HomeVideos

I was down big. Then I did THIS...

Now Playing

I was down big. Then I did THIS...

Transcript

647 segments

0:00

By 10:00 in the morning, I was down more

0:03

than I wanted to be and our desk was

0:04

down something like a million bucks. But

0:07

the same stock, the same day, we

0:09

finished up big. And the only thing that

0:11

changed between the part of the day when

0:13

being down and finishing the day strong

0:16

was one single thing. I'm going to walk

0:18

you through every decision I made today

0:20

on SPCX. the mistake I made in the

0:22

morning, exactly how I reset, and the

0:25

moment in the afternoon where I where we

0:28

finally hammered it because

0:30

understanding why three trades we are

0:32

about to cover in real detail are

0:34

completely different. That's the

0:36

difference between a trader who

0:38

compounds losses and one who compounds

0:40

gains. Let's go.

1:00

So this is SPCX SpaceX the morning of

1:04

June 16th, right? Pre-market stock was

1:07

quiet. It had gapped up. Nothing really

1:10

special, but it had gapped up and it was

1:12

the third day up, right? It had sold off

1:14

a little bit. traders were kind of

1:15

calling for a top because of the

1:17

pre-market selloff and they thought

1:19

maybe first day of options the open was

1:22

going to be the high here. We're going

1:23

to open and just sell off, right? It

1:25

opened right around 200. Then right at

1:27

9:30,

1:29

it opened and and the first move was up,

1:32

right? And that's when the trade kind of

1:34

got amusing and not in a good way, but

1:36

it did. A trader called out, "It's

1:38

stuffed. Get short. Hammer this thing."

1:41

Great. It's a short. Let's put the

1:43

hammer on the chart right at the highs,

1:45

right? It's going to go lower. We can

1:47

get risk on in this trade. Let's hammer

1:50

this thing. And traders, I did too. Put

1:53

risk on. But the response wasn't really

1:55

right. The hammer didn't work. Now, this

1:58

is something that happens. You take a

2:00

trade and it doesn't work. You take your

2:02

stop, right? But traders were so focused

2:05

on the idea and they were so afraid to

2:08

miss the short, they didn't see that

2:10

obvious mini hitchhiker trade setting

2:13

up. I mean, that was a rip, right? It

2:16

was a frustrating rip. And from there,

2:18

for a little bit, it didn't get better

2:20

as the stock started grinding higher.

2:22

The thing just kept going. There wasn't

2:24

really a pullback, but then it did start

2:27

to consolidate just below 220. And I was

2:30

watching this happen in real time. And

2:32

everything in me was saying this is too

2:34

extended on the higher time frame. This

2:37

has to stop. This has to be close to the

2:39

top. So I shorted it and we shorted it

2:42

with size. Let's be very clear about

2:44

what I did wrong here. What we did wrong

2:46

here because this is the exact mistake I

2:49

see developing traders make every single

2:52

day. I wasn't reacting to the market. I

2:55

wasn't reacting to the price action. I

2:57

was predicting it. There's a massive

2:59

difference between those two things. And

3:01

in the moment when you're watching a

3:03

stock rip and your instincts are

3:06

screaming at you, that difference is is

3:09

really easy to blur. At SMB, we grade

3:12

every setup, every trade before we trade

3:15

it. And the grade isn't based on how you

3:17

feel. It's based on what the market's

3:19

actually telling you. So, let's grade

3:22

this opportunity right now. Uh trend

3:25

direction. Well, the trend was up. It

3:27

was hard up. I'm trying to short in an

3:30

uptrend. Was Was there confirmation? No.

3:33

None. The stock hasn't shown any signs

3:35

of topping. There's no failed breakout,

3:37

no reversal candle. There wasn't volume

3:39

drying up. There was nothing. Catalyst?

3:42

No. There was no real news. This is a

3:45

momentum move. It could run for another

3:47

hour if it wanted to. The riskreward, I

3:49

mean, I was shorting against momentum

3:51

with no defined level to get short

3:53

against. My stop was honestly a little

3:55

too ambiguous. my target was was based

3:58

on hope that this was going to reverse.

4:00

If we take those input variables, that's

4:03

maybe at best a C trade, but it's more

4:06

likely a D trade. And here's the rule at

4:08

SMB. C setups get C size, D setups get

4:13

no size, and they don't get taken at

4:16

all. I broke that rule.

4:20

I sized up. traders on our desk sized up

4:23

because we were convinced because the

4:26

move on the higher time frame looks so

4:28

obvious that it just had to fail because

4:31

there was a seller at 220, right? That's

4:33

it's going to fail there.

4:36

A couple hundred,000 maybe a million is

4:39

what it costs our desk when we guess

4:43

when we are thinking we might be right

4:46

on the direction but we're actually off

4:48

on the timing. The hardest part wasn't

4:50

the loss.

4:52

It was knowing in the moment when I was

4:55

down 10% of a stop, then 20, then 30,

4:59

knowing that I'd made the wrong trade

5:01

and I was still fighting because I

5:04

wanted to be right. That's the other

5:06

mistake in inside the mistake, and we'll

5:08

come back to it. But first, what do you

5:11

do when you're down a bunch of money on

5:13

a trade you shouldn't have taken? So

5:15

most traders after a loss like that,

5:18

they do one of two things. They either

5:21

walk away. They just get up and and walk

5:23

away. They shut it down. They're just

5:26

too frustrated to think straight and

5:28

they need to get all this clarity right.

5:31

Or they revenge trade. They double their

5:33

size in the next setup because they need

5:35

to get it back right now. And they can

5:38

quickly turn a $1,000 loss into a $2,000

5:40

loss. for our desk. That's how we turn a

5:43

million dollar loss into a two or $2.5

5:45

million loss. It's honestly exactly the

5:48

same process. It's just done at scale.

5:50

So, we have to be really careful here

5:52

because I've done both those things.

5:54

I've walked away out of frustration with

5:56

myself and I've revenge traded trying to

5:59

get it back right away. We all know

6:03

exactly how each one ends when the

6:05

pressure gets amped up so much that it

6:08

almost feels like it forces you to act.

6:10

You can physically feel your body

6:12

getting tight, your mind almost

6:14

certainly driving right into fight or

6:16

flight mode. So, we have to put a system

6:20

in to interrupt that negative feedback

6:22

loop because I don't like the outcomes

6:24

of those two choices that I could make.

6:27

Right after I got blown out of that

6:29

short, I I stepped back. I mean,

6:31

physically, I took my hands off the

6:33

keys, took a breath, and I looked at the

6:36

chart again. I went through this simple

6:38

skill. It's called a 120, which we're

6:41

going to detail in just a minute. It

6:42

just takes three steps. It's 120

6:45

seconds. But after that, I did and we

6:48

all kind of looked at the chart again,

6:50

like the desk hadn't just drawn down a

6:52

million dollars on it, right? We looked

6:54

at it like it was a new stock and and we

6:57

were seeing it completely fresh. And

6:59

when we did that, when I did that,

7:02

something changed. All right, look at

7:04

this area right here.

7:08

SpaceX had driven to 225 and now it was

7:11

trying to push higher and it it just

7:12

can't. Right? Getting clarity after

7:15

using that 120. We started to think,

7:17

okay, I'm looking for a bearish rubber

7:19

band scalp to start, right? The buyers

7:23

are maybe exhausted here. This is a

7:26

totally different trade from what I

7:28

traded in the morning. In the morning, I

7:29

was trying to predict a top. Now, the

7:32

market actually might be showing me one.

7:35

So, I went into the next step of this

7:38

process or another step. We're going to

7:39

go through all the steps later, but I

7:41

graded the setup using our simple asset

7:44

protocol and and this time it came back

7:46

a B. Not an A, but a B. There was still

7:49

uncertainty. The stock hadn't fully

7:52

confirmed the rollover. I mean, it

7:54

definitely could squeeze back to high.

7:55

So, I sized it for a B, which at my

7:58

level means with 50% of what I'd

8:01

normally trade on an A setup or an A

8:03

opportunity, right? I've got a defined

8:06

stop above the recent high and I'm

8:09

waiting for confirmation before I add

8:13

if the stock offers it. It doesn't have

8:15

to offer it, but I'm waiting for that

8:17

confirmation.

8:19

Using the asset protocol allocation was

8:21

B- risk. Stop was 2 cents above the high

8:24

a day. It was 225, I think 66, right?

8:27

The entry was the first move below that

8:30

prior bar low, right? or that prior two

8:34

bar low. So it was right around

8:37

22163ish,

8:39

right? Our target was VWAP 212.

8:44

Now this is the discipline that most

8:47

people don't talk about. It's not

8:49

exciting. There's no big moment here.

8:51

It's just grade it, size it, execute it.

8:56

Right? This trade started to work,

8:58

right? It started to roll over

9:00

magnetically making its way to VWOP. We

9:03

were getting a little more confirmation

9:05

as the stock tried to pop and then kept

9:07

giving us lower highs and lower lows,

9:09

but I never had an opportunity to really

9:11

add. This was just a straightup rubber

9:13

band, right? The trade gave me B- risk

9:15

and it didn't give me a super obvious

9:17

place to add. It didn't show a super

9:19

clean backside or even a great version

9:22

of a fashionably late. So, it was a

9:24

trade to exit as it pulled into the

9:27

targets.

9:29

By the time the position was closed, I

9:31

was back to flat, maybe even a little

9:33

bit up and so was the desk. As a desk,

9:37

we're talking about maybe being up a few

9:38

hundred grand. Nothing crazy, but up.

9:40

Right now, here's what I want you to

9:43

understand about that number. Our

9:45

traders,

9:47

I didn't try to make back that draw down

9:49

in a single trade. I mean, I I didn't

9:52

need to. We didn't need to. The rubber

9:53

band short wasn't a thousand trade or a

9:56

$100,000 trade or a million-doll trade.

9:58

It was a B trade. It made back what a B

10:02

trade should make because the grade

10:05

drives the size. Not your ego, not your

10:08

morning P&L, not the voice in your head

10:10

telling you to get it back really fast.

10:12

The grade drives the size. It doesn't

10:15

matter that we were right. Right? That

10:17

stock topped out there. There was this

10:19

trader that said, "Oh man, that felt so

10:21

good." Right? One of the traders says,

10:24

"That's the tough. We won't see those

10:25

prices again for a long time in this

10:27

thing." But here's the big difference

10:30

between falling for that mindset and

10:32

letting it go and just trading well. One

10:35

mindset focuses on being right. You

10:39

attach your personal value to your call,

10:42

to your prediction. The other mindset is

10:44

is a much more productive one. It

10:46

focuses on getting your actions right,

10:50

grading well, and not giving yourself

10:52

the chance to backslide. The day is not

10:56

done because one trade is over. And

10:59

here's the key self-t talk after that

11:02

moment. All right, I made a mistake,

11:05

but I came back and I graded it well and

11:07

I let the trade fall into my lap. My

11:10

next goal, my very next goal, not the

11:12

goal of the year or the month or the

11:14

week, but my very next goal is just to

11:17

win my asset protocol. The first step of

11:21

that, the thing that gets the wheels

11:22

moving is to get my allocation right.

11:26

That's all I have to do. Now, we're

11:29

going to show you the 120, a process we

11:31

use. We teach our traders to get back

11:34

into that trader mindset in two minutes.

11:37

But the key here is I don't have to pick

11:39

what's going to happen in the stock on

11:41

any given day or week. I just have to

11:44

get my allocation right for the very

11:47

next trade I'm making. I have to make

11:49

sure I have to win the asset protocol

11:53

first. And even more of a focus, I have

11:55

to win the allocation part of the asset

11:58

protocol first.

12:00

Once you have that mindset and

12:02

particularly if you're looking for the

12:04

next trade with that mindset, that

12:06

targeted focus, our desk was able to

12:10

stay grounded. It actually allowed

12:12

traders, it allows you to say, "I don't

12:14

have anything to risk now." As we watch

12:17

the price action evolve, it wasn't even

12:18

a C trade, so it wasn't worth it to me

12:20

at all right now. And we just kept

12:22

saying that as it kind of chopped

12:24

around, chopped around. We let other

12:26

people guess with size if it was going

12:28

to break out or if it was going to break

12:29

down. But at that point, it wasn't even

12:32

worth see risk there. So, we didn't have

12:34

anything to do. So, nothing was was

12:36

done. As we came into the early

12:38

afternoon, we started to see, you know,

12:41

the price change. We had been watching

12:43

SPCX all day. We knew this stock now. We

12:46

knew where it had been. We knew how it

12:48

moves. We knew where the key levels

12:50

were. And we started to see something

12:53

happen.

12:55

So this red line that you're looking at

12:57

of the chart, that's VWOP, the volume

12:59

weighted average price. It's the line

13:01

that separates where buyers are in

13:02

control from where sellers are in

13:04

control. For most of the afternoon,

13:07

SpaceX had been above VWAP. I mean, not

13:10

super strong, a little bit weak, but at

13:12

least above VWAP. The sellers were

13:14

trying, but the buyers kept holding it

13:16

up. Then right around here at like 130,

13:20

it started to change.

13:23

And then at like 245 it changed the

13:27

stock loss VWAP and and not really

13:29

barely big candles, real volume, real

13:34

sellers stepping in and I'm watching

13:37

this happening. I'm running through the

13:39

asset grade in real time. Would I have

13:41

liked to catch it from that 215 failure

13:43

earlier in the day? Yeah, absolutely.

13:45

Did I have a trade there? No. Would I

13:48

have liked to catch that move below

13:51

VWOP? That would be amazing. Did I have

13:53

a trade there? No.

13:56

Working the asset protocol. What was

13:58

happening in the trend at that point?

14:01

Now it was clearly down. The VWAP was

14:04

lost. The moving averages were rolling

14:06

over. The price was making lower lows.

14:10

We can actually use a catalyst here too

14:13

because the stock spent all morning

14:15

trying to go up and now it's failing.

14:17

That failure is the catalyst. Remember

14:19

price getting through an important

14:21

technical level is a catalyst not

14:23

because of the level but because of the

14:25

psychology of the stock and more

14:28

specifically the psychology of the

14:29

participants watching and trading this

14:32

stock along with us. At this point the

14:35

VWAP and that level getting broken

14:37

anybody who was looking for this to

14:39

squeeze into the close was wrong. the

14:42

chasers or the people looking for that

14:44

momentum to continue to the upside are

14:46

are wrong and they're going to offer us

14:48

a great trade for the afternoon. So, the

14:51

stock gave it one last attempt to try

14:53

and rally back above VWOP and it got

14:55

completely stuffed after there was this

14:58

consolidation, really tight

15:00

consolidation. And if you notice, it's

15:03

below the area where the buyers were

15:05

supporting it all day. Now, this is a

15:08

puppy dog consolidation. It's a

15:10

modification of the big dog. It's just a

15:12

shorter one at a more pivotal level.

15:16

It's a consolidation below a key support

15:18

level in a stock that was overextended

15:20

and now showing signs of reversal.

15:23

Given the fact that the trend changed,

15:25

given the fact that the price action was

15:27

confirming for us, this is an a

15:30

allocation a setup and a setups get a

15:35

size. Was there confirmation? Yeah, the

15:38

VWAP break was with volume. This wasn't

15:40

a fake out. The seller seemed committed.

15:43

Now, let's go through our full asset

15:46

protocol here again. Allocation. Well,

15:48

the stop was clean. It was above VWOP,

15:51

above 212, right? If I'm wrong, I know

15:53

exactly where I'm wrong. The entry was a

15:57

break of the puppy hog consolidation to

15:59

the downside. So, it was around 20875.

16:03

All right. So, what do you have for a

16:04

target here? I I'll admit this is a

16:06

little bit of a tricky one, but let's

16:08

think about it. If buyers from today are

16:11

wrong, where should this go? Well, yeah,

16:14

at a minimum it should go down to 200.

16:16

It should test everybody who was long,

16:19

right? And then with our asset protocol

16:23

armed with our a risk, knowing our stop,

16:26

knowing our clear entry, and knowing our

16:28

target, we can just wait for that entry

16:30

to materialize.

16:32

It gives us that entry. SBCX started

16:35

moving and I mean I mean moving right

16:38

now it was getting hammered lower not

16:40

that choppy back and forth of the

16:42

morning. This is a clean directional

16:45

move with sellers in control, buyers

16:47

clearly stepping aside. The stock

16:50

quickly went from that 209 or 208 entry

16:52

to 202.

16:54

I've seen this before, but let's break

16:56

it down again because now the stock's

16:58

below everywhere the buyers have been

17:01

supporting all day. The only threshold

17:03

left is that 200 target.

17:07

It's below that 205 area of key support.

17:10

It got so close to that target at 200.

17:13

And because it got there so fast, I have

17:15

to cover some just because it went down

17:17

there that quickly. I cover half traders

17:20

on the desk who had loaded in with me.

17:23

Lots of traders taking a risk on this

17:26

trade.

17:28

covered half.

17:31

But given the change in dynamics and

17:34

given the time of day, I got to look for

17:37

a second chance scalp. We all got to

17:40

look for a second chance scalp. So, we

17:42

can keep half our position with a stop

17:44

at break even now from our puppy dog

17:47

scalp and we can look for a totally new

17:49

trade. And the second chance scalp is a

17:52

great one to use once the setup has

17:54

changed, right? And this one went from

17:57

all the momentum to the upside to all

17:59

the momentum to the downside. So, the

18:01

setup has changed. The second chance is

18:04

a trade you you make when people have to

18:07

get in because they're going to have

18:08

FOMO after the trade broke out of range

18:10

to the upside or they have to get out

18:13

because the stock's already broken to

18:14

the downside. Again, I'm not counting my

18:17

money in the trade that I'm already in

18:18

or I'm not worrying about if it stops me

18:20

out. I've already accepted the risk and

18:24

this next risk is a good risk to be

18:27

taking. The risk from the prior trade

18:29

was a good risk to be taking.

18:33

All I have to do is reset, take a deep

18:36

breath, and make sure I can focus on my

18:39

asset protocol here. All right, second

18:41

chance below a key level this late in

18:44

the day. It's B risk. I know, I know

18:47

what you're thinking, right? What? Isn't

18:49

that a risk? Weren't you just in an

18:50

A-Risk trade? But wait a second. Did

18:52

this break 200? No. Now, if this same

18:56

price action that happening that's

18:58

happening around 205 or between 200 and

19:01

205, if that was happening below 200,

19:03

how much better would this trade be?

19:06

That trade would be a risk. All the

19:09

buyers would be wrong in the day. But

19:11

they're not. So, I have B allocation.

19:14

My stop 205 and a half. Let's call it

19:18

206 just to be safe because this thing

19:20

moves, right? My entry would be when I

19:22

get a clear break to the downside. So, I

19:25

want to see the candle break that small

19:27

range that's formed to the downside.

19:30

Entry is like 20330, right? Or 203

19:33

probably. And let's just call it three

19:35

points of risk. Now, target this is a

19:39

momentum trade. So, I'll trail using a

19:41

trailing stop of the 9 EMA. And I'll use

19:44

it on a one minute chart. Other traders

19:46

will use uh a double bar break or

19:49

something like that, but I like to give

19:50

it a little bit of room and use those

19:52

trailing EMAs, but at a minimum, this

19:55

should break 200, maybe a little fight

19:58

there, and then actually move lower

20:01

given the time of day. 205 to 200. I

20:04

hold tight stop, let it work. 200 to

20:09

197. All right, that's where I start

20:11

scaling out or getting ready to scale

20:15

out. I'm ready because as soon as that

20:18

that bid steps back in, as soon as we

20:20

get clearing above that 9 EMA, I really

20:24

need to manage my risk 197 to 195. By

20:28

the time we close out of the last

20:30

position, by the time we get that flush

20:33

and then that rebid and all our traders

20:35

are saying that that's it, we're out.

20:37

that momentum to the downside is gone.

20:40

When that happens, we're finally on that

20:43

day up some serious money in this trade.

20:46

You actually heard it from different

20:48

sections of the trading floor as traders

20:50

took advantage of this. People were

20:52

clapping like, "Yeah, nice job." No one

20:55

is applauding the P&L. That wasn't what

20:57

we're about. We're actually applauding

20:59

the risk and the risk takingaking, that

21:01

following of the asset protocol to stay

21:04

engaged. This is all on SPCX, SpaceX. It

21:08

was the same stock that we lost close to

21:09

a million on in the morning across the

21:12

desk. But here's the thing I need you to

21:14

understand. I want you to understand

21:16

because this is the part that so many

21:18

people get wrong when they hear a story

21:19

like this. I didn't make serious money

21:22

because we're better traders than we

21:24

were this morning. We didn't suddenly

21:26

develop new skills between 10:00 a.m.

21:28

and 2 p.m. It's not the way it works,

21:31

right? The market just gave us an a

21:33

setup in the afternoon.

21:35

It gave us a D setup or a C setup maybe

21:38

in the morning and then it gave us a B

21:40

setup as as we saw that reversal, right?

21:43

The only reason I was in a position to

21:45

take that A trade with full size with a

21:48

clear head with that discipline to hold

21:49

it and then add to it when that other

21:52

trade showed up was because I hadn't

21:54

blown up my account on the idea trade in

21:56

the morning. And more importantly, I

21:57

hadn't blown up my psychology

22:00

on that idea trade in the morning. I

22:02

didn't need grit. I didn't need like

22:04

like this resolve to be able to stick

22:06

with the idea. No, the mental cushion I

22:09

built by using that appropriate reset,

22:13

the money I made back in the B trade,

22:15

that's what gave me the emotional runway

22:17

to trade the afternoon correctly. I

22:20

wasn't desperate. I wasn't trying to get

22:22

back to break even. I was just watching,

22:25

waiting, grading, and looking for that a

22:29

trade. And when it came, I was ready.

22:32

All right. So, let me ask you something.

22:34

If you'd been down $1,000 or $100,000 or

22:37

a million dollars by 10:00 a.m. today,

22:41

what would you have done? Would you have

22:43

stepped back,

22:45

graded the next setup, size for a B when

22:48

you were only in a B situation?

22:51

Or would you have done what most people

22:53

do? Let that morning loss poison the

22:59

reversal and then the afternoon. Because

23:03

here's what I've learned after years of

23:05

training traders at SMB. The traders who

23:07

make money long term, they're not the

23:09

ones with the best scanner or the best

23:11

data feed or the most screens. They're

23:13

the ones who put themselves in a

23:15

position to grade every single trade.

23:18

That's the standard that they have for

23:20

themselves. They don't listen to how

23:22

they're feeling. They listen for if they

23:26

are thinking through trades from the

23:28

asset protocol. If they can't follow the

23:31

asset protocol, that's when they take a

23:33

break, a quick break, but a break. Let's

23:36

get into the specific twominut break

23:38

that they take. And this is a little

23:41

part of the pressure mastery protocol we

23:43

teach to our traders. This subset of it

23:45

is called the 120. And here it is. Step

23:48

one, you label the emotions that you're

23:52

feeling. And this comes from a concept

23:54

from a really great book, Never Split

23:56

the Difference. I think it's by Chris

23:58

Voss. We actually teach traders to label

24:01

the event that triggered them and label

24:03

the emotion around it. And what they do

24:06

is they actually say this out loud. I

24:09

forced this trade because I was afraid

24:11

to miss a good opportunity.

24:14

So they label the trigger and they label

24:16

the emotion.

24:17

That's the first step of this entire

24:20

process. Usually, it takes a couple

24:22

seconds to get into that mindset when

24:24

you're like, "Okay, I forced this trade

24:27

because I was afraid to miss a good

24:28

opportunity." Step two, you take your

24:31

hands off the keys for 60 seconds. Off

24:34

the mouse, off the keys for 60 seconds.

24:38

Not getting up and running away. Just 60

24:40

seconds sitting at your desk. Hands off

24:43

keys, off mouse. Just be there.

24:48

That's the pause.

24:51

That pause allows your brain to start

24:54

receiving information again

24:59

and then you make the switch. Step

25:02

three, you go right into the asset

25:04

protocol. Now, if you can't get to a

25:07

clear asset protocol, you don't force

25:09

anything, but you use it to get back

25:11

into high quality idea generation mode.

25:14

Here's an example from this morning

25:17

right after I took a 120. All right. All

25:20

right. The allocation. All right. This

25:22

is now extended. It's a B trade. If I

25:26

see a rubber band candle. All right. If

25:28

I see a rubber band candle, where's my

25:30

stop? All right. It's above the high of

25:31

the candle. Where is my entry? All

25:33

right. It's the close of the first red

25:34

bar before the prior two green bars,

25:37

right? Double bar break. What's my

25:40

target? It's VWAP. Now, a really

25:43

fascinating thing happens when you enact

25:44

the 120.

25:46

Traders,

25:48

you won't become someone you're not.

25:51

You'll actually become who you actually

25:53

are. And for almost everybody, that's

25:55

enough. Traders are balanced. They're

25:58

back to who they are at their best. They

26:00

can trade with a clear mind because

26:03

we're traders who size by the grade, not

26:05

by how they feel.

26:08

Traders that use this stay in the game

26:10

long enough for that a setup. That setup

26:12

that occurred later in the day to arrive

26:15

and at that point they take the right

26:18

risk in the right trade. That's who we

26:21

are and that's who you are. You're just

26:23

like us. We're all traders. We're all

26:25

elite level traders. Today started badly

26:28

and I could have let that define the

26:30

whole day. We could have let that define

26:32

our whole approach to the opportunities

26:34

offered on the day. But instead, I let

26:38

the grade define my trades and the

26:41

trades define the day. That's the shift.

26:44

That's what changes everything.

26:47

If you want to build a system that

26:48

actually does this, if you want to

26:50

understand how to grade your setups, how

26:52

to size by grade, how to know the

26:54

difference between a C trade and an A

26:56

trade before you're in it, uh here's a

26:58

link to a video where we teach the

27:00

actual trades we discuss, and there are

27:02

cheat sheets for those as well. Watch

27:04

that next. It's the framework behind the

27:07

trades I made today, and it'll change

27:10

the way you see every chart you look at

27:12

from here on. I'll see you there.

Interactive Summary

The video discusses how a professional trading desk handled a significant morning loss on the stock SPCX by adhering to a disciplined 'asset protocol'. The speaker explains the mistake of predicting the market rather than reacting to it, and how they used the '120' protocol—a two-minute reset process—to maintain emotional control. By grading setups and sizing positions based on that grade (A, B, C, or D) instead of revenge trading, the team successfully recovered their losses and capitalized on an 'A-setup' later in the day.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts