HomeVideos

Ann Arbor City Council Ward 3 Candidate Forum - Bartholomew/Hall (June 4 2026)

Now Playing

Ann Arbor City Council Ward 3 Candidate Forum - Bartholomew/Hall (June 4 2026)

Transcript

1512 segments

0:08

for sound. You guys can hear me. Thanks

0:09

for being here tonight. This is um

0:12

hopefully what I thought would show up.

0:13

We had 60 people last time this week.

0:15

It's a nice day. Welcome to the Ann

0:17

Arbor Third Ward Candidate Forum. Thank

0:19

you again for being here. We thank you

0:21

Ashley Hall and Ryan Bartholomew for

0:23

making time. Uh tonight's format is Q&A

0:26

town hall format. So, candidates, please

0:28

address the room, the people. Uh, if you

0:30

haven't gotten a chance to write a

0:32

question down, please avail yourself to

0:34

these 4x6 cards up the table. Some of

0:36

the helpers are away at you. Uh, write

0:39

your question down. I'll ask. We'll get

0:40

to six or eight questions before we run

0:43

out of time. That's the best we can do.

0:45

Let me think. I think that's it. Three

0:48

minute opening statements. We're going

0:50

to alternate order. So, Ryan, you open

0:52

first and then Ashley, you answer the

0:54

first question first. The timekeeper is

0:57

Tessia. At 30 second mark in 30 seconds

1:00

remaining. Tessia will just ticulate

1:02

wildly at you and three minutes. I will

1:05

gently break in a few. You ready? Your

1:08

lights on. Your mics on.

1:09

>> I think so. We good? All right, let's

1:11

get going.

1:13

>> Hi, I'm Ryan Bartholomew. Uh, I

1:16

currently serve as State Representative

1:17

Carrie Ryan's legislative director. I

1:20

spend most of my days working on trying

1:22

to get universal healthcare for all

1:23

Michiganders. Yep. Uh, so I encourage

1:27

folks here to look up HB4407 my care.

1:29

That's the main thing that I spend my

1:30

time working on. I also draft a lot of

1:32

progressive legislation, particularly

1:34

when it comes to standing up to

1:36

corporate power. Um, making sure that

1:38

we're standing up to the Trump

1:39

administration. Our office has really

1:40

taken the lead on um trying to codify

1:44

constitutional rights at the state

1:45

level, which I never thought I would

1:46

have to say, but we're living in the

1:49

reality that we're living in. Um, prior

1:51

to uh working with Repans in the

1:53

legislature, I was a senior health

1:55

policy analyst at the Center for Health

1:56

and Research Transformation from MI uh

1:58

Michigan Medicine. Uh, I've been an

2:00

American court vista. Um, I was an Obama

2:03

White House intern in 2015. And also I

2:05

have two degrees in public policy from

2:07

the Ford School at U of M, a bachelor's

2:09

and a master's. So that's a little bit

2:11

about me. But why did I do this? This is

2:14

a very crazy thing to do running for

2:15

office. It's it's not for the faint of

2:17

heart. Um, I did this because our city

2:19

has become increasingly unaffordable for

2:22

the workingclass people, families, and

2:24

seniors that make up this town. Um,

2:27

we've just watched for years as people

2:29

have been pushed further and further

2:31

away. My wife Carly in the front row

2:33

right there is a teacher in the Ann

2:35

Arbor public schools. Um, we watched so

2:37

many of her friends and colleagues just

2:39

not be able to afford to live here and

2:41

they're being pushed out. I think that's

2:43

wrong. I think we can do better. Um this

2:45

comes as a juxtaposition to how the

2:48

current city council and the mayor have

2:49

been handling um a lot of things with

2:52

this city. Uh we see developments like

2:54

Arbor South where the mayor and city

2:57

council who all or vast majority of them

3:00

happen to be recipients of campaign

3:02

contributions from Arbor South approved

3:04

a $350 million project

3:08

uh that's going to be our tax dollars

3:09

over 30 years. most of that money being

3:12

diverted away from the public schools to

3:14

largely build three parking garages.

3:16

That's insane. There's always money for

3:19

corporate developers, but there is never

3:20

money for the workingclass people who do

3:22

the work that make Ann Arbor the great

3:24

place that it is. Our transit workers um

3:27

and our uh ASME government employees,

3:30

the folks who do the work like the water

3:32

treatment plant, they have not had a

3:34

contract in months and they have not had

3:35

a raise in years. Maybe they should have

3:38

more money that they could donate to the

3:39

mayor in city hall.

3:41

I think that's wrong. I think we can do

3:44

better. We need to prioritize the needs

3:46

of workingclass people here and now and

3:49

not in some hypothetical way that maybe

3:51

they'll be able to afford to live here

3:52

in 20 or 30 years if their plan works

3:54

out. I'm Ryan B for W 3. I hope I can

3:57

earn your vote. We need independent

4:00

voices on city council, not ones who are

4:01

going to be rubber stamps for the mayor.

4:03

I hope to earn your vote and I'm really

4:05

looking forward to this discussion

4:06

tonight. Thank you so much for coming

4:07

out.

4:14

>> The floor is yours.

4:14

>> I haven't tested mine yet. Does it work?

4:16

>> Amazing. Hello everyone. I want to start

4:19

by saying thank you so much to Durk for

4:21

putting this event together. I know how

4:22

much work it is to do stuff like this.

4:24

So, thank you so much.

4:28

>> And I also want to say thank you to all

4:29

of you for coming out. It is 85 degrees

4:31

and sunny and beautiful. and you're

4:32

spending your day at kind of a hot

4:34

elementary school gym um hanging out

4:36

with two people who are just running for

4:38

city council. So, I really appreciate

4:39

that. My name is Ashley Hall. I'm

4:41

running for city council Ann Arbor

4:42

because I love this city. I grew up in a

4:45

working-class family. Uh my dad worked

4:48

in a print shop and my mom was a type

4:50

setter. And there's probably some young

4:51

people in this room who don't know what

4:52

a type setter is. It's a job that does

4:54

not exist anymore. Um but when I was

4:56

growing up, Ann Arbor felt like a place

4:58

that I didn't belong. It felt like a

5:00

place that wasn't accessible to me. Felt

5:02

like a place where the rich people live,

5:04

the doctors, the lawyers, the

5:05

professors. And it felt like a place

5:07

that I couldn't end up one day. But I uh

5:10

I did what millennials do and I took out

5:11

a bunch of student loans. And I went to

5:13

college. And while I was in college, I

5:16

fell in love with public service. I fell

5:18

in love with bringing together people

5:19

over a shared cause. I fell in love with

5:21

fighting for people's rights. And that

5:23

has really been the thread that has held

5:25

my entire career together. My first paid

5:27

job was as as an SEIU organizer. I

5:30

organized to get home healthcare workers

5:31

a living wage. Uh and after that I

5:34

worked for Hillary Clinton on her 2016

5:36

presidential campaign where I put my

5:38

blood, sweat, and tears into that uh

5:40

race and it was very tragic ending. Uh

5:42

after that I was lucky enough to be

5:44

Congresswoman Debbie Dingle's political

5:46

director and that's where I learned how

5:48

important it is to show up for your

5:50

community and that is what I intend to

5:51

do in this role to continue to show up

5:53

for this community. Currently I'm the

5:55

director of board operations for the

5:56

Wash County Board of Commissioners. Um

5:59

but I mean something else that's really

6:00

important about me is I live in this

6:02

neighborhood. I live in Forestbrook. My

6:04

husband Abishek and I in the back corner

6:06

bought a house on Yeah. Wave babe. Thank

6:08

you. Uh we bought a house on Lillian in

6:11

2019. I love this community. And one of

6:15

the things that I will hold together

6:17

that will hold me together if I'm

6:19

elected to city council is that I never

6:21

want anyone growing up either outside of

6:23

the city inside of the city to feel like

6:25

an inarm is a place that they don't

6:26

belong like I did when I was growing up.

6:28

And I think we do that in three ways.

6:30

First is through affordability. I agree

6:32

with Ryan. The city is not affordable

6:34

and we need to increase that workforce

6:36

housing. We need to increase affordable

6:38

housing and we need to make sure that

6:39

everyone can be able to live here.

6:42

Number two, as someone who works in

6:43

municipal government right now, those

6:45

basic city services are essential. We

6:47

want to make sure that our roads are

6:48

paved. People who live in this

6:50

neighborhood understand the roads are a

6:52

mess, right? How do we make them better?

6:54

That I will be an advocate for this

6:55

community um on city council. What's my

6:58

time? Have you given me it yet?

6:59

>> Yeah, it's 2:45.

7:00

>> Oh, I'm so sorry. I didn't even see you.

7:02

Uh last but not least, I'm deeply

7:04

passionate about climate. I think the

7:06

work that's going on in the Bryant

7:07

neighborhood to make climate energy

7:08

accessible for everyone is deeply

7:10

important and that is something I will

7:11

advocate for on city council. Thank you

7:13

all for being here.

7:20

Thank you folks. Okay, first question

7:21

goes to Ashley first. We're going Ryan

7:23

Ashley ask Ryan right now. I'm sure

7:25

you'll catch me if I mess that up. And

7:27

for the audience, they knew this

7:29

question's coming. So

7:31

>> the question is, how do your priorities

7:34

on city council impact this

7:36

neighborhood, Darlington, Pittsfield,

7:38

and Forest Brook? Ashley,

7:40

>> thank you, Dirk. Okay, as I mentioned,

7:44

Abishek and I live on Lilian. We bought

7:46

in 2019. I still remember what it felt

7:49

like to like stand on our porch after we

7:52

closed on our house. We popped a bottle

7:54

of champagne, but the cork was kind of

7:55

messed up. It just kind of like fell on

7:57

the ground. Was not that exciting. Thank

7:58

you. I I I had bigger visions in my

8:00

brain. However, I remember that feeling.

8:03

I know what it felt like to feel like I

8:05

owned a piece of this neighborhood and a

8:07

piece of this community. And over those

8:09

past goodness, six years that we've

8:12

lived here, uh my husband and I have two

8:14

dogs and we walk our Huskys. If you live

8:16

in this neighborhood, you probably seen

8:17

us. We walk our Huskys from Forestbrook

8:20

to Pittsville to Darlington every day. I

8:23

know the people of this neighborhood. I

8:25

see when you go to work. I'm not like a

8:27

stalk or anything, but I see when you're

8:29

going to work every day. I see when

8:30

you're coming home. I see when you're

8:32

socializing with your children. Making

8:34

sure that I'm representing your

8:37

priorities is deeply deeply important to

8:39

me. And I want to do that in three ways,

8:41

which is interesting because I I had

8:44

this in mind as I was running and it's

8:46

what I hear on doors every day. Number

8:48

one, roads. My road is crumbling.

8:52

How can you help me ensure that my road

8:54

is repaired in a timely manner? If you

8:57

look at the city of Man Arbor road

8:59

repair website, this kind of southeast

9:02

corner of the city is all pink and red

9:04

and pink and red is the bad color. Green

9:06

is the good color. I think out I think

9:08

in the city, our neighborhood has some

9:10

of the worst roads in the city. I will

9:13

be an advocate on city council to ensure

9:16

that our roads are paved. Yoast, you

9:19

guys know where you come off of Yoast

9:21

and it is an absolute disaster right by

9:23

Victory in that is slated for repair in

9:25

2027 at least. That is in the in the

9:29

kind of near future. Oakwood is is the

9:32

only other road slated for repair in our

9:33

neighborhood. That's 2030. That seems

9:35

like far too long to wait for me. I'll

9:37

be an advocate to ensure that our roads

9:40

are repaired in a timely manner. Number

9:41

two, taxes. That is the main thing I

9:44

hear on doors. Are you going to make

9:46

sure that my that my property taxes do

9:48

not increase? I work for the Washna

9:50

County Board of Commissioners. Um, a

9:52

little wonky, but a lot of millagers are

9:54

put on the ballot by the county board of

9:55

commissioners, and every time they do

9:57

it, I sit there and I'm like, "Oh my

9:59

god, another millage." I am mill

10:01

fatigued. I feel like we have very high

10:04

property taxes, and there's a reason for

10:06

that, right? We have incredible city

10:08

services. One of the things that I want

10:10

to look at as as I get on city council

10:13

is a comprehensive overview of all the

10:15

city's millages. When are they set to

10:18

expire? Has what has the purpose of that

10:21

millillage been solved? There's a lot of

10:23

county millages. The purpose of it it's

10:25

actually we we've completed it with one

10:27

of our parks village. Can we can we

10:29

sunset some millages and make some room

10:31

in that in that Headley limit for those

10:34

uh in here know who Headley is. uh to to

10:36

make some room in our millillage cap to

10:38

to to help alleviate some of that tax

10:40

pressure on our and I didn't get to my

10:42

last one, but it's climate. Okay,

10:44

>> thank you.

10:49

>> Thank you.

10:49

>> How do your priorities on city council

10:52

impact this neighborhood, Darlington,

10:53

Pittsfield, and Porsche?

10:55

>> Thank you for the question. Um I have

10:58

been walking this neighborhood a lot. I

11:00

live directly across plat on old Boston

11:02

Court. Um, and something that I hear

11:05

across these neighborhoods, across

11:08

Pittsfield and Forestbrook, I hear very

11:10

uh commonly articulated in my home

11:11

neighborhood of Allen as well, and that

11:14

is everybody is so exhausted by how much

11:17

they have to pay for literally

11:20

everything. Um, I what I love about

11:23

these neighborhoods is that there are

11:24

people who are representative of the

11:27

people who serve the community. I've

11:29

knocked the doors of teachers, nurses,

11:32

um, and government employees in this,

11:34

uh, in this neighborhood, and I've again

11:36

heard the same thing. So, what are the

11:38

big costs that Ann Arbor has faced?

11:39

Number one, housing, of course. Number

11:41

two, child care. Did you know Ann Arbor

11:45

is the most expensive city in the entire

11:48

state for child care? Does anyone want

11:50

to take a guess at how much it would

11:51

cost to have one infant be watched in

11:53

the city of Ann Arbor? Anyone have a

11:55

guess? You want to throw it out?

11:56

>> $2,500. $2700

11:59

a month. Who can afford a mortgage

12:01

payment to have someone watch your kids?

12:02

Nobody can. Uh especially not the people

12:05

who do the work that make Ant Arbor what

12:06

it is. Um secondarily, there was a study

12:10

that came out around child care in 2023

12:12

that found that Ann Arbor was the sixth

12:13

most expensive place, sixth most

12:16

expensive place to raise a child in the

12:18

entire country. That's insane. So what I

12:21

am proposing is a municipal run child

12:23

care pilot starting with the people who

12:25

serve this community first, our

12:27

teachers, nurses, first responders,

12:28

government employees, the people who

12:31

make Ann Arbor what it is, and then

12:32

rolling it out citywide if it's

12:34

successful. We have seen 15 years of

12:37

declining enrollment in the Ann Arbor

12:38

public schools. Why is that?

12:40

Working-class families cannot afford to

12:42

live here. Let's do something about it.

12:44

Um, number two,

12:47

we obviously need affordable housing.

12:49

That's without question. I am a little

12:51

skeptical though about the way that this

12:54

current council has been going about

12:55

doing things, being very agnostic about

12:57

market rate housing, saying that we just

12:59

need housing. Doesn't matter what it is.

13:03

What we've seen is a bunch of highrises

13:05

and million-dollar luxury condos that

13:07

workingass people cannot afford. People,

13:10

and I would love to get into this later,

13:11

and I'm sure we're going to get

13:12

questions about it. I I think that

13:14

they're misguided. I think that we all

13:15

share the goal of trying to ensure the

13:17

working-class people can live here, but

13:19

I'm not convinced that building a bunch

13:21

of million-dollar condos will make sure

13:22

that the lower income people can

13:24

actually afford to live here. Okay. Um,

13:28

and we also I I completely agree on

13:31

basic city services, but we have to

13:33

reign in the privatization. We have seen

13:35

privatization happen of our city

13:37

services for many years now. This has

13:40

made our city services more unreliable.

13:42

I think that's wrong. We've seen just a

13:44

depletion of union jobs. We need to

13:46

bring them back in house and then make

13:48

sure that our city services are better.

13:50

Um I'm assuming I saw the green.

13:54

>> Yeah.

13:55

>> Yeah. I figured as much. Uh and I I'm

13:57

happy to take your questions and to

13:59

discuss more about other things.

14:01

>> Thank you, Brian.

14:02

>> Of course.

14:03

>> Uh first question from the audience. And

14:04

if you haven't uh if you've got a

14:06

burning question you want to ask, please

14:07

get one of those 4x6 index cards and

14:10

hand it to Jan.

14:12

Okay.

14:14

This goes to Ryan.

14:15

>> Yes.

14:16

>> Do you support the recent CL

14:18

comprehensive land use plan?

14:20

>> Ah, there we go.

14:20

>> Aspirational goals. How would you

14:22

prioritize its implementation in

14:23

practice? And can you name one or two

14:26

points you support? And one or two

14:28

points that you would modify it or

14:30

disagree with it.

14:30

>> Thank you for the question. Um, I I

14:32

believe we do need to do reszoning in

14:35

this town. We need to ensure density.

14:37

I'm not as convinced that the

14:39

methodology in which that we're going

14:40

about it as I've said with the market

14:42

rate housing being the primary driver

14:44

and using Mayor Taylor's own words that

14:45

in 20 or 30 years from now housing will

14:49

get more affordable for teachers and

14:50

nurses. They do not have time to wait. I

14:54

was with the teachers last night. I was

14:55

with marching with the nurses before.

14:58

These folks are struggling now. We need

15:00

to build permanently affordable

15:02

publiclyowned housing that can make sure

15:05

that folks can actually live in the

15:07

community that they serve. I'm and I I'm

15:10

skeptical about the supply side

15:11

absolutism that if you just build enough

15:13

supply that's going to actually lower

15:15

the cost of housing. I think I've read

15:18

the studies that a lot of the folks in

15:19

Neighbors for More Neighbors in the Club

15:21

have cited. I'm skeptical because

15:23

they're not taking into consideration

15:25

demand specifically a couple of

15:26

variables. Number one, a lot of these

15:30

studies say that if we build luxury

15:32

housing, folks will move from their

15:34

medium tier housing to the luxury

15:37

housing. But that presupposes that

15:39

people will do that. The issue here is a

15:43

lot of folks in Ann Arbor are locked

15:45

into pre-proposal a housing. They pay

15:47

much lower taxes than I do because they

15:50

bought their house when I was 2 years

15:51

old or before I was 2 years old in 1994.

15:54

So people are paying lower taxes and

15:57

then a lot of people refinance their

15:59

homes during COVID and are paying a much

16:01

lower mortgage rate than I'm paying at I

16:03

pay 6% they're paying like two

16:05

something% now it's 7%. So I'm a little

16:08

skeptical that people are going to move

16:10

out from the lower income housing to

16:13

higher income housing and then that will

16:15

make it available which begs the

16:16

question who is the luxury housing for

16:18

because it's not for the people who

16:19

serve this community. Um, lastly, I want

16:23

to talk about Arbor South. If I have a

16:24

minute, I would like to discuss it a

16:26

little bit more. We're giving this tax

16:27

giveaway to a corporate developer who is

16:29

a donor to the mayor and to folks on

16:31

city council, diverting money away from

16:33

our public schools, as I said, for

16:34

largely for three parking garages. This

16:36

is insane. This is arguably insane. and

16:40

they say that it's for building 200

16:42

affordable housing units, except there's

16:44

a stipulation in the contract that they

16:46

can pay $20 million back to the city and

16:49

then not build affordable housing at

16:50

all. And I think that a private

16:52

corporation that wants to maximize

16:54

profit is going to do that. So, we need

16:57

to use our bonding capacity to build

16:59

publiclyowned, permanently affordable

17:01

housing. We have a lot of models around

17:04

town. We have co-ops like Colonial. We

17:07

have Arowwood. We have the community

17:09

land trust. We have things that we can

17:10

do in order to ensure that our housing

17:12

remains affordable for the people who

17:14

serve this city. And that those are the

17:16

people that we should be targeting, not

17:18

a bunch of wealthy out of town people

17:19

who might come in for six game days as

17:21

we see a lot of wealthy uh uh a lot of

17:24

the higherend housing remains vacant to

17:26

this day. And lastly, I'll add what we

17:28

have to really do as well is rein our

17:30

short-term rentals. This city council

17:33

>> I'll get more into that later. I'm sure

17:35

it'll come up. Thank you. So some

17:37

questions

17:40

you support the reason aspirational

17:43

goals prioritize this implementation in

17:45

practice and maybe name one or two

17:47

points you agree with one or two points

17:49

you modify or disagree with.

17:51

>> Thank you Dirk. Hey Tessia, can you like

17:54

wave your arm when we're at 30 seconds?

17:55

Yeah,

17:56

>> that would just be super helpful. Okay,

17:58

so I think the question that you asked

18:00

is important. Um so the question is do I

18:04

support the conference of land use plan?

18:05

What are two things I agree with? One to

18:07

two things I agree with. One to two

18:08

things I disagree with.

18:11

The comprehensive land use plan has been

18:13

one of the most controversial pieces of

18:16

policy that has run through this city in

18:18

a very long time.

18:21

And in reality, it is really, in my

18:23

opinion, it is a city's attempt to bring

18:26

us into

18:29

a a city where more people can belong,

18:33

which is really my goal at the end of

18:35

the day. So, if we're asking for a yes

18:38

or a no, yes, I am supportive of the

18:40

comprehensive land use plan. I think we

18:42

100% need zoning changes in this

18:45

community. We need more housing of all

18:48

kinds in the city of Ann Arbor. I agree.

18:52

I I I agree with my opponent here. Uh we

18:55

don't need as much luxury highrises as

18:57

we as we have right now. We need

18:58

workforce housing. We need affordable

19:00

housing. The city of Ann Arbor is

19:01

actually building 1,200 units of

19:03

affordable housing right now. 1,200

19:06

units of affordable housing that is paid

19:08

for in large part by our affordable

19:10

housing mill, but also by some of those

19:14

developers. They they throw money into

19:17

building those affordable units. I think

19:19

that is I think that's important. I

19:21

think that's something that we need to

19:22

know. The city is not just building

19:24

luxury highrises. We are building 1,200

19:26

units of affordable housing. What are

19:29

two points of a comprehensive land use

19:31

plan that I agree with? First, has

19:34

anyone in this has anyone here ever been

19:36

to Jefferson Market? Yes. I think

19:39

Jefferson Market is an incredibly

19:41

special place. I love my husband and I

19:44

love to go to breakfast there. Part of

19:45

the conference of land use plan is

19:47

changing zoning to allow more

19:48

neighborhoods to have a Jefferson market

19:49

in their neighborhood. I 100% agree with

19:52

that. I would love to be able to walk

19:54

around my corner, get a coffee. I would

19:56

love to be able to walk around the

19:57

corner and get a croissant. Um, another

20:00

piece of the land use plan that I agree

20:02

with is uh expanding our green spaces.

20:05

There's a large part of the competency

20:06

land use plan that is about preserving

20:08

green spaces and expanding them in the

20:10

city. It is not just about building

20:12

luxury highrises. Um, and I think it's

20:14

important. It's very dense, but I think

20:15

it's important that everyone when they

20:17

can take a chance to try to understand

20:19

what it actually says instead of

20:21

listening to talking points about what

20:22

it doesn't say. What is one of the

20:24

things that I don't actually agree with

20:25

in the comprehensive land use plan? Um,

20:28

it has a lot of focus on maintaining

20:30

downtown Ann Arbor and continuing to

20:32

invest in downtown and Arbor. Downtown

20:34

and Arbor is amazing. I think we've

20:36

invested in it enough. I think we to

20:37

invest in outside of downtown and

20:39

neighborhoods like Darlington, Forsburg,

20:41

Pittsfield um and across the city of Ann

20:43

Arbor. Thank you.

20:48

>> Thank you, Ashley. We tried to turn off

20:51

my sound in the back. I hope you can

20:52

hear me. Thanks, Andy.

20:55

Follow question from the audience.

20:57

Affordable housing, who will pay for it?

20:59

those of us who are working class and

21:00

have owned our own homes, more taxes.

21:03

What's wrong with an Ipsy or Pittsfield

21:06

Township? And I think we go to Ashley

21:09

first.

21:10

>> Can you just say it one more time, the

21:11

last part?

21:12

>> What's wrong with I think they mean

21:14

building in Ipsy or Pittsfield Township?

21:18

>> So, affordable housing.

21:20

>> Affordable housing will pay a for those

21:21

of us who are working class and owner

21:22

own homes. More taxes.

21:24

>> Yep. what's wrong with a building in

21:26

Ipsy or Pristo,

21:28

>> right? Um, so there was a Ann Arbor area

21:31

Community Foundation did a a housing

21:33

study last year and largely what it

21:36

found was that the city of Ipsellani and

21:39

Pittsville Township essentially act as

21:43

Ann Arbor's affordable housing options

21:45

that is already in existence. Um, so

21:48

that is that is already what's

21:49

happening. Um really truly uh if if you

21:53

if you can't afford to live in Ann

21:55

Arbor, you buy a house in Iceland, you

21:56

buy a house in Pittsville Township. That

21:57

is already happening. Who pays for it?

22:00

The city has an affordable housing

22:01

village. So everyone pays into it. Yes,

22:03

that means working-class people. That

22:05

means, you know, my husband and I, that

22:07

means everyone who everyone in this

22:08

room, you pay into an affordable housing

22:09

village, and that's what helps build

22:11

that affordable housing. But also, you

22:13

know, when we give those

22:16

when we give those, you know, developers

22:18

the ability to to build these highrises,

22:21

part of what they're part of what

22:22

they're paying for, they pay into that

22:24

affordable housing village. If they're

22:25

not going to put affordable housing in

22:27

their development, they give money to

22:29

pay to help pay for those 1,200 units of

22:31

affordable housing that we're building

22:33

right now in the city. On top of

22:35

affordable housing, I'm a large

22:37

proponent of what we're of what Annor is

22:38

doing right now with the uh community

22:40

land trust. Has anyone heard of the town

22:42

homes? This is so people that are

22:45

workforce housing, people that are

22:46

teachers, nurses, can actually afford to

22:49

live in the city. Um, and these houses

22:52

are specifically for people who work

22:53

here to be able to live here. If I was

22:55

elected to city council, that's

22:57

something I would I would want to give

22:58

more money to. Um, and that's something

23:00

I would want to continue to expand and

23:02

allow for more workforce housing in the

23:04

city of Ann Arbor. Thank you.

23:08

Would

23:12

you would you just repeat the question?

23:13

>> I think I'll repeat the question.

23:15

>> Affordable housing, who will pay for it?

23:17

Those of us who are working class,

23:18

haven't owned and have owned our own

23:20

homes, more taxes. What's wrong with

23:23

building in Ipsy or Pittsfield Township?

23:25

Three months.

23:26

>> Thank you. We're already paying for it,

23:28

obviously, with the affordable housing

23:29

village, but we're paying for it where

23:30

the people who serve this community

23:32

can't live here. I think we need to

23:34

change that. Um, we have a billion

23:36

dollar bonding capacity in this city. We

23:39

have a lot of money at our disposal. We

23:41

should use it.

23:44

So, there's my answer to how we're going

23:46

to pay for it is largely through um

23:49

bonding out through our billion dollar

23:51

capacity permanently uh publicly

23:54

affordable housing, publicly owned

23:56

affordable housing. Um, as I mentioned,

23:58

we have the co-ops and land trusts. Now,

23:59

something that I'm really um skeptical

24:02

about is the number of affordable units

24:04

that the current council and the mayor

24:06

site 1,200. We just heard um there are a

24:09

lot of units that were of set to be

24:12

affordable that didn't materialize. I

24:15

don't know if folks here are familiar

24:17

with the Klein's law. The Klein's Lot

24:19

was slated to be affordable housing.

24:22

What happened? Sold to a private

24:23

developer, just came out recently. How

24:26

much do you think one of these was going

24:28

to be an affordable housing unit is now

24:30

going to go for? 750 ft. Anyone have a

24:33

guess?

24:35

$4,000 a month. Who's that for? That is

24:39

not for the workingclass people of this

24:41

city. I am tired of hearing these

24:44

numbers cited as, oh well, we're just

24:46

going to build a bunch of luxury housing

24:48

and then affordable housing is going to

24:50

be a side effect. That's the wrong way

24:51

of thinking about this. We should be

24:53

prioritizing affordable and missing

24:55

middle housing, not giving in to this

24:57

supply side absolutism. As I mentioned,

25:00

demand is a huge issue. People are not

25:02

going to buy luxury housing. People are

25:04

not moving right now because they are

25:06

locked into a lower tax rate and they

25:08

are locked into a lower mortgage rate.

25:10

My taxes became uncapped when I bought a

25:12

home from a n the estate of a

25:14

90-year-old woman and we're paying about

25:16

$400 more a month, $500 more a month

25:18

than she was paying in taxes. A lot of I

25:20

talked to a lot of older folks in town.

25:22

They do not want to move or I'm sorry,

25:25

they do want to move but they feel

25:27

constrained that they are locked into

25:28

their homes that they cannot move. This

25:30

is something that we need to address.

25:32

Also building more senior housing,

25:33

senior community living. This is

25:35

something that we hear uh often from a

25:37

lot of seniors that they would like to

25:39

downsize and live in a place where they

25:41

have a lot of activities and other

25:42

things that they can do. So building

25:44

more affordable senior housing is

25:46

something that we also really need to

25:48

prioritize. Um, I love Pittsfield. I

25:51

love Ipsy, but my priority is ensuring

25:55

that we can keep the workingclass people

25:56

of this city here. So many of my wife's

26:00

friends and colleagues used to live

26:02

here. They no longer do. Uh, also, shout

26:05

out to giving teachers a contract that's

26:06

not was city hall, but I'm always going

26:08

to say that. Um, so please support the

26:11

teachers. Please support our nurses.

26:12

Please support the other working-class

26:14

people who make this city what it is. Um

26:19

I I believe that is time and I answered

26:22

the question but yes we

26:24

>> good enough. Thanks. Thanks for

26:26

>> Okay, great. Thank you.

26:29

>> We have a nonhousing question for you.

26:33

>> Okay. I appreciate road diets adding

26:35

cycling infrastructure and enhanced

26:37

pedestrian safety. However, in my Allen

26:39

school neighborhood near Packard Plat,

26:41

the amount of cutth through traffic

26:43

continues to increase. No problem with

26:45

drivers who dress little and respect

26:46

that children and older adults dog

26:48

walkers need to be safe in their

26:50

neighborhood. But what can the city do

26:51

specifically about this issue? I think

26:53

they're referring to the the cuts and

26:55

travelers.

26:55

>> Yes. Yes. Uh thank you for the question.

26:57

So this is something that I hear on

26:58

doors often. So both in the Allen

27:01

neighborhood and here in the Pittsfield

27:03

Forestbrook neighborhoods. I have heard

27:05

that because of the road diet on Packard

27:07

and also I live literally or on Plat

27:09

rather. I live right off of Plat. When

27:11

it the bike lanes came in and it went to

27:14

one lane on each side, it is bumper to

27:17

bumper at 5:00. So, what happens is that

27:20

people will drive through the

27:21

neighborhoods recklessly going 50 miles

27:23

an hour, endangering our children,

27:25

senior citizens. This is crazy. I talked

27:28

to a gentleman on Parkwood last week and

27:30

he said since the bike lanes went in, he

27:34

has witnessed seven accidents from his

27:37

window, including a woman being pulled

27:39

out via the Jaws of Life.

27:42

>> Yes. Um I believe Parkwood and uh some

27:46

of the streets um in the neighborhood

27:48

don't have any stop signs either, so

27:50

people just don't. Um I am all for bike

27:53

lanes, but what I want to ensure is that

27:55

they were well thought out. And

27:56

something that really bothers me is the

27:57

way that the mayor and city council

27:59

actually funded these bike lanes. I

28:00

don't know if a lot of people are

28:01

familiar. We have many millages. That's

28:03

true. One of them is the public safety

28:05

and mental health millage. That's where

28:07

a lot of the bike lane funds came from.

28:10

Ironically endangering some of the

28:11

public safety.

28:13

>> I think that the funds that we allocate

28:16

should or the that we vote for should go

28:18

to those services. So how do we reform

28:21

it? I think we think through regionally

28:23

for our transit. We need to have

28:25

obviously better uh public

28:27

transportation. I still am a proponent

28:29

of bike lanes, but ensuring that it is a

28:30

good path like maybe we have one

28:33

concrete path that goes from our

28:35

neighborhoods here in Ward 3 downtown

28:37

and then we maybe you know fix the road

28:40

diet, particularly here on Plat. It it's

28:42

a big issue, but we really need to worry

28:44

about public safety. Um we've seen speed

28:46

bumps installed, but that has not been a

28:48

deterrent. So we need to really think

28:51

creatively here about what we can do to

28:54

a increase modes of transportation or uh

28:57

different types of transportation. We

28:58

want to decrease our carbon footprint

29:00

while also ma maintaining the safety of

29:03

our children and our senior citizens. So

29:05

that that is uh how I feel about road

29:08

diets. Thank you.

29:09

>> Thank you Ryan. Absolutely

29:13

question. I appreciate road diets adding

29:15

cycling infrastructure and enhanced

29:16

pedestrian safety. However, in my Allen

29:19

school neighborhood near Bagger Plat,

29:21

the amount of cutthrough traffic

29:22

continues to increase. I have no problem

29:24

with drivers who dress slowly and

29:25

respect that children, older adults, dog

29:27

walkers need to be safe in their

29:28

neighborhood. What can the city do

29:31

specifically about this issue?

29:33

>> Uh, thank you for always repeating the

29:35

question, Derek. I very much appreciate

29:37

that. So, the thing about Ann Arbor, we

29:41

are we're a job center, right? There are

29:43

I mean I I think it's like a 100,000

29:45

people drive into our city every day to

29:47

go to work and those people have no

29:49

other way to get into the city of Ann

29:51

Arbor other than their car because we do

29:53

not have a regional transit system. So

29:56

they have to drive into our city. How

29:59

can the people who live here, all the

30:01

people in this room, how can the city

30:04

make it possible for us to get to our

30:06

jobs if we if we work and live in Ann

30:08

Arbor without having to take our cars?

30:11

How can we increase our bus routes? How

30:13

can we build more bike lanes? Um, how

30:15

can we increase mobility options so that

30:18

we can decrease that car congestion?

30:21

That's something I'm very interested in.

30:22

Um, I so I live on Lillian Road. Does

30:25

anyone remember when Packard and

30:27

Carpenter was closed? They were putting

30:29

in the sewer lines and it was closed for

30:31

I it felt like a year and everyone, like

30:34

I said, my husband and I walk our dogs

30:36

down Yoast every day. People were

30:38

zooming down yoast and we don't we don't

30:41

have children but I was concerned. I

30:43

became the woman who yelled at cars who

30:45

were speeding down the road

30:47

>> because it's it's very scary. I

30:49

completely agree with this. It's it's

30:51

incredibly scary and there has to be

30:52

something that we can do at the city to

30:54

make to help that. I I I know that um so

30:59

Yos does have speed bumps. Is there a

31:02

different terminology for those? I'm not

31:03

sure. Speed bumps seems right. Um, Yos

31:06

does have speed bumps and but guess

31:07

what? People go 40 miles an hour and

31:09

then slow down and go over the speed

31:10

bump. Then they go 40 miles an hour,

31:12

slow down, go over the speed bump. Um,

31:14

I, you know, I I feel like I keep saying

31:16

this, but I agree with Ryan here, like

31:18

we have to we have to think really

31:20

innovatively. We have to think really

31:22

transformationally.

31:23

Um, the city right now is currently

31:25

doing a a transportation comprehensive

31:27

plan. I I I'm really interested to see

31:29

what comes out of that because I do

31:30

think a lot of our engineers and the

31:32

folks who work at the city do a really

31:34

good job and and and care deeply about

31:36

safety. Uh so the city has a

31:38

transportation plan called vision zero

31:40

which envisions that zero people are

31:42

killed through you know vehicle

31:44

accidents in the city of Ann Arbor. We

31:46

we we have not reached that. um how can

31:49

we put more resources and money into

31:52

something like Vision Zero to ensure

31:54

that we reduce those pedestrian deaths

31:56

um and that we can slow down people on

31:58

our roads and protect our children and

32:00

our dogs. Thank you.

32:06

>> Thanks, Ashley. This actually ties into

32:08

cycling, but I'll make it a little more

32:09

generic. How will you be responsive to

32:12

neighborhoods concerns when they're

32:13

counter to the city's development plan?

32:15

And I think Ashley's first this time.

32:20

So, one of the one of the I I've done um

32:23

constituent work for a long time. If

32:26

you're if you're not familiar with what

32:27

constituent work is, it means I work for

32:28

an elected official and when someone

32:30

calls the elected official and needs

32:32

help with something, I'm usually the one

32:33

to to do that thing. Um and elected

32:36

officials often hire very good staff to

32:38

do that thing. I am incredibly

32:41

accessible. Uh my husband might

32:43

complain, I am on my own constantly.

32:45

People are calling me. I am emailing. I

32:48

am always trying to be responsive to the

32:51

needs of the people in our community. Uh

32:53

that will be incredibly important to me

32:55

as a city council person. City council

32:57

people don't have staff, right? And and

32:59

it's part-time. So, how can you how can

33:03

I as someone who works full-time um also

33:06

having a part-time job if I was to win

33:07

city council remain as responsive as

33:10

humanly possible to everyone in this

33:12

room? And I can make that commitment to

33:13

you today. You want my cell phone

33:14

number? Have it. Uh, I I want to be

33:17

accessible. I want to be able to be

33:19

someone that you can call when you have

33:20

questions. Um,

33:24

can you remind me what the question was?

33:26

>> How will you be responsive to

33:27

neighborhoods concerns when they're

33:29

counter to the city's development plan?

33:30

>> Okay, that's what I thought. I just

33:31

wanted to make sure that I was hitting

33:32

that that piece. Number one, I'm going

33:34

to be I'm going to be accessible. Number

33:36

two, um I am not 100% in agreement with

33:40

everything that the city is doing right

33:41

now. I do like the idea of the

33:43

comprehensive land use plan. Um, I am

33:45

supportive of it, but I am, one of the

33:47

things I like to say about myself is I

33:50

am a curious human. Um, I never want to

33:52

enter a conversation with someone and

33:54

them feel like my mind is already made

33:56

up. I think there's always room for

33:58

growth and there's always room for

34:00

compromise. And that is how I will lead

34:02

if I'm elected to city council. And if I

34:05

am your city council person, I want you

34:06

to feel comfortable reaching out to me

34:08

even if you think I'm going to disagree

34:09

with you because, as with most things,

34:12

the truth is usually somewhere in the

34:14

middle. So, thank you.

34:19

>> Thanks, Absolutely. Brian, how will you

34:21

be responsive to neighborhoods concerns

34:23

when they are counter to the city's

34:25

development plan?

34:26

>> Thank you, Jerry. Um, something that I

34:28

hear a lot on doors is that folks are

34:30

concerned with the direction that the

34:31

city's been going in. They think that um

34:35

folks have not been listening. I I've

34:37

heard all over W three that they have

34:39

not been able to get in contact with any

34:42

either of our city council members. Um I

34:45

also pledge to be accessible. I also do

34:48

constituent services work. I work for a

34:49

state representative. We pride ourselves

34:51

on that. We have a h coffee hour or

34:54

happy hour all over her district which

34:56

spans from West Ann Arbor to Jackson uh

34:58

just outside of Jackson. Um we do that

35:00

once a month. I'm going to move around

35:02

the district um or the ward, make sure

35:04

that um folks in every part of it can uh

35:07

attend the events and also uh ensure

35:10

that I'm again responding to folks. But

35:14

something that I'm very concerned about

35:15

is the direction that the city council

35:17

has been going, as I've said, I've heard

35:18

this a lot, that everyone on city

35:20

council rubber stamps what the mayor

35:22

wants.

35:23

I am not as convinced that uh folks who

35:27

are touting the mayor's endorsement and

35:29

the endorsement of everybody on city

35:30

council are going to be able to

35:33

withstand the pressure to vote the way

35:36

that the mayor wants. I'm somebody who

35:39

is an independent voice. I am my own

35:41

person. I am not endorsed by the mayor

35:43

or anyone on city council. I'm here for

35:45

you and I'm going to listen to you and

35:48

be responsive to your needs. This is

35:51

very important to me that all of you

35:53

know this because this town is ready for

35:56

change. I hear it everywhere. We all

35:59

feel it. This is the election that

36:02

progressives are going to come in and

36:04

actually make Ann Arbor into the

36:06

progressive beacon that we know it can

36:08

be.

36:10

It's time that we actually have change

36:12

and we have people in this town who are

36:13

going to be receptive and lead from the

36:16

bottom up from the grassroots and not

36:18

tell you how it is from the top down.

36:20

Thank you.

36:24

>> We have a ground swell of questions

36:26

about downtown businesses. I'm going to

36:28

try to combine them. How do you plan to

36:31

protect small businesses in the face of

36:33

rent and uh land value inc pressures?

36:37

What are your thoughts for improving the

36:39

downtown environment like vagrancy, pan

36:41

handling, etc. And a little more

36:43

pointed, downtown is dying. Recently,

36:45

we've seen businesses closing. Uh, if we

36:48

don't have businesses, we don't have a

36:49

town. What will you do to save the soul

36:51

of our city?

36:52

>> And Ryan, I think you're first.

36:53

>> Thank you. That's a great question. Uh,

36:55

I I like many of you, I was very

36:57

saddened to see Tio's closed this week.

37:00

Um, I had uh just I lived right around

37:04

the corner in college from Teos. I had

37:06

many great memories there, some not so

37:08

great. Um, I had a bad first date there.

37:11

We don't talk about it. It's fine. Uh,

37:13

but Tios was a lovely place. The best

37:14

carrot cake I've ever had. Um, something

37:17

that I'm concerned about the club is the

37:21

um the the um the multi-use zoning where

37:25

stores would be underneath high-rise

37:28

apartments or other buildings. Um, mixed

37:31

use zoning. Sorry, that's the

37:32

terminology. Um, I'm not against mixed

37:34

use zoning, but what we've seen is that

37:37

uh the rent becomes so prohibitively

37:39

expensive that businesses are pushed

37:41

out. Something that is a big part of

37:44

Ward 3 is the Packard corridor and all

37:47

of the lovely immigrant-owned businesses

37:49

along the Packard corridor.

37:51

>> They deserve to stay here. I want to

37:55

ensure that we are not building

37:56

highrises on top of them and pushing

37:58

them out,

37:59

>> right?

37:59

>> So, we need to ensure that any mixed

38:01

zoning that we do is keeping them here.

38:04

They are the lifeblood of our community.

38:06

And at a time when there's a bunch of

38:07

anti-immigrant hate, we need to ensure

38:09

that the immigrants that live in our

38:11

community are able to stay here and that

38:12

we protect them.

38:14

>> So yeah,

38:18

>> I and then an example of mixed use

38:21

zoning that didn't materialize is the

38:23

George.

38:24

>> They just a grocery store was there

38:27

previously.

38:28

>> We all have been hearing a lot about we

38:30

want walkable neighborhoods. We all want

38:31

walkable neighborhoods. We all want to

38:33

be able to get a croissant and coffee,

38:34

which you can at DJ's Bakery. Fun fact.

38:36

Please check it out.

38:38

>> Yep. Shout out to DJs. They're great. Uh

38:40

great blueberry uh donut. Um so the

38:44

George was buil as we're going to put in

38:47

a grocery store on the main floor and

38:50

still have the luxury housing above it.

38:52

Where's that grocery store now? It's not

38:54

there.

38:56

I'm very concerned about all of the

38:57

things for our downtown, but I'm also

38:59

really concerned about the DDA and their

39:01

just ability to do um of they are not

39:05

responsible or they are not responsive

39:07

to the voters. They are an unelected

39:09

board. I'm concerned of the decision

39:11

that they're making with the amount of

39:12

money that they have.

39:13

>> We need to ensure that we can re them in

39:15

and make sure that they're accountable

39:17

to the voters.

39:18

>> What's DDA

39:20

development authority?

39:21

>> Thank you.

39:22

>> Downtown development. downtown

39:23

Development Authority. Um,

39:26

>> okay. So, um, basically where I stand on

39:30

this is also to I I guess the other

39:32

thing to mention is that the

39:33

construction downtown has been been very

39:35

nonsensical. They've been building a

39:37

bunch or doing a lot of construction

39:38

without actually thinking it through.

39:40

That has been preventing people from

39:41

going downtown to be able to frequent

39:44

our businesses that make Ann Arbor what

39:45

it is. people out here might be more

39:48

inclined to go to chains, but we need to

39:50

make sure that we can uh divert people

39:52

downtown so they can frequent the

39:54

businesses that make Ann Arbor what it

39:55

is. Thank you.

40:02

>> I completely failed. I've lost which

40:04

car.

40:05

>> I believe in you,

40:07

>> Ryan. Can you repeat the question?

40:09

>> Sure.

40:11

The question was about uh reviving our

40:13

downtowns. Uh making sure that

40:15

businesses aren't uh pushed out.

40:18

>> Oh yeah, that's right. There's like

40:19

three of them.

40:20

>> We have vagrancy problem downtown. The

40:22

prices are going up.

40:23

>> Uh downtown is dying. Okay. City

40:25

council, do your help. Thank you.

40:27

>> Um

40:28

yeah, Timas is the greatest place on the

40:31

planet. Tas must be protected at most

40:33

costs. Um must be protected at all

40:35

costs. I also love Monty's. Bonties. Uh,

40:39

>> everything that's happening at Packard

40:41

and Plat I love. My husband and I

40:43

frequent Bombay grocery store. Not sure

40:45

if many of you have been there. Very,

40:46

very good prices on vegetables. Um,

40:50

that is the soul of our city. Uh, also,

40:53

fun fact, at the county we have these

40:56

large department head meetings and I did

40:57

a blind taste test with DJ's Donuts and

40:59

Dom's Donuts and everyone was like, "Oh,

41:01

Dom's going to win." DJ's wine made like

41:03

a lot. DJ's better than Dom's. Uh, I'm

41:06

going to say it. So, I mean, that being

41:08

said, um, what can we do downtown? Not

41:12

only have we lost Tio's, we recently

41:13

lost Ginger Deli. Um, I used to get a

41:15

bond meme at Gender Deli once a week.

41:17

Um, we also lost an Aaholic. We've lost,

41:20

which was a chain, but still own local.

41:22

Um, protecting our downtown businesses

41:25

is something that's important to me. Can

41:27

we enforce rent restrictions on the

41:30

businesses downtown? something I'm very

41:32

interested in exploring because ensuring

41:34

that the people who have held businesses

41:37

downtown for as long as they losing

41:38

downtown home and garden it felt like

41:40

felt like a soul crushing blow to me. Um

41:43

it's where we got our plans. It's where

41:45

we got our pots. Um how can we ensure

41:48

that we're protecting those kind of

41:50

landmark band institutions? Uh I'm

41:52

interested in in looking at what rent

41:54

restrictions looks like on on

41:56

businesses. Um vagrancy downtown. So, I

42:00

I work for the county. Uh what the

42:02

county is really responsible for is uh

42:04

health and mental health largely and and

42:06

and we have a sheriff and public safety,

42:09

but um I think that the city needs to

42:13

partner closely with our community

42:15

mental health to inc to kind of get more

42:18

folks out. So, the county has what we

42:20

call a path team and a crisis team. So,

42:22

if someone is experiencing a mental

42:24

health crisis, the county has a team

42:25

that responds usually within 30 minutes

42:27

to an hour.

42:29

um how can we add more funding to that

42:31

team so that when folks on our streets

42:33

are are having, you know, emergencies,

42:36

mental health emergencies, we can help

42:38

them. Uh I I I work downtown. Um I I

42:42

experience this on a daily basis. It it

42:45

is something that I think we need to

42:46

think about as we continue to preserve

42:48

the city. Um, I would be very I'd be

42:51

very supportive of increasing the the

42:54

kind of like the partnership between the

42:56

city and the county in terms of mental

42:57

health to help the folks downtown. Um,

42:59

dying downtown vagrancy businesses. Feel

43:02

like I got it. Thanks, guys.

43:08

>> And I think you were the first one for

43:10

this next question. I told you I would

43:11

get out of place. Do you support the

43:14

Hanover Hanover Republic Power Project

43:17

andor the SCU? If so, please help please

43:20

discuss how they would be planning it.

43:22

Nashville,

43:23

>> uh, this is an excellent question and a

43:25

question I was expecting to be asked

43:27

today. Um, does does everyone know what

43:30

an arm for public power is?

43:32

>> So, it is essentially an attempt for the

43:34

city to municipalize our power system.

43:37

Um, which would mean purchasing all of

43:39

the infrastructure that DTE owns and

43:42

having it run by the city.

43:45

There is likely going to be a ballot

43:47

initiative um in November that would

43:51

create a leadership. I I believe it's

43:52

like um a board that would run Anna for

43:56

public power. Um I am very interested to

43:59

see how the city votes on this proposal.

44:02

I I am someone who I'm hearing every day

44:06

when I'm when I'm knocking doors, how

44:08

can you ensure that my taxes are not

44:10

going to go up? I I worry that if we

44:13

municipalize it will be very expensive.

44:16

So, um I was talking to Linda, did I get

44:19

it right? Uh about Boulder, Colorado.

44:23

Boulder, Colorado is a really

44:25

interesting kind of case study

44:26

counterpoint for the city of Ann Arbor.

44:28

Boulder, Colorado has has gone through

44:30

they started the municipalization

44:32

process. They've gone through what it

44:34

looks like. They spent a lot of money on

44:36

lawyers and at the end of the day they

44:38

actually decided not to municipalize

44:40

because of the cost and because of the

44:42

cost it would be on the taxpayers in the

44:44

city. Um that is something I'm very

44:47

cognizant of. That's something that I

44:49

care a lot about making sure that the

44:50

people of the city are not paying for uh

44:54

are not paying a billion dollars having

44:56

a billion dollars added to the tax

44:57

rules. Um, however, I will say, um, DTE

45:02

is trash and 100% we have to hold DTE

45:07

accountable. Um, I think I think one of

45:10

the things that we also learned from

45:11

Boulder is as they went down that

45:13

municipalization path, they actually

45:15

gained some power from their from their

45:19

monopoly utility. I'm not exactly sure

45:20

what the name of their utility was. Um,

45:22

so going down the path could actually be

45:24

advantageous to the city. I am

45:27

personally interested to see number one

45:28

how the city votes on the ballot

45:30

initiative because I'm very interested

45:31

in supporting with the voter support.

45:33

Number two, I'm worried about the cost

45:35

of Anarch for public power. Thank you.

45:42

>> You don't need to repeat the question.

45:43

Um I'm going to start with agreeing with

45:45

my opponent. DT is trash, but I'm uh

45:48

really skeptical when I hear you repeat

45:50

their talking points. Um they've funded

45:54

>> speak this is not a debate.

45:56

>> Fair enough. Uh DTE thinks it is though.

45:58

They uh have invested 1.8 million into

46:02

an effort to stop us from municipalizing

46:05

because they know that it will save us

46:06

money in the long term.

46:08

>> Spoiler alert for folks who couldn't

46:10

tell. I am supportive of public power

46:11

and I do carry the petition. But it is

46:13

going to be cheaper in the long run for

46:16

us. We can even bond out for this. And

46:18

basically the model of how it would work

46:20

is even if it is a billion dollars, we

46:22

would pay the the city and then extra

46:26

money beyond just the cost of the energy

46:29

would go into another pot that could pay

46:31

down the bond. And it's been projected

46:34

that we could do this in about 10 years

46:36

and then we would permanently own our

46:37

infrastructure, which is very important.

46:39

I work in Lancet. DTE likes to throw

46:41

their money around. DTE is the biggest

46:45

um donor to both sides of the aisle. In

46:47

Democratic trifecta, we could not hold

46:48

them accountable because they literally

46:51

gave to everyone, especially our speaker

46:54

of the house who actually told us we

46:55

could not do anything to reign them in.

46:58

So, I think that at the local level

47:00

where we have the capability of doing

47:02

it, we should do it. And not only that,

47:04

it would facilitate the switch to green

47:06

energy much faster. We care about the

47:09

environment here in Ann Arbor. That's

47:11

part of our character. We should

47:13

facilitate the switch to green energy

47:16

100% renewable as quickly as humanly

47:18

possible. So I am supportive of this

47:22

effort. Uh the SEU a little less so.

47:25

There's a DTE executive that's on their

47:27

board. Little rubs me the wrong way. Um

47:33

we as a community though um have this

47:37

within us to do. It's it's not the the

47:39

vote as Ashley was saying is going to be

47:42

establishing a board that would um work

47:46

through the specifics of the plan. So we

47:49

would have half of them would be elected

47:50

and half of them would be appointed

47:52

thereby making them accountable to us

47:54

and that is the most important thing

47:55

that we can do is democratize our

47:57

processes. We the people of Ann Arbor

48:00

know better than a giant corporation

48:01

that seeks to just maximize profit and I

48:04

think over time it'll bear it out. And

48:06

then then lastly, I'll add 40

48:08

municipalities in Michigan already run

48:10

their own utility, including Lancing.

48:11

And are we really going to let them be

48:13

better than us?

48:15

>> Go Blue.

48:16

>> I know that was pandery, but go blue.

48:21

>> Thanks, Ryan. I think we've got time for

48:23

one more round of three more questions.

48:25

So, this last one's a little feisty, and

48:27

I'm going to reward it. Whoever wrote,

48:29

"What are you doing to protect us from

48:31

ICE?" I'm going to bring that down to

48:32

Ann Arbor level. I apologize. I

48:35

apologize in advance for rewarding our

48:38

police officers. I consider them quite

48:40

good, but police officers association of

48:42

Michigan, their union is very pro ICE.

48:44

The union contract is up at the end of

48:47

the year. What can city council do to

48:49

get a better uh better relationship, a

48:51

better union, better representation for

48:53

our officers here at work?

48:57

>> Oh, yes. I would be first.

48:59

>> Sorry, I logged in. All right. So, uh,

49:01

I'm very, um, interested in finding

49:04

unique ways to hold ICE accountable. I

49:06

was a little disappointed to hear Mayor

49:07

Taylor's response at the forum with, uh,

49:10

mayoral candidate Ysef Robbie. He

49:12

effectively said, "Look, there's only so

49:13

much we can do." Like, we we need to

49:16

stay within the confines of the law.

49:17

Even though this lawless organization is

49:19

just disregarding the Constitution and

49:21

barging into people's homes and taking

49:23

them, we need to be creative. We need to

49:27

use the resources that we have at our

49:29

disposal. We have snow plows. We can

49:32

schedule uh road repair. We can be just

49:35

we can impede ice as much as we can. And

49:37

also the current city council has let

49:39

ice into particular buildings. They

49:40

banned them from some, but not entirely.

49:43

We need to take a lesson from the

49:44

county. They stood up to ICE. They are

49:46

being sued by the Trump administration

49:48

for their bravery. We should do the same

49:50

in Ann Arbor. We yeah

49:54

we

49:56

have this in us to do but we just need

49:58

the will. We also can learn from

50:00

Minnesota's example. Uh Minnesota really

50:03

did a neighborhood by neighborhood

50:04

approach. We should do the same thing

50:06

all over W 3. I'd like to see signal

50:07

chats of folks um who are actively

50:11

communicating whenever they see ICE. Um

50:13

there

50:15

>> yes,

50:16

>> but it's not widely publicized and we

50:18

need to get as many people on it as

50:19

possible. There was an incident that

50:21

just happened at Scarlet um where a

50:23

parent was taken. And I will also say

50:25

this in my job I have been combating ICE

50:27

as much as I can. I actually talked with

50:29

some of the first people who were

50:31

imprisoned in Baldwin and released. Um I

50:34

sitting with people who were victims of

50:36

ISIS brutality um really shook me to my

50:39

core. I started writing legislation and

50:41

introducing it uh with my boss in the

50:43

legislature to hold ICE accountable. We

50:45

introduced a law to ban 287g agreements.

50:48

Uh this would prevent local uh police

50:50

departments uh from um uh entering into

50:54

contracts with ICE. Um we did this in

50:57

conjunction with Sheriff Alicia Dyer who

50:59

ran on that platform of we are going to

51:02

prevent ICE from taking our neighbors.

51:04

Um we've uh introduced legislation to

51:07

codify the Fourth Amendment. Didn't

51:09

think I'd say that, but they released a

51:11

memo saying, "Hey, we can just barge

51:12

into your home." Um, we need to be as

51:15

creative as humanly possible because

51:17

part of what makes Ann Arbor so great,

51:19

the largest part of what makes Ann Arbor

51:21

so great are the people that live here.

51:22

And I'll be damned if this federal

51:24

government is going to take them away

51:26

from us. They are integral to our

51:28

community. We must do everything in our

51:30

power to keep them here. Thank you.

51:38

What What are you going to do to protect

51:39

us from ICE? that I'd like to point out

51:41

are why our police officers are quite

51:43

good. They're represented by a union

51:44

that is very proise and that union's

51:46

contract is up at the end of the year.

51:48

Is there anything city council do can do

51:50

to encourage a better relationship with

51:52

union or get a better union?

51:54

>> Thank you, Derek. Um, this is a personal

51:57

question for me. I am married to an

52:00

immigrant. Um, I think it hits different

52:03

when you see immigrants being dragged

52:05

through the streets and you're married

52:06

to one. It feels very personal. Um, my

52:09

husband and I had a very serious

52:11

conversation when he was up to become an

52:13

American citizen about whether or not we

52:16

actually believed enough in this country

52:18

for him to become an American citizen.

52:21

His citizenship hearing was actually the

52:23

day after Trump got shot at that rally.

52:26

And when we saw that, we were like,

52:28

"Holy this man's going to win. Do

52:31

we want do we want to further invest in

52:34

this country?" Um, I work at the

52:36

Washington County Board of

52:37

Commissioners. Uh, I work for them. I've

52:40

been with them every step of the way as

52:41

they've been sued by the Trump

52:43

administration. The Trump administration

52:45

sued my bosses uh to get our county ID

52:49

information, which is largely for our

52:51

undocumented friends and our immigrants.

52:54

Uh, they sued the county for our I-9

52:56

information. So, that the the actual

52:58

biographical information of everyone who

53:00

works at our county. We had a meeting

53:02

where 400 people in our community came

53:04

and they gave public comment telling my

53:06

bosses to stand strong and I was with

53:08

them every single step of the way.

53:11

They're also currently being sued again

53:12

by the Trump administration for the ICE

53:15

reszone resolution that they passed

53:16

which prohibits ICE from entering any

53:19

county building. I am 100% supportive of

53:23

passing that exact same resolution for

53:25

the city. Um, I do not want the city to

53:27

have access. I I know what I used to

53:29

have access to any city properties. Very

53:32

similar to what the county did. And

53:33

guess what? If we get sued, bring it on.

53:36

Right. Nothing like we have the money

53:39

and we have the will and we have the

53:41

value to stand up to ICE in this

53:43

community. I've seen it at county. I

53:45

know that we would do the exact same

53:46

thing at Ann Arbor City Council. When it

53:49

comes to the police union, um

53:53

we do have great local police officers.

53:56

Um and we also our our our Ann Arbor

53:59

police chief is great and I and one of

54:02

the things that he's really helped

54:03

advance is um an unarmed response unit.

54:07

Um which I am also very much in support

54:09

of. Um

54:12

I think that Chief Anderson is very good

54:15

at what he does. I am someone who firmly

54:18

believes if I'm not a subject matter

54:20

expert, let's talk to the subject matter

54:22

expert and find out how they think we

54:24

should do something. I believe that

54:26

Chief Anderson as a as a chief of police

54:29

is the best person to help create that

54:32

stronger relationship with the police

54:34

union and help Ann Arbor police and the

54:37

union actually represent our values more

54:39

strongly and to make sure that we keep

54:41

federal agents, mass agents, and ICE out

54:43

of our community. Thank you so much.

54:48

Well, folks, first, thanks again for

54:50

being here. This is a great crowd.

54:52

Unfortunately, we are out of time

54:53

because we have to pack up. If you'd be

54:55

willing to carry a chair over to the

54:57

wall on my left, that'd be great. Thanks

54:59

again for coming. Thank you.

55:00

>> Thank you for coming, everybody.

55:02

>> All right. Thank you so much for

55:07

grabbing on the way out for the

Interactive Summary

This video captures the Ann Arbor Third Ward Candidate Forum, where candidates Ryan Bartholomew and Ashley Hall discuss their visions for the city. Key topics included addressing the housing affordability crisis, managing city services and road infrastructure, the comprehensive land use plan, the proposed municipalization of Ann Arbor power, and maintaining community safety, including protections against ICE. The candidates provided distinct perspectives on policy approaches while sharing their personal motivations for seeking office.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts