China Outbuilds America 230-to-1. Saronic Has a Plan
1363 segments
All right everybody, welcome back to the
allin interview series. I am thrilled
really thrilled because Seronic is a
defense company that has been doing
amazing work and we are so lucky to have
the co-founders here on the program.
Welcome to the program Dino Mavukus. How
are you sir?
>> Doing well. Thanks for having us.
>> And uh your co-founder here uh Vib
Alakar. Let's talk a little bit about
Seronic. Uh and we're going to get into
everything but you were in the news. You
were in the news because you're making
autonomous ships and one of these was
used recently in the straight of hormuz.
I understand.
>> I'm going. [singing]
[music]
>> As your wealth grows, have you noticed
how much more complex things get between
investments, tax strategy, and estate
planning? Managing it all is a full-time
job that you didn't ask for. Creative
planning can help. Their coordinated
team of investment managers, CPAs, and
affiliated estate attorneys can do much
of the heavy lifting so you don't have
to. Creative planning, where wealth
works together. Go to
creativeplanning.com/allin.
>> I got to start there, Dino. Tell us
about the mission. Tell us what
happened. This is the first time an
autonomous
uh ship has ever rescued uh folks in the
field. and then we'll get back into your
history and everything. But I think like
we got to start off with this story
because it's incredible.
>> It it it's just a huge story and I look
I can't get into too many specifics of
the operation and the mission for for
obvious reasons. But um before we get
into what it means for the country, what
it means for our company, I mean without
saying the most important thing is that
those two pilots came home safely
regardless of how they got there. Right
now, what we were able to demonstrate
through this partnership with the Navy,
like for us is the Navy actually trusted
us in this moment. Lives are on the
line. We're going to send this
autonomous platform to go and rescue
these folks. This is not a patrol. This
is not maritime domain awareness. This
is the highest stakes of the highest
stakes. There's downed American pilots
in the Straits of Hormuz. like Corsair,
which you actually see right over my
right shoulder, which is our 24 foot
fully autonomous speedboat for th for
those that that don't know. Um, he said,
"We're going to use that to rescue the
pilots." And that's that's actually like
a milestone moment for the country. And
I can tell you I'll tell you a personal
story firstand kind of what this means,
but you know this like leaving people
behind in the US military just it's not
a thing. Like the US military does not
do it, right? Like I was in the Navy
Seal teams for 11 years. From 2004 to
2015,
uh my last five years were on SEAL team
six. I personally experienced 2005 there
were four SEALs trapped on a mountain
side in Afghanistan and the helicopter
got sh got shot down while going to
rescue them. So what we were able to
prove in this moment was that you can go
and rescue people without putting
additional soldiers in harm's way.
That's that's the impact of what this
had. That's what it means for the
country and for our company. It was just
an extremely proud moment where the Navy
trusted us in this high stakes
environment.
>> Absolutely incredible. And obviously
thank you for your service. I and I know
you can't get into too many details, but
I've been reading all about it and I got
to wonder when when these two pilots,
did they know that this was an
autonomous ship and the ship comes
rolling up and they're like, somebody
sent them a message, hey, you're going
to get picked up by the autonomous ship.
Grab the side of it, climb on board.
Like, what's the protocol for the
autonomous ship picking up two folks?
Are they swimming out to it? Well, I I
just got to get a little color on this
before it becomes a movie.
>> I mean, it's the first time that it that
it happened, right? And when a ship when
a boat pulls up to you and there's
nobody on it, you know, you can very
quickly deduce that it's fully that it's
an autonomous boat. And you know, these
pilots were in the water for I don't
even know how long. They're in a
completely contested environment. We're
in a conflict with Iran. They're in the
Straits of Hormuz. And we can go through
the dynamic there. But they looked at
this platform and said that that's my
way home,
>> right? That that's how I get out of
here.
>> I love it. All right, let's step back a
bit here. You're a Navy Seal uh VIB.
You've uh worked in this space for a
while. Uh you previously worked at
Andrew, I understand. Uh the mission as
I understand it for the company uh is to
greatly increase our ability in America
to produce ships. And for people who
don't know, the amount of uh tonnage,
the number of ships that we are able to
make in America and most western
countries is very low. But there's an
adversary uh in the Pacific who is able
to produce a lot of ships. It's known as
the Chinese Communist Party. So maybe
from first principles you could just
explain what you're building and why
it's important and just how insane
uh the incompetence of the West in terms
of building ships has become. I mean we
are really bad at making ships right
now. Am I correct?
>> We're beyond bad. Uh, let me I'll take a
step back and just kind of highlight
where we're at and then I'll let Vib go
through what we're doing about it, how
how we're changing that dynamic. But
Jason, what you were saying, right, just
to put it in context, the United States
can build a 100,000 gross tons of ships
every year. Gross ton is this volumetric
measure of ship. So if you build, you
know, a 200 foot ship, that's different
than an 800 foot ship. But let's compare
apples to apples. 100,000 gross tons.
The Chinese, which you were referencing,
can build 23 million gross tons. So,
they can out build the US 230 to1. And
it wasn't always the case. Right? 30
years ago, the Chinese didn't have this
capability. They had 5% of the world's
ship building capacity. Today, they have
57%
of the world ship building capacity. And
actually that problem's getting worse
because the cons the communist party is
just con constantly it's like
subsidizing the entire industry. So
they're undercutting the commercial
market on price. They're not just
subsidizing the direct cost to build.
They're subsidizing raw material and
labor costs. So the ship built in the
United States is actually five to six
times the cost of that same ship built
in China. And so they keep getting more
and more orders. So that number is of
57% is just going up. How did they get
that capability? Is that because as a
manufacturer to the world, they needed
to ship out products. So they did this
in a commercial way f first or was this
always very intentionally we need to own
the South Pacific? much revolves around
the commercial market and then I'll talk
about I want to talk about the status of
our navy like where the naval fleet is
today what that means and then where the
Chinese navy is and where that's going
because again 30 years ago the Chinese
navy was a lural backwater navy today
they have nuclear submarines aircraft
carriers and hypersonic missiles so
there's a massive massive change over
the last 30 years and what's happened in
the US ship building industry it's
completely declined So the US naval
fleet has 296 ships today. There's a
congressional mandate statutory minimum
of 355 ships that was set by Congress in
2018. That was 8 years ago. Last year we
built nine ships, but we retired 19
naval vessels. So we're going in the
wrong like the completely wrong
direction. The Chinese delivered
somewhere in the ballpark of 30 ships.
Their fleet size is around 370. They'll
be at 450 before you know it. But the
commercial market is where that
discrepancy lies. Even larger, right?
They delivered over a thousand
commercial ships last year. The United
States built five.
>> Five. 1 2 3 4 5.
>> 1 2 3 4 5. One hand.
>> Wow.
>> So if a conflict actually kicks off, and
we saw this in the US in World War II
where we had the production capacity
where we're building thousands of
vessels every year. If a conflict kicks
off, that commercial capacity isn't
going to go to building cargo containers
anymore. It's all going to flip to
defense capacity and it's going to be
building for what the Chinese Communist
Party needs to to win a conflict. And
that's what we have to be building
towards. That's what we're doing at
Seronic. That's why we're thinking,
okay, how do we build mass? How do we
build scale in whatever it is that we
do?
>> And so, how do you do it, Vib? I would
think and listen I'm a neopight here but
if these are autonomous ships well you
can remove things like you don't need
beds you you don't need a commissary and
you don't need uh latrines and I don't
know what percentage of a corsair or
battleship are there to uh support
humans on the ship but I got to think
it's half the mass of it is to is to
keep humans on it am I directionally
correct
>> I think half is a little half is a
little excessive but there is a
significant percentage of the
components, the cost, the labor that
actually goes into catering to human
beings on board. Um, I would say at a
high level, you know, you're really
reducing the complexity of the entire
product, right? Um, you don't need to
worry about a separate electrical system
for humans. You don't need to worry
about, as we mentioned, doors, bathroom,
stairs, etc. Um, and then at the end of
the day, you can actually start to end
optimize a lot of different things. So
even if you look at Corsair for example,
you know, if you were to buy a
commercial 24T boat, it's unlikely to go
a thousand nautical miles. Um it's also
unlikely to drive and have the control
authority um of the boat that we've
built here. Um because you don't have
again, you don't have to worry about you
know a person feeling uh you know you
know taking in the middle of the oceans.
Yeah. Um and so you can actually
optimize across a bunch of different
areas. Naval architecture, the speed,
range and payload of the craft itself.
Um, and then again reduce a lot of the
complexity where you're removing
subsystems that are meant for humans.
>> Yeah. And the Corsair, which is my
favorite ship just based on the name. I
I believe for my research this me was
originally meant like a pirate ship or a
privateeering ship, but it's is it now
standard lingo that that's a 24 ft boat
and and has a certain profile? Do you
know? Is that is that how these
designations come about the names of
these ships? I mean, I wouldn't say that
Corsair is now universal 24 foot
autonomous surface vessel. It's the name
of our product lines and we chose it uh
very purposefully and we chose all our
names purposefully. Even the name of the
company, I mean, we were talking about,
you know, our Greek heritage before the
show and where that came from. You know,
the Seranic Gulf is a Gulf off the coast
of Athens where the Battle of Salamis
happened. It's one of the most famous
naval battles in history. came after the
battle of Thermopoly or the famous stand
of the spar 300 Spartans and it was the
naval battle between um the Greeks and
the Persians where the Greeks were
wildly on mesh. The the Persians had
much much larger ships. They had a much
larger fleet and the Greeks were able to
lure them into this narrow straight and
use smaller more maneuverable products
to ultimately uh defeat the Persians.
Now cost is part of this uh in terms of
these ships in the field and the number
of ships. My understanding of our
contemporary China is that they don't
build a lot of big ships. They build a
lot of ships. So they've got a lot of
smaller and very varied number of ships
if I'm correct there. Then the cost
becomes the issue because building a
bunch of aircraft carriers I keep
hearing that supersonics are going to
take out all these uh aircraft carriers
in the first 15 minutes. Vib is is that
true what we hear that hey we need
smaller ships faster ships and what is
the cost of something like you know the
Corsair that you used on this incredible
mission. Yeah, I would say, you know, at
a high level, the goal is mass, right?
Um like large scale attritable mass. And
yeah, if an aircraft carrier takes 10
years to build and $13 billion, like
you're not really achieving that. Um I
think there's always going to be like
kind of a role and responsibility for
for a craft like that. Um but
ultimately, you're right, like if you're
big and and you know, very obvious to
find and you can find you from space,
etc. um you know that's that's a real
risk when you reduce you know the the
overall cost of like just doing things
in the ocean right like that's
ultimately where the autonomous piece
comes in um you can deploy at scale you
can monitor a large larger body of water
with less people um and ultimately what
you're what you're really getting to is
removing people from harm's way right um
so what when we think about designing
and kind of thinking through the price
points of these things the comparison to
Mancraft isn't really um necessarily
even comparable as you get into larger
ships, right? Um for for us, it's really
a question of like what is the cost that
you would typically have to use humans
for and how much is that actually being
reduced by having a large autonomous
fleet.
>> Corsair's a million bucks or something.
Do you know the the Corsair costs about
a million?
>> Yeah, I want to go back to we'll get
that. I want to go back to one thing you
said earlier and it's like China's
building both
>> very large ships and a lot of ships.
They're right. They're doing it all.
Right. And when we think about, okay,
how do you actually change the paradigm
for the US Navy, it's
>> let's actually boil it down to unit
economics. Let's think about this like a
commercial company. How do you Viv
mentioned like payloads? What are you
actually moving on the ocean? One of the
most important metrics is VLS tubes. So
vertical launch systems. Basically, how
many big tomahawk missiles can you carry
on a ship? It's how much firepower are
you fielding. So, let's use an example
of that, right? A destroyer, naval
destroyer costs about $3 billion. Takes
three billion three billion. And I'm not
even getting into the sustainment and
maintenance costs over the life cycle of
the destroyer. I'm just talking about
what it costs to buy. If we do that,
it's 10 10 billion over 30, 40 years.
$3 billion, 6 to 8 years to make. You
carry you you can field about 96 VLS
tubes. So, I'm going to round up. I'm
going to make that 100 for easy math. So
on average, you're fielding somewhere
between 10 to 15 VLS tubes per year at a
cost of 30 million per tube.
Marauder,
I won't give you the exact price or
cost, but can reduce that cost by a
significant amount, but we're building
20 Marauders for we're going to be
building 20 marauders per year at our
shipyard in Louisiana.
Right? So now you can field, we can
carry the equivalent of 16 VLS tubes on
the back of that 180 foot fully
autonomous ship. So now you can field
320
VLS tubes per year as opposed to 15. And
you could do it at a fraction of the
cost. This is how you actually save the
taxpayers hundreds of billions of
dollars and you get more capability into
the field faster.
>> I mean, that's just extraordinary
thinking about it. What do you lose by
not having humans on it? You know, are
we going to be faced with a moment in
time where these are kind of like uh
drones, you know, where there's no
pilots. They're just pilots in a
shipping container dropped somewhere
either, you know, in the middle of
America and doing it remote like we've
done. Is that the future of warfare with
these ships or and and what do you lose
when you don't have a team there on the
boat? What is the criticism, valid or
invalid, that people have of unmanned
ships?
>> Well, I'm going to let V talk about the
way that we're using software because I
think the the criticism to your question
is, well, what happens if we're in the
middle of the ocean and the ship breaks
down? Who's going to fix it? It's not
it's not that we don't need this
technology. It's folks that aren't used
to technology saying, "Oh, how's the
technology actually going to work?" And
that's what we're proving out every
single day. To your point of like what
do you lose by not having people on
them? Look, it all it all boils down to
the mission, right? And this is why we
partner so closely with the Navy. This
is why we work with actual operators.
It's like what are you using? What are
you delivering? If the mission is long
range fires, we're packing a bunch of
VLS tubes on the back of Marauder. You
actually don't lose anything, right?
you're just delivering those
capabilities into the field while
keeping people out of harm's way. And
that's a very very important part of the
equation. But if our ships, let's be
clear, like if our boats and ships
aren't accomplishing the mission, then
they're not relevant. They're not going
to be used in the first place. And there
is going to be some mix. I don't know
what that mix is. I don't think anybody
really knows what that mix is of manned
and unmanned ships. So what you're going
to see in the Navy is like a hybrid
Navy. So the things that you're missing
from having people on the ships, forward
deployed decision makers in the
environment, you can actually have out
there onman ships, but you're using
unmanned ships to put into combat areas
and conflict areas to keep those people
very safe.
>> Fib, take us through the production of
these. How do you achieve speed at it?
you know, uh, friend of the pod, Elon
Musk, with the Teslas. Over time, he
eventually built the full stack. In the
beginning, if you had a Tesla, you would
look at the the shifter and you'd be
like, "Hey, that looks like my
Mercedes." And that's because they had
their steering column from Mercedes, one
of the early investors. The HVAC was
from somebody else. But eventually, he
had materials coming in one side of the
factory, cars coming out the other, and
he made every single thing in that car.
He was now no longer dependent on any
third party manufacturers or a supply
chain, you know, and famously the HVAC,
I think in the Model 3 and Y when it
came out reduced massively the drain on
the battery, right? So, it's
purpose-built for that mission. So, I'm
assuming you're doing that from first
principles, but what what's the secret
to this rapid production and lowerc cost
production? Yeah, listen, I think
there's, you know, within the ship
building industry at large, there's a
bunch of different challenges of of why
the production isn't as high as it
should be. And one of those core
reasons, and the Navy's talked about
this extensively, is is investing in the
supply chain, right? Um, when you don't
when you only build five commercial
ships a year, your gen set
manufacturers, the marine engine
manufacturers also don't have to produce
at a at a very high rate. So one of the
things that we get the luxury of doing u
by being vertically integrated is that
we get to work with these manufacturers
directly do non-recurring engineering
work invest in really digitizing a lot
of the components that historically have
been very analog right um you know you
asked earlier like what do people what
do the people do on the ships like what
are they going to do if if the ships are
autonomous well when you think about you
know Dina mentioned the life cycle of
these ships are 30 years you think about
a ship that was built 30 years ago you
know you have people that are doing
extremely manual things in the engine
room that today should be extremely
trivial to automate through software.
Um, and so a lot of that work actually
gets completely absorbed by the software
stack and so you don't have to worry
about it. Um, and as we choose
components, we invest in the supply
chain. We invest in invest in the
industrial base. We actually help bring
all of these analog components that for
a long time were you know meant to be
operated by humans. We give them
software APIs. We make sure that they
can be controlled by you know MCP or
software stack somewhere else and can be
you know remotely accessed and whatnot.
Um,
>> so the complexity is going to go down
massively when you're building one of
these. Yeah,
>> absolutely. Yeah. And and you know,
frankly, I don't think the the person
who's sitting in the engine room is
super thrilled about it anyway.
>> No, not a great idea.
>> You're actually changing the um you're
democratizing the decision-m, right?
Like now there's going to be you have
more mass out in the ocean. More sailor
is going to be making decisions about
what those what that mass is going to be
doing and where assets are going to be
instead of worrying about, you know,
coolant pressure in an engine, right?
Um, and so, you know, when we think
about the the actual design, there's
there's a lot of different variables
there. There's some components that are
commercial off the shelves, right? Elon
in the early days, um, from a compute
perspective, they had to invest in A6,
right? The comput stack wasn't there to
run, you know, large models and and run
inference at the speeds and and power
budgets that they wanted to. In 2026,
it's a totally different game, right?
Um, and so there's there's a lot of
different parts of the supply chain
that, you know, sometimes we're looking
at, you know, investing in the
industrial base and making sure that,
you know, our engine manufacturers and
genet manufacturers are keeping up. Um,
on the other side, there's there's
particular components that we're like,
hey, the marine industry actually hasn't
had this level of investment in in a
long time, so we're going to have to
build this in house. Um, you know, a
couple of examples around that are
related to a lot of the electronics,
related to the sensors and compute. Um,
but you know, bunch of different things
there that that help us build and
assemble quickly.
>> Starting a business usually means
juggling a bunch of different services
just to look legit. Not anymore. With
Northwest Registered Agent, you get a
complete business identity all in one
place. A business address, domain,
website, phone number, and more with
privacy protection built in from day
one. Don't spend hundreds or thousands
on services you can get from Northwest
for free. Visit
northwestregisteredagent.com/allinfree
and start using free resources to build
your business today.
>> Let's talk a little bit about Adino on
the business side. How you work with the
Department of War, formerly known as the
Department of Defense. Emil Michaels and
a bunch of the folks over there are
really focused on getting startups
essentially like you are uh more
contracts but you also are moving out I
assume of this cost plus world and
you're just figuring out hey what what's
the right price for this and take us
inside that paradigm shift. You have
these primes and then you have these up
starts and it seems like based on
history the incumbents sometimes don't
uh take this lying down. So take us
inside the paradigm shift from cost plus
to what these I guess they call the new
primes like yourself and Andrew are
doing.
>> Yep. And I'll just define cost plus
everybody that's listening basically
means hey we're going to go build you
something Mr. government and however
long that takes, however much it costs,
you're just going to pay us 10 to 15% on
top of that. So, I'm actually
incentivized and I'm not saying there's
malicious intent, but I'm incentivized
to make it take longer and cost more
because if it costs $100 million, well
then I only make $15 million. But if it
costs a billion dollars, then as a
company I make $150 million. So, there's
this perverse incentive to drive up
cost. Now, that's not the only reason
the industry is where it is today, but
we're we're very encouraged
by the push from the administration um
to adopt things at at speed and scale
and to do that quickly and to do that
differently and to move away from cost.
Plus, you hit it like we invest our own
capital. To date, we're we're just about
four years old. We've raised $2.5
billion in private capital. We're
pouring that into R&D. I remember when
we decided to build Marauder again 180
foot ship. Viv and I were talking and
it's like who who's crazy enough to go
and build a ship on Irad? And it's like
well well we are cuz that's what the
country needs. That's what it demands.
That's what we're going to go do. And
our investors are giving us the capital
to go do it. They're actually entrusting
us with that capital. That's the reverse
of what's happening in the large primes
where their investors are kind of
demanding share buybacks. They're saying
give us our capital back. So the country
very much needs us to build for needs
companies like us to build for the
future. Um, and when you look at what
the administration is doing, even just
in ship building, just recognizing that
ship building is a critical strategic
industry, right? The president, one of
the first things he did was put out the
maritime executive order that was
followed with the maritime action plan,
right? There's ships act sitting in
Congress. You had the Secretary of War
give a whole speech on defense
acquisition reform, talking about how
we're going to push the department to be
better, to move faster, to work with
companies like us that are building on
firm fixed price contracts that are
focused on delivering at speed and scale
and driving down cost for the taxpayer.
So all of that is extremely encouraging.
But I want to be I also want to be clear
here on the flip side. We're in the
early days, Jason. Like very early days.
When you look at the overall Defense
Department of Wars budget,
1%
1% goes to autonomous systems. That's
not nearly enough. Make that 5%. Make
that I don't know the right mix, but it
needs to go up and it needs to go up
quickly. I I'll just add one more thing
that um that you know historically ship
building you know the design is
bifurcated from the builder right so the
design someone gets paid to do the
design um and the groundup general
assembly and all of that and gets handed
off to a totally different person to go
build a ship um and I think there's a
statistic out there that's like 70% of
sequence critical components on on some
Navy ships are sole source suppliers
like single source suppliers um and so
to Dino's point it's not just that
you're incentivized to to take longer
it's that you're not incentivized to
change that necessarily um because you
know that you're still going to get
paid. Um whereas like from our
perspective when you own the design, you
own the shipyard, you know, software
engineers, ship builders, naval
architects, and welders can all all sit
down and eat lunch together in the yard.
Um there's end to end optimizations that
you get that, you know, the system from
a from a historical perspective just
wasn't set up to gain.
>> Yeah. Let's do a little uh look at what
happened in the straight of Hormuz. Uh
we weren't able to control it
completely. doesn't seem like anybody in
history has been able to uh control it.
If we were to fast forward and you had
your entire fleet, you had let's assume
uh not unlimited but massive capacity,
how would you or would you be able to
secure something like the straight of
Hormuz with these autonomous vehicles?
What might that look like? Take us into
a you know scenario five years from now.
What would it take?
>> That's the type of scenario that that
we're building for. I think before
talking about the scenario, let's talk
about the straight of Hormuz itself,
right? The environment, the part of the
world like what neighborhood is it in,
right? It it connects. So you have the
Persian Gulf which is 200 miles wide
which narrows down to a 20 mile wide
strip which is the straight of Hormuz
and then it connects to the Indian Ocean
and connects these large oil producing
countries to global markets. On the one
side of the Persian Gulf, you have, you
know, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, UAE,
Qatar, and Oman. And on the other side
of the Persian Gulf, the north side is
all controlled by Iran.
So now Iran is saying, well, how are we
going to disrupt traffic in the straight
of Hormuz? Well, it's only a 20 mile
wide stretch. I can use missiles. I can
use fast attack vessels. I can use naval
mines. I can use cheap drones because I
don't have a large distance to cover. I
can launch these things anywhere from
shore. So, it becomes this completely
chaotic environment that sending in
naval destroyers into or trying to get
commercial ships pass becomes extremely
dangerous. So, using large numbers of
autonomous vessels, you can combat these
threats in completely different ways.
You can offer scale, persistence, and
risk reduction in ways that, you know,
man vessels just can't. And again, we
won't get into too many of the specifics
on the types of operations that we're
building towards, but autonomy is a way
to counter these effects, these these um
these effects that are overwhelen
meant to be countered by traditional man
ships alone. We can counter that with
scale and technology and keep people out
of harm's way.
>> Well, you have some small ships. So
yeah, you got the cutless and you got
the spy glass in this uh you know
buildout. Those are 6 foot 15t or
whatever.
>> We actually started with those and I and
I'll give you an interesting story. We
actually don't build those aren't we
haven't productized those. Those were
great subscale demonstrators but our
real flagship product is Corsair. And
when you talk about again the the
scenario in the straight of four moves
and what type of volume can we bring
there like it's not only five years in
the future. We could build 2,000 Corsair
per year right now at our manufacturing
facility in Austin.
>> So I I know you live in Austin. We'd
love to show you around. When you see it
when you see it, it actually comes to
life. You're like, "Oh, wait. We can
actually build thousands of these
vessels every single year."
>> How many would you need? th000 5,000 in
the straight hormonous I don't think
it's a 20 mile wide straight
>> so you're just going to and and they
this is their offensive strategy they
have these speedboats that they use I
don't know what they're called but
>> they call them fast attack vessels
>> fast attack vessels these guys
essentially are kamicazi right they just
zip in you know no regard for safety in
their life etc and they will attack
>> they're using fast attack vessels
they're using cheap drones so you have
to be able to count have counter UAS
capabilities. They're you they're using
mines. They're just floating mines into
the straight without regard for what
those mines may set off. So, it's a
really complicated environment that you
need to bring a lot of capabilities
towards.
>> Yeah. But it sounds like VIB with
artificial intelligence, which is the
next card that I think is going to turn
over. You put these Corsaires out there.
Could they with AI be able to, you know,
be using satellite data from planet or
whoever is providing it to just and or
military satellites and just zip out
there and know, say, somebody's putting
out some mines. Hey, somebody's putting
out some of these fast attack vehicles.
Just intercept them. And now they have
an actual cost, human life, and a
limited amount of resources. And hey,
we're America and we have you guys
building ships at scale. They don't have
this ability to build AI based ships. So
talk about what AI on these ships could
do eventually.
>> Yeah. So I would I would say today, you
know, there's a bunch of different, you
know, machine learning applications that
run on our boat today. Um there's heavy
amounts of compute on all of our crafts.
Um that allows people to have tons of
capability, whether it's, you know, the
navigation and kind of the autopilot or
self-driving of the craft itself or
compute for payloads, whether that's
counter UAS, as Dino mentioned, or or a
bunch of other things really. Um there's
a variety of different mission sets. The
end state here is that you know you have
a distributed fleet you know across the
ocean that you know in variable like
listen the ocean is a tumultuous place
like by default without war zone like
the ocean's still bad um you know
saltwater hits antennas you lose you
lose comms uh so there's a bunch of
different communications on this there's
a bunch of different sensors um all of
those things kind of areworked together
with ML with a bunch of different
software components of the software
stack to make sure that you can
basically translate intent
from a commander or a sailor and then
result in a mission outcome.
>> Let's talk Dino a little bit about the
adversary China and they have started to
put weapons on robots. I'm assuming that
they're doing the same if they're
willing to put it on a you know one of
those dog robots like the spot robots.
They're putting weapons on them. They're
demonstrating it and whatever they're
demonstrating they've already got in
production. Let's just call it what it
is. And they're not signing some UN
treaty to not put autonomous and AI
weapons. This is a different type of
adversary. And I'm sure North Korea and
and other bad guys are doing similar
things. We have um I believe treaties
where we're not allowed to put weapons
and use AI based weapons. Am I correct
about that? In the West here,
>> there is a autonomous weapon system
standard called 3009 that basically
outlines exactly how AI can be used on
an on an autonomous system. Yeah,
>> tell us all about that. Like or cuz this
is the Robocop scenario. This is the
robotic soldier or the robotic boat
that's able to engage the enemy without
a human, you know, if it loses comms or
to do a kamicazi mission, which seems
like something we might have to do.
These are things we might have to do,
Dino, versus the Chinese because they're
not signing these treaties. They are not
thinking ethically. They are not
respecting the Declaration of Human
Rights. They've got their own playbook.
Yep. Yeah. And I think the the important
thing to to articulate here is
especially when you use the kind of
Robocop example and just to kind of
quell people's fears a little bit is
even in that example where we're sending
boats off the off of Taiwan and we're in
the Taiwan Strait and they're engaging,
we're still using artificial
intelligence to bifurcate between an
enemy vessel and a friendly vessel,
between a non-combatant and a combatant.
And people are still making the
decisions and setting the mission
intent. It's just government policy
that's setting, okay, when are you
authorized to engage versus not.
Artificial intelligence actually just
gives the military the opportunity to
one operate at a greater scale and then
operate more efficiently. These aren't
robots actually just making decisions on
when to go to war or not.
>> Got it. So it says, hey, this is a bad
guy. Hey, our recommendation is to, you
know, neutralize it. And then a human
has to say, okay, neutralize it. But if
you're up against an adversary who says,
hey, no, no, we built this thing.
Anybody comes in to the blockade in
Taiwan, which, you know, we think is uh,
you know, a pretty significant nonzero
probability in our lifetime. If you're
up against somebody who says, "I'm just
going to have these ships kill anything
that's not our ship." Period. Full stop.
Then we lose, don't we?
>> No. Because the the technologies the all
you're doing is putting policy
thresholds and approval thresholds into
the technology. There's a real world
scenario where doomsday scenario, we go
to World War II, the Taiwan Strait is a
complete conflict. Exactly what you
said. Our commanders are going to make
that same judgment, right? and they be
like, "Hey, if anything, there's no
fishing boats out here right now."
>> Yeah.
>> There's no cruise ships coming through.
>> If you're not if you're not a friendly
vessel, you're an enemy vessel. And
that's that. And our technologies
actually enables that. What we were
talking about earlier is like the
autonomy, the artificial intelligence,
and everything else is there. And you're
building the policies into the software
based on government procedures. And when
those authorizations need to be in
place, those authorizations will change
based on
the threat environment that we're in.
>> Is the plan for you to sell to our
allies? And what are the rules there?
Because it sounds like we need as many
ships for our navy as we can get, but if
you can get up to capacity, then hey,
the French, the Germans, and the English
have essentially just stopped making
ships, right? and they they they have
very deprecated militaries. My
understanding is the only people who are
really doing a great job at this are the
folks in South Korea which I believe are
building but one ship for us. So maybe
you could talk about the other uh top
countries in the world, democracies and
our allies and what their capability is
and then your ability to help arm them
and sell to them.
>> I mean very very focused on our allies
and partners. If you talk to the
Department of War, if you talk to the
United States Navy, they actually want
our allies and partners to have these
capabilities as well. This is this is
going to be a combined effort, right? We
mentioned earlier that China has 57% of
the world's ship building capacity.
That's not limited to just that one
industry. We could go industry by
industry and talk about their
manufacturing might and their
manufacturing dominance. Um, so you
really do need a combined effort. We
need our allies and partners to have
this technology. We're talking to um our
allies in Asia, obviously, in Europe,
and in the Middle East right now about
getting not only our our products there,
but also how do we stand up, you know,
domestic production in those countries.
How do we give them the sovereign
capability? How do we have production
lines overseas so that they're already
forward deployed if we get into a
conflict in the first place?
>> Pretty amazing stuff. And you have an
announcement today, I understand, that
we're going to share with the all-in
audience for the first time.
>> That's right. So, we've been working on
Port Alpha for a long time now. So, Port
Alpha, just for the listeners, is our
shipyard of the future. This is going to
bring American ship building back to a
place that we haven't seen since World
War II. Um, to be clear, we're already
operating a shipyard. We have a shipyard
in Franklin, Louisiana. That's where
we're building Marauder. We're ramping
that up to 20 Marauder. We can bring
that up to 50 marauders per year, every
single year. And that is a 100 acre
shipyard.
What we're doing at Port Alpha is 10xing
that. We're looking at a shipyard that
is well over a thousand acres. We've
been doing this search for over a year
now on what is the ideal location for
this shipyard. Where are we going to
find the right partner, the right land,
the right workforce, the right community
to be a part of? Um, and we're proud to
announce that we found that in
Brownsville, Texas. So, we're we're
headquartered in Austin. We're going to
be basing Port Alpha in Brownsville.
We're going to start on a 800 acre plot
of land, which in and of itself, 800
acres is now the largest shipyard in the
United States.
>> Amazing.
>> Just to give you a sense of scale, we
have the opportunity over time to scale
that to 4,000 acres. We're going to
invest billions of dollars into this
project. We're going to create 10,000
jobs over the next 10 years and we're
going to bring ship building in this
country back again to a place that we
haven't seen since World War II. And
we're just grateful for the partnership
from the state, from Governor Abbott,
from Cameron County, and then the city
and the port of Brownsville for making
this happen.
>> I mean, this is one of the great things,
Vib, about being based in Texas. They
let us build things in Texas. Yeah. As a
recent resident here, it's pretty
amazing to live in a state where the
state's like, "What do you want to
build? How can we help?" as opposed to,
"Hey, uh, you know, f off like they told
uh Elon in California." And he got the
message received reply uh to that
lunatic. So, maybe you could talk a
little bit about operating VIB in Texas
and the crazy support you get from
Abbott and everybody.
>> One of the uh questions that we used to
get like back in the day was, "You guys
are a maritime company. There's no water
in Austin. What are you guys doing
there? Um, and I would say like, you
know, Austin has this like magical um
kind of nexus of both digital and
physical labor forces. Like you can find
software talent, you can find AI talent,
you can find designers. Um, but you can
also tap into, you know, the industrial
base from San Antonio, from the oil and
gas industry in Houston. Um, and when
you marry those two together, like you
can actually start to co-design these
things across the entire stack, right? I
mentioned earlier like typically ship
design and ship build is is totally
independent. Um but with port alpha we
get the luxury of like green field
designing what the the manufacturing
plant for ships should look like. Um and
so you can design the you can you can
optimize the design as ship for the yard
and the design of the yard for the ship.
And it's very similar to kind of like
you know how how companies today like do
hardware software co-design on chips,
right? You design the compiler and they
stick together to optimize both for for
the other. Um, and we can we have the
luxury of being able to do that for for
ships here. And um, I I can't think of a
better place to do it than Texas.
>> Well, and uh, Starbase is right down the
block. SpaceX obviously and Elon's made
that work. And I think it's like a four
what, maybe four, five, six hour drive
down to the coast. Yeah. So you guys can
either zip there on a PJ or you can just
drive. So it's pretty straightforward.
>> It's pretty straightforward. It's easy
for logistics. What what SpaceX has did
has done in Brownsville is incredible. I
think what Brownsville has done for
SpaceX and helping them build out build
the community down there. Um, we were
very impressed, very very excited to be
basing Port Alpha there. And look, at
the end of the day, it's the people that
are going to make this work. It's it's
the labor force. It's the workforce. Viv
mentioned it earlier, and we can talk
about, you know, why the American ship
building industry has declined so much,
but it's the supply chain and the
workforce that has suffered the most.
And so like one of the things we focus
on is really how do we rebuild that
workforce? How do we upskill existing
talent to advance manufacturing? How do
we take somebody that's building a car
at Ford and get them building ships very
very efficiently, very quickly, right?
And that actually all starts with the
design. If you design a ship from the
ground up from a first principles
approach to be more simplistic to be
designed and manufactured at scale, then
you can put in the training, the work
instruction, the processes and
everything else where hey, let's go make
this much faster. Let's train, let's
build the workforce. And then let's be
honest, like you have to make it cool
for young people to go work in a
shipyard again. You have to you have to
pay them good wages. like every one of
our employees, every welder, every pipe
fitter, um they have good wages, the
same benefits as our Silicon Valley
software engineers, they have equity in
our company, um they're they're fired
up. Like I mentioned our our shipyard in
Louisiana. Like people are fired up down
there. And it's not just the workforce,
it's the community. Like some of the
some of the stories I hear when I'm down
there are like so encouraging. People
are like, I'm wearing my hat in the
grocery store and people are coming up
to me saying, "You guys are kicking
butt. Keep building ships because nobody
else in the country is doing what we're
doing."
>> And these are great salaries. People are
getting paid significant amounts of
money obviously to work in manufacturing
at your company at uh down at Starbase.
And now you have these two incredible
companies. I I don't know if there's any
other ones in Brownsville, but this is a
small community. There's only like
200,000 people down there. This is going
to be an incredible boom town. Oh, it's
going to be incredible. SpaceX, you
know, and
I mentioned earlier like the cost of
building ships in the United States. And
the United States just isn't competitive
in the commercial market. And again, we
can go through the specifics and what
happened over time, five to six times
the cost of building a ship in China. We
think just by investing in product and
processes and new shipyards, we can cut
the cost of a ship in the United States
in half. So if you have a ship that
costs $300 million, we can get that
under $150 million. And that's not by
simply just paying people less. We're
paying people more, but we're investing
in our product. We're investing in the
process. We're designing the product to
be built that way in the first place.
So, we're making the investments that
are needed for long-term sustainability
and to rebuild the workforce.
>> All right. If people want to come work
with you, VIB, how can they apply their
career page and what are you looking
for? What what talent do you need to
come do this incredibly patriotic duty
and go work at Seronic?
>> Yeah, I mean sur uh we have a careers
page. Um you can you reach out on
Twitter, LinkedIn, whatever you want. Um
we're we're hiring pretty aggressively
right now. I would say that, you know,
the biggest thing, you know, we look for
generally speaking is, you know,
especially in 2026 when, you know, Chad
GBT and Claude are getting so much
better every year. Um, it's pretty
important right now to be fairly, you
know, neuroplastic. Um, you know, be
ready to adapt for what the future looks
like. Computing is changing. Um, you
know, there's there's going to be agents
that can help you on the manufacturing
floor to to assemble faster if you have
an issue. uh there's all these digital
systems that are they're kind of
changing the paradigm here. I mean, when
we first got to Golfcraft um in in done
in Louisiana, a lot of the processes
were were pretty much pen and pen and
paper, right? And that's pretty common
across most shipyards. Um so, like kind
of bringing that into the 21st century
really quickly. Um I mean, it's just
going to require people to be um
thoughtful um adapt to the future and um
and really be passionate and excited and
and about about kind of building the
future.
>> Yeah. go to the uh website s ar nic.com
join the mission 300 jobs listed on the
website there's something there for
everybody and uh listen just as a fellow
Greek dino uh you know we were obviously
the cradle of innovation and or science
math technology art and everything
happened but we were also the great
warriors uh and we patrolled the sea
obviously Greece has a lot of coastlines
so you're you're doing our Greek u
brothers and sisters and ancestors Greek
has a lot of Greek has a lot of
coastline and they're actually big in
the shipping industry. So now they are
big. Yeah.
>> So So now I hear more more often than
not now. Oh, it's good to see a Greek in
building ships.
>> I you know what? I can sleep now at
night. I was very worried about the
straight of Hormuz. I was worried about
the Pacific theater, the South China
Sea. Dino, now that I know that my Greek
brother is on top of this, my head's
going to hit the pillow. I'm going to go
right. I'm going to sleep like a baby
tonight. I know you got us covered. Uh
thanks so much guys and uh sincerely uh
on behalf of all Americans like thank
you for doing this work. You know this
is something where we really need
technologists and entrepreneurs uh to
really help us innovate because we're
falling behind and we're the good guys
in this. We're the ones who are
spreading democracy and freedom and
protecting that. The only thing in the
world that isn't trending in the right
direction, man, if you look at
lifespans, if you look at, you know,
infant mortality, if you look at uh
people's standard of living, everything
is trending in the world in the right
direction except the spread of
democracy, which has been on the decline
in our lifetime. Let that sink in,
folks. More people living under
authoritarians than democracies. It's
it's a modest amount, but you've seen
the statistics, I'm sure, Vib and and
Dino. And we need to have a great
military. We need to have this advanced
technology if we're going to maintain uh
the number of people living under a
democracy of in and freedom and
hopefully increase it. A lot of bad guys
out there and uh you know just thank you
so much for doing this work.
>> That's right. Well, thank you for having
us and I I will end on a positive note
where look we're seeing that starting to
turn around in a really big way. It's
not just Sironic. You mentioned Android.
there SpaceX and Palanteer before that
and now there's just a big wave a big
push into defense tech because people
realize the importance and the magnitude
of the moment that we are living in
right now. I I tell our team I'm like
this is our generation's version of the
space race.
>> Make make no mistake about it and we
cannot lose. So that's how hard we're
working at. That's how we're working
with a sense of urgency and there's a
lot of other companies into the coming
into the space that are working with
that same sense of urgency. So I am I am
very optimistic. I know this country can
do it. When we put our minds and we get
a collective effort behind something,
nobody can beat us. So
>> nobody can. Yeah. Nobody can beat us.
And listen, if you were thinking of
going, listen, there's no no dig to
anybody, but if you're thinking about
going and optimizing an ad network at
some big tech company, like it's
incredibly boring and it's incredibly
meaningful. You'll get 20, 30 years into
your career and you'll say, "What did I
do?" Go work at Seronic. You'll get
couple of years into your career and you
say, "I'm doing important work."
>> That's right. That's right. Every person
that walks through the door every single
day is quite literally changing the
world and we remind them of that and
they they know it.
>> Yeah. All right, Vib Dino, thank you so
much for coming on and we'll see you
next time on the All-In Interview.
[music]
>> I'm [music] going all in.
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
This episode of the All-In interview series features Dino Mavukus and Vib Alakar, co-founders of the defense tech company Seronic. They discuss their mission to revolutionize the shipbuilding industry by building fully autonomous ships, addressing the significant decline in U.S. shipbuilding capacity compared to China. A key focus of the discussion is the role of autonomous platforms in high-stakes environments, such as a recent successful rescue operation in the Strait of Hormuz. The founders also announce the establishment of 'Port Alpha,' a massive new shipyard in Brownsville, Texas, intended to restore U.S. competitive advantage in naval production through first-principles design and vertical integration.
Videos recently processed by our community