Candada doesn't want a 'partial' trade agreement with the US
18 segments
And you know, what the issue has been
for us has been a comprehensive
agreement.
We understand
the US approach to strategic sectors,
what they call strategic sectors. They
are strategic sectors, but under their
definition 232 definitions, that's
aluminum, that's forest products, that's
steel, that's automobiles,
pharmaceuticals, copper, others. But
those first four being the most
important for the Canadian economy. And
that uh
we don't want a partial agreement. We
want something that addresses those
sectors as well, so that is a viable
approach going forward.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The speaker discusses the necessity of a comprehensive trade agreement with the US, highlighting that Canadian economic interests depend on including key sectors like steel, aluminum, forest products, and automobiles rather than settling for partial deals.
Videos recently processed by our community