HomeVideos

A2Council Update: July 20, 2026 Ann Arbor City Council Meeting

Now Playing

A2Council Update: July 20, 2026 Ann Arbor City Council Meeting

Transcript

507 segments

0:00

Welcome to A2 Council Update, a recap of

0:02

the Ann Arbor City Council meeting on

0:04

July 20th, 2026. This meeting included

0:07

comments and discussion about honoring

0:10

county deputy chief public defender

0:12

Lauren Brown, buying new technology for

0:14

the police department, approving new

0:17

staff for unarmed crisis response and an

0:19

agreement with the county, reszoning

0:22

three locations, Wagner Road, Varsity

0:24

Drive, and [music] North Main. Amending

0:27

sustainability requirements for height

0:29

premiums, directing the creation of an

0:31

ordinance for tenants right to organize,

0:34

directing a future 6-month moratorum on

0:36

new short-term rental licenses, and

0:39

issuing $18 million in bonds to fund the

0:42

purchase of affordable housing. This is

0:45

the voting chart for the city council

0:46

meeting on July 20th, 2026. There was

0:49

one split vote on a resolution directing

0:52

staff to develop a moratorum on

0:54

short-term rental licenses. Council

0:56

member Lisa Dish voted against it.

0:58

Council member Erica Briggs from W 5 was

1:01

absent. Council member Gazi Edwin left

1:03

the meeting early. For Briggs, this was

1:05

her 15th absence since taking office in

1:08

November 2020. Gazy Edwin has missed 22

1:12

meetings since taking office in November

1:14

2022. You can find this voting chart and

1:17

more information about this meeting at

1:19

a2consil.com.

1:21

Like and subscribe if you would like to

1:22

see more content like this.

1:28

At the beginning of the meeting, an item

1:30

was added to the agenda in order to

1:32

honor the county deputy chief public

1:34

defender Lauren Brown, who recently

1:37

passed. A tree will be planted as a

1:39

memorial

1:41

this week. After introductory remarks,

1:43

public comments, and staff explanations,

1:46

council discussed agenda items for less

1:48

than an hour. 27 people signed up in

1:51

advance to offer public comment. 16

1:54

people spoke to topics on the agenda.

1:56

The consent agenda this week included 21

1:59

items and expenditures of over $6

2:01

million. Three items were pulled for

2:03

discussion.

2:05

Staff presented information about a

2:07

nearly $3 million contract for

2:09

technology that will support the police

2:11

department. The police chief answered

2:14

questions. The Taser 10 expands an

2:18

officer's effective range from 25 ft as

2:21

it was before to 45 ft. The standoff

2:25

distance allows for more space as

2:26

indicated, but that standoff distance

2:29

allows for us to have conversations that

2:32

will keep us in a position to

2:35

deescalate. I declined and turned down

2:38

the ability to use license plate reader.

2:42

We are not able, we are not using that.

2:45

Our axon uh AI is a redaction tool. The

2:49

tool does not use facial recogni rec

2:53

recognition technology does not use it.

2:56

Now in speaking to Axon they have

2:58

indicated that they're open to our

3:00

council's recommendation regarding an

3:03

independent audit and they already have

3:05

one in place. They have Axon AI ethics

3:09

board.

3:10

>> The contract was approved unanimously.

3:14

Council considered a budget amendment to

3:16

add four full-time employees in order to

3:18

implement a pilot unarmed response

3:20

program for public safety. This program

3:23

was first funded 5 years ago. This is

3:26

its initial launch. Earlier in the

3:28

evening, candidate for city council in

3:30

Ward 1, Rebecca Erenss, offered a public

3:33

comment. As someone who works in psych

3:35

emergency services, I know that dispatch

3:38

criteria, inter agency coordination,

3:41

clinical responsibility, and clear

3:43

performance standards are the foundation

3:45

of a safe and effective crisis response.

3:48

The public deserves a transparent

3:50

accounting of current public safety

3:52

resources. Staff explained the pilot

3:55

program. This will allow us to

3:57

officially start building the support

3:58

the supportive response and outreach

4:00

team as it was presented to you in

4:03

December. The most important

4:06

consideration is whether the program has

4:08

the clinical, operational, and follow-up

4:11

capacity to safely respond, connect

4:13

people to care, evaluate outcomes, and

4:16

adapt as demand evolves.

4:18

>> Council members expressed support. What

4:21

I am most proud of with Sprout is what

4:25

it is not. It is not armed. It is not

4:28

AAPD. It is a fully civilian unarmed

4:32

response staffed by licensed social

4:34

workers trained in crisis intervention

4:36

and trauma-informed care. In addition to

4:39

resolving a crisis in the moment, the

4:41

goal is to prevent the next one. At what

4:44

point might we consider the pilot status

4:48

complete in terms of time past or

4:51

outcomes and what changes might we

4:53

envision should we decide to move to

4:56

permanent program status?

4:58

>> We want to make sure that we start it

5:01

move forward and refine it as we go. Um

5:04

so if that takes some time it might take

5:07

some time. out of all the places that we

5:09

visited, uh, there wasn't any cities

5:12

that had the pilot for less than 12

5:15

months on the ground. So, that's that's

5:17

the minimum.

5:18

>> The budget amendment for four additional

5:20

full-time employees was approved

5:21

unanimously.

5:23

Council considered an agreement for the

5:25

city to pay the county's community

5:27

mental health program $135,000

5:30

in order to receive just over 2,000

5:32

clinician hours per year in support of

5:35

the Ann Arbor Police Department. Earlier

5:37

in the evening, Democratic candidate for

5:39

state senate Felicia Braybeck offered a

5:42

comment in support as did Democratic

5:44

Council candidate Rebecca Erenss. and

5:46

I'm so happy to be back uh and want to

5:50

offer my thanks and support for the

5:53

resolution to approve the

5:54

intergovernmental agreement with

5:56

community mental health to support the

5:58

co-response program with the Ann Arbor

6:00

Police Department. I support expanding

6:03

behavioral health crisis response and I

6:06

support accountability.

6:08

I support CA21 because it strengthens

6:11

the existing community mental health

6:13

co-response model. The Ann Arbor Police

6:16

Chief explained the proposal.

6:18

>> The police department and our

6:20

professionals do not want to respond and

6:24

encounter a person that has some type

6:27

some type of minuity that doesn't

6:30

require the police officers to be there.

6:33

We're bringing in police officers that

6:35

are trained differently from the way

6:37

they were in the past. So now what you

6:40

have is a police officer that has

6:43

additional training outside the norm.

6:46

Training that allow for that police

6:48

officer to respond in concert with a

6:51

clinician.

6:52

>> Council reacted.

6:53

>> I'm glad that this response is being

6:55

implemented by AAPD and is informed by

6:58

current best practices.

7:00

>> The agreement and expenditure was

7:02

approved unanimously.

7:04

After a brief introduction, council

7:06

unanimously approved a resoning on

7:08

Wagner Road. Council considered a

7:11

resoning on Varsity Drive in an area of

7:14

mostly warehouses and office space. At

7:16

first reading, it was pointed out that

7:18

the proposed resoning would permit

7:20

full-time short-term rentals. This week,

7:22

a condition was added to the resoning

7:25

that would prohibit use of the housing

7:27

units as non-owner occupied short-term

7:29

rentals. The reasonzoning with

7:31

conditions was approved unanimously

7:33

without discussion.

7:35

Council considered a resoning on North

7:37

Main, including a condition of height

7:40

limit.

7:41

>> I'd also like to observe that I of

7:42

course have too received the

7:43

communication from the neighborhood

7:44

organization with respect to the

7:46

potential presidential value of this

7:48

parcel. They observe that the 75 ft uh

7:51

limit is uh contextually uh appropriate,

7:54

but what might not be otherwise uh and

7:56

in their view would not be otherwise

7:58

contextually appropriate for

8:01

uh other parcels deep within the

8:03

neighborhood. And I totally see that

8:05

>> the reasonzoning was approved

8:06

unanimously.

8:08

Council considered final approval for an

8:10

ordinance amendment to allow

8:12

developments to exceed height limits

8:14

when they meet sustainability

8:15

requirements. The amendment will allow

8:17

developments to make payments in Lu for

8:19

a portion of solar installation

8:21

requirements. Earlier in the evening,

8:23

council approved the framework for

8:25

calculating those payments in L where

8:27

developers cannot cover enough of the

8:29

building footprint with solar collector

8:31

surface. Where a developer cannot meet a

8:33

requirement for 60% coverage, the

8:36

developer can provide at least 20%

8:38

coverage and pay fees in lie. Developers

8:41

will pay about $60 per square foot of

8:44

solar collection coverage. they cannot

8:46

install.

8:47

A public commenter offered feedback.

8:49

>> This was intended to be an incentive,

8:51

but it's become a loophole.

8:54

Um, we should be asking a lot more for

8:56

that extra height. For that extra 30%

8:58

height, construction should be net zero

9:02

energy in compliance with appendix CC of

9:06

the state energy code. Um, as the A20

9:09

plan stipulates, uh, if a developer

9:11

chooses not to comply, they can go with

9:14

this the affordable housing 15% of units

9:17

to get the 30% extra height.

9:20

Uh, but as it stands, uh, this ordinance

9:24

actually sets back, I think, our our

9:26

sustainability goals. This was a topic

9:28

that we discussed in the renters's

9:30

commission which is that the uh

9:32

affordability section of this uh

9:34

exception to height limit was something

9:36

which wasn't being um utilized

9:38

effectively because of the

9:40

sustainability loophole. Um we would

9:43

like to see affordability take front and

9:46

center with uh height exceptions.

9:48

>> Council discussed it. This is an

9:50

improvement that is needed now because

9:53

we are seeing taller, narrower buildings

9:56

in downtown where there may not be

9:58

enough roof space to accommodate 60%

10:02

solar panel coverage in addition to the

10:05

mechanicals that need to go up there.

10:06

>> I think this item tonight is a

10:08

meaningful step in the right direction

10:10

uh on the long road towards achieving uh

10:13

our housing and sustainability goals.

10:15

The ordinance amendment was approved

10:16

unanimously.

10:18

After a brief introduction, council

10:20

unanimously approved an ordinance to

10:22

regulate the trimming of oak trees in

10:24

order to prevent the spread of oakwilt

10:26

disease.

10:28

Council considered a resolution

10:29

directing the city attorney to prepare

10:31

an ordinance establishing the tenants

10:33

right to organize. The ordinance will be

10:36

prepared by September 8th. The renters

10:38

commission discussed this at a meeting 5

10:41

months ago. Council member Travis Redina

10:43

and Council Member Cynthia Harrison are

10:45

liaons to the renters commission. Redina

10:48

was absent for the meeting when it was

10:50

presented. In February, the renters

10:52

commission passed a resolution

10:54

acknowledging that a draft ordinance had

10:56

been developed and presented by the Ann

10:58

Arbor Tenants Union. That resolution

11:00

asked city council to collaborate with

11:02

the tenants union and other stakeholders

11:04

to approve an ordinance. Commenters

11:07

offered feedback about the resolution

11:09

directing staff to prepare an ordinance.

11:11

Neither the renters commission nor the

11:13

tenants union were informed of this

11:15

development despite asking about the

11:16

right to organize ordinance for months.

11:18

>> We talked with legal scholars in housing

11:20

so Jim Shasma says Gail Rosen who run

11:22

the renters commission. Now we see this

11:24

proposal right for the request that does

11:26

not reference pretendence union [snorts]

11:27

does not reference the draft ordinance

11:29

that we prepared. I personally don't

11:31

know if it's a political stunt if it's a

11:33

lack of care for community engagement or

11:35

if it's a simple mistake. And finally,

11:36

I'd like to clarify that um the the

11:39

resolution asked the city of Stormy to

11:40

provide the language um by um I think

11:42

September 8th, but um the resolution was

11:44

the language was already provided five

11:46

months ago. Um so that's that's that's

11:49

the main. Thank you.

11:51

>> My name is Hannah Larsenes and I am the

11:53

vice chair of the Ann Arbor Renters

11:54

Commission. In February 2026, the

11:57

renters commission endorsed a right to

11:59

organize ordinance as presented by the

12:01

Ann Arbor Tenants Union in the Hiron

12:04

Valley DSA. Since February, the

12:06

renters's commission has asked for an

12:08

update on the right to organize every

12:09

month. Yet, we have not been presented

12:12

with any feedback nor an amended draft

12:14

of the ordinance.

12:15

>> And renters commission was completely

12:17

unaware of this resolution on the agenda

12:18

despite their asking for discussion on

12:20

the right to organize for the past 5

12:22

months. And it begins to look like this

12:24

effort is a little bit more of a

12:26

political move than a good faith effort

12:27

to engage with the needs of renters in

12:29

Ann Arbor.

12:30

>> And I personally submitted the original

12:31

draft language for review on March 5th.

12:34

encourage greater communication between

12:36

council, the commission, and authors of

12:39

the ordinance so that we can achieve our

12:40

shared goals, which I know are expanding

12:43

tenants rights. My name is Allesia, and

12:45

I'm a tenant and a member of the Ann

12:47

Arbor tenants union. Just a couple of

12:49

weeks ago, each of you received an email

12:51

from an AU or HBDSA member asking you to

12:54

support and endorse the tenant bill of

12:55

rights. And so far, you have not done

12:57

either. Not to mention the months of

12:59

silence from you regarding the right to

13:00

organize ordinance when we asked for

13:02

feedback and comments. Council member

13:04

Redina and the mayor weighed in.

13:07

>> I want to start tonight by personally

13:08

apologizing to the advocates who

13:10

expressed their frustration this evening

13:12

with communication and process uh as I

13:14

did earlier today by email. Uh this

13:16

resolution tonight is an effort to

13:18

expedite and further prioritize this

13:20

issue. It is also a bit disappointing to

13:23

hear many of the people I have worked

13:24

alongside suddenly suggesting that these

13:26

efforts are just politics as we approach

13:28

an election.

13:30

The deadline in this resolution provides

13:32

direction to have an ordinance ready by

13:33

for introduction at the September 8th

13:35

council meeting simultaneous to this

13:37

review period. That means the sponsors

13:39

will have the final legislation, the

13:41

final version of the legislation to

13:43

continue ongoing engagement with

13:45

impacted community members and

13:46

organizations.

13:47

>> I'm excited about the passage of the

13:50

ordinance ultimately and the good work

13:52

that it will do for the residents of our

13:54

community. The resolution directing

13:56

preparation of an ordinance was approved

13:58

unanimously.

14:00

Council considered another resolution

14:02

directing the city attorney to prepare

14:03

an ordinance. That ordinance would

14:05

establish a six-month moratorum on

14:07

short-term rental or STR licenses.

14:11

STR investors offered comments.

14:14

>> We've registered. We've passed

14:15

inspections. We'd pay non-homestead

14:18

taxes. And relying on this framework,

14:20

we've now invested in renovating two

14:22

more historic commercial properties. A

14:25

blanket freeze would mainly harm the

14:27

people trying to comply, people like us.

14:29

>> We've invested uh hundreds of hours and

14:32

thousands of dollars to get this

14:34

property off the ground only to find out

14:37

this weekend that this moratorum is

14:39

coming.

14:40

>> I would like to express my support for

14:42

the short-term rental moratorum. You may

14:45

not hear the voices of in our brights

14:47

pushed out because of lack of housing

14:49

tonight. They are no longer in this

14:51

city, but we would tell you this, which

14:55

is that we need more housing fast and we

15:00

do not need a game day getaway.

15:02

>> Some cynical voters are wondering, why

15:05

is this important issue only coming up

15:07

at the very last council meeting before

15:10

the critical August primary? Three years

15:12

ago, you reszoned a large property near

15:15

the stadium to permit the prospective

15:18

developer, a large campaign donor, to

15:21

rent out 30% of her units on a

15:24

short-term basis. Six years ago, a

15:27

council not controlled by the mayor

15:30

voted to take action on this problem.

15:33

And once the mayor regained a majority,

15:36

his council diluted those restrictions

15:38

for better or for worse. But since then,

15:40

there have been well over a hundred

15:42

council meetings with no real action to

15:46

check the growth of Airbnbs. I'm happy

15:49

you're putting a moratorium on STRs.

15:51

That should have been done years ago. Or

15:53

when folks asked to put it in the club.

15:55

Now in election eve, you're finally

15:57

doing it. You've done reszonings

15:59

allowing more. You've had six years to

16:02

study and react but have done nothing.

16:03

One short-term rental host argued that

16:06

there was an abundance of housing that

16:07

could be Airbnbs instead of sitting

16:10

empty.

16:10

>> Thousands of new beds are expected to

16:12

come online over the next few years. As

16:14

someone who works in leasing every day,

16:16

I have already seen the market shift

16:18

dramatically. Renters now have more

16:20

choices than ever before, and I believe

16:21

that's a positive thing. However, that

16:24

also means there are properties that are

16:26

appropriately zoned for short-term

16:28

rentals that may sit vacant for long

16:30

periods of time without being rented. In

16:32

discussion by friendly amendment,

16:34

council added language to clarify that a

16:36

moratorum happen while allowing renewal

16:39

licenses for existing and compliant

16:41

short-term rentals. It does not impose a

16:44

moratorum at this time. This resolution

16:47

asks city staff to identify issues that

16:49

would need to be addressed by staff

16:51

during such a moratorum. You know, I

16:53

will say I am fully hopeful that we're

16:55

going to get back some strong

16:57

recommendations on further regulation,

16:59

>> but a moratorum is a strong and broad

17:01

action and I do not think the arguments

17:03

and evidence in this resolution fully

17:04

warrant the city administrator preparing

17:07

and the city council considering a

17:09

moratorum. But they do not fully

17:10

understand how a moratorum on issuing

17:13

new STR licenses, not renewals but new

17:18

for new STRs will provide a remedy for

17:21

the most significant problems associated

17:23

with principal residents STRs.

17:25

>> STRs uh understand and they do have

17:28

benefit for visitors and for uh

17:30

entrepreneur local entrepreneurs who are

17:32

engaging with them. Uh they do take up

17:35

rental units. They do take up units that

17:37

could and would and uh I uh expect

17:40

should be used for long-term residents.

17:43

>> The resolution was approved with only

17:45

council member Lisa Dish voting no.

17:48

Without discussion, council unanimously

17:51

approved two area plans for projects at

17:53

locations on Varsity Drive and North

17:55

Main, which were reszoned earlier in the

17:58

meeting.

18:00

Finally, council discussed the issuance

18:02

of $18 million in bonds in order for the

18:05

housing commission to purchase housing

18:07

units at Victor's Way.

18:09

>> Are the is the public going to be made

18:11

aware of the amorization schedule of the

18:14

bond and the payback of the bond?

18:17

>> To answer the uh commenters's question,

18:20

yes, the amortization schedule will be

18:22

made public as is required for a public

18:25

offering. This is a purchase of an

18:27

existing structure and the renovation of

18:29

that structure. The purchase and rehab

18:31

is much less expensive than initial full

18:35

construction. City council went into

18:37

close session for about 10 minutes to

18:39

discuss privileged communications sent

18:41

on July 17th. After the closed session,

18:44

more public commenters spoke to topics

18:46

not on the agenda. The meeting adjourned

18:49

before 11 p.m. For more information

18:52

about this meeting, visit a2consil.com.

18:56

Welcome to this week's A2 Council Moment

19:00

of Zed.

19:03

What specific adjustments, if any, were

19:06

made to fit this unit to Ann Arbor

19:10

Police Department's particular

19:11

operations, call value, and geography

19:15

rather than simply replicating the

19:17

county model as is.

19:21

There is an author that I highly respect

19:26

and he wrote a book and the book is

19:28

called it always begins with leadership.

19:32

Now

19:34

with that book this always begins with

19:37

leadership.

Interactive Summary

The Ann Arbor City Council meeting on July 20, 2026, covered a diverse range of municipal issues, including public safety, housing, and land use. Key actions included approving a contract for police technology and creating an unarmed crisis response team, as well as initiating a six-month moratorium on new short-term rental licenses. The council also addressed tenant rights, sustainable development, and approved $18 million in bonds for the purchase of affordable housing.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts