Inauguration Interviews: Trump's Talent, Dem Rebrand & more w/ Whip Emmer, Reps Swalwell & Khanna
2851 segments
[Music]
all right everybody Welcome to uh the
Allin inauguration special we are here
in town uh to celebrate Andor
commiserate the second term of Donald
Trump depending on where you sit on the
political spectrum and we are extremely
lucky to have a partner in Spotify who
has given us a box yes we're in a glass
box on the street they really splurged
and got a trailer it's absolutely
fantastic but we thank them for their
host us it's very cool uh with me today
of course my co-host shth poaa and David
freeberg who is a little under the
weather because let's be honest
freedberg you've been out there you and
Lex took on the town last night I had a
good time with Lex Freedman last night
it was good let's leave it at that let's
leave it at that yeah that sounds great
it's been a couple nights in a row I'm
pretty beat jamaath you have a very busy
social schedule and uh you've been just
bouncing around town with the Who's Who
and taking CR for Donald Trump's Victory
how's the Victory lap going here cuz you
played such a key role here by coming
out and being even more unlikable in our
hometown of the Bay Area and supporting
Trump I'm a small bit player a bit
player but as you said to me in the car
over here you were the folc room that
started the boulder that created the win
I said none of that but uh I think more
changes are coming Jason maybe to our
home state of California let's see let's
see um let's see phase two we're
extremely um honored to have Tom Emer
here he is the US representative from
The Amazing state of Minnesota home of
Bob Dyan Prince and the Cohen Brothers
and Tim Walls and Tim
Walls coming in hot already well let's
start
there let's start there um how much of a
disaster uh was the Democratic party and
when you watched what happened with
Biden in all seriousness do you think
there was a cover up in terms of his
mental acuity and what do you think of
kamla's job out there not doing podcasts
and uh essentially being anointed and
not having a primary the Democratic
party seems lost crooked and crooked
okay yeah I mean the leadership I I got
good friends who are Democrats so I
don't I'm not going to disparage them
but uh first Jason all of you thank you
it's nice to be on Allin I heard
everybody's heard about it everybody
wants to be here so it's just nice that
and you promised you'd listen to it
after this right
actually I listened last week sadly it
was about the fires but uh uh the
uh the way they did this uh was if you
think about it ballot access is a big
thing you you have to run for uh months
and you have to get delegates and you
have to make your case state by state
and you have to meet certain
requirements to actually end up on the
ballot how the Democrats are able to
remove move Joe Biden literally uh in a
coup a back room coup and install kamla
Harris in a matter of hours or days uh
and avoid any convention uh like real
democracy taking place where people are
debating their candidates and where
they're at and then to your your uh
other question that that's wrong but
your other question was uh Joe Biden was
there a coverup I a coverup is when you
don't see it when you don't know about
it when you're totally unaware this
wasn't a coverup this was a conspiracy
everybody in this town for four years
watched when he came in he was already
diminished and watch him continue to
diminish over the course of his uh over
the course of his uh uh term it was the
mainstream media that refused to
actually comment on it and then it was
amazing overnight when uh he has the
debate last June it's like oh my gosh
this is terrible look at this and and
suddenly it was like they'd never seen
it before this was a conspiracy by a
left-wing media that uh they're littered
with people who have a partisan View and
they write about it they create stories
about it and they don't tell you the
whole story if you were here let's go
down this pull this thread a little bit
more because you said the the Democrats
themselves are good people some of them
many of them you know but then the
leadership you said was corrupt so just
can you help us understand who is the
leadership and then how does the
corruption play out what does the
corruption look like well remember I'm
on the Republican side yeah no but I'm
but I I can tell you what I watch what I
watch is there were two times that they
literally whoever they are it would be
the superdelegates it a lot of people
would say it's the Obamas it's the
clintons it's the you know by original
that's the that's the boogeyman for what
it's worth that people point to at least
when you're not in DC like if somebody
said who who are the leadership elected
or otherwise that runs a Democratic
party a lot of people would point to the
Obamas and then some of these super
donors is that sort of your perception
of how it works it is and the reason I I
go back as you'll remember Bernie
Sanders is marching towards the
Democratic nomination right and they get
to South Carolina and all of a sudden
Amy kashar from my state it's just one
after another I'm out I'm out I support
uh Joe Biden right clearly the
whoever that is because you're right
we're not in the room to see is it the
Obamas is it uh Consultants like
Carville or Axel Rod or whoever who is
in that room yeah uh but whoever's in
that room they have a plan when it gets
to the end and I I never thought Joe uh
Biden was going to be the
candidate and that's not how the
Republican Party operates because I
think some people in the public have
this perception that both parties
operate that way that there is a cabal
of the the most influential and
ultimately they end up getting to pick
and the other party does the same thing
is that not the case no and clearly that
wasn't the case with Trump right yeah no
ours I I would say that watching from
the outside again we're not on the
inside of the Democrat machine but
watching from the outside that's a top-
down process on the Republican side
that's a bottom up process and uh Donald
Trump is the best example of best
example because uh people in this town
you know especially in the house where I
serve are like you know we we got the
American people we have a mandate and
you got to remind them yeah no no Donald
Trump has a mandate he got 77 million
votes we got a little less than 75
million so if you're looking at who
literally is expanding this party and
pulling this party over the line it's
one guy it's Donald Trump so to your
point do you view him the party leader I
do so to your point this was a almost
like a Donald Trump hostile takeover of
the Republicans meaning if you look at
the establishment rhetoric of what
Republicans stood for I don't think
Trump really cared he had a point of
view and he had his own intellectual
agenda and ideology and to your point 77
million people said I go with that do
you think that that's possible on the
Democratic side as well do you think
that there's a different ideology that
needs to be born there I can only tell
you the experience I've had with one of
my Minnesota colleagues who I I won't
name him but he might have run against
the uh sitting president I he he was we
were talking on the house floor one day
and I was uh complaining to or giving
him a hard time I should say about some
of the
uh off-color remarks coming from the
squad and he made a point of telling me
off color sorry off color H well let's
just say there were some anti-semitic uh
comments uh All About the Benjamins this
stuff and there was a centure that was
being worked on oh wow yeah and uh uh it
was public but the point is when I was
saying boy you've had quite a week he
goes oh yeah yeah he says that's a very
small group of people in our party with
very large voices and my response to him
was okay well that might be true but
then people like you have to stand up
and speak up and take my grandfather's
Democrat Party back exactly and so no I
think they've got a problem identity
politics which they've perfected and
been playing for years it has now come
back to bite them and there's where is
the way out they don't have a brand they
don't know who they are they they
they're fighting about things like men
participating in in women's sports I
mean it just it isn't resonating with
the American people so they're they're
going to have to figure that out for the
future but on our side we're going to
have to figure out Donald Trump is the
one that pulled this across the line
here's here's the problem with the
Republican party for me the last 30
years we've had great people
representing us but the public has been
very frustrated because it seems like
government and the bureau rats always
get a better deal right than the average
citizen in this country right we're
talking about Main Street we're not
talking about Silicon Valley which has
its own Main Street but I'm talking
about just good old Main Street USA you
know where it's rural country it's uh
you know people who are just trying to
live their lives they feel like their
government hasn't been listening to them
for years this is what spawned the tea
party this is why we've had this over
and over and Donald Trump you got to
give him credit this energy was out
there and he actually grabbed it and he
showed us what it looked like when he
ran in 16 and he took the time to
understand it or or he just innately has
an ability to read people better than
I've ever seen yeah I mean I think he is
a generational retail politician
generational I think he's a one in 150
year leader yeah freeberg you have a lot
of thoughts on fiscal responsibility and
have been bangging the drum on the
national debt Tom you also have a
passion for responsibility maybe you
have some butts on that freeberg or
maybe you can tell us your point of view
on how much of an impact Doge can have I
don't know if you've talked and what you
think reconciliation is going to look
like I mean this is going to be a very
gnarly pitch battle here how how do we
get two trillion out of the why you st
bug exactly why are you stopping at well
actually let's ask that question is two
even possible and if so how do you think
you can get $2 trillion out of it so I'd
rather let's do it two ways I'd rather I
look at what's uh what could we put on
the table and we do this privately so
you won't get me to say what it is where
it is but I'll tell you there's a list
that we've sat down with that uh reaches
somewhere between five and seven
trillion a year uh over the next 10
years okay and the the uh that's what
that two trillion would be over the next
10 years okay I mean it listen if if
you're the budget's 7.2 what's that the
budget the annual budget 7.2 right so
the goal is first we got to balance the
budget you got to quit bleeding 1.5 to
2.2 trillion oh it's another trillion
yeah whatever you got to balance yeah
second thing you got to do is start to
bend the curve down we we got the
greatest economy in the world it hasn't
been performing where it could I I think
with Donald Trump we can put it in place
where it can you can see those revenues
start to go up again and you if youve
have this so you're controlling it you
could pay that you could pay that down
rather quickly I mean if you're talking
in terms of a decade this requires
sacrifice and it requires
representatives from each City uh and
each state to then go to their
constituents and say hey we fought to
get you X Y and Z and you're only going
to get X and Y yeah be careful some tell
you they fight but they're not really
fighting the uh I this this thing is
going to happen because of Donald Trump
I think I I leave it to Mike Johnson
he's the speaker he will make these
decisions I'm not got it I'm the whip
whatever you tell me my job is to make
sure we get it done and that's what
we'll do but I think you're going to see
a two trck process Mike Johnson for
reconciliation has set a deadline he
wants to vote on a budget resolution by
the first week of February why is that
important the budget resolution you have
to have before you can even move forward
with uh uh reconciliation that's usually
pre-negotiated with the Senate so if we
can keep with that aggressive timeline
you'll have that back to the house
sometime in February once you have that
that allows your 12 subcommittees to get
their allotment and start to build out
their right 12 appropriation
subcommittees build out their budgets
Jason Smith our ways and means chair
believes we can have that process done
by the end of March Mike in again in
this our speaker in this uh very
aggressive timeline if that's possible
he would like to vote on it in the house
in the first two weeks of April this
includes
the tax permanency extensions Etc from
the Trump tax cuts back in
2017 if we're able to keep to that
schedule then you could you could
realistically have a Reconciliation Bill
to president's Trump's desk by Memorial
weekend let's just talk about the other
long-term Challenge and your point of
view on the solution what's going to
happen to Social Security by 2030 2032
2033 where's this headed why I think
people are going to have to innovate and
I think you got to honor the promises
that have been made uh there are many
different things out there that are
being looked at like a voluntary program
that people I in a certain range and
this is above my my pay grade A Certain
range age range y like I don't know 18
to whatever it is that are just coming
into this system that it would give them
a choice right they would have a choice
to stay in Social Security as we know it
or to pursue a private route that will
have Federal parameters so you can't
just be putting it into a retirement
account taking it out it would serve the
same purpose but like Australia system
the super system it would obviously and
then it would grow the uh the private
side yeah and sorry is that ultimately
necessary we need to change Social
Security and when do we have to change
it by and now that the election is over
because every politician is scared to
talk about social security because
everyone's got an election coming up are
we going to hear something different
this time around or is it always going
to be the Kick the Can down the road
with Social Security and weever it's
just such a Golden Goose no one can talk
about it no one can touch it Donald
Trump was elected for three reasons one
to fix uh our economic woses uh the
inflation that's killed people uh get
energy moving again seal the southern
border and create peace and stability
around the globe if we perform and I'm
I'm going to change that because that's
not really my attitude when we perform
you start to build credibility with the
American public then and only then can
you start talking about because nobody
believes us right right so in in the
media plays games they try to pit us
against each other with these different
ideas the key is you have to honor the
promises that have been made to
Americans since Social Security was
created and then you have to look
forward and again we've said we're not
going to touch Social Security uh
Medicare and Medicaid that was the
president who said that I got that but
there are some uh efficiency things
reforms that you can do around these
programs that actually will make them uh
not only more uh uh viable financially
but more efficient should Americans be
able to trade cryptocurrency freely
without regulations or do you think
those regulations are in place for a
good reason well you're you're talking
so you remember Animal House with the
evil and the good on the shoulders I I
had that last night and the evil one and
well I got the libertarian and the uh
Republican with a small r on either one
libertarian always wins for me but yeah
well and it it used to for me but I
realized that I was a republican with a
small R when I was doing a radio show
with an anarchist for several months and
all he ever said was shut her down she's
pumping mud and it's like oh I must be a
republican I the libertarian says
absolutely okay I the Republican with a
small r i I think the key is going to be
we have the the greatest Financial
system markets here in the United States
in the world all we have an existing
Legacy two-tier banking system uh it
needs to come into the 21st century the
beauty of crypto to me is not just that
it's crypto one it's going to help us if
Congress does its job if we put some
parameters up Market structure you know
give people rules of the road so they
know what they can and can't do and
who's going to be uh having
responsibility for oversight we can
protect the existing two-tier Legacy
system yeah and allow it time to move
into the 21st century I think the the
key is and this is why the central
Bankers are so worried this is so
disruptive and potentially destructive
that they're scared to death it's not
just losing their power they're they're
afraid that uh this decentralization is
going to somehow send Finance back to
the uh I suppose there are also a
concern that consumers maybe who are not
super sophisticated or new to it might
lose their money and yesterday Trump
launched a $30 billion yeah coin uh
which we refer to on the internet as a
coin or a meme coin are you troubled by
him doing something like that was that a
wise decision on his part I don't know
time will tell about that he seems to
make some pretty good decisions they've
uh they've done you got work on the
regulations for that so if he can do
that can we all just do it and take any
you could have done it too oh well it
was a the SEC previously would have um
actually gone after you for um taking
money from retail investors ding dong
the witch is dead now we're going to be
moving forward with a new SEC got it
okay so
YOLO What's that YOLO YOLO you only live
once just go for it my uh my staff gives
me a hard time because I don't know all
those cute quips yeah but you're you're
cool with it you're cool with him doing
a coin 24 hours before I have no problem
did you see the mem that said Baron
apparently had his dad's phone last
night made a billion
dollar I love the baron memes they're my
favorite they call him the Lian alib
which if you like if you watch Dune is
like he's the Savior that's sent in Dune
to basically save all of us it's
definitely going to be an interesting
four years uh let's talk about right now
Jason is about to implode Congressman
what you're seeing is him melting down
has a big like negative bias against um
these coins no no no I have a bias
against stealing meanwhile you want
every ret you want every retail investor
to have access to buy startups and
because that that'll benefit you but
when it comes to coins you're like oh no
one should be able to do that no I'll
address that I think there should be a
sophisticated investor test where people
learn about things like diversification
they learn who owns 80% of the coins
that just been dumped on retail and
under what circumstance they can sell
them and you know there is a a
legitimate issue here that uh foreign
adversaries could just buy these coins
that influence the president I think
that's a real concern that people should
have so you can diminish it you're it
it's actually a real issue I actually
agree with you like Securities
regulations require and when you do an
IPO you file an S1 and you disclose who
owns the shares yes and it has to go on
a regulated exchange so you know who the
buyers of the shares are so I do
actually think your framework is pretty
reasonable that it I thought you were
just mocking me well I do mock you yeah
in addition let's go to the next one
then no no I do think that's right you
brought up the Border uh Steve Bannon
says huh I did you did you said the
Border was one of the M re in his uh
mandate yeah so let's talk about that
part of the Mandate that you brought up
uh Steve Bon says he's doing a great job
today's moderator you're doing I think
he's the only one that s they knock you
down and then they build you up it's all
good I'm not paying attention to them
I'm paying attention to you this is
called management Steve Bannon said he
wants all 15 out day one so what's going
on uh Steve Miller says America is for
Americans and Americans
only do you believe 15 million people
should be dragged out of this country
day one like Steve Bannon and Steve
Miller I I think we should look at what
the American people think so a New York
Times of all Outlets had a poll that
said uh it's like 80% I believe that
criminals terrorists uh people who have
committed uh bad offenses should be the
hell out of here yeah easy one to have
consensus on you no but then it starts
to drop down yeah which is uh the next
one is a uh oh I forget what the second
one is it drops down about 60 but 55% of
Americans believe any illegal immigrant
should be out of here how many 55% 55%
this in a New York po W what do you
think that'll do to the economy you
brought up inflation and we have to tame
that we have 4% unemployment the lowest
of our lifetimes can I just tell you
agricultural um labor costs have climbed
by probably 3x in the last four or five
years yeah it's and there's not enough
labor to address kind of agricultural
production needs in this country
particularly in specialty crops it's the
world I I work in how are we going to
kind of address both the kind of economy
economic demand for labor in this
country and address this kind of
immigration challenge you don't fix your
labor problem with h illegal immigration
uh you fix it by fixing your immigration
system and making sure that it's working
the way it's supposed to by the way I
come from the state of Minnesota the two
primary drivers of our state's private
economy are manufacturing an EG I mean I
I've got huge uh operations of families
that have bound together as a co-op that
they literally have to bring in foreign
workers and they they' built a Village
housing they have teachers but there's
there's the solution this idea and I
come from Minnesota which is why you
made the hair on the back of my neck
stand up the the argument is oh illegals
people who are here illegally and their
Advocates are bracing for Trump's
arrival and then they write an article
that says if they remove all these
people our economy is going to tank
stop it you you you've got laws for a
reason you got to enforce the laws that
are on the books and if they don't work
this is why we passed the strongest
border bill in 20 years with 222 members
in the last Congress which Chuck Schumer
never looked at they they wanted to say
that Trump killed the bipartisan bill
you realize the house bill did five
things finish the wall reform the parole
process reform Asylum uh end Catch and
Release and restore remain in Mexico
those were the five pillars that
so-called bipartisan Bill actually
codified catch and release said that if
you don't have emergency Authority on
the border until you have 5,000 plus one
coming across a day so we seem to have
the answer we seem to have you know
pretty solid consensus here and in the
country criminals who are basically
committing two crimes whatever crime
they committed here and coming cross the
border illegally they have no standing
they go but you seem to be um punting
and not answering the question of should
the 14.5 milon other people dragged out
of the country in year one so maybe you
can answer that one J's a journalist I
I'm telling you right now that Trump
trump was elected to get this what do
you think though you are from a state
where that's going to be highly
unpopular I I don't think you should be
here if you're illegal so all for all 15
million got to go in year one I don't
think you should be here if you're
illegal now you're you're painting with
a pretty broad brush you don't know what
specific using Steve Bannon and Steve
Miller have said so I'm just quoting
their words again I think the
the goal is to make sure Poss JD Vance
JD Vance came on our show and he said
hey you got to do the first thing first
and you know then the second thing
second and the third it's not all going
to happen on day one but yeah it's GNA
be well I'm trying to interpret that but
you're being straight so well actually I
resent that I am being straight I will
tell you Adar no I just want to know if
that this is I think there's a lot of
Americans who want to know if 15 million
people are literally going to be dragged
out this is a big question for the
American people are you going to drag 15
million people out the country or not
because Stephen Miller who seems to be
you know a big part of this
Administration and C Bannon who was the
architect of the previous administration
say that's actually going to happen
people are actually nervous about that
this is when we need sacks here to check
you to fact check you on whether those
guys have said that and the the problem
is you're using terms like dragged them
out no I mean they're going to start
with the worst of the worst in JD's uh
answer you start with those because you
know that this is going to have an
emotional aspect to it and guess what
yeah if you start doing it the way
you're supposed to do it I'm going to
suggest to you that a lot of them are
going to leave voluntarily and then if
we fix the system that we have then we
can start to restore this by the way
that's already happening because I've
heard from a lot of agricultural leaders
they're seeing labor depart the country
right now in anticipation of the
administrative change and a lot of Labor
is very scared of what's Happening they
don't want to be caught they just came
here for work these are individuals who
came to this country to work they
employed whether legally or illegally to
do work that's in demand in this country
and they're worried they're going to go
to jail so they're leaving and there's a
massive outl right now particularly in
rural areas there's a massive out right
now of Labor that's really critical to a
lot of those farming economies and that
a lot of people in the agricultural
sector are very nervous about what's
about to happen in the impact but let me
ask you another question do you think
and in align with elon's point of view
and some of the stuff that's been
promoted that there's a big Push by the
Democrats to keep the borders open to
create more voting Democrats in this
country that that's a big reason or
rationale for the alternative of you
know having illegal immigration then
converting everyone to Legal I think I I
think it's more basic than that I do
think there's a political element to it
states like Minnesota where the uh where
the traditional educated
I what entrepreneur yeah is leaving
they're being replaced with uh in many
cases with illegals yeah right because
we are a sanctuary state right so they
come into Minnesota whether they vote or
not that there is a big there is a big
argument that yes many of them are but I
think the bigger issue is how Congress
is uh divided up you're losing you're
hollowing out whether you're Illinois or
you're New York you're hollowing out
your state they bring illegals in and
Incredibly our census calculates them in
the uh numbers that doesn't make sense
no so you got these blue states that
mandering cartel just to try to how does
yeah I guess that's a longer
conversation and we probably need to
wrap up in a minute I never how that
works have a totally different question
something more fun the job of whip was
totally romanticized after House of C
