HomeVideos

The Obamas Strike Back

Now Playing

The Obamas Strike Back

Transcript

931 segments

0:00

Christine have you ever bought something

0:02

and thought wow this product actually

0:04

made my life better totally and usually

0:06

I find those products through wire

0:08

cutter yeah but you work here we both do

0:10

we're the hosts of The Wire cutter show

0:11

from the New York Times it's our job to

0:13

research test and vet products and then

0:16

recommend our favorites we'll talk to

0:17

members of our team of 140 journalists

0:20

to bring you the very best product

0:22

recommendations in every category that

0:24

will actually make your life better the

0:26

wire cutter show available wherever you

0:28

get podcasts

0:31

[Music]

0:34

from New York Times opinion this is the

0:36

Ezra Klein show

0:41

[Music]

1:19

it is Wednesday August 21st I spent last

1:22

night at the second night of the

1:23

Democratic National Convention which was

1:26

a night of Heavy Hitters in the

1:28

Democratic Party it was a night of

1:30

Bernie Sanders of Chuck Schumer of JB

1:34

pritsker it was a night of Doug mhof who

1:37

gave a truly lovely speech about KLA

1:40

Harris but it was above all the night of

1:42

the Obamas and we'll talk about both of

1:45

them here but it was specifically I

1:48

would say the night of Michelle Obama

1:51

please welcome former First Lady

1:53

Michelle

1:57

Obama when she came out the crowd warned

2:00

her in a way it roared for no one else

2:02

at night in a way I've not heard it Roar

2:04

at this convention in a way it would not

2:06

even Roar for her husband a couple of

2:09

minutes

2:11

later hello

2:15

Chicago and the beginning of her speech

2:18

was very different than the beginning of

2:21

any other Democrat speech at this

2:23

convention something wonderfully magical

2:27

is in the air isn't it

2:31

yeah you know we're feeling it here in

2:34

this Arena but it's spreading all across

2:37

this country we love a familiar feeling

2:40

that's been buried too deep for far too

2:45

long you know what I'm talking

2:49

about it's the contagious power of

2:57

Hope the anticipation

3:01

the energy the exhilaration of once

3:03

again being on the cusp of a brighter

3:07

day the chance to Vanquish the Demons of

3:12

fear Division and hate that have

3:15

consumed us and continue pursuing The

3:18

Unfinished promise of this great nation

3:22

the dream that our parents and

3:24

grandparents fought and died and

3:27

sacrificed

3:28

for America hope is making a

3:36

comeback so I want to say a few things

3:38

about

3:40

this in this

3:43

speech which was one of the great pieces

3:45

of political oratory I have

3:47

heard the best piece of oratory at the

3:49

convention so far probably the best

3:51

there will be at the

3:53

convention Joe Biden didn't

3:56

exist you would think Donald Trump was

3:58

President right now in Michelle Obama

4:00

speech she did not do the thing other

4:02

Democrats are doing of talking about Joe

4:04

Biden's record of talking about his

4:07

sacrifice but nor did she portray Biden

4:11

and nor would Biden be portrayed across

4:13

this night as the inheritor of Obama

4:17

ISM what she did and what her husband

4:20

would do a little bit later in the

4:22

evening is pass the torch of their

4:25

movement not to Joe Biden but to KLA

4:30

Harris and Tim Walls and Michelle

4:32

Obama's speech was much more explicit

4:34

about this because functionally what she

4:37

argued was that since Obama left since

4:41

they left the White House we have been

4:43

in the Trump era in the emotional

4:45

structure of the Trump era and only now

4:48

was there really the possibility to

4:49

Vanquish it I'm joined here by my great

4:52

producer elas isth to talk about the

4:55

second night of the Democratic National

4:57

Convention Elias thank you for being

4:59

here it's great to be here so I wanted

5:02

to start with a moment on Joe Biden

5:03

because like as you said Michelle Obama

5:05

didn't mention him in her speech but

5:07

Barack Obama did and I thought the way

5:10

he honored him his choice of language

5:12

was pretty interesting Joe and I come

5:15

from different

5:17

backgrounds but we became

5:19

brothers and as we worked together for

5:23

eight sometimes pretty tough

5:26

years what I came to admire most about

5:28

Joe wasn't just his smarts his

5:33

experience it was his

5:35

empathy and his

5:37

decency and his hard earned resilience

5:42

his unshakable belief that everyone in

5:45

this country deserves a fair

5:52

shot and over the last four years those

5:55

are the

5:57

values America has needed most

6:00

so he makes a point of saying that he

6:02

and Biden are different but he also says

6:04

that Biden is what America needed the

6:07

last four years what did you make of

6:09

that there's a dynamic that you often

6:12

see in startup

6:14

companies they have as their first

6:18

leader their first CEO or founder this

6:21

Visionary charismatic leader right the

6:23

ideas guy Steve

6:26

Jobs and when that person passes from

6:28

the scene re fires gets pushed out

6:30

whatever it is they are often followed

6:34

in leadership by a stabilizer a more

6:37

managerial type somebody who doesn't

6:41

have their Glitz and their Glamour and

6:43

their Charisma and all their giant new

6:45

ideas but knows how to run an

6:47

organization was maybe their number two

6:49

before and can sort of

6:52

pull together something that had become

6:56

sort of too diffuse and was running too

6:58

hot

6:59

I I hear a bit of that in that

7:01

description of Joe Biden that what Biden

7:04

brought and remember I mean Biden runs

7:07

in

7:08

2020 I believe if Biden had been the

7:10

nominee in 2016 he would have crushed

7:12

Donald Trump and a lot of how we

7:14

understand American politics in American

7:15

political history would have been

7:16

different if you want to see a great

7:18

convention speech by the way go watch

7:21

Joe Biden's convention speech from the

7:22

2016 convention from Hillary Clinton's

7:25

convention he absolutely wrecks Donald

7:28

Trump his cynicism is

7:31

unbounded his lack of empathy and

7:34

compassion can be summed up in a phrase

7:37

I suspect he's most proud of having made

7:39

famous you're

7:41

fired I mean really I'm not joking think

7:44

about that think about that think about

7:48

everything you

7:50

learned as a child no matter where you

7:53

are

7:54

raised How can there be

7:57

pleasure in saying you're

8:01

fired he's trying to tell us he cares

8:04

about the middle class give me a break

8:07

that's a bunch of

8:11

malarkey I watched that speech and

8:13

thought this guy would beat Trump by

8:14

seven points so he runs in 2020 in a

8:17

different context but he is the

8:20

ultimately the successor as a Democratic

8:21

president to to Barack Obama and he's

8:23

not Obama what he represents is not what

8:26

made Obama an agent and a representation

8:30

of change what he represents is a kind

8:33

of return to normaly right it's the

8:34

pandemic Donald Trump is crazy here's

8:37

Joe Biden he's 77 he's been in politics

8:40

forever he's the most known quantity in

8:43

American political life he is calm he is

8:47

decent he is somebody who calls you when

8:49

there's a death in your family you can

8:52

trust him right he's not here to upend

8:54

the entire order that might have been

8:56

the right thing for 2020 but one of the

8:58

things interesting last night about the

9:00

Obama speeches is that they were passing

9:04

the mantle of change hope and change to

9:07

Kamala in a way that made it seem to me

9:12

like they believed that Biden was a sort

9:15

of pause from that right he was

9:17

something else which I think is actually

9:19

accurate Biden did a lot in terms of

9:21

policy change but in terms of what he

9:23

represented politically he was stability

9:26

he was normaly he was decency and

9:29

there's nothing wrong with that but he

9:32

wasn't the forward thrust of the

9:34

political tendency Barack Obama created

9:37

in 2008 he was

9:41

stabilization after the rupture of

9:43

Donald Trump and the pandemic and now

9:46

the sort of argument they're making

9:46

about kamla Harris isn't that it is time

9:49

to go back to a normal presidency but

9:52

it's time to go forward in the thing

9:54

that that they either started or were at

9:57

least part of so let's talk about that

10:00

thing you called it Obama ISM at the top

10:02

what is Obama ISM o that's a big

10:05

question one place I think to start with

10:08

it is to say that it is not Obama's

10:11

presidency and this was always a very

10:14

tricky place for Obama himself but I

10:17

understand Obama ISM as a form of

10:21

politics that rewrites the American

10:24

story to be at its core about pluralism

10:27

and social progress Obama ism is a

10:32

recognition that Americans hate how

10:34

politics feels right in that that first

10:37

204 speech this

10:40

dissolving of the reality of red and

10:43

blue America which I think there is a

10:45

very real reality to red and blue

10:46

America but Obama's ongoing point that

10:50

who we are in politics and who we are in

10:52

our lives feel very different from each

10:53

other that the people we are when we're

10:56

watching Fox News and MSNBC and then who

10:58

we are in our church

11:00

and our little league fields and our

11:02

ptas are so different from each other

11:06

and that the goal of politics should be

11:09

to make us feel in our politics the way

11:10

we feel in our communities right to

11:12

bring out the better

11:14

angels that are so endlessly

11:18

evident if you walk through an American

11:21

Community but then seem so

11:24

absent when you end up in politics but

11:27

then there there was also this effort to

11:30

shift the American story remember that

11:32

Obama ISM arises after George W bush and

11:35

in 2004 in one of the real low points in

11:39

my lifetime for American liberalism when

11:40

George W bush wins re-election there is

11:44

this huge narrative that what has

11:45

happened is Democrats have lost the

11:47

Heartland they've become

11:50

unpatriotic John krey is framed as this

11:53

french-speaking Cosmopolitan who you

11:55

can't really trust and Obama comes in

11:59

and he's a black man with the middle

12:03

name

12:04

Hussein who lives in

12:06

Chicago and spent much of his upbringing

12:09

abroad right it is everything that is

12:12

easy to paint as un American in the

12:14

George W bush era and what he does is he

12:16

retells the American story and puts him

12:19

and people like him at the center of it

12:20

the American story is a story of an

12:22

expanding moral Circle it is a story of

12:25

social justice movements it is a story

12:28

of real realizing that we have bonds

12:30

with people who don't look like us or

12:32

sound like us or think like us and that

12:34

the true Americans the people who are

12:37

the real Patriots are the people who've

12:39

endlessly fought in every generation to

12:42

make what America is more like what the

12:44

Declaration of Independence says it is

12:46

going to be and Obama ISM mattered

12:49

because Obama ISM one and it showed that

12:50

Democrats could reclaim that

12:52

patriotism now when you govern that's

12:55

not what you govern over but that's what

12:57

his politics were about they were about

13:00

speaking to the anger and disappointment

13:03

people had and how politics felt and

13:06

they were about reclaiming a fundamental

13:09

Narrative of America and patriotism for

13:12

a rising multiethnic

13:16

Multicultural political tendency that

13:19

did not have the numbers to Wi elections

13:21

in

13:22

1988 but did by 2008 and does now Obama

13:26

actually directly spoke to that idea in

13:28

a speech that this is a tendency that

13:30

can win our politics have become so

13:33

polarized these days that all of us

13:36

across the political Spectrum seem so

13:39

quick to assume the worst in others

13:42

unless they agree with us on every

13:44

single

13:46

issue we start thinking that the only

13:48

way to win is to scold and shame and out

13:51

yell the other

13:52

side and after a while regular folks

13:55

just tune

13:56

out or they don't bother to vote

13:59

[Music]

14:01

now that approach may work for the

14:04

politicians who just want

14:06

attention and thrive on

14:09

division but it won't work for

14:12

us to make progress on the things we

14:15

care about the things that really affect

14:18

people's

14:20

lives we we need to remember that we've

14:23

all got our blind spots and

14:26

contradictions and and

14:27

prejudices and that if we want to win

14:30

over those who aren't yet ready to

14:32

support our candidates we need to listen

14:35

to their

14:36

concerns and maybe learn something in

14:38

the

14:39

[Music]

14:41

process a after

14:45

all if a parent or grandparent

14:48

occasionally says something that makes

14:49

us

14:53

cringe we we don't automatically assume

14:56

they're bad

14:57

people we recogniz ize that the world is

14:59

moving

15:01

fast that they need time and maybe a

15:03

little encouragement to catch

15:06

up our fellow citizens deserve the same

15:10

Grace we hope they'll extend to

15:13

[Music]

15:21

us that's how we can build a true

15:25

Democratic majority the idea that if we

15:27

just listen to each other that if our

15:29

politics was less divisive that this

15:31

could build a true Democratic majority

15:34

is that his pitch do you think he really

15:36

believes that Obama like every other

15:39

politician is not so naive as to think

15:42

his politics are an 8020 or 9010

15:46

proposition even in 2008 I think he's

15:48

got something like a seveno popular vote

15:52

margin what Obama does believe is that

15:55

there's a big middle in American

15:57

politics and that you can win elections

16:00

and even win governing majorities

16:01

remember he got 60 seats in the Senate

16:05

you can win big majorities and you can

16:06

win elections by reaching out to the

16:09

people who are there to be reached out

16:10

to and by the way those are not all

16:12

people who believe in and vote for

16:14

Donald Trump they're not Maga supporters

16:16

necessarily right Republican opposition

16:18

to Barack Obama was intense during

16:20

Obama's presidency what they are the

16:23

people Obama is reaching out to there

16:26

are people who just don't like the whole

16:28

tone of politics

16:29

right they don't like the bitterness

16:31

they don't like the division they don't

16:33

like the polarization the people they

16:35

know who are into politics are

16:36

unbelievably annoying they don't like

16:39

them but I want to pull something else

16:41

out of that because that clip you played

16:42

that was the core of Barack Obama's

16:44

speech that was and he would go on to do

16:46

this very explicitly a few paragraphs

16:48

later that was Barack Obama calling back

16:50

directly to his 2004 speech to his

16:53

original concerns about polarization

16:55

about pluralism about our ability to

16:57

speak to each other there was just a big

17:00

piece in New York Magazine about obam

17:02

cor which was the sort of liberal

17:04

cultural

17:06

interpretation of Obama ISM I I sort of

17:09

disagree with this interpretation but

17:10

but this is the way they framed it it's

17:13

Hamilton it's parks and wreck it's a

17:16

bunch of culture you know it's fight

17:18

song although I really associate that

17:19

with Hillary Clinton Obamacare though is

17:23

not Obama ISM Obamacare is this thing

17:27

liberals took out of Obama ISM and made

17:30

their own and they they sort of took

17:33

this teleological Rising multiethnic

17:36

majority idea turned it into a political

17:39

Theory and into culture and made it into

17:42

something about how they were on this

17:44

Unstoppable march to a form of dominance

17:48

in America you're sort of on the train

17:51

or you were retrograde and being left

17:53

behind and Obama ISM in the speech Obama

17:57

gives at the4

17:59

that makes him into a national figure in

18:01

his 2008 campaign it wasn't about how

18:04

liberals were right at least not

18:06

exclusively it was about how you talk to

18:09

people in politics and how you frame a

18:11

politics it is about people who don't

18:12

agree with you in a way the most

18:15

contradictory political move from Obama

18:18

ISM was Hillary Clinton's deplorables

18:20

comment it's also for people who don't

18:22

remember this why when Obama was caught

18:24

at a fundraiser talking about how people

18:27

after their Manufacturing get hollowed

18:29

out become bitter and cling to guns and

18:31

religion that this was such a big

18:33

problem for him because that was also in

18:34

real contradiction to the way he talked

18:37

about talking to people and what Obama

18:40

was sort of reprising here look you're

18:42

not going to convince Donald Trump but

18:45

there is a way of talking to your

18:46

neighbors and a way of talking to people

18:48

in politics who disagree with you and

18:50

who are never going to agree with you

18:51

and are never going to be a down thee

18:54

line hardcore liberal on every issue

18:56

that is about making politics work and

18:58

making this country feel like a place we

19:00

can all live in and one mistake I think

19:03

Democrats made at many different times

19:05

was he sort of dropped that part of it

19:08

they took the winning but they didn't

19:10

take that part about how do you talk to

19:12

people who feel like they're

19:14

losing how do you include people who

19:16

don't feel

19:18

included and he was sort of a genius at

19:21

this one thing that was different in his

19:24

speech from Michelle Obama I think is he

19:27

was actually making an argument to the

19:28

party and to KLA Harris about how he

19:31

thinks they should campaign and how he

19:33

thinks they should campaign and talk to

19:35

people who don't agree with him and he's

19:37

basically saying that he wants to see

19:38

them bring back parts of what made his

19:42

early politics work that in many ways

19:44

Democratic party has dropped I mean that

19:46

that part about scolding people and

19:48

reading them out of your movement that's

19:50

a critique not of the right it's a

19:52

critique of the

19:54

left so I wanted to move now to Michelle

19:56

Obama's speech she talked thought about

19:59

values and the meaning of America but in

20:02

a way that felt pretty different from

20:03

her husband's speech you see those

20:07

values have been passed on through

20:11

Family Farms in Factory towns through

20:14

Treeline streets and crowded tenements

20:17

through prayer groups and National Guard

20:20

units and social studies

20:22

classrooms those were the values my

20:24

mother poured into me until her very

20:27

last breath

20:30

KLA Harris and I built our lives on

20:33

those same foundational

20:36

values even though our mothers grew up

20:38

an ocean

20:40

apart they shared the same belief in the

20:43

promise of this

20:45

country that's

20:47

why her mother moved here from India at

20:51

19 it's why she taught kamla about

20:55

Justice about the obligation to lift

20:58

others up about our responsibility to

21:02

give more than we

21:04

take she'd often tell her daughter don't

21:07

sit around and complain about things do

21:12

something so what do you hear there in

21:15

terms of Michelle Obama's vision of

21:17

Obama ISM one of the Striking things

21:20

about Michelle Obama's

21:22

speech was that even more so than at

21:26

past conventions and this had been a

21:28

dynamic that emerged over I would say a

21:30

series of democratic

21:31

conventions Michelle Obama

21:34

represents a related but different

21:37

political lineage now and

21:40

tradition to Barack

21:42

Obama Barack Obama is of the Obamas the

21:47

one who has this expansive optimistic

21:51

vision of America Michelle Obama is the

21:54

harder-edged

21:55

version of their politics very famously

21:59

she said when he was winning the

22:01

nomination the first time that this was

22:03

the first time she'd been proud of her

22:05

country Michelle Obama is the part of

22:08

this it does not believe America always

22:09

does the right thing that believes there

22:13

is quite a lot of racism in America

22:16

quite a lot of class war in America that

22:19

that sees America not as an arc of

22:22

History bending towards justice but as a

22:25

fight that you might lose at any minute

22:27

and that was very much what this the

22:28

speech was about to do something refrain

22:31

that was very much her argument towards

22:33

the end of the speech where she began

22:35

telling people they're going to be bad

22:36

polls and you cannot fall apart they are

22:40

going to try to destroy kamla Harris and

22:43

you cannot let them you cannot wait to

22:45

be asked to participate in this campaign

22:48

very much separately from Obama Barack

22:50

Obama who is all about the better angels

22:52

of American nature Michelle Obama is one

22:55

of the two who tends to focus on the

22:57

darker

22:59

Angels Demons of American nature and in

23:03

a way she was passing her torch somewhat

23:05

separately from her husband's torch to

23:08

kamla Harris she was saying that kamla

23:10

Harris is like her that kamla Harris

23:12

comes from a family like Michelle Obama

23:14

which is a different kind of family than

23:15

Barack Obama came from that kamla Harris

23:19

has Michelle

23:21

Obama's political history a fighting

23:25

forward in a country that was very like

23:28

not going to recognize her developing

23:31

the toughness and even this cynicism at

23:34

times of being a warrior and so for the

23:38

part of the party that actually in a way

23:40

sort of believes what Michelle Obama

23:42

believes about America rather than what

23:44

Barack Obama believes about America that

23:47

was the part of the party was being

23:49

spoken to here I think after the Trump

23:51

years that part of the party is bigger

23:53

in a way Michelle Obama's view of this

23:54

feels Less in acronis to a lot of people

23:56

than Barack Obama's sunnier View Trump

23:59

in many ways was a reputation of parts

24:02

of the Barack Obama view right I don't

24:04

think it robs it of its power but it

24:07

robs it of its almost teleological force

24:10

and here's Michelle Obama saying yeah

24:13

the person who can win this fight

24:15

because it is actually a fight is kamla

24:18

Harris because she comes from the

24:20

lineage like I do in this case like a

24:22

matriarchal lineage of people who've

24:25

been in this fight and climbing this

24:26

mountain and were never given anything

24:28

and now understand what it's going to

24:30

take to

24:31

win so have we come a long way from when

24:34

they go low we go high or is there more

24:36

continuity here these were not when they

24:39

go low we go high

24:40

speeches there was a moment in Michelle

24:43

Obama's speech where she seemed to

24:46

actually update that formula where she

24:49

began to talk not about high and low but

24:50

small and big and let me tell you this

24:54

going small is never the

24:56

answer going small is the opposite of

25:00

what we teach our kids going small is

25:04

petty it's unhealthy and quite frankly

25:07

it's

25:10

unpresidential Trump is small there's a

25:12

smallness to him his smallness is

25:14

unpresidential KLA Harris and Tim Walls

25:16

they're big they're big-hearted but it

25:19

wasn't when they go low we go high both

25:23

Michelle Obama and Barack Obama went low

25:26

there were real elbows thrown gr at

25:28

Donald Trump lowest maybe was in Barack

25:32

Obama's speech where he talked about

25:35

Donald Trump's obsession with crowd

25:36

sizes and then he made a a series of

25:39

sort of measuring motions with his hands

25:42

that suggested I would say and certainly

25:45

this was how it was received in the

25:46

arena that what Donald Trump was

25:48

fundamentally worried about was not

25:50

actually the size of his

25:52

crows both Obamas were much more in the

25:55

slipstream of where the party is now of

25:58

Donald Trump of treating him as

26:01

dangerous yes but comic and

26:05

ridiculous and old I mean Barack Obama

26:08

had a line that his act is getting stale

26:11

Michelle Obama talked about the

26:13

presidency being one of those black jobs

26:15

that Donald Trump talks about who's

26:17

going to tell him that the job he's

26:19

currently seeking might just be one of

26:21

those black

26:26

jobs so you said a moment ago that

26:29

Michelle Obama was passing the torch to

26:31

kamla Harris in this specific way but

26:34

what about Barack Obama how does Harris

26:36

fit into his vision of Obama ISM I think

26:39

this is really interesting and I mean

26:41

we're going to see because she is still

26:42

shaping who she is going to be on the

26:43

national

26:45

stage but while part of Harris's own

26:48

story is she's a very early suppor of

26:51

Barack Obama she endorses him as a

26:53

California politician when many people

26:54

don't she goes to Iowa over New Years in

26:58

8 to you know be out there campaigning

27:00

for him in the snow Harris's politics

27:02

are quite different than his and when

27:06

she is out there on the campaign Trail

27:08

right now she does not sound like Barack

27:10

Obama in 2008 or

27:12

2004 the applaus lines for Harris when

27:15

she says I am a prosecutor I put bad

27:18

people behind bars and I know Donald

27:20

Trump's type that is not Obama ISM

27:22

that's something else what's interesting

27:25

to me is that of the two of them Tim

27:27

wall is the one that has a very Obama

27:30

likee take Tim Walls is the one who is

27:33

actually playing with his own

27:35

stereotypes in an interesting way when

27:36

Obama used to be like look my name's

27:38

Barack Hussein Obama and I'm skinny and

27:41

I got funny ears and all these things

27:42

that might make you mistrust me in a

27:44

funny way while that was aimed outward

27:48

walls has been doing the same thing

27:50

aimed inward at the Democratic Coalition

27:53

like I'm a military man I'm a football

27:56

coach I you know come from a small rural

28:00

community you know I'm a like a white

28:02

guy who wears flannel and fixes your car

28:05

and where I come from we believe in

28:07

neighborliness and where I come from we

28:09

believe in helping each other and I help

28:11

found the you know the LGBT Alliance at

28:13

a small fairly rural school when that

28:16

was not a thing many people were doing

28:18

right walls with his these other people

28:20

are weird and politics doesn't have to

28:22

feel like this it shouldn't feel like

28:24

this we can just take care of each other

28:25

and be nice to each other and listen to

28:28

each other and we don't need to be

28:29

pulled in by these weirdos over here the

28:32

sort of mix of telling a story about

28:34

yourself that defies what people would

28:36

think of you and using that Defiance to

28:39

then make an argument that American

28:40

politics doesn't actually fit into the

28:42

boxes people put it into that's Obama

28:45

ISM and Obama's moment on the stage last

28:47

night where he said let me let me tell

28:49

you something I love this

28:53

guy Tim is the kind of person who should

28:56

be in politics

28:58

it sounded very genuine not him saying

29:01

Tim Walls is a great public servant

29:03

who's you know passed a lot of great

29:04

policy in Minnesota but Tim Walls like

29:07

that dude's great so Harris is different

29:09

than Obama which I think is important

29:11

you know it's a different era but

29:14

there's a strain of Obama ISM in her

29:16

there's a very potent strain of it in

29:18

her running mate and then again I I

29:21

think Harris is in the lineage of

29:24

Michelle Obama right now more than she

29:26

is in in Barack Obama and I don't think

29:28

it's an accident that Michelle Obama's

29:29

speech which just was extraordinary was

29:32

the one that connected so powerfully

29:34

last night it wasn't just because of how

29:36

good the speech was but it was because

29:38

it felt very real to the moment right

29:41

that feeling the articulated feelings of

29:44

fear and despair and anger and the need

29:46

to actually have a fight that vanquishes

29:49

Donald Trump and the forces he

29:51

represents whether or not you believe

29:52

that is possible that is authentic to

29:55

the way kamla Harris talks about

29:57

politics and people feel feel about her

29:59

so it is funny right you know I think

30:02

Barack Obama's natural relationship here

30:05

is not the top of the ticket but the

30:06

bottom of it and Michelle Obama who in

30:09

many ways has risen to represent a huge

30:12

part of the democratic Coalition in a

30:13

way that would not have been anticipated

30:15

in maybe 2008 she's the one who did the

30:19

direct passing of the torch to the the

30:20

top of the ticket so in terms of Harris

30:23

and the future of this movement I'd be

30:25

remiss if I didn't ask you about a very

30:27

different part of Barack Obama's speech

30:29

because it hits on something that is

30:31

near and dear to your heart and in doing

30:33

that we can't just point to what we've

30:36

already

30:37

accomplished we can't just rely on the

30:39

ideas of the past we need to chart a new

30:42

way forward to meet the challenges of

30:45

today and kamla understands this she

30:49

knows for example that if we want to

30:51

make it easier for more young people to

30:53

buy a home we need to build more units

30:56

and clear away some of the out dated

30:58

laws and regulations that made it harder

31:00

to build homes for working people in

31:03

this country that is a priority and

31:05

she's put out a bold new plan to you

31:07

just

31:09

that I love it welcome to the abundance

31:12

agenda Barack Obama so I noted this in

31:15

yesterday's DNC dispatch which is that

31:18

it was very striking to me that when you

31:20

looked at the kamla Harris fact sheet

31:22

for her Economic Policy

31:25

announcements increasing housing Supply

31:27

came first

31:29

how she was going to do that wasn't I

31:30

think 100% clear how much power the

31:32

federal government has to do that is not

31:34

always 100% clear but that was what came

31:36

first the problem is housing the problem

31:41

in housing is Supply she also has

31:44

subsidy ideas but that was not what she

31:46

front-loaded and here it was so notable

31:49

to me that the first

31:51

policy argument Obama makes is about

31:54

increasing housing Supply the Democratic

31:57

par is becoming more yimi I mean there's

31:59

no other way of putting that and by the

32:02

way it's not like Democrats are the only

32:03

ones to have made housing a major part

32:05

of their convention if you go back to JD

32:07

Vance's speech he also talks about

32:09

housing but what he ends up saying is

32:12

the answer for

32:13

housing is getting rid of immigrants and

32:16

if you look at project

32:17

2025 they're really making arguments

32:20

about why you want to maintain control

32:22

of housing stock at the local level

32:24

Donald Trump himself has been a very big

32:26

backer and defender of single family

32:28

zoning and meanwhile the Democratic

32:30

party which if you look at the places it

32:32

governs has been terrible in housing is

32:35

intellectually moving into the other

32:36

position where it is saying the problem

32:39

in housing is Supply there was something

32:41

that went out on the Joe Biden White

32:43

House Twitter feed that said the problem

32:45

in housing is that we need to build

32:46

build build it takes time for policy to

32:49

catch up to intellectual consensus and

32:53

rhetorical currence and so I think it

32:55

will take time for this to express

32:57

itself but I see this as genuinely huge

33:01

both that Democrats have decided housing

33:03

is this Central of a problem that it is

33:05

coming first for them and that they have

33:08

correctly I want to say this correctly

33:10

come to the view that the problem is

33:13

Supply the problem is we're not building

33:14

enough housing and that is something

33:16

that in part Democrats are responsible

33:18

for with too much red tape and too much

33:21

outdated process and too much regulation

33:23

and this is a place where the government

33:24

doesn't just need to help it needs to in

33:27

many cases get out of the way you could

33:30

see it in Harris's policies and you

33:32

heard it from Barack Obama in this

33:34

passing of the torch to the Future right

33:36

this is what a new idea is and in fact

33:39

it actually is a new idea for the

33:40

Democratic party this is not where the

33:41

Democratic party was even in the Obama

33:43

era at least not at this level of

33:45

centrality so from a policy perspective

33:49

I was

33:50

thrilled as a last question I wanted to

33:53

ask you about a moment of Barack Obama's

33:55

speech that really struck me it's when

33:57

he described a kind of spiritual

33:58

emptiness that he sees afflicting people

34:01

we live in a time of such confusion and

34:06

ranker with a culture that puts a

34:09

premium on things that don't

34:12

last money Fame

34:16

status

34:18

likes we chase the approval of strangers

34:20

on our

34:22

phones we build all manner of walls and

34:25

fences around ourselves and then we

34:27

wonder why we feel so

34:31

alone we don't trust each other as much

34:34

because we don't take the time to know

34:36

each other and in that space between us

34:40

politicians and algorithms teach us to

34:43

caricature each other it's an argument

34:45

that I've heard more often from figures

34:47

like JD Vance and the post liberals why

34:50

do you think he wanted to go there I

34:52

think the post liberals as they they now

34:55

get called have talked themselves into

34:58

believing that they were the first

35:00

people to worry about spiritual

35:03

emptiness in America and they just

35:06

weren't look I'm a pretty unabashed

35:09

defender of Obama and Obama

35:14

ISM and I think that a lot of the

35:18

narrative that has taken hold about what

35:19

his politics were what he did what his

35:22

political movement represented just

35:24

wrong this idea that what was happening

35:26

in the Obama era and in the Obama

35:29

elections was his unrelenting

35:31

technocracy it's just not accurate it is

35:35

hard to solve the problems and even

35:38

correctly talk about the problems of

35:40

modernity it always has

35:42

been the Obamas didn't invent this

35:46

either we have been worrying about this

35:48

talking about this for decades now

35:50

loneliness atomization the breakdown of

35:53

the American Family the decline of

35:56

organized religion the line of

35:58

communities you know going back to sort

36:00

of like Robert putnam's bowling alone

36:02

like modernity is not well oriented

36:04

towards Community people move around all

36:07

across the country not all people but

36:09

many people live further from families

36:11

or families are smaller they are not as

36:14

connected to Civic institutions to

36:16

religious institutions we stare at our

36:18

phones social media is a simulacrum of

36:21

human connection it is one of the only

36:24

things you can do in which you're in

36:26

constant communication with others and

36:27

end up feeling so much lonelier and so

36:30

much less understood and what I see

36:32

happening in a lot of Corners right now

36:34

is a belief that this is all somehow

36:35

newly discovered and not just newly

36:38

discovered but that it has these simple

36:40

answers right that oh the problem is

36:42

just manufacturing jobs that went to

36:44

China and if you just change trade

36:47

policy maybe you reverse these

36:50

problems and you don't and you can't and

36:52

it's a multi-headed

36:54

Hydra and Obama but not only Obama has

36:59

always spoken to this great politicians

37:02

great I think political

37:04

figures speak to the

37:09

character of the country at any given

37:11

moment they just they don't just speak

37:12

to

37:13

policy they speak to who Americans are

37:17

and and what they're worried about at

37:18

that moment in

37:20

America and Barack Obama's presidency

37:23

did not have any traction on this what

37:25

you have tools to do as president is try

37:27

to expand health insurance work on trade

37:30

policy but Joe Biden's presidency didn't

37:33

have an answer Donald Trump's presidency

37:34

didn't have an answer and to be honest

37:36

KLA Harris's presidency if she gets it

37:38

will not have an answer and nor does JD

37:40

Vance have an

37:41

answer the spiritual and communal

37:45

condition of the country is something

37:47

politicians can speak to but I don't

37:49

really believe it is something they can

37:51

solve but it is something they need to

37:53

speak to human beings do not understand

37:56

their lives

37:58

as fundamentally about policy and so if

38:01

you're trying to speak to their

38:04

aspirations and their concerns you have

38:06

to identify what they really are one of

38:08

my favorite lines at the Democratic

38:09

Convention so far was from Raphael waro

38:12

on the first night a vote is a kind of

38:16

prayer for the world we desire for

38:18

ourselves and for our children and our

38:21

prayers are stronger when we pray

38:24

together and there's a lot to that and

38:26

the problem is that it is a prayer that

38:28

will always end up being

38:29

unfulfilled because you're voting for a

38:32

president who is to pass legislation to

38:34

the House and Senate it's not God but

38:37

that doesn't mean it's not the job of

38:40

political leaders to speak to what those

38:42

prayers actually are rather than what

38:45

can actually be answered I think that's

38:48

a Fitting Place to end so thank you Ezra

38:51

thank you alias

38:57

[Music]

39:06

this episode of the eclan show is

39:08

produced and hosted by elas iswith

39:09

factchecking by Michelle Harris with

39:11

Mary Marge locker and Kate Sinclair our

39:13

senior engineer is Jeff gel our senior

39:15

editor is CLA Gordon the show's

39:17

production team also includes and Galvin

39:18

Roland who and Kristen Lynn original

39:21

music by Aman sah and Isaac Jones

39:23

audience strategy by Christine Sami and

39:25

Shannon Busta the executive producer of

39:27

new YK K's opinion audio is Andy Rose

39:29

ster

39:30

[Music]

39:39

[Music]

Interactive Summary

The video features a discussion about the second night of the Democratic National Convention, specifically focusing on the speeches given by Barack and Michelle Obama. The host analyzes the unique rhetorical styles of both Obamas, noting how they both aimed to pass the mantle of their movement to Kamala Harris while distancing it from the presidency of Joe Biden, which was portrayed more as a necessary period of stabilization. The conversation also explores the concept of 'Obamaism'—a form of politics rooted in pluralism and a belief in a shared American narrative—and discusses the party's shifting focus toward housing policy and addressing the 'spiritual emptiness' prevalent in modern society.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts