The Real Effects of the Six Day War - Sarah Paine
38 segments
Israel fighting Egypt, Jordan, and
Syria. And as part of Egypt's [music]
strategy, doesn't want Israel using the
Suez Canal, so they sink a bunch of
blocked ships here. So, that's the
operational effect, but here is the
strategic effect, the ones [music] that
actually count. If you look at before
the war, almost 90% of ships were 50,000
deadweight tons or less. [music] And so,
they could all make it through the Suez
Canal. But then, the Suez Canal is is
closed down from 1967 to 1972-ish.
So, that's a long time in world trade.
Well, look at the adjustments that take
place. By '72, you've got almost 30%
[music] of the number of ships are these
huge ships that never had existed
before. They're not going to make it
through the Suez Canal. [music] The Suez
Canal has since been widened, but still
the biggest ships can't make it through.
And so then, if you look at the cost of
sending [music]
oil from the Persian Gulf to Rotterdam
in the Netherlands, if you're going to
send it in an itty-bitty ship through
the canal, it might be a little over $13
per ton to send [music] it. Whereas, if
you're sending it in a big ship the long
way around Africa, I believe it's a
third that price.
>> [music]
>> So, um strategic effect of things,
unexpected. That overhead costs in
shipping is is [music] uh the size of
ship gets over a lot of it. It's not
about distance.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The video discusses the long-term strategic impact of the closure of the Suez Canal during the 1967 war. Because the canal remained closed for several years, the shipping industry was forced to adapt by building much larger vessels. These larger ships became more cost-effective than using the canal, permanently altering global shipping economics even after the canal reopened.
Videos recently processed by our community