that Ro you got to kill people well no
because you had you had spy you had spy
in this really famous scene you got an
interesting the Whip and saying when I
was Whi my job was to whip the votes and
then he was screaming into the phone
whip the votes and I just remember this
thinking now that seems like a really
cool job his nickname is Chairman
dictator just so you know he was voted
like number one commentator by Xing pan
Chinese Communist Party in the first
year of podcast I have a lot of
important people that look up to me yes
yeah uh but but just the job of whip is
it as enjoyable as it sounds so
everybody likes to say to me you got the
worst job in Washington DC I think the
speaker has the worst job in Washington
D that guy can be having a great day and
he's got all kinds of people that are
just throwing sandwiches at them all the
time the majority leader uh does a
calendar manages the floor works with
the chairs uh great job the whip you
don't get to do anything those guys want
to do unless we can actually get it
across the floor and the world has
changed I you know they I think well I
know they elected me because they
thought my personality is very direct I
am from uh Minnesota I get the sense
that you're incredibly effective or you
could whip the votes well but it's you
just got to be honest and you got to
respect everybody and and it's a
different world because we probably have
40% of our members who will vote for
whatever Mike Johnson says we're going
to put on the floor okay but we got 60%
and this is what's been changing I think
over the last couple of decades it keeps
getting larger they didn't come here to
follow somebody they came here to to
lead to represent their people and they
need to be involved in the process and
and what I tell them all the time I
don't care if you like each other I
don't care if you despise one another I
don't care if you socialize together or
the second you walk out of here you run
to two polar opposite places when you're
here the American people elected Donald
Trump and we have the benefit of uh a
majority see you're opening the votes
but that's what it is and I I tell them
you got to get over yourself we're going
to let everybody participate in the
process we're going to take all of your
ideas we put the uh the more Centrist
part of our our majority and the more uh
rightwing part of our party together and
that that list of uh savings Cuts
offsets I was talking about we privately
run that through small groups one at a
time so that they can talk to each other
right so that if if you come from a ruby
red District down south and I come from
a you know swingy swingy District in New
York York we can have a conversation
about why I can and can't do something
and why you will and won't do something
and at the end of the day this is how
you're successful everybody wants to be
involved it's it's hard only from the
aspect that you you can't afford to
leave anyone last question uh when you
saw the last week was pretty prolific in
terms of the Senate confirmation
hearings that started um I think we're
still waiting to figure out when Bobby
is going to come up like do you see any
push back who do you think who might not
make it who might not make it I think
everybody's making it I I think anybody
uh that listens to you guys or anything
that interview where they start saying
bringing this up we got to remind people
this has been the left's Playbook since
Robert Bourg yeah they started it with
Robert bour they took him out of his
Supreme Court appointment they uh they
did it to Clarence Thomas they really
did it to Kavanagh and look at this now
they've moved it to Cabinet picks right
and and Pete Heth is a great example
none of us is perfect but all of that
was Anonymous and I think once it
started going through the process and
somebody asked me this question a few
weeks ago I said yeah they're starting
with Pete Pete's going to get uh he's
going to get through the process they'll
move on to Tulsi then they'll move on to
Bobby Kennedy Jr right those will
probably be their their three biggest
ones that they'll attack yeah right I
mean my my perspective on this is that
to your point in the absence of somebody
being compromised it's not an IDE iCal
difference that should stop cabinet
picks on either side whoever is the
President should get to pick their team
put the team on the field that's the
Mandate he was given by the people and
then the people should get to vote it up
it's supposed to be an advisory capacity
right I mean the yeah Congressional it
is but the beauty of what Donald Trump
is doing you can't fix what's broken
with people that broke it he's going
outside of this godforsaken place and
bringing people in that have have
completely new ideas whether you like
them or not right come on folks let's
see what this does we've been doing the
same thing now for years which by the
way is what happened 250 years ago when
this okay wait Congressman last question
okay this is the last question Congress
last us give us the red an opinion you
said you listened to the Fire episode
that we did but just general from the
outside in as a Minnesotan looking at
California just diagnose what's going on
there it's it's more complicated than
the right and the left want to make it
seem but uh there definitely is a
problem it's not just limited to
California it's across this country with
not man in our resources the way we
should we had this problem in northern
Minnesota probably 20 years ago 25 years
ago we had a blow down in the bwca The
Boundary Waters canoe area you had all
those trees uh laying down they were
kindling right and I think our governor
at the time Jesse Ventura said he was
going to go in there and he was going to
log it right so we could protect the uh
citizens in their property and we could
actually make use of these uh trees that
have been destroyed in the storm uh the
federal government told him he couldn't
do it and of course we've had fires
right uh California this is tragic my
brother-in-law sent me a picture he
lives in Woodland Hills he sent me a
picture of flames at the end of his
culde-sac above the that's where my
parents live they probably live a couple
blocks from each other in Woodland Hills
two the fire sto two blocks from their
house yeah that's the picture he took
they might live did the winds just take
no so the uh the the the Ventura County
Line comes up to right there yeah and
the fire department did and I I calfire
and fire department are incredible they
stopped it from entering the
neighborhood that's amazing it was
amazing yeah very I don't know how his
house is still standing based on the
picture you sent Tom this has been
amazing you fit right in here appreciate
the honesty and candidness and we'd love
to have you back anytime I appreciate
the conflict I love that well I mean the
American people have this is why we love
job he got he got motivated we went to a
Spotify dinner last night and they were
talking about journalism he's like I'm a
journalist I'll show you guys I can
Journal I think it's a really important
conversation and you know the one thing
I'm a little concerned with is um just
some clarity because Trump has an
ability to say things in a in a in a
bold way in an effervescent way and then
you know sometimes these things actually
affect people and they want a little
more clarity so well and the whip has uh
has to find Clarity amongst 219 people
yeah good luck with that job appreciate
it thank you thank you you guys are fine
thanks okay everybody welcome back to
the all-in podcast we're here for the
inauguration of Donald Trump in his
second term and we're delighted to have
Eric swell with us today uh he is
obviously the house representative from
California and the Democratic party uh
you guys East Bay East Bay East Bay East
Bay yeah uh you guys got shellacked this
time around wasn't great wasn't good
yeah um what are the lessons that the
Democratic party can take from this I'll
will uh insert myself into this a little
bit I'm a moderate who's voted Democrat
two out of three times I was
absolutely really disappointed I I'll
just leave it at that that you didn't
have a speedrun primary that Biden was
put up when he was clearly in cognitive
decline and I'm absolutely disgusted by
the Democratic party's um hatred of
successful entrepreneurs in this country
you've kind of lost me as somebody who
voted two out of three times why has the
Democratic party left me somebody who
you know two out of three times would
vote Democrat and now you hate as a
party entrepreneurship winning and you
you you seem to hate democracy and you
won't even have a primary Jesus Christ
um don't hate democracy um no but this
is my perception I think a lot of
Democrats feel this way we just lose you
lost a lot of fol folks like a lot of I
mean this this is across the board
there's a lot of middle of the road
folks that just yeah we
we need
a story that connects with everyday
Americans I think when you look at a lot
of the policies that we like believe in
and you look at polling and focus groups
people will be like oh yeah I like that
I like that I like that but our story
right now I don't think we know who we
are and who we're fighting for now so it
is to me exciting that we can go through
this reset and renovation to find that
story that connects I'm a bluecollar kid
I was raised by a cop and a mom who had
six different jobs I was the first of my
family to go to college I like to think
you were raised by two Republicans yeah
I was they they they were they are were
and are two Republicans and I've got
three little brothers who are cops and I
grew up in Dublin California everyone
called it scrubin until we invested uh
there and we saw success what was your
ideological change growing up in a
republican household of cops essentially
yeah uh to becoming a you know you're a
bit of a democratic poster boy well
that's that's only because I've gone
after Donald Trump but if you look I ran
against the most liberal member of
Congress Pete Stark um I have been a
pretty independent vote in Congress and
I root for success of entrepreneurs and
business and want to connect that
success to the people who work hard at
those businesses so everyone does well
and I think if we're just perceived as
rooting against success overall and
vilifying by people who are successful
um then no one can be successful if if
that's the case did you like or not like
did you agree with Biden's framing as he
was leaving about this Tech
oligarchy it it it's only an oligarchy
if working class folks don't benefit
from it so if that's what it becomes
then that that's a problem what I want
to see and I think what you all are
rooting for is that anyone if you work
hard work your ass off you should do
better for yourself and dream bigger for
your kids and I think we have an
opportunity to do that the president the
president-elect has an opportunity to
make that happen and where he tries to
do that he'll find uh a partner in me
but do we have this uh branding issue
yes no I think that's what is The
Branding issue let un the The Branding
issue the wokeism is it the
judgmentalism is it the sanctimony is
pandering is it the you have to you have
to be perfect and pure is what the
perception is right now but nobody's
perfect no no no that's the
of people who like like we're all ridd
with errors and of course we're not
perfect and pure but I think the
perception is that to be a Democrat you
have to check all these Purity boxes and
then you can be a part of the party and
right now the Republican part is like I
think the exact opposite it's like do
you like Donald Trump great come to the
party and
so even like if you don't like Trump can
we get you on these three policies and
you can still come to Peter T's party I
have never been more courted by
political party than trumps and I have
never been more hated than I've been by
the Democratic party that's wrong it
shouldn't make people feel that way Jam
feels that way I think he was a major
donor you guys are talking about having
you guys are saying you should have a
Joe Rogan equivalent you had Joe Rogan
he was a Democrat if you watch all his
shows they were all he had Bernie
Sanders on he wanted to have Hillary on
you guys fumbled it you guys had Elon
Musk you fumbled it well see the party
fumbled it maybe you can comment you
represent and let's talk about
rebuilding and we have we have an
opportunity to rebuild now and so on for
example the department of government
efficiency like we should root for
government to be more efficient and we
should try and enable that but like if
that effort goes into an area where it's
going to cut Social Security or cut you
know Medicare then I think you'll see us
be Guardians against that but like most
small businesses think it's pretty hard
start a small business and then even
once you do you don't have the resources
that bigger businesses do and they see
regulations as what gets in the way so
we should try and knock those what's
happening in the party like what what
are you guys doing or is it just
headless as an organization yeah who
runs a Democratic party I would say in
in the house right now hakee Jeff uh has
been pretty effective at at uniting us
and and even in the last Congress uh you
saw something that you've never seen
before in any Congress in our country
any parliament in the world which is the
minority party delivered the majority
votes on every vote of consequence so
keeping the government open lifting the
de ceiling which's which the incoming
president now supports which we welcome
that and we would love to get rid of it
by the way um you know the funding of
even the funding you know to Israel that
that moveed forward because uh Democrats
were unified uh on that front so I think
hakee has shown himself as like a
practical negotiator someone who can
work with Johnson but I think the the
the other Fair commentary is he's young
and he's inexperienced what I mean by
leadership is yeah who who is the elder
Statesman that can help push and cajo
and influence the Democratic party to
find a more solid ground I think one I
think one of our best thought leaders is
Mark cubin I think he's Mark cubin right
Mark Cuban yeah he he's very influential
has a lot of relationships with my
colleagues uh myself he has business
experience but I think he's also not
lost touch of like what regular people
care about and I thought he was an
effective surrogate uh for kamla uh
being out there on the trail but I I go
to mark on a lot of stuff and and I
think he um understands where most
people are how did Kamala get selected
how did she get select so she was vice
president and the runway was about 100
days and I we can go through the
different scenarios I don't think any of
them good and as you said if if your
premise is that President Biden should
not have run for re-election making that
decision that close to the election you
know I don't know if any candidate you
know should there have been a speed
primary like
j
i we could go through a hundred
scenarios there were a bunch of great
candidates I I still think all of them
would have probably been set up to fail
did you it's too too short of a Runway
did you in your interactions with the
president did you say to yourself
gosh what's going on here I I didn't and
my colleagues and I I don't think we
interacted with him you know that often
and we kind of you know we started his
presidency in Co and so the Joe Biden
that I knew when I was in a baby you
know child in the Congress in 2013 was
very engaged and you know Lov meeting
with Congress and the meetings would go
an hour over the time allotted and it it
was kind of that Bill Clinton charm
offensive that he could put on and I
will just tell you like the first two
years with the covid restrictions that
we had we didn't see that because we you
know we would have remote meetings with
the White House and so um they hit him
they hit him I I don't yeah again I
don't know I I know I know where we are
now the reports are he was gay c yeah
yeah like I said I'm I'm man focus on
the future let's talk about the future
let's talk about Doge so you mention
wait wait hold on hold on before we talk
to Doge yeah yeah ER you were on the
house intelligence committee yes let's
talk about Tik Tok yes yeah okay done
and dusted what what do you think might
back tomorrow right might might not yeah
um you're you're in the room and these
things happen there are these off the
record I guess intelligence briefings
that happened and um this was a n0
unanimous Supreme Court decision it was
an overwhelming majority yeah in
Congress can you just help us understand
what needs to happen happen for
something like those two events to
happen yeah just be General you don't
have to say specifically obviously and
disclose anything that you know but
we're just trying to understand how does
something when it's such a ranker
congress which can't seem to agree on
anything or a supreme court which tends
to be five4 on every issue finds a n0
and a super majority in Congress I can
you just help us understand so the
Supreme Court was not saying whether we
should ban or not ban Tik Tok they were
saying the Congress voted president
signed corre and there's no way around
this ban so they I think they were just
following the law I voted against the
ban I think China is the place where you
ban things and the problems that I have
with Tik Tok as a father of like three
little kids are the problems that I have
with meta and the problems that I have
yeah it also so you don't view it you
don't view it as a security risk for the
United States and and and I Look to Jim
heims who is the senior Democrat on the
intelligence committee the ranking
member he's in What's called the gang of
eight he has the most exquisite access
to intelligence and Jim voted against
the ban and I thought you know what if
this guy is not seeing anything on the
National Security level there was an off
the Record or confidential briefing to
the house intelligence committee so you
think in that meeting there was nothing
that was very meaningful that was
disclosed about Tik Tok nothing that I
had seen is it owned by the Chinese
government absolutely but is there a
national security risk I have not seen
that hold on a second though I mean if
the Chinese government owns a 100
million plus American phones their
location data access to their
microphones access to their cameras how
is that not a security risk and where I
mean that seems incredibly naive to say
that I want I want to build on what J is
saying um we know that there are
security vulnerabilities for example in
WhatsApp it's riddled with stuff so you
know you could send a PDF before then
you could send an image now you can just
send a message and you can root your
phone the difference is WhatsApp is
owned by an American citizen right I
really and so what which is to say all
these apps are compromised it's just
that the Tik Tok is owned by a Chinese
owner who is out of the reach of the
United States government yeah and is
that fair or unfair to you it is out of
the reach of the United States
government but what I will say is most
of what we buy as far as you know what's
in our basket at Walmart is has a
Chinese component what's in our Basket
doesn't have a microphone or your GPS
let me say a lot of it does have you
seen a lot of stuff you buy um drones
Chinese made drones there'ss there's a
whole website now that that breaks down
modern consumer electronics from China
that actually have these hacking devices
built into them I don't know if you've
seen this but like you you'll buy like a
USB charger that's like eight bucks on k
or something and it's inside it's got
like an IP address and it actually finds
Wi-Fi it connects and it transmits
information this is incredibly dangerous
like there's so many and I bought this
like cheap drone for like Christmas
someone uh for like anyway one of my
little neews brought it and I'm like
dude this thing is like 149 bucks and I
looked it up online it's like got camera
connects to your Wi-Fi and then it asked
for access to your phone and I'm like
I'm not doing that like I tweeted this a
few months ago I don't think Tik tok's
the issue the USBC charging cables
exactly yeah be yeah rooted the charging
cables yes this
is this is more reason to B speculative
no I don't but I don't think Tik Tok I
guess my point is like we Tik Tok you
want to ban everything that's made in
China that's great you'll destroy the
economy yeah but one thing has 100
million people in an algorithm that
could influence people's perception that
you know the that Hamas is being
harassed by the Israelis like they they
literally can change how Americans
especially young ones perceive the world
even if they're not doing it currently
do you not see how obvious it is that
they can use it it's a censorship point
of view which is government has a ro
contr let's get his yeah I guess I'm the
only one of the four of us that doesn't
want to ban speech um yeah I'm no I'm
with you with you I want I want to B I
want either reciprocity where we can put
our apps in China or I want it gone now
you're now you're making a different
case now you're saying it's like
reciprocity as opposed to controlling
first you were saying it's security then
you're saying it's like controlling our
point of view now you're saying
reciprocity you're like those aren't the
same thing here security security risk
likely lies everywhere on security on
controlling the point of view of stuff I
think you guys have to separate look Tik
Tok there are three things in Tik Tok
okay there's the content and the content
creators that's one thing then there is
a network effect and then there is the
vessel which is the app okay which is
the code my very specific point of view
is the content creators and the network
effect can easily be replicated in other
places The Vessel itself is corrupt and
I think if you can't technically see
that it's probably because you just
you're not steeped enough in the techn
the intelligence committee doesn't
technically see that so clearly they're
not agre they've been caught they've
seen tracking got a guy the intelligence
committee here tell well but I I also
looked at the small business owners who
use that as a platform I understand how
you just the buckets that you just cre
people depend on it and more people in
the what I was telling the White House
was more people watch President Biden's
State of the Union Address on Tik Tok
than anywhere else and the and President
Biden had just gone on Tik Tok right
before this is the content and the
network my point is across meta or
across X my preference would be X you
can replicate the network effect and you
can create a mechanism for those content
creators who are already on those
platforms anyway to shift my point is
the vessel itself is easily rooted I I I
told this to president Trump when we
were sitting down I was like that
phone the microphone on that iPhone can
get turned on remotely you can choose
what state actor wants to do it but I
will bet you to Donuts it is
inconceivable to me that the NSA did not
find that capability and the reason is
not because Tik Tok is bad or good the
reason is all of these apps are rooted
the only difference is that most of
these apps are controlled by American
citizens gives us control mechanism and
this app is not
yeah I I mean I think Donald Trump is
going to allow Tik Tok well he got 50
million donation from Jeff Yas that and
I think he also recogniz I think super
pack 50 million yes and I think the
reason he cares is because he knows a
lot of his followers are on there and
for whatever reason they didn't CH they
have not chosen you what else is very
popular exported from China fentol yeah
we should probably ban that too like I
mean the fact that it's popular should
not be why we are doing that's why I
think you're framing WR popular Jason
what I'm saying is you can't put the
toothpaste back in the tube and and so
you're take you're going to take away a
platform that is on by Americans the
weak chosen to go to those other ones
and I just don't think we ban things in
America I I think yeah but this is the
Chinese Communist Party Jason if you if
you actually they spy on their own
citizens if you're just think about this
for a second if your business depended
on you using Tik Tok how would you feel
about the Tik Tok and you're you're not
wealthy you're not most important thing
you guys have to assume that if if it is
true that the CCP uses the Chinese
version of Tik Tok as a mechanism to
surveil their own people the idea that
for an extra few units of resources
they wouldn't spy on the most important
powerful nation in the world to me seems
pretty illogical and dumb they are going
to they would do it and separately it's
not to say that President Trump is using
uh Tik Tok per se or you know important
people but it is true that when you have
enough people use an app and those
people come into contact with other
people like look what happens today how
do you exchange contact information with
an iPhone you touch one another
there's NFC capability C from Ian just
think naive assum that like technology
is very deterministic there are so many
good things that happen but there are
people that are paid to find every
single edge and to push it because the
stakes are high and I just think that
this is an assumption that we have to
live with I'm just very cautious when it
comes to bands that's that's fair that's
an ideological thing and I age with you
CU Cham where this goes is you're like
well I don't want to import Korean cars
because they've got electronics that are
connected to the internet in every
Korean car now the Koreans can spy on
where we are I mean you can very quickly
see how this can open up a Floodgate Of
Banning because foreign adversaries
could take advantage of us including
including B including Banning chip
Imports including Banning router Imports
you could very quickly make this a whole
happen with routers literally the number
my is literally already with equipment
we're going to go down a very nasty
place like we're going down an
intelligent route which is to not give
access to all of the personal
information of the Sons and Daughters of
Representatives of military experts to
the Chinese Communist party there there
is a reason why Huawei is banned in
America yes yeah security
vulnerabilities were found they don't
have our best all of a sudden you think
that it stopped there China to like gave
up and said okay I'm saying there's a
different let's go watch the dance
videos now it's great let the Americans
Dance by way it do a little C isn't the
US Revenue Tik Tok for bite dance like
5% if it wasn't important the Chinese
government they would have divested I
think it's a 30 or they give up their
golden Shar us is 30 or 40 let's move on
to the Border um yeah wait wait Doge
we're gonna do Doge okay let's do Doge
because you tell us your point of view
on Elon VI coming in what they're going
to do what's good about it what you
really don't think is good about it you
have concerns yeah well so I do think
it's funny that a committee about
efficiency has two people running it
that's
but I think it it just cut itself in
half with if vex's running you know for
governor so that is their first success
um I guess you know to cut you know the
size of the committee but they got a lot
of people that they've recruited I got
it yeah as they said knock yourself out
if you want to make it easier for small
businesses you know to start a business
if you want to save you know money inal
employ federal employees not showing up
to the office yeah look I my staff shows
up um and and we benefit from people
being in the office we show a lot of
flexib ability uh for people who have
family issues kind of on a case-by Case
basis um and people with disabilities
have more access to work but I I
generally I see the benefits of having
everybody at the office and we were one
of the first offices to come back uh on
the hill um you know during Co because I
saw the benefit of that and if they can
draw a a straight line between you know
benefiting our constituents and people
being in the office I'm I'm open-minded
to that Eric tell us about um how you
think this reconciliation Bill the
budget yeah um it's going to be a very
knockout drag out kind of a process um
we're going to hit the debt ceiling yeah
tomorrow yeah um and so you guys are
going to be back to work right away what
do you
expect what I'm going to be asking my
constituents you know is tax cuts are
proposed and regulations you know
potentially are cut is you know what did
you get out of this and what have you
lost because if it's just as I said if
it's just kind of a a bro Archy that
benefits and and you don't benefit then
I won't support it but if you can draw
the line and say you know this business
getting this benefit or this corporate
tax rate going down means that you know
you're going to do better and dream
bigger I can be for that and and so
that's what I'm going to be looking at
do you think generally that governments
should generally just have less tax
receipts and be forced to spend less to
be more ingenious and less over reliant
on overpowering things with money yes
and frankly a lot of that starts with
the Department of Defense I mean look at
where the cost drivers are government
yeah I I think that but that means you
need to have alliances in the world
right you're going to have if you're
going to reduce what you spend on
defense you better strengthen your
Partnerships some people on the
Republican side so I think it's a
wonderful Point some people on the
Republican side say this is why energy
is so important for us because when we
have resource Independence it actually
allows us to forge and cast many of our
relationships abro that then create a
very different security envelope I so I
share the the rare earth ex minerals
caucus and for this reason and it
probably surprises people that a Bay
Area Democrat wants to get the US uh you
know back into Mining and that's because
we're getting our ass kicked by China on
this uh on the um you know not just the
mining but the processing and the
magnetizing but we do have allies who
have these resources so we can do it in
the United States there's Mountain Pass
where they're doing it with almost 100%
uh recycled water so you don't have the
acid Pond issue but you also have
countries that you could have I I I
helped fun Jim to get that thing off the
ground I've been out there and going
it's an incredible thing but even he he
will tell you doing these kinds of
projects in America today is almost next
to Impossible and the reason he was able
to do it I mean he has support from
folks like you which are for thinking
but the reason was because it had
already largely been built right and he
said if he had tried to get it permitted
that's right uh and it's just a question
you know less money for the government
less regulation it it almost seems like
sometimes if the Republicans say yay the
Democrats say nay and if the Democrats
said yay the Republicans would say nay
but if you ask everybody privately
everybody agrees the government should
have less and to your point business
people should just have more of a wide
birth to actually go and work and then
be held to account as I said if the
wealth is only concentrated at the
top make sure we can point to people at
every part of the economic spect yes
that's like but that's a very reasonable
thing to say what you're saying well I I
I hope that's how we govern in this next
but it doesn't come out that way well I
think this is a key point that what you
lead with and what you talk about and
what you make a priority that will be
people's perception of your focus right
and the perception that I have as
somebody who again has voted Democrat
two out of three elections is that
you're focused on and talking about
things like Dei things like having trans
kids get surgery and no parent agrees
with this nobody agrees with this
they're banning it around the world and
you guys lead with that that shows a
lack of prioritization that is palatable
to the voting populace what they want is
effective leadership and when you look
at what happened in Southern California
it is the height of arrogance that
they're working on things like Dei and
saying this is important when the
reservoir is not filled when they're not
clearing brush and you have to make
tradeoffs in the world and you guys
don't seem to be able to communicate
that it's incredibly frustrating for me
you can hear it in my voice that you can
say you know what we care about nature
we care about the trees but you can't
have trees on the floor around homes in
a fire oh you said floor you didn't say
ground so no I'm going to not listen to
you or we can't get minerals that we're
going to be dependent on China for
minerals right it we need those minerals
we cannot be dependent on foreign
adversaries to make important weapon
systems to make important things like
electric vehicles and you guys are
concerned about the cranes and trans
kids being able to get surgery that
nobody wants that's the problem with the
party we need a better story and I don't
think stop focusing on those weird
things don't leave that story with the
concerns people have with Dei although I
would argue now the new Dei is Don Eric
and Ivanka and people probably won't
like that approach to it uh either is
that you floating the tri you're trying
to
I'm not sure but okay we need a better
story and I look forward to being that
the first time
work we Workshop it yeah yeah you're GNA
have to Workshop that way yeah I mean
listen there's a long tradition in these
parties of the kids being grifters
Hunter everybody's getting in on it um
but let's let's close on the borders no
no hold on before we do that I just want
to ask you about um should the United
States spend $200 billion doll to
acquire Greenland from Denmark I don't
give a if he tries to acquire Greenland
I just want the cost of eggs to go down
that's what my constituents are
promising knock yourself out go get
green Minal right security aspect of
course there's there there's benefits
there but I I just I want to know you
said you're going to lower the cost of
eggs eggs are pretty expensive what like
how are you going to do that and if you
can tell me that you know spending $200
billion to get Greenland is going to
help lower our cost great but I think
people want to see costs come down I
have a question about today I just want
to actually go back in time uh today are
there any of President Trump's nominees
that uh really give you Aida and if so
who and why and who's inspiring you mean
give some credit if there's something
like inspiring yeah who do you like give
give us one that inspires you and give
us one I I think Rubio's GNA do a great
job Secretary State I think he's he has
the the gravitas and the experience uh
to do it and I want I want to see that
happen Kos Patel is the one that I I
think could destroy the president's uh
agenda because can you say more well
what I see and I may be a little bit
biased because the guy wrote a book he
listed 100 enemies I'm not in that 100
I'm actually in the Preamble he starts
it with of course Adam Schiff and Eric
swell are the most dangerous people well
you were part of the house Russia Russi
investigation but I I do believe if if
the president focuses on going after his
enemies he's going to lose the ability
to bring order to the Border yep to get
the most violent uh you know the most
violent undocumented immigrants out of
the country yeah and make people feel
safe in communities where they don't
feel safe what do you think about
Jason's comment um do you think that we
should
systematically uh work through a process
to deport 15 million illegal I I think
you should focus on violent
offenders sexual so let's say you get
that done in six months what do you do
after that uh well you also need order
at the border right I mean and I I
support surging resources to bring that
but 40% of my constituents were born
outside the United States we are the
eighth wealthiest District in the
country no thanks to me I'm not
contributing to that wealth there is a
straight line between those immigrants
and that wealth and so if we can find a
way to address you know shortages in the
workforce in agriculture Hospitality
food and beverage of course we see it in
biotech and Tech I think we can have the
best in the world I just leave it leave
you with this a foreign minister uh in
Asia said to me in the past year he said
Eric he said you know the population of
the United States is 3 billion people
and I looked at him and I said no you
mean it's like 300 plus million I
thought he misspoke he said no he said
there are three billion people in the
world who would give up everything to
come to the United States and he said if
you get it right he said you can pick
the best that's right absolutely
recruitment as opposed to immigration is
a better framework yes go go back please
you mentioned this uh the house Russia
investigation created a lot of yeah um
talking points on both sides that I
think are still lingering and in the
spirit of sort of putting it to bed
um any regrets about that whole process
uh was there anything substantive that
came out of It ultimately or was it the
beginning of this more politically
directed kind of Action Reaction which
is now why people are afraid about what
happen s you know Russia had a preferred
candidate and they did a lot to try and
get that guy to win I think he could
have and I think he may regret that in a
lot of his trolling he made himself look
guiltier when he probably could have
shown us that the concerns we had
weren't there but I I don't I'm not
going to dwell on that I'm not going to
you know focus on the fact that he was
impeached twice and sent a mob that you
know could have killed many of the
people in the capital with me on January
6 I'm GNA focus on if he wants to bring
order to the Border make our community
safer and raise wages and lower costs
I'm going to work with what I meant what
I meant more I think that's a ad yeah
work backwards from yeah an outcome or
do you think you and Adam actually just
followed the facts and I was a alam
County prosecutor uh in the same office
Earl Warren you know worked in and we
were trained that it's not about wins
and losses it's just about doing Justice
and I approached it just trying to
follow the fact and when you were
watching some of the other things that
happened post all of this yeah like
what's happening in New York and whatnot
what were your thoughts for as a
prosecutor on the legal veracity of some
of the things that were going on to to
Trump leading into this
election a lot of people around him went
to jail and it felt like well if Michael
Cohen went to jail like why the is
this guy not being held to account like
Michael Cohen went to jail for being a
part of that hush money settlement so
again just being a bluecollar kid who
resents people who think that their
position entitles them to be better than
regular folks I just wanted everyone to
be treated the same and and so that's
the way I was raised my dad lost his job
as a cop when he wouldn't essentially be
get bribed when he wouldn't allow a
bribe from a mayor um to influence him
and and he well that's amazing T that
that was my ear experience in a small
town in Iowa and he was the police chief
the mayor very publicly tried to like
corrupt him and he wouldn't do so my
earliest memory is that he was willing
to lose his job to do the right thing no
but you're saying something very
important which is everybody should be
treated the same so correct if if one of
your kids were charged with a
misdemeanor would you hope that it was
just prosecuted as a misdemeanor or do
you think that folks that may not like
Eric swall well figure out a way to now
make it a felony the former yeah okay
yeah I mean as I said I'm I'm going into
this open mind what we can do no I'm I'm
just saying into this New Year open
minded not focused on the past on what
we can do to make the country succeed
yeah and On the Border issue I think
that's the one where you all could maybe
get some consensus and some clarity
because it really does seem to be
creating an underlying tension in the
country as to what's going to happen and
you can't do anything on the workforce
issues until the public believes youve
secured the Border that's just a whether
that's rational or not how much of that
was why you think kamla lost was just
her not taking ownership of the Border I
just think she was attached to an
incumbent party incumbent parties
worldwide are just getting pounded and
there wasn't much that was going to
change where this thing was going what's
what's happening in
California well give us give us the
grade on G which Republican will be the
next governor of
California uh well they they don't have
their together either by the way
the Republican party in California um
look I'm I I was in the palates on
Monday um I have 10 friends who lost
everything I was with a woman who stood
on top of a pile of Ashes that was her
house looking for any momento for her
family and it it's it's awful and I I
will also be open-minded as to what we
could have done to prevent it to prevent
it why resources that should have been
there weren't there and as a member of
the homeland security committee uh make
sure that you know we're better prepared
next time and if there is accountability
that should have that should come uh to
be a part of that but like there's fires
are still burning right now and so I
don't want to be that Meme where it's
like you know the guy that like last
week I was a hostage expert this week
I'm a wildfire expert us that's that's
our function my my job is is to look at
you know what we could have done who
should be held accountable but with a
fire still burning and familes you know
living uh with friends and relatives
right now um I I don't want to hop I
don't want to give this a hot take yet
yeah fair enough fair enough thank you
all right everybody uh Eric we really
appreciate your candidness and good luck
reing the
party okay thanks awesome great job
brother all right welcome back to the
all-in podcast at the inauguration of
Donald Trump our 47th president and
we're really delighted to have friend of
the Pod Rana back on the program he is
the US Representative for California's
17th District AKA our hometown Silicon
Valley how are you Ro honored to be back
on you made it big time huh You're Now
like in these
inauguration Jason's a republican now
did you know that no I remain a moderate
Jason I'm holding on to you as the
Democrat and Silicon Valley I'm a I'm
I've always been a moderate I like to
vote for what I believe is the most
qualified person and this time around I
was a they call in your business a
double hater and let's let's get right
into that with the Democratic party uh
you guys got shellacked um the candidate
who you put up didn't go through a
primary the previous candidate seemed to
be incognitive decline we can all agree
and it feels like a bit of a mess in the
party what is going to happen to the
Democratic party going forward is there
a voice saying this is the plan or is it
a little Game of Thrones right now we're
all wondering where are the Democrats it
feels like you went dark and is that a
strategy to just sort of let Trump have
his moment and then come back and be
adversarial or you know State a new
platform what's going on inside the
democra party and think crises are times
for reform and renewal and the reality
is that this was a huge blow to the
establishment of the party uh people
wanted a more competitive process they
want new voices they want a new
generation of leadership uh and now
that's going to emerge and so you're
seeing it happening in California with
Dan lurry uh winning in San Francisco
for mayir Matt Mayan winning in uh San
Jose you're seeing new people in
Congress emerging new Governors emerging
and so I think that there's going to be
a lot of reflection one of the things
I've said is the Democrats need to spend
as much time understanding why many
Americans voted for Donald Trump as we
do criticizing Donald Trump and uh I
think you're starting to see that happen
what do you think the new platform will
be if you had to think of you know
things to remove from the platform and
things to prioritize in the platform if
you were in charge or Jean Phillips
friend of the pot as well um there's
some people who who feel you know
there's more important issues than the
ones that maybe you've been focused on
that you the Democratic party has been
focused on for this last election cycle
so maybe give us two or three ideas of
what you would add to the agenda and two
or three things that you might say hey
this isn't a priority for Americans
anymore I think the whole thing has to
be about prioritizing the economy the
economic independence of Americans how
are we going to have economic renewal
economic growth uh in a stagnant working
in middle class and then let's argue our
different Visions Donald Trump says that
the way he's going to turn around
Johnstown and Youngstown and down river
Michigan is just with uh a large tax
cuts and deregulation our view has got
to be that it has to involve technology
leaders Business Leaders but also
strategic government Investments to be
able to build new industry there to be
able to credential new folks there to be
able to build a Workforce but we have to
offer a compelling economic vision and
then an economic Vision so people aren't
dependent on uh the denials of Private
health insurance and so that they have
child care but I think whoever wins the
argument that there's going to lead
America in the 21st century on the
economy uh and on economic independence
is going to win Ro do you you you're
saying government investment in building
new businesses building new Industries
is necessary to achieve that vision and
that's a better alternative what is the
historical
kind of examples where um policies where
government was going to go start new
Investments start fundamentally
supporting new businesses being built
that's worked successfully and work
better than free markets like the the
the the Republican argument is the free
market is more efficient the free market
works better let capital and capitalists
find where the capital is best applied
it'll be more efficiently utilized
versus government making the decision
about where Capital should go it's
typically lower Roi very often negative
Roi and doesn't actually create aable
economic growth I think ask me
government investment that's Market
sustainable but you look at Hamilton you
look at Lincoln and you look at FDR that
is in my view what Built America
infrastructure uh well it's
infrastructure but it's also
manufacturing I mean I have a build to
build new steel plants in Johnstown in
Ohio now you need the private sector you
need Cleveland Cliffs you need a a
private Steel company but if we're going
to finance that the scaling of that uh
the federal government has to have some
role uh and what we ended up having in
free market uh economics is China last
week one trillion dollar Trade Surplus
now we are at almost a trillion dollar
trade deficit yep you know the economics
well so that's financed with a capital
account Surplus that means all that
money is coming into to Wall Street wall
Street's doing really well the finance
sector is doing really well but it's
hollowed out our manufacturing base it's
hollowed out our industrial base that is
free market economics gone too far
that's globalization is what some of the
non- neocon Republicans would say is
that global trade versus cut off some of
the global trade create a tariff program
with China and will reignite
manufacturing that's kind of a a counter
policy argument but to your point it's a
different point of view that uses
different set of data to make the case
and I I'd agree with some of the
Strategic terrorist I just don't think
that's going to be enough for us to have
pill factories here have uh the steel
factories aluminum factories to to
Revitalize these areas and to look at
what is the invest you think we need
government programs I think we need
government partnering with the private
sector and on DG so you know do you feel
and does the party feel that there
should be no deregulatory effort in the
United States to unleash kind of you
know economic investment and growth or
like this this whole point just you know
it just feels wrong to me to say like we
don't want DG like shouldn't DG be a
thing that we're always cutting back
things bureaucracy bureaucratic red tape
that we've created to unleash I mean
even Gavin H's making this claim now in
California with respect to the
rebuilding I I think you need Effective
Government I think execution matters and
I think there's Fair criticisms to say
that the execution of the chips and
science act which I helped WR or the IRA
wasn't enough I mean the money didn't
get out fast enough the the bureaucracy
in permitting uh was uh was slow and if
there are ways to make government
procurement more competitive that is
good I mean why is it that five primes
are dominating uh the defense
procurement system so Michael Bloomberg
had a plan which I think seems pretty
reasonable have 15% of Department of
Defense spending for startups and
Innovative uh technology as opposed to
just going for the five primes that's
regulatory reform but we also have to
look at the fundamental why is Intel not
succeeding we asked PT Ginger who was uh
asked to leave in Intel uh and I said is
it was it the permitting reform and he
said no it's that the the the capital
expenditures to make wall Street's
numbers uh were was very high and there
was no no procurement Apple everything's
too expensive in this country by the way
this goes back to nuclear energy it's
too expensive to build a gigawatt of
nuclear power in this country it's too
takes too long meanwhile China can do it
for about a tenth of the price and
they're scaling up 300 XR rate in terms
of new energy production and they can do
it in half the time half the time a
tenth of the cost and there's a
regulatory path for Gen 4 reactors going
up in China versus here I'm for nuclear
energy for smart modular nuclear energy
I'm for looking at how we uh build
nuclear energy here in the United States
in a safe way but in one that I agree
that our part my party has been opposed
to largely so this is really important
because I think what happens is the
Republicans order Democrats will come
forward with a general policy statement
we need to DG to unleash economic
Prosperity or DG to unleash nuclear but
the the other party then says well we've
got to figure out a way to attack them
on that vector and then they take this
like diametrically opposed point of view
to try and diminish the strength that
they're gaining because of their strong
policy perspective that may be good for
America and then we end up in this
unfortunate circumstance where we can't
ever align on the things that really are
good for America that's how I feel as an
American looking at how the the parties
attack each other one party says this is
a good thing for America why doesn't the
other party say you're absolutely right
we all agree on that let's move forward
can you can you give the win on Doge
like government efficiency seems like
consensus well I've gotten criticized
because I put out an innocent tweet and
have said that uh if musk and ramaswami
have a good idea then I want to look at
that and you know musk disrupted the
entire pentagon with SpaceX I mean he
worked with Ash Carter to do that the
track record's there the track record is
there so if he's going to and you have
all of the progressives like me saying
the defense budget is bloated 56% of
spending we need to figure out how to
have more competition we need to look at
the waste that is there I mean spending
$150,000 on soap dispensers and so now
if musk is it's really is Boeing
$150,000 60 Minutes
$1,00 for breast pumps I mean I think
it's outrageous yeah and so now because
musk is saying let's look at the defense
department you don't want to do it even
though you've been saying to do that for
the past five six years that's the stuff
that drives people crazy or I Flo in uh
you know that Bob Iger would be a a good
person to run next time for for mayor of
of La he's considering it well I mean
did he tell you that when you talking
yeah I don't want to to talk about what
he what we've talked about privately I
just think he'd be you did ask him I did
ask him I I I and so now I'm getting uh
attacked for well am I for an oligarch
that's that's literally my my Twitter
stream B's an oligarch you look at
Disney I said I want someone who's going
to rebuild this this place he it would
actually be a public service for him
after I want popcorn and lemonade stands
on every corner in
La FDR FDR went FDR was one of the
wealthiest people John F Kennedy so I
think there's got to be a there's got to
be common sense yeah how do we actually
help people that has to be the the
metric and willingness to to to work
across the A on things yeah it it does
seem in the wake of what's happened in
Southern California Pacific Palisades
and all the other regions uh that were
impacted that a large number of
affluent um and and voters and people
who are AC in politics are now saying
it's kind of enough the progressivism
went too far left we need really
qualified people in office and so what
do you think's going to happen in
California and what impact do you think
these 12,000 14,000 homes being
destroyed and of course the 25 people
who lost their lives tragically what
impact is that going to have is you
think that's a turning point in some
ways I do I I mean first of all it's
just horrific and I'm sure you know
people CP friends who lost lost their
homes they're alive and that's what's
important but they did lose everything
they lost everything and I mean a place
has just burned down it's it's it's
devastating and I think it's just a
culmination in California of something
that's been creeping up which is
governance matters execution matters yes
keeping places safe matters making sure
that we're pragmatic matters and that's
why you saw Dan Lorry win that's why you
saw Matt Mayhan win that's why you've
seen uh sort of reason able people in
District Attorneys when I think that's
and you're going to see that in La I
think you're going to see that in the
governor's race I I do think California
is saying regardless of your ideology on
issues we need to be able to govern well
so you have the economy um I think
safety's up there for folks uh what else
do you think on that short list of
things that the party in California
could say to the voters in terms of
winning them back and letting them
understand you're focused on something
other than in their perception Dei maybe
environmental overreach I can't believe
I'm saying that but like the fact that
people don't believe in clearing the
forest around homes and they're fighting
it on environmental grounds well I mean
it doesn't take a rocket science to
understand rocket scientist to
understand that these wildfires have
been occurring for a long time you got
the salt in of science here who can go
into the science of it and that if you
want to live live near a forest in a
fire zone you kind of got to clean up
the detrius on the forest floor like it
feels like we you know the the the
leadership in California is kind of
pressing company excluded kind of lost
the script here huh I think it's
reasonable to ask why the brush wasn't
cleared outside La I got in trouble for
asking that I said these are legitimate
questions that's not going after people
and I supported Karen bass in disclos
full disclosure against Rich Caruso I
was PRI to do it but if Caruso asked
reasonable questions the whole point of
being in governance is you say okay the
guy had a good point you're disappointed
in her performance the fact that she's
out of the country going back in time
would you vote would you have endorsed
Caruso knowing what you know now I I
don't know if I would have endorsed him
but I I I I certainly think it's fair to
say that people are disappointed in
what's what's happening I'd Endo someone
like Iger or others I think there's I
certainly think there needs to be a a
new mayor do you think there was any
reason for her to be in
Ghana but she said she said says that
she went on uh the presid the
inauguration of the president the
inauguration I I she was in a palace
having cocktails yeah whether if there
were actual warnings before I think she
would probably say she should she even
be going to Ghana as the mayor of a city
that has no economic vacation I suppose
no well that no look that's a common
thing where the president of both
parties ask people Mayors Governors I
haven't been asked as the congressman
yet to to represent them at a at a
forign inauguration is that yeah that's
a common thing and I don't if there
weren't the warnings I don't think
that's a big big issue or know she's
going to Paris because you know the uh
La is hosting the Olympics the question
is though your first priority and if
there were warnings if she should
explain why why why why she didn't go
and I I like her I think she's a good
person but the question is uh what is it
going to take going forward but the big
point about one of the points about what
what we need to do differently other
than the economics is we've got to also
go around the country and say my party
is not going to look down on people who
we have different uh cultural or social
viewpoints with I think there was this
sense of condescension and that if you
disagree with someone somehow our party
is morally Superior and that's got to
stop and this whole thing about if we
disagree the policy generally is wrong
which is I think disting distinguishing
the policy from the party
um do you think California has a chance
of electing a republican governor in 26
do you think that that chance is now
greater than 50% after the
wildfires I still think and I will uh
support most likely the Democrat I mean
whoever the good a good Democrat is
there are a lot of good Democrats uh
that can run but you know I mean AR
schweger was a Republican and can a
republican who is a pro-choice and take
some of the social issues off the table
be competitive yeah I think the
Democratic party would be naive uh to
take that for granted and we need to
have thoughtful strong people on our
side run and run understanding people
care about Public Safety they want
Effective Government they want uh reform
I mean people like Matt Mayhan uh who
now have had a couple years and have
been effective uh are are the type of
Democrats I think that can win Statewide
what are your thoughts on um Tik Tock uh
going dark in the last 24 hours here
it's terrible i've been I've been vocal
we had 1.3 million people sign a
petition never had that in ERS of
magnitude saying keep uh Tik Tock uh
because they like the product or they
make a living on it it's yeah it's first
of all it's the the stories about people
who make a living I there was one person
a content creator her husband cheated on
her abusive marriage she leaves she's
got four kids uh two toddlers uh and two
people around two kids around five and
she's broke she's in a hotel uh she's
staying in her best friend's uh living
room for 4 months and then she starts
telling her story and now she's making
60 770,000 as a content creator I could
tell you 50 stories like this of people
are actually relying on this for their
livelihood some people are making it
making using it to make rent and then
you have the issue of free speech and uh
just being able to express it now people
say what about China well why don't you
pass a broad uh broader law that says
any interference by a foreign government
in algorithms is going to be illegal and
criminal Well India banned these apps
and we're not India they're prettyy
Savvy though I mean these things are an
attack Vector you can remotely control
these phones they were caught spying on
journalists and uh they could shape
public policy so and they've had years
to divest seems to me that the Chinese
government sees this as a strategic
military asset do you disagree with that
I do I one I think the United States has
a much much more robust tradition of
free speech than in than in India and
and so I think our consider are are
different I also think we have far more
capability in making sure that we
protect our data uh and protect any
foreign interference in algorithms now
president Trump has floated this idea
that uh you have 50% us ownership my
understanding is 60% of the investors
already are are us investors uh I will
work with him and Mike Waltz I know very
well we were co-chair of the India
caucus together in Congress I will work
with them in a bipartisan way to figure
out how do we have this app operational
if the Chinese government spies on their
own people why wouldn't they spy on
their adversary the American people well
certainly they would but the question is
are they uh can we protect the American
people from that happening on this app
we can uh as long as we have two clear
laws one that the data stays here by the
way a lot of the data that's going to CH
the China communist party is through
data Brokers there's no law against that
so pass a law that all data of Americans
if it goes to in the hands which by the
way there's us companies that are
selling that that data there's us
companies that are buying that data any
third party can access that data if they
want to buy it in one of the markets
that stuff exists it's existed for a
very long time yeah and and the irony of
it is going back to the trade deficit
China's got a the same week China
announces one trillion dollar Trade
Surplus they're building more drones
than us more ships than us more steel
than us uh we're talking about banning
this Tik Tock app electricity yeah know
what about the concept of reciprocity
would you be uh in favor of requiring
that we have our social networks in
China if they want to have theirs here I
would be in favor of us pushing for our
social media networks to be there just
because of Free Speech but I would not
allow the Chinese Communist party to be
controlling any social media app or
having any influence whether it's on Tik
Tok or whether it's on uh any other app
I don't want to name another app because
I don't want to malign other apps uh uh
incorrectly but they pass a law that
says it's a criminal offense if an
executive this country is found
collaborating or overseeing any app that
has any influence in the algorithms by
the Chinese Communist party or if our
data goes to the in the hands of the
Chinese Communist party you could you
could have a law while still keeping Tik
Tock operational yeah you litigate the
outcome you don't litigate the method I
I don't trust China as much as your
gentleman do um talk about Jason it's
not about trusting China and you keep
trying to characterize it as like people
being pro China if they're Pro free
speech or they're Pro giving people the
only platform you can you're making you
continue to make assumptions about
security when there are security issues
with a lot of apps and security issues
with a lot of phones they don't have the
same scale as Tik Tok this great the
scale of Tik Tok is extraordinary I'll
tell you where we got the politics wrong
I I mean so Donald Trump comes in there
and he says you know what the Chinese
took your jobs they took your steel jobs
they took your auto jobs and we're going
to have tariffs and by the way this Tik
Tock thing pretty popular app for young
people we're going to keep it what do
what what do we do we do the exact
opposite we are running ads we don't
want tariffs so we're telling all these
folks in the midwest that we're opposed
to the policies that could save some of
their jobs and then we're telling all
these young people that we want to ban
Tik Tok and fair they didn't take the
jobs we gave them to them at some point
I think we've got it one of the things
the Democrats need to do is stop
listening to the foreign policy blob and
the Beltway exe you know uh pundits who
got fancy titles and fancy think tanks
every time we get these letters 500
groups 200 groups I said who are these
groups these are 200 groups with 130
people it's like every person as three
groups and we're listening to them as
opposed
to I just popped up five groups while
we're speaking here you know and I and I
think part of what Trump was doing I
mean I I and I obviously totally oppose
him I voted for his impeachment twice
but it was sort of like in the in our
world AB testing or fast uh iterations
he' put out ideas he' get feedback he
iterates it may not call it that but
he's just kind of gauging where people
let's talk about one of those ideas
Americans want the border secure there's
no doubt about that the statistics just
show it 80% Americans want it kind of
shut down and be orderly and legal maybe
even more um but this idea that we're
going to drag 15 million people out of
the
country word drag because he continues
to no I'm just quoting Steve Bannon and
uh Stephen Miller who work uh one of
them worked in the first Administration
and architect is first win and the other
one is the most powerful person inside
the administration this time so I'm just
quoting people they say day one 15
million are going so do you think that's
actually going to happen and do you
think it should happen it shouldn't
happen whether it's actually going to
happen or not I don't know is the answer
whether they're going to try what do you
think should happen I think you should
have people who are convicted first of
all we need a secure border uh we need
to encourage people to come here through
the legal process like my parents did or
like so many you say encourage do you
say encourage or require require but but
but to do that we've got to have reform
to make that more possible because right
now that's a a a a very hard thing to do
uh and it wasn't as hard by the way when
my father came and the 1960s studied
engineering had a green card within
months of of of graduating so how do we
do that but of course uh require people
to come through the legal process uh and
secure the Border I don't deny that
there's been
the but and then for those who are
criminals here who are convicted
convicted of crimes fine Deport people
we all agree on that those all seem
logical and and obvious but but in terms
of so let me tell you someone in my
district without telling her name and
you you tell me what what should happen
with this person she's a she's been in
the country she's undocumented she came
to to to see me with a a group of people
uh she's a dental hygienist uh her
daughter is going to med school she
undocumented she's undocumented do you
consider yourself to be her
representative she's not a citizen of
the United States she doesn't have a
legal right to vote are you representing
that undocumented non-american person I
am supposed to represent everyone in the
district that lives there regardless of
their citizenry I I my my citizenship I
don't we don't ask in terms of their
citizenship in terms of just being a
representative of the area if everyone
no I won't but as a congress member you
believe that you should represent
non-americans that happen to be iled in
your region in your District I don't
think I don't think that I need to
represent their political views but if
they're being abused in terms of the
process in some way and they came to us
within the law uh we would figure out
how they got due process now would have
empathy and sympathy for the person
living in your District even if they
weren't legal is what you're saying I
think it's quite reasonable if I may
interpret yeah I mean that's that's a
more eloquent way of putting it but let
me just tell you about this this person
so she's she her daughter is in uh med
school in in Southern California she
drives down once a month and drives back
cuz she can't afford a hotel down there
and the reason she can't afford a hotel
is she's being underpaid as a dental
hygienist for 20 years now do you really
think we need to deport her and what is
that going to do to our daughter or do
can we find a path sounds like a great
potential American so well the the the
um the alternative point of view someone
would say I'll play the The Advocate the
devil's advocate here they would say but
there is another American who is
qualified to be a dental hygienist who
cannot get a job who would be getting
paid more because they are a citizen and
they are legal and documented this
person is undercharging their employer
and they are taking a job away from
American that's what the counterargument
would be from some people so there are
two things one I agree that if there's
someone who is in a position that is
undocumented or even on an H1B and they
are being underpaid that's wrong that's
why we need reform so that people are
being paid appropriately and aren't
being employers aren't abusing the
process to drive down Market wages but
the argument that they're taking
American jobs misses a central point and
that is when you have a immigrant as a
worker yes you're increasing the labor
Supply and the supp if you increase
Supply that drives down price or wages
but you're also increasing demand
because they're spending a lot of money
on things and most I've always viewed
this to be more of a demand part of the
equation for growing the US population
is you can actually increase the
economic growth so let's put a number on
this you know so clearly you don't
believe these people should be dragged
out of the country correct I think we're
in agreement on that some people are not
magga 1.0 do you believe they should be
dragged out it's a long uh let's I don't
want to put you on this F no no it's
it's not that simple um and I'm really
hung over today so I'm not going to be
super articulate about it um what about
that Dental High J who's been here for
20 years would you give her amnesty I
would seems like a great
American working hard a ly being
empathetic I think for me would always
be a priority that person should not
lose their job lose their life that's a
very hard circumstance at the same time
there are a lot of Americans who feel
they are getting underpaid that they
don't have jobs and there's empathy that
I think is part of the alternative side
of that equation so I would you know let
me let me ask this question whenever we
talk about
immigration we never have a number put
on it and we never have a point we don't
have a point based system here so it
devolves into this discussion we're
having right here which is oh they they
stole our jobs and wages are down in the
face of the lowest unemployment of our
lifetime uh 4% and seven eight million
jobs out there there's two jobs for
every person who's unemployed if you do
that basic math now of course there's
some disparity in people having the
skills to take certain jobs and and
geography putting all that aside we have
340 million Americans would a would an
easy situation here be to say we will
import People based on the need in the
country so if we don't have enough
people working in healthcare we're going
to open up um and if unemployment's
under 10% we'll have three million
people coming a year we'll have two
million people coming a year and just
put a number on it and then have
Americans and our Representatives debate
that number why don't you guys do this
well I say two things I think my view of
why we have lost jobs and stagnation has
been the offshoring of so much of our
industry and the hollowing out of towns
and communities where we just watched as
wealth piled up in districts like ours
not because we people in our district
stole the wealth from Youngstown or down
river it's just that the wealth was
piling up industry was being offshored
and there was kind of indifference
towards it and if we want real solutions
we need to have economic revitalization
instead of blaming the dental hygienist
in my district like that's not why uh
you know Johnstown or war in Ohio are
suffering they the broader point though
is that we have a number on uh green
cards and uh legal immigrants around 1.4
million a year uh and then we should de
how do we uh where which categories do
you want to increase it why uh and how
do you get people out of these status
where they're being underpaid I do think
that's what's hurting is this is whether
you're on an H1 and you're there for
years and you're being underpaid uh or
whether you're undocumented and being
underpaid that's hurts the American
worker far more than when that's such an
important Point people don't understand
this about the h-1bs is they are
transferable but you have 30 days which
makes essentially as it was explained to
me when I was in the it business these
are indentured servants and they don't
have choice and they have this you know
threat that they're constantly under if
you don't do what we say as an employer
and you don't accept the salary you're
going to be out of the country exactly
and you're going to have to take your
family with you would an easier solution
to be to just charge 10% of the salary
into a pool as a tax so people don't
abuse it the salaries go up have a
minimum salary and give them maybe a
year to find another job what do you
think of that I I think that type of a
solution is reasonable and have them be
paid well I mean this idea that they're
being abused you know put a floor or
have it be the prioritized based on the
the highest wages because that's a
reflective of uh talent coming in uh but
you know you don't want a situation like
now where you're on a H1 for three years
then you get it extended uh because you
apply for a green card to six years and
then while your green card application
is in process it keeps getting extended
so these folks are here 10 12 years and
and and and the abuse of it and and my
view is you know I think the American
people are pretty decent and fair I grew
up in Bucks County Pennsylvania It was
95 98% white it was a few
indian-american families and I grew up
with a belief that you could do anything
in America look at you and and you know
the country trusted me to represent a
district with1 trillion of value of the
most
economically prosperous Place perhaps in
the history of humanity Pro
perhaps right and I I I just think that
that is America and people are upset at
the extremes they're upset at the abuses
they're upset that there wasn't a
process at the border but deep down this
country has always been one that
Embraces uh immigration and most IM
almost most immigrants tend to be very
patriotic so when you hear Stephen
Miller say America is for Americans and
American only you think that flies in
the face of the spirit of this country I
say what does he mean by Americans I you
know what I want to do I'd love to have
lunch with them actually you know maybe
have him on all be great yeah you want
to join for that if we I'd love to and
you know we should all instead of just
reading every tweet you know read
Lincoln's I heard he's a guy that if you
sit down with him and have a long form
conversation you get a lot more than
what the the short form media uh bites
have been about him so I'd actually be
really yeah no I would love to have M
because I watch his entire speech and
the way he speaks seems incredibly
xenophobic and a bit racist to me so
what I would I would argue what I would
ask him about is is is without being too
uh uh pedantic about history is Lincoln
has the speech in 1858 uh on
Independence Day and the challenge for
Lincoln is to say how is a German
American or French americanamerican
because back then to be American you
literally had to trace one
great-grandparent who fought the
Revolutionary War how could you be
American if no one in your family fought
the Revolutionary War and Lincoln has
This brilliant formulation that he says
you're flesh of the Flesh Blood of the
blood uh of the founders if you believe
in the Constitution if you believe in
the Declaration of Independence and so
I'd say to Stephen do you do you still
believe that what how are you define
okay if you don't too right I mean we
could have that discussion in America if
we're pulling the ladder up now and
we're not a land of immigrants but I
agree with you I'm an immigrant I think
the immigrants are the most patriotic
that's why I believe in because you free
everything with well I mean you should
because You' done great things and look
what you're going to do for here from
sou you know South Africa when I was six
years old and I'm hanging out in
Washington DC with a congressman and how
many jobs have you created the president
and the vice president I get to meet all
these people and hang out with them and
you've created thousands of jobs and
you're going to create billions of extra
calories with these amazing Ohana
strawberries ohal is the
name I think I think my company might
actually be in your District you cover
Santa Cruz County uh no that's Jimmy
Panetta I see okay all right well no
favor sorry let me ask you a question um
do you think the United States should
spend $200 billion to acquire Greenland
from Denmark Denmark has $150
billion um uh debt they could build a
public pension plan they could here's
what are we trying to solve F first of
all I'm a a person that believes that we
need to respect the self-determination
of other countries that's what makes us
different than Britain that makes us
different than Rome the America you know
might even though we intervene in
foreign elections and use military force
to overturn foreign governments well
nobody's perfect there you go there you
go I gotta get this guy he's got my
talk you know if you ever if you ever
need a hype man or a campaign manager
let's go when you do your when you do
your run for governor yeah exactly by
the way this show has been brought to
you not only by row but also Roman go to
get Roman row we got to wrap up you got
to go no no hold on I want to hear the
Greenland
green no but but the question is why
what interest does Greenland have they
have critical minerals they have uh a
lot of uh important resources and
basically they want to partner
economically with us they're letting us
invest they're letting us develop it so
what what what what do we gain so you're
saying we could achieve our objective
without without it becoming a Terr what
about Puerto Ric by way do you really
want here's here's my cautionary tale I
think this could be the dispositive
argument every time Bernie Sanders ran
you know what he talked about the
politics of Denmark you only want
Greenland as state we're gonna get to
Denmark they call it getting to Denmark
GRE is gonna that's gonna that those two
senators are going to be Democratic
senators watch the interviews that have
come out on Twitter from the people that
live in Greenland they're sick of the
Socialist you know kind of overseers I
think they do want to have a different
way of governing I don't know I'm gonna
have more kids if I get two years of
fraternity it sounds pretty amazing yeah
but it is I mean look I I don't think
that you're necessarily getting that but
there's aboutto Ric it's an important
question is like does um does the United
States need territorial Dominion to
achieve its strategic objectives I'm
open I'm openminded what about Puerto
Rico well I there it too like look every
Democrat is like oh we want Porto R why
because you're going to get two
Democratic senators in Cong people but
my view is it should be a Puerto Rico
self a referendum 8 90% want to do it
you'd be down yes if they want to join
the United States because that's a
different thing there there we you know
we basically took that as a territory
now let's see what they want to do I'm
all for it let's go straight to 60
states are you are you running for
governor of California no are you why
not you done such a great job you you're
a no not you WR I I I I think I I think
there's a I I love being in Congress I
love representing Valley and I have been
focused on how do we get uh innovation
technology partnering with communities
to to have economic rev if you were
asked would you consider but didn't I
see a rumor this week that someone said
something that you were am I wrong I
think someone may have floated a rumor
I'm trying to get out asked by your
party and the citizens of California
would you consider would you consider it
is that's just a consider I consider
anything you know there you go all right
he consider your campaign manager my my
I need I mean he's good well I got some
he's got his moments I'll give him
that that's a wrap from the 47th
inauguration of the United States and
we'll see you next time byebye
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The "All-in inauguration special" discusses Donald Trump's second term with three guests: Tom Emmer, Eric Swalwell, and Ro Khanna. Tom Emmer, a Republican, critiques the Democratic Party's top-down leadership, accusing the media of a "conspiracy" regarding Biden's mental acuity. He advocates for significant budget cuts to address national debt, suggests a voluntary private option for Social Security, and calls for strict border enforcement, although he acknowledges voluntary departures. Eric Swalwell, a Democrat, admits his party needs a "reset" to connect with everyday Americans, moving away from perceptions of "wokeism" and "purity tests." He expresses skepticism about the TikTok ban, viewing it as a free speech issue, and highlights the economic benefits of immigrants. Ro Khanna, also a Democrat, sees the recent election as a blow to the party establishment and urges a focus on economic independence through strategic government investments. He opposes the TikTok ban, citing economic livelihoods and free speech, and emphasizes reforming the immigration system to create legal pathways while protecting workers from exploitation. All guests touch on themes of government efficiency, national security, and the polarized political landscape.
Videos recently processed by our community