HomeVideos

What’s the Deal With Trump’s “Binky,” Natalie Harp? | Pivot

Now Playing

What’s the Deal With Trump’s “Binky,” Natalie Harp? | Pivot

Transcript

1698 segments

0:00

There's a bunch of photos of Natalie

0:01

Harp smiling at him like that new movie

0:03

Obsession, you know, the new horror

0:04

movie that's coming out. She's standing

0:06

in the corner like smiling at him. I

0:08

swear to God [laughter] if you look at

0:09

these photos.

0:15

Hi everyone, this is Pivot from New York

0:17

Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast

0:19

Network. I'm Carara Swisser and I'm

0:20

kicking off another week of

0:24

Got Bree August.

0:29

Oh, he never gets sick of that. Yeah,

0:31

Scott is still away. I don't know where

0:33

he is. He has not been in touch, which

0:34

is a good sign or a bad sign. So, uh, I

0:37

think he's on some island. He might be

0:39

who knows where he is in some expensive

0:41

place. Um, so I brought on a co-host

0:44

Scott would approve of a young man. It's

0:47

Adam. No, no, that sounds weird. Okay,

0:50

>> it didn't sound weird till you said it

0:51

sounds weird. It was fine. Anyway, it's

0:53

Adam Mockler, Gen Z commentator and host

0:56

of the Adam Mockler show. Talk a little

0:59

bit about your background for people who

1:00

don't know.

1:00

>> First of all, I just want to say thanks

1:02

for having me on. I'm excited to

1:03

co-host. I really appreciate how you

1:05

guys do put attention on young male

1:07

issues, which is obviously what you were

1:08

getting towards. You guys talk about it

1:09

in a very unique way, and that means a

1:11

lot. I'm 23 years old and I'm building a

1:14

media company in Chicago. I've got a

1:16

team of five to six scrappy people. I do

1:18

a lot of debates and a lot of political

1:20

content online and I've just built this

1:23

over the past 2 to 3 years, but also

1:25

over the past decade or so. I I made my

1:27

YouTube channel when I was 9 years old

1:29

and I used to make Call of Duty videos.

1:30

You're 23. Okay.

1:32

>> I used to make these Call of Duty and

1:33

Minecraft videos. Many young people have

1:35

experiences where they would make like

1:36

these gaming videos and that kind of

1:39

sprouted into me doing political videos

1:41

when I graduated high school. I would go

1:43

to Trump rallies and debate the

1:44

supporters there and now it's turned

1:46

into this. Now I speak to some young

1:47

male issues, political issues.

1:49

>> Where did you go to college? Did you go

1:50

you went to college, correct?

1:51

>> Yes. And in Indiana for one year and

1:54

then I dropped out after going to

1:56

college for a year. It just it was too

1:58

much of a balance between

1:59

>> Zuckerberg. Little Mark Zuckerberg

2:00

action.

2:01

>> Something like that. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

2:02

People always say Charlie Kirk cuz he

2:04

dropped out too and did politics, but I

2:05

I don't know. I think Zuckerberg I like

2:07

that a little bit more. I like

2:08

>> use that one. What What is your hopes

2:10

and dreams of what you want to make? I

2:12

just want to make politics accessible

2:14

for a younger generation by, you know,

2:16

using the vehicles to my advantage, such

2:19

as short form content. Short form

2:20

content is a really powerful vehicle for

2:22

posting debate content and clips. And I

2:25

I just want to keep building my own

2:27

show, my own apparatus. I worked with

2:28

Midas Touch uh for a while and now I'm

2:31

building my own sort of machine on my

2:33

side. So my goal is to just keep scaling

2:35

and expanding and making politics

2:37

accessible,

2:38

>> right? Because it's been a lot less

2:39

expensive. I mean I hate to tell you but

2:41

I happen to be the OG of this met 10 a

2:43

decade two decades ago really when we

2:45

left the Wall Street Journal and it's

2:47

very exciting. It is you know one of the

2:49

things a lot of people who are doing

2:51

this like you are always like oh should

2:53

I leave I'm like yes like it's such an

2:55

an interesting time to do this. I find

2:57

independent media to be unique and you

2:59

probably found this as well because you

3:01

can build a quite nimble, fast-paced

3:03

team and you can scale almost infinitely

3:06

with content. Like there's always

3:07

another podcast to do or hit or

3:09

appearance or interview and then you can

3:11

post it on Facebook, on threads, on

3:13

YouTube. It's like there's so much you

3:15

can scale and you can have a really

3:17

tight nimble team as opposed to

3:18

mainstream media which there's like a

3:20

few different conglomerates that own it.

3:23

There's five layers of approval if you

3:24

want to ever post anything. It's a lot

3:26

more nimble in this space.

3:28

>> Yeah. I I was I always joke that I was a

3:29

bad employee and so I just left. But

3:31

what when when you when you're doing

3:33

this, you're funded, are you

3:35

self-funded?

3:35

>> Yep. I self fund. I reinvest the revenue

3:37

from YouTube back into the business.

3:39

>> Uhhuh. So YouTube is your principal

3:41

place to do this. Correct.

3:42

>> Yep.

3:43

>> Is there anywhere how do you look at

3:44

that? How do you think about that? Uh my

3:46

business model, I kind of look at it as

3:48

a pyramid where YouTube is my main

3:50

priority and then I trickle it down to

3:52

Facebook, Spotify, and the the

3:56

organizations that are like audio and

3:57

then it trickles down to short form

3:59

content on Instagram, Tik Tok, and

4:02

Twitter and all of those.

4:03

>> I tell this to people all the time.

4:05

YouTube is television for young is not

4:07

just for young people, by the way.

4:08

Everyone's like, "It's for young

4:09

people." I'm like, "Yeah, but it it's

4:10

not, you know, it's more from lots of

4:12

people." It's interesting if you look at

4:14

the change. There's more people watching

4:16

my show on tele on their TVs now. You

4:18

can see on the YouTube backend

4:19

analytics, there's more people watching

4:21

on their TV watch hour wise than on

4:23

their phone. So, it is the new

4:25

television and then I'm able to actually

4:26

go on TV and do these debates and

4:28

combine it with my YouTube. So, it's an

4:30

interesting model that we're building.

4:32

>> Well, one of the reasons I'm having your

4:33

I see you're very clever, but how do you

4:35

where do you look at your audience?

4:36

>> It's interesting. I actually have a

4:38

pretty diverse audience age- wise. I've

4:40

got a lot of people in the 40 to 60 age

4:42

range and of course a lot of people in

4:43

the 18 to 34 age range on different

4:46

platforms. I think there's a migration

4:48

happening from places like MS Now or

4:51

like some of the bigger networks to

4:54

digital media. And you see that in my

4:56

comment section. You see that from

4:57

people that said they're disillusioned

4:59

from mainstream media. Now, a lot of the

5:01

big media organizations are using people

5:04

online, online personalities in their

5:06

shows, and it's becoming really

5:08

symbiotic in a way. So, I think the

5:10

relationship will become more symbiotic.

5:12

Like we said, independent media allows

5:14

you to be so much more nimble with lower

5:16

overhead. I mean, I can have a scrappy

5:18

team of five people who are fresh out of

5:20

college and we all are growing together

5:22

while we invest a lot of our time into

5:24

this uh ecosystem. So, I think that I

5:27

think that there's a lot of mileage for

5:29

this independent media ecosystem. One of

5:30

the big questions is during the next

5:32

administration after Trump is gone out

5:35

of the spotlight, what kind of what's

5:36

the attention economy going to look

5:38

like, right? Like I think everybody is

5:40

asking the question about the attention

5:41

economy. And I think that honestly it's

5:43

probably a good thing for politics to be

5:45

boring. I'm not saying that that's a bad

5:46

thing, but the way the environment works

5:48

is going to be much different when

5:50

there's not a clown cabinet and a

5:51

constant train wreck to watch, you know.

5:53

>> Yeah. Trump has said that said it years

5:55

ago. I think Jeff Zucker even said it

5:57

like thank goodness for Trump is really

5:59

he is people do like the show

6:01

essentially. They liked his original

6:02

show. It is getting a little tired and

6:04

weird at this point. Um but one last

6:06

question. What do you worry about? What

6:08

do you think you have missing or what do

6:10

you worry about?

6:11

>> What I'm worrying about a lot like what

6:13

I think about most of the time is

6:15

longevity in the space is building

6:17

something that isn't just a quick blip

6:19

that rises and falls. I feel like there

6:22

are so many examples and I can't even

6:24

pull them off the top of my head because

6:25

they they fall in of people that that

6:27

have this infrastructure that they're

6:29

reliant on. They're reliant on one

6:31

single contract or one single gig rather

6:33

than building a long-term infrastructure

6:35

around them that they can own and rely

6:37

on. So, I'm thinking about longevity. I

6:39

mean, Bill Maher has had his show since

6:42

like the late 90s. Like, hasn't he had a

6:44

show since the early he's had it for 20,

6:46

30 years at this point. Different shows,

6:48

of course. Same thing with like John

6:49

Stewart. show, but different

6:51

>> these people have longevity in the space

6:53

and that's what I'm trying to build

6:54

towards a show or an infrastructure that

6:56

I can own rather than being reliant on

6:58

the next booker hitting me up, you know?

7:00

>> Right. Absolutely. That's a really smart

7:02

thing to think about. Are are you

7:03

worried about things like liable and

7:06

stuff like that?

7:07

>> Yeah. Well, yeah. I have a lawyer and I

7:09

we talk about it a lot and sometimes

7:11

with this political space I I have to

7:13

either title things or use like

7:16

outrageous sometimes titles and ways

7:18

that I frame things. But at the end of

7:20

the day, my reporting is pretty spot-on.

7:23

I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I don't

7:25

float conspiracy theories. I reject a

7:27

lot of the conspiracy theories that are

7:29

out there. Anything about Trump's fake

7:30

assassination attempts, I don't I think

7:32

they were real. I think the

7:33

assassination attempts were real. I

7:34

think the elections have not been

7:35

stolen. I'm not into conspiracy

7:37

theories. cuz I'm not into gossip or

7:39

rumors. I'm generally pretty on point.

7:41

Like like I made a video about Natalie

7:43

Harp and I relied on Maggie Haberman's

7:45

reporting from the New York Times. It

7:47

doesn't worry me. It's rather well

7:48

sourced.

7:49

>> Yeah. Right. Exactly. And of course, you

7:50

still have to rely on reporters, but

7:52

eventually you'll get into reporting.

7:53

We've got a lot to get to today, so

7:55

let's dig in. First, there's a growing

7:57

concern about the 5,000 sailors aboard

7:59

the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft

8:01

carrier, which has now been deployed for

8:02

more than 250 days and hasn't made a

8:04

port call in at least 200 days. Military

8:06

families and lawmakers are sounding the

8:08

alarm about the food shortages,

8:09

contaminated water, and mental health

8:10

struggles. There's reports of multiple

8:12

attempts by uh crew members to jump

8:14

overboard. Defense Secretary Pete Hgs

8:16

has said concern about conditions on

8:18

board have been completely

8:19

misrepresented. And acting Navy

8:21

Secretary notes Lincoln's deployment was

8:23

extended because the mission demanded

8:24

it. The ship will soon be replaced by

8:26

the USS George Washington. Obviously,

8:29

it's complex and and and people push

8:32

back against Exad and President Donald

8:34

Trump. Let's hear what he said about the

8:36

Lincoln.

8:36

>> Family members of US service members are

8:39

concerned about the conditions on board

8:41

the USS.

8:42

>> Well, no. That ship is moving. No,

8:43

they're not. That ship is moving right

8:45

now or very shortly. And it's being

8:48

replaced with another very similar ship.

8:52

>> No, no, no, not nearly long enough.

8:55

>> So, uh, the that was something to say. I

8:59

think the families are very upset. Now,

9:01

also, Georgia Democratic John Osaf this

9:04

week had some thoughts on all of this

9:06

and Trump in general. Let's listen to

9:07

what he said at a rally on Sunday night.

9:09

>> And while the sailors on the Lincoln

9:11

fight his war

9:14

while he fruitlessly drains our

9:16

munitions and oil reserves, the

9:20

president sleeps through his meetings.

9:24

>> He golfs and trades stocks.

9:27

>> See, he doesn't want to do the job.

9:31

He wants to build his ballroom and

9:33

travel with Natalie on their apparently

9:35

defenseless flying palace gifted by the

9:37

Amir ofQar.

9:39

>> I just want to explain to listeners

9:40

Natalie is Natalie Harb, Trump's

9:42

personal aid, no also known as the human

9:44

printer. She's sort of his binky or

9:46

comfort blanket as Maggie Haberman you

9:48

speaking which recently put it. Natalie

9:50

was even with him in the catering cart

9:52

during his plain decoy operation last

9:54

month. Uh talk a little bit about these

9:56

stories. These are all like merging into

9:58

one story. Um, and also by the way,

10:00

Maggie talked about the the Secret

10:02

Service being nervous about Natalie Harp

10:04

and her love notes she leaves for Trump

10:06

all around his private spaces. Um, talk

10:09

a little about these stories. This is

10:10

bizarre on all levels, Adam.

10:12

>> Yeah, [clears throat] first of all, John

10:14

Oaf did a really good job of weaving

10:16

everything together there. I think he's

10:17

a really talented communicator. Natalie

10:19

Harp has been leaving a lot of these

10:20

weird notes for Donald Trump saying,

10:23

"You are all that matters to and she's

10:24

inseparable from him at a time when

10:26

Milani has kind of been missing from all

10:28

these public events. Honestly, putting

10:30

that aside for one second, I just want

10:32

to return to the the USS Abraham Lincoln

10:34

because this is wild to me. The war has

10:37

been going on for 170 days. These

10:40

sailors, many of whom were in their 20s,

10:42

like early 20s, have been trapped there

10:44

for hundreds and hundreds of days with

10:47

deteriorating conditions. It reminds me

10:49

a lot of the prior wars when I was

10:52

really really young in the mid-200s. The

10:54

same leaders, many of the same people

10:56

would go on TV and say that this will

10:58

make America more safe and protected in

11:00

the long term. And we had to watch as

11:02

these wars turned into grinding

11:04

counterinsurgencies, whether it's Iraq

11:06

or Afghanistan. We were told that we

11:08

were winning. They went out there and

11:09

they said, "We're winning. We killed the

11:10

bad guys. Saddam Hussein's dead." Then

11:12

it turned into a grinding

11:14

counterinsurgency that cost us trillions

11:16

of dollars. We are seeing the same thing

11:18

repeat. We have these leaders going out

11:20

on television claiming that this war is

11:23

being won, that their military is

11:24

destroyed. That's obviously not true. If

11:26

the military were destroyed from Iran,

11:28

then why is Trump still in danger? Why

11:30

are Trump and Natalie Harp in this

11:32

catering cart? Why is the straight of

11:34

moose closed? It's very clear that Iran

11:37

still has a chokeold over the region.

11:38

They still have enough of a military to

11:40

close the straight of Hormuz, and it's

11:42

not making us safer. I think there's a

11:44

really strong parallel to be drawn that

11:46

a lot of millennials or a lot of people

11:48

in my generation, especially people of

11:49

your generation, have seen play out over

11:52

the years. Being in the Middle East

11:54

doesn't just make us more safe because

11:55

we're in the Middle East. We have to be

11:57

getting political concessions from the

11:59

country. So, sorry. All of this is to

12:00

say that we're not getting any political

12:02

concessions out of this war. Trump is

12:04

more focused on hanging out with Natalie

12:05

Harp and Americans are struggling right

12:07

now. It's bad. The USS Abraham Lincoln

12:10

has 20-year-olds. Do young people think

12:12

about this ship and what's do these

12:13

stories break through?

12:14

>> The war is absolutely breaking through.

12:17

It's a pretty big promise that you can't

12:19

ignore or avoid. It's a complete 180

12:21

from what he said on the campaign which

12:22

was no new wars. And that really bothers

12:25

a lot of young people. You can see it in

12:26

the way that it manifests on like Joe

12:28

Rogan's podcast or Theo Vaughn. Theo

12:31

Von's a comedian who's not even MAGA.

12:34

People always try to ascribe these

12:35

beliefs. He's just a dude who kind of

12:37

pays attention to the news when when

12:38

it's there. And when it comes to Iran,

12:41

he keeps saying that this is a illegal

12:43

war. It's a war of aggression, that it's

12:44

not right. Joe Rogan has echoed similar

12:47

thoughts about us being stuck. I think

12:48

the broad populace of young people and

12:51

these figures don't like this same war

12:53

because of what I just said, the the

12:56

echoes of the prior wars in the mid

12:58

2000s.

12:59

>> Absolutely. One of the things that's

13:00

really interesting is I've noticed both

13:02

my sons very much focused on it and

13:04

they're between your age, one is 21, one

13:07

is 24. Um, and this is at the top of

13:10

mind for them, but this seems to have

13:12

resonated in a way that a lot of news

13:14

stories haven't. I don't I'm not they're

13:16

aware of the Natalie Harp of it all, but

13:18

I think they were super offended by the

13:21

way they talked about these families.

13:23

Uh, my dad was in the military and was

13:26

in in the Navy and I was offended for

13:29

these families. What has to occur here?

13:31

And what do why do you imagine this is

13:33

the way Trump is handling it?

13:35

>> I think that he's kind of cornered right

13:37

now. He's trapped himself and he's

13:40

trying to negotiate with the carrot.

13:42

He's trying to entice them via

13:44

negotiations and use the carrot. It's

13:45

not working. And then he's trying to use

13:47

the stick and bomb them over and over

13:49

and that's not working. So, he's

13:51

cornered himself to a point he's

13:52

entirely trying to reject this idea that

13:55

he's cornered. And it does break through

13:57

to young people. It's just such a

13:58

brazen, broken promise. I also want to

14:01

point out we're going to spend hundreds

14:03

of billions of dollars on this. We

14:05

already spend $1 trillion per year on

14:07

the interest of our national debt just

14:09

to service our debt. We spend $1

14:11

trillion per year. It's one of the most

14:13

expensive line items that we that we

14:15

have in our country. Like my generation,

14:17

your son's generation, we're going to

14:18

have to bear the brunt of all of this

14:20

debt that is accumulating right now. And

14:23

I again, I think the most offensive part

14:24

is the way that Trump and the people

14:26

around him are lying about it so

14:28

brazenly, acting like it's not existing,

14:30

trying to blind themselves. They have

14:32

people like Caroline Levit, even the

14:34

Scott Jennings of it all going out there

14:36

and trying to say that that there's

14:39

nothing wrong, that we're winning this

14:41

war. It's a really sickening lie.

14:42

>> Is it an out of touch thing? Is it an

14:44

age thing? What do you how when you

14:45

listen to them or is it just they're

14:47

just good at lying?

14:48

>> They're just trying to tow the party

14:49

line. You know how when we ask any

14:50

Republican who won the 2020 election,

14:52

they have that line that they run.

14:54

They're like some of them. They're like

14:55

most most of them uh that they're trying

14:57

to become a cabinet member say this.

15:00

They're like Joe Biden was right was

15:03

certified. They have this weird way they

15:05

go around it. I think they have to tow

15:07

the party line and they have to hold

15:08

faith in the Iran war. But one more

15:10

time, it started 170 days ago. What do

15:13

they say four to six weeks at the

15:14

beginning of this?

15:15

>> Yes, they did. And I was with actually a

15:17

pretty prominent Republican senator. He

15:19

goes, "If this is more than two weeks,

15:20

Cara, everything's fucked." And I was

15:22

like I just I text him. I'm like, "It's

15:24

more than two weeks.

15:24

>> It's pretty bad now." Did you see the

15:26

Chris Christie clip where he said that

15:27

Trump is is going to be Jimmy Carter?

15:29

that Iran Iran learned one lesson from

15:32

the Jimmy Carter debacle that you can

15:34

hold something hostage and if you do it

15:37

for long enough it begins to look bad

15:38

for the president every single day.

15:40

>> Oh, it's his biggest favor. I was with a

15:42

pretty prominent uh foreign affairs.

15:44

This is like they they were talking

15:46

about the the the attempts by Iran to

15:48

kill him and they're like why would

15:50

they? He's doing he's he's good for them

15:53

like in terms of giving them a lot of

15:55

cover and inability to just make exactly

15:58

what you're talking about Jimmy G. He's

15:59

being Jimmy Carter. Does the Deli Harp

16:02

story get a lot of resonance? It seems a

16:04

little purant but at the same time it's

16:06

weird and she's right there like all the

16:08

times.

16:09

>> Um yeah, people find it very interesting

16:11

combined with the fact that Melania is

16:13

also gone. I mean, listen, Melania is

16:15

clearly not enjoying this. And I'm not

16:18

going to speculate on like what Trump

16:19

and Natalie Harp are doing, but Natalie

16:21

Harp has been obsessed with him for

16:23

years. I found this uh thread from

16:26

Decoding Fox News, a Twitter account,

16:27

and they point out that Natalie Harp on

16:30

O used to sign off her show by quoting

16:33

the Bible, and sometimes she would quote

16:35

Trump in lie of the Bible. So, she would

16:36

either quote Trump or quote the Bible

16:38

back in 2020, 2021. She's been obsessed

16:41

with him for a while. And the more I

16:43

cover it, the more people are rather

16:45

interested in this weird note passing

16:47

that's happening back and forth.

16:48

Apparently, the Secret Service, as you

16:50

mentioned out, said this was sort of a

16:52

security concern, there's a bunch of

16:54

photos of Natalie Harp smiling at him,

16:56

like that new movie Obsession. You know,

16:57

the new horror movie that's coming out,

16:59

she's standing in the corner like

17:00

smiling at him. I swear to God, if you

17:02

look at these photos,

17:04

>> explain obsession. Explain obsession.

17:06

>> It's like it's like a curse. It's like a

17:08

horror movie where a guy wishes that his

17:10

girlfriend is obsessed with him and then

17:12

it turns into a curse where she's really

17:14

creepily obsessed with him. And that's

17:15

Natalie Harp all. That movie doesn't end

17:18

well. Anyway, Adam, let's go on a quick

17:21

break. We come back, press secretary

17:22

Karen Levit steps down. [music]

17:25

>> This is advertiser content from Harvey

17:27

AI. We have a choice over who we work

17:29

with and who we don't. Specifically, who

17:31

we allow to advertise and who we don't.

17:32

And for those of you who watch my

17:34

content, I am not an AI catastrophist.

17:36

I'm an AI optimist. I think it's going

17:37

to create more jobs [music] than it

17:39

destroys. And I think our job as

17:41

professionals is to figure out how to

17:43

leverage these these [music] tools. AI

17:46

more than almost anything I do in terms

17:47

of what I could point to for real

17:49

economic leverage and savings is [music]

17:51

100% in the legal fields. Harvey is the

17:54

AI designed specifically for legal work,

17:56

trusted by leading law firms and

17:58

enterprise legal teams. All right, so

18:00

now I'm looking at their demo. It plugs

18:04

into tools that lawyers already work

18:06

with, Lexus, Nexus, Microsoft, and this

18:09

is a key, and I do this internally with

18:11

my LLMs. With permissions, it lets you

18:14

look at the firm's own files and

18:17

databases.

18:19

So, here it's answering a question,

18:21

reads the complaint, pulls the relevant

18:23

terms, checks the web, weighs the

18:26

evidence, and drafts a [music] response.

18:27

But it also can do this in a shared

18:30

workspace between the firm and the

18:32

client. [music]

18:33

So they both have visibility into the

18:34

work being done and can both add value

18:36

to it. I I think this space is clearly

18:40

sort of handin glove for AI, right? So

18:43

there's no doubt about it. This I think

18:44

is uh it's going to be super helpful not

18:48

only for law firms themselves but

18:50

internally for general counsels at

18:52

companies. Harvey is AI tailored for

18:55

law. You can learn more at harvey.ai.

19:02

>> Adam, we're back. Uh, who will replace

19:04

press secretary Carolyn Levid? As was

19:06

recording, we don't know. Trump

19:07

announced last week that Levid is

19:09

stepping down at the end of the month to

19:10

spend more time with her family. She

19:12

just had her second kid. Some of the

19:14

rumored candidates to replace Levan

19:15

include Trump's former personal lawyer,

19:17

Alina Haba, who was with him at his

19:20

dancing to YMCA at the club in New

19:23

Jersey recently. his daughter-in-law,

19:25

uh, Larara Trump and political

19:27

commentator Scott Jennings, your best

19:29

friend. Um, uh, I I'll mention that

19:32

after, but Scott was asked about this on

19:35

CNN. Let's listen to what he said.

19:37

>> Scott,

19:38

>> who should replace Caroline Love it?

19:39

Obviously, she is, uh, stepping down

19:42

>> and are you throwing your hat?

19:44

>> Who do you think? Who do you Yeah. Well,

19:45

first of all, you're throwing your hat

19:46

in the ring. And

19:47

>> will you serve, Scott? Answer the

19:49

question. [laughter]

19:50

>> No. Look,

19:50

>> answer the question. I I don't know. But

19:52

I'll tell you this, Caroline Levit has

19:54

been maybe the greatest White House

19:57

press secretary in the last 30 years at

20:00

least. She's been nothing short of

20:02

brilliant. She's done it while raising a

20:03

young family. I think it's great that

20:05

she's going to go spend time with her

20:06

family, but I don't know a single

20:08

Republican in the country who isn't in

20:10

awe of and in appreciation of Caroline

20:12

tonight. So, Godspeed on your journey

20:14

back to your family. You've done a great

20:15

job.

20:15

>> Do you want the job or not?

20:16

>> Let me help Scott. Democrats are afraid

20:18

of Scott Jennings becoming press

20:19

secretary.

20:20

>> [laughter]

20:21

>> There you go.

20:22

>> Okay. So, explain. Um I I want to remind

20:26

people before we get into this. You have

20:27

a little history with Scott Jennings.

20:29

This was so sweet. Let's listen to a

20:31

clip.

20:31

>> Scott Jennings is more than happy to

20:32

defend a war with a country that starts

20:34

with the letters IRA that we [laughter]

20:36

are currently failing. That is going to

20:37

put us trillions and trillions of

20:38

dollars more in debt. I was only a few

20:40

years old while you were in the

20:41

administration defending prior endless

20:43

wars. Now, this war is failing.

20:45

>> 8 weeks is endless to you.

20:46

>> Okay. You said it was going to be four

20:47

weeks. You have the attention span of a

20:49

net. I debated you on TV four to 6 weeks

20:51

ago when you said we were weeks away

20:52

from it. Now you're making condescending

20:54

remarks because you can't defend the

20:55

fact that this war is not going your

20:56

way. Wait one more time.

20:59

One political concession one political

21:01

concession. Yeah. Get your [ __ ] hand

21:03

out myself. Uh that got a lot of

21:05

attention. So talk a little bit about

21:08

that first and then the press

21:10

secretary's job. Is it does it matter uh

21:13

one way or the other if Scott Jennings

21:14

goes there or any of these other names

21:16

we've mentioned? I mean, I think that

21:17

Scott Jennings would make a perfect

21:19

press secretary from all of my past

21:21

interactions with him. Unfortunately,

21:23

it's it's probably too much of a pay cut

21:25

uh because he likes doing the media

21:27

stuff where he's always towing the line,

21:29

but he's really built up a unique talent

21:31

that I respect in constantly graveling

21:33

at Donald Trump's feet, constantly

21:35

making sure he's towing the party line

21:37

and kind of pivoting around questions.

21:39

Even in that clip that you just played

21:40

right there, you see how he very quickly

21:42

brushes off the actual question and goes

21:44

in to trying to sanewash and whitewash

21:47

all of Caroline Levit's history. If she

21:50

was doing such a good job over the past

21:52

16 months, Donald Trump's approval

21:53

rating wouldn't be underwater across

21:55

every single sector, both immigration

21:58

domestically, immigration at the border,

22:00

immigration overall with ICE, the

22:02

economy, everything. When it comes to

22:04

Scott Jennings, I mean, I I I can

22:07

explain how that clip came to be. It was

22:10

the Iran war putting so much pressure on

22:13

him. Let me reword that. Him putting

22:15

pressure on himself because he kept

22:16

lying about the Iran war week after week

22:19

after week and we blew through the

22:21

timeline. I was sitting next to him on

22:23

these panels and he was saying this was

22:24

going to be a 4 to 6 week timeline,

22:26

right? 4 to 6 week war. We blew through

22:28

that and then it was seven to eight

22:30

weeks, then nine to 10 weeks. Then we

22:31

were 12 weeks in. And I would probably

22:34

feel a lot of pressure too if I were the

22:35

one who had to keep lying about this

22:37

war. So, as I point out, he'll lie about

22:39

any war that starts with the letters I

22:41

A. And I really do think he had cornered

22:43

himself and felt the pressure in that

22:45

moment. There's like there's something

22:47

weirdly fragile and not masculine about

22:51

constantly trying to dish it out and be

22:53

condescending on these panels, but then

22:55

the moment someone tries to reciprocate

22:57

and at least like press you on

22:58

something, you freak the hell out.

23:00

There's something really fragile and

23:02

like hypocritical about that in my

23:03

opinion.

23:04

>> Why? What? What in that moment? What was

23:07

you handled it really rather well and

23:09

you you didn't have your hand in his

23:10

face. Let's be clear. That was so

23:12

strange. I was like, what are you

23:13

talking about? like and he actually got

23:16

physical. I I've noticed a lot

23:18

interesting a lot of physicality when

23:20

RFK interviewed Dana Bash was was

23:23

interviewed by Dana Bash. he got he was

23:25

moving forward to it's very strange and

23:28

weird and you're right it's I wouldn't

23:30

say non-masculine n it's something weird

23:32

it's something else that's very str it's

23:35

a very strange reaction to what I

23:37

thought was a legitimate point you were

23:38

making and you know you're very good at

23:40

debate so that probably irked him you

23:42

know you probably are irk to him in some

23:45

way

23:45

>> like the the reality of it is I had been

23:47

on multiple panels with him in the weeks

23:49

prior talking about the Iran war and

23:52

every single time I don't play the game

23:54

that he plays. Like he plays this game

23:56

where he's able to lie and dodge and

23:58

weave on the panel and then everyone

24:01

kind of collectively moves on. And it's

24:03

fine. I I get it. There's only so much

24:04

time in the show. It's like it's just

24:06

it's part of the show. But sometimes I'm

24:08

like, "Wait a minute. I genuinely don't

24:10

want to move on from this guy weaving

24:12

around this right now." So I pressed him

24:14

on it and I pressed him on it and he

24:16

didn't have an answer. I I think that uh

24:18

that you could just admit the Iran war

24:20

is failing and it would be much easier

24:21

than blowing up and doing that to

24:23

yourself.

24:24

>> Mhm. So, him leaving to be press

24:26

secretary, thoughts?

24:28

>> I I don't know. I don't think it's going

24:29

to happen. I mean, I wouldn't be

24:30

surprised if he's probably floating his

24:32

own name just to create the headlines

24:33

and the buzz.

24:34

>> I think he's being considered. I do I I

24:36

believe that to be true. I do think

24:38

you're right. He likes media attention

24:40

in

24:41

>> I guess the question would be what's the

24:42

upside versus downside. The downside is

24:45

that you have to constantly be a part of

24:47

these clips where the media are trying

24:49

to pin you down and press you and we saw

24:51

right there he doesn't have the temper

24:52

at this very moment. I don't know what's

24:53

going on with him. He just doesn't have

24:54

the temper. On the other side of that,

24:57

he probably takes a pay cut as well. So

24:59

there's a lot of downside. What's the

25:00

upside? You become like a figure and

25:02

then usually you become a media figure

25:04

after he's already a media figure. I

25:06

just I don't see the calculation of

25:07

becoming the press secretary.

25:08

>> Yeah. He doesn't want to go right to

25:09

Dancing with the Stars like Sean Spicer.

25:12

But one of the things that it it's I I'm

25:14

like there's no plus to being on Nero's

25:16

barge at the last part of it. That to me

25:19

and Scott is smart enough to do that.

25:21

>> He's making more money for doing the

25:22

same thing basically.

25:23

>> So who would make a good uh uh one of

25:26

these people? Is there another person

25:27

you're not think we're not thinking of?

25:29

>> I'd have to think about it. I mean

25:30

anyone in the Trump orbit who is

25:32

well-versed. I wouldn't be surprised if

25:34

he puts like [sighs]

25:36

one of his ex- lawyers like Alina Haba

25:38

could work. Um, I saw a clip of Natalie

25:41

Harp when she was an OA anchor. That

25:43

would not work. She was not very good.

25:44

She was doing like a discount Tucker

25:46

Carlson.

25:47

>> Scott Jennings would be really good, but

25:49

like I said, there's too much downside.

25:50

I good in like a infuriating way. Who

25:53

Who do you think Who do you think is at

25:54

the top of the list?

25:55

>> I think probably it's Alina Haba. She

25:56

was sitting there kissing his ass, you

25:58

know? I just I think she doesn't have a

25:59

lot of choices and I don't think she's a

26:01

lot of financial choices either.

26:02

>> Is she going to be good at that job? You

26:03

think

26:04

>> I It doesn't Does it matter? I mean,

26:05

does it matter? does I mean Karen Levit

26:07

is good at it except you're I think you

26:09

make the salient point his polls are

26:11

going down so it's not she's not that

26:13

good like ultimately if she's the

26:15

probably she got a lot of pressure

26:16

apparently she was yelled at quite a bit

26:18

by him constantly

26:19

>> she was a little bit too obviously good

26:21

at lying it's like a bad episode of the

26:23

boys

26:23

>> yeah it'll be interesting to see where

26:24

she goes the reason they made her a

26:27

senior advisor outside adviser is

26:30

because of uh she gets protected in

26:32

executive privile the way he said it she

26:35

you know they're all going to

26:36

The other thing is Scott doesn't want to

26:38

need a a pardon, right? That's the

26:40

problem. Like they all are going to need

26:42

a pardon. And I don't think you can give

26:44

blanket pardons to that many people.

26:45

Maybe you can. He probably could. Um but

26:48

I I think there's a doubt. I think it

26:49

hardly matters now after the midterms.

26:51

Like that's going to be a shitty [ __ ]

26:53

job uh for whoever it is. It seems to me

26:57

>> Caroline got it at the right time.

26:58

>> Yes, she really is. She's a very cany

27:00

that way. So let's move to the

27:02

Democrats. They've officially signed off

27:04

on a new presidential primary calendar

27:05

for 2028. South Carolina and Nevada are

27:08

now first, replacing Iowa and New

27:09

Hampshire as the top two. The change

27:11

moves more racially diverse states to

27:13

the front of the calendar. DNC Chair Ken

27:16

Martin says the new calendar will battle

27:18

test our nominee, putting them in the

27:19

strongest possible position to win back

27:21

the White House. Talk about the

27:22

calendar. I've heard a lot about this in

27:25

which candidates it helps and it hurts.

27:27

It probably helps Kala Harris um in some

27:30

ways and and others, but talk a little

27:32

bit about because she's a known quantity

27:34

down there. Talk a little bit about this

27:36

shift.

27:37

>> Yeah, so obviously folks in Iowa will be

27:39

disappointed. That was a huge state in

27:41

the in the process for a while. Even in

27:43

the Obama race that Iowa was like a huge

27:46

turn, so people there are going to be

27:47

upset. I went to a lot of the Iowa

27:50

primary rallies in the Iowa State Fair a

27:52

few years back. I'll miss it myself, but

27:54

from my understanding, it's pretty

27:56

simple. It's meant to empower and give

27:58

more weight to black and Latino voters.

28:00

There's a very big labor presence in the

28:02

state of Nevada, which will be one of

28:04

the earliest states. And I think the

28:06

Democratic party is really trying to

28:07

move in that direction. And overall,

28:10

there's just a lot of distrust in the

28:12

current establishment. You have to

28:13

remember in of course you remember, I'm

28:15

just saying you have to remember in 2020

28:17

the Iowa caucuses didn't really go too

28:19

smoothly and Pete Buddha Judge's

28:21

campaign had a lot of problems. The app

28:23

had a lot of problems. This comes at a

28:25

time when you see uh the DNC not

28:28

bringing in a lot of money which is

28:29

interestingly because individual

28:31

candidates are bringing in a lot of

28:33

money. If you look at the DNC it's

28:36

really struggling as an apparatus but

28:38

people like James Terico and John Oaf

28:40

are outraising their opponent.

28:42

>> They are indeed.

28:43

>> Terrio has raised $72 million or

28:46

something. So there is energy but not

28:48

for the establishment if that makes

28:49

sense.

28:50

>> Yeah. And so what who does this put in a

28:52

position for the for the nominees?

28:55

>> You rightfully pointed out that Kla

28:57

Harris will do well. Um again, there's a

29:00

strong labor presence in Nevada. So it

29:03

might not be the candidates that people

29:05

think. When I think of a strong labor

29:07

presence and who people like that vote

29:09

for, it's not always inherently the more

29:10

progressive candidate, which kind of

29:12

breaks the archetype of a lot of people

29:13

think. So I could see Kamla doing well.

29:16

I could see if somebody like John Oaf

29:19

ran doing very very well. I'm a big fan

29:21

of him lately. Like you played that clip

29:22

of him. He's just so good at

29:24

communicating.

29:24

>> Atlanta, he's vehemently rejecting the

29:27

idea that he's going to run. Is that is

29:29

is like a game? Like do they just say

29:30

that they're not going to run or

29:31

>> I don't know. I don't know. I think he

29:34

can't say anything because he's running

29:35

for his office. Of course. Yeah.

29:37

>> So if he's like of course I am then the

29:39

citizens of Georgia are like [ __ ] you.

29:41

Like you know he can't he's got to be

29:43

vehement. And then he was like, "Oh, as

29:45

as I began to hear people, I understood

29:47

that my my future has to be with how he

29:51

sounds like something like that. This is

29:53

in the head. This isn't these these

29:54

people wake up every morning and as

29:56

Scott says, saying, "Hello, Mr.

29:58

President." They just do. Come on. Like,

30:01

stop it. Um, but I I I don't know who

30:04

would do well in Nevada. I mean, there

30:05

it'd be interesting if AOC runs. There's

30:07

all manner of people who have appealing

30:10

in different states. I think it also

30:11

goes to show where the Democratic party

30:13

is trying to move back to. We lost a lot

30:15

of ground with the Latino vote in 2024.

30:18

Like a surprising amount of ground and

30:20

now it's immediately shifted back very

30:23

much so like a rubber band where Trump's

30:25

ICE uh raids like he s he sends ICE

30:29

surgically and intentionally into these

30:31

majority Latino communities in order to

30:33

intimidate and terrorize them and then

30:35

wonders why Latino communities are

30:37

moving far away from him again. So, I

30:39

think Democrats could really make a

30:41

move, realign a lot of the demographics

30:43

again. Uh, we just need a strong

30:45

candidate. It's going to be a really

30:46

interesting ideological primary.

30:48

>> Yeah. All right. Speaking of

30:49

ideological, before we get to 2028, we

30:51

got to get through the midterms. In

30:52

Michigan, Democrat Abdul Elsad is

30:54

trailing Republican Mike Rogers by four

30:57

points in the first poll, although it's

30:58

up and down. Like, poly market is a

31:00

different thing. Palio I don't always

31:02

rely on them. By the way, you've

31:03

reshared some polling numbers the other

31:05

day on the Senate race in Kansas showing

31:07

Democrat uh Adam Hamilton just one point

31:09

behind Republican incumbent Roger

31:11

Marshall, which is a big deal. And you

31:13

said uh the blue wave is here. Careful

31:15

with the waves as they say. So what's

31:17

your latest prediction on the midterms

31:20

Senate and House and how the Democratic

31:22

anti-establishment aggressive movements

31:24

factor in?

31:25

>> A lot of my tweets are just formulated

31:26

to be as simple as possible. So that's

31:28

usually why I'm very reductive on

31:30

Twitter. But um listen,

31:32

>> the best way to be.

31:33

>> It's Yeah. Yeah. Listen, so I think that

31:35

at the end of the day,

31:37

>> people want change in the Democratic

31:39

party. It's that simple. Like Democratic

31:41

voters aren't reading marks and turning

31:43

far left. People want change. They don't

31:45

want the establishment. And that's

31:47

leading to more and more um you know,

31:50

progressive candidates winning. They can

31:52

use social media in a more savvy and

31:54

nimble way and have these newer

31:56

platforms. I think that we're in a good

31:58

spot to take over the house come the

32:00

midterms. Uh KHI and poly market, like

32:02

you said, it's not the best indicator,

32:03

but there's a lot of there's millions of

32:05

dollars [ __ ] up on Franchesca Hong.

32:07

>> Oh, it's bad. It's bad sometimes.

32:08

There's millions of dollars flowing into

32:09

some of these markets and right now it

32:11

seems like Democrats have a good shot at

32:14

winning the House in the midterms and

32:16

the Senate is up for grabs. I want to

32:18

point out with the House, we're already

32:20

at a fivepoint inherent disadvantage due

32:22

to the redistricting that Republicans

32:24

did. This radical midcycle redistricting

32:27

put us at a five-point disadvantage, so

32:30

we have to fight back there. But I think

32:32

Democrats are in a really good position.

32:33

We have a lot of strong candidates. I

32:35

I'm not really trustworthy of the poll.

32:37

I'm not trusting the polling right now,

32:39

nor the betting markets because they

32:40

effed up with Hong really badly. At the

32:43

end of the day, Democrats are in a good

32:46

position for the midterms. Democrats

32:48

want change and Abdul Aliad is a really

32:50

strong candidate in my opinion. And like

32:52

people keep saying that he's an example

32:54

of these like lefty progressive DSA

32:56

members, but he's not even DSA. He's a

32:58

self-described free market guy who likes

33:00

entrepreneurialism. He likes small

33:02

businesses. I think there's a really

33:04

strong accessible version of, you know,

33:08

liberalism there.

33:09

>> Well, it's interesting because there's

33:10

two I have a friend who's from Michigan

33:12

and he said all his relatives and he's a

33:15

he's not progressive. He's a Democrat.

33:16

He's a solid Democrat can't vote for

33:18

him. like he won't they these are sort

33:20

of suburban kind of people and they're

33:22

going to vote with their noses held for

33:25

Rogers which I cannot believe they would

33:26

do that.

33:27

>> Wow.

33:27

>> Uh I know and I was this is a longtime

33:29

Michiganer. Uh and I was like huh

33:32

interesting. Then again my son who lives

33:34

in Michigan and all his frat bro friends

33:36

are voting for Elsai and and they did in

33:39

in the in the in the election over Haley

33:41

Stevens and war was the issue. issues of

33:45

the uh Apac was certainly an issue for

33:48

them. Um there was a bunch of others and

33:50

I'm like which one is going to win here?

33:53

Like it was really but they're very

33:54

committed to him and I wouldn't call my

33:56

son even slightly liberal. He's not.

34:00

It's a really interesting thing. I think

34:02

people don't know. It's a question of

34:04

how well this guy can because if he if

34:06

he chokes and doesn't win he'll and he

34:08

costs the Senate by one Z that'll make

34:11

him sort of widely reviled. And if he

34:14

does, then it's what? What does it say?

34:17

>> Yeah. Well, first of all, I think that

34:19

there's still a few months left of the

34:21

campaign, and we just got out of a

34:23

primary where there were $60 million

34:25

spent against Abdul, like negative

34:27

spending against his character and his

34:29

past and his policy. So, right now, Mike

34:33

Rogers on the other side didn't really

34:34

have a very competitive primary where

34:36

there were negative ads against him. I

34:38

hope at this point a lot of money begins

34:39

to flow in to the negative advertising

34:42

against Mike Rogers. and Abdul El Sayad

34:44

is able to consolidate some of the base,

34:46

but I've heard similar concerns out of

34:48

people that are voting in Michigan.

34:50

People are concerned about him. I hope

34:52

that as the general goes on, he's able

34:54

to make a stronger case and able to

34:57

continue to captivate Michigan voters,

34:59

>> right? They're sort of attacking him.

35:00

The Trump terrorist, communist.

35:02

>> Yeah. No, I mean, they're they're

35:04

overstepping. Listen, like a a really

35:06

hard, divisive Democratic primary is

35:09

always going to splinter part of the

35:10

base. I'm sure people got some crazy ads

35:12

about Abdul coming from Haley Stevens

35:14

campaign, but now we're going to

35:15

consolidate. Mike Rogers is going to

35:17

have so many ads going against him, and

35:18

this guy's got a wild past that they're

35:20

going to keep highlighting. If Abdul

35:22

wins, first of all, if Abdul loses, it's

35:25

going to broadly be a rebuke of not him

35:27

personally, but this more progressive

35:29

strand of politics. He's not even DSA,

35:32

but he does represent a new wave of

35:34

insurgent candidates. if he wins, I

35:38

think it'll only further embolden that

35:40

sort of movement. I I personally hope

35:43

it's not the DSA taking over with their

35:45

candidates. I hope it's a more

35:46

progressive, pragmatic, liberal view of

35:49

people who want to redistribute wealth.

35:50

That's fine. Uh a higher minimum wage

35:52

and more healthcare is fine. I'm not for

35:55

some of the more farther left DSA ideas.

35:58

>> Well, he is not, as you point out, he's

35:59

not in the DSA. He's not either. There's

36:01

there's been a call for him to not stick

36:05

with the Hassan [ __ ] another, you

36:07

know, political pundit who, by the way,

36:09

may be suing Scott Jennings for

36:10

defamation and correctly so because

36:13

those clips were really manipulative, I

36:15

would say. Uh, he said a lot of he says,

36:17

look, he's clearly narcissistic and says

36:19

a lot of like inflammatory things, but

36:22

that he he should go move forward with

36:25

anything that he feels was manipulated.

36:27

But should should al say um

36:32

separate from him?

36:33

>> Listen, Hassan says things I disagree

36:35

with too, but that Scott Jennings clip

36:36

was over the pale. It was like the most

36:39

maliciously clipped up series of events

36:42

ever.

36:42

>> Yeah, I went back and watched all the

36:44

real thing and I was like, this is

36:46

>> I mean, he's like reading comments out

36:48

of chat or whatever and then they're

36:49

taking that out of context.

36:50

>> I think he didn't know. I think [ __ ]

36:53

said this. I think Scott was not aware

36:55

of what Hassan was doing, which is

36:57

>> that's even that's even worse. You got

36:59

to be more stupidity is not is not a

37:01

defense, but go ahead.

37:02

>> You got to he's got to be more media

37:04

might be offense. Yeah,

37:05

>> it might [clears throat] maybe if it's

37:06

not malicious and I'm not sure, but I

37:08

think that when it comes to Assan [ __ ]

37:10

Abdul, there doesn't need to be a

37:11

disavowel. I think that's fruitless and

37:13

I think it's just conceding to these

37:14

right-wing frameworks. I genuinely think

37:17

that Donald Trump surrounds himself with

37:19

people that are just as like radical as

37:21

per on a daily basis. the way that

37:23

Steven Miller is always screaming and

37:25

frothing at the mouth on Fox News every

37:27

single week. I I mean, Donald Trump

37:29

surrounds himself in campaigns with many

37:31

extremist radical people. The Republican

37:33

party is like uniting around Max Miller

37:36

after he allegedly broke his 2-year-old

37:38

collar bone. Um, I'm not trying to

37:40

compare any of that to matter for

37:42

>> I'm just saying that the Republican

37:44

party holds themselves to one standard

37:46

and then holds Abdul Aliad to this

37:48

impossibly high guilt by association

37:50

standard. No, we shouldn't disavow it.

37:52

Keep campaigning. Keep moving forward.

37:54

Keep laser focused on Mike Rogers. I'd

37:57

say that's my framework.

37:58

>> That's your framework. Yeah. Um uh it's

38:00

by the way it's say I mispronounced it a

38:02

second ago. In any case, we'll see what

38:03

happens. You you feel like he could win

38:05

if he if he got through to voters in a

38:08

more even with the attacks that are

38:10

coming from the Republicans.

38:12

>> I'd like to think so. Yeah. I mean,

38:13

listen, Michigan is a purple state. It's

38:15

a swing state and right now he's a more

38:17

progressive candidate than we've run in

38:18

that state in a while. Again, there was

38:21

just $60 million of pretty negative

38:23

spending directed at him. So now he has

38:25

the chance to put Mike Rogers on his

38:27

back foot and spend against Rogers. It's

38:30

definitely possible. The polling has

38:32

been a bit misleading lately, but I

38:34

guess the rebuttal to that is it's been

38:36

it's been overestimating the progressive

38:37

candidates. So, we just have to see what

38:40

happens. Mike Rogers has some skeletons

38:42

in his closet. So,

38:43

>> yeah. All right, Adam, let's go on a

38:44

quick break. When we come back, will

38:45

President Trump help the Tate brothers?

38:48

Support for the show comes from Mint

38:50

Mobile. Kids know how to live in the

38:51

moment. That's why they love summer. No

38:53

school or teachers to structure their

38:55

days. Well, that freedom doesn't need to

38:56

go away as you get older, especially

38:58

when you actually have spending power.

39:00

So, [music] save your money this summer

39:01

for the things that are fun and free.

39:03

And do it by saving money on your phone

39:05

bill. Get the coverage you know and love

39:06

at a fraction of the price. [music] And

39:08

you can do that with Mint Mobile. Right

39:10

now, all of Mint's premium wireless

39:11

plans are [music] only $15 per month.

39:13

All plans come with high-speed 5G data

39:15

and unlimited talk and text. To get your

39:17

new wireless plan for just 15 bucks a

39:19

month, go to mintmobile.com/pivot.

39:21

[music] That's mintmobile.com/pivot.

39:23

Cut your wireless bill to 15 bucks a

39:24

month at mintmobile.com/pivot.

39:27

That's [music] it. There's no catch.

39:28

Upfront payment of $45 or 3 month 90 for

39:31

6 months or 180 for 12 month plan

39:33

required. $15 per month of quickland

39:35

taxes and fees extra initial plan term

39:37

only. [music] Greater than 50 GB may

39:39

slow when network is busy. Includes up

39:41

to 20 GB hotspot. Capable device

39:43

required. Availability, speed, and

39:44

coverage of various mintmobile.com.

39:49

>> Adam, we're back with more news.

39:50

Supporters of Andrew and Tristan Tate

39:52

want want them freed. Many gathered

39:54

outside the Miami Federal Detention

39:56

Center chanting for their release and

39:57

even doing group push-ups. The brothers

40:00

have been in federal custody since July

40:02

18th as they fight extradition in the UK

40:05

uh where they face charges including

40:07

rape and sex trafficking. Tate's

40:08

attorney has said that if the judge

40:10

doesn't agree the brothers are innocent,

40:11

they will go straight to President

40:13

Trump's office. Um, what is the groups

40:16

doing push-ups? I don't even begin to

40:18

understand, but I I actually don't want

40:20

to understand. Um, will Trump end up

40:23

intervening here?

40:24

>> I don't think he'll intervene in this

40:26

case because he already did in February

40:29

of 2025, January, February, and it

40:32

didn't really go too well for them. I've

40:34

been doing a lot of coverage on this,

40:35

but back in 2025, early 2025, uh the

40:39

Tape brothers were being invested by the

40:41

UK and by Romania. There was a travel

40:43

ban. They weren't allowed to leave

40:45

Romania during this investigation. And

40:47

members of the Trump administration

40:49

specifically asked Romania to lift this

40:51

travel ban so the Tate brothers could

40:53

leave during this investigation. Baron

40:55

Trump is reportedly very good friends

40:57

with Andrew Tate and talks to him on the

40:59

phone. And Paul and Gracia was one of

41:01

Tate's lawyers and he now works in the

41:03

Trump admin and has been lobbying for

41:05

the Tate brothers to be freed for the

41:07

investigation to be dropped. You might

41:09

remember Paul and Gracia from his leaked

41:11

text about a year ago. He's the one that

41:13

said he has a Nazi streak in him. So

41:15

just some some real great gems in the

41:18

Trump administration advocating for some

41:20

real great people. The Tate brothers,

41:22

they very insidiously would manipulate

41:24

and abuse and basically traffic women

41:27

who were in very bad positions in their

41:29

lives. Coers them into doing webcam

41:31

modeling by acting like he was in love

41:32

with them, then intensely intentionally

41:35

isolating them from their family members

41:37

and from their hometown and making sure

41:39

they had nowhere to go.

41:40

>> Yeah, this is an extensive Law and Order

41:42

special vist unit.

41:44

>> It's wild. It's wild. And like they

41:46

allegedly would skim 95% of the profits

41:48

off the top and just pay the women

41:50

nothing and then spread rumors about

41:52

them in their family and their hometown.

41:53

So the women had nowhere to go. It was

41:55

awful. Then he would go brag about this

41:57

and poison the minds of young men in my

41:59

generation. Sorry that's a lot right

42:01

there. But I'm passionate about this

42:02

case right here.

42:03

>> No, I know. I listen my sons both we

42:06

both had long discussions about Andrew

42:08

Tate and uh initially it was attractive.

42:10

It absolutely was to a lot of people

42:12

the, you know, the be your own man, that

42:15

kind of stuff. But soon turn them off

42:17

pretty quickly. But I remember early I

42:19

was like, I think these guys are really

42:21

toxic pieces of [ __ ] kids. But you watch

42:23

them and you you make your own decisions

42:25

here. But this is my take as your mom.

42:28

>> It's like attractive in the way that

42:29

some of Nick Fuentes clips are

42:31

attractive. And I know that sounds

42:32

controversial, but like

42:33

>> it's not. I get

42:34

>> it's like a guilty pleasure for a lot of

42:36

people. It's like I'm not supposed to be

42:38

playing this video game. I'm not

42:39

supposed to be playing this at midnight.

42:41

I'm It's even more fun because I'm So

42:42

whenever I see a

42:43

>> Nick with Marjorie Taylor Green, you're

42:45

like, "Oh, exactly. Still terrible."

42:47

>> And then there's some sort of allure to

42:48

it. But the reality is Andrew Tate is

42:51

somebody who's uniquely awful because

42:53

he's like living the worst stuff that

42:56

he's speaking out loud. Some of these

42:58

people are just fakers. They they're

42:59

playing. They're role playing. They're

43:01

acting like they're these big tough guys

43:03

who like do the sh They don't actually

43:05

do anything. Andrew and Tristan Tate

43:07

built an empire based off of

43:09

manipulating and allegedly trafficking

43:11

women in multiple different countries.

43:13

And now I have friends like reposting

43:15

their reels because they're slightly

43:17

funny or whatever. It's

43:18

>> so so what happens? Trump is not good.

43:20

There's no plus for Trump to do

43:22

anything.

43:22

>> No, it's No, especially through the

43:23

Epstein stuff,

43:24

>> right? Yeah. It's related to Epstein.

43:26

Yeah. I mean, it's it's all related to

43:27

each other. But my I have he might

43:30

that's my feeling. He might

43:32

>> he could. So, the Tate Brothers lawyer,

43:34

Joe McBride, has been trying to get a

43:37

hold of Trump or Marco Rubio because

43:39

Marco Rubio is the one that's in charge

43:41

of extraditions. Marco Rubio said he

43:44

wants nothing to do with it, but at the

43:46

end of the day,

43:48

I don't know. I think that Donald Trump

43:50

did it in the first time in an attempt

43:52

to court these younger male voters.

43:54

Andrew Tate and Tristan Tate's lawyer

43:57

has been saying that if Trump doesn't

43:58

allow them to be released, he's going to

44:01

tell all their young fans never to vote

44:03

for Republicans again. So, they're kind

44:05

of like dangling it as leverage over

44:07

Trump and the Republican party. I think

44:09

he would have to be pretty dumb to do

44:11

it. Like, after all the Epstein saga,

44:13

this would be very bad PR, but he he

44:16

does stuff like that all the time. Then

44:18

Scott Jennings has to defend it. Imagine

44:19

that.

44:20

>> Yeah, I know, right? Even even he did

44:22

not defend the I don't I recall that he

44:24

didn't give a [ __ ] break here but a

44:28

great like anyway. [clears throat] All

44:30

right, Adam, one more quick break. We'll

44:32

be back for wins and fails.

44:34

>> Support for the show comes from Vanta.

44:36

What's the one thing in business that's

44:37

spreading as fast as AI? It's not

44:39

inflated egos or vicious backstabbing or

44:41

delusions of grandeur among CEOs.

44:43

Frankly, that stayed pretty constant for

44:45

years. It's AI risk. Every new tool your

44:47

team signs up for, every vendor that

44:49

turns on AI features, every new

44:50

integration, each one is an opportunity

44:52

for something to go wrong. And most

44:54

security programs weren't built for AI's

44:56

pacer [music] growth. Enter Vanta. Vanta

44:59

is the number one Aentic trust platform

45:00

used by over 16,000 fastmoving [music]

45:03

companies including Ramp Cursor and

45:05

Harvey to ensure they're always audit

45:07

ready. And now Vant is helping companies

45:09

[music] including yours watch for the

45:10

risks that show up between audits across

45:12

your vendors, your AI tools, and your

45:14

whole environment. How the Vanta agent

45:17

works like a 24/7 GRC engineer in the

45:20

background finding issues, drafting

45:21

fixes for you, and cutting vendor

45:22

[music] assessment time by up to 50%.

45:24

Whether you're a fast growing startup or

45:26

a global enterprise, Vant is here to

45:28

help you automate your security and

45:30

compliance and earn improved trust. Get

45:32

started today at vanta.com/pivot.

45:35

That's venta.com/pivot.

45:41

>> Okay, Adam, let's hear some wins and

45:43

fails. Why don't you go first? Okay. So,

45:46

I I'll start with the fail. I got I did

45:48

a 7-day trip to a few different cities,

45:51

multiple different hotels, and I lost my

45:52

car keys at some point in that 7-day

45:54

trip. And I flew back to O'Hare airport,

45:57

and my car was stuck in the parking

45:59

garage. No keys, nothing. Really bad

46:01

situation.

46:03

>> Really bad situation to be in. You know,

46:04

I'm only human. And yes, I am like a

46:06

young I'm in early 20s. I'm just like

46:08

this. I can be aloof. I can be aloof.

46:10

The win is that we've just been hiring

46:12

and training our new assistant over the

46:14

past month and I asked him if he could

46:16

do a favor for me. So, he drove to

46:18

O'Hare airport. Found a locksmith, got

46:21

the key, and my car is now back. So, the

46:23

win and the fail are a bit connected.

46:25

Um,

46:26

>> what kind of car do you have, Adam?

46:27

>> It's uh Buick. It's

46:29

>> You know, some of these cars you can

46:30

open with an app. May May I help you as

46:33

>> Oh, really?

46:34

>> Yes. When I lose my keys or leave them

46:37

in the car, you can open them with an

46:38

app. I believe all new cars you can do

46:41

that with just now.

46:42

>> That's actually a really good That's a

46:43

really good show. Did your son teach you

46:45

that?

46:45

>> No, I taught. Are you kidding? Hello.

46:47

Sorry. No, I wasn't supposed

46:48

>> I don't need help with tech, my friend.

46:50

I just I teach my sons that. No, my son

46:53

dropped his credit card out of his

46:54

pocket when he was ice climbing. I could

46:56

have killed him and like it went down to

46:58

the canyon and I I've had to replace so

47:00

many credit cards from my son who drops

47:02

credit cards. I'm not giving them

47:04

anymore. I'm like get it on your phone

47:05

and that's the end.

47:05

>> No, I drop them too. They make them too

47:07

easy to replace. It almost incentivizes

47:08

you to be like it's not a big deal.

47:10

>> You can do you can get into houses. You

47:12

don't need keys anymore.

47:13

>> Let's hear your wind fail.

47:14

>> My fail today is Jason Arde. And

47:16

actually, I'm going to link it with

47:17

Hayden Paniter. Um I think she's Let me

47:21

start with her backwards. She's just

47:23

died. She's 36 years old. Wonderful

47:25

actor. Um just a lovely presence. She

47:28

wrote a memoir recently, very clear,

47:31

showing her struggles with postpartum

47:33

depression, drinking, etc. Uh there was

47:37

there's sort of this heinous uh

47:38

Neutrogena dumped her for talking about

47:41

that. Um I just it's such a sad

47:44

situation. We don't know what happened

47:46

to her, but it could be problematic,

47:49

let's just say. And it's just sad. And

47:51

one of the things she talked about was

47:52

the relentless attacks of the media on

47:54

her as a young woman. and she couldn't

47:56

believe how much she'd been attacked and

47:58

and as a as a you know an attractive

48:01

young woman and talked about it and the

48:04

toll it took on her and I get

48:05

celebrities not easy but um uh but it

48:08

was really she did in a way that was

48:10

really ugly and was not unable to

48:12

sustain it in a lot of ways and it

48:14

affected her. I'll connect this to Jason

48:16

Arde who was the youngest black

48:17

professor at Cambridge in the UK and he

48:19

was found dead late last week and he uh

48:22

he was under a lot of pressure because

48:24

of plagiarism allegations but the pylon

48:26

and we can debate all the nuance there's

48:28

a very good Atlantic story that debates

48:29

the nuance of maybe he was doing things

48:32

taking shortcuts at this point I don't

48:34

really care because there's a lot of

48:35

white academics who get out very easily

48:38

compared to this guy the attention that

48:40

this guy got was so out of out of size

48:44

in Britain. The attacks on this guy were

48:47

so oversized of his alleged crime uh of

48:51

plagiarism and and some other falsehoods

48:54

that he might have told. It it doesn't

48:55

mean you don't care about those things

48:57

and accountability and academia, etc.,

49:00

etc., But the the the the overwhelming

49:03

ability of social media and the press,

49:05

in this case, I blame the media for both

49:06

of these um of of just not knowing when

49:09

to stop with with this kind of stuff is

49:11

really disturbing in every and I think

49:13

we all participate in it. Um but the

49:16

ugliness that you see here, especially

49:19

uh with both of them and Jason more

49:21

recently, is really quite something has

49:23

to shift in the way we cover things. I

49:25

doubt it will. It's been going on

49:27

forever when their tabloids have been

49:29

here for a long time, but it's gotten

49:30

amplified and uglified in a way that's

49:32

gross and everyone uh who was a part of

49:35

this should feel some regret and

49:37

responsibility. I'm not sure they will.

49:39

Um I I feel I their families, it's just

49:43

so unnecessary what's happened in these

49:45

cases um that contributed this kind of

49:47

thing. I'm going to do an opposite one

49:49

that's that's different. I've been

49:50

watching the D23 stuff. Um, I don't know

49:53

if you are a child of Disney, but my

49:55

kids, my I have two younger kids too

49:57

watch Disney. My older kids watch

49:59

Disney, and they're doing this amazing

50:01

uh gathering of all these different

50:03

Disney products. And I have to say, it's

50:05

the most entertaining thing. And it's

50:06

not just a, you know, it's a showcase

50:08

for their talent, but it's very

50:10

beautiful. And uh whether it's Anne

50:12

Hathaway giving a wonderful speech about

50:14

her career um and I know I'm being

50:17

manipulated or this incredible song by

50:19

Lynn Manuel

50:21

Miranda sung to a song from the Little

50:24

Mermaid uh that about his career because

50:28

he was he was inspired by the Little

50:30

Mermaid and Howard Ashman and others and

50:32

I have to say it was just wonderful and

50:34

this is when I love celebrity and I love

50:36

that kind of thing and you see someone

50:38

like Anne Hathaway who's grown up also

50:40

in public eye who's done who's thrived

50:42

and Hayden who did not. It's really it's

50:44

it's a really interesting week for that.

50:47

Both incredibly talented by the way. Um

50:49

so those are my wins and fails. Um there

50:51

are you were you a Disney child, Adam?

50:53

>> Yeah. Yeah. I like Disney a lot. There

50:55

was this movie named Bolt about this dog

50:57

that went on this. Do you remember that?

50:58

Do you remember Bolt? I remember

51:00

watching that.

51:00

>> I have four children. I know all the

51:02

>> Okay. Okay. So you watched it a lot. And

51:03

then a lot of the D23 stuff even excites

51:05

me. They're doing all these like new

51:07

casting announcements on stage where

51:08

they're talking about this is the new

51:10

X-Men.

51:10

>> Yeah, they're great. Is there an X-Men

51:12

you object to? I think people kind of

51:14

like the X-Men choices.

51:16

>> Um, no, I think I think it's good so

51:18

far. I really liked it. I really liked

51:20

the uh the cast. I like Satie S.

51:24

She's really good. Yeah.

51:25

>> And she was in the new Spider-Man movie.

51:27

Have you seen that?

51:27

>> No, I'm going to. I'm about to. I'm

51:29

check it out. I am going to see it this

51:31

week. My girlfriend refuses to watch the

51:33

original Tobeby Magcguire movies cuz she

51:35

says they're too corny and old and I'm

51:37

like, "Dude, I I grew up on those. How

51:39

do I How do I convince her to watch

51:40

those?"

51:41

>> She's I'm sorry. She has to watch them.

51:43

They're wonderful. They're

51:44

>> Are you seeing the new one with your

51:45

kids?

51:45

>> Uh I I My one son is living in San

51:48

Francisco and he's not a Spider-Man fan

51:50

and the other is in China hiking right

51:52

now. So, he's not going to be able to do

51:53

it. They're I have the older the younger

51:55

ones are too young to watch Spider-Man.

51:56

They're not ready for it yet. Um,

51:58

they're four and six. And so they are

52:01

still on in the They went to see Paw

52:02

Patrol Dino. Okay. Island, which I am so

52:05

glad I didn't have to see Paw Patrol,

52:07

which I call Capaganda. Um, is they just

52:11

make a mess. The The Paw Patrol people

52:13

make a mess and then clean it up and

52:14

declare themselves heroes. I hate them.

52:16

I hate Oh my god.

52:17

>> Paw Patrol's copaganda.

52:19

>> Copaganda.

52:20

>> The cute little puppies.

52:21

>> They're propaganda. Just I like cops,

52:25

but man, they don't need more shows

52:26

celebrating [laughter] them. and not

52:28

little animals that destroy things. Then

52:30

I like may I'm for mayor. Uh what's his

52:32

name? Oh, the mayor. What's mayor? Oh,

52:35

now I'm going to forget. There's a

52:36

>> Paw Patrol mayor.

52:37

>> Paw Patrol mayor is Mayor Dingleberry.

52:40

>> Humdinger.

52:40

>> Humdinger. Yes. Yes. Thank you for

52:42

telling me that. He is so bad. And I I'm

52:45

with I'm with Humdinger on all things.

52:47

Anyway, uh we'll move on from that.

52:50

Anyhow, I will go see Spider-Man this

52:52

week. Um anyway, we want to hear from

52:54

you. Send us your questions about

52:55

business tech or whatever's on your

52:56

mind. Go to nymag.com/pivot

52:58

to submit a question for the show or

53:00

call 8551 pivot. Elsewhere in the Karen

53:03

Scott universe, this week on On, I

53:05

talked to author Ryan Holidayiday, who's

53:07

been popularizing the philosophy of

53:08

stoicism through his books and his

53:10

podcast. I'm really a fan of his. He

53:12

used to have a lot of high-profile fans

53:14

in Silicon Valley and tech, but many of

53:16

them have turned on him as they've

53:18

turned uh toward President Trump. also

53:20

because he's pointing out the things

53:21

they're using from stoicism, they

53:24

pervert completely, which is why I love

53:26

Ryan. Let's listen to a clip.

53:28

>> It's It's been weird. I don't feel like

53:30

I've changed that much.

53:31

>> You haven't?

53:32

>> And and it's it's been interesting to

53:35

watch people radicalize. Like I talked

53:37

about this in the book I did on wisdom.

53:38

Like watching Elon Musk go from reading

53:41

Soviet rocket manuals to like getting

53:43

all his news from from social media, you

53:46

realize just how easily smart people can

53:49

fry their brains. And I think that's

53:51

kind of the main problem of our time is

53:53

like how to avoid getting brain [ __ ]

53:55

>> Yeah. If you think that, Adam, is that

53:57

how you feel?

53:58

>> Actually, very very well said. I've

54:00

actually wondered a lot throughout the

54:01

past few years how Elon Musk can

54:03

simultaneously be somebody who seems

54:05

rather clever at times and can build and

54:08

hire and and push humanity in a

54:11

visionary direction, but then also at

54:13

such a minute level get caught up in

54:14

these weird lies about like black crime

54:17

statistics and trans statistics. How can

54:20

you simultaneously be caught up in both

54:21

of those?

54:22

>> Well,

54:24

this is your brain on drugs. I don't

54:26

[laughter] I don't Allegedly. Allegedly.

54:28

allegedly

54:29

>> uh you know this this it's more than

54:31

that. It's he really was really an

54:33

interesting character and not perfect by

54:35

any stretch of the imagination. But

54:37

what's happened to him has been really

54:38

disappoint for those of us who know him

54:40

pretty well. The shift has been dramatic

54:42

and disturbing and uh multifaceted and

54:45

it's a it's a waste. It's an enormous

54:47

waste. He's a little bit like Howard

54:48

Hughes or Henry Ford. You know, just

54:51

happens. Okay, that's the show. Thanks

54:53

for listening to Pivot and be sure to

54:54

like and subscribe to our YouTube

54:56

channel. will be back on Friday with

54:58

another special guest host. Uh Adam, I'm

55:01

a real fan. You're doing an amazing job.

55:03

I think you're going to have longevity.

55:04

Let me say the way you're talking about

55:06

your business is really smart and uh

55:08

just keep changing. I would say just

55:10

keep changing and shifting and and and

55:13

I'm sure you'll be around for a long

55:14

time to come.

55:15

>> Thank you. You and Scott are a huge

55:16

inspiration. Thank you for having me on

55:18

and I'm sure we'll cross paths again

55:19

soon.

55:19

>> Absolutely. Thanks, Adam.

55:30

>> [music]

Interactive Summary

In this episode of Pivot, Kara Swisher hosts guest co-host Adam Mockler, a 23-year-old Gen Z commentator. They discuss the evolving landscape of independent media, the challenges of navigating political content, and the importance of building long-term, self-owned media infrastructure. The conversation touches on various political topics, including the ongoing war in Iran, the conditions aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, and the speculation surrounding potential replacements for White House Press Secretary Caroline Leavitt. Furthermore, they address the controversy involving the Tate brothers and conclude with personal wins and fails, highlighting the pressures of social media and the entertainment value of cultural events like D23.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts