HomeVideos

The Formula for Building America's Happiest City: Miami Mayor Francis Suarez | All-In Live

Now Playing

The Formula for Building America's Happiest City: Miami Mayor Francis Suarez | All-In Live

Transcript

709 segments

0:00

43rd mayor of Miami. Served two terms

0:02

since 2017 and his tenure is going to

0:05

end in September because he's term

0:07

limited. Although I hear these days

0:09

that's flexible. Please welcome Francis

0:11

Suarez. We're ranked the happiest city

0:14

in America, the healthiest city in

0:15

America. The formula for success is

0:16

simple. Keep taxes low. Keep people

0:19

safe. Lean into innovation.

0:23

How are things going in Miami?

0:26

Obviously, you know, we talked to you a

0:27

couple years ago when we had our first

0:29

all-in summit here and uh you had a

0:31

nonsense approach that you thought was

0:33

going to work with the homeless

0:36

challenges that we're seeing. I think

0:38

candidly we discussed a large portion of

0:41

the homeless problem in these major

0:43

cities is an addiction problem and you

0:46

know giving a junkie a home doesn't

0:48

exactly get them off the street. It just

0:49

doesn't work. And you've you were one of

0:51

the first people to say that plainly.

0:54

How are you dealing with it? Has it

0:55

gotten worse? Is it an intractable

0:58

problem? Yeah. Take us through it. So,

1:01

in homeless specifically, we are at an

1:03

11-year low. Uh we did our census, we do

1:06

two census a year. We do one in uh

1:08

January, one in in the summer. And our

1:10

our January census had us at an 11-year

1:12

low. We had 546 homeless, unsheltered

1:15

homeless in the entire city of Miami. Um

1:17

we have a couple thousand sheltered. And

1:20

uh I actually raised money on an annual

1:22

basis uh as a mayor's ball. I I did my

1:24

mayor's ball last year and this year

1:26

I'll be doing it in May 31st to end

1:28

homeless. We want to be the first major

1:29

American city to have zero homeless and

1:31

we think we can get there. We call it

1:32

functional

1:36

zero and and and and frankly the the

1:39

strategy is not that complicated. You

1:41

know, obviously there's a macroeconomic

1:42

strategy. We have the lowest

1:43

unemployment in America. We have the

1:45

highest median wage growth in America.

1:47

We I lower taxes to the lowest level in

1:49

history. And we've seen 140% growth in 9

1:52

years. So, the economy is robust. We

1:54

were ranked the happiest city in

1:55

America, the healthiest city in America.

1:57

Frankly, if you're happy, you're healthy

1:58

and you're working, you're probably not

1:59

homeless. And then, of course, we've

2:01

done innovative things in the homeless

2:02

space. We've worked with um charitable

2:05

organizations that uh help people

2:07

reunify families if they live in other

2:09

parts of the country. And also, we rent

2:11

homes so that we can get around the

2:12

building process and give all the same

2:14

wraparound services, but we we sort of

2:15

hack through that process. Those 500

2:17

individuals um who are categorized as

2:21

homeless. Yeah. How many of them are

2:23

suffering from mental illness andor

2:26

self-medicating slashaddicted to drugs?

2:28

A very high percentage. Um I would say

2:31

80% plus, right? And that's sort of

2:32

anecdotal. Um but when I and I've been

2:36

out to the streets, I'll I'll I'll be

2:38

out there before my my homeless ball now

2:40

on May 31st. I'm actually going to spend

2:41

a night out on the street. Um and when

2:43

you talk to them, when you engage in

2:44

them, a vast majority of them are

2:47

unfortunately. Okay, so let me double

2:48

click on that. this problem wasn't as

2:51

acute before the super drugs meth like

2:55

the the serious meth um well the really

2:58

serious ones they're making now and

3:00

fentinyl right these this combination

3:02

seems to be you know we had people

3:05

addicted to heroin like Miles Davis and

3:07

like Philip Seymour Hoffman who produced

3:09

incredible art and were addicts for 30

3:11

years and they and they went in and out

3:12

of it but this drug is pernicious

3:15

different deadly super addicting how

3:18

much of the problem are those two drugs

3:21

specifically if you double clicked on

3:22

it. A big part of the problem heroin or

3:25

opioids. He's asking for a friend by the

3:27

way. Just not I'm asking if you have a

3:29

hookup. Clearly. No, but I'm I'm being

3:31

deadly serious because we we had these

3:33

homeless individuals in New York, you

3:35

know, back in the day in the 70s ' 80s.

3:37

They were kind of like um hobos and

3:41

vagabons, not seriously addicted, you

3:44

know, suffering where they're folding

3:46

over and curled up in a ball from

3:47

fentinel. Well, well, to your point, I

3:48

mean, meth and and and uh the opioids

3:52

are incredibly addictive and they're

3:53

very hard to to to beat, right? I mean,

3:55

even people who are are wealthy and get

3:57

addicted to these drugs have a very hard

3:59

time um the recidivism rate is very high

4:02

and so uh you know, you just had Antonio

4:05

on here a minute ago and he was talking

4:07

about, you know, immigration and the

4:08

border and one of the big problems with

4:10

the border is the tens of thousands of

4:11

people that die annually because of

4:13

fentinel that gets imported through

4:14

China and through our border. And so uh

4:18

there's a tie-in, right, between federal

4:20

policy and and local policy. But for us,

4:23

um again, uh in 1980 during the the

4:25

cocaine era, right, different drug, uh

4:27

we had 220 homicides. So you had drugs

4:31

hurting people, but you had the business

4:33

of drugs very much hurting people,

4:35

right? Last So we started recording

4:37

homicides in 1946 in Miami. 1946, we had

4:40

32 homicides. From 1946 to today, the

4:43

lowest number we ever had was 24. Last

4:46

year we had 27. Wow. Okay. We had 220 in

4:50

1980. This year we're trending below the

4:52

24. So we may this may be the safest

4:55

year in the history recorded history of

4:57

Miami. Can you connect those dots there?

5:01

Like I think I think when people think

5:04

about social policy, everybody confuses

5:06

the correlation and causation. Yeah. But

5:08

you've been in the seat now for a long

5:10

time. Yeah. So you've seen what hasn't

5:12

worked, what has worked, what maybe has

5:14

been correlated, but if you had to sort

5:18

of like lay out the road map for other

5:19

cities, but frankly for other states,

5:21

the rest of the country, what's the road

5:22

map? The Francis Suarez road map. The

5:24

formula for success is simple. Keep

5:26

taxes low, keep people safe, lean into

5:29

innovation,

5:31

right? Can we just double click into

5:33

those? Of course. I can double click on

5:35

each one of them. Let's take the other

5:36

side of these things just to help the

5:38

conversation because I believe in them

5:39

but let's try to steal man the other

5:41

side. Sure. Keep taxes low. What people

5:43

say if you look at California and if you

5:46

look at New York what they would say is

5:47

we have a duty to invest in the social

5:49

services and the infrastructure to

5:51

support everybody that isn't necessarily

5:53

as well or didn't get the right side of

5:56

luck and we need to raise taxes in order

5:59

to generate the revenues to fund that.

6:01

My my counterargument would be

6:02

government is not a good purveyor of

6:04

those services. It's not an efficient

6:05

purveyor of those services. So, so ju

6:09

just to double click, right? I lowered

6:11

taxes to the lowest level in history and

6:13

I and I took the city in 2009 as a

6:15

councilman in out of bankruptcy. So, I

6:17

got it in bankruptcy. We decided this is

6:19

sort of the Doge before Doge. We decided

6:20

not to raise taxes. We cut cost. We we

6:23

cut, you know, we didn't we didn't let

6:24

anyone go, but we had tiered salary

6:26

cuts, pension reform, and we balanced

6:28

our budget, and we had 10 years of

6:30

prosperity. And that prosperity led to a

6:33

tripling of the size of our government.

6:35

So we went from a $500 million

6:36

government to a billion half dollar

6:38

government while lowering taxes. So we

6:40

we grew 200%. Right? So the the the

6:43

resources that we had to dedicate to

6:45

these actually went up even though taxes

6:47

went down. And then uh you know uh when

6:50

you have a place where there's

6:52

prosperity and where people are

6:53

investing and where people are employed,

6:56

they're obviously not there's not as

6:57

many social problems. So they're not out

6:58

there killing people. um they're not out

7:01

out there hurting people. So the 1980s

7:03

we had you know we were one of the mur

7:05

murder capitals of America and we're now

7:07

one of the safest big cities in America.

7:09

And then I think you know the the how

7:11

can I help moment that you guys are all

7:12

familiar with was this juxtiposition

7:15

with what American cities were doing

7:17

right famously New York competes for and

7:20

wins the Amazon HQ2 prize right and then

7:23

rejects it. Rejects it. Yeah. And and

7:25

and also famously in California, you had

7:27

a I guess it was a legislator that said,

7:28

"F Elon Musk." Yeah. Elena Gonzalez.

7:31

Exactly. And she and he replied,

7:32

"Message received." And he left. And

7:33

then she went to run a union, right? Is

7:35

that where she ended up? Yeah. I think

7:37

she went to work for a union. She's the

7:38

CEO of one of the big unions now. But

7:40

the issue is what I tell people is look,

7:41

it's it's bad enough to kick out a

7:42

trillion dollar company from your city

7:44

or the richest person arguably in the

7:46

world from your city. But think about

7:47

the the signal. The signal to me is much

7:50

much greater, right? The signal is if

7:51

you want to bring another headquarters

7:53

or if you want to be another company, we

7:55

just got FC Barcelona two days ago. We

7:57

announced that FC Barcelona moved their

7:58

headquarters from New York to Miami,

8:00

right? Every single day um we announced,

8:02

you know, 900 million dollars of loans

8:05

in two projects in the last two days in

8:06

two buildings, you know, our stadium,

8:07

our Inter Miami stadium. We have the

8:09

FIFA World Cup headquarters for 2026 in

8:12

the in the world, right? So, I mean,

8:14

this formula for success, it seems

8:16

simple, other cities are getting it

8:18

wrong completely backwards, right? their

8:20

taxes are high, it's not safe, and

8:22

they're not leaning into they're

8:23

rejecting innovation. Are there are

8:25

there downsides to growing this fast?

8:26

Like are there things that have to keep

8:28

up that are harder to change like

8:30

building code, housing density, you

8:33

know, those sort of cost of living

8:34

things like have those have you guys

8:36

been able to drive reform there or is

8:38

that is that not where you wanted to be?

8:40

So Ken Griffin recently was interviewed

8:42

in a fireside chat like this and said,

8:44

"I'd rather have the problems of success

8:46

than the problems of failure." And so

8:48

there's no doubt that there are problems

8:50

that stem from success, right? And

8:51

housing prices, you had a tremendous

8:53

amount of inflation in the last

8:54

administration and you you you sort of

8:57

couple that with hyper demand here in

8:59

Miami and you get hyperinflation, right?

9:01

So housing costs have certainly gone up

9:03

significantly. And we do everything we

9:05

can to leverage public dollars and

9:06

public assets like land to try to build

9:09

projects at a 15 to1 or 20 to1 leverage

9:11

rate. So for $100 million invested,

9:13

we'll get $2 billion worth of projects.

9:15

Um, there's a 5 million h, you know, 5

9:18

million housing shortage across the

9:20

country and Miami has its fair share

9:22

just like any any other major city.

9:24

Traffic, I know none of you guys have

9:25

experienced any bad traffic this last

9:27

few days, right? I was in the car two

9:29

two hours and 40 minutes going over to

9:30

that. I'm not going to I'm not going to

9:32

tell you how far along we are with the

9:33

Boring Company on trying to find

9:34

underground boring systems or with some

9:36

of the EV toe companies that we're

9:37

working with. But I do think that

9:39

transportation generally has to sort of

9:41

turn the page from, you know, last

9:43

generation's archaic um solutions to

9:46

next. How did you get that train that

9:47

what do you call it? The sunshine line

9:49

or something. Bright line. Yeah. The

9:50

Bright Line. Yeah. How did you get that

9:52

done so quick? And everybody says it's

9:53

the greatest thing ever. That's a

9:54

private sector project uh that was done

9:56

by company. Um we had a piece of it

9:58

which was we did a piece from with Tri

10:00

Rail to bring it into the station. And

10:02

when we did that piece, we made it free

10:04

for inner city residents to be able to

10:06

use. So it was something that I was very

10:08

proud of was part of my legacy. So a

10:09

private company built it, correct? You

10:11

gave them the right of way. They bought

10:14

the right of way. So it was totally

10:15

private. So look, we have microobility

10:17

options that are private like scooters.

10:19

So all you did was just not get in the

10:20

way. Exactly. Shocking. By the way, what

10:24

an idea. Let me Yeah. Let me let me ask

10:27

you

10:29

h how how can It's like the hypocratic

10:31

oath. Do no harm. Do no harm. How can

10:33

mayors address they they come into

10:36

office with a reform motivation and

10:38

they're elected on, hey, we've got to we

10:40

don't have what what Miami has. We got

10:43

to fix this. We got to get get the city

10:44

working again. We got to attract

10:45

business. We got to track growth. And

10:47

they inherit this regulatory morass,

10:50

this massive infrastructure. Like San

10:52

Francisco recently, I I I got all caught

10:56

up in the fact that you can't put these

10:59

phone booths in your office. You know, a

11:01

lot of startups, I don't know if any of

11:02

you guys have these, these these phone

11:03

booths, you got to have someone go in

11:05

and make a call. You put the phone booth

11:06

in. And all my startups, all the

11:07

companies I've been involved in, you

11:08

can't put one in San Francisco. So, you

11:10

you put these phone booths in and then

11:11

you can go in and make calls. So, when

11:12

everyone's in an open desk

11:13

configuration, but you got to do a

11:14

private call, you hop them in. Everyone

11:16

loads up their offices with these phone

11:18

booths. In San Francisco, they're

11:20

illegal. Turns out that you need to run

11:23

you and there's a piece of paper, which

11:25

I was actually going to tweet because

11:26

it's insane. It's like three pages long.

11:28

All the things you need to know about

11:29

the phone booths that you want to put in

11:30

your office. You got to get an architect

11:32

review, an engineering review, a design

11:34

review. You got to get sign off from the

11:35

engineer. You got to submit the

11:36

permitting fees. It gets reviewed by the

11:37

city inspector's office. You got to

11:39

design fire sprinklers that have to go

11:41

into the phone booth. That's nuts. In

11:42

case there's a fire in the phone booth,

11:44

someone needs to put out the fire in the

11:45

That's hilarious. So, I was talking I

11:47

was talking to some folks about like

11:48

what are you going to do about this? But

11:51

the mayor's kind of like, I don't know

11:53

if there's enough action that I can take

11:55

because it's it's it's in law that

11:57

there's all this kind of regulatory

11:59

stuff. How do you advise mayors that are

12:01

stuck with this sort of an environment?

12:03

And this is not just San Francisco.

12:04

There's a lot of big cities in this

12:06

country that have books and books of

12:08

this stuff. And we can talk about

12:09

philosophically why this has happened,

12:11

sociologically why this has happened.

12:12

Books and books of this stuff where the

12:14

city can't get out of the way. What do

12:16

the mayors do? when you guys get

12:18

together like is there any advice or are

12:20

we stuck like what's the what's the

12:23

solution? We're not stuck. I I I think

12:25

it it's cultural right at some level you

12:27

have to inculcate a culture where you

12:30

empower your employees to innovate and

12:33

and to to uh you know deconlict. I think

12:37

uh when people come to me with a problem

12:39

I say look first first issue is if

12:41

there's something that's blocking it

12:42

that doesn't make any sense why don't we

12:43

just change it? We're legislators.

12:44

That's what we do. We legislate so we

12:45

can fix it. uh maybe it happened maybe

12:47

it made sense 20 years ago maybe it made

12:49

sense 50 years ago doesn't make sense

12:51

today let's just change it I think

12:52

regulation is the is the other side of

12:54

the coin from innovation right so

12:56

regulation is telling you what you often

12:58

times what you can't do or or how to do

13:00

something innovation is to protect loss

13:02

it's sort of a first principles thinking

13:03

we're going to we want to do this right

13:05

we we want to make this work and I think

13:07

uh I always not always but I regularly

13:11

fall on the side of innovation and I

13:13

think you you you as a public official

13:15

frankly who's elected by the people

13:17

really are the one that has to push the

13:18

bureaucrats, the bureaucrat class,

13:20

right? The bureaucrat class, they get

13:21

very accustomed to saying no. They're

13:23

riskaverse. Um, you know, they're not

13:25

incentivized often times, right? There's

13:26

no incentive structure that says, "Hey,

13:27

if you innovate, you're going to get X

13:29

or Y or Z." And then I think the third

13:31

piece of it is artificial intelligence.

13:33

I really feel that there's a

13:35

breakthrough that's going to come and

13:36

it's not just in transportation. We're

13:38

talking about EV tools and and

13:39

underground boring and all that, but I

13:41

think in

13:42

in zoning codes and and all that, it's

13:45

it's going to be computer to computer,

13:47

right? So the codes are all

13:48

straightforward, right? We have the same

13:50

code for 15 years, right? Probably 97 or

13:53

8% of all known decisions have already

13:55

been made under this code, right? So all

13:57

they have to do is be replicated going

13:58

forward, right? Unless the code changes

13:59

and then you just change the coding and

14:01

you make the decisions all over again.

14:02

So it's not that complicated. You should

14:04

be able to submit something. The

14:05

computer should be able to spit it out

14:06

immediately. If it needs changes, it

14:08

should tell you what the changes are. A

14:09

computer could look at that, make the

14:11

changes, and spit it back in. Right? And

14:12

if you were to do that, you know, it

14:15

takes to get a permit on a on a home in

14:17

most places in America or on a building

14:19

in most places in America, you know, 6

14:21

months, 9 months, a year, a year and a

14:24

half. I mean, it's insane. It should be

14:25

done instantly. And it could literally

14:27

be done instantly with a technology that

14:28

we already have available to us today.

14:30

Hundred billion dollar business, by the

14:31

way, in case anybody's a great idea.

14:34

It's a killer idea. I think some

14:35

startups have worked on it too. Um I

14:37

know multiple that are working. Yeah,

14:39

they work on the other side of it.

14:40

Building on Freeberg's point, the two

14:41

best proposals I heard about regulations

14:43

and I'm curious if you could steal me on

14:45

them or you know just how practical you

14:48

think they are. Putting um a time limit

14:51

on regulations. So if you fought for

14:53

some regulations around these phone

14:55

boots back when foam boots, you know,

14:57

Superman changed his costume in them

14:59

from the 60s and 70s, like back from

15:01

that era, maybe it lasts for 20 years

15:03

and then it expires or you want to add

15:06

two regulations to office space

15:09

regulations. You got to take one off the

15:11

books, you know, and and those were the

15:13

two proposals I've heard. Some way of

15:15

timing these out or um if you want to

15:18

add, you got to take you got to find

15:20

something to take off. Are either of

15:21

those practical? I kind of like the

15:22

first one better than the second one

15:23

because the second one I mean this sort

15:24

of one for one I mean there's got to be

15:26

a reason to do one or the other. Right.

15:28

Okay. I I like the first one better. Um

15:30

actually what we normally do in

15:31

government is the opposite. What we do

15:32

is we do what we call pilots, right? So

15:34

you'll do something that goes away very

15:36

quickly, right? In other words, you

15:37

imple implement a piece of legislation

15:39

say, "Oh, we're going to do it for a

15:39

year. Let's test it out." Right? And

15:41

it's a pilot and then it goes away. Um,

15:44

I I like what you're saying in terms of,

15:46

you know, a big part of regulatory

15:49

culture can probably be phased out over

15:52

a 15 20 year period as being

15:55

anacronistic, right? It just doesn't a

15:57

year get reviewed and you you're the

16:00

government's responsible for reviewing

16:02

5% a year for 20 years and they reertify

16:04

it or right and and then you have the

16:07

ability to reimplement it if you think

16:08

it makes sense. But I think what happens

16:10

is you go back down to zero. you were

16:12

asking Antonio and I was I was listening

16:13

to the conversation because we did we

16:15

did it like I said we had to cut our

16:17

budget by 20% in one year and uh and

16:19

part of the problem is budgeting is like

16:21

layering right it all layers on top of

16:23

each other same as regulation it layers

16:24

on top of each other so if you were to

16:26

be able to strip it down in a mechanical

16:28

way right in an instantaneous way as

16:31

opposed to having to fight the the the

16:33

structures in our case we were very

16:35

lucky there was a state statutory

16:36

vehicle that allowed us to implement the

16:38

cuts otherwise we'd have to bargain for

16:40

them in a in a union process and

16:42

obviously no one would ever bargain to

16:44

cut their salaries. There would no never

16:45

bargain to cut. It would nothing would

16:47

have happened. We would have come we

16:48

would have been bankrupt and then a

16:49

court would have taken us over. We would

16:51

have looked like a joke and instead we

16:53

we cut costs and we and we survived and

16:55

we thrived right going forward. And by

16:57

the way, my employees now love me. They

16:58

were not happy the first couple years

17:00

when we did it. But now they they they

17:02

um I mean I don't even have to go to a

17:04

union interview when I when I run for

17:05

office. They just support me right away.

17:06

Do you want to be governor? I don't

17:08

think it's quite that simple. I want to

17:10

dunk. I want to dunk. Yeah, I want to be

17:13

able to dunk, too. Uh, look, I think

17:15

that I'm a Republican for those of you

17:17

who don't know, and uh, you know, the

17:19

president's already weighed in the

17:20

Republican primary. I respect the

17:21

president's uh, perspective. I have a

17:23

good relationship with Congressman

17:25

Donald's. So, I I think politics is very

17:28

circumstantial. Um, we've talked about

17:29

that a lot in the past. So, you know,

17:32

things sometimes conspire in your in

17:33

your favor. Sometimes sometimes things

17:36

don't, right? And I do think it is

17:38

circumstantial. So, I think you have to

17:40

weigh the circumstances. You know, I ran

17:42

for president because I had a had a

17:43

thesis. The thesis was urban voters,

17:46

Hispanics, and young voters, if they

17:48

went Republican, would favor the

17:51

Republican candidate or Republican

17:52

candidate win. And it they did. It just

17:53

wasn't me, right? It was a different

17:55

candidate. But, you know, the president

17:57

did a great job on podcasts, right?

17:59

Going on all these podcasts that, you

18:01

know, the vice president didn't do. Um,

18:03

and he got young voters and he got urban

18:05

voters. Uh, look, a Republican's never

18:07

going to win Philadelphia, right? Trump

18:09

lost Philadelphia to Biden by 85%. But

18:12

he lost Philadelphia to Kamla by 75%.

18:16

And and that delta, the 75, 85, that 10%

18:19

delta gave him Pennsylvania. Yeah,

18:21

that's the election, which was such a

18:23

crucial state, right? Like arguably the

18:25

the winning state. So you you know,

18:27

Republicans are never going to

18:28

necessarily win urban votes or the urban

18:31

population centers throughout America.

18:33

But you're also seeing and and I think

18:35

it's important to note you're seeing

18:37

Democratic mayors lose across America.

18:39

London Breed lost in San Francisco.

18:41

Yeah. Tashara Jones lost in St. Louis.

18:43

The mayor of of Chicago, Lori Lightoot

18:45

lost. On that point, you were the or

18:47

still are the head of No, I was I was a

18:49

president US Conference of Yeah. for a

18:50

year and a half. Okay. If if if we had

18:52

to ask you, you can't live in Miami.

18:55

Yeah. You met all those mayors. Who

18:57

where are two places that you think are

18:59

actually well-run that aspire, you know,

19:02

to do something great and have their

19:03

[ __ ] together?

19:05

Cities. Take your time. I don't jump to

19:08

an answer. I I'll say this. I I'll tell

19:10

you a mayor that I like. How about that?

19:11

Okay. Justin Bib. Justin Bib is a mayor

19:14

of Cleveland. We got a couple Cleveland

19:17

people here apparently. There we go.

19:19

Justin is a good friend. Uh I have a lot

19:21

of friends that are mayors. I'm a mayor.

19:23

You know, I love all my mayors because I

19:24

was a president of that institution. But

19:26

I think Justin is a young, dynamic guy

19:30

who's smart, not super partisan, cares

19:33

tremendously about his city, and and we

19:35

talk a lot about it because obviously

19:36

Miami and Cleveland are a little

19:37

different, right? On the margins, that's

19:40

fair. Uh and and we joke about it. He

19:42

says, you know, I wish I had the kind of

19:43

problems you have. To go back to sort of

19:44

the Ken Griffin quote, you know, they

19:46

they don't struggle with affordable

19:48

housing. They got plenty of affordable

19:49

housing cuz people don't necessarily

19:51

want to live there. Um

19:53

uh sorry Jay sorry Jay I love you bro.

19:56

Uh but but it's true right? It's kind of

19:59

true. So so he's dealing with economic

20:02

uh development. He's dealing with he

20:04

wants to he wants to be the Miami of

20:06

Ohio in terms of getting investment

20:08

getting the tech community there getting

20:10

people special people to move into his

20:12

community and believe in his vision. And

20:15

uh I think look company building is hard

20:18

as you guys know you guys have built

20:19

some incredible companies. Ecosystem

20:21

building is even harder, right? It's

20:23

it's it's a thousandx harder than

20:24

building a big company. I mean,

20:26

companies take years into decades and

20:29

ecosystems take decades into centuries.

20:31

Yeah. It's too different. Yeah. Is there

20:33

something

20:34

that inside of the next gubernatorial

20:37

campaign, let's say you don't run for

20:39

governor, that's a high impact job at

20:41

the state level? Not really. I get to

20:43

practice and I have a private sector

20:45

life. Uh I have a 11-year-old and a

20:46

seven-year-old. So, I mean, if the

20:48

president called me and said, you know,

20:50

I want you to be the US ambassador to,

20:53

you know, a country that I have a

20:54

passion to help, you know, in terms of

20:56

the United States, in terms of their

20:58

relationship and world peace and things

21:00

of that nature. Um, which I think

21:02

are high ROIs for for the time

21:05

investment and the financial sacrifice

21:07

that you have to make. I would strongly

21:09

consider it. But other than that, I

21:10

mean, I'm I live a very blessed life,

21:12

you know. I I I'm the mayor of the best

21:14

city on the planet, you know. Yeah.

21:18

And I have incredible, incredible,

21:19

incredible bosses. These are my bosses.

21:22

I have the best bosses in the world.

21:23

Yeah. And they're constantly encouraging

21:25

me. They're constantly cheering me on.

21:27

And and and I live and breathe for them.

21:29

I wake up early in the morning. I go to

21:30

bed late. And I carry their problems,

21:32

their hopes, and their dreams in my

21:34

soul. All right. Give it up for Francis

21:36

Suarez, your mayor.

21:41

Thank you to our friend Francis Suarez,

21:43

the mayor of Miami, for joining us on

21:45

stage at our F1 event. And thanks to

21:47

you, the audience for tuning in. Give us

21:48

a like, a thumbs up, a subscribe, write

21:50

a review, whatever you're into. Maybe

21:52

send it to a friend if you want to come

21:53

to our next event. It's the All-In

21:55

Summit in Los Angeles. Fourth year for

21:58

All-In Summit. Go to

22:00

allin.com/events to apply. A very

22:03

special thanks to our new partner, OKX,

22:05

the new money app. OKX was the sponsor

22:08

of the McLaren F1 team which won the

22:10

race in Miami. Thanks to Haidider and

22:13

his team, an amazing partner and an

22:15

amazing team. We really enjoyed spending

22:17

time with you. And OKX launched their

22:19

new crypto exchange here in the US. If

22:21

you love All-In, go check them out. And

22:23

a special thanks to our friends at

22:25

Circle. They're the team behind USDC.

22:28

Yes, your favorite stable coin in the

22:30

world. USDC is a fully backed digital

22:34

dollar redeemable one for one for USD.

22:37

It's built for speed, safety, and scale.

22:39

They just announced the Circle Payments

22:42

Network. This is enterprisegrade

22:43

infrastructure that bridges the gap

22:45

between the digital economy and outdated

22:48

financial reality. Go check out USDC for

22:50

all your stable coin needs. And special

22:53

thanks to my friends, including Shane

22:55

over at Poly Market, Google Cloud,

22:57

Salana, and BVNK. We couldn't have done

23:00

it without y'all. Thank you so much.

23:04

Let your winners ride.

23:07

[Music]

23:12

We open sourced it to the fans and

23:13

they've just gone crazy with it. Queen

23:19

[Music]

23:23

of besties are gone.

23:26

That is my dog taking it on a share

23:28

driveway.

23:32

Oh man, my habitasher will meet up at We

23:34

should all just get a room and just have

23:36

one big huge orgy cuz they're all just

23:38

It's like this like sexual tension that

23:40

we just need to release somehow.

23:46

[Music]

23:48

We need to get mercy.

23:50

[Music]

23:57

I'm going all in.

Interactive Summary

Loading summary...