HomeVideos

Why Being the Most Reliable Person Is Ruining You

Now Playing

Why Being the Most Reliable Person Is Ruining You

Transcript

1258 segments

0:00

This is not about perfectionism. This is

0:02

not about guilt. This is not about

0:03

boundary setting. This is about the

0:05

fundamental programming, the rules of

0:07

the game that are in your mind through

0:10

which you interpret your interactions

0:14

with other people. The schema dictates

0:17

what emotions arise. And so if you try

0:19

to solve the emotion or you try to solve

0:21

perfectionism or you try to set

0:23

boundaries, you're not targeting the

0:25

root. As a psychiatrist, I see this

0:27

incredibly central pattern in so many of

0:30

the women and many of the men that I've

0:32

worked with that they are the default

0:35

caregiver. They are the responsible one.

0:37

They're surrounded by people who would

0:39

like fall apart if they stopped doing

0:42

the supporting role. And this leads to a

0:44

lot of draining first of all, but it

0:47

also leads to a lot of frustration

0:49

because these people feel bound by their

0:52

circumstances. And as the resentment

0:54

builds up, as the anger builds up, what

0:57

they'll sometimes do is like swing the

0:59

pendulum. So they'll be like, "Okay, I

1:02

need to be more independent. I need to

1:04

stop letting everybody rely on me. I

1:06

need to look out for myself. I need to

1:08

advocate for myself." So they sort of

1:09

swing into this hyperindependence. And

1:12

they may even do that for a while. But

1:14

as they do that, some kind of weird

1:18

circumstance or like gravitational force

1:22

pulls them back into that old

1:24

environment. And that gravitational

1:25

force could be feeling guilty, right?

1:27

They're like, "Oh my god, I feel like

1:29

such a terrible person and now all these

1:31

people are struggling." It could be

1:33

being vulnerable to guilt tripping,

1:35

right? People call you and they're like,

1:37

"Oh my god, you left and like now I

1:38

can't do anything." Then you kind of

1:39

feel bad. It could even be anger towards

1:42

yourself and other people. And sometimes

1:44

even when you try to pull away, you may

1:47

find yourself stumbling into additional

1:51

relationships where

1:54

people take advantage of you where like

1:56

you meet people at work and like they're

1:58

like they need help so you kind of step

2:00

up, right? There's this big attitude of

2:02

sort of stepping up. And so the tricky

2:04

thing about this is if you're someone

2:06

who's like chronically depleted and

2:08

you're someone who is surrounded by

2:10

people who don't have their [ __ ]

2:12

together and you're the the one that

2:14

they rely on. The real problem with this

2:16

is that you may look at this and you may

2:18

think like, "Okay, I need to set better

2:20

boundaries." Fair enough, right? So like

2:23

I need to set firm boundaries. But as

2:25

you try to set firm boundaries, like it

2:27

works for some people, but something

2:29

gets in the way. This kind of feels a

2:31

little bit like whack-a-ole and it seems

2:32

like nothing is sufficient. And this

2:35

problem of whack-a-ole not working is

2:37

something that I saw years ago, right?

2:38

So, I started making content on the

2:39

internet and it's like, okay, I teach

2:41

this. Here's how to deal with

2:42

perfectionism. Here's how to emotionally

2:44

regulate. But for some people, they

2:46

don't see outcomes. literally why I

2:48

built the coaching program because

2:49

sometimes what happens is you need

2:51

someone else to help you understand the

2:55

specific nature and kind of like

2:57

intersection of different problems that

2:59

you have and we our coaches get great

3:02

outcomes do a really really really good

3:04

job and so if you're someone for whom

3:05

whack-a-ole doesn't seem to be working

3:07

or you've watched a lot of content on

3:09

the internet and you're not getting the

3:11

progress that you're really looking for

3:13

consider working with one of our

3:14

coaches. So what do you do about this?

3:16

And this is where we're going to explain

3:19

a really important concept today, which

3:21

is the concept of a schema. And what a

3:23

schema is is like a foundational thing

3:26

that shapes the way that you interact

3:29

with the world. And the tricky thing

3:30

about today's video is if you guys have

3:32

this problem, actually the most

3:34

important thing that you need to do is

3:35

understand it. You don't actually need

3:37

to do anything. The problem is that what

3:39

you need to understand is so

3:42

subconscious is so baked into the

3:45

assumptions of how you interact with the

3:48

world that like kind of dictates what

3:51

keeps on happening to you. Okay? But the

3:53

challenge that that I have in this video

3:55

is like this is so foundational that

3:58

it's kind of hard to see and kind of

3:59

hard to understand. So what I want you

4:01

guys to do is first of all bear with me

4:03

because it's going to be a little bit

4:04

abstract and then we'll get into the

4:05

details and then after you are done

4:08

understanding what a schema is go back

4:11

and re-examine these issues. Listen to

4:13

the introduction again and then see it

4:15

through the lens of schema. If you are

4:17

able to do that will be the most

4:20

important step that you take for

4:22

breaking this pattern. Okay. So let's

4:24

start with what a schema is. So a schema

4:27

is a pattern of interacting with the

4:30

world. And what I mean by pattern is it

4:32

isn't like an emotion. It isn't a

4:35

worldview. It isn't a way of socially

4:38

interacting with other people. It's all

4:40

of those things put together. Okay? So

4:43

schemas are formed in adolescence. And

4:45

the way that I kind of describe it in

4:47

layman's terms, it is the rules of the

4:50

game that you learned. Okay? So I'll

4:53

give you all a simple example. There's

4:54

this game that I used to play many years

4:56

ago called Munchkin. It's a card game.

4:58

And the whole point of Munchkin is that

5:00

like cheating is okay, right? So, it's a

5:04

game that cheating is part of the rules.

5:08

So, if someone cheats like and they win,

5:11

that's not something that pisses people

5:12

off. I mean, it may still piss people

5:14

off, but that is something that is fully

5:15

acceptable. Versus, let's say you're not

5:18

playing Munchkin. Let's say you're

5:19

playing like bridge or something else,

5:20

okay? or chess or whatever and then

5:22

someone cheats, the way that you

5:24

perceive what they're doing, your

5:27

emotional reactions to their actions,

5:30

and even the way that you engage with

5:32

them will all be shaped by this set of

5:35

assumptions. So, schemas are sort of the

5:38

like the rules of the game of life that

5:41

we are taught. And for people who are

5:44

consistently depended upon, consistently

5:47

emotionally depleted, who just surround

5:49

themselves with various people,

5:51

subconsciously you are playing the game

5:54

of life with a certain set of rules that

5:56

creates these reactions over and over

5:59

and over again. Okay. So let's start

6:01

with the first major schema which is a

6:03

self-sacrificing schema. So this is

6:06

characterized by a couple of really

6:07

important things. The first is excessive

6:10

and voluntary focus on meeting others

6:14

needs at the cost of one's own

6:17

satisfaction. Okay, so there's a couple

6:19

of important features of this. It's kind

6:21

of like compulsive that you take care of

6:24

other people more so than yourself. The

6:27

tricky thing about this, the really

6:28

confusing thing about this, the really

6:30

frustrating like self anger kind of

6:32

provoking thing is that this is

6:34

voluntary, right? You kind of choose to

6:36

do this. People will ask you for help

6:38

and you can say no, but you don't. And

6:41

not only do you volunteer to help

6:43

people, but the amount of help that you

6:46

provide is usually excessive. Like you

6:49

don't do a mediocre job, you do a very

6:52

good job. If you're taking care of

6:53

someone who's sick, you're going to

6:55

really knock it out of the park. If

6:57

someone needs help, you are not going to

6:59

be the person that halfasses it. So, it

7:01

is both excessive and voluntary. And

7:04

often times meeting other people's needs

7:06

comes at the cost of your own

7:08

satisfaction. Second thing is a sense of

7:12

guilt when you prioritize yourself. So

7:16

notice that a what a schema is. It's

7:18

like this pattern, right? So it's not

7:20

just that you have guilt. It is that if

7:23

I do something for myself, the way that

7:26

I am wired is like even if it's

7:28

completely acceptable, if I'm like, hey,

7:30

like this is my day off, I get days off.

7:33

it's completely reasonable to get days

7:34

off. But if someone asks for my help and

7:37

then on my day off, if I take my day

7:39

off, I feel incredibly guilty. So this

7:41

is how a schema works. It's kind of a

7:43

pattern that evokes certain emotions

7:48

in inappropriate situations or in

7:50

maladaptive ways. Right? So the the way

7:53

to get underneath a schema is not to

7:55

just focus on the guilt. It's to really

7:57

understand the pattern that is creating

8:00

the inappropriate guilt. This

8:02

self-sacrifice schema also has an

8:04

element of self identity in it which is

8:06

specifically an inflated sense of

8:09

responsibility for others. So it as

8:13

human beings in life we all have some

8:15

degree of responsibility to our fellow

8:17

human beings. But in people who have a

8:19

self-sacrificing schema their sense of

8:22

responsibility towards others is

8:24

inflated. You know other people should

8:26

help people a little bit but I have to

8:28

help people a lot. That's kind of this

8:30

core drive that you have, right?

8:32

Somewhere written in your programming is

8:35

the idea that I have to help other

8:37

people a lot. And there are all kinds of

8:39

thoughts that go with with this. So if I

8:41

don't, then things will fall apart. If I

8:43

don't, then other pe people will suffer.

8:45

If I don't, they're not going to be able

8:47

to handle it. So this sense of

8:48

responsibility has two major kind of

8:50

divisions. It's other people's needs

8:53

become your responsibility and other

8:55

people's feelings become your

8:57

responsibility. So think a little bit

8:59

about how you feel this grippy

9:01

responsibility towards other people, but

9:03

like it's not good enough to just do

9:05

what they need. It is also important for

9:08

you to make sure that they feel good

9:10

about it. Okay? And we'll get to where

9:12

this comes from in a second. The last

9:13

part of this schema, the

9:14

self-sacrificing schema, is difficulty

9:17

in receiving care or attention. So

9:20

here's you overworked, taking too much

9:22

responsibility, and burnt out. And then

9:25

along comes someone in your life who's

9:26

like, "Hey, bro, you seem burnt out and

9:29

tired. Let me help. Let me do something

9:31

nice for you." And you kind of like on

9:33

some level you may appreciate that, but

9:36

something in your programming makes you

9:39

feel really uncomfortable.

9:41

If people are focusing on you, if people

9:44

are taking care, it becomes hard. You

9:47

have this weird reaction of like craving

9:51

other people's support. But when they

9:54

actually give it, some part of you can

9:56

activate and feel really uncomfortable.

9:58

So how do you get to be this way? How do

10:00

you end up with this set of rules in

10:02

your head? Well, it turns out depends a

10:04

lot usually on your upbringing, right?

10:06

Cuz we are psychiatrists here. So it's

10:08

all about your childhood. So let's

10:09

understand. So a really common feature

10:11

of these people is parentification. So

10:13

this is when a child grows up in an

10:16

environment that is unstable in some way

10:19

where the parents don't do the job of

10:21

parents. So the child has to do the job

10:24

of parents. So this can look like a

10:26

couple of things. Okay. The first that

10:28

oftenimes people miss is an emotionally

10:31

unstable environment. So you may be

10:34

thinking like, oh, like it's not like I

10:35

had to cook myself food or anything like

10:37

that. Like my upbringing was okay. So if

10:40

you grew up in an emotionally unstable

10:42

environment, what often times children

10:44

learn is how to manage the emotions of

10:48

their parents. So, I see this a lot um

10:50

when I have kids who have parents who

10:53

are have a substance use disorder or

10:55

basically addicts, right? Because even

10:57

as a six-year-old child, you learn as a

11:00

survival skill that you need to manage

11:04

your parents like anger, frustration,

11:07

their depression, their sadness, right?

11:09

This happens so unconsciously and it's

11:11

quite devastating because it becomes

11:13

kind of like your unconscious

11:14

responsibility to keep dad or mom calm.

11:18

like let's not have them flip out like

11:19

we can't have them flip out. Now

11:21

suddenly what's happening in this

11:22

scenario is the parent is no longer

11:24

responsible for their emotional

11:27

regulation for their outbursts. It

11:29

becomes the child's responsibility. And

11:31

so if you sort of think about a parent

11:33

child relationship what's supposed to

11:34

happen is kid is the one that's supposed

11:36

to be throwing a temper tantrum right is

11:38

the one that's supposed to throw like ba

11:40

their fits. I don't want to go to

11:41

school. I want to go to school. And it's

11:42

the the parents job to be the emotional

11:45

container. So emotional instability

11:48

really can lead to parentification on

11:50

the part of the child. Another really

11:52

common example is an ill parent. So when

11:54

our parents are physically ill, have

11:56

chronic illness, usually this is what I

11:58

kind of see. We have kids who will have

12:01

to step up. They will have to do

12:02

everything from like, oh, mommy needs

12:04

like medicine or daddy needs medicine.

