HomeVideos

Red-pilled Billionaires, LA Fire Update, Newsom's Price Caps, TikTok Ban, Jobless MBAs

Now Playing

Red-pilled Billionaires, LA Fire Update, Newsom's Price Caps, TikTok Ban, Jobless MBAs

Transcript

2554 segments

0:00

all right everybody welcome back to the

0:01

Allin podcast the number

0:04

one Finance technology business and Maga

0:08

podcast in the

0:09

world with us again today is the sulate

0:13

of science David freeberg living a

0:17

modern 1950s aesthetic lifestyle there

0:21

this is the uh House of Tomorrow House

0:24

of the future world at the original um

0:27

1955 Tomorrowland at Disneyland wow and

0:30

you have a NASA hat on this is amazing

0:32

he's in full geek out mode yeah I didn't

0:35

this I told you guys about this haircut

0:36

last week because you couldn't blow

0:39

yourself that's right properly I told

0:42

you this would happen to you it's

0:43

exactly what your M said would happen

0:46

look at the continuity he told you you

0:48

could never match the blow you got last

0:50

week and here we are I did my best I

0:53

mean it looks ridiculous but stylish in

0:55

a way and with us again your chairman

0:57

dictator chamath poly hop

1:00

he's ready to go to the

1:02

inauguration and take his Victory lap

1:05

and take an enormous amount of credit

1:08

shamad are you looking forward to your

1:10

Victory lap I was in Florida earlier

1:14

this week I came all the way back so

1:16

that I could play poker with my friends

1:18

and see my family and children oh nice

1:20

and I'll be flying all the way back out

1:22

tomorrow morning were you at maral Lago

1:24

no I was with my friend in a undisclosed

1:28

location with a friend in an undisclosed

1:30

location okay sounds great and joining

1:33

us for the first time one of my oldest

1:37

friends Mr Mark Pinkus or as we like to

1:40

say Marcus Pinkus why do you always take

1:42

credit for these guests being only your

1:45

friends the rest of us are the ones that

1:47

call them and are like hey do you want

1:48

to come on the show and then you're like

1:49

my old think longer than you I don't

1:52

know about that is that true back to

1:54

like AOL yeah well we met when you were

1:58

doing silicon alley right reporter yeah

2:00

in the 90s I've been collecting rent

2:02

from Mark pinkis for the last year it's

2:05

true my landlord you should whistleblow

2:07

on freeberg to Gavin's gouging police

2:10

and see if you can get

2:14

some let your winners

2:16

[Music]

2:17

ride

2:18

[Music]

