HomeVideos

The Quitting Expert: Quit NOW Before AI Makes The Choice For You, This Is a Superpower! | Seth Godin

Now Playing

The Quitting Expert: Quit NOW Before AI Makes The Choice For You, This Is a Superpower! | Seth Godin

Transcript

3185 segments

0:00

How do I know when to quit something?

0:02

>> It's okay. You can quit things.

0:04

>> Hang on a minute. When I went to the gym

0:05

this morning, there was the Michael

0:07

Jordan quote.

0:08

>> If you [music] quit once, it becomes a

0:10

habit. Never quit. He's wrong. And it's

0:13

very clear that he's wrong. And I've

0:15

failed more times than most people are

0:16

listening to this. And the simple secret

0:18

for the power of quitting is the dip.

0:20

And the dip describes something in the

0:21

world that no one talks about. And so,

0:23

one of the things I try to do is help

0:25

people understand it. Because my whole

0:27

career is about how can I help people do

0:29

better, find [music] why they're stuck,

0:31

realize what's holding them back, go

0:32

solve the problem. Because problems are

0:34

opportunity. And I believe all problems

0:36

can be solved. But what we're wrestling

0:38

now with is people are afraid. People

0:40

are lonely. People are disconnected.

0:42

They're victims of all sorts of media

0:44

and commercial systems. And we've been

0:46

indoctrinated to not notice it.

0:47

>> So I really want to just focus in on

0:49

people who feel stuck right now.

0:51

>> So there's this [music] philosophy which

0:52

is the key to figuring out our

0:54

stuckness. The donkey is trapped halfway

0:56

[music] between the water and the

0:58

carrot. The donkey is thirsty and

1:00

hungry, but he's unwilling to move away

1:02

[music] from either of the things he

1:03

wants. So, he starves to death and he

1:05

dies of thirst. And all of us do this

1:07

and we do it with one simple word, but I

1:10

want to run the marathon, but I don't

1:12

want to get tired. I want to have a job

1:13

that fulfills me, but [music] I also

1:15

like this car and this house. And so, I

1:17

can give you tools that can help you

1:19

overcome resistance. And also I can give

1:21

you the mechanics to become the person

1:23

your future self thanks you for.

1:24

>> And then the skill of overcoming shame

1:26

or embarrassment [music] might be one of

1:28

the most important skills in the modern

1:29

world today. How do I get better at

1:30

dealing with that?

1:31

>> So let me try to make it really simple.

1:33

>> The floor is yours.

1:34

>> So

1:37

this is super interesting to me. My team

1:38

given me this report to show me how many

1:40

of you that watch this show subscribe.

1:41

And some of you have told us according

1:43

to this that you are unsubscribed from

1:45

the channel randomly. So, favor to ask

1:47

all of you, please could you check right

1:48

now if you've hit the subscribe button,

1:50

if you are a regular viewer of the show

1:51

and you like what we do here. We're

1:53

approaching quite a significant landmark

1:54

on this show in terms of a subscriber

1:56

number. So, if there was one simple free

1:58

thing that you could do to help us, my

2:00

team, everyone here to keep this show

2:02

free, to keep it improving year over

2:04

year and week over week, it is just to

2:06

hit that subscribe button and to double

2:07

check if you've hit it. Only thing I'll

2:09

ever ask of you, do we have a deal? If

2:11

you do it, I'll tell you what I'll do.

2:12

I'll make sure every single week, every

2:15

single month, we fight harder and harder

2:16

and harder and harder to bring you the

2:17

guests and conversations that you want

2:19

to hear. I've stayed true to that

2:20

promise since the very beginning of the

2:21

D ofio and I will not let you down.

2:24

Please help us. Really appreciate it.

2:26

Let's get on with the show.

2:28

[music]

2:31

Seth Golden, for my audience who have

2:34

just clicked on this conversation, my

2:36

question to you is by the time this

2:38

conversation is done, what do you hope

2:40

that they're going to come away with?

2:42

What questions in their life are they

2:43

going to have answers to?

2:45

>> Some of your best guests are world

2:47

experts and they show up and they say,

2:49

"I did the research. I did the math. Do

2:51

this because I told you to." And I've

2:54

never done that. I show up and I try to

2:57

paint a picture for people of what the

2:59

words mean and what the systems are like

3:01

and then encourage you to do things

3:02

because you told.

3:05

And so what I think we're wrestling now

3:08

with is people are afraid. People are

3:10

lonely. People are disconnected. They're

3:12

victims of all sorts of media and

3:15

commercial systems. And we've been

3:17

indoctrinated to not notice it. And

3:20

there are problems all around us. And if

3:21

we can solve problems, we can make

3:23

things better. So what I want to help

3:25

people do is find the words to talk

3:28

about their problem, realize what's

3:30

holding them back, go solve the problem.

3:32

Because when we solve problems, we make

3:34

things better for ourselves and for

3:35

other people. So problems aren't

3:38

something to be avoided. Problems are

3:39

are opportunity.

3:41

And I believe all problems can be

3:43

solved. Some things aren't problems.

3:46

They're situations and you have to live

3:48

with them. But if it's a problem, it

3:50

means there's a solution. And I would

3:52

like to help people find the vision and

3:55

the words to see where they're stuck,

3:58

why they're stuck, and whether it's a

4:00

problem or a situation. If it's a

4:01

problem and someone's going to benefit

4:03

from you solving it, I hope I can give

4:05

you the mechanics, the tools, the

4:07

vocabulary to go move forward toward

4:10

better.

4:11

>> And what kind of problems specifically

4:14

do you try and solve for people in your

4:15

work, but also in this more recent book

4:17

that you've just written called the not?

4:20

>> So, I don't solve problems for people,

4:22

they solve problems for themselves. And

4:24

when someone points out to you

4:27

where the problem is, you can now make a

4:29

new decision. Right? So if someone's

4:32

applying for college, it's super easy if

4:34

you're 17 years old to get all hung up

4:36

on I'm about to be judged. How are they

4:38

going to know the real me? What if I get

4:39

rejected? Am I a loser? Have I wasted my

4:41

whole life? But once you see the college

4:43

industrial complex, once you understand

4:46

the agenda of the admissions office,

4:48

once you realize what people are looking

4:50

at and why, you say, "Oh, this is a

4:53

game. This is a game like Settlers of

4:55

Katan or Monopoly. And if I win this

4:57

game, it's not because I'm a good

4:59

person. It's because I played the game

5:00

better. If I lose the game, same thing.

5:03

Once you see that, all the drama and

5:06

entanglement of applying for college

5:09

moves to the side. You say, "What's in

5:11

it for the admissions officer to see the

5:13

person I want to present to them?

5:15

Because if I can solve their problem,

5:17

I'm going to go to the school I want to

5:18

go to." Well, that's true in so many

5:21

parts of our lives. is there. We engage

5:24

with a system or a person or a boss or a

5:27

co-orker or spouse and we think we're

5:30

right. We've got all this noise in our

5:32

head. We think everyone can hear the

5:33

noise in our head. They can't. We think

5:35

everyone wants what we want. They don't.

5:39

And so we show up saying, "It's my turn.

5:42

I need to get this." And now we have a

5:45

problem. And the reason we have a

5:46

problem is because that other person

5:48

thinks they're as right as we think

5:49

we're right. And they have a different

5:51

problem. So we're colliding. But if we

5:54

can see that all of this is a dynamic

5:58

within family systems, corporate

6:01

systems, commercial systems,

6:03

we can understand what are the forces at

6:05

work. Now that we see them, we can use

6:08

them to get to where we want to go.

6:10

>> You know, it's funny because I I go out

6:12

into the world and I I sit in taxis and

6:15

I I walk down the street and people come

6:16

up to me and I get sort of an idea of

6:18

the personas of people watching. And

6:20

because I get in a lot of taxis, I have

6:21

a lot of conversations with taxi

6:23

drivers. So, they're one persona in my

6:24

head. And then, you know, the other is

6:25

maybe like a a mother with with with a

6:28

kid or two who's trying to make a change

6:30

in in their sort of later career. For

6:32

those people, the average person

6:34

listening right now,

6:36

>> where is it that they want to go to? And

6:38

I don't mean specifically, I don't mean

6:39

job. Where is it that they want to go to

6:41

and where are they?

6:42

>> Right? I think most people we meet would

6:45

like to be seen, missed if they are

6:48

gone, understood, and of use. Right?

6:53

That's something that's crosses borders

6:55

and cultures. And yet we end up being a

6:58

cog in a system. The Uber driver racing

7:01

around doing things they wouldn't

7:02

ordinarily do because the system is

7:04

pushing them to cut every corner. or the

7:06

mom who's struggling because the

7:09

financial system that she's stuck in is

7:12

pushing her away from the kind of work

7:15

or parenting she wants to do. And many

7:18

of those things are injustices and some

7:20

of those things cannot be fixed by an

7:21

individual. We can accept those as

7:23

situations. You're not going to change

7:25

Uber. Uber is going to be the way Uber

7:27

is going to be. And if you choose to be

7:28

an Uber driver, the rules of Uber come

7:30

with it. But other things are things

7:33

where we get to make a choice. And I'm

7:36

not saying I want to be really clear.

7:38

I'm not saying anyone deserves an

7:40

injustice. Anyone deserves where they're

7:43

are right now. But given who you are,

7:45

given where you are, what are the

7:48

choices you do have? And how do we get

7:51

out of the not the stuckness of wanting

7:55

two things that we can't have at the

7:57

same time? Because it's when we want two

7:59

things at the same time that cannot

8:01

coexist that we feel stuck. And that

8:05

feeling of stuckness robs us from the

8:08

chance to be of use. It robs us from the

8:10

chance to get to that place that deep

8:12

down we want to go. So I use the word

8:14

purpose and what I mean by that is not

8:16

you're born with a purpose because I

8:18

don't think you were. But you can choose

8:21

with intent the purpose of whatever

8:23

you're going to do tomorrow. That

8:24

purpose might be I need to get paid.

8:27

That purpose might be I need to get this

8:28

date. That purpose might be I need to

8:30

put something on the internet that

8:32

changes the lives of a thousand people.

8:35

When you say your purpose out loud, the

8:37

purpose of this work is so and so. Then

8:40

I say back to you the very first

8:41

question which is the key. Who who is

8:44

this for? Is it for everyone or is it

8:48

for 12 people or a thousand people? What

8:51

change are you here to make and for who?

8:54

And if we can't figure out who the who

8:56

is, then we feel like there's just this

8:58

amorphous horrible heavy blanket on us

9:00

trapping us. But if you can find the

9:02

five people you can solve a problem for

9:04

or the 25 people who would miss you, it

9:07

starts to work. So, let me give you a

9:08

quick story to help you understand the

9:10

analogy. You're a stand-up comic. You've

9:13

been working really hard. Um, and your

9:15

agent calls, I got a great gig. So, you

9:17

go and there's 100 people there and you

9:19

bomb. Not one laugh for 10 minutes. And

9:22

you leave the stage. Then you find out

9:25

it's a tour group from Italy and no one

9:28

in the room speaks English.

9:30

So, who bombed? Right? It's your agent

9:32

who put you in the wrong room. There was

9:34

nothing wrong with your jokes. It was a

9:36

mismatch because the audience didn't

9:38

speak English. So, you're allowed to

9:40

say, "It's not for you." When we show up

9:44

to try to engage with someone it's not

9:46

for, if we read the comments, if we read

9:48

the reviews, and someone gives a great

9:51

book a one-star review,

9:53

all that one star review says is, "This

9:55

book wasn't for me." That's all they

9:56

needed to write. Nothing else in the

9:58

review is helpful because someone else

10:00

thought it was five-star book. So the

10:02

author has learned nothing. So we pick

10:05

who it's for. What is our intent? This

10:08

person I'm going to help. I'm going to

10:10

trade with. I'm going to engage. I'm

10:12

going to sell to or whatever. Who

10:14

exactly? What do they believe? What do

10:16

they want? What are they afraid of? If I

10:19

can solve their problem,

10:21

they're going to want to engage. And I

10:24

can be of use. And then I can do it

10:26

again. and then I can do it again.

10:28

>> Is this a point about getting unstuck in

10:30

your current situation? Is it come right

10:33

back to who you want to serve, their

10:37

persona, what their needs are, and then

10:39

focusing on that? Cuz I'm thinking again

10:40

about this Uber driver who feels

10:42

somewhat powerless in their life. They

10:43

they they think I've got to sell my time

10:45

to make this much money, but I'm not

10:47

satisfied and I'm not fulfilled. So, how

10:49

does what you've just said sort of

10:50

dovetail into that person's life?

10:53

So people sometimes call me a marketer

10:55

and I had the luxury of starting my

10:58

career right when television was dying.

11:00

So before that marketing meant big

11:02

companies buying ads, interrupting

11:04

people, hustling them etc. And then it

11:07

shifted. So I got to define marketing as

11:10

anything I wanted. And I have defined

11:12

marketing as telling a true story to the

11:15

right people in a way that helps them

11:17

get where they want that they will tell

11:19

their friends about. If you do those

11:21

steps, you're not doing any of the icky

11:23

part. You're being of service. And you

11:26

don't have to have a budget to do this.

11:28

We are all marketing. When you walk in

11:30

in tatty jeans to a job interview at an

11:33

investment bank, you've just marketed

11:35

yourself by your clothing, right?

11:38

There's a signal that you chose to send

11:40

and that they will receive or not

11:41

receive. So when we think about the

11:45

agency, the freedom that each of us

11:47

have, we have the freedom to decide who

11:51

we're going to show up for and what's

11:52

the story that's built in. So back to

11:54

this Uber driver, if you want to make a

11:57

living driving a car and meeting

11:59

interesting people, one thing you could

12:01

do is give up all of your freedom to

12:03

Uber and let them find you, the

12:05

passengers. But the other thing you

12:08

could do is realize that there are 75

12:10

people who live in this suburb of your

12:12

town who need to get somewhere reliably

12:15

and safely and would be delighted to

12:17

have you be their driver. And when you

12:21

hand out the right cards to the right

12:23

people, making it clear what you do and

12:25

don't do and who you do it for and don't

12:27

do it for, getting to 15 regular

12:30

customers is not out of reach

12:32

>> as a private chauffeur.

12:33

>> Yeah. that path is a better use of his

12:36

tomorrow

12:37

>> than [clears throat] simply being ground

12:39

out by some social media company or or

12:43

ride sharing service.

12:44

>> Bringing it back to this this rope thing

12:46

over here because I really want to just

12:48

focus in on people who feel stuck right

12:50

now. The essence of where I'm trying to

12:51

go to this conversation is I want to

12:53

speak to people that currently feel

12:54

stuck but they know that they're capable

12:56

of more. They know that they could have

12:57

another life, but they practically don't

12:59

understand, I guess, both the

13:00

psychology, the systems, the mechanisms,

13:03

and I guess what they can control in

13:05

order to move from where they are to

13:07

where they want to be.

13:07

>> Right.

13:08

>> There's a rope here. Yeah.

13:09

>> And it serves as a somewhat interesting

13:11

analogy for I guess being stuck and

13:15

pulling on the wrong thing.

13:17

>> Yeah. You sound like a magician. Yeah.

13:18

Okay.

13:19

>> I mean, do you know the analogy? Because

13:20

I don't.

13:20

>> Yes, I do. So, 2,500 years ago, this guy

13:24

named Alexander. who didn't have a last

13:25

name yet, showed up outside of a small

13:28

village in Turkey and there was a legend

13:30

from King Midas. There was a wagon there

13:33

and it was tied with a complicated knot.

13:36

And the legend was whoever could untie

13:38

this knot would become the ruler of huge

13:42

parts of Europe. And Alexander was 21

13:45

years old and he did not use a knife. He

13:47

did not cut anything. But he looked at

13:49

this knot that was tied to the wagon and

13:53

he did one thing that no one before him

13:55

had ever done. He realized that there

13:57

was a pole in the center of it that it

13:59

was tied around and he removed

14:04

the pole and then he could see by

14:07

looking very carefully how the whole

14:10

knot was held together

14:13

and he could untie it with no trouble

14:14

whatsoever.

14:16

And then he became Alexander the Great

14:18

because the secret the simple secret was

14:22

we are stuck because we can't see what's

14:26

holding us there. If what's holding us

14:29

there we cannot change like gravity is

14:31

holding us to earth. Gravity is not a

14:33

problem. Gravity is a situation. Going

14:35

to the moon doesn't deny gravity. It

14:38

works with the fact that it exists. But

14:41

we are working with problems, but we're

14:46

confused

14:47

because we want two things. So, can I

14:50

show you what I mean?

14:51

>> Yeah.

14:51

>> Okay. So, here's an actual carrot and

14:55

here is actual water. This is not

14:58

actually a dunkey, but let's pretend

15:01

this is a dunkey. Okay. In Burden's

15:04

philosophy experiment from a couple

15:06

hundred years ago, the dunkey is hungry

15:08

and thirsty. He has complete freedom. He

15:11

can move. And he's halfway between a

15:14

pile of carrots and a bucket of water.

15:17

And he's trapped because every time he

15:19

moves toward the water, he's moving away

15:21

from the carrot. Can't do that cuz he's

15:22

hungry. And every time he moves toward

15:24

the carrot, he's moving away from the

15:25

water. Can't do that because he's

15:27

thirsty. And so in the experiment,

15:29

because we're trapped, we end up dying

15:32

of hunger and thirst. And all of us do

15:35

this. And we do it with one simple word

15:39

which is but. I want this but I also

15:43

want that. Right? I want to have a

15:47

creative life but I never want to get

15:49

rejected. I want to run the marathon but

15:53

I don't want to get tired. And we hide

15:56

the butt. We don't say the butt out

15:57

loud. So my favorite story which I talk

16:00

about in the book is Jackson Pollock. So

16:03

Jackson Pollock was the most famous

16:05

painter in America in the 1940s about 80

16:09

years ago. He was on the cover of Life

16:11

magazine. He had three years where he

16:13

could do no wrong. His paintings were

16:17

snapped up. Everyone saw him as a little

16:20

bit of a hero. It's very unusual for an

16:22

artist to be a hero in their own

16:23

lifetime.

16:25

And his wife Lee Kraner later said that

16:28

he felt like he had done everything he

16:29

could do with this cycle of art. And

16:32

what most people in that situation would

16:34

have done is become a Jackson Pollock

16:36

cover band. Paint more versions of his

16:38

old paintings. Take the money. You've

16:40

won. He wanted to be a brilliant

16:44

creator. He wanted to be on the

16:46

frontier. So he stopped painting Jackson

16:49

Pollock paintings. He went to a studio

16:51

and came up with a whole new style.

16:54

Different size canvas, different

16:55

approach. It didn't look like Jackson

16:57

Pollock had done it. and he brought it

17:00

to this big show and the world yawned.

17:03

Not one piece sold. And to this day, if

17:06

you go to a museum, you will probably

17:07

not see a second cycle Jackson Pollock.

17:11

This led him to become even more of a

17:15

substance abuser, which led to him dying

17:17

in a tragic car crash that killed

17:19

somebody else as well. Because Jackson

17:22

Pollock wanted two things. He wanted to

17:24

live on the frontier and be the creative

17:27

artist on the cutting edge, but he also

17:30

wanted to be the celebrity who could

17:32

sell everything he made and was seen as

17:33

a genius. He forgot how many years it

17:36

took the first Jackson Pollock to

17:38

accomplish that. And because the second

17:40

Jackson Pollock didn't hit, the butt

17:43

became really loud in his head. You

17:46

can't have two of these things if they

17:48

are diametrically opposed. We need to

17:50

find where is the butt. I want this

17:52

butt. I want that. It's usually hiding

17:54

as an and but once we see it, once we

17:57

say, "Oh, that is what is keeping me

17:59

from giving the people I'm trying to

18:01

serve what they need. That's why I'm not

18:03

getting where I need to go." We can

18:07

remove the pole,

18:09

see the entanglements, see what we're

18:11

measuring wrong, forgive them, make a

18:14

new decision, and the problem goes away.

18:17

>> And you can substitute and, you're

18:19

saying, instead of but. The and is the

18:22

thing that emphasizes it. I want to be a

18:23

creative person and I'm eager to be

18:26

rejected and not people have people get

18:28

the joke for a while and have to live in

18:30

the back of my van because that's what

18:32

creative people do. That's part of it. I

18:34

get that. I want to be popular on social

18:37

media. And that means I can't be honest

18:40

and authentic and consistent because I

18:43

got to keep chasing X, Y, or Z. And when

18:46

we look at the people who consistently

18:48

get big clicks, that's what they're

18:50

doing. They're not saying, "This is who

18:52

I am." They're going to chase the next

18:54

thing. If you're not happy with that,

18:55

please don't do it. But the and

18:59

amplifies the work, but undercuts it.

19:03

There should be a button just down below

19:05

here. And if it says subscribed, you're

19:07

already subscribed. If it says

19:08

subscriber, that means you're not yet.

19:11

And if you're not subscribed, please

19:12

could you do us a favor and hit that

19:13

button? It helps the show more than you

19:14

know. And according to the algorithm,

19:16

you're someone that watches our show,

19:18

but you haven't yet hit that button.

19:19

Thank you so much. There's people

19:21

listening right now that are maybe they

19:24

got three kids under the age of seven.

19:26

I'm thinking about my brother. He's got

19:27

three kids under the age of seven.

19:29

>> And they also want to launch a company,

19:33

>> right? And they they might feel that

19:36

there's a tension between those two

19:37

things because they on one hand want to

19:39

be the best dad on earth like my brother

19:40

wants to be but at the same time they

19:42

really want to launch that AI startup.

19:45

>> Yeah.

19:45

>> Now these two things are tugging at each

19:47

other.

19:47

>> Correct.

19:48

>> What do they do?

19:49

>> Well, the first thing they did was

19:50

really important. They named it.

19:52

>> Okay.

19:52

>> Okay. Second thing can't do two things

19:56

at the same time, but you can do many

19:57

things over time.

19:59

And what that means is he made a

20:01

commitment to three small humans in this

20:03

moment. He's going to go to work, but he

20:06

can't go to work for 100 hours a week.

20:08

So he needs to pick a project where the

20:12

amount of time he has is enough time to

20:14

do the project really well. He cannot

20:17

start an open AI competitor. It is off

20:19

the table. That is impossible because

20:22

the thing he's committed to cannot

20:24

coexist with that.

20:26

>> That's hard to admit,

20:28

>> right? But it unlocks the door to what

20:30

we can do. If he can figure out how to

20:33

build an entity where he's not hiding,

20:35

where he's actually showing up on the

20:37

hook to a group of people and say, "I

20:39

know more about AI than you, and I'm

20:41

going to use this tool to do X, and they

20:43

pay him for it."

20:45

Now, at the end of a 40-hour week, he

20:47

appropriately goes and does the work of

20:50

a dad, right? That's a business that's

20:53

creating value for people that will make

20:55

you more profit than OpenAI made last

20:57

year, right? So the point I'm making is

21:01

media keeps showing up and saying what

21:02

you're supposed to do is be a

21:04

Kardashian. What you're supposed to do

21:05

is be Sam Alman. No, that's not what

21:07

you're supposed to do. You're supposed

21:09

to make promises and keep them for the

21:11

smallest audience. That's enough. You

21:14

can't maximize two things that use the

21:17

same space. Do you think it's possible

21:20

to know if a motivation or a goal or a

21:24

dream you have or an ambition you have

21:26

is real or not? And when I say real, I

21:29

mean like did I just inherit this from

21:31

expectations from Instagram or from my

21:33

family or because my brother-in-law is

21:35

rich and I want to kind of compete. Is

21:37

there a way to know if my my the goal I

21:39

say I want is a real one?

21:41

>> Yeah, I love this. This is brilliant.

21:43

This gets back to the idea of purpose.

21:45

What is the change you seek to make with

21:48

the next cycle of your effort? Not your

21:51

purpose on earth, but the purpose of the

21:53

work you're about to do. Are you trying

21:54

to make Mark Zuckerberg happy? Are you

21:56

trying to make an anonymous commenter

21:58

happy? Are you trying to teach troll a

21:59

lesson? Because when you say that out

22:01

loud, you realize that's a ridiculous

22:03

purpose and a trap.

22:05

>> If [clears throat] we can be clear,

22:06

what's in it for me? If I put this time

22:10

in, what will I get in return?

22:13

So my company has 75 people, let's say,

22:16

and should I grow to have 250 people?

22:19

Well, what would be in it for me to be a

22:21

CEO of 250 people instead of 75 people?

22:24

>> You're going to have a bigger headache.

22:26

You're going to have more money

22:27

theoretically.

22:27

>> Theoretically, but what you're really

22:29

going to earn is a different kind of

22:30

status. You have to decide if that

22:32

status boss of more people that status

22:36

what I get to say at the cocktail party

22:38

that status of what could happen after

22:39

that is worth the price you're going to

22:42

pay to do this or not. And so we keep

22:46

making these choices about what is the

22:48

purpose of this work. And that leads to

22:51

the key from Steve Presfield which is

22:53

resistance. And resistance is any

22:57

feeling we have that keeps us from doing

23:02

generous generative creative work of any

23:05

kind. So for example, writer's block is

23:08

resistance. For example, you're going

23:10

out on a date and you change your outfit

23:12

six times. Resistance shows up in so

23:15

many of the things we do. And the

23:17

systems around us indoctrinate us

23:20

because they want us to be cogs in the

23:22

system. They want us to say, "Well, how

23:24

do I get an A? How do I get permission

23:25

to do X, Y, or Z? I'm not going to

23:27

initiate anything.

23:29

So, it's easier for your brother to deal

23:33

with the resistance in his head by

23:35

saying, "I'm stuck." than it is for him

23:37

to say, "I changed the lives of 17

23:39

people this weekend." Whereas, if we

23:42

kept drilling into what's your purpose,

23:45

I think he would say, "Yeah, changing

23:46

the lives of people is more important to

23:48

me than making Business Week magazine

23:51

happy because I built some company." Is

23:53

it useful to try and name the resistance

23:56

in order to overcome it?

23:57

>> You can't make resistance go away ever.

24:02

You can dance with it. You can invite it

24:04

in for tea. You can name it. You can say

24:07

the reason I'm hesitating to do this is

24:09

resistance. You can say, "I don't feel

24:11

like it. I got to go do this other thing

24:13

instead. I don't want to host a small

24:14

party." Resistance. My friend Lisa moved

24:18

across the country to be with her

24:19

partner all the way to Los Angeles. knew

24:22

three people in the whole city. She

24:25

says, "I don't want to live a lonely

24:26

life in Los Angeles. I'm going to have a

24:28

potluck dinner every Friday. I'm going

24:31

to start by inviting the three people I

24:32

know. And every week, you can come back

24:35

if you bring a new person.

24:37

50 weeks later, she has a network of 400

24:40

people, all good friends."

24:42

Anyone could have done that. No one

24:45

does. Resistance. What if I invite

24:48

someone and they say no? What if I

24:49

invite someone I don't like them? What

24:50

if I invite someone and they don't like

24:52

me? Resistance, resistance, resistance.

24:54

Name the baggage. Drop the baggage. Do

24:57

it. Once you can name the baggage, you

24:59

can say this is why I am feeling stuck.

25:03

If I can let go of this other thing, I

25:05

can move toward the carrot because I can

25:07

forgive the water. I was sort of running

25:10

through different people in my head that

25:11

I'm that I know. Again, trying to think

25:13

about the personas of the people

25:14

listening. And one of the things I

25:15

realized is that everybody's starting

25:16

from a very different place here,

25:18

>> right?

25:18

>> And why is that? Why is it that some

25:20

people are quite good at dealing with

25:21

resistance? They can invite around

25:22

strangers and then other people are

25:24

living in fear. They're almost Yeah.

25:26

They never take a risk.

25:27

>> Yeah. Well, a big part of it is

25:30

privilege. It's injustice. It's living

25:33

in a culture that never gives you the

25:35

benefit of the doubt. But even if I look

25:37

among a group of people who all have the

25:39

same amount of privilege, there's still

25:41

somebody who is at the marketplace

25:44

helping strangers find where they're

25:46

going. There's still somebody who, you

25:48

know, I have a family friend went to an

25:50

Ivy League school. He wanted to be an

25:51

actor and he went to apply to the improv

25:55

troop for auditions and they picked 10

25:58

people and he came in 11th and he called

26:01

me up. He was very upset and I said,

26:03

"Why don't you start your own improv

26:04

troop? You don't need any equipment. You

26:07

don't need a permit. You just need four

26:10

people to do improv with. Start your own

26:11

improv troop." And the irony, the reason

26:14

I remember the story is he couldn't do

26:16

it. I mean, isn't that what improv is?

26:19

Start your own improv troop. And so, you

26:23

know, I run a online community called

26:24

Purple.space. And on Purple, we got

26:27

thousands of people who are coaching

26:29

each other. And it's the opposite of a

26:32

social network. There's no scams.

26:33

There's no hustle. Nobody sells anything

26:35

to anybody else. It's just I'll talk you

26:37

through my

26:40

not you talk me through yours. Let's

26:41

hold each other accountable. Well,

26:43

someone needs to go first. Everyone

26:45

wants to be invited to an engagement

26:47

like that, but few people want to start

26:50

one because you're afraid of being

26:51

rejected because it's one step short of

26:55

dying. So, when we can name this and

26:58

realize it's actually not at all related

27:00

to dying, this isn't about hustling

27:03

someone and getting in their face to

27:05

sell them something. This is about

27:07

offering to solve their problem as you

27:09

solve your problem by naming the thing

27:11

and figuring out where we can be of

27:13

value.

27:14

>> One of the things that I've experienced

27:15

as a podcaster is a lot of people come

27:16

up to me in the street and they'll tell

27:17

me about the podcast idea that they've

27:19

had for four years. [laughter]

27:22

>> And I it's quite a curious thing to

27:23

observe because it appears on the

27:26

surface that they are serious, but the

27:29

very nature that they've been mulling it

27:30

for a couple of years means that there's

27:32

probably some kind of resistance there.

27:33

>> Correct. Exactly. So I for a couple

27:36

years my friend uh Alex Depal and I ran

27:38

the podcasting fellowship. So thousands

27:40

of people went through this workshop to

27:42

start a podcast and the reason podcasts

27:46

are such a great example is everyone

27:48

knows what a podcast is and the cost of

27:50

starting a podcast is less than a

27:52

dollar. So why don't you have one,

27:55

right? Okay. Well, so we start the cycle

27:58

by give me all the reasons you can't

27:59

have a podcast. And one of the ones that

28:01

comes up is well I don't think I could

28:03

get good guests. M

28:04

>> and then we would say, "Okay, who would

28:06

be the best guest you could ever get?"

28:09

And amazingly, Michelle Obama's name

28:10

comes up.

28:12

Michelle Obama is not going to be on

28:14

your podcast, [laughter]

28:16

but who would you need to have on your

28:17

podcast as the guest before Michelle

28:19

Obama that would lead her more likely to

28:22

say yes? And who would be the guest

28:23

before that and the guest before that?

28:25

And let's go all the way back to your

28:26

next door neighbor. Can you get your

28:27

next door neighbor to be a guest on your

28:29

podcast? Yes. So go make that podcast

28:32

and just play it for the 20 people who

28:34

are in this circle. And at that point,

28:36

half the people can't do it. There's no

28:39

technical reason why. It's just too hard

28:42

to say to your next door neighbor, can I

28:43

interview you for 20 minutes? And then

28:45

show it to somebody else because

28:46

resistance.

28:48

And so the hack I give people is start a

28:51

blog under another name, under an

28:53

assumed name. No one will know you wrote

28:56

it. Do it for 100 days in a row. If you

28:58

do that for 100 days in a row, I'm

29:00

betting you're going to want to put your

29:01

real name on it. But if not, at least

29:04

you understand there was nothing fatal

29:06

about posting something in public for

29:09

100 days in a row with somebody else's

29:10

name on it. So that's obviously not

29:12

where the writer's block is. It's in

29:14

resistance. Two things at once. I want

29:16

to do this. I want to be recognized, but

29:20

I don't want it to fail. I don't want to

29:22

be disrespected. I don't want to lose

29:24

status. And those two things keep us

29:26

paralyzed. And the system likes it like

29:28

that.

29:29

>> What you did there is you took the

29:30

resistance and you tried to break it

29:32

down into the smallest possible piece.

29:34

>> Correct. Yes.

29:35

>> So you took a big piece of resistance

29:36

which is how do I get Michelle Obama on

29:37

my podcast. You broke it down into I

29:40

need to go ask my next door neighbor to

29:41

come on my podcast.

29:42

>> Yeah.

29:42

>> And then you broke it even smaller to

29:44

I'm going to start an anonymous blog.

29:46

>> Yeah.

29:47

>> Cuz when we call our own bluff, it's

29:49

very uncomfortable, but it's better than

29:51

someone else calling her bluff. And this

29:54

gets back to my posture of I can't solve

29:56

your problem, but maybe I can give you

29:58

tools that can help you name your

30:00

problem so that in a safe place you can

30:02

talk to somebody about where is the

30:05

resistance? Why am I in my head about

30:07

this? What's the smallest unit of value

30:10

for the smallest possible audience that

30:12

I could do that would make a difference

30:15

for them? Bob Leitz writes the most

30:17

popular music blog in the world.

30:19

Everybody in the music industry knows

30:21

him. I promise you when he started he

30:25

had five readers. My blog has a million

30:27

readers. When I started I had five

30:29

readers. That's the way they all start.

30:31

That's how your podcast started. Five

30:33

listeners.

30:36

>> When you um you broke it down there and

30:38

you turned it into an anonymous blog.

30:39

What I I guess what you were also doing

30:41

is you were breaking down the

30:43

embarrassment into smaller and smaller

30:45

and smaller and smaller pieces of

30:47

embarrassment, right? But like

30:49

irrespective there was still

30:50

embarrassment. And I heard this phrase

30:53

embarrassment is the cost of entry.

30:55

Would you agree with the the general

30:57

idea that irrespective of what you do,

31:00

you're going to have to be embarrassed.

31:02

You're going to have to like pay that as

31:03

the the fee of entry to almost anything

31:05

outside of your current context and

31:07

identity.

31:08

>> All right. So let's talk about

31:09

lifeguards and imposttor syndrome. So

31:12

imposter syndrome was named by two

31:14

social scientists about 70 years ago.

31:16

Imposter syndrome is that feeling when

31:18

you're doing something important or new

31:20

that you're a little bit of a fake or a

31:22

fraud and that someone else ought to be

31:24

doing this instead of you. So, the story

31:27

I tell is about being a lifeguard. So,

31:28

in Canada, you have to get your bronze

31:30

medallion to be a lifeguard. And imagine

31:33

you're on uh Canoe Lake on duty. There's

31:36

six lifeguards on the dock and a kid

31:39

starts drowning right in front of you.

31:42

The first thing that might come to mind

31:44

is I just barely got my bronze medallion

31:46

and that guy two docks down is a much

31:49

better swimmer than me. This is someone

31:52

else should say it. And then you

31:53

realize, no, no, it's right in front of

31:54

you. This is your kid. You jump in the

31:56

water. Do you apologize for your stroke?

31:58

Do you say I'm really sorry I'm not

32:00

getting there as fast? You save the kid.

32:03

That's what lifeguards do. The kid is

32:05

going to thank you and their parents are

32:06

going to thank you. That's the work of a

32:08

lifeguard. Lifeguards are able to

32:11

overcome resistance because it's such a

32:13

vivid thing. Well, if someone's going to

32:16

send an email newsletter to someone who

32:18

asked for it and that might help them

32:21

get to where they're going, where's the

32:23

embarrassment exactly? And shame is this

32:27

interesting emotion because we must

32:29

receive it. It's sent to us all the

32:31

time, but you have to receive it for it

32:34

to work. Now, I'm walking on 74th

32:37

Street, not far from here, past this

32:39

little pocket playground, and I hear a

32:42

four-year-old inside the playground

32:44

taunting somebody else. And this kid is

32:46

making fun of this guy, making fun of

32:49

his clothes, making fun of the fact that

32:50

he's bald. And then I realize the kid's

32:52

taunting me

32:55

because he was just, you know, it felt

32:57

safe for him, and he was just yelling at

32:58

bystanders. The point was, it instantly

33:02

brought me back to third grade.

33:03

instantly brought me back to what does

33:05

it feel like to be bullied? But I wait,

33:07

first of all, you're on the other side

33:08

of a fence. I'm never going to see you

33:10

again. You cannot put any shame on me.

33:13

It doesn't it bounces off of me. And

33:17

when we can get to useful work for a

33:19

small audience of people, we're allowed

33:21

to say to someone who doesn't get the

33:22

joke, "Sorry, it's not for you. I

33:24

forgive you. I don't have to accept your

33:27

shame. I don't have to accept the

33:28

embarrassment you want to give me

33:29

because I'm here for the right reason.

33:32

And if it's not for you, we both learned

33:34

something.

33:34

>> I guess because of the internet as well.

33:36

Embarrassment is everywhere and shame is

33:39

everywhere. People are you start

33:40

anything on the internet, there's going

33:42

to be some troll that tells you it's

33:43

terrible. Even when we started this

33:45

podcast, I mean, still today we get a

33:46

lot of people telling us it's

33:47

terrible. But

33:48

>> um because it's everywhere,

33:50

one could almost argue that um

33:53

overcoming it is now a superpower

33:57

because you know, everybody that does

33:59

anything is going to encounter it. And

34:01

you know how painful it is to deal with

34:03

that and you also know that most people

34:05

won't. That actually the skill of

34:07

mastering like overcoming shame or

34:08

embarrassment or critical feedback or

34:10

whatever it might be might be one of the

34:12

most important skills in the modern

34:13

world today when there's so much

34:15

negative feedback and so much shame or

34:16

embarrassment or whatever. And just

34:18

that's what you that's what I was

34:19

thinking of when you're saying it's like

34:20

how how do I get better at dealing with

34:22

that?

34:22

>> Well, let's look at it slightly

34:24

differently because I think that's a

34:25

great point. But practical empathy says,

34:29

"I don't know what you know. I didn't

34:31

have the day you had. I don't want what

34:33

you want." And that's okay. And I can

34:35

forgive that and I don't have to take it

34:38

personally. I can simply take it

34:41

seriously. And those are different

34:43

things. Here's an interesting semi-

34:45

business example. You've been to Shake

34:47

Shack?

34:47

>> Yes.

34:48

>> My friend Danny Meyer started Shake

34:49

Shack. It's now a multi-billion dollar

34:51

company. Shake Shack is based on his

34:53

youth in St. Louis, Missouri. and he

34:56

grew up with crinkle cut French fries.

34:58

Crinkle cut French fries are the secret

35:00

to a certain kind of fast food hamburger

35:02

joint. And fancy New York restaurant

35:06

critics, Ed Lavine, the New York Times

35:08

said, "What are you doing? You're making

35:09

this whole big deal out of everything is

35:11

handmade and fresh. You're serving

35:13

frozen crinkle cut French fries that we

35:16

can buy in the freezer at the

35:17

supermarket. You need to make real

35:20

French fries." So Danny, his status is

35:23

associated with the fanciest restaurants

35:25

in the United States. And he and his

35:27

team see this assault they're getting on

35:30

being embarrassed about the French fries

35:31

which are at the heart of their menu. So

35:34

they spend millions of dollars over the

35:36

course of a year researching potatoes,

35:39

reconfiguring every single restaurant,

35:42

putting in a different kind of fryer,

35:44

making fresh cut French fries is a

35:46

really big challenge. Also, fresh cut

35:50

French fries are a living thing, and in

35:53

May, the potatoes are different than

35:54

they are in November. So, sometimes a

35:56

fresh cut French fry is the best French

35:58

fry you ever had. And sometimes it's

36:01

limp and not very good. And they

36:03

switched to fresh cut French fries

36:05

because they wanted the status that came

36:07

from New York cultural critics saying,

36:09

"These are guys authentic. They're the

36:11

real deal." And the French fries were no

36:14

good. and the entire internet blew up

36:18

and say, "What have you done to Shake

36:20

Shack?" And the staff hated making them

36:22

and it was a mess and you had to clean

36:24

things differently. Nothing good came of

36:26

this shift except making a couple people

36:28

in New York City happy because that's

36:30

who they decided to listen to. And one

36:34

day, Danny looked at this and said,

36:35

"What is the purpose of the French fries

36:37

at Shake Shack? Do the French fries at

36:39

Shake Shack exist to help a non-C

36:42

customer feel good about eating at a

36:44

Danny Meyer restaurant or do the French

36:46

fries at Shake Shack exist to further

36:48

the story of what it is to come to Shake

36:50

Shack? And they ripped everything out

36:52

and they went back to the crinkle cut

36:54

fries and the world rejoiced. profits

36:56

went up, productivity went up, and they

36:59

got back to what they were trying to do

37:01

in the first place by forgiving and

37:04

ignoring the people who needed to say,

37:07

"You need fresh cut French fries."

37:09

Because that's what they stood for. But

37:10

it wasn't what the business was for.

37:14

>> This sounds like a business story, but

37:15

actually, as you were saying it, I

37:17

realized that it pertains to everybody's

37:19

life listening right now because we're

37:21

all serving a certain voice,

37:23

>> right? And then the other thing that

37:24

came to mind is I've just hired someone

37:26

called Arada Pema who came from Amazon.

37:28

She was leading products there, building

37:30

AI products at AWS. She's now leading,

37:32

she's our CIT, chief innovation and

37:34

technology officer at Steven.com, my

37:36

holding company. And one of the things

37:37

she told me about Amazon is that they

37:39

are just unbelievably obsessed in the

37:42

customer. Every decision they make from

37:44

a culture perspective is all about the

37:45

customer. She even told me that Jeff

37:47

Bezos in his meetings and still in the

37:49

Amazon meetings today, they put an extra

37:51

chair in every meeting that is empty to

37:55

represent the customer because they want

37:57

the customer to be in every meeting. And

37:59

she told me how that anchors all of the

38:01

decisions they make from a product

38:02

perspective right back to the the person

38:04

they're serving. I guess it kills the

38:07

donkey thing you told me because they're

38:10

not having to choose between serving the

38:11

merchants or the customer. They are

38:13

serving the customer. Sometimes she told

38:15

me at the merchants's expense, but you

38:18

have to be okay with that.

38:20

>> That's what she said to me. And I

38:21

actually really stayed with me cuz now I

38:22

always think about like who's the

38:23

customer, who's the C. Even when I do

38:24

this podcast, you hear me talking about

38:25

personas. I'm talking about Dave the

38:27

taxi driver and Jay, the mum.

38:28

>> Exactly.

38:29

>> That's who we're serving here.

38:30

>> Yeah. And so I just need to put a small

38:32

paper clip here. In the last two years,

38:34

Amazon has lost their way about who

38:35

they're serving. And Amazon made

38:38

billions and billions of dollars last

38:39

year selling ads that make Amazon search

38:41

worse

38:42

>> to people who want to interrupt what

38:43

you're looking for to put their thing up

38:45

on top. That doesn't serve the customer

38:47

that serves a different kind of

38:49

shareholder. But yes, the model of what

38:52

Jeff built there from the way they hold

38:54

their meetings, which is absolutely

38:55

fascinating to what they chose to do

38:59

about who it was for and who it wasn't

39:01

for, were consistent about saying this

39:04

is the problem we are here to solve.

39:06

This is the purpose of this click. This

39:08

is the purpose of this page. There's no

39:10

doubt about what it's for. And so the

39:13

meeting thing, most people who are

39:15

listening to this go to meetings. And

39:17

many people who have white collar jobs

39:19

say the meetings are the worst part of

39:20

their day. What is the meeting for? The

39:24

typical meeting, if we're going to be

39:25

honest, is to make the boss feel like

39:27

you are listening to them and let the

39:29

boss take attendance because it could

39:32

probably be a memo. And if you're not

39:34

sending a memo and you're having a

39:35

meeting, let's be clear. Who's this for?

39:38

What's it for? What is the purpose of

39:39

what we just did here with eight people

39:41

just listening the whole time? Well, why

39:42

didn't you just send them a video that

39:44

they could watch at double speed?

39:46

Meetings are a symptom. They're a

39:48

symptom of whether the organization is

39:50

entangled and stuck with unspoken rules

39:54

about what we do around here.

39:57

And we can see them everywhere we look.

40:00

When in doubt, there are three things

40:02

that drive people.

40:04

fear,

40:06

belonging or affiliation and status and

40:10

we don't really understand what they

40:11

mean. So first fear I call it the

40:14

freedom from fear which is different.

40:16

Freedom from fear is I don't want to do

40:18

things that are going to make me feel

40:19

nervous. I don't want to do things that

40:21

I think I'm afraid of. That keeps people

40:24

from doing a lot of things. That's

40:25

resistance.

40:27

Affiliation is you don't wear a tuxedo

40:31

to a funeral because or a clown suit. No

40:34

one's going to do that, so you're not

40:35

going to do that. Fitting in. Who's to

40:37

my left? Who's to my right? What's

40:38

everybody else doing? And the third one,

40:40

which is really misunderstood, is

40:42

status. Status is simple. Who eats lunch

40:46

first? When we get to the oasis, which

40:48

animal gets the water first? Status

40:50

isn't money, but it could be related to

40:53

money. Status is just who's up and who's

40:55

down. These three things keep dancing

40:58

with each other about how people choose

41:00

what kind of coat. or are they going to

41:02

buy Patagonia or are they going to buy a

41:05

cheaper knockoff? One of those things

41:07

comes with a different kind of

41:08

affiliation and status than another one.

41:10

But if we can look for this, we can

41:13

start to decode

41:15

that quiet butt that's been going on in

41:17

our head. Name it, right? I want to get

41:19

this car. Why? Because it's fast. No,

41:21

you don't need to go fast. I want to get

41:23

this car because that kid at the high

41:26

school lunch table who said I was never

41:28

going to amount to something, he could

41:29

never afford this car. And every time I

41:31

get in this car, I'm going to be able to

41:32

tell myself a story that I'm not that

41:34

kid from the lunch table anymore. That's

41:35

why I want to get this car. Okay, now

41:38

we're clear about what problem you're

41:39

here to solve.

41:41

Go for it.

41:42

>> Really?

41:43

>> Well, does it help you? Is that what you

41:45

want to put your resources into? If that

41:48

helps you, then it solved the problem.

41:50

>> Do you think it is a worthy goal, a

41:52

worthy reason? Well, it's not for me to

41:55

decide this that high school leaves all

41:59

sorts of tracks all over how we look at

42:01

the world. My high school English

42:02

teacher wrote in my yearbook, "You are

42:05

the bane of my existence and you will

42:07

never amount to anything."

42:10

And

42:11

she was partially inest, but remembering

42:14

that as I become a professional writer

42:18

is fascinating. I dedicated like my

42:21

ninth book to her and then I could let

42:23

it go, right? And she and I had a

42:26

wonderful lunch a couple years later.

42:28

The point is we can't deny that these

42:31

things are in our lives. None of us are

42:33

living this optimized, fully optimized

42:36

life.

42:38

The reason you're going and taking those

42:40

nutritional supplements, the reason

42:41

you're listening to this thing about

42:43

some shortcut of bio, whatever has

42:46

nothing to do with you doing an actual

42:48

analysis of all the best ways for you to

42:50

be healthy. They have to do with feeling

42:52

agency. They have to do with feeling a

42:55

certain kind of affiliation with the

42:56

crowd you're in. That's why we have

42:58

cycles in medicine. It's not because

43:01

medicine goes in and out of actual

43:03

science fashion. It's cuz culture

43:06

changes what we think is beautiful.

43:08

Changes what we think we need to do to

43:11

get our emotional needs met. I've got 60

43:15

seconds and I'm going to show you how

43:16

much I can get done because of our

43:18

sponsor called Whisper Flow. And for

43:20

those of you that don't know what it is,

43:22

it's a business I invested in that turns

43:23

your speech into text in any app or

43:26

device. I'm going to post into our Slack

43:28

channel which rewards whichever team

43:30

member conducted the most experiments

43:31

this week. Hi everyone. Here is this

43:34

week's experimentter of the week.

43:35

Congratulations to the Dire of SEO

43:37

trailer team, which is Aunt, Liv, Dom,

43:40

and Cam. You guys have one. Okay, now

43:44

I'm going to open Gmail. So, here is one

43:45

of our founders on an email chain that I

43:47

want to connect my team with. All I have

43:48

to say is add my team's emails, and

43:52

Whisper will do exactly that. Now, a

43:54

quick message to Juan, who does my

43:56

schedule every single week. Hey, Juan,

43:58

can I record on Wednesday at 2?

44:00

Actually, no. Do you know what? Let's

44:01

record at 3 p.m. on Wednesday. Whisper

44:04

Flow is four times faster than typing,

44:06

and it is incredibly easy to use. So, if

44:08

you want to give it a go, all you have

44:09

to do is head to whisperflow.ai/stephven

44:13

to download it today. I've spent the

44:15

last decade building and investing in

44:17

companies. And so often the conversation

44:18

around marketing budgets follows the

44:20

exact same pattern. The budget gets

44:22

approved, but then the results don't

44:23

come back. And most of the time, the

44:25

creative pitch and the offer is fine.

44:28

The problem lies with the audience. Ads

44:30

reach people who will never buy or

44:33

refer, nor do they have the power to

44:34

sign off anything at all. And this is

44:36

why so much budget gets wasted. LinkedIn

44:39

Ads, who are sponsor of this podcast,

44:40

lets you reach them specifically by job

44:43

title, seniority, company size,

44:45

industry, the skills that they have, and

44:48

much more. You're no longer hoping your

44:50

ad reaches the right person. Instead,

44:52

you're defining exactly who sees it. And

44:54

LinkedIn Ads drives the highest B2B

44:56

return on ad spend across all major ad

44:59

networks. Give them a try at

45:01

linkedin.com/diary.

45:03

And if you spend $250 on your first

45:05

campaign, you'll get a $250 credit for

45:08

your next one just by going to

45:10

linkedin.com/diary.

45:12

Keep this to yourself. Terms and

45:14

conditions apply. I think I asked this

45:16

as well because yes, you can serve my

45:18

parents expectations because they're

45:20

immigrants and they want me to be

45:21

doctor, lawyer, scientist, whatever. Or

45:23

I could serve my kids who want me to be

45:27

a great dad. Or I could serve my

45:30

playground trauma who wants to get the

45:31

kid back who said I was never going to

45:32

be anything.

45:33

>> Exactly.

45:34

>> Are any of these voices more worthy than

45:36

the other? Is there a particular voice

45:37

we should really orientate ourselves

45:39

around? And the other thing I've really

45:40

now sort of internalized is I'm going to

45:42

have to say no to the other voices.

45:43

Yeah.

45:44

>> I can't transerve them all or else I'll

45:45

be the donkey stuck in the middle of the

45:46

water and the carrot.

45:47

>> I love this. I wish I put this in the

45:49

book. This is exactly correct that we're

45:52

going to have to forgive some of these

45:54

voices. So there are three basic things

45:56

that get us hung up. There are time

45:58

entanglements which is today is not

46:01

yesterday and today is not tomorrow.

46:04

Today is right now. There are social

46:07

community entanglements. What will this

46:10

person think of me? What will that

46:11

person think of me? And then there are

46:13

the entanglements we have with our

46:15

vision of ourselves. when I look in the

46:17

mirror, if this works, what will I think

46:19

of myself? If this doesn't work, what

46:20

will I think of myself? And all three of

46:23

them get in the way of announcing a

46:26

purpose and then going to solve that

46:29

problem because we say to ourselves,

46:32

well, I want to work to help the poor,

46:34

but I can't get a job at a really fancy

46:36

nonprofit. And if I get a job at a less

46:38

fancy nonprofit, then what will my

46:40

parents think? Oh, all of that's going

46:43

on. We have to acknowledge that, right?

46:45

We say, "I went to law school for three

46:48

years. I didn't like it. I practiced law

46:50

for five years. I hated it. Do I want to

46:54

spend the next 40 years of my life being

46:56

a lawyer? Because I've tried it fully

46:59

out." We can't quit because then we

47:02

would have to explain to our former

47:05

self, why did they pay this big price to

47:07

get me this fancy gift and I'm ignoring

47:10

it? Sunk costs keep us trapped. And what

47:13

we can do is realize that's a gift from

47:15

our former self. And like all gifts, you

47:17

don't have to accept it. If someone

47:18

shows up and offers you a Vietnamese pot

47:20

belly pig to take care of, you can say,

47:22

"No, thank you. I don't want to accept

47:23

your gift." That law degree is a gift.

47:26

But you don't have to accept it now. Now

47:28

that you know what you know, you can

47:30

make a different decision about the

47:32

purpose of your work. And if it's not

47:34

helping you achieve the purpose of your

47:36

work, you can forgive it, say, "Thank

47:37

you very much and untie the knot."

47:41

I think that point around sunk cost is

47:43

an important one to really um double

47:45

click on because when I learned about

47:47

the idea of sunk cost, it completely

47:49

changed me as an investor.

47:51

>> It was actually my brother my brother's

47:52

been working in like investment banking

47:54

for like 15 years now works in my

47:56

company. And he explained to me one day

47:58

early in my career. He goes, "Stephen,

48:00

it was a a stock I had. I was an

48:02

investor in a particular stock and the

48:04

stock was doing terribly. The company

48:05

was doing terribly, but I didn't want to

48:06

sell it."

48:07

>> Right.

48:08

>> Because I had invested at a higher

48:09

price.

48:10

>> Correct. And then he sent me the

48:11

psychology of money book and a few other

48:13

papers and said this is what sunk cost

48:15

bias is and it'll ruin your life if you

48:17

don't realize what it is.

48:18

>> Yeah. And it's in everything we do. So

48:20

there's the new parking apps let you

48:22

find a parking garage near where you're

48:24

going and pay in advance.

48:26

>> So when I come into the city sometimes

48:28

I'll do this. So I've got a $35

48:32

ticket to go park at this lot starting

48:35

in five minutes. I'm driving in and I

48:37

pass a free space on the street. Should

48:40

I take it?

48:42

So, the advantage of the free space, of

48:43

course, is you can leave when you want

48:44

to leave and you don't have to engage

48:47

and it does it saves you five or 10

48:48

minutes. But if I take the free space,

48:51

I'm wasting the money I just paid for

48:54

that parking garage and it still goes

48:56

off in my head that well, yeah,

48:59

obviously you take the free space

49:00

because the money you paid is already

49:02

gone.

49:03

>> That's a that ticket is a gift from your

49:05

former self. Knowing what you know now,

49:08

would you take this job? Knowing what

49:10

you would know now, would you take this

49:12

parking space? And if the answer is yes,

49:15

then you can forgive what got you here

49:18

because serving the old you, the old

49:22

you's gone.

49:23

>> D, I was thinking about relationships as

49:25

well.

49:25

>> Yeah. Now, if you're the kind of person

49:28

that leaves a relationship every 3 weeks

49:30

because you're ignoring some cost, then

49:32

you're never going to have a

49:33

relationship. repeating the process has

49:37

costs to you because it develops these

49:40

patterns. That's not the kind of sunk

49:42

cost I'm talking about. But yes, when

49:44

you meet somebody who has decided to end

49:47

a relationship,

49:49

the healthy thing for them to do is to

49:51

say that relationship was then I made

49:54

all the right decisions based on who I

49:56

was then, based on who they were then.

49:59

But we are not those people anymore. So

50:01

based on who we are now, do we want to

50:03

recommmit to this, will it pay off in

50:06

the future? And if the answer is no, it

50:08

will not pay off in the future, you've

50:10

already answered the question. It

50:11

reminds me of Daniel Coleman's work on

50:13

loss aversion.

50:14

>> Mhm.

50:14

>> And I think this is an important thing

50:16

to explain because when you realize

50:17

what's actually going on in your head

50:18

and why people don't like to lose

50:20

things, you can spot it when it's

50:22

happening to you.

50:23

>> Right?

50:23

>> I read this study that showed if you

50:25

lose £10 in the street, falls out my

50:27

pocket. If I then fi find 10 pounds, it

50:30

doesn't make up for the 10 pounds I just

50:32

lost. I'd have to find 20 pounds to feel

50:36

um the pleasure sufficient to the pain

50:38

that I experienced from losing the 10.

50:40

>> Humans don't like to lose things. And

50:42

when I I I remember searching what's

50:44

like the evolutionary reason for this

50:46

and it it came to say that once upon a

50:48

time in our evolutionary past again this

50:51

is a hypothesis when we had a meal in

50:54

front of us going in pursuit of another

50:56

meal that would risk the one we current

50:58

have was a terrible decision to make.

51:01

>> So actually this whole you know we're

51:03

designed to be sufficiently satisfied

51:05

with what we have versus the pursuit of

51:07

surplus.

51:08

>> Yeah.

51:08

>> So we want to protect what we currently

51:10

have. That was a survival um advantage.

51:13

>> No, absolutely. And we don't have to

51:14

look in evolution. We look at wild

51:16

animals today. Wild animals are wild.

51:18

They hate change. Change never helped a

51:22

species move forward because it

51:25

represents a threat. And what we built

51:28

as humans is a culture where change is

51:29

happening faster and faster and faster.

51:31

By the time we're done with this

51:32

conversation, some AI company will have

51:34

launched a new frontier model. Boom. And

51:38

we can look at this and say, "Where can

51:40

I go hide? How can I get back to being a

51:42

wild animal that's in in this one place

51:45

where nothing changes?" Or we can decide

51:48

to get back to the purpose of what are

51:50

we trying to do right now. Ignore the

51:52

stuff that's not relevant to it. Seek

51:54

out the stuff that helps us make the

51:56

change we seek to make and get back to

51:58

work. So, we need to decide where we're

52:03

going to put our attention because our

52:05

attention is something we can never get

52:06

back.

52:08

>> You talked as well about systems, the

52:10

systems we're like held in place with.

52:13

One of the things that I've seen in your

52:15

work is this idea of picking yourself

52:17

because I guess we're wired to to

52:19

believe that there are still

52:20

gatekeepers, but those gatekeepers have

52:22

increasingly vanished. I mean, the fact

52:23

that I can start this podcast and people

52:25

listen, I think is evidence of the fact

52:27

that you no longer need gatekeepers. Do

52:28

you know a funny story that I've never

52:30

told is [laughter]

52:33

I um I went for an interview with LBC,

52:37

which is a UK radio station before I

52:40

took this podcast seriously. I went

52:42

there, I did my 2-hour audition, sat

52:45

there in the chair, people pretended to

52:46

phone in. It was just staff LBC,

52:48

>> right?

52:48

>> And um I left. I was like quite nervous,

52:50

etc. I thought I did a good job, but I

52:52

was a little bit nervous, unsure about

52:53

what they might say. And I never heard

52:55

back. They never gave me feedback. They

52:57

never told me if I was good or if I was

52:58

bad. So, I started this podcast um on

53:00

YouTube in my kitchen [laughter]

53:03

because I never heard back from LBC. And

53:06

it just goes to show actually you don't

53:07

need

53:09

>> massive company to give you permission

53:10

to start a platform. You can just do

53:12

things in this modern world. And this is

53:14

kind of dubtales into your idea of

53:15

picking yourself.

53:16

>> Yeah. So, let's talk about systems first

53:17

and then we'll come back to picking

53:18

yourself.

53:19

>> Okay.

53:19

>> People get a little glassy when you talk

53:22

about systems. So, let me try to make it

53:23

really simple.

53:25

When you get in a car here, you drive on

53:27

the right side of the road. When you get

53:29

back to the UK, you drive on the left

53:30

side of the road. Why? Because it's way

53:33

more efficient to drive on the same side

53:35

of the road as everybody else. We have a

53:37

system that says if you're going to

53:38

drive in the United States, drive on the

53:39

right side of the road. Systems start to

53:41

get a little bit more complicated. The

53:43

college industrial complex is a system

53:45

that starts in first grade that includes

53:47

things like the SATs and the stickers

53:49

and the football teams and the dorms.

53:51

And it's a 400-year-old system that we

53:54

got into because it works. It works for

53:58

most people most of the time. It's an

54:00

easy way to look at a resume, see one

54:03

word, and decide if you want to

54:04

interview somebody or not. So, the

54:06

system that people my age grew up in is

54:10

you would do as well as you could in

54:12

high school, and a college would pick

54:13

you. And then you do as well as you

54:14

could in college, and then a company

54:16

would pick you. and you would do as well

54:17

as you could at the company and then

54:19

they would pick you and you get a

54:20

promotion and then you would die. And so

54:22

we indoctrinated billions of people

54:25

around the world. Please wait to get

54:27

picked. Here are all the rules and if

54:30

you follow all the rules you might get

54:31

picked. Turns out it was rigged. Some

54:34

people got picked unfairly. But that's

54:36

what we got brainwashed. And we still

54:38

teach our kids this.

54:40

>> And then all of a sudden starting, you

54:42

know, in the 90s we said, "Here's a

54:44

microphone. Here's a video camera.

54:46

Here's a typewriter. Pick yourself.

54:50

And now it's extended to here's an AI.

54:54

You can start a company by tomorrow. You

54:55

could build a complicated website by

54:57

Friday.

54:59

Wait, I'm waiting for someone to tell me

55:00

I should go do that. No one's going to

55:02

call. It's $20 a month. You can probably

55:05

get it for free at your library. What

55:08

are you going to do? And when we put

55:11

ourselves on the hook, it's super scary

55:13

because does that mean I'm responsible

55:15

for every kid on Canoe Lake who needs a

55:16

lifeguard and I'm responsible for every

55:18

kid who might suffer from river

55:21

blindness and I'm responsible for this?

55:22

I'm responsible

55:24

for nobody. I'm a victim. But we have

55:26

the chance to say, I pick myself to

55:29

solve this problem. I'm on the hook to

55:31

help these people. I'm going to use

55:33

whatever tools I can to pick myself to

55:36

make a thing better. Turns out that's

55:39

generative. If you get a little good at

55:41

it, lots of people will ask you to do it

55:43

again. When you give away credit and

55:47

take responsibility, lots of people will

55:49

ask you to do it again.

55:51

Sometimes we tell ourselves that we're

55:53

waiting to be picked because it's a nice

55:56

excuse for resistance.

55:58

>> Mhm.

55:59

>> We live in a permission seeking state

56:02

because it's a good shield.

56:05

>> Yeah. to avoid this thing you were

56:07

talking about which is the freedom from

56:09

fear.

56:10

>> Yeah. I mean the entire New York City

56:12

book publishing industry is based on the

56:15

author gets to say well they picked me

56:17

to write the book and then I got to go

56:19

promote the book because I promised I

56:21

would promote the book. The the book

56:22

isn't there because I wanted the book to

56:25

be there. They asked me to write this

56:27

book. And as soon as you can publish

56:30

your own book, as soon as you can start

56:31

your own YouTube channel, you don't get

56:32

to you don't get to say great news

56:34

YouTube call. They want me to start

56:36

putting things on YouTube. And that's

56:38

why

56:40

the number of people you would think

56:42

would go ahead and use this tool isn't

56:46

as big as it could be because again,

56:48

it's one thing to ask a teenager to be

56:50

on Tik Tok. They're just entertaining

56:52

themselves. They don't see themselves as

56:54

a Tik Tocker.

56:55

>> To see yourself as somebody I picked

56:58

myself. I am saying this and I'm

57:00

responsible.

57:02

That's hard. No one taught us to do

57:04

that.

57:05

It's kind of like the LBC thing. I was

57:06

waiting for LBC to pick me. And

57:08

>> I think once this podcast comes out,

57:10

they're going to call you and you got a

57:11

big decision to make cuz it's steady,

57:14

Stephen. [laughter] They they they'll

57:16

give you like health insurance, the

57:18

whole thing.

57:18

>> I still love LBC, by the way. I still

57:20

watch LBC. So, but um I'm probably too

57:23

busy now to do LBC. One of the the the

57:26

sort of adjacent points here is how do I

57:29

know if I'm delusional?

57:31

>> Right? I I always think this because a

57:33

lot of the advice we give people around

57:35

like getting going and starting and

57:36

pursuing the thing they want to pursue

57:38

doesn't necessarily always come with the

57:40

nuance that actually like I can't

57:42

actually be an NBA player.

57:44

>> Correct.

57:44

>> But h how do I know because all the

57:46

advice is just go for it, pick yourself,

57:48

etc. But

57:49

>> yeah, that's not my

57:50

>> have the talent.

57:51

>> I'm so glad you brought this up. That's

57:52

not my advice. You probably are

57:55

delusional if you're picking something

57:57

that's super fun that involves skipping

57:59

lots of intermediate steps and it ends

58:02

with a happy ending where you're famous.

58:04

The chances of winning that lottery are

58:05

very very low. So people come to me and

58:08

say, "I got this great book. Will you

58:10

help me get a career as a novelist?" And

58:13

the answer is super easy. Take your

58:15

novel. It was really hard for you to

58:17

write. I get that. Make it into a nicely

58:19

formatted PDF. Cost you nothing. email

58:21

it to 20 people. If they send it to

58:24

other people and it spreads, someone's

58:26

going to call you and hire you to write

58:28

your next novel. If it doesn't spread,

58:30

write a better novel.

58:33

But don't start running around saying,

58:35

"I'm a novelist and I deserve to get

58:38

picked and have a big advance." The

58:41

heartbreak of someone who is delusional

58:43

is they insist that the world owes them

58:47

because they worked so hard on X, Y, or

58:49

Z or that they have found some secret

58:52

transcript that if anyone else

58:54

understood it, everyone would real.

58:56

Well, if people don't understand it,

58:57

that's on you. So, we can get past the

59:00

delusion by going for the smallest

59:02

viable audience. What's the smallest

59:03

group of people that if I made a

59:06

difference for them, it would be enough.

59:09

What's interesting is I imagine if you

59:10

said that to some people, they would

59:13

really not like the answer.

59:15

>> People hate it when I say this.

59:17

>> Why?

59:18

>> Because it's so comfortable to be stuck

59:20

in that knot.

59:22

I'm a genius and I'm really hardworking,

59:24

but no one in the world understands me.

59:26

So now my butt isn't the problem because

59:28

I don't have to worry about any of the

59:30

things that come with the responsibility

59:33

of it being in front of the wrong people

59:35

or whatever. It's so much easier to say,

59:37

"If only and I, you know, I need to be

59:40

home for this or I I this thing happened

59:42

to me. Therefore, I'm stuck." We're safe

59:46

at some level in that frustration.

59:49

And so, what I'm trying to do with the

59:51

knot is help people understand this is

59:54

possible, but it is not easy. This is

59:56

possible, but it will not give you the

59:58

thing you are dreaming of. It will

60:01

merely find a path to get to where it is

60:04

possible to go.

60:05

That's a grownup thing to have to commit

60:08

to

60:09

>> if someone's not happy with the advice

60:10

you just gave. I think it also

60:12

illuminates

60:14

that maybe their motives are wrong. It

60:16

reminded me of when I started this

60:17

podcast and I had these two friends,

60:18

Oliver and Ash, come to me and say that

60:21

was good. When's the next one? And I

60:22

always say if they hadn't have said that

60:24

to me, it probably wouldn't have

60:25

continued because I was busy with other

60:26

things. But those two people who I

60:28

trusted and would tell me when something

60:29

is terrible. I often do. um saying that

60:32

to me

60:34

just it gave me so much energy and

60:36

motivation and I kept publishing in part

60:39

for them because I knew Oliver had this

60:41

like 3 and a half hour commute to work

60:43

every day from Sheffield

60:44

>> and um I loved the process. I was

60:46

getting this feedback from this

60:47

particular person. It carried on going.

60:48

But a lot of the time, actually, I think

60:50

a lot of people would bounce off this

60:51

advice of just send it to 20 people

60:53

because they're actually attached to the

60:56

podium,

60:56

>> right?

60:57

>> And what you're saying is no, focus on

60:59

the journey,

61:00

>> right?

61:01

>> But they want in their head somewhere,

61:02

actually, no, I the journey, Seth.

61:04

I want to be famous and I want the

61:06

million pounds, right?

61:07

>> And that's not what you're offering

61:08

them. But actually, you are. [laughter]

61:10

>> Well, someone someone's going to win the

61:11

lottery, Stephen, and it's probably not

61:13

going to be you.

61:15

And and so in your case, we're talking

61:18

because you won the podcast lottery.

61:20

There are a 100 podcasts as good as this

61:23

one out of a million, right? That's

61:25

pretty amazing.

61:26

>> But there's still a hundred of them.

61:28

>> So you show up to buy lottery tickets in

61:32

a way that lets you buy more lottery

61:33

tickets. You show up to add value for

61:36

people so you can keep going. And then

61:38

when there's a lottery, you got a shot,

61:40

right? But along the way, the journey

61:43

says

61:45

I have a chance to say here I made this.

61:49

I made this means it's for you. It is a

61:52

gift I'm giving you. If you don't accept

61:54

the gift, I can't blame you. I just have

61:56

to make a better gift. But if people

61:58

start accepting your gifts, you have

62:00

traction. And Steve Blank talks about

62:03

customer traction. As an investor, you

62:04

know this. Customer traction is the

62:07

single best indicator of whether a

62:09

startup is going to succeed more than

62:12

any other metric. How many customers

62:14

would miss you if you shut down

62:15

tomorrow?

62:17

>> And for a pizza place, 100 is enough.

62:20

>> Yeah, they say that a lot in product

62:21

development. They say just make a thing

62:24

for one person you know and make make it

62:27

for one person you know that really

62:29

really really loves it and it will turn

62:31

out that there'll be lots of people like

62:32

that person you know. enough people.

62:35

Maybe it's not lots, but it'll be

62:36

enough.

62:37

>> And so this cycle we're talking about

62:40

>> isn't self-focused. It's empathic. You

62:44

have to let the audience in to your

62:47

thinking or else you're thinking about

62:49

what's in this for me and me alone. And

62:51

that's narcissistic. And that is where

62:54

you see all the internet hustle going

62:56

on. All the people who are trying to

62:57

pressure folks into sending them $5 or

63:00

multi-level marketing, all that stuff.

63:02

that isn't what's possible and it's not

63:04

what we should be spending our time on.

63:06

But when we can be of service for the

63:08

right people,

63:10

we have a chance to make things better.

63:12

But I need to put a big aside here,

63:13

which is where resistance kicks back in.

63:16

The only way to launch something new is

63:19

to create tension. Not to relieve it,

63:22

but to create tension. Generous tension.

63:24

The tension of you might be left behind.

63:27

You won't be in on the first cycle of

63:28

it. I have this thing that's going to

63:30

help you and you don't know what it is

63:31

yet. Tension

63:33

that's offered generously is the only

63:37

way people create forward motion. So

63:39

Taylor Swift is having a concert 15,000

63:42

people can fit in the arena. She just

63:44

created tension for 40,000 people

63:47

because they're saying to their moms and

63:48

dads, I got to go get tickets before

63:49

everybody else. If she's not willing to

63:52

create the tension, she can't go on

63:53

tour.

63:54

>> So yes, it's awkward to create

63:56

attention. It's awkward to say, "I'm

63:58

doing this event. I hope there's room

64:00

for you." But it's the only way we can

64:04

cause other people to decide to move

64:08

forward.

64:08

>> I was stress testing that Taylor Swift

64:10

analogy. And the way that I stress

64:12

tested it was, well, what if Taylor did

64:14

a gig and there was unlimited seats?

64:15

[clears throat]

64:16

People would still go, I guess, because

64:18

the tension is that she's so good. I

64:21

might miss the experience. As you said,

64:22

there's FOMO itself is the tension.

64:24

There's unlimited seats, but there's not

64:26

unlimited nights. It's just tonight.

64:28

>> Yeah. Okay. Yeah.

64:29

>> And that's why live events create a

64:31

different sort of tension. You know,

64:33

this videos on the internet you haven't

64:34

seen, I haven't seen. And we're not

64:36

stressed about that because they'll be

64:37

there tomorrow,

64:39

>> right? But the live event starts to

64:42

change how we're going to engage with it

64:44

among that community.

64:47

>> What else is sort of adjacent to this

64:49

idea of getting unstuck? Because that's

64:51

really what we're circling here. It's

64:52

like the things that keep you stuck and

64:54

how to take sort of actionable steps

64:56

outside of being stuck. Is there

64:58

anything else we need to close off on

65:00

here?

65:01

>> So, you saw some of my juggling balls

65:03

there. Juggling is

65:06

fascinating because when you see someone

65:09

on the street, if you're a good person,

65:10

if you see someone on the street

65:11

juggling, you're not rooting there for

65:12

them to drop a ball, right? That we want

65:15

the juggler to be able to juggle. So,

65:18

when people say, "I'm going to learn how

65:19

to juggle." What happens is they throw

65:22

one ball and they can catch it. They

65:23

throw the other ball, but within two or

65:25

three throws, one of the balls goes over

65:28

here. So, they lunge to catch it because

65:30

the juggling is about catching. So, they

65:32

lunge to catch it, but now they're out

65:34

of position and the next one's going to

65:36

hit the ground. And then people give up.

65:38

People give up because they think

65:40

juggling is about catching. It's not.

65:44

It's about throwing. If you get good at

65:46

throwing, the catches take care of

65:48

themselves. So the way I teach juggling

65:51

is with one ball, throw it, catch it,

65:53

throw it, catch it till you're really

65:54

bored. Then two balls, throw, throw,

65:56

catch, catch. This is not hard, but if

65:58

you do throw, throw, catch, catch for 20

66:00

minutes,

66:02

every ball is landing exactly where it's

66:04

supposed to. And now juggling is easy.

66:07

But what we are hooked on, and listen to

66:10

any self-improvement podcast, it's all

66:12

about the catching, right? Does this

66:14

help me lose weight? Does this help me

66:15

find friends? Does this help me build my

66:17

business? Those are all catches.

66:20

Where's the throwing? How are we going

66:21

to get good at throwing? How are we

66:23

going to get good at realizing even if

66:25

no one reads this next short story, I'm

66:28

going to get good at putting words on

66:31

the page?

66:31

>> The process.

66:32

>> The process. The practice. If we can

66:34

develop a practice, we're no longer

66:37

attached to the outcome because the

66:40

outcome's out of our control. The

66:41

practice is under our control. Get good

66:44

at throwing. Get good at seeing where

66:46

problems lie, seeing where audiences

66:48

are, seeing where you can be generous.

66:50

When you get good at seeing those

66:52

things,

66:54

the catches take care of themselves.

66:56

This is something that I've made for

66:58

you. I realize that the direio audience

67:00

are strivals

67:04

that we want to accomplish. And one of

67:05

the things I've learned is that when you

67:07

aim at the big big big goal, it can feel

67:10

incredibly psychologically uncomfortable

67:13

because it's kind of like being stood at

67:15

the foot of Mount Everest and looking

67:16

upwards. The way to accomplish your

67:18

goals is by breaking them down into tiny

67:21

small steps. And we call this in our

67:23

team the 1%. And actually this

67:25

philosophy is highly responsible for

67:27

much of our success here. So, what we've

67:29

done so that you at home can accomplish

67:31

any big goal that you have is we've made

67:34

these 1% diaries and we released these

67:36

last year and they all sold out. So, I

67:39

asked my team over and over again to

67:40

bring the diaries back, but also to

67:42

introduce some new colors and to make

67:43

some minor tweaks to the diary. So, now

67:45

we have a better range for you. So, if

67:50

you have a big goal in mind and you need

67:51

a framework and a process and some

67:53

motivation, then I highly recommend you

67:56

get one of these diaries before they all

67:58

sell out once again. And you can get

67:59

yours at the diary.com.

68:02

And if you want the link, the link is in

68:03

the description below. This again is not

68:05

a narrative that people will love

68:07

because we all want to get good at

68:09

catching. Yeah. Weirdly, this is very

68:12

very adjacent and almost unlin, but it's

68:14

somewhat linked. Um, I sat here with

68:16

Julian Treasure. He did two TED talks.

68:18

One about speaking, right? 40 million

68:21

views. One about listening,

68:23

>> two million views. [laughter]

68:25

>> I thought it's almost kind of similar to

68:27

like the catching and the throwing. It's

68:28

>> Yeah.

68:29

>> And and actually when I sit here with

68:31

spies and I've interviewed some of the

68:32

world's leading spies and I say, "How is

68:34

it that you're able to get people to do

68:35

whatever you want that have just met you

68:37

in foreign lands and hand over their

68:38

secrets? They say listening."

68:40

>> Yeah.

68:41

>> It's all about the listening. I go in a

68:43

taxi and I listen to them for eight

68:44

weeks as they offload because no one

68:45

listens. And it kind of got me thinking

68:47

about this is like no one focuses on the

68:49

throwing.

68:50

>> Yeah.

68:50

>> And actually that becomes the great

68:52

competitive advantage,

68:53

>> right? Exactly. Yeah. The practice. I

68:55

love the idea world famous spies because

68:57

you would think that that's sort of an

68:59

oxymoron. I would imagine the world's

69:00

greatest spies. We have no idea who they

69:02

are.

69:02

>> Well, they go on podcasts now, so they

69:04

are like [laughter]

69:05

um but but part of it links to one of

69:07

the books you wrote, which is called The

69:08

Dip. We're talking about delusion here

69:10

and how to know if you're delusional or

69:12

if you're just going through the dip.

69:14

So, I've got uh some images here, but

69:17

>> okay. How does someone listening know if

69:20

they should give up on something or if

69:22

it's just the inevitable rough patch

69:25

that you go through when you start and

69:26

you're bad?

69:27

>> Okay, so the dip describes something in

69:28

the world that no one had talked about

69:30

in the book before, which is the power

69:32

of quitting.

69:34

What is the dip? The dip is the hard

69:36

part in between starting and getting

69:38

good at it. The dip is organic chemistry

69:41

on your way to being a doctor.

69:44

And you got to get through it to get to

69:46

the other side. The dip is the gym in

69:50

March. If you want six-pack abs, you

69:53

can't quit the gym in February, which

69:56

you joined during the holidays. You're

69:58

going to have to get through the hard

69:59

part. And so most of what we do that

70:03

creates value has a dip in it. [snorts]

70:06

And my argument is you should a see the

70:08

dip before you start. You should say,

70:11

"If I'm going to drive this car across

70:12

the Gobi Desert, I can't whine when I

70:15

can't find a gas station." There are no

70:17

gas stations in the Gobi Desert. There's

70:18

a dip to get across the desert. Pack

70:21

what you need to get through the dip or

70:23

don't start.

70:25

And number two, when the dip shows up,

70:29

say thank you because it means you hit

70:31

the hard part. It means this is the

70:33

beginning of getting to the other side.

70:36

Don't complain about organic chemistry.

70:37

You knew organic chemistry was coming.

70:39

Organic chemistry is part of the process

70:42

of becoming a doctor. As my friend Gabe

70:44

says, it's not an obstacle in the way.

70:48

It's something along the way and it's a

70:51

signpost that you're on the way. So your

70:53

question then is should we quit. Has

70:56

anyone ever made it through this dip

70:59

before?

71:01

If this is a dip like organic chemistry

71:03

where every single doctor in the world

71:04

has made it through, now you know. you

71:07

know this is coming and you know if you

71:09

make it through you're going to get to

71:10

the other side. On the other hand, no

71:12

one that I know of has ever smoked their

71:15

way through emphyma. That when emphyma

71:18

shows up, it's not a dip and continuing

71:21

to smoke is not going to make you

71:22

better. It's what made you worse. It's a

71:24

culde-sac. It's a trap. And so what we

71:27

look for when we're talking to people

71:29

about this journey, this delusion, this

71:32

problem we're trying to solve is

71:35

what does it usually cost to get through

71:36

a dip like this one? Do I have the

71:38

resources to get through it or am I just

71:40

throwing good time and good money after

71:42

bad? But if you got a business that's

71:44

losing money and losing money and losing

71:46

money and losing money and there's no

71:48

evidence that putting more money into

71:50

your thing is going to get you to the

71:51

other side, that's a culdeac. Forgive

71:53

yourself. the old self who started the

71:56

wrong business say thank you thank you

71:59

for having the right insight but it

72:00

wasn't correct for this world today I

72:04

forgive you I'm going to go quit and do

72:06

something else

72:06

>> key word there you said is evidence

72:09

>> and the evidence could be as you say

72:11

small

72:13

>> yeah so the so if we think about the

72:16

business if you had a retail shop or a

72:19

restaurant

72:21

the ones that succeed 95% of their

72:24

profit goes to the landlord.

72:26

And the ones that fail, 102% of their

72:28

profit goes to the landlord. That's the

72:30

only difference between failing and not

72:31

failing in one of those businesses. The

72:33

landlord's job to take as much as they

72:35

can of your profit, but not too much

72:37

that you go out of business.

72:40

So, someone's got a four-year lease.

72:43

They're two years into it. They're not

72:45

making rent. They're losing money every

72:47

single day. And they have a sunk cost,

72:49

which is I got to pay for the next two

72:51

years of this storefront. whether or not

72:53

I'm in here, but you can quit because

72:57

you can forgive that two years you you

73:00

have to pay. You decided that two years

73:02

ago. That's not a new thing. That's an

73:05

old thing. Are you really going to spend

73:07

the next two years of your life

73:09

punishing yourself because you made a

73:10

decision a few years ago and signed a

73:12

bad lease and built the wrong business

73:13

on the wrong street in a system that

73:15

doesn't support you? Why? You can't get

73:17

those two years back. But we can take a

73:19

deep breath and say, "Yeah, I'm going to

73:21

leave this place empty and go build

73:23

something really useful over here and

73:26

I'll come out way ahead compared to

73:28

defending that old decision."

73:30

>> But hang on a minute, Seth. When I went

73:32

to the gym this morning, there was

73:34

quotes written on the wall. And the

73:36

quotes are like this one here.

73:40

>> Can you read that out for me?

73:41

>> If you quit once, it becomes a habit.

73:43

Never quit.

73:44

>> It's a Michael Jordan quote.

73:45

>> Michael Jordan. Yes. I'm never gonna

73:47

have an argument with Michael Jordan,

73:49

but he's wrong. And it's very clear that

73:51

he's wrong. He doesn't play professional

73:54

baseball anymore. He doesn't play

73:56

professional golf, nor does he play

73:58

professional basketball anymore. Because

74:01

humans age and he did a thing, but then

74:04

he stopped doing the thing because it

74:05

wasn't productive anymore.

74:08

And when we think about our fuel, he

74:12

used as an athlete a couple things to

74:15

fuel him. One thing he had was

74:16

grievance. And if you listen to his Hall

74:19

of Fame speech, it's just a long list of

74:21

chips he's had on his shoulder for his

74:23

whole career. That's fuel based on who

74:25

he was and how he grew up. That's how he

74:27

gets on the court. And the second one

74:29

was never quit. So if those two pieces

74:31

of fuel help you become the greatest

74:34

basketball player of your generation,

74:36

I'm not going to argue with you. If

74:37

that's getting you where you need to go,

74:40

it's up to you. But for most people,

74:43

it's resistance and a trap. It's shame.

74:48

It's getting stuck in a knot. It's all

74:50

of the butts. Right? I want to be a

74:52

successful business person, but I can't

74:54

admit I was wrong.

74:56

>> I've shut down more businesses than most

74:58

people who are listening to this. I've

75:00

failed more times than most people are

75:01

listening to this. If I was still

75:03

running the light bulb fundraising

75:05

company I started in 1987, I wouldn't be

75:09

talking to you today.

75:12

It it's funny because there's this weird

75:14

paradox that's so obvious to all of us

75:15

but um still people believe this idea of

75:19

never quitting and the paradox that I'm

75:20

pointing at is the minute someone starts

75:22

something a new company a new job a new

75:24

relationship we celebrate but we also

75:26

intuitively know that in order to start

75:28

something like a new job or a new

75:30

relationship you have to do something

75:32

before that which is quit the other

75:34

thing. Yeah,

75:35

>> never quit, but we celebrate starting.

75:37

Theoretically, then we should celebrate

75:39

the quitting just as much as we

75:41

celebrate the starting because they are

75:42

fundamentally inter.

75:43

>> Correct. But only quitting the right

75:45

stuff. You don't want to celebrate

75:47

someone who quits the marathon at mile

75:50

25 because what they failed to do in

75:53

their training was become the kind of

75:55

runner that sees that the people who

75:58

finish the marathon figure out where to

76:00

put the tired. But that's not the same

76:02

as working for an abusive boss because

76:04

your boss is never going to stop being

76:05

abusive. And so you can say this can't

76:09

get better and every day I come here and

76:11

subject myself to this trauma is costing

76:14

me. It's reinforcing a system I don't

76:16

believe in and I can get tomorrow back

76:19

again.

76:20

>> What you've described there sounds a lot

76:22

like um something I wrote about in uh in

76:25

my last book which was just a quitting

76:26

framework for this exact situation

76:29

people find themselves in. because I

76:30

know what people are saying that are

76:31

listening. They're all saying, "How do I

76:33

know when to quit something?" So, I made

76:35

this framework which I'll throw up on

76:36

the screen. And actually, the example I

76:37

use is a marathon.

76:38

>> I mean, this is the framework. You can

76:39

see it for yourself and I'll just sort

76:40

of give you the voice over.

76:42

>> But if you look down the the left side,

76:44

I'm referring to a marathon there. And

76:46

what I'm saying is when something is

76:47

hard, that is not reason enough to quit.

76:49

Like a marathon in mile 23 when you're

76:51

raising money for a charity that means a

76:54

lot to you. when you should quit is when

76:57

something if you go down the right hand

76:58

side is when something sucks like you've

77:01

said about the toxic boss and critically

77:03

the effort it would take to change it is

77:05

not worth the thing on the other side.

77:08

>> Exactly right

77:08

>> because people that's what people will

77:09

say they'll say how do I know when to

77:11

quit something how do I know like you

77:13

know how do I know when to quit the job

77:14

or to

77:15

>> Right. And you can question your

77:17

judgment because if you have a history

77:18

of quitting because in the short run it

77:21

was tough as opposed to looking at

77:23

whether it was worth it, you can find a

77:26

coach or peers who can challenge you on

77:28

that.

77:29

>> So I was one of the leading makers of

77:32

DVDs for book publishing companies back

77:35

in the brief moment when they're doing

77:36

this. So I worked with Fischer Price and

77:38

we made a DVD for parents and stuff. And

77:40

then this day shows up and it becomes

77:43

very clear that book publishers aren't

77:46

going to do more of this because the

77:48

internet's here. They're going to do

77:50

less of this. So every day I would be

77:53

defending what I had built as a DVD

77:56

producer was completely wasted.

77:59

>> So forgive yourself. I didn't change the

78:01

world. Somebody else changed the world.

78:03

But it's not going to get better. This

78:06

is a culde-sac. It's a dead end. Thanks

78:09

for doing this. let's start something

78:10

else.

78:11

>> Cuz there's a lot of people right now

78:12

that are in their 30s, 40s, 50s that are

78:15

in jobs that have not made them

78:17

fulfilled for a decade.

78:18

>> Yeah.

78:19

>> But they're 20 years in. They've climbed

78:21

the ladder. They're director.

78:23

>> So they have sunk costs because they've

78:25

earned the spot. But they also have a

78:27

whole bunch of entanglements like I want

78:29

to have a job that fulfills me, but I

78:31

also like this car and this house. I

78:34

want to have a job that fulfills me, but

78:36

I also like my neighbors thinking I'm

78:38

this stable, respectable person. I want

78:39

to have a job that fulfills me, but I

78:42

have all this other stuff I have to pay

78:44

for. All right. But if we look at those

78:47

butts, we realize you just made the

78:49

choice to stay in this job. So, you

78:52

don't have to fret about it anymore.

78:54

You've accepted that you made that

78:56

choice. The alternative is move to a

78:58

two-bedroom flat, eat rice and beans,

79:01

take a deep breath, reset all these

79:03

things, and now you can get a different

79:04

job that's going to pay you half as much

79:07

because you gave up the butts, right? A

79:10

job that fulfills me, will give me a

79:12

better relationship with my family, will

79:14

give me hope for the future, will give

79:16

me a chance to make X, Y, or Z happen in

79:19

the world. That's hard because you can't

79:23

have the butts. You got to let them go.

79:26

In that scenario, you know, I okay, I

79:28

have the car. I have the the business

79:30

card, which is impressive to people. I

79:31

get invited to nice things, but I'm

79:33

miserable,

79:34

>> right?

79:34

>> So, what do I do? I've got a community

79:37

I've built around this identity that is

79:39

on this business card, but I'm

79:41

miserable, Seth.

79:42

>> Right? So the magic of this process is

79:45

if you announce through this that it's a

79:47

situation that all these other things

79:50

are so important to me that I cannot

79:52

change my job. Suddenly your job gets a

79:55

lot better

79:56

>> because you're not bridling against it.

79:59

You chose it

80:01

>> and so if you talk to people I I I've

80:05

gave a couple talks for people who are

80:06

in the funeral industry undertakers.

80:09

Most of us would not sign up for that

80:11

job as high school students at the

80:12

career fair, right? But the people who

80:15

stick with it, they're not sitting there

80:18

saying, "This is horrible. I hate being

80:20

around dead people." They're saying,

80:22

"All the stuff that I get in my life.

80:26

This is part of it. It comes with it.

80:29

Just like getting tired in the marathon

80:30

comes with it. If I want to have this

80:32

life where it's stable, where I don't

80:33

have to move around, where a member of

80:35

the community, where the cash flow is

80:36

assured

80:38

and I get to be an undertaker within

80:41

that structure, how do I be the best

80:43

undertaker I could possibly be? As

80:46

opposed to wishing that I would get a

80:49

call from Michael Jordan who wants me to

80:50

run his financial empire or something

80:51

because it's not going to happen.

80:54

>> I get to be you're you're taking back

80:57

control from the situation. you're

80:58

shifting from victimhood to control,

81:00

right?

81:01

>> There's this remarkable couple of stats

81:03

that I read about this idea of feeling

81:05

like you have control and how it changes

81:07

your outcomes in your life. Um the first

81:09

stat is people who believe they are in

81:11

control of their life and have control

81:13

over their happiness rate their overall

81:15

life satisfaction at an average of 7.4

81:19

out of 10 compared to those that don't

81:20

feel like they have control over their

81:22

situation who rate their life

81:23

satisfaction at 5.6.

81:26

>> Yep. People who report low overall

81:29

happiness are five times more likely to

81:31

feel like their own personal situation

81:34

is entirely outside of their control. I

81:36

mean, this one's was a landmark study

81:38

they did in care homes. In a famous 1976

81:42

study, elderly residents given plant

81:45

care and small daily choices that they

81:47

could make were 50% less likely to die

81:51

over an 18-month period compared to

81:53

residents whose care was fully handled

81:56

for them.

81:57

>> Yeah.

81:57

>> Crazy the power of feeling like you have

81:59

control in your life,

82:00

>> right? And also, I don't know the stats,

82:02

but when they give uh people in hospice

82:05

control over their painkillers as

82:07

opposed to them having to wait for

82:09

someone to give them a painkiller, they

82:10

don't necessarily take more painkillers.

82:12

It was knowing they can do it. Same

82:14

thing back to the meetings thing. If you

82:16

have a job where you're going to

82:16

meetings all day where you just have to

82:18

know this, you've lost control over your

82:20

day. And I'm not here to say there's no

82:23

cost to switching. There's huge cost to

82:25

switching. That's why you chose not to

82:27

switch until now. But let's name it.

82:29

Let's say, you know, gravity is

82:32

fascinating because it's here, but if I

82:34

was on a planet that didn't have gravity

82:35

or had low gravity, I would miss this

82:37

gravity because I've built my whole life

82:39

around gravity being this consistent

82:42

thing. I get to live on a planet with

82:44

gravity. I get to be the kind of

82:47

organism that's going to die before he's

82:48

100. If you look at the world that way

82:51

that that's inevitable and I get to

82:54

inhabit each day the best I can, you're

82:56

going to have a different life than if

82:58

you're spending all your time trying to

82:59

figure out how to live forever. I'd

83:01

never heard that painkiller study

83:02

before, but as you're speaking, I just

83:03

pulled it up and it says it's one of the

83:04

most famous real world demonstrations of

83:07

how the perception of control alters

83:08

your physical and psychological

83:10

experience. When hospital patients are

83:12

given a button to self-administer pain

83:14

medication, two incredible things

83:15

happen. Number one is they consume equal

83:18

or less painkillers. Number two, they

83:21

report lower pain levels and higher

83:23

satisfaction. The physical pain itself

83:25

doesn't magically change, but the stress

83:27

of helplessness,

83:28

>> right,

83:29

>> amplifies pain,

83:30

>> right?

83:31

>> The stress of helplessness.

83:34

I mean, it goes right back to what we're

83:35

saying about the not in your new book,

83:38

which is a lot of us are living with

83:39

distress of helplessness, but sometimes,

83:41

not always, but sometimes that

83:43

helplessness is in part a story.

83:47

I would say it's always a story because

83:51

we can look at someone who is in human

83:54

bondage. We can look at someone who's,

83:56

you know, been through trauma and we are

83:59

projecting what we would feel in that

84:01

situation. There are all these unfair

84:03

situations around there. But then the

84:06

question is what is our narrative? What

84:09

is our narrative of how are we living

84:12

this day? What do we actually have

84:14

control over? And what situations are we

84:17

choosing to stick with because most of

84:20

us have the freedom to shift, right? And

84:23

so it's a story we tell ourselves that

84:26

might not change the outside world in

84:28

the short run, but what it does is it

84:31

gives us this feeling of agency which

84:34

then gives us a sense of responsibility

84:37

which then amplifies into choice and my

84:41

whole career is about how can I help

84:44

people do better.

84:46

>> I wanted to throw another quote at you

84:47

here. This one is about meaningful work.

84:50

So, if you could read that as well.

84:52

>> From Warren Buffett. In the world of

84:54

business, the people who are most

84:57

successful are those who are doing what

85:00

they love.

85:00

>> I've heard that a million times. Do what

85:02

you love.

85:03

>> Yeah, it's backwards. Sorry, Warren.

85:06

The people who are the most successful

85:09

love what they do.

85:11

>> What's the difference?

85:12

>> Well, doing what you love means there's

85:14

an amusement park out there that has all

85:16

the treats I love and all the best

85:18

prizes. Of course, I love it. The other

85:22

is a choice. I chose to do this work

85:26

because I love it. There was a guy who

85:29

worked at the Dean and Duca cafe in

85:31

Midtown

85:32

>> and he was developmentally challenged

85:35

and he was probably 50 years old. He was

85:37

the mayor of this Dean and Duca. He was

85:40

the guy who cleared the tables and kept

85:42

the things straight. He loved this job.

85:45

>> You and I would have lasted 15 minutes

85:47

in this job. He loved this job because

85:49

he decided to love this job. The

85:52

Reverend King had a great quote about

85:54

street sweepers and he said, "If you

85:56

have to be a street sweeper, at least

85:58

choose to be the best street sweeper in

86:01

that situation under these conditions

86:03

that it's possible to be." And the

86:05

reason is not because you want to help

86:06

the street sweeping company. It's cuz

86:08

your day is going to go better if you do

86:09

that. I was thinking he also meant

86:12

potentially although he you know I guess

86:13

he didn't clarify but the way that I

86:15

perceived it was that if I become the

86:17

best street sweeper not to say that's

86:18

that's not an important job it increases

86:21

my possibility of becoming something

86:23

else as well of being promoted being

86:26

>> dare I say picked to be something else

86:29

or to start my own street sweeping

86:31

business or to you know I'm going to

86:32

build a great relationship with my

86:34

customers who might be

86:35

>> and I think they rhyme and dance with

86:36

each other they don't contradict each

86:38

other And so all of us have had a job

86:42

where we thought it was a good job and

86:44

someone doing the same job down the

86:46

aisle hated it or vice versa.

86:48

>> Mhm.

86:48

>> So clearly it's not the job. It's where

86:51

did we come from? What are we afraid of?

86:54

What do we believe? Where are we going?

86:56

That creates the story that opens the

86:58

door for possibility.

87:00

>> Well, I guess some of these other quotes

87:01

linked to it then. I mean, they kind of

87:03

all say the same thing, but let's do

87:06

this one. This is a famous Mark Twain

87:08

quote that probably everybody's heard.

87:10

>> If you get a chance, talk to your AI

87:13

favorite AI about Mark Twain quotes.

87:15

>> The most mostly fake,

87:16

>> but it's it's a great conversation. The

87:19

two most important days of your life are

87:20

the day you are born and the day you

87:22

find out why.

87:23

>> I've heard that a lot as well.

87:25

>> And my small shift is not the day you

87:27

find out why, it's the day you decide

87:31

why.

87:33

Because this isn't something you're born

87:35

with. This is something you choose.

87:38

And if you make the decision, like my

87:41

friend Jacqueline, to say there are 400

87:44

million people on this earth who are

87:46

making three or four dollars a day. I'm

87:48

going to devote a generation of my life

87:51

to helping them. You can go do that. And

87:56

most people don't have the head start.

87:58

Most people aren't starting at mile 20

88:00

of the marathon. Some people are

88:02

starting behind others. But we still get

88:04

to decide based on who we are, what we

88:06

know, what we've got access to, which

88:08

problems are we going to solve and who's

88:11

going to benefit from us solving those

88:12

problems. That is what I think Twain was

88:15

trying to get at.

88:16

>> And my last one,

88:19

this one from a very famous guy whose

88:21

device I'm using right now.

88:23

>> The only way to do great work is to love

88:26

what you do. Bingo. If you haven't found

88:28

it yet, keep looking. Don't settle.

88:32

>> Who is that? That's Steve Jobs. And I I

88:35

think the keep looking part might mean

88:39

look inside. Don't look over there.

88:43

Why is it that you don't love what you

88:44

do right now? Let's unnot that first. Is

88:49

it because you're being disrespected? Is

88:51

it because the external narrative of

88:55

what's happening is undermining who you

88:57

hope to be? If we can get clear about

89:00

that, finding the next thing gets way

89:03

easier. You're not giving in to this

89:05

lottery of hoping you get picked by the

89:07

next right boss. You can go hire a boss.

89:10

And when you hire the right boss, your

89:13

job is transformed.

89:15

>> At the heart of a lot of this is this

89:18

word perfectionism.

89:20

>> That's a that's a big knot. You know,

89:22

when I thinking about the young lady

89:23

that came up to me in the Apple store

89:25

the other day and told me that she's

89:26

been thinking about her podcast for two

89:27

years and she's been working on it for

89:29

two years, but it's never been published

89:30

yet. What I heard there is perfectionism

89:33

maybe as a form of procrastination.

89:35

Perfectionism is a trap every time.

89:37

Perfectionism has nothing to do with

89:39

quality. So the word quality has a very

89:42

specific meaning. It doesn't mean

89:43

luxury. It means meets spec.

89:47

So, the quality of a 1998 Toyota Celica

89:52

was higher than the quality of a

89:54

Rolls-Royce in 1998 because the pieces

89:57

fit together better. They met spec. It

90:00

wasn't all over the place. If you're not

90:02

happy with the quality, make the spec

90:04

better better. But perfectionism says

90:08

perfect feels like an honorable thing to

90:12

pursue, but perfect is unachievable. So,

90:15

if I announce I'm a perfectionist, I'm

90:17

hiding because what I've just announced

90:19

is I'm never going to need to ship this

90:20

because it's never going to be perfect.

90:22

>> One of the other words that I think does

90:25

tie people in knots as well is this word

90:26

authenticity.

90:27

>> Yeah.

90:28

>> Because authenticity is is a terrifying

90:30

concept when you really think about it.

90:32

>> What do you think of this idea?

90:33

>> It's a trap. And authenticity is for

90:35

amateurs.

90:37

>> Your friends need you to be authentic.

90:38

Your family wants you to be authentic.

90:40

Nobody else. Professionals are not

90:42

authentic. Professionals are consistent.

90:45

Professionals make a promise and they

90:47

keep it. So if you're having knee

90:49

surgery, you don't want the doctor to

90:51

authentically be in a bad mood and screw

90:53

up. You want them to be the best version

90:55

of themselves, even if they don't feel

90:58

like it. And Keanu Reeves, he's not

91:01

authentically Neo. He's an actor. He's

91:06

pretending to be Neo. If he was playing

91:08

Keanu Reeves in the movie, it wouldn't

91:10

be any good.

91:12

on social media if you're gonna show up

91:14

and show up and show up. Unless you're a

91:16

diva, then we're watching you

91:18

self-destruct. That's what we're paying

91:19

for. You know, like Amy Winehouse or

91:21

something. Everybody else, we want them

91:24

to be consistent. And consistent means

91:27

you made a choice about the promise

91:29

you're going to make and you keep the

91:32

promise over and over again. So, when

91:34

I'm writing my blog, I am playing the

91:37

role of Seth Goden, the blogger. It is

91:39

not authentically how I felt in that

91:42

moment. It's my best version of what I

91:45

think Seth Goden the blogger would say

91:47

today. And we've spent time together. I

91:50

like you a lot, but I don't know you.

91:53

And that's for your friends and your

91:54

partner. So authenticity as a buzzword

91:59

is a version of resistance. It's one

92:01

more way to hide. We say, "Oh, I was

92:04

just being authentic." No, you were just

92:05

being a jerk and that's why I rejected

92:08

you. because you chose to be a jerk, not

92:10

because you were authentic. We say, "I

92:12

[snorts] can't write the next novel

92:14

because it wouldn't authentically be who

92:16

I am." Well, yeah, but the people you're

92:18

writing the novel from don't know you.

92:20

They just want to read the next Perry

92:22

Mason novel. Write that or else get out

92:25

of this circle we're in because that's

92:27

what they came for.

92:28

>> In some way, these two things are

92:30

somewhat interlin. So, I was thinking,

92:31

you know, as a podcaster, I know that

92:33

I'm going to have to do if I want to

92:35

sort of accomplish my goals and continue

92:37

to have this life, I'm going to have to

92:38

do thousands and thousands and thousands

92:40

and thousands and thousands of episodes.

92:42

And one of the ways that I'm going to be

92:43

able to do that is by being as authentic

92:45

as I possibly can because it's very I

92:48

find it to be very exhausting to to be

92:51

inauthentic in that way. One like very

92:53

practical way that I mean that is when I

92:54

look at my guest booking request list

92:56

that my team sends me.

92:58

>> I go down there and I look at all the

92:59

people. I go, "Oh my god, okay, so that

93:00

person's got 100 million followers and

93:02

they're a super famous person. I've

93:03

never watched their movies. I have no

93:04

idea who they are cuz I don't really

93:05

watch many movies." But, you know, I

93:07

guess I could be authentic and pretend

93:09

to care about that thing. But then this

93:10

principle comes into my mind, which is,

93:12

well, then I wouldn't be able to do this

93:14

for a long time. I wouldn't be able to

93:15

be consistent if I didn't make those,

93:18

dare I say, authentic decisions. For me

93:20

to sit here and try and be someone else

93:22

in those hours and hours and hours times

93:24

by 10,000 episodes, I wouldn't be able

93:26

to be consistent.

93:27

>> Thank you for calling this out. what you

93:29

just said doesn't contradict what I

93:31

said. It's really important we highlight

93:33

this. You should not sign up for

93:35

something where you cannot happily be

93:39

consistent. And so let's think about a

93:41

teacher. The teacher knows everything

93:43

they're teaching. The students know

93:45

nothing they're teaching. So the

93:47

empathic solution is not to

93:48

authentically talk about whatever is

93:51

interesting to you. It's to create the

93:53

conditions for you to teach people so

93:55

that they can start to get closer to

93:56

where you are. That's a commitment, not

93:59

an authenticity thing. It's what kind of

94:03

taste am I going to bring so I can

94:05

consistently make a promise and keep it.

94:08

That needs to rhyme with what you would

94:11

do if it was your hobby. But it

94:13

shouldn't be your hobby. When you turn

94:14

your hobby into a business, you ruin

94:16

both of them.

94:17

>> So, do I conclude then that it's this

94:19

sort of dance between

94:22

me and my authentic self and the thing

94:24

that I can do to be consistent at this

94:26

goal? Is it a dance?

94:28

>> It's a dance because people who are

94:29

happy find consistency that rhymes with

94:35

their overall authentic self.

94:37

>> And their overall authentic self, it

94:39

turns out, changes over time based on

94:42

the promises they made. So if you hang

94:44

out with people on Wall Street, even if

94:46

they weren't, you know, loud and short

94:49

cycle kinds of people when they got the

94:52

job, they authentically became like that

94:54

because that's who they were surrounded

94:56

by. affiliation, status, we change.

94:59

We're not who we were. And so, we get to

95:02

pick this arc. It cost me a lot coming

95:05

out of business school to be an

95:07

undermployed entrepreneur in the

95:10

creative business, not joining um you

95:12

know, Apple or Activision or something

95:14

like that. So, for years, I was behind

95:17

on the status ladder of my peers. That's

95:20

an investment on the long arc of quote

95:24

authentically becoming the kind of

95:26

person I want to be all day. But I said

95:28

to myself, if I have to make a promise

95:30

to an engineering company that I'm going

95:32

to be Dilbert all day every day, I'm

95:35

going to die a little bit inside until

95:37

it's over. And I don't want to do that.

95:40

>> All industries are changing.

95:43

AI.

95:45

What are your thoughts on this crazy new

95:47

technology that has come down from?

95:49

>> So, so my background here is uh when I

95:51

was at Stanford in 1983, I took a PhD

95:54

course with Doug Lenat who was one of

95:56

the fathers of AI. I worked with Isaac

95:58

Azimov and Arthur C. Clark in my first

96:01

real job. So, I've been a science

96:03

fiction person thinking about AI my

96:05

whole life.

96:06

>> And so, when it finally showed up, I was

96:08

like, "Yes, it's finally here." And I'd

96:10

been writing about it for a while. while

96:12

I did some AI related products. Here's

96:14

my two big ideas. Number one, this is

96:17

the biggest change in our world since

96:20

electricity.

96:22

And number two, either you work for AI

96:25

or AI works for you.

96:28

And what do I mean by those two things?

96:30

There were companies and workers in 1890

96:34

who said, "Ah, I'll wait for electricity

96:36

to go away. I'm just going to keep being

96:38

a blacksmith or whatever it is." That

96:40

did not work out very well. This is like

96:42

that but much much faster.

96:45

And then the AI thing is if you work for

96:47

an AI, it's not going to treat you very

96:49

well. It's not going to be secure and

96:51

it's not going to make you happy because

96:54

bosses are going to keep pushing the AI

96:56

to do all the good parts and you to be a

96:59

gig worker for all the parts that the AI

97:01

can't do yet. But if you can say, I use

97:04

AI to connect humans. I use AI to build

97:07

a network of people.

97:09

We don't know how to replace networks of

97:11

people. And AI is never going to be able

97:13

to replace networks of people. If you

97:14

are trusted and connecting and leading

97:17

using whatever AI tools you want, you're

97:20

never going to have trouble making a

97:21

living. And so that's what you say,

97:24

okay, if I have these tools, how do I

97:27

use them not to be a junior, smaller

97:29

version of open AI, but use them the

97:33

same way that the movie theater used

97:35

electricity, right? That the electric

97:38

company brought electricity to lots of

97:39

businesses, but it took a movie theater

97:42

to figure out how to get you to pay $5

97:43

to see the movie. You used the word

97:45

people and humans within that answer and

97:47

it made me made me sort of think that

97:48

actually maybe the great opportunity in

97:50

in a world of artificial intelligence is

97:52

not to try and be the world's best

97:55

accountant because maybe the

97:57

intelligence is going to be great at

97:58

that but all the human stuff.

97:59

>> Correct.

98:00

>> All the human and the people stuff.

98:01

>> Yes. Exactly right. Good taste.

98:04

Understanding who trusts you and why.

98:08

There are very few jobs where if I can

98:10

write down what you do all day, I can't

98:12

find an AI to do it faster and cheaper

98:14

than you.

98:15

>> Interesting.

98:16

>> So, you want a job where I can't write

98:18

down what you do all day [laughter] and

98:20

then you'll be fine.

98:21

>> Well, the quiet quitter is

98:23

>> well, I mean, so if you think about what

98:26

does a bookkeeper do? I can write down

98:28

all the rules of bookkeeping and hire a

98:31

different bookkeeper tomorrow and my

98:32

business isn't going to fail.

98:35

That's something AI is going to get

98:36

really good at. really fast because once

98:38

we can write down rules, AI knows how to

98:41

follow them. On the other hand, somebody

98:44

the way you were talking about u your

98:46

good taste about who the next guest

98:48

should be. You can't write down the

98:50

algorithm for how to do that. your

98:53

awareness of the world you're in. The

98:57

fact that you have read so many books,

98:59

met so many people, talked to so many

99:01

listeners. I can't write all that down

99:03

with instructions to get Claude to do

99:06

that for me.

99:07

>> I was thinking about my fiance actually.

99:08

She runs a business called Bali Breath

99:10

Work and what she does is she takes

99:12

women away on these retreats for seven

99:14

days. And I see these these the the sort

99:17

of feedback and the testimonials and the

99:18

videos that these women send and they

99:19

love it. Mhm.

99:20

>> I always say to her, don't worry about

99:22

>> most of what they got out of it

99:24

>> is each other.

99:25

>> Yeah.

99:26

>> And when we let the computer networks

99:29

take over, it keeps pushing us away from

99:31

each other. It pretends we're connecting

99:32

on social media, but people are more

99:35

lonely than ever before. But when we

99:37

figure out how to connect human to

99:39

human, we create value. And ultimately,

99:43

if you want to make a living, you're

99:45

going to have to create value. And the

99:47

bosses that are right now cost reducing

99:50

as fast as they can have no imagination.

99:53

They're saying, "Oh, this is cheap,

99:55

super offshore labor. It's called a

99:56

computer. I can get rid of 400 customer

99:59

service reps."

100:00

>> They're racing to the bottom. Some

100:02

people are racing to the top. How can I

100:04

make this more human? How can I make it

100:07

so that now that I've augmented doctors

100:09

with these AI tools, they're going to

100:11

spend more time per patient, not less

100:13

time per patient? Mhm.

100:15

>> Because we know that patients that have

100:18

doctors that spend more time with them

100:19

are more satisfied.

100:21

>> So that's a business advantage because

100:24

now someone can either stay home, talk

100:26

to Dr. Google and figure out what's

100:27

wrong with them and never go to the

100:28

doctor or they can go to a doctor that's

100:30

worth paying for because that doctor has

100:34

an AI working for them.

100:37

It's very true.

100:39

Is there anything else in the knot

100:44

that we haven't talked about that we

100:46

should have talked about? Obviously, I

100:47

want everyone to go and buy the book.

100:49

Um, I I I love what you did on here. I

100:51

think this is probably worth just

100:53

spending a second on, but I mean, do you

100:57

know when you see an idea and you just

100:58

wish it was yours? [laughter]

101:00

This is one such example.

101:02

>> Yeah, that's the names of all the people

101:03

who pre-ordered the book from my site

101:06

and then I used a a gray tone. So if you

101:09

look at it from a distance just right,

101:10

it says the word purpose as in what is

101:13

the project you're trying to do? Let me

101:16

close with the story of of Dame Fina

101:18

Cooper

101:19

>> because a lot of times we talk about,

101:23

you know, the personal thing. What

101:24

should this Uber driver do? But then

101:26

there other times we talk about systemic

101:28

injustice. Are we all victims? So Dame

101:32

Cooper was uh an indigenous person

101:35

growing up in New Zealand and New

101:37

Zealand was the last major country to be

101:39

colonized by the United Kingdom and so

101:43

huge amounts of native lands were taken

101:46

and the uh indigenous people were

101:49

disenfranchised in a lot of ways. It's

101:52

really tragic when you think about it.

101:54

And Dame Cooper at the age of 78 or so

101:58

decided that she would use her status

102:01

and affiliation within the tribe she was

102:04

part of to capture the attention of the

102:06

entire nation and try to put indigenous

102:10

people's rights on the agenda. So you

102:14

look at this and say here's this woman,

102:15

she doesn't she's not famous. She

102:17

doesn't have a lot of money. She's

102:19

almost 80 years old. What could she

102:21

possibly do? this is a problem or it's a

102:24

situation. If it's a situation, what are

102:26

we gonna do? Just live with it. But if

102:28

it's a problem, let's figure out where

102:30

are the pieces to make progress happen.

102:33

She organizes 50 people. Most of us

102:36

could organize 50 people. And they start

102:38

marching to the Capitol

102:41

and they do the work to spread the the

102:44

news in advance. And day after day after

102:47

day for more than a month, this group of

102:50

people is walking to the Capitol. She's

102:52

on the front page of every newspaper in

102:55

New Zealand by halfway through. Now

102:58

there's a 100 people, 200 people, 2,000

103:01

people. By the time they get to the

103:03

capital, there are 4,000 people

103:06

patiently marching side by side. And

103:09

they presented their demands,

103:11

requirements, suggestions to the

103:14

parliament. And too late, not enough.

103:17

But in a very big way, it shifted the

103:20

culture of the entire country, changed

103:22

the laws about how land was allocated

103:25

and made a really fundamental

103:28

difference. She didn't do that by

103:30

herself, but she understood she had

103:33

enough agency to connect the others, to

103:36

create a culture, to show up and show up

103:39

and show up with a practice. So, if one

103:42

80-year-old woman can change an entire

103:45

country, what can we do? Right? We can't

103:49

drive to London or Washington DC and

103:51

change everything. But what we can do is

103:54

find the others, come up with the story

103:57

we can tell ourselves and the others and

103:59

establish a new normal. The only way the

104:02

world has ever changed is when a few

104:05

people come together, build a culture

104:08

and repeat it over and over and over

104:10

again.

104:12

For some reason when you talked about

104:14

that and it was it was a very um

104:16

motivating thing to hear the the subject

104:19

of death came into my mind because I

104:21

again I've dropped into the world of the

104:22

listener right now and I guess I asked

104:25

myself how you create that tension to do

104:28

it today and not tomorrow

104:29

>> right

104:30

>> because there's never going to be a

104:31

perfect time. Tomorrow is going to be

104:32

imperfect. Next week's going to be

104:33

imperfect. So, when faced with like lots

104:36

of imperfect options, how do you create

104:37

enough tension to get whoever's

104:40

listening right now to like go do it?

104:42

>> Yeah. When the person you're dreaming of

104:44

becoming meets the person you become,

104:47

how's that meeting going to go?

104:50

How do you become the person your future

104:51

self thanks you for?

104:54

Because most of us have regret. I wish I

104:57

had done something when I was 20 or 30

104:59

or 40. Well, that regret's a powerful

105:02

fuel. You said this to me before we

105:04

started recording about regret.

105:06

>> Yeah.

105:06

>> And you said that

105:08

>> it's actually not about what you want to

105:10

accomplish. I think you said it's

105:11

actually about some of the things that

105:12

you wish you had done.

105:14

>> Yeah. So when I think about my mistakes

105:17

>> Yeah.

105:17

>> And I've had so many mistakes. The

105:19

mistakes I regret the most are the

105:21

things I didn't do, not the things I

105:23

tried that failed. The person I didn't

105:26

help, the lesson I didn't teach, the

105:28

door I didn't open. Because it's easy to

105:31

ignore those things and just move on.

105:34

But that's our power, our leverage, our

105:36

agency is to be able to say, "There's a

105:39

thing I could do. There's someone on

105:41

that street corner who needs a hand. How

105:43

do we build a thing that our future self

105:46

will thank us for doing today?" And so I

105:49

spent two years organizing the carbon

105:51

almanac with 1900 co-authors, full-time

105:54

volunteer work for me. And the 1900 of

105:59

us got something out of seeing each

106:01

other, working with each other,

106:02

realizing we could do something about

106:04

our understanding of our climate

106:06

problem. And then it became a bestseller

106:08

in five or six countries and opened the

106:10

door for many of the people who

106:11

participated in it to have more leverage

106:13

and to do the next thing. But when I

106:16

think about that day when I said, "Well,

106:19

I could post something about this and

106:21

see who shows up." It would have been

106:22

super easy to say, "Nah, let's just go

106:25

see what's on Star Trek today."

106:28

But the habit, the practice of saying,

106:30

"Okay, this is the next thing."

106:33

That begins this generative positive

106:35

cycle. And it's contagious.

106:38

And that's the magic of this sort of

106:40

virus. If the generative contagious idea

106:43

of who can I open a door for spreads,

106:47

then you're probably going to end up

106:48

living in a world that's more like the

106:49

world you want to live in.

106:51

Why do you continue to do things?

106:53

Because you you've written more books

106:54

here than I could bloody carry. I mean,

106:57

you know, I was saying to you when you

106:58

arrived that when I started my career as

107:00

a marketeteer, which is, you know, that

107:02

website that failed turned into a

107:04

marketing business essentially and then

107:05

I and then people everybody gives you

107:07

this book when you get into marketing,

107:08

which is your book, this is marketing,

107:10

and they use your ideas all the time. I

107:12

mean, one could say, Seth, you've done

107:14

enough. Uh, maybe now is a good time to

107:17

just enjoy it. they might say. Why do

107:19

you keep going?

107:21

>> You know, when I invented email

107:22

marketing all those years ago, I needed

107:24

to do it to make a living, to eat, and

107:27

it was thrilling to watch an industry

107:29

grow up out of that.

107:32

But after that, writing books is a lousy

107:35

way to make a living, but it's a pretty

107:37

good way to make a difference. And I

107:40

said, don't turn uh your hobby into a

107:43

business because you'll ruin both of

107:44

them. But it's interesting to think

107:47

about turning your business into a

107:48

hobby, into the thing you love to do.

107:51

And if someone said, "I can't share

107:52

ideas anymore." I'm not exactly sure how

107:55

I would spend my day. For me, when I

107:58

hear from somebody who says, "I learned

108:00

something from someone who learned it

108:02

from someone who learned it from someone

108:04

who learned it from you." That's

108:06

thrilling. The only thing I'm trying to

108:08

do is turn on some lights for people,

108:11

offer them some dignity, and create the

108:13

next cycle. And if you sign up for that,

108:16

I'm not sure how you can stop.

108:18

>> Now, maybe, just maybe, listen, I'm not

108:20

that superstitious, but maybe there's a

108:21

couple of people that found this

108:23

conversation and they got to this point

108:24

in the conversation for some kind of

108:26

reason. And I imagine it's because they

108:28

are in, you know, they have their knot

108:31

somewhere. So, just to close off for

108:33

those people who currently are in a bit

108:35

of a knot, it could be a job, a

108:36

relationship, a situationship, whatever

108:38

it might be. What is your sort of

108:40

closing remarks to those people that are

108:42

a bit stuck and that are on that

108:43

precipice of maybe taking a leap, a step

108:46

forward, but they're they're tied up a

108:48

little bit like these knots are.

108:51

>> Yeah. You're not alone. We all are.

108:54

Every single one of us, especially me,

108:56

we're all stuck it with something.

108:58

>> Yeah.

108:58

>> And you can forgive that and then say,

109:02

"Okay, who can I contribute to today?

109:05

who can I offer help to and maybe ask

109:09

for help? And it doesn't mean that where

109:12

you are is fair and it doesn't mean that

109:15

what you're feeling isn't real. It is

109:17

real. The only question is what will we

109:19

do next?

109:21

>> I've really sort of taken to heart this

109:22

idea as well that you we talked about

109:24

earlier of um just being really clear on

109:26

which voice you're serving.

109:28

>> Mhm.

109:29

>> Because everyone's life is a noisy place

109:31

increasingly.

109:32

>> Yeah. You know, we're so connected in a

109:36

digital sense. We're so connected to

109:38

other people's lives. And even if

109:40

someone isn't directly shouting at us

109:42

and telling us what to go be and who to

109:44

become, their life is.

109:45

>> Yeah.

109:46

>> Seeing them in Hawaii on a beach having

109:48

a margarita is shouting at me, telling

109:50

me that my life sucks and that I should

109:51

change it and that I should be more like

109:53

them. And in such a noisy world, I think

109:55

maybe some of the most critical advice

109:57

you've you've left me with is this

109:58

central idea of like getting clear on

110:01

which voice in my life I'm going to

110:02

listen to.

110:03

>> Yeah.

110:04

>> Cuz we fail. We end up in a knot when we

110:06

try and serve them all.

110:08

>> People are really lucky to have this

110:10

show. The way you show up, you've been

110:12

narrating this kind of journey for years

110:14

now and you probably don't hear it often

110:16

enough, but it's important and thank you

110:19

for doing it. Oh, well that's a

110:20

unbelievable compliment coming from one

110:22

of my sort of personal icons. So, I

110:24

appreciate that a lot. The knot problems

110:26

can be solved. Comes out in September.

110:29

If it's September, it's out now. If it's

110:31

not, you can pre-order it. There'll be a

110:33

link um below. But I think, you know,

110:35

again, in the context of the world, I

110:37

think unfortunately we might find

110:39

ourselves in even more knots. So, this

110:40

is a wonderful thing, I think, to buy

110:42

for somebody in your life that might be

110:44

in a little bit of a knot themselves.

110:45

Um, but also to buy for yourself if you

110:48

find yourself in one. Seth, we have a

110:50

closing tradition on this podcast where

110:51

the last guest leaves a question for the

110:52

next, not knowing who they're leaving it

110:54

for. And the question left for you, if

110:57

you were given the opportunity to live

110:59

forever, would you take it?

111:02

>> No. That was quick. [laughter]

111:04

I think walking through the world as the

111:07

only immortal person would be

111:10

heartbreaking and innovating and wear

111:14

you out much faster than you think. If

111:17

everyone was immortal, I think we would

111:20

play by different rules as a planet and

111:22

that would be fascinating. But that

111:24

wasn't the question. I think if you read

111:26

enough science fiction, you realize that

111:28

selective immortality is a real curse.

111:31

>> Why? Because everyone around you is

111:35

dying and you're not. Every single day,

111:37

everyone's dying just a little bit more.

111:40

And we define our humanity by our

111:42

connections.

111:43

>> And we're all on this journey together.

111:45

And all of a sudden, you opted out of

111:46

the journey. You're the only person on

111:48

the boat that's not going where the

111:50

boat's going. And in the short run, it

111:53

would be nice that my shoulders didn't

111:54

hurt and that my voice was fixed and

111:56

things like that, but that would get old

111:58

really fast.

112:00

That point of connection is so

112:02

interesting because it immediately made

112:03

me think about my friendship circle.

112:05

I've got these five best friends that

112:06

I've had for the last 15 years and we're

112:08

all progressing through the life stages

112:10

together. Like they've all started

112:11

having kids now and then I'm trying to

112:13

have a kid at the moment and so we're

112:15

like talking about that together and

112:16

we're connecting about that together and

112:18

it makes you know and actually my

112:21

nightmare would be to be the only one

112:23

that wasn't in that life phase right

112:25

now. I feel disconnected.

112:27

>> Yeah.

112:28

>> Gosh. If I lived forever, I would Yeah.

112:30

No, I've I've never wanted to live

112:31

forever. I think it's I think it's um

112:33

people need to think about the

112:34

trade-offs of of everything in their

112:36

life, but particularly this idea of

112:38

longevity,

112:38

>> embracing this moment, you lose that.

112:41

>> I highly recommend just before we do

112:42

wrap up, people go read your blog as

112:44

well. I'm going to link that below.

112:45

>> Thank you,

112:46

>> Seth. We're done.

112:47

>> What a treat.

112:48

>> YouTube have this new crazy algorithm

112:49

where they know exactly what video you

112:52

would like to watch next based on AI and

112:54

all of your viewing behavior. And the

112:56

algorithm says that this video is the

112:59

perfect video for you. It's different

113:01

for everybody looking right now. Check

113:02

this video out and I bet you you might

113:04

love it.

Interactive Summary

The speaker challenges the conventional wisdom of "never quitting," introducing "the dip" as a necessary and often difficult phase on the path to mastery, which must be distinguished from a "cul-de-sac" or dead end, where quitting is the appropriate response. He illustrates how individuals often feel stuck (the "donkey philosophy") due to conflicting desires or internal "buts." The conversation emphasizes that problems are opportunities that can be solved by identifying what truly holds us back (likened to untying a "Gordian knot"), rather than being afraid or disconnected. Key concepts include embracing an intentionally chosen "purpose," understanding and serving a specific audience, and the empowering act of "picking yourself" in a world that no longer relies on traditional gatekeepers. The speaker advises against succumbing to sunk costs, promotes the mindset of "loving what you do" over "doing what you love," and critiques perfectionism and rigid authenticity as professional traps, advocating instead for consistency and meeting specifications. In the era of AI, the focus should be on leveraging technology to augment human connection and creativity. Ultimately, achieving goals is about focusing on the "throwing" (the process and practice) rather than the "catching" (the outcome), cultivating agency, and building a life that one's future self will appreciate by addressing regrets of inaction.

Suggested questions

8 ready-made prompts

Recently Distilled

Videos recently processed by our community