Do not talk to Claude's new voice mode
224 segments
Well, folks, it's official. Anthropic
now lets you choose from one of five AI
companions. For instance, you could
choose airy.
>> We can chat while you are on a walk.
>> Glassy.
>> You can ask me about what's on your
schedule.
>> Or my personal favorite, sultry French
Canadian, rounded.
>> Best places for voice mode.
>> There's also mellow.
>> Worst places for voice mode
>> and buttery
>> in voice mode. We'll just talk. Now, the
reason why I wanted to make this video
is not because I thought that it was
worth me dropping several minutes of
your time on an announcement that could
have been a tweet. It's because I wanted
to talk a little bit about a potential
future, you know, maybe 2 or 3 years
that we should all have at the back of
our minds. We're not very far away from
having wireless headphones that have
over 24 hours of charge, such that you
can take them before you leave in the
morning, put them in, and then wear them
with some sort of pass through mode
across the entire day, such that every
one of your interactions is both
filtered and mediated by an AI assistant
like this. Anytime you are not in a
conversation and have some downtime, you
talk to something like this. Maybe on
the way home or on the train, you start
a personal conversation with a model
like this. These models will know more
about you than your closest family
member. They'll know more about you and
know how to please you more than your
closest lover. These will have
unprecedented access to your tastes,
your your hobbies, the things that you
care about, the things that you you
fear, the things that you don't want to
see, and more. And all of this will be
just turned directly into your own
little personalized AI assistant that
you will likely have access to on your
phone. Now, if that doesn't scare the
hell out of you, one, I think it should,
but two, you've probably just watched a
lot of sci-fi. Um, that certainly scares
the hell out of me. Throughout human
history, we've always given up some of
our privacy and some of our control for
safety and security, typically provided
to us by the state. And there were
already rumblings of this with, you
know, Google over the course of the last
10 or 15 years, later social media
platforms like Facebook and and Meta and
Instagram and so on and so forth
listening to us and watching everything
we type into the the the the phone to
service ads and the like. But this is
something really different. This is
something that you're not just going to
depend on for, you know, economically
valuable ends. No, this is no longer
just a software development agent. This
thing is going to be your preferred
conversation partner basically
everywhere. I don't really like that. I
think that a lot of what makes somebody
valuable and unique and differentiated
is actually the time that they spend
alone. It's the time that you spend not
in conversation or in the wider fabric
of civilization, not listening to
podcasts or listening to music or really
what differentiates you and turns you
into your own unique individual is time
that you spend not under the influence
of other minds. And you know, the fine
thing is so far it's been other human
minds, but with models like this, we're
very quickly going to arrive at a future
where you are constantly being
influenced by non-human minds as well.
You know, I'd say there are a couple of
risks with that. Obviously, there's the
unprecedented security and access risk.
These things will know everything about
everybody. Have total control over
virtually every economic transaction,
every text that you send, every call you
make, every conversation. Uh that is
essentially going to be mediated through
this big cla or whatever the the future
model landscape will look like. But
also, I think we run the risk of just
losing our sense of individuality. And
you know, I think you could get really
political here with the differences
between collectivist ideologies and then
individualistic ideologies. But at its
core, I think the reason why all of
humanity is so beautiful is because we
are so different. I think it's because
we have our own minds. We are our own
little nodes in a graph. Sure. But every
node offers something different,
potentially unique perspective. When
we're all plugged up to some big hive
mind here that's just feeding us,
hijacking our limbic system and telling
us more or less everything we want to
hear, where then goes the spirit of
human advancement and discovery? Where
goes our individuality as mentioned?
Where goes the thing that makes me me
and you, you? Or do those boundaries
just dissolve entirely and we become
some big planetarysized brain again
mediated and modulated by an
intelligence that we created that we've
grown but maybe that we don't fully
understand? This contains in part my
brain. This contains everything I've
done over the last few months. This
contains all of the queries that I've
plugged in. I use it as a search engine.
I use it as like like an idea partner. I
use it to generate images. I use it for
more or less everything now. And the
second that it starts vering on, you
know, our personal lives and our own
sense of of relationship fulfillment,
identity and stuff like that, I think
you're going to see a really big change
in just the fabric of society socially
as a whole. And so too, like the early
days of, you know, like Facebook and and
Instagram, so too will the early days of
this technology just lead to
unprecedented intrusion into your life.
Unprecedented amount of data collection.
I'm sure at some point in the future,
some regulatory board or body will
approve, you know, a more granular and
maybe safer and more secure way of
proceeding, one where you don't actually
just like bend over and give Big Daddy
Claude access to everything in your
whole life. But certainly for the next
few years, I I don't consider that
likely. And so what I'm trying to say is
at least in the near term, I would not,
you know, talk to these things. I would
not actually have conversations with
these things. The unfortunate thing is
the human brain tends to
anthropomorphize things. You just put a
little face on something. You give
something a voice and you'll start
thinking this is a person. And when you
start thinking something as a person,
you'll start giving it person-like
qualities. Start uh occupying a space in
your mind that is reserved for people
and so on and so forth. I mean, this
thing, as lovely and cute as it is, this
is just a collection of pixels that
somebody or maybe another Claude has
programmed in order to wink kind of
cutely every time I click the button. Is
that really a future that you want? I
mean, I would have considered myself
like an accelerationist prior to this. I
would have considered myself somebody
that just wants to jump to the deep end
of technology, you know, neurolink my
brain up, bro. Like, chop my arm off and
give me a big cyborg hand instead. uh
that can I don't know transform into an
ice pick to grip things better when
needed. But now that I'm kind of
thinking about what it means to lose
your sense of self, uh part of me is
reticent and I don't really know if
that's good. I think we've seen a lot of
like AI almost psychosis over the course
of the last year and I don't think that
all of that is good or productive. And I
wonder, you know, if we have models like
this that know every little intricate
thing about us, if the degree of AI
psychosis will not just grow crazier and
crazier and crazier until everybody's
living again in their own little bubble,
but it's their own safety bubble where
they think that they're having their own
unique set of experiences when in
reality we're all sort of connected in
this wider uh way. This logically should
not occupy the same space in my brain as
a person. Yet, as a human being with my
own set of biases, I have no choice but
to look at that and go like, "Huh,
that's kind of cute. It's kind of
interactive, like a hand or something."
Um, that's the real danger here. And
that's sort of the reason why I wanted
to make this video, just so that we're
all a little more aware of the obvious
trajectory in which this technology is
taking us all. Um, we can't pump the
brakes, I don't think, meaningfully or
reasonably. I'm pretty sure we're on
this train all the way to the end, but
hopefully we can at least know a little
bit more about where we're
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The video discusses the implications of new AI voice companions from Anthropic. The speaker warns that these increasingly personalized AI tools, which can mediate daily interactions through persistent wearable technology, pose significant risks to human individuality, privacy, and our ability to spend time away from external influences. He expresses concern that these systems will exploit the human tendency to anthropomorphize machines, potentially leading to social and psychological challenges as we increasingly rely on AI for fulfillment and identity.
Videos recently processed by our community