguised

202:55

toast, right? Red Bull didn't ask me to

202:57

drink the drink. They didn't ask me to

202:59

talk about how much I love Red Bull so

203:02

huggy muggy much. They just they kept

203:03

the drink out of it. And I was like,

203:06

"Okay, you know what? I can do this. I

203:08

can build a PC for some cool people that

203:10

you also sponsor and

203:13

that's I'm I'm will I'm willing to do

203:15

it.

203:16

>> I don't know what it is. I detest the

203:19

taste of beer for whatever reason. I

203:22

really like the taste of energy drinks

203:24

>> almost. So many people think they taste

203:26

like junk. I I love them. I really like

203:29

Red Bull. I really like a variety of

203:32

other ones.

203:32

>> Can't do it. It overpowers any other

203:34

flavor in a drink for me. I didn't even

203:36

know there were artificial sweeteners.

203:38

>> Yeah, I'm pretty sure. Uh, which one do

203:40

they use?

203:40

>> I have no idea.

203:42

>> What about wine? Hate it. Hate it. Hate

203:44

it so much.

203:45

>> It's fermented. I've I've never been

203:46

able to really get over that. But

203:48

although I will sit and I will eat a jar

203:50

of pickles this big in one sitting.

203:52

>> I don't know if that's it. I love

203:53

kimchi. I love pickles. Um I I'm pretty

203:57

sure sauerkraut is fermented. I really

203:59

like that. I don't know if that's true.

204:00

>> Apparently, original Red Bull uses real

204:02

sugars. M

204:03

>> it's the sugar-free and zerocalorie ones

204:05

that use sucralose and acetulamine

204:08

acettoulfame potassium.

204:10

>> But yeah, I don't drink them too often

204:12

because I mean I'm trying to lose weight

204:14

right now. I'm focuses on I'm on I'm on

204:16

the water game. But if there's like

204:19

I would rather have a Red Bull than like

204:21

most pops. Not all. Give me Give me an

204:26

orange crush or any Hero. You guys don't

204:29

you guys don't Red Bull, but I'm always

204:31

surprised that people are like, "I don't

204:33

like the taste of this or it's got the

204:34

sugar." Like, it's not a it's an energy

204:37

drink. You're drinking it for the drugs

204:38

that are in it.

204:39

>> Oh, it doesn't do anything for me.

204:40

>> I I call them [laughter] I call them

204:42

drug water because like that's what it

204:44

is. And you know, it's not a you're

204:46

consuming it as a uh

204:48

>> I mean, coffee is just hot drug water.

204:51

>> Coffee is also drug water. You know,

204:53

[laughter]

204:56

>> some people seem to really like the

204:58

flavor. I can't say that I quite

204:59

understand it.

205:00

>> I like it. I'm not like obsessed with it

205:02

or anything, but I like it.

205:03

>> I tried a fancy I tried a fancy espresso

205:05

when I was at Robert's AMD upgrade.

205:08

>> And uh

205:09

>> I basically what I think what I said

205:11

ended up being like one like a highly

205:13

quotable moment in the comments when I

205:15

was like, "I'm so glad you like it.

205:17

[laughter]

205:22

>> [gasps]

205:22

>> But yeah, I like I like cold drug water

205:25

and I don't like hot drug water.

205:26

>> The funny thing about that one is

205:29

I love coffee flavored ice cream.

205:33

>> Oh, interesting.

205:34

>> I know.

205:35

>> What the heck?

205:36

>> Do you drink coffee with a bunch of

205:38

milk?

205:38

>> Yeah. I don't drink coffee at all.

205:40

>> Do you just need like sweeteners in your

205:42

coffee? Maybe.

205:43

>> Cuz kind of what I explained to Luke

205:44

ages ago is that most people drink milk

205:46

that has coffee in it.

205:48

>> I see. Uh, espresso is pretty damn

205:50

hardcore. Uh, that's like most people

205:53

don't drink espresso. They can't handle

205:55

that. You're not alone in that.

205:56

>> Got it. Yeah. But it tastes nice. Tastes

205:59

nice.

206:00

>> Okay.

206:01

Uh, we should probably move to After

206:03

Dark. I do have to put my chickens away

206:04

pretty relatively soonish.

206:07

>> It's actually a a concern.

206:10

>> Has to go home to tend to his

206:11

>> Oh, adorable. We've got four

206:15

[laughter]

206:18

I did bleep that.

206:20

>> Oh,

206:20

>> just for you guys' context.

206:23

>> Uh,

206:27

sure.

206:28

Buttons.

206:30

I have so many things that I have to do.

206:32

Uh, that one and that one. There we go.

206:37

[snorts]

206:38

Okie dokie. After dark.

206:40

>> Hell yeah.

206:41

>> Hey, Burb owners and Dan. In light of

206:44

BMW car ads, do you think AIO screens

206:47

will eventually have ad placements? If

206:50

they had different plans, for example,

206:51

ads or without ads, would you do it?

206:54

>> Took took me a minute to figure out what

206:56

they meant, but like

206:58

>> CPU screens,

206:59

>> why aren't I getting ads for like

207:02

Cheerios on those? They're perfect.

207:04

>> Here's the thing.

207:06

>> I hate you, Phillip. If I was getting a

207:08

good deal on it, then that would be

207:10

fine. But everything's like

207:13

skimpflation, shrinkflation,

207:15

inificication.

207:17

So, I'm going to end up paying the same,

207:19

but you're just going to put ads on it.

207:21

Like, if I like that TV, remember that

207:23

TV that had like the device to make sure

207:25

you were actually watching the ads and

207:27

everything, but the TV was free. Like,

207:29

fine. If I'm going to be the product, I

207:32

shouldn't be paying for it, too. It's

207:34

got to be one or the other. Either I'm

207:35

the customer or the product. It It can't

207:38

be both.

207:40

Be there.

207:42

>> DLL getting another screwdriver to have

207:44

one. [laughter]

207:46

>> Sorry.

207:46

>> I thought maybe someone else would say

207:47

something.

207:48

>> No, I just completely agree.

207:49

>> All right.

207:50

>> And I'd rather not be the product. I'd

207:52

rather buy it. This is the same reason

207:54

why I think local AI stuff is so

207:56

important. I think AI is is super

207:58

interesting and honestly really fun to

208:00

play with. Um, I'm pretty not okay with

208:03

the the moral issues of it being

208:05

entirely built on theft and all that

208:07

kind of stuff. Um,

208:09

but my way of of doing that is I don't

208:12

want to share my usage information. I

208:13

don't want to share all the information

208:14

that I input input into it, etc. with

208:17

companies that did that problem in the

208:18

first place. I don't want to support

208:20

them. So, I'll run it locally. seems

208:24

like the same kind of thing of like I

208:26

would ra it's going to be it the the

208:28

very obvious financial problem with

208:30

running it locally is looking at any of

208:32

the cost of the hardware that would be

208:34

required to run decently advanced models

208:36

and then comparing that to a monthly

208:38

subscription to one of these things and

208:39

just being like what like it is

208:41

currently way more financially efficient

208:44

if you need to run or want to run more

208:46

advanced things to just join a

208:48

subscription thing

208:50

I just I just I don't want

208:53

I am in a financial position where I can

208:55

make that decision. So, I'm going to do

208:57

that.

208:58

>> That's crazy. I thought you were poor.

209:01

>> Doing this might make me poor. Uh,

209:04

>> yeah. We'll see how it goes. But yeah,

209:08

>> 44 weeks. Sorry.

209:10

[laughter]

209:11

Just mad.

209:13

>> Dan hit me.

209:13

>> DLL. Getting another screwdriver to have

209:15

around my building maintenance job for

209:17

the police department. Any advice for

209:20

cleaning laminate floor that's been

209:21

abused for 25 years?

209:22

>> Uh, replace it.

209:24

>> Hopefully it's not blood. [laughter]

209:28

>> Uh, I don't think the floor bleeds.

209:30

>> Also, you're you're the person I would

209:32

ask for that information. [laughter]

209:35

>> Um, yeah, cleaning laminate floor. Uh, I

209:38

don't I I don't think there's really

209:40

anything you can do about beat up

209:41

laminate floor. I think I think that's

209:43

like the whole idea behind it is that

209:45

it's cheaper up front, but then when

209:47

it's done, you just have to throw it

209:49

away and replace it. There's no

209:51

refinishing a laminate floor,

209:52

unfortunately. Um, oh, with that said,

209:56

MRO MUT says, "I think it's an acid they

209:59

use to clean them." Is that Is this a

210:02

thing, guys? Help me out here. Is this a

210:04

thing? Uh, Mind Paradox says, "If it

210:07

isn't actively worn out, you can use TSP

210:09

to clean it really well." Yeah, TSP is a

210:10

cool product. Uh, but it's 25 years,

210:13

guys. It's a and it's in a commercial

210:14

environment. Like, it's got to be

210:17

>> I suspect it's going to be the genuine

210:19

physical damage.

210:20

>> It's got to be. Yeah.

210:21

>> 25 years, guys, cuz we're talking this

210:23

is laminate floor from 2001.

210:27

It laminate floor wasn't good yet 25

210:30

years ago. Like, it's probably the

210:31

crappy stuff.

210:34

H.

210:37

Let's see. TSP. Sodium phosphate.

210:40

Uh, no, not TPS.

210:44

Testicular pain syndrome. What are you

210:46

talking about that for?

210:47

>> No. What? I tagged a specific person. I

210:49

was asking him tokens per second.

210:52

>> Oh, I thought you were talking about TPS

210:53

reports and then I I did the testicular

210:55

pain syndrome.

210:56

>> No, they said

210:57

>> thought it was an Office Space

210:58

reference. Never mind.

210:59

>> They they were responding to the

211:00

previous thing that I said. They said,

211:03

"An M3 Ultra with 512 GB of unified

211:07

memory was my best recent personal

211:08

hardware investment."

211:10

>> And then I was asking them some

211:11

questions about it. What model do you

211:12

run? How much did it cost? What's your

211:14

TPS, etc.

211:15

>> Uh because you can you can fit a massive

211:17

model on something like that. Oh yeah.

211:19

>> Uh but your TPS might be pretty slow.

211:22

Um,

211:23

it sounds like TPS is 8 to 11, which is

211:26

pretty slow, but depending on what your

211:29

use case is, being able to fit that

211:31

massive model on there might be really

211:33

freaking cool. Anyways, uh, I think

211:35

that's pretty sweet.

211:36

>> Arnold Palmer 69 asks, "I would love an

211:39

unfiltered bad news WAN show. You just

211:41

go off about whatever you want. Maybe a

211:42

float plane exclusive." I think we've

211:44

eased off on just the good news stuff,

211:46

but we're just trying to have more of an

211:48

eye out for if there's anything cool.

211:50

trying to be balanced.

211:51

>> Let that bubble to the surface a little

211:53

bit better, which I think is good.

211:54

>> Yeah.

211:55

>> Yeah. All right. Hit me, Dan.

211:57

>> Hey, Lionus and Luke, have you ever

211:59

considered doing a video on the

212:00

performance differences between standard

212:02

monitor aspect ratios and ultra wide

212:04

aspect ratios, 16x9 versus 21x9? There's

212:08

dozens of us. Um, I mean, that's the

212:11

kind of thing that if you are someone

212:14

who has one of those monitors, you can

212:16

very easily explore for yourself. So, we

212:19

tend to we tend to want to test tech

212:21

tips that you can't tick tip yourself

212:25

because you don't have the tech, right?

212:27

Like, all you've got to do is just

212:30

change your in-game resolution to a 16x9

212:33

aspect ratio resolution and then run the

212:35

same benchmark and then

212:38

you've got the answer. So, that I I lean

212:42

away from a little bit. And it's a it's

212:43

a cool idea to just kind of like explore

212:46

resolution scaling, but um we tend to

212:50

focus on 16x9 just because it is so

212:53

ubiquitous and if you must know exactly

212:55

how much of a difference then it Yeah,

212:56

it's something that you can tip

212:58

yourself.

213:00

>> Go tip yourself. Hello.

213:02

>> That was I said it way nicer than that.

213:04

>> I did not. Hello W.L. With physical

213:08

games going out, do you think we'll see

213:10

a renaissance for PC gaming? What's the

213:12

point of consoles if they'll cut down

213:14

PCs? Is Xbox OS PSOS a thing we'll see

213:18

in the future?

213:21

Ah, [sighs] I I would see Xbox and PC

213:24

merging before I would see like a

213:26

separate Xbox OS. Like what what what

213:29

are we going to have like NT kernel and

213:32

freaking uh regular kernel again? Like

213:36

>> go back to Windows X.

213:38

>> Yeah. um [sighs]

213:41

h renaissance for PC gaming. I mean, I

213:44

think the renaissance is happening. Luke

213:45

has talked about this fairly

213:46

extensively, but it's less to do with

213:48

because of OS changes and it's more to

213:50

do with

213:50

>> honestly a lot of really good quite new

213:55

games out

213:56

>> like double A, single A.

213:58

>> Yeah.

213:58

>> Um and it's just down to fragmentation

214:00

from the major gaming companies that

214:03

it's taking place right now. the the

214:04

game of the years over the last little

214:07

bit have been just wicked games.

214:12

007's really fantastic that just came

214:14

out.

214:16

There's there's been some really

214:17

bangers. We We were in uh quite a rough

214:21

area for a while, but we seem to be out

214:23

of it. Gaming seems like a pretty good

214:25

pretty healthy space right now. [snorts]

214:28

>> Hit me, Dan. If I have to. Hey, Mommy

214:31

Luke and R Dan. What's the staggering

214:34

quantity of gamers that absolutely

214:36

despise skill-based matchmaking?

214:38

>> Missed a word.

214:39

>> Uh oh, there's not a lot in here.

214:41

>> What's with with the staggering quantity

214:44

of gamers that absolutely despise

214:47

skill-based matchmaking? Are there any

214:50

other hobbies where people don't enjoy

214:52

fair matches? Does this happen in

214:54

badminton?

214:56

I honestly don't get it either.

215:00

I always love to play the closest

215:03

possible match.

215:04

>> Oh, no. I completely get it.

215:05

>> I would rather lose by one than win by

215:07

10.

215:08

>> The problem is that's not necessarily

215:09

what's happening. Skill-based

215:11

matchmaking is often being misused in

215:14

order to maximize engagement.

215:18

>> Oh, okay.

215:19

>> Skill-based matchmaking, the name makes

215:21

you think that it works in one specific

215:23

way,

215:23

>> but it doesn't work in one specific way.

215:26

Um, you're thinking, okay, obviously

215:29

skill-based matchmaking, we're going to

215:30

match people with as close of skilled

215:32

people as possible and balance the teams

215:34

as well as we can so the game is as even

215:36

as possible so people have as many good

215:38

games as possible instead of wash outs.

215:40

>> It's like not quite. It's often used in

215:43

a way

215:44

>> Oh, right. where you'll be like on the

215:46

verge of being frustrated and wanting to

215:48

give up and then it'll let you like roll

215:50

a team.

215:51

>> They'll give you away.

215:52

>> Yeah. Know, we've talked about this

215:53

actually. It's

215:54

>> I forgot. So, and you know, not every

215:57

company's doing that. Different

215:59

companies do it to different degrees,

216:01

etc., etc., etc. Um, and what the people

216:04

that don't like that that situation is

216:06

even possible. Um, it's EOMM, not SPMM.

216:10

Yeah, cool. Except people call it SPMM

216:11

anyway, so it doesn't really matter. Um,

216:14

it's so like you run into this situation

216:17

where you would rather they just don't

216:19

have their grubby little fingers in it

216:20

at all.

216:22

>> Yeah. But random is not

216:23

>> they don't know what they're doing

216:24

behind the scenes.

216:25

>> Random is trash.

216:26

>> I agree. I'm just saying I understand

216:28

where the argument comes from.

216:29

>> I see.

216:30

>> Um I think online matchmaking is just a

216:33

horrific mess right now in general. I

216:35

don't think there's an answer for it.

216:37

There's way too many cheaters. Someone

216:38

tagged me saying uh

216:42

shoot. Where is it? Maybe they didn't

216:43

tag me. Maybe they just said it. U but

216:46

it was something along the lines of like

216:48

there's there's so many cheaters that

216:49

it's not balanced anyways. Um,

216:53

yeah,

216:53

>> in badminton I would say it.

216:56

>> Yeah, Conrad said uh Dota 2 had has uh

217:00

Yeah, I don't know. There's a Conrad

217:01

quoting Dota 2 has 50 a forced 50% win

217:04

rate. Some games are balanced. Sometimes

217:06

it's completely unwinable or unlosable.

217:09

It's just like

217:13

why don't we not even bother playing the

217:15

game

217:15

>> like a moa? [clears throat]

217:16

>> Yeah. Why don't we just Why don't we

217:18

just flip a coin and be excited when it

217:20

lands heads? Like I

217:21

>> Yeah. So then So then that comes back to

217:24

the like, well, you might as well just

217:25

throw everybody in the pot and see how

217:26

it goes.

217:28

>> But that's not how it has to be because

217:30

it could actually just be skill-based

217:31

matchmaking, right?

217:32

>> Like a lot of skill-based matchmaking

217:34

systems were or some that still are.

217:36

Lots probably majority that still are to

217:38

be honest. Um, but I think in my

217:41

perspective, that's why people don't

217:42

like it is because they've heard about

217:45

the fact that these things happen. And

217:47

you can call it other acronyms all you

217:48

want, but the the gaming companies will

217:50

often call it skill-based matchmaking.

217:52

Um, even if that's not really what it

217:54

is. Um,

217:58

>> uh, as for whether it happens in

218:00

badminton, I would actually say more

218:01

often it happens the other way where

218:04

you'll have people that will prefer

218:07

>> to, uh, take the worst partner on court

218:11

so that they can like

218:13

>> they just play the whole game,

218:14

>> hot dog um, and and kind of ballhog

218:18

against

218:19

>> hot dog.

218:20

>> Yeah, hot like hot dogging.

218:23

Never heard of this term.

218:24

>> Shut up. Okay. I'm h I've had this

218:26

conversation heard of that term either.

218:27

>> Yeah, but you're from Britain. Who cares

218:29

what you think? [laughter]

218:30

>> Oh, you mean bangering?

218:32

>> Bangering.

218:34

Um, this is the second time this week

218:38

that I've run into something like this.

218:40

I was at uh we were shooting an AMD

218:42

Ultimate Tech upgrade earlier this week

218:43

for Jordan and I walk in. I'm like,

218:46

"Hey, can I borrow your washroom?" And

218:48

they all start laughing at me. They go,

218:49

"What do you mean borrow it?" You know,

218:51

was there ever any possibility you

218:52

weren't going to give it back? I was

218:53

like, "No, that's a thing." THEY'RE

218:55

LIKE, "YEAH, SEE RIGHT ABOUT THAT ONE."

218:57

>> I'm right about hot dogging, too. Look

218:59

at the chat. People know.

219:00

>> What is hot dog?

219:01

>> It's showing off.

219:04

>> Sure. I'm not against it. I've just

219:06

never heard of it.

219:06

>> It's totally a thing.

219:07

>> Never heard that in Canada.

219:09

>> Uh Jay Hirshman says, "4s Midwesterner

219:12

here. I know that term." Yeah, people

219:13

know what I'm talking about.

219:14

>> Oh, it's cuz you're old.

219:17

>> Look, listen. [laughter] Listen. Get out

219:19

of here. that much older than I am.

219:21

>> You get out of here, too.

219:22

>> Yeah, but you're British.

219:24

>> God damn it. So, [laughter]

219:27

>> so it's more it's more often that this

219:30

would happen where people would like

219:32

want to show off

219:33

>> like they can they can onev2 the other

219:36

the other two players versus like

219:38

someone trying to stack a team with the

219:41

two best players on the court just so

219:43

that they can crush the other team.

219:44

However, and however, I do run into

219:47

people occasionally where I'll go and

219:48

I'll play somewhere that I'm not

219:50

familiar or at like a drop in or

219:51

something and I'll say, you know, hey,

219:54

what's what's a balanced match here and

219:56

someone will intentionally grab a better

219:58

player and and we'll do that, but it's

220:01

very rare and highly dishonorable. So,

220:04

it it really doesn't happen that often.

220:06

More often, what'll happen is if people

220:07

aren't sure how to balance the teams, uh

220:09

we'll do something uh Okay, you can come

220:12

back. Not you though. Um, we'll do

220:16

something called racket spinning. So,

220:18

you you hold your racket neck here and

220:20

then you spin the handle and then you

220:22

stop it and then the logo on the bottom,

220:25

if it's up or down, you just point in

220:27

the direction of your logo and whoever

220:29

matches the direction plays together.

220:31

>> Yeah. Cool.

220:32

>> And if you have too many, like if

220:34

everyone gets up, then you just spin

220:35

again.

220:36

>> The the type of game where you might not

220:38

be able to find a perfect matchup

220:40

anyways, so you just do what you can.

220:42

>> Yeah. And I mean a lot of the time

220:43

really strong players like I was playing

220:45

with uh my buddy Jaden last night and

220:47

he's just an absolute god. Um so he was

220:51

playing with me against two guys who are

220:53

very strong like too good for me to play

220:55

against normally. So and then he just

220:57

like adjusts. [laughter] He's like well

221:00

I don't have to smash with my full

221:02

power. I could do 70%. Which is not

221:05

enough to just they don't touch it at

221:08

all but not enough for them to return

221:10

comfortably. So that gives Lionus an

221:13

opportunity to like get practice his net

221:15

kills. [laughter]

221:16

>> Like he's one of those players that just

221:18

like

221:19

>> I will turn the dial

221:20

>> dictates 30% down.

221:21

>> Yeah. Unless you're also like a super

221:24

high level player then and he has to try

221:25

against you.

221:27

>> Anyway, [clears throat]

221:29

>> discussion question relating to my job.

221:32

Has it become too complicated? At what

221:34

point do layers of redundancy, security,

221:37

virtualization, and monitoring create

221:39

more failure points than they prevent?

221:43

Um,

221:45

I'll be honest with you, I feel the same

221:47

way sometimes. Like, every time we have

221:51

uh an issue with our VLANs, I'm just

221:53

like, "Fuck it. Get rid of them." Like,

221:56

not really, but I I have that

221:58

>> I was going to say, "We definitely want

221:59

them." I understand. I understand. But

222:02

we we definitely do.

222:03

>> I know we want them, but it's just like

222:06

>> they configure them, right?

222:07

>> I think this so rest assured just said

222:09

something that I think is a really

222:10

important point here. He said, "Bruh,

222:12

I'm getting into infraes code. Effing

222:15

kill me."

222:16

>> And I think that's probably where your

222:17

feeling is coming from is I I think

222:19

there's tons of benefits from this

222:21

virtualization, monitoring, etc. is is

222:24

incredible. the stuff that like

222:25

Jonathan's been up to uh with with

222:28

Kubernetes has been just honestly wild

222:31

and very interesting and entertaining to

222:34

watch. Uh

222:36

really awesome. If you don't have a

222:38

Jonathan, um, that gets complicated.

222:40

Yeah. And I think it's also kind of a

222:43

little interesting because you're taking

222:44

very traditional IT people

222:48

and mashing them into this infra code

222:51

thing

222:52

and it's not always mixing super great.

222:58

And sometimes like one of the ways that

222:59

we've kind of tried to set up our team

223:01

is that we have people that are more on

223:03

the infras code thing and we have people

223:04

that are less on the infres code thing

223:07

cuz you still need both. But if you're

223:09

like an individual solo IT person,

223:15

mastering both sides of that is yeah I

223:17

mean I can understand too complicated.

223:19

It's basically two jobs.

223:21

>> Um

223:21

>> but at certain size of company there

223:24

aren't two salary budgets.

223:26

>> Totally. So

223:28

>> yeah. Um,

223:29

>> good luck.

223:32

>> Yeah. Is it becoming too complicated? I

223:34

think it's doing the thing that it

223:35

should do. I think a lot of the infras

223:38

code stuff totally makes sense to be

223:39

completely honest. Is that difficult and

223:42

rough on a lot of people? I'm 100%

223:45

certain.

223:45

>> Yeah. Papa Pac-Man says, "As somebody in

223:48

the hospital IT environment, VMs can

223:50

solve and cause a bunch of problems."

223:53

>> Totally. Yeah.

223:54

>> There you go.

223:55

>> Yep.

223:56

>> All right. All right, hit me. Dan,

223:58

>> what's up, boys? Lionus, do you find

224:01

your life to be busier when your kids

224:03

are in or out of school?

224:04

>> Every year, we plan for how our life is

224:08

going to be gloriously unusy during the

224:10

summer because we don't have to deal

224:11

with school. And every year we discover

224:13

aesh that it's actually um busier.

224:17

>> There's no way. [laughter]

224:19

I mean, our kids are older now, so it's

224:21

they're pretty low maintenance if we

224:23

don't sign them up for a bajillion

224:25

summer camps, World Scholars Cup. And

224:28

>> when are you going to not do that?

224:30

>> I don't know. When we stop wanting to

224:32

overachieve as parents, I guess, which I

224:35

mean, you've seen my wife, you've met

224:36

her, you know what she's like. So,

224:38

>> yeah. So, never, I guess. Uh, how long

224:40

>> even when they're moved out, I suspect

224:42

we're still going to like, you know, be

224:44

doing the rounds, you know, dinner

224:46

delivery and whatnot going.

224:48

>> Yeah. Uh, this is somewhat rhetorical

224:50

because I don't necessarily want you to

224:51

give the answer away. Uh, but how many

224:54

years until a little man can drive?

224:57

>> Oh, less than two

224:58

>> on his own.

224:59

>> Uh, that I don't know. I'd have to look

225:01

that up.

225:01

>> I'm not sure what the current rules on.

225:03

>> It's Dude, it's crazy.

225:05

>> Used to be one.

225:07

>> It's two years.

225:11

>> Dude, I can't I can't believe how

225:14

quickly everything's going by. Like I

225:18

feel so old. What What is What is the

225:20

new meme? Like getting into beekeeping

225:22

or something? Like I'm reaching

225:23

beekeeping age now.

225:24

>> Is that a Is that a thing?

225:25

>> Apparently it's a thing. Someone was

225:26

saying it's like it's like a it's like a

225:28

midlife crisis thing. Beekeeping trend.

225:33

>> I like that one actually. That seems

225:34

pretty good.

225:35

>> That's kind of cool.

225:35

>> I dig that one.

225:36

>> But nobody has enough property to like

225:38

get a beehive.

225:39

>> Urban beekeeping.

225:40

>> Urban beekeeping. Well, it's it's also

225:43

calling you old and and rich, I guess,

225:45

which is what Boomer was. So, like it

225:48

wouldn't be now.

225:50

>> Yeah, that's fair. [laughter]

225:52

>> Only they get to own a yard.

225:54

>> Yeah.

225:54

>> The wellness trend which has the social

225:58

set all ab buzz. How beekeeping became

226:01

the hobby beloved by the A-list and

226:03

royals alike for its meditative

226:05

qualities. Uh, this is from Tatapler. I

226:08

have no idea what a tatler is, but um

226:12

pictured David Beckham with Romeo Cruz

226:14

and Harper.

226:16

>> Oh, so it's not beekeeping.

226:19

>> This isn't like

226:19

>> it's even beyond

226:21

>> Prince and Princess of Wales just doing

226:24

beekeeping, you know, royal people and

226:26

whatnot. James Middleton.

226:30

Um

226:30

>> I mean, somebody's got to keep the bees

226:32

alive,

226:33

>> I suppose. So

226:34

>> maybe it'll be the ultra rich

226:35

>> new Netflix series.

226:38

What is he dinging?

226:39

>> I don't know.

226:40

>> Oh, he's dinging every time we use the

226:42

word be.

226:45

>> Stop,

226:47

>> dork. [laughter]

226:50

Sorry. Thoughts on the Mount Pleasant

226:54

data center? Data center bad, but maybe

226:57

it should affect people who use it, not

226:59

just small communities. Thanks for

227:01

screwdrivers. This is the third one I've

227:03

bought. They're great.

227:04

>> Oh, terrific. I'm glad you like it. Uh,

227:06

what's Mount Pleasant?

227:09

>> It is a place.

227:10

>> Where's this? Oh, this is Oh, this is

227:12

here. Oh, we're having a Mount Pleasant

227:14

data center. Oh, it's like near Science

227:16

World.

227:16

>> I didn't know we were building.

227:18

>> Yeah, it's by like the Timmy's just

227:19

south of Science World.

227:21

>> That seems insane.

227:23

>> I mean, that kind of makes sense. I

227:25

mean, there's data centers in urban

227:27

places.

227:29

>> This one doesn't.

227:33

I

227:33

>> mean, I put it there over East Hastings.

227:38

If those were the only two options on

227:39

earth, I'd go Mount Pleasant. It's right

227:41

in the name. Miss Pleasant.

227:42

>> It w it might actually be a way better

227:44

idea to put it at East Hastings.

227:46

>> Really do go on.

227:47

>> Okay. So, you can't keep stores open

227:49

there,

227:50

>> right?

227:51

>> Reasons.

227:52

[snorts] Uh what if it just wasn't a

227:54

storefront?

227:57

>> Uh I mean, yeah, any data center is

227:59

going to have like security up the

228:01

rectum. So,

228:02

>> and probably only one entrance anyways.

228:04

So instead of a bunch of closed

228:06

storefronts, they could just have a

228:08

wall.

228:10

>> You're not really going to you're not

228:12

really going to promote the idea of just

228:14

building walls, are you?

228:15

>> Well, no. It's Well, every every

228:17

building has a wall. I don't mean that

228:19

kind of a wall.

228:20

>> And we'll make the wall of a building.

228:22

That's my only point to be clear.

228:24

>> Oh my god.

228:25

>> Who's going to pay for it? Maybe Mexico.

228:27

[laughter]

228:31

>> Uh anyway, we can move on. Uh, I didn't

228:33

know it was happening, so I don't really

228:35

have any thoughts on this.

228:36

>> Me neither. Yeah. I don't know. Sorry.

228:38

>> I mean, it seems like everyone's getting

228:39

data centered, so I guess we got data

228:41

center.

228:41

>> I'm interested in AI stuff. I'm not

228:43

interested in the data center side of AI

228:45

stuff. I'm interested in the running it

228:46

myself.

228:47

>> Yeah.

228:47

>> Side of AI stuff.

228:49

>> Loud, lanky, and lurking. Considering

228:52

making robotics or electronics content.

228:55

They're getting really weird with these.

228:57

Uh, do you find enough fulfillment in

228:59

making content versus traditional work?

229:01

I think about the early days before you

229:03

were making products and float plane.

229:06

>> Um,

229:08

yeah. I mean, it's uh it's one of those

229:10

things where I think everyone needs

229:12

occasional reminders, but people go out

229:15

of their way to do it often enough that

229:17

I don't really struggle with it. Um,

229:20

like especially attending OpenSauce was

229:22

really cool because like more than this

229:26

many people were like, "Yeah, I started

229:30

watching you when I was this high and

229:32

now I have this degree or I'm working on

229:35

this incredible job and I wouldn't have

229:37

gotten started on it if it wasn't for

229:39

LTT and thank you so much." And I'm

229:41

like, "Bro, you know stuff better than I

229:45

do now. Don't thank me. Thank yourself."

229:46

But they're like, "No, really. like you

229:48

ignited my passion for this and and I I

229:50

think it's really awesome and that kind

229:52

of stuff really just it makes my entire

229:54

week.

229:55

>> Met an engineer at Google who if I

229:57

remember correctly started watching us

229:59

in elementary school.

230:00

>> Good lord.

230:01

>> Sounds like

230:03

>> Yeah, I [laughter] know, right?

230:06

>> But super cool, right? Cuz that's

230:08

awesome.

230:09

>> That's our job. That's what we do. We

230:11

don't make content. We build community

230:14

if we if we want to like really drill

230:16

down to what we do that is actually

230:18

meaningful. Yeah. Conrad just posted in

230:20

float plane chat. He's like NCX tech

230:22

tips got me into tech and now I work for

230:24

you. [laughter]

230:26

Like it's it's a thing. And uh and it's

230:30

really cool. And so I I go out of my way

230:32

once in a while to send it over to HR so

230:35

they can include it in like the weekly

230:36

emails or post it on a fridge here and

230:39

there. like these emails people send me

230:41

or messages and

230:42

>> this is why I'm and I understand there's

230:44

there's lots of reasons why we stopped

230:46

doing it like many and good ones

230:48

>> but this is why I mourn the loss of LTX

230:50

is I think this was a really interesting

230:52

thing for a ton of people at the company

230:54

to experience because I get to

230:55

experience it when I go to shows you get

230:57

to experience it all the time

230:59

>> most people at the company are never

231:01

going to experience that

231:02

>> that's true

231:03

>> and it's just like the the stuff that we

231:04

do is actually very very interesting

231:09

I I on my side of things, I do miss

231:11

content creation a little bit. There

231:13

were also reasons why I was happy to

231:14

leave it. Um

231:20

I don't know. I think I do not envy the

231:24

content creation teams at Linus Media

231:25

Group right now.

231:29

I don't think some of the guys that work

231:32

here could even imagine what it was like

231:35

when you and I first started. Oh, it was

231:37

crazy

231:37

>> when stuff would just show up and it was

231:40

like, "Hey, look, great content showed

231:43

up at the door. I guess we'll make great

231:46

content out of it." Like, it's such an

231:48

insanely different game now.

231:50

>> It's hard.

231:51

>> And I I started getting kind of

231:53

frustrated near the end of my tenure of

231:55

being a writer, uh, with like, man,

231:58

there's all this crap now.

231:59

>> You used to joke that you could just

232:01

write a GPU review

232:02

>> ahead of time

232:03

>> with just looking at the price.

232:05

>> Yeah. So you would just be like, "Yeah,

232:07

it'll perform this percent faster than

232:10

this other card and this percent slower

232:12

than this other card."

232:13

>> And that was very soul destroying and

232:15

it's still possible by the way. Uh but

232:17

that was very soul destroying because

232:19

when I got into computers, it was like

232:21

>> I remember when I like really got into

232:23

it into into not just being like, "Wow,

232:26

computers are cool. I like using

232:27

Windows. What can I do on Windows?" but

232:29

like actually building stuff and like

232:30

the performance aspect was around like

232:32

the 8000 series, 7000 series and Nvidia

232:34

GPUs. And that was not the case back

232:37

then.

232:38

>> It was a wild landscape of of craziness

232:41

and overclocking and and different

232:43

binning stuff. And I remember you go on

232:45

forums and there's there's entire

232:47

subsections just for people doing

232:48

binning and firmware unlocks,

232:50

>> all this crazy. It was a wild

232:52

environment to be in. And now it's like

232:55

>> uh you know,

232:56

>> there's some cool stuff coming. No, I I

232:59

>> So, you know about one of them, but you

233:01

don't know about another really cool

233:02

that kind of wild westy thing that I've

233:04

got in my office right now.

233:05

>> Oh, really?

233:06

>> Yeah. There's some cool stuff still.

233:08

>> We just got to dig for it.

233:09

>> It's kind of sparking up right now in a

233:11

weird way.

233:11

>> I feel like it is. I'm actually I'm

233:13

actually

233:14

>> The unfortunate part is no one can

233:15

afford it, but there is very very

233:18

interesting things happening.

233:19

>> The thing in my office is really cool

233:21

and very affordable.

233:22

>> Okay. Sick

233:23

>> for now.

233:23

>> Sick.

233:24

>> Uh so, sick sick.

233:25

>> Yeah. I don't know how it's going to go

233:27

after we make our video,

233:29

>> right? Yeah,

233:30

>> that's the LTT effect.

233:32

>> Yeah, but it's it's it's

233:36

I don't know. Yeah, maybe maybe

233:39

L and I have been talking. Maybe there

233:41

will be stuff again.

233:42

>> I think I I think there will. And I've

233:45

got ideas for, you know, what our future

233:48

content's going to look like that will,

233:51

I think, help rejuvenate things. I'm

233:54

actually I had a chat with the whole

233:56

writing team actually two one Friday

233:57

ago, two Fridays ago,

233:59

>> I forget what it was, but basically I

234:01

told them I'm like I'm more excited

234:03

about the future of our content right

234:05

now than I think I've been in years. And

234:07

I think part of it is just sort of an

234:09

attitude realignment on my side. And

234:10

part of it is that things are there are

234:12

some exciting things happening right now

234:14

behind the you know RAM and storage

234:17

price increases.

234:19

>> It's people are getting scrappy again.

234:22

>> Yeah. And it's kind of cool. Yeah. And

234:24

like one of the I used to say this and I

234:26

know Lionus hates it and I understand

234:27

why he hates it and it's a valid

234:28

opinion, but I I will chirp negatively

234:31

about computer building by saying that

234:32

it's just electronic Legos.

234:34

>> Oh, it is not. I know.

234:35

>> It's so that's such

234:38

>> It's a It's electronic Duplo.

234:41

>> It is not [laughter]

234:42

>> a skill skill issue.

234:44

>> But one of the reasons why I used to

234:45

throw that like basically insult out was

234:48

because it was getting boring. Not

234:50

because it was actually electronic

234:51

Legos, but because it was getting

234:52

boring.

234:53

>> And you just called them Legos. So,

234:55

anyone that you didn't upset by

234:57

[laughter]

234:58

>> cuz it's just Lego, right? Legos already

234:59

plural or whatever. Whatever. Um,

235:02

>> silly geese. [laughter] Goosees. Sorry,

235:05

I meant to say goosees.

235:06

>> Um,

235:07

>> anyway, [snorts]

235:08

>> it's it's fun for me when I have to mess

235:12

with stuff.

235:13

>> Yeah.

235:14

>> And we're getting kind of back into that

235:17

realm.

235:18

>> Yeah. Oh, I agree.

235:19

>> Which is kind of cool.

235:22

>> It's just really expensive.

235:24

>> Yeah.

235:25

[sighs]

235:26

>> All right. Get ready to be as triggered

235:27

as I was. Go ahead, Dan.

235:29

>> Yeah. Last one I've got. Uh, hi Zev.

235:32

Anyone read Dungeon Crawler Carl yet?

235:34

>> Nope. Sorry.

235:36

>> Tons of fun. Great audiobook narration.

235:37

Also, what category is Water Bottle

235:40

under? I had to search.

235:44

>> All right, let's play.

235:46

>> Luke, go ahead.

235:47

>> Contentious. What would you like to

235:48

click on? No. No. Over here. Okay.

235:53

>> Oh man. Is it bags and accessories or

235:55

home and decor? I'm going to go home and

235:56

decor.

235:56

>> Home and decor.

235:58

>> Yeah,

236:00

>> there you go.

236:01

>> Cuz bag Okay. What's under bags and

236:03

accessories though? Cuz bags and

236:04

accessories has socks still.

236:06

>> Yes.

236:06

>> So that I just have no idea then.

236:08

>> So the reason this has socks, I did

236:10

actually ask that is apparently that is

236:12

industry standard categorization.

236:14

>> I Googled it. Well,

236:17

>> and they seem to be right.

236:21

>> It does depend on the type of brand you

236:23

are.

236:24

>> No, no, I got to interject.

236:27

>> Why Why can't we just have it in

236:28

multiple places?

236:29

>> I love I love Goblin Dan.

236:31

>> I have I have an opinion question. Why

236:35

can't it be in multiple places? So, if

236:37

something is obvious for one person that

236:39

you could just click on it cuz they're

236:40

both hypertext links that go to the same

236:42

like page.

236:43

>> I do wonder about that because the It

236:46

seems like the standardization of socks

236:48

being under accessories

236:50

>> from my googling which might be

236:51

inaccurate to be very clear but from my

236:53

googling is more for like fashion brands

236:56

high fashion brands mostly.

236:58

>> Mhm.

236:59

>> I don't know how many people shopping on

237:02

LT store based on our audience

237:04

demographics spend a ton of time on like

237:08

high fashion websites.

237:10

>> So maybe they would look under

237:12

apparel.

237:14

>> Yeah. Just put them

237:16

>> especially because

237:18

>> would it be a bottom?

237:19

>> I thought the high fashion brands also

237:21

thought that underwear was an accessory.

237:24

>> Maybe

237:27

>> I am extremely hyper the wrong person to

237:30

talk to about.

237:31

>> Why don't we establish a committee?

237:33

>> No.

237:34

>> Okay. I'm just I'm over it right now.

237:37

Just temporarily. At some point I will

237:39

be ready to play this crusade again, but

237:41

right now I'm over it.

237:42

>> I don't mind Dan's approach. Just put it

237:44

in both places.

237:45

>> Why don't we just put them under

237:46

everything?

237:47

>> Why doesn't it no matter what you hover

237:49

over it just has one long list of

237:51

everything we sell? [laughter]

237:55

We'll incre It will infinitely increase

237:57

discoverability on our site by exp why

238:01

would you have to hover over anything?

238:02

Why don't we just have a big long list

238:04

of everything on our site just on the

238:07

homepage?

238:08

>> You should just make it like an HTML

238:10

directory.

238:12

Just old school style.

238:13

>> Just like that blank product list,

238:17

>> white page, the old blue text. Oh, I

238:19

would love that.

238:19

>> Yeah.

238:20

>> All right. And on that note,

238:21

>> water bottle nightly.

238:22

>> I got to go put my chickens away. So,

238:24

we'll see you again next week. Same bad

238:26

time, same bad channel.

238:27

>> Play with them a little bit first. Okay.

238:28

Bye.

238:30

>> You told me to play with my

238:32

[laughter]

238:32

>> Yeah. No, no one's home. You're home

238:34

alone with your four

238:40

Oh, and you got uh Andy got some I I

238:43

don't know if I'm supposed to believe

238:44

that or not. Anyway, good night

238:45

everyone. [laughter]

Interactive Summary

This WAN show covers Linus's solo week and personal anecdotes, controversial tech news like the exclusive GTA 6 trailer on Netflix and apps turning smart TVs into residential proxies. Discussions also include the 'secret Netflix for billionaires' (Kaleidescape), Google Assistant's problematic replacement by Gemini, LTT's power bank production delays due to IC shortages, BMW's in-car ads, and the gaming industry's layoffs versus backward compatibility efforts. The hosts also delve into LMG's ethical stance on sponsorships and the complexities of modern IT infrastructure.

Suggested questions

8 ready-made prompts