HomeVideos

Why This Bull Market May Still Have Room to Run With Caleb Franzen & Kris Bullock

Now Playing

Why This Bull Market May Still Have Room to Run With Caleb Franzen & Kris Bullock

Transcript

503 segments

0:07

Hello and welcome to Real Vision Alpha.

0:09

I am Chris Bulock. Today we have Caleb

0:11

Franson joining us once again. As many

0:13

of you know, Caleb was kind enough to

0:15

join us a few times last year and all of

0:17

those episodes turned out to be quite

0:18

popular with the community, so it's

0:20

great to get him back on the platform.

0:21

Uh Caleb, welcome. Thank you for being

0:24

here.

0:24

>> Happy to be back, man. And uh yeah, we

0:26

killed it last time. So hopefully we'll

0:28

uh we'll keep that momentum going. Huh.

0:30

>> Yes. Yes. I've been looking forward to

0:31

this. Uh in fact, I had to go back and

0:32

look. You were here last on November

0:34

26th,

0:36

which happened to be just a few days

0:37

after Bitcoin completed that first big

0:39

leg down to start the bare market. So,

0:41

it's been it's been quite a ride uh

0:43

since then. And um I I know you've got a

0:46

bunch of stuff prepared for us today.

0:48

But before we get into that, I wanted to

0:50

start by asking you some general

0:52

thoughts on like you have this really

0:54

amazing disciplined technical approach

0:56

and I want I want you to talk a little

0:58

bit about how that has served you over

1:00

the last like six or seven months in

1:02

this crazy bifurcated market where we

1:04

had stocks going one way, crypto going

1:06

the complete opposite um you know and

1:08

then all the volatility with the run and

1:10

things like that. So uh yeah, just talk

1:12

a little bit about how you've navigated

1:13

this with your approach that you use.

1:15

You know, I think price is the only

1:17

thing that pays us as investors. Quite

1:18

literally, what we're trying to do at

1:20

all times is manufacture arbitrage or

1:22

take or participate in arbitrage. And

1:24

that means we either need to buy low and

1:26

sell high or or buy high and sell

1:28

higher, right? And so that's really it

1:29

for me. And so everything starts and

1:31

ends with price because if I'm making an

1:33

investment, that's literally the thing.

1:34

It starts with what price I buy and it

1:36

ends with what price I sell. And so for

1:38

me, that comes down to studying

1:40

technical analysis, looking at different

1:42

statistical indicators. I hated coming

1:44

on the show last November. Of course, I

1:45

love the opportunity to come on and talk

1:46

to your audience, but I hated coming on

1:48

sounding so bearish on Bitcoin because,

1:50

you know, at the time uh or I should say

1:52

in October, it was the largest position

1:54

in my portfolio. And it still was even

1:55

in November. But for the first time in a

1:57

very long time, I had to sell Bitcoin uh

1:59

based on my rules-based system. And I

2:01

kept telling investors in 2025 what I

2:03

would do if certain conditions happened

2:04

for Bitcoin when the trend objectively

2:06

changed. And when that happened, I had

2:08

no choice. I had to follow the system.

2:10

And uh you know I think part of my

2:12

process of being an investor is

2:14

accepting that I'm going to be wrong a

2:16

lot and I try to identify these

2:18

inflection points based on technical

2:20

analysis based on statistical indicators

2:22

where at those inflection points quite

2:24

literally the cost for being wrong is so

2:26

small. So, if I was wrong in my bearish

2:29

outlook in the middle of October 2025,

2:32

you know, I could change that back,

2:34

excuse me, the middle of November 2025,

2:36

I could buy back my exposure 3% higher

2:38

than where I sold it. By definition,

2:40

that's a low cost for being wrong. So, I

2:42

think investors, first of all, need to

2:44

give themselves kindness. Uh, you know,

2:46

Steph Curry misses three-point shots.

2:48

Michael Jordan missed gamewinners. Show

2:50

Otani, you know, throws balls all the

2:52

time, right? And so as an investor, you

2:55

can't expect to have really high success

2:56

rates. I think there's an amazing quote,

2:58

you know, I grew up as a tennis player.

3:00

Uh I think Roger Federer has only won

3:02

like 52% of his points, you know, and

3:04

he's considered like the greatest of all

3:05

time. It's probably the same for

3:06

NovakJokovic. So as investors, I think

3:08

it's it's critical for us to to have

3:10

that process. Of course, I pay attention

3:12

to macro. I brought some macro charts

3:13

with me, but as it pertains to macro,

3:15

right, opinions are a dime a dozen. I'm

3:17

not here to be some armchair

3:18

macroeconomist. I'm not trying to become

3:19

some Nobel laureate or a PhD candidate.

3:21

So everything for me always comes back

3:23

to price.

3:25

>> Well, and I think that's important the

3:26

way you describe that. You know, you're

3:28

playing to your strengths and that's how

3:30

you win. Basically, it's when you try to

3:32

introduce other other things that you're

3:34

that, you know, areas where you're not

3:36

super skilled at or, you know, things

3:38

like that that you end up making

3:39

mistakes that you end up questioning

3:40

your decisions that you end up violating

3:42

your own framework and that's how you

3:45

lose, you know, and so I think it's

3:47

important, like you said, to just stick

3:48

with what you're good at and stick to

3:51

it, you know, and and it clearly has

3:53

worked out for you. Like a lot of us,

3:55

myself included, were were really

3:57

skeptical about uh this, you know, the

3:59

the peak of last year because none of

4:01

the macro lined up. You for the first

4:03

time in Bitcoin's history, none of the

4:04

macro lined up with the price action.

4:06

And everybody was just very confused. We

4:08

had, you know, we remember the four-year

4:09

cycle campers and then the macro campers

4:12

and it was just very, you know, one

4:14

against the other on on, you know,

4:15

crypto Twitter and things like that. And

4:18

um

4:19

fouryear cycle or not, the the people

4:21

that followed the technicals are the

4:22

ones that that won out in that that

4:24

argument. And um there's something to

4:27

that, you know,

4:28

>> for sure. And you know, so many people

4:30

ask me about the four-year cycle in

4:31

2025. I still get asked about it today.

4:34

And you know, I'm never going to invest

4:36

or have an outlook based on what month

4:38

it is in the Gregorian calendar, right?

4:40

Like for me, that's relatively

4:41

insignificant. Um, and so what I always

4:44

said was if the four-year cycle is

4:46

right, it's going to be reflected in

4:48

price. At which point, if I'm monitoring

4:50

price, I'll adapt if the four-year cycle

4:53

is actually true and correct. So, I got

4:54

asked about that, you know, last week,

4:56

you know, oh, like, is Bitcoin going to

4:58

bottom in October 2026? I was like, I

5:00

have no idea if it's going to bottom in

5:01

October 2026 based on the four-year

5:03

cycle, but if it does, what's it going

5:05

to do? It's going to re reassert itself

5:07

back into an uptrend. we're going to get

5:09

above a bunch of different uh you know

5:11

structural and dynamic levels that are

5:13

going to force me to get bullish and

5:15

overly optimistic again from a cyclical

5:16

perspect excuse me from a cyclical

5:18

perspective.

5:20

>> Yeah. I got to say too that last

5:21

conversation we had back in November uh

5:24

was really one of the ones was a

5:25

catalyst for me to uh take a step back

5:28

and really buckle down and stick to my

5:31

framework. I had a framework but I was

5:33

questioning it. I was questioning it

5:34

because the macro didn't line up. And I

5:36

was one of those that was just going

5:37

back and forth in my own head, you know,

5:39

what do I do here? And in the end, I

5:42

would have been better off had I been

5:44

more rigid with my my framework, you

5:46

know, and uh that was a learning lesson

5:48

for me. And like I said, it was in part

5:50

uh inspired by by the way you have

5:52

approached it. And so since then, I've

5:54

been much more strict with sticking with

5:57

my framework and uh calling myself out

5:59

every time that I, you know, think about

6:01

think otherwise. So yeah,

6:02

>> that's really awesome. And uh you know,

6:05

it reminds me of the phrase, right? It's

6:06

like the stock market is not the

6:08

economy. Um you know, I I I used to hear

6:10

that so often, but then I would use so

6:12

much macro data to try to create a

6:16

forecast for the market. And it's like,

6:17

but everyone's also saying that the

6:19

stock market is not the economy, so

6:20

which one do I actually kind of trust

6:21

here? And it's like, again, you just got

6:23

to focus on on price action.

6:25

>> Right. Right. Exactly. Exactly. So,

6:27

okay. I know you've got got a ton of

6:29

stuff for us today. So, let's uh let's

6:31

get into it here. Um yeah, where are we

6:34

at? What have you brought? [laughter]

6:35

>> You know, so so here I am dismissing

6:36

macroeconomics, but I actually want to

6:38

start with macro because look, you know,

6:40

I think I might might have mentioned it,

6:41

but as it pertains to macro, I think

6:43

less is more, right? For, you know, the

6:45

better part of four years, I've been

6:46

talking about the resilient and dynamic

6:47

nature of the US economy. Is it perfect?

6:49

Absolutely not. But has it been

6:51

sufficient to support the uptrend in

6:53

stock market? In the stock market, the

6:55

answer is absolutely yes. Right? that's

6:57

irrefutable. And um you know this past

6:59

weekend I was talking a little bit about

7:01

the CPI report that we were expected to

7:03

get today uh for June 2026. And um you

7:06

know there's been this all this talk

7:08

about reacelerating inflation. And you

7:10

know the key nuance here that we had to

7:12

embrace which was in my opinion excuse

7:14

my language but a bit like dumb

7:15

obvious is like we need to strip out

7:17

energy from CPI in order to actually

7:19

evaluate whether or not inflation is an

7:22

actual problem right now for all other

7:24

consumer items. And the answer was, in

7:26

my opinion, vehemently no. So if you

7:28

want to go to my chart on this, I have

7:29

the consumer price index for all urban

7:31

consumers stripping out energy. And so

7:34

we can see historically, you know, we

7:36

were kind of back in that average range

7:38

going back to the 1980s for this data

7:41

point. So, you know, this this data

7:43

point tends to be above 2% anyways. So a

7:45

little bit hotter than the Fed's 2%

7:47

target. And the key thing that I was

7:49

really noticing back here in this pocket

7:51

um while the Iran war uh excuse me while

7:53

the Iran war started was we were seeing

7:55

a modest uptick in non-energy CPI

7:59

inflation on a year-over-year basis but

8:01

nothing that was like systemic right

8:03

because the whole fear was is this

8:05

increase in energy going to have this

8:06

trickle down effect into all other

8:08

consumer goods and services and the

8:10

answer was in my opinion no and what we

8:12

got this morning was a resounding win

8:14

for the disinflation argument and so if

8:16

we look at this data point now we're

8:18

basically sweeping the cycle lows for

8:20

disinflation in the non-energy component

8:22

of CPI and so I think this is fantastic

8:25

because you know the market has become

8:27

overwhelmingly hawkish in terms of rates

8:29

the dollar you know wars is coming in

8:31

he's coming to shake things up all of

8:33

this talk right um you know but if we

8:37

get disinflation coming back in the

8:39

market is rapidly going to price out

8:41

those probabilities of rate hikes and if

8:43

that happens in a market environment

8:45

where the macro as a whole continues to

8:47

be resilient and dynamic and it is then

8:50

the market should continue to do well as

8:52

a whole and I'm talking specifically

8:53

about equities here because equities

8:55

continue to be rock solid. So this for

8:57

me was a a key win which continues to

9:00

support uh a bullish outlook on equities

9:02

and you know we're seeing great price

9:03

action in Bitcoin today getting back

9:04

above 64,000. I have a great chart for

9:06

Ethereum we'll get to later um which

9:08

achieved a key uh technical win for me

9:11

today. So, you know, I I have a pretty

9:13

nice little outlook here for a relief

9:15

rally in crypto and Bitcoin and Ethereum

9:17

specifically.

9:19

>> Good. Yeah, me too. What do we got next?

9:22

>> Okay, so I I kind of teased it a bit

9:25

here, but uh Redbook retail sales. If

9:27

you think about the resilient and

9:28

dynamic nature of the US economy, you

9:30

know, I I continue to see doomers doom

9:32

everywhere I turn, right? And so, we

9:34

continue to see this pessimistic outlook

9:36

on the US economy. But if we look at

9:38

redbook retail sales growing 8.2% 2% for

9:40

same store retail sales. By the way,

9:42

this does not include anything uh energy

9:45

related. So, this is really giving us a

9:47

pulse of actual consumption trends. This

9:49

is a nominal figure, but if we adjust

9:51

this for something like core PCE, um

9:53

which is what we should be adjusting

9:54

this by, then you know, real retail

9:56

sales is still growing like well above

9:58

5%, which is a rock solid figure. Um and

10:01

I also wanted to just briefly talk here

10:03

about initial unemployment claims uh

10:05

continue to be very rangebound over a

10:07

4-year period. um making new multi-deade

10:11

lows by the way on initial unemployment

10:14

claims. So if we think about

10:15

consumption, if we think about the labor

10:17

market, if we think about inflation

10:19

dynamics, all of this to me is

10:21

continuing to support a really strong

10:23

environment for let's call them risk

10:25

assets, but in particular equities. And

10:28

again, if we're looking at something

10:29

like the 3-month Treasury yield in blue,

10:32

the six-month Treasury yield in red, and

10:34

then the effective Fed funds rate, for

10:35

me, this is the best way to forecast

10:37

monetary policy dynamics. And so, yes,

10:39

the 3-month and the six-month Treasury

10:41

yield did get well above that effective

10:43

Fed funds rate. Basically telling us,

10:44

hey, within 6 months, there's the higher

10:46

probability that the Fed is going to

10:48

raise interest rates. But with this

10:50

disinflation print today, I feel pretty

10:52

confident that both of these uh blue and

10:54

red lines are going to trend back

10:56

towards 3.6 6 3.7% basically signaling

10:59

an extended pause which should alleviate

11:02

uh risk assets back to the upside.

11:04

>> Yeah, that makes sense. I want to get

11:06

back to the the last couple of charts

11:08

you had shared. Thinking about that uh

11:10

in terms of like the the bottom the

11:12

bottom half of the the K-shaped economy.

11:14

Does it seem like it's not

11:16

>> perhaps as bad as anecdotally people are

11:20

making it seem?

11:22

>> I have no idea. I really I really have

11:25

no idea. And maybe this uh maybe this

11:27

sounds um I'm a bit mute on this, but

11:29

like as it pertains to me being an

11:32

investor, I genuinely I'm not going to

11:34

preoccupy myself with that, right? If

11:36

anything, all it does is light more of a

11:39

fire under my ass to go out and buy more

11:41

assets for the long run, right?

11:43

>> Yeah.

11:44

>> Because we know what's what's causing

11:46

this K-shaped economy. Um it's monetary

11:49

stimulus. It's the increase in M2. And

11:51

it's going to reward asset holders and

11:52

it's going to reward the people who are

11:54

using debt and productive means via

11:56

inflation eating away at the amount of

11:58

capital that we need to pay back from a

12:00

nominal perspective. Right. Right.

12:02

>> Um so, you know, from that standpoint,

12:04

all it does is just yes, the K-shap

12:06

economy is here. It's likely going to

12:07

continue to get worse. I don't know at

12:09

what pace, but all that tells me is I

12:11

need to continue to be a net buyer of

12:13

assets every single year. That's

12:14

something that I I've been saying since

12:16

2022. Um when I start first started

12:18

having the opportunity to go on

12:19

different podcasts is I'm going to be a

12:20

net buyer of assets every single year. I

12:22

was saying that when I was what was I 27

12:25

now I'm 31. So you know I'm going to

12:26

keep you know beating that same drum

12:29

>> 100%. Yeah. Okay. Um I see the next one

12:33

here. High Oh yeah. High yield

12:36

>> high yield credit spreads. Um I think

12:38

this is really important. This for this

12:40

for me has been one of like the secret

12:41

weapons that I that I use in the market

12:44

to kind of sniff out um warning signs or

12:47

to reiterate uh bull market conditions.

12:49

First of all, what are we looking at

12:50

here? We're basically looking at the

12:52

difference between high yield junk

12:54

bonds, the yield on those junk bonds

12:55

relative to US treasuries of the same

12:57

duration. So we get this spread here.

12:59

That's why it's called high yield credit

13:01

spreads, right? And so what we're

13:03

looking here, what we're looking at here

13:04

is when this chart goes up, it's

13:06

indicating higher risk. If investors

13:08

think that junk bond companies aren't

13:10

going to be able to pay back the debt,

13:12

the yield on those instruments is going

13:13

to go up way faster than it is on

13:14

treasuries. In fact, Treasury yields are

13:16

probably going to fall in that

13:17

environment, causing this to dislocate

13:19

even further. And so, what we want to

13:21

see as bulls, as optimists, is we want

13:24

to see this line go down. And so, we can

13:26

see in 2022 when we started to really

13:28

get into that riskoff environment, what

13:30

was happening? This line was going up.

13:31

And since 2022, it's been going way

13:34

down. And so what I love to see here is

13:36

when credit spreads, especially on a

13:38

multi-month horizon, start making lower

13:40

lows. And I'll show you why here in just

13:42

a second, but we can see, you know,

13:44

since we kind of had that panic sell-off

13:46

with the Iran war, um, you know, various

13:49

things happening in Q1. uh you know,

13:51

credit spreads are making new lows on

13:53

that time frame, which I think is ultra

13:55

impactful because if we invert this

13:57

chart, if we just flip it onto its head

14:00

and we overlay the S&P 500, you know,

14:03

these aren't going to be perfect, but

14:04

generally speaking, major local lows and

14:06

local highs occur at the same time. And

14:09

so, what often gets me nervous is when

14:11

we're seeing a divergence here between

14:13

spreads uh and the S&P 500. And what

14:16

we're seeing right now is we're not

14:18

seeing that at all. If anything, credit

14:19

spreads are reaffirming that this bull

14:21

market is strongly intact.

14:23

>> Well, and not only that, not only are

14:25

credit spreads tight, they're they're at

14:27

like historically tight levels, you

14:29

know, going I mean, they weren't this

14:31

low

14:32

>> till back in like 2007, you know,

14:34

basically. So, [laughter]

14:37

>> I mean,

14:38

>> I think that's noteworthy also.

14:40

>> It is noteworthy. Um, I don't want to

14:43

use that though as like a just as like a

14:46

as a warning sign that we could be back

14:48

in like another GFC type of moment like

14:50

just before because as of right now,

14:52

we're not seeing the same warning signs

14:54

and spreads that we were seeing at that

14:56

time or what we were seeing going into

14:57

2020 or even what we were seeing going

14:59

into the end of 2021. Like you could

15:02

see, for example, at the end of 2021,

15:04

credit spreads here, well, let me go

15:06

back to this other chart if it's uh if

15:08

it's here. credit spreads here were

15:10

making these higher lows, right? And

15:12

then that continued going into the

15:13

middle of uh or Q1 of 2022. Right now,

15:17

we're continuing to make new cycle lows.

15:19

So, I don't know what this chart is

15:20

going to look like 3 months down the

15:22

line, 6 months down the line. But what

15:24

this chart does tell me, the fact that

15:26

we are not seeing a divergence here,

15:28

tells me that any material dips at the

15:30

index level for the S&P 500, for the

15:32

equity market as a whole, even for

15:34

something like Bitcoin, is just an

15:36

opportunity to produce a higher low or

15:38

an opportunity to back up the truck into

15:40

that dip because we're not getting some

15:42

macro signal here that, hey, the bull

15:44

market is over. And we just need to

15:46

recognize what do bull markets do? Bull

15:48

markets are just uptrends. Uptrends are

15:50

the sustained production of higher highs

15:52

and higher lows. If we as investors get

15:54

scared at every opportunity to produce a

15:57

higher low, by definition, we're going

15:58

to miss 50% of the bull market. And I

16:01

don't know about everybody else, but

16:03

it's probably a good idea to be invested

16:05

during bull markets, right? So, for me,

16:08

if because we're not seeing a warning

16:09

sign here in credit spreads, I feel

16:12

really reaffirmed. I don't know what the

16:13

S&P 500 is going to do next. I have a

16:15

chart on this. But if we do get a dip,

16:18

which I'm perfectly open to that

16:20

possibility, I'm going to view that as a

16:22

really strong buying opportunity. Before

16:24

you go, that was just the preview. The

16:27

full conversation goes much deeper.

16:29

What's really driving markets, where the

16:31

risks are, and how the best investors

16:34

are positioning. That's what we do at

16:36

Real Vision. We connect the dots before

16:37

they become obvious. So, don't stop

16:39

here. Watch the full episode now and

16:41

more on Real Vision.

Interactive Summary

In this conversation, Chris Bulock and guest Caleb Franson discuss the importance of a rules-based, technical approach to investing rather than relying solely on macro sentiment. Caleb highlights his methodology of prioritizing price action as the ultimate indicator for navigating market cycles. He presents data on the resilient US economy, arguing that disinflationary trends and strong consumer behavior support a bullish outlook for equities and risk assets like Bitcoin. Furthermore, he emphasizes the utility of high-yield credit spreads as a reliable indicator that confirms the current bull market's strength.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts