HomeVideos

“There Is No Legal Confidentiality When Using Chat GPT” Facing The AI Privacy Issue

Now Playing

“There Is No Legal Confidentiality When Using Chat GPT” Facing The AI Privacy Issue

Transcript

184 segments

0:00

We should talk about this this um AI

0:02

privacy issue that Sam Alman mentioned.

0:03

>> All right, that's a great segue because

0:05

I saw that as well, David Saxs, and uh

0:08

as our civil servant working on AI, this

0:10

is something where you can have an

0:11

additional contribution. There's more

0:13

work we can give you. All right, listen.

0:15

Here it is. AI user privacy is becoming

0:17

an issue because friend of the pod Sam

0:20

Alman says there is no legal

0:22

confidentiality when using his product

0:25

Chat GPT. Here's a 30 second clip again.

0:29

Friend of the pod fop Sam Alman on Theo

0:33

Vaughn.

0:34

>> People talk about the most personal

0:35

in their lives to chatt young people

0:37

especially like use it as a therapist, a

0:39

life coach, uh having these relationship

0:41

problems. What should I do? And right

0:43

now if you talk to a therapist or a

0:46

lawyer or a doctor about those problems,

0:48

there's like legal privilege for it. We

0:50

haven't figured that out yet for when

0:51

you talk to Chad GBT. So if you go talk

0:53

to CHP about your most sensitive stuff

0:54

and then there's like a lawsuit or

0:56

whatever, like we could be required to

0:58

produce that and I think that's very

0:59

screwed up. I think we should have like

1:01

the same concept of privacy for your

1:03

conversations with AI that we do with a

1:06

therapist or whatever.

1:07

>> Okay, Saxs, this is bringing up

1:09

something super important.

1:11

>> What's your take on it? Okay. Well, I I

1:13

think this is an interesting topic

1:14

because like copyright, this is an area

1:16

where we have existing law, but it does

1:20

make you rethink whether those laws are

1:23

truly applicable or make as much sense

1:26

in this new world. So, the existing law,

1:30

the existing example is search history.

1:32

You know, the government can get a copy

1:34

of your search history. They can

1:36

subpoena it.

1:36

>> Yeah. Every true crime story starts with

1:39

the person's search for how do I kill my

1:41

husband slowly with you know poison and

1:43

then they Yeah. That's

1:44

>> right. Exactly. The point is though that

1:48

I think Sam is right about the legal

1:50

treatment right now which is that your

1:53

chat history isn't any different than

1:55

the search history in the eyes of the

1:57

law. But it is much more personal. It's

1:59

much more interactive than your search

2:01

history. You are using it like you said.

2:03

You could use it as a as your doctor.

2:05

You could use it as your therapist. You

2:07

could use as your lawyer. And so the

2:10

ability for the federal government to be

2:12

intrusive is so much greater than with

2:15

your search history. So I don't know

2:18

what like the right policy should be

2:21

yet, but I I will say it does make me

2:23

uncomfortable.

2:24

>> Yeah, there's a market.

2:26

>> Can I make a recommendation to my AIR?

2:28

>> Yes, please. He's our

2:30

>> Why don't we let AI models get bar

2:34

certified and get medically certified?

2:38

So if the AI models, it turns out, are

2:40

actually proving to be more accurate,

2:43

more thoughtful,

2:45

more responsive, more reasonable,

2:47

whatever it is, whatever metric we're

2:48

using, and they pass the same criteria

2:51

as one would need to pass to qualify for

2:53

the bar or to qualify for a doctor

2:56

certificate. Why don't we do that for

2:57

the AI? If that then happens, then the

3:00

the same privilege occurs to the AI as

3:02

it does to the individual human that

3:04

does it. And now if you extrapolate from

3:05

where that takes us, if we're suddenly

3:07

giving AI the same sort of privileged

3:09

rights that we give to privileged

3:10

humans, where's that going to take us

3:12

ultimately with respect to the overall

3:14

rights for AI?

3:14

>> Well, and they have responsibility. Hold

3:16

on a second. I just want to point out

3:18

here once again, you have a mind-blowing

3:20

concept here. I've never heard anybody

3:22

vocalize that. Could they actually be

3:23

certified in that knowledge? And if they

3:26

pass the test, makes sense they would.

3:27

But then you also get responsibility. So

3:29

with great power comes great

3:30

responsibility. I will tell you this.

3:32

>> You can turn this stuff off. But this is

3:34

an opportunity. I'm going to send a note

3:35

to El.

3:36

>> It sounds crazy today, but I guarantee

3:37

if you put it on Poly Market, there will

3:39

be a date when this happens.

3:39

>> Let's do it. Poly market. Shout out to

3:41

Shane. Let's get that up there. I just

3:43

want to point out I'm going to email

3:44

Elon about this when I get off the pod.

3:46

>> This is an opportunity to create the

3:47

signal of the signal equivalent of an

3:50

LLM. The all of your chat should be

3:52

encrypted. All of it should be by by

3:55

default. encrypt it by default on Grock.

3:57

Make it so that Grock can't even see it.

4:00

They don't have it. So when you try to

4:01

subpoena it, you can do what Tim Cook

4:03

does, which he says like I don't have

4:04

it. You if you want to try to back door

4:07

it, you can. That's a market

4:08

opportunity. I can tell you I only use

4:10

the Brave browser and Brave search for

4:12

this reason. I don't want my search

4:14

history like saved somewhere or

4:16

whatever. That you can take control of

4:18

this as an individual, but the defaults

4:20

matter and you have to then do the work.

4:22

It's a great market opportunity. Hey

4:23

Chimoth, I don't even want to know what

4:24

you're talking to chat GPT about. What

4:26

are you What's in your chat GBT logs?

4:29

What's in there, Chimoth? How to extend?

4:31

How to get the extra centimeter? What's

4:32

in there? You trying to

4:35

What's in there?

4:36

>> I keep asking it to find me a moderator.

4:38

>> Oh, great. I keep asking it to find me a

4:41

participant who's not a douche. Um,

4:47

>> my god, you are so deep in your villain

4:49

era and you're leaning into it and I'm

4:51

so here for it. I love your villain.

4:53

>> You know why I am so

4:55

>> Why are you going into your villain era?

4:56

>> I am so riskon right now. It's like

4:59

>> it's liberating actually. It's amazing.

5:03

>> It's really amazing.

5:04

>> Is there any blowback to how outlandish

5:07

you've become this year? Any blowback at

5:09

all? Has it had any negative consequence

5:11

on business or hiring or anything?

5:13

>> No. But but outlandish? How how have I

5:15

been outlandish?

5:16

>> You're you're you're just filter off.

5:18

You're filter off as And I think it's

5:20

great. I think the over two windows

5:21

back. It's absolutely fantastic we're

5:23

seeing here. I asked Chad GPT about my

5:25

future and uh my IQ. It's very

5:27

interesting when you ask ChatGpt to

5:28

analyze you.

5:29

>> I suggest everyone do it.

5:30

>> Well, actually, yeah, when you just ask

5:32

ChatGpt or whatever, what do you know

5:34

about me?

5:36

>> And it's scary how much it already does.

5:38

>> It's scary. There's this great

5:39

personality test. You can put this

5:40

personality test into Grock and this guy

5:42

like made this prompt and it goes and it

5:45

tells you all your personality based on

5:47

your Twitter ex history. It is wild how

5:50

accurate it is. What does it say about

5:51

you, Jal? I'm actually curious.

5:53

>> It says the same thing about all of us.

5:55

We're all likeworked

5:57

narcissist ENTJ. You can literally run

6:00

the MyersBriggs against your

6:02

>> Yeah.

6:03

>> your chat history. It's actually But I I

6:05

like your mind-blowing concept there, by

6:07

the way, of like them becoming certified

6:09

in some

Interactive Summary

Loading summary...