12:06

Can you get me water? They have to do

12:07

things like they have to handle homework

12:09

on their own. They may have to prepare

12:10

their own meals. They may have to

12:12

prepare meals for the their parents,

12:14

things like that. And this is another

12:15

scenario where children have to grow up

12:17

way too fast, right? And if we think

12:19

about what's happening with the child

12:21

there, the child is learning that okay,

12:24

my role in this household is to take

12:28

responsibility. Without me, things will

12:31

start to fall apart. The other big

12:33

pattern that leads to this schema later

12:35

in life is conditional selfworth. So a

12:38

child learns on some really basic level

12:41

that love, acceptance, and even

12:44

proximity with a parent depends on the

12:47

value that I bring to the table. So if I

12:50

do a good job, like let's say dad works

12:52

really hard and isn't really available,

12:54

but if I do a good job, then dad will

12:56

take me out for dinner to celebrate. But

12:59

the only time I see dad is when there's

13:02

celebrations involved. When dad is proud

13:03

of me, that's when he pays attention to

13:05

me. Okay? So this conditional

13:08

self-worth, this is what's so tricky

13:10

about it. It teaches the child a really

13:12

important lesson, which is my

13:14

self-esteem depends on what I give to

13:17

others. Because there are some children

13:20

who, this is so sad, but many people in

13:21

our community will be like, I don't

13:23

understand unconditional love. Like, I

13:25

just don't [ __ ] get it. We don't live

13:28

in a world with unconditional love. The

13:30

only thing that matters is like what you

13:32

give people, right? People will say

13:34

like, "Well, what have you done for me

13:35

lately?" And in a prof professional

13:38

setting or something like that, like

13:39

fair enough, right? Like you have a job,

13:41

there's an exchange of your time and

13:43

energy for some amount of compensation,

13:45

like yeah, like you do have some worth

13:47

in the world that is somewhat

13:48

transactional. But hopefully when we're

13:51

growing up, like I have a couple of

13:52

kids, like hopefully they don't feel

13:54

like my love for them or their value as

13:58

a person depends on their performance.

14:02

that my affection as a father is not

14:05

contingent upon their behavior. But

14:08

there are many people who grow up in

14:10

that way where they basically learn okay

14:13

I get safety I get proximity by doing

14:17

good by being good and then something

14:19

really tricky happens which is their

14:21

self-identity their self-esteem their

14:23

self-v valueue gets intrinsically tied

14:27

to doing good for other people or living

14:30

up to other people's expectations. And

14:32

this explains why this pattern is so

14:35

hard to break. Because if your sense of

14:37

self-esteem is tied up, is correlated,

14:41

the rules of the game for you are

14:44

self-esteem means doing good for others.

14:48

I've also seen this pattern in highly

14:49

religious households, which we'll get to

14:51

in in a couple minutes. Right? If these

14:53

two things are are intrinsically linked,

14:56

then you can even as an adult look at

14:59

your situation and say, "I'm sacrificing

15:02

too much. I need to look out for myself

15:05

more." But as you start to pull away

15:07

from the people that are dependent on

15:09

you, the schema will activate and your

15:12

sense of self-esteem because this is the

15:14

equation of self-esteem will start to

15:16

drop. This is why you will feel that

15:19

gravitational pull because you feel it's

15:21

not just guilt. It's something that is

15:23

even deeper than that. Your sense of

15:26

identity starts to disintegrate. Your

15:28

personhood starts to disintegrate as you

15:31

move away from the role of a caregiver.

15:34

Because if you are not a caregiver, then

15:36

who are you? And so the body and mind

15:39

don't like it when you move away from a

15:42

secure sense of identity. You know how

15:44

to play this game. You know who you are.

15:46

you know how you fit into this drama,

15:48

right? You know which play which part of

15:50

the play you're supposed to occupy. But

15:52

when you move away from it, it's very

15:54

very anxietyprovoking. Causes this weird

15:57

existential dread and like it basically

15:58

the feeling is like I don't know how to

16:00

do this. So what kind of problems do we

16:02

see in adults who have this kind of

16:04

schema? Okay. So the first thing is that

16:06

there are relationship problems. People

16:08

with the self-sacrificing schema are

16:10

drawn to people or partners, friends,

16:13

co-workers, whatever, who have one main

16:15

feature, accept care without

16:17

reciprocity. So, you're drawn to people

16:20

who are like okay being helped. So,

16:23

sometimes this will be people with like

16:25

once again like a friend with a chronic

16:26

illness, a friend who doesn't have their

16:28

[ __ ] together, a co-orker who's always

16:30

like, you know, behind on things and

16:32

needs a do me a solid bruh. Do me a

16:34

solid bruh. Right? So, you're drawn to

16:36

these people. And why are you drawn to

16:39

these people? Because the rules of the

16:41

game in your mind are like, I'm the PC

16:44

and these are the NPCs. And the problem

16:46

with NPCs is that they have side quests.

16:49

All these [ __ ] NPCs need some help

16:51

from me. And it is my job as the player

16:54

character to run around the town talking

16:57

to random people, getting their side

16:59

quests, and then going and doing

17:01

something. But unlike most RPGs or

17:03

whatever GTA take your pick where the

17:06

rewards are designed to be worth the

17:08

labor that you do, there's a second

17:11

problem with people who have the

17:13

self-sacrificing schema which is that

17:15

they have a lot of discomfort or anxiety

17:19

with reciprocation or what really really

17:22

really gets them bent out of shape,

17:24

makes them very uncomfortable is when

17:26

other people try to initiate care. So

17:29

what these people have a lot of

17:31

difficulty tolerating is a sense of

17:34

lopsided care. So I'm okay giving but

17:38

I'm not okay receiving and the only

17:40

circumstances in which I will receive is

17:43

if I have given first or you you are

17:46

guarantee that we'll be able to

17:48

reciprocate this right and if you kind

17:50

of think about this what these people

17:53

crave is exactly what makes them

17:55

uncomfortable which is like I'm spending

17:57

my whole life taking care of other

17:59

people oh my god I wish someone would

18:01

take care of me so this also manifests

18:03

professionally so these people tend to

18:05

be what we call overfunctioning at work,

18:08

right? So they're like basically like

18:10

some of these people nowadays who are

18:11

using AI to do three jobs. You're like

18:13

that except you're not doing AI, you're

18:16

just doing three jobs. So these people

18:18

struggle a lot with delegation. They

18:20

struggle a lot with assigning

18:22

responsibility. So even if you have

18:25

maybe subordinates or co-workers who

18:27

like have work that they are responsible

18:30

for, you have a tendency to micromanage.

18:32

You have a tendency to check. You have

18:34

to like make sure that they don't screw

18:36

up because they're fundamentally

18:37

unreliable. So I have to make sure that

18:40

things are okay. And the really scary

18:41

thing about this is that in a

18:43

professional setting or in

18:44

relationships, what we see with a lot of

18:46

these people is the buildup of a silent

18:48

resentment. So, as you engage in these

18:50

patterns and you're like, "Oh my god,

18:52

like this person is like such a dumbass

18:54

and like I can't rely on them. I have to

18:55

check. I have to check. I have to

18:56

check." And as you do this, you feel

18:59

cognitively, and this is what's so

19:00

confusing about a schema. You feel

19:02

cognitive. You can look at this and you

19:03

can say, "Hey, this is unfair. I

19:04

shouldn't be doing this." And so, as you

19:06

end up doing it again and again and

19:08

again, and things become more and more

19:10

and more lopsided, this gap is where

19:12

your resentment starts to build. And

19:15

sometimes what'll happen with these

19:16

people is that resentment builds. so

19:19

much that they kind of crack and they

19:22

shift gears into this pattern of like,

19:25

okay, it's just going to be all about

19:28

alloc all the time. F everybody else. I

19:31

just got to look out for myself. I got

19:33

to separate from the world. Other people

19:35

can go f themselves. But unfortunately,

19:38

deciding overnight to become a boss babe

19:41

and over reliance on yourself, severing

19:44

your connections is sort of this like

19:46

rebound response from the schema. And

19:49

often times what these people will do is

19:51

they'll do that for a while, but then

19:53

the feelings of guilt, these other

19:55

fundamental things of I'm going to be a

19:56

boss bay, but when someone shows up and

19:58

tries to do something nice for me, that

20:01

still doesn't work, right? Because what

20:02

I'm doing is there's this schema of like

20:04

I'm the caregiver, they're the

20:06

caretaker, and becoming like

20:08

hyperindependent is actually scrapping

20:10

away with that entirely. And then the

20:12

problem is I don't have a clear way to

20:14

relate to people, right? So if I've

20:15

decided like I'm going to f everybody

20:17

else in my life, I'm going to live my

20:18

own life. Then like how do I form a

20:20

healthy relationship because it's all

20:21

about me me? And then that really

20:24

bothers you because you're not selfish,

20:26

right? So, you have a sense of

20:27

self-esteem that is based on your

20:29

capacity to give. And you don't want to

20:31

be the selfish person because there's a

20:33

selfish person, there's a selfless

20:34

person. And why don't you want to be the

20:36

selfish person? Because you know what

20:38

it's like to be on the receiving end of

20:42

unrescrocated care. So, emotionally,

20:44

these people feel a lot of fatigue and

20:46

burnout. And this is the really

20:48

interesting thing. The fatigue and

20:49

burnout are seen as often times personal

20:51

failures, right? So, I'm so tired. Like

20:54

let's say you have a you know a parent

20:56

who's ill and one day you're like man

20:58

I'm just so tired. And then how does the

21:00

child respond to that? They're like oh

21:02

my god I'm so weak. I need to be better.

21:05

This is a personal feeling. The the

21:07

seven-year-old child who's like making

21:09

chicken noodle soup for their

21:10

chronically ill mother is not thinking

21:13

to themselves the reason I feel tired

21:15

and burnt out is because of my

21:17

circumstances. Now often times as we

21:19

grow up we'll start to have insight into

21:21

this. But understanding that your

21:22

fatigue is not a personal failure but is

21:25

a structural problem based on the the

21:27

structure and shape of your

21:29

relationships is a really important

21:31

shift that needs to be made. Often times

21:33

the other primary emotional thing that

21:35

will happen in the schema is people will

21:36

feel a lot of guilt or some kind of

21:39

negative emotion. A sense of self-

21:41

judgment or weakness is also pretty

21:43

common um when you relax, have fun or

21:46

engage in pleasure. So, when you try to

21:48

do the things that you crave, and this

21:50

is why it's so hard to break out of the

21:51

schema, just think about this for a

21:52

second. I'm like, man, I I wish I had a

21:53

day off. And then when your day off

21:54

comes, oh my god, I'm so lazy. I'm

21:56

wasting my time. So, I want you guys to

21:58

think about when you engage in pleasure,

22:00

if your internal emotional reaction is

22:03

guilt, then like how can you possibly

22:06

engage in pleasure? And that's the

22:08

problem with the schema. The schema

22:10

shapes your reactions to things that are

22:14

healthy for you, right? So in a real

22:17

game, cheating is bad. In Munchkin,

22:19

cheating is good. It so your reaction is

22:22

being perverted by the schema. So that's

22:24

why it's so hard to take a day off

22:25

because when you take a day off, a

22:28

normal person, a person without this

22:29

maladaptive schema may experience

22:31

pleasure, relaxation, oh my god, one day

22:34

off is never enough. I wish I could have

22:37

be retired, right? They want more of it,

22:39

but your emotional reaction to some

22:41

pleasurable activities is negative. And

22:44

so then how are you supposed to move

22:46

towards that if your body is punishing

22:47

you, your mind is punishing you with

22:49

like guilt and like self-critical talk.

22:51

The other way the schema manifests is in

22:53

our thoughts. Okay. So schema therapy is

22:56

built off of cognitive behavioral

22:58

therapy and a lot of other things that

23:00

are mixed together because there are a

23:01

lot of shortcomings of cognitive

23:02

behavioral therapy. But the cognitions

23:04

are also well well mapped in schema

23:07

therapy. So these are cognitions like I

23:09

have to do it. If I don't do it, nobody

23:11

else will. if I don't check it won't be

23:14

good enough. And also that that's one

23:16

side of cognitions. The other side of

23:17

cognitions is if you need help, that

23:19

makes you weak. That makes you a burden.

23:21

That makes you pathetic. That makes you

23:23

fundamentally not a good person. Okay?

23:25

And then the really common result of all

23:28

of these things is people will sort of

23:30

like push up against the schema. They'll

23:33

try to do things like I got to set set

23:35

better boundaries. I got to like treat

23:37

myself. I got to take days off. I got to

23:38

learn how to relax. I got to do this. I

23:40

need to learn how to meditate. I need to

23:41

learn how to therapy. I needed to learn

23:42

how to emotional regulation. Right? Once

23:44

again, what are all these things? What

23:45

do you need to do? These are all

23:47

personal failings. Yeah, you need to

23:49

learn how to be better. Right? That is

23:52

how deep a schema goes. Even in your

23:55

attempt to solve the problem, you are

23:58

operating within the problem. This is a

24:00

personal failing of yours. So, usually

24:03

what ends up happening and this is not

24:04

like permanent, but people will run

24:06

against they'll have a lot of friction

24:08

against the schema. they'll be unhappy

24:10

building up this silent resentment.

24:11

They'll try to break out and then

24:13

eventually what happens and this is what

24:14

causes people to like fall back into it

24:17

is a sense of surrender. So they're like

24:19

ah I just can't handle it. I can't

24:21

figure this out. And then you'll kind of

24:23

slip back into the pattern for a while.

24:25

Resentment builds up and then you try to

24:27

break free and then you're like ah. So

24:29

there's sort of this sense of

24:30

resignation. And this is where the term

24:32

burnout really comes in. When these

24:34

people get burnt out, that's when they

24:36

stop fighting against the schema and

24:38

surrender back into the pattern. So, the

24:40

really interesting thing is that

24:42

self-sacrificing as a trait isn't

24:45

necessarily maladaptive. What happens in

24:48

a lot of people who are self-sacrificing

24:51

to the point of depleting themselves is

24:53

that that that the self-sacrificing

24:55

schema combines with a second schema,

24:58

which is the unrelenting standard

25:00

schema. So this is a schema that has a

25:03

couple of different rules. First of all,

25:05

a sense or a drive for perfectionism

25:08

that is independent of achievement,

25:11

right? So many of us want to do a good

25:13

job, right? So I'm I'm perfectionistic

25:15

and I want to do good. But then what

25:18

should happen if I'm perfectionistic is

25:20

when I try really hard and I do a really

25:22

good job, I should feel good about it,

25:24

right? So it's like, hey, I studied

25:26

hard. I got a test. Time to relax. Time

25:29

to have a good time. Time to celebrate.

25:31

But for some people, their sense of

25:34

perfectionism is not satisfied by actual

25:37

achievements. And this is what makes it

25:39

feel so relentless. Okay? Because even

25:43

if you do a good job, that internal

25:45

voice is still there telling you you

25:47

need to do good, you need to do good,

25:48

you need to do good. So it is a

25:50

perfectionism that is unusually

25:52

persistent. And this schema also has two

25:55

things that we've talked about. One is

25:56

selfworth that that depends on

25:58

performance. Right? So this is the

26:00

unrelenting standards. So my sense of

26:03

identity, my sense of self-worth depends

26:05

on doing a good job. And a lot of

26:07

difficulty with rest and relaxation

26:10

because if I'm resting, if I'm relaxing,

26:11

that's scary. That's not good. Maybe

26:13

I'll screw up. The perfectionistic

26:16

tendency in my mind is going to not let

26:19

me relax. And I think schemas are this

26:22

is another important point here where

26:23

you may say okay is this perfectionism?

26:26

Well if where if we look at like

26:27

perfectionism this is the important

26:28

thing about a schema. You can be

26:30

perfectionistic and still be like

26:33

relatively mentally happy right? So

26:35

perfectionism is a personality trait

26:38

that in a certain upbringing you have

26:40

certain perfectionistic tendencies and

26:42

in a certain upbringing that

26:44

perfectionism becomes mutated to be

26:47

incredibly self-critical. something that

26:49

does not allow you to enjoy the the

26:52

results of your labor. Okay, so this is

26:54

another good example of why people with

26:56

this schema may say they may look at

26:58

themselves and they say, "Okay, I am

27:00

perfectionistic. How do I target

27:02

perfectionism?" Whereas that's not

27:03

actually what you need to target. What

27:05

you need to target is a mutated version

27:08

of perfectionism. You need to target

27:10

that mutation. So these people also have

27:13

another really important feature which

27:14

is they need proof of their self-worth.

27:17

So their sense of identity is not

27:20

something that is internally born is not

27:22

like I feel good about myself like I

27:24

practice self-love and self-compassion

27:25

or they don't pra I mean maybe they do

27:27

practice because it's not intrinsic for

27:29

them. They have to practice self- loveve

27:30

and self-compassion, all these kinds of

27:32

things. But what they usually find, what

27:34

what their mind really craves is proof

27:38

of their status, proof of achievement,

27:42

proof of productivity, proof of

27:45

caregiving because when they get those e

27:47

external signals, they kind of calm

27:49

down. So now let's talk about how this

27:51

develops and hopefully this this will

27:53

give some some clarity. So these people

27:56

with this sort of hyperp perfectionistic

27:58

internally criticizing voice usually

28:01

grow up in an environment that is like

28:03

fundamentally unsafe or fundamentally

28:06

has conditional acceptance. The same two

28:08

that we kind of talked about earlier but

28:10

they manifest in a slightly different

28:12

way. So they grow up in environments

28:14

where their nervous system so there's

28:18

some really fascinating research that

28:19

this is like just as physiologic as it

28:22

is mental. So, the nervous system is

28:24

panicking. And what does what calms down

28:26

the nervous system? Like getting an

28:28

award, like getting an A. And then the

28:30

nervous system calms down. It's like,

28:31

"Oh, thank God." Like, "If I don't get

28:33

an A, like mom or dad is going to be

28:34

pissed. Like, I'm going to get my ass

28:36

beat. So, like, I got to get an A." Or

28:38

when I get an A, this still happens to

28:40

me, which blows my mind. Like, but it's

28:42

just so baked in, right? So, I'm Dr. K.

28:45

I'm all Kenoji. I spent years studying

28:47

become a monk. Went to Harvard Medical

28:49

School, was faculty there for years. one

28:51

of the most followed psychiatrists on

28:53

the planet. And the thing that blows my

28:55

mind is like how quickly my mom compares

28:59

like it's automatic. She compares all of

29:02

the things that random people are doing

29:04

better to me. She's like, "Hey, these

29:05

people take their kids to church every

29:07

week. These people are doing this with

29:09

their kids. These people are doing this

29:10

with their kids." And it's just like

29:11

automatic. Like I enter the room and

29:13

she's talking about how like all these

29:14

people are doing all this [ __ ] that I'm

29:16

not doing. And I'm like, "What? What?"

29:18

Like so, so I realize that this is

29:20

something that's very common for South

29:21

Asian parents, right? Oh, you got like

29:24

you got an A on the test. Like, why

29:25

aren't you number one, right? Oh, like

29:27

this kid, like you may be at the top of

29:29

your class, but this kid this your

29:31

cousins, aunts, nephews-in-law

29:34

is like not only number one in his

29:36

class, but he's also an astronaut. Like,

29:40

why are you slacking, bro? So, people

29:42

grow up in these environments with very,

29:44

very, very high expectations. And the

29:47

really scary thing is it's not just

29:49

expectations. It becomes safety because

29:51

there is a threat within the household

29:54

that unless you live up to these

29:57

standards, there is going to be some

30:00

kind of punishment. So this is what

30:02

becomes really scary is like achieving

30:04

is not about achieving anymore.

30:07

Achieving becomes survival. Achieving

30:10

becomes safety. And so what that means

30:12

is unless I'm getting these really

30:14

positive signals of achievement of

30:16

perfection, like the only way I can be

30:18

safe is to be number one, right? Their

30:20

nervous system in the same way that we

30:22

have like evolved to have like be scared

30:25

of threats, right? So if like I'm

30:27

walking down the street and like a bear

30:29

charges at me, my nervous system is

30:31

going to respond and I can't really like

30:33

control that response. And this is

30:35

what's so scary and what is

30:37

transformative about schema oriented

30:40

work in psychiatry is these people are

30:42

going through life with their nervous

30:44

system telling them unless you at the

30:46

top of your class unless you're [ __ ]

30:47

perfect the reaction that it has is this

30:49

bear is charging at you. So these people

30:51

will say why is it that when I do a good

30:54

job over and over and over and over

30:57

again why does that not build my

31:00

self-esteem? I've been doing such a good

31:02

job. I've been taking care of people for

31:05

so long. Why do I still feel like [ __ ]

31:08

Why is the feeling of relief, the

31:10

feeling of being good, the feeling of

31:12

pride, why is it so temporary? Cuz you

31:15

look at other people and you're like,

31:17

"This person did a good job and then

31:18

they did this and then they did this and

31:20

they've developed confidence. Now they

31:22

have the internal strength to set

31:24

boundaries. They know what their own

31:27

worth is, but I do all of the same

31:29

things, but I don't know what my worth

31:32

is. My worth still feels frustratingly

31:35

dependent on the approval of others. How

31:37

do I break free of this? And this is

31:39

because at a very young age, they

31:41

learned that making other people happy,

31:44

doing an exceptional job is the only way

31:49

to protect myself. And this is where

31:51

things get really interesting because

31:53

oftentimes what these people will have

31:55

Young describes this beautifully. He

31:56

says they have an internal critical

31:59

parent. Okay? So they he calls it

32:01

demanding parent but it's like an

32:02

internal critical voice. And so these

32:05

people will look at this and they'll say

32:06

like yeah I have this running dialogue

32:07

in my head that like gets pissed at me

32:09

unless I do something perfect. So if I

32:11

try to relax it's like oh my god you

32:13

could be doing this you could be doing

32:14

this. You could be doing this right? It

32:16

has this really critical voice which on

32:18

the one hand we may say on a

32:19

psychological perspective is just

32:20

internalized from your parents like

32:22

literally right so they spoke to you in

32:24

a certain way and then you internalize

32:26

their words into your own internal

32:28

dialogue but sometimes that realization

32:31

and working on that doesn't work and

32:33

this is the critical step that people

32:35

are missing if you have a critical

32:37

internal dialogue and you're saying I

32:39

need to learn self-compassion uh I need

32:41

to talk better to myself I need to do

32:43

cognitive reframe all Those techniques

32:46

are good, but sometimes there's a piece

32:48

missing and this is that piece. It is at

32:50

the internal dialogue. Remember,

32:52

achievement is safety, right? This is

32:54

the only way that you can be safe. So,

32:56

how can you guarantee safety? You

32:58

criticize yourself relentlessly. So,

33:00

when your parents are brutal with you,

33:04

like, you're a piece of [ __ ] This kid

33:07

did so good. This kid did so good. That

33:09

kid did so good. And that hurts, right?

33:13

Like it hurts to try your hardest and

33:16

have your parents be like, "I love him

33:18

more." Instead of being proud of your A,

33:20

they're like disappointed in you. So,

33:22

how does a 12year-old, 13year-old,

33:24

10year-old, 8-year-old child protect

33:27

themselves from the hurt of a parent who

33:31

is disappointed in them when they

33:33

achieve? Really simple. You program

33:35

yourself with their voice. I know what

33:38

I'm going to do. I'm going to beat

33:40

myself up because if I beat myself up

33:43

enough, the likelihood that I achieve

33:45

increases. And if I beat myself up, then

33:48

I achieve. And if I achieve, mommy or

33:50

daddy will be proud of me. The internal

33:52

demanding parent, the self, the internal

33:54

critical voice is not a problem. It is a

33:57

solution. It is your avenue towards

34:00

safety. Those are the legs that help you

34:03

run away from the bear that is chasing

34:04

you. And until you realize that this is

34:06

the core function that it's serving,

34:08

it's really hard to break free. So the

34:10

unrelenting standard schema manifests in

34:12

a couple of ways. So let's start with

34:13

relational. So this this is people

34:16

becoming people pleasers, but not like

34:18

the dormat style people pleaser. This is

34:21

like I cannot afford to have people

34:24

dislike me. So this isn't like the the

34:26

obsequious like, oh please sir, don't be

34:29

mad at me. Don't be mad. This is like

34:31

okay, I got to be good. I got to have

34:33

people like me. I got to be dependable.

34:35

I have to have people like understand

34:36

that I'm dependable, that I'm a good

34:38

person. I need to show people how

34:40

dependable and great I am. Right? So,

34:41

it's sort of this weird inflated

34:44

standard that you are living up to. You

34:46

want to be great in other people's eyes.

34:49

And once again, this relates to safety

34:51

because if you're great in other

34:52

people's eyes, that means you're no

34:54

longer in danger. Okay? So, this can

34:56

also manifest as more obsequious, people

34:58

pleasing, trying to make people happy.

35:00

But generally speaking, it is the need

35:02

to be great in front of other people.

35:04

But this is not ego. This is not

35:05

narcissism. This is safety. Second

35:07

thing, behavioral. This leads to a lot

35:09

of overwork. Okay? People work

35:12

incredibly hard. You may do a lot even

35:14

if you're burnt out. This also leads to

35:16

having a lot of difficult with this idea

35:18

of like don't let perfect be the enemy

35:20

of good. You're like, "Yeah, [ __ ] that."

35:23

Like we got to be perfect. Like we don't

35:25

good enough is not good enough. Like

35:27

this is terrible. it feels like

35:29

antithetical to to be good enough. The

35:31

foundation of this is not the emotional

35:33

reaction that you have. You can try to

35:35

control that reaction, but as long as

35:36

the schema is persistent, it will be

35:39

dictating your emotional reactions. Next

35:41

thing, so this is fascinating from an

35:43

emotional perspective. Young has some

35:45

beautiful stuff written about this.

35:46

These people have what I would call a

35:48

persistent percolating anxiety. So they

35:51

have this feeling of like always looking

35:54

for relief but never actually finding

35:57

it. You have this like lowgrade like

35:58

background like you know whatever the

36:00

the black body radiation in the universe

36:03

level of like anxiety, right? You have

36:05

just this constant like oh my god like

36:07

oh my god. It's not even like focal.

36:09

It's not like oh my god this thing or oh

36:12

my god that thing. It's like just this

36:13

background oh my god oh my god. And it's

36:16

kind of unformed. And that's why it's so

36:19

hard to pinpoint. That's why it's so

36:22

hard to fix because it's just this

36:23

background level of like, oh my god,

36:25

these people also have this this feeling

36:28

of always looking to relax, but they

36:31

never get there. So, it's like, okay, if

36:33

I do this, like there's this very

36:34

intense hunger, this perfectionism,

36:36

right? I need to achieve this. I need to

36:37

achieve it a lot. I need to do a really

36:38

good job. I need to do a good job and I

36:40

need to go do a good job. But even if

36:42

you achieve a uh have a do a good job,

36:44

that feeling is very temporary or you

36:46

never achieve it. Even after doing a

36:48

good job, this is a really common

36:49

reaction. You're like, "Oh my god, I

36:50

have this presentation. It's got to be

36:52

great." You go and you do the

36:53

presentation. It's great. And your

36:54

reaction is, "Oh [ __ ] now people are

36:57

going to expect this of me every time.

36:59

Now every presentation that I have to

37:00

do, if I do even 1% less than this,

37:02

people are going to be disappointed."

37:03

It's like instead of celebrating a

37:04

victory, you're already terrified of

37:07

future disappointment. And so it's it it

37:09

really wears on people. Like really just

37:12

wears on your nervous system. Burns

37:14

people out. Last thing is that it in

37:16

terms of cognitions we see a lot of

37:18

black or white thinking, a lot of all or

37:20

nothing thinking and the other really

37:21

common thing is like different standards

37:24

for yourself versus other people. You

37:26

guys have heard me talk about imposter

37:27

syndrome. These are also elements of

37:29

that, right? Where it's like other

37:31

people can do a have a good presentation

37:34

and that demonstrates how hardworking

37:36

and awesome they are. But if I have a

37:38

good presentation that means I got

37:40

lucky. That means that I barely scraped

37:42

by and other people can afford to

37:44

celebrate. I cannot. So now hopefully

37:46

you guys understand what I said at the

37:49

beginning of the video. I want you all

37:50

to go back and like listen to that

37:52

initial presentation and see how this is

37:54

not about perfectionism. This is not

37:56

about guilt. This is not about boundary

37:58

setting. This is about the fundamental

38:00

programming, the rules of the game that

38:02

are in your mind through which you

38:06

interpret your interactions with other

38:08

people. The schema dictates what

38:11

emotions arise. And so if you try to

38:13

solve the emotion or you try to solve

38:15

perfectionism or you try to set

38:17

boundaries, you're not targeting the

38:19

root. So how do we target the root? So

38:21

the first step arguably sufficient,

38:23

arguably the most important thing to do

38:25

is actually insight is to actually

38:27

understand. So as I've done work with

38:29

people as a psychiatrist, I'm more and

38:31

more convinced that their biggest

38:34

problem is a misdiagnosis problem. They

38:36

think this is perfectionism. This they

38:38

think this is weak boundary setting. So

38:39

you try to solve this little problem.

38:41

But once you see the pattern, once you

38:44

realize, oh, my internal self-critic is

38:47

actually trying to protect me from doing

38:50

a bad job and if I do a bad job, I'm

38:53

going to feel terrible about myself. I'm

38:54

going to feel unsafe. My world will come

38:56

crashing down unless I do a good enough

38:58

job. That's why I have an internal

39:00

self-critic, right? So, the solution to

39:02

that is not to get rid of the internal

39:04

critic because then everything will fall

39:05

apart. The solution of that is to learn

39:08

how to feel safe independent of your

39:10

performance. So the next thing that I

39:12

think is important to develop is what I

39:13

would call like a healthy schema. Okay?

39:15

So there's like all of these schemas are

39:18

designed to protect you from a certain

39:22

environment in your upbringing. Okay? So

39:24

they like they're like they're

39:25

misapplied over here. So, I think about

39:28

this, you know, was my mom asked me the

39:30

other day, why is it that so many

39:32

college football stars don't become

39:34

great NFL football players? And my sense

39:37

of this, I don't really know it's I'm

39:38

not an expert in this, but what I've

39:40

noticed is that there are some

39:41

strategies that work at low rank. Like,

39:44

if I'm playing like low rank League of

39:45

Legends or Dota or like Valerant or

39:47

Marvel Rivals or whatever, like I can

39:49

get away with some stuff. But as I move

39:52

up through the ranks, as I move into

39:54

different situations, these strategies

39:56

start becoming ineffective. They become

39:58

maladaptive. So what we need to do is

40:00

learn a healthy way of engaging in the

40:03

world. And this has a couple of really

40:05

important points. Okay. The first is

40:08

learn to accept help. So recognize that

40:11

when other people try to help you,

40:13

you're going to have this very negative

40:14

reaction. Wait for it. Look at it.

40:17

Practice receiving help. Second thing,

40:19

be on the lookout for an absence of

40:22

reciprocity. And this is the really

40:24

weird thing. Absence of reciprocity in

40:26

relationships will make you feel

40:28

comfortable. Won't make you feel good.

40:30

It'll make you feel comfortable. It'll

40:31

be familiar territory. So, when you

40:33

start to enter into reciprocal

40:35

relationships, literally what this is

40:36

going to look like is you're going to do

40:38

something for somebody else and then

40:39

they're going to want to do something

40:40

back for you. And if they do something

40:42

back for you, it's not quits. Now you're

40:44

like, "Oh crap." The only safe way to

40:47

exist in a relationship is for somebody

40:49

else to be indebted to you. So if you do

40:53

them a solid and they do you a solid,

40:54

that's not good enough. I got to do them

40:56

a solid. You always want to stay one

40:58

step ahead. And here's the really scary

41:00

thing. As you're as you're always

41:02

staying one step ahead, you never want

41:03

to be in anybody's debt. And the safest

41:05

place to be is for other people to be

41:06

indebted to you. You're always going to

41:08

build up resentment because things are

41:10

unequal. So you need to notice this

41:12

pattern in your life and let things be

41:15

equal. And oh the other scary thing you

41:17

can do is let someone do something nice

41:19

for you and then you do something really

41:20

weird. Okay, this may sound really

41:22

confusing. So there's this thing that

41:24

normal humans do when someone does

41:25

something nice for them. So they say

41:27

thank you and then they don't do

41:28

anything else. They just stop. They say

41:30

thank you. They express appreciation.

41:31

They receive the gift with love and then

41:33

they stop. Right? So these are the

41:35

microscopic things that if YOU'RE LIKE,

41:37

"OH MY GOD, that feels so bad.

41:40

[screaming]

41:41

You see how it's like saying thank you

41:43

after someone does something nice is

41:45

what we teach our children to do, right?

41:48

We're like, "Hey, if you want to be like

41:50

a social human being, little one, when

41:52

someone does something nice, we don't

41:54

say panic and put them in your debt,

41:57

bitch." We say, "Say thank you." And

41:59

that's like literally what we teach kids

42:02

is the end of the interaction. And here

42:04

you are with someone doing something

42:06

nice to you and you say thank you.

42:07

You're like, "Ah." You see how the

42:09

schema shapes your reaction to things,

42:12

right? And then like here's the other

42:14

really like interesting sign that it's a

42:16

schema. If I ask you what's wrong with

42:19

saying thank you and some part of you

42:21

goes a and you cannot verbalize it, that

42:25

means that this schema formed before you

42:28

had it's preverbal. Really cool concept.

42:30

So like this was these rules were baked

42:33

in before your brain had the capacity to

42:36

put things into words or understanding.

42:38

So it's like this really weird primitive

42:40

feeling. So you got to learn how to say

42:41

thank you. So another part of healthy

42:43

adulting is being able to relax, right?

42:45

So it's recognizing that when you relax

42:48

there's going to be some kind of weird

42:50

like obsession with efficiency. So the

42:51

only way that these people can relax is

42:53

they're going to say like, "Okay, if I

42:54

relax, if I relax, then I'm going to

42:56

come in on Monday morning and I'm going

42:58

to be so energetic that I can work twice

43:00

as hard." Relaxation is how I become the

43:03

most productive and most efficient ever.

43:05

No, no. Relaxation has no benefit beyond

43:10

shocking beyond your enjoyment. You're

43:13

like, [screaming]

43:14

there's that preverbal schema happening

43:16

like I can't do that. Can you just take

43:19

a day just one day that is not for any

43:22

other reason than your enjoyment and

43:24

you'll say oh yes the schema will

43:25

operate it'll say yes wonderful Dr. K is

43:28

teaching me about schemas. I know what I

43:30

need to do to chip away at my schema. I

43:32

need to relax one day. But if you do it

43:34

to chip away at your schema, you are

43:36

turning your relaxation into

43:38

productivity. No, you have to have

43:40

useless relaxation day. No benefit. Just

43:43

enjoy yourself. And it's got to be a

43:45

waste. There's no psychological growth.

43:46

There's no leveling up. There's nothing.

43:48

Being a healthy adult means sometimes

43:50

taking some time for yourself. And be

43:52

prepared for the wall of fire that is

43:55

like all these emotions when you try to

43:57

do that. Be prepared for the sneakiness

43:59

of the schema trying to hijack your

44:01

relaxation and turn it into productivity

44:03

and efficiency. And if I can learn how

44:05

to relax, I will be a more perfect human

44:07

being. I know I'm flawed. I can't relax.

44:09

I need to be more perfect. So therefore,

44:11

let me learn this skill of relaxation,

44:13

then I will be a more complete human

44:15

being. Don't let the schema work it its

44:17

way into it. Okay. Last thing, the

44:19

schema is structural. So if you are in

44:22

an environment where people demand this

44:25

of you, it will be perpetuated and

44:28

perpetuated in the way that a potter's

44:30

wheel is perpetuated. It's not that it's

44:32

going to be forever, but as long as

44:33

you're in that environment, it's like

44:35

spinning the wheel, right? So if you

44:36

leave the environment over time, it will

44:38

start to die down. And often times

44:40

what'll happen is y'all will be in

44:42

situations like a marriage with kids or

44:45

parents who are ill where you can't just

44:47

unplug from the situation. But this is

44:49

where you have to sort of build your

44:51

bridge one brick at a time. And so it

44:53

can feel very very like unproductive or

44:57

inefficient. But be aware that the

44:59

environment will perpetuate it. So if

45:01

you guys want more concrete skills on

45:03

how to behave within that relational

45:07

structure, strongly recommend you guys

45:09

check out a membership video we have

45:11

with Dr. Gori Aragam. Dr. Dr. Aragam is

45:13

a friend of mine from residency, also a

45:14

Harvard trained physician, also the

45:17

number one psychiatrist that I would

45:18

send people that I love and in my life

45:20

to. She's just an absolutely brilliant

45:22

psychiatrist, probably better than I am.

45:24

I don't know. I've never seen a

45:25

head-to-head comparison, but she has

45:27

this awesome video called Being

45:29

Authentic with Family. It's a 2-hour

45:30

deep dive that really gets into this

45:33

stuff, and she's really good with female

45:36

relational issues. So, thanks for

45:38

watching and y'all can find the link in

45:40

the description below take you to a free

45:42

trial where y'all can check it

Interactive Summary

Loading summary...