HomeVideos

How Your Immune System Works & How to Improve It | Dr. Max Krummel

Now Playing

How Your Immune System Works & How to Improve It | Dr. Max Krummel

Transcript

4625 segments

0:00

a famous um marinologist in the 1970s

0:03

drew this parallel in wartime and said

0:05

in World War II submarines had two sets

0:07

of books. One of them was a book that

0:10

gave them the sound profile of all the

0:12

US submarines and so they could listen

0:14

to the were of the engines and if they

0:15

heard a were of the engine that had the

0:17

certain cycle of a general mo you know

0:19

motors engine they wouldn't fire. So

0:21

that's the sort of like self I know what

0:23

self is. And then they had another book

0:25

that was the engine sounds of the known

0:28

diesel engines of whatever engines of

0:29

the German submarines. And if they heard

0:31

that then they absolutely would fire.

0:33

And that's a self versus

0:34

non-self-discrimination problem just

0:36

like the immune system has to do. But

0:38

what I bring you with it aging is this

0:40

concept that as you get weirder and

0:41

different your body is getting like more

0:43

complex then that those books you know

0:46

start to have every possible possibly

0:48

every possible permutation of every

0:49

biomolelecule could could could be made

0:51

by your body at that point and then a

0:53

virus doesn't necessarily have anything

0:55

unique about it.

0:56

>> Welcome to the Huberman Lab podcast

0:58

where we discuss science [music]

1:00

and science-based tools for everyday

1:02

life.

1:04

>> [music]

1:05

>> I'm Andrew Huberman and I'm a professor

1:07

of neurobiology and opthalmology at

1:10

Stanford School of Medicine. My guest

1:12

today is Dr. Max Kuml, a professor and

1:15

leading expert in immunology and cancer

1:17

biology at the University of California,

1:19

San Francisco. Today we discuss your

1:22

immune system, how it works, what it

1:24

needs to function at its best, and how

1:26

things like aging, vaccines, sleep, and

1:28

even your thoughts and emotions shape

1:30

immune function. For instance, most

1:32

everybody knows that being sleepd

1:33

deprived makes you more prone to getting

1:35

sick. But why? Meaning mechanistically

1:37

why? Well, it turns out there's a

1:39

specific set of cells that need to

1:40

migrate in a particular way during

1:42

sleep. And we talk about how you can

1:44

reinforce that process in ways other

1:46

than sleep. We also discuss incredible

1:48

findings that certain brain states and

1:50

memories can be associated with an

1:52

immune system status you had when those

1:54

memories formed and evidence that just

1:57

recalling those memories, thinking about

1:59

where you were, what you were feeling at

2:01

those times when the memories formed can

2:03

activate your immune system in the same

2:05

way, which is remarkable. We also have a

2:08

very candid discussion about vaccines

2:10

and medications more broadly. You'll

2:12

notice that Dr. Dr. Croml is incredibly

2:13

balanced throughout today's conversation

2:16

and yet he's also willing to state his

2:17

views very clearly. So it provides a

2:20

very rich discussion about vaccines and

2:22

all the rest. Indeed, thanks to Max's

2:24

incredible breadth of understanding of

2:25

immunology and much more and his ability

2:28

to break down complex topics and make

2:30

them accessible, plus his genuine care

2:32

for public education and science.

2:34

Today's is a truly special and important

2:36

episode to educate and inform you in

2:39

actionable ways. I should also mention

2:40

that Dr. Dr. Crumbl has an incredible

2:42

zerocost substack. It's called the

2:44

immune beyond. You can access it by

2:46

going to the immune beyond all

2:47

oneword.substack.com.

2:50

And there he teaches about science and

2:51

more. Again, it's awesome. It's free. So

2:54

definitely check it out. Before we

2:56

begin, I'd like to emphasize that this

2:57

podcast is separate from my teaching and

2:59

research roles at Stanford. It is,

3:01

however, part of my desire and effort to

3:03

bring zerocost to consumer information

3:04

about science and science related tools

3:06

to the general public. In keeping with

3:08

that theme, today's episode does include

3:10

sponsors. And now for my discussion with

3:13

Dr. Maxruml. Dr. Max Kuml, welcome.

3:17

>> Thanks.

3:17

>> Most everybody, including me, has heard

3:19

of this thing we call the immune system.

3:21

And most people just think, okay, this

3:23

is the thing that when I'm rested, keeps

3:25

me from getting sick. And when I'm not

3:27

as well rested, I tend to get more sick.

3:30

And there are these airborne things and

3:31

we can get sick. And there's like

3:34

funguses and viruses and and I think

3:36

that's probably what most people

3:38

understand and they probably also

3:39

understand that there are like cells and

3:41

T- cells and B cells. But if we want to

3:44

think about a little bit of the history

3:46

of our understanding of the immune

3:48

system and what we understand now, maybe

3:50

you could orient us because in reading

3:53

your work prior to this discussion, I'm

3:55

realizing that this is a very recent

3:58

field and also there's still a lot that

4:01

we do not understand. When I started

4:03

immunology sort of 30 years ago, I was

4:05

rotating in labs at Berkeley. I think

4:08

you were at Berkeley as well. And uh one

4:10

of the transcription factor biologists,

4:12

you know, mentor said, uh, you know, why

4:14

do you want to work in imunology? It's

4:15

not really a field. And so at the time

4:17

it was kind of true, you know,

4:18

everything was about um DNA cloning. We

4:21

still, you know, it's obviously still a

4:22

lot about molecular biology, what we do,

4:24

but uh, you know, at the time it was

4:26

pretty simple. We thought of the immune

4:28

system as something that on the one hand

4:29

it had to come into play when you saw a

4:31

virus or something foreign.

4:34

Um and otherwise it generally had to be

4:36

quiet and kind of leave you alone. I

4:38

think cancer imunotherapy changed that a

4:39

lot. that that gave us the idea that you

4:41

could tune its reactivity so that you

4:43

could get to the point where if you gave

4:45

an amnotherapy, what it was actually

4:47

doing was raising the threshold of when

4:49

a T- cell would activate and allowing

4:51

tea cells that might be just letting the

4:53

tumor get by get they'd be able to go

4:56

and go after that tumor and and and kill

4:58

it. I think that changed the spectrum a

5:00

certain degree where we suddenly saw

5:02

okay this isn't just a just a you know

5:04

foreign versus self thing because it's a

5:06

tumor is kind of not exactly self but

5:08

it's exactly it's also not foreign it's

5:10

was once you it's a cell that's kind of

5:12

evolved so I think tumor immunology

5:14

really changed our perspective on that

5:16

you know to the point where we now think

5:18

of it as a as a tunable system

5:21

but then I think you know a lot has

5:22

happened in the last 20 years there's

5:24

been a lot of excitement about cancer

5:25

imunotherapy because we're curing people

5:27

with cancer

5:28

which really wasn't done before. And

5:30

you're now in this space where um the

5:32

immune system is showing all these other

5:34

roles. I mean, you know it in the in the

5:35

nervous system, the brain, there's

5:37

microglea that do various functions,

5:39

cleaning up, etc. But it's in your gut.

5:42

It's allowing microbes to live in you,

5:44

but it's titrating them. It's keeping

5:46

them there in kind of like the right

5:47

quantity. So, it's kind of guarding

5:49

yourself. It's uh, you know, it sits in

5:52

your liver regulating how how much you

5:55

metabolize. there's a collection of

5:57

cells there. Um, it's in your heart.

5:59

It's, you know, regulating cardiomyio

6:02

function. Those are the the muscle cells

6:04

of your heart. Uh, they have to be

6:06

cleaned up from time to time. So,

6:07

there's a set of immune cells that will

6:09

help get rid of their byproducts in in

6:11

the in the heart. So, it has all these

6:13

additional functions that kind of before

6:15

were were lost in the in the just, you

6:18

know, the foreign battle against the

6:20

foreign and now we have this kind of

6:22

perspective of this system that measures

6:24

us all the time. It measures everything

6:26

about us and it exists in some ways. I

6:28

think it's to to help us be who we are,

6:31

you know, and that's hopefully that's

6:33

you as a healthy person, you know, and

6:35

chronic disease unfortunately can be

6:37

part of the problem where it becomes

6:38

part of the things that's letting the

6:40

chronic thing whether that's a tumor or

6:42

kidney disease or what have you. It can

6:44

it can actually help perpetuate it

6:45

because um well it's you know some ways

6:47

it's trying its best

6:49

>> but it's applying the wrong program to

6:51

the wrong situation. Um so yeah it's

6:54

it's changed a ton and I'll give you

6:56

another little funny story which is that

6:58

that um you know when I first came into

7:00

immunology again we had the story like

7:02

you know the mentor who says you know

7:04

this isn't really a field the year was

7:07

like came to the field in 1989 and

7:09

that's right at the peak of AIDS and um

7:13

AIDS was like as as a biologist was

7:15

really interesting because you know the

7:17

HIV virus infects tea cells so your body

7:20

is filled with 10 the 11th or so T-

7:22

cells like a ton of different kinds of

7:24

T- cells and um you had a you have a

7:26

subset of TE- cells that are called CD4

7:28

T cells they're kind of a flavor of TE-

7:30

cells and the virus gets rid of those so

7:34

HIV virus will infect the CD4 T cells

7:36

and then then you end up with not having

7:38

them and the the manifestations of AIDS

7:41

for those that weren't around dur was it

7:43

was just a ton of different

7:45

opportunistic infections so like soil

7:47

bacteria that you and I you know fight

7:49

off without even thinking about it would

7:51

would would kill people but so too would

7:54

you see you saw people with carbosio

7:56

saroma you saw like a opportunistic vi

7:58

like where you know a cancer is emerging

8:01

um and you just saw all these kind of

8:03

manifestations of where the immune

8:04

system was important dementias in in

8:07

people with HIV as well you know it was

8:09

early accent at the time on how many

8:11

different things the immune system might

8:12

be important for so regardless of

8:14

whether you know it was a field or not

8:16

it was clearly important and it was all

8:18

these things we didn't know about it

8:19

that like fueled the discoveries ies

8:21

that have led to where we are right now.

8:23

And some of those I, you know, I think

8:24

it's worth pointing out were just these

8:26

curiosity questions like what are these

8:28

cells? Like they were hard to study at

8:30

in the beginning. You know, they're they

8:31

don't live, you know, it's sometimes

8:33

hard to keep cells out of out of a out

8:34

of a human body alive. So, you know,

8:37

there's there's issues about how do you

8:39

keep these things alive in the very

8:40

first place and then and then what kinds

8:42

of things, you know, trigger them to do

8:43

stuff and you got to make reagents to

8:46

test those, you know, ideas you might

8:47

have about what they might do. It was a

8:49

long haul, I think, to get ourselves

8:50

together where we now have a pretty good

8:52

understanding of all the molecules and

8:54

the cell types and the and the behaviors

8:56

that they can engage in. And it just

8:58

gets more comp, you know, more more

9:00

complex and more like rich as we

9:02

understand that they're basically every

9:03

single T- cell in your body is like a

9:05

free agent and they're part of a sensory

9:07

system. Each one can measure the

9:09

concentration of a of a of a set of

9:11

biomolelecules, proteins, and they form

9:14

a peptides. they can measure that and

9:16

each one then can say that's out of

9:18

range or that's in range. So it's like

9:20

you have like 10 to the 11th little

9:21

sensors going around you curating you

9:24

know making sure you're the right thing

9:26

and if they see something that's out of

9:28

range they can do something about it you

9:30

know like the whole thing is

9:31

magnificent. It is magnificent. Do you

9:34

mind if we take a developmental um

9:37

perspective on this for a second and

9:38

then I have a basic health question.

9:40

Yeah. The developmental perspective is I

9:43

think most of us either remember or have

9:45

observed that when humans are young they

9:49

get sick a lot more. Presumably that's

9:52

because their immune system isn't as

9:54

well developed. But kids tend to get

9:57

sick and then get over being sick pretty

9:59

quickly.

9:59

>> Yeah.

9:59

>> Maybe you could describe what's going on

10:01

there.

10:02

>> Yeah. And it also is the case that you

10:05

know as we get older much older in fact

10:09

uh last quarter of life let's say people

10:12

tend to get sick more uh what's going on

10:15

um in terms of immune system function um

10:18

or is there something more broadly

10:20

happening at level of just kind of

10:22

energetics mitochondrial function very

10:24

curious about this

10:25

>> if I can take a step even further back

10:28

I'll ask you a question of like who are

10:30

you and I don't mean that like in the

10:32

personal sense, but I can talk about

10:33

that too if you want. Uh, but the more

10:34

the question is like at at some point

10:36

where does your body end and where does

10:38

the world outside start

10:41

and one of the things that, you know,

10:42

you start to realize if you look in a

10:43

microscope is that we're covered with

10:45

microbes all over our surface. We're

10:47

covered with microbes all the way in our

10:48

gut. In fact, we can't, you know, you

10:50

can't digest, you've probably heard this

10:52

before, but you can't digest animal fats

10:54

if it weren't for the bugs, the bacteria

10:55

in your gut. They make some of the key

10:57

components of of bile acids that allow

11:00

you to digest animal fats. So, you need

11:02

this system that's around you. So, you

11:04

aren't just the cell like if you learn

11:06

biology, you've got the again, we're

11:08

going to go way back. There's the egg

11:09

and the sperm and they fertilize and now

11:11

you got this this this cell that starts

11:13

to divide and gives rise to every other

11:15

cell in our body. So you might say that

11:16

your body is just that collection of

11:18

cells, [snorts]

11:20

but in fact it's it's it's it's absorbed

11:22

a lot of viruses and and bacteria from

11:25

our environment. And you know, to go

11:27

into that really briefly, that's really

11:28

important because we only have 20,000

11:30

genes in our genome. So there's only so

11:32

much in a given life that we can do with

11:34

those genes. And so by absorbing all

11:36

kinds of other species onto us, we get

11:38

their genomes. So like you said, like I

11:40

was saying, the the bacteria in your gut

11:42

can now help you absorb nutrients that

11:44

you wouldn't otherwise. If you eat

11:45

sushi, you know, you've heard this

11:46

probably, right? You get you get

11:47

bacteria in your gut that can help you

11:48

absorb the the the seaweed, you know,

11:52

nutrients from seaweed. So, so taking

11:55

this into your question, you know, when

11:56

you're first born, you've never really

11:58

seen anything. And so, two things are

12:00

are I think worth pointing out at the

12:03

early phase of life. One of them is for

12:05

the first six months or so, your immune

12:06

system is pretty poor at being trained

12:09

on things. And it's presumably we

12:11

presume that for those six six months

12:13

that's because your body is developing

12:14

so fast that if you were to have a super

12:16

active immune system you might actually

12:18

find yourself attacking yourself. You

12:19

might think that you're foreign because

12:21

some genes turn on during development

12:22

and then all of a sudden you're you know

12:24

your immune system's like oh I see

12:25

something different and now I need to

12:27

react. So that's well known and that's

12:29

that's one of the reasons why some

12:30

childhood vaccinations they're really

12:32

important to protect kids in long over

12:34

life. Why they aren't given until you're

12:36

6 months or or older. But I think to

12:39

your point, one of the things that's

12:41

happening with kids is that they then

12:42

then as they go into their like until

12:44

they're 10 and you're talking about they

12:45

get sick a lot, they just haven't seen a

12:47

lot of these bugs before. So they don't

12:49

have an immune system that knows what

12:50

flu is cuz they've never seen the body's

12:53

never that body and kids body has never

12:55

seen flu before. So every single virus

12:57

and pathogen that hits it is going to

12:59

elicit some, you know, some amount of

13:01

illness. But then they have a very

13:03

strong immune system. it reacts and you

13:05

know gets rid of that with the exception

13:07

of the ones that you know are those

13:08

those certain viruses and bacteras

13:10

mumps, measles, rebella that are they're

13:12

lethal and that's why we immunize as we

13:13

say and that's those are things that

13:14

your immune system if they get too much

13:16

of those kids will die and so it's

13:18

better to protect them with a vaccine.

13:21

All right. So that's the front end,

13:22

right? The front end has this initial,

13:24

you know, imunosuppression, then just

13:26

exposure to all these things that are in

13:28

our environment and you and I take on as

13:30

part of our genomes. But we have to get

13:32

a we have to reach a day tant with some

13:34

of them. You know, we have to get to the

13:35

point where the immune system can kind

13:36

of like fire back when they show up if

13:38

they're bad and and and allow them to

13:40

live in us if they're good with us. And

13:42

so I think that's what's happening a lot

13:44

in those first years of life. And you

13:45

know, you can see that both in the form

13:47

of, you know, kids getting sick a lot,

13:48

but you'll also see that their guts

13:50

develop way diverse microbiome. You

13:53

know, they allow a whole bunch of things

13:54

that come in from the outside and are

13:56

acceptable and are quite good for you.

13:59

That's the front end. In the back end of

14:00

life, it's a little bit more

14:01

complicated, but I'll tell you I'll tell

14:03

you two things that I think are

14:04

important. On the one hand is the idea

14:05

that is is the fact that a lot of your

14:08

cells in general become less functional,

14:09

including immune cells, and you get less

14:12

cells produced. And and that might just

14:14

be because, you know, we were never

14:16

selected as organisms to live as long as

14:18

we do right now. That's one idea of

14:19

aging, right?

14:20

>> We know that that we just were supposed

14:22

to be dead by 70.

14:23

>> Well, no, but we do know that that we

14:26

can reproduce and and you pass on our

14:28

genes successfully already when we're

14:29

16. So, you know, the selective pressure

14:32

to pass on your genes, if you imagine

14:34

that's how genetic evolution happens is

14:36

that you pass on your genes as being

14:37

successful, you can already do that at

14:40

16 and anything after that is just cream

14:42

on the crop.

14:43

um you know at some point maybe there's

14:45

no selection. So we don't know that but

14:47

it's it's a reasonable hypothesis to say

14:49

there wasn't any real selective pressure

14:50

for passing on genes that do anything

14:53

past when you're actually having kids.

14:55

The psychologists would tell us that uh

14:57

the wisdom of people, you know, 60, 70,

15:00

80 and beyond is useful for um groups of

15:04

humans that live in, you know, you know,

15:07

villages of 100 or so people because

15:08

they can give information to younger

15:10

people that is on the periodicity of

15:13

like every 5 to 10 years, maybe every 30

15:15

years.

15:16

>> But that's a just so story, right? I

15:18

mean, it's a nice just so story.

15:20

>> I like it too. And the I think the

15:22

genome geneticists will refer to that as

15:24

like the grandfather effect where genes

15:26

may be selected for and maybe they're

15:28

mostly about you know genes that make us

15:30

social in the in for for for the elderly

15:33

that do you know they're going to have

15:35

effects on the fitness of their

15:37

grandchildren which is their genes.

15:39

>> And so this yeah I think there's

15:41

something to be said for that in in

15:43

conceptual space. I don't know if I can

15:45

prove it to you that that's

15:46

>> it's a tough experiment to do. It's a

15:47

really tough experience to have two

15:48

villages where the you know the

15:50

grandparents are eliminated or like kept

15:52

you know both non-ethical and also non

15:55

>> but we were talking about the aging

15:56

immune system and I think I think

15:57

there's two things that again come to

15:59

this question that I was asking you like

16:00

who are you um and I was saying okay

16:03

well in aging you have this issue that

16:04

the immune system is is tapering in its

16:06

efficacy it's many of the cells that you

16:08

you know you've been holding your whole

16:09

life start to to literally they die off

16:12

but there's another thing which is I

16:13

think a lot of people don't realize when

16:15

you say when basic biology ology say

16:17

that sperm, you know, like uh fertilizes

16:19

the egg. So, you've got your mom's genes

16:20

and your dad's genes. You got 23

16:22

chromosomes for your mom, 23 chromosomes

16:24

for your dad. And and and at least in

16:26

when you're first born, every cell is a

16:28

clone. It has exactly the same

16:29

information.

16:31

But DNA replication and and DNA sort of

16:34

like fidelity isn't perfect. Like they

16:36

say that on your skin, the cells of your

16:38

skin may have somewhere between 10 and

16:39

30,000 mutations per cell per day just

16:43

from like by basic sun exposure. And

16:45

it's that that's higher than some of the

16:47

other organs. But the basic idea is that

16:48

your DNA, you know, it's susceptible to

16:50

UV radiation. That's one of the reasons

16:52

we put on sunscreen. [gasps]

16:54

But what it what it practically means,

16:55

no matter what number you put in there,

16:57

whether it's 10,000 mutations per day or

16:59

remember the the genomes are huge,

17:01

right? So 10,000 mutations out of

17:03

terabytes of of of information, still is

17:06

only a certain number. But do that over

17:07

every over years. And the main thing is

17:10

that that means is that every cell in

17:12

your body is no longer identical to the

17:13

one next to it because this one got

17:15

different mutations on day one. This one

17:17

got some mutations on day two. And

17:19

slowly but surely, you are becoming like

17:21

a mosaic. And I say mosaic, you know,

17:23

because like the tile that you see in

17:25

Morocco, you know, very intricate

17:27

designs because if you actually, you

17:29

know, start to look into tissue, you

17:30

know, you'll find that certain clones,

17:32

certain mutations do make certain cells

17:34

more fit. And they're the ones that if

17:36

you scratch yourself and a cell has to

17:38

like some some new has to has to form,

17:40

they might be the fittest to fill that

17:41

void. [laughter]

17:42

>> And one of the other clones over here

17:44

that got a different mutation may not be

17:45

fit to fill that clone. And so you you

17:47

end up with this pastiche of who you

17:48

are. So now again I ask you like who are

17:51

you now? So if I want to defend against

17:54

something that looks different, what if

17:57

everything looks different? What if

17:59

every cell is different from every other

18:00

cell? It's it's it okay. You want you

18:03

want another analogy? I would like

18:05

another analogy. The only um exception

18:08

that I can think of to this and I could

18:10

be wrong is that our neurons, our

18:13

central nervous system neurons, our

18:14

brain and spinal cord, most all of them

18:17

are the same ones that we were born

18:18

with.

18:19

>> Same cells, but

18:20

>> same cells, but so you're saying

18:21

mutations are constantly occurring in

18:22

the neurons in the DNA. So there it is

18:25

fascinating by the way that neurons live

18:26

that long. and you know hair cells that

18:28

they say that the the proteins in in our

18:30

hair hair cells of our ear are the same

18:32

exact molecules atoms as we had when we

18:36

were born. So there's there's some cells

18:37

that are along the but in their nuclei

18:39

the DNA that's encoding who they are who

18:42

those cells are is subject to mutation

18:44

ongoing and it depends on how deep they

18:45

are like the we tend to think that one

18:47

of the reasons that immune stem cells

18:49

live in our bone marrows you know our

18:51

long bones are hollow and in there is

18:53

the source of the immune systems you

18:56

know revitalization it's the stem cells

18:57

that make more white blood cells we like

19:00

to think that they live in there because

19:01

it protects them from a reagent they

19:03

they they they hang out stem cells are

19:06

You know that the bone actually serves

19:07

not only a structural purpose in our

19:08

body, but they it's a cavity in which

19:10

things can live and

19:11

>> keep it away from from solar radiation.

19:14

>> Keep it away from chemical cues in the

19:16

environment that can mutate.

19:17

>> Sequester your stem cells

19:19

>> and um

19:19

>> don't burn them.

19:20

>> Yeah.

19:21

>> That kind of thing.

19:22

>> Yeah. Likewise, the neurons in the in

19:24

the uh inside of the skull.

19:26

>> Yeah.

19:27

>> And the spinal cord

19:28

>> are protected.

19:29

>> They're protected.

19:29

>> Yeah.

19:30

>> And that's interesting.

19:32

>> Yeah.

19:32

>> Yeah. I would like to take a quick break

19:34

and acknowledge one of our sponsors,

19:36

JWVE. JWV makes medical grade red light

19:39

therapy devices. Now, if there's one

19:41

thing that I have consistently

19:42

emphasized on this podcast, is the

19:44

incredible impact that light can have on

19:46

our biology and our health. Now, in

19:49

addition to sunlight, which I've talked

19:50

about a lot on this podcast, red light,

19:53

near infrared, and infrared light have

19:55

been specifically shown to have positive

19:57

effects on improving numerous aspects of

19:59

cellular and organ health. These include

20:01

faster muscle recovery, improved skin

20:04

health, wound healing, improvements in

20:06

acne, reduce pain and inflammation,

20:08

improved mitochondrial function, and

20:10

even improvements in vision. Nowadays,

20:12

there are a lot of red light devices out

20:14

there. But what sets Juv lights apart

20:17

and why they're my preferred red light

20:18

therapy device is that they use

20:20

clinically proven wavelengths. Meaning,

20:22

they use the specific wavelengths of red

20:24

light, near infrared, and infrared light

20:26

in combination to trigger the optimal

20:28

cellular adaptations. Personally, I use

20:30

the Juv whole body panel about three to

20:32

four times a week, usually for about 10

20:34

to 20 minutes per session. And I use the

20:36

JWV handheld light both at home and when

20:38

I travel. If you would like to try JWV,

20:41

they're offering up to $400 off select

20:43

products for listeners of this podcast.

20:45

To learn more, visit JW, spelled

20:47

JV.com/huberman.

20:50

Again, that's jovv.com/huberman.

20:54

Today's episode is also brought to us

20:56

byleep. Eightle makes smart mattress

20:59

covers with cooling, heating, and sleep

21:00

tracking capacity. One of the best ways

21:02

to ensure you get a great night's sleep

21:04

is to make sure that the temperature of

21:06

your sleeping environment is correct.

21:08

And that's because in order to fall

21:09

asleep and stay deeply asleep, your body

21:11

temperature actually has to drop by

21:13

about 1 to 3°. And in order to wake up

21:16

feeling refreshed and energized, your

21:17

body temperature actually has to

21:19

increase by about 1 to 3°. Eight

21:22

automatically regulates the temperature

21:23

of your bed throughout the night

21:25

according to your unique needs. I've

21:27

been sleeping on an eightle mattress

21:28

cover for nearly 5 years now and it has

21:31

completely transformed and improved the

21:33

quality of my sleep. The latest EightLe

21:35

model is the Pod 5. This is what I'm now

21:37

sleeping on and I absolutely love it. It

21:39

has so many incredible features. For

21:41

instance, the Pod 5 has a feature called

21:43

autopilot, which is an AI engine that

21:45

learns your sleep patterns and then

21:47

adjusts the temperature of your sleeping

21:48

environment across different sleep

21:50

stages. It'll even elevate your head if

21:52

you're snoring, and it makes other

21:53

shifts to optimize your sleep. If you'd

21:55

like to try eight, go to

21:57

eightsleep.com/huberman

21:59

to get up to $350 off the new Pod 5.

22:02

Eight ships to many countries worldwide,

22:04

including Mexico and the UAE. Again,

22:06

that's eight.com/huberman

22:09

to save up to $350.

22:11

>> Sometimes I tend to think the immune

22:12

system, you want to defend it like you

22:14

want to defend a nation and you want to

22:16

defend it from outsiders. And I've just

22:18

told you a story that's if you want to

22:19

take a political statement from it's

22:21

pro- immigration because all these

22:22

bacteria that live on us are actually

22:24

bringing us goods and they they do a

22:26

lot.

22:26

>> We just lost half the audience. No, I'm

22:28

just kidding. I'm I'm totally joking. We

22:29

we're a bipartisan audience. I'm joking.

22:32

Take it how you want. But by analogy,

22:35

it's the argument for, you know, why why

22:37

certain um you know, influx of of of u

22:40

in this case organisms onto us, you

22:42

know, create a more robust, you know,

22:44

person than we were before. But I want

22:46

to give you this story that one of a

22:48

famous um marinologist in the 1970s drew

22:51

this parallel in wartime and said in you

22:54

know World War II submarines would be

22:56

underneath the ocean and they'd be

22:58

traveling around and they would if they

23:00

could if they heard another submarine

23:02

they would scuttle the missiles the

23:05

torpedoes because that could be the

23:07

enemy and the enemy could fire at them.

23:09

[snorts] And so they had two sets of

23:10

books that they used. Uh, one of them

23:14

was a book that gave them the sound

23:16

profile of all, let's say it's a US, of

23:19

all the US submarines. And so they could

23:21

listen to the were of the engines and if

23:22

they heard a were of the engine that had

23:24

the certain cycle of a general mo, you

23:26

know, motors engine, they wouldn't fire.

23:29

So that's the sort of like self I know

23:31

what self is. And then they had another

23:34

book that was the engine sounds of the

23:36

known diesel engines of whatever engines

23:38

of the German uh, you know, submarines.

23:40

And if they heard that then they

23:41

absolutely would fire. And that's a self

23:44

versus non-self-discrimination problem

23:45

just like the immune system has to do.

23:47

But what I bring you with the aging is

23:49

this concept that as you get weirder and

23:51

different your body is getting like more

23:53

complex then that those books you know

23:56

start to have every possible possibly

23:58

every possible permutation of every

23:59

biomolelecule could could could be made

24:01

by your body at that point. And then a

24:03

virus doesn't necessarily have anything

24:05

unique about it. A virus is also going

24:06

to make proteins and that's your immune

24:08

system can see the viral proteins and

24:09

say oh a new thing has come in and

24:12

that's you know that's out of range and

24:14

now I need to mount that a T- cell

24:16

response against this I need to make the

24:17

you know bring in the troops but with

24:19

aging we have this this kind of you know

24:22

us diverging problem so that this you

24:25

know this system that's supposed to

24:26

sense us

24:27

>> is just you know has a lot of cosmic

24:29

background has a lot of noise in it and

24:31

so I think it I think that's one of the

24:33

reasons why we also have issue when

24:34

we're aging and it's I I think it's also

24:36

one of the issu reasons why cancer is

24:37

more prevalent in later life for I mean

24:40

there's two parts of that one is of

24:41

course you've accumulated mutations in

24:43

your cells that could be cancerous but

24:45

also the immune system has been seeing

24:47

those and all the various different

24:48

accumulations of them and ones like them

24:51

you know over these years to the point

24:52

where the weird doesn't look that weird

24:54

anymore you know something like a cancer

24:56

that is different than you it's not that

24:58

much different than like another cell

25:00

over here that's gone you know like and

25:02

it's just happily making skin and isn't

25:04

cancerous but you you know, is it's got

25:06

some differences.

25:07

>> What about the argument that there's so

25:09

much cellular turnover that um the cells

25:13

that accumulate these mutations are

25:15

being eliminated? You're saying because

25:17

they're clonal, they're producing

25:20

different they become different, they

25:21

produce cells that are also different,

25:23

then they die. Is this is that the way

25:25

it works?

25:26

>> Yeah. And I think I think you you are

25:28

bringing something up that's also true,

25:29

which is that all the time I think the

25:31

immune system is defending us against,

25:33

you know, mutations. So, one example

25:35

that everybody sees when they get to be

25:37

about 40 or 50 is is little these white

25:39

spots on your skin. And we we think that

25:42

those are places where the immune system

25:44

has sensed a collection of cells that

25:46

were precancerous, maybe they were even

25:48

beginning of cancer, and has wiped them

25:50

out. And and so the you know, a lot of

25:52

the origin of cancers in skin is is

25:54

melanin producing cells like melan, you

25:56

know, melanoma is what we call skin

25:59

cancer. um those melanocytes that that

26:02

white area they've been wiped of a whole

26:04

collection of melanocytes and that's why

26:06

it's you know it's white instead

26:08

[snorts] of as dark as your as the rest

26:09

of your skin. So you know to that extent

26:12

the idea that the immune system is is

26:13

pruning you all the time is you know

26:15

there it looks like there's pretty good

26:16

evidence for that.

26:17

>> Um and the question is when does

26:19

something become dangerous

26:22

that's that's that's you know that's

26:23

fundamentally question with cancer and

26:25

these sorts of things. If you said, "I

26:26

want to actually have the fittest cells

26:28

in my skin to uh fill in a gap if I

26:31

scratch myself. I would like to have

26:32

cells that quickly replicate just like

26:34

maybe in kids. Kids heal so ridiculously

26:36

quickly, right? Because they have an

26:38

abundance of these cells that

26:39

>> I think I think they're they're their

26:40

wound healing. I mean, there's a group

26:42

out of Stanford that studies this, but

26:43

essentially, you know, wound healing in

26:44

in in young is quite quite a bit faster

26:47

and more efficient and and there's many

26:49

that there's many levels of that. Yeah.

26:52

>> But um yeah, remarkably faster. If

26:54

you're a parent, you've seen this. You

26:55

know, you cut yourself on the same day

26:56

as a kid, your kid cut yourself and

26:58

they're they're 3 days later, they can't

27:00

even find it on them and you know, like

27:02

four weeks later, you're still like got,

27:03

you know, scap or something. But I was

27:05

just coming to the point that if you do

27:07

that and you you want this, do you want

27:08

you maybe want that to fill back in

27:10

because you certainly out in the wild

27:12

having an open wound is a bad thing. So,

27:14

you like to heal quickly. Well, if a

27:17

mutation has happened that fills that

27:18

cell in quick, more quickly, that is

27:20

almost by definition a mutation that's

27:22

let that cell divide faster.

27:25

Well, what is cancer? It's cells that

27:27

divide faster. So, in some sense, all

27:29

these events in your life where winners

27:31

win by filling in the space left by

27:33

cells that die is selecting for cells

27:36

that get a little out of range with

27:38

growth. They may be a little bit better

27:39

at growing. And then again, the question

27:42

is like, well, how much better do you

27:43

want that? You want it to like help you,

27:45

but at some point you don't want it to

27:46

basically form a lesion and grow grow

27:48

grow and go other places and grow, which

27:51

is called metastasis in cancer, which is

27:53

how most people die. To me, that the

27:55

issue of self and non-self is one of the

27:57

ones that's been with immunology for a

27:59

very long time. And again, it's way

28:02

richer than we thought about, I think,

28:03

in the 1990s or 2000s, you know. And

28:06

then at the same time, the idea of what

28:08

you can do with that information is also

28:10

I call this kind of a new immunity.

28:12

Immunity used to be like a fuel gauge.

28:14

You'd say it was low for itself and it

28:16

was really high against viruses and it

28:18

was like a fuel gauge. You don't know.

28:19

Now it's really hot. And what we

28:21

originally thought we were doing with

28:22

cancer imotherapy was making it just

28:23

hotter generally. But now you realize

28:26

that in between like the immune system

28:28

not caring about something at all and

28:30

and going and you know like releasing

28:32

all its fury on something are all these

28:35

other things it can do with the

28:36

information it gathers in there. And

28:37

that's where I was saying you know it

28:38

can it can like quarantine bacteria.

28:40

It's not going to kill them. It's it's

28:41

in that zone. The bacteria as long as

28:43

they're in the right zone, there's not

28:44

too many of them, there's not too few of

28:45

them, immune system can actually help

28:47

them be there. It can produce things

28:48

that like either tighters them out of

28:50

circulation or keeps them there. You

28:52

know, in all these other settings, like

28:53

I say, in the heart and the can go to

28:56

almost any organ and uh and the immune

28:58

system is consistently present and it's

29:01

consistently measuring you. And the U

29:04

again is this complex you. It's not just

29:05

what came from the egg, it's the you

29:07

that's you right now, including all the

29:09

mutations that you might have acred and

29:11

all the bacteria and and and the

29:13

viruses. You know, we have a lot of

29:14

viruses in our bodies that we tend to

29:16

think that at the end of a of a illness

29:18

that we've gone back to our pure state.

29:20

This may came from religion. You know,

29:21

that we were born pure and if God made

29:23

us correctly, then we would be pure at

29:25

the end of things and you know that

29:27

would be pure immunity would would

29:29

purify us of things. But the more we

29:31

look, the more we find that every virus

29:33

leaves a little evidence of a little bit

29:35

of itself. And then there's a then

29:37

there's the goal for the immune system

29:38

to kind of quarantine that to say this,

29:40

you know, maybe we don't want to kill

29:41

every one of our cells to get rid of

29:43

every virus that's infected one of our

29:44

cells. We need to leave some of those

29:47

alive. We don't like for example herpes

29:49

virus infection infects the nerves and

29:51

when people have uh you know emergence

29:53

they they get nerve pain and worse. A

29:56

lot of that is caused by the immune

29:58

system reacting to the virus trying to

30:00

get out and then killing off neurons. So

30:02

the the the it's imopathology. The

30:05

immune system is c causing as much of

30:07

the damage and problem as the virus is.

30:09

And it's the failure of that day tant.

30:11

And when certain viruses are just

30:13

sitting in us, we're perfectly fine. You

30:15

know, we have new viruses sitting

30:16

around. As long as they're laying

30:18

dormant, our immune system can say,

30:19

"Okay, I'm going to hang out here and if

30:21

anything bad happens, I'm going to

30:23

squatchch that." But it's not like we've

30:25

been purified.

30:26

>> You know, that's a reality that's a

30:27

little bit too bad. But, you know, it's

30:29

also one where you say, again, if if the

30:31

goal of us is to make it to 30, let's

30:33

say you get a a an early liver infection

30:36

of a HCV or HPV. If the immune system

30:39

can just let that be, you're not going

30:42

to destroy your own liver and you'll

30:43

live to produce and your genes will get

30:45

passed on. On the other hand, if you

30:47

mounted a massive immune response, you

30:49

know, you went all the way in the fuel

30:50

gauge to the right, your immune system

30:53

can kill you. It absolutely can. You

30:55

know, it's can can kill any cell it

30:57

wants. So, so that that that again that

30:59

idea that the space in between is the

31:00

one that we actually are starting to

31:02

understand that it has all these

31:03

specialized roles that are not always

31:05

about getting rid of things at all cost.

31:08

This raises a question for me and

31:09

obviously I'm not an immunologist but it

31:11

seems like one

31:12

>> you're going to be one by the end of I

31:14

like the sound of that. Um as will the

31:16

audience. One potentially useful

31:20

strategy the immune system could have

31:23

perhaps would be rather than to decide

31:26

to launch an attack on a particular cell

31:28

because it's mutated and different

31:31

>> um enough to assess how many cells

31:35

throughout the body or even just get a

31:38

local average of how many cells have

31:39

similar mutations or just are different.

31:42

Right? So that if we are indeed born

31:44

pure um in the biological sense um

31:47

[laughter]

31:48

let's just keep it there for sake of

31:49

today's discussion and you know by the

31:52

time we are um you know 32 years old we

31:56

are a mosaic of mutations

31:58

>> as it it appears we are if the immune

32:00

system could surveil multiple regions in

32:03

the body

32:04

>> maybe compare organs or maybe keep it

32:07

within organ system and say you know the

32:10

number of of mutated cells or not pure

32:13

me cells would be one way to do it more

32:16

simply perhaps has exceeded a certain

32:18

threshold measured I don't know like

32:20

enough receptors have something in them

32:22

that the cell goes okay you know what

32:24

I'm going to fight y

32:25

>> right in the same way that you know

32:27

soldiers you know they might hear a shot

32:29

whis by but then do they necessarily

32:32

reveal their location and launch an

32:33

attack no but but if it's enough of an

32:36

of an attack they'll uh fight back

32:39

>> it seems like there should be some way

32:42

to that the immune system could quantify

32:44

either bodywide or or local organ or or

32:47

over some period of time they could

32:48

integrate over time. I have to imagine

32:50

that such a mechanism exists. you're

32:53

coming from neurobiology as I know and

32:55

so there is that in neurobiology of

32:56

accommodation right if I always tell the

32:58

story of I went to this little village

33:00

in in France called aas if you know the

33:03

names is a kind of a famous cheese that

33:05

they make in this town and it's super

33:06

stinky and they make it only in that

33:08

town and they make a lot of it in that

33:10

town and so when you drive into that

33:11

town it's like somebody has the worst

33:13

foot odor striking it really hits you

33:16

but after being in the town for like an

33:18

hour

33:18

>> Mhm. you don't notice it. Yeah.

33:20

>> And that's neuronal accommodation where

33:22

your nervous the same kind of thing

33:23

you're talking about where the you know

33:24

the sensors in your nose can become

33:28

they're like okay I've seen it. I'm

33:29

seeing it now it's not anymore and and

33:30

so I'm going to tune that out because

33:32

then your nose has the potential to

33:33

smell other dangers or other stuff.

33:35

Right. So that's the nervous system. I I

33:38

think you're exactly right where you're

33:39

going with this is and we think this is

33:40

true that the immune system is it you

33:43

know for danger it's looking for

33:45

something you would call like a it's how

33:47

it's seeing the signal over time. So, a

33:49

virus may, you know, let's let's say

33:51

you're a T- cell that recognize a virus.

33:53

Well, you're looking for something that

33:55

you've had nothing of before and then

33:57

all of a sudden the virus comes in, it

33:58

starts replicating and you have a lot of

34:00

it. And then at some point, if you get

34:02

rid of it, it'll come back down to next

34:04

to nothing. And in that period, you

34:05

mount an immune [clears throat] response

34:07

and you learn it and so the next time

34:08

around you'll be faster to respond to it

34:10

and keep you from getting sick. That's

34:12

one kind of signal. But self can have

34:16

either one of two signals, I think. One

34:17

of them is that you've had it your

34:18

entire life. So that amount of protein,

34:21

maybe it's a maybe it's insulin, you

34:23

know, which we think in general, you

34:25

know, it has a little bit of signal up

34:26

and down as you have a sugar, but

34:27

there's a range for that. And so your

34:29

body gets used to that range. And the

34:30

tea cells that see insulin, they are

34:32

very low. They're going to only be very

34:34

very low reactive to that. And there's

34:36

there's a whole story behind that, but

34:38

basically they're going to see that

34:39

level. But you can also have things that

34:42

the immune system is going to want to

34:43

treat like self that maybe do a slow

34:45

rise. they don't have this peak that you

34:47

have with virus and so like a a mutant

34:49

cell and maybe it's just a tiny tiny bit

34:52

above normal for months and then it

34:54

makes two copies of your cells and now

34:56

it's a little bit higher than normal and

34:57

the immune system is you know has I

34:59

think one of the deficits with cancer is

35:01

exactly that that things that you do and

35:04

this is sort of like I try to live my

35:05

life a little bit this way but it's not

35:07

validated by any you know any

35:08

experimental stuff is the idea that

35:10

whatever you are is what the immune

35:13

system is going to help you be if it if

35:15

it's if If it's a slow direction this

35:17

way, it's going to it's going to be okay

35:18

with that. What it doesn't like is like

35:20

big spikes and and and and that's maybe

35:22

the signal that you're asking about,

35:24

like could you actually get to the point

35:26

where you be reactive? The problem with

35:28

cancer is that it is, you know, slow and

35:30

nefarious. It grows over time and it and

35:32

and I think we're made to absorb slow

35:35

change

35:37

>> because if it's not causing us to be

35:38

sick yesterday and a little bit more of

35:40

it isn't causing us to be sick today,

35:42

then it's probably just a developmental

35:44

change. Maybe it's a new bacteria, maybe

35:46

it's a new, you know, this commensal is

35:48

so long as it doesn't accompany. Again,

35:50

viruses have two features in common. One

35:52

one is this spike of of, you know,

35:54

appearance. But they also cause damage

35:55

in that window. And so you have like

35:57

these cues that I think the immune

35:58

system, and I say the immune system

36:00

because it's some cells are going to see

36:01

the damage and some cells are going to

36:03

see the the additional proteins that

36:04

come in and then they exchange

36:06

information just like your brain, you

36:07

know, uh you can talk about the fact

36:09

that the brain has this wired, you know,

36:11

set of cells that are wired in space.

36:13

They're, you know, across your body from

36:15

your brain all the way to a muscle.

36:16

Let's say immune system has this

36:19

collection of cells that are they're

36:20

literally crawling around us right now.

36:22

And we used to do we still do a lot of

36:24

imaging. If you look in a piece of skin,

36:25

you can see the cells the immune system

36:27

are really really surveying us. They're

36:28

crawling around. But they get together

36:31

like neurons and they can form synapses

36:33

and one can say to another one, "This is

36:34

what I saw." And oh, you saw that? Oh, I

36:38

you know, I'm just being this. and they

36:39

can, you know, form a cluster of cells

36:41

that basically get together like a

36:43

neural little mini brain in our tissue

36:44

and they can say this is bad. We got to

36:46

do something about that. But I think the

36:48

slow burn doesn't do that. The slow burn

36:50

is one of the ones where the cells are

36:52

like, "Yeah, it's not that bad." I

36:54

realize this perhaps is not your

36:56

immediate area of uh research, but

36:58

recently I've been seeing a lot more

36:59

interest um in the thymus,

37:02

>> this organ that we have when we're young

37:04

and it disappears as we get older. And

37:06

there's a lot of interest in the thymus.

37:09

um because [snorts] we've never covered

37:10

the thymus on this podcast in any amount

37:12

of detail. If you could just uh educate

37:14

us a bit uh what it is, what it does,

37:15

and why it might be interesting as a as

37:18

a um therapeutic. I mean, maybe we in a

37:21

few years we'll all be banking our

37:22

thymic cells. Um maybe we will be

37:25

>> I know some people are already injecting

37:27

non-FDA approved peptides that uh come

37:30

from the thymus. I'm not recommending

37:31

anyone do that, but people are already

37:32

doing it um because that's the the

37:34

internet in 2026. But what's the thymus?

37:37

What does it do? Wh why this interest?

37:40

>> Yeah. Well, I can back up one step and

37:42

I've I've used the word T- cell before

37:43

>> and T- cell originally was thymus cell.

37:46

So, for those that maybe don't, you

37:49

know, have gone to had blood taken, you

37:50

know, if you have blood taken in

37:52

hospital, whatever, you you'll get red

37:54

blood cells and those are the cells that

37:55

carry oxygen around your body. And then

37:58

you have white blood cells that come in

37:59

two flavors, two me well, they come in

38:01

multiple flavors, but we for the moment

38:03

we'll talk about two. One are called B

38:04

cells and one are called T- cells. And

38:06

TE- cells were named because of the

38:07

thymus. So the thymus is this funny

38:09

organ. And it has a funny history. In

38:11

fact, I'm writing these substacks these

38:13

days and and I'm writing one that's

38:14

supposed to be released tomorrow about

38:15

the thymus because it uh it really

38:18

should have gotten the Nobel Prize.

38:19

There's a guy who's alive. He's like 97

38:21

years old in in Australia who did this

38:23

saw did this remarkable kind of

38:24

experiment. There was this time when

38:27

kids that had heart issues would come in

38:30

for surgeries and they would discover

38:33

this enormous white whitish organ as

38:36

growth near the heart as they were

38:39

taking the body, you know, this cutting

38:41

open. And all the autopsies up to that

38:44

point had been done mostly with adults.

38:46

And in adults, there's only this small

38:48

little thing there. And so they were

38:49

like, "Oh my god, part of the heart

38:51

thing is this overgrown thing." they

38:54

they didn't really know what it did

38:55

[snorts] and so they would remove it and

38:58

uh the kids then would go home and it

39:00

was usually exploratory heart surgery

39:01

but then kids would go home and uh far

39:04

from you know dying of heart disease

39:05

many of them would die from like

39:06

opportunistic infections they get all

39:08

these infections they get flu and etc

39:11

and so there was this hint that maybe

39:13

this removal had taken out a critical

39:15

part of your immune system had made it

39:17

so you were super susceptible to

39:18

bacteria and so this guy named Jo Miller

39:21

who's this this 97-year-old codger in in

39:24

Australia at the time he was in in

39:26

England and he basically took a bunch of

39:28

mice and then when they were newborn he

39:30

removed their thymus the same same

39:31

little whitish organ. And sure enough,

39:34

those mice were they basically grew up,

39:36

okay? But then they all would succumb to

39:39

bacterial infections. And in fact, a few

39:41

of them even got tumors, which was kind

39:42

of noted at the time, but forgot. And

39:44

the reason why that is is because the

39:46

thymus is the place that makes all your

39:47

tea cells. And it and it comes from a

39:49

kind of a convoluted path, but you

39:50

remember how we talking about how the

39:52

stem cells of your immune system lives

39:54

in your bone? Well, there's stem cells

39:55

that live in your bone and they travel

39:56

through your bone through your blood to

39:58

the thymus and become te- cells. And

40:01

[snorts] the the reason they need to do

40:03

that is that the thymus is this kind of

40:05

super special place that is able to

40:07

present to them to show them all of the

40:09

genes in your genome in various

40:11

different ways. And so the tea cells

40:13

that come in there, the tea cells are

40:15

developing and they each have a possible

40:16

10 to the 11th different kinds of

40:18

receptors to smell different things. And

40:20

you don't want any to come out that are

40:21

too reactive to you. So you don't want

40:23

you don't want to produce tea cells that

40:25

are going to go off and kill your

40:26

pancreas or, you know, kill your big toe

40:28

or anything, right? you want to you want

40:30

to maintain like tolerance. So you want

40:32

to make sure that you don't make the

40:33

immune system that's too harsh. So the

40:34

the thymus has the the role of producing

40:37

tea cells but also of educating them in

40:39

some ways of only letting the ones that

40:41

come out that have sensors that are

40:43

correctly tuned to to let you be you in

40:47

that way. Now to [snorts] the point

40:49

about the the story and you were asking

40:51

about aging is that is that in kids

40:53

those are really big because at that

40:54

point we were talking about the

40:55

developing immune system. It has to go

40:57

from like, you know, living under the

40:59

veil of your mother's immunity and then

41:02

it needs to let some development happen

41:03

and then it needs to burst out and start

41:05

to be able to react against whatever

41:07

bacteria and viruses you're going to see

41:09

over life. So your thymus has this huge

41:11

output. So as like between [snorts]

41:13

really from you know three to six months

41:15

old and you know into your into your

41:17

four or five years age but tapering your

41:20

body makes tons of tea cells and it's

41:21

because probably what you're talking

41:22

about you're getting exposed to all

41:23

kinds of different back bacteria and

41:25

viruses and so you need to make that

41:26

make that collection of immune cells

41:28

that both some of them you know see self

41:30

at low levels but then they also can

41:32

maybe react against different things in

41:34

the environment including the ones you

41:35

need to defend against. Then what

41:37

happens is because again I think we're

41:39

not needing that later and maybe we

41:41

don't even want that the thymus

41:42

involutes it gets super super small so

41:45

that in aged people it's like tiny

41:47

[snorts] and um and so it's not putting

41:49

out new tea cells and so the reason why

41:51

there's interest in like these peptides

41:53

but all these other approaches to like

41:55

revitalize the thymus is that like in

41:57

cancer for example wouldn't you like to

42:00

have a whole bunch of new tea cells that

42:02

could come into into you flood in there

42:04

with exactly the specificity for the for

42:07

the tumor the tumor has managed to teach

42:09

all your normal cell your other diesel

42:11

cell in your body that it's normal maybe

42:13

you need a source of new material to

42:14

come in and do that and there's really

42:16

two ways I think you you mentioned you

42:18

talked to Alex Marson not too long ago

42:19

and I'm sure he would have talked about

42:21

engineering cells that you can engineer

42:23

on the outside and give them specificity

42:25

but [snorts] the sort of like if you

42:26

will the more natural route to that

42:28

might be to to let the thymus make use

42:30

more tea cells and and make sure that as

42:32

they come out you make sure that they

42:34

can react against this tumor or whatever

42:37

it is you need to defend against. It's

42:38

always been a fascinating organ from the

42:40

sense that it's the origin of all the

42:42

cell types that we care about, the T-

42:44

cells in that case. But it does have

42:46

this like aging hit, you know, sort of

42:48

aging effect that seems to make us a

42:51

little bit more susceptible to things

42:52

later in life.

42:53

You know, again, we could argue about

42:54

what whether there was a big

42:56

evolutionary design behind doing that or

42:58

whether there just wasn't needed because

43:00

if you got you got to 30 and you died of

43:02

an arrow wound, you know, you know, and

43:05

but you given your genes, you're you're

43:06

a winner in the evolutionary sense. You

43:09

know, I love this uh uh this stance on

43:12

well, if you've already reproduced, I'll

43:14

just give a brief uh vignette. Uh we

43:17

were introduced by our uh mutual friend

43:20

uh David Felheim who's a a phenomenal

43:22

developmental biologist from UC Santa

43:25

Cruz and his wife Sophie Salama's also

43:27

phenomenal biologist a mutual friend and

43:29

years ago I was in Dave's lab because we

43:31

are longtime collaborators and published

43:34

a bunch of papers together and uh he was

43:36

doing some injections. I'm going to get

43:37

you in trouble Dave. He doesn't do this

43:39

any longer.

43:40

>> Yeah. I'm going to I'm going to join him

43:41

to get you in trouble cuz we

43:42

>> he was doing some injections and he

43:43

might have been using might have been

43:45

using carocyanide dyes.

43:47

>> This was kind of conventional tool back.

43:49

You put a little crystal in a piece of

43:50

tissue that's fixed tissue so it's not a

43:52

live animal or anything. And then you

43:54

put it in the fridge and then the

43:55

fluorescent dye would label a set of

43:56

neurons in a pathway. And um and I

43:59

walked over and I I saw Dave doing this

44:01

and he wasn't wearing any gloves.

44:03

>> And I thought, these are carboyanide

44:05

dyes

44:07

>> with cyanide.

44:07

>> Cyanide being the And I said, um

44:11

>> Dave, uh don't you want to put on

44:14

gloves? And he literally looked up from

44:16

the microscope at me. I'll never forget.

44:17

And he said, I've already successfully

44:19

reproduced. And he went back to doing

44:22

it. And it's his lab. So, and everyone

44:24

else was following a safety protocol.

44:25

Don't go after him. doesn't do this any

44:27

longer, folks. But, um, there's an

44:29

interesting mindset among you because he

44:31

comes from cell biology, Randy

44:33

Sheckchman's lab. You both trained in

44:34

Nobel Prize winning laboratories as

44:36

graduate students. So, I I find it

44:38

remarkable that this this stance of uh,

44:40

well, if you've already successfully

44:41

reproduced, we really aren't needed.

44:43

But, um, his kids are now graduated or

44:46

in college. So, there is this thing

44:47

about raising the young, too, and not

44:49

just creating them and then dying.

44:51

>> Agreed. I think there's a fitness

44:52

associated with being older than that.

44:54

And again when I say that this it is

44:56

maybe just taking this from a purely

44:57

like what would have been the source of

45:01

what we are today. You know what would

45:03

have been the selective pressures on

45:05

them and it would have been a little bit

45:06

like David saying you got to you know

45:07

the selective pressure is to get your uh

45:10

you know for for my genes to be passed

45:12

on my offspring have to be born

45:15

>> and then have to get to some age because

45:17

most humans are born pretty incapable

45:20

for a period. It's not like giraffes

45:21

where they drop off and they you know

45:22

drop out and within an hour they're

45:24

running. Um [clears throat] so that that

45:26

that period of of raising children I

45:28

think creates more pressure in in humans

45:30

to to to you know to successfully be

45:33

healthy longer. But I guess just you

45:36

know that there may be a negative

45:37

viewpoint there may but that concept

45:40

that maybe there isn't as much pressure

45:42

for you to be healthy and and going with

45:44

this is the idea that some of the things

45:46

that we want to be super efficient early

45:48

on might actually be bad for us as we

45:51

get like I'm like like I think this

45:52

issue that I that I brought up of our

45:54

mosaics is is a is a real confounder to

45:56

everything because that creates

45:58

something that is

46:00

>> quite hard to defend against. I think

46:02

that that that that aging backdrop um

46:05

and uh you know some of the immune

46:07

system that is really going to be

46:08

important to just be super reactive

46:09

early on may have some you know

46:12

compensatory problems when in faced with

46:14

that new reality of a 50-year-old or

46:17

70-year-old or whatever it looks quite

46:19

you know looks quite more complex but

46:21

you would have you would have definitely

46:22

wanted in gene space you know gene space

46:25

what genes you have to select for you

46:27

know an immune system let's say or even

46:29

just your body system that makes sure

46:31

that you get to 30 that say who are you?

46:34

And and it's again there's that isn't to

46:36

say that we can't overcome some of those

46:38

deficiencies if we understand them. But

46:40

here's my plug for basic research is

46:42

that to understand them we have to ask

46:44

some some questions that are almost 90%

46:47

of them are going to be dead ends. You

46:48

know you can hypothesize it's one thing.

46:50

Well, you got to do the experiment to

46:51

like eliminate that. Mhm.

46:53

>> And this is one of the things that

46:54

people I don't think always understand

46:55

about science is that for all the

46:57

discoveries that you know I made or

46:58

other people have made, there is

47:00

hundreds [snorts] and hundreds of like

47:02

disappointments. You know, and you'll

47:04

recognize this where you you just go

47:06

home from the lab at the end of the day

47:07

and you've you know you've you've done

47:08

everything right, but the answer isn't

47:11

the one isn't the right one.

47:12

>> Yeah. One control experiment can

47:15

>> nuke your whole project.

47:16

>> Well, there's that.

47:17

There's obviously that you have to do

47:19

the experiment well and have it

47:20

controlled, but but the answer just

47:21

could be not the one you thought. And

47:23

and you know, we can only imagine stuff

47:26

>> and then try and see if it's true and or

47:27

or more importantly try to prove that

47:29

it's not true. So the better

47:31

experiments, the kind of we call them

47:32

killer experiments, right? The ones that

47:34

kill them kill the idea if they're

47:35

wrong. if the idea is wrong, but it's

47:37

killer because it if it's turns out the

47:39

way you hope it will, you know, again,

47:41

when we get to some of these aging

47:42

things, there's a lot of in there's a

47:44

lot of intuition that we all can put

47:46

into this, whether we're like

47:48

professional scientists or at home

47:49

scientists, but it's really hard to say

47:52

that intuition like your idea about how

47:54

the way the world should work is in fact

47:56

the way the world does work. You know,

47:58

that that I I wish that because of age

48:01

certain things would happen. That's

48:02

that's a that's lovely. But it could be

48:06

super the word was baroque, you know,

48:07

like [clears throat] it should the whole

48:09

system could be, you know, configured in

48:11

a completely weird way that doesn't

48:13

really initially make intuitive sense to

48:15

us. And that's also why some of those

48:17

discoveries are so big to us. We're

48:19

like, "Oh my god, I didn't realize that

48:20

this system that seems like it might be

48:22

quite as simple is so complicated. The

48:24

world is so strange."

48:25

>> Well, when I started in neurobiology,

48:27

the brain, the actually the entire

48:29

central nervous system was considered an

48:31

immuneprivileged organ. Yes. There

48:33

weren't supposed to be immune cells

48:34

there. And thanks to the beautiful work

48:36

of Carla Shatz with the major histo

48:39

compatibility complex work and um Ben

48:42

Baris and I'm failing to mention all

48:45

their scientific offspring but Beth

48:46

Steven, Shala Ergloo like and on and on.

48:49

Um it would take the rest of the episode

48:50

to name all all of Ben's scientific

48:52

offspring and Carlos too being you one

48:55

of

48:55

>> right I didn't work on those issues but

48:57

um but I was in those labs when it was

48:59

happening. We now know that the immune

49:00

system is active and alive in the

49:02

central nervous system throughout the

49:04

whole lifespan serving critical roles.

49:06

>> There are two things that well three

49:09

really that that are somewhat practical

49:10

questions. I'll start with the most

49:12

basic one. Why is it at a mechanistic

49:15

level that if you miss a night or two of

49:17

sleep that your immune system seems so

49:19

less effective in fighting off off

49:22

infections? Do we know what's happening?

49:23

Is it like you've got so much adenosine

49:25

which is the sleeping molecule and and

49:27

[clears throat] uh like that that

49:28

adenosine inhibits T- cell function or

49:30

something? Do we actually know? Because

49:32

I think all of us are familiar with the

49:33

fact that if we we don't sleep well or

49:35

enough for a couple of nights, we're

49:37

much more susceptible to getting sick.

49:39

Yeah.

49:39

>> Is there a mechanistic understanding of

49:41

why that's so?

49:42

>> I think there are bits and pieces of it.

49:43

I think um some some really nice work

49:46

shows that at night a few wacky thing

49:49

when you're sleep a few what you might

49:51

have thought would be wacky things

49:52

happen and and one of them is that a lot

49:54

of your immune cells clear back to the

49:56

bone marrow

49:58

um and and your tissues become populated

50:00

with a bunch of neutrfils that come out

50:02

of the bone marrow and and seem to be

50:05

you know depositing collagen around your

50:07

body and and so there's a lot of things

50:09

that I think are reparative about sleep.

50:11

But I've thought about this a lot in my

50:12

own life as probably you have with sleep

50:14

is to one of the questions of course is

50:16

why do we bother to have sleep and and I

50:18

guess I can only imagine this because

50:20

our you know we've created these these

50:22

bodies of ours are so capable and

50:24

they're so energetically and you know

50:26

you know um consumptive and they make

50:28

all these byproducts during the day that

50:30

that at some point you just need a

50:32

cleanup phase and that's that's one

50:33

interpretation of sleep. You just need

50:35

to reset. So the immune system is

50:37

definitely resetting and and you know

50:38

there's as I said there's evidence that

50:40

a lot of the cells go kind of quesuscent

50:41

into the tissues and they they may leave

50:43

you alone for those reparative processes

50:45

and actually allow those

50:47

>> you know in terms of the data on there

50:49

there's there's a lot of studies that

50:51

are being done and and I can't say that

50:53

I've come to a a conclusion about that.

50:55

This is this comes in the question of

50:57

like is it known or do I do I not know

50:59

it or is it does nobody know it and I'd

51:02

say this is might be one of these areas

51:03

where about 10 factions of people know

51:06

it but they don't agree

51:07

>> you know so there's variations on things

51:09

but I I think the data for example that

51:11

immune cells dive into the bone marrow

51:12

at night is is pretty solid

51:14

>> that makes sense

51:15

>> what they're doing and why that's

51:16

important in the long sense of like what

51:18

you're talking about everything from

51:19

well but I think it's you know things

51:21

that happen overnight you you're

51:23

definitely your cognition improves is

51:25

that immune immune or is that neuronal

51:26

or both? I think it's both.

51:28

>> Something in the lymph plumbing immune

51:30

system. One thing that's just striking

51:32

like that is undeniable is probably the

51:35

best way to put it is um everybody has

51:37

bags under their eyes and looks like

51:38

when they are sleepd deprived. They

51:40

sleep for a night or two

51:42

>> and it goes away.

51:44

>> That's clearly accumulation of lymph. We

51:46

we actually know that. That's just lymph

51:48

fluid that's not being cleared. And it

51:50

might not even be the brain's uh

51:51

glimpmphatic clearance system. It's just

51:53

there's a bunch of lymph pooling under

51:55

your eyes. That's why you look like

51:57

>> Yeah.

51:57

>> And then you sleep for two nights.

51:59

>> Well, and you look better again. And the

52:02

eyes get glassy. We know that the eyes

52:04

get glassy when we're sleepd deprived.

52:06

>> That's also a a lymphatic clearance

52:08

issue. This is well established. Like,

52:10

so there's some things that are just

52:11

like plumbing works better when we sleep

52:13

and get up again. There's something

52:14

literally about lying down and getting

52:15

up. But but that to me can't explain the

52:18

the immune thing entirely because like

52:23

the lymphatic system is like among other

52:25

things, you know, immune surveillance.

52:28

But

52:28

>> I mean, one night lousy sleep and the

52:32

person coughing across the room gets you

52:34

sick

52:35

>> often.

52:36

>> But when you're well rested, you

52:37

actually feel this robustness like n

52:40

like okay, I might wash my hands or just

52:41

kind of avoid them and you're good.

52:43

>> Yeah. So it's it's I mean it's an

52:45

incredible effect one way or the other.

52:47

>> Again, I don't know the degree to which

52:49

we can nail down, you know, which which

52:52

part of things that are happening is

52:53

which. I always like the story that that

52:55

the um there's macrofasages, immune

52:57

cells in your eye that are basically

52:59

clearing the clearing the lens,

53:01

>> you know. So there's there's all these

53:02

like places where it's doing little

53:05

cleanup that you can imagine that if the

53:07

the thing it's trying to get rid of is

53:09

granularity that that you need to have

53:11

sleep where you just aren't making more

53:13

granularity so they can you know sort of

53:15

like when you wash your car windshield

53:16

you do it completely at that point and

53:19

but you can't be driving with flying and

53:21

right [laughter]

53:22

you'll never clean.

53:23

>> That's a great analogy

53:24

>> you So, I think there's certain elements

53:25

of some of these cleanup processes that

53:27

happen best when you're not getting

53:29

things, you know, you know, dirty or

53:31

again, I think a lot of what we're

53:33

talking about is byproducts of our

53:34

energetics that leave, you know, some

53:36

damage behind it. I I think we just use

53:38

a lot of ATP and we do a lot of stuff as

53:40

our bodies in in the sleep time where

53:43

you can not be, you know, producing more

53:45

of that and get ahead of the curve on

53:47

cleaning things up a bit.

53:48

>> Um, like pulling into a gas station,

53:49

cleaning off your windshield. I'd like

53:52

to take a quick break and acknowledge

53:53

our sponsor, AG1. I'm excited to share

53:56

that AG1 has just launched their newest

53:58

formulation, AG1 Pro. AG1 Pro takes the

54:02

clinically backed AG1 formula, which is

54:03

a blend of vitamins, minerals,

54:05

probiotics, and adaptogens, and adds

54:07

three important new ingredients:

54:09

creatine monohydrate, calcium HMBB, and

54:11

zinc carnosine. Each serving has 5 grams

54:14

of creatine monohydrate to support

54:16

muscle strength and performance, as well

54:17

as brain health. calcium HMBB to support

54:20

muscle recovery and reduce muscle

54:21

breakdown and zinc carnosine to support

54:24

and improve the lining of your gut. All

54:25

three of these ingredients have

54:26

compelling science to support them and

54:29

therefore I love seeing them added to

54:30

the existing AG1 formula. As most of you

54:33

know, I've been taking AG1 every day for

54:35

nearly 14 years now. I started taking it

54:38

long before I even knew what a podcast

54:39

was. It's a great product and it's now

54:41

made even better with the new AG1 Pro

54:43

formula. If you would like to try AG1

54:46

Pro, you can go to

54:47

drinkaga1.com/huberman

54:49

to get a special offer. AG1 is giving

54:52

away a free bottle of omega-3 co-enzyme

54:54

Q10 with your first subscription. Again,

54:56

go to drinka1.com/huberman

54:59

to get a free bottle of omega-3

55:01

co-enzyme Q10 with your first AG1

55:03

subscription. This thymus thing is

55:06

really intriguing. And uh I know a lot

55:08

of people who um opted to bank their

55:11

child's umbilical cord in the hopes that

55:14

the stem cells from the umbilical cord

55:15

will someday be useful.

55:16

>> Yeah.

55:17

>> How invasive is it? Andor should we be

55:19

uh banking thyic cells?

55:22

>> Uh because these seem like incredibly

55:24

valuable cells for their ability to

55:27

immune surveil and create kind of the

55:30

perfect situation using our own

55:31

indogenous tea cells to battle

55:33

infections. I mean, I kind of wish I had

55:35

a little little chunk of my thymus.

55:37

Yeah.

55:37

>> Um, in a minus 80 freezer someplace so

55:40

that when I'm 85 years old,

55:42

>> you might

55:43

>> I might be able to exploit that.

55:44

>> Yeah.

55:46

>> Well, I'll I'll say that the umbilical

55:48

cord one is is pretty straightforward.

55:50

It's, you know, the umbilical cord is

55:51

being essentially discarded anyway and

55:54

it contains a lot of, as you know, bone

55:56

marrow stem cells that um the utility of

55:59

those is a little different than the

56:00

thymus. the utility of of banking that

56:02

material and banking just means you put

56:04

it into a vial small little you know

56:06

small little vial with right of media

56:08

and you set it in a very very cold

56:10

environment for whenever you might need

56:11

it is that if you need to have a bone

56:14

marrow transplant so for example if you

56:15

have a tumor of the bone marrow system

56:18

you can subject yourself to radiation

56:21

and wipe out all that tumor cells but

56:23

you'll wipe out all the stem cells but

56:24

if you get this vial here you've got a

56:26

little replacement

56:27

>> has that ever been done successfully

56:29

>> yeah you can do Are there kids even kids

56:32

or adults that are alive today because

56:34

they banked their umbilical courses?

56:36

>> But certainly companies sell access to

56:37

that

56:38

>> somebody has to pay to keep the freezers

56:39

on backup generators and things like

56:41

that. So people invest time and money

56:43

into this idea. Is is there a

56:45

>> walking talking breathing human who

56:48

would be otherwise dead would otherwise

56:50

be dead excuse me because they they paid

56:52

money to bank their their umbilical

56:54

cord?

56:54

>> It's a really good question. I don't

56:55

know the answer to that question. I

56:56

guess the parents pay the

56:57

>> I can tell you and this will be just

56:59

like this is this is the depth of to

57:01

which you're you're describing uh Dave

57:03

Felheim injecting a you know mouse is

57:05

that in mice this is true that if you

57:08

take you know bone marrow stem cells you

57:10

can reconstitute a mouse with a blood

57:13

blood cancer and you can do that. I'm

57:15

sure you can do it in humans too. I have

57:17

zero doubt that it also works. I don't

57:19

know whether those companies have done

57:20

that. That's that's just actually

57:21

something where I

57:23

>> this is offered in mass now.

57:24

>> Yeah. Yeah.

57:26

Do you want to do you want to keep the

57:27

umbilical cord?

57:27

>> Honestly, honestly, I would do it

57:29

because it's one of those situations

57:30

where if it's not too Well, I don't know

57:32

if it you know, it depends on your your

57:33

how much money you have to spend because

57:35

the

57:35

>> it's within within the noise. Yeah.

57:37

Yeah. It's one of those so it's one of

57:39

those ones where you particularly when

57:41

you have kids there's this whole aspect

57:42

of like I would like to protect them

57:44

from anything that could come their way

57:45

and then I think this would if if they

57:48

happen to have a a childhood leukemia

57:51

this would this would cure it

57:53

>> which is an incredible statement if you

57:54

think about it even if it hasn't been

57:56

done successfully yet you didn't say it

57:58

might be able to lead to a cure by

58:00

virtue of a new technology you said it

58:03

>> would cure it

58:05

>> I mean that's a big statement

58:07

>> you can tell I'm ratcheting up from like

58:08

sleep to banking thymus and umbilical

58:10

cord. Now I'm going to go to the sort of

58:12

next level which is um not just in the

58:14

Bay Area. A lot of people uh however are

58:16

starting to think about oh maybe I make

58:19

some induced pur potent stem cells from

58:21

a fiberblast from one of my skin cells

58:23

put the so-called Yamanaka factors on

58:25

revert to stemness and then I might be

58:27

able to grow a new pancreas or study my

58:30

uh you know whatever organs in these

58:32

so-called organoids or what however

58:34

they're referred to. Yep.

58:35

>> But I learned today from you that if I

58:38

take that fibroblast now, that

58:40

fibroblast might not be completely

58:44

Andrew Huberman as I know him to be

58:45

[clears throat] genetically. It's

58:47

actually could have some uh mutations.

58:50

That seems important to compare against

58:52

a sort of um a standard cell.

58:56

>> I don't want to grow organ organoids

58:58

from a from an IPS environment that um

59:02

carries mutations. that that seems like

59:04

a bad idea.

59:05

>> Yeah,

59:05

>> because then anything I would I'm not

59:07

talking about transplanting in those

59:08

organoids. I'm talking about studying

59:09

them, thinking I'm getting information

59:10

about them. People are doing this and

59:12

thinking, oh, I'm seeing what drugs are

59:14

effective in treating uh, you know, a

59:16

liver [snorts] disease or a heart

59:17

disease. But if those are mutant cells,

59:20

that's a lousy experiment.

59:21

>> Yeah, I wouldn't I wouldn't say they're

59:22

likely mutant cells for that reason. I

59:24

think the biggest question would be

59:25

whether your induction of them to become

59:27

the organ that you, you know, want was

59:30

successful, was replicating the actual

59:32

organ itself. So you're you're

59:33

referencing these things called

59:34

organoids which are collections of cells

59:37

from a body of a human for example that

59:41

are are induced with various different

59:42

factors to grow to resemble maybe an

59:45

organ a particular organ.

59:47

You know I think all of us have little

59:49

doubt and this this is the source of the

59:50

California Institute for Regenerative

59:52

Medicine that making stem cells that can

59:54

become particular organs will at some

59:56

happen. We will figure all these things

59:58

out. And I I believe in science. I

60:01

believe in our ability to sort of like

60:02

test learn test learn test learn how

60:06

soon you know that becomes useful is a

60:08

bigger question. If you take out your

60:09

fiberblast today, that might only cure

60:12

you someday in the future. And

60:14

meanwhile, you may die of that thing

60:15

that you wish you had the stem cells

60:17

because it's not yet ready. The

60:18

technology and the understanding isn't

60:20

yet ready. But the other problem about

60:21

those is you probably will die of

60:22

something else. You get hit by a car,

60:24

you know, [laughter]

60:25

it won't help you that you've got those

60:26

things bang. I think in some of these

60:28

cases like overemphasizing this might be

60:30

your point about the storage of of

60:33

umbilical cords is like at what point is

60:35

that a high odds situation where you

60:38

your kid needs it and you have it stored

60:40

away versus all the other things fates

60:42

that can be flawless as humans that have

60:45

nothing to do with you know stem cells

60:47

from the bone marrow and and to me

60:49

that's that's a point where you could

60:51

spend your life worrying about how

60:52

you're going to die and and maybe that's

60:54

not a good way to live. Well, that's

60:55

certainly not how I live right now.

60:57

There's a lot of

60:58

>> kind of excitement, attention around

60:59

so-called longevity. And um at at the

61:02

extremes of never dying or living to be

61:04

120, which seems to be the

61:06

>> perhaps the genetic limit uh currently.

61:09

Um it's not my fascination. I'm more

61:11

interested in living in the years I've

61:12

got as it seems you are too. Exactly.

61:15

Vital, healthy, you know, being able to

61:17

move,

61:18

>> sense, and and think [clears throat]

61:19

seems like and remember, you know, those

61:21

seem like the critical ones. You know,

61:22

you know, a moment ago you mentioned the

61:24

concept of like removing a bit of thymus

61:25

and I I think that the issues with for

61:27

me with that are or you know, it's an

61:28

invasive surgery and like if you were to

61:30

take out thymus it would it's not clear

61:32

to me that it's the thymus that you

61:35

need. You might be able I mean in fact

61:36

you can make thyic that so the thymus is

61:40

both the cells that come into it from

61:42

the bone marrow. So it as an organ it

61:44

has contents but its structure are some

61:47

thymic epithelial cells a kind of cell

61:49

that make a matrix that all those cells

61:51

live in and they get educated in and um

61:54

there's definitely you know pretty

61:56

strong work that says that you can

61:57

create sort of a thymic epithelium that

61:59

will do some of this work but whether

62:02

you know a guy at home [laughter] could

62:05

hold on to the thymic cells and we would

62:07

be in a position to do something

62:08

important for longevity in our lifetime

62:12

I don't No, I I I I honestly don't know.

62:14

Some things in my career, I've seen

62:16

things happen really fast. So fast that

62:18

almost like you didn't realize that you

62:20

were doing it. You're like, "Oh my god,

62:21

we've got a cure for cancer. That's

62:22

great. Okay, let's go and do the next

62:23

thing." Two things that So you're like,

62:25

you know, the California Institute for

62:27

Regenerative Medicine, they we thought

62:28

that we would have some stem cell

62:30

therapies, you know, within the seven or

62:32

eight year window of that bond, first

62:33

bond, and then there's a second bond. We

62:35

didn't really get very many out of that.

62:37

We learn a lot and that is the risk

62:39

>> about stem cell biology

62:40

>> about stem cell about biology and that

62:41

is the risk we take when we do research.

62:43

You know we're talking a moment ago

62:44

about how many times you might be in a

62:46

lab spending hundreds of hours and not

62:48

getting anything that you understand and

62:49

then and then one hour and you

62:50

understand everything because you know

62:52

so all of a sudden all those failures

62:53

make us make make sense. I think when we

62:55

get into some of this stem cell biology

62:57

it's it's intuitive and it's almost

62:59

certainly true that we will have some of

63:00

these things. Whether we'll have them in

63:02

time for like you or me I I don't know.

63:06

I just don't [clears throat] know. And I

63:07

I think that's true of a lot of these

63:08

things that say, "Oh, you know, we seem

63:09

to be right on the cusp right now." For

63:11

example, in in cancer therapy, we've

63:12

been on the cusp for 10 or 15 years of

63:14

these things called cartis. Alex will

63:17

have told you about these where you

63:18

engineer your tea cells and you give

63:19

them special receptors that can get them

63:21

to go into to eliminate tumors. But for

63:24

whatever reason, they haven't worked in

63:25

patients. They haven't worked. They

63:26

haven't worked. They haven't worked. And

63:28

T- cell the immune system gets turned

63:29

off. These cells don't make it. They

63:31

don't fail they fail to eliminate the

63:32

tumor. We will figure that out. But

63:35

we've been thinking, we've figured out,

63:36

you know, sort of for five or 10 years.

63:38

And it's it's, you know, that gets

63:39

frustrating. And I think it gets

63:40

frustrating for people that are like

63:42

waiting for it to um on the outside like

63:44

why can't you solve this? And you're

63:45

well because the universe isn't always

63:47

configured how we think it is. And

63:49

that's discovery. That's the problem of

63:50

discovery. If we knew what we needed to

63:52

do, we would engineer it and it would

63:53

work.

63:55

>> This is an important discussion that we

63:56

haven't spent enough time on in this

63:59

podcast that I think is very important

64:01

for people to hear. And I have some

64:02

thoughts about it, but I I'd love for

64:04

any disagreements. I'm not looking for

64:06

um just agreements, but

64:08

>> yeah.

64:08

>> So my observation from a couple decades

64:11

or more doing science and then mainly

64:13

shifting to podcasting, but this is what

64:15

I do. I talk with great scientists.

64:17

>> So that's the podcast. [clears throat]

64:18

So I'm very immersed in like what's

64:19

happening right at the cutting edge. And

64:21

um because of great guests like you, you

64:24

know, my my sense is that in every field

64:26

there's been like this kind of steady

64:28

pressure like water on rock pressure

64:30

like okay we're going to understand like

64:32

salamanders regenerate. Wouldn't it be

64:34

great if we could do that too? Cut off a

64:35

limb it could grow back. Okay, amazing.

64:37

I think it's like Ellie Tanaka's work

64:39

has just shown that you're like wow this

64:40

would be incredible for amputees and

64:42

brain regeneration and right

64:44

>> but then it never really transfers or

64:46

like oh we're going to figure out ways

64:47

to get genes into cells. We're going to

64:49

electroporate liposomes. Uh we're going

64:51

to use calcium phosphate. Like great

64:54

research tools. Tons of things happen.

64:56

It's like we're going to modify genes.

64:57

Zinc finger nucleus. All this. Okay.

64:59

Crisper. Boom. And one thing just breaks

65:02

through and goes so much further. And

65:04

even though you know the ethics are

65:06

questionable, there are babies that have

65:09

deliberately induced uh gene alterations

65:12

with crisper cickle cell anemia

65:14

treatments as well. More benevolent

65:15

example.

65:16

than the person who went rogue and just

65:18

kind of did this in humans in China. But

65:20

Crisper just kind of broke through it

65:22

all.

65:23

>> This the excitement about stem cells led

65:24

to like Yeah. I mean even initiatives at

65:26

the legislative level and like all these

65:29

labs working on things and then as you

65:30

said it's kind of like

65:32

>> run up against the dam.

65:33

>> Yeah.

65:34

>> But I feel like in 10 years some or all

65:37

of that information will be extremely

65:39

relevant when boom one thing will just

65:41

like leap out of bacteria or like

65:42

grasshoppers, no pun intended with the

65:44

grasshoppers. But the the last example

65:46

would be, you know, for years it was

65:48

like the country is getting fatter. The

65:49

c the country is getting obese. What are

65:51

we going to do? Do calories matter? Of

65:53

course calories matter. This kind of

65:55

thing, you know, laws of thermodynamics

65:57

still apply. And then all of a sudden,

66:00

this freaking helila monster biologist.

66:03

>> Yeah. Yeah.

66:03

>> Tells people what they already knew

66:05

because the GLPs were already being used

66:08

as a drug, just not at significantly

66:10

high levels. Yeah.

66:11

>> And all of a sudden we have a imperfect

66:14

but very important more or less dare I

66:18

say cure

66:19

>> for obesity. It's got problems. There's

66:21

muscle wasting. You know there could be

66:22

other issues, apathy, etc. I'm not I'm

66:24

not trying to discount any of that. But

66:26

I feel like that's the way science

66:28

works. It's like steady pressure, steady

66:29

pressure, steady pressure, frustration,

66:31

and something comes out of nowhere

66:33

>> and it almost seems prerequisite to have

66:35

all those years of frustration and

66:37

failure.

66:37

>> Yeah. And then and you say, "Well,

66:39

couldn't we have just gotten Crisper

66:40

first or the GLP's first? Like, why did

66:42

we go through all these, you know,

66:43

billions of dollars of expenditures,

66:45

time, energy?"

66:46

>> Yeah.

66:47

>> I don't know. I feel like there's some

66:48

natural order to this. And and I ju just

66:51

would like your thoughts on I feel like

66:52

it's necessary, but not sufficient to

66:55

have lots and lots and lots of failures.

66:57

>> Yeah. And I think it's necessary and

66:59

necessary, absolutely necessary to study

67:01

things that are just at some point

67:03

curiosities. And that sounds like

67:05

science is about trivia, but you know,

67:08

you you gave the example clip one.

67:09

Somebody was just curious as to why Hila

67:12

monsters. It was the feature was that

67:14

Hila monsters can go into, you know,

67:16

dormcancy for like 10 months, not eat,

67:19

and then uh and then come out and like

67:20

how do they manage that? And so that's

67:22

that was just like what is that? What is

67:24

it? What causes that? Crisper, you know,

67:26

that was people were studying like how

67:28

do bacteria defend against other

67:29

bacteria? Well, they use this. It turns

67:31

out there's this enzyme and it it

67:33

remembers the sequence of this one

67:34

bacteria that has come and invaded you

67:36

before and then can like modify the

67:38

genome and get rid of that and like kill

67:39

it. Well, that same you know that same

67:41

enzyme then which we now use for all

67:42

this human engineering came out of a

67:44

basic like how do bacteria defend

67:46

themselves. It's not anything about like

67:48

you know modifying single cell anemia.

67:50

It was about how does the world work? My

67:52

career is exactly as long as as the as

67:54

the lifespan of of this this field we

67:56

call cancer imotherapy. I did the first

67:58

imotherapy experiment. I injected a

68:00

mouse with an antibbody that I had made.

68:02

It was against molecules on te- cells

68:04

and I'd shown already in the lab that

68:06

that molecule caused the tea cells to

68:07

get more activated when you blocked it

68:09

and uh and we did a series of like other

68:11

mouse experiments of like all kinds of

68:13

diseases and it you know kept jamming up

68:14

the tea cells and then then you know Jim

68:17

I said we got some tumors in the fridge

68:19

and so we set up that experiment and uh

68:21

you know he injected this antibbody and

68:22

the tumors melted. Well that was the

68:24

start of cancer imunotherapy. We're like

68:26

that's that's this that's the origin.

68:27

This is the experiment for which let's

68:28

just be direct here that your your

68:30

adviser won the Nobel Prize.

68:32

>> Correct. Correct.

68:32

>> Did you at least get to attend the

68:33

ceremony?

68:34

>> Yeah. Yeah.

68:35

>> It was a little thing.

68:36

>> This is how science works folks. Doesn't

68:37

matter who did the experiment. Doesn't

68:39

matter what lab you're in.

68:40

>> Yeah. You got, you know, got to go to

68:42

the the afterparties were good. Uh but I

68:44

guess I take you back like we weren't

68:47

trying to cure cancer when we started

68:48

this. I the thesis project when I went

68:50

into Jim my my mentor at that point. The

68:54

discussion was like, well, there's some

68:55

molecules on TE- cells and and I said,

68:57

you know, we knew from AIDS and a few

68:58

other things that T- cells were

68:59

important. So, that was the attraction,

69:01

even though you had people say, why

69:02

would you do immunology? Well, we they

69:04

seem to be interested. And there was a

69:05

molecule. I was like, well, yeah, let's

69:06

just see what it does. And once you saw

69:09

you could turn things off, then

69:10

everything became possible. Right? Now,

69:12

you set an immune system you could dial

69:13

up. You can say, well, if I could dial

69:15

up, what will happen to vaccination?

69:16

Well, it got better. What will happen

69:18

to, you know, multiple scerosis? The

69:20

disease got worse. You know, what will

69:21

happen to cancer? Oh, we can start to

69:23

have an effect on and and and you know

69:25

the X-ray you know the people were

69:27

studying physics and then it turns out

69:28

to be that that they were like oh I can

69:30

measure I can I can measure bone and

69:32

that's how we use X-rays now like to to

69:34

you know so there's all these examples

69:35

that everything you know like the big

69:37

things often come from these orthogonal

69:40

directions and then we realize what it

69:42

might mean and I think you have to start

69:44

there otherwise you'll just plow this

69:46

direction and you'll hit those walls

69:47

because you don't have the workaround

69:49

that comes with some orthogonal piece of

69:51

The orthogonal meaning at right angles,

69:53

right? So, you know, again, the crisper

69:56

came from bacteria, but it's really

69:57

useful in us as an engineering tool. But

70:00

we wouldn't have known that if somebody

70:01

hadn't been out there sort of saying,

70:03

okay, well, how do how do bacteria do

70:05

it? You know, how do they defend

70:06

themselves? Oh, they use this enzyme.

70:08

And I think that's a really important

70:09

message that that dispels this idea that

70:12

everything is sort of like basically

70:14

just easy for us to engineer. Yes, once

70:16

you have the crisper tool, it becomes

70:17

actually kind of easy to do some really

70:19

cool things with it and still creative.

70:20

But the fundamental leap that you're

70:22

describing, I don't think in many of

70:24

those cases that people were kind of

70:25

conceiving when they were in in the

70:27

first drags of doing it,

70:30

this would become an industry.

70:32

>> You know, this would become a whole

70:33

thing. And and maybe that's important

70:34

because you need to foster that. If if

70:36

everybody always thought they were doing

70:37

it to build a company and, you know,

70:40

sell a product or something, then then I

70:42

don't think we would do the things that

70:43

get us new. You know, that's that's all

70:45

that's all kind of what we already know.

70:47

That's human knowledge. We want to build

70:48

human knowledge. And to build human

70:49

knowledge, we got to go off the piece.

70:51

You can't ski on the slope. You got to

70:53

be like in the trees. And maybe you'll

70:55

bunk your head a bunch of times. I I

70:57

think that's the reality. And it's like

70:58

you got a lot of people out there that

70:59

are that have decided to do that for a

71:01

life because it's a it's a it's a chance

71:03

to like solve a puzzle. It's like

71:05

there's there's puzzles about how the

71:07

world works. And if you've ever done a

71:08

jigsaw puzzle where you there's always

71:10

like the oh you get in and especially in

71:11

the end you're like how you what pieces

71:13

come together to do it. I think that's

71:15

what makes this whole science thing

71:16

really fun. It's that's the that's the

71:18

reward is that you get the puzzle piece

71:20

in and you're like oh you know it makes

71:23

sense that now I know what I've been

71:24

building. and I've been building this

71:25

puzzle and and then you go back and you

71:27

do it again because that's really

71:29

satisfying at the end of it even though

71:31

you know you again with a family puzzle

71:32

the first parts are so hard thousand

71:35

pieces and you you maybe find the edge

71:37

but the intervening where there's like

71:39

all clouds super hard and and I think

71:42

that's that's that is what science is a

71:44

lot about is uh is doing that and then

71:46

realizing what the picture is you know

71:48

what is that picture of and then then

71:51

all the you know the brakes are are off

71:54

I often tell people that if if an if an

71:55

experiment if experiment you'll do in

71:57

lab has a 10% chance of yielding

71:59

anything interesting you got to do at

72:00

least 10 you know to even meet the

72:03

fundamental stats you actually have to

72:04

do quite a few more. So that's where

72:08

it's not a um it's not a cost-effective

72:10

thing if you it's it's really difficult

72:12

to be a scientist because there's no

72:14

quid proquo. There's nothing there's

72:15

nothing to say if you put in five hours

72:17

that you'll get five units of goodness

72:19

of of knowledge out of it. A lot of

72:21

times you get zero and and but then

72:24

sometimes you put five and you get 500,

72:25

>> right?

72:26

>> And and those are the jackpot moments

72:27

where you're like

72:28

>> it's like life.

72:28

>> It's like life. It really is. I have to

72:31

say anyone who's considering a PhD. We

72:33

had a call in from audience recently and

72:35

someone said they're finishing

72:36

undergraduate, they want to go the or

72:38

finishing graduate school, should they

72:39

go the research route? They want to do a

72:41

posttock. And I'm like yes, yes, and

72:43

yes. I rather than answer publicly, I

72:45

decided to just have a call with this

72:46

individual because it's a rather niche

72:48

qu question. But I mean also just in

72:51

training your reward system to work for

72:55

5 years on something

72:56

>> is so valuable especially in this day

72:58

and age because everything else feels

73:00

like it comes at like warp speed.

73:02

>> Yeah, you know it clicks.

73:03

>> Yeah. Like and um to just put steady

73:06

pressure on something with all the

73:07

failures and all the things and then to

73:09

finally complete something it's a lot of

73:11

people think it'll be underwhelming. I

73:12

think I think quite the opposite.

73:14

>> Yeah. It's like anyone that's like done

73:16

a triathlon or, you know, raised raised

73:19

a kid or done anything, you're like, "Oh

73:20

my goodness." Like, and that never ends,

73:22

right? There's nothing better than these

73:25

long-term investments.

73:26

>> Yeah.

73:27

>> Nothing.

73:27

>> Yeah. When they break through that

73:29

you're like your analogy, when you break

73:31

through that dam or when you realize

73:32

sometimes that you broken through the

73:33

dam. That's that's one of the funny

73:34

things about I think science and maybe

73:37

it's true in triathlons and stuff too

73:38

where you've realized that you've all of

73:40

a sudden got somewhere.

73:41

>> I haven't done a triathlon so I have to

73:43

be fair. Rob, our producer sitting to

73:45

our left is he has done many Iron Mans.

73:48

Um, and he has that mindset of just

73:50

steady pressure. I mean, his

73:51

relationship to work and effort is

73:53

remarkable because he burns so little

73:55

energy worrying about things that we

73:56

refer to as in the left column, like the

73:58

stuff you can't impact and just focusing

74:00

on what you can impact.

74:01

>> And so, a lot of it is about learning

74:03

energetic control, like doing science

74:05

that is, or anything is about what not

74:06

to think about, what not what to force

74:08

yourself not to do or think about.

74:10

>> Yeah. If I may, I'd like to shift us to

74:12

this very interesting area of immunology

74:16

and biology, which you refer to as

74:17

spatial biology.

74:18

>> Okay?

74:19

>> And I'm going to pose a question that

74:20

may or may not fit with um this

74:22

framework, but either way, I'd like like

74:24

you to educate us on it.

74:26

>> I'm fascinated by these old kind of

74:28

barbaric experiments in medicine. Um

74:31

wonderful book, by the way, folks, is uh

74:33

The Prince of Medicine about Galen. If

74:34

you ever want to learn about how we

74:36

learned about medicine back when, it was

74:37

truly barbaric. It was like surgeries

74:40

done on warriors and without anesthesia.

74:44

And we've known for a long time that if

74:46

uh somebody, god forbid, has a finger

74:48

lpped off or a hand lpped off, that

74:51

might actually be a worthwhile

74:52

investment to make an incision in the

74:54

gut and stuff that thing in the gut to

74:55

keep it warm and keep the tissue viable

74:58

for regeneration once you try and put it

75:00

back on. Turns out that's true.

75:01

>> Is that true?

75:02

>> Yeah. There's a bunch of juicy stuff in

75:03

the in the gut that maybe it's the

75:05

warmth. Maybe it's the immune system.

75:08

Okay.

75:08

>> Maybe it's the lack of infection from

75:10

being inside as opposed to outside the

75:11

body. Who knows?

75:13

>> Gut. You mean the intestine or you mean

75:15

the sto within the stomach? The stomach

75:17

itself.

75:17

>> Yeah. I'm not suggesting anyone do this

75:18

experiment. As I started reading into

75:20

this, I discovered that there are a lot

75:22

of really cool experiments not just in

75:25

limb or tissue preservation and and

75:27

restoration. Like for instance, I've

75:30

talked many times on this podcast about

75:31

the fact that above our the roof of our

75:33

mouth, we have this small cluster of

75:34

neurons, the super kaismatic nucleus

75:36

organizes the circadian rhythms of every

75:39

cell in our body from the genetic to the

75:41

transmitter level, peptides, etc. Keeps

75:43

us

75:43

>> sleepwake cycles, does all the

75:45

organization that we need for circadian

75:47

rhythms. So much so that you can take

75:50

just one subpopul of these neurons, the

75:53

calbindon expressing super chaismatic

75:55

nucleus neurons. It's like 5% of the

75:57

total neurons in this already tiny

75:59

cluster of neurons and you can

76:01

transplant them pretty much anywhere

76:06

and certainly in the brain and you'll

76:08

restore the circadian rhythm of an

76:09

arythmic animal.

76:11

>> Okay,

76:12

>> so that tells you a lot of cool things.

76:14

it says, "Okay, there's probably

76:15

something that's secreted or but like

76:17

these cells are that important and it

76:19

doesn't really matter where they are,

76:21

>> at least in the brain. They can do what

76:23

they need to do, which is super cool."

76:25

>> Yeah.

76:26

>> And then I started reading about, oh,

76:27

like you could actually take perhaps

76:29

like a little bit of pancreatic tissue

76:31

and like stuff it in the, you know,

76:33

under the skin. Not ideal, but you get

76:36

some function back.

76:38

>> So, I'm fascinated by this because we

76:39

like to think that the organization of

76:41

our organs is so critical.

76:42

>> Yeah. But maybe they just need to be

76:44

there. Now, no one should test this

76:46

hypothesis unless they have to. But when

76:49

we think about the immune system,

76:50

>> you described the function of the thymus

76:52

beautifully. You talked about the bone

76:53

marrow, but you also talked about the

76:55

massive migration of these cells that

76:57

are working in this network.

77:00

>> How important is spatial

77:02

compartmentalization of these cells or

77:04

is the rule eliminate spatial

77:07

compartmentalization in order to make

77:09

the immune system function at its best?

77:10

And there's a very specific practical

77:12

question for which I'm asking this, but

77:14

I'm just going to tuck that away uh to

77:15

peique people's interest and I'll get to

77:17

it. But this is relevant to how we to

77:20

decision important decisions that we

77:21

make I believe.

77:22

>> Well, the the answer is yes and yes, you

77:25

know, it's it's both. So although I

77:27

described the immune system in the

77:29

earlier part of this discussion as super

77:31

migratory, it you know hitches a ride in

77:33

the blood gets into tissues. It travels

77:36

through your lymphatics. There are these

77:37

things called lymph nodes down the

77:38

lymphatic tubing which for those that

77:40

don't know lymphatics are like drainage.

77:42

It's how you drain the the fluid back

77:43

out of your tissue. [snorts]

77:45

So [clears throat] although there's you

77:46

know these mass migration of cells

77:48

there's also in like even in just in T-

77:50

cells there's tea cells that lodge in

77:52

particular settings and they you know

77:54

act to protect that tissue and they um

77:57

and they're resident cells of those

77:59

tissues. they never leave. And um so

78:01

both are true that you have, you know,

78:03

parts of your immune system that are,

78:04

you know, protective or or like

78:06

nurturing of particular areas and then

78:08

there's ones that are circulating and

78:10

can hit any any spot. You know, going

78:12

back to your idea of organs and and such

78:14

being moved. I think there's two

78:16

components of that that you might be

78:18

thinking about. One of them is the

78:19

question of whether the organ can

78:21

survive in the new space like does it

78:23

have the growth factors and the blood

78:25

flow and the and lymphatic outflow and

78:28

maybe even some neuronal activity that

78:30

you know makes that tissue work. So so

78:33

that's where like if you take the

78:34

pancreas you can famously put it

78:36

underneath a kidney capsule. Kidney has

78:37

kind of like a skin around it. You can

78:39

tuck some some some pancreatic cells in

78:41

there and they're super happy. They love

78:43

that. They get all the blood flow they

78:45

need and it seems to be just right for

78:46

them. But if you've got somebody with

78:49

diabetes, for example, and you try to

78:51

put new pancreatic cells in anywhere in

78:53

their body, the immune system will

78:54

attack it just as it did the first

78:57

diabetes for those, you know, type 1

78:58

diabetes or is caused by the immune

79:00

system. It gets too active against the

79:02

pancreas. It's autoimmunity. It's where

79:04

it's now saying the pancreas is is not

79:06

self. It's something foreign and it

79:08

wipes it out. And that's the source of

79:10

what I said earlier, like your immune

79:11

system can be quite dangerous.

79:13

So like when you talk about this concept

79:15

of like spatial um there's a few things

79:17

to bring in. One is does the organ can

79:19

the organ get what it needs and then

79:21

does the immune system accept it in some

79:23

ways in that environment. And that's

79:25

where like some some of your immune

79:26

system that lives spatially in certain

79:28

areas is going to be very like defensive

79:30

against whatever it's you know specific

79:32

against in that area but may not care

79:34

what's happening elsewhere because those

79:35

cells just aren't it's not like the

79:37

brain where like if I I do something

79:38

here it's sensed in my brain immune

79:40

system that if it does if the cells

79:42

don't migrate they don't have really a

79:44

lot of ways to communicate that they can

79:46

they can hitch some signals on neurons

79:48

and that's a really interesting we could

79:50

talk about the the capacity for your

79:51

brain and you know the insular cortex

79:53

there's great set of stories emerging

79:55

about how your insular cortex can

79:57

program your immune state into organs

79:59

and can via via the Vegas can can

80:02

essentially program

80:03

>> by levels of of calm or stress or by

80:05

thoughts themselves.

80:06

>> Well, the the one the latter one is the

80:08

one that gets me super excited about the

80:10

possibility that you could have triggers

80:12

for thoughts that so the insular cortex

80:14

as I understand it it's a source of some

80:16

of our moral decision- making. And it's

80:18

also the the thought to be the part of

80:20

our brain where if you cut your hand and

80:22

and I see a bleeding, I can feel it in

80:23

my hand, I oh ow. You know, I can sense

80:26

and you can sense each other's pain.

80:28

It's a set set that this very nice uh

80:30

Israeli group did this Royce lab did

80:32

this very nice study where they induced

80:34

into the guts of of mice inflammatory

80:37

bowel disease. They fed them a really

80:39

kind of weird sugar that causes the the

80:41

bowel to puncture and then they get they

80:43

get a really bad, you know, stomach

80:45

ache. um uh stomach ache, inflammatory

80:49

bowel disease, diarrhea and um and in

80:52

that period they used you know you know

80:53

what dreads are. So they they marked um

80:56

for the for the crowd it's they used

80:57

they they used they used a way to to

80:59

mark all the neurons that were firing

81:01

during that period in the instrumental

81:02

cortex and then later they could fire

81:04

them like after the mouse had recovered

81:05

and the they saw evidence that the

81:07

immune system was resetting up itself in

81:09

the gut as if it had just been punctured

81:12

you know like with and the cues for that

81:14

in that case were a drug but we know

81:16

that we can you know cue the insular

81:18

cortex like me watching you do things

81:20

>> so it's always it's maybe wonder whether

81:22

you know like some of the things we we

81:23

smell all cut grass and we can it'll

81:26

instantly take us back to a whole bunch

81:27

of thoughts about how we were when we

81:29

were kids and maybe even make you feel a

81:30

little like that. Whether there's

81:32

aspects to this to which our you know

81:34

our ability of our thoughts to control

81:36

that region are are going to be revealed

81:38

to you know to have potential that you

81:40

could train

81:41

>> uh you know train yourself to to you

81:44

know to bring up an immune state in a

81:46

particular tissue.

81:47

>> And just so I'm we make sure everyone's

81:50

on board what you just described because

81:52

there's a lot there. If I understand

81:54

correctly, we know that the nervous

81:56

system can do contextual learning. Like

81:58

if like if an animal or or human, let's

82:01

just keep it at humans, gets um shocked,

82:03

scared, or traumatized in a given

82:05

region. Yeah.

82:05

>> Or even I've had friends visit San

82:07

Francisco and get their cars broken into

82:08

and their computers stolen.

82:10

>> You can develop a context context

82:12

dependent or and or place dependent

82:14

memory where you kind of don't like San

82:16

Francisco as much even though the rest

82:18

of the trip was awesome. That's a pretty

82:19

broad interpretation. or um you have a

82:23

great experience someplace and you

82:24

actually really love

82:26

>> San Francisco because you met your

82:29

future spouse there or you just had a

82:30

particularly awesome experience there

82:32

even if it was just in one part you

82:34

might feel better about your computer

82:35

getting stolen anyway okay insula seems

82:38

like a you know let's take the positive

82:40

example let's keep it positive for a

82:41

moment I think what you're describing is

82:43

that if we remember the positive thing

82:46

if there was a positive immune status

82:50

>> associated

82:51

The immune system is also part of that

82:53

contextual memory. And [snorts] so

82:56

merely by recalling the positive or

82:58

negative, but in this case positive

83:00

memory, we can also rec we recall not

83:02

just the memory but also the body state.

83:04

And the body state includes the immune

83:06

status that accompanied the positive or

83:09

negative event.

83:10

>> That's what these studies are starting

83:12

to emerge. And

83:13

>> that's cool. That's really cool because

83:15

um we've heard for so long that like we

83:17

know that chronic stress impedes

83:20

>> immunity. We also know that acute stress

83:23

>> boosts it. And that's something that you

83:24

know with all due respect to my

83:26

colleagues who've focused on the ill

83:27

effects of chronically elevated cortisol

83:30

like that the the immune enhancing

83:33

effects of acute cortisol and stress are

83:35

are really important and and I think

83:37

they've been overlooked. But I love this

83:39

because one of the problems slash um

83:41

luxuries that I I have is I sit sort of

83:43

at the interface between like real

83:45

science and biology and like what most

83:47

people perceive as complete nonsense

83:49

wackiness.

83:50

>> But more and more we're finding that

83:51

within the complete nonsense wackiness

83:53

there are kernels of truth like that you

83:55

can actually meditate your way into a

83:57

better state which helps serve your

83:59

immune system and so on and so and

84:01

that's seeming less and less wacky even

84:03

outside California. Yeah.

84:05

>> Because of studies like the one you

84:06

described. One of my friends who's a

84:08

faculty, Dan Lim at NYU, we were talking

84:10

about the same study and he was like

84:11

that may be what meditation is doing

84:13

because it may be allowing your brain to

84:16

you know communicate and reset um you

84:19

know less inflammatory states

84:21

>> across your body because of this axis

84:23

and the study was really I think it was

84:26

you know there's still work to be done

84:27

it but the you know the the fundamentals

84:29

of it was in the actual event there were

84:32

certain cells that would accumulate in

84:33

there and then in the induced event when

84:35

you made the the brain fire again of

84:37

this mouse you would see you not as

84:39

profound but you saw this this evidence

84:41

of these same sorts of cells

84:43

accumulating there as if they you know

84:45

they're ready for that inflammation and

84:46

I think what we're talking about is the

84:47

idea that you could have that go both

84:49

directions and that again you know that

84:51

the concept of I mean I'm sure you've

84:52

talked about this before of of

84:54

meditation where the idea is that you um

84:57

you know you it's one of the ways that

84:59

you can control your autonomous nervous

85:01

system is through is through your breath

85:03

>> um that happens with meditation I think

85:05

that

85:05

>> to me there's something intuitive about

85:07

that. But you know, I just an hour ago

85:09

warned you about the problem of science

85:11

being intuitive that some things that

85:12

make that they sort of make a great

85:14

story in our minds and don't turn out to

85:16

be true. But the the data on this insert

85:18

cortex thing is starting to look like

85:19

it's a real thing. Like there's a real

85:22

connection between some of the

85:23

peripheral states and and like a regions

85:26

of the brain and however those are

85:28

triggered. Now, maybe, you know, again,

85:30

I've I've lost that. Well, maybe when

85:31

you're healthy, you should smell like

85:32

mint, and then when you want to be

85:34

healthy again, like, you know, there's

85:36

there kind of crazy thoughts, but but

85:37

again, there's an element of that that's

85:38

intuitive, too, where we say, "Oh, that

85:40

seems to be the case. My mom makes me a

85:42

comfort meal." Is it really the meal

85:44

settling in, or is it just the that the

85:46

sensations that make me feel like, you

85:48

know, less, you know, stressed in one

85:51

sense,

85:52

>> but maybe also to this point and

85:54

literally resetting your tissue. I'd

85:56

like to take a quick break and

85:58

acknowledge our sponsor, Function.

86:00

Function provides over 160 advanced lab

86:03

tests to give you a clear snapshot of

86:05

your bodily health. This snapshot gives

86:07

you insights into your heart health,

86:09

your hormone health, autoimmune

86:10

function, nutrient levels, and much

86:12

more. They've also recently added access

86:15

to advanced MRI and CT scans. function

86:18

not only provides testing of over 160

86:20

biomarkers key to your physical and

86:22

mental health, it also analyzes these

86:24

results and provides recommendations for

86:26

improving your health from top doctors.

86:28

For example, in a recent test with

86:30

function, I learned that some of my

86:32

blood lipids were slightly out of range.

86:34

As a result, I decided to start

86:36

supplementing with nattokinise, which

86:38

can naturally help reduce LDL

86:39

cholesterol. And it did. In a follow-up

86:42

test, I could confirm that this strategy

86:43

worked. My blood lipids are now back

86:45

exactly where I want them. Comprehensive

86:47

lab testing of the sort that function

86:49

offers is just so important for health.

86:51

I mean, how else are you going to know

86:52

what's going on under the hood? And

86:54

while I've been doing blood work for

86:55

years, it used to be timeconuming,

86:57

complicated, and expensive. In fact, I

87:00

used to spend thousands of dollars per

87:01

year trying to get this kind of data.

87:03

And the data frankly were not all that

87:05

good. But now with Function, it's

87:07

extremely easy and affordable. A

87:09

function membership is only a dollar a

87:11

day, $365 a year. And if you think about

87:14

the information it provides and the

87:16

health challenges it helps you avoid and

87:17

the proactive things that it can do for

87:19

you to enhance your health, I truly look

87:21

at it as a savings. To learn more, visit

87:24

functionhealth.com/huberman

87:26

and use the code hubman for a $50 credit

87:29

towards your membership. Again, that's

87:31

functionhealth.com/huberman.

87:34

I'm always struck by um extreme of

87:37

personality but in both directions. So

87:40

there are these [clears throat] people

87:41

who just say like I don't get sick

87:44

>> and they don't get sick and it's super

87:45

frustrating because I'm not one of these

87:47

people that's very sickly but I

87:49

occasionally get like a sniffle or a

87:51

cold or something you less and less with

87:52

each year because I do feel I pay more

87:55

attention to the sleep piece

87:57

>> um than I certainly than I did when I

87:58

was a graduate student postto or junior

88:01

professor but there does seem to be this

88:04

quote unquote

88:05

>> positive or let's just call it a

88:06

reinforced mindset as opposed like

88:08

[clears throat] an immune rein

88:09

reinforcement associated with mindset

88:11

because um some people will say like I I

88:14

just always get sick and I believe them.

88:15

They always seem sick. But it could be

88:18

that um you get sick in in a given

88:21

environment once and then you you just

88:23

decide that you're sickly. So then you

88:25

you know it could be that the immune

88:27

system is listening to these thoughts

88:29

but not in the form of words. I think

88:30

this is where like it gets hokey for

88:32

people like real biologists and and

88:34

physicians are like yeah you got to be

88:36

kidding me like but because immune cells

88:39

don't listen to thoughts they listen to

88:41

brain states

88:42

>> triggers of some sort

88:43

>> triggers of some sort right um and then

88:45

there's like as humans we have this

88:46

obsession with language that makes it

88:48

seem like you can you know write

88:50

affirmations and then it's the word

88:52

content but it's the feeling state

88:54

associated with that that

88:56

>> a biological level makes total sense. So

88:59

we were talking about spatial biology

89:00

and the fact that you can tuck some

89:01

pancreas in the kidney and unless they

89:03

someone has type 1 diabetes

89:05

>> a lot of the functions of the pancreas

89:07

can um can persist or transplantation of

89:11

these clock neurons and clearly there

89:13

are limits to this but in the context of

89:15

the immune system

89:17

>> I'm wondering

89:19

can we take a little bit of thyic tissue

89:22

bank it just later like put it in a

89:25

slowrelease capsule under our skin of

89:28

our hand, you know, like. And that might

89:31

sound crazy, but I have friends, one of

89:33

whom might be at Neurolink

89:34

[clears throat]

89:34

now, who actually embedded a little

89:36

radio receiver under his hand to be able

89:38

to open his

89:39

>> um locks at his home and his car. And

89:41

his wife might have one also. And like

89:43

that might sound really like Bay Area

89:45

like future tech kind of wacky

89:46

biohacking, but

89:48

>> if I knew that I could be much healthier

89:51

>> by taking a few thyic cells and in a you

89:55

know a sterile capsule and sliding it

89:56

under the skin, you know, people get

89:58

their ears pierced with, you know, right

90:00

>> less less invasive uh procedures. Why

90:03

not?

90:04

>> Well, I mean the question is why would

90:06

that you know is that likely to work?

90:08

You're basically remember how we were

90:09

just talking about if I do 10

90:10

experiments, one might work. yours isn't

90:13

a bad idea, but you know, is there it's

90:15

it's more than likely at one of the nine

90:17

out of 10, I would guess.

90:18

>> Sure. But is there a correlate from any

90:19

studies on animals? Um I mean, we know

90:22

that in a lot of studies of cancer and

90:24

tumors, I used to see these mice down in

90:26

the vivarium,

90:27

>> they would slide tumors under the skin

90:29

and study them

90:30

>> and give animals drugs or give animals

90:32

stuff.

90:32

>> Very common. Yeah.

90:33

>> Yeah. Uh tumors are happy to thrive in

90:36

novel environments. So why wouldn't

90:38

healthy cells

90:38

>> No, I think you can. I think one of the

90:40

things that comes into play a little bit

90:41

about that that's more about you know um

90:44

replacing an organ with one that might

90:46

be better is that at some point if you

90:48

come in so one of the the challenges of

90:51

tissue engineering is if you want to

90:53

bring in new genes the vector the

90:56

material the the the surrounding whether

90:58

you bring in using a virus to and you

91:00

know to bring it into those cells that

91:02

you're going to now put into the person

91:03

whether it's a virus or a small piece of

91:05

DNA called a plasmid you you effectively

91:08

are giving that a new bit of identity

91:11

and when that when you go to transplant

91:13

that organ back in it's seen as foreign

91:16

>> and it's it's just like you just put an

91:18

infected cell in you you know as far as

91:19

the immune system knows all of a sudden

91:20

there's a cell with huge number of new

91:23

things being expressed and some of them

91:25

viral literally so you know that's a

91:27

that represents an issue I think when we

91:29

talk about any kind of you know sort of

91:31

engineering at the you know the moment

91:33

is is if you engineer a system to be

91:36

maybe better the immune system isn't

91:38

necessarily going want better and and so

91:40

you have to overcome this issue of

91:41

tolerance maybe at the same time and and

91:44

and again that's why that particular

91:45

experiment depending on what you're

91:47

putting under the kidney capsule or

91:48

whatever it matters what the immune

91:50

state is and what that thing is as to

91:52

whether your immune system is going to

91:53

let it fly.

91:55

>> I'm not considering doing this. I just I

91:57

think we are I don't know how old you

91:59

are, but I can guess based on some

92:00

mutual friends we have, but I'm guessing

92:03

>> that a lot of people

92:06

who are able to understand speech,

92:08

they're old enough to understand speech,

92:10

are thinking that in our lifetime, we

92:13

are going to be able to use our own

92:14

cells or peptides or synthetic versions

92:17

of peptides from our own cells and and

92:20

so forth to to overcome a lot of the

92:22

issues that our parents and grandparents

92:23

were not able to overcome. you know,

92:25

with regards to like the peptide side of

92:27

things and even the cells and this is

92:29

maybe where you're going with space is

92:31

that context does matter for the immune

92:34

system. So,

92:36

and and it matters for all biological

92:38

systems. I'll just give you an example.

92:39

We did a study of of wound healing uh

92:42

some years ago and if you have a wound

92:44

in a mouse that's maybe just a like you

92:46

know if you ever have a melanoma removed

92:48

they do a punch biopsy. It's a little

92:50

circle. So you can do that in the back

92:52

of a mouse and then you can watch the

92:53

wound healing happen. The there's zones

92:57

within there where certain biology is

92:59

really important to be happening and

93:00

then so so imagine the the wound is like

93:03

this and it's open. The cells like one

93:05

layer back are doing certain things but

93:07

the other ones behind that are also

93:09

induced to do so. The wound isn't just

93:11

this area. It's it's actually sensed all

93:14

like a gradient almost like in the

93:15

neurons. And so these cells need to do

93:17

different things than these cells. So if

93:18

you wanted to administer some you know

93:20

like like a peptide or even just a cell

93:22

type you have to be a little bit

93:23

conscious of like where it's going to do

93:25

the work you want it to do and the

93:27

natural system does that naturally like

93:29

the cells on the inside actually

93:30

instruct the cells one layer back

93:32

>> but you don't necessarily want everybody

93:34

getting the same signal

93:35

>> so like development happens that way you

93:37

know about gradients and we were talking

93:38

about this earlier that there's

93:39

gradients so so I think one of the

93:40

tricks that we don't really understand

93:42

about this is when is something good uh

93:45

for a process and when is it only good

93:47

when it's given in the right dose at the

93:48

right time.

93:50

>> And I think that's one of the tricks

93:51

about some of these things. And again,

93:53

that's where, you know, both in the lab

93:55

and, you know, like I I would say that

93:56

more so than ever in in in our lives,

93:59

you know, we're seeing, you know, people

94:00

kind of like experimenting with things

94:03

on themselves. And one of the sad parts

94:05

about this, we don't capture a lot of

94:06

data. Therefore, you know, because it's

94:08

not seen as a study and we can't say

94:10

everybody that took this gets this

94:11

result. And and then you have this rise

94:13

of things on the internet of of

94:14

anecdotes that become seen as data like

94:17

I took this thing and this happened. And

94:19

that's you know I I I could drink this

94:21

drink and have something great happen to

94:23

me or something bad happen to me but

94:24

might have nothing to do with the drink,

94:25

right?

94:26

>> You know that that issue is one that I

94:28

think is really um is really critical in

94:31

in this in this window of time right

94:32

now. And honestly I don't know what to

94:33

think about the idea that people you

94:35

know do experiments on themselves. I I

94:36

think we all want to improve ourselves.

94:37

We all do all all do some kind of

94:39

experiments on ourselves. you read a

94:40

book, you're trying to improve yourself,

94:42

right? Um the physical one gets a bit

94:44

tricky when uh you know, you're not sure

94:46

whether something's going to be

94:47

dangerous or not, but

94:48

>> Oh, yeah. And I'm not promoting that

94:49

people do this. I think that of course

94:51

you would want to see pre-clinical,

94:54

clinical, and and other um trials for

94:57

this. I

94:57

>> think I would personally. I mean, just

94:59

>> Yeah. I mean, I'm I there are a few

95:00

areas well where I am um a bit more

95:03

adventurous, but for the most part, I'm

95:06

like, you know, based on my training and

95:08

[clears throat] background, I have to

95:09

orient toward, you know, I'd like a

95:11

bunch of Let me put this way. I'd like

95:13

to a bunch of other people to do it

95:14

first.

95:15

>> Yeah.

95:15

>> Like, who wouldn't? It's fun to be first

95:17

unless you're doing something really

95:18

stupid and that can get you killed in

95:20

which case like let other people go

95:21

first.

95:22

>> Yeah. Well, I think a good example of

95:23

that right now is and this is, you know,

95:25

sort of nationwide or even international

95:27

is vaccine hesitancy. And I know this is

95:29

a touchy topic, so we can open. Well,

95:32

I'll just point out that that the one

95:35

group that's completely no matter

95:36

whether they're hesitant against

95:37

childhood vaccines and the number of

95:38

them we get and the the fact that the

95:40

government makes you take them and these

95:42

sort of things, if those people have

95:44

cancer, they're very interested in

95:46

vaccines because it's a there there's

95:48

really good data that you can promote

95:50

more immune cells against the um tumor

95:52

by making a vaccine that consists of

95:56

some of the proteins and peptides that

95:58

are unique to the tumor and not

95:59

different from you. and you introduce

96:01

those as if you would introduce a virus

96:03

or anything in in a childhood vaccine on

96:06

similar concept um just different

96:09

peptides. their peptides from the tumor

96:11

and and in those situations it's

96:13

context, right? So if if you and I had

96:15

cancer and we don't have the the

96:16

conventional cures are not going to work

96:18

on us. We know there we know statistics

96:19

really well. Chemo is not very good for

96:21

a lot of you know cancers and that's the

96:24

only thing we got. But if you have

96:25

access to something that's relatively

96:27

new and particularly vaccines despite

96:28

what you know some people worry about

96:30

they're pretty safe. Um, and so the the

96:33

certain die versus try out a vaccine

96:35

drives a lot of people to be interested

96:36

in vaccines. And I would say yeah in

96:38

that case it's a really you know you can

96:41

see where people's their their question

96:43

about whether they're going to try

96:44

something or not is very context

96:45

dependent

96:46

>> very I think uh I don't want to go too

96:48

deep into the vaccine debate and I don't

96:49

want to be a spokesperson for either

96:51

side because that's not my role today

96:53

but

96:54

>> I think that the um the what you refer

96:57

to as vaccine hesitancy actually comes

96:59

back to an earlier issue that maybe

97:01

you'd be willing to comment on.

97:02

>> Sure. um which is I think there are a

97:05

very large number of people for whom

97:07

they are neither antivaccine

97:09

nor super pro but they are um they're

97:12

asking about timing and combinations.

97:15

>> Agreed.

97:15

>> They're saying okay listen and we had

97:17

Jay Bachari on here and I've had several

97:20

others who said maybe there should be an

97:22

investigation of the spacing of these

97:25

things how many um how critical it is to

97:27

do at a given age you know um and on and

97:30

on. We could pick any vaccine for that

97:31

reason. And as an immunologist,

97:35

do any of those questions make sense to

97:36

ask? I mean, I could see how, you know,

97:39

bombarding the immune the young immune

97:41

system with a lot of vaccines is a very

97:44

different thing than spacing out the uh

97:46

delivery of those vaccines. I'm not

97:48

saying don't give them all. I'm saying

97:50

>> over what time window does one give

97:52

them? Yeah.

97:53

>> I think a lot of people, many more

97:54

people are asking that question. Yeah.

97:56

It's just a quieter murmur

97:58

>> than our um saying, "Listen, we don't

98:01

want to take any of these things."

98:02

>> Yeah.

98:03

>> We don't want our kids to take any of

98:04

these.

98:04

>> Well, I've heard that, too. And I I

98:05

think there's some fair aspect to which

98:08

most of these vaccines were not studied

98:10

in the context when they were studied of

98:12

of what it does, you know, in in in

98:15

combination and and these sorts of

98:17

timings. The fact is that, you know, the

98:19

the evidence that there's that there's

98:22

bad things happening doesn't look to me,

98:24

you know, tremendously strong. It's

98:25

almost like anecdotal sort of

98:27

information. So,

98:28

>> unless it's your kid.

98:30

>> Unless it's your kid, in which case

98:31

you're going to look for an explanation.

98:32

So, I I don't know.

98:33

>> Just being fair, as long as we're

98:35

admitting psychology as a factor.

98:36

>> Yeah.

98:37

>> Yeah.

98:37

>> Yeah. So, there there's fairness on both

98:40

sides of that discussion. And I think I

98:42

think that almost certainly where we are

98:44

now, there's probably ways to put

98:46

together vaccines and certainly more

98:49

convenient ways. It's I I I as a parent

98:51

I I actually had something very similar

98:53

where we delayed you know my first

98:54

daughter's one of her vaccines partly

98:57

because I know that that as a you know

98:59

like there's a certain element to which

99:01

when we designed a protocol like the the

99:03

protocol for imotherapy of cancer for

99:04

patients was was actually based a little

99:06

bit on the mouse work a lot on the mouse

99:08

work that I did you can imagine that

99:09

mice and humans are quite different but

99:11

that is the protocol the protocol is

99:13

protocol and that's how it's done in

99:14

medicine and that's because you have a

99:16

fairly good sense of the safety of it

99:18

because of statistics

99:19

But that isn't to say that it's the only

99:21

protocol that would work. And I think

99:22

you're getting at this concept like

99:24

could there be at least a more

99:25

convenient one

99:26

>> and also or safest or even one that is

99:29

less disruptive to the lives of the

99:30

children and the parents. We we delayed

99:32

one of our kids vaccines, you know, by

99:34

just a month or something because uh she

99:36

had not been feeling well just straight

99:38

up. And it is true, you know, and I'd

99:40

say that a couple of the vaccines that

99:41

have come out that I've had recently,

99:42

the shingles one is a good example. I

99:43

had the other has knocked me completely

99:45

out and it, you know, it's very very

99:47

heavily advented. So, it's clear that

99:48

it's, you know, it's having to um does

99:51

it does it need to be, you know, I

99:53

actually don't know. I don't know what

99:54

studies were done. And and there's kind

99:56

of an aspect to which you I don't know

99:58

that we're all um being shielded from

100:00

the information, but I don't know that

100:01

we all know how to read the information

100:03

about how these regimens were chosen.

100:06

>> Um some of them are chosen by competing

100:08

far pharma companies that each make

100:09

their own, you know, materials. And

100:12

you know, again, I think there's a

100:14

there's a lot in this question. And I

100:15

don't know how much of it also

100:18

represents the one problem of science

100:20

that I could talk about is this um this

100:23

issue that's a lot of science treat

100:25

science as a kind of a papacy like we

100:26

know the language we know the facts and

100:28

and we probably don't have time to tell

100:30

you why we think this and where where

100:32

the holes are.

100:33

>> Excuse me for interrupting but you know

100:35

a huge basis of this podcast is to

100:39

counter exactly that. I know.

100:41

>> I mean, I know all these incredibly

100:42

smart, incredibly well-meaning

100:45

>> people who have lives of their own,

100:47

health lives of their own, health

100:48

challenges of their own, kids of their

100:50

own, and on and on, and no one was

100:53

hearing from them.

100:54

>> Yeah,

100:54

>> it it was and as things get more

100:56

politicized, there's less incentive to

100:59

give nuance. I actually really

101:00

appreciate you providing some nuance on

101:02

the I mean it's clear where you stand on

101:04

vaccines generally based on what you've

101:05

said but you're you're offering perhaps

101:08

the opportunity for for better

101:10

understanding and certainly delivery of

101:12

the information.

101:12

>> Yeah.

101:13

>> Yeah. I mean it's it's a huge problem.

101:15

>> Yeah. Well, I guess it's it's one of

101:17

those ones that I can only speak about

101:18

what I did, right, as a as a as a human

101:21

when I had kids and I looked at the data

101:23

and I have probably better capacity than

101:25

some anyways to read it and look at risk

101:28

versus harm, you know, the percentages

101:30

of these things. I absolutely, you know,

101:33

vaccinated kids and that was it seemed

101:34

like it seems even now like a a

101:36

reasonable no-brainer. But I just told

101:38

you too that I I asked to go off

101:40

protocol because at some point I know

101:43

that these protocols have a little bit

101:44

of like again they were designed on a

101:45

one study but it doesn't mean that it

101:47

doesn't work if you wait another month.

101:48

In fact if you do if you've done enough

101:50

mouse experiments as I have you know

101:51

that when you vaccinate on a slightly

101:53

different schedule you can still end up

101:54

with the same outcome you know that is

101:56

protection you know with slightly

101:58

different schedules. It's not that

102:00

convenient for doctors and hospitals and

102:02

and even sometimes for patients to get

102:04

off on, you know, like weird schedule

102:06

and then you forget a dose and then it

102:08

isn't as effective, right? So there's

102:09

there's efficacy that comes with, you

102:11

know, trying to follow the protocol and

102:12

because the protocol has some

102:15

convenience built into it that means

102:16

you're going to do it. It's um it's like

102:18

it's like brushing your teeth in the

102:19

morning, you do it in the morning, the

102:20

evening, it's when you do it and so

102:22

you'll do it twice a day. So there's a

102:25

lot in this. I mean, you know, there's a

102:27

lot of politics, I think, involved in in

102:28

vaccine 2 that relates to the question

102:30

of like at what point can the government

102:32

do tell you what to do, which is, you

102:35

know, it's a it's a surrogate question

102:36

to the vaccine one where vaccine is, you

102:39

know, if there's a harm, who gets to

102:41

choose with the harm benefit and then

102:43

how resources are given out for like

102:45

schools and you know, we know all these

102:46

we know all these sort of nuances. From

102:48

the science standpoint, I don't think

102:49

you want to wipe out the baby with the

102:51

bath water. I don't think you personally

102:53

like I wouldn't not immunize my kids.

102:55

Could there be additional studies about

102:56

the combination of these into like fewer

102:58

shots? I think so. I don't see why not.

103:01

Here's where you get the financial re.

103:03

What's the benefit to any pharma company

103:05

of doing that?

103:06

>> Well, I think this is again I I

103:07

[clears throat] have to be careful that

103:08

I don't place myself into an advocacy

103:11

group that I'm not. I I'm I look at

103:13

everything on a case- by case basis. I

103:16

try to do that.

103:16

>> I really try to do that. But the you

103:19

know and I've tried to be in recent

103:22

years more open to the to at least

103:24

understanding what the anti- big pharma

103:27

stance is really about.

103:29

>> You know it comes up a lot around SSRIs.

103:31

But you talk to somebody with clinical

103:33

grade OCD and they will tell you that

103:35

SSRI saved their life.

103:37

>> So then you go okay well you know so we

103:39

can say all we want about pharma. Are

103:40

you talking about people getting in

103:41

taking insulin or you know and till

103:44

recently the GLPs were mostly available

103:46

through pharma. Now they're sort of it's

103:48

kind of the wild west. People are micro

103:50

doing them from all sorts of

103:51

compoundingies as their own issues and

103:53

so on. But my sense is that the

103:56

frustration around the kind of

103:58

dictatorial like you're going to do this

104:00

at this point because this or else like

104:03

your persona non grata that kind of like

104:05

people not people being shunned

104:08

>> in both directions in either direction

104:10

rather. That's you know that that's

104:12

really the source of the problem there.

104:14

There really hasn't ever been a

104:15

conversation quite like this.

104:17

>> Yeah, I agree.

104:18

>> At least not one I've seen publicly.

104:20

Yeah, there not a lot of labs that are

104:21

going to devote themselves to this.

104:23

People will wage the argument that and I

104:26

don't know if this is actually true, but

104:27

that the pharma companies are protected

104:29

against lawsuits about vaccine injuries.

104:31

>> Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I think that

104:32

probably is frustrating to very

104:34

frustrating, excuse me, to a parent

104:36

whose kid seemed essentially fine, got a

104:39

vaccine, and 3 days later started

104:41

exhibiting symptoms that then set them

104:43

off on a course that was um really,

104:45

really tragic.

104:46

>> Yeah.

104:46

>> Um and those groups are the ones that

104:49

have accumulated the most oomph out

104:52

there.

104:53

>> And if you think about the those

104:54

parents, it's totally understandable.

104:56

>> Yeah. why they would feel that way.

104:58

Whether or not the basis of their

105:00

feelings is exactly right, I can't speak

105:02

to. But you can understand if your kid

105:04

is one way, walked out of the doctor's

105:06

office is is another way. And you can't

105:08

do anything about it. That's got to be

105:11

>> I mean beyond maddening

105:12

>> and and and the question is what could

105:14

you have done differently? I think is in

105:16

those situations having been in them not

105:18

that exact situation where you said oh

105:19

now it's done and now it can't go

105:21

backward.

105:22

>> And you did that to them. This is the

105:24

thing that well this is the thing I

105:25

think that is not often discussed is

105:27

that the the parents made that choice on

105:29

the basis of what they thought was the

105:31

best. So that there's a certain um

105:34

>> guilt/ anger. I mean there's a whole

105:36

psychology to it that's completely

105:38

understandable.

105:39

>> Yeah.

105:40

>> Didn't wander into the clinic.

105:41

>> Yeah. Well, I mean, you know, on the way

105:43

over here, I was thinking about some of

105:44

the things that, you know, are happening

105:46

in in uh medical space and, you know,

105:49

you guys obviously from time to time

105:51

talk about peptides and these sorts of

105:52

things that people are using, you know,

105:54

off lab, well, not even off label,

105:55

they're just getting them from from uh

105:57

who wherever the internet. And you know

105:59

that I was thinking, well, you know,

106:00

there's a funny thing there because the

106:02

legitimacy of pharma companies has sort

106:04

of fallen into even worse straits than

106:07

before because I think it I was thinking

106:08

about this a lot of it does relate to

106:09

the fact that we are advertised to take

106:11

a lot of things that often aren't you

106:13

know the side effects are worse than the

106:15

than the symptoms that we're leaving and

106:18

and that sort of uh you know again I I

106:20

may find myself like having a bunch of

106:22

colleagues hate me for talking about

106:23

this with you but I do think it's kind

106:24

of important at some point to surface

106:26

where all this comes from you know and

106:28

and the idea that we can do experiments

106:30

on ourselves on our own bodies. Again,

106:32

it's quite different to say read a book

106:34

although you can be infected by we

106:36

believe like by you know strict

106:38

scripture and things and than your

106:40

behavior but somehow [snorts] in here

106:42

this idea that that um you know we can

106:44

be told to do things by people that

106:46

aren't quite in our best interests. I

106:49

think it opens up the idea well why why

106:51

can't I choose my best interest? You

106:52

know who who are these experts that I

106:54

can't always trust?

106:56

>> What's more American than that after

106:57

all? Well, it is it is it is part of the

106:59

pioneering spirit. Like if the if the

107:01

government's not going to protect my 40

107:03

acres, I got to have a gun and protect

107:04

it myself. And that's that's been a part

107:06

of our culture for a very long time. And

107:08

I think this idea of individuality plays

107:09

into this. But it could be exacerbated

107:12

at the moment by the by the fact that

107:13

there, you know, haven't always been

107:15

good communication with something you're

107:17

trying to work out and and and maybe

107:18

even surface any of these ideas that are

107:20

hard to talk about like should we trust

107:22

farm companies? I know a lot of people

107:23

that work for pharma and they really

107:25

they are doing good. They they you know

107:27

they're like you and me. They they

107:28

really think and they are treating

107:31

disease. They're making really good

107:32

drugs and they do really good things.

107:34

But that's not always true. Not just

107:35

just because you know a bunch of people

107:37

and it's not always true that the subtle

107:39

best interest of a corporation is the

107:40

same as the best interest of an

107:42

individual. So you know we have to

107:43

surface those things exist. It's not

107:44

like we have to say that it's right or

107:46

wrong or whatever but at some point

107:47

those these kind of perverse incentives

107:49

exist. I I wonder why, you know, like

107:51

pharma companies haven't um gotten

107:53

better tests for who's going to respond

107:54

to these checkpoint drugs that we made.

107:56

We've had we've had a few papers that

107:58

show who are the responders and who are

107:59

not. But it's still the case that if you

108:01

get come in with melanoma, even though

108:02

there's only a 50% chance you're going

108:04

to be cured, which is great. You used to

108:05

be zero with these drugs, you still take

108:08

100% of the market takes that drug.

108:11

Well, because the 50% that aren't going

108:13

to respond, they don't know who they

108:14

are. And so everybody takes it. So the

108:17

companies that sell those have no

108:18

incentive to develop a test although get

108:21

if they develop a test that shows who is

108:22

and who isn't going to respond they'll

108:24

cut their market into 50 in half. So I

108:28

don't think any pharma executives out

108:29

out there going but there's no there's

108:32

no positive incentive to do that study

108:35

to study those things and I think it's

108:37

kind of true in some of these other

108:38

drugs that we've been you know brought

108:40

brought forward some of which are better

108:41

and worse than others we could told that

108:43

this is going to be good for us and and

108:45

we should take it and and there's a

108:47

again you're you're getting to the

108:48

American kind of like mentality which is

108:49

to say well some point if you fool me

108:52

twice or you know I'm not going to

108:53

believe it and and I might not believe

108:54

it against the entire spectrum of things

108:57

called science. And the problem is that

108:59

there's people like you and me that are

109:00

trying to actually do and and most of

109:02

us, I'd say 99.9% of us are working our

109:05

asses off to like you figure things out

109:07

and discover stuff that's important for

109:08

mankind. And then you have these sort of

109:11

issues that arise and you're like, well

109:12

then should you distrust as a as a as a

109:15

species, should you distrust the entire

109:17

class of science? Probably not. You just

109:20

need to maybe make it so that knowledge

109:22

is is freer and knowledge is better

109:24

communicated and that

109:25

>> and that um and you do watch out for

109:27

those situations where there should be

109:29

you know uh you know and maybe vaccines

109:31

are one we you know we just need to do

109:34

something sensible like what you're

109:35

describing and just to do a study and

109:36

say let's do that study and and make

109:38

that very public that we do it and say

109:40

we're going to do that and and and

109:42

obviously people can sign up for you

109:44

know be you can have this regimen or you

109:46

the old regimen or the new regimen and

109:48

you know again I I may speaking. I don't

109:51

do vaccines. It's not what my lab

109:53

studies, but there could be some sense

109:54

to saying, well, maybe science as a

109:56

whole could take this on and say what

109:58

would be maybe the answer isn't just say

110:00

no vaccines and we we think they do.

110:03

There's good evidence that they're

110:04

protective. But to the extent that

110:05

you're coming out, could we make it less

110:09

let's do it and let's just do it. Let's

110:10

do that experiment. But I don't see that

110:12

that's one of the things that's not

110:13

happening right now is that nobody's

110:14

actually describing an experiment.

110:17

>> What would be the experiment?

110:19

>> Yeah. Well, the discussions haven't

110:20

happened and I should say a couple of

110:22

things. Um, first of all, thank you for

110:23

being willing to venture into this area.

110:26

I seriously doubt that any of your

110:28

colleagues are going to be upset that

110:29

you're having this conversation. I will

110:30

make sure that anything we put out is in

110:32

context. If anyone cuts a clip, I will

110:35

be the first to dive in there and say

110:36

this is taken out of context. It um but

110:40

to any people, colleagues or otherwise

110:43

that would say, hey, actually this is

110:45

the wrong stance. You don't want to be

110:46

talking about nuance in a time when

110:47

there's so much threat to uh traditional

110:50

medicine and vaccines etc. I will say

110:52

this

110:54

the idea that you need to push back with

110:56

a with just a fire hose of do this or

110:58

else

110:59

>> did not work.

111:01

>> The pandemic proved that the in fact I

111:04

think one of the biggest mistakes was to

111:06

have one individual as opposed to a

111:08

panel of people

111:09

>> with more nuance communicating public

111:11

health information at that time. any

111:13

person, scientist, doctor, or otherwise,

111:15

who thinks that the way to convince

111:17

people to change their behavior around

111:19

vaccines or anything else is to just ram

111:22

it down the public's throat and say, "Or

111:25

else, you're whatever. You're political

111:27

this or you're a fascist or whatever."

111:29

Okay, that is proven to be wrong.

111:33

>> And the path forward is really this kind

111:35

of conversation. It's highly educated

111:38

people like yourself in the educated in

111:40

the immune system who understand this

111:42

who have children who've made certain

111:44

choices saying yes and I can understand

111:47

why you would be considering the

111:49

following um questions and we should do

111:51

a study and and in the meantime you're

111:54

not preventing anyone from getting

111:55

vaccines. There's now a hunger for more

111:58

nuanced conversation around these

111:59

things. I think it's the right time to

112:00

have it when we're not in the throws of

112:02

a pandemic.

112:03

>> Yeah.

112:04

>> Yet yet. I mean, there's some things

112:05

that are on the rise. It is scary. I'll

112:07

I'll be quite blunt. Um, you know, the

112:10

the rise in measles is scary. People

112:12

say, "Well, measles, they used to have

112:13

measles parties." Talk to somebody who

112:15

had massive inflammation

112:17

>> and brain inflammation from measles. Not

112:19

a pretty picture.

112:21

>> Not a pretty picture. Yeah.

112:22

>> So, I think it's great that these

112:24

conversations are starting

112:26

>> and it won't be taken out of context.

112:28

>> Yeah. Well, I mean on the vaccination

112:29

front, I mean, I just wrote a little a

112:31

little subsequ um you know, the origins

112:33

of small vaccination and I think what's

112:36

lost in those stories is if you look on

112:38

the internet that the the absolute that

112:40

that's a terrible disease. I mean that

112:42

you know the reality of what we're

112:44

protecting against we haven't it's

112:46

really hard to to like also have the

112:48

conversation without doing a little bit

112:50

of reading into your history

112:52

>> you know and I I don't think the history

112:53

books are pulling the wool over our eyes

112:55

by saying some of these things were

112:57

really horrendous

112:58

>> small box was dreadful

112:59

>> so so there's an element of that though

113:01

that I think you know that we have to

113:03

make sure that the conversation focuses

113:05

on on what are we what are we trying to

113:07

achieve here and and and sometimes that

113:10

that question is can get lost. But I

113:12

think man, if my kid got smallox or got

113:15

measles or got mouse and and and and you

113:17

know, as we know like measles is not a a

113:19

theoretical again, you know, that that

113:22

concept uh is enough to say, well, there

113:25

is a risk of that. And that's one where

113:26

you

113:27

>> it's like you you know, not teaching

113:28

your kid how to cross the street

113:29

properly. If you didn't do that and then

113:31

the kid got hit by a car, you'd just be

113:33

decimated. So, you know, just because we

113:35

haven't seen these things for a while

113:37

doesn't mean that they're not still

113:39

real. And I [clears throat] think that's

113:40

also an important again that's what

113:42

that's me as a parent saying and I did

113:44

look at the history of these things and

113:45

they really are bad and so we are you

113:48

know we are defending against something

113:50

but you know is there a better way to do

113:52

it uh you propose experiment that's

113:55

let's you know I think there's a you

113:58

know like cutting off you know the

114:00

concept of human curiosity and science

114:02

at the legs is probably not the way to

114:05

figure something out from my experience

114:07

you you you dive in you think of the

114:09

experiment they would answer the

114:10

question and you say well that is that

114:12

the killer experiment for this thing

114:14

again I think you look at the numbers

114:15

and the numbers from my this is me as a

114:17

parent looking at the numbers of of u

114:19

you know like the the danger of of of of

114:22

bad stuff happening versus the the odds

114:25

of an adverse effect they were all that

114:28

high but you know again if you're one of

114:29

the people that even if it is that even

114:31

if it is caused by a vaccine which I

114:33

don't by the way can I tell you a little

114:35

story please maybe you know this already

114:37

but if you want to induce autism in

114:39

mice. People do it by injecting a

114:41

bacterial infection into the mom when

114:43

she's pregnant.

114:44

>> Mhm.

114:45

>> Which tells you that an immune challenge

114:48

can affect the neurons of the of a

114:50

developing pup. So, it's not outside the

114:54

realm to say that in some situations and

114:56

in an aduant situation. Again, I I may

114:58

regret saying this because it's, you

115:00

know, it's going to open up a

115:01

conversation to have this, but to say

115:02

it's not outside the bounds to say that

115:04

a immune insult will have influence on

115:07

neural development, period. Is it the

115:11

source of autistic children? Or was it

115:14

in fact that the mom had infection

115:16

during pregnancy? That's not absolutely

115:18

wacko to think, and you should think

115:20

this is a neurobiologist. I think you'll

115:21

probably agree, to think that

115:22

inflammation, some of the molecules of

115:23

inflammation will affect the the the

115:27

cells of the brain.

115:28

>> In fact, one of the one of the best

115:29

experiments that I love along these

115:30

lines, it's not about about autism at

115:32

all, but it's about um when you get a

115:34

flu,

115:35

>> you tend to go you you tend to feel like

115:37

you want to socially isolate yourself.

115:39

At least I do and most people do. I

115:40

think they kind of want to crawl in a

115:41

hole in a hole. There's an experiment

115:43

that was done that involved injecting

115:45

gamurfon which is one of the things your

115:47

immune system makes when it's fighting

115:48

off an infection into the bloodstream of

115:51

a mouse and then just watching it and

115:53

[snorts] they become uh you know

115:55

socially isolating from just the

115:57

molecule that's made by the immune

115:59

response during infection

116:00

>> not even from being sick

116:01

>> not even being sick they're not sick

116:03

they just are given this this cue that's

116:04

part of the systemic immune response and

116:06

then they they show the signs of social

116:09

isolation and

116:10

>> the lab that did this um also showed

116:13

that the brain has receptors for these

116:15

immune molecules. And you know the

116:17

simple conclusion of that paper and you

116:19

know there's still always work to be

116:21

done but simple conclusion was that the

116:22

brain could sense infection and and it

116:24

would affect behavior [snorts] um even

116:27

in mature in us as mature. So, you know,

116:31

again, there's these these ideas that

116:32

there is there's something that I mean,

116:35

scientists use that infection of a mom,

116:38

you know, to lead to neuronal changes

116:39

that lead us to be able to under study

116:41

autism in later mice. So, there there's

116:43

definitely potential there. I don't know

116:45

that the vaccines and all of them and or

116:48

whether there's a circumstance or

116:49

whether it's, you know, again, the mom

116:50

actually had a fever before and that

116:52

vaccine now disgued or didn't or just

116:54

circumstance because you give vaccines

116:56

at 2 years of age, which is when autism

116:57

appears. there's all kinds of options,

117:00

you know, and that and and the sort of

117:01

anecdotes of of that. And and um I just

117:05

think that that that fact that, you

117:07

know, the way that we study autism is by

117:09

giving a pregnant female mouse an

117:13

infection is sort of like, okay, that's

117:15

that's important to know.

117:17

>> That work is still ongoing by

117:18

laboratories to understand autism. They

117:20

want to understand the origins of it and

117:23

maybe it will not turn out to be

117:24

vaccines at all. Again, we we need data

117:27

and and we're in we definitely need

117:28

data.

117:28

>> We're almost in a co situation. I

117:30

describe the co situation now in

117:31

retrospect as one that is data sparse

117:33

>> and this is why I've been trying to work

117:34

on I was telling you about this project

117:36

of trying to work on the publishing

117:38

problem. But it's not it's not just the

117:40

publishing problem. It's how we how we

117:42

synthesize knowledge that under data

117:45

sparse circumstances to make decisions.

117:47

I think we're not very good at that

117:49

society. Um you when we have tons of

117:52

data and it says absolutely if you have

117:54

cancer and you take imotherapy then

117:56

there's a 50% chance you're going to

117:58

revive great those stats are solid

118:00

they're very good and I would I would

118:02

take that drug every time but if it's

118:04

sort of a case where you're like no

118:05

there's some things that are happening

118:06

and there's some other things that

118:07

happen we don't know you remember at the

118:09

beginning of co we talked about it

118:10

amongst ourselves in labels and we were

118:11

coming in to analyze blood and it was

118:14

kind of unsafe because we didn't know

118:16

what was safe we didn't know how it was

118:17

transmitted we didn't know anything

118:18

about it was it could we get it from

118:20

blood um and and that kind of went on

118:23

for a while, right? And this was the

118:24

source of like a lot of confusion that

118:26

came from the medical it was seem seen

118:28

as confusion that matter of fact it's

118:29

like do you mask you not mask do you

118:31

touch do you not touch I think that's a

118:33

that's a data sparse situation you know

118:35

the data that we had was sparse it

118:37

wasn't a lot of information and so you

118:39

know how do you make a decision when you

118:41

don't have a lot of data well I think

118:42

that's the major argument when there you

118:44

know there are people that will critique

118:48

people saying okay your experience is

118:50

anecdata it's correlative but then the

118:53

the the w with regard to vaccines and

118:56

autism and other issues, but then the

118:58

push back is well this vaccine, etc. was

119:02

directionally guided by sparse

119:04

information to begin with under times

119:05

[clears throat] of pressure. There's

119:06

financial incentives. So, it's just this

119:08

pingpong that goes back and forth, but

119:10

many thousands of parents write to me

119:13

and say,

119:14

>> "Should I wait on certain vaccines?" And

119:16

I'm like, "Listen, I am not the person

119:17

to answer that question."

119:18

>> Um, but you have every right to ask your

119:20

doctor,

119:21

>> right? But they're not asking because

119:22

they're extremists. They're not

119:24

antivaxers. They're asking because they

119:25

love their kids and they've seen enough

119:27

things to call into question the

119:29

incentives and they just know that the

119:30

conversation cannot be as polarized as

119:33

it's presented to them in re in reality.

119:35

The data cannot be as polarized as it's

119:37

been presented.

119:37

>> Yeah. Certainly certainly in media some

119:39

of these things get presented quite

119:41

quite um you know inflammatory and again

119:43

if if newspapers want to sell a

119:45

newspaper they show a plane crash you

119:47

know so it's not happening every day

119:49

>> but they'll show you an airline ad in

119:50

the same issue. Well, there's that, too.

119:52

Yeah. So,

119:53

>> I think one of the interesting things

119:54

that we could get into is that in you in

119:57

a lot of these studies, scientists are

119:59

there's a motivation to to make the most

120:01

of your result. And we've talked about

120:02

why that's important is that if you find

120:04

something orthogonal, crisper,

120:06

checkpoint blockade, uh, you know,

120:08

x-rays, you look for that orthogonal use

120:10

for it, right? And you or that that

120:12

orthogonal meaning that would sometimes

120:14

be called extensibility. Like I see that

120:16

if I if I drop coffee cup on the thing

120:18

that gravity pulls it down. Well, then I

120:20

can learn that I can drop all kinds of

120:21

things. I can make gravity work for me.

120:23

You know, it becomes a tool. And and

120:25

[snorts] I think one of the things

120:26

that's that that is lost sometimes is

120:29

that some things are not extensible. So,

120:31

you know, you can imagine that like if I

120:33

if I had something that move makes a

120:34

cell move that that might screw up the

120:36

whole system forever. But humans and our

120:39

bodies turn out to be remarkably

120:41

resilient. I mean, we can go from

120:42

minus20 degrees to, you know, 110

120:45

degrees. We can not eat for a long time.

120:47

you know, all you know, all these things

120:49

don't cause us to fall apart. So, if we

120:52

didn't have resilience, I think our

120:53

species wouldn't exist because there's

120:55

all these pressures and all these

120:56

varieties of life under which we lead.

120:58

And I think a lot of science sometimes

121:00

doesn't, you know, and and from the

121:02

outsider, even as an insider, you can

121:04

read a paper and they they they point to

121:06

why it might be important, but they're

121:08

really doing that to to to get garner

121:10

interest for their story, you know, and

121:11

then say, "This might be important for

121:13

this, but I haven't shown it's important

121:14

for they don't say it's important as it

121:16

might be important." And they're trying

121:17

to look for that orthor that orthogonal

121:19

or that extensibility of it. And I think

121:22

that's kind of important also just to go

121:23

a little bit off this topic for a moment

121:26

in how we think about drugging diseases

121:28

as we go forward. And that is to say

121:30

we've looked for these oneanddone drugs

121:32

that you you take a pill and it cures

121:34

everything you know forever. That's sort

121:36

of found of youthish. And um you know we

121:39

found a few of those. I'd say check one

121:40

blockade is one of those that you can

121:41

take it and you know in 50% of melanomas

121:44

everything the tumor goes away and

121:45

everything's great.

121:47

But most biological systems, if you have

121:49

one button to push, they're super

121:51

non-resilient. A virus can exploit that

121:53

button. Uh, you know, that that can

121:56

cause, you know, collapse. And so, most

121:58

things are wired like in these really

121:59

complicated ways. And I think what a few

122:01

of us are thinking, this is for cancer

122:03

in particular, where you want to get the

122:04

immune state from like, you remember I

122:06

had a little concept of a fuel gauge.

122:08

You want to get it from one position to

122:09

another position. It may not just be

122:11

about a push here. You may have to push

122:13

some cells that way, create some new

122:16

environment that looks like development.

122:18

You know, your cells develop through

122:19

states and and you push the the

122:21

biological systems to reach this new

122:22

state in a way that doesn't look like

122:24

the linear between like low immune

122:26

reactivity and high reactivity. You

122:28

might have to push it in a serious way

122:30

because resiliency the res the systems

122:33

like even in chronic disease but even in

122:35

health we're pretty resilient and like

122:37

we you can stand up to a lot of stuff.

122:40

Can humans do that even in the context

122:43

of abundant funding for basic research?

122:46

Can what you just described actually be

122:48

tested to the point where we can develop

122:52

things? And the analogy here is I had my

122:55

dad on the podcast. He's a theoretical

122:56

physicist and he explained to me that

122:59

one of the most important things you

123:00

learn in physics is that you can't

123:01

really understand quantum mechanics

123:03

using your logical brain. You need the

123:06

math to prove it. M

123:07

>> and this is when whenever somebody he

123:09

also warned whenever somebody says they

123:10

understand quantum stuff you have to ask

123:13

them to demonstrate it for you because

123:14

because people talk quantum because

123:17

>> and and we make all these assumptions

123:18

about quantum they talk about quantum

123:20

fields so we think they're smart but but

123:22

that

123:22

>> theoretical physicists

123:24

>> and therefore engineers you know develop

123:27

all sorts of incredible theorems and

123:29

real experiments and then technologies

123:31

based on all of that

123:33

>> because the math works not because we

123:36

can conceptualize it. And I wonder given

123:38

the complexity of biological systems,

123:40

>> perhaps in 2026, we're running up

123:43

against this barrier where by virtue of

123:46

the sociology of science that papers

123:48

need to have one maybe two take-home

123:50

messages by virtue of the fact that

123:52

>> there's limited amount of funding,

123:55

people need to sleep at night and on and

123:56

on. that doing the kinds of experiments

123:58

like you described like pushing the

124:00

cells this way, nudging them that way

124:01

and then drugging the the outcome in a

124:04

way that is beneficial but not

124:07

detrimental.

124:08

Is this a place where machines are going

124:10

to be better or at least helpful in

124:14

doing these experiments?

124:15

>> I take the standpoint that AI is and I

124:18

think you know this is back to talking

124:19

to experts. It's really quite good at at

124:21

at producing stuff that is in the

124:23

corpus. The corpus is the knowledge that

124:25

we already have.

124:28

almost by definition when you're coming

124:29

at that with orthopedic discovery you're

124:32

discovering something it doesn't exist

124:34

in the corpus you might have hints of it

124:36

there but you still have to do

124:38

experiments at some point so if I mean

124:41

going answer you know the question

124:42

you're trying to raise if I get a tumor

124:44

from a patient and I take apart all the

124:46

cell and I look at all the genes that

124:47

are expressed in all the different cell

124:48

types I can build in silicico a network

124:51

where I can look at how all those cells

124:52

are wired together now and I can ask you

124:55

know what would be the possible

124:56

consequence of clipping this molecule's

124:58

ability to touch that cell. [snorts]

125:00

That that's that's now doable, but it

125:03

relies on an area of math is not really

125:05

AI. It's called machine learning. And

125:07

sometimes these things are conflated,

125:09

but machine learning is basically

125:10

looking to say what are some of the

125:12

relationships that I can discover about,

125:15

you know, um the relationship between

125:16

this feature of the cell and this other

125:18

feature of the cell. So it's it's

125:19

learning about it and then it's it

125:21

allows you to propose a bunch of

125:22

experiments but you still kind of have

125:24

to choose and select which ones you're

125:25

going to do. Some experiments are just

125:27

really expensive and that's where you

125:29

have to have I think still human

125:30

judgment that comes into that and say am

125:32

I going to spend a year studying this

125:35

question or am I going to study a little

125:37

bit more and try to understand some some

125:38

things in a greater detail than maybe

125:40

the machine learning gave me but it's

125:42

not clear to me that any anywhere right

125:44

now we can say the the corpus of

125:46

knowledge doesn't have a bunch of

125:48

examples of cures you know across from

125:51

treatments and say oh all I need to do

125:53

is match those up which is kind of what

125:54

AI does when it comes to large language

125:56

Well, you query it. It looks in

125:58

statistically and says what are the what

125:59

are the relationships between what you

126:01

query and what I give you back as an

126:02

answer. In a discovery space, we don't

126:05

have examples of the you know the other

126:07

end. we have you know sure I can tell

126:09

you all the things you could do but you

126:11

know knowing which one is going to be

126:12

orthogonal big big hit isn't there but

126:15

what I'm talking about a little bit is

126:16

is to is to take a problem apart and say

126:19

if I have something like I want to

126:21

change something and anything this could

126:24

be how if I want to change the world

126:26

it's unlikely that any one act will do

126:29

it also the world is pretty sure

126:30

political systems despite what we think

126:32

are somehow semi-stable but a series of

126:35

of of these nudges can create the

126:38

condition where the last one takes you

126:39

across the border. And I think that's

126:40

what we're going to have to do in

126:41

disease where we say, look, nature

126:44

doesn't necessarily want us banging on

126:46

it, it'll bang back. What in in fact we

126:49

need to do is if we want this tumor to

126:50

get cured, we need to first let it not

126:53

look like it's a wound that's healing.

126:54

So don't give it the power of the immune

126:56

system, the positive power, and then get

126:58

to the point where we can say, well, now

126:59

we want it to teach the immune system to

127:01

kill it. But we might not be able to do

127:02

that until we kind of dissemble some of

127:04

its defenses. And that's that's a way of

127:07

you know again in this in this kind of

127:08

deep computational space we end up with

127:10

a lot of feature the tissue of the of

127:12

tissue cells and how they're organized

127:13

and what genes are expressing that start

127:15

to look like Mellin's map of the of the

127:17

of the world that you know in its early

127:19

phase it only had parts and then you

127:21

know starts as you explore and you add

127:23

things to it it I think when we start to

127:25

think about how tissues are configured

127:26

we're starting to be able to see these

127:28

really complicated states where the

127:29

immune system is doing this and

127:31

fibroblast certain cells are doing this

127:33

and epithelial cells are doing this and

127:34

that's That's a we call them archetypes.

127:37

They're [snorts] they're like they're

127:38

like a way that biology organizes

127:41

itself. And to get from one to the next,

127:43

we need to understand how it does it

127:44

developmentally. That would be a really

127:45

nice thing to follow. And then we need

127:47

to give those cues in order. And that's

127:49

where I was coming back. You know, when

127:50

you were talking about peptides earlier

127:52

and saying, well, they may some some of

127:53

these drugs may well work, but I might

127:56

imagine that they might work best if

127:57

given in the right sequence and the time

127:59

and the place. And that that's when you

128:01

really want to like hammer it to get the

128:03

system to go to that but then it might

128:04

be connected to another one and we all

128:06

want to find the one thing that like you

128:08

know the fountain of youth the thing

128:10

that cures a disease and and and it's

128:12

been forever that we've looked for a

128:14

single you know single hits one and done

128:17

but it may be a collection of and you

128:19

know this is probably this is how I live

128:20

my life for health too collection of

128:23

behaviors and foods you eat and sleep

128:24

you get and all these things create and

128:27

partners you know your

128:29

>> loves of your life, the the friends you

128:32

have, they're all part of I think this

128:34

this and that's getting a little away

128:36

from imology obviously, but

128:37

>> no, but an thing about the insula, you

128:40

know, not so much a good friend of mine

128:41

who's a physician in the Bay Area says

128:43

uh you know, better living through

128:44

chemistry still requires better living,

128:47

>> which I love because it says you should

128:48

never abandon as much as one can the

128:51

foundational stuff of sleep, exercise,

128:53

nutrition, circadian rhythm, light,

128:55

social connection, you know, stress

128:57

mitigation and on and on. Could I ask

128:59

you a couple of additional questions

129:00

about the immune system?

129:01

>> Yeah, please.

129:02

>> Before we wrap because I know um

129:05

>> many people are curious about autoimmune

129:08

>> issues. More and more I hear about, you

129:12

know, I don't know is chronic fatigue

129:13

considered an autoimmune issue by most.

129:16

A lot of people seem to have chronic

129:17

fatigue. There was a debate, does it

129:19

really exist? For someone who believes

129:20

they have it, uh they it absolutely

129:22

exists. Um they're tired. I believe

129:24

them. I know someone who had a myalgia

129:28

>> uh recently. Um psoriasis is something

129:32

that I maybe have known to be now

129:36

>> autoimmune. Um asthma

129:38

>> these are interesting conditions not all

129:40

of them life-threatening. Yeah.

129:42

>> But some of them cause a lot of

129:43

discomfort. um what is known about the

129:45

formation of autoimmune conditions

129:48

either inheritance lifestyle factors and

129:50

then what excites you about some of the

129:52

newer treatments that might be available

129:54

or currently available for those and

129:56

other things. It's a big question but

129:58

>> yeah it's a big question. Well,

130:00

fundamentally, again, this is I think

130:02

where um the immune system and you know,

130:05

our bodies have I think they have

130:07

playbooks like a football team or

130:08

something that they can run and they can

130:10

put players in particular

130:11

configurations. Again, we call those

130:13

archetypes. The immune system is trying

130:15

to do a certain kind of thing. It's

130:17

genetically and through history, it's

130:18

wired to work with with cells in certain

130:21

ways. And I think if you look at

130:22

autoimmunities, there's a there's a view

130:24

of them that they represent a misplaced

130:26

immune system that's either thinks that

130:28

it's under attack or it thinks that it's

130:30

meant to be doing something that it

130:32

really isn't. And so the origins of some

130:34

of those are genetic for sure. There's

130:36

um you know lupus there's a familial

130:38

mutation in a a receptor that's on a B

130:41

cell that normally helps turn off the

130:42

immune system and it's defective. And so

130:46

those those people are susceptible to

130:47

getting what are called auto antibodies.

130:50

That's where the B cells, we talked a

130:51

lot about T- cells, but B cells are the

130:52

ones that make antibodies and they're

130:54

the ones that you try to pro, you know,

130:56

to jazz up for COVID vaccines, you know,

130:59

those can be overactive and they can be

131:01

genetically overactive and you know, one

131:03

wonders why we'd ever have such genes

131:05

and why they would be propagated except

131:06

that maybe in some s circumstances you

131:08

need it when there's a big pandemic or

131:10

something people might have a

131:11

particularly good response. So there's

131:13

definitely genetic origins of some of

131:15

these things. I think what's uh you know

131:17

what's interesting to some extent is is

131:18

something that you'd alluded to with

131:19

asthma where asthma was one of these

131:21

things that historically would be called

131:23

an allergy and it still is an allergy

131:25

you know where you have you know

131:26

inciting things that are grass pollen

131:29

you know these sorts of things but in a

131:31

lot of these settings the concept that

131:33

that is is coming in part and parcel

131:35

with you know the immune system

131:37

recognizing self you know is is a is a

131:40

thing and to the degree that we don't

131:43

understand some of the diseases as well

131:45

as we should given the tools we have

131:47

today. There's a lot there's actually

131:48

work to be done in a lot of these areas

131:49

where you say what is the immune system

131:52

up to like like 10 years ago we might

131:54

have just said you know what is if I I

131:57

might have taken a a lung of a asthmatic

131:59

patient who died and like cut it and

132:01

look it in a microscope and say oh yeah

132:02

I can really see that there's thickening

132:04

of the airways and that why that's why

132:06

they couldn't breathe but like I'm

132:07

saying now we can go into those and we

132:09

can look at every single cell and ask

132:11

how those are wired together. Is there

132:12

only one form of asthma? That's no.

132:14

There's actually definitely like seven

132:16

or eight and they have and that's why

132:17

some people are, you know, like can take

132:19

the inhalers and it works and other

132:20

people can't. Some people they're very

132:22

like chlorine sensitive. They go to a

132:24

pool and it and initiates are cold

132:25

sensitive. So there's there's variations

132:27

on what sets up that inflammatory focus

132:29

and I would call it like an archetype.

132:31

Some of them have lots of cells called

132:32

eosinaphils. Other ones have lots of

132:34

cells called neutrfils. So it's asthma

132:36

isn't just one disease. It's one symptom

132:39

fail, you know, difficulty breathing,

132:41

but it has many different sort of

132:43

configurations and and I guess I'm I

132:46

would just say that in a lot of this

132:48

domain, I mean, we have a study right

132:49

now that's looking at across a bunch of

132:51

autoimmunities to figure out whether

132:53

they have things in common with each

132:54

other and psoriasis is one where you

132:56

start to see, you know, variations and

132:58

lupus for sure and inflammatory bowel

133:00

disease and and and you know this in the

133:02

clinic because inflammatory bowel

133:04

disease, you ask about drugs, is a good

133:05

case where there's a couple different

133:07

drugs is that for some patients work

133:09

really well. TNF therapy for example it

133:13

blocks a cytoine and some people with

133:15

IBDs is like really bad diarrhea and

133:18

manifests and very very painful um you

133:21

know some people they so there starts to

133:23

be classes of patients that have

133:25

responses to these things. Those drugs

133:27

are exciting because they say you can

133:28

modulate this but a little bit like the

133:30

checkpoint drugs we don't really

133:32

understand why one works in one patient

133:34

and one doesn't. Inflammatory bowel

133:36

disease and autoimmunity is pretty

133:38

tricky too because people will respond

133:39

to a drug for a while and then they'll

133:40

stop

133:41

>> and then the doctors just have to do

133:43

this like whack-a-mole thing where they

133:45

try one and it doesn't work. They try

133:47

the next thing then where it doesn't

133:48

work.

133:48

>> Sounds like psychiatry.

133:49

>> It does. Yeah, there's [laughter] a lot.

133:51

It sounds like a

133:52

>> no disrespect to the psychiatrist.

133:55

>> But they have a hard job, right? I mean

133:56

drugs will work for a while then they

133:57

don't work. Side effects crop up that

133:59

never existed before. It's it's a tough

134:01

one.

134:02

>> Yeah. Agreed. Agreed. So yeah,

134:04

autoimmunity is a real thing. It's it

134:06

has, you know, I think it's similar to

134:09

cancer where we're just with cancer

134:11

starting to understand the fact that it

134:12

comes in these different immune flavors.

134:15

And so the drugs that you try to use,

134:17

it's clearly immune system can do a lot

134:18

of good work for us, but what you need

134:21

to do to it in these different sort of

134:23

archetypal immune systems is going to be

134:26

different. You know, you you just got a

134:27

different football team out there

134:28

playing or they running a different

134:30

play. If somebody has a kind of mild

134:33

autoimmune condition like let's say mild

134:35

psoriasis

134:37

>> does that I've read but that doesn't

134:39

necessarily mean anything. Um I've read

134:42

that that might confer because it's

134:44

autoimmune that might confer them with a

134:46

bit better uh viral and bacterial

134:50

infection resistance. So, you know,

134:52

there's a trade-off there like, okay, so

134:53

scalp cells are like sloing off and like

134:56

I think it's like interlucan 17 or

134:58

something now like the treatment they

134:59

have some good shampoos for this or but

135:02

>> anti-influc

135:06

but but you that individual is um maybe

135:10

better at fighting out other infections.

135:12

So, you know, given there's a

135:14

anti-influcch

135:19

um and uh and yet you're more resistant

135:22

to infection. So, you could see how it's

135:24

adaptive in the modern context. And now,

135:27

severe psoriasis can be very disruptive

135:28

for people. And people might wonder

135:30

like, are we really talking about

135:31

psoriasis? But I think it's sort of a

135:32

individ

135:35

point for why autoimmunity could

135:38

actually be useful. Yeah.

135:40

>> Um it's not always the case. It's like

135:41

there to give us asthma or flaky scalp.

135:44

>> You know, we could talk about there's a

135:45

lot of disease states, you know, the

135:46

argument for why we would ever have a

135:47

cickle cell gene. This is the one that

135:49

causes people to have hemoph you know

135:51

hemophilia and it's a lot of subsaharan

135:54

African gene people from that origin

135:56

have this is that it's actually

135:58

defensive against malaria is you know it

136:00

seems to be the case that so so having

136:01

that I think this is true a lot of these

136:04

situations where the diversity of the

136:05

human population over time you by having

136:09

some of these things that make some

136:10

people hyper sensitive to you know uh to

136:13

maybe bacter viral infection at the cost

136:16

of having things like psoriasis pop up

136:19

or you know various various other

136:20

autoimmunities is the only way that you

136:23

know like a a billion strong population

136:25

has to to to to move forward and I I

136:28

always give this example that because I

136:30

think it's a really straightforward one

136:31

if you take a a flask of bacteria

136:34

and um and you put them in glucose which

136:37

is like sugar like you put in your

136:38

coffee um maybe sucrossse either one you

136:41

put them in a in a in a simple sugar uh

136:43

and you watch the colony grow you'll get

136:45

these cells that grow really really fast

136:46

the bacteria you know becomes billions,

136:48

trillions of of individual cells, but

136:50

there's almost always some just losers

136:52

that are dividing slowly. And it's for

136:55

whatever reason, the system always

136:56

springs us off. You're like, why would

136:57

you do that? Why would the system why

136:58

why wouldn't just the winners win? But

137:00

if you take a little bit of that culture

137:01

and you put it into galactose, which is

137:03

a milk sugar, often the ones that were

137:06

winners don't win anymore. And it's from

137:07

the loser pool that the new ones emerge.

137:10

And this is a case of like, you know,

137:12

like uh crowd uh fitness that comes from

137:16

diversity of of genes. And so some of

137:19

these things that make some of us

137:20

susceptible to disease are also, as

137:22

you're pointing out, in other situations

137:24

going to be quite good for you. And and

137:26

and that seems unfair at the time that

137:28

you have these kind of bad genes, but

137:30

like a different day you would have been

137:31

happy, right? you know, so I think

137:33

there's a lot to be said and and that's

137:35

also why a lot of the things that we

137:36

look at, you know, anecdotally somebody

137:38

takes a supplement and it works for

137:40

them.

137:41

>> I mean, I don't know how much you know

137:42

about this literature, but the the

137:44

differences in urine mine vitamin

137:46

requirements is going to be quite

137:47

profound because the metabolic enzymes

137:49

we have for the vitamins that we might

137:50

take in are going to be different

137:52

between us. And so these FDA limits,

137:54

these these numbers are averages. Some

137:56

people may need five times that amount

137:58

of, you know, vitamin X and other people

138:00

may need a fifth. And I think this is

138:02

super critical. The supplement world is

138:04

kind of like scattershot. Well, I

138:06

appreciate the rational grounding in all

138:07

of it. I I think uh thread throughout

138:09

today's conversation. I think that um I

138:11

picked up on, you know, I the fact that

138:13

we covered things like peptides and

138:15

things like that. And I'm not certain

138:16

about the peptide question across the

138:19

board. It's clear some are beneficial.

138:20

It's clear some are still experimental.

138:22

I'm just a big fan of more data and more

138:24

data collected the right ways and

138:26

communicated the right ways as the same

138:27

way with vaccines and all the rest. You

138:30

have an amazing substack. I know that

138:32

because I've spent time there.

138:33

>> No, thanks.

138:34

>> Part of the reason we invited you here

138:36

today is to learn about the immune

138:37

system and we barely talked about

138:39

cancer. I realize we're going to have to

138:40

get you back to talk about that, but

138:41

you've done an amazing job of educating

138:44

us on the immune system. I really want

138:45

to thank you and speak on behalf of

138:47

many, many people for that. Never before

138:50

has somebody presented in in the ways

138:53

that you have and uh as somebody who

138:55

thinks in analogy I and likes to teach

138:58

in analogy. I really appreciate that

139:00

that uh that stance. What inspired you

139:03

to get into

139:05

>> public education about science and

139:07

health before coming on this podcast?

139:08

And by the way, everyone should check

139:10

out Max's uh Substack. We'll put a link

139:13

to it in the in the show notes. It's

139:15

it's so thoughtful, so nuanced, so

139:18

relevant to all the issues that we're

139:20

talking about, if not directly, then in

139:22

in the general contour, and in some

139:25

cases directly, and I I imagine you're

139:27

going to continue doing this. So, what

139:28

inspired you to do it, and um how can we

139:31

make sure that you continue to do it?

139:32

>> Yeah. Well, thank you for the call out.

139:34

Um it is it's something I've been trying

139:36

to work on for about 10 years and it it

139:39

really started when um a group of us you

139:42

know were were hanging around after a

139:45

conference and we were talking about

139:48

some of the issues with science in

139:50

society and there were many you know

139:52

there's many there's there's we've

139:54

surfaced a few of them today but I think

139:56

something that you guys are working on

139:57

is is the capacity for everyone else to

139:59

think as a scientist like why you can

140:01

ask yourself you know oh why don't

140:03

people agree agree with this data that

140:05

you show and take the action that seems

140:06

logical but then you present it in such

140:09

a way that they can't you know that two

140:11

things two things are important about it

140:13

I think one of them is you if you

140:14

present the information in a format that

140:16

isn't you know familiar you're not going

140:18

to be able to teach anything anybody

140:20

anything about what's important but the

140:22

other thing is that you know we were

140:23

talking we we spent some time talking

140:24

about this and we consulted some other

140:26

folks that are in science comms and we

140:28

realized you know the other thing is

140:29

that that that if you say you're a

140:31

scientist

140:33

it's not a neutral statement. Science

140:36

has a history and history is stronger

140:38

than science actually. So the history

140:40

like you know there's there's hesitancy

140:42

among African-American for example to

140:44

take drugs because of things of history

140:46

of Tuskegee which is like 80 years ago

140:48

or however long ago 60 years ago. Wow.

140:51

It's it's it's it's not in their

140:52

lifetime in many of these people. And so

140:54

part of the realization was like maybe

140:56

part of what we really should be doing

140:58

as scientists is one of part of our job

141:01

should be to figure out how we relate to

141:03

other humans. And it's you know that

141:05

there's a painting of this and you

141:06

obviously the media and and things help

141:09

this happen because it makes it

141:10

interesting to have a you know kind of a

141:12

nerdy scientist and and we all you can

141:14

be a nerdy scientist. I heard you and

141:16

you know but also you're a human. You're

141:17

a human being. You have you know there's

141:19

foibless to you know loves and hates and

141:21

and um

141:22

>> certainly foibless. I have plenty of

141:24

those. [laughter]

141:25

>> We can get in that off the podcast. But

141:27

you know that this concept of if we want

141:30

to relate um you know if we want to have

141:33

impact of the work you do if you want it

141:35

to be relevant at some point you have to

141:37

the science science as a field needs to

141:39

make sure that it doesn't ostracize

141:41

itself from people and I think one of

141:43

the issues there I just use the word o

141:46

you know is separate is is this concept

141:48

that we speak in our our vocabulary that

141:51

is gets very precise and we forget that

141:53

you know if you hear a foreign language

141:54

and you hear one word that you don't

141:56

recog recognize it. It throws you off

141:57

for a few sentences and next thing you

141:59

know you don't know what people are

142:00

talking about. And I I think that

142:02

concept that that you know and again

142:04

this is where I think bringing it down a

142:06

level and saying let's give it analogy,

142:08

let's give it that [clears throat]

142:09

strikes me as really really important to

142:12

the impact that you can have with with

142:14

your science and and that science can

142:16

have in in terms of teaching people what

142:19

we could do better which I think we all

142:21

want to do. But if you end up thinking

142:23

that science is a distrusted weird

142:26

collection of people that have different

142:27

motivations and u designs, then then

142:30

you've lost that that that the potential

142:33

for it to do good is is gone. So the

142:35

Substack came about it because I was

142:37

like, well, I need to write as a person

142:38

a little bit more and and tell about

142:40

some of the, you know, the time that you

142:43

spend on this and why it matters and

142:44

what it's like to to do this work and

142:47

and in some respects also what it's like

142:49

to to lose in this, which happens way

142:52

more often than the, you know, it's like

142:54

a casino, right, in science. Science you

142:56

hear the bells and some cool device

142:58

comes out and it's but but there's a

143:00

bunch of people pulling the arm, you

143:01

know, and they're they're not winning.

143:04

And so, [laughter]

143:05

you know, so I feel like that's kind of

143:06

an important part of this that that

143:08

again, it's not the glory story always.

143:11

>> Um, you know, the best some of the

143:12

bestselling books about science or are

143:14

the winds, but um, you know, it's might

143:17

be more relatable at some point to get

143:19

all of it. So, that's kind of what what

143:20

I was trying to put together. And and at

143:22

the same time, I think the immune system

143:23

is also just so relevant and so

143:25

important and it's got all these

143:26

different facets and these archetypes

143:28

and these sorts of things that it's

143:28

doing that we kind of scratch the

143:30

surface today. So, anyway, thanks for

143:32

calling it out. been

143:33

>> working on for a bit.

143:35

>> Well, I hope you continue to and um

143:38

>> thank you so much for the work you've

143:40

been doing in your laboratory and all

143:41

the people in your laboratory doing that

143:43

work because now you're the one calling

143:45

the shots while other people do

143:46

experiments. But

143:47

>> um for your advocacy for science and

143:50

public education, it's huge. Uh we need

143:53

more people like you. But you've

143:54

certainly put your own unique signature

143:56

on it and the Substack reflects that.

143:59

It's an incredibly interesting set of

144:00

reads and um and people will really

144:02

learn. So that's essential especially in

144:05

this day and age. But even not in this

144:07

day and age, science is is just really

144:08

cool. And with all the meaningless dril

144:10

out there, it's nice to go to a place

144:12

like your Substack and I'm speaking to

144:15

the audience now. You you will learn if

144:17

you read Max's Substack. You will be

144:20

inspired by certain things. And I

144:22

promise you, so I'm saying this

144:23

intentionally, mark my words, at some

144:25

point some somebody's going to contact

144:26

you that they decided to study the

144:28

immune system or they learned something

144:29

or they explored a a novel treatment

144:33

with their physician in a in a given

144:35

unfortunate or maybe even fortunate

144:37

situation that bettered their lives.

144:38

It's it's incredible what um Substacks

144:42

and conversations like the one you've

144:44

been willing to have today and going

144:46

forward can can really do. So, thank you

144:49

so much. should definitely come back

144:50

again and tell us about cancer and other

144:53

other things because I I took us off

144:55

course quite a lot but I I had a great

144:57

time talking about all of this and I'm

144:58

going to be thinking about a lot of it

145:00

and really appreciate you.

145:02

>> Yeah. Well, same here. Thanks so much.

145:03

>> Thank you for joining me for today's

145:05

discussion with Dr. Max Crumbl. To learn

145:07

more about his work and to find a link

145:09

to his superb substack, please see the

145:11

links in the show not caption. If you're

145:13

learning from and or enjoying this

145:14

podcast, please subscribe to our YouTube

145:16

channel. That's a terrific zerocost way

145:18

to support us. In addition, please

145:20

follow the podcast by clicking the

145:22

follow button on both Spotify and Apple.

145:24

And on both Spotify and Apple, you can

145:26

leave us up to a five-star review. And

145:28

you can now leave us comments at both

145:30

Spotify and Apple. Please also check out

145:32

the sponsors mentioned at the beginning

145:33

and throughout today's episode. That's

145:35

the best way to support this podcast. If

145:38

you have questions for me or comments

145:39

about the podcast or guests or topics

145:41

that you'd like me to consider for the

145:42

Hubberman Lab podcast, please put those

145:44

in the comment section on YouTube. I do

145:46

read all the comments. For those of you

145:48

that haven't heard, I have a new book

145:50

coming out. It's my very first book.

145:52

It's entitled Protocols: An Operating

145:54

Manual for the Human Body. This is a

145:56

book that I've been working on for more

145:57

than 5 years. And that's based on more

145:59

than 30 years of research and

146:01

experience. And it covers protocols for

146:03

everything from sleep to exercise to

146:06

stress control protocols related to

146:08

focus and motivation. And of course, I

146:10

provide the scientific substantiation

146:13

for the protocols that are included. The

146:15

book is now available by pre-sale at

146:17

protocolsbook.com.

146:19

There you can find links to various

146:21

vendors. You can pick the one that you

146:22

like best. Again, the book is called

146:24

Protocols, an operating manual for the

146:26

human body. And if you're not already

146:28

following me on social media, I am

146:30

Huberman Lab on all social media

146:32

platforms. So that's Instagram, X,

146:34

Threads, Facebook, and LinkedIn. And on

146:37

all those platforms, I discuss science

146:38

and science related tools, some of which

146:40

overlaps with the content of the

146:41

Huberman Lab podcast, but much of which

146:43

is distinct from the information on the

146:45

Huberman Lab podcast. Again, it's

146:47

Hubberman Lab on all social media

146:49

platforms. And if you haven't already,

146:51

subscribe to our neural network

146:52

newsletter. The neural network

146:53

newsletter is a zerorost monthly

146:55

newsletter that includes podcast

146:57

summaries as well as what we call

146:58

protocols in the form of one to

147:00

three-page PDFs that cover everything

147:02

from how to optimize your sleep, how to

147:04

optimize dopamine, deliberate cold

147:06

exposure. We have a foundational fitness

147:08

protocol that covers cardiovascular

147:09

training and resistance training. All of

147:12

that is available completely zero cost.

147:14

You simply go to hubmanlab.com, go to

147:16

the menu tab in the top right corner,

147:17

scroll down to newsletter, and enter

147:19

your email. And I should emphasize that

147:21

we do not share your email with anybody.

147:23

Thank you once again for joining me for

147:25

today's discussion with Dr. Max Crumbl.

147:28

And last, but certainly not least, thank

147:30

you [music] for your interest in

147:31

science.

Interactive Summary

In this episode of the Huberman Lab podcast, Dr. Andrew Huberman hosts Dr. Max Krummel, an expert in immunology and cancer biology. They discuss the immune system not just as a defense against external threats, but as a complex, body-wide sensory system that continuously 'measures' and maintains our health, including roles in metabolism and organ function. Dr. Krummel highlights how the immune system evolves with aging, the significance of the thymus, and the emerging concept of spatial biology, where immune function is deeply tied to the context and organization of tissues. They also engage in a nuanced conversation about vaccines, the importance of data, and the challenges of scientific discovery in modern society.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts