HomeVideos

Stop Buying AI Stocks NOW. Watch Out For THIS...

Now Playing

Stop Buying AI Stocks NOW. Watch Out For THIS...

Transcript

408 segments

0:00

Hey, everyone. I'm starting a series on

0:01

risk management, because that's my area

0:03

of expertise after 12 years of

0:05

experience working at Goldman Sachs. And

0:06

in this video, I will cover how I

0:08

identify warning signs before major

0:11

market declines, how I hedge my

0:13

portfolio, how I prepare for volatility,

0:15

and most importantly, how I protect

0:17

capital when the market environment

0:19

starts to change. Now, look at this.

0:20

This is really interesting. Look at my

0:22

YouTube views. Now, look at the market.

0:25

These are two separate charts. However,

0:28

you will see that they look very

0:29

similar. Now, I want to overlay YouTube

0:32

views over the stock market, and you'll

0:34

see something very interesting. You will

0:36

see that there's a huge correlation, or

0:39

basically, whenever my YouTube views go

0:41

down, that the stock market also goes

0:43

down. I'm launching an indicator that

0:44

can help investors predict when the

0:46

market is likely to crash before it

0:48

crashes. This indicator will connect the

0:50

following three criteria. The first is a

0:52

speculation and sentiment score. This

0:55

looks at things like YouTube views,

0:56

retail investor attention, and Google

0:58

Trends, option activity, and other

1:00

measures of investor enthusiasm. The

1:03

idea is simple. When everyone becomes

1:04

extremely bullish and speculation starts

1:06

accelerating, complacency may be

1:08

building. The second is a market health

1:10

score. Here, I'll look beneath the major

1:12

indexes at things like market breadth,

1:15

how many stocks are trading above their

1:16

200-day moving average, small cap

1:18

performance, credit spreads, volatility,

1:21

and whether fewer stocks are actually

1:22

participating in the rally. And third is

1:25

a macro and liquidity score. This looks

1:27

at the bigger economic picture,

1:29

financial conditions, credit markets,

1:31

earnings revisions, liquidity, interest

1:33

rates, and other signs that the

1:34

environment supporting stocks may be

1:36

weakening. So, let's focus in this video

1:38

on how I spot market crashes before it

1:41

may happen. This is only part one of the

1:44

series, and today we're focusing on

1:45

detection, how I identify when the

1:47

market risk is starting to build. In

1:49

part two, I'll show you exactly how I

1:51

prepare and adjust my portfolio when

1:53

these warning signs appear. Then in part

1:55

three, I'll break down how I actually

1:57

hedge and protect my portfolio if the

1:59

risk of a major decline becomes much

2:01

higher. If you want access to my full

2:03

market risk scorecard including live

2:04

updates to my YouTube views and

2:06

sentiment indicator, you can now find it

2:08

in description below. It's only in this

2:10

specific video. Now, the goal is simple.

2:12

Identifying when market risk is building

2:15

early so you have more time to prepare

2:17

before potential dangerous market

2:19

conditions develop. My market warning

2:21

score will be from one to 10 and higher

2:23

score that a crash is more likely to

2:25

happen in the near term. Let's start

2:27

with why this is even reliable to begin

2:30

with. For that, we need to understand

2:31

how retail attention matters. So,

2:33

markets aren't driven purely by

2:36

earnings, revenue, or economic data.

2:38

They're driven by people and people are

2:40

emotional. Fear and greed can push

2:42

prices much further in either direction

2:44

than fundamentals alone might suggest.

2:47

Think about what happens during a strong

2:49

bull market. Stocks are starting to go

2:50

up, investors start making money, and

2:52

suddenly people who weren't paying

2:54

attention market six months ago are now

2:56

becoming interested. And now there's

2:58

more people rushing to the market to buy

3:01

up stocks because they think that it's

3:03

easy money. They see their friends

3:04

making money, they see stocks constantly

3:06

appearing on social media, and they

3:07

start searching for stocks to buy,

3:09

watching investing videos, opening up

3:11

brokerage accounts, and sometimes taking

3:13

significantly more risk or investing

3:16

money that they would not have even

3:17

invested in the first place. And that is

3:20

where FOMO starts to become important.

3:22

When markets have already gone up

3:23

substantially, investors often become

3:26

even more confident, unfortunately, and

3:28

that is precisely when prices are

3:30

becoming more expensive. Instead of

3:32

asking how much could I lose, people

3:34

start asking how much more money can I

3:36

make. That behavior is exactly what my

3:38

indicator is looking to measure. You can

3:40

look at Google search activity, you can

3:42

look at options activity, you can look

3:44

at retail trading volumes, you can look

3:46

at social media engagement. And in my

3:47

case, I have another data set that I've

3:49

been watching for years, our very own

3:52

YouTube channel. When hundreds of

3:53

thousands of retail investors suddenly

3:55

become much more interested in the stock

3:56

market content, I think that's really

3:58

worth paying attention to. It doesn't

4:00

mean that YouTube views predict a crash

4:02

alone. If my views double tomorrow,

4:04

obviously I'm not going to be selling my

4:05

portfolio because I think the market's

4:07

overvalued based off of my views alone.

4:09

Instead, it is a data point and a piece

4:11

of information that has really strangely

4:13

been very accurate in a backtest result.

4:16

When I had backtested my YouTube data

4:18

versus when markets were going down,

4:20

they were correlated at 0.79%

4:23

and we'll talk about what correlation

4:25

means later on in this video. So,

4:26

imagine that S&P 500 is still making new

4:29

highs. From the outside, everything

4:31

looks good, but underneath the surface,

4:32

fewer stocks are participating in the

4:35

rally. Small caps are weakening, credit

4:37

conditions are deteriorating, and

4:38

volatility is starting to behave

4:40

differently. Earnings expectations are

4:42

being revised lower. Meanwhile,

4:44

investors and specifically retail

4:46

investors are more bullish than ever.

4:48

That is a type of divergence that I am

4:51

looking for. Markets are extremely

4:53

emotional. When everything is going up,

4:55

investors tend to believe the good

4:56

environment will continue. They also

4:58

completely give up and you can see

5:00

videos of mine that usually would get 5x

5:03

the views that don't get any more

5:05

attention. That's how I know when the

5:06

bottom is near. All right, here's what

5:08

I'm seeing with YouTube views and why

5:09

this matters for investors. So, check

5:11

out my YouTube views which have been

5:13

steadily going down and check out QQQ,

5:15

which is basically the Nasdaq. This is

5:16

the ETF for the Nasdaq. Very, very

5:18

similar. And actually plot of them on

5:20

the same chart here with today, all the

5:23

days in July and now it's July 30th as

5:25

I'm recording this video. So, for the

5:26

month of July, I have basically taken my

5:29

views every single day, okay, and I have

5:31

taken the close price of QQQ. Of course,

5:34

on the weekends and on the holiday it

5:36

was closed. So, I have taken these two

5:38

numbers and I have ran a correlation.

5:40

I'm going to explain correlation in a

5:42

moment or I will soon in this video. And

5:44

you can see that surprisingly, this is

5:46

very shocking data, the correlation is

5:50

.86 for the views that I'm getting as

5:53

well as the market coming down. And I

5:55

plotted here as well. This actually

5:57

makes pretty logical sense. This means

5:59

that essentially when investor

6:01

enthusiasm, which I'm defining as one of

6:03

the data points in my indicator as my

6:05

YouTube views, which you can track as

6:07

well in my indicator that I have, is

6:09

that when people are searching for

6:11

option trading topics, stock market

6:14

topics, investing topics, which is what

6:16

I cover on this channel, and when that

6:18

search volume goes down, the stock

6:20

market is also going down. That

6:23

correlation is pretty clear. And what

6:25

I've seen recently is I've made a video

6:27

which is 54 minutes long, 4.7 thousand

6:29

less views. I made another video here, 1

6:32

hour and 27 minutes. Now, these videos

6:34

are typically I'm getting double or

6:36

triple or even quadruple the amount of

6:38

views when the market is hot. As soon as

6:40

I have a video that's not performing

6:42

well, that actually tells me some

6:44

important information,

6:45

which is that investors are not that

6:47

excited about the market because they're

6:49

feeling fearful. It's actually a very

6:50

important metric within my indicator

6:52

because this has been historically, on a

6:55

back test, extremely useful information.

6:58

Now, I want to show you a little bit

6:59

more about correlation and what

7:01

correlation actually looks like. So,

7:03

here is Nvidia stock and I'm going to

7:06

use Nvidia stock and compare it to AMD

7:08

stock so you can understand what

7:10

correlation does to your portfolio and

7:13

how to diversify better against stocks

7:15

that are correlated, which means that

7:17

they're going to fall down together. So,

7:19

here's Nvidia stock, okay, it's at $190

7:22

per share. We have a simple chart here,

7:23

okay? Pretty straightforward. Now, you

7:25

can also see correl here, which stands

7:27

for correlation 14 days, and I can

7:29

change this number and play around with

7:31

it. But we're just going to use 14 days

7:32

for now. Okay, so I'm going to add a

7:34

comparison. The comparison I'm going to

7:36

add is AMD. So, when I go into AMD right

7:38

down, you can see here on the chart that

7:41

of course they're very different, okay?

7:43

Over the last 6 months, they're very

7:44

different. Let me do 1 month here. Over

7:46

the last 3 months, as you can see here,

7:49

although the stocks are moving pretty

7:51

differently, and one stock's up 27%

7:54

whereas it's down 9% over the last 3

7:56

months, the correlation here is actually

7:59

.9, meaning similar to the chart that we

8:01

have seen earlier, that there is a very

8:03

strong relationship between these two

8:06

stocks moving together. Now, what I want

8:08

to do is pull up an AI stock, Nvidea,

8:11

ticker symbol NVDA, and I want to

8:13

compare it to another AI stock because I

8:15

want to show you how dangerous it is to

8:17

have multiple AI stocks. You can see

8:19

here, I am using NVDA and IREN, and they

8:23

have a correlation of .92, even stronger

8:26

relationship than AMD and Nvidia, which

8:28

anything over .75 is already a very

8:30

strong relationship. .92 basically means

8:33

you're practically owning the same

8:35

stock. So, if you have multiple stocks

8:38

in your portfolio, but they're in the

8:39

same sector, or specifically they're

8:41

tied to AI, you are not as diversified

8:43

as you think. The market is really

8:45

connected, which is why this data that I

8:47

have of my YouTube views and the QQQ

8:50

close price is also surprisingly

8:53

extremely correlated. So, whenever I

8:55

spend multiple thousands of dollars to

8:56

create awesome content on YouTube and

8:59

nobody subscribes or watches it, it

9:01

doesn't make me bitter, it doesn't make

9:02

me upset, it just makes me realize that

9:04

the investors who are very enthusiastic

9:06

in the market are now being very

9:08

fearful, it's actually a good indicator

9:10

that the market is likely to pull back

9:12

or have poor future performance. Let's

9:14

get into the next chapter of my

9:16

detection series and discuss

9:18

correlation. You might think you're

9:19

diversified because you own 15 or 20

9:22

different stocks. You have watched other

9:24

videos about diversifying and protecting

9:26

yourself, but if most of these companies

9:28

are exposed the same underlying risk

9:30

factors, your portfolio may be much more

9:33

concentrated than it actually looks.

9:35

During periods of market stress,

9:37

correlations can also increase.

9:39

Investors reduce risk, institutions

9:42

reposition portfolios, leverage gets

9:44

unwound, and selling can spread across

9:47

sectors, even if that specific sector

9:49

doesn't warrant a pullback. Suddenly, it

9:51

matters a lot less that you own 20

9:53

different stocks if 17 of them are

9:55

falling together. So, before we look at

9:57

a real example, let me quickly explain

9:59

what correlation actually means. Imagine

10:02

there are two completely different

10:03

stocks, stock A and stock B. If stock A

10:06

goes up and stock B tends to go up at

10:09

the same time, and when stock A falls,

10:11

stock B tends to fall with it, those

10:13

stocks have a positive correlation.

10:16

Correlation is generally measured -1 to

10:19

+1. A correlation near +1 means the two

10:22

investments have historically moved very

10:25

closely together. You can see an example

10:27

of correlation here on the screen, which

10:29

is exactly one. It's essentially just a

10:31

straight line. Now, here is a plot of

10:34

dots with a correlation of 0.8. You can

10:37

see how these two lines are very

10:39

related, but they're not exactly equal

10:42

to each other as the dots are spread out

10:44

and there are some outliers. Now,

10:47

correlation is explaining the

10:48

relationship between two things. A

10:51

simple example of that is height and

10:53

weight. So, the chart that I'm showing

10:55

you on the screen is actually a chart of

10:57

height and weight. Taller people tend to

11:00

weigh more, so as height increases,

11:02

weight generally increases, too, but

11:04

it's not perfect, which is why the dots

11:06

wouldn't form a perfectly straight line.

11:09

For example, height and weight are

11:10

positively correlated. In one study of

11:13

more than 11,800 adults, the correlation

11:15

was about 0.55.

11:18

So, taller people tend to weigh more,

11:20

but the relationship was nowhere near

11:22

perfect. Now, here's why this matters

11:24

for risk management and what it means

11:26

for your portfolio. Imagine I split my

11:28

money equally between five different

11:29

stocks. At first, that seems

11:31

diversified, but if all five have

11:33

extremely high correlations with each

11:35

other, a major stock can push almost the

11:37

entire portfolio in the same direction.

11:40

Compare that with a portfolio containing

11:42

investments whose returns aren't as

11:44

closely correlated, and you will see a

11:46

really big difference. One position

11:48

might be falling while another is

11:50

relatively stable or even moving higher.

11:53

It doesn't mean that low correlation

11:55

eliminates risk completely. It means

11:57

that you're less dependent on one market

11:59

factor determining what to your entire

12:02

portfolio. So, when I think about

12:03

diversification, I'm not just counting

12:05

positions. I'm asking how much of my

12:07

portfolio could realistically start

12:09

moving in the same direction at the same

12:11

time. Now, imagine what's happening at

12:13

the same time. The S&P 500 is near an

12:15

all-time high, retail investors are

12:17

extremely bullish, my YouTube views and

12:20

other measures of speculation are

12:22

exploding. Individually, none of these

12:24

indicators tell me a crash is definitely

12:25

happening. That's impossible to tell,

12:28

and nobody can really predict the

12:29

market. However, together, they're

12:31

telling me something much more

12:33

interesting. I was joking with my

12:34

community that I found how to predict

12:36

the market. And again, of course, nobody

12:38

can do that. Only maybe Michael Burry

12:40

can do that, and he's done that about 10

12:42

of the last three times. If you get that

12:43

joke, you get that joke, right? Means

12:45

that he can't even predict the market,

12:47

right? But when I look closer at my own

12:49

YouTube data, I've actually gained some

12:51

confidence that combining multiple

12:52

factors, especially my enthusiasm score,

12:54

performed surprisingly well for timing.

12:57

This unusual indicator, I believe, will

12:59

be very useful for you to protect your

13:01

portfolio going forward. I also think

13:03

it's a great way to get risk

13:05

management-focused together in a small

13:07

focused community. We can see the views

13:09

that I'm getting, how enthusiastic or

13:11

how greedy or how selfish or how fearful

13:14

investors are based off of the videos

13:16

that I'm making, and we can also use

13:18

other indicators to combine to make up a

13:20

full score to try to protect ourselves,

13:23

especially before a market crash may

13:25

happen. Because by the time that

13:27

everyone already agrees that there's a

13:28

problem in the market has already

13:30

repriced significantly. And I'm looking

13:32

to be early before momentum really

13:34

catches on and it's too late. Now, you

13:37

can subscribe for part two if you're

13:38

interested. I'll be using VIX as one of

13:40

the factors to understand within your

13:42

own risk management process. So, I'll be

13:44

diving deeper into risk management

13:45

topics and depending on how many likes

13:47

and interest this video gets, then I'll

13:49

consider making the part two. Check out

13:51

my YouTube if you're interested in my

13:53

own indicator based on my own data set

13:55

for my YouTube channel, then go ahead

13:56

and check out the link in the

13:57

description. Make sure to subscribe and

13:59

if you're interested in that indicator

14:00

that follows my YouTube data, then go

14:02

ahead and check it out right now.

Interactive Summary

The video introduces a series on risk management from an expert with 12 years of experience at Goldman Sachs. The author proposes a unique market indicator that predicts potential market downturns by combining sentiment analysis (using their own YouTube channel views as a proxy for retail investor enthusiasm), market health metrics, and macroeconomic data. The core premise is that when investor speculation and FOMO are at their peak, markets often reach complacency, signaling a higher risk of a crash. Additionally, the video emphasizes the importance of understanding correlation in portfolio diversification, warning that owning many stocks does not guarantee safety if they are all highly correlated.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts