HomeVideos

China Outbuilds America 230-to-1. Saronic Has a Plan

Now Playing

China Outbuilds America 230-to-1. Saronic Has a Plan

Transcript

1363 segments

0:00

All right everybody, welcome back to the

0:01

allin interview series. I am thrilled

0:04

really thrilled because Seronic is a

0:06

defense company that has been doing

0:08

amazing work and we are so lucky to have

0:11

the co-founders here on the program.

0:13

Welcome to the program Dino Mavukus. How

0:15

are you sir?

0:16

>> Doing well. Thanks for having us.

0:18

>> And uh your co-founder here uh Vib

0:21

Alakar. Let's talk a little bit about

0:23

Seronic. Uh and we're going to get into

0:26

everything but you were in the news. You

0:29

were in the news because you're making

0:32

autonomous ships and one of these was

0:35

used recently in the straight of hormuz.

0:37

I understand.

0:38

>> I'm going. [singing]

0:40

[music]

0:41

>> As your wealth grows, have you noticed

0:43

how much more complex things get between

0:45

investments, tax strategy, and estate

0:47

planning? Managing it all is a full-time

0:50

job that you didn't ask for. Creative

0:51

planning can help. Their coordinated

0:53

team of investment managers, CPAs, and

0:56

affiliated estate attorneys can do much

0:59

of the heavy lifting so you don't have

1:01

to. Creative planning, where wealth

1:03

works together. Go to

1:04

creativeplanning.com/allin.

1:10

>> I got to start there, Dino. Tell us

1:12

about the mission. Tell us what

1:14

happened. This is the first time an

1:15

autonomous

1:17

uh ship has ever rescued uh folks in the

1:20

field. and then we'll get back into your

1:21

history and everything. But I think like

1:22

we got to start off with this story

1:24

because it's incredible.

1:25

>> It it it's just a huge story and I look

1:27

I can't get into too many specifics of

1:29

the operation and the mission for for

1:31

obvious reasons. But um before we get

1:34

into what it means for the country, what

1:36

it means for our company, I mean without

1:38

saying the most important thing is that

1:41

those two pilots came home safely

1:44

regardless of how they got there. Right

1:46

now, what we were able to demonstrate

1:47

through this partnership with the Navy,

1:49

like for us is the Navy actually trusted

1:52

us in this moment. Lives are on the

1:54

line. We're going to send this

1:56

autonomous platform to go and rescue

1:58

these folks. This is not a patrol. This

2:00

is not maritime domain awareness. This

2:02

is the highest stakes of the highest

2:04

stakes. There's downed American pilots

2:06

in the Straits of Hormuz. like Corsair,

2:09

which you actually see right over my

2:11

right shoulder, which is our 24 foot

2:13

fully autonomous speedboat for th for

2:15

those that that don't know. Um, he said,

2:18

"We're going to use that to rescue the

2:20

pilots." And that's that's actually like

2:22

a milestone moment for the country. And

2:24

I can tell you I'll tell you a personal

2:26

story firstand kind of what this means,

2:28

but you know this like leaving people

2:30

behind in the US military just it's not

2:32

a thing. Like the US military does not

2:36

do it, right? Like I was in the Navy

2:38

Seal teams for 11 years. From 2004 to

2:42

2015,

2:43

uh my last five years were on SEAL team

2:45

six. I personally experienced 2005 there

2:49

were four SEALs trapped on a mountain

2:51

side in Afghanistan and the helicopter

2:54

got sh got shot down while going to

2:56

rescue them. So what we were able to

2:58

prove in this moment was that you can go

3:01

and rescue people without putting

3:04

additional soldiers in harm's way.

3:06

That's that's the impact of what this

3:08

had. That's what it means for the

3:10

country and for our company. It was just

3:13

an extremely proud moment where the Navy

3:16

trusted us in this high stakes

3:17

environment.

3:18

>> Absolutely incredible. And obviously

3:20

thank you for your service. I and I know

3:23

you can't get into too many details, but

3:24

I've been reading all about it and I got

3:26

to wonder when when these two pilots,

3:29

did they know that this was an

3:31

autonomous ship and the ship comes

3:32

rolling up and they're like, somebody

3:34

sent them a message, hey, you're going

3:35

to get picked up by the autonomous ship.

3:36

Grab the side of it, climb on board.

3:38

Like, what's the protocol for the

3:40

autonomous ship picking up two folks?

3:43

Are they swimming out to it? Well, I I

3:45

just got to get a little color on this

3:46

before it becomes a movie.

3:47

>> I mean, it's the first time that it that

3:49

it happened, right? And when a ship when

3:51

a boat pulls up to you and there's

3:53

nobody on it, you know, you can very

3:54

quickly deduce that it's fully that it's

3:57

an autonomous boat. And you know, these

3:59

pilots were in the water for I don't

4:02

even know how long. They're in a

4:04

completely contested environment. We're

4:06

in a conflict with Iran. They're in the

4:07

Straits of Hormuz. And we can go through

4:09

the dynamic there. But they looked at

4:12

this platform and said that that's my

4:14

way home,

4:15

>> right? That that's how I get out of

4:17

here.

4:17

>> I love it. All right, let's step back a

4:19

bit here. You're a Navy Seal uh VIB.

4:22

You've uh worked in this space for a

4:24

while. Uh you previously worked at

4:26

Andrew, I understand. Uh the mission as

4:29

I understand it for the company uh is to

4:33

greatly increase our ability in America

4:36

to produce ships. And for people who

4:38

don't know, the amount of uh tonnage,

4:41

the number of ships that we are able to

4:45

make in America and most western

4:46

countries is very low. But there's an

4:49

adversary uh in the Pacific who is able

4:53

to produce a lot of ships. It's known as

4:55

the Chinese Communist Party. So maybe

4:57

from first principles you could just

4:58

explain what you're building and why

5:00

it's important and just how insane

5:05

uh the incompetence of the West in terms

5:07

of building ships has become. I mean we

5:09

are really bad at making ships right

5:12

now. Am I correct?

5:13

>> We're beyond bad. Uh, let me I'll take a

5:16

step back and just kind of highlight

5:18

where we're at and then I'll let Vib go

5:21

through what we're doing about it, how

5:24

how we're changing that dynamic. But

5:26

Jason, what you were saying, right, just

5:28

to put it in context, the United States

5:31

can build a 100,000 gross tons of ships

5:34

every year. Gross ton is this volumetric

5:36

measure of ship. So if you build, you

5:38

know, a 200 foot ship, that's different

5:39

than an 800 foot ship. But let's compare

5:42

apples to apples. 100,000 gross tons.

5:46

The Chinese, which you were referencing,

5:47

can build 23 million gross tons. So,

5:51

they can out build the US 230 to1. And

5:54

it wasn't always the case. Right? 30

5:58

years ago, the Chinese didn't have this

6:00

capability. They had 5% of the world's

6:02

ship building capacity. Today, they have

6:05

57%

6:06

of the world ship building capacity. And

6:08

actually that problem's getting worse

6:10

because the cons the communist party is

6:13

just con constantly it's like

6:15

subsidizing the entire industry. So

6:17

they're undercutting the commercial

6:18

market on price. They're not just

6:19

subsidizing the direct cost to build.

6:22

They're subsidizing raw material and

6:23

labor costs. So the ship built in the

6:26

United States is actually five to six

6:28

times the cost of that same ship built

6:30

in China. And so they keep getting more

6:32

and more orders. So that number is of

6:34

57% is just going up. How did they get

6:37

that capability? Is that because as a

6:40

manufacturer to the world, they needed

6:42

to ship out products. So they did this

6:45

in a commercial way f first or was this

6:47

always very intentionally we need to own

6:50

the South Pacific? much revolves around

6:51

the commercial market and then I'll talk

6:53

about I want to talk about the status of

6:55

our navy like where the naval fleet is

6:58

today what that means and then where the

7:01

Chinese navy is and where that's going

7:03

because again 30 years ago the Chinese

7:05

navy was a lural backwater navy today

7:08

they have nuclear submarines aircraft

7:10

carriers and hypersonic missiles so

7:12

there's a massive massive change over

7:14

the last 30 years and what's happened in

7:16

the US ship building industry it's

7:18

completely declined So the US naval

7:21

fleet has 296 ships today. There's a

7:24

congressional mandate statutory minimum

7:27

of 355 ships that was set by Congress in

7:30

2018. That was 8 years ago. Last year we

7:35

built nine ships, but we retired 19

7:38

naval vessels. So we're going in the

7:40

wrong like the completely wrong

7:42

direction. The Chinese delivered

7:45

somewhere in the ballpark of 30 ships.

7:46

Their fleet size is around 370. They'll

7:49

be at 450 before you know it. But the

7:52

commercial market is where that

7:54

discrepancy lies. Even larger, right?

7:56

They delivered over a thousand

7:58

commercial ships last year. The United

8:01

States built five.

8:03

>> Five. 1 2 3 4 5.

8:04

>> 1 2 3 4 5. One hand.

8:07

>> Wow.

8:07

>> So if a conflict actually kicks off, and

8:10

we saw this in the US in World War II

8:12

where we had the production capacity

8:14

where we're building thousands of

8:15

vessels every year. If a conflict kicks

8:17

off, that commercial capacity isn't

8:19

going to go to building cargo containers

8:21

anymore. It's all going to flip to

8:22

defense capacity and it's going to be

8:24

building for what the Chinese Communist

8:26

Party needs to to win a conflict. And

8:29

that's what we have to be building

8:30

towards. That's what we're doing at

8:32

Seronic. That's why we're thinking,

8:33

okay, how do we build mass? How do we

8:36

build scale in whatever it is that we

8:38

do?

8:38

>> And so, how do you do it, Vib? I would

8:41

think and listen I'm a neopight here but

8:43

if these are autonomous ships well you

8:46

can remove things like you don't need

8:48

beds you you don't need a commissary and

8:50

you don't need uh latrines and I don't

8:53

know what percentage of a corsair or

8:55

battleship are there to uh support

9:00

humans on the ship but I got to think

9:02

it's half the mass of it is to is to

9:04

keep humans on it am I directionally

9:06

correct

9:07

>> I think half is a little half is a

9:08

little excessive but there is a

9:10

significant percentage of the

9:11

components, the cost, the labor that

9:14

actually goes into catering to human

9:15

beings on board. Um, I would say at a

9:17

high level, you know, you're really

9:19

reducing the complexity of the entire

9:21

product, right? Um, you don't need to

9:23

worry about a separate electrical system

9:24

for humans. You don't need to worry

9:26

about, as we mentioned, doors, bathroom,

9:27

stairs, etc. Um, and then at the end of

9:30

the day, you can actually start to end

9:32

optimize a lot of different things. So

9:34

even if you look at Corsair for example,

9:36

you know, if you were to buy a

9:37

commercial 24T boat, it's unlikely to go

9:40

a thousand nautical miles. Um it's also

9:42

unlikely to drive and have the control

9:44

authority um of the boat that we've

9:46

built here. Um because you don't have

9:47

again, you don't have to worry about you

9:49

know a person feeling uh you know you

9:52

know taking in the middle of the oceans.

9:54

Yeah. Um and so you can actually

9:56

optimize across a bunch of different

9:57

areas. Naval architecture, the speed,

9:59

range and payload of the craft itself.

10:01

Um, and then again reduce a lot of the

10:03

complexity where you're removing

10:04

subsystems that are meant for humans.

10:06

>> Yeah. And the Corsair, which is my

10:08

favorite ship just based on the name. I

10:11

I believe for my research this me was

10:13

originally meant like a pirate ship or a

10:14

privateeering ship, but it's is it now

10:17

standard lingo that that's a 24 ft boat

10:20

and and has a certain profile? Do you

10:21

know? Is that is that how these

10:23

designations come about the names of

10:25

these ships? I mean, I wouldn't say that

10:27

Corsair is now universal 24 foot

10:30

autonomous surface vessel. It's the name

10:32

of our product lines and we chose it uh

10:34

very purposefully and we chose all our

10:36

names purposefully. Even the name of the

10:38

company, I mean, we were talking about,

10:40

you know, our Greek heritage before the

10:42

show and where that came from. You know,

10:44

the Seranic Gulf is a Gulf off the coast

10:46

of Athens where the Battle of Salamis

10:49

happened. It's one of the most famous

10:50

naval battles in history. came after the

10:53

battle of Thermopoly or the famous stand

10:55

of the spar 300 Spartans and it was the

10:58

naval battle between um the Greeks and

11:01

the Persians where the Greeks were

11:03

wildly on mesh. The the Persians had

11:05

much much larger ships. They had a much

11:07

larger fleet and the Greeks were able to

11:09

lure them into this narrow straight and

11:11

use smaller more maneuverable products

11:14

to ultimately uh defeat the Persians.

11:17

Now cost is part of this uh in terms of

11:21

these ships in the field and the number

11:24

of ships. My understanding of our

11:27

contemporary China is that they don't

11:30

build a lot of big ships. They build a

11:31

lot of ships. So they've got a lot of

11:33

smaller and very varied number of ships

11:35

if I'm correct there. Then the cost

11:38

becomes the issue because building a

11:40

bunch of aircraft carriers I keep

11:41

hearing that supersonics are going to

11:43

take out all these uh aircraft carriers

11:45

in the first 15 minutes. Vib is is that

11:48

true what we hear that hey we need

11:49

smaller ships faster ships and what is

11:52

the cost of something like you know the

11:54

Corsair that you used on this incredible

11:56

mission. Yeah, I would say, you know, at

11:58

a high level, the goal is mass, right?

12:00

Um like large scale attritable mass. And

12:03

yeah, if an aircraft carrier takes 10

12:05

years to build and $13 billion, like

12:07

you're not really achieving that. Um I

12:09

think there's always going to be like

12:10

kind of a role and responsibility for

12:12

for a craft like that. Um but

12:14

ultimately, you're right, like if you're

12:15

big and and you know, very obvious to

12:17

find and you can find you from space,

12:19

etc. um you know that's that's a real

12:21

risk when you reduce you know the the

12:24

overall cost of like just doing things

12:27

in the ocean right like that's

12:28

ultimately where the autonomous piece

12:30

comes in um you can deploy at scale you

12:33

can monitor a large larger body of water

12:35

with less people um and ultimately what

12:38

you're what you're really getting to is

12:40

removing people from harm's way right um

12:42

so what when we think about designing

12:45

and kind of thinking through the price

12:46

points of these things the comparison to

12:49

Mancraft isn't really um necessarily

12:52

even comparable as you get into larger

12:53

ships, right? Um for for us, it's really

12:56

a question of like what is the cost that

12:58

you would typically have to use humans

13:00

for and how much is that actually being

13:02

reduced by having a large autonomous

13:03

fleet.

13:04

>> Corsair's a million bucks or something.

13:06

Do you know the the Corsair costs about

13:07

a million?

13:08

>> Yeah, I want to go back to we'll get

13:10

that. I want to go back to one thing you

13:12

said earlier and it's like China's

13:14

building both

13:15

>> very large ships and a lot of ships.

13:17

They're right. They're doing it all.

13:19

Right. And when we think about, okay,

13:21

how do you actually change the paradigm

13:23

for the US Navy, it's

13:25

>> let's actually boil it down to unit

13:27

economics. Let's think about this like a

13:29

commercial company. How do you Viv

13:32

mentioned like payloads? What are you

13:33

actually moving on the ocean? One of the

13:36

most important metrics is VLS tubes. So

13:39

vertical launch systems. Basically, how

13:41

many big tomahawk missiles can you carry

13:42

on a ship? It's how much firepower are

13:45

you fielding. So, let's use an example

13:47

of that, right? A destroyer, naval

13:50

destroyer costs about $3 billion. Takes

13:52

three billion three billion. And I'm not

13:55

even getting into the sustainment and

13:57

maintenance costs over the life cycle of

13:59

the destroyer. I'm just talking about

14:00

what it costs to buy. If we do that,

14:02

it's 10 10 billion over 30, 40 years.

14:06

$3 billion, 6 to 8 years to make. You

14:09

carry you you can field about 96 VLS

14:11

tubes. So, I'm going to round up. I'm

14:13

going to make that 100 for easy math. So

14:16

on average, you're fielding somewhere

14:19

between 10 to 15 VLS tubes per year at a

14:23

cost of 30 million per tube.

14:26

Marauder,

14:27

I won't give you the exact price or

14:29

cost, but can reduce that cost by a

14:32

significant amount, but we're building

14:35

20 Marauders for we're going to be

14:37

building 20 marauders per year at our

14:38

shipyard in Louisiana.

14:41

Right? So now you can field, we can

14:43

carry the equivalent of 16 VLS tubes on

14:46

the back of that 180 foot fully

14:49

autonomous ship. So now you can field

14:51

320

14:53

VLS tubes per year as opposed to 15. And

14:56

you could do it at a fraction of the

14:58

cost. This is how you actually save the

15:00

taxpayers hundreds of billions of

15:03

dollars and you get more capability into

15:05

the field faster.

15:07

>> I mean, that's just extraordinary

15:09

thinking about it. What do you lose by

15:11

not having humans on it? You know, are

15:13

we going to be faced with a moment in

15:15

time where these are kind of like uh

15:18

drones, you know, where there's no

15:20

pilots. They're just pilots in a

15:22

shipping container dropped somewhere

15:24

either, you know, in the middle of

15:26

America and doing it remote like we've

15:28

done. Is that the future of warfare with

15:30

these ships or and and what do you lose

15:32

when you don't have a team there on the

15:35

boat? What is the criticism, valid or

15:37

invalid, that people have of unmanned

15:40

ships?

15:40

>> Well, I'm going to let V talk about the

15:43

way that we're using software because I

15:46

think the the criticism to your question

15:48

is, well, what happens if we're in the

15:50

middle of the ocean and the ship breaks

15:51

down? Who's going to fix it? It's not

15:54

it's not that we don't need this

15:56

technology. It's folks that aren't used

15:58

to technology saying, "Oh, how's the

16:00

technology actually going to work?" And

16:02

that's what we're proving out every

16:04

single day. To your point of like what

16:06

do you lose by not having people on

16:08

them? Look, it all it all boils down to

16:10

the mission, right? And this is why we

16:12

partner so closely with the Navy. This

16:14

is why we work with actual operators.

16:16

It's like what are you using? What are

16:17

you delivering? If the mission is long

16:19

range fires, we're packing a bunch of

16:21

VLS tubes on the back of Marauder. You

16:23

actually don't lose anything, right?

16:26

you're just delivering those

16:28

capabilities into the field while

16:29

keeping people out of harm's way. And

16:32

that's a very very important part of the

16:33

equation. But if our ships, let's be

16:36

clear, like if our boats and ships

16:38

aren't accomplishing the mission, then

16:40

they're not relevant. They're not going

16:43

to be used in the first place. And there

16:45

is going to be some mix. I don't know

16:48

what that mix is. I don't think anybody

16:49

really knows what that mix is of manned

16:52

and unmanned ships. So what you're going

16:54

to see in the Navy is like a hybrid

16:56

Navy. So the things that you're missing

16:58

from having people on the ships, forward

17:00

deployed decision makers in the

17:02

environment, you can actually have out

17:04

there onman ships, but you're using

17:06

unmanned ships to put into combat areas

17:09

and conflict areas to keep those people

17:12

very safe.

17:13

>> Fib, take us through the production of

17:15

these. How do you achieve speed at it?

17:17

you know, uh, friend of the pod, Elon

17:19

Musk, with the Teslas. Over time, he

17:22

eventually built the full stack. In the

17:26

beginning, if you had a Tesla, you would

17:28

look at the the shifter and you'd be

17:30

like, "Hey, that looks like my

17:30

Mercedes." And that's because they had

17:33

their steering column from Mercedes, one

17:34

of the early investors. The HVAC was

17:36

from somebody else. But eventually, he

17:38

had materials coming in one side of the

17:40

factory, cars coming out the other, and

17:43

he made every single thing in that car.

17:45

He was now no longer dependent on any

17:48

third party manufacturers or a supply

17:50

chain, you know, and famously the HVAC,

17:53

I think in the Model 3 and Y when it

17:55

came out reduced massively the drain on

17:57

the battery, right? So, it's

17:58

purpose-built for that mission. So, I'm

18:01

assuming you're doing that from first

18:03

principles, but what what's the secret

18:05

to this rapid production and lowerc cost

18:07

production? Yeah, listen, I think

18:09

there's, you know, within the ship

18:10

building industry at large, there's a

18:12

bunch of different challenges of of why

18:14

the production isn't as high as it

18:15

should be. And one of those core

18:16

reasons, and the Navy's talked about

18:18

this extensively, is is investing in the

18:19

supply chain, right? Um, when you don't

18:22

when you only build five commercial

18:23

ships a year, your gen set

18:25

manufacturers, the marine engine

18:27

manufacturers also don't have to produce

18:29

at a at a very high rate. So one of the

18:31

things that we get the luxury of doing u

18:33

by being vertically integrated is that

18:34

we get to work with these manufacturers

18:36

directly do non-recurring engineering

18:37

work invest in really digitizing a lot

18:40

of the components that historically have

18:42

been very analog right um you know you

18:44

asked earlier like what do people what

18:46

do the people do on the ships like what

18:47

are they going to do if if the ships are

18:48

autonomous well when you think about you

18:50

know Dina mentioned the life cycle of

18:51

these ships are 30 years you think about

18:53

a ship that was built 30 years ago you

18:55

know you have people that are doing

18:56

extremely manual things in the engine

18:58

room that today should be extremely

19:00

trivial to automate through software.

19:02

Um, and so a lot of that work actually

19:04

gets completely absorbed by the software

19:06

stack and so you don't have to worry

19:07

about it. Um, and as we choose

19:09

components, we invest in the supply

19:10

chain. We invest in invest in the

19:11

industrial base. We actually help bring

19:14

all of these analog components that for

19:15

a long time were you know meant to be

19:18

operated by humans. We give them

19:19

software APIs. We make sure that they

19:21

can be controlled by you know MCP or

19:23

software stack somewhere else and can be

19:25

you know remotely accessed and whatnot.

19:27

Um,

19:27

>> so the complexity is going to go down

19:29

massively when you're building one of

19:31

these. Yeah,

19:32

>> absolutely. Yeah. And and you know,

19:33

frankly, I don't think the the person

19:35

who's sitting in the engine room is

19:36

super thrilled about it anyway.

19:37

>> No, not a great idea.

19:38

>> You're actually changing the um you're

19:40

democratizing the decision-m, right?

19:41

Like now there's going to be you have

19:43

more mass out in the ocean. More sailor

19:45

is going to be making decisions about

19:46

what those what that mass is going to be

19:48

doing and where assets are going to be

19:49

instead of worrying about, you know,

19:51

coolant pressure in an engine, right?

19:53

Um, and so, you know, when we think

19:56

about the the actual design, there's

19:59

there's a lot of different variables

20:00

there. There's some components that are

20:01

commercial off the shelves, right? Elon

20:03

in the early days, um, from a compute

20:05

perspective, they had to invest in A6,

20:07

right? The comput stack wasn't there to

20:08

run, you know, large models and and run

20:10

inference at the speeds and and power

20:11

budgets that they wanted to. In 2026,

20:14

it's a totally different game, right?

20:16

Um, and so there's there's a lot of

20:18

different parts of the supply chain

20:19

that, you know, sometimes we're looking

20:20

at, you know, investing in the

20:22

industrial base and making sure that,

20:23

you know, our engine manufacturers and

20:25

genet manufacturers are keeping up. Um,

20:27

on the other side, there's there's

20:28

particular components that we're like,

20:30

hey, the marine industry actually hasn't

20:32

had this level of investment in in a

20:34

long time, so we're going to have to

20:35

build this in house. Um, you know, a

20:37

couple of examples around that are

20:38

related to a lot of the electronics,

20:40

related to the sensors and compute. Um,

20:42

but you know, bunch of different things

20:44

there that that help us build and

20:46

assemble quickly.

20:52

>> Starting a business usually means

20:54

juggling a bunch of different services

20:56

just to look legit. Not anymore. With

20:58

Northwest Registered Agent, you get a

21:00

complete business identity all in one

21:03

place. A business address, domain,

21:05

website, phone number, and more with

21:07

privacy protection built in from day

21:09

one. Don't spend hundreds or thousands

21:11

on services you can get from Northwest

21:14

for free. Visit

21:15

northwestregisteredagent.com/allinfree

21:20

and start using free resources to build

21:22

your business today.

21:25

>> Let's talk a little bit about Adino on

21:27

the business side. How you work with the

21:30

Department of War, formerly known as the

21:32

Department of Defense. Emil Michaels and

21:34

a bunch of the folks over there are

21:35

really focused on getting startups

21:38

essentially like you are uh more

21:40

contracts but you also are moving out I

21:43

assume of this cost plus world and

21:45

you're just figuring out hey what what's

21:47

the right price for this and take us

21:51

inside that paradigm shift. You have

21:54

these primes and then you have these up

21:56

starts and it seems like based on

22:00

history the incumbents sometimes don't

22:03

uh take this lying down. So take us

22:04

inside the paradigm shift from cost plus

22:08

to what these I guess they call the new

22:10

primes like yourself and Andrew are

22:12

doing.

22:13

>> Yep. And I'll just define cost plus

22:15

everybody that's listening basically

22:17

means hey we're going to go build you

22:19

something Mr. government and however

22:22

long that takes, however much it costs,

22:24

you're just going to pay us 10 to 15% on

22:27

top of that. So, I'm actually

22:29

incentivized and I'm not saying there's

22:31

malicious intent, but I'm incentivized

22:33

to make it take longer and cost more

22:35

because if it costs $100 million, well

22:38

then I only make $15 million. But if it

22:41

costs a billion dollars, then as a

22:43

company I make $150 million. So, there's

22:46

this perverse incentive to drive up

22:49

cost. Now, that's not the only reason

22:50

the industry is where it is today, but

22:53

we're we're very encouraged

22:56

by the push from the administration um

22:58

to adopt things at at speed and scale

23:00

and to do that quickly and to do that

23:02

differently and to move away from cost.

23:05

Plus, you hit it like we invest our own

23:07

capital. To date, we're we're just about

23:10

four years old. We've raised $2.5

23:11

billion in private capital. We're

23:14

pouring that into R&D. I remember when

23:16

we decided to build Marauder again 180

23:19

foot ship. Viv and I were talking and

23:22

it's like who who's crazy enough to go

23:25

and build a ship on Irad? And it's like

23:28

well well we are cuz that's what the

23:30

country needs. That's what it demands.

23:32

That's what we're going to go do. And

23:34

our investors are giving us the capital

23:36

to go do it. They're actually entrusting

23:38

us with that capital. That's the reverse

23:40

of what's happening in the large primes

23:43

where their investors are kind of

23:44

demanding share buybacks. They're saying

23:46

give us our capital back. So the country

23:49

very much needs us to build for needs

23:52

companies like us to build for the

23:54

future. Um, and when you look at what

23:56

the administration is doing, even just

23:57

in ship building, just recognizing that

24:00

ship building is a critical strategic

24:02

industry, right? The president, one of

24:04

the first things he did was put out the

24:06

maritime executive order that was

24:08

followed with the maritime action plan,

24:10

right? There's ships act sitting in

24:12

Congress. You had the Secretary of War

24:14

give a whole speech on defense

24:15

acquisition reform, talking about how

24:18

we're going to push the department to be

24:21

better, to move faster, to work with

24:23

companies like us that are building on

24:26

firm fixed price contracts that are

24:28

focused on delivering at speed and scale

24:30

and driving down cost for the taxpayer.

24:34

So all of that is extremely encouraging.

24:38

But I want to be I also want to be clear

24:39

here on the flip side. We're in the

24:42

early days, Jason. Like very early days.

24:45

When you look at the overall Defense

24:47

Department of Wars budget,

24:50

1%

24:52

1% goes to autonomous systems. That's

24:56

not nearly enough. Make that 5%. Make

24:58

that I don't know the right mix, but it

25:00

needs to go up and it needs to go up

25:02

quickly. I I'll just add one more thing

25:04

that um that you know historically ship

25:07

building you know the design is

25:09

bifurcated from the builder right so the

25:11

design someone gets paid to do the

25:12

design um and the groundup general

25:14

assembly and all of that and gets handed

25:16

off to a totally different person to go

25:17

build a ship um and I think there's a

25:19

statistic out there that's like 70% of

25:22

sequence critical components on on some

25:24

Navy ships are sole source suppliers

25:26

like single source suppliers um and so

25:28

to Dino's point it's not just that

25:30

you're incentivized to to take longer

25:32

it's that you're not incentivized to

25:33

change that necessarily um because you

25:35

know that you're still going to get

25:36

paid. Um whereas like from our

25:37

perspective when you own the design, you

25:39

own the shipyard, you know, software

25:41

engineers, ship builders, naval

25:42

architects, and welders can all all sit

25:44

down and eat lunch together in the yard.

25:46

Um there's end to end optimizations that

25:47

you get that, you know, the system from

25:50

a from a historical perspective just

25:52

wasn't set up to gain.

25:53

>> Yeah. Let's do a little uh look at what

25:56

happened in the straight of Hormuz. Uh

25:58

we weren't able to control it

26:00

completely. doesn't seem like anybody in

26:02

history has been able to uh control it.

26:05

If we were to fast forward and you had

26:07

your entire fleet, you had let's assume

26:11

uh not unlimited but massive capacity,

26:15

how would you or would you be able to

26:18

secure something like the straight of

26:20

Hormuz with these autonomous vehicles?

26:22

What might that look like? Take us into

26:24

a you know scenario five years from now.

26:26

What would it take?

26:27

>> That's the type of scenario that that

26:29

we're building for. I think before

26:31

talking about the scenario, let's talk

26:33

about the straight of Hormuz itself,

26:35

right? The environment, the part of the

26:37

world like what neighborhood is it in,

26:39

right? It it connects. So you have the

26:41

Persian Gulf which is 200 miles wide

26:43

which narrows down to a 20 mile wide

26:45

strip which is the straight of Hormuz

26:47

and then it connects to the Indian Ocean

26:49

and connects these large oil producing

26:51

countries to global markets. On the one

26:55

side of the Persian Gulf, you have, you

26:57

know, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, UAE,

27:01

Qatar, and Oman. And on the other side

27:04

of the Persian Gulf, the north side is

27:06

all controlled by Iran.

27:09

So now Iran is saying, well, how are we

27:11

going to disrupt traffic in the straight

27:13

of Hormuz? Well, it's only a 20 mile

27:15

wide stretch. I can use missiles. I can

27:17

use fast attack vessels. I can use naval

27:19

mines. I can use cheap drones because I

27:21

don't have a large distance to cover. I

27:24

can launch these things anywhere from

27:25

shore. So, it becomes this completely

27:28

chaotic environment that sending in

27:30

naval destroyers into or trying to get

27:32

commercial ships pass becomes extremely

27:35

dangerous. So, using large numbers of

27:37

autonomous vessels, you can combat these

27:39

threats in completely different ways.

27:41

You can offer scale, persistence, and

27:43

risk reduction in ways that, you know,

27:45

man vessels just can't. And again, we

27:48

won't get into too many of the specifics

27:50

on the types of operations that we're

27:52

building towards, but autonomy is a way

27:55

to counter these effects, these these um

27:59

these effects that are overwhelen

28:02

meant to be countered by traditional man

28:04

ships alone. We can counter that with

28:07

scale and technology and keep people out

28:09

of harm's way.

28:10

>> Well, you have some small ships. So

28:12

yeah, you got the cutless and you got

28:14

the spy glass in this uh you know

28:16

buildout. Those are 6 foot 15t or

28:20

whatever.

28:21

>> We actually started with those and I and

28:22

I'll give you an interesting story. We

28:24

actually don't build those aren't we

28:25

haven't productized those. Those were

28:27

great subscale demonstrators but our

28:29

real flagship product is Corsair. And

28:32

when you talk about again the the

28:33

scenario in the straight of four moves

28:35

and what type of volume can we bring

28:38

there like it's not only five years in

28:40

the future. We could build 2,000 Corsair

28:43

per year right now at our manufacturing

28:46

facility in Austin.

28:47

>> So I I know you live in Austin. We'd

28:49

love to show you around. When you see it

28:51

when you see it, it actually comes to

28:53

life. You're like, "Oh, wait. We can

28:55

actually build thousands of these

28:56

vessels every single year."

28:58

>> How many would you need? th000 5,000 in

29:01

the straight hormonous I don't think

29:02

it's a 20 mile wide straight

29:05

>> so you're just going to and and they

29:06

this is their offensive strategy they

29:08

have these speedboats that they use I

29:10

don't know what they're called but

29:12

>> they call them fast attack vessels

29:13

>> fast attack vessels these guys

29:15

essentially are kamicazi right they just

29:17

zip in you know no regard for safety in

29:20

their life etc and they will attack

29:23

>> they're using fast attack vessels

29:25

they're using cheap drones so you have

29:27

to be able to count have counter UAS

29:29

capabilities. They're you they're using

29:31

mines. They're just floating mines into

29:33

the straight without regard for what

29:36

those mines may set off. So, it's a

29:39

really complicated environment that you

29:41

need to bring a lot of capabilities

29:43

towards.

29:44

>> Yeah. But it sounds like VIB with

29:46

artificial intelligence, which is the

29:48

next card that I think is going to turn

29:49

over. You put these Corsaires out there.

29:52

Could they with AI be able to, you know,

29:55

be using satellite data from planet or

29:59

whoever is providing it to just and or

30:01

military satellites and just zip out

30:03

there and know, say, somebody's putting

30:04

out some mines. Hey, somebody's putting

30:06

out some of these fast attack vehicles.

30:08

Just intercept them. And now they have

30:10

an actual cost, human life, and a

30:13

limited amount of resources. And hey,

30:14

we're America and we have you guys

30:17

building ships at scale. They don't have

30:19

this ability to build AI based ships. So

30:21

talk about what AI on these ships could

30:23

do eventually.

30:25

>> Yeah. So I would I would say today, you

30:27

know, there's a bunch of different, you

30:29

know, machine learning applications that

30:30

run on our boat today. Um there's heavy

30:32

amounts of compute on all of our crafts.

30:34

Um that allows people to have tons of

30:37

capability, whether it's, you know, the

30:39

navigation and kind of the autopilot or

30:41

self-driving of the craft itself or

30:43

compute for payloads, whether that's

30:44

counter UAS, as Dino mentioned, or or a

30:47

bunch of other things really. Um there's

30:48

a variety of different mission sets. The

30:50

end state here is that you know you have

30:52

a distributed fleet you know across the

30:55

ocean that you know in variable like

30:57

listen the ocean is a tumultuous place

30:59

like by default without war zone like

31:00

the ocean's still bad um you know

31:02

saltwater hits antennas you lose you

31:04

lose comms uh so there's a bunch of

31:06

different communications on this there's

31:08

a bunch of different sensors um all of

31:10

those things kind of areworked together

31:12

with ML with a bunch of different

31:14

software components of the software

31:16

stack to make sure that you can

31:18

basically translate intent

31:20

from a commander or a sailor and then

31:22

result in a mission outcome.

31:23

>> Let's talk Dino a little bit about the

31:25

adversary China and they have started to

31:28

put weapons on robots. I'm assuming that

31:32

they're doing the same if they're

31:34

willing to put it on a you know one of

31:36

those dog robots like the spot robots.

31:38

They're putting weapons on them. They're

31:39

demonstrating it and whatever they're

31:41

demonstrating they've already got in

31:44

production. Let's just call it what it

31:45

is. And they're not signing some UN

31:48

treaty to not put autonomous and AI

31:50

weapons. This is a different type of

31:51

adversary. And I'm sure North Korea and

31:54

and other bad guys are doing similar

31:56

things. We have um I believe treaties

32:01

where we're not allowed to put weapons

32:03

and use AI based weapons. Am I correct

32:05

about that? In the West here,

32:07

>> there is a autonomous weapon system

32:09

standard called 3009 that basically

32:11

outlines exactly how AI can be used on

32:14

an on an autonomous system. Yeah,

32:15

>> tell us all about that. Like or cuz this

32:17

is the Robocop scenario. This is the

32:20

robotic soldier or the robotic boat

32:23

that's able to engage the enemy without

32:25

a human, you know, if it loses comms or

32:27

to do a kamicazi mission, which seems

32:30

like something we might have to do.

32:32

These are things we might have to do,

32:33

Dino, versus the Chinese because they're

32:36

not signing these treaties. They are not

32:37

thinking ethically. They are not

32:40

respecting the Declaration of Human

32:42

Rights. They've got their own playbook.

32:43

Yep. Yeah. And I think the the important

32:46

thing to to articulate here is

32:48

especially when you use the kind of

32:50

Robocop example and just to kind of

32:53

quell people's fears a little bit is

32:55

even in that example where we're sending

32:58

boats off the off of Taiwan and we're in

33:01

the Taiwan Strait and they're engaging,

33:03

we're still using artificial

33:04

intelligence to bifurcate between an

33:07

enemy vessel and a friendly vessel,

33:09

between a non-combatant and a combatant.

33:11

And people are still making the

33:13

decisions and setting the mission

33:15

intent. It's just government policy

33:17

that's setting, okay, when are you

33:19

authorized to engage versus not.

33:21

Artificial intelligence actually just

33:23

gives the military the opportunity to

33:25

one operate at a greater scale and then

33:28

operate more efficiently. These aren't

33:30

robots actually just making decisions on

33:32

when to go to war or not.

33:33

>> Got it. So it says, hey, this is a bad

33:36

guy. Hey, our recommendation is to, you

33:40

know, neutralize it. And then a human

33:42

has to say, okay, neutralize it. But if

33:44

you're up against an adversary who says,

33:47

hey, no, no, we built this thing.

33:48

Anybody comes in to the blockade in

33:51

Taiwan, which, you know, we think is uh,

33:53

you know, a pretty significant nonzero

33:56

probability in our lifetime. If you're

33:58

up against somebody who says, "I'm just

34:00

going to have these ships kill anything

34:02

that's not our ship." Period. Full stop.

34:05

Then we lose, don't we?

34:07

>> No. Because the the technologies the all

34:10

you're doing is putting policy

34:13

thresholds and approval thresholds into

34:15

the technology. There's a real world

34:17

scenario where doomsday scenario, we go

34:20

to World War II, the Taiwan Strait is a

34:22

complete conflict. Exactly what you

34:24

said. Our commanders are going to make

34:26

that same judgment, right? and they be

34:27

like, "Hey, if anything, there's no

34:29

fishing boats out here right now."

34:31

>> Yeah.

34:31

>> There's no cruise ships coming through.

34:34

>> If you're not if you're not a friendly

34:36

vessel, you're an enemy vessel. And

34:37

that's that. And our technologies

34:39

actually enables that. What we were

34:41

talking about earlier is like the

34:43

autonomy, the artificial intelligence,

34:44

and everything else is there. And you're

34:46

building the policies into the software

34:48

based on government procedures. And when

34:51

those authorizations need to be in

34:52

place, those authorizations will change

34:56

based on

34:58

the threat environment that we're in.

35:00

>> Is the plan for you to sell to our

35:03

allies? And what are the rules there?

35:04

Because it sounds like we need as many

35:07

ships for our navy as we can get, but if

35:10

you can get up to capacity, then hey,

35:12

the French, the Germans, and the English

35:15

have essentially just stopped making

35:17

ships, right? and they they they have

35:19

very deprecated militaries. My

35:21

understanding is the only people who are

35:22

really doing a great job at this are the

35:24

folks in South Korea which I believe are

35:26

building but one ship for us. So maybe

35:27

you could talk about the other uh top

35:30

countries in the world, democracies and

35:32

our allies and what their capability is

35:34

and then your ability to help arm them

35:36

and sell to them.

35:37

>> I mean very very focused on our allies

35:39

and partners. If you talk to the

35:41

Department of War, if you talk to the

35:43

United States Navy, they actually want

35:44

our allies and partners to have these

35:46

capabilities as well. This is this is

35:49

going to be a combined effort, right? We

35:51

mentioned earlier that China has 57% of

35:54

the world's ship building capacity.

35:56

That's not limited to just that one

35:59

industry. We could go industry by

36:01

industry and talk about their

36:02

manufacturing might and their

36:03

manufacturing dominance. Um, so you

36:06

really do need a combined effort. We

36:08

need our allies and partners to have

36:09

this technology. We're talking to um our

36:12

allies in Asia, obviously, in Europe,

36:15

and in the Middle East right now about

36:17

getting not only our our products there,

36:20

but also how do we stand up, you know,

36:22

domestic production in those countries.

36:25

How do we give them the sovereign

36:26

capability? How do we have production

36:28

lines overseas so that they're already

36:30

forward deployed if we get into a

36:32

conflict in the first place?

36:33

>> Pretty amazing stuff. And you have an

36:34

announcement today, I understand, that

36:36

we're going to share with the all-in

36:38

audience for the first time.

36:39

>> That's right. So, we've been working on

36:41

Port Alpha for a long time now. So, Port

36:44

Alpha, just for the listeners, is our

36:47

shipyard of the future. This is going to

36:49

bring American ship building back to a

36:52

place that we haven't seen since World

36:54

War II. Um, to be clear, we're already

36:57

operating a shipyard. We have a shipyard

36:58

in Franklin, Louisiana. That's where

37:00

we're building Marauder. We're ramping

37:02

that up to 20 Marauder. We can bring

37:04

that up to 50 marauders per year, every

37:07

single year. And that is a 100 acre

37:10

shipyard.

37:11

What we're doing at Port Alpha is 10xing

37:14

that. We're looking at a shipyard that

37:16

is well over a thousand acres. We've

37:18

been doing this search for over a year

37:20

now on what is the ideal location for

37:23

this shipyard. Where are we going to

37:24

find the right partner, the right land,

37:26

the right workforce, the right community

37:28

to be a part of? Um, and we're proud to

37:30

announce that we found that in

37:32

Brownsville, Texas. So, we're we're

37:34

headquartered in Austin. We're going to

37:36

be basing Port Alpha in Brownsville.

37:38

We're going to start on a 800 acre plot

37:41

of land, which in and of itself, 800

37:44

acres is now the largest shipyard in the

37:46

United States.

37:47

>> Amazing.

37:48

>> Just to give you a sense of scale, we

37:50

have the opportunity over time to scale

37:52

that to 4,000 acres. We're going to

37:55

invest billions of dollars into this

37:57

project. We're going to create 10,000

38:00

jobs over the next 10 years and we're

38:03

going to bring ship building in this

38:04

country back again to a place that we

38:06

haven't seen since World War II. And

38:08

we're just grateful for the partnership

38:10

from the state, from Governor Abbott,

38:13

from Cameron County, and then the city

38:15

and the port of Brownsville for making

38:16

this happen.

38:17

>> I mean, this is one of the great things,

38:19

Vib, about being based in Texas. They

38:21

let us build things in Texas. Yeah. As a

38:23

recent resident here, it's pretty

38:24

amazing to live in a state where the

38:27

state's like, "What do you want to

38:28

build? How can we help?" as opposed to,

38:31

"Hey, uh, you know, f off like they told

38:34

uh Elon in California." And he got the

38:36

message received reply uh to that

38:38

lunatic. So, maybe you could talk a

38:40

little bit about operating VIB in Texas

38:42

and the crazy support you get from

38:45

Abbott and everybody.

38:46

>> One of the uh questions that we used to

38:48

get like back in the day was, "You guys

38:50

are a maritime company. There's no water

38:52

in Austin. What are you guys doing

38:53

there? Um, and I would say like, you

38:55

know, Austin has this like magical um

38:58

kind of nexus of both digital and

39:00

physical labor forces. Like you can find

39:02

software talent, you can find AI talent,

39:04

you can find designers. Um, but you can

39:06

also tap into, you know, the industrial

39:08

base from San Antonio, from the oil and

39:10

gas industry in Houston. Um, and when

39:12

you marry those two together, like you

39:13

can actually start to co-design these

39:16

things across the entire stack, right? I

39:17

mentioned earlier like typically ship

39:19

design and ship build is is totally

39:21

independent. Um but with port alpha we

39:24

get the luxury of like green field

39:26

designing what the the manufacturing

39:29

plant for ships should look like. Um and

39:31

so you can design the you can you can

39:33

optimize the design as ship for the yard

39:34

and the design of the yard for the ship.

39:36

And it's very similar to kind of like

39:37

you know how how companies today like do

39:39

hardware software co-design on chips,

39:41

right? You design the compiler and they

39:42

stick together to optimize both for for

39:44

the other. Um, and we can we have the

39:46

luxury of being able to do that for for

39:48

ships here. And um, I I can't think of a

39:50

better place to do it than Texas.

39:52

>> Well, and uh, Starbase is right down the

39:54

block. SpaceX obviously and Elon's made

39:57

that work. And I think it's like a four

39:59

what, maybe four, five, six hour drive

40:00

down to the coast. Yeah. So you guys can

40:03

either zip there on a PJ or you can just

40:05

drive. So it's pretty straightforward.

40:07

>> It's pretty straightforward. It's easy

40:08

for logistics. What what SpaceX has did

40:11

has done in Brownsville is incredible. I

40:13

think what Brownsville has done for

40:15

SpaceX and helping them build out build

40:18

the community down there. Um, we were

40:21

very impressed, very very excited to be

40:23

basing Port Alpha there. And look, at

40:26

the end of the day, it's the people that

40:27

are going to make this work. It's it's

40:29

the labor force. It's the workforce. Viv

40:31

mentioned it earlier, and we can talk

40:33

about, you know, why the American ship

40:35

building industry has declined so much,

40:38

but it's the supply chain and the

40:40

workforce that has suffered the most.

40:42

And so like one of the things we focus

40:44

on is really how do we rebuild that

40:46

workforce? How do we upskill existing

40:49

talent to advance manufacturing? How do

40:51

we take somebody that's building a car

40:53

at Ford and get them building ships very

40:56

very efficiently, very quickly, right?

40:59

And that actually all starts with the

41:00

design. If you design a ship from the

41:03

ground up from a first principles

41:04

approach to be more simplistic to be

41:07

designed and manufactured at scale, then

41:09

you can put in the training, the work

41:11

instruction, the processes and

41:13

everything else where hey, let's go make

41:16

this much faster. Let's train, let's

41:18

build the workforce. And then let's be

41:20

honest, like you have to make it cool

41:22

for young people to go work in a

41:23

shipyard again. You have to you have to

41:26

pay them good wages. like every one of

41:28

our employees, every welder, every pipe

41:30

fitter, um they have good wages, the

41:33

same benefits as our Silicon Valley

41:35

software engineers, they have equity in

41:37

our company, um they're they're fired

41:39

up. Like I mentioned our our shipyard in

41:41

Louisiana. Like people are fired up down

41:44

there. And it's not just the workforce,

41:46

it's the community. Like some of the

41:48

some of the stories I hear when I'm down

41:50

there are like so encouraging. People

41:52

are like, I'm wearing my hat in the

41:53

grocery store and people are coming up

41:55

to me saying, "You guys are kicking

41:57

butt. Keep building ships because nobody

42:00

else in the country is doing what we're

42:03

doing."

42:03

>> And these are great salaries. People are

42:06

getting paid significant amounts of

42:07

money obviously to work in manufacturing

42:10

at your company at uh down at Starbase.

42:12

And now you have these two incredible

42:14

companies. I I don't know if there's any

42:16

other ones in Brownsville, but this is a

42:18

small community. There's only like

42:19

200,000 people down there. This is going

42:21

to be an incredible boom town. Oh, it's

42:23

going to be incredible. SpaceX, you

42:24

know, and

42:27

I mentioned earlier like the cost of

42:29

building ships in the United States. And

42:31

the United States just isn't competitive

42:33

in the commercial market. And again, we

42:35

can go through the specifics and what

42:37

happened over time, five to six times

42:40

the cost of building a ship in China. We

42:43

think just by investing in product and

42:46

processes and new shipyards, we can cut

42:49

the cost of a ship in the United States

42:51

in half. So if you have a ship that

42:53

costs $300 million, we can get that

42:55

under $150 million. And that's not by

42:59

simply just paying people less. We're

43:02

paying people more, but we're investing

43:04

in our product. We're investing in the

43:06

process. We're designing the product to

43:08

be built that way in the first place.

43:10

So, we're making the investments that

43:11

are needed for long-term sustainability

43:13

and to rebuild the workforce.

43:16

>> All right. If people want to come work

43:17

with you, VIB, how can they apply their

43:20

career page and what are you looking

43:21

for? What what talent do you need to

43:23

come do this incredibly patriotic duty

43:26

and go work at Seronic?

43:27

>> Yeah, I mean sur uh we have a careers

43:30

page. Um you can you reach out on

43:32

Twitter, LinkedIn, whatever you want. Um

43:34

we're we're hiring pretty aggressively

43:36

right now. I would say that, you know,

43:37

the biggest thing, you know, we look for

43:40

generally speaking is, you know,

43:41

especially in 2026 when, you know, Chad

43:45

GBT and Claude are getting so much

43:46

better every year. Um, it's pretty

43:48

important right now to be fairly, you

43:50

know, neuroplastic. Um, you know, be

43:53

ready to adapt for what the future looks

43:54

like. Computing is changing. Um, you

43:57

know, there's there's going to be agents

43:59

that can help you on the manufacturing

44:01

floor to to assemble faster if you have

44:03

an issue. uh there's all these digital

44:05

systems that are they're kind of

44:06

changing the paradigm here. I mean, when

44:08

we first got to Golfcraft um in in done

44:10

in Louisiana, a lot of the processes

44:12

were were pretty much pen and pen and

44:14

paper, right? And that's pretty common

44:15

across most shipyards. Um so, like kind

44:18

of bringing that into the 21st century

44:19

really quickly. Um I mean, it's just

44:22

going to require people to be um

44:23

thoughtful um adapt to the future and um

44:26

and really be passionate and excited and

44:28

and about about kind of building the

44:30

future.

44:31

>> Yeah. go to the uh website s ar nic.com

44:35

join the mission 300 jobs listed on the

44:38

website there's something there for

44:39

everybody and uh listen just as a fellow

44:43

Greek dino uh you know we were obviously

44:47

the cradle of innovation and or science

44:49

math technology art and everything

44:52

happened but we were also the great

44:53

warriors uh and we patrolled the sea

44:55

obviously Greece has a lot of coastlines

44:57

so you're you're doing our Greek u

45:00

brothers and sisters and ancestors Greek

45:02

has a lot of Greek has a lot of

45:03

coastline and they're actually big in

45:04

the shipping industry. So now they are

45:06

big. Yeah.

45:07

>> So So now I hear more more often than

45:09

not now. Oh, it's good to see a Greek in

45:12

building ships.

45:13

>> I you know what? I can sleep now at

45:15

night. I was very worried about the

45:16

straight of Hormuz. I was worried about

45:18

the Pacific theater, the South China

45:21

Sea. Dino, now that I know that my Greek

45:23

brother is on top of this, my head's

45:26

going to hit the pillow. I'm going to go

45:27

right. I'm going to sleep like a baby

45:28

tonight. I know you got us covered. Uh

45:31

thanks so much guys and uh sincerely uh

45:33

on behalf of all Americans like thank

45:36

you for doing this work. You know this

45:38

is something where we really need

45:40

technologists and entrepreneurs uh to

45:43

really help us innovate because we're

45:44

falling behind and we're the good guys

45:46

in this. We're the ones who are

45:48

spreading democracy and freedom and

45:49

protecting that. The only thing in the

45:51

world that isn't trending in the right

45:53

direction, man, if you look at

45:54

lifespans, if you look at, you know,

45:56

infant mortality, if you look at uh

45:59

people's standard of living, everything

46:01

is trending in the world in the right

46:03

direction except the spread of

46:05

democracy, which has been on the decline

46:07

in our lifetime. Let that sink in,

46:09

folks. More people living under

46:10

authoritarians than democracies. It's

46:13

it's a modest amount, but you've seen

46:14

the statistics, I'm sure, Vib and and

46:16

Dino. And we need to have a great

46:19

military. We need to have this advanced

46:21

technology if we're going to maintain uh

46:23

the number of people living under a

46:25

democracy of in and freedom and

46:27

hopefully increase it. A lot of bad guys

46:30

out there and uh you know just thank you

46:32

so much for doing this work.

46:33

>> That's right. Well, thank you for having

46:35

us and I I will end on a positive note

46:37

where look we're seeing that starting to

46:39

turn around in a really big way. It's

46:41

not just Sironic. You mentioned Android.

46:43

there SpaceX and Palanteer before that

46:46

and now there's just a big wave a big

46:48

push into defense tech because people

46:51

realize the importance and the magnitude

46:54

of the moment that we are living in

46:56

right now. I I tell our team I'm like

46:58

this is our generation's version of the

47:00

space race.

47:01

>> Make make no mistake about it and we

47:04

cannot lose. So that's how hard we're

47:06

working at. That's how we're working

47:08

with a sense of urgency and there's a

47:10

lot of other companies into the coming

47:12

into the space that are working with

47:13

that same sense of urgency. So I am I am

47:16

very optimistic. I know this country can

47:18

do it. When we put our minds and we get

47:20

a collective effort behind something,

47:23

nobody can beat us. So

47:24

>> nobody can. Yeah. Nobody can beat us.

47:25

And listen, if you were thinking of

47:27

going, listen, there's no no dig to

47:28

anybody, but if you're thinking about

47:30

going and optimizing an ad network at

47:32

some big tech company, like it's

47:34

incredibly boring and it's incredibly

47:36

meaningful. You'll get 20, 30 years into

47:38

your career and you'll say, "What did I

47:39

do?" Go work at Seronic. You'll get

47:42

couple of years into your career and you

47:44

say, "I'm doing important work."

47:45

>> That's right. That's right. Every person

47:47

that walks through the door every single

47:49

day is quite literally changing the

47:50

world and we remind them of that and

47:52

they they know it.

47:53

>> Yeah. All right, Vib Dino, thank you so

47:55

much for coming on and we'll see you

47:56

next time on the All-In Interview.

48:05

[music]

48:14

>> I'm [music] going all in.

Interactive Summary

This episode of the All-In interview series features Dino Mavukus and Vib Alakar, co-founders of the defense tech company Seronic. They discuss their mission to revolutionize the shipbuilding industry by building fully autonomous ships, addressing the significant decline in U.S. shipbuilding capacity compared to China. A key focus of the discussion is the role of autonomous platforms in high-stakes environments, such as a recent successful rescue operation in the Strait of Hormuz. The founders also announce the establishment of 'Port Alpha,' a massive new shipyard in Brownsville, Texas, intended to restore U.S. competitive advantage in naval production through first-principles design and vertical integration.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts