Why This Bull Market May Still Have Room to Run With Caleb Franzen & Kris Bullock
503 segments
Hello and welcome to Real Vision Alpha.
I am Chris Bulock. Today we have Caleb
Franson joining us once again. As many
of you know, Caleb was kind enough to
join us a few times last year and all of
those episodes turned out to be quite
popular with the community, so it's
great to get him back on the platform.
Uh Caleb, welcome. Thank you for being
here.
>> Happy to be back, man. And uh yeah, we
killed it last time. So hopefully we'll
uh we'll keep that momentum going. Huh.
>> Yes. Yes. I've been looking forward to
this. Uh in fact, I had to go back and
look. You were here last on November
26th,
which happened to be just a few days
after Bitcoin completed that first big
leg down to start the bare market. So,
it's been it's been quite a ride uh
since then. And um I I know you've got a
bunch of stuff prepared for us today.
But before we get into that, I wanted to
start by asking you some general
thoughts on like you have this really
amazing disciplined technical approach
and I want I want you to talk a little
bit about how that has served you over
the last like six or seven months in
this crazy bifurcated market where we
had stocks going one way, crypto going
the complete opposite um you know and
then all the volatility with the run and
things like that. So uh yeah, just talk
a little bit about how you've navigated
this with your approach that you use.
You know, I think price is the only
thing that pays us as investors. Quite
literally, what we're trying to do at
all times is manufacture arbitrage or
take or participate in arbitrage. And
that means we either need to buy low and
sell high or or buy high and sell
higher, right? And so that's really it
for me. And so everything starts and
ends with price because if I'm making an
investment, that's literally the thing.
It starts with what price I buy and it
ends with what price I sell. And so for
me, that comes down to studying
technical analysis, looking at different
statistical indicators. I hated coming
on the show last November. Of course, I
love the opportunity to come on and talk
to your audience, but I hated coming on
sounding so bearish on Bitcoin because,
you know, at the time uh or I should say
in October, it was the largest position
in my portfolio. And it still was even
in November. But for the first time in a
very long time, I had to sell Bitcoin uh
based on my rules-based system. And I
kept telling investors in 2025 what I
would do if certain conditions happened
for Bitcoin when the trend objectively
changed. And when that happened, I had
no choice. I had to follow the system.
And uh you know I think part of my
process of being an investor is
accepting that I'm going to be wrong a
lot and I try to identify these
inflection points based on technical
analysis based on statistical indicators
where at those inflection points quite
literally the cost for being wrong is so
small. So, if I was wrong in my bearish
outlook in the middle of October 2025,
you know, I could change that back,
excuse me, the middle of November 2025,
I could buy back my exposure 3% higher
than where I sold it. By definition,
that's a low cost for being wrong. So, I
think investors, first of all, need to
give themselves kindness. Uh, you know,
Steph Curry misses three-point shots.
Michael Jordan missed gamewinners. Show
Otani, you know, throws balls all the
time, right? And so as an investor, you
can't expect to have really high success
rates. I think there's an amazing quote,
you know, I grew up as a tennis player.
Uh I think Roger Federer has only won
like 52% of his points, you know, and
he's considered like the greatest of all
time. It's probably the same for
NovakJokovic. So as investors, I think
it's it's critical for us to to have
that process. Of course, I pay attention
to macro. I brought some macro charts
with me, but as it pertains to macro,
right, opinions are a dime a dozen. I'm
not here to be some armchair
macroeconomist. I'm not trying to become
some Nobel laureate or a PhD candidate.
So everything for me always comes back
to price.
>> Well, and I think that's important the
way you describe that. You know, you're
playing to your strengths and that's how
you win. Basically, it's when you try to
introduce other other things that you're
that, you know, areas where you're not
super skilled at or, you know, things
like that that you end up making
mistakes that you end up questioning
your decisions that you end up violating
your own framework and that's how you
lose, you know, and so I think it's
important, like you said, to just stick
with what you're good at and stick to
it, you know, and and it clearly has
worked out for you. Like a lot of us,
myself included, were were really
skeptical about uh this, you know, the
the peak of last year because none of
the macro lined up. You for the first
time in Bitcoin's history, none of the
macro lined up with the price action.
And everybody was just very confused. We
had, you know, we remember the four-year
cycle campers and then the macro campers
and it was just very, you know, one
against the other on on, you know,
crypto Twitter and things like that. And
um
fouryear cycle or not, the the people
that followed the technicals are the
ones that that won out in that that
argument. And um there's something to
that, you know,
>> for sure. And you know, so many people
ask me about the four-year cycle in
2025. I still get asked about it today.
And you know, I'm never going to invest
or have an outlook based on what month
it is in the Gregorian calendar, right?
Like for me, that's relatively
insignificant. Um, and so what I always
said was if the four-year cycle is
right, it's going to be reflected in
price. At which point, if I'm monitoring
price, I'll adapt if the four-year cycle
is actually true and correct. So, I got
asked about that, you know, last week,
you know, oh, like, is Bitcoin going to
bottom in October 2026? I was like, I
have no idea if it's going to bottom in
October 2026 based on the four-year
cycle, but if it does, what's it going
to do? It's going to re reassert itself
back into an uptrend. we're going to get
above a bunch of different uh you know
structural and dynamic levels that are
going to force me to get bullish and
overly optimistic again from a cyclical
perspect excuse me from a cyclical
perspective.
>> Yeah. I got to say too that last
conversation we had back in November uh
was really one of the ones was a
catalyst for me to uh take a step back
and really buckle down and stick to my
framework. I had a framework but I was
questioning it. I was questioning it
because the macro didn't line up. And I
was one of those that was just going
back and forth in my own head, you know,
what do I do here? And in the end, I
would have been better off had I been
more rigid with my my framework, you
know, and uh that was a learning lesson
for me. And like I said, it was in part
uh inspired by by the way you have
approached it. And so since then, I've
been much more strict with sticking with
my framework and uh calling myself out
every time that I, you know, think about
think otherwise. So yeah,
>> that's really awesome. And uh you know,
it reminds me of the phrase, right? It's
like the stock market is not the
economy. Um you know, I I I used to hear
that so often, but then I would use so
much macro data to try to create a
forecast for the market. And it's like,
but everyone's also saying that the
stock market is not the economy, so
which one do I actually kind of trust
here? And it's like, again, you just got
to focus on on price action.
>> Right. Right. Exactly. Exactly. So,
okay. I know you've got got a ton of
stuff for us today. So, let's uh let's
get into it here. Um yeah, where are we
at? What have you brought? [laughter]
>> You know, so so here I am dismissing
macroeconomics, but I actually want to
start with macro because look, you know,
I think I might might have mentioned it,
but as it pertains to macro, I think
less is more, right? For, you know, the
better part of four years, I've been
talking about the resilient and dynamic
nature of the US economy. Is it perfect?
Absolutely not. But has it been
sufficient to support the uptrend in
stock market? In the stock market, the
answer is absolutely yes. Right? that's
irrefutable. And um you know this past
weekend I was talking a little bit about
the CPI report that we were expected to
get today uh for June 2026. And um you
know there's been this all this talk
about reacelerating inflation. And you
know the key nuance here that we had to
embrace which was in my opinion excuse
my language but a bit like dumb
obvious is like we need to strip out
energy from CPI in order to actually
evaluate whether or not inflation is an
actual problem right now for all other
consumer items. And the answer was, in
my opinion, vehemently no. So if you
want to go to my chart on this, I have
the consumer price index for all urban
consumers stripping out energy. And so
we can see historically, you know, we
were kind of back in that average range
going back to the 1980s for this data
point. So, you know, this this data
point tends to be above 2% anyways. So a
little bit hotter than the Fed's 2%
target. And the key thing that I was
really noticing back here in this pocket
um while the Iran war uh excuse me while
the Iran war started was we were seeing
a modest uptick in non-energy CPI
inflation on a year-over-year basis but
nothing that was like systemic right
because the whole fear was is this
increase in energy going to have this
trickle down effect into all other
consumer goods and services and the
answer was in my opinion no and what we
got this morning was a resounding win
for the disinflation argument and so if
we look at this data point now we're
basically sweeping the cycle lows for
disinflation in the non-energy component
of CPI and so I think this is fantastic
because you know the market has become
overwhelmingly hawkish in terms of rates
the dollar you know wars is coming in
he's coming to shake things up all of
this talk right um you know but if we
get disinflation coming back in the
market is rapidly going to price out
those probabilities of rate hikes and if
that happens in a market environment
where the macro as a whole continues to
be resilient and dynamic and it is then
the market should continue to do well as
a whole and I'm talking specifically
about equities here because equities
continue to be rock solid. So this for
me was a a key win which continues to
support uh a bullish outlook on equities
and you know we're seeing great price
action in Bitcoin today getting back
above 64,000. I have a great chart for
Ethereum we'll get to later um which
achieved a key uh technical win for me
today. So, you know, I I have a pretty
nice little outlook here for a relief
rally in crypto and Bitcoin and Ethereum
specifically.
>> Good. Yeah, me too. What do we got next?
>> Okay, so I I kind of teased it a bit
here, but uh Redbook retail sales. If
you think about the resilient and
dynamic nature of the US economy, you
know, I I continue to see doomers doom
everywhere I turn, right? And so, we
continue to see this pessimistic outlook
on the US economy. But if we look at
redbook retail sales growing 8.2% 2% for
same store retail sales. By the way,
this does not include anything uh energy
related. So, this is really giving us a
pulse of actual consumption trends. This
is a nominal figure, but if we adjust
this for something like core PCE, um
which is what we should be adjusting
this by, then you know, real retail
sales is still growing like well above
5%, which is a rock solid figure. Um and
I also wanted to just briefly talk here
about initial unemployment claims uh
continue to be very rangebound over a
4-year period. um making new multi-deade
lows by the way on initial unemployment
claims. So if we think about
consumption, if we think about the labor
market, if we think about inflation
dynamics, all of this to me is
continuing to support a really strong
environment for let's call them risk
assets, but in particular equities. And
again, if we're looking at something
like the 3-month Treasury yield in blue,
the six-month Treasury yield in red, and
then the effective Fed funds rate, for
me, this is the best way to forecast
monetary policy dynamics. And so, yes,
the 3-month and the six-month Treasury
yield did get well above that effective
Fed funds rate. Basically telling us,
hey, within 6 months, there's the higher
probability that the Fed is going to
raise interest rates. But with this
disinflation print today, I feel pretty
confident that both of these uh blue and
red lines are going to trend back
towards 3.6 6 3.7% basically signaling
an extended pause which should alleviate
uh risk assets back to the upside.
>> Yeah, that makes sense. I want to get
back to the the last couple of charts
you had shared. Thinking about that uh
in terms of like the the bottom the
bottom half of the the K-shaped economy.
Does it seem like it's not
>> perhaps as bad as anecdotally people are
making it seem?
>> I have no idea. I really I really have
no idea. And maybe this uh maybe this
sounds um I'm a bit mute on this, but
like as it pertains to me being an
investor, I genuinely I'm not going to
preoccupy myself with that, right? If
anything, all it does is light more of a
fire under my ass to go out and buy more
assets for the long run, right?
>> Yeah.
>> Because we know what's what's causing
this K-shaped economy. Um it's monetary
stimulus. It's the increase in M2. And
it's going to reward asset holders and
it's going to reward the people who are
using debt and productive means via
inflation eating away at the amount of
capital that we need to pay back from a
nominal perspective. Right. Right.
>> Um so, you know, from that standpoint,
all it does is just yes, the K-shap
economy is here. It's likely going to
continue to get worse. I don't know at
what pace, but all that tells me is I
need to continue to be a net buyer of
assets every single year. That's
something that I I've been saying since
2022. Um when I start first started
having the opportunity to go on
different podcasts is I'm going to be a
net buyer of assets every single year. I
was saying that when I was what was I 27
now I'm 31. So you know I'm going to
keep you know beating that same drum
>> 100%. Yeah. Okay. Um I see the next one
here. High Oh yeah. High yield
>> high yield credit spreads. Um I think
this is really important. This for this
for me has been one of like the secret
weapons that I that I use in the market
to kind of sniff out um warning signs or
to reiterate uh bull market conditions.
First of all, what are we looking at
here? We're basically looking at the
difference between high yield junk
bonds, the yield on those junk bonds
relative to US treasuries of the same
duration. So we get this spread here.
That's why it's called high yield credit
spreads, right? And so what we're
looking here, what we're looking at here
is when this chart goes up, it's
indicating higher risk. If investors
think that junk bond companies aren't
going to be able to pay back the debt,
the yield on those instruments is going
to go up way faster than it is on
treasuries. In fact, Treasury yields are
probably going to fall in that
environment, causing this to dislocate
even further. And so, what we want to
see as bulls, as optimists, is we want
to see this line go down. And so, we can
see in 2022 when we started to really
get into that riskoff environment, what
was happening? This line was going up.
And since 2022, it's been going way
down. And so what I love to see here is
when credit spreads, especially on a
multi-month horizon, start making lower
lows. And I'll show you why here in just
a second, but we can see, you know,
since we kind of had that panic sell-off
with the Iran war, um, you know, various
things happening in Q1. uh you know,
credit spreads are making new lows on
that time frame, which I think is ultra
impactful because if we invert this
chart, if we just flip it onto its head
and we overlay the S&P 500, you know,
these aren't going to be perfect, but
generally speaking, major local lows and
local highs occur at the same time. And
so, what often gets me nervous is when
we're seeing a divergence here between
spreads uh and the S&P 500. And what
we're seeing right now is we're not
seeing that at all. If anything, credit
spreads are reaffirming that this bull
market is strongly intact.
>> Well, and not only that, not only are
credit spreads tight, they're they're at
like historically tight levels, you
know, going I mean, they weren't this
low
>> till back in like 2007, you know,
basically. So, [laughter]
>> I mean,
>> I think that's noteworthy also.
>> It is noteworthy. Um, I don't want to
use that though as like a just as like a
as a warning sign that we could be back
in like another GFC type of moment like
just before because as of right now,
we're not seeing the same warning signs
and spreads that we were seeing at that
time or what we were seeing going into
2020 or even what we were seeing going
into the end of 2021. Like you could
see, for example, at the end of 2021,
credit spreads here, well, let me go
back to this other chart if it's uh if
it's here. credit spreads here were
making these higher lows, right? And
then that continued going into the
middle of uh or Q1 of 2022. Right now,
we're continuing to make new cycle lows.
So, I don't know what this chart is
going to look like 3 months down the
line, 6 months down the line. But what
this chart does tell me, the fact that
we are not seeing a divergence here,
tells me that any material dips at the
index level for the S&P 500, for the
equity market as a whole, even for
something like Bitcoin, is just an
opportunity to produce a higher low or
an opportunity to back up the truck into
that dip because we're not getting some
macro signal here that, hey, the bull
market is over. And we just need to
recognize what do bull markets do? Bull
markets are just uptrends. Uptrends are
the sustained production of higher highs
and higher lows. If we as investors get
scared at every opportunity to produce a
higher low, by definition, we're going
to miss 50% of the bull market. And I
don't know about everybody else, but
it's probably a good idea to be invested
during bull markets, right? So, for me,
if because we're not seeing a warning
sign here in credit spreads, I feel
really reaffirmed. I don't know what the
S&P 500 is going to do next. I have a
chart on this. But if we do get a dip,
which I'm perfectly open to that
possibility, I'm going to view that as a
really strong buying opportunity. Before
you go, that was just the preview. The
full conversation goes much deeper.
What's really driving markets, where the
risks are, and how the best investors
are positioning. That's what we do at
Real Vision. We connect the dots before
they become obvious. So, don't stop
here. Watch the full episode now and
more on Real Vision.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
In this conversation, Chris Bulock and guest Caleb Franson discuss the importance of a rules-based, technical approach to investing rather than relying solely on macro sentiment. Caleb highlights his methodology of prioritizing price action as the ultimate indicator for navigating market cycles. He presents data on the resilient US economy, arguing that disinflationary trends and strong consumer behavior support a bullish outlook for equities and risk assets like Bitcoin. Furthermore, he emphasizes the utility of high-yield credit spreads as a reliable indicator that confirms the current bull market's strength.
Videos recently processed by our community