HomeVideos

Inauguration Interviews: Trump's Talent, Dem Rebrand & more w/ Whip Emmer, Reps Swalwell & Khanna

Now Playing

Inauguration Interviews: Trump's Talent, Dem Rebrand & more w/ Whip Emmer, Reps Swalwell & Khanna

Transcript

2851 segments

0:00

[Music]

0:04

all right everybody Welcome to uh the

0:06

Allin inauguration special we are here

0:09

in town uh to celebrate Andor

0:12

commiserate the second term of Donald

0:15

Trump depending on where you sit on the

0:17

political spectrum and we are extremely

0:19

lucky to have a partner in Spotify who

0:21

has given us a box yes we're in a glass

0:24

box on the street they really splurged

0:26

and got a trailer it's absolutely

0:28

fantastic but we thank them for their

0:29

host us it's very cool uh with me today

0:32

of course my co-host shth poaa and David

0:36

freeberg who is a little under the

0:38

weather because let's be honest

0:40

freedberg you've been out there you and

0:43

Lex took on the town last night I had a

0:45

good time with Lex Freedman last night

0:46

it was good let's leave it at that let's

0:48

leave it at that yeah that sounds great

0:49

it's been a couple nights in a row I'm

0:50

pretty beat jamaath you have a very busy

0:53

social schedule and uh you've been just

0:57

bouncing around town with the Who's Who

0:59

and taking CR for Donald Trump's Victory

1:01

how's the Victory lap going here cuz you

1:04

played such a key role here by coming

1:06

out and being even more unlikable in our

1:08

hometown of the Bay Area and supporting

1:10

Trump I'm a small bit player a bit

1:12

player but as you said to me in the car

1:14

over here you were the folc room that

1:17

started the boulder that created the win

1:19

I said none of that but uh I think more

1:22

changes are coming Jason maybe to our

1:23

home state of California let's see let's

1:25

see um let's see phase two we're

1:28

extremely um honored to have Tom Emer

1:31

here he is the US representative from

1:33

The Amazing state of Minnesota home of

1:36

Bob Dyan Prince and the Cohen Brothers

1:38

and Tim Walls and Tim

1:41

Walls coming in hot already well let's

1:44

start

1:45

there let's start there um how much of a

1:49

disaster uh was the Democratic party and

1:53

when you watched what happened with

1:54

Biden in all seriousness do you think

1:56

there was a cover up in terms of his

1:58

mental acuity and what do you think of

2:01

kamla's job out there not doing podcasts

2:05

and uh essentially being anointed and

2:07

not having a primary the Democratic

2:09

party seems lost crooked and crooked

2:12

okay yeah I mean the leadership I I got

2:15

good friends who are Democrats so I

2:16

don't I'm not going to disparage them

2:18

but uh first Jason all of you thank you

2:21

it's nice to be on Allin I heard

2:24

everybody's heard about it everybody

2:25

wants to be here so it's just nice that

2:27

and you promised you'd listen to it

2:28

after this right

2:30

actually I listened last week sadly it

2:33

was about the fires but uh uh the

2:39

uh the way they did this uh was if you

2:43

think about it ballot access is a big

2:45

thing you you have to run for uh months

2:49

and you have to get delegates and you

2:50

have to make your case state by state

2:53

and you have to meet certain

2:54

requirements to actually end up on the

2:56

ballot how the Democrats are able to

2:59

remove move Joe Biden literally uh in a

3:02

coup a back room coup and install kamla

3:06

Harris in a matter of hours or days uh

3:10

and avoid any convention uh like real

3:14

democracy taking place where people are

3:17

debating their candidates and where

3:19

they're at and then to your your uh

3:21

other question that that's wrong but

3:22

your other question was uh Joe Biden was

3:25

there a coverup I a coverup is when you

3:28

don't see it when you don't know about

3:30

it when you're totally unaware this

3:33

wasn't a coverup this was a conspiracy

3:35

everybody in this town for four years

3:38

watched when he came in he was already

3:40

diminished and watch him continue to

3:42

diminish over the course of his uh over

3:44

the course of his uh uh term it was the

3:49

mainstream media that refused to

3:53

actually comment on it and then it was

3:56

amazing overnight when uh he has the

3:58

debate last June it's like oh my gosh

4:01

this is terrible look at this and and

4:03

suddenly it was like they'd never seen

4:05

it before this was a conspiracy by a

4:08

left-wing media that uh they're littered

4:10

with people who have a partisan View and

4:13

they write about it they create stories

4:15

about it and they don't tell you the

4:17

whole story if you were here let's go

4:19

down this pull this thread a little bit

4:21

more because you said the the Democrats

4:24

themselves are good people some of them

4:25

many of them you know but then the

4:26

leadership you said was corrupt so just

4:29

can you help us understand who is the

4:32

leadership and then how does the

4:34

corruption play out what does the

4:35

corruption look like well remember I'm

4:37

on the Republican side yeah no but I'm

4:39

but I I can tell you what I watch what I

4:42

watch is there were two times that they

4:45

literally whoever they are it would be

4:47

the superdelegates it a lot of people

4:50

would say it's the Obamas it's the

4:51

clintons it's the you know by original

4:55

that's the that's the boogeyman for what

4:56

it's worth that people point to at least

4:58

when you're not in DC like if somebody

5:00

said who who are the leadership elected

5:03

or otherwise that runs a Democratic

5:05

party a lot of people would point to the

5:07

Obamas and then some of these super

5:09

donors is that sort of your perception

5:10

of how it works it is and the reason I I

5:12

go back as you'll remember Bernie

5:15

Sanders is marching towards the

5:17

Democratic nomination right and they get

5:19

to South Carolina and all of a sudden

5:21

Amy kashar from my state it's just one

5:24

after another I'm out I'm out I support

5:26

uh Joe Biden right clearly the

5:30

whoever that is because you're right

5:32

we're not in the room to see is it the

5:35

Obamas is it uh Consultants like

5:38

Carville or Axel Rod or whoever who is

5:41

in that room yeah uh but whoever's in

5:44

that room they have a plan when it gets

5:46

to the end and I I never thought Joe uh

5:48

Biden was going to be the

5:50

candidate and that's not how the

5:52

Republican Party operates because I

5:54

think some people in the public have

5:55

this perception that both parties

5:57

operate that way that there is a cabal

5:59

of the the most influential and

6:01

ultimately they end up getting to pick

6:03

and the other party does the same thing

6:05

is that not the case no and clearly that

6:07

wasn't the case with Trump right yeah no

6:08

ours I I would say that watching from

6:11

the outside again we're not on the

6:12

inside of the Democrat machine but

6:15

watching from the outside that's a top-

6:16

down process on the Republican side

6:19

that's a bottom up process and uh Donald

6:22

Trump is the best example of best

6:23

example because uh people in this town

6:26

you know especially in the house where I

6:27

serve are like you know we we got the

6:29

American people we have a mandate and

6:31

you got to remind them yeah no no Donald

6:34

Trump has a mandate he got 77 million

6:37

votes we got a little less than 75

6:39

million so if you're looking at who

6:42

literally is expanding this party and

6:44

pulling this party over the line it's

6:46

one guy it's Donald Trump so to your

6:49

point do you view him the party leader I

6:50

do so to your point this was a almost

6:53

like a Donald Trump hostile takeover of

6:56

the Republicans meaning if you look at

6:57

the establishment rhetoric of what

6:59

Republicans stood for I don't think

7:01

Trump really cared he had a point of

7:02

view and he had his own intellectual

7:04

agenda and ideology and to your point 77

7:07

million people said I go with that do

7:10

you think that that's possible on the

7:11

Democratic side as well do you think

7:13

that there's a different ideology that

7:14

needs to be born there I can only tell

7:17

you the experience I've had with one of

7:19

my Minnesota colleagues who I I won't

7:21

name him but he might have run against

7:23

the uh sitting president I he he was we

7:27

were talking on the house floor one day

7:29

and I was uh complaining to or giving

7:31

him a hard time I should say about some

7:33

of the

7:35

uh off-color remarks coming from the

7:38

squad and he made a point of telling me

7:41

off color sorry off color H well let's

7:43

just say there were some anti-semitic uh

7:46

comments uh All About the Benjamins this

7:48

stuff and there was a centure that was

7:50

being worked on oh wow yeah and uh uh it

7:55

was public but the point is when I was

7:58

saying boy you've had quite a week he

8:00

goes oh yeah yeah he says that's a very

8:02

small group of people in our party with

8:04

very large voices and my response to him

8:07

was okay well that might be true but

8:09

then people like you have to stand up

8:12

and speak up and take my grandfather's

8:15

Democrat Party back exactly and so no I

8:18

think they've got a problem identity

8:19

politics which they've perfected and

8:21

been playing for years it has now come

8:24

back to bite them and there's where is

8:27

the way out they don't have a brand they

8:29

don't know who they are they they

8:31

they're fighting about things like men

8:34

participating in in women's sports I

8:36

mean it just it isn't resonating with

8:39

the American people so they're they're

8:42

going to have to figure that out for the

8:43

future but on our side we're going to

8:46

have to figure out Donald Trump is the

8:47

one that pulled this across the line

8:50

here's here's the problem with the

8:51

Republican party for me the last 30

8:53

years we've had great people

8:54

representing us but the public has been

8:56

very frustrated because it seems like

8:58

government and the bureau rats always

9:00

get a better deal right than the average

9:03

citizen in this country right we're

9:05

talking about Main Street we're not

9:06

talking about Silicon Valley which has

9:08

its own Main Street but I'm talking

9:09

about just good old Main Street USA you

9:12

know where it's rural country it's uh

9:15

you know people who are just trying to

9:17

live their lives they feel like their

9:19

government hasn't been listening to them

9:21

for years this is what spawned the tea

9:23

party this is why we've had this over

9:25

and over and Donald Trump you got to

9:26

give him credit this energy was out

9:28

there and he actually grabbed it and he

9:32

showed us what it looked like when he

9:33

ran in 16 and he took the time to

9:35

understand it or or he just innately has

9:40

an ability to read people better than

9:42

I've ever seen yeah I mean I think he is

9:44

a generational retail politician

9:46

generational I think he's a one in 150

9:49

year leader yeah freeberg you have a lot

9:52

of thoughts on fiscal responsibility and

9:54

have been bangging the drum on the

9:56

national debt Tom you also have a

9:58

passion for responsibility maybe you

10:01

have some butts on that freeberg or

10:02

maybe you can tell us your point of view

10:04

on how much of an impact Doge can have I

10:07

don't know if you've talked and what you

10:09

think reconciliation is going to look

10:10

like I mean this is going to be a very

10:12

gnarly pitch battle here how how do we

10:15

get two trillion out of the why you st

10:18

bug exactly why are you stopping at well

10:20

actually let's ask that question is two

10:22

even possible and if so how do you think

10:23

you can get $2 trillion out of it so I'd

10:26

rather let's do it two ways I'd rather I

10:29

look at what's uh what could we put on

10:32

the table and we do this privately so

10:34

you won't get me to say what it is where

10:36

it is but I'll tell you there's a list

10:38

that we've sat down with that uh reaches

10:41

somewhere between five and seven

10:42

trillion a year uh over the next 10

10:45

years okay and the the uh that's what

10:49

that two trillion would be over the next

10:50

10 years okay I mean it listen if if

10:53

you're the budget's 7.2 what's that the

10:56

budget the annual budget 7.2 right so

10:59

the goal is first we got to balance the

11:01

budget you got to quit bleeding 1.5 to

11:04

2.2 trillion oh it's another trillion

11:06

yeah whatever you got to balance yeah

11:08

second thing you got to do is start to

11:10

bend the curve down we we got the

11:12

greatest economy in the world it hasn't

11:14

been performing where it could I I think

11:17

with Donald Trump we can put it in place

11:19

where it can you can see those revenues

11:21

start to go up again and you if youve

11:23

have this so you're controlling it you

11:25

could pay that you could pay that down

11:27

rather quickly I mean if you're talking

11:29

in terms of a decade this requires

11:31

sacrifice and it requires

11:33

representatives from each City uh and

11:36

each state to then go to their

11:38

constituents and say hey we fought to

11:40

get you X Y and Z and you're only going

11:42

to get X and Y yeah be careful some tell

11:44

you they fight but they're not really

11:46

fighting the uh I this this thing is

11:50

going to happen because of Donald Trump

11:53

I think I I leave it to Mike Johnson

11:55

he's the speaker he will make these

11:57

decisions I'm not got it I'm the whip

12:00

whatever you tell me my job is to make

12:02

sure we get it done and that's what

12:04

we'll do but I think you're going to see

12:05

a two trck process Mike Johnson for

12:07

reconciliation has set a deadline he

12:10

wants to vote on a budget resolution by

12:13

the first week of February why is that

12:15

important the budget resolution you have

12:18

to have before you can even move forward

12:20

with uh uh reconciliation that's usually

12:23

pre-negotiated with the Senate so if we

12:25

can keep with that aggressive timeline

12:27

you'll have that back to the house

12:30

sometime in February once you have that

12:32

that allows your 12 subcommittees to get

12:35

their allotment and start to build out

12:37

their right 12 appropriation

12:39

subcommittees build out their budgets

12:42

Jason Smith our ways and means chair

12:44

believes we can have that process done

12:46

by the end of March Mike in again in

12:49

this our speaker in this uh very

12:52

aggressive timeline if that's possible

12:54

he would like to vote on it in the house

12:56

in the first two weeks of April this

12:58

includes

12:59

the tax permanency extensions Etc from

13:03

the Trump tax cuts back in

13:06

2017 if we're able to keep to that

13:09

schedule then you could you could

13:11

realistically have a Reconciliation Bill

13:14

to president's Trump's desk by Memorial

13:16

weekend let's just talk about the other

13:19

long-term Challenge and your point of

13:22

view on the solution what's going to

13:23

happen to Social Security by 2030 2032

13:26

2033 where's this headed why I think

13:29

people are going to have to innovate and

13:31

I think you got to honor the promises

13:32

that have been made uh there are many

13:34

different things out there that are

13:36

being looked at like a voluntary program

13:38

that people I in a certain range and

13:41

this is above my my pay grade A Certain

13:43

range age range y like I don't know 18

13:47

to whatever it is that are just coming

13:49

into this system that it would give them

13:51

a choice right they would have a choice

13:53

to stay in Social Security as we know it

13:56

or to pursue a private route that will

13:58

have Federal parameters so you can't

14:01

just be putting it into a retirement

14:02

account taking it out it would serve the

14:05

same purpose but like Australia system

14:07

the super system it would obviously and

14:09

then it would grow the uh the private

14:11

side yeah and sorry is that ultimately

14:15

necessary we need to change Social

14:17

Security and when do we have to change

14:19

it by and now that the election is over

14:21

because every politician is scared to

14:23

talk about social security because

14:24

everyone's got an election coming up are

14:26

we going to hear something different

14:27

this time around or is it always going

14:29

to be the Kick the Can down the road

14:31

with Social Security and weever it's

14:33

just such a Golden Goose no one can talk

14:34

about it no one can touch it Donald

14:36

Trump was elected for three reasons one

14:38

to fix uh our economic woses uh the

14:42

inflation that's killed people uh get

14:44

energy moving again seal the southern

14:46

border and create peace and stability

14:48

around the globe if we perform and I'm

14:51

I'm going to change that because that's

14:53

not really my attitude when we perform

14:56

you start to build credibility with the

14:58

American public then and only then can

15:01

you start talking about because nobody

15:04

believes us right right so in in the

15:06

media plays games they try to pit us

15:08

against each other with these different

15:10

ideas the key is you have to honor the

15:13

promises that have been made to

15:15

Americans since Social Security was

15:17

created and then you have to look

15:19

forward and again we've said we're not

15:22

going to touch Social Security uh

15:25

Medicare and Medicaid that was the

15:26

president who said that I got that but

15:29

there are some uh efficiency things

15:31

reforms that you can do around these

15:33

programs that actually will make them uh

15:35

not only more uh uh viable financially

15:39

but more efficient should Americans be

15:42

able to trade cryptocurrency freely

15:44

without regulations or do you think

15:46

those regulations are in place for a

15:48

good reason well you're you're talking

15:50

so you remember Animal House with the

15:52

evil and the good on the shoulders I I

15:56

had that last night and the evil one and

15:59

well I got the libertarian and the uh

16:02

Republican with a small r on either one

16:04

libertarian always wins for me but yeah

16:05

well and it it used to for me but I

16:08

realized that I was a republican with a

16:10

small R when I was doing a radio show

16:12

with an anarchist for several months and

16:14

all he ever said was shut her down she's

16:16

pumping mud and it's like oh I must be a

16:18

republican I the libertarian says

16:22

absolutely okay I the Republican with a

16:25

small r i I think the key is going to be

16:28

we have the the greatest Financial

16:30

system markets here in the United States

16:32

in the world all we have an existing

16:35

Legacy two-tier banking system uh it

16:39

needs to come into the 21st century the

16:42

beauty of crypto to me is not just that

16:44

it's crypto one it's going to help us if

16:47

Congress does its job if we put some

16:49

parameters up Market structure you know

16:52

give people rules of the road so they

16:54

know what they can and can't do and

16:56

who's going to be uh having

16:58

responsibility for oversight we can

17:00

protect the existing two-tier Legacy

17:04

system yeah and allow it time to move

17:07

into the 21st century I think the the

17:09

key is and this is why the central

17:11

Bankers are so worried this is so

17:14

disruptive and potentially destructive

17:16

that they're scared to death it's not

17:18

just losing their power they're they're

17:20

afraid that uh this decentralization is

17:22

going to somehow send Finance back to

17:25

the uh I suppose there are also a

17:27

concern that consumers maybe who are not

17:29

super sophisticated or new to it might

17:32

lose their money and yesterday Trump

17:35

launched a $30 billion yeah coin uh

17:38

which we refer to on the internet as a

17:39

coin or a meme coin are you troubled by

17:42

him doing something like that was that a

17:44

wise decision on his part I don't know

17:46

time will tell about that he seems to

17:47

make some pretty good decisions they've

17:49

uh they've done you got work on the

17:51

regulations for that so if he can do

17:53

that can we all just do it and take any

17:56

you could have done it too oh well it

17:58

was a the SEC previously would have um

18:01

actually gone after you for um taking

18:04

money from retail investors ding dong

18:06

the witch is dead now we're going to be

18:08

moving forward with a new SEC got it

18:11

okay so

18:12

YOLO What's that YOLO YOLO you only live

18:16

once just go for it my uh my staff gives

18:20

me a hard time because I don't know all

18:22

those cute quips yeah but you're you're

18:24

cool with it you're cool with him doing

18:25

a coin 24 hours before I have no problem

18:28

did you see the mem that said Baron

18:30

apparently had his dad's phone last

18:31

night made a billion

18:34

dollar I love the baron memes they're my

18:37

favorite they call him the Lian alib

18:39

which if you like if you watch Dune is

18:42

like he's the Savior that's sent in Dune

18:44

to basically save all of us it's

18:46

definitely going to be an interesting

18:47

four years uh let's talk about right now

18:49

Jason is about to implode Congressman

18:51

what you're seeing is him melting down

18:53

has a big like negative bias against um

18:55

these coins no no no I have a bias

18:57

against stealing meanwhile you want

18:59

every ret you want every retail investor

19:01

to have access to buy startups and

19:03

because that that'll benefit you but

19:04

when it comes to coins you're like oh no

19:06

one should be able to do that no I'll

19:07

address that I think there should be a

19:08

sophisticated investor test where people

19:11

learn about things like diversification

19:14

they learn who owns 80% of the coins

19:16

that just been dumped on retail and

19:18

under what circumstance they can sell

19:20

them and you know there is a a

19:23

legitimate issue here that uh foreign

19:26

adversaries could just buy these coins

19:27

that influence the president I think

19:29

that's a real concern that people should

19:30

have so you can diminish it you're it

19:33

it's actually a real issue I actually

19:34

agree with you like Securities

19:36

regulations require and when you do an

19:37

IPO you file an S1 and you disclose who

19:40

owns the shares yes and it has to go on

19:42

a regulated exchange so you know who the

19:43

buyers of the shares are so I do

19:45

actually think your framework is pretty

19:47

reasonable that it I thought you were

19:48

just mocking me well I do mock you yeah

19:50

in addition let's go to the next one

19:52

then no no I do think that's right you

19:53

brought up the Border uh Steve Bannon

19:56

says huh I did you did you said the

19:59

Border was one of the M re in his uh

20:02

mandate yeah so let's talk about that

20:03

part of the Mandate that you brought up

20:05

uh Steve Bon says he's doing a great job

20:07

today's moderator you're doing I think

20:09

he's the only one that s they knock you

20:12

down and then they build you up it's all

20:13

good I'm not paying attention to them

20:14

I'm paying attention to you this is

20:17

called management Steve Bannon said he

20:19

wants all 15 out day one so what's going

20:21

on uh Steve Miller says America is for

20:24

Americans and Americans

20:26

only do you believe 15 million people

20:28

should be dragged out of this country

20:30

day one like Steve Bannon and Steve

20:31

Miller I I think we should look at what

20:33

the American people think so a New York

20:36

Times of all Outlets had a poll that

20:39

said uh it's like 80% I believe that

20:42

criminals terrorists uh people who have

20:45

committed uh bad offenses should be the

20:48

hell out of here yeah easy one to have

20:49

consensus on you no but then it starts

20:51

to drop down yeah which is uh the next

20:53

one is a uh oh I forget what the second

20:56

one is it drops down about 60 but 55% of

20:59

Americans believe any illegal immigrant

21:03

should be out of here how many 55% 55%

21:06

this in a New York po W what do you

21:09

think that'll do to the economy you

21:10

brought up inflation and we have to tame

21:12

that we have 4% unemployment the lowest

21:14

of our lifetimes can I just tell you

21:16

agricultural um labor costs have climbed

21:19

by probably 3x in the last four or five

21:21

years yeah it's and there's not enough

21:23

labor to address kind of agricultural

21:25

production needs in this country

21:26

particularly in specialty crops it's the

21:28

world I I work in how are we going to

21:31

kind of address both the kind of economy

21:33

economic demand for labor in this

21:35

country and address this kind of

21:37

immigration challenge you don't fix your

21:38

labor problem with h illegal immigration

21:42

uh you fix it by fixing your immigration

21:45

system and making sure that it's working

21:47

the way it's supposed to by the way I

21:48

come from the state of Minnesota the two

21:50

primary drivers of our state's private

21:52

economy are manufacturing an EG I mean I

21:55

I've got huge uh operations of families

21:59

that have bound together as a co-op that

22:02

they literally have to bring in foreign

22:04

workers and they they' built a Village

22:07

housing they have teachers but there's

22:10

there's the solution this idea and I

22:12

come from Minnesota which is why you

22:13

made the hair on the back of my neck

22:15

stand up the the argument is oh illegals

22:18

people who are here illegally and their

22:20

Advocates are bracing for Trump's

22:23

arrival and then they write an article

22:25

that says if they remove all these

22:26

people our economy is going to tank

22:29

stop it you you you've got laws for a

22:32

reason you got to enforce the laws that

22:33

are on the books and if they don't work

22:35

this is why we passed the strongest

22:37

border bill in 20 years with 222 members

22:41

in the last Congress which Chuck Schumer

22:43

never looked at they they wanted to say

22:45

that Trump killed the bipartisan bill

22:47

you realize the house bill did five

22:49

things finish the wall reform the parole

22:52

process reform Asylum uh end Catch and

22:55

Release and restore remain in Mexico

22:57

those were the five pillars that

22:59

so-called bipartisan Bill actually

23:01

codified catch and release said that if

23:04

you don't have emergency Authority on

23:06

the border until you have 5,000 plus one

23:09

coming across a day so we seem to have

23:11

the answer we seem to have you know

23:13

pretty solid consensus here and in the

23:15

country criminals who are basically

23:18

committing two crimes whatever crime

23:19

they committed here and coming cross the

23:20

border illegally they have no standing

23:23

they go but you seem to be um punting

23:26

and not answering the question of should

23:27

the 14.5 milon other people dragged out

23:30

of the country in year one so maybe you

23:31

can answer that one J's a journalist I

23:34

I'm telling you right now that Trump

23:35

trump was elected to get this what do

23:38

you think though you are from a state

23:39

where that's going to be highly

23:40

unpopular I I don't think you should be

23:42

here if you're illegal so all for all 15

23:44

million got to go in year one I don't

23:46

think you should be here if you're

23:47

illegal now you're you're painting with

23:49

a pretty broad brush you don't know what

23:52

specific using Steve Bannon and Steve

23:54

Miller have said so I'm just quoting

23:56

their words again I think the

23:59

the goal is to make sure Poss JD Vance

24:01

JD Vance came on our show and he said

24:03

hey you got to do the first thing first

24:04

and you know then the second thing

24:05

second and the third it's not all going

24:06

to happen on day one but yeah it's GNA

24:08

be well I'm trying to interpret that but

24:09

you're being straight so well actually I

24:12

resent that I am being straight I will

24:14

tell you Adar no I just want to know if

24:16

that this is I think there's a lot of

24:18

Americans who want to know if 15 million

24:20

people are literally going to be dragged

24:21

out this is a big question for the

24:23

American people are you going to drag 15

24:25

million people out the country or not

24:27

because Stephen Miller who seems to be

24:29

you know a big part of this

24:30

Administration and C Bannon who was the

24:31

architect of the previous administration

24:33

say that's actually going to happen

24:34

people are actually nervous about that

24:35

this is when we need sacks here to check

24:37

you to fact check you on whether those

24:39

guys have said that and the the problem

24:40

is you're using terms like dragged them

24:42

out no I mean they're going to start

24:44

with the worst of the worst in JD's uh

24:46

answer you start with those because you

24:48

know that this is going to have an

24:50

emotional aspect to it and guess what

24:52

yeah if you start doing it the way

24:53

you're supposed to do it I'm going to

24:55

suggest to you that a lot of them are

24:56

going to leave voluntarily and then if

24:58

we fix the system that we have then we

25:01

can start to restore this by the way

25:03

that's already happening because I've

25:04

heard from a lot of agricultural leaders

25:06

they're seeing labor depart the country

25:08

right now in anticipation of the

25:09

administrative change and a lot of Labor

25:11

is very scared of what's Happening they

25:13

don't want to be caught they just came

25:14

here for work these are individuals who

25:16

came to this country to work they

25:17

employed whether legally or illegally to

25:19

do work that's in demand in this country

25:21

and they're worried they're going to go

25:22

to jail so they're leaving and there's a

25:24

massive outl right now particularly in

25:26

rural areas there's a massive out right

25:28

now of Labor that's really critical to a

25:30

lot of those farming economies and that

25:31

a lot of people in the agricultural

25:33

sector are very nervous about what's

25:34

about to happen in the impact but let me

25:36

ask you another question do you think

25:38

and in align with elon's point of view

25:40

and some of the stuff that's been

25:41

promoted that there's a big Push by the

25:43

Democrats to keep the borders open to

25:46

create more voting Democrats in this

25:47

country that that's a big reason or

25:49

rationale for the alternative of you

25:52

know having illegal immigration then

25:53

converting everyone to Legal I think I I

25:55

think it's more basic than that I do

25:57

think there's a political element to it

25:59

states like Minnesota where the uh where

26:02

the traditional educated

26:05

I what entrepreneur yeah is leaving

26:09

they're being replaced with uh in many

26:12

cases with illegals yeah right because

26:15

we are a sanctuary state right so they

26:17

come into Minnesota whether they vote or

26:20

not that there is a big there is a big

26:22

argument that yes many of them are but I

26:26

think the bigger issue is how Congress

26:28

is uh divided up you're losing you're

26:31

hollowing out whether you're Illinois or

26:33

you're New York you're hollowing out

26:35

your state they bring illegals in and

26:38

Incredibly our census calculates them in

26:40

the uh numbers that doesn't make sense

26:43

no so you got these blue states that

26:45

mandering cartel just to try to how does

26:48

yeah I guess that's a longer

26:49

conversation and we probably need to

26:50

wrap up in a minute I never how that

26:51

works have a totally different question

26:53

something more fun the job of whip was

26:55

totally romanticized after House of C

26:58

that Ro you got to kill people well no

27:01

because you had you had spy you had spy

27:03

in this really famous scene you got an

27:05

interesting the Whip and saying when I

27:08

was Whi my job was to whip the votes and

27:10

then he was screaming into the phone

27:12

whip the votes and I just remember this

27:14

thinking now that seems like a really

27:16

cool job his nickname is Chairman

27:18

dictator just so you know he was voted

27:20

like number one commentator by Xing pan

27:23

Chinese Communist Party in the first

27:24

year of podcast I have a lot of

27:26

important people that look up to me yes

27:27

yeah uh but but just the job of whip is

27:31

it as enjoyable as it sounds so

27:33

everybody likes to say to me you got the

27:35

worst job in Washington DC I think the

27:37

speaker has the worst job in Washington

27:39

D that guy can be having a great day and

27:41

he's got all kinds of people that are

27:42

just throwing sandwiches at them all the

27:44

time the majority leader uh does a

27:47

calendar manages the floor works with

27:48

the chairs uh great job the whip you

27:52

don't get to do anything those guys want

27:54

to do unless we can actually get it

27:56

across the floor and the world has

27:58

changed I you know they I think well I

28:01

know they elected me because they

28:03

thought my personality is very direct I

28:05

am from uh Minnesota I get the sense

28:07

that you're incredibly effective or you

28:08

could whip the votes well but it's you

28:10

just got to be honest and you got to

28:11

respect everybody and and it's a

28:13

different world because we probably have

28:15

40% of our members who will vote for

28:17

whatever Mike Johnson says we're going

28:18

to put on the floor okay but we got 60%

28:21

and this is what's been changing I think

28:22

over the last couple of decades it keeps

28:24

getting larger they didn't come here to

28:28

follow somebody they came here to to

28:30

lead to represent their people and they

28:32

need to be involved in the process and

28:34

and what I tell them all the time I

28:35

don't care if you like each other I

28:37

don't care if you despise one another I

28:38

don't care if you socialize together or

28:40

the second you walk out of here you run

28:42

to two polar opposite places when you're

28:44

here the American people elected Donald

28:47

Trump and we have the benefit of uh a

28:50

majority see you're opening the votes

28:52

but that's what it is and I I tell them

28:53

you got to get over yourself we're going

28:55

to let everybody participate in the

28:57

process we're going to take all of your

28:58

ideas we put the uh the more Centrist

29:02

part of our our majority and the more uh

29:05

rightwing part of our party together and

29:09

that that list of uh savings Cuts

29:11

offsets I was talking about we privately

29:14

run that through small groups one at a

29:17

time so that they can talk to each other

29:20

right so that if if you come from a ruby

29:22

red District down south and I come from

29:25

a you know swingy swingy District in New

29:27

York York we can have a conversation

29:30

about why I can and can't do something

29:33

and why you will and won't do something

29:36

and at the end of the day this is how

29:38

you're successful everybody wants to be

29:40

involved it's it's hard only from the

29:42

aspect that you you can't afford to

29:44

leave anyone last question uh when you

29:46

saw the last week was pretty prolific in

29:48

terms of the Senate confirmation

29:50

hearings that started um I think we're

29:52

still waiting to figure out when Bobby

29:53

is going to come up like do you see any

29:56

push back who do you think who might not

29:58

make it who might not make it I think

30:00

everybody's making it I I think anybody

30:02

uh that listens to you guys or anything

30:05

that interview where they start saying

30:07

bringing this up we got to remind people

30:10

this has been the left's Playbook since

30:13

Robert Bourg yeah they started it with

30:15

Robert bour they took him out of his

30:17

Supreme Court appointment they uh they

30:20

did it to Clarence Thomas they really

30:22

did it to Kavanagh and look at this now

30:25

they've moved it to Cabinet picks right

30:28

and and Pete Heth is a great example

30:30

none of us is perfect but all of that

30:33

was Anonymous and I think once it

30:34

started going through the process and

30:36

somebody asked me this question a few

30:37

weeks ago I said yeah they're starting

30:39

with Pete Pete's going to get uh he's

30:41

going to get through the process they'll

30:43

move on to Tulsi then they'll move on to

30:45

Bobby Kennedy Jr right those will

30:47

probably be their their three biggest

30:49

ones that they'll attack yeah right I

30:51

mean my my perspective on this is that

30:53

to your point in the absence of somebody

30:56

being compromised it's not an IDE iCal

30:58

difference that should stop cabinet

30:59

picks on either side whoever is the

31:00

President should get to pick their team

31:02

put the team on the field that's the

31:03

Mandate he was given by the people and

31:05

then the people should get to vote it up

31:07

it's supposed to be an advisory capacity

31:08

right I mean the yeah Congressional it

31:10

is but the beauty of what Donald Trump

31:12

is doing you can't fix what's broken

31:15

with people that broke it he's going

31:17

outside of this godforsaken place and

31:20

bringing people in that have have

31:22

completely new ideas whether you like

31:24

them or not right come on folks let's

31:26

see what this does we've been doing the

31:28

same thing now for years which by the

31:29

way is what happened 250 years ago when

31:31

this okay wait Congressman last question

31:32

okay this is the last question Congress

31:34

last us give us the red an opinion you

31:37

said you listened to the Fire episode

31:39

that we did but just general from the

31:41

outside in as a Minnesotan looking at

31:43

California just diagnose what's going on

31:45

there it's it's more complicated than

31:48

the right and the left want to make it

31:50

seem but uh there definitely is a

31:53

problem it's not just limited to

31:55

California it's across this country with

31:57

not man in our resources the way we

31:59

should we had this problem in northern

32:02

Minnesota probably 20 years ago 25 years

32:05

ago we had a blow down in the bwca The

32:08

Boundary Waters canoe area you had all

32:10

those trees uh laying down they were

32:13

kindling right and I think our governor

32:15

at the time Jesse Ventura said he was

32:17

going to go in there and he was going to

32:18

log it right so we could protect the uh

32:21

citizens in their property and we could

32:23

actually make use of these uh trees that

32:25

have been destroyed in the storm uh the

32:28

federal government told him he couldn't

32:29

do it and of course we've had fires

32:33

right uh California this is tragic my

32:36

brother-in-law sent me a picture he

32:37

lives in Woodland Hills he sent me a

32:39

picture of flames at the end of his

32:41

culde-sac above the that's where my

32:43

parents live they probably live a couple

32:44

blocks from each other in Woodland Hills

32:46

two the fire sto two blocks from their

32:47

house yeah that's the picture he took

32:50

they might live did the winds just take

32:52

no so the uh the the the Ventura County

32:55

Line comes up to right there yeah and

32:57

the fire department did and I I calfire

32:59

and fire department are incredible they

33:00

stopped it from entering the

33:01

neighborhood that's amazing it was

33:03

amazing yeah very I don't know how his

33:04

house is still standing based on the

33:06

picture you sent Tom this has been

33:07

amazing you fit right in here appreciate

33:09

the honesty and candidness and we'd love

33:11

to have you back anytime I appreciate

33:13

the conflict I love that well I mean the

33:15

American people have this is why we love

33:16

job he got he got motivated we went to a

33:18

Spotify dinner last night and they were

33:19

talking about journalism he's like I'm a

33:20

journalist I'll show you guys I can

33:22

Journal I think it's a really important

33:24

conversation and you know the one thing

33:27

I'm a little concerned with is um just

33:30

some clarity because Trump has an

33:33

ability to say things in a in a in a

33:35

bold way in an effervescent way and then

33:38

you know sometimes these things actually

33:40

affect people and they want a little

33:41

more clarity so well and the whip has uh

33:44

has to find Clarity amongst 219 people

33:48

yeah good luck with that job appreciate

33:50

it thank you thank you you guys are fine

33:54

thanks okay everybody welcome back to

33:56

the all-in podcast we're here for the

33:59

inauguration of Donald Trump in his

34:01

second term and we're delighted to have

34:03

Eric swell with us today uh he is

34:06

obviously the house representative from

34:08

California and the Democratic party uh

34:10

you guys East Bay East Bay East Bay East

34:12

Bay yeah uh you guys got shellacked this

34:14

time around wasn't great wasn't good

34:17

yeah um what are the lessons that the

34:20

Democratic party can take from this I'll

34:23

will uh insert myself into this a little

34:25

bit I'm a moderate who's voted Democrat

34:27

two out of three times I was

34:32

absolutely really disappointed I I'll

34:34

just leave it at that that you didn't

34:36

have a speedrun primary that Biden was

34:39

put up when he was clearly in cognitive

34:41

decline and I'm absolutely disgusted by

34:45

the Democratic party's um hatred of

34:49

successful entrepreneurs in this country

34:52

you've kind of lost me as somebody who

34:54

voted two out of three times why has the

34:57

Democratic party left me somebody who

35:01

you know two out of three times would

35:03

vote Democrat and now you hate as a

35:06

party entrepreneurship winning and you

35:10

you you seem to hate democracy and you

35:12

won't even have a primary Jesus Christ

35:14

um don't hate democracy um no but this

35:16

is my perception I think a lot of

35:18

Democrats feel this way we just lose you

35:20

lost a lot of fol folks like a lot of I

35:23

mean this this is across the board

35:24

there's a lot of middle of the road

35:25

folks that just yeah we

35:28

we need

35:30

a story that connects with everyday

35:34

Americans I think when you look at a lot

35:35

of the policies that we like believe in

35:38

and you look at polling and focus groups

35:39

people will be like oh yeah I like that

35:42

I like that I like that but our story

35:44

right now I don't think we know who we

35:46

are and who we're fighting for now so it

35:48

is to me exciting that we can go through

35:50

this reset and renovation to find that

35:54

story that connects I'm a bluecollar kid

35:57

I was raised by a cop and a mom who had

36:00

six different jobs I was the first of my

36:01

family to go to college I like to think

36:03

you were raised by two Republicans yeah

36:04

I was they they they were they are were

36:07

and are two Republicans and I've got

36:08

three little brothers who are cops and I

36:11

grew up in Dublin California everyone

36:13

called it scrubin until we invested uh

36:16

there and we saw success what was your

36:18

ideological change growing up in a

36:21

republican household of cops essentially

36:24

yeah uh to becoming a you know you're a

36:28

bit of a democratic poster boy well

36:30

that's that's only because I've gone

36:32

after Donald Trump but if you look I ran

36:34

against the most liberal member of

36:36

Congress Pete Stark um I have been a

36:39

pretty independent vote in Congress and

36:41

I root for success of entrepreneurs and

36:44

business and want to connect that

36:46

success to the people who work hard at

36:49

those businesses so everyone does well

36:52

and I think if we're just perceived as

36:53

rooting against success overall and

36:56

vilifying by people who are successful

37:00

um then no one can be successful if if

37:02

that's the case did you like or not like

37:04

did you agree with Biden's framing as he

37:07

was leaving about this Tech

37:09

oligarchy it it it's only an oligarchy

37:11

if working class folks don't benefit

37:15

from it so if that's what it becomes

37:18

then that that's a problem what I want

37:19

to see and I think what you all are

37:22

rooting for is that anyone if you work

37:26

hard work your ass off you should do

37:28

better for yourself and dream bigger for

37:30

your kids and I think we have an

37:31

opportunity to do that the president the

37:33

president-elect has an opportunity to

37:35

make that happen and where he tries to

37:37

do that he'll find uh a partner in me

37:39

but do we have this uh branding issue

37:43

yes no I think that's what is The

37:44

Branding issue let un the The Branding

37:46

issue the wokeism is it the

37:48

judgmentalism is it the sanctimony is

37:50

pandering is it the you have to you have

37:52

to be perfect and pure is what the

37:54

perception is right now but nobody's

37:56

perfect no no no that's the

37:57

of people who like like we're all ridd

38:00

with errors and of course we're not

38:01

perfect and pure but I think the

38:03

perception is that to be a Democrat you

38:06

have to check all these Purity boxes and

38:10

then you can be a part of the party and

38:12

right now the Republican part is like I

38:14

think the exact opposite it's like do

38:15

you like Donald Trump great come to the

38:17

party and

38:19

so even like if you don't like Trump can

38:22

we get you on these three policies and

38:23

you can still come to Peter T's party I

38:25

have never been more courted by

38:27

political party than trumps and I have

38:29

never been more hated than I've been by

38:31

the Democratic party that's wrong it

38:33

shouldn't make people feel that way Jam

38:34

feels that way I think he was a major

38:37

donor you guys are talking about having

38:40

you guys are saying you should have a

38:41

Joe Rogan equivalent you had Joe Rogan

38:45

he was a Democrat if you watch all his

38:47

shows they were all he had Bernie

38:49

Sanders on he wanted to have Hillary on

38:50

you guys fumbled it you guys had Elon

38:53

Musk you fumbled it well see the party

38:55

fumbled it maybe you can comment you

38:57

represent and let's talk about

38:59

rebuilding and we have we have an

39:01

opportunity to rebuild now and so on for

39:04

example the department of government

39:07

efficiency like we should root for

39:09

government to be more efficient and we

39:11

should try and enable that but like if

39:14

that effort goes into an area where it's

39:17

going to cut Social Security or cut you

39:20

know Medicare then I think you'll see us

39:22

be Guardians against that but like most

39:25

small businesses think it's pretty hard

39:27

start a small business and then even

39:28

once you do you don't have the resources

39:30

that bigger businesses do and they see

39:33

regulations as what gets in the way so

39:34

we should try and knock those what's

39:36

happening in the party like what what

39:38

are you guys doing or is it just

39:41

headless as an organization yeah who

39:42

runs a Democratic party I would say in

39:44

in the house right now hakee Jeff uh has

39:46

been pretty effective at at uniting us

39:49

and and even in the last Congress uh you

39:52

saw something that you've never seen

39:53

before in any Congress in our country

39:55

any parliament in the world which is the

39:56

minority party delivered the majority

40:00

votes on every vote of consequence so

40:02

keeping the government open lifting the

40:04

de ceiling which's which the incoming

40:06

president now supports which we welcome

40:08

that and we would love to get rid of it

40:10

by the way um you know the funding of

40:12

even the funding you know to Israel that

40:16

that moveed forward because uh Democrats

40:19

were unified uh on that front so I think

40:22

hakee has shown himself as like a

40:24

practical negotiator someone who can

40:27

work with Johnson but I think the the

40:29

the other Fair commentary is he's young

40:33

and he's inexperienced what I mean by

40:35

leadership is yeah who who is the elder

40:38

Statesman that can help push and cajo

40:42

and influence the Democratic party to

40:45

find a more solid ground I think one I

40:48

think one of our best thought leaders is

40:49

Mark cubin I think he's Mark cubin right

40:51

Mark Cuban yeah he he's very influential

40:54

has a lot of relationships with my

40:56

colleagues uh myself he has business

40:59

experience but I think he's also not

41:01

lost touch of like what regular people

41:04

care about and I thought he was an

41:06

effective surrogate uh for kamla uh

41:10

being out there on the trail but I I go

41:12

to mark on a lot of stuff and and I

41:13

think he um understands where most

41:16

people are how did Kamala get selected

41:19

how did she get select so she was vice

41:21

president and the runway was about 100

41:23

days and I we can go through the

41:25

different scenarios I don't think any of

41:26

them good and as you said if if your

41:30

premise is that President Biden should

41:32

not have run for re-election making that

41:34

decision that close to the election you

41:36

know I don't know if any candidate you

41:38

know should there have been a speed

41:40

primary like

41:41

j

41:43

i we could go through a hundred

41:45

scenarios there were a bunch of great

41:46

candidates I I still think all of them

41:49

would have probably been set up to fail

41:50

did you it's too too short of a Runway

41:53

did you in your interactions with the

41:54

president did you say to yourself

41:57

gosh what's going on here I I didn't and

42:00

my colleagues and I I don't think we

42:01

interacted with him you know that often

42:05

and we kind of you know we started his

42:07

presidency in Co and so the Joe Biden

42:10

that I knew when I was in a baby you

42:14

know child in the Congress in 2013 was

42:17

very engaged and you know Lov meeting

42:20

with Congress and the meetings would go

42:21

an hour over the time allotted and it it

42:24

was kind of that Bill Clinton charm

42:27

offensive that he could put on and I

42:29

will just tell you like the first two

42:31

years with the covid restrictions that

42:32

we had we didn't see that because we you

42:36

know we would have remote meetings with

42:38

the White House and so um they hit him

42:41

they hit him I I don't yeah again I

42:43

don't know I I know I know where we are

42:45

now the reports are he was gay c yeah

42:48

yeah like I said I'm I'm man focus on

42:50

the future let's talk about the future

42:52

let's talk about Doge so you mention

42:54

wait wait hold on hold on before we talk

42:55

to Doge yeah yeah ER you were on the

42:57

house intelligence committee yes let's

42:59

talk about Tik Tok yes yeah okay done

43:01

and dusted what what do you think might

43:05

back tomorrow right might might not yeah

43:08

um you're you're in the room and these

43:11

things happen there are these off the

43:12

record I guess intelligence briefings

43:14

that happened and um this was a n0

43:18

unanimous Supreme Court decision it was

43:20

an overwhelming majority yeah in

43:22

Congress can you just help us understand

43:26

what needs to happen happen for

43:27

something like those two events to

43:29

happen yeah just be General you don't

43:31

have to say specifically obviously and

43:33

disclose anything that you know but

43:35

we're just trying to understand how does

43:36

something when it's such a ranker

43:38

congress which can't seem to agree on

43:40

anything or a supreme court which tends

43:42

to be five4 on every issue finds a n0

43:46

and a super majority in Congress I can

43:47

you just help us understand so the

43:49

Supreme Court was not saying whether we

43:51

should ban or not ban Tik Tok they were

43:53

saying the Congress voted president

43:55

signed corre and there's no way around

43:57

this ban so they I think they were just

43:59

following the law I voted against the

44:01

ban I think China is the place where you

44:05

ban things and the problems that I have

44:07

with Tik Tok as a father of like three

44:09

little kids are the problems that I have

44:11

with meta and the problems that I have

44:14

yeah it also so you don't view it you

44:16

don't view it as a security risk for the

44:17

United States and and and I Look to Jim

44:20

heims who is the senior Democrat on the

44:23

intelligence committee the ranking

44:24

member he's in What's called the gang of

44:25

eight he has the most exquisite access

44:27

to intelligence and Jim voted against

44:31

the ban and I thought you know what if

44:33

this guy is not seeing anything on the

44:35

National Security level there was an off

44:37

the Record or confidential briefing to

44:39

the house intelligence committee so you

44:41

think in that meeting there was nothing

44:43

that was very meaningful that was

44:44

disclosed about Tik Tok nothing that I

44:47

had seen is it owned by the Chinese

44:48

government absolutely but is there a

44:51

national security risk I have not seen

44:54

that hold on a second though I mean if

44:56

the Chinese government owns a 100

44:59

million plus American phones their

45:01

location data access to their

45:03

microphones access to their cameras how

45:06

is that not a security risk and where I

45:08

mean that seems incredibly naive to say

45:10

that I want I want to build on what J is

45:12

saying um we know that there are

45:13

security vulnerabilities for example in

45:15

WhatsApp it's riddled with stuff so you

45:17

know you could send a PDF before then

45:19

you could send an image now you can just

45:21

send a message and you can root your

45:22

phone the difference is WhatsApp is

45:24

owned by an American citizen right I

45:26

really and so what which is to say all

45:28

these apps are compromised it's just

45:31

that the Tik Tok is owned by a Chinese

45:34

owner who is out of the reach of the

45:36

United States government yeah and is

45:38

that fair or unfair to you it is out of

45:40

the reach of the United States

45:41

government but what I will say is most

45:44

of what we buy as far as you know what's

45:47

in our basket at Walmart is has a

45:49

Chinese component what's in our Basket

45:51

doesn't have a microphone or your GPS

45:54

let me say a lot of it does have you

45:55

seen a lot of stuff you buy um drones

45:58

Chinese made drones there'ss there's a

46:00

whole website now that that breaks down

46:02

modern consumer electronics from China

46:05

that actually have these hacking devices

46:07

built into them I don't know if you've

46:08

seen this but like you you'll buy like a

46:10

USB charger that's like eight bucks on k

46:12

or something and it's inside it's got

46:15

like an IP address and it actually finds

46:17

Wi-Fi it connects and it transmits

46:19

information this is incredibly dangerous

46:21

like there's so many and I bought this

46:22

like cheap drone for like Christmas

46:24

someone uh for like anyway one of my

46:26

little neews brought it and I'm like

46:28

dude this thing is like 149 bucks and I

46:31

looked it up online it's like got camera

46:33

connects to your Wi-Fi and then it asked

46:34

for access to your phone and I'm like

46:36

I'm not doing that like I tweeted this a

46:38

few months ago I don't think Tik tok's

46:39

the issue the USBC charging cables

46:42

exactly yeah be yeah rooted the charging

46:45

cables yes this

46:47

is this is more reason to B speculative

46:50

no I don't but I don't think Tik Tok I

46:52

guess my point is like we Tik Tok you

46:53

want to ban everything that's made in

46:54

China that's great you'll destroy the

46:56

economy yeah but one thing has 100

46:58

million people in an algorithm that

46:59

could influence people's perception that

47:02

you know the that Hamas is being

47:05

harassed by the Israelis like they they

47:08

literally can change how Americans

47:10

especially young ones perceive the world

47:13

even if they're not doing it currently

47:15

do you not see how obvious it is that

47:18

they can use it it's a censorship point

47:21

of view which is government has a ro

47:24

contr let's get his yeah I guess I'm the

47:25

only one of the four of us that doesn't

47:27

want to ban speech um yeah I'm no I'm

47:29

with you with you I want I want to B I

47:31

want either reciprocity where we can put

47:33

our apps in China or I want it gone now

47:37

you're now you're making a different

47:38

case now you're saying it's like

47:39

reciprocity as opposed to controlling

47:41

first you were saying it's security then

47:43

you're saying it's like controlling our

47:45

point of view now you're saying

47:46

reciprocity you're like those aren't the

47:48

same thing here security security risk

47:51

likely lies everywhere on security on

47:53

controlling the point of view of stuff I

47:55

think you guys have to separate look Tik

47:57

Tok there are three things in Tik Tok

48:00

okay there's the content and the content

48:03

creators that's one thing then there is

48:06

a network effect and then there is the

48:08

vessel which is the app okay which is

48:11

the code my very specific point of view

48:14

is the content creators and the network

48:17

effect can easily be replicated in other

48:20

places The Vessel itself is corrupt and

48:23

I think if you can't technically see

48:25

that it's probably because you just

48:27

you're not steeped enough in the techn

48:28

the intelligence committee doesn't

48:30

technically see that so clearly they're

48:32

not agre they've been caught they've

48:34

seen tracking got a guy the intelligence

48:36

committee here tell well but I I also

48:38

looked at the small business owners who

48:41

use that as a platform I understand how

48:42

you just the buckets that you just cre

48:44

people depend on it and more people in

48:46

the what I was telling the White House

48:47

was more people watch President Biden's

48:49

State of the Union Address on Tik Tok

48:51

than anywhere else and the and President

48:53

Biden had just gone on Tik Tok right

48:55

before this is the content and the

48:58

network my point is across meta or

49:01

across X my preference would be X you

49:04

can replicate the network effect and you

49:05

can create a mechanism for those content

49:07

creators who are already on those

49:08

platforms anyway to shift my point is

49:11

the vessel itself is easily rooted I I I

49:14

told this to president Trump when we

49:15

were sitting down I was like that

49:17

phone the microphone on that iPhone can

49:19

get turned on remotely you can choose

49:22

what state actor wants to do it but I

49:25

will bet you to Donuts it is

49:27

inconceivable to me that the NSA did not

49:31

find that capability and the reason is

49:32

not because Tik Tok is bad or good the

49:35

reason is all of these apps are rooted

49:37

the only difference is that most of

49:39

these apps are controlled by American

49:40

citizens gives us control mechanism and

49:43

this app is not

49:45

yeah I I mean I think Donald Trump is

49:48

going to allow Tik Tok well he got 50

49:50

million donation from Jeff Yas that and

49:53

I think he also recogniz I think super

49:55

pack 50 million yes and I think the

49:57

reason he cares is because he knows a

49:59

lot of his followers are on there and

50:01

for whatever reason they didn't CH they

50:02

have not chosen you what else is very

50:03

popular exported from China fentol yeah

50:06

we should probably ban that too like I

50:08

mean the fact that it's popular should

50:10

not be why we are doing that's why I

50:11

think you're framing WR popular Jason

50:14

what I'm saying is you can't put the

50:15

toothpaste back in the tube and and so

50:17

you're take you're going to take away a

50:18

platform that is on by Americans the

50:22

weak chosen to go to those other ones

50:24

and I just don't think we ban things in

50:26

America I I think yeah but this is the

50:27

Chinese Communist Party Jason if you if

50:30

you actually they spy on their own

50:33

citizens if you're just think about this

50:34

for a second if your business depended

50:36

on you using Tik Tok how would you feel

50:37

about the Tik Tok and you're you're not

50:39

wealthy you're not most important thing

50:42

you guys have to assume that if if it is

50:45

true that the CCP uses the Chinese

50:48

version of Tik Tok as a mechanism to

50:51

surveil their own people the idea that

50:54

for an extra few units of resources

50:58

they wouldn't spy on the most important

51:00

powerful nation in the world to me seems

51:03

pretty illogical and dumb they are going

51:06

to they would do it and separately it's

51:08

not to say that President Trump is using

51:12

uh Tik Tok per se or you know important

51:15

people but it is true that when you have

51:17

enough people use an app and those

51:19

people come into contact with other

51:21

people like look what happens today how

51:23

do you exchange contact information with

51:24

an iPhone you touch one another

51:27

there's NFC capability C from Ian just

51:31

think naive assum that like technology

51:35

is very deterministic there are so many

51:37

good things that happen but there are

51:40

people that are paid to find every

51:42

single edge and to push it because the

51:45

stakes are high and I just think that

51:47

this is an assumption that we have to

51:49

live with I'm just very cautious when it

51:50

comes to bands that's that's fair that's

51:52

an ideological thing and I age with you

51:55

CU Cham where this goes is you're like

51:57

well I don't want to import Korean cars

51:59

because they've got electronics that are

52:00

connected to the internet in every

52:01

Korean car now the Koreans can spy on

52:03

where we are I mean you can very quickly

52:04

see how this can open up a Floodgate Of

52:08

Banning because foreign adversaries

52:09

could take advantage of us including

52:12

including B including Banning chip

52:14

Imports including Banning router Imports

52:16

you could very quickly make this a whole

52:18

happen with routers literally the number

52:21

my is literally already with equipment

52:25

we're going to go down a very nasty

52:26

place like we're going down an

52:28

intelligent route which is to not give

52:31

access to all of the personal

52:32

information of the Sons and Daughters of

52:34

Representatives of military experts to

52:37

the Chinese Communist party there there

52:40

is a reason why Huawei is banned in

52:42

America yes yeah security

52:44

vulnerabilities were found they don't

52:45

have our best all of a sudden you think

52:47

that it stopped there China to like gave

52:48

up and said okay I'm saying there's a

52:50

different let's go watch the dance

52:52

videos now it's great let the Americans

52:54

Dance by way it do a little C isn't the

52:58

US Revenue Tik Tok for bite dance like

53:00

5% if it wasn't important the Chinese

53:02

government they would have divested I

53:04

think it's a 30 or they give up their

53:05

golden Shar us is 30 or 40 let's move on

53:07

to the Border um yeah wait wait Doge

53:10

we're gonna do Doge okay let's do Doge

53:12

because you tell us your point of view

53:14

on Elon VI coming in what they're going

53:16

to do what's good about it what you

53:18

really don't think is good about it you

53:19

have concerns yeah well so I do think

53:22

it's funny that a committee about

53:24

efficiency has two people running it

53:26

that's

53:27

but I think it it just cut itself in

53:29

half with if vex's running you know for

53:31

governor so that is their first success

53:33

um I guess you know to cut you know the

53:35

size of the committee but they got a lot

53:37

of people that they've recruited I got

53:38

it yeah as they said knock yourself out

53:41

if you want to make it easier for small

53:43

businesses you know to start a business

53:44

if you want to save you know money inal

53:47

employ federal employees not showing up

53:49

to the office yeah look I my staff shows

53:51

up um and and we benefit from people

53:54

being in the office we show a lot of

53:56

flexib ability uh for people who have

53:58

family issues kind of on a case-by Case

54:01

basis um and people with disabilities

54:04

have more access to work but I I

54:06

generally I see the benefits of having

54:09

everybody at the office and we were one

54:11

of the first offices to come back uh on

54:12

the hill um you know during Co because I

54:16

saw the benefit of that and if they can

54:18

draw a a straight line between you know

54:20

benefiting our constituents and people

54:22

being in the office I'm I'm open-minded

54:24

to that Eric tell us about um how you

54:28

think this reconciliation Bill the

54:29

budget yeah um it's going to be a very

54:31

knockout drag out kind of a process um

54:34

we're going to hit the debt ceiling yeah

54:36

tomorrow yeah um and so you guys are

54:38

going to be back to work right away what

54:40

do you

54:41

expect what I'm going to be asking my

54:45

constituents you know is tax cuts are

54:48

proposed and regulations you know

54:49

potentially are cut is you know what did

54:51

you get out of this and what have you

54:54

lost because if it's just as I said if

54:57

it's just kind of a a bro Archy that

54:59

benefits and and you don't benefit then

55:02

I won't support it but if you can draw

55:04

the line and say you know this business

55:08

getting this benefit or this corporate

55:10

tax rate going down means that you know

55:12

you're going to do better and dream

55:14

bigger I can be for that and and so

55:16

that's what I'm going to be looking at

55:17

do you think generally that governments

55:20

should generally just have less tax

55:23

receipts and be forced to spend less to

55:25

be more ingenious and less over reliant

55:28

on overpowering things with money yes

55:31

and frankly a lot of that starts with

55:33

the Department of Defense I mean look at

55:35

where the cost drivers are government

55:37

yeah I I think that but that means you

55:39

need to have alliances in the world

55:40

right you're going to have if you're

55:41

going to reduce what you spend on

55:43

defense you better strengthen your

55:45

Partnerships some people on the

55:46

Republican side so I think it's a

55:47

wonderful Point some people on the

55:48

Republican side say this is why energy

55:50

is so important for us because when we

55:52

have resource Independence it actually

55:54

allows us to forge and cast many of our

55:57

relationships abro that then create a

55:59

very different security envelope I so I

56:01

share the the rare earth ex minerals

56:04

caucus and for this reason and it

56:06

probably surprises people that a Bay

56:07

Area Democrat wants to get the US uh you

56:10

know back into Mining and that's because

56:13

we're getting our ass kicked by China on

56:15

this uh on the um you know not just the

56:18

mining but the processing and the

56:19

magnetizing but we do have allies who

56:22

have these resources so we can do it in

56:24

the United States there's Mountain Pass

56:26

where they're doing it with almost 100%

56:29

uh recycled water so you don't have the

56:30

acid Pond issue but you also have

56:32

countries that you could have I I I

56:34

helped fun Jim to get that thing off the

56:37

ground I've been out there and going

56:38

it's an incredible thing but even he he

56:40

will tell you doing these kinds of

56:43

projects in America today is almost next

56:45

to Impossible and the reason he was able

56:46

to do it I mean he has support from

56:48

folks like you which are for thinking

56:50

but the reason was because it had

56:51

already largely been built right and he

56:53

said if he had tried to get it permitted

56:55

that's right uh and it's just a question

56:57

you know less money for the government

56:59

less regulation it it almost seems like

57:02

sometimes if the Republicans say yay the

57:03

Democrats say nay and if the Democrats

57:06

said yay the Republicans would say nay

57:08

but if you ask everybody privately

57:10

everybody agrees the government should

57:11

have less and to your point business

57:13

people should just have more of a wide

57:14

birth to actually go and work and then

57:17

be held to account as I said if the

57:19

wealth is only concentrated at the

57:21

top make sure we can point to people at

57:24

every part of the economic spect yes

57:27

that's like but that's a very reasonable

57:28

thing to say what you're saying well I I

57:30

I hope that's how we govern in this next

57:33

but it doesn't come out that way well I

57:35

think this is a key point that what you

57:38

lead with and what you talk about and

57:40

what you make a priority that will be

57:42

people's perception of your focus right

57:45

and the perception that I have as

57:47

somebody who again has voted Democrat

57:49

two out of three elections is that

57:52

you're focused on and talking about

57:54

things like Dei things like having trans

57:58

kids get surgery and no parent agrees

58:02

with this nobody agrees with this

58:03

they're banning it around the world and

58:05

you guys lead with that that shows a

58:08

lack of prioritization that is palatable

58:11

to the voting populace what they want is

58:14

effective leadership and when you look

58:15

at what happened in Southern California

58:17

it is the height of arrogance that

58:20

they're working on things like Dei and

58:21

saying this is important when the

58:23

reservoir is not filled when they're not

58:25

clearing brush and you have to make

58:27

tradeoffs in the world and you guys

58:28

don't seem to be able to communicate

58:29

that it's incredibly frustrating for me

58:31

you can hear it in my voice that you can

58:33

say you know what we care about nature

58:34

we care about the trees but you can't

58:37

have trees on the floor around homes in

58:39

a fire oh you said floor you didn't say

58:42

ground so no I'm going to not listen to

58:44

you or we can't get minerals that we're

58:47

going to be dependent on China for

58:49

minerals right it we need those minerals

58:53

we cannot be dependent on foreign

58:54

adversaries to make important weapon

58:57

systems to make important things like

58:59

electric vehicles and you guys are

59:01

concerned about the cranes and trans

59:03

kids being able to get surgery that

59:05

nobody wants that's the problem with the

59:07

party we need a better story and I don't

59:09

think stop focusing on those weird

59:11

things don't leave that story with the

59:13

concerns people have with Dei although I

59:15

would argue now the new Dei is Don Eric

59:19

and Ivanka and people probably won't

59:21

like that approach to it uh either is

59:24

that you floating the tri you're trying

59:25

to

59:28

I'm not sure but okay we need a better

59:30

story and I look forward to being that

59:32

the first time

59:34

work we Workshop it yeah yeah you're GNA

59:37

have to Workshop that way yeah I mean

59:39

listen there's a long tradition in these

59:41

parties of the kids being grifters

59:42

Hunter everybody's getting in on it um

59:45

but let's let's close on the borders no

59:48

no hold on before we do that I just want

59:49

to ask you about um should the United

59:50

States spend $200 billion doll to

59:52

acquire Greenland from Denmark I don't

59:55

give a if he tries to acquire Greenland

59:58

I just want the cost of eggs to go down

59:59

that's what my constituents are

60:01

promising knock yourself out go get

60:03

green Minal right security aspect of

60:05

course there's there there's benefits

60:06

there but I I just I want to know you

60:09

said you're going to lower the cost of

60:10

eggs eggs are pretty expensive what like

60:13

how are you going to do that and if you

60:14

can tell me that you know spending $200

60:16

billion to get Greenland is going to

60:18

help lower our cost great but I think

60:20

people want to see costs come down I

60:22

have a question about today I just want

60:24

to actually go back in time uh today are

60:27

there any of President Trump's nominees

60:31

that uh really give you Aida and if so

60:34

who and why and who's inspiring you mean

60:36

give some credit if there's something

60:38

like inspiring yeah who do you like give

60:40

give us one that inspires you and give

60:41

us one I I think Rubio's GNA do a great

60:43

job Secretary State I think he's he has

60:47

the the gravitas and the experience uh

60:50

to do it and I want I want to see that

60:51

happen Kos Patel is the one that I I

60:53

think could destroy the president's uh

60:56

agenda because can you say more well

60:58

what I see and I may be a little bit

61:00

biased because the guy wrote a book he

61:02

listed 100 enemies I'm not in that 100

61:05

I'm actually in the Preamble he starts

61:07

it with of course Adam Schiff and Eric

61:09

swell are the most dangerous people well

61:11

you were part of the house Russia Russi

61:12

investigation but I I do believe if if

61:15

the president focuses on going after his

61:18

enemies he's going to lose the ability

61:21

to bring order to the Border yep to get

61:23

the most violent uh you know the most

61:27

violent undocumented immigrants out of

61:29

the country yeah and make people feel

61:32

safe in communities where they don't

61:33

feel safe what do you think about

61:33

Jason's comment um do you think that we

61:37

should

61:38

systematically uh work through a process

61:40

to deport 15 million illegal I I think

61:43

you should focus on violent

61:46

offenders sexual so let's say you get

61:48

that done in six months what do you do

61:50

after that uh well you also need order

61:52

at the border right I mean and I I

61:54

support surging resources to bring that

61:56

but 40% of my constituents were born

61:58

outside the United States we are the

62:00

eighth wealthiest District in the

62:02

country no thanks to me I'm not

62:04

contributing to that wealth there is a

62:06

straight line between those immigrants

62:09

and that wealth and so if we can find a

62:11

way to address you know shortages in the

62:13

workforce in agriculture Hospitality

62:16

food and beverage of course we see it in

62:18

biotech and Tech I think we can have the

62:21

best in the world I just leave it leave

62:23

you with this a foreign minister uh in

62:26

Asia said to me in the past year he said

62:29

Eric he said you know the population of

62:31

the United States is 3 billion people

62:34

and I looked at him and I said no you

62:35

mean it's like 300 plus million I

62:38

thought he misspoke he said no he said

62:40

there are three billion people in the

62:42

world who would give up everything to

62:45

come to the United States and he said if

62:46

you get it right he said you can pick

62:48

the best that's right absolutely

62:50

recruitment as opposed to immigration is

62:53

a better framework yes go go back please

62:55

you mentioned this uh the house Russia

62:57

investigation created a lot of yeah um

63:01

talking points on both sides that I

63:03

think are still lingering and in the

63:06

spirit of sort of putting it to bed

63:09

um any regrets about that whole process

63:13

uh was there anything substantive that

63:16

came out of It ultimately or was it the

63:18

beginning of this more politically

63:20

directed kind of Action Reaction which

63:23

is now why people are afraid about what

63:25

happen s you know Russia had a preferred

63:28

candidate and they did a lot to try and

63:30

get that guy to win I think he could

63:32

have and I think he may regret that in a

63:36

lot of his trolling he made himself look

63:38

guiltier when he probably could have

63:41

shown us that the concerns we had

63:43

weren't there but I I don't I'm not

63:44

going to dwell on that I'm not going to

63:46

you know focus on the fact that he was

63:48

impeached twice and sent a mob that you

63:50

know could have killed many of the

63:52

people in the capital with me on January

63:53

6 I'm GNA focus on if he wants to bring

63:56

order to the Border make our community

63:58

safer and raise wages and lower costs

64:00

I'm going to work with what I meant what

64:01

I meant more I think that's a ad yeah

64:04

work backwards from yeah an outcome or

64:07

do you think you and Adam actually just

64:08

followed the facts and I was a alam

64:12

County prosecutor uh in the same office

64:14

Earl Warren you know worked in and we

64:16

were trained that it's not about wins

64:18

and losses it's just about doing Justice

64:20

and I approached it just trying to

64:22

follow the fact and when you were

64:23

watching some of the other things that

64:25

happened post all of this yeah like

64:27

what's happening in New York and whatnot

64:28

what were your thoughts for as a

64:29

prosecutor on the legal veracity of some

64:32

of the things that were going on to to

64:34

Trump leading into this

64:36

election a lot of people around him went

64:38

to jail and it felt like well if Michael

64:41

Cohen went to jail like why the is

64:43

this guy not being held to account like

64:46

Michael Cohen went to jail for being a

64:48

part of that hush money settlement so

64:52

again just being a bluecollar kid who

64:54

resents people who think that their

64:56

position entitles them to be better than

65:00

regular folks I just wanted everyone to

65:02

be treated the same and and so that's

65:04

the way I was raised my dad lost his job

65:07

as a cop when he wouldn't essentially be

65:10

get bribed when he wouldn't allow a

65:11

bribe from a mayor um to influence him

65:14

and and he well that's amazing T that

65:17

that was my ear experience in a small

65:20

town in Iowa and he was the police chief

65:22

the mayor very publicly tried to like

65:24

corrupt him and he wouldn't do so my

65:26

earliest memory is that he was willing

65:29

to lose his job to do the right thing no

65:31

but you're saying something very

65:32

important which is everybody should be

65:33

treated the same so correct if if one of

65:35

your kids were charged with a

65:37

misdemeanor would you hope that it was

65:39

just prosecuted as a misdemeanor or do

65:41

you think that folks that may not like

65:43

Eric swall well figure out a way to now

65:44

make it a felony the former yeah okay

65:47

yeah I mean as I said I'm I'm going into

65:50

this open mind what we can do no I'm I'm

65:53

just saying into this New Year open

65:55

minded not focused on the past on what

65:57

we can do to make the country succeed

65:59

yeah and On the Border issue I think

66:03

that's the one where you all could maybe

66:05

get some consensus and some clarity

66:07

because it really does seem to be

66:08

creating an underlying tension in the

66:10

country as to what's going to happen and

66:12

you can't do anything on the workforce

66:13

issues until the public believes youve

66:15

secured the Border that's just a whether

66:17

that's rational or not how much of that

66:19

was why you think kamla lost was just

66:21

her not taking ownership of the Border I

66:24

just think she was attached to an

66:26

incumbent party incumbent parties

66:28

worldwide are just getting pounded and

66:31

there wasn't much that was going to

66:33

change where this thing was going what's

66:35

what's happening in

66:37

California well give us give us the

66:39

grade on G which Republican will be the

66:42

next governor of

66:43

California uh well they they don't have

66:45

their together either by the way

66:46

the Republican party in California um

66:48

look I'm I I was in the palates on

66:50

Monday um I have 10 friends who lost

66:53

everything I was with a woman who stood

66:56

on top of a pile of Ashes that was her

66:59

house looking for any momento for her

67:02

family and it it's it's awful and I I

67:06

will also be open-minded as to what we

67:08

could have done to prevent it to prevent

67:11

it why resources that should have been

67:13

there weren't there and as a member of

67:15

the homeland security committee uh make

67:17

sure that you know we're better prepared

67:19

next time and if there is accountability

67:20

that should have that should come uh to

67:23

be a part of that but like there's fires

67:24

are still burning right now and so I

67:27

don't want to be that Meme where it's

67:28

like you know the guy that like last

67:30

week I was a hostage expert this week

67:32

I'm a wildfire expert us that's that's

67:34

our function my my job is is to look at

67:37

you know what we could have done who

67:40

should be held accountable but with a

67:41

fire still burning and familes you know

67:44

living uh with friends and relatives

67:46

right now um I I don't want to hop I

67:48

don't want to give this a hot take yet

67:50

yeah fair enough fair enough thank you

67:52

all right everybody uh Eric we really

67:54

appreciate your candidness and good luck

67:56

reing the

67:57

party okay thanks awesome great job

68:01

brother all right welcome back to the

68:04

all-in podcast at the inauguration of

68:07

Donald Trump our 47th president and

68:09

we're really delighted to have friend of

68:11

the Pod Rana back on the program he is

68:14

the US Representative for California's

68:16

17th District AKA our hometown Silicon

68:20

Valley how are you Ro honored to be back

68:22

on you made it big time huh You're Now

68:24

like in these

68:26

inauguration Jason's a republican now

68:28

did you know that no I remain a moderate

68:30

Jason I'm holding on to you as the

68:31

Democrat and Silicon Valley I'm a I'm

68:34

I've always been a moderate I like to

68:36

vote for what I believe is the most

68:38

qualified person and this time around I

68:40

was a they call in your business a

68:42

double hater and let's let's get right

68:45

into that with the Democratic party uh

68:47

you guys got shellacked um the candidate

68:50

who you put up didn't go through a

68:51

primary the previous candidate seemed to

68:55

be incognitive decline we can all agree

68:58

and it feels like a bit of a mess in the

69:01

party what is going to happen to the

69:03

Democratic party going forward is there

69:06

a voice saying this is the plan or is it

69:09

a little Game of Thrones right now we're

69:11

all wondering where are the Democrats it

69:13

feels like you went dark and is that a

69:15

strategy to just sort of let Trump have

69:18

his moment and then come back and be

69:21

adversarial or you know State a new

69:23

platform what's going on inside the

69:25

democra party and think crises are times

69:28

for reform and renewal and the reality

69:31

is that this was a huge blow to the

69:34

establishment of the party uh people

69:36

wanted a more competitive process they

69:39

want new voices they want a new

69:41

generation of leadership uh and now

69:44

that's going to emerge and so you're

69:46

seeing it happening in California with

69:48

Dan lurry uh winning in San Francisco

69:50

for mayir Matt Mayan winning in uh San

69:53

Jose you're seeing new people in

69:55

Congress emerging new Governors emerging

69:58

and so I think that there's going to be

69:59

a lot of reflection one of the things

70:01

I've said is the Democrats need to spend

70:04

as much time understanding why many

70:07

Americans voted for Donald Trump as we

70:09

do criticizing Donald Trump and uh I

70:12

think you're starting to see that happen

70:15

what do you think the new platform will

70:16

be if you had to think of you know

70:20

things to remove from the platform and

70:22

things to prioritize in the platform if

70:24

you were in charge or Jean Phillips

70:25

friend of the pot as well um there's

70:27

some people who who feel you know

70:29

there's more important issues than the

70:31

ones that maybe you've been focused on

70:34

that you the Democratic party has been

70:36

focused on for this last election cycle

70:38

so maybe give us two or three ideas of

70:40

what you would add to the agenda and two

70:41

or three things that you might say hey

70:43

this isn't a priority for Americans

70:44

anymore I think the whole thing has to

70:46

be about prioritizing the economy the

70:49

economic independence of Americans how

70:51

are we going to have economic renewal

70:54

economic growth uh in a stagnant working

70:57

in middle class and then let's argue our

70:59

different Visions Donald Trump says that

71:01

the way he's going to turn around

71:03

Johnstown and Youngstown and down river

71:06

Michigan is just with uh a large tax

71:09

cuts and deregulation our view has got

71:11

to be that it has to involve technology

71:14

leaders Business Leaders but also

71:16

strategic government Investments to be

71:18

able to build new industry there to be

71:20

able to credential new folks there to be

71:23

able to build a Workforce but we have to

71:25

offer a compelling economic vision and

71:28

then an economic Vision so people aren't

71:30

dependent on uh the denials of Private

71:33

health insurance and so that they have

71:34

child care but I think whoever wins the

71:36

argument that there's going to lead

71:38

America in the 21st century on the

71:40

economy uh and on economic independence

71:43

is going to win Ro do you you you're

71:44

saying government investment in building

71:47

new businesses building new Industries

71:49

is necessary to achieve that vision and

71:51

that's a better alternative what is the

71:53

historical

71:55

kind of examples where um policies where

71:58

government was going to go start new

72:00

Investments start fundamentally

72:02

supporting new businesses being built

72:04

that's worked successfully and work

72:05

better than free markets like the the

72:08

the the Republican argument is the free

72:09

market is more efficient the free market

72:10

works better let capital and capitalists

72:14

find where the capital is best applied

72:15

it'll be more efficiently utilized

72:17

versus government making the decision

72:19

about where Capital should go it's

72:20

typically lower Roi very often negative

72:23

Roi and doesn't actually create aable

72:26

economic growth I think ask me

72:28

government investment that's Market

72:29

sustainable but you look at Hamilton you

72:32

look at Lincoln and you look at FDR that

72:34

is in my view what Built America

72:36

infrastructure uh well it's

72:37

infrastructure but it's also

72:39

manufacturing I mean I have a build to

72:41

build new steel plants in Johnstown in

72:44

Ohio now you need the private sector you

72:46

need Cleveland Cliffs you need a a

72:48

private Steel company but if we're going

72:50

to finance that the scaling of that uh

72:53

the federal government has to have some

72:55

role uh and what we ended up having in

72:58

free market uh economics is China last

73:02

week one trillion dollar Trade Surplus

73:06

now we are at almost a trillion dollar

73:08

trade deficit yep you know the economics

73:10

well so that's financed with a capital

73:12

account Surplus that means all that

73:14

money is coming into to Wall Street wall

73:16

Street's doing really well the finance

73:17

sector is doing really well but it's

73:18

hollowed out our manufacturing base it's

73:20

hollowed out our industrial base that is

73:23

free market economics gone too far

73:26

that's globalization is what some of the

73:27

non- neocon Republicans would say is

73:30

that global trade versus cut off some of

73:33

the global trade create a tariff program

73:35

with China and will reignite

73:37

manufacturing that's kind of a a counter

73:39

policy argument but to your point it's a

73:40

different point of view that uses

73:42

different set of data to make the case

73:44

and I I'd agree with some of the

73:46

Strategic terrorist I just don't think

73:47

that's going to be enough for us to have

73:49

pill factories here have uh the steel

73:53

factories aluminum factories to to

73:55

Revitalize these areas and to look at

73:57

what is the invest you think we need

73:58

government programs I think we need

74:00

government partnering with the private

74:01

sector and on DG so you know do you feel

74:05

and does the party feel that there

74:07

should be no deregulatory effort in the

74:09

United States to unleash kind of you

74:13

know economic investment and growth or

74:15

like this this whole point just you know

74:17

it just feels wrong to me to say like we

74:19

don't want DG like shouldn't DG be a

74:21

thing that we're always cutting back

74:22

things bureaucracy bureaucratic red tape

74:24

that we've created to unleash I mean

74:26

even Gavin H's making this claim now in

74:27

California with respect to the

74:28

rebuilding I I think you need Effective

74:30

Government I think execution matters and

74:33

I think there's Fair criticisms to say

74:35

that the execution of the chips and

74:37

science act which I helped WR or the IRA

74:39

wasn't enough I mean the money didn't

74:41

get out fast enough the the bureaucracy

74:44

in permitting uh was uh was slow and if

74:47

there are ways to make government

74:49

procurement more competitive that is

74:51

good I mean why is it that five primes

74:53

are dominating uh the defense

74:55

procurement system so Michael Bloomberg

74:57

had a plan which I think seems pretty

74:59

reasonable have 15% of Department of

75:02

Defense spending for startups and

75:04

Innovative uh technology as opposed to

75:06

just going for the five primes that's

75:08

regulatory reform but we also have to

75:11

look at the fundamental why is Intel not

75:13

succeeding we asked PT Ginger who was uh

75:16

asked to leave in Intel uh and I said is

75:20

it was it the permitting reform and he

75:21

said no it's that the the the capital

75:23

expenditures to make wall Street's

75:25

numbers uh were was very high and there

75:28

was no no procurement Apple everything's

75:30

too expensive in this country by the way

75:31

this goes back to nuclear energy it's

75:34

too expensive to build a gigawatt of

75:36

nuclear power in this country it's too

75:38

takes too long meanwhile China can do it

75:40

for about a tenth of the price and

75:41

they're scaling up 300 XR rate in terms

75:43

of new energy production and they can do

75:45

it in half the time half the time a

75:48

tenth of the cost and there's a

75:49

regulatory path for Gen 4 reactors going

75:52

up in China versus here I'm for nuclear

75:54

energy for smart modular nuclear energy

75:56

I'm for looking at how we uh build

75:59

nuclear energy here in the United States

76:01

in a safe way but in one that I agree

76:04

that our part my party has been opposed

76:06

to largely so this is really important

76:08

because I think what happens is the

76:10

Republicans order Democrats will come

76:11

forward with a general policy statement

76:14

we need to DG to unleash economic

76:16

Prosperity or DG to unleash nuclear but

76:19

the the other party then says well we've

76:21

got to figure out a way to attack them

76:23

on that vector and then they take this

76:25

like diametrically opposed point of view

76:27

to try and diminish the strength that

76:29

they're gaining because of their strong

76:31

policy perspective that may be good for

76:32

America and then we end up in this

76:34

unfortunate circumstance where we can't

76:36

ever align on the things that really are

76:38

good for America that's how I feel as an

76:40

American looking at how the the parties

76:42

attack each other one party says this is

76:44

a good thing for America why doesn't the

76:45

other party say you're absolutely right

76:47

we all agree on that let's move forward

76:48

can you can you give the win on Doge

76:50

like government efficiency seems like

76:52

consensus well I've gotten criticized

76:55

because I put out an innocent tweet and

76:57

have said that uh if musk and ramaswami

77:00

have a good idea then I want to look at

77:03

that and you know musk disrupted the

77:06

entire pentagon with SpaceX I mean he

77:08

worked with Ash Carter to do that the

77:09

track record's there the track record is

77:11

there so if he's going to and you have

77:13

all of the progressives like me saying

77:14

the defense budget is bloated 56% of

77:17

spending we need to figure out how to

77:19

have more competition we need to look at

77:21

the waste that is there I mean spending

77:23

$150,000 on soap dispensers and so now

77:26

if musk is it's really is Boeing

77:29

$150,000 60 Minutes

77:32

$1,00 for breast pumps I mean I think

77:34

it's outrageous yeah and so now because

77:37

musk is saying let's look at the defense

77:39

department you don't want to do it even

77:41

though you've been saying to do that for

77:42

the past five six years that's the stuff

77:44

that drives people crazy or I Flo in uh

77:48

you know that Bob Iger would be a a good

77:50

person to run next time for for mayor of

77:52

of La he's considering it well I mean

77:55

did he tell you that when you talking

77:56

yeah I don't want to to talk about what

77:58

he what we've talked about privately I

77:59

just think he'd be you did ask him I did

78:02

ask him I I I and so now I'm getting uh

78:05

attacked for well am I for an oligarch

78:07

that's that's literally my my Twitter

78:09

stream B's an oligarch you look at

78:12

Disney I said I want someone who's going

78:14

to rebuild this this place he it would

78:16

actually be a public service for him

78:18

after I want popcorn and lemonade stands

78:20

on every corner in

78:22

La FDR FDR went FDR was one of the

78:25

wealthiest people John F Kennedy so I

78:27

think there's got to be a there's got to

78:29

be common sense yeah how do we actually

78:32

help people that has to be the the

78:35

metric and willingness to to to work

78:37

across the A on things yeah it it does

78:39

seem in the wake of what's happened in

78:43

Southern California Pacific Palisades

78:45

and all the other regions uh that were

78:47

impacted that a large number of

78:50

affluent um and and voters and people

78:54

who are AC in politics are now saying

78:56

it's kind of enough the progressivism

78:59

went too far left we need really

79:02

qualified people in office and so what

79:04

do you think's going to happen in

79:06

California and what impact do you think

79:09

these 12,000 14,000 homes being

79:12

destroyed and of course the 25 people

79:14

who lost their lives tragically what

79:16

impact is that going to have is you

79:17

think that's a turning point in some

79:18

ways I do I I mean first of all it's

79:20

just horrific and I'm sure you know

79:23

people CP friends who lost lost their

79:26

homes they're alive and that's what's

79:27

important but they did lose everything

79:29

they lost everything and I mean a place

79:31

has just burned down it's it's it's

79:34

devastating and I think it's just a

79:36

culmination in California of something

79:38

that's been creeping up which is

79:40

governance matters execution matters yes

79:44

keeping places safe matters making sure

79:47

that we're pragmatic matters and that's

79:49

why you saw Dan Lorry win that's why you

79:51

saw Matt Mayhan win that's why you've

79:53

seen uh sort of reason able people in

79:56

District Attorneys when I think that's

79:58

and you're going to see that in La I

79:59

think you're going to see that in the

80:00

governor's race I I do think California

80:03

is saying regardless of your ideology on

80:06

issues we need to be able to govern well

80:09

so you have the economy um I think

80:12

safety's up there for folks uh what else

80:15

do you think on that short list of

80:16

things that the party in California

80:21

could say to the voters in terms of

80:24

winning them back and letting them

80:27

understand you're focused on something

80:28

other than in their perception Dei maybe

80:32

environmental overreach I can't believe

80:34

I'm saying that but like the fact that

80:35

people don't believe in clearing the

80:37

forest around homes and they're fighting

80:39

it on environmental grounds well I mean

80:42

it doesn't take a rocket science to

80:44

understand rocket scientist to

80:46

understand that these wildfires have

80:48

been occurring for a long time you got

80:51

the salt in of science here who can go

80:52

into the science of it and that if you

80:54

want to live live near a forest in a

80:56

fire zone you kind of got to clean up

80:58

the detrius on the forest floor like it

81:01

feels like we you know the the the

81:04

leadership in California is kind of

81:06

pressing company excluded kind of lost

81:07

the script here huh I think it's

81:09

reasonable to ask why the brush wasn't

81:11

cleared outside La I got in trouble for

81:14

asking that I said these are legitimate

81:16

questions that's not going after people

81:18

and I supported Karen bass in disclos

81:20

full disclosure against Rich Caruso I

81:22

was PRI to do it but if Caruso asked

81:24

reasonable questions the whole point of

81:26

being in governance is you say okay the

81:29

guy had a good point you're disappointed

81:30

in her performance the fact that she's

81:31

out of the country going back in time

81:33

would you vote would you have endorsed

81:35

Caruso knowing what you know now I I

81:37

don't know if I would have endorsed him

81:38

but I I I I certainly think it's fair to

81:41

say that people are disappointed in

81:42

what's what's happening I'd Endo someone

81:45

like Iger or others I think there's I

81:47

certainly think there needs to be a a

81:49

new mayor do you think there was any

81:51

reason for her to be in

81:52

Ghana but she said she said says that

81:54

she went on uh the presid the

81:57

inauguration of the president the

81:58

inauguration I I she was in a palace

82:01

having cocktails yeah whether if there

82:03

were actual warnings before I think she

82:05

would probably say she should she even

82:07

be going to Ghana as the mayor of a city

82:09

that has no economic vacation I suppose

82:11

no well that no look that's a common

82:14

thing where the president of both

82:15

parties ask people Mayors Governors I

82:18

haven't been asked as the congressman

82:20

yet to to represent them at a at a

82:22

forign inauguration is that yeah that's

82:24

a common thing and I don't if there

82:26

weren't the warnings I don't think

82:27

that's a big big issue or know she's

82:29

going to Paris because you know the uh

82:31

La is hosting the Olympics the question

82:33

is though your first priority and if

82:35

there were warnings if she should

82:37

explain why why why why she didn't go

82:40

and I I like her I think she's a good

82:42

person but the question is uh what is it

82:45

going to take going forward but the big

82:46

point about one of the points about what

82:49

what we need to do differently other

82:50

than the economics is we've got to also

82:52

go around the country and say my party

82:53

is not going to look down on people who

82:56

we have different uh cultural or social

82:58

viewpoints with I think there was this

83:00

sense of condescension and that if you

83:03

disagree with someone somehow our party

83:05

is morally Superior and that's got to

83:07

stop and this whole thing about if we

83:09

disagree the policy generally is wrong

83:12

which is I think disting distinguishing

83:15

the policy from the party

83:18

um do you think California has a chance

83:21

of electing a republican governor in 26

83:24

do you think that that chance is now

83:26

greater than 50% after the

83:29

wildfires I still think and I will uh

83:32

support most likely the Democrat I mean

83:34

whoever the good a good Democrat is

83:36

there are a lot of good Democrats uh

83:38

that can run but you know I mean AR

83:40

schweger was a Republican and can a

83:43

republican who is a pro-choice and take

83:46

some of the social issues off the table

83:47

be competitive yeah I think the

83:49

Democratic party would be naive uh to

83:52

take that for granted and we need to

83:53

have thoughtful strong people on our

83:56

side run and run understanding people

83:59

care about Public Safety they want

84:01

Effective Government they want uh reform

84:03

I mean people like Matt Mayhan uh who

84:05

now have had a couple years and have

84:07

been effective uh are are the type of

84:10

Democrats I think that can win Statewide

84:12

what are your thoughts on um Tik Tock uh

84:16

going dark in the last 24 hours here

84:18

it's terrible i've been I've been vocal

84:20

we had 1.3 million people sign a

84:22

petition never had that in ERS of

84:25

magnitude saying keep uh Tik Tock uh

84:28

because they like the product or they

84:29

make a living on it it's yeah it's first

84:31

of all it's the the stories about people

84:33

who make a living I there was one person

84:35

a content creator her husband cheated on

84:37

her abusive marriage she leaves she's

84:40

got four kids uh two toddlers uh and two

84:44

people around two kids around five and

84:47

she's broke she's in a hotel uh she's

84:49

staying in her best friend's uh living

84:51

room for 4 months and then she starts

84:53

telling her story and now she's making

84:54

60 770,000 as a content creator I could

84:57

tell you 50 stories like this of people

84:59

are actually relying on this for their

85:01

livelihood some people are making it

85:03

making using it to make rent and then

85:06

you have the issue of free speech and uh

85:08

just being able to express it now people

85:10

say what about China well why don't you

85:12

pass a broad uh broader law that says

85:16

any interference by a foreign government

85:18

in algorithms is going to be illegal and

85:20

criminal Well India banned these apps

85:23

and we're not India they're prettyy

85:25

Savvy though I mean these things are an

85:27

attack Vector you can remotely control

85:30

these phones they were caught spying on

85:33

journalists and uh they could shape

85:35

public policy so and they've had years

85:37

to divest seems to me that the Chinese

85:40

government sees this as a strategic

85:42

military asset do you disagree with that

85:45

I do I one I think the United States has

85:47

a much much more robust tradition of

85:49

free speech than in than in India and

85:52

and so I think our consider are are

85:55

different I also think we have far more

85:57

capability in making sure that we

85:59

protect our data uh and protect any

86:02

foreign interference in algorithms now

86:05

president Trump has floated this idea

86:07

that uh you have 50% us ownership my

86:10

understanding is 60% of the investors

86:12

already are are us investors uh I will

86:15

work with him and Mike Waltz I know very

86:17

well we were co-chair of the India

86:19

caucus together in Congress I will work

86:21

with them in a bipartisan way to figure

86:22

out how do we have this app operational

86:25

if the Chinese government spies on their

86:26

own people why wouldn't they spy on

86:28

their adversary the American people well

86:31

certainly they would but the question is

86:32

are they uh can we protect the American

86:34

people from that happening on this app

86:37

we can uh as long as we have two clear

86:40

laws one that the data stays here by the

86:43

way a lot of the data that's going to CH

86:44

the China communist party is through

86:46

data Brokers there's no law against that

86:48

so pass a law that all data of Americans

86:51

if it goes to in the hands which by the

86:52

way there's us companies that are

86:53

selling that that data there's us

86:54

companies that are buying that data any

86:56

third party can access that data if they

86:58

want to buy it in one of the markets

87:00

that stuff exists it's existed for a

87:01

very long time yeah and and the irony of

87:05

it is going back to the trade deficit

87:07

China's got a the same week China

87:09

announces one trillion dollar Trade

87:11

Surplus they're building more drones

87:12

than us more ships than us more steel

87:15

than us uh we're talking about banning

87:17

this Tik Tock app electricity yeah know

87:19

what about the concept of reciprocity

87:21

would you be uh in favor of requiring

87:25

that we have our social networks in

87:26

China if they want to have theirs here I

87:29

would be in favor of us pushing for our

87:31

social media networks to be there just

87:33

because of Free Speech but I would not

87:35

allow the Chinese Communist party to be

87:38

controlling any social media app or

87:41

having any influence whether it's on Tik

87:43

Tok or whether it's on uh any other app

87:45

I don't want to name another app because

87:46

I don't want to malign other apps uh uh

87:49

incorrectly but they pass a law that

87:51

says it's a criminal offense if an

87:53

executive this country is found

87:56

collaborating or overseeing any app that

87:59

has any influence in the algorithms by

88:01

the Chinese Communist party or if our

88:03

data goes to the in the hands of the

88:04

Chinese Communist party you could you

88:06

could have a law while still keeping Tik

88:08

Tock operational yeah you litigate the

88:10

outcome you don't litigate the method I

88:12

I don't trust China as much as your

88:13

gentleman do um talk about Jason it's

88:16

not about trusting China and you keep

88:17

trying to characterize it as like people

88:18

being pro China if they're Pro free

88:20

speech or they're Pro giving people the

88:22

only platform you can you're making you

88:24

continue to make assumptions about

88:26

security when there are security issues

88:28

with a lot of apps and security issues

88:29

with a lot of phones they don't have the

88:31

same scale as Tik Tok this great the

88:33

scale of Tik Tok is extraordinary I'll

88:34

tell you where we got the politics wrong

88:36

I I mean so Donald Trump comes in there

88:39

and he says you know what the Chinese

88:41

took your jobs they took your steel jobs

88:43

they took your auto jobs and we're going

88:45

to have tariffs and by the way this Tik

88:48

Tock thing pretty popular app for young

88:51

people we're going to keep it what do

88:53

what what do we do we do the exact

88:55

opposite we are running ads we don't

88:57

want tariffs so we're telling all these

88:59

folks in the midwest that we're opposed

89:01

to the policies that could save some of

89:03

their jobs and then we're telling all

89:05

these young people that we want to ban

89:07

Tik Tok and fair they didn't take the

89:09

jobs we gave them to them at some point

89:12

I think we've got it one of the things

89:13

the Democrats need to do is stop

89:15

listening to the foreign policy blob and

89:17

the Beltway exe you know uh pundits who

89:21

got fancy titles and fancy think tanks

89:24

every time we get these letters 500

89:26

groups 200 groups I said who are these

89:28

groups these are 200 groups with 130

89:30

people it's like every person as three

89:32

groups and we're listening to them as

89:34

opposed

89:35

to I just popped up five groups while

89:37

we're speaking here you know and I and I

89:39

think part of what Trump was doing I

89:41

mean I I and I obviously totally oppose

89:43

him I voted for his impeachment twice

89:44

but it was sort of like in the in our

89:47

world AB testing or fast uh iterations

89:50

he' put out ideas he' get feedback he

89:53

iterates it may not call it that but

89:55

he's just kind of gauging where people

89:56

let's talk about one of those ideas

89:58

Americans want the border secure there's

90:00

no doubt about that the statistics just

90:01

show it 80% Americans want it kind of

90:04

shut down and be orderly and legal maybe

90:06

even more um but this idea that we're

90:10

going to drag 15 million people out of

90:12

the

90:13

country word drag because he continues

90:15

to no I'm just quoting Steve Bannon and

90:17

uh Stephen Miller who work uh one of

90:19

them worked in the first Administration

90:21

and architect is first win and the other

90:23

one is the most powerful person inside

90:25

the administration this time so I'm just

90:26

quoting people they say day one 15

90:28

million are going so do you think that's

90:32

actually going to happen and do you

90:33

think it should happen it shouldn't

90:36

happen whether it's actually going to

90:38

happen or not I don't know is the answer

90:41

whether they're going to try what do you

90:42

think should happen I think you should

90:44

have people who are convicted first of

90:46

all we need a secure border uh we need

90:49

to encourage people to come here through

90:52

the legal process like my parents did or

90:55

like so many you say encourage do you

90:56

say encourage or require require but but

90:59

but to do that we've got to have reform

91:01

to make that more possible because right

91:03

now that's a a a a very hard thing to do

91:07

uh and it wasn't as hard by the way when

91:08

my father came and the 1960s studied

91:11

engineering had a green card within

91:13

months of of of graduating so how do we

91:16

do that but of course uh require people

91:19

to come through the legal process uh and

91:21

secure the Border I don't deny that

91:23

there's been

91:24

the but and then for those who are

91:27

criminals here who are convicted

91:29

convicted of crimes fine Deport people

91:32

we all agree on that those all seem

91:34

logical and and obvious but but in terms

91:37

of so let me tell you someone in my

91:38

district without telling her name and

91:40

you you tell me what what should happen

91:41

with this person she's a she's been in

91:43

the country she's undocumented she came

91:45

to to to see me with a a group of people

91:49

uh she's a dental hygienist uh her

91:52

daughter is going to med school she

91:53

undocumented she's undocumented do you

91:55

consider yourself to be her

91:57

representative she's not a citizen of

91:58

the United States she doesn't have a

92:00

legal right to vote are you representing

92:02

that undocumented non-american person I

92:04

am supposed to represent everyone in the

92:06

district that lives there regardless of

92:08

their citizenry I I my my citizenship I

92:12

don't we don't ask in terms of their

92:14

citizenship in terms of just being a

92:16

representative of the area if everyone

92:18

no I won't but as a congress member you

92:19

believe that you should represent

92:21

non-americans that happen to be iled in

92:24

your region in your District I don't

92:26

think I don't think that I need to

92:27

represent their political views but if

92:29

they're being abused in terms of the

92:32

process in some way and they came to us

92:34

within the law uh we would figure out

92:37

how they got due process now would have

92:40

empathy and sympathy for the person

92:42

living in your District even if they

92:43

weren't legal is what you're saying I

92:45

think it's quite reasonable if I may

92:47

interpret yeah I mean that's that's a

92:48

more eloquent way of putting it but let

92:49

me just tell you about this this person

92:51

so she's she her daughter is in uh med

92:55

school in in Southern California she

92:57

drives down once a month and drives back

93:00

cuz she can't afford a hotel down there

93:02

and the reason she can't afford a hotel

93:03

is she's being underpaid as a dental

93:05

hygienist for 20 years now do you really

93:08

think we need to deport her and what is

93:10

that going to do to our daughter or do

93:11

can we find a path sounds like a great

93:14

potential American so well the the the

93:16

um the alternative point of view someone

93:18

would say I'll play the The Advocate the

93:20

devil's advocate here they would say but

93:22

there is another American who is

93:24

qualified to be a dental hygienist who

93:26

cannot get a job who would be getting

93:28

paid more because they are a citizen and

93:30

they are legal and documented this

93:32

person is undercharging their employer

93:35

and they are taking a job away from

93:37

American that's what the counterargument

93:38

would be from some people so there are

93:39

two things one I agree that if there's

93:42

someone who is in a position that is

93:44

undocumented or even on an H1B and they

93:47

are being underpaid that's wrong that's

93:50

why we need reform so that people are

93:52

being paid appropriately and aren't

93:55

being employers aren't abusing the

93:57

process to drive down Market wages but

93:59

the argument that they're taking

94:01

American jobs misses a central point and

94:03

that is when you have a immigrant as a

94:06

worker yes you're increasing the labor

94:08

Supply and the supp if you increase

94:10

Supply that drives down price or wages

94:13

but you're also increasing demand

94:14

because they're spending a lot of money

94:16

on things and most I've always viewed

94:18

this to be more of a demand part of the

94:20

equation for growing the US population

94:22

is you can actually increase the

94:23

economic growth so let's put a number on

94:25

this you know so clearly you don't

94:27

believe these people should be dragged

94:28

out of the country correct I think we're

94:30

in agreement on that some people are not

94:33

magga 1.0 do you believe they should be

94:35

dragged out it's a long uh let's I don't

94:37

want to put you on this F no no it's

94:39

it's not that simple um and I'm really

94:41

hung over today so I'm not going to be

94:42

super articulate about it um what about

94:45

that Dental High J who's been here for

94:46

20 years would you give her amnesty I

94:48

would seems like a great

94:50

American working hard a ly being

94:54

empathetic I think for me would always

94:56

be a priority that person should not

94:57

lose their job lose their life that's a

95:00

very hard circumstance at the same time

95:02

there are a lot of Americans who feel

95:04

they are getting underpaid that they

95:05

don't have jobs and there's empathy that

95:07

I think is part of the alternative side

95:08

of that equation so I would you know let

95:11

me let me ask this question whenever we

95:13

talk about

95:14

immigration we never have a number put

95:16

on it and we never have a point we don't

95:19

have a point based system here so it

95:21

devolves into this discussion we're

95:23

having right here which is oh they they

95:24

stole our jobs and wages are down in the

95:27

face of the lowest unemployment of our

95:29

lifetime uh 4% and seven eight million

95:32

jobs out there there's two jobs for

95:34

every person who's unemployed if you do

95:35

that basic math now of course there's

95:37

some disparity in people having the

95:39

skills to take certain jobs and and

95:41

geography putting all that aside we have

95:43

340 million Americans would a would an

95:45

easy situation here be to say we will

95:48

import People based on the need in the

95:50

country so if we don't have enough

95:52

people working in healthcare we're going

95:54

to open up um and if unemployment's

95:57

under 10% we'll have three million

95:59

people coming a year we'll have two

96:00

million people coming a year and just

96:01

put a number on it and then have

96:03

Americans and our Representatives debate

96:05

that number why don't you guys do this

96:09

well I say two things I think my view of

96:10

why we have lost jobs and stagnation has

96:13

been the offshoring of so much of our

96:14

industry and the hollowing out of towns

96:17

and communities where we just watched as

96:20

wealth piled up in districts like ours

96:21

not because we people in our district

96:24

stole the wealth from Youngstown or down

96:26

river it's just that the wealth was

96:28

piling up industry was being offshored

96:30

and there was kind of indifference

96:31

towards it and if we want real solutions

96:34

we need to have economic revitalization

96:36

instead of blaming the dental hygienist

96:37

in my district like that's not why uh

96:40

you know Johnstown or war in Ohio are

96:43

suffering they the broader point though

96:45

is that we have a number on uh green

96:47

cards and uh legal immigrants around 1.4

96:50

million a year uh and then we should de

96:54

how do we uh where which categories do

96:56

you want to increase it why uh and how

96:58

do you get people out of these status

97:00

where they're being underpaid I do think

97:02

that's what's hurting is this is whether

97:04

you're on an H1 and you're there for

97:06

years and you're being underpaid uh or

97:08

whether you're undocumented and being

97:10

underpaid that's hurts the American

97:12

worker far more than when that's such an

97:14

important Point people don't understand

97:16

this about the h-1bs is they are

97:18

transferable but you have 30 days which

97:20

makes essentially as it was explained to

97:23

me when I was in the it business these

97:25

are indentured servants and they don't

97:27

have choice and they have this you know

97:29

threat that they're constantly under if

97:31

you don't do what we say as an employer

97:33

and you don't accept the salary you're

97:34

going to be out of the country exactly

97:36

and you're going to have to take your

97:37

family with you would an easier solution

97:38

to be to just charge 10% of the salary

97:40

into a pool as a tax so people don't

97:43

abuse it the salaries go up have a

97:45

minimum salary and give them maybe a

97:47

year to find another job what do you

97:49

think of that I I think that type of a

97:52

solution is reasonable and have them be

97:54

paid well I mean this idea that they're

97:55

being abused you know put a floor or

97:58

have it be the prioritized based on the

98:01

the highest wages because that's a

98:02

reflective of uh talent coming in uh but

98:06

you know you don't want a situation like

98:07

now where you're on a H1 for three years

98:09

then you get it extended uh because you

98:12

apply for a green card to six years and

98:13

then while your green card application

98:15

is in process it keeps getting extended

98:17

so these folks are here 10 12 years and

98:20

and and and the abuse of it and and my

98:22

view is you know I think the American

98:24

people are pretty decent and fair I grew

98:26

up in Bucks County Pennsylvania It was

98:28

95 98% white it was a few

98:32

indian-american families and I grew up

98:33

with a belief that you could do anything

98:35

in America look at you and and you know

98:37

the country trusted me to represent a

98:39

district with1 trillion of value of the

98:42

most

98:43

economically prosperous Place perhaps in

98:45

the history of humanity Pro

98:48

perhaps right and I I I just think that

98:51

that is America and people are upset at

98:54

the extremes they're upset at the abuses

98:56

they're upset that there wasn't a

98:57

process at the border but deep down this

98:59

country has always been one that

99:02

Embraces uh immigration and most IM

99:04

almost most immigrants tend to be very

99:07

patriotic so when you hear Stephen

99:09

Miller say America is for Americans and

99:11

American only you think that flies in

99:12

the face of the spirit of this country I

99:16

say what does he mean by Americans I you

99:18

know what I want to do I'd love to have

99:19

lunch with them actually you know maybe

99:22

have him on all be great yeah you want

99:25

to join for that if we I'd love to and

99:27

you know we should all instead of just

99:28

reading every tweet you know read

99:30

Lincoln's I heard he's a guy that if you

99:32

sit down with him and have a long form

99:33

conversation you get a lot more than

99:35

what the the short form media uh bites

99:37

have been about him so I'd actually be

99:40

really yeah no I would love to have M

99:41

because I watch his entire speech and

99:42

the way he speaks seems incredibly

99:44

xenophobic and a bit racist to me so

99:46

what I would I would argue what I would

99:48

ask him about is is is without being too

99:52

uh uh pedantic about history is Lincoln

99:55

has the speech in 1858 uh on

99:57

Independence Day and the challenge for

100:00

Lincoln is to say how is a German

100:01

American or French americanamerican

100:02

because back then to be American you

100:04

literally had to trace one

100:07

great-grandparent who fought the

100:08

Revolutionary War how could you be

100:10

American if no one in your family fought

100:11

the Revolutionary War and Lincoln has

100:14

This brilliant formulation that he says

100:15

you're flesh of the Flesh Blood of the

100:17

blood uh of the founders if you believe

100:19

in the Constitution if you believe in

100:21

the Declaration of Independence and so

100:23

I'd say to Stephen do you do you still

100:25

believe that what how are you define

100:27

okay if you don't too right I mean we

100:28

could have that discussion in America if

100:29

we're pulling the ladder up now and

100:31

we're not a land of immigrants but I

100:33

agree with you I'm an immigrant I think

100:34

the immigrants are the most patriotic

100:36

that's why I believe in because you free

100:38

everything with well I mean you should

100:40

because You' done great things and look

100:41

what you're going to do for here from

100:44

sou you know South Africa when I was six

100:45

years old and I'm hanging out in

100:47

Washington DC with a congressman and how

100:48

many jobs have you created the president

100:50

and the vice president I get to meet all

100:51

these people and hang out with them and

100:53

you've created thousands of jobs and

100:56

you're going to create billions of extra

100:57

calories with these amazing Ohana

100:59

strawberries ohal is the

101:02

name I think I think my company might

101:04

actually be in your District you cover

101:05

Santa Cruz County uh no that's Jimmy

101:07

Panetta I see okay all right well no

101:08

favor sorry let me ask you a question um

101:10

do you think the United States should

101:11

spend $200 billion to acquire Greenland

101:13

from Denmark Denmark has $150

101:17

billion um uh debt they could build a

101:20

public pension plan they could here's

101:23

what are we trying to solve F first of

101:25

all I'm a a person that believes that we

101:27

need to respect the self-determination

101:29

of other countries that's what makes us

101:30

different than Britain that makes us

101:32

different than Rome the America you know

101:34

might even though we intervene in

101:35

foreign elections and use military force

101:38

to overturn foreign governments well

101:41

nobody's perfect there you go there you

101:43

go I gotta get this guy he's got my

101:46

talk you know if you ever if you ever

101:48

need a hype man or a campaign manager

101:50

let's go when you do your when you do

101:52

your run for governor yeah exactly by

101:54

the way this show has been brought to

101:55

you not only by row but also Roman go to

101:58

get Roman row we got to wrap up you got

102:00

to go no no hold on I want to hear the

102:01

Greenland

102:03

green no but but the question is why

102:06

what interest does Greenland have they

102:08

have critical minerals they have uh a

102:10

lot of uh important resources and

102:14

basically they want to partner

102:15

economically with us they're letting us

102:17

invest they're letting us develop it so

102:20

what what what what do we gain so you're

102:21

saying we could achieve our objective

102:23

without without it becoming a Terr what

102:25

about Puerto Ric by way do you really

102:27

want here's here's my cautionary tale I

102:29

think this could be the dispositive

102:31

argument every time Bernie Sanders ran

102:34

you know what he talked about the

102:36

politics of Denmark you only want

102:38

Greenland as state we're gonna get to

102:40

Denmark they call it getting to Denmark

102:42

GRE is gonna that's gonna that those two

102:45

senators are going to be Democratic

102:47

senators watch the interviews that have

102:49

come out on Twitter from the people that

102:50

live in Greenland they're sick of the

102:51

Socialist you know kind of overseers I

102:54

think they do want to have a different

102:55

way of governing I don't know I'm gonna

102:57

have more kids if I get two years of

102:58

fraternity it sounds pretty amazing yeah

103:01

but it is I mean look I I don't think

103:02

that you're necessarily getting that but

103:03

there's aboutto Ric it's an important

103:05

question is like does um does the United

103:09

States need territorial Dominion to

103:13

achieve its strategic objectives I'm

103:15

open I'm openminded what about Puerto

103:16

Rico well I there it too like look every

103:19

Democrat is like oh we want Porto R why

103:21

because you're going to get two

103:21

Democratic senators in Cong people but

103:24

my view is it should be a Puerto Rico

103:25

self a referendum 8 90% want to do it

103:28

you'd be down yes if they want to join

103:30

the United States because that's a

103:31

different thing there there we you know

103:33

we basically took that as a territory

103:34

now let's see what they want to do I'm

103:37

all for it let's go straight to 60

103:38

states are you are you running for

103:39

governor of California no are you why

103:42

not you done such a great job you you're

103:45

a no not you WR I I I I think I I think

103:50

there's a I I love being in Congress I

103:52

love representing Valley and I have been

103:54

focused on how do we get uh innovation

103:57

technology partnering with communities

103:59

to to have economic rev if you were

104:02

asked would you consider but didn't I

104:03

see a rumor this week that someone said

104:04

something that you were am I wrong I

104:06

think someone may have floated a rumor

104:08

I'm trying to get out asked by your

104:09

party and the citizens of California

104:11

would you consider would you consider it

104:13

is that's just a consider I consider

104:15

anything you know there you go all right

104:17

he consider your campaign manager my my

104:20

I need I mean he's good well I got some

104:23

he's got his moments I'll give him

104:26

that that's a wrap from the 47th

104:30

inauguration of the United States and

104:31

we'll see you next time byebye

Interactive Summary

The "All-in inauguration special" discusses Donald Trump's second term with three guests: Tom Emmer, Eric Swalwell, and Ro Khanna. Tom Emmer, a Republican, critiques the Democratic Party's top-down leadership, accusing the media of a "conspiracy" regarding Biden's mental acuity. He advocates for significant budget cuts to address national debt, suggests a voluntary private option for Social Security, and calls for strict border enforcement, although he acknowledges voluntary departures. Eric Swalwell, a Democrat, admits his party needs a "reset" to connect with everyday Americans, moving away from perceptions of "wokeism" and "purity tests." He expresses skepticism about the TikTok ban, viewing it as a free speech issue, and highlights the economic benefits of immigrants. Ro Khanna, also a Democrat, sees the recent election as a blow to the party establishment and urges a focus on economic independence through strategic government investments. He opposes the TikTok ban, citing economic livelihoods and free speech, and emphasizes reforming the immigration system to create legal pathways while protecting workers from exploitation. All guests touch on themes of government efficiency, national security, and the polarized political landscape.

Suggested questions

7 ready-made prompts