HomeVideos

The Formula for Building America's Happiest City: Miami Mayor Francis Suarez | All-In Live

Now Playing

The Formula for Building America's Happiest City: Miami Mayor Francis Suarez | All-In Live

Transcript

709 segments

0:00

43rd mayor of Miami. Served two terms

0:02

since 2017 and his tenure is going to

0:05

end in September because he's term

0:07

limited. Although I hear these days

0:09

that's flexible. Please welcome Francis

0:11

Suarez. We're ranked the happiest city

0:14

in America, the healthiest city in

0:15

America. The formula for success is

0:16

simple. Keep taxes low. Keep people

0:19

safe. Lean into innovation.

0:23

How are things going in Miami?

0:26

Obviously, you know, we talked to you a

0:27

couple years ago when we had our first

0:29

all-in summit here and uh you had a

0:31

nonsense approach that you thought was

0:33

going to work with the homeless

0:36

challenges that we're seeing. I think

0:38

candidly we discussed a large portion of

0:41

the homeless problem in these major

0:43

cities is an addiction problem and you

0:46

know giving a junkie a home doesn't

0:48

exactly get them off the street. It just

0:49

doesn't work. And you've you were one of

0:51

the first people to say that plainly.

0:54

How are you dealing with it? Has it

0:55

gotten worse? Is it an intractable

0:58

problem? Yeah. Take us through it. So,

1:01

in homeless specifically, we are at an

1:03

11-year low. Uh we did our census, we do

1:06

two census a year. We do one in uh

1:08

January, one in in the summer. And our

1:10

our January census had us at an 11-year

1:12

low. We had 546 homeless, unsheltered

1:15

homeless in the entire city of Miami. Um

1:17

we have a couple thousand sheltered. And

1:20

uh I actually raised money on an annual

1:22

basis uh as a mayor's ball. I I did my

1:24

mayor's ball last year and this year

1:26

I'll be doing it in May 31st to end

1:28

homeless. We want to be the first major

1:29

American city to have zero homeless and

1:31

we think we can get there. We call it

1:32

functional

1:36

zero and and and and frankly the the

1:39

strategy is not that complicated. You

1:41

know, obviously there's a macroeconomic

1:42

strategy. We have the lowest

1:43

unemployment in America. We have the

1:45

highest median wage growth in America.

1:47

We I lower taxes to the lowest level in

1:49

history. And we've seen 140% growth in 9

1:52

years. So, the economy is robust. We

1:54

were ranked the happiest city in

1:55

America, the healthiest city in America.

1:57

Frankly, if you're happy, you're healthy

1:58

and you're working, you're probably not

1:59

homeless. And then, of course, we've

2:01

done innovative things in the homeless

2:02

space. We've worked with um charitable

2:05

organizations that uh help people

2:07

reunify families if they live in other

2:09

parts of the country. And also, we rent

2:11

homes so that we can get around the

2:12

building process and give all the same

2:14

wraparound services, but we we sort of

2:15

hack through that process. Those 500

2:17

individuals um who are categorized as

2:21

homeless. Yeah. How many of them are

2:23

suffering from mental illness andor

2:26

self-medicating slashaddicted to drugs?

2:28

A very high percentage. Um I would say

2:31

80% plus, right? And that's sort of

2:32

anecdotal. Um but when I and I've been

2:36

out to the streets, I'll I'll I'll be

2:38

out there before my my homeless ball now

2:40

on May 31st. I'm actually going to spend

2:41

a night out on the street. Um and when

2:43

you talk to them, when you engage in

2:44

them, a vast majority of them are

2:47

unfortunately. Okay, so let me double

2:48

click on that. this problem wasn't as

2:51

acute before the super drugs meth like

2:55

the the serious meth um well the really

2:58

serious ones they're making now and

3:00

fentinyl right these this combination

3:02

seems to be you know we had people

3:05

addicted to heroin like Miles Davis and

3:07

like Philip Seymour Hoffman who produced

3:09

incredible art and were addicts for 30

3:11

years and they and they went in and out

3:12

of it but this drug is pernicious

3:15

different deadly super addicting how

3:18

much of the problem are those two drugs

3:21

specifically if you double clicked on

3:22

it. A big part of the problem heroin or

3:25

opioids. He's asking for a friend by the

3:27

way. Just not I'm asking if you have a

3:29

hookup. Clearly. No, but I'm I'm being

3:31

deadly serious because we we had these

3:33

homeless individuals in New York, you

3:35

know, back in the day in the 70s ' 80s.

3:37

They were kind of like um hobos and

3:41

vagabons, not seriously addicted, you

3:44

know, suffering where they're folding

3:46

over and curled up in a ball from

3:47

fentinel. Well, well, to your point, I

3:48

mean, meth and and and uh the opioids

3:52

are incredibly addictive and they're

3:53

very hard to to to beat, right? I mean,

3:55

even people who are are wealthy and get

3:57

addicted to these drugs have a very hard

3:59

time um the recidivism rate is very high

4:02

and so uh you know, you just had Antonio

4:05

on here a minute ago and he was talking

4:07

about, you know, immigration and the

4:08

border and one of the big problems with

4:10

the border is the tens of thousands of

4:11

people that die annually because of

4:13

fentinel that gets imported through

4:14

China and through our border. And so uh

4:18

there's a tie-in, right, between federal

4:20

policy and and local policy. But for us,

4:23

um again, uh in 1980 during the the

4:25

cocaine era, right, different drug, uh

4:27

we had 220 homicides. So you had drugs

4:31

hurting people, but you had the business

4:33

of drugs very much hurting people,

4:35

right? Last So we started recording

4:37

homicides in 1946 in Miami. 1946, we had

4:40

32 homicides. From 1946 to today, the

4:43

lowest number we ever had was 24. Last

4:46

year we had 27. Wow. Okay. We had 220 in

4:50

1980. This year we're trending below the

4:52

24. So we may this may be the safest

4:55

year in the history recorded history of

4:57

Miami. Can you connect those dots there?

5:01

Like I think I think when people think

5:04

about social policy, everybody confuses

5:06

the correlation and causation. Yeah. But

5:08

you've been in the seat now for a long

5:10

time. Yeah. So you've seen what hasn't

5:12

worked, what has worked, what maybe has

5:14

been correlated, but if you had to sort

5:18

of like lay out the road map for other

5:19

cities, but frankly for other states,

5:21

the rest of the country, what's the road

5:22

map? The Francis Suarez road map. The

5:24

formula for success is simple. Keep

5:26

taxes low, keep people safe, lean into

5:29

innovation,

5:31

right? Can we just double click into

5:33

those? Of course. I can double click on

5:35

each one of them. Let's take the other

5:36

side of these things just to help the

5:38

conversation because I believe in them

5:39

but let's try to steal man the other

5:41

side. Sure. Keep taxes low. What people

5:43

say if you look at California and if you

5:46

look at New York what they would say is

5:47

we have a duty to invest in the social

5:49

services and the infrastructure to

5:51

support everybody that isn't necessarily

5:53

as well or didn't get the right side of

5:56

luck and we need to raise taxes in order

5:59

to generate the revenues to fund that.

6:01

My my counterargument would be

6:02

government is not a good purveyor of

6:04

those services. It's not an efficient

6:05

purveyor of those services. So, so ju

6:09

just to double click, right? I lowered

6:11

taxes to the lowest level in history and

6:13

I and I took the city in 2009 as a

6:15

councilman in out of bankruptcy. So, I

6:17

got it in bankruptcy. We decided this is

6:19

sort of the Doge before Doge. We decided

6:20

not to raise taxes. We cut cost. We we

6:23

cut, you know, we didn't we didn't let

6:24

anyone go, but we had tiered salary

6:26

cuts, pension reform, and we balanced

6:28

our budget, and we had 10 years of

6:30

prosperity. And that prosperity led to a

6:33

tripling of the size of our government.

6:35

So we went from a $500 million

6:36

government to a billion half dollar

6:38

government while lowering taxes. So we

6:40

we grew 200%. Right? So the the the

6:43

resources that we had to dedicate to

6:45

these actually went up even though taxes

6:47

went down. And then uh you know uh when

6:50

you have a place where there's

6:52

prosperity and where people are

6:53

investing and where people are employed,

6:56

they're obviously not there's not as

6:57

many social problems. So they're not out

6:58

there killing people. um they're not out

7:01

out there hurting people. So the 1980s

7:03

we had you know we were one of the mur

7:05

murder capitals of America and we're now

7:07

one of the safest big cities in America.

7:09

And then I think you know the the how

7:11

can I help moment that you guys are all

7:12

familiar with was this juxtiposition

7:15

with what American cities were doing

7:17

right famously New York competes for and

7:20

wins the Amazon HQ2 prize right and then

7:23

rejects it. Rejects it. Yeah. And and

7:25

and also famously in California, you had

7:27

a I guess it was a legislator that said,

7:28

"F Elon Musk." Yeah. Elena Gonzalez.

7:31

Exactly. And she and he replied,

7:32

"Message received." And he left. And

7:33

then she went to run a union, right? Is

7:35

that where she ended up? Yeah. I think

7:37

she went to work for a union. She's the

7:38

CEO of one of the big unions now. But

7:40

the issue is what I tell people is look,

7:41

it's it's bad enough to kick out a

7:42

trillion dollar company from your city

7:44

or the richest person arguably in the

7:46

world from your city. But think about

7:47

the the signal. The signal to me is much

7:50

much greater, right? The signal is if

7:51

you want to bring another headquarters

7:53

or if you want to be another company, we

7:55

just got FC Barcelona two days ago. We

7:57

announced that FC Barcelona moved their

7:58

headquarters from New York to Miami,

8:00

right? Every single day um we announced,

8:02

you know, 900 million dollars of loans

8:05

in two projects in the last two days in

8:06

two buildings, you know, our stadium,

8:07

our Inter Miami stadium. We have the

8:09

FIFA World Cup headquarters for 2026 in

8:12

the in the world, right? So, I mean,

8:14

this formula for success, it seems

8:16

simple, other cities are getting it

8:18

wrong completely backwards, right? their

8:20

taxes are high, it's not safe, and

8:22

they're not leaning into they're

8:23

rejecting innovation. Are there are

8:25

there downsides to growing this fast?

8:26

Like are there things that have to keep

8:28

up that are harder to change like

8:30

building code, housing density, you

8:33

know, those sort of cost of living

8:34

things like have those have you guys

8:36

been able to drive reform there or is

8:38

that is that not where you wanted to be?

8:40

So Ken Griffin recently was interviewed

8:42

in a fireside chat like this and said,

8:44

"I'd rather have the problems of success

8:46

than the problems of failure." And so

8:48

there's no doubt that there are problems

8:50

that stem from success, right? And

8:51

housing prices, you had a tremendous

8:53

amount of inflation in the last

8:54

administration and you you you sort of

8:57

couple that with hyper demand here in

8:59

Miami and you get hyperinflation, right?

9:01

So housing costs have certainly gone up

9:03

significantly. And we do everything we

9:05

can to leverage public dollars and

9:06

public assets like land to try to build

9:09

projects at a 15 to1 or 20 to1 leverage

9:11

rate. So for $100 million invested,

9:13

we'll get $2 billion worth of projects.

9:15

Um, there's a 5 million h, you know, 5

9:18

million housing shortage across the

9:20

country and Miami has its fair share

9:22

just like any any other major city.

9:24

Traffic, I know none of you guys have

9:25

experienced any bad traffic this last

9:27

few days, right? I was in the car two

9:29

two hours and 40 minutes going over to

9:30

that. I'm not going to I'm not going to

9:32

tell you how far along we are with the

9:33

Boring Company on trying to find

9:34

underground boring systems or with some

9:36

of the EV toe companies that we're

9:37

working with. But I do think that

9:39

transportation generally has to sort of

9:41

turn the page from, you know, last

9:43

generation's archaic um solutions to

9:46

next. How did you get that train that

9:47

what do you call it? The sunshine line

9:49

or something. Bright line. Yeah. The

9:50

Bright Line. Yeah. How did you get that

9:52

done so quick? And everybody says it's

9:53

the greatest thing ever. That's a

9:54

private sector project uh that was done

9:56

by company. Um we had a piece of it

9:58

which was we did a piece from with Tri

10:00

Rail to bring it into the station. And

10:02

when we did that piece, we made it free

10:04

for inner city residents to be able to

10:06

use. So it was something that I was very

10:08

proud of was part of my legacy. So a

10:09

private company built it, correct? You

10:11

gave them the right of way. They bought

10:14

the right of way. So it was totally

10:15

private. So look, we have microobility

10:17

options that are private like scooters.

10:19

So all you did was just not get in the

10:20

way. Exactly. Shocking. By the way, what

10:24

an idea. Let me Yeah. Let me let me ask

10:27

you

10:29

h how how can It's like the hypocratic

10:31

oath. Do no harm. Do no harm. How can

10:33

mayors address they they come into

10:36

office with a reform motivation and

10:38

they're elected on, hey, we've got to we

10:40

don't have what what Miami has. We got

10:43

to fix this. We got to get get the city

10:44

working again. We got to attract

10:45

business. We got to track growth. And

10:47

they inherit this regulatory morass,

10:50

this massive infrastructure. Like San

10:52

Francisco recently, I I I got all caught

10:56

up in the fact that you can't put these

10:59

phone booths in your office. You know, a

11:01

lot of startups, I don't know if any of

11:02

you guys have these, these these phone

11:03

booths, you got to have someone go in

11:05

and make a call. You put the phone booth

11:06

in. And all my startups, all the

11:07

companies I've been involved in, you

11:08

can't put one in San Francisco. So, you

11:10

you put these phone booths in and then

11:11

you can go in and make calls. So, when

11:12

everyone's in an open desk

11:13

configuration, but you got to do a

11:14

private call, you hop them in. Everyone

11:16

loads up their offices with these phone

11:18

booths. In San Francisco, they're

11:20

illegal. Turns out that you need to run

11:23

you and there's a piece of paper, which

11:25

I was actually going to tweet because

11:26

it's insane. It's like three pages long.

11:28

All the things you need to know about

11:29

the phone booths that you want to put in

11:30

your office. You got to get an architect

11:32

review, an engineering review, a design

11:34

review. You got to get sign off from the

11:35

engineer. You got to submit the

11:36

permitting fees. It gets reviewed by the

11:37

city inspector's office. You got to

11:39

design fire sprinklers that have to go

11:41

into the phone booth. That's nuts. In

11:42

case there's a fire in the phone booth,

11:44

someone needs to put out the fire in the

11:45

That's hilarious. So, I was talking I

11:47

was talking to some folks about like

11:48

what are you going to do about this? But

11:51

the mayor's kind of like, I don't know

11:53

if there's enough action that I can take

11:55

because it's it's it's in law that

11:57

there's all this kind of regulatory

11:59

stuff. How do you advise mayors that are

12:01

stuck with this sort of an environment?

12:03

And this is not just San Francisco.

12:04

There's a lot of big cities in this

12:06

country that have books and books of

12:08

this stuff. And we can talk about

12:09

philosophically why this has happened,

12:11

sociologically why this has happened.

12:12

Books and books of this stuff where the

12:14

city can't get out of the way. What do

12:16

the mayors do? when you guys get

12:18

together like is there any advice or are

12:20

we stuck like what's the what's the

12:23

solution? We're not stuck. I I I think

12:25

it it's cultural right at some level you

12:27

have to inculcate a culture where you

12:30

empower your employees to innovate and

12:33

and to to uh you know deconlict. I think

12:37

uh when people come to me with a problem

12:39

I say look first first issue is if

12:41

there's something that's blocking it

12:42

that doesn't make any sense why don't we

12:43

just change it? We're legislators.

12:44

That's what we do. We legislate so we

12:45

can fix it. uh maybe it happened maybe

12:47

it made sense 20 years ago maybe it made

12:49

sense 50 years ago doesn't make sense

12:51

today let's just change it I think

12:52

regulation is the is the other side of

12:54

the coin from innovation right so

12:56

regulation is telling you what you often

12:58

times what you can't do or or how to do

13:00

something innovation is to protect loss

13:02

it's sort of a first principles thinking

13:03

we're going to we want to do this right

13:05

we we want to make this work and I think

13:07

uh I always not always but I regularly

13:11

fall on the side of innovation and I

13:13

think you you you as a public official

13:15

frankly who's elected by the people

13:17

really are the one that has to push the

13:18

bureaucrats, the bureaucrat class,

13:20

right? The bureaucrat class, they get

13:21

very accustomed to saying no. They're

13:23

riskaverse. Um, you know, they're not

13:25

incentivized often times, right? There's

13:26

no incentive structure that says, "Hey,

13:27

if you innovate, you're going to get X

13:29

or Y or Z." And then I think the third

13:31

piece of it is artificial intelligence.

13:33

I really feel that there's a

13:35

breakthrough that's going to come and

13:36

it's not just in transportation. We're

13:38

talking about EV tools and and

13:39

underground boring and all that, but I

13:41

think in

13:42

in zoning codes and and all that, it's

13:45

it's going to be computer to computer,

13:47

right? So the codes are all

13:48

straightforward, right? We have the same

13:50

code for 15 years, right? Probably 97 or

13:53

8% of all known decisions have already

13:55

been made under this code, right? So all

13:57

they have to do is be replicated going

13:58

forward, right? Unless the code changes

13:59

and then you just change the coding and

14:01

you make the decisions all over again.

14:02

So it's not that complicated. You should

14:04

be able to submit something. The

14:05

computer should be able to spit it out

14:06

immediately. If it needs changes, it

14:08

should tell you what the changes are. A

14:09

computer could look at that, make the

14:11

changes, and spit it back in. Right? And

14:12

if you were to do that, you know, it

14:15

takes to get a permit on a on a home in

14:17

most places in America or on a building

14:19

in most places in America, you know, 6

14:21

months, 9 months, a year, a year and a

14:24

half. I mean, it's insane. It should be

14:25

done instantly. And it could literally

14:27

be done instantly with a technology that

14:28

we already have available to us today.

14:30

Hundred billion dollar business, by the

14:31

way, in case anybody's a great idea.

14:34

It's a killer idea. I think some

14:35

startups have worked on it too. Um I

14:37

know multiple that are working. Yeah,

14:39

they work on the other side of it.

14:40

Building on Freeberg's point, the two

14:41

best proposals I heard about regulations

14:43

and I'm curious if you could steal me on

14:45

them or you know just how practical you

14:48

think they are. Putting um a time limit

14:51

on regulations. So if you fought for

14:53

some regulations around these phone

14:55

boots back when foam boots, you know,

14:57

Superman changed his costume in them

14:59

from the 60s and 70s, like back from

15:01

that era, maybe it lasts for 20 years

15:03

and then it expires or you want to add

15:06

two regulations to office space

15:09

regulations. You got to take one off the

15:11

books, you know, and and those were the

15:13

two proposals I've heard. Some way of

15:15

timing these out or um if you want to

15:18

add, you got to take you got to find

15:20

something to take off. Are either of

15:21

those practical? I kind of like the

15:22

first one better than the second one

15:23

because the second one I mean this sort

15:24

of one for one I mean there's got to be

15:26

a reason to do one or the other. Right.

15:28

Okay. I I like the first one better. Um

15:30

actually what we normally do in

15:31

government is the opposite. What we do

15:32

is we do what we call pilots, right? So

15:34

you'll do something that goes away very

15:36

quickly, right? In other words, you

15:37

imple implement a piece of legislation

15:39

say, "Oh, we're going to do it for a

15:39

year. Let's test it out." Right? And

15:41

it's a pilot and then it goes away. Um,

15:44

I I like what you're saying in terms of,

15:46

you know, a big part of regulatory

15:49

culture can probably be phased out over

15:52

a 15 20 year period as being

15:55

anacronistic, right? It just doesn't a

15:57

year get reviewed and you you're the

16:00

government's responsible for reviewing

16:02

5% a year for 20 years and they reertify

16:04

it or right and and then you have the

16:07

ability to reimplement it if you think

16:08

it makes sense. But I think what happens

16:10

is you go back down to zero. you were

16:12

asking Antonio and I was I was listening

16:13

to the conversation because we did we

16:15

did it like I said we had to cut our

16:17

budget by 20% in one year and uh and

16:19

part of the problem is budgeting is like

16:21

layering right it all layers on top of

16:23

each other same as regulation it layers

16:24

on top of each other so if you were to

16:26

be able to strip it down in a mechanical

16:28

way right in an instantaneous way as

16:31

opposed to having to fight the the the

16:33

structures in our case we were very

16:35

lucky there was a state statutory

16:36

vehicle that allowed us to implement the

16:38

cuts otherwise we'd have to bargain for

16:40

them in a in a union process and

16:42

obviously no one would ever bargain to

16:44

cut their salaries. There would no never

16:45

bargain to cut. It would nothing would

16:47

have happened. We would have come we

16:48

would have been bankrupt and then a

16:49

court would have taken us over. We would

16:51

have looked like a joke and instead we

16:53

we cut costs and we and we survived and

16:55

we thrived right going forward. And by

16:57

the way, my employees now love me. They

16:58

were not happy the first couple years

17:00

when we did it. But now they they they

17:02

um I mean I don't even have to go to a

17:04

union interview when I when I run for

17:05

office. They just support me right away.

17:06

Do you want to be governor? I don't

17:08

think it's quite that simple. I want to

17:10

dunk. I want to dunk. Yeah, I want to be

17:13

able to dunk, too. Uh, look, I think

17:15

that I'm a Republican for those of you

17:17

who don't know, and uh, you know, the

17:19

president's already weighed in the

17:20

Republican primary. I respect the

17:21

president's uh, perspective. I have a

17:23

good relationship with Congressman

17:25

Donald's. So, I I think politics is very

17:28

circumstantial. Um, we've talked about

17:29

that a lot in the past. So, you know,

17:32

things sometimes conspire in your in

17:33

your favor. Sometimes sometimes things

17:36

don't, right? And I do think it is

17:38

circumstantial. So, I think you have to

17:40

weigh the circumstances. You know, I ran

17:42

for president because I had a had a

17:43

thesis. The thesis was urban voters,

17:46

Hispanics, and young voters, if they

17:48

went Republican, would favor the

17:51

Republican candidate or Republican

17:52

candidate win. And it they did. It just

17:53

wasn't me, right? It was a different

17:55

candidate. But, you know, the president

17:57

did a great job on podcasts, right?

17:59

Going on all these podcasts that, you

18:01

know, the vice president didn't do. Um,

18:03

and he got young voters and he got urban

18:05

voters. Uh, look, a Republican's never

18:07

going to win Philadelphia, right? Trump

18:09

lost Philadelphia to Biden by 85%. But

18:12

he lost Philadelphia to Kamla by 75%.

18:16

And and that delta, the 75, 85, that 10%

18:19

delta gave him Pennsylvania. Yeah,

18:21

that's the election, which was such a

18:23

crucial state, right? Like arguably the

18:25

the winning state. So you you know,

18:27

Republicans are never going to

18:28

necessarily win urban votes or the urban

18:31

population centers throughout America.

18:33

But you're also seeing and and I think

18:35

it's important to note you're seeing

18:37

Democratic mayors lose across America.

18:39

London Breed lost in San Francisco.

18:41

Yeah. Tashara Jones lost in St. Louis.

18:43

The mayor of of Chicago, Lori Lightoot

18:45

lost. On that point, you were the or

18:47

still are the head of No, I was I was a

18:49

president US Conference of Yeah. for a

18:50

year and a half. Okay. If if if we had

18:52

to ask you, you can't live in Miami.

18:55

Yeah. You met all those mayors. Who

18:57

where are two places that you think are

18:59

actually well-run that aspire, you know,

19:02

to do something great and have their

19:03

[ __ ] together?

19:05

Cities. Take your time. I don't jump to

19:08

an answer. I I'll say this. I I'll tell

19:10

you a mayor that I like. How about that?

19:11

Okay. Justin Bib. Justin Bib is a mayor

19:14

of Cleveland. We got a couple Cleveland

19:17

people here apparently. There we go.

19:19

Justin is a good friend. Uh I have a lot

19:21

of friends that are mayors. I'm a mayor.

19:23

You know, I love all my mayors because I

19:24

was a president of that institution. But

19:26

I think Justin is a young, dynamic guy

19:30

who's smart, not super partisan, cares

19:33

tremendously about his city, and and we

19:35

talk a lot about it because obviously

19:36

Miami and Cleveland are a little

19:37

different, right? On the margins, that's

19:40

fair. Uh and and we joke about it. He

19:42

says, you know, I wish I had the kind of

19:43

problems you have. To go back to sort of

19:44

the Ken Griffin quote, you know, they

19:46

they don't struggle with affordable

19:48

housing. They got plenty of affordable

19:49

housing cuz people don't necessarily

19:51

want to live there. Um

19:53

uh sorry Jay sorry Jay I love you bro.

19:56

Uh but but it's true right? It's kind of

19:59

true. So so he's dealing with economic

20:02

uh development. He's dealing with he

20:04

wants to he wants to be the Miami of

20:06

Ohio in terms of getting investment

20:08

getting the tech community there getting

20:10

people special people to move into his

20:12

community and believe in his vision. And

20:15

uh I think look company building is hard

20:18

as you guys know you guys have built

20:19

some incredible companies. Ecosystem

20:21

building is even harder, right? It's

20:23

it's it's a thousandx harder than

20:24

building a big company. I mean,

20:26

companies take years into decades and

20:29

ecosystems take decades into centuries.

20:31

Yeah. It's too different. Yeah. Is there

20:33

something

20:34

that inside of the next gubernatorial

20:37

campaign, let's say you don't run for

20:39

governor, that's a high impact job at

20:41

the state level? Not really. I get to

20:43

practice and I have a private sector

20:45

life. Uh I have a 11-year-old and a

20:46

seven-year-old. So, I mean, if the

20:48

president called me and said, you know,

20:50

I want you to be the US ambassador to,

20:53

you know, a country that I have a

20:54

passion to help, you know, in terms of

20:56

the United States, in terms of their

20:58

relationship and world peace and things

21:00

of that nature. Um, which I think

21:02

are high ROIs for for the time

21:05

investment and the financial sacrifice

21:07

that you have to make. I would strongly

21:09

consider it. But other than that, I

21:10

mean, I'm I live a very blessed life,

21:12

you know. I I I'm the mayor of the best

21:14

city on the planet, you know. Yeah.

21:18

And I have incredible, incredible,

21:19

incredible bosses. These are my bosses.

21:22

I have the best bosses in the world.

21:23

Yeah. And they're constantly encouraging

21:25

me. They're constantly cheering me on.

21:27

And and and I live and breathe for them.

21:29

I wake up early in the morning. I go to

21:30

bed late. And I carry their problems,

21:32

their hopes, and their dreams in my

21:34

soul. All right. Give it up for Francis

21:36

Suarez, your mayor.

21:41

Thank you to our friend Francis Suarez,

21:43

the mayor of Miami, for joining us on

21:45

stage at our F1 event. And thanks to

21:47

you, the audience for tuning in. Give us

21:48

a like, a thumbs up, a subscribe, write

21:50

a review, whatever you're into. Maybe

21:52

send it to a friend if you want to come

21:53

to our next event. It's the All-In

21:55

Summit in Los Angeles. Fourth year for

21:58

All-In Summit. Go to

22:00

allin.com/events to apply. A very

22:03

special thanks to our new partner, OKX,

22:05

the new money app. OKX was the sponsor

22:08

of the McLaren F1 team which won the

22:10

race in Miami. Thanks to Haidider and

22:13

his team, an amazing partner and an

22:15

amazing team. We really enjoyed spending

22:17

time with you. And OKX launched their

22:19

new crypto exchange here in the US. If

22:21

you love All-In, go check them out. And

22:23

a special thanks to our friends at

22:25

Circle. They're the team behind USDC.

22:28

Yes, your favorite stable coin in the

22:30

world. USDC is a fully backed digital

22:34

dollar redeemable one for one for USD.

22:37

It's built for speed, safety, and scale.

22:39

They just announced the Circle Payments

22:42

Network. This is enterprisegrade

22:43

infrastructure that bridges the gap

22:45

between the digital economy and outdated

22:48

financial reality. Go check out USDC for

22:50

all your stable coin needs. And special

22:53

thanks to my friends, including Shane

22:55

over at Poly Market, Google Cloud,

22:57

Salana, and BVNK. We couldn't have done

23:00

it without y'all. Thank you so much.

23:04

Let your winners ride.

23:07

[Music]

23:12

We open sourced it to the fans and

23:13

they've just gone crazy with it. Queen

23:19

[Music]

23:23

of besties are gone.

23:26

That is my dog taking it on a share

23:28

driveway.

23:32

Oh man, my habitasher will meet up at We

23:34

should all just get a room and just have

23:36

one big huge orgy cuz they're all just

23:38

It's like this like sexual tension that

23:40

we just need to release somehow.

23:46

[Music]

23:48

We need to get mercy.

23:50

[Music]

23:57

I'm going all in.

Interactive Summary

Francis Suarez, the 43rd Mayor of Miami, details his successful strategy for the city, which is ranked as America's happiest and healthiest. His formula involves keeping taxes low, ensuring public safety, and embracing innovation. Miami has achieved an 11-year low in homelessness, with a goal of "functional zero," attributing much of the problem to addiction and mental illness. The city has experienced robust economic growth, including low unemployment and high wage growth, alongside historic low crime rates. Suarez contrasts Miami's welcoming stance towards businesses and innovation with other cities that have rejected major investments. He addresses challenges like housing inflation and traffic, proposing solutions such as leveraging public assets for housing and exploring advanced transportation technologies. He also offers advice to other mayors on tackling regulatory hurdles, advocating for cultural change, legislative reform, pushing back against bureaucracy, and utilizing AI for efficient urban planning and permitting.

Suggested questions

6 ready-made prompts