2:21

David we open sources to the fans and

2:24

they've just gone crazy with it Queen

2:30

we'll get right to that in a minute uh

2:32

the price couch continues if our viewers

2:34

had to vote on who is most likely to

2:36

price couch it's 100% free BR th% but

2:39

let's be clear the real gouging is the

2:42

predio trust who's charging an amazingly

2:45

high rent like over $100 a foot and then

2:47

freeberg was actually giving me a pretty

2:50

good deal he was getting a pretty good

2:51

deal I was paying like 130 a foot or

2:53

something 120 130 a foot all in uh for

2:56

real estate in the Presidio and we just

2:59

weren't using the space but it is the

3:00

most expensive real estate it is nuts

3:02

quite an office my Lord the prio trust

3:05

manages that federal land and they get

3:07

to keep all the money and reinvest it

3:09

it's probably the only profitable

3:10

operation in the federal government I

3:13

used to be on the board so I I saw it

3:16

close up and they they reinvest in

3:18

things like you know restoring natural

3:20

habitats cutting down eucalyptus trees

3:23

right you know archaeological digs right

3:27

right it was really interesting I looked

3:29

at one of those those

3:31

houses to rent when it was first moving

3:34

up to San Francisco and the only problem

3:37

with those houses have these gorgeous

3:38

houses that were like the General's

3:39

houses like three four five bedrooms but

3:42

they would have one

3:44

bathroom right for four rooms and I like

3:47

can you put another bathroom and cannot

3:48

change anything these are historic

3:50

privileges so you know historic

3:52

landmarks marked it freeloader tribe

3:57

social network back in the day

3:58

support.com and if you wasted some

4:01

portion of your youth playing

4:03

Farmville he was one of the original app

4:06

creators or Zinga poker which famously

4:10

he said hey would you like to be an

4:11

investor in Zinga poker and I said how

4:13

does it work he said oh well you play

4:14

for virtual coins and I said Mark this

4:17

is the stupidest thing I've ever heard

4:18

you've taken all of the money out of the

4:22

the the game it's never going to work

4:24

and of course he turned it into a

4:25

multi-billion dollar company and that

4:27

was another $25 million Angel investment

4:29

Miss on my part but Mark you were also

4:32

like early General social networking you

4:34

were involved in Facebook as an investor

4:37

Linked In weren't you like ear on yeah I

4:41

I think the first social media

4:43

investment I made was Napster I sent the

4:45

first check Wow first $100,000 I think

4:48

of that as the beginning of all this but

4:50

then yeah Reed and I put up the first

4:52

money for

4:54

friender and then we were lucky enough

4:57

to invest along with Peter in the first

4:59

round Facebook wow the First on on

5:02

Twitter so yeah like pick the right body

5:05

of water even if your boat doesn't tribe

5:08

didn't

5:09

work but but you placed five other bats

5:12

so you hit a couple of them it works out

5:14

just

5:16

fine you uh I believe you owned the six

5:20

degrees patents the original social

5:23

network in the 90s in web 1.0 was a

5:26

company called six degrees and uh they

5:28

had a bunch of patents and I believe you

5:30

bought them and then sold them to

5:32

Facebook yeah no we didn't sell them

5:34

Reed and I bought them because we were

5:37

worried that if Yahoo at the time had

5:40

gotten them or even Friendster that they

5:42

would have blocked the whole industry so

5:44

we bought them we we paid 750k which was

5:48

a lot then and we were accused of being

5:51

patent trolls and we never got that

5:55

opportunity we just sat on them to this

5:58

day actually I own half and Microsoft

6:00

owns other half are you still close with

6:03

with Reed Mark yeah very close how did

6:07

you guys reconcile your differences and

6:09

political views in this last election

6:11

because he was very vocal kamla you

6:13

obviously became vocal Trump and very

6:17

kind of kind of diametrically different

6:20

views on the

6:22

future well it's interesting because

6:23

Reed and I really started the whole kind

6:26

of journey into bigger National politics

6:29

together we both sat down and had lunch

6:32

with Biden and made wrote big checks uh

6:36

a little over a year ago December of

6:39

23 and and then you know won't bother

6:43

you but I I had my red pill moment and I

6:45

went a very different direction which

6:47

started off just questioning the

6:49

Democrats hold on hold on can you

6:51

actually just double click into that

6:53

what was your red pill moment was there

6:55

one specific thing or was it more of a

6:57

trickle of things it was both right it

6:59

starts the wall starts crumbling and

7:01

then it comes down all at once so for me

7:04

it really

7:06

started early in 23 I started reading

7:10

pirate wires and Mike salana and I

7:13

thought he was a little crazy at first

7:14

because he would write these articles

7:17

one he wrote was about how the Ukrainian

7:20

soldiers had swastikas on their helmets

7:22

in the New York Times photographers

7:24

would ask them to take the saskas off

7:26

for photos and I said that can't be

7:28

right that can't be true

7:30

and then four months later it was in the

7:31

New York Times buried in the middle of

7:33

the paper and I kept seeing stories like

7:36

that that that he would be early on and

7:40

so I just started feeling uncomfortable

7:42

and Queasy about what was going on with

7:44

mainstream media and then in May of last

7:48

year of 24 I read some article that

7:51

talked about Trump's speech in

7:53

Charlottesville and this has been well

7:56

covered but but where he said there was

7:58

good people on both sides Ides and the

8:01

article said it was completely you know

8:05

propaganda and not what he actually not

8:07

accurately reflecting what he said that

8:10

uh that he denounced the Nazis a bunch

8:12

of times in his speech and so then I

8:14

went and watched that video and that was

8:17

my red pill moment I think it was for a

8:19

lot of people because it wasn't just the

8:22

media spinning it or politicians

8:25

spinning it that was like one of the

8:27

pillars of why you were supposed to hate

8:28

Trump

8:30

that speech and and then you

8:34

see Biden say that's why he had to run a

8:37

second time and you see Obama go to you

8:40

even see Biden bring it up again in the

8:42

beginning of the DNC and it's one of

8:44

their pillars and they clearly know that

8:46

they're misrepresenting things so for me

8:49

that was just that was beyond

8:51

uncomfortable I was just like okay now I

8:53

got to go back to First principles and

8:55

look at the primary data and listen only

8:58

to original speech by people and I just

9:01

realized I couldn't trust mainstream

9:03

media so I was I became I started

9:06

questioning the Democrats as soon as I

9:07

started questioning the Democrats I

9:09

started getting a lot of Shame and anger

9:13

and hatred oh the other thing that

9:14

happened those part of this journey is

9:16

that my chief of staff parted ways with

9:19

me after nine years in April of last

9:21

year and he was the main person

9:24

protecting me from myself on Twitter and

9:26

he was the one who would say stay in

9:28

your lane nobody wants to hear what you

9:30

think about politics or San Francisco or

9:33

anything other than you know your area

9:35

of products and investing and with him

9:37

gone I just started tweeting whatever I

9:40

felt and thought and sometimes I got it

9:43

wrong or it was a little too emotional

9:45

but first of all it was really fun and

9:47

then second of all I found I got

9:50

connected to this whole new audience of

9:52

people who are these kind of techno

9:54

optimists I think you guys probably

9:56

talked about

9:57

it and

9:59

that just brought me down this path that

10:02

eventually I came out two days before

10:05

the

10:07

election publicly for Trump um and it

10:10

was only because that's when I

10:12

completely got there and I was trying to

10:14

just be completely honest and authentic

10:17

with myself and on Twitter at the same

10:20

time and my daughters turned to me that

10:23

Sunday and they said you're you're going

10:26

to vote for Trump we know it and I said

10:28

yeah you're probably right and they said

10:29

well then you have to go say it on

10:31

Twitter and my daughter's like really in

10:33

this with me yeah so anyway and then it

10:36

was on the front page of the New York

10:38

Post on the day of the election that I

10:41

was uh this not that I'm such news but

10:44

maybe it just was their news Peg um that

10:47

I was coming out for Trump and but I'll

10:51

get back to your re question but what I

10:53

love about my New York Times about my

10:55

New York friends is that they did not

10:58

give a they were all proa and they

11:02

texted me and they're just like oh

11:04

that's kind of funny but it's one thing

11:06

I kind of love about New York they

11:08

didn't care back to your question on

11:10

Reed what I love about Reed was he was

11:14

already getting pings from people saying

11:16

what's going on with pinkis he's going

11:18

off the rails he's becoming a Trumper

11:21

you know it's you guys I'm sure have

11:23

gone down got a little bit of that too

11:25

about shamas in

11:27

freeberg yeah me like what's wrong with

11:30

him we got to bring him back into the

11:32

fold you know he's he's should we lock

11:34

him up is he crazy um and so Reed was

11:37

already getting these I had a lot of

11:39

anxiety about talking to Reed about it

11:42

and finally Reed and I got on

11:46

FaceTime and he just said I just want to

11:49

start by saying I'm team Mark and I said

11:52

I'm team Reed and it gets out a little

11:54

you know a a but well no Americans can

11:57

get along even if they disagree ically

11:59

about a candidate is probably where we

12:01

need to get to especially you know now

12:03

that Trump's going to be in office in a

12:04

couple of days what was it like when you

12:07

had for Biden yeah okay well just to

12:10

finish the read part sorry but no

12:12

problem what what I love about Reed is

12:15

that we followed that with a 4-Hour

12:16

dinner and he said I never questioned

12:20

your principles he said I know you're a

12:23

highly principled person and I just want

12:25

to understand which principles it is and

12:28

I'd like to convince to change your mind

12:30

but anyway so was hold on one second

12:34

so I you said something almost in

12:38

passing but I just want to double click

12:41

I think part of what Silicon Valley

12:44

actually gets wrong is that we don't

12:47

embrace the tism and what I mean by that

12:50

is everybody we're all a little socially

12:53

uncomfortable we awkward I wouldn't say

12:56

that we were the coolest people growing

12:58

up and there this virulent form of

13:01

blockers you called it Chief of Staff I

13:05

think that these folks can be very

13:08

detrimental which almost represent this

13:11

filter between your true self and

13:14

everybody else and there is this game

13:16

that's played about being a

13:19

gatekeeper I do think that executive

13:22

assistants are valuable administrative

13:24

assistance are valuable the reason I can

13:27

say this is that my EA went on maternity

13:30

leave I had and I experimented with a

13:32

chief of staff Etc and now I use Jason

13:35

service called Athena and I have a guy

13:38

that works with me in the

13:41

Philippines and it's about 3,000 a month

13:44

and I can honestly tell you this guy is

13:46

the single most effective administrative

13:49

support I've ever had and what there

13:52

isn't is all these opinions on what I

13:54

can say or do and I think that when you

13:57

look at a lot of these big companies if

13:58

you look at zuck's current

14:00

transformation or what you just spoke

14:01

about there are all these

14:03

Interlopers that seem to get in the

14:05

middle of you and people's perception of

14:09

you I don't know if you have any

14:10

comments or reactions to that idea yeah

14:13

it's part of where I know you guys have

14:15

talked about Zuck coming out as Lisa's

14:18

based or his seemingly more authentic

14:20

self or sharing more about himself and I

14:24

can relate to it because I think we all

14:27

go through this this struggle as you

14:31

start to be more of a known person

14:34

inside your company outside your company

14:37

and you have people around you taking

14:40

the edges off and I think that we're now

14:45

in this time that I think we're having

14:47

authenticity is having a moment now

14:50

which is great for me because Reed said

14:53

to me I I've if you Google me you'll see

14:55

that there's lots and lots of bad things

14:58

written about me and a lot of it is my

15:01

high school quote was some people have

15:03

tacked and others tell the truth and

15:05

I've always been kind of just committed

15:07

to being honest even if it's nuanced and

15:11

it's not an easy sound bite and Reed

15:13

said to me early on you need to pick

15:15

what the easy narrative is or the Press

15:18

is going to make it up for you and he

15:20

was right and they did or my competitors

15:23

did so I think that now with long form

15:28

podcasts and there's just more and the

15:31

fact that we can kind of directly in a

15:33

lot of ways Elon was the first one to

15:35

directly defend himself you remember

15:37

when well he fired his whole do you

15:38

remember when he fired his whole PR team

15:40

he fired all those people there's just

15:42

like there's none of that infrastructure

15:44

between him and and everybody else but

15:47

do you remember when he would be on

15:49

Twitter all the time post PayPal trying

15:51

to correct the story and just write long

15:55

long diet tribes and then and then when

15:57

a New York Times reported said something

15:59

negative about a Tesla he just went off

16:02

for weeks about them and and it seemed a

16:05

little crazy and deranged and then you

16:06

started to see that it worked like he

16:08

actually and we were told don't defend

16:11

yourself if something bad is written

16:12

about you you're going to prolong the

16:14

press cycle you're going to make the

16:17

journalist

16:19

angry and so we've we're now Unshackled

16:22

I I teach this class at Stanford and I

16:24

taught two backtack on Monday and I

16:27

looked around and I saw half the plaque

16:29

her said you know she her you know he

16:33

him his and I got a little Pang of like

16:36

oh do I have to watch what I'm saying

16:37

I'm like no I don't I'm Unshackled I'm

16:40

just gonna this is just me and I'm gonna

16:43

be Mark unfiltered and it's the better

16:45

version of ourselves so anyway I I'm

16:48

glad that Zuck feels like he can be he

16:51

can present more of his complete self

16:55

out there now and I think we can get

16:57

into it later but I have a lot of

16:59

thoughts on how the culture is going to

17:01

kind of move more towards Bas back to

17:03

the other question with Biden that lunch

17:06

you had did he seem like he was all

17:09

there yeah come on was it in the

17:11

afternoon I mean did you have concerns

17:13

about that that was sharp as attack that

17:16

was thing that broke me I mean I'm not

17:18

saying I'm like full mag over here I was

17:20

like wait a second are you guys lying

17:22

about this like how long is this and how

17:25

deep is this cover up I have no horse in

17:27

this race I didn't have a horse in the

17:29

race so I had nothing to lie about I for

17:32

sure don't now I'm really not a Biden

17:35

fan or

17:37

protector I'll tell you like the exact

17:41

my exact observation we we had this

17:44

lunch there was like maybe five of us

17:47

with Biden and a few of his Finance

17:49

people in they had it in the tennis

17:52

house which is the way they found that

17:55

they can have a fundraising lunch on the

17:57

property of the White House they found

17:59

some way we'll see if if Trump does it

18:01

hole right yeah the loophole and and it

18:04

was I was impressed it was a long launch

18:06

it must have been hour and a half two

18:07

hours and I'll tell you the good and the

18:10

bad the good the part I was impressed

18:13

was he kept the conversation thread he

18:16

was engaged and kept the thread the

18:18

whole time when people you say sharp as

18:21

attack or kept the thread that's how we

18:24

talk about like our 90-year-old

18:26

grandparent or something so I'm just

18:28

saying the reality to me he he was

18:32

not he did not seem mentally debilitated

18:37

in the sense of

18:39

dementia but we were impressed that he

18:42

was able to follow the conversation

18:45

thread and then say you know but okay

18:48

let me say it differently would you have

18:50

had the same bar if it was Jamie Diamond

18:53

sitting across from you for 2our

18:56

lunch no no so so so yes it was it was

19:00

wow your grandfather is holding up

19:03

really well like your grandfather was

19:05

able to have a whole lunch and hold the

19:08

conversation but it wasn't I didn't walk

19:11

away saying I I have to admit I did not

19:14

walk away saying I think he's mentally

19:15

unfit but I did but and I wasn't shocked

19:20

but I was like okay this is someone

19:22

who's being really handled and managed

19:24

by the people around him and he's being

19:26

told to show up here say say this but I

19:30

will say he was he was not on an obvious

19:32

script which I know I think famously he

19:35

did some fundraiser at vod's house where

19:38

he was reading a prompter the whole time

19:40

so wasn't reading a

19:42

prompter yeah that at a at a person's

19:46

home they brought a teleprompter for him

19:48

to speak wow that's you didn't hear that

19:50

I didn't actually that's new information

19:52

that's yeah crazy but I mean In fairness

19:56

like the um there's this issue called

19:58

Sun Downing people who are in that age

20:01

group they're good in the day and then

20:03

the sun goes down and you know their

20:06

brains are exhausted and and that's when

20:09

you would see it and that's what they

20:10

said about the debate but for me that

20:12

was the the coronation of comma and like

20:15

not actually having a speedrun primary

20:17

that to me was just anti-democratic

20:20

anti-American and like just what

20:22

happened to Meritt and like having a

20:24

process here right that's when I felt

20:26

like the party just CED

20:29

I'm glad you're here let's jump um okay

20:31

but let me ask you a question before we

20:32

get into the doc we got a lot to talk

20:34

about obviously but what do you think

20:36

the Democratic party does from here like

20:38

is everybody's like this they're lost in

20:40

a drift we're not even hearing from them

20:43

maybe a little bit of uh push back I

20:46

guess at

20:47

these Senate hearings right now for

20:50

confirmations but what do you think

20:52

happens is there any hope for this and

20:55

and who would lead them out of this

20:56

Shapiro somebody

20:59

AOC I think that what my brain my kind

21:03

of intelligent front of brain would tell

21:06

me the logical thing which I think I

21:09

want to say is one lens that I think we

21:12

have to be careful not to just apply

21:13

logic here because it's parties and and

21:16

the Democrats but the logic would say oh

21:19

they're going to find based authentic

21:22

people to put up against these other

21:24

ones like the kind of Federman types

21:27

that they're going to put those people

21:30

forth who are more Centrist and also are

21:34

more trustworthy that they're actually

21:36

authentic in their flaws that's what my

21:38

brain would tell me I think there'll be

21:40

a little of that that the party I

21:43

believe is will move more that way I

21:46

think that the corporate candidates

21:48

aren't going to fly anymore with the

21:50

electorate I think that the managed

21:53

corporate through sound bites can't do a

21:56

long form things like this I think

21:59

that's over and we can get into that

22:02

later if we want but I think they won't

22:05

go as far as they should so so they the

22:08

they won't go as far as like what I

22:10

think we would intelligently advise them

22:12

to do so so that's as much as I can

22:16

figure out that they should do that but

22:18

they won't interesting well we're

22:20

certainly going to find out in the next

22:22

year or two what their direction is when

22:24

they get to the midterms I suppose oh

22:27

one more thing though on it is yeah and

22:29

a lot of it depends on really what we

22:32

see and if if Doge starts to really get

22:36

popular support this whole I think you

22:38

guys talked about this last week that

22:39

the more that FDR style Trump and people

22:44

get popular support it's going to become

22:47

a more and more isolating lonely place

22:50

in two years to still be like you know

22:53

California Gavin everyone saying don't

22:56

worry we're going to protect you against

22:58

these people if if they're doing things

23:00

that are popular to still saying you're

23:02

protecting against them I think won't

23:04

fly well that's a a great jump off point

23:06

because Gavin does seem and Karen bass

23:09

seem like their careers are ending and

23:10

they're in the last stages of trying to

23:13

maybe get a little bit more pragmatic

23:16

based is the word people might use for

23:17

that just being super candid but let's

23:20

get let's get into a little bit of an

23:22

update here about the absolute tragedy

23:24

occurring in Los Angeles the death toll

23:26

is now at 25 uh ,000 structures have

23:29

been destroyed it's mostly people's

23:31

homes it's 40,000 Acres that's 60 square

23:34

miles I think San Francisco is 7 by S

23:38

miles right so this is a lot of uh space

23:41

it's bigger than all of San Francisco

23:44

the Palisades and eaten fires are still

23:46

burning and as of Wednesday 80,000

23:49

people were under evacuation

23:52

orders couple of our friends lost their

23:54

homes and uh but they survived but the

23:58

story of losing everything are just

24:00

tragic every

24:02

memory all your personal documents

24:04

photos art whatever that you've

24:07

collected over a lifetime I just had two

24:09

conversations with people and they were

24:11

just in shock the estimates right now of

24:15

damage are between 135 billion and $150

24:19

billion this is some of the most

24:21

expensive real estate on the planet it's

24:24

10 times more costly than any other

24:26

wildfire in history according to reports

24:29

uh you might remember the campfire near

24:32

Paradise California that's about what 3

24:34

hours North of San Francisco Northeast

24:37

that one was 12.5 billion just to level

24:41

set it

24:42

uh and now people are talking about and

24:45

we'll talk about here today what the

24:47

recovery and rebuild effort might look

24:49

like California leadership disad across

24:53

the

24:54

board Gavin I just

24:59

disad Gavin new have you had traffic to

25:02

dad.com with all of this yeah right now

25:04

dad.com is going to be red director to

25:06

Gavin or Karen bass I don't know which

25:09

one is more disgraceful I mean it's it's

25:12

an incredible troll that you just

25:13

redirected every week to whoever you're

25:15

mad is that

25:17

yeah who would be more disgraceful in

25:19

this situation Gavin or Karen bass I

25:22

think it's got to be k for just being

25:23

out of the country I think I think it

25:25

would be quite funny if every week you

25:27

actually gave an award redirected the

25:29

website to the I give it to this week

25:31

and before that it was Jake Paul for

25:33

that Tyson fight and the

25:36

disad but it's the stakes have gone up

25:41

Gavin is now doing executive orders one

25:44

of them is to make it illegal to lobal

25:47

offers to impacted homeowners for the

25:49

next three months I don't know what the

25:52

point of that is and the other one is to

25:55

eliminate the coastal acts review of

25:58

permits for the the

26:02

houses that are along PCH I

26:05

suppose and he wants

26:08

to extend key price gouging protections

26:12

quote to help make rebuilding more

26:14

affordable gouging is defined as raising

26:17

the rent or price of other goods and

26:19

services more than 10% from the last

26:21

marketed

26:23

price but it could be as little as 5%

26:25

it's just not clear and then LA mayor

26:28

bass created a snitch hotline to report

26:31

on any kind of price gouging and rents

26:34

which we've started to see people are

26:36

now naming and shaming Zillow and red

26:40

fin listings where they you can see the

26:42

previous history of what they were

26:44

asking for for a home or for rent and

26:46

obviously the free market is

26:49

making rental homes double in price

26:52

freeberg we talked a bunch about this

26:54

and I know Pinkus you've got we had I

26:56

don't know if you're comfortable talking

26:57

about it but we had a whole conversation

26:58

about your getting dragged by the

27:01

coastal

27:02

Commission in Northern California

27:05

freeberg maybe kick us off here on what

27:08

your thoughts are on rebuilding this

27:11

area how this will happen especially

27:15

with what we brought up last week and I

27:18

think when a bit viral is your sort of

27:20

talk about putting your thumb on the

27:21

scale with insurance I mean this is I

27:25

think one of the concerning things here

27:27

is

27:29

the free market not being allowed to

27:31

progress previously with insurance and

27:33

then now with the rebuild well

27:36

California's got at this point price

27:39

controls or a mechanism for

27:42

controlling the change in price on

27:45

insurance on Housing Services and now

27:48

they've got this non-solicitation

27:51

rule all three I think are very

27:54

challenging to I think an appropriate

27:58

Market recovery look the insurance issue

28:00

is a longer one if you guys want we

28:02

could talk about that I've got a couple

28:03

notes I can bring up on the history of

28:05

how we got to this point but I think

28:06

it's going to be the one of the biggest

28:08

burdens going forward and it could

28:10

actually lead to a pretty significant

28:12

effect in long-term housing prices in

28:15

California because of the way that the

28:17

insurance Market is structured and

28:19

regulated in

28:21

California but if you want we can talk

28:23

about that or up or down what do you

28:25

think ultimately you know tldr like do

28:28

you think prices are going to go way up

28:30

here do you think this is going to take

28:32

five or 10 years to rebuild these homes

28:34

I mean we've never seen this many

28:36

structures go down at this price point

28:39

in a constrained area where just

28:42

construction is so expensive and hard so

28:44

I think the the governor did a good job

28:46

suspending the permitting requirements

28:47

for the coastal act for affected homes

28:50

and the squa review those are very

28:53

important I think

28:54

suspensions but he also put in place

28:57

this executive order for price gouging

28:58

and if you pull up the note Nick so he

29:01

basically said California penal code

29:03

section

29:04

396 which prohibits price gouging during

29:07

a declared state of emergency will now

29:09

extend indefinitely in this region and

29:12

in the language in that Penal Code it

29:15

says that businesses cannot raise the

29:18

price of essential goods and services by

29:20

more than 10% above their pre-emergency

29:23

price for a specified period and in this

29:26

case his executive order is in

29:28

definitely so in on an indefinite basis

29:30

you cannot raise the price of goods and

29:33

services which generally applies to

29:35

consumer goods like food and emergency

29:37

supplies but it also applies to building

29:39

materials and services related to

29:41

housing work so if you want to

29:45

attract Builders if you want to attract

29:48

contractors if you want to attract

29:50

electricians and plumbers to go to the

29:52

LA area you have to allow the market to

29:55

do its job if I'm a plumber operating in

29:58

Sacramento or in Phoenix and I'm like

30:00

man I could make some money if I go to

30:02

La you will see an influx of service

30:05

providers and an influx of goods to

30:07

support the rebuilding effort in

30:08

Southern California that's the way the

30:10

free market should work is there's an

30:12

opportunity in the market folks show up

30:14

they say great I can make money I'm

30:16

going to come here and do this work and

30:18

as more folks show up they begin to

30:21

compete on price and eventually the cost

30:23

kind of normalizes and you end up

30:25

finding what is now the new fair market

30:27

value between the bid and the ask the

30:30

people that are saying hey I'll do the

30:31

work they're the ask and hey I need

30:33

people to do work that's the bid and you

30:35

find a price but the benefit of that is

30:37

you increase the supply you increase the

30:39

supply of goods you increase the supply

30:41

of service providers of contractors

30:43

there is a home building dir right now

30:45

in the United States so this is an

30:46

amazing opportunity because they can now

30:48

move to LA build homes we can get a

30:51

rapid reconstruction effort underway

30:53

except the governor just said we can't

30:56

pay people 10% higher than what they

30:57

were getting paid

30:58

right before this happened on an

31:00

indefinite basis and then Karen bass

31:02

created a hotline you can go to La 311

31:05

and report people if they're trying to

31:06

charge too much and then the uh you know

31:08

the Stacey will come and investigate you

31:10

and determine that you're charging too

31:12

much I understand that there's a strong

31:14

moral imperative and incentive to say we

31:16

got to stop price gouging we don't want

31:18

people to get hurt but the second order

31:20

effect is you're actually hurting the

31:21

market and you're hurting the rebuild

31:23

effort because you're reducing the

31:24

incentive for folks to come in and fill

31:26

the void in the market that is necessary

31:28

for us to accelerate the development of

31:30

15,000 homes in a very short period of

31:32

time the alternative now is people are

31:34

going to be sitting around and I already

31:36

spoke to a couple friends I'm sure you

31:37

guys have that are like I try calling

31:39

Architects I try calling contractors

31:41

people that live in this area that have

31:42

been affected I cannot get anyone to

31:44

return my call there is not enough

31:46

service providers down there you're

31:47

going to end up waiting six seven years

31:49

to get your home rebuilt now what do you

31:51

do you own a a lot you don't have a home

31:53

to live in and then there's this other

31:56

thing where we can't take unol offers on

31:58

the home that was the other executive

31:59

order so if you want to pull that one up

32:01

the governor said it is illegal to make

32:04

an unsolicited offer on a piece of real

32:07

estate in one of these affected zip

32:08

codes I don't know what that happened in

32:12

Hawaii that makes the governor keep

32:14

referencing the Hawaii story as if you

32:16

know that there were people that were

32:18

taken advantage of and we need to

32:19

protect the citizens of LA but I'm

32:22

pretty sure that having an increase in

32:25

the number of offers coming in for Real

32:27

Estate

32:29

increases maret increases buy behavior

32:33

and that will ultimately

32:35

drive and that will ultimately make it

32:37

easier by having more liquidity for some

32:39

of these folks who owned burn down lots

32:41

to be able to sell their lot take their

32:43

insurance check move to another

32:45

neighborhood and go somewhere else

32:46

because they're going to have to

32:47

otherwise wait six or seven years to

32:48

build a

32:50

home yeah I think you're a little bit

32:53

off the deep end with some of this stuff

32:54

because I think you're not being totally

32:56

fair in representing what this EO says

33:00

and that's coming from me I mean I am

33:03

not a Nome fan okay and I think he is

33:06

completely and totally

33:09

incompetent but I'll just take the other

33:11

side of this which is that I read the EO

33:15

and I actually think it's somewhat

33:18

reasonable and I didn't connect the dots

33:22

with the EO and the real estate market

33:24

and the reason is that if you read all

33:26

of what he said the EO was hypers

33:28

specific to unsolicited offers to a very

33:32

specific handful of zip codes and it was

33:34

time boxed for three months so he said

33:38

making any unsolicited offer to an owner

33:41

of real estate property located in the

33:44

areas encompassed by and he names a

33:46

bunch of zip go I think there was like

33:48

one two there's like 12 or 13 of them

33:51

okay so unsolicited okay yep to to

33:54

acquire any interest in real property

33:56

for an amount less than the fair market

33:59

value of the

34:01

property on January 6th so before the

34:06

fire started and before the home bur

34:08

down and he said that's prohibited for

34:10

three months that's it for three months

34:13

and the reason I think he said that is

34:15

that if you just scope out a little bit

34:18

just from this moment in Los Angeles the

34:21

problem is that after natural disasters

34:23

there is a spike in fraudulent

34:26

activities and there are people that try

34:29

to take advantage of that situation to

34:31

make money so for example after

34:32

hurricanes we saw this in Florida people

34:35

poses contractors they come in and they

34:38

offer inflated prices they offer poor

34:40

quality of work and especially when you

34:43

sort of deregulate for that moment where

34:45

there's less checks there's less folks

34:48

involved because you're trying to speed

34:50

up the process you can have a bunch of

34:53

pressure tactics that work against the

34:55

best interests of the person trying to

34:57

build on the Wildfire side there was

35:00

this crazy thing Nick I'll s you the

35:02

link from KTLA that about these folks

35:05

called fire Chasers which are

35:07

essentially like you know Wildfire

35:08

scammers they're ambulance Chasers but

35:11

during fir okay so so so my point is

35:13

yeah I don't disagree with his

35:15

incompetence okay and I think he is

35:17

totally out of touch I think there's a

35:20

broken cartel that runs the state that's

35:22

going to drive this state into just

35:25

complete disrepair he was

35:28

NE already you can't say a state that

35:32

has $322 billion budget is already

35:35

bankrupt it's it's teetering on a path

35:38

where we won't be able to return and we

35:40

can debate that but my point is I just

35:43

think despite all of this he's grossly

35:45

negligent Karen bass is grossly

35:47

negligent the California cartel is

35:50

breaking this state but on this specific

35:53

narrow thing I kind of will give him his

35:55

flowers I think it was like a decent

35:57

smart good thing it's narrowly focused

36:01

there's a specific window here that's

36:03

time boxed so that the worst behaviors

36:06

of other people are roughly managed and

36:09

mitigated until we can figure out a

36:11

better answer you're saying that

36:12

unsolicited offers on real estate can

36:15

drive fraud what you talked about if

36:18

there is a person that is this does not

36:21

prevent Somebody by let's talk about

36:23

Services separately because he has a

36:24

separate EO on services this does not

36:26

prevent anybody whose house burned down

36:28

from listing his lot you could sell it

36:30

for a dollar that's right so it's not

36:32

it's I think it's it's not right and

36:34

it's inaccurate to say that this is

36:37

perturbing and distorting the free

36:38

market the idea that you cannot sell

36:41

isn't what is in this CEO the idea is

36:43

some person shows up out of the blue and

36:46

applies a pressure tactic to you when

36:48

you're in a very stressful situation

36:51

trying to deal with your insurance

36:53

brokers trying to figure out where your

36:55

kids are going to go to school they're

36:56

just making an offer what's the pressure

36:58

tactic it's why can't someone make an

37:00

offer on your home you want people to B

37:01

up David David here's what's going to

37:03

happen there are people that in the

37:05

middle of all of this stress are trying

37:07

to figure out how much money they can

37:08

get somebody shows up and underbids what

37:12

the true price Discovery could be in a

37:15

few months from now you don't know

37:17

whether you have to still pay back your

37:19

mortgage there will be people it will be

37:21

nonzero that will make a mistake and I

37:24

think that it's good to try to stop that

37:26

it doesn't absorb him from his

37:28

incompetence but this I think was

37:30

reasonably good what about the services

37:32

piece jamat the fact that you can't

37:34

increase pricing on goods and services

37:35

by more than 10% for an indefinite

37:37

period don't you think that that creates

37:39

a disincentive for service providers to

37:40

come into the state to come and address

37:43

the obviously it does yeah this Grand

37:46

ideal of the free market will solve

37:49

everything isn't necessarily always true

37:52

it's great in theory it reads well in a

37:54

textbook but real life is messy right

37:57

now we are in the messy part and we are

37:59

in the most critical part where the

38:01

abuses will be the highest I suspect

38:03

that in 6 months and 9 months and 12

38:05

months the free market will sort all of

38:08

these things out so if there's a

38:10

governor who can Implement some checks

38:14

and balances to protect these folks who

38:16

are probably totally dazed like for

38:18

example we know some of our friends I've

38:20

spoken to them over the last few days

38:22

I've spoken to their

38:26

wives

38:28

H I'll say I'll say it in in a horrible

38:31

way one person said this to me and I'll

38:33

just just quote him the amount of people

38:36

that have reached out to me if you had

38:37

asked me two weeks ago why would so many

38:39

people reach out with condolences I

38:42

would have thought that one of my

38:43

children had died that's what he said to

38:44

me and it completely struck me with it's

38:48

not on that same level but the amount of

38:50

emotional turmoil that these families

38:53

are going through probably approaches

38:54

that I don't think many of those people

38:56

are in a condition to make make good

38:57

decisions right now so I almost think a

38:59

cooling off period actually benefits

39:02

everybody it can allow the free market

39:05

to work in a few months from now we're

39:06

only talking 90 days no no the uh the

39:08

services thing is indefinite that's

39:10

that's what I think is a little bit

39:11

frustrating let me bring Mark in here

39:12

Mark you heard both sides of this

39:14

debate if you had a lot in the Pacific

39:18

Palisades that burned down and people

39:20

started making unsolicited offer listen

39:22

you're sophisticated I've known you for

39:24

20 plus years uh you're very

39:26

sophisticated

39:28

obviously but do you think that's a

39:31

reasonable thing to do to put a

39:33

moratorium on people making these low

39:35

bit offers and then we'll get to the

39:36

construction piece second but you know

39:39

what you offers unsolicited offers yes

39:41

unsolicited offers yeah what do what do

39:43

you think of that I think what what

39:45

bothers me about it there's a

39:47

presumption and and maybe chim's right

39:50

in it you're getting me to think about

39:51

it a little more than I was but but I'm

39:54

pretty much where freeberg is that we're

39:57

we're kind of treating these people like

39:59

children cuz we're what we're saying is

40:02

that they're not capable of making good

40:06

decisions so we need to protect them

40:08

from themselves and we're saying so we

40:11

don't want you to know that somebody is

40:15

willing to pay X dollar for your

40:17

property because you might take it and

40:19

you might regret later that you took

40:22

that is kind of what chamath is saying

40:24

no in a in a very narrow window where

40:27

you may not have the best and clearest

40:30

ability to make the best decision for

40:32

you because you're dealing with so many

40:33

other crazy issues in your life and you

40:36

could still say no you could say no but

40:39

you're presuming there's there's one

40:41

side that bothers me that feels like

40:43

what we've had from the Democratic party

40:45

forever which is that this this big wise

40:49

Overlord that's going to protect us from

40:51

our selves from our worst natures and

40:55

then on the other hand you're bringing

40:57

up something chat that I I hadn't

41:00

thought about that I'm just thinking

41:01

more about now which is well maybe

41:03

people could be taken advantage of at

41:06

the

41:07

margin because they're in they feel like

41:10

they're in a dire position but but if

41:13

they think they're in a dire position

41:14

they might really be in a dire position

41:16

so they might really well for example

41:19

let's just say that you haven't heard

41:20

back from the banks that own your

41:22

mortgage about whether there's going to

41:25

be a moratorium on mortgage payments

41:28

and so now you're trying to juggle

41:29

paying for an extra rental and this

41:31

house while you're trying to figure out

41:32

where to put your kids and somebody

41:34

shows up and says hey I will buy this

41:36

from you I think that there are a lot of

41:38

people who would otherwise be able to

41:41

make a much more rational decision who

41:43

may make a panic decision in that moment

41:46

and I think that if you give people a

41:47

90-day cooling off period I think it at

41:50

least shines a light on whether all of

41:54

this governmental and other

41:55

infrastructure can actually do something

41:57

for these people I do think that there

41:59

is a moment at which you can't govern

42:01

these things and all I'm suggesting is a

42:04

very narrow window of time where

42:07

people's feelings of just like

42:08

desperation are at their highest I think

42:10

that this is a decent thing to do you

42:13

know there is some precedent for the

42:15

state doing stuff like this you know in

42:17

Most states there is a cooling off

42:19

period with marriages and divorces you

42:22

you have to wait 3 Days To to file

42:25

either way to get married or to get

42:26

divorced let's talk about the

42:28

construction process here freeberg

42:29

because I think that's the most

42:31

important one because we're going to

42:32

rebuild if you don't pay a premium to

42:37

get somebody to leave another Market to

42:39

come to this one which is what's going

42:40

to be required there are simply not

42:42

enough construction people in any state

42:44

that's right so now you're competing

42:45

with another state that's right this

42:47

immediately triggered uh the debate and

42:51

D I say courage that Travis had around

42:53

this issue with surge pricing for Uber

42:56

lift and side car and a bunch of other

42:58

folks who were kind of virtue signaling

43:00

were like we don't ever want to do

43:02

search pricing therefore there were

43:04

never cars on the road on Friday and

43:06

Saturday nights when people needed them

43:08

or

43:09

during you know inclement weather

43:12

snowstorms

43:14

or on New Year's Eve and he said if you

43:17

want to increase Supply We Believe Uber

43:20

should have availability lift took a

43:22

different decision we're GNA have no

43:23

search pricing and they just simply

43:25

weren't available so maybe

43:27

what do you think about that piece

43:29

Pinkus you

43:31

think that the free market and people

43:34

should be able to say you know what I'll

43:35

pay you time and a half to come here

43:37

I'll pay you double time to work

43:38

Saturday and Sundays I'll get a couple

43:40

of RVs put them in the back if you want

43:42

to have some folks live on the

43:44

construction site and if you hit these

43:46

dates I'll pay you a bonus for hitting

43:47

it doesn't seem like any of that would

43:50

be wrong to me for somebody who had the

43:53

ability to pay an incentive for somebody

43:56

to move from another state would be out

43:59

of line here what are your thoughts on

44:01

that I agree I mean I'm I'm pretty much

44:05

just a free market believer and so I

44:09

think other than guardrails like chamat

44:12

saying and maybe I like the idea of

44:14

cooling off periods it kind of makes

44:16

sense but outside of that when it comes

44:19

to service providers yeah you have the

44:20

opposite problem right now which is like

44:22

you're saying you need to incentivize a

44:25

huge construction for

44:27

to come to LA and the cost for them to

44:32

get there to find housing themselves is

44:36

going to be even higher or the amount of

44:39

distance they're going to have to travel

44:40

every day so I think I think this could

44:43

have real unintended consequences and

44:46

just stop the just stop the wheels from

44:50

turning on rebuilding all these homes

44:53

which just make it way more complex so I

44:57

agree J final thoughts on the rebuild

45:00

and the free market in that regard yeah

45:03

I think this is where the government

45:05

ineptitude is at its

45:09

worst I think that we need to dismantle

45:11

this regulatory state that makes doing

45:15

the right thing impossible so

45:18

specifically the thing that Nome did was

45:22

essentially create

45:25

a Time expectation on when things will

45:29

get permitted and I think he said it was

45:32

like six months the problem is like this

45:34

is what just goes to show you how insane

45:37

the state has become even if you get a

45:40

permit within 6 months and this is where

45:43

I do agree with freeberg like getting

45:45

service people in and being able to

45:46

build something to spec safely is going

45:49

to take three four five six years and

45:52

it's going to be insane and the example

45:56

of the complete incompetence of the

45:57

California state government is if you

46:00

contrast and compare this with how the

46:03

state was able to respond in the North

46:05

Bridge earthquake and the crazy thing

46:08

which I thought was incredible was after

46:10

the 1994 Northridge Earthquake they

46:12

rebuilt I 10 right which is like that is

46:16

like a crazy

46:17

artery in 66 days guys they rebuilt it

46:22

not they permitted it not that they were

46:24

trying to get the California Coastal

46:26

commission to app on it not a Sierra

46:28

Club lawsuit about the Upper Land grous

46:31

they rebuilt it so you actually know

46:34

what's possible in California if if

46:36

Tradesmen are allowed to go to work yeah

46:39

they can build incredibly complicated

46:41

things with safety with speed this is

46:44

where Nome I don't think understands how

46:46

the real Market works because if you

46:49

looked at that example the real question

46:51

you should be asking is well what has

46:52

changed well Technology's gotten way

46:55

better since then the people are more

46:58

skilled there are more people to be able

47:00

to do more of these jobs and so why does

47:02

it only take six months to just get the

47:04

permit when in 120 days you could just

47:06

rebuild an entire Highway similarly why

47:08

aren't we saying that we expect these

47:09

homes built in the next three years get

47:11

these kids back in their homes and back

47:13

in school you know what they did on that

47:16

they offered a

47:17

$200,000 per day early build bonus on

47:20

that program back then so they basically

47:22

the the state declared we need this

47:25

freeway reopened and here's the date it

47:28

was like 144 days and they're like

47:29

you'll get a $200,000 bonus for every

47:32

day under 144 that you deliver it soever

47:35

w show me an incentive I'll show you an

47:37

outcome exactly the really interesting

47:40

thing here is there are regulations that

47:42

this is a unique

47:44

opportunity to put in place Nick if you

47:47

can pull it up there was a home that

47:48

wasn't burned in the Pacific Palisades

47:50

and the architect talked about some of

47:53

the design decisions

47:55

there you know have having Stone scaping

47:57

around your home gravel Etc and using

48:01

these new materials and not having

48:03

overhangs uh which and then having vents

48:06

into your uh addict which is what a lot

48:08

of homes have and the Embers get into

48:10

the addict there's an overhang and

48:12

they're not using and they're they're

48:14

all wood built you know none of this is

48:16

concrete none of it's brick California

48:18

is all wood and so they probably should

48:21

add some regulations about building

48:24

things that are fireproof because if you

48:26

had a 100 homes that were all fireproof

48:28

and built to withstand this that would

48:31

act as a natural break and if you didn't

48:33

have as much vegetation so there's

48:34

probably a series of things that should

48:36

be added here in terms of regulations

48:38

while you're getting rid of some of the

48:40

ones that are slowing you down right um

48:42

but let's pivot over to oh and then

48:44

finally like allowing people to park

48:47

their mobile homes in these places to

48:49

have housing for construction to your

48:50

point mark would be super critical and

48:52

they block that kind of stuff so when

48:54

you need temporary housing in California

48:56

you can't do it

48:57

by the way I want to I want to hear what

48:59

freeberg has to say about insurance but

49:01

let me connect the dots between what you

49:02

said and what he's about to say there

49:05

are three images I just want to show you

49:06

guys and to Bubble this up for everybody

49:09

that isn't necessarily living in

49:11

California and is consumed with what all

49:13

of this means there's a bigger Trend

49:16

across the country that I think is just

49:18

worth putting out there so Nick do you

49:20

want to just show the first chart from

49:22

FEMA so this is basically a graph

49:27

per locality all over the United States

49:29

where FEMA tries to assess the disaster

49:32

risk for living in a given area and what

49:36

you see here is that there's some risk

49:39

in living on the Eastern Seaboard and

49:41

there's a lot of risk in it's growing

49:43

for living on the western Seaboard and

49:45

the two most complicated states that

49:49

have to deal with this are clearly

49:50

Florida and

49:52

California so that's one which is this

49:54

is a problem that isn't just focused on

49:58

this one little area so then if you

50:00

double click a little bit further

50:01

there's a company called core logic they

50:04

publish a lot of real estate data here's

50:06

a chart about the western United States

50:08

that just double clicks into Wildfire

50:11

risk and I was shocked when I saw this

50:13

this is first of all most of California

50:17

this is like Nevada this is Arizona this

50:20

is parts of Texas this is Washington I

50:22

didn't even know the fire risk went up

50:25

that high but this is essentially a lot

50:28

of the western United States and then

50:30

the last chart goes through and it

50:32

actually does core logic does an

50:34

assessment of the value at risk so in

50:38

California it's three4 of a trillion

50:41

dollars that are at about 1.26 million

50:45

homes that are at moderate or great risk

50:49

of fires in Colorado it's about 141

50:53

billion in Texas it's 88 billion in

50:56

Oregon it's 45 billion in Arizona 36

50:59

billion the point is that everything you

51:03

said

51:04

Jason now needs to get Scaled out

51:07

meaning there needs to be a national

51:09

level conversation this can't be a bunch

51:11

of city planners making code and making

51:15

laws in a little municipality yeah

51:17

because that problem what that shows you

51:19

is we have a multi-trillion doll risk to

51:24

a lot of people in the Western United

51:27

States specifically around this issue

51:29

that has to get dealt with by code all

51:32

right really interesting in New York

51:34

finally New York has put into place

51:37

congestion pricing I've been waiting for

51:39

this my entire life here's a math this

51:43

went into effect January 5th this

51:46

congestion pricing concept exists in

51:48

London as everybody probably

51:50

knows basically if you're below Central

51:53

Park which is six stage straight in

51:54

Manhattan and you enter between 5:00

51:56

a.m. and 900 p.m. you're going to get

52:00

you know on your easy pass a charge of

52:02

but $9 cheaper than a bacon egg and

52:04

cheese in Manhattan these days if you're

52:06

going clubbing in Manhattan between 9:00

52:08

p.m. and 5:00 a.m. it's just like two

52:10

bucks it's going to increase to $12 in

52:12

2028 and $15 in 2031 trucks pay more

52:16

taxes pay less the results have been

52:20

awesome weight times to get on the

52:22

island are down 50% across the board

52:25

Lincoln Tunnel down 46% Holland Tunnel

52:28

down 63% Williamsburg Bridge down 35%

52:31

it's just an awesome effort when I live

52:34

there man as a resident the traffic was

52:37

nuts you can have emergency services

52:39

move a lot faster you get rid of noise

52:42

pollution you obviously get rid of air

52:44

quality pollution for ice engines uh

52:47

it's great for cabs great for

52:48

pedestrians and great for bike riders

52:51

the only people really complaining are

52:55

selfish and entitled people who Drive

52:56

their cars into Manhattan that's at

52:58

least my position on it opponents are

53:01

saying it's a money grab for the transit

53:04

authority because the money from this

53:05

goes to make public transportation

53:08

better what do you think Mark you in

53:09

favor of

53:10

this yeah I think more generally I feel

53:15

like since the pandemic what's been on

53:18

my mind a lot living still in San

53:20

Francisco I wanted to start a social

53:22

network called still here uh it's like

53:25

oh you still live here me too some way

53:28

for us to like come out of our houses

53:31

and notice that you're here and I'm here

53:33

but we never leave our homes I walk

53:35

around this city at my own risk and I

53:39

like the cities I feel like cities have

53:42

lost the point like they've lost the

53:43

plot like why we've kind of we still

53:46

live in cities or value them but I feel

53:49

like we have to go back to First

53:50

principles and think like why did we

53:53

move to cities in the first place and

53:54

what was the value supposed to be and is

53:57

that still the deal we're getting or is

53:59

there it have to be a new deal because

54:01

we used to live in a city because it was

54:03

economic we were closer to our job and

54:06

then we lived in a city because there

54:08

was a high density of things that we

54:11

wanted cultural people restaurants and

54:15

the best cities really were the ones

54:17

that are fun to walk around and then we

54:19

got to a point where it's not safe or

54:22

clean to walk around you don't work in

54:24

the city anymore and San Francisco

54:26

started to feel like this gigantic like

54:28

retirement community it's just all these

54:31

people who still live here because their

54:32

kids are in school maybe or they grew up

54:35

here you know a lot of our friends left

54:38

went to Austin and other places and we

54:41

started I I don't know about chamat but

54:43

I think or Dave but I think our family

54:45

has a conversation probably twice a year

54:48

of should we move why haven't we moved

54:50

what's wrong with us and so there's this

54:52

questioning going on around cities and I

54:54

think it's a good question and I think

54:57

cities need to innovate aggressively to

55:01

give to be better they have to compete

55:03

with the other options again they have

55:05

to make it fun to be there fun to work

55:08

there I think it's great that Daniel

55:10

lurry is mayor of San Francisco and he's

55:13

putting smart people around him and

55:16

they're trying to rethink first some of

55:18

attacking these core problems but also

55:21

how do we make San Francisco fun again

55:24

so I love things like congestion pricing

55:27

I think now is the time to try every new

55:30

innovation that you ever thought of and

55:33

see what sticks and and figure out like

55:37

how do you take this this tax not

55:40

literally I mean New York has a big tax

55:42

but this tax on all of us whether it is

55:46

that you can't walk across this city

55:48

that you don't feel safe or that that

55:51

the the good side of it being fun to be

55:54

in you know is that the the deal is off

55:59

and so I think you know and I also what

56:02

I'm hoping Daniel lurry does and other

56:04

smart Mayors is that they Benchmark and

56:07

they say who's doing it really well

56:09

around the world whether it's dealing

56:10

with homelessness or things like

56:13

congestion

56:14

pricing who's who's innovating and doing

56:16

it well and why aren't we doing it here

56:19

I mean I think you got to run these you

56:21

got to reinvent these cities and you

56:23

know sorry to sound cliche but I think

56:25

you got to kind of take a startup

56:27

mentality and say you're not going to

56:28

live on your incumbency anymore you've

56:31

got

56:32

to reinvent this and we can't make

56:35

companies come back to work you know

56:37

come back to the office I mean the

56:38

companies can make their employees but

56:40

it'd be really nice if the employees

56:42

wanted to be there um you know and you

56:45

can't make people live in California so

56:48

I'm in favor yeah chamath any thoughts

56:51

on Mark's point about making cities fun

56:54

again and joyful again sounds like a

56:56

pretty pretty good

56:57

platform I mean I think he's right um

56:59

San Francisco sucks it's trash they

57:02

never go there yeah it's terrible and

57:06

the reason that you don't like to go

57:07

there is it's dirty it's disgusting

57:10

there's crime there's

57:13

Grime everything just sucks there yeah

57:16

freeberg your thoughts uh

57:19

on the Gotham City that did he visit you

57:22

in the Dave did chat ever come to the

57:25

Presidio I have come to your office I've

57:28

come to Dave's office I've come to I've

57:29

gone to Peter's office there but what I

57:32

do is I I don't even go through the city

57:34

I go all the way around I drive all

57:36

through the East Bay up through Berkeley

57:38

and I come I'm just kidding no no no I

57:41

just think that the city is very poorly

57:43

managed and just the quality of many

57:46

cities are poorly managed and I think

57:48

that there's a common through line in

57:50

these poorly managed cities all the

57:53

things that you say there's no will to

57:55

do there's no will to keep crime at Bay

57:59

there's no will to make you know usable

58:01

spaces for people there's no will to

58:03

invest in the Arts so what do you expect

58:06

right there's more money collected by

58:07

these cities but there's just just more

58:09

total grift corruption and waste I

58:12

really like that you got to this will

58:13

point because whether we come back to

58:15

the coastal commission or not or talk

58:18

about California or San Francisco I

58:21

don't think it's really about the red

58:23

tape I think it's about the willpower of

58:26

of the people who are running the tape

58:28

and reading the tape you're 100% right

58:30

did you see this thing I have to read

58:32

this to you because this is really

58:34

stunning I sorry Mark keep going but I

58:37

you're still th% right you know because

58:39

sure okay maybe maybe in one case Gavin

58:43

can override the coastal commission but

58:46

it doesn't matter if you cut their red

58:48

tape by 90% as long as there's any tape

58:51

that they can use the people running

58:55

both the St there and the people on the

58:57

board have stated on their website that

59:00

their policy is managed retreat they

59:02

drew a new map of the California

59:04

coastline if that's their intention

59:07

they're going to look for anything they

59:09

can to to stop and obstruct you so it's

59:12

it's really not like their hands are

59:14

tied because there's so much permitting

59:17

you're you're right they' made a

59:18

decision and the decision in California

59:19

and San Francisco specifically was that

59:21

we're going to cater to fentol dealers

59:24

and junkies and that those people were

59:26

going to get a stipend a hotel room and

59:29

be allowed to take a super drug on the

59:33

streets thousands of people with no

59:36

recourse listen I'm pro drug okay here's

59:39

I sent you guys a I sentation but not

59:42

for fentol and meth these things are

59:43

super drugs yeah let's make it less

59:45

about San Francisco let's talk about

59:47

middle Ohio and let's talk about Ender

59:51

Palmer lucky did this really awesome

59:54

shout up really awesome interview Nick I

59:56

just sent you the link to it he's

59:58

building a new Ohio plant but the

60:02

question and answer from the interviewer

60:05

is exactly what pink has talked about

60:07

which is will the interview

60:09

says was this the only state that could

60:13

guarantee that timeline that you needed

60:15

and here's Palmer's answer was this the

60:18

only state that could guarantee that

60:20

timeline I think that they were the

60:21

state that gave us the best shot of

60:23

hitting that timeline look we've really

60:25

Eng well with jobs Ohio with a lot of

60:27

the politicians here uh not just at the

60:29

state level but the local level you know

60:31

like you said we're hiring 4,000 people

60:32

here in direct jobs a lot more jobs than

60:35

that in a direct or sorry an indirect

60:37

capacity it's the largest single job

60:39

creation event in Ohio history it was a

60:42

state that told us we have the workforce

60:44

we have a million people who are capable

60:46

of working in this facility within a

60:47

45-minute drive we're willing to work

60:49

with you on higher education to help

60:51

train people so they can come in and

60:53

they can work with you uh our customer

60:55

in the the United Air for United States

60:57

Air Force obviously it's a huge presence

60:59

here in the form of right Patterson Air

61:00

Force Base so really all the stars align

61:03

to make Ohio a great place for us to do

61:05

it and to do it fast and speaking

61:06

candidly as someone who is from

61:08

California there's some states that are

61:10

really good at uh pushing you out and

61:13

slowing you down and there's others that

61:14

are great at pulling you in and speeding

61:16

you up and that's what Ohio was

61:19

fantastic yeah states are competing for

61:22

elite

61:23

companies and there's a willpower that's

61:27

that there's an

61:28

intention and you know that if they want

61:31

to make it happen they'll make it happen

61:32

just like Gavin just did right you Gavin

61:35

could have theoretically I don't know

61:38

signed an executive order to override

61:39

the coastal Commission on lot even his

61:42

diesel plant like I don't know why he

61:44

didn't just force that through but if we

61:47

had diesel maybe there'd be more water

61:49

to fight the fire now so I think the

61:51

important thing is to note that cities

61:53

have a right to be what they want to

61:57

be you guys might find this surprising

62:00

but I'm not necessarily of the belief

62:02

that every city should necessarily cater

62:05

to progress and acceleration and

62:08

enterpris and

62:11

industrialization look when you go to

62:12

Pino every summer chth you would

62:15

probably you know stop going and would

62:18

be disappointed if you found out that

62:20

they were building a giant glass tower

62:22

apartment complex and a giant office

62:24

building right by the Portofino Port

62:27

like that's just not the character of

62:29

what that City wants to be and I do

62:31

remember when I first moved to San

62:33

Francisco 25 years ago it was it felt

62:37

like a smaller European like City it

62:39

wasn't overrun with technology companies

62:41

at the time and it was a the charm and

62:44

the quaint nature and the smaller

62:45

buildings of San Francisco that made it

62:47

a beautiful fantastic town I think that

62:50

part of the challenge of San Francisco

62:52

has been this diametrically kind of

62:54

opposed Viewpoint of progress from the

62:56

technology sector and a desire to keep

62:59

San Francisco a small City by the bay

63:02

and that that frustration has manifested

63:04

with a lot of kind of ugliness over the

63:06

the last couple decades in addition to

63:07

obviously all the silly stupid policies

63:09

that just make no sense whatsoever

63:12

they're rooted in people thinking that

63:13

this is a good solution in the short

63:15

term but it creates extraordinary damage

63:16

and harm in the long term separate but I

63:19

do think that cities have a right to be

63:20

what they want to be and I think that

63:22

Dave I think that's just I just want to

63:24

interject as a fellow San Franciscan for

63:26

a long time um just as long is that

63:30

that's the normal tension that's been

63:31

here all along and that kind of makes

63:33

the city culture great and there's you

63:36

want to have this

63:38

creative uh Melting Pot here but there's

63:41

this other side that I think has come

63:44

into play in the last 15 20 years or I

63:47

don't 10 15 years which is this

63:50

progressivism side which we saw Chessa

63:53

you know with and I think it's it's

63:55

different virus that's the ugly

63:58

silliness I meant I was saying but like

64:00

let's put that aside let's put San

64:01

Francisco aside I do think that a city

64:04

can and should be what it wants to be

64:05

does it want to attract and build in

64:07

Industry does it want to attract and

64:09

build enterprising companies or does it

64:12

want to be a small quain town does it

64:14

want to stay you know with no h that's a

64:18

false trade-off the problem is that

64:21

people in government at every level

64:23

sells the former doesn't doesn't

64:26

actually even give them that nor the

64:28

ladder what they give them is a

64:30

dysfunctional hellscape instead well

64:32

Cino doesn't do that right because it

64:34

doesn't make those promises it's not

64:36

asking to elect people that are trying

64:37

to do it not every City's making that

64:40

though why are we lying to everybody and

64:42

why are people falling for these lies

64:44

over and over and over again there's

64:45

there's a moral Clarity in telling the

64:47

truth bino doesn't try to do that but I

64:49

don't think the point is you're saying

64:50

that the cities that that promise that

64:52

and don't deliver that your San

64:53

Francisco promises it right London

64:55

promises it New York promises it these

64:58

things are chaotic messes mhm and it's

65:01

not the trade-off of oh well Parris has

65:03

found a way to stay quaint that was

65:04

never on the ballot some person comes up

65:07

and says I'm going to spend x billion

65:09

dollars a year then another person shows

65:11

up is is actually I'm going to spend it

65:12

a totally different way they both claim

65:15

to have measurements of how it's going

65:17

to be great and my point is none of them

65:20

are rooted in the real world nobody

65:21

knows how to actually run a business all

65:23

the money gets wasted and nothing

65:25

happens it neither stays quaint nor does

65:27

it

65:28

Advance if you were uh living in Los

65:31

Angeles you had the opportunity to have

65:32

Rick Caruso who built so many

65:36

amazing experiences and uh shops for the

65:41

citizens there and you picked Karen bass

65:43

I looked on her Wikipedia page looking

65:46

for any kind of operational position she

65:49

ever felt it's you want to read her

65:51

resume it's tragic I mean just it's

65:54

tragic she I would like I said last week

65:56

not send her to get my lunch because you

65:58

know that order would be totally screwed

66:00

up she is so dis so unqualified and you

66:03

had this perfect person Rick Caruso who

66:07

literally you can't script this he built

66:09

the Pacific Palisades

66:12

Village when the days before there was

66:15

going to be a fire do you know what he

66:17

did he hired water trucks to park on

66:21

those streets you can find the picture

66:23

Nick pull it up and he hired

66:25

firefighters and people to protect the

66:29

village that he

66:30

built Karen bass was in Ghana partying

66:35

taking meetings I don't know what the

66:37

connection between Los Angeles and their

66:39

citizens and what they need to get done

66:41

and Ghana after she promised she would

66:43

not do this Global you know uh Globe

66:46

trotting which she apparently has a

66:47

track record of

66:49

doing she left and stayed there knowing

66:52

this was all coming Rick ruso who you

66:55

didn't vote for

66:57

mayor he did the right thing vote these

67:00

people out recall Karen bass you can do

67:03

it we recall Chessa Boudin you remember

67:05

on this show David Sachs is a a

67:08

republican entrepreneur venture

67:11

capitalist good friend of mine I'll

67:13

introduce you guys if you haven't met

67:14

him he started a recall chesa Boudin

67:17

movement I hired a journalist to cover

67:20

the victims of crime in San Francisco

67:22

Chessa Boudin was out in 18 months you

67:24

can recall these people they're

67:27

unqualified take action start a recall

67:30

they'll tell you oh it's not a good

67:31

thing for continuity whatever these

67:33

people are not qualified they are not

67:35

thinking in your best interest you have

67:37

no choice citizens of Los Angeles but to

67:40

get these people out immediately every

67:42

day they stay in office they are going

67:45

to cause more damage to your family your

67:48

property and your city we call them now

67:52

didn't James Woods post a petition on

67:55

change.org that I saw on Twitter it was

67:57

already I signed it though I don't live

67:59

there and I think it was already over

68:01

like 90,000 you know names I mean you

68:03

you you have power the people of

68:06

California don't understand how much

68:07

power they have when Gavin new I just

68:09

told people on Twitter jamou every time

68:11

Gavin tweets or Karen best Tweets just

68:13

reply with the word resign hundreds of

68:15

people are doing it now shame these

68:17

people into resigning it's a very mature

68:19

way for you to affect you you know what

68:21

it worked in Brooklyn shame worked I

68:24

don't know why people think they have no

68:25

power you can literally just go in there

68:27

and do things and one of the things you

68:29

can do is recall them okay do we have

68:31

anything else except your pical left on

68:33

the docket all right Tik tok's future is

68:35

in question right now the ban is about

68:38

to happen unless the pairing company

68:40

bite dance divest by January 19th which

68:43

is this Sunday Tik Tok will be banned in

68:46

America Google and apple are going to be

68:48

forced to remove Tik Tok from their app

68:50

stores and Oracle Tik tok's cloud

68:52

provider has to stop providing hosting

68:54

services and cut ties assuming bite

68:56

dance doesn't come up with a last minute

68:58

deal tick Talk's only hope is the

69:01

Supreme Court blocking the law what do

69:04

you think Mark do you think it's Chinese

69:06

spyware do you think they should be

69:07

forced to divest what do you think their

69:10

repercussions will be here's what's so

69:12

hard for me about this on the one hand

69:15

part of it seems so obvious from a both

69:18

not just National Security point of view

69:20

but also just fairness like it's insane

69:25

if you think about it that there's a

69:26

Chinese company that's arguing in court

69:30

for protections under our Constitution

69:34

and freedom of speech when none of our

69:38

companies have those kinds of Rights in

69:41

China much less the right to even

69:42

operate there if they're not majority

69:44

controlled or in line like you guys

69:47

talked about with censorship or whatever

69:49

else so on the one hand it seems like a

69:51

no-brainer to me that on this case but

69:55

what you're starting to see come up in

69:57

the last couple days I'm even hearing it

69:59

from one of my daughters who's a major

70:02

Tik tocker is the law of unintended

70:05

consequences here is that we could see

70:08

this band especially if they don't get

70:10

to a deal with somebody and then the 170

70:14

million Americans many younger Americans

70:18

who rely on this all a sudden feel like

70:20

this is censoring them and it's taking

70:23

away their freedom of expression

70:25

question and it could backfire in a lot

70:28

of ways and we're already seeing memes

70:30

where they're going on to these other

70:32

apps like there's this chines book red

70:35

book which is even worse right I think

70:37

that one is owned by the Chinese

70:38

government and so we're driving them

70:41

there and so so I'm the best outcome I

70:44

think would be forced to divest and sell

70:46

to another American company but if that

70:51

doesn't happen I I'm kind of nervous

70:54

about a a real backlash I'm delighted

70:58

jamath that our kids are gonna go out

70:59

and play and have friendships and stop

71:02

scrolling on T talk what you describe

71:04

sound sounds awesome I literally get on

71:08

their iPads and phones when I sometimes

71:11

allow them to have phones and just

71:12

delete the app and then they go get it

71:14

back of course of course K are right

71:16

around it what do you think Cham what do

71:18

you think's GNA happen here I mentioned

71:19

this

71:20

to president Trump and I and I really

71:23

think this is true the reason why there

71:25

was so much bipartisan support for the

71:27

bill as it worked through Congress is

71:29

because I think that they were briefed

71:31

on just how severe the security

71:34

violations of this app are because I

71:36

don't think we've seen anything in

71:38

modern history that is that that is this

71:41

controversial yet be so almost unanimous

71:45

yeah so I think that that's an important

71:47

data point there is something happening

71:49

in the app that they've been briefed

71:51

on that makes them take this posture

71:56

and when I listened to the Supreme Court

71:58

arguments I didn't hear a very

72:00

compelling reason why this ban should be

72:03

overturned so I do agree with Mark that

72:06

we have to find a suitable

72:09

home and I think that we'll probably

72:11

find one and I think that it probably

72:13

happens under the Trump

72:15

presidency and whoever gets their hands

72:17

on it gets their hands on an incredible

72:20

asset that they will be able to buy

72:22

extremely cheaply because there is no

72:24

way that is a fair market value here

72:27

deal for that asset because whoever is

72:29

the buyer is in the total cat bird seat

72:31

and in order to get a deal done with the

72:32

federal government I think you're just

72:35

going to get a basically like a buy at

72:36

now price that's very cheap the other

72:38

thing that I'll say though on a totally

72:39

separate tangent so when I started

72:41

hunting around Tik tok's realtime

72:44

recommendation algorithm was open source

72:46

the learning method yep Nick do you want

72:49

to just throw it up here it's called

72:50

monolith this is an incredible paper the

72:53

cleverness of what these guys have built

72:55

cannot be

72:57

underestimated and what's incredible is

72:59

what they describe in this paper which I

73:01

think frankly a lot of social apps would

73:04

benefit from

73:05

understanding is exactly how they've

73:07

built it to essentially not take this

73:10

more monolithic training approach for

73:11

recommendations but how do you do it in

73:13

real time how do you make it

73:15

collisionless it's

73:17

incredible this paper is a tour to force

73:21

and it just makes me realize that

73:24

despite the

73:27

political maneuvering of this hot potato

73:29

there are some folks that have been

73:30

working in that app or in you know the

73:33

parent company that are truly

73:35

technically talented and it's a it's a

73:37

bit of a shame that they're going to get

73:38

sort of throw the baby out with the bath

73:40

water so to speak so people should know

73:43

that there's some technological

73:45

innovations inside of bike dance and Tik

73:47

Tok that are just truly amazing feats of

73:50

computer science this is an example it

73:53

doesn't though change the fact that I

73:54

think that enough of Congress and the

73:57

rest of the security apparatus know that

73:58

this is a mechanism to spy I think you

74:00

both nailed it isn't China saying though

74:02

that they're going to if this does get

74:05

divested they're going to keep either

74:07

bite dance or Chinese government saying

74:09

we're not going to give over the

74:10

algorithm or are you saying it's open

74:12

source it doesn't matter well this was

74:14

an example of just sort of like

74:15

describing the methodology it's not

74:17

functionally open source yet but I think

74:19

that open sourcing it doesn't solve the

74:21

problem and the reason is so let's just

74:23

say that you're Pegasus was able to

74:25

reverse engineer or build penetration

74:28

attacks into WhatsApp that were

74:31

imperceptible to everybody until it

74:33

happened to Jeff Bezos to other people

74:35

right where you get these state

74:37

sponsored attacks on your

74:39

phone and all of a sudden you're dealing

74:41

with this attack Vector that then you

74:45

call the FBI and they take your phone

74:47

and they help you deal with it's

74:48

happened to a bunch of people that's

74:50

happened to me

74:52

twice so

74:55

the fact that these things can happen

74:57

and then the attack vectors get

74:59

incrementally more and more

75:00

sophisticated it used to be that there

75:02

was a PDF payload then there can just be

75:05

an image payload now it's any payload

75:08

right and you don't even have to click

75:09

to open it and all of a sudden they just

75:11

roots your phone so these are extremely

75:14

sophisticated mechanisms that are

75:17

enabled by a very few very talented

75:19

people talented I'll put in

75:21

quotes but when those talented people

75:23

work on the wrong side you have to act

75:25

so open sourcing it won't solve this

75:27

these these exploits are known to a few

75:31

and I think that if it's known to the

75:33

NSA this is probably what was disclosed

75:35

to folks under confidentiality that

75:37

caused them to get to this conclusion I

75:38

think people just need to wake up and

75:40

realize the Chinese government does not

75:42

have Americans best interest at hard I

75:44

mean the there there is no concept of

75:47

reciprocity as you mentioned Mark that's

75:50

the number one reason to do this number

75:52

two what you pointed out your mouth with

75:53

security and if you think about the two

75:55

biggest imports from China right now

75:58

it's Fentanyl and Tik Tock here's what I

76:00

will say want to make us addicted they

76:02

want to impact our society they want to

76:05

divide us this is an a massive scops

76:09

that's going on it is a scops and it is

76:11

a spyware and it's been proven they

76:13

spied on journalists these are Bad

76:15

actors it has to go I was super excited

76:17

when I saw that there was the potential

76:20

that X would take over Tik Tok and the

76:23

reason I say that is I do think that if

76:26

you can take the video content of Tik

76:30

Tok and the graph of

76:33

creators but have a different app and a

76:36

different substrate be the delivery

76:38

mechanism where you know that it's much

76:39

safer and it's governed by an American

76:42

that to me would be the compromise so I

76:45

think the app should go away but if you

76:48

can somehow give creators a path to sort

76:50

of like restart their content creating

76:53

capabilities on X I think that that's

76:55

actually a pretty good one you guys

76:56

notice in the app freeberg that the left

76:59

hand tab um because you have following

77:01

shop and for you they added a leftand

77:04

tab all the way over that stem and it's

77:07

just science technology engineering and

77:09

math content I've not noticed that yeah

77:13

take a look I don't know if it's just

77:14

mine and they're microt targeting me

77:15

because they know I'm such a fan of stem

77:17

but I think it's for everybody any

77:20

thoughts uh Dave as we wrap on the Tik

77:22

Tok seems like they're going to strike

77:25

deal Chuck Schumer today is calling for

77:26

a delay in the ban I'm sure by the time

77:29

this episode airs something will have

77:30

been worked out to create some space for

77:32

them to get a deal done but I think they

77:34

want to get a deal done and keep Tick

77:35

Tock active in the US seems like both

77:37

the Dems and the Republicans are pushing

77:39

for it so this kind of also leads to

77:41

what I think will

77:43

be the grand deal with China which I

77:46

think will happen in the first six

77:47

months of the Trump Administration I'm

77:48

obviously speculating but it feels like

77:51

there's going to be some workout here

77:54

China is like in a lot of economic

77:57

distress I don't know if you guys have

77:58

followed much on the stories of the

78:00

deflationary challenges that China is

78:03

dealing with Chinese bonds are trading

78:04

at a below 2% yield now which is kind of

78:08

unprecedented and there's this real

78:10

concern that China is in a very

78:12

significant economic deflationary spiral

78:14

so they're in a very weakened position

78:16

economically at the moment the United

78:18

States seems to be in a position of

78:21

strength and I would imagine just given

78:24

the rhetoric

78:25

that this Administration may try to work

78:27

out again some deal that's going to

78:29

provide access to the Chinese market in

78:31

exchange for the US minimizing the

78:33

Tariff effect on Chinese um importers to

78:35

the US so there could be I think

78:38

something you know that eases the the

78:41

tension with China and creates you know

78:43

Mutual economic value in the first six

78:47

months of the administration we'll see I

78:49

mean it's a great Point Trump is a great

78:51

negotiator it's probably his greatest

78:52

strength and he's great at saber

78:53

rattling and we're strong they're weak

78:56

right now a grand deal could be an

78:58

awesome outcome I think this was my one

79:00

of my this was my contrarian prediction

79:02

I think um oh no this was my stock this

79:04

was my stock prediction yeah this was

79:05

like my I picked the Chinese tech stocks

79:07

yeah same I I've been loading up on

79:11

Alibaba a couple Chinese names with the

79:15

same bet hey guys here's a chart for

79:17

you companies are not hiring as many

79:21

mbas this is a recent spike in in

79:24

unemployment among mbas from Top

79:27

Business Schools like Harvard MIT and

79:30

Stanford I'm not sure I think Pinkus did

79:32

you go to Harvard

79:34

FIA guilty guilty so and you've also

79:39

stopped working so you're represented

79:40

here on the chart yeah you still have a

79:42

job I think you still work what what are

79:45

your thoughts on on this are NB out of

79:47

Vogue are they opting out what's your

79:49

theory here well so yes I went there I I

79:52

would say that

79:55

that my all the learning that's helped

79:58

me in my career

80:00

started later after I got out my first

80:03

product management job was really when I

80:05

started learning things that are useful

80:08

to me today I think being there I

80:11

learned a lot about like how to sell to

80:12

Corporate America and some how do they

80:15

think kind of things and then I've gone

80:19

back to HBS for decades trying to

80:21

recruit from there and in the beginning

80:24

they would tell me the kids would when I

80:26

had support.com and it was going to go

80:28

public they said I'd have to be a vice

80:30

president and own 3% of the company to

80:32

take a job with a startup like you and

80:34

this was just before the company went

80:36

public there was a little bit of a

80:38

Renaissance period where some HBS people

80:40

were excited to join Zinga probably

80:42

because they thought it was going public

80:44

but they were a little more risk on at

80:45

that point and now

80:48

everyone's open to jobs my take is that

80:52

there's this fundamental imbalance that

80:56

people go and get an MBA because they're

80:59

drisking their career you go to HBS or

81:02

Stamford and you're guaranteed this High

81:05

salary and this kind of great job for

81:08

life so the reason to go there is to

81:11

take the risk off that's in fundamental

81:15

opposition to where we are in our

81:17

economy in my opinion today or where the

81:19

most interesting sectors are those kinds

81:21

of jobs have dried up and the kinds of

81:24

jobs that I think should be interesting

81:27

to mbas are more like go find a

81:31

ycombinator company and join a founding

81:33

team as the business person or whatever

81:37

and these people are smart and qualified

81:39

but there's this mismatch that they are

81:42

fundamentally risk averse and so they're

81:44

not so when it says they haven't found

81:47

jobs part of it is I think they're going

81:50

they're going to have to fall further or

81:52

this might happen so that a part of it

81:55

they have maybe debt or they have to pay

81:57

back this expensive degree but I think

82:00

that they've got to get to a point like

82:02

I was when I started my first company

82:04

preloader I happily had very little to

82:06

no opportunity cost because I had

82:08

torched my career by that point torched

82:10

my resume I was fired or asked to leave

82:14

every job and so there was kind of no

82:16

turning back so uh can you imagine being

82:20

Mark P's boss I mean that's almost as

82:22

hard as being trats

82:24

yeah I always say I'm a great team

82:26

player as long as I'm running the team

82:28

so right great quarterback yeah but yeah

82:31

so I had no opportunity cost when I

82:34

started my first company which looked

82:36

like it didn't have a chance in hell you

82:38

know of ever making it so you probably

82:40

thought so too then about my company but

82:43

so now the question is maybe what's

82:45

going to happen is we're g to get a new

82:47

equilibrium where these the

82:49

opportunities for these people start to

82:50

come down the guaranteed opportunities

82:53

and a good thing cons firms right they

82:55

all go to McKenzie Boston Consulting

82:57

Group whatever even I just the class I

82:59

taught on Monday at Stanford they said

83:02

everyone wants a job at meta or Google

83:04

and that's the get-rich quick place and

83:07

it's I don't even think that's

83:08

necessarily true anymore and they can't

83:10

get those jobs because those companies

83:12

are now trying to get rid of middle

83:14

management so those jobs have dried up

83:17

you know part of what's in this data

83:19

probably also is a lot of these people

83:22

aren't taking jobs they're not finding

83:25

jobs that meet this High expectation for

83:28

right pay and opportunity so I think

83:30

it's a I think it's a good thing it also

83:33

probably is going to reduce the demand

83:35

to go into these MBA programs because if

83:38

you're thinking well that's not going to

83:40

be my riskof trade and I'm I'm not going

83:43

to be guaranteed 100% so why go in the

83:45

first place and I would advise people

83:48

today you know to depending on what

83:50

industry I'm biased but I'd say go get a

83:53

product management job some where and

83:55

make enough that you can afford to live

83:57

on it and that's going to be the

83:59

beginning of Learning doing these chth

84:02

what what are these things called when

84:03

these NB graduate they raise a bunch of

84:05

money to go buy some real business SE

84:07

fun yeah that's that's not happening

84:09

anymore they yeah that was like the

84:11

thing none of them made money none of

84:12

them made money turns out these NBAs

84:14

don't know what they're doing oh yeah so

84:16

when they take over the business run by

84:17

a family and some matriarch or patriarch

84:20

for 50 years to get it to 25 million

84:24

there's that there's that one deal out

84:25

of Stanford GSB the guy founded assurion

84:29

which is like you know 10 B it's

84:31

billions that guy would have founded

84:33

that company outside of Stanford he

84:35

could have gone to timbuk 2.com

84:37

University disad State and he would have

84:39

been

84:41

fine that speaks that speaks to more

84:44

about the cleverness of that one

84:45

individual not the 99,000 other sh deals

84:48

that been let me say something that

84:49

builds on what Pinkus was saying which

84:52

is I think that this is a interesting

84:54

window into the future of AI in the

84:57

sense that I think what companies are

85:00

internalizing slowly that the first

85:03

place that AI disintermediate is

85:06

actually middle management you thought

85:08

that it was the customer support person

85:11

maybe you thought it was the engineer

85:13

maybe you thought it was the designer

85:14

maybe you thought it was the product

85:15

manager I think those are less true I

85:18

think it's the middle manager it's the

85:20

functionary that basically is acting as

85:24

as essentially

85:25

cartilage inside of this

85:27

organization has less and less to do in

85:31

a place where AI enabled systems are

85:34

making a lot of decisions on behalf of

85:38

businesses and if you take a step back

85:40

how did that evolve well it started

85:43

because of what I mentioned a couple

85:45

weeks ago what the software industrial

85:48

complex will really be known for after

85:50

it is dismantled and

85:52

gone is that it

85:55

created all of these really

85:57

dysfunctional or charts in a company

86:01

meaning when you are a system of record

86:03

that sells something let's make it up

86:06

hey I'm the best general ledger

86:08

software okay and a CEO says great

86:11

Implement that and then all of a sudden

86:13

it's like well you're going to need a

86:15

CFO okay but then the CFO comes to you

86:17

and says well you actually need ahead of

86:19

fpna ahead of this ahead of that ahead

86:22

of the other thing then the CEO says

86:24

okay then those people hire and what

86:26

happens is the software sprawl is really

86:29

what created those jobs somebody else

86:31

says here's a customer relationship

86:33

management thing okay great so then you

86:36

hire a CMO and a cro those people build

86:39

infrastructure so my premise about this

86:43

is if you look inside of any or chart of

86:45

any company you can map those jobs to

86:49

some clunky old piece of software that

86:51

was sold to them maybe it was 10 years

86:53

ago maybe it was 20 years ago but that's

86:56

why orgs are this bulky and now when you

86:59

have all of these new nextg businesses

87:02

that are ripping all of that software

87:03

out the middle management layers that

87:06

used to manage that software are no

87:07

longer necessary that's why you're not

87:09

hiring mbas and I think that this trend

87:11

is only going to grow so I don't think

87:14

that this is a commentary on the people

87:16

the people are probably quite smart but

87:19

I do think that this is a warning sign

87:20

that people should not go and pursue

87:22

these degrees because I think as P said

87:25

you're not taking the trade of least

87:27

volatility you're actually taking on a

87:29

lot more volatility than you probably

87:30

thought you shouldn't be taking on by

87:33

going to a place like Harvard or

87:34

Stanford freeberg any thoughts as we

87:36

wrap here about this NBA chart the

87:39

collapse of the MBA program could be the

87:41

beginning of the unwinding of the um

87:44

higher education

87:46

Market why s

87:49

more I think this is the easiest one to

87:52

discard first in an age of AI and

87:56

Automation and self-learning and I think

88:00

that I I mean I've been thinking a lot

88:02

about I've I've have young kids right so

88:05

my kid my oldest kid is seven years old

88:08

I had to think about that for a sec um

88:10

so many kids now and um isn't it great

88:14

by the way I go through this all I don't

88:16

know I have to go through I have to feel

88:17

like what's my kids birthday Jam has a

88:19

busload of children when you have when

88:20

you have I just had a fifth think five

88:24

and you're at four days no I have five I

88:27

can't I have to really think about all

88:28

the birthdays fourth on the way but yeah

88:30

I would say I I think a lot about

88:33

whether or not it makes sense for my

88:35

kids to go to undergrad and I think like

88:38

about going to classes as an undergrad I

88:40

certainly there's the social experience

88:42

and I I learned a lot in you know kind

88:45

of working at a lab when I was there and

88:47

doing other stuff but those were like on

88:49

the job experiences I do think that the

88:52

social experience and

88:54

practical experience can be gotten

88:57

outside of the college infrastructure

89:00

this Ed educational infrastructure oh I

89:03

I cannot tell you guys how much time I I

89:05

just had a great idea I just had the

89:07

best idea ever the Allin MBA let's start

89:10

our own NBA I don't think I think that's

89:12

the whole point is people should get

89:14

back to kind of an apprenticeship type

89:16

model or a self-learning model

89:17

everyone's got their own personal tutor

89:19

now that's what I think people aren't

89:20

realizing is anything you want to learn

89:23

with

89:25

have you guys heard about what Johnny I

89:26

has done with his kids I'm pretty sure

89:29

they skip college and they just went to

89:32

work directly with him and his design

89:35

firm exactly and like I'm taking him out

89:37

to lunch because I want to interview him

89:38

about it I think

89:41

exactly by the way your daughters and my

89:43

daughters want to start a podcast

89:45

together Pinkus do you know what they

89:47

want to name it oh no I don't I don't

89:50

know if I should say it they I don't

89:52

know I didn't hear the name I think Jam

89:54

daughters in on this as well I think it

89:56

was another friend's child who came up

89:59

with the name they wanted to call it the

90:00

nepo

90:03

Pod Jamal's got a couple kid I'm here

90:06

for it no I think freeberg nailed it on

90:09

this one because I just had arouche

90:12

Selvin who's the pm at Google doing deep

90:15

research on this week in startups

90:17

yesterday and this product is nuts and

90:21

they designed it to basically be one of

90:23

these like million doll or $5 million

90:25

reports you pay for from these

90:27

consulting firms that MBA is right and

90:30

it does a better job it's more accurate

90:34

it's done in 5 to 10 minutes this thing

90:36

fires off have you used deep research

90:38

yet

90:39

Mark no I keep hearing you talking about

90:42

it and I'm such an idiot about this

90:44

stuff it's on the desktop only you can't

90:46

use the mobile and then Gemini how to

90:49

use it and it's only and you have to pay

90:52

20 bucks for it and then grock 2.0 is

90:54

doing something similar when you put

90:55

your query in it decides like all the

90:57

second level queries that would be asked

91:00

then it checks its work so it's firing

91:03

off a spider that goes and crawls 150

91:06

pages in real time then it asks

91:08

questions about the data then it says

91:09

what's missing from this so all the

91:11

questions you would get from your

91:12

manager if you were working at Boston

91:14

Consultant Group where they tell some

91:16

young MBA hey you missed this you miss

91:18

this can you double check this can you

91:20

find double click on this it goes and

91:22

does those followup question questions

91:25

so and now you can do a Cron job where

91:27

you can say take my research and every

91:30

week do a update on it and fill in

91:33

information and tell me the differences

91:35

so instead of just buying a Boston

91:36

Consulting or Mackenzie or whatever

91:38

report you build it and then have it

91:42

auto and the Deep research is coming out

91:43

this it's going to automatically refresh

91:45

it in your Google Docs and then update

91:47

you on what's been

91:48

changed and so and grock is doing it as

91:51

well except grock has all the tweets so

91:53

when you grock now did you see now at

91:55

the top of the page it says and I think

91:57

it's only in the grock app uh the

91:59

dedicated app they just launched last

92:00

week it shows you all the tweets and it

92:03

shows you all the web pages that it

92:05

indexed for that query so this is like

92:09

putting somebody on a week-long research

92:11

project and like I said it takes between

92:13

5 and 10 minutes to do this and it costs

92:15

a massive amount of server capacity to

92:18

do these real time you know two 300

92:20

queries are occurring behind your one

92:23

it's nuts I don't know if you guys have

92:25

been using advanced voice on chat GPT

92:28

much or do you guys any the voice and So

92:31

lately anytime I kind of have come

92:32

across an interesting topic I end up

92:35

finding that I just talk to chat GPT for

92:37

like an hour or two and I'll be like in

92:39

my car like when I'm driving to work or

92:41

going to a meeting or I go for like a

92:44

walk down to the coffee shop I'm like

92:47

okay so tell me about like what happened

92:49

during the Ice Age with respect to how

92:51

quickly sea levels receded and I start

92:54

to gather and like it's it's basically

92:56

like your own personal tutor I finally

92:58

have a best friend

93:00

Mark and I think that basically you end

93:03

up seeing a future where if people are

93:07

put into almost like the real world

93:09

becomes the lab environment that is

93:11

created in a very short window and small

93:14

amount of space in a college environment

93:16

where you're like in some like

93:18

applied scape that applied scape

93:22

basically becomes the real world and

93:24

you've got your college in your ear

93:26

you've basically got your tutors your

93:27

educational experience your capabilities

93:29

that you're learning and you learn more

93:31

in real time and I think that that's

93:33

what AI is going to take us to which is

93:35

basically going to destroy much of the

93:36

value of higher education and I think

93:38

that this MBA piece is probably just the

93:40

first step of many that's going to

93:43

ultimately erode the value ofation did

93:46

you guys see that Fleshlight that can

93:48

actually be synced to a video you're

93:50

watching at CES that's pretty crazy no

93:55

can we go to the UFOs instead of sex

93:57

toys we get it show us the video show us

94:00

the

94:01

video it's also did you get one of

94:04

course he's about to show us from his

94:06

hidden folder I saw it on X it was like

94:09

a it was like a summary of like the top

94:11

10 things from CES and it was a

94:14

flashlight that that would gyate based

94:17

on the actual contortions in the videos

94:20

which one's guest rooms tonight I'm a

94:22

little nervous f interesting Pinkus you

94:24

you get to see two different things here

94:26

when AI comes up as a topic freeberg

94:29

finally has a best friend and chth

94:31

finally has a lover who will do exactly

94:33

what he tells it to it's absolutely

94:36

perfect so Mark lately we've been

94:38

talking we've been talking to all the

94:40

guests about UFOs and UAP welcome to

94:42

conspiracy you have a point of view on

94:45

UFO UAP phenomena I

94:49

do and I guess everyone's everyone else

94:52

say too so I won't be that weird an

94:54

outlier so first of all just say I don't

94:57

believe in uaps UFOs and I don't not

95:00

believe in them and I'm just curious

95:03

about it and I've I've had this theory

95:05

that something is going to happen that

95:07

we're going to break our current

95:10

understanding of physics theory and our

95:12

our physics laws and so I've been

95:14

looking for that moment and one of those

95:17

is around the uaps so I've been more and

95:20

more Curious and digging more and more

95:23

and I started working with a friend who

95:25

made the movie Icarus on the idea of

95:28

like a Netflix docu series I thought it

95:30

should be funny and have somebody like a

95:33

Larry David kind of character narrating

95:35

it but he said maybe maybe he came back

95:38

to me he he's making a documentary about

95:40

the fentol crisis and how it China

95:43

documented how China has dumped it here

95:46

and he said you've got to meet with me

95:48

and this guy I came while he was working

95:51

on that he was interviewing a former DOD

95:53

contractor who had worked for them for

95:56

decades and said you know I've got a lot

95:58

on fentol but I have this whole other

96:00

thing to show you about these uaps and

96:04

he he'll just tell you his claim his

96:06

claim so they came and met with me and

96:09

we had to meet outside and put our

96:11

phones in Fairway bags faay bags faay

96:14

bags so so uh it was a good setup if

96:18

nothing else and he said he claimed that

96:21

in doing running these War games for the

96:25

defense department it inadvertently was

96:28

summoning these uaps these drones and he

96:32

had tons and tons of video of it and

96:34

classified them I'm just telling you

96:36

what he told me let me guess the Drone

96:38

all the Drone videos look up they were

96:40

shot on an mm 1968 camera wait wait wait

96:44

hold on hold on Jason Mark just explain

96:45

this so so the United States is is

96:49

simulating war games yeah and what is it

96:52

doing exactly that's causing these

96:54

drones to show up he did not tell me

96:57

what were the the games what were the

97:00

exact triggers that but he said

97:03

different things would trigger a

97:05

different one and he classified them and

97:08

he said some of them were aggressive

97:10

from an electronics and commun would

97:13

take out electronics and Communications

97:15

wow and he so he was interested and my

97:19

friend was interested in saying okay can

97:21

you put up a couple people um a million

97:25

and a half dollars to recreate this and

97:27

film this and I thought about it I even

97:32

had him go meet with

97:33

Reed and and didn't move quickly and

97:36

then he went dark on us and stopped

97:40

responding and then some friends of mine

97:43

went to a gathering at and what they it

97:49

was on multiple things related to this

97:51

and they said that this guy was there

97:53

and that he summoned one of these they

97:56

kind of said it looked like a large

97:58

drone and my friends showed me some

98:01

pictures that they took which were

98:02

really it was at night they were really

98:03

gra come on stop come on stop I'm not

98:06

making this up I'm just telling you just

98:08

one piece of advice with this

98:09

documentary film stuff you know how to

98:11

make a hundred million dollar in

98:12

documentary films right Pinkus yes start

98:15

with a billion start with a billion

98:17

you're the mark in all of this you're

98:19

just a mark this guy needs a million

98:21

dollars to finish his house or something

98:23

a canyon fair and you're the way to do

98:26

it I didn't the Mark I didn't find it

98:29

okay good so all I'm saying is that I

98:32

think that there's a possibility that

98:34

there is some kind of drone that's

98:37

getting that that is showing up and and

98:41

I'm not saying it's even from you know

98:43

from nonhuman making I believe it I

98:46

believe it I am looking I'll be honest

98:48

because I am looking for a reason to

98:50

believe in this I I'll be honest like I

98:52

know my bias

98:54

I am very sympathetic when I hear these

98:56

stories I listen way too long you know

99:00

to the podcast on this stuff I watch are

99:02

you donating to Alex Jones no but are

99:05

you a subscriber no but I I okay how

99:08

about

99:09

this are we convinced that there has

99:12

been absolutely

99:14

zero unidentified object inside some

99:19

Vault Buri deep somewhere

99:23

either the us or national state

99:25

government somewhere are we guaranteed

99:27

that the odds of that are zero and I say

99:30

no it's not let's do our fir uh what is

99:33

it fmy

99:34

paradox freeberg fmy paradox why aren't

99:37

the if there if there are aliens why

99:39

haven't we seen them quick around the

99:42

I'm not I'm not saying done my point on

99:43

this there is a UAP that is that has

99:46

been unidentified that is sitting inside

99:48

some Vault somewhere in in a state

99:50

government in the world so your position

99:53

is the aliens have come no stop saying

99:57

you but you you you you make the whole

99:59

thing seem ridiculous when you say

100:00

aliens I'm not saying that I'm saying

100:02

okay visitors from another planet no

100:04

stop with the visitors just let's just

100:06

put it this way a

100:08

vehicle that doesn't have to have

100:10

anything inside it a vehicle could be

100:12

autonomous and

100:13

unmanned okay is are the odds exactly

100:16

zero

100:19

no but with billions of planets it would

100:23

you know logic would make you think that

100:25

one has come already right that's with

100:28

there billions of inhabitable planets

100:30

and species out there there must have

100:32

somebody must be ahead of us but the

100:34

other conclusion of ferm's paradox is we

100:37

statistically are the highest a society

100:40

has ever gotten and we have yet to send

100:44

our probes out to the rest of the

100:45

universe although we have send probes

100:47

freeberg to Uranus all right everybody

100:51

thanks for tuning in this is all

100:53

disad

100:57

disad I need I need a I need

101:00

um young Spielberg to make us a a jingle

101:03

for disad

101:05

a.com Mark Pinkus you're amazing thank

101:08

you for fitting right in with your

101:10

besties uh and top bro on the baby

101:13

congrats congrat looking forward to

101:15

seeing you this weekend all right and we

101:17

will see oh and by the way just

101:18

programming note we're all going to be

101:21

at at the inauguration various parties

101:23

uh this weekend and we will be doing

101:26

some live episodes of the Allin podcast

101:29

probably on Sunday Monday time frame and

101:31

we will see you on the live stream go to

101:35

youtube.com subscribe to the Allin

101:37

podcast put on the notifications the

101:38

bell and then follow us on x.com the

101:41

Allin podcast and then again subscribe

101:44

and then just turn on notifications

101:45

you'll get a notification when we go

101:47

live on those two platforms we'll see

101:49

you all next time byebye love you boys

101:51

byebye

101:53

will let your winners

101:55

ride

102:00

Rainman we open sourced it to the fans

102:02

and they've just gone crazy with it love

102:05

queen

102:06

[Music]

102:12

of

102:14

[Music]

102:15

Besties my dog Tak

102:18

driveways man oh man myit

102:23

we should all just get a room and just

102:25

have one big huge orgy cuz they're all

102:27

this useless it's like this like sexual

102:28

tension that they just need to release

102:36

somehow we need to get

102:38

merch

102:41

[Music]

102:45

all I'm going

102:48

[Music]

Interactive Summary

The All-In podcast hosts welcome guest Mark Pincus for a wide-ranging discussion. The conversation covers political realignments, the challenges of navigating public perception, and the necessity of organizational authenticity. The group discusses the rebuilding efforts in Los Angeles following recent wildfires, debating the impact of government regulations versus free-market principles. Other topics include the future of TikTok, the shifting landscape of MBA programs in an AI-driven world, and brief musings on UAP phenomena.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts