HomeVideos

Kash Patel Defends FBI's New Policy on Bestiality. Kara and Scott Have Questions.

Now Playing

Kash Patel Defends FBI's New Policy on Bestiality. Kara and Scott Have Questions.

Transcript

1925 segments

0:00

Sydney Sweeney is probably going to be

0:02

soon the youngest self-made female

0:04

billionaire,

0:05

>> but I don't think she's like winning it.

0:10

[music]

0:12

>> Hi everyone, this is Pivot from New York

0:14

Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast

0:15

Network. I'm Cara Swisser

0:17

>> and I'm Scott Galloway.

0:18

>> Hey Scott, I just flew in from

0:19

California.

0:20

>> Oh, really? So did I before.

0:22

>> Oh well, here we are. But listen, I have

0:25

a lot to tell you about things I've been

0:26

doing this week, but we have a big

0:28

announcement breaking late yesterday. We

0:31

are going on tour.

0:33

>> Yes, we are. Super excited. Back in

0:36

Canada. We've added Denver, which I'm

0:38

excited about.

0:39

>> Well, let me let me see. We're kicking

0:41

off November 2nd in New York City, and

0:43

then we hit Toronto, Minneapolis, LA,

0:46

San Francisco, and Denver. And you can

0:49

head to pivotourre.com for tickets. We

0:51

do sell out pretty quickly, so please

0:53

get there. And we want all our fans

0:55

there. And if you're not following us on

0:57

social media, you're not going to get

0:58

all the latest announcement. And our our

1:00

handles are in the show notes. But let

1:03

me tell you something. It's going to be

1:04

good. We're going to have so many so

1:06

many amazing secret guests. Correct. We

1:08

are.

1:09

>> I got to give it to you, Cara. You give

1:10

good event. You're very good at this.

1:13

Um, you know, I just kind of

1:14

>> Is there anyone you absolutely want in

1:16

any of these cities? Toronto Sydney

1:18

Sweeney.

1:19

>> I I can try. I can

1:22

>> I know her boyfriend.

1:23

>> As a palette cleanser, what do you think

1:25

of all this controversy on the script?

1:28

>> You know, I don't care. I like it's

1:29

stupid. I don't think it's a good ad.

1:31

Okay. I just don't think it's a good ad.

1:32

I think it's a stupid purant ad and it's

1:35

not very clever. Like, if you go back

1:36

and watch the Brook Shields ads, which

1:38

were very controversial, they're very

1:40

funny. The the dialogue is super funny.

1:42

This is just dumb. It's like boobs. Oh,

1:44

so boobs and some boobs. And I get why

1:46

guys like it. What do you think? You

1:48

like boobs.

1:49

>> Um I think my taste is a little bit more

1:51

Well,

1:51

>> oh, all right. I'm sorry. I I forget

1:53

that you've developed

1:55

>> all the notion that it's ruining women's

1:56

sports and the outrage. I think it's

1:58

ridiculous. I think that if she were a

2:01

black gay progressive, uh it would be my

2:04

body, my choice, sexist work, um you

2:08

know, girl boss, and instead because

2:10

she's a white MAGA

2:13

uh Republican, everyone's outraged. No,

2:15

I think it's a double standard. What's

2:16

happening to you? Like [clears throat]

2:17

everyone's going away from Trump. You're

2:19

moving that direction. No, I don't think

2:21

so.

2:21

>> A critical thinker. It's entire This is

2:23

entire This is entire identity

2:25

escalation [ __ ] politics.

2:27

>> No, it's just a stupid ad. Like I don't

2:29

I don't really care.

2:30

>> I'm not talking about the ad. I'm not

2:31

I'm talking about I'm talking about the

2:32

reaction to it.

2:33

>> Oh, I don't know. I just you know I

2:35

think if you if you're a woman in

2:37

sports, you have made a lot of strides

2:39

>> and it's irritating. It's it it's

2:42

>> Is it irritating when Sports Illustrated

2:44

does an entire episode on their bodies?

2:46

Is it irritating when US Open men take

2:47

off their shirts to increase their

2:49

clout?

2:49

>> No, it's not the same thing. You know,

2:51

it's not. Then, by the way, the picture,

2:53

go look at the pictures in I knew you'd

2:55

do this, but it it you go look at the

2:57

pictures in Sports. I never loved the

2:59

swimsuit issue. Whatever. I don't I

3:02

don't really care if people want to look

3:03

at ladies in bikinis. I just thought

3:06

it's just dumb. And she's appeared in

3:08

the second dumb ad. And I'm not sure

3:10

what she's doing with her.

3:11

>> It might be a dumb ad. It's not ruining

3:12

women's sports.

3:14

>> No, no, no. But it it's just like, oh my

3:16

god, really? You're going to put

3:17

basketballs in front of your nipples?

3:19

Okay, sure.

3:20

>> What do you Okay, we respect female

3:22

entrepreneurs. We en encourage women to

3:24

be entrepreneurs. We do.

3:25

>> Uh she's bought a ton of attention.

3:26

She's going to make a [ __ ] ton of money.

3:28

>> Yeah, but listen, I would go if I were

3:31

her, cuz I think she's a very talented

3:33

actress. She's kind of taken a weird

3:35

left turn off what I think is a very

3:37

promising actor. Excuse me, I should say

3:39

actor because I like to call that like

3:42

>> should so not be her agent.

3:44

>> What? What?

3:45

>> She should so not be her agent.

3:46

>> No, but I don't think she's like winning

3:48

it. I don't think she's winning. She

3:50

could

3:50

>> Sydney Sweeney is probably going to be

3:52

soon the youngest self-made female

3:55

billionaire.

3:56

>> Mm-

3:57

>> Are you kidding?

3:58

>> No.

3:58

>> How much? Okay, let's take a bet. How

4:00

much is she going to make from that very

4:02

offensive ad? I have no idea.

4:03

>> It was poor judgment.

4:05

>> I We'll see. I think

4:06

>> she owns a stake in the company.

4:08

>> I get it. But so did a lot. Listen, this

4:10

is I've seen this come and go. Actors

4:12

and owning things. I'm just telling you.

4:14

I think she's I think she's better. I

4:17

think she's got some bad advice. That's

4:18

my feeling.

4:19

>> So, you think she should have done a

4:20

dramatic reading for some kale oatmeal

4:22

company?

4:23

>> Mr. Anti-woke, which I don't know what's

4:24

happened to you.

4:25

>> Anti-woke.

4:26

>> Yeah, you are. Well, you always go, "Oh,

4:28

V signal." You anti-woke signal all the

4:30

time.

4:31

>> Anoke signal.

4:33

A [laughter] that's what you are AWS.

4:35

>> I I think it's just look I would say

4:38

someone she was on a show with Zenaya is

4:40

sort of handling her career really

4:42

interestingly and and it's not cuz she

4:45

she never utters a word about politics.

4:47

By the way, I've never really heard her

4:49

say anything.

4:50

>> Um but uh I I find I think she's sort of

4:53

I think if Sydney Sweeney went in that

4:55

direction a little more and focused on

4:57

what a good actor she is, she would I

4:59

get that she has nice

5:00

>> they have different assets. I guess I

5:02

think she's actually talented.

5:05

>> I think so in White Lotus. I just think

5:07

[clears throat] you can't stop looking

5:08

at her boobs, right? That's the whole

5:10

thing. It's the whole

5:11

>> And and why shouldn't she like men who

5:15

le anyways I

5:18

don't care. I don't honestly care. I

5:20

think she looks stupid. But whatever.

5:22

She wants to look stupid. It's the

5:24

second stupid ad, so I'm I'm questioning

5:26

her judgment.

5:27

>> You didn't like the jeans one either.

5:28

>> I was dumb. It was so like loaded and oh

5:31

let's make

5:31

>> sold a ton of merchandise made the

5:33

company a ton of money.

5:34

>> It didn't it didn't it was it was not a

5:37

win. That was not a win.

5:39

>> Not [clears throat] among young the

5:40

young folk.

5:41

>> You're signing up for the narrative and

5:42

ignoring the data.

5:43

>> Yeah. You don't I'm not ignoring the

5:45

data. I don't think she I don't think

5:46

she's I think she's going to have a less

5:48

good career. We will see in five years

5:51

who's the bigger star. Okay. Again, this

5:53

is the man who said Taylor Swift was a

5:55

passing phase or something like that.

5:57

You don't. She kills.

5:59

>> I never don't put words in my mouth. I

6:00

never said I never said Taylor Swift was

6:02

a bad her down. You were always Stop it.

6:06

I don't like her music. That's the crime

6:08

against humanity that you have levied

6:10

against me.

6:10

>> Crime against humanity.

6:11

>> How many Taylor Swift concerts have you

6:13

been to?

6:13

>> Uh, one big the big one. I couldn't

6:15

afford to.

6:16

>> Okay, so we're tied. I've been to a

6:17

Taylor Swift concert as well. I think

6:19

she's an inspiration. I'm glad she is

6:22

drawing outside of the lines and also

6:23

has incredible talent and is making

6:25

millions of dollars. Good for her.

6:27

>> Okay. All right. Carl Rove is about to

6:29

vote Democrat in Texas and you're going

6:31

the other direction. This is fantastic.

6:33

Anyway, nonetheless, we're kicking

6:35

>> going to Texas to campaign for Taler.

6:37

>> This will be Which one of us is going to

6:40

like Baby Jesus? I know you love Baby

6:42

Jesus. I know it. I know it. But let me

6:44

tell you, we're kicking off. This is

6:45

going to be [laughter] a good tour.

6:46

That's good. It's going to be a good

6:47

tour. Baby Jesus.

6:48

>> It's That's what I call them.

6:50

>> Guest stars James Tarico and Sydney

6:52

Sweeney doing a dramatic reading of

6:53

Shakespeare's

6:55

>> Oh, God. Tamia the Shrew. Um I I I met

6:59

him in Texas. You you kindly I think

7:01

introduced me to the PR person and um

7:03

and I he didn't like me calling him baby

7:06

Jesus. And I said, "Well, would you like

7:08

>> a little for for a pastor or whatever.

7:10

>> I know, but he's so adorable. I'm so

7:12

offensive. You call people so red pill

7:15

that time." I call him baby Jesus. And

7:17

then I he he says, "Oh, that's not a

7:19

good nickname." And he knows all our

7:21

nicknames.

7:21

>> Just call him BJ for short.

7:23

>> That's what I said. I said, "I'll call

7:24

you BJ." He goes, That's

7:27

There [laughter] you go. That's That's

7:29

>> He's so adorable.

7:30

>> That's an ad with Ted Cruz.

7:32

>> That's not Baby. He looks like Satan now

7:34

with his weird beard.

7:35

>> Looks like Count Choula.

7:36

>> Count Choula. He does. Did you What did

7:39

you like? What was it? Quis. Oh, that

7:41

was Quer Quake. We had to decide when we

7:43

were kids. Do you remember that?

7:44

>> I did. I was like a charms.

7:46

>> Okay. I do too. That's my favorite. My

7:48

My kids cultural appropriation of the

7:50

Irish.

7:50

>> It is still excellent. It is still

7:52

fantastic. Anyway, everybody, we have

7:55

we're we're bantering and arguing since

7:57

we're disagreeing and you're wrong. We

8:00

have got to get once again.

8:02

>> I am [laughter] right. We've got to get

8:04

going because rivalry is heating up

8:07

between the US and Canada this morning,

8:09

as you know, our Canadian friends. But

8:12

speaking of heated rivalries, get that

8:14

Canada heated rivalries, we are bringing

8:16

in Scott's other work wife to help us

8:18

break it down. Please welcome the

8:19

co-host of Raging Moderates, Jessica

8:21

Taroff. Her new book is out now. It's

8:23

called I Disagree: Winning Arguments

8:25

Without Losing Friends. Jess, welcome.

8:29

Welcome to our home.

8:31

>> I That's what this feels like. Like I

8:33

got invited to the big house.

8:34

>> The big house? [laughter]

8:36

>> Yeah.

8:36

>> The one on top of the hill.

8:38

>> The one on top of the hill. We were just

8:40

arguing before

8:41

>> the Mean Girls table.

8:43

>> Our mom and dad having a fight. We were

8:45

He's like going on about the great

8:47

attributes of Sydney Sweeney.

8:49

>> Sydney Sweeny's chest.

8:51

>> Exactly.

8:52

>> And you would know more about the two of

8:54

you. What's attractive [clears throat]

8:55

in breast than I do? They do look great.

8:57

>> They do. They're fantastic. That's a

8:59

nice car is making the point that if she

9:01

was smarter, she'd focus on her acting

9:03

capabilities cuz dramatic skills.

9:06

>> Oh, wow. Oh, she's going for the she's

9:08

trying to get us to disagree and and

9:11

>> then I'll fix it or I'll just leave I'll

9:14

leave you in a state of show off her

9:16

rack like Dolly Parton did and also be

9:18

talented. Is that correct?

9:20

>> She's both of those things. She's doing

9:22

both of those things.

9:23

>> She's having a moment across different

9:26

verticals, which is how you succeed.

9:30

Yeah. You see what I did there? But

9:31

also, there's a finite amount of time

9:33

when you look like that. Oh, you can

9:36

keep that going for a while.

9:37

>> I You know what? I don't even I just

9:38

love I love a woman who leans into her

9:40

aging. I think it's really I love that

9:43

confidence. And

9:44

>> I just can't wait to look at 60-year-old

9:47

breasts.

9:47

>> This is This is an uncomfortable

9:49

conversation for me cuz I find that

9:51

Cara, I really don't see age when it

9:52

comes to women and I don't see looks. I

9:54

don't see.

9:55

>> I'm going to show you my boobs in a

9:56

second and then it's all going to end

9:57

very quickly.

9:58

>> Jesus Christ.

9:58

>> They're nice.

9:59

>> Do I have to show my boobs to come to

10:02

everybody? But let's listen. This is

10:04

>> Well, you know my You know my question

10:05

when I meet a feminist, I ask them if

10:07

they'd still be a feminist if they had

10:08

bigger tits.

10:09

>> Oh, God. You wrong. Is that wrong? Is

10:13

that wrong?

10:14

>> Yes, it is. Yes, we disagree. That's

10:16

right up the

10:16

>> We disagree. Welcome back. Remain lose

10:20

Scott. We should lose Scott member of

10:23

the

10:23

>> and have a new show. We should like I'm

10:25

thinking of dumping him for Caitlyn

10:26

Collins. I'll be honest. According to

10:27

the comments, it's happening.

10:28

>> I know. Um listen, we I want to talk

10:31

about your Let's focus on Jess. Let's

10:32

focus on Jess. She's here. I just had

10:34

her on the show for on show for an hour

10:36

to talk about the book, but we're going

10:38

to get into some actual practical

10:40

aspects of your book, which is about

10:41

disagreeing. And you have to like endure

10:44

Jesse Waters. So, I I I feel for you,

10:46

honey, um kind of thing. So, let's get

10:48

into it. The Canadian Prime Minister

10:50

Mark Cart, this is a good example,

10:52

addressed the EU Parliament a little

10:53

while ago, saying Europe and Canada are

10:55

stronger together. The speech comes a

10:57

day after European Commission President

10:58

Ursula Vander Lean proposed that Canada

11:01

become EU's first associate member. I'm

11:03

not sure it's like a junior member or

11:05

whatever. Let's listen to Carney explain

11:07

his vision of this partnership.

11:09

>> We do not seek power to dominate others.

11:13

On the contrary, we are pursuing

11:16

resilience so no one no one can control

11:20

our open markets, impair our

11:22

sovereignty, threaten our territorial

11:24

integrity, or undermine our freedoms,

11:26

our democracies, our rule of law.

11:32

>> He was clear about what this alliance is

11:35

not about.

11:36

>> I also want to be precise about what I

11:40

am not proposing.

11:43

I'm not proposing a third block in order

11:46

to become a great power rival, only with

11:49

better manners.

11:51

>> Okay, Trump is not happy about this.

11:53

Even before Carney's speech, he said

11:54

Canada was becoming becoming an

11:56

associate member of the EU could be a

11:58

hostile act and he threatened to punish

12:00

Europe with, you guessed it, tariffs.

12:02

Just this is a real like what any advice

12:04

on Trump losing friends because he loses

12:06

a lot of there's a lot of friends he's

12:08

lost. I'm not sure Canada was ever his

12:11

friend. Some people are beyond hope,

12:13

which is part of the book, that you are

12:15

not into forced to to have friendships

12:17

that you don't want to. Um, but what

12:20

Mark Carney was doing, and as I was

12:21

listening to the speech this morning

12:23

before I hopped on here, I was thinking,

12:26

this man is parenting, right? He's doing

12:29

the same thing that we would do with any

12:31

of our kids and explaining in very clear

12:34

terms, we do not seek to dominate

12:36

others. Do not push someone on the

12:38

playground. It is like a very easy rule

12:41

to teach. But what he did do because

12:43

this is an arc, right? A journey that

12:45

Mark Carney has been on. And he did a

12:49

lot of the things that we talked about

12:51

her and I disagree. He started with the

12:54

soft start originally and he said like

12:56

we're pals. We have a lot. It's

12:59

important. 8 what is it? 800 billion in

13:01

trade. Second biggest partner. We want

13:03

to make this work. We share this border.

13:05

We share our values. Then he went to

13:08

let's talk in averages and not

13:09

anecdotes. Let's get to the brass tax.

13:12

So this isn't about my feelings. This is

13:13

a win-win for everybody. And then when

13:16

the toddler couldn't deal with reality,

13:20

he dropped the bomb and he said, "Here I

13:23

am. Let me into the EU and uh let's

13:26

figure out a bright future together." So

13:28

he didn't get an advanced copy of the

13:29

book, but I feel like he saw what is in

13:32

there. But is he cutting off cuz you

13:34

said you don't as you said you don't

13:36

have to remain friends with everyone or

13:37

is he leaving an opening like is this

13:39

like a

13:39

>> I don't think you can ever cut off the

13:42

US. I mean that's just not feasible and

13:44

you share

13:45

>> he can cut off Trump.

13:46

>> Yeah. Well he could also make a plan for

13:49

the next two years and change and then

13:52

pray that someone sane and that someone

13:54

sane doesn't necessarily have to be a

13:56

Democrat. I don't think if Marco Rubio

13:59

was in charge that he would be going

14:00

about it this way or even a JD Vance.

14:04

So, I think that he wants to send a

14:07

strong message. Obviously, he has tried

14:09

a lot of different ways to be able to

14:11

have this conversation to make it clear

14:14

it's worth your while and keep the

14:15

relationship. And uh now he's got to do

14:19

what's best for Canadians and what his

14:21

people are telling him that they want.

14:23

They're ready to take the pain in order

14:26

to have their sovereignty and their

14:27

dignity.

14:28

>> Yeah. Scott, what do you think? What

14:29

would you do if you were him? Besides

14:31

talk about Sydney Sweeny's boobs, but go

14:33

ahead.

14:33

>> The

14:34

>> Go ahead, Jo.

14:36

>> Oh, no. I was going to say Scott's

14:37

probably going to say he's also very

14:38

attractive, which she is. It's a

14:40

different look than Sydney Sweeney, but

14:42

>> actually Cara objectifies Carney all the

14:44

time, and I'm really uncomfortable with

14:46

it. She's constantly referencing his

14:48

looks. Anyways, it's very upsetting. Um,

14:52

so look, America being indignant here

14:56

and calling it an act of hostility is

14:59

like uh, you know, someone is in an

15:00

abusive relationship and then the

15:02

husband finds out, what do you know?

15:03

She's download hinge. I mean,

15:05

>> this just can't be that surprising. We

15:07

used to we used to be the head of the

15:09

cool table in the cafeteria and we

15:11

walked in and now it's just us at the

15:13

cool table. This is of course they're

15:16

looking for new partners. Of course they

15:18

are. They'd be they'd be irresponsible

15:20

mto.

15:20

>> Right now, I think a lot of people are

15:22

wanting to get along again, you know,

15:25

and maybe forgive people. I was just

15:27

noting to Scott Carl Robes that he's

15:29

going to vote Democrat. I'm sure he's

15:30

getting a lot of push back from uh

15:32

Republicans there, but the thing the guy

15:34

said was heinous, right? And then you

15:36

have Mike Johnson defending a guy who

15:38

called women cumbuckets. Like, and

15:41

you're like, what is happening here?

15:43

>> Yeah, I know. But we're the offensive

15:45

ones. I love that. I'm like, I'm really

15:47

prepared to be lectured by the party of

15:48

[ __ ] buckets about whatever it is that so

15:52

and so said that I'm sure I'm going to

15:53

see a clip of later. The overarching

15:55

message that's important for people to

15:57

keep in mind is that life is long and

16:00

people change and they evolve. And if

16:02

you are careful about when you talk and

16:06

when you listen, you can get somewhere

16:09

in most cases. Again, not forcing anyone

16:11

to do anything that they don't want to,

16:13

but we're also desperate to be

16:16

acknowledged and for people to say like,

16:19

I'm actually interested in what you've

16:21

got to say. And then by doing that,

16:24

you're also better prepared to respond

16:26

to it. But the cutting each other off

16:27

and yes, I get interrupted all the time,

16:29

which I I see as a sign of weakness, and

16:31

I write about that that if you're

16:33

getting interrupted, you're actually

16:34

winning. If they're criticizing you on

16:36

style, you're winning on substance. And

16:38

you can take internal gratification from

16:40

that and people who are watching this go

16:42

on know it as well. Um but the listening

16:45

it matters so much and that's across the

16:49

political spectrum that people are

16:51

really hungry for it. Scott

16:53

>> well just going what what Jess said

16:56

about go to data 870 billion is sold in

17:00

or is purchased in from Canada and we

17:02

don't treat them like our best customer.

17:04

They purchase $130 billion in EU goods.

17:07

So, there's literally $740 million or

17:09

3/4 of a trillion dollars in business up

17:11

for grabs. Uh, and I got to think that

17:14

if you're a Norwegian company that's

17:17

selling, you know, motorcycle parts or

17:19

ATV parts, you're now quickly on the

17:22

phone with every Canadian uh uh Canadian

17:27

manufacturer of ATVs, including

17:28

Bombardier, and say, "Hey, have you

17:30

considered doing business with us?" This

17:31

business is this business is up for

17:33

grabs. American companies have never had

17:36

a greater assault on their inventory and

17:38

their new business from the president

17:40

who has made them very vulnerable to

17:43

switching. So, so is it just a president

17:45

thing this dis you know the way he

17:46

disagrees which is win or it's always

17:49

win like he said we have if we win in AI

17:52

we win that's his new that's his new

17:54

saying he goes I coined it I'm like it's

17:55

really stupid but um but it's always a

17:59

sort of dominance thing and and which is

18:01

not good when you're trying to disagree

18:03

correct like a constant but disagreement

18:05

is now turned into dominance or dunking

18:07

and of course there's an online aspect

18:09

to it and the way you dunk some things

18:11

are super [ __ ] funny they just are um

18:13

there's a whole bunch of Mitch

18:15

McConnell's you know I I I thought he

18:17

was dead and it's worse kind of thing

18:19

you know we'll talk about him later but

18:21

um but how can we get back to

18:24

disagreeing in a better way because now

18:25

it's like a real it's sort of like

18:27

scorched earth at this point and you

18:29

know I think you do do a great job on on

18:32

the five although it's very

18:34

disconcerting that they just they don't

18:36

seem to listen at all like they never

18:38

there's no movement in their in their or

18:42

maybe they're just performative. I don't

18:43

know.

18:43

>> There have been signs of movement. I I

18:46

keep a list on my wall. I'm just

18:48

kidding. But I But you're also you're

18:51

doing it for the people that you're

18:53

talking to, but also who else might be

18:55

listening. And in this algorithmically

18:58

dominant universe, you know, your

19:01

audience can be any number of places. is

19:03

remember when mom Donnie came on with

19:05

Martha Macllum before the election and

19:09

he had points that he wanted to make to

19:11

distinct groups. He spoke directly into

19:13

the camera. Andrew Cuomo, you speak to

19:15

the voters, you speak to the president.

19:18

You know, understanding

19:20

who you're tailoring the message for and

19:22

making sure that it's getting to those

19:24

places is as important as the content of

19:28

what it is that you're saying. And I did

19:30

think on the AI front and Trump saying,

19:32

you know, you just need the most

19:33

intelligent president in the world,

19:35

which you have here. I thought it was

19:37

interesting that Carney included this AI

19:40

partnership in his offering to the EU.

19:43

It doesn't even really count as that cuz

19:44

the EU has said we want you for whatever

19:47

this special relationship is going to

19:48

be. and and that felt like a real shot

19:50

across our bow as well since we're

19:52

having this debate about, you know, do

19:54

you regulate, do you not, and if they're

19:56

going to shift towards the EU model or

19:59

what kind of progress they might create

20:02

together without us.

20:03

>> But when you But what's the fault? Is it

20:05

is it Trump or is it that we that that

20:08

the online has turned us into sort of

20:10

these dunk men?

20:11

>> Well, Trump is the problem. I mean,

20:12

Trump is a fundamental problem. Uh but

20:15

he's only exposed things that was that

20:17

were already in people right there. It

20:19

was just waiting to be pulled out of

20:21

them. And from working in conservative

20:24

media, and we've talked about this

20:27

before, I was not aware of how deep

20:31

grievance culture from the Obama years

20:34

was. And not just in the racist way. It

20:37

it's not that um you know, the economic

20:40

issues, cultural issues. And you've seen

20:42

that huge pendulum swing back where

20:44

we've gotten so much more fiscally

20:46

liberal and culturally conservative on a

20:48

comparative basis to where I thought we

20:51

were. Um, so Trump is a symptom of it

20:56

obviously and he's a vehicle for a lot

20:58

of this. Um, and has has reframed the

21:02

way that we do politics. Um, but it

21:06

doesn't mean it can't be mastered by

21:08

other people and

21:10

>> mastered in a good way, not in this bad

21:11

way.

21:12

>> In a good way. Yeah. To understand how

21:13

you wield it. I mean, we have examples

21:15

of people who use the internet and their

21:18

followings and communities uh for good.

21:21

Even if you don't love their politics,

21:22

you look at an AOC for instance, and you

21:24

think, okay, like I I understand where

21:27

this could go in a positive direction,

21:29

but I don't think people are going to

21:30

there will be no one who disagrees like

21:32

Trump. Again, it is a a case study of

21:35

one

21:35

>> of of who dis and doesn't want to listen

21:38

essentially. Is there any way I can't

21:40

advise him? Oh, you just think he's

21:41

broken. It doesn't matter.

21:43

>> I mean, he seems pretty broken to me.

21:45

Well, what I He's definitely getting

21:46

advised the right things. It's not as if

21:49

Republicans on the ground don't know

21:51

what's going on. They're pleading for

21:52

money. They're pleading for the right

21:54

kind of support, saying they're

21:56

stripping him off their websites. I

21:58

mean, MAGA Inc., The big pack can't even

22:01

send out money under the name MAGA Inc.

22:04

They have to put it out in other

22:05

vehicles because the brand is so toxic.

22:07

You have Carl Rove, like you said,

22:09

voting for a Democrat. Like things have

22:13

changed. So if you're JD Vance, who

22:16

probably can or Maru Marco Rubio, what

22:19

do you do if you are the candidate? Do

22:22

you you start to bring everyone together

22:24

again? You don't keep this up because

22:25

neither of them are capable of keeping

22:27

up the anger. I don't think they're I

22:29

don't think they're actually like that,

22:30

you know. I don't think they're

22:31

comfortable as Trump is in that space.

22:33

>> I think Vance would be fine with it if

22:35

he could pull it off. I don't think he's

22:37

built like that. He's uh too I don't

22:40

want to just say weak, but you know,

22:42

he's so malleable, fungeible as a human,

22:46

you know, so I I don't think he has the

22:49

backbone for it. And I don't think Marco

22:51

Rubio has the interest. I I think he

22:53

will convert back to something looking

22:56

more like the 2016 version with some

22:58

America first updates. Um, but I think

23:02

that they will know, especially if a

23:04

strong message is sent in the midterms,

23:06

that the party, the Republican party

23:09

cannot survive 2028, even with the

23:12

redistricting and the census, um, if

23:15

they try America First 2.0.

23:17

>> Anger, just not agreeing.

23:19

>> Well, anger and no and no deliverables.

23:22

That's what people they said in 2024, I

23:24

actually don't care that this guy is

23:25

terrible. Just give me money in my

23:27

pocket. And now that there's no money in

23:29

your pocket, they're certainly not going

23:31

to accept this kind of leadership.

23:34

>> Right. Scott, last question.

23:36

>> Well, for for the first time in probably

23:38

20 years, I watched a full Fox program

23:40

because I wanted to watch the five. And

23:42

what I found is that the clips are more

23:43

antagonistic than the general vibe.

23:45

>> That's right. And

23:47

>> what what I would say is I think they

23:48

just I I think they're less rude than a

23:50

lot of the clips would indicate to you

23:52

and and I want you to comment on it, but

23:54

one, you bring data. Two, I get the

23:57

sense the audience wants to hear what

23:59

you have to say. And three, I generally

24:01

get the sense that your four colleagues

24:03

really like you and respect you enough

24:05

that they don't want to, you know, show

24:06

you, you know, a certain level of

24:08

disrespect. Not my question. Talk about

24:11

bringing this to your personal life.

24:13

like when you examine this topic, how

24:15

has it changed the way you quote unquote

24:17

argue or resolve disputes with with your

24:20

your husband or your family?

24:21

>> And any advice for Scott and I,

24:23

[laughter]

24:24

>> since he's going to be fine.

24:26

>> Roger Federer should lean into his

24:27

acting. Those are his real assets. Cara

24:30

>> Christ. I'm sorry. Go ahead.

24:32

>> He's an anti-woke

24:35

virtue signal.

24:36

>> So red pill. So red pill.

24:38

>> It's so true. Go ahead.

24:39

>> Right.

24:40

>> Yeah. Um, this is so fun being at the

24:43

grown-up house.

24:44

>> Jess, she doesn't touch me anymore.

24:46

>> Oh my god. Answer is lovely question.

24:50

>> How has it affected how I talk or

24:53

disagree in my regular life? Um, I think

24:55

that I am more zen and calm generally

24:59

from having this experience. So, the

25:01

usual reaction is like what what pills

25:04

do you take? Like what is your

25:06

meditation routine? And I actually feel

25:10

genuinely at peace in that conflict. I I

25:14

don't know what I have done to make my

25:17

inside so steely to it. Um but I am

25:20

clocking

25:22

aspects of the interactions as these

25:25

winds as we go along. And I think that

25:27

that has really helped me in talking to

25:30

regular like the mom, group chat,

25:32

dealing with my husband, my mom, sister,

25:36

everyone around you.

25:37

>> I don't think Jess, I don't think you

25:38

and I have ever had an argument.

25:40

>> That's You save it for me.

25:42

>> Yeah, you will.

25:43

>> Seriously, I don't I don't know what

25:44

that sounds.

25:45

>> Thank god I'm here. Thank God.

25:47

>> Thank God. That's what everybody says.

25:49

>> Cara, they do. Yeah.

25:51

>> Yes. Thank God. Um for a whole host of

25:53

reasons. Um, but no, I don't think that

25:56

we I don't even know what we would argue

25:57

about. But I choose not to get upset

26:00

that you like ignore all of my text

26:02

messages basically.

26:03

>> There we go. It's the beginning. It's

26:04

the beginning of the anger.

26:06

>> Oh, is that how it started with you? You

26:07

were like, can't you just like my

26:08

message?

26:09

>> Texted angry. No, I text him in the

26:11

middle of the night. Anyway, let me

26:13

something kooky. Um, anyhow, I can't

26:15

help myself. Anyway, Jess, this is a

26:17

really great book. Um, she hosts

26:19

obviously Raging Moderates. She's on the

26:21

five top show in cable I think. Um and

26:24

and raging moderates is our own Scott

26:26

Galloway. Um and her book I disagree is

26:29

out now. I hope you get to the number

26:31

one on the Times bestseller. Um I think

26:34

it's the kind of book we all need right

26:35

now. I really do.

26:37

>> Thank you for joining us.

26:38

>> Well, thank you and thank you for having

26:40

me and welcoming the side piece and I

26:44

Scott's the side piece. I don't know

26:45

whatever this is.

26:46

>> Side piece of you. He has nice boobs.

26:48

Anyway, thanks for joining us. Thanks.

26:50

Bye guys. Thank you so much. I hope

26:52

everyone loves the book.

26:53

>> Great. Thanks. Well, that was nice. Your

26:55

your your your other girlfriend

26:57

visiting. That was

26:58

>> She is universally love.

27:00

>> She is. She's good at what she does.

27:02

Moving on. Um interesting story broke

27:05

about a movie I have seen. Universal,

27:07

which has worldwide distribution rights

27:09

outside North America to Alice Gibney's

27:11

new Elon Musk documentary is reportedly

27:13

getting cold feet about releasing the

27:14

film internationally. the studio paid a

27:17

multi-million dollar sum for the

27:18

international rights back in 2023. If it

27:20

walks away now, it could be required to

27:22

pay off the filmmakers and then they can

27:24

go and sell it. Um they're, you know,

27:27

it's not clear what they're going to do.

27:29

I I know people uh close to it and they

27:31

they just haven't said anything and so

27:33

they're not able to get the I mean

27:35

there's a lot of international interest

27:36

in this film. Um people really dislike

27:39

Elon in Europe particularly for example.

27:42

Um but and and people want to see it uh

27:44

there. And so it's interesting another

27:46

yet another company could be sort of

27:47

bending the knee at this late date and

27:50

worried about it. Uh Elon's called the

27:52

documentary a hit piece and boring. It's

27:54

not boring though there's no indication

27:55

he's actually seen it. It is absolutely

27:57

not boring. Um I just uh I know a little

28:01

bit about it. Um there's a there's they

28:03

they have to pay Universal a negative

28:05

pickup fee on delivery and um they've

28:09

just been silent. Universal has been

28:10

silent with and and with the group that

28:13

owns the documentary and um you know

28:16

probably if they walk away there's other

28:18

distributors a lot of them in the story

28:20

that was written a lot of distributors

28:22

are really interested in it um uh but it

28:25

it's it's just interesting the silence

28:27

and not doing anything cuz all these now

28:30

Comcast is facing an issue the owner of

28:32

Universal is facing an issue with again

28:34

the [ __ ] Brendan Carr around DEI stuff

28:38

um and they're all sort continuing to be

28:40

kind of just just still nervous about

28:44

the Trump administration, what it can

28:46

do. I think the time is limited for them

28:48

and they continue to do it, which is,

28:50

you know, I'm I'm not loving that

28:52

they're doing this. What do you think?

28:54

And I really like Donna Langley who runs

28:55

it. I like Brian Roberts, but it's still

28:58

possibly disappointing depending on what

29:00

happens.

29:01

>> Well, it's the issue isn't isn't whether

29:04

the Musk documentary is accurate, not

29:06

accurate, if it's good or bad. The issue

29:09

is when a media company

29:12

discovers that distributing journalism

29:16

about a powerful person carries

29:18

commercial and political risk. And

29:20

that's the fear here is that this all

29:23

creates a chill around journalism and

29:25

speaking truth to power and power

29:27

corrupts and absolute power corrupts and

29:29

the media has always been exceptionally

29:31

good. I mean, you feel this and I feel

29:34

this and when you get to a certain

29:36

footprint, people start quite frankly

29:39

looking for reasons to [ __ ] post you and

29:42

quite and some of it is healthy. You

29:45

know, power should be checked along the

29:48

way. There should be friction. And the

29:50

studio finds it in itself or it finds

29:53

itself in a place now where it's

29:55

basically got like a, you know, there's

29:56

nothing it can do. It's a hot potato

29:58

that will burn no matter what they do.

29:59

If they if they drop it, it burns.

30:01

They're they're in an they're in an

30:02

unwininnable position. If they try to

30:05

distance themselves from it, they

30:07

probably lose money and they look weak

30:09

and everyone everyone in the industry

30:12

will start, you know, just being

30:13

outraged, right? And if they do give in,

30:16

if they do bend, if they do bend a knee,

30:19

then they just absolutely or if they

30:21

move forward with it, they go crosshair.

30:25

There is real temptation right now to

30:27

the following strategy. keep a low

30:29

profile, say the [ __ ] out of his way

30:30

>> until he's gone.

30:31

>> He's 24. Yeah, there's 24 months.

30:34

>> He may be he may be very hindered after

30:35

the elections, but go ahead.

30:37

>> The original scripted series around big

30:39

tech I was working on got shut down. And

30:41

I don't think it was I don't think it

30:42

was politically motivated, but we had so

30:45

many talented people involved, the

30:46

production house immediately was like,

30:48

"Oh, this will be We had multiple biders

30:51

when we first pitched it." Now crickets.

30:55

People are like, "You know what, boss?

30:57

It might be amazing. Let's talk about it

30:59

again right now. Just not worth the

31:01

headache.

31:02

>> Yeah, it's a chill. It is. It's

31:04

definitely a chill. It's It's

31:05

interesting because there are a lot of

31:06

very anti- tech movies about to come

31:08

out. Like there's this I I was

31:10

interviewing Aaron Sorcin last night at

31:12

a private event of ex-f Facebook people

31:14

in Mountain View right near Meta

31:16

actually. Um about of the social

31:18

reckoning. Um, there's, you know, Musk

31:21

documentary, there's artificial, there's

31:23

like a lot of, you know, and on

31:25

television like the Audacity, there's a

31:27

lot of, you know, tech is villains out

31:29

there. It's not like it's not out there.

31:31

Um, but I think it's I think in this

31:34

case it's a non-fiction and it's a very

31:36

highly latigious person. Um, I don't

31:40

know. I just I would just say, "Oh, [ __ ]

31:42

it. We made it. We paid." I think at the

31:44

time they got it, he wasn't so mus he

31:47

wasn't so Trumpy, right? This this has

31:49

gone on this movie for many years.

31:50

>> Well, that's the thing. It's not being

31:52

anti- tech that's dangerous. It's being

31:53

anti-Trump. And Musk is considered very

31:56

closely affiliated with Musk with Trump.

31:58

>> Yeah. And of course, again, Brendan Carr

32:00

is like again making noise about, you

32:02

know, he's even going after possibly

32:04

going after um the Roku deal. Um cuz

32:08

this guy is this guy is really quite

32:11

like a ridiculous.

32:12

>> He's going after the Roku deal.

32:14

>> Yeah. No, they're looking at it. They're

32:16

looking at like there or the Justice

32:17

Department might and I'm not sure he

32:19

can, but there's all because there's a

32:21

device and the FCC might. It's like he's

32:24

I think they're probably mad at at

32:26

Murdoch's being much tougher on Trump

32:28

recently. Um, you know, it's sort of

32:30

messages. I I do think there'll be a

32:32

growing resistance to Trump. You sort of

32:34

are starting to see little bits and

32:36

pieces of the push back. Um, but we're

32:38

going to take a quick break. When we

32:39

come back, Mark Zuckerberg steps into

32:41

the great AI safety debate.

32:44

Support for the show comes from

32:45

Coreavee. AI isn't just a new tool. It

32:48

encompasses so much more. [music] It's

32:50

spurring a revolution across all

32:51

industries and reshaping itself to

32:53

become a big part of our future

32:54

together. Corweave is at the center,

32:56

powering some of the biggest names in

32:58

AI. [music] As the essential cloud for

33:00

AI, Coree provides an AI platform that

33:02

combines next generation infrastructure,

33:04

intelligent tools, and expert support.

33:06

It's powering the world's most complex

33:07

AI workloads faster and more

33:09

efficiently. From medical research and

33:11

diagnosis to education, from complex

33:12

visual effects from movies to

33:14

breakthroughs in science and technology.

33:16

If it's AI, Cororeweave is uniquely

33:18

ready to power it with purpose-built

33:19

[music] tech. The big ideas, the wild

33:21

visions and what-ifs and why nots.

33:24

Corweave is working to build what's

33:25

never been built before. [music]

33:27

Cororeweave is the essential cloud for

33:28

AI. Ready for anything, ready for AI. To

33:31

learn more about how Cororeweave powers

33:32

the world's best AI, go to

33:34

corweave.com/reforthing.

33:39

Scott, we're back. All of a sudden, this

33:41

is the only story. AI killing us

33:44

essentially. Um, Mark Zuckerberg has

33:47

entered the chat. In a post on X,

33:48

Zuckerberg has said AI labs should

33:50

prioritize safely, but push back on

33:51

calls for industry slowdown. Of course,

33:53

he did. He's arguing that competition

33:55

and legal liability are to give

33:56

companies sufficient reason to build

33:58

their models responsibly, which is

33:59

[ __ ] because suing on these things

34:01

is long and hard and they have a lot of

34:03

money. It's up to each AI company to

34:05

make sure the technology is safe, he

34:07

said. But I think that's correct. But

34:08

essentially he wants them to grade their

34:10

own homework. To back up his argument,

34:12

Zuckerberg said meta a delayed release

34:13

of its muse AI agent for several months

34:15

to ensure safety and security. We'll see

34:17

about that. Mark, um I I I think you

34:20

know it's so the difficulty of this

34:22

debate is everyone's got kind of a

34:24

different take whether it's Jensen Wong

34:26

or Elon or Alman or Emodi and they're

34:29

all talking and David Sachs they're all

34:31

talking at once and it's very confusing

34:34

and I don't trust any of them. Like it's

34:38

really an an odd position to be in. What

34:40

do you think about what Zuckerberg was

34:41

saying that they can you we can get them

34:44

through liability or or just their good

34:46

nature of not wanting to kill people?

34:48

>> Uh yeah. And and and Stalin's like, can

34:51

we just all get along? It just

34:55

this is this is the fox you find in your

34:58

hen house and then he says to the

34:59

farmer, I got this. Don't worry, you can

35:02

leave. I got this. there.

35:05

60% of Americans say they aren't

35:07

confident US companies will develop and

35:08

use AI responsibly. And 67% have little

35:11

or no confidence government can regulate

35:13

it effectively.

35:14

And and to Zuckerberg's credit, he is

35:19

partially right. Meta delayed muse and

35:21

open AI is publicly reporting incidents.

35:23

>> Yeah. I'm going to you want me to note

35:24

what they are? Six incidents of what are

35:26

called concerning. I love when people

35:28

use the word concerning. The company

35:30

says its AI systems hid mistakes, made

35:32

up data, move files into the open

35:33

internet without permission. Also, the

35:36

dialogue is creepy. Essentially, it

35:37

wants to kill all of us. Um, open now

35:40

has developed new framework for

35:41

reporting this behavior and employee can

35:43

request that an incident be investigate

35:44

disclosed publicly. Um, this is policing

35:47

themselves, but I'm like, they're like,

35:49

look, we told you what happened. I'm

35:50

like, I don't like what happened, but

35:52

but but go but go ahead. Well, I'll just

35:55

remind people, you've never had an

35:56

industry this this large that's been

35:58

allowed to police itself. Now, either

35:59

we've been wrong all along, and we

36:01

should just let them do whatever they

36:02

want,

36:02

>> cars, all those people. Yeah,

36:04

>> but we're in uncharted territory because

36:06

we've never had companies with this much

36:07

power and this much capital. Meta alone

36:09

is going to spend $150 million of capex

36:12

this year. So, that's that's not a

36:14

company. It's the Manhattan project with

36:15

quarterly earnings.

36:17

>> Very good. Well said, Scott. There's a

36:18

scene in Oppenheimer where they say,

36:20

"Well, what if this starts keeps

36:22

igniting and it doesn't stop?" And he

36:26

said, "Well, we we're confident that

36:27

we've done the modeling that it's going

36:29

that it is going to stop." Like, I don't

36:32

The anxiety is the following. Not that

36:35

these companies not that these companies

36:38

are evil, not 1% 10%. The anxiety is

36:44

not knowing what's going on. And

36:50

what do we know works for kids? Every

36:52

parenting book seems to contradict the

36:54

one before it, but the one consistent

36:56

thing is that kids that kids need guard

36:58

rails. And this is effectively where we

37:00

are. The CDC, the Center for Disease

37:04

Control, who's supposed to prevent an

37:06

outbreak of measles, much less an

37:07

existential health threat.

37:10

What if what would they say to MOA? If

37:12

Mona, if a scientist in MOA came out and

37:15

said, you know what, the the COVID

37:17

vaccine, I think there's a 1 in 10

37:18

chance that the COVID vaccine turns

37:22

turns offensive and turns into a

37:24

pathogen that becomes infectious and

37:26

kills 10% of the world's population.

37:29

That's effectively what this guy said.

37:31

And then when asked about it, the CEO of

37:33

Madna said the following. Well, you know

37:35

what? He might have a point.

37:38

He might have a point.

37:40

What would we do?

37:41

>> Who knows?

37:42

>> Would the CDC and then would the CDC and

37:46

the president say to the CEO of Mona,

37:47

"Shut the [ __ ] up. Keep producing those

37:49

vaccines. Get your stock up."

37:51

>> Yeah,

37:51

>> that's what he's saying right now.

37:52

>> Trump is really doubling [ __ ] down.

37:54

He has to double down. Right. I mean, as

37:56

you noted, he's bet his whole enchilada

37:58

on the tech and the AI boom.

38:01

>> So, you're you're you're in a

38:02

neighborhood and there's a household

38:04

where you think, "Oh god, there's chaos

38:06

over there. I don't know." And then you

38:07

find out the parents are giving the kids

38:09

mess and going say wreak more havoc. The

38:13

insecurity around a lack of adult

38:14

supervision around not knowing what is

38:17

actually going on whether whether

38:18

they're they're slowing down these

38:20

things cuz they're earnest about it and

38:21

trying to be good citizens or they're

38:23

saying tap the brakes so all the open AI

38:26

mod oh the all the open weight models

38:28

have to slam the brakes. They're raising

38:30

awareness. Mus wants everyone to slow

38:32

down so he can get Nobody knows what the

38:35

[ __ ] is going on. Here's what I do know.

38:37

I don't trust any of them. Not a one of

38:38

them.

38:39

>> Yeah, there you go.

38:39

>> Not a one of them.

38:40

>> That's That's the no.

38:41

>> I was like, each of you have a point,

38:43

but I think you're all lying. I

38:45

literally sat there. I was I I looked at

38:47

all their different interviews they did.

38:48

They were at Dreamforce and they all

38:50

Wang did. Um Wang's sort of over on the

38:53

Trump side. Um Mark is wandering

38:55

somewhere in the middle. Musk,

38:57

[clears throat] of course, he's behind

38:59

um trying doing this shocking agreement

39:01

with Altman and Modi. all of them like

39:05

two things I would make two three things

39:08

I want to make actually one is that they

39:09

keep saying AI could be dangerous

39:11

they're dangerous it's people that are

39:13

dangerous like guns don't kill people

39:15

people kill people like that kind of

39:16

thing um the second thing is their shock

39:20

and shock about what's happening is such

39:23

a lie because I have been at dinner

39:24

parties 10 years ago where they were

39:26

talking about the dangers now these were

39:28

speculation of where it was going

39:30

because now they have some proof but

39:31

they absolutely And it reminds me of,

39:35

you know, well, we split an atom and it

39:38

it caused boom. Like we thought it would

39:42

go.

39:42

>> It caused boom. And it's like we thought

39:44

it would, you know, from a theoretical

39:45

point of in fact it did. Like they knew

39:48

this. I was at I couldn't tell you how

39:49

many dinner parties where they discussed

39:51

this very outcome and they knew it.

39:54

Right. The one thing they did at the

39:56

time was we don't know where it's going

39:58

to go. like they did they were at the

40:00

time not so certain about everything

40:03

like we don't even understand it was

40:05

often said to me by a lot of these same

40:07

people. The last part is it doesn't

40:10

really matter cuz they have financial

40:11

interest. How can you say anthropic this

40:15

is a real risk to humanity by the way

40:17

buy my stock like which something must

40:20

pointed out

40:20

>> they haven't slowed down their slow down

40:22

JP Morgan Gold. So it's all like all I

40:25

know is they're not the ones to do this.

40:27

we are we it has to be elected officials

40:30

and even Barack Obama who I think has

40:32

been a suckup to tech for a long time

40:34

was was that he was like why are we

40:36

letting these people make the decisions

40:38

like this is absolutely should not we

40:41

should talk to them we should work with

40:43

them but the fact of the matter is going

40:44

to be a white house thing once again is

40:46

there any critic going to that meeting

40:48

no it's all the heads nobody and there's

40:51

one person who's affecting there was a

40:52

good story in the journal today um a lot

40:55

of people like Scott Bessant and um and

40:58

Susie Wilds and others are trying to get

41:01

Trump in a much more let's regulate a

41:03

little bit here position because that's

41:05

both politically correct and the right

41:07

thing to do and David Sachs or the

41:10

individual CEOs keep calling him and

41:12

he's and they shift him. They can just

41:14

call him and do it. So I don't see an

41:16

end to this until Congress changes

41:19

whatsoever. I don't know. What do you

41:20

think? Where we are now is 1946 and

41:24

Oenheimer finds Carnegie or whoever was

41:27

the richest person at the time and says,

41:29

"Give me a hundred million bucks and I'm

41:31

going to convince MAG and General Motors

41:34

that uh we're going to build bombs at

41:36

scale." And you will not believe the

41:39

margin and the price I'm gonna get for

41:41

these things when I How much would

41:43

Pakistan pay for a bomb?

41:45

>> It's crazy. And then they and not only

41:47

that they can't buy just one cuz if

41:48

India buys two they need three and

41:51

>> we would have been dead we'd have been

41:53

dead by now

41:54

>> and well that's the fear and I think if

41:58

Truman or Roosevelt were president right

42:00

now I'm not sure we wouldn't have

42:01

nationalized AI

42:02

>> that's what a lot of tech people have

42:04

told me yeah absolutely I said that the

42:05

other day

42:06

>> realistically that's not going to happen

42:08

but there is a sweet spot of regulation

42:10

there is why if you think about the

42:14

greatest threat Uh if the CDC is

42:16

supposed to be doing its job and

42:18

controlling disease, the center for

42:20

disease control, the greatest threat to

42:22

the control of disease

42:24

>> is a supervirus developed in one of

42:26

these frontier labs

42:27

>> and RFK.

42:28

>> Why does this

42:29

>> how does the CDC not have people

42:31

embedded who are allowed to go into any

42:34

room at any time and ask any question?

42:37

>> No. 100%. I agree. Well, let's talk

42:40

about what could happen. So the AA

42:41

debate is it's creating strange

42:43

bedfellows. the sort of anti- these

42:45

people, Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon

42:47

delivered back-to-back speeches at the

42:48

bipartisan summit in DC this week, the

42:50

prohuman assembly. The list of people

42:52

that were there that really don't like

42:54

each other was astonishing when I saw

42:56

it. Both men called for regulation on AI

42:58

and denounced billionaires at the helm.

43:00

Sanders warned virtually all the

43:01

decisions regarding the development of

43:02

AI have been made by a handful of the

43:04

richest people in the world, which we

43:06

point out all the time. Bannon took a

43:08

similar stance, arguing the power

43:10

shouldn't be in the hands of these CEOs.

43:11

Let's listen all things to Steve Bannon.

43:14

>> This is a hinge in history. We have to

43:16

handle this right correctly. To handle

43:19

it correctly,

43:21

number one, we can never trust what

43:24

oligarch says because all they do,

43:26

they're disingenuous and they lie. This

43:29

has to be the American people. You

43:31

cannot be a supplicant and we're not

43:33

going to be supplicants anymore. The

43:35

American people are going to drive this.

43:37

>> So, did you ever think you'd be agreeing

43:38

with Steve Bannon? This is something we

43:40

say all the time.

43:41

>> All you know is if Steve Bannon and

43:43

Bernie Sanders show up at a cocktail

43:44

party, you're dying to know who's

43:46

hosting that cocktail party, right?

43:48

That's that's there's something

43:50

something interesting going on there. I

43:52

generally think it's a bad sign when the

43:55

far left and the far right disagree.

43:56

They disagree on isolationism,

43:58

anti-semitism,

44:00

>> when they agree, not disagree.

44:02

>> When I'm sorry, when they agree, then

44:03

you got to watch out. But this is

44:07

they're both look they're at the end of

44:08

the day they're both populists and 71%

44:11

of Americans think AI means jobs

44:14

>> and it's a rare bipartisan issue. Both

44:18

sides of the aisle

44:21

um you know both sides of the aisle

44:24

agree or are concerned about this and

44:26

the real question isn't whether GPT9 is

44:29

smarter than a lawyer. The question is

44:31

who captures the upside and who gets the

44:33

pink slip. What's interesting so far is

44:38

that the articles I've read from the

44:40

economists and others is that AI so far

44:42

has been a net job adder

44:45

and but the the people here do such a

44:47

bad job of talking about there is real I

44:51

sat next to the guy who runs UCSF the

44:53

other night for dinner and he was

44:54

talking about how AI can be used to

44:56

reduce sepsis how we think it's going to

44:59

there really is Hinton quote the

45:01

godfather of AI he kind of summarized it

45:03

perfectly but it didn't any of us really

45:05

feel better. He's like, you can imagine

45:06

a future where AI is makes the world a

45:09

much better place and you can also

45:11

imagine a future where AI makes it a

45:14

worse place. And the fulcrum in the

45:15

room, the traffic signal here should be

45:18

thoughtful regulation and we don't have

45:20

that right now.

45:21

>> Yeah, it's interesting to see what'll

45:23

happen because the tech people and Trump

45:26

think they can muscle this past all of

45:28

the country and it's really interesting

45:30

to see. I don't think they can. I think

45:32

that when you talk to people, they are

45:35

they are pissed. They're pissed and

45:38

they're scared and they don't and they

45:40

don't trust these people. The the the

45:41

real time. By the way, Hinton's in the

45:43

must documentary. He's excellent in it.

45:45

Um uh the real time political they they

45:50

just don't see we, as I said, we hate

45:52

them. Like we hate them and what they're

45:55

doing and we don't think they should be

45:57

in charge. All right, Scott, let's go on

45:58

a quick break. We come back, we'll talk

46:00

about your favorite topic, Cash Patel's

46:02

bizarre hearing on the Hill this week.

46:04

Support for this [music] show comes from

46:05

Vanta. AI adoption is everywhere you

46:08

look and growing. At the same time, so

46:10

are your company's security [music]

46:11

risks and requirements. New frameworks,

46:13

audits, and vendors keep piling on, but

46:16

if your team isn't getting any bigger,

46:17

you [music] can start to feel the

46:19

strain. So then you turn to compliance

46:21

tools that promise automation. But for a

46:23

lot of those tools, you end up [music]

46:24

stuck doing all the work by hand anyway,

46:26

chasing screenshots, validating

46:28

controls, and playing catch-up when

46:30

audit season comes around again. Vanta

46:32

works differently. [music] Vant's Aantic

46:34

Trust platform is built to scale with

46:36

you, not to slow you down. With over

46:38

1,400 automated [music] tests across 400

46:42

plus integrations, Vanta collects

46:44

evidence and monitors your controls year

46:46

[music] round, it can cut your audit

46:47

prep by 82%. Plus, you can access the

46:50

Vant agent everywhere you work. Whether

46:52

your team is in Vant every day or living

46:54

in tools like Claude or Cursor, over

46:57

16,000 fast growing companies like Ramp,

46:59

Writer, and Harvey. Save time and

47:01

resources while scaling fast [music]

47:03

with Vanta. You can join them today.

47:05

Learn more at vanta.com/pivot.

47:08

[music] That's spelled van.com/pivot.

47:15

>> [music]

47:16

>> Support for the show comes from NPR.

47:18

Trying to follow the political news

47:19

every day can be a lot, especially with

47:21

all the outrage and noise. [music]

47:22

Here's a cheat code that could help you

47:24

out. The NPR Politics podcast. They're a

47:26

daily political podcast where you can

47:28

catch up on the biggest political news

47:30

of the moment. And you can do it in 15

47:31

minutes or less every weekday. Right

47:33

now, NPR Politics has its eye on the

47:35

midterms and the issues that actually

47:37

affect your life. Things like the high

47:39

cost of housing, healthcare, ICE, and

47:41

immigration, America's role in the

47:42

world, and the growing debt. There's no

47:44

doom scrolling needed. It's just an

47:46

exact, calm summary [music] for you to

47:47

declutter the chaos. The NPR politics

47:50

team is full of experienced political

47:51

journalists who talk like your smart

47:53

friends. [music] They offer clarity

47:54

without judgment so you can wrap up

47:56

every episode with better understanding

47:57

of how the balance of power might shift

47:59

without stressing you out. I absolutely

48:02

adore NPR. It is my go-to when I want to

48:05

bring my blood pressure down and [music]

48:06

just, you know, ma'am, just the facts,

48:08

please. U every media company has a

48:10

certain level of spin.

48:11

>> [music]

48:12

>> I find NPR has the least. Listen now to

48:14

the NPR Politics podcast in the NPR app

48:17

or wherever you get your podcasts.

48:23

Scott, we're back and I regret to inform

48:25

you. We have to talk about bestiality.

48:27

Let's listen to a clip of John Kennedy.

48:29

I've met him in person. He's hysterical.

48:31

Asking FBI Director Cash Patel about a

48:33

new policy that does not immediately

48:35

disqualify applicants who have engaged

48:37

in bestiality.

48:38

>> Why would you even get into bestiality?

48:42

We we are not into beastiality, but a

48:45

lot of these individuals

48:46

>> I know you're not, but you changed you

48:48

you you changed

48:49

>> but I'm trying to explain it. Hang on.

48:50

>> You changed the qualifications and

48:52

mentioned beastiality.

48:54

If if Joe if Joe participated in

48:57

beastiality,

48:59

>> not as the animal, but as the human,

49:03

>> don't you think he ought to be

49:04

qualified, disqualified?

49:06

>> If he voluntarily did it, sure. But if

49:08

he was trafficked into it,

49:09

>> how do you involuntarily do it?

49:11

>> Oh man, Scott, this was this there were

49:13

two moments on Capitol Hill this week.

49:15

This and then Mitch McConnell being

49:17

abused, you know, voting yes and no.

49:21

Like seriously, I mean, I was like, what

49:24

are the Republicans doing to themselves

49:26

like doing this? It was so strange. Um,

49:29

what is going on? And there's so many

49:31

good memes, so many good memes about

49:33

Cash Patel screwed the pooch. Uh uh

49:36

Christy Gnome's dog breathe a sigh of

49:39

relief at this. At least you didn't get

49:41

[ __ ] You just got shot. Um thoughts

49:44

like I can't. It's so [ __ ] up. The

49:48

both things. The both things really.

49:50

>> Well, look, this this sort of hits close

49:52

to home because I had a problem. Uh I

49:55

have struggled with addiction to

49:57

beiality with wolves,

50:00

but I'm getting better. Cara, I'm down

50:01

to a pack a day.

50:05

You [laughter] just said that's a good

50:07

one.

50:08

>> This is how

50:08

>> that is a really good joke.

50:10

>> This is how [ __ ] this is just how

50:13

[ __ ] I don't care. Take the stupidest

50:16

administration.

50:18

We couldn't have imagined anything

50:19

dialogue issue this stupid this has who

50:22

gives a [ __ ] a beastiality who can be

50:24

hard that means nothing here. What's

50:27

what's significant here is that one

50:32

how far how far we have fallen that the

50:35

director of FBI

50:38

legitimately has to defend this kind of

50:41

stupid policy change and what you

50:45

referenced before that a Republican

50:47

senator is starting to sense weakness

50:50

and isn't afraid to go after Trump's

50:53

appointees. You're starting to see the

50:55

worm turn, but this is just

50:58

embarrassing. This is our allies with

51:02

their with their, you know, their hands

51:04

their their head in their hands.

51:07

And

51:08

>> the senators were trying to save him,

51:10

those Republicans. And and then they

51:11

were like, "Okay, I've had enough of

51:13

this."

51:14

>> I was the other day I was trying to

51:15

figure out how many I was trying to

51:18

count how many sheep I had [ __ ] but I

51:21

fell asleep.

51:23

[laughter]

51:24

You just saved those up all week, didn't

51:25

[gasps] you?

51:26

>> I have been so excited about [laughter]

51:28

this podcast.

51:29

>> There's so many good cash. There's so

51:31

many good like

51:32

>> I'm almost as excited about this podcast

51:35

as the dramatic reading of all Ingmar

51:37

Bergman roles by Emily Ratikowski cuz

51:39

she clearly should lean into her acting

51:41

capabilities.

51:42

>> Oh, stop it. Listen,

51:44

>> you'd be the worst agent. Mitch

51:45

McConnell, you get 5 seconds on that.

51:47

That was like I don't I literally want

51:49

to go get him and save him. I don't even

51:51

like him. But I'm like, what are you

51:53

doing to this old man? Like, you're

51:54

moving him around. And

51:56

>> aren't Doesn't he have grandkids?

51:57

Doesn't he have someone to go like, "I'm

51:59

here to save grandpa. I'm here to give

52:01

pop some dignity."

52:02

>> This is like crazy what's happening up

52:04

here. I mean, it couldn't get more

52:05

embarrassing. They look like

52:07

>> What are you doing? Let me give you I

52:10

ran into John Kennedy on the on a plane

52:11

once and he he he must listen to Pivot

52:14

because he goes, "You two are funny." He

52:18

said he he looks like Fogghorn Legghorn

52:20

and he sounds like him. And I go, "Well,

52:22

thanks so much. You should come on the

52:24

podcast." He goes, "I will." And then I

52:26

was sitting in first class. He was in

52:28

coach. And he kept using the first class

52:31

bathroom. And he kept coming up like 10

52:33

times. There must have been a prostate

52:34

issue. And every time he came by, he

52:37

patted me like like physically patted

52:39

like, "Oh, you're fun." Did he say

52:41

you're funny?

52:42

>> Did he say hi? Did he say hi, little

52:43

boy? [laughter]

52:44

>> No. But he patted me that the steartist

52:47

came over uh and said, "Are you okay?

52:50

Did that bother you?" I'm like, "No,

52:51

it's John Kennedy." And he said, "Bogorn

52:53

Legghorn, I don't care. He's a smart

52:54

guy." But that was just something. Also,

52:57

I would I would urge people to watch the

52:59

surgeon general's questioning by um the

53:01

other Republican Senator Cassidy was

53:04

quite good. I would like him except that

53:06

he's voted for some terrible things. I

53:07

do I think he's charming in a lot of

53:09

ways. Anyway, this was something to

53:10

watch. which I couldn't and he couldn't

53:12

even and then after he did interviews

53:13

he's like I kept trying to say why do

53:16

you keep doing this and he wouldn't like

53:18

buy I wouldn't he wouldn't get out of it

53:20

anyway one more quick break and we'll be

53:22

back for predictions I've got a text

53:25

might be almost over but a new bombshell

53:28

has entered the villa meet the voices of

53:30

deep grand flux TTS I'm Drew lowkey

53:33

casual

53:34

>> I'm [music] Alexis an upbeat morning

53:36

person I'm Haley always cheerful

53:39

>> flux [music] TTS has some real

53:41

personalities that are ready to speak.

53:43

You can interrupt, pause, and keep

53:45

talking [music] without losing the plot.

53:46

>> Fancy a chat? Come try all the voices

53:48

free through September 12th at

53:50

deepgram.com/keeptalking. [music]

53:53

Terms apply.

53:54

>> Support for the show comes from Quint.

53:57

Is there something in your closet you

53:58

can't wait to bring back into rotation

54:00

every year? Maybe it's the jacket you

54:01

throw on for just about anything, the

54:03

boots that fit [music] perfectly, or the

54:05

scarf that instantly makes an outfit

54:07

feel put together. Those are the

54:08

reliable pieces you come back to season

54:10

after season. They're exactly what Quint

54:12

[music] does best. Quint makes premium

54:15

essentials for any season using

54:16

highquality materials like Mongolian

54:18

Kashmir, organic cotton, and washable

54:20

silk. The designs are timeless, [music]

54:22

expertly craft, and made to be worn

54:24

again and again. And all of their items

54:26

are priced 50 to 80% less than similar

54:29

brands. Plus, they work directly with

54:30

top [music] factories, cutting out the

54:32

middlemen. That way, you're only paying

54:34

for exceptional quality and not brand

54:36

markup. I just got Quinc sheets of all

54:39

things and I was surprised. [music] I

54:41

love them. They were incredibly well

54:42

priced. They're so soft. They're well

54:45

done. I didn't [music] have to like wash

54:47

them. They didn't feel scratchy in any

54:49

way and they were quite [music]

54:50

beautiful. I also have this um cardigan

54:53

that I'm ready to wear for the fall when

54:54

it stops being 90° here in Washington

54:56

DC. [music]

54:57

And I'm looking forward to buying other

54:58

things from Quint for the fall. Find the

55:00

fall pieces you'll reach for most

55:02

[music] at Quint. Download the Quint app

55:04

for app exclusive offers or go to

55:06

quint.com/pivot. [music]

55:07

Get free shipping with your order and

55:09

365day returns now available in Canada

55:12

and the UK too. That's quinc.com/pivot.

55:14

[music]

55:20

Okay, Scott, let's hear a prediction.

55:22

Can I do a very short one?

55:24

>> Of course.

55:24

>> I do think this Paramount leaving

55:26

California thing. I think they're going

55:27

to settle. I do. They have to settle. I

55:29

don't know what they're doing here by

55:30

being like so saber rattling. But behind

55:32

the scenes, I am absolutely certain

55:35

they're chitchatting away with Rob Bont

55:37

and the grand cuz they they haven't been

55:39

able to to peel off. They told me they

55:41

were going to peel off AGs. They didn't

55:43

do that. None of these op-ed ads have

55:44

worked. The money is getting really ugly

55:47

right now, including Larry Ellison's own

55:49

fortune. Um they don't have a choice.

55:52

And if they go, they'll probably go to

55:53

Nashville, I guess. But it didn't really

55:55

work when Disney tried to move a lot of

55:57

stuff to Florida. It's very expensive

55:59

and lots of people don't want to move.

56:01

They need to settle this like yesterday.

56:04

And um and if they go somewhere, I'm

56:06

assuming I've heard that Ellison, David

56:08

Ellison's looking for houses in

56:09

Nashville. But um but I I'd assume

56:12

that's where they're going. But uh we'll

56:14

see. We'll see because there's a lot of

56:15

entertainment there, I guess. I don't

56:16

know. Uh but I I can't imagine they're

56:18

going to do this. It's so it's so stupid

56:20

on top of other stupid things. And all

56:23

signs point to shitty, including the 60

56:26

Minutes decline, everything else. They

56:27

really need to get this in their

56:28

rearview mirror. Anyway, your thoughts

56:31

or your prediction?

56:32

>> Uh, well, first of all, I think you're

56:33

absolutely right. It's this isn't moving

56:35

customer service down to Orlando. These

56:38

are really talented, unique people who

56:41

live in LA for a reason. And right now,

56:44

essentially, Hollywood has already left

56:46

LA because the majority of the

56:47

production now takes place outside of

56:49

it. It's a hollow weird threat. Okay.

56:51

Also, the other thing is YouTube and

56:53

Netflix are doubling down and they will

56:54

buy everything up and then they'll laugh

56:56

in your [ __ ] face.

56:57

>> We'll take we'll take the best

56:58

production and creative executives. That

57:00

would be a gift to them.

57:00

>> They are. You both of them, YouTube and

57:02

Netflix will take everything. They're so

57:04

dumb and childish.

57:06

>> That's a hollow threat. So, uh, a couple

57:09

things. Uh, one, you're going to see a

57:12

country or a trading block ban

57:15

[clears throat] frontier models.

57:17

>> There's so much animosity.

57:20

all the moons are lining up. If if

57:23

you've had it with America, you're

57:25

looking to press on their soft tissue

57:27

and there's all this insecurity that oh

57:30

wait, 10% chance we might have an

57:32

extinction event. I know just for the

57:35

time being, dear America, as you have

57:38

levied all these ridiculous, sclerotic,

57:39

inconsistent tariffs on us, we're going

57:41

to take a break and we're going to put a

57:43

pause

57:45

>> on frontier models out of the US and

57:47

we're going to make it illegal and stop.

57:49

And if one of them really wants to go

57:51

gangster, they're going to do it for

57:52

against several tech companies.

57:54

>> Which is it? Europe, presumably or who?

57:57

>> I don't know where it could come from.

57:58

It might come from the Philippines. It

58:00

might come from It might come from

58:01

Finland. That guy's pretty

58:03

>> pretty, you know,

58:05

>> put in the leftist group too.

58:07

>> But one one or the block, the block is

58:09

the joint. You might come together and

58:11

say, you know what, just as Kathy Hogle

58:13

put in a moratorum on data centers,

58:15

we're going to put a moratorium on

58:17

frontier models out of the US.

58:20

and and you have never seen trillion

58:24

dollar plus companies this this fragile.

58:27

The these companies could lose and then

58:30

and then Bill Gates and Sach and Adella

58:32

and uh Sundar are going to call these

58:35

guys and go and Trump, what the actual

58:37

[ __ ] We're now being banned because

58:39

everybody thinks an 8-year-old is

58:41

running these things and you're talking

58:43

about extinction events. Anyways, that's

58:46

coming down the pike. we're going to see

58:47

a nation state or a block ban American

58:50

frontier models if we can coordinate

58:52

with the British and the Russians to put

58:54

push back on fascism. We're going to

58:56

find out that people can actually

58:57

coordinate to push back on economic

58:59

warfare.

59:01

So that that to me would be the smartest

59:04

thing they could do right now because

59:05

the reality is AI is being used by some

59:08

other companies but it hasn't really

59:10

picked up the same level of consumer

59:11

adoption that media would have you

59:13

believe in many of these countries.

59:14

>> I would agree. My real prediction here

59:17

is that [sighs and gasps]

59:19

and I'm back ining into a theory here

59:21

but uh it's pretty easy

59:25

times man of the era is already decided

59:26

it's Mark Carney and I have been paring

59:30

something you said that I was really

59:32

powerful that that was a Crow Magnum man

59:35

bested the Neanderls because of

59:37

>> cooperation to be fair I was I was I'm

59:39

listening to his book again but go ahead

59:41

yeah

59:41

>> so I was inspired by it and I I read

59:44

some of Robin Dumbar who's this famous

59:46

anthropologist

59:48

and he estimated that humans can

59:50

maintain roughly 150 meaningful social

59:53

relationships

59:55

but the whole point of modern society is

59:57

we can coordinate tens sometimes

59:58

hundreds of millions of strangers with

60:01

money laws uh treaties corporations

60:04

markets religions nations and

60:08

essentially that circle grows uh

60:11

exponentially.

60:12

If you think about a city, every time a

60:15

city's population doubles, the economic

60:18

prosperity of its citizen goes up,

60:20

citizens goes up 15%. Because it starts

60:23

to leverage cooperation. And what most

60:26

people don't appreciate is that one

60:28

pencil requires a civilization.

60:32

If you think about Reed's famous eye

60:33

pencil observation, no one no one person

60:37

knows how to make an ordinary pencil

60:39

from scratch. You need cedar, you need

60:41

graphite, you need metal,

60:43

>> you have to be in mining, shipping,

60:45

rubber, finance, retail. So a 20 cent

60:48

object requires the cooperation of

60:51

thousands of strangers coordinating

60:53

without knowing one another. Your your

60:55

breakfast is a multinational joint

60:57

venture. Coffee from Colombia, the

61:00

machine from Italy, wheat from the

61:02

Midwest, fertilizer from Qatar. I'm

61:05

relisting and I recommend everyone do it

61:07

to I read it but now I'm listening to

61:09

it. Uvel Harrari's Sapiens and I'm a

61:12

huge fan of his and for a while tech

61:15

loved that book. A lot of them are like

61:17

have you read Sapiens? Did you know all

61:18

this? I'm like I did. I went to college

61:19

and I paid attention and you didn't. But

61:22

one of the things that's critical in

61:23

this is how the Neanderl beat. There

61:25

were lots of other uh uh hominids,

61:28

right? And they were all over. There

61:29

were like 12 or 15 of them. They all

61:31

were put put out of business by sapiens

61:34

and they we were smaller. We were we

61:38

were much smaller than all almost all of

61:40

them and had had very you know in terms

61:42

of physical and stuff like that. But the

61:44

one thing that he talked about and this

61:45

the section I'm in right now is called

61:47

cooperation networks and and these are

61:50

structures of interconnected individuals

61:52

organizations and that can coordinate

61:54

resources and build collective value and

61:57

um and it's it was critically it is the

61:59

thing that allowed us to dominate was

62:02

the we were good at doing war too but we

62:05

were really good at cooperation networks

62:08

among and between tribes and everything

62:09

else and the others were not at all like

62:12

in that regard

62:13

>> and that This is the killer app. And one

62:16

of a piece of advice when young people

62:17

say I'm basically I'm e what advice

62:20

would you have for young people? I'm

62:21

like geography has a lot to do with it.

62:23

If you're an economic animal, the first

62:24

thing is get to a city. Cities are

62:26

cooperation engines. And when cities get

62:30

larger, wages, patents, economic

62:32

activity goes up. It humans together in

62:36

the network of a city can become more

62:38

productive than the sum of its parts.

62:40

>> Restaurant, you know, everything. You

62:41

know, it's interesting. It's funny,

62:43

speaking of cooperation, Louisie was in

62:44

the salad department of the fancy

62:46

restaurant he's working in San

62:47

Francisco. He's just been moved to the

62:49

hotline, which and he's very nervous

62:50

because it requires enormous

62:52

cooperation, right? He's [snorts] like,

62:54

but he makes the salads by himself, but

62:56

he's like he's it's really it was we

62:58

were talking about this cooperation

63:00

network. He's like, I'm really nervous

63:01

about the hotline, Mom. And I was like,

63:03

it was so funny because I was like,

63:05

well, you have to you really it's like a

63:06

dance, right? And that's how we make

63:09

things. It's like it it makes you think

63:10

about a lot of ways we do that.

63:12

>> We touch more people and have benefit

63:14

from more relationships before 9:00 a.m.

63:16

than any medieval king had in his entire

63:19

lifetime. Modern prosperity is a team

63:22

sport uh disguised as individual

63:24

achievement. And this is what this

63:26

president does not

63:27

>> can't we all get along.

63:29

>> We must all get along. You think about

63:32

behind every billionaire, every big

63:34

company, employees, universities, roads,

63:37

courts, capital markets, customers,

63:39

suppliers, the electric grid, uh, DARPA,

63:42

the internet, and generations of

63:45

accumulated knowledge. There is no such

63:48

thing as self-made.

63:50

>> I love both of these. These are

63:51

excellent predictions, Scott.

63:53

>> There's no such thing. And the fact that

63:56

we are regressing

63:59

and deciding through our actions to to

64:04

devolve

64:06

and ruin relationships.

64:08

It is it is the most basic lesson when

64:11

you're advising a young person. Your

64:13

success is a function of the number of

64:17

deep and meaningful and positive

64:20

relationships you're going to develop. I

64:21

think we should all agree on Sydney

64:23

Sweeny's boobs and then go move on.

64:26

>> Well, I don't know if you've heard, but

64:27

she's just been cast in the new Terms of

64:28

Endearment and she's playing Shelley

64:30

Mlean. She's playing Shirley Mlan's role

64:32

because she listened to you and she

64:34

realized her assets is her acting

64:35

capability.

64:36

>> 20 years from now and Roger Federer is a

64:38

new James Bond,

64:39

>> whatever. Anyway, you didn't do that.

64:41

You're not being a cooperation network.

64:43

You're doing the very opposite President

64:44

Trump here. You're President Trump of

64:46

this podcast is what you are.

64:48

>> There we go. All right, we have to go

64:50

some. Excellent. This is These are two.

64:51

I think your other one is quite um

64:54

interesting. That would be a real blow

64:55

to these companies, too.

64:57

>> Um and they're not a cooperation

64:59

network. They're a cooperation for

65:00

themselves. Anyway, that was great.

65:02

Scott, both of those were brilliant.

65:04

Once again, once again, you shock and a

65:06

me. Um anyway, we want to hear from you.

65:09

Send us your questions about business

65:11

tech or whatever's on your mind. Go to

65:12

new yorkymag.com/pivot.

65:14

Send a question for the show or call

65:16

85551 pivot. Um, remember we're going on

65:19

tour, so get tickets. We do sell out and

65:21

especially in certain cities like San

65:23

Francisco and others. Toronto for sure.

65:25

Go to uh pivotour.com and get your

65:28

tickets as soon as you can. We're going

65:29

to have It's going to be a really good

65:31

show. It's going to be so much news and

65:33

information. We're going to have a good

65:34

time. We'll have great guests and we

65:36

love seeing you all. Um,

65:38

>> are you inviting former girlfriends

65:39

who've turned lesbian?

65:40

>> Yes, all of them. Do you have any more?

65:42

Oh, I'm going to have many surprises. I

65:44

think it's called I think my guess is

65:46

pretty much every ex 78 70 80%

65:49

likelihood here. You know what? That was

65:51

a highlight for me. Debbie Brewbaker, I

65:53

hope you're well.

65:54

>> I am going to surprise you once again

65:56

with many, many, many things throughout

65:58

the tour. I I'm planning it right now

66:01

and they're going to be they're going to

66:02

be good. That's good. We're also going

66:03

to have merch Scott and I have been

66:05

deciding on finally and it's really

66:07

good. It's really fun

66:08

>> stuff.

66:08

>> Um okay, that's the show. Thanks for

66:10

listening to Pivot and be sure to like

66:12

and subscribe to our YouTube channel.

66:14

We'll be back next week.

66:19

[music]

Interactive Summary

In this episode of Pivot, hosts Cara Swisher and Scott Galloway engage in a wide-ranging discussion covering pop culture, the challenges of modern political discourse, the tension between major tech companies and the government regarding AI regulation, and a humorous analysis of recent political hearings. The hosts are joined by Jessica Tarlov, co-host of "The Five," to discuss her new book "I Disagree: Winning Arguments Without Losing Friends" and explore the necessity of nuanced disagreement in a polarized climate. The episode also touches on the potential international fallout regarding AI and the broader implications of corporate governance in an increasingly connected world.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts