HomeVideos

We're touring the country to axe S1201 and we're going to WIN!

Now Playing

We're touring the country to axe S1201 and we're going to WIN!

Transcript

2098 segments

0:00

Today I want to announce a tour that

0:01

we're doing here at Fulu Foundation.

0:02

We're going to be visiting a bunch of

0:03

cities all over the United States to try

0:05

and get people galvanized and excited,

0:06

bring people together that care about

0:07

ownership to push back against

0:09

anti-ownership laws that exist in the

0:10

United States. We are doing everything

0:12

that we can to reform, repeal, push back

0:14

against these laws wherever we can. But

0:16

we can't do that by oursel. We need the

0:18

help of everybody else on this channel.

0:19

For the past 14 years, you have never

0:21

seen me, not once, say, "By the way,

0:24

check out Tunnel Bear. Check out Raycon.

0:26

Hey, this hotel gave me a free room, so

0:28

I'm going to pretend that they're

0:29

actually a good hotel and try and get my

0:30

audience to pay for overpriced [ __ ] I

0:32

never say ring that bell, like and

0:33

subscribe. You never hear that from me.

0:35

But the one thing that I will ask you to

0:37

do is consider showing up for this. And

0:40

if you're not able to show up, at the

0:41

very least when we release a call to

0:42

action in your particular area, in your

0:44

particular congressional district, that

0:46

you answer the call and you do the

0:47

things that we ask you to do to push

0:48

back against these in an organized way.

0:50

I'm showing up in California next week.

0:52

I'm gonna be flying out on Monday. going

0:54

to be showing up on Tuesday morning in

0:55

the California in Sacramento in the

0:57

Senate building. I hope as many people

0:58

show up as possible who care about 3D

1:00

printing not being destroyed by a law

1:02

that requires that the 3D printer

1:03

connect to a [ __ ] government database

1:04

to try and figure out if it thinks that

1:06

you're printing a gun, which again, as I

1:08

went over, if you have a cold shoe mount

1:11

to a camera, if you have a case to a

1:13

Raspberry Pi, if you have a flashlight,

1:14

there's there's so many place for this

1:16

to go wrong. I'm showing up there to

1:17

record all the heroes that have decided

1:18

to take time out of their day to explain

1:21

why this is a horrible bill and try to

1:22

get as many people to show up as

1:23

possible to push back against it. And I

1:25

we're also going to be doing that with

1:26

section 121 of the DMCA and many other

1:28

anti-ownership laws. One of the things I

1:31

learned while watching the um push for

1:33

that bill is that while the group that

1:35

is doing it has a lot of money, it's a

1:36

very small number of people that are

1:38

actually getting a [ __ ] ton done.

1:40

Because while our side, the pro

1:41

ownership side, the pro repair side, the

1:43

pro- freedom side is often very black

1:45

pill, deniialistic, and believes eh, you

1:46

know, they're never going to listen to

1:47

us. What's the point? The anti-freedom

1:50

side, the anti- ownership side, the

1:52

anti-consumer right side, they are very

1:54

[ __ ] motivated all the time. And one

1:57

of the things that I'm realizing is that

1:59

I need to start trying some new things

2:01

to get our side as motivated as

2:03

possible. We are going to organize the

2:05

people that we get together to take

2:06

elective action that actually results in

2:08

us being able to say that we all we

2:09

bought and paid for. I do not want to

2:11

sit back as easy as it would be and

2:14

every day come up here and say, "Welcome

2:16

to today's episode of How You're Getting

2:17

[ __ ] I'm your host, Louis Rossman."

2:18

It would be a very easy life if that's

2:20

all I did. And it would be a much easier

2:22

life if I just started answering even

2:24

10% of the [ __ ] sponsorship emails in

2:26

my inbox with a yes and sent them that

2:28

my demographics like they asked and

2:30

started taking the three to5 to10 to

2:32

$20,000 checks to show you [ __ ] But

2:34

that's not what this channel is about.

2:35

This channel has been about, is about,

2:38

and always will be about trying to clean

2:39

up our corner of the world. So, I'm

2:41

going to play you what we did today, and

2:43

we're going to be repeating this all

2:44

across the country. I will let you know

2:45

in the YouTube community posts as well

2:47

as in YouTube videos when you can expect

2:49

to see these. And I hope to see you

2:51

there. And I also hope to see you take

2:54

part in the things that we're going to

2:55

ask you to do because the things we're

2:57

going to ask you to do are the things

2:58

that are necessary to move us forward.

3:02

Thank you for everybody who showed up

3:03

today and I look forward to seeing many

3:05

more of you Tuesday morning in the

3:07

Senate building in Sacramento for that

3:09

3D printer bill. Without further ado,

3:24

that was a lot.

3:26

How's everybody doing?

3:29

>> Yeah, a little more than that. Come on.

3:30

How's everybody doing?

3:32

>> Yeah, there we go. That's what I like to

3:34

hear. Um, hi everybody. My name is Kevin

3:37

O'Reilly. I'm the executive director

3:38

with Fulu Foundation. And first of all,

3:41

I want to thank all of you for taking

3:42

some time out of your holiday weekend to

3:44

be here with us today. Um, the reason

3:47

that we're here is because something

3:49

about our relationship with our

3:51

technology has changed, right? Uh, we

3:54

have all lived through a time of

3:55

incredible technological innovation and

3:58

progress. And I'd argue that many of us

4:00

in this room have been some of the eager

4:02

adopters and maybe even advocates for

4:04

that tech. Uh but what's become clear is

4:06

that the companies that make that tech

4:08

are no longer showing us the same

4:09

respect. Right? It used to be that when

4:12

you bought something, you owned it and

4:14

that ownership came with control. So

4:17

that meant that, you know, the maker of

4:19

your television or your tractor or your

4:21

pickup truck had no ability and no right

4:24

to tell you how to use it, when or where

4:27

to get it fixed, which features you had

4:29

access to, right? It was your thing.

4:31

When you bought a uh a video game, you

4:35

got the disc, you could play it for as

4:36

long as you wanted. Um, that's shifted.

4:39

And this conception of ownership right

4:42

now is under attack. So these days, if

4:44

you want to get your Kawasaki's oil

4:46

changed, you've got to go to the

4:47

dealership, right? If you want to use

4:49

your BMW's heated seats, you got to fork

4:52

over a monthly subscription. And if you

4:55

just don't want your TV to spy on you

4:57

and then sell that data to advertisers,

5:00

you've got to navigate through five to

5:02

10 screens of legal ease and hope that

5:04

the manufacturer honors your request.

5:06

That's ridiculous. It's not right.

5:08

Right. Uh as owners, we deserve the

5:10

right to call the shots. We deserve the

5:13

ability to make our technology work for

5:15

us. We deserve the right to repair. And

5:18

for goodness sake, we deserve to own our

5:20

[ __ ]

5:21

YEAH.

5:26

SO, today you're going to be hearing

5:27

from a few folks that are leading the

5:30

push for ownership, for control, for

5:32

privacy. Um, you're going to be hearing

5:35

a lot about the Digital Millennium

5:36

Copyright Act or the DMCA.

5:40

Ooh, that's the right answer. That's the

5:43

right response. Um, right. This law that

5:46

has made true ownership into a federal

5:50

crime with penalties of up to 5 years in

5:52

prison and $500,000 in fines. Uh, and

5:56

then after that, each one of you is

5:57

going to take action. You're going to be

5:58

writing a postcard to your member of

6:00

Congress because the only way that we're

6:02

going to be able to change this is if we

6:03

all come together and demand that kind

6:05

of change. So, thank you again for being

6:07

here. Now the person you've all come

6:09

here to see Lewis Rossman, president of

6:11

Fulu, YouTube activist, many, many

6:14

things. Lewis, take it away. How about a

6:17

round of applause for Lewis? HUH?

6:24

All right. Beautiful. It works. All

6:26

right. So, today I thought we'd start

6:28

out with the primary problem, which is

6:30

what we've been talking about,

6:31

ownership. So, I thought we'd start by

6:33

defining the problem. Let's let's define

6:35

what purchase used to mean in the 14th

6:37

century. In the 14th century, purchase

6:39

meant to acquire in exchange for payment

6:41

in money or an equivalent. The action or

6:43

act of obtaining something in exchange

6:44

for payment for money or in equivalent

6:47

buying. That was the 14th century

6:49

definition. Let's read the 21st century

6:51

definition from Sony. Sony, due to

6:54

updated licensing arrangements. As of

6:56

December 31st, 2023, due to our content

6:58

licensing arrangements with content

7:00

providers, you will no longer be able to

7:01

watch any of your previously purchased

7:03

Discovery content and the content will

7:05

be removed from your video library. We

7:06

sincerely thank you for your continued

7:08

support. They didn't say stream. They

7:11

didn't say rent. They said purchase. And

7:13

then they just took it away because that

7:15

is what is normal. Now, another word

7:17

that I think is really important is

7:18

lifetime. I much prefer the 14th century

7:20

definition. The 14th century definition

7:22

from Oxford English dictionary is the

7:24

duration of a person's or animal's life.

7:26

The period of time over which a person's

7:28

life extends. Person's life. Let's see

7:30

what it means in the 21st century.

7:31

Anybody here have to buy textbooks for

7:33

college? Anybody here try to buy a used

7:35

textbook but the teacher tells you the

7:36

questions are different from last years

7:38

even though calculus hasn't changed in

7:39

70 years? Yeah. Yeah. So let's take a

7:42

look at what Vital Source says. Now you

7:43

have three different licenses. You have

7:45

the $62 for 180 days, $86 for a year, or

7:48

$110 for a lifetime. Now, let's see.

7:51

What do you think lifetime means to

7:52

vital source? Any guesses?

7:56

>> Products labeled as lifetime typically

7:58

mean five years typically, not even

8:00

five. They're not committing of online

8:02

access and permanent downloads to a

8:04

supported device. Which means if they do

8:05

not make that app for this version of

8:06

Android anymore, sucks for you. This is

8:08

not a PDF file or a document file that

8:10

you download. This is a book that you

8:12

paid $200 or $400 for for a lifetime

8:13

license that you now have access to for

8:16

again up up to five years, which means

8:18

could be two weeks.

8:21

Books. Speaking of books, Amazon used to

8:24

allow you to purchase books and then

8:26

download them. And many of these books

8:27

were advertised as not having digital

8:29

rights management. Starting February 26,

8:31

2025, the download and transfer via USB

8:33

option will no longer be available. And

8:35

there are books on Amazon right now that

8:37

are being sold without digital rights

8:39

management. And yet when you buy it, you

8:41

cannot download it, even though the

8:42

actual advertising on Amazon's site said

8:44

you were allowed to download the book.

8:46

Now, my personal favorite was the $400

8:48

baby monitor. How many people here have

8:50

bought a baby monitor for their family

8:52

or their kids or seen one?

8:54

Okay, not a lot of people with kids

8:55

here, but for the usual price for this

8:58

thing is usually 30 to 50 bucks, maybe

9:00

80 bucks after the Iran war. This is

9:02

$400 for a baby monitor. Now, what do

9:04

you think the company did when they

9:05

started having financial issues? You

9:06

they started trying to make a better

9:07

product. Did they try to figure out new

9:09

ways to attract consumers? Oh, [ __ ] no.

9:11

What they did is they sent out a

9:12

firmware update that turned it into a

9:13

subscription. Live breathing and sleep

9:15

tracking are available with a Meiku

9:17

membership. My $400 baby monitor has

9:19

locked previously features behind a

9:21

subscription payw wall. One of my

9:22

personal favorites is that they do this

9:23

with wheelchairs. Somebody had a

9:25

wheelchair that used to be able to go 8

9:26

km an hour and now it's only able to go

9:28

5 to 6 km an hour unless they pay to

9:30

unlock these new features because being

9:32

able to catch the bus is apparently

9:33

worth a subscription. So, they actually

9:35

did this to somebody with multiple

9:36

scerosis. Lovely. Now, this hit a

9:38

crescendo for me when there's a company

9:40

called Future Home that makes these

9:41

smart home products like thermostats,

9:43

things for your water heater, everything

9:44

else. They were having financial issues

9:46

and instead of trying to make a better

9:48

product, they sent out a firmware update

9:50

to all these devices so that if you

9:52

wanted to be able to use it the way you

9:53

could before, you had to pay them $117 a

9:55

year to use the thermostat that you you

9:57

that you already paid for. And this is

9:59

the point where this just kind of

10:00

reached a crescendo for me and I

10:01

realized something has to change. So

10:03

when I started this channel, I did a lot

10:05

of videos of fixing motherboards and

10:06

fixing things at component level. And

10:08

what I and at some point I got a phone

10:11

call from a lawyer from Kilpatrick and

10:13

Townson. It was a very very kind and

10:15

polite person from Apple calling out

10:16

asking if I could just take down this

10:18

one troublesome video that I had of. And

10:19

I'm like, why? I like, well, we really

10:23

like your content. It's just that one

10:24

piece you used this little piece of um

10:26

copyrighted or trade secret work, which

10:28

was a schematic that showed how the

10:30

motherboard was put together. So, if I'm

10:31

going to fix a motherboard, I need to

10:32

know how the motherboard is put

10:33

together. And in the on the bottom

10:35

corner of the motherboard, it usually

10:36

says something like this that lets me

10:38

know what they were mad at. Notice a

10:40

proprietary property. Do not copy or

10:42

reproduce it. Don't reveal or publish it

10:44

and hold her in part. And there were

10:45

there were a few million people on

10:46

YouTube watching me fix things. So, I I

10:49

spoke to a lawyer and the lawyer told

10:51

me, "Wow, you have no case. Like, look

10:53

at what you're putting on the screen

10:54

over here. You have absolutely no case.

10:56

You are clearly breaking the law. What

10:57

are you doing?" But I'm looking at my

10:59

comments and there's hundreds of

11:00

thousands of people saying, "Thank you.

11:01

Apple wanted $700 to fix this. I just

11:03

fixed it myself for $15. Thank you. I

11:05

started a business doing this. I no

11:06

longer work at Walmart and make minimum

11:08

wage. This is great." And I thought to

11:09

myself, if I'm actually helping enough

11:11

people, if I'm doing the right thing for

11:12

the right reasons, then the fact that

11:14

I'm net I'm breaking the law is not the

11:16

issue. It's the law that's the issue,

11:18

not me. So, I paid my lawyer and I told

11:21

him politely, "Tell them I'm not taking

11:23

the video down." He's like, "What?"

11:25

Like, yeah, tell them if they want the

11:26

video taken down. They can file the

11:28

claim. And the thing is, when you file a

11:30

DMCA claim to have a video taken down,

11:31

you have to say why. You have to say the

11:33

timestamp, but you also have to say the

11:35

section that was offending and why. And

11:36

I wanted Apple to have to put in writing

11:38

a company that has a department and a

11:40

director of sustainability and

11:41

environmental justice. I wanted them to

11:43

say that at 55 seconds to 1 minute,

11:44

Lewis Rossman shows where the fuse is,

11:46

and we don't want our customers knowing

11:47

where it is. Put that [ __ ] on paper.

11:50

Now, there's this idea that I have where

11:51

I try to frame my life where if I win, I

11:53

win. And if I lose, I win. If I win,

11:55

they leave me alone. I get to keep

11:56

making videos for the next 5 to 10 years

11:58

and promoting right to repair. If I lose

12:00

and they file a claim, now again, this

12:03

trillion dollar company with the

12:04

director of sustainability and

12:05

environmental justice is now going to

12:07

have to explain to the world that they

12:09

really don't like you knowing where a

12:10

fuse is in your product. And I decided

12:12

to take that principle to the issue of

12:14

ownership. So, let's see what we did

12:15

with the future home thermostat. With

12:17

this, I knew somebody who worked at the

12:19

company. And I knew a few people who

12:21

knew how this stuff worked, knew how to

12:23

release a workaround to it. They just

12:25

needed a little push. So, we put out a

12:27

bounty program of $5,000. And I said,

12:30

"If somebody unbricks this thermostat,

12:31

if you return it to the functionality

12:33

that it had before, we will give you

12:34

$5,000." And that little push worked

12:36

because very shortly thereafter, the CEO

12:39

of Future Home said, "This is illegal

12:42

hacking." So, let me get this straight.

12:43

When you push out a firmware update to a

12:45

product because you went bankrupt,

12:47

saying, "We want $117 a year from all of

12:49

you, just holding you hostage, holding

12:51

you ransom," that's a business model.

12:52

But when I say, "I'm going to give you

12:54

back access to the product that you

12:55

already bought and paid for," that is

12:57

illegal hacking. Now, somebody wound up

13:00

coming up with a solution, a very nice

13:01

open- source solution to this, and they

13:03

won the bounty, and it was a great

13:05

solution. A lot of people are now using

13:06

their thermostat without paying that

13:08

corrupt [ __ ] $17 a year. Now, the

13:11

thing is, what he said is not true. That

13:13

is not considered illegal hacking in the

13:15

country of Norway. It's not. However, it

13:18

is considered illegal hacking in the

13:19

country of America because in the US we

13:20

have a law called section 121 of the

13:22

DMCA which says if you bypass a

13:24

technical protection measure to get

13:25

access to a work that the company

13:26

doesn't want you to have access to. Even

13:27

if it's for the purpose of repair, even

13:29

if for you to make the device that you

13:31

already bought and own work again after

13:32

the manufacturers bricked it, doesn't

13:34

matter. You're technically allowed to

13:36

fix it for yourself, but you can't show

13:37

other people how to do it. So, this is

13:39

kind of like saying you're allowed to

13:40

work on your own cancer. You just can't

13:41

treat other people. How many people here

13:43

know how to reprogram the firmware in

13:44

their thermostat after the manufacturer

13:46

bricks it? Some maybe wanted to, but

13:48

most people don't know how to do that.

13:50

You're not going to become an expert in

13:51

that. So, by saying that you can't share

13:53

the solution with others and making it

13:54

illegal, you've effectively said

13:56

technically you can fix it, but who's

13:59

going to do that if you can't share it?

14:01

So, we started to get known as the group

14:03

that was paying bounties for unlocking

14:05

these devices and offering to unlock

14:06

these devices for people uh who have

14:09

been screwed by this. One of the

14:10

examples afterwards was the Nest

14:12

thermostat. The Nest thermostat had

14:14

anybody here have a Nest in their house?

14:16

Yeah. So for the older ones, they said,

14:17

"This is just not going to work

14:18

anymore." What I found offensive about

14:20

this is that there is no

14:23

expiration date on the box. Like you

14:25

probably say, "Here's how long my eggs

14:27

are good for on your carton." Many, but

14:29

there are no Okay, bad example. Small

14:32

bad example, small farm. A lot of stuff

14:34

in your grocery store says when it

14:35

expires, but this does not. But none of

14:37

these products said when they expire and

14:39

it had an expiration date. So we put up

14:42

another bounty. Again, this one was for

14:43

$14,772.

14:45

Now the thing is I as like listen as as

14:47

a like large follower YouTuber, I would

14:50

never tell people to break the law. I

14:51

can't do that. But I also can't tell

14:53

people whether or not they're going to

14:54

release the solution afterwards. I'm not

14:55

your mom. I'm not your dad. I'm a

14:57

YouTuber. So if people and the way I see

14:59

this is if we win and somebody releases

15:01

a solution, hundreds of thousands of

15:03

people get back access to what they

15:04

bought and paid for. And if they decide,

15:06

you know what, I'm not going to release

15:07

the solution after I win the bounty, we

15:09

also win. The reason for that is because

15:11

now we can point to the fact that this

15:12

law exists. I would be able to show

15:14

millions of people how to make their

15:15

thermostat work again instead of having

15:17

to throw it away. But I can't because

15:19

this is here. And that's the purpose of

15:20

what we were doing with this bounty

15:22

program. And I'm going to talk about

15:23

some of those laws and some of the

15:24

excuses that people make for them

15:26

shortly. So somebody came out with a

15:28

solution, the Nest thermostat jailbreak.

15:30

This is on the no longer evil website

15:33

making a nice poking jab at Google

15:34

getting rid of the don't be evil slogan

15:36

around 2008 or 2009. There's a couple of

15:39

other examples of this. There's a

15:40

company called Echelon. They make these

15:42

exercise bikes. It's kind of like cheap

15:43

version of Pelaton. And they're sent out

15:46

a firmware update that stopped it from

15:47

being able to work with third party

15:48

apps. Would surprise anybody here that

15:50

at the time that they sent out a

15:51

firmware update that stopped you from

15:52

using other people's apps, their apps

15:54

were trying to sell you on

15:55

subscriptions. Would that surprise

15:57

anybody here? Yeah. And somebody came

15:59

out with a way to use it with third

16:00

party applications again, the same way

16:01

that you could when you bought the bike.

16:03

But he decided not to release it after

16:04

winning the bounty because he did not

16:06

feel like dealing with a 30-year-old law

16:07

that could subject him to 3 to 5 years

16:09

in federal prison. And again, I don't

16:11

blame him. I don't blame him. Now, the

16:13

reason that this is important and the

16:15

reason that we win even if this man does

16:17

not release it is because allow it

16:19

allows us to push back against the

16:20

opposition's most common talking point

16:22

that this is a solution in search of a

16:24

problem that does not exist. When I go

16:25

around the country and I I talk about

16:27

this issue, I'll often meet people that

16:28

say this.

16:30

Let's Here we go.

16:33

>> My name is Samantha Kersel and I'm the

16:35

executive director for TechNet.

16:36

Respectfully, we are testifying in

16:38

opposition to Senate Bill 5799 today. Uh

16:42

we believe this legislation is in search

16:43

of a problem that does not exist.

16:45

>> Something that's resonated with me is

16:47

something that you heard early on here

16:48

is this is legislation in search of a

16:50

problem.

16:51

Now, I got in trouble after releasing

16:53

this because it had her name in the

16:55

title and apparently she said she's

16:56

getting all these types of messages

16:57

online and and I figured it out right

17:00

before this hearing that we went to. She

17:01

had tweeted and I quote, "I'm

17:03

experiencing phone issues. The phone is

17:05

on but the screen is black. I've tried

17:07

everything. It's time for and when you

17:08

click this, it's like five or seven

17:09

years ago, so I don't have the link

17:10

anymore, but it said something along the

17:11

lines of me to figure out how to fix my

17:13

phone." Life comes at you fast. if I

17:17

guess with the salary that she's getting

17:18

to lobby against consumer rights for

17:19

Samsung and Apple, she could probably

17:21

just afford to buy a new one. But they

17:22

will often say that what we're talking

17:24

about is not really a problem. None of

17:25

this stuff is a problem. We're just kind

17:27

of making it up. And one of the things

17:28

that we're trying to do here is

17:30

demonstrate every single way that this

17:32

particular law is a problem, that this

17:34

does exist. U now I'm very biased in

17:37

favor of right to repair. So I don't

17:39

want you to listen to what I have to

17:40

think about these laws. I'd rather you

17:42

listen to the person who actually wrote

17:44

it about 35 years ago. This is Bruce

17:46

Leman. He is the architect of the

17:48

Digital Millennium Copyright Act. And I

17:49

want you to hear what he has to say

17:51

about this law.

17:56

>> Unfortunately, at least in some areas,

17:58

our policies haven't worked out too

17:59

well. Our attempts at copyright control,

18:02

at least thus far, have not been

18:03

successful. But I don't just blame

18:05

teenagers and and college students. I

18:08

really blame the the moguls in the music

18:10

industry because had they been thinking

18:13

about these business models

18:16

when we were doing our work in 1994 in

18:19

the Clinton administration, had they

18:21

been developing effective online

18:22

distribution models when the internet

18:25

first came into business? said they've

18:26

been talking to Steve Casease when AOL

18:28

first started to become a big deal and

18:31

really seriously developing an online

18:33

business model. Perhaps we would not be

18:37

in the situation that we are. But the

18:39

culture of that industry was such that

18:41

you know those people were concerned

18:43

principally with uh you know and their

18:46

talents were developing talent,

18:47

understanding public taste. They didn't

18:49

know anything about distribution or

18:51

technology or anything like that.

18:53

Minions dealt with that. Well, their

18:55

industry has paid the price. Hopefully,

18:57

there's not any, you know, I won't be

18:58

quoting the US, but I'm afraid our

18:59

Clinton administration policies didn't

19:01

work out very well. Now, a lot of people

19:03

accused me at the time of doing an end

19:05

run around Congress and everybody else

19:08

by negotiating these treaties and then

19:10

coming back and saying, "Well, we have

19:12

because we submitted this to Congress

19:13

before the treaties uh process was

19:16

complete." And then coming back and

19:17

saying, "Well, now you have to do this,

19:19

Congress, because we've agreed to a

19:21

treaty." And I would say that they're

19:22

probably right that it was an end run

19:25

and it was partly deliberate.

19:26

>> And the final statute that comes out,

19:29

you know, with a guy who was the head of

19:31

then the biggest record company in the

19:34

world, Warner Records, and he was very

19:36

nice guy and he wrote a book a few years

19:39

later after he retired and confirmed

19:40

what I always thought to be the case

19:43

about record industry executives. Record

19:45

industry executives are imprarios. And

19:47

the typical the best the most successful

19:50

record industry executives I would

19:51

characterize as 45year-old man who can

19:54

think like a 17-year-old girl and likes

19:57

to hang out at 3:00 in the morning and

19:59

do drugs with rock stars. And he

20:01

basically admitted to all of that in his

20:04

book that he wrote several years later.

20:06

Unfortunately, that is not a way that is

20:09

not a mindset, a part of the brain that

20:12

does very well at evolving new business

20:14

models for highly complex technologies.

20:18

So, let's get this straight. He admits

20:19

that it is a horrible law that didn't do

20:21

what it was supposed to. Check. He

20:22

admits and laughs about the fact that he

20:24

snuck this into a treaty to trick

20:26

Congress into passing it. And he admits

20:27

that the entire business model was based

20:30

on junkies that should not have the

20:31

ability to legislate technology. And yet

20:33

29 years later, this law is still the

20:35

reason that a man is afraid that if he

20:37

shows you how to make your exercise bike

20:38

work again, that he will go to federal

20:40

prison. Only in America. What we're

20:42

doing here is we are trying to fix this

20:44

law. And we are trying to also reform

20:46

it. And similar laws like it because

20:48

this law came out at a time when your

20:50

refrigerator, your car, your exercise

20:52

bike, your baby monitor did not connect

20:54

to the internet. And we lived in a world

20:55

of when you bought something, you

20:57

actually owned it. the 14th century

20:58

definition applied to ownership, not the

21:00

new we can take it away from you

21:02

afterwards thing. And the reason that

21:03

we're starting this off in Austin, as

21:05

Kevin Welch said, is that most I think

21:08

most people like deep down be honest,

21:10

you probably believe there's really no

21:11

point to showing up. I'm going to email

21:12

my congress person. I'm going to email

21:13

my city council person. They go, "Yeah,

21:15

whatever. Who cares?" And they're going

21:16

to do what they want to do anyway. But

21:18

they wanted to spend about $2 million to

21:20

put AI surveillance cameras in almost

21:22

every single park in Austin. And they

21:24

were about to get that through. And then

21:26

a bunch of people here showed up in

21:27

front of city hall. And you didn't

21:28

curse, you didn't scream, you didn't

21:30

yell, you didn't throw stuff. You were

21:31

just polite, kind, and courteous, but

21:32

you made it obvious that you're not

21:34

going to go until they do what it is

21:36

that they should be doing. And you made

21:37

change. Those cameras are not here. They

21:40

didn't spend the money on it. And the

21:41

point is that it doesn't take a lot of

21:44

people showing up. It takes maybe.1% of

21:46

the people that care about an issue to

21:47

actually show up and get involved to do

21:49

something about it and to make real

21:51

change. And that's what we're going to

21:52

be asking of all of you. So right by

21:53

there there's a going to be a QR code

21:55

for a chat server that we have. It's

21:57

Zulip. It's kind of like Slack or Teams

21:58

or Discord but open source. So that when

22:01

these issues come up, I want you to be

22:03

sharing them with us because I can only

22:05

read through I can only keep up with so

22:07

many of the echelons and the nests and

22:08

the wheelchairs. I want to know when

22:10

these issues show up in your life so

22:11

that we can push back against them so

22:13

that we can update our bounty program

22:14

and more so when opportunities show

22:17

themselves for us to be able to

22:18

collectively push back against these

22:20

laws and reform them. I want to get all

22:22

of you involved the same way that

22:23

happens in front of city hall here with

22:25

the flock cameras where we're able to

22:26

get rid of them and the live view

22:28

cameras. I want to be able to do the

22:29

same thing with this. Are you with me?

22:31

>> Yeah.

22:33

>> Thank you.

22:38

>> Yeah.

22:39

>> Cool. All right. So, on that note, let's

22:42

write some letters to uh big congressman

22:46

uh Mr. Casar. So, we've got

22:51

we're going to have Maria and Stephie

22:53

from our team um who are going to be

22:55

coming by to drop off some postcards.

22:58

And each one of you is just going to

23:00

take a couple minutes, write a couple

23:01

sentences, right? A little bit of

23:03

friction, not just an email. You're

23:05

going to actually put the personal touch

23:06

on it and say why it's important to you

23:08

that we change this law. So, let me pull

23:11

up an example here that we've got.

23:22

So, we've got some basic instructs,

23:25

right? So, address the postcard to your

23:27

member of Congress. We've got a some

23:28

like labels for you to put those on.

23:30

They might already be on there. Maybe

23:32

share a story or a reason as to why uh

23:35

you care about being able to own your

23:37

[ __ ] You care about being able to

23:38

repair your stuff. You care about uh

23:40

being able to continue to play your

23:42

video games. Um and then make sure to

23:45

say about talk about the need to reform

23:47

the DMCA. Um encourage your member to s

23:50

support the freedom to fix act. So this

23:53

is our current legislative priority. So

23:55

while uh Lewis is doing all of his good

23:58

work to make sure that consumers are

23:59

aware of these kind of practices, a big

24:02

part of my job is heading to DC and uh

24:05

finding ways for us to make steps

24:07

forward. So the Freedom to Fix Act is uh

24:10

would make it so that at the very least

24:13

bypassing a digital lock for the purpose

24:14

of repair would no longer be a federal

24:16

crime, right? So that Cody Kosmba who

24:19

developed the no longer evil solution

24:21

for your Nest thermostat couldn't become

24:24

a federal criminal. I think that's just

24:25

crazy. So ask them to support the

24:27

freedom to fix and then add your name,

24:30

add your address so that they know that

24:32

you are a um constituent because that is

24:35

really important. So, any questions

24:37

about any of that?

24:40

Sweet. When you're done, we've got a box

24:42

over here by the merch table um that you

24:44

can drop them off. We'll make sure those

24:45

get in the mail. Uh also, check out the

24:47

merch. It is we've got suggested

24:49

donations amounts um there. We've got

24:52

food. And then finally, as Lewis

24:54

mentioned, we've got a QR code that I'll

24:56

put up afterwards. Um that will allow

24:59

you to either if you want to donate to

25:01

the cause, great. But more importantly,

25:02

we want you in that Zulip chat so that

25:04

we have a place online where we can let

25:06

you know when things are happening um

25:08

and we can, you know, take advantage of

25:10

those important moments to really drive

25:12

some political change. So,

25:15

thank you guys again for being here for

25:17

the rest of the time. Grab some food,

25:19

talk to folks. Um, also Stephie, who is

25:22

our social media manager, is going to be

25:25

going around and she has some questions

25:26

about ownership and repair and why we

25:28

care about that. So, if you would, we

25:30

would love to hear from you why you care

25:32

about these issues. Um, that's

25:34

information that we'll be then using to

25:36

continue to build this movement and uh

25:40

work towards making the change that we

25:41

need to make. So, thank you again.

25:44

Awesome to see you all. Thanks for

25:45

coming.

25:58

But only

26:03

>> just let them know that these are going

26:04

to be coming. So they should be prepared

26:06

to send to respond to all these

26:08

messages.

26:09

>> That went really well then.

26:10

>> Yeah.

26:11

>> Okay, cool.

26:12

>> How' you feel like?

26:13

>> Good.

26:13

>> Yeah,

26:14

>> it went well. I didn't get

26:18

>> and

26:21

>> I thought your presentation, your speech

26:22

was awesome.

26:23

>> Awesome. Thank you. I like the thing

26:25

that I was thinking is like it's kind of

26:27

like getting to watch you make a video

26:29

in real life. You know what I mean? It's

26:31

>> Yeah. The mic doesn't work, the camera

26:32

doesn't work except I can just edit I

26:34

can edit all that [ __ ] out though. I can

26:35

edit it out.

26:36

>> Yeah.

26:37

>> I just mean like it's cool to watch the

26:39

process in person, you know? It's kind

26:40

of like I think of like I went to see

26:43

Larry David, like an evening with Larry

26:44

David where he just kind of sat down and

26:46

talked about like this was what Seinfeld

26:48

was like, blah blah blah blah blah blah.

26:50

There's a level of like, you know, they

26:52

do live tapings of podcasts. It's almost

26:56

I wonder if there's an angle for that,

26:58

right? It's like come out, we're gonna

27:00

do this thing and then Lewis Rossman is

27:02

going to film a video live and you do a

27:04

video on a topic.

27:06

>> Yeah, I wrote a speech and then I didn't

27:07

read it. I didn't realize until after it

27:09

always done.

27:10

>> Yeah, you don't need it.

27:12

>> You've got it all here. So, anyways,

27:14

great work. I'm happy with how it went.

27:16

I'm hope you're happy with how it went.

27:18

>> I'm happy with how it went. The one

27:19

thing I'm noticing is the percentage of

27:20

people that sign up that show up that

27:22

maybe just not caring about the whole

27:24

fire marshall thing next time. You

27:25

always put the mic there at the worst

27:26

possible time. Like he literally like

27:28

don't care about what the [ __ ] the fire

27:29

marshall says.

27:30

>> I'm glad you don't get the SD card at

27:32

the end of this. Sir,

27:32

>> I'm going to hand things over to Kevin

27:33

Welch who is the uh president of EFF

27:36

Austin.

27:40

>> Hello everyone. Thanks for coming out to

27:43

the Own Your [ __ ] Tour and uh thanks for

27:46

FU for having us. Uh, my name is Kevin

27:48

Welch. I'm the current president of the

27:49

board at EFF Austin. For those of you

27:51

who are new to hearing about us, we're

27:53

an Austin based digital civil liberties

27:55

organization. We do a lot of work with

27:56

Electronic Frontier Foundation out of

27:58

San Francisco, nation's oldest and

28:00

largest digital civil liberties advocacy

28:01

group. We also recently um have been

28:03

thankful to uh Louis Rossman's efforts

28:05

in more ways than one thanks to groups

28:07

like Fudo and Rossman Repair Group. They

28:09

have now recently become the home of our

28:10

meetups. They're the second Tuesday of

28:12

every month at 700 p.m. Um there next

28:15

one's going to be coming up. I think

28:16

it's Tuesday, July 14th. Um, we're going

28:19

to be, I think, having a panel

28:21

discussion around the recent drama

28:23

around the uh high-end anthropic models

28:26

with Mythos and uh what we think about

28:29

uh that frontier models can just uh be

28:31

shut off like that and the digital

28:33

civiliz implications of that. So, it

28:34

should be fun. You should come out. We

28:36

do a lot of education advocacy in the

28:37

local area. Why am I talking to you here

28:39

at a right to repair group event? Well,

28:42

this is part of an deeper overarching

28:44

problem where right to repair is really

28:46

looking at the hardware and firmware

28:48

side of trying to control how we can use

28:50

the things we own. A lot of what we look

28:53

at can be more in the software space

28:55

basically. So, one of the big activism

28:58

pushes EF Austin's been involved in

29:00

locally is we're one of the founding

29:01

members of what's called the no ALPRs

29:04

coalition. This is about a coalition of

29:06

about 30 different activist groups here

29:08

in town. How many of you know what an

29:09

ALPR is?

29:11

Oh, okay. Decent number I suspected in

29:13

this room. So, for those of you who

29:14

don't know, an ALPR is an automated

29:17

license plate reader. And now, that is a

29:19

very bureaucratic sterile name, but what

29:22

it really is is it's a tool of mass

29:24

surveillance is what it is. It tracks

29:26

every car that goes by a certain

29:28

location and you can very quickly build

29:31

out a picture of where every citizen is

29:34

going at all times. Flock you may have

29:36

heard of is the most prominent one. The

29:38

reality is there is no good democratic

29:40

oversight of this data. It is being

29:41

controlled by private companies to do

29:44

all sorts of things to violate our

29:46

rights. We all have different politics.

29:47

I promise I can find you something that

29:49

you would find horrifying they are doing

29:51

with this data. Well, the nos's

29:53

coalition is proud that here in Austin,

29:55

we became the largest city in America

29:57

that got ALPRs banned. They are not used

30:00

by the city of Austin anymore.

30:03

However, however, this is not the end of

30:06

the story. First of all, there are still

30:08

ALPRs in Austin for a couple reasons.

30:10

One, they're still legal at the state

30:12

level. So, any road in Austin that is

30:15

owned by the state and not the city,

30:16

there are still ALPRs on those roads.

30:19

Um, it's going to take a state level ban

30:21

to solve that problem. There's also

30:23

private businesses still using them.

30:25

Have you been to a Lowe's or Home Depot

30:26

recently? Hooray, you've been pinging by

30:28

an ALPR. There's actually a cool website

30:31

called Deflock where you can see exactly

30:33

where known ones are mounted because

30:34

they don't want to tell you. But even

30:36

more than that, and here's where the

30:37

quick call to action I'm going to do

30:38

before I turn things over to the real

30:39

speakers, which is our city council is

30:43

shamelessly exploiting a recent mass

30:45

shooting to try to bring back ALPRs

30:47

against the will of the voters. And so

30:49

it's probably going to come up in July

30:51

at Austin City Council. We do not yet

30:54

know the exact Thursday meeting that

30:57

it's going to happen, but you should

30:59

follow both EFF Austin and No LPRs and

31:02

and probably Lewis on social media that

31:04

we will be telling you more about when

31:06

we know. You can find us on any social

31:08

media of your choice by going to effg.l.

31:12

It's basically our hacker link tree

31:14

basically without the surveillance. So

31:16

go there um and you can follow us and we

31:18

will tell you more. The only way you're

31:19

maybe going to keep them away is you got

31:21

to write them and you got to show up in

31:23

force. Bare minimum, they're going to

31:24

have to stare down hundreds of people

31:26

saying no if they do it anyway, which is

31:29

not a good look. So, I encourage all of

31:30

you to follow, get involved, and you

31:32

shouldn't feel hopeless about this

31:33

stuff. We got ALPRs banned in Austin. We

31:36

could have just given up. We didn't and

31:38

they were banned. But I also want you to

31:40

know that these fights never end. You

31:43

can't ever give into apathy. They will

31:44

always try to bring it back. They

31:46

believe in their view just as much as we

31:48

believe in ours. So the fight never

31:51

ends. So let's get back to work. And I'm

31:53

going to now turn things over to people

31:55

who are frankly probably having a lot

31:56

bigger impact than us and who are the

31:58

reason we're all here today.

32:05

>> Thank you, Kevin. Uh do we have any

32:06

clippies in the room? Anybody show up?

32:09

Yeah,

32:10

>> that was such an inspiring thing to see.

32:12

And you know, another case of Lewis's

32:14

leadership kind of standing up for

32:16

people and uh making sure to fight back

32:18

against this. But next, I want to invite

32:19

up Richard Ryan, who's a local

32:20

entrepreneur. He's an author. He's going

32:22

to talk a little bit about uh his new

32:25

book. So, come have a seat.

32:26

>> Oh, yeah.

32:27

>> Reserved for you.

32:28

>> All right. I'll take it.

32:29

>> Yeah. Um awesome. Well, first of all,

32:33

you want to introduce yourself and

32:34

>> Yeah. I'm Richard Ryan, depending on

32:36

what box you want to put me in. Um, I

32:38

guess you could say I'm an entrepreneur,

32:40

author, co-founder of Black Rifle Coffee

32:42

Company, founded Verizon and Hurst Media

32:44

Partners, Daily Editorial News Company.

32:47

I've kind of been all over the place,

32:48

you know, starting with the answer or

32:50

the solution. This is it, right? You'll

32:52

hear all these different things on

32:54

social media, people talking about

32:56

existential threats, the things

32:57

happening in the world that you have no

32:59

control over. This is what matters most,

33:02

right? You showing up for your

33:03

community, your friends, your family. If

33:06

everyone did this, it would scale to a

33:09

better world. And I think social media

33:12

taps into that fight orflight response

33:14

and you start worrying about these

33:15

things that you have absolutely zero

33:17

control over. You're fighting these

33:18

massive corporations and stuff. This is

33:20

how you make progress, showing up for

33:22

the things that matter in your

33:24

community. So, thank you for showing up.

33:26

>> Awesome. That's one of the first things

33:27

I wanted to ask you about, right? In

33:28

your latest book, The Warriors Garden,

33:30

right? You write about the attention

33:32

economy as well as the importance of

33:34

friction, right? And I think of

33:35

ownership as being a very kind of

33:37

frictionladen experience. Tinkering,

33:39

repair, control, those things are not

33:40

seamless. So could you tell me a little

33:42

bit of like what you think of when you

33:44

think of friction and why that's

33:46

important to a quality life?

33:47

>> Yeah, I mean it's it's really effort or

33:51

friction and life is a good thing,

33:52

right? Whether you're going to the gym,

33:54

uh you there's so many analogies to

33:56

like, you know, back in the day maybe

33:58

you went to Blockbuster Video or Movie

34:00

World or something like that. the effort

34:02

of going to get the movie, picking up

34:04

the popcorn, going to the theater,

34:05

whatever it is, the leadup to that movie

34:07

versus the constant streaming. Yes,

34:09

things are a little bit more accessible

34:11

now, you get more. But I I feel like

34:14

there's a lot of research around removal

34:16

of friction in your life, the Amazon

34:18

one-click experience that it's it's

34:20

meant to extract as much value. And to

34:23

be brutally honest, you can you can say

34:25

it's money, but what does money

34:27

represent? It's your time. That's your

34:29

most valuable asset. So be it social

34:31

media extracting your attention or

34:34

businesses looking to extract as much

34:35

money from you as possible with having

34:37

subscription as a service mattress or

34:40

whatever these things are. Right? So for

34:43

me I found that by introducing these

34:45

things conveniently or inconveniently

34:47

back in like even gratitude. Gratitude

34:49

was the biggest needle mover for me.

34:50

Like I I started doing this uh

34:52

intentional practice of gratitude like

34:54

I' I'd take five minutes whenever I get

34:56

in my truck before I go anywhere. I just

34:58

say, "All right, uh, I'm grateful for

35:00

this, you know, and just, you know, the

35:03

fuel in my truck, the ability to provide

35:05

for my family, uh, a job that I'm going

35:07

to or whatever it is." And the this this

35:09

shift started happening me me me me me

35:10

me me me me me me me me me me me me me

35:10

me me ment ment ment ment ment ment ment

35:10

ment ment ment mentally as I get in

35:12

traffic here in Austin because everyone

35:13

knows 35 is going to be a parking lot

35:15

I'd just be sitting there and like

35:17

typically I'd be frustrated about a [ __ ]

35:19

I'm running late you know this sucks you

35:20

know wo is me wo is me and then I

35:22

started looking at things a little bit

35:23

different you know oh this guy working

35:25

on the side of the road here uh he has a

35:27

job he's providing for his family and

35:29

everything and he's improving he's

35:30

trying to make my community better and

35:32

this you know mentally this shift

35:34

started happening and everything and you

35:36

know there's there's other ways to

35:37

introduce friction in life. Uh, you

35:39

know, I've I've gone back analog far as

35:41

DVDs and stuff like that. I canceled all

35:43

my streaming services. Yes, I'm like I'm

35:45

I'm slowly regressing technologically in

35:47

some ways. But I found that if I'm going

35:50

to purchase a DVD or Blu-ray, we have to

35:53

make the conscious decision. Is this

35:55

worth buying and then waiting, you know,

35:57

a day or two for it to come in versus

35:58

just going and clicking and watching it

36:00

on streaming? And even if you like the

36:02

interesting thing is like when you buy

36:04

these on streaming services, you know,

36:06

be it Apple TV or whatever, typically

36:08

you're paying like 20 bucks for it. You

36:09

get the DVD, it's like $4. So if you're

36:12

willing to wait for it, you end up

36:14

going, "Okay, well this is something

36:15

that I appreciate just a little bit

36:17

more." So just a little added friction

36:18

here and there I think has led to a more

36:20

meaningful and you know gratifying life

36:23

for me. So

36:24

>> yeah, absolutely. I mean I remember you

36:26

talk about Blockbuster, right? That was

36:27

like a Friday night ritual going with my

36:29

parents and the excitement, right?

36:31

Versus this. So you you talked too,

36:33

right? A lot of people are kind of

36:35

actively looking for friction in our

36:37

lives, right? Whether that's people

36:39

starting to turn back to dumb phones or

36:41

dumb TVs, people collecting vinyl

36:43

records and CDs. They're um looking for

36:46

older cars that they can fix. They are,

36:49

you know, taking on and looking at

36:51

open-source software rather than what

36:53

comes in the box. Uh why do you think

36:55

that's happening? And why do you think

36:57

that's important?

36:59

>> Uh, I think that a lot of people now are

37:02

craving some type of nostalgic

37:04

experience. I think a lot of us, you

37:05

know, maybe in our 30s and 40s are

37:08

yearning for that '9s, a little bit more

37:11

simple, but on the verge of

37:12

technological uh advancement. You know,

37:15

for me, my first vehicle my grandma

37:17

bought for me when I was 13 years old.

37:19

Uh, she spent $500 on a 67 Mustang.

37:22

didn't run and it wasn't the coolest

37:24

thing to have as a a teenager in the in

37:27

the 90s because, you know, everything

37:28

had moved to electronic fuel injection

37:31

and I had this carbureted car. She's

37:32

like, "Here's the Hannes manual. If you

37:34

want a car to drive when you're 15,

37:36

figure it out." So, I worked summers as

37:38

a carney, as a attic rat for my uncle's

37:41

HVAC company. Uh, did all these odd jobs

37:44

and by the time I was 15, I'd figured it

37:46

out with the Hannes manual. It would

37:48

have been awesome if YouTube was around

37:49

and there were tutorials and stuff, but

37:52

you know, I ended up figuring it out and

37:53

that kind of it really molded who I am

37:56

today and like always trying to

37:58

deconstruct things, build things and and

38:01

everything. And it it's a it's a core

38:02

part of who I am. And even when it comes

38:04

to things like buying those DVDs and

38:06

stuff that it it stems back to that

38:09

right to repair and the DRM around all

38:12

these systems because you know I've been

38:13

thinking about this a lot and really all

38:15

these different problems are boiling

38:16

down to profit or power and control is

38:19

the mechanism to achieve either of those

38:21

right and so whether it's corporations

38:25

wanting to you know I'm going to beat up

38:27

eight sleep because they're just so

38:28

frustrating to me that you can pay

38:30

$4,500 for a mattress and then they

38:32

charge you $300 $100 a year subscription

38:34

on it, right? And then their AWS

38:36

connection goes offline and then, you

38:38

know, they have a statistic around how

38:40

many people didn't sleep that night

38:42

because the temperatures went through

38:43

the roof, right? And so, a number of

38:46

problems there. One, like, why won't my

38:48

mattress work without an internet

38:50

connection? But then two, why do you

38:51

have sleep data on all these people that

38:54

you're publicizing? I thought this was

38:56

this was private, right? So, who else

38:58

has access to that data? Um, and of

39:01

course you can take and you can go

39:02

through their click wrapped terms of

39:04

agreement and privacy statements and

39:07

stuff like that. But I think it was one

39:08

of the justices was like even he he

39:10

doesn't do that. So you know it's really

39:12

frustrating to see that you know that

39:14

mechanism for control through extracting

39:16

profit by just keeping people in these

39:19

closed ecosystems as long as possible.

39:21

But then on the the other side of that,

39:23

you have the financial incentive, but

39:25

you also have the power incentive where

39:27

I feel like we're we're we're we're

39:30

rapidly approaching this

39:32

totalitarianism.

39:34

Um whether or not it's it's intentional,

39:36

but the byproduct of you know, like be

39:39

it the LPRs, you know, the um the you

39:44

know, open AI uh chat GPT rappers of

39:47

Siri and everything else. It's like

39:49

you're going to have an agent inside

39:50

your phone. You're going to have an

39:51

agent inside your car. If you go 56 and

39:54

a 55, they're going to automatically

39:56

deduct your uh you know from your bank

39:59

account. All these all these different

40:00

mechanisms in play to extract as much

40:03

value or uh assert as much control uh

40:06

for those in power. So I could ramble on

40:09

about that for days, but

40:11

very passionate about that.

40:13

>> Yeah. Awesome. And then I think you know

40:15

one other thing you mentioned was also

40:16

right you you're a farmer you've got a

40:19

tractor. I'd love to hear just kind of

40:20

about your relationship with your

40:22

tractor and how that has changed as

40:24

these software locks have been

40:26

introduced and the problems that have

40:27

come.

40:27

>> Yeah with a red light going on a camera.

40:29

I don't know if I want to say exactly

40:31

why I was on YouTube uh looking up some

40:34

stuff on my John Deere tractor but

40:36

that's how actually how I found Lewis.

40:38

Uh, funny enough, I was looking I was

40:40

having some issues with my tractor and

40:42

as with a lot of these different uh,

40:44

ecosystems. Again, I understand there's

40:47

a convenience and an efficiency involved

40:49

in, you know, adding electronics to

40:51

these things. There's GPS. That's

40:54

actually pretty remarkable. Some of

40:55

these John Deere loaders, you can pretty

40:57

much set it and forget it, like grading

41:00

via GPS, and it'll get the slope exactly

41:03

perfect, right? Um but then you run into

41:06

an issue where you know you there's a

41:09

very small window for harvesting, very

41:11

very small window for all these

41:14

different things from planting or

41:15

whatever and you're relying on this

41:17

equipment and at the point it goes down.

41:19

if they can't get over there to service

41:21

it, you're so and and that problem has

41:24

come up time and time again with farmers

41:27

who are like, "Hey, look, it sucks that

41:28

I'm in this closed ecosystem and I can't

41:30

pay you guys to come here and do this,

41:33

but if I can't, I still need to get the

41:35

job done. So, there needs to be a third

41:37

party or I need to be able to have some

41:39

type of solution here because my

41:40

livelihood's on the line." And it's

41:42

unfortunate that's just that's a very

41:44

very small fraction of all the different

41:48

instances out there where they're just

41:49

they're trying to extract as much value

41:52

as possible. And the way I you know it's

41:54

frustrating to look at the American

41:55

dream in the last you know hundred years

41:57

or so and it was like hey I'm going to

41:59

get a job. I'm going to be able to

42:01

support a family. We're going to have

42:02

the white picket fence and everything

42:04

else. And now it's like the American

42:06

dream for so many people is to create a

42:08

SAS company or a CPG company and create

42:11

some type of moat and then lock your

42:13

users or subscribers into an annual

42:16

recurring membership or whatever it is

42:18

and get it big enough to the point where

42:20

you can go public or you can bring on VC

42:22

or PE and then whenever you do then you

42:25

can inshitify your product as much as

42:27

possible and extract as much value. And

42:29

it's like it's like the hollowing out of

42:31

the American dream for profit or control

42:33

is just one of the most mind-numbingly

42:35

frustrating things for me right now. So,

42:38

you know, again, coming out and

42:39

supporting things like this, I think

42:40

it's very, very important to hold your

42:42

city council members, your local elected

42:44

politicians, and again, when it comes to

42:46

one of the issues that I have with the

42:48

license plate readers, too, is like, you

42:51

know, I support law enforcement, and you

42:52

could put me in any box that you you

42:54

want, but the Fourth Amendment exists

42:56

for a reason. And the people who enforce

42:59

the law are separate from those who we

43:02

elect. Right? So the judge is the one

43:04

who is the check to power to sign off on

43:07

that search warrant. Right? And so all

43:10

these systems in place are just being

43:13

slowly eroded just because of profit or

43:16

control. And so it's it's very very

43:18

important to come things like this to

43:21

meetups or wherever. But definitely

43:23

definitely reach out to your

43:25

representatives in whatever capacity,

43:27

state, local, municipal, county,

43:30

sheriff, whatever. Write them, fax them.

43:33

Do not make it easy for them. Do not

43:36

don't just send them an email because

43:37

they just scroll through, scroll

43:39

through, scroll through, scroll through.

43:40

Send them a letter, right? Send them a

43:42

fax. Whatever you can just show up. So,

43:45

>> do they still have fax machines?

43:47

>> Yes.

43:47

>> Okay. All right. There you go. You heard

43:49

it here first. Um, and you might you

43:51

might even have to use an online service

43:53

for it. Go to FedEx or something like

43:55

that, but uh yeah, it's one of those

43:57

things just it it's great whenever you

43:59

fill up um a representative's uh inbox

44:02

with just a ton of paper.

44:05

>> Amen. Awesome. Well, Richard, thank you

44:07

so much for being here. Really

44:08

appreciate it.

44:08

>> Yeah, I brought a bunch of eggs, too, so

44:11

get them before you go. And there's a a

44:13

QR code inside of them. So, I built a

44:15

tech stack where you can scan the QR

44:18

code and then put in the date that's

44:20

inside the carton of eggs and you can

44:22

see the eggs being laid. You see the

44:24

chickens out in the pasture and all that

44:25

other stuff. Cuz again, one of the

44:27

issues that I have with all these the

44:30

extraction of value and profit and

44:32

everything else is we're losing so much.

44:33

So, by supporting your local farmers, I

44:36

built this open source tech stack so

44:38

that you can see actual transparency and

44:40

supply chain. So, it's not some

44:41

greenwashed B-roll footage. It's the

44:44

There's a Starlink on the mobile chicken

44:47

coupe. So, like they have their own

44:49

Wi-Fi hotspot and you can throw a

44:50

chicken party for them and play music

44:52

and all this other stuff. So, so grab

44:54

some eggs before you before you leave.

44:56

>> Awesome. Thank you.

45:01

>> Show me your solution to the DMCA over

45:03

here.

45:03

>> To DMCA? Well, this is actually it's a

45:06

it's a it's not a bigger problem. It's

45:08

just a different problem, right? So, um,

45:11

the term greenwashing, have you ever

45:12

heard it?

45:13

>> Yes.

45:13

>> So, it's just deceptive marketing. You

45:15

tell people that this is, you know,

45:17

grass-fed. Well, what does that mean?

45:18

Like, doesn't mean that a cow was on a

45:20

pasture frolicking and eating a happy

45:22

life, right? It could be on a 5x5 feed

45:25

lot and they dump truck grass in. So,

45:27

technically, it's still grass-fed or

45:29

freerange or, you know, pasture-raised.

45:31

A chicken can be freeranging in a a 5x5

45:35

cage or something or the the the

45:38

container itself could be on a pasture.

45:39

It doesn't mean it's out in the open

45:41

enjoying the sun. So, I'm trying to

45:43

solve a few problems, right? So, how do

45:45

you help small farmers compete with the

45:47

bigger meat producers or uh a producers

45:50

out there? And I think it's through

45:52

transparency and supply chain. And how

45:55

do you how do you how do you do that?

45:56

So, I build a tech stack that I give

45:58

away to small farmers. So for my

46:01

chickens, I have like 65 of them. We

46:04

have cameras in the nesting box out

46:06

where they they forage inside where they

46:08

roost all over the place. And so

46:11

whenever you get a carton of eggs,

46:12

there's a a date inside and you scan a

46:14

QR code and it'll show all the different

46:17

nesting boxes where those eggs were laid

46:19

that day. So that in theory, what would

46:22

u a small farmer would do is they would

46:24

upsell their stuff at a premium. cuz if

46:26

I don't know if you kept up with the

46:26

Vital Farms controversy or anything like

46:28

that, um you know, some producers will

46:32

take and put um additives into the feed

46:36

to make that the eggs look a little bit

46:37

more orange, the yolks. Um what we do is

46:41

uh

46:42

>> keratene or something like that.

46:43

>> Exactly. That's exactly it. You can do

46:45

it a number of ways. You can put crushed

46:46

peppers and and stuff like that in

46:48

there, but

46:48

>> it gives you that good placebo of

46:50

thinking that you're eating a better

46:51

egg.

46:51

>> That's exactly it. and you you have a

46:53

nice fancy package or something like

46:55

that and you you say something nice on

46:57

it where it's like very

46:58

>> I got tricked by that five years ago

46:59

before I realized they were just putting

47:00

something in it.

47:01

>> Do you want to name drop? You want to

47:02

burn somebody down?

47:03

>> No, I don't remember the name. I just

47:04

remember the placebo of thinking like I

47:05

got a better egg and then my personal

47:07

trainer tells me that that's just they

47:08

just put something in it to change the

47:09

color.

47:10

>> Yeah. And so that's actually one thing

47:11

that I've I've done here recently too is

47:13

I uh I sent out my eggs to different

47:16

laboratories to have them tested so we

47:18

could compare them to all the other

47:19

different ones like in Whole Foods and

47:21

everything else cuz these are really

47:22

really bougie. The average person's not

47:24

going to spend that much money on like

47:26

oil or olive oil soaked feed for the the

47:29

chickens and stuff like that. But I just

47:31

want to prove a point that even though

47:32

I'm paying a premium for feed and the

47:34

experience for the chickens, the cost of

47:37

the eggs is actually the same if not

47:39

cheaper than going to, you know, vital

47:42

farms or something along those lines.

47:44

But again, we're solving many problems

47:45

here. Another one is I think that if co

47:49

showed us many things it's the

47:51

vulnerabilities within society and

47:53

supply chain and there's not a whole lot

47:55

of elasticity in civilization and

47:58

there's so many different aspects of

48:00

that and I think food is a key right so

48:03

like we don't have small farms in a lot

48:05

of cities there are food deserts that

48:07

have you know fast food Walmart and

48:09

stuff like that where they're growing

48:11

the the meat the produce and everything

48:14

really far away from in the communities.

48:16

So, by supporting a local farmer, you're

48:18

building that resilience and elasticity.

48:21

God forbid something happened like a

48:22

hurricane or whatever, there's some some

48:24

type of uh supply chain resilience for

48:28

uh the communities and everything. So,

48:29

and then, you know, small farmers could

48:31

upsell their stuff at a premium to

48:33

compete with those bigger ad producers

48:35

because, uh, you know, in business, you

48:38

you're always looking at giving up

48:40

margin somewhere. It's usually in

48:41

shipping a meat processor or you know

48:44

it's not just DTOC and that's that's

48:47

where some of these you know social

48:48

media there are some places like white

48:50

oak pastures where they have a

48:52

destination farm that people can go

48:54

visit and they get 100% of the the

48:56

revenue or profit from that because

48:58

people are going direct to consumer. But

49:01

>> if I scan the QR code inside of there,

49:02

what do I get?

49:03

>> Yeah. So that'll take you to uh

49:05

chickenparty.com.

49:09

That reminds me of something else from

49:10

childhood that I knew not to click.

49:12

>> So, and again, it's it's very it's very

49:14

gimmicky. I'm trying to I'm trying to

49:16

just give people a good time.

49:19

>> Let's see. Where do I find where do I

49:20

find my carton number, sir?

49:22

>> Yeah. So, this you just put in It

49:23

doesn't honestly it matter. You can put

49:25

in any any number, right?

49:27

>> A three four.

49:28

>> Yeah.

49:29

>> What's nest box?

49:30

>> Uh just put nest box one

49:32

>> one.

49:32

>> Yeah. And you can or a you can cycle

49:35

through any of them and really any date.

49:38

>> Meet the chickens.

49:39

>> Yeah.

49:39

>> Oh, invalid number

49:40

>> here. Just put a

49:42

>> I don't think maybe we updated it to

49:44

letters.

49:44

>> Meet the chickens.

49:46

>> Yeah.

49:49

>> Whoa.

49:51

>> So,

49:52

>> so that's that day, right? So, uh

49:54

>> Hello, I can see a chicken.

49:55

>> So, that's legit. There's a there's a

49:57

Starlink on the chicken coupe, two huge

50:00

solar panels, and uh I I have it powered

50:03

by a Raspberry Pi, a full ubiquity

50:05

system inside there. Um and the idea is

50:08

like extreme transparent. Some maybe

50:10

some of those videos you'll see me out

50:12

there feeding my chickens in my

50:13

underwear. Um but again, you know, this

50:16

is with cows, goats, any of that stuff.

50:19

Um, I I just think people the the

50:22

disconnect between people and their

50:23

food. Uh, you know, it's one of those

50:25

things where, you know, some people may

50:27

be hunters and they can really speak to

50:29

that intimate relationship with their

50:31

food. It's it's like it's very

50:33

emotional. It's visceral. Um, it's very

50:36

meaningful. Um, and I'm just wanting to

50:38

bridge that gap a little bit more for

50:40

some people so that hopefully they can

50:42

support those local producers and they

50:44

can sell their stuff to compete with the

50:46

bigger uh companies.

50:47

>> You know, I thought about this. I was

50:48

there was this documentary I was

50:49

watching about this one company in

50:51

Israel that makes tomatoes, but they

50:53

make tomatoes that are that they last a

50:55

little longer before they go moldy.

50:56

However, they have very little taste,

50:58

but more importantly, when it was

50:59

measured in a lab, they had very low

51:01

nutritional value. And there was people

51:03

asking if people could see at the store

51:05

that your tomato was 5% cheaper but had

51:08

75% less magnesium, 80% less calcium,

51:11

and so on and so forth. I forget the

51:12

exact nutrients, but something like

51:13

that. Do you think that they would still

51:14

be willing to spend 5% less for your

51:16

product if they knew it had 80 or 85%

51:18

less nutrition? And the CEO would not

51:19

give a clear answer. And obviously all I

51:21

think 99% of the world would buy the

51:23

product that actually has nutrition in

51:24

it. And the thing is when you go to the

51:26

store, there's all these different

51:27

products where you can't really tell

51:29

from looking at it. You would have to

51:30

take it to a lab to figure out if it is

51:32

actually nutritious. And this looks like

51:33

one way to one step closer to have an

51:35

idea of what you're actually getting.

51:36

And I think there are some um solutions

51:39

out there that people are trying to

51:40

build like I think seed oil scout yoka

51:43

yuka like a lot of these applications

51:46

are trying to make more conscious

51:49

consumer decisions much like what you

51:51

did

51:51

>> is awesome for fruit that's still a big

51:53

fruits and vegetables is still a big

51:55

problem.

51:55

>> Yeah. But the same thing with the

51:56

consumer rights wiki right like you're

51:58

trying to make a more educated consumer

52:00

so that they know how they're spending

52:02

their money how they're being vulnerable

52:04

and like you know all these different

52:05

things. So uh you know for me I think

52:08

that the time to act on a lot of these

52:11

things is yesterday but if we again look

52:15

at these solutions they can be

52:17

overwhelming at times was I'm just

52:19

trying to start at a local level

52:21

>> the next best time is 30 years ago. No

52:24

the best time is 30 years ago. The next

52:26

best time is now.

52:26

>> Yeah.

52:27

>> Thank you for coming by. I really

52:28

appreciate it. Thank you so much.

52:30

>> Thank you.

52:36

I spend most of my time. Hello.

52:40

>> Hey, Louis. Thank you. I'm Danny. This

52:42

is my son, Wesley.

52:43

>> Pleasure to meet you, sir.

52:44

>> He's told me all about it. Pleasure to

52:45

meet you. Very excited to meet you.

52:47

>> Uh, I heard in the beginning the Tuesday

52:49

night meetings. Is that something that's

52:52

the the guy mentioned before, the very

52:54

first speaker, is that something that

52:55

happens at your shop or

52:57

>> It happens upstairs. It's an event space

52:59

upstairs from my building and it's a EFF

53:02

Austin. They have a meet up for people

53:03

who just care about things like digital

53:05

privacy, not having you spied on, not

53:08

having digital ID, people who would

53:10

oppose age verification, use the

53:11

internet,

53:13

>> anybody who's within that space, it's

53:15

important to show up and realize that

53:16

there are people like you. Like one of

53:18

the things that happened, my girlfriend

53:19

at work was called an idiot by her boss

53:21

in front of other people for voting

53:22

against digital ID. And now, aside from

53:24

the fact that I think she should have

53:25

immediately punched him in the face for

53:27

saying that in general in front of other

53:28

people, but it's very easy. The point my

53:30

point is it's very easy in modern

53:31

society to believe that you're like one

53:33

of a thousand people that think this and

53:34

that you're the crazy person. So being

53:36

around other people that will that share

53:39

these views makes it easier to realize

53:41

I'm not crazy. It's just most people

53:43

don't know about this. But when they do

53:44

know about it, the group gets bigger and

53:46

bigger and bigger.

53:46

>> And it's every Tuesday.

53:48

>> I think it's the first Tuesday of the

53:49

month, but don't quote me on that. If

53:50

you go to EFF Austin's website, you'll

53:52

find it. Yeah. I don't know if Kevin is

53:53

still here, but if he's right out there,

53:55

so if you ask Kevin,

53:56

>> we're like the electronic like that EFF.

54:00

>> So there's EFF, like the national one,

54:02

and then there's an EFF Austin that

54:03

there's a local one

54:04

>> and he's like he that he has a local

54:06

one.

54:07

>> I think it's been around since the early

54:08

90s or so.

54:09

>> Jeez.

54:10

>> It's a good meet up for people who care

54:11

about this. Every month I'll have a new

54:12

speaker come about the issues. Like

54:14

sometimes he'll let people come from the

54:15

city. Um, there was one lawyer that

54:17

showed up who gave a really good talk on

54:19

AI and how people lawyers were getting

54:21

put held in contempt. There were some

54:23

lawyers that were being held in contempt

54:24

because they were using hallucinated

54:25

case precedent in their briefings. Uh,

54:28

>> I've tried that hallucinated like OS.

54:30

You've have you seen it like I haven't

54:32

seen that.

54:33

>> Like there's like this fully AI written

54:36

uh OS. Well, I mean also that's Windows

54:38

but like

54:39

>> Yes.

54:40

Like it's crazy like it's stupid that

54:43

like that like it's all vibe coded and

54:45

now like once people now people are like

54:47

switching to Linux more and more and

54:49

Microsoft's like wait why did we do

54:51

this?

54:51

>> So what got you to come out today?

54:53

>> What got you to come out today?

54:55

>> What are the things that

54:56

>> Well, he got me to come out. I

54:58

subscribed I guess to something. I saw

55:01

an email and I was like hey is this

55:03

something that is of interest to you?

55:05

and I told him about the event and your

55:07

name and he's his eyes lit up and he

55:08

said, "Yeah, can we go to it?" So, we

55:11

signed up and I'm kind of learning from

55:14

him more about the privacy and uh he's

55:18

urging me to, you know, get off the grid

55:20

quote unquote more

55:22

>> than I am.

55:23

>> Like, it's stupid that I even have to go

55:25

to the vent. Like, these should not be

55:26

problem.

55:27

>> I agree. Like, this stuff should not be

55:29

a problem. And I think the way that it

55:31

gets snuck in is by convenience. And

55:33

then it things are very convenient the

55:35

way they are and then over time they

55:36

just make it a little bit worse but just

55:37

enough that you're not gonna ride over

55:38

it and then that happens a thousand

55:40

times over 10 or 20 or 30 years.

55:42

>> Yeah. It's like uh like Netflix like

55:45

like uh there was like Shrek on Netflix

55:49

and like and then they're like, "Oh,

55:51

this is going to be removed." And I was

55:52

like, "Come on, I love Shrek. Why' they

55:54

have to like remove it? It's stupid."

55:55

Like and then like there's ads for like

55:58

Amazon Prime. like when you uh do a

56:00

subscription for Amazon Prime, you still

56:02

have to watch ads to watch the stuff

56:04

when you're already paying for it.

56:05

>> The fun part of it is is that they made

56:08

it so that if you're using Amazon Prime,

56:10

let's a lot of people pay for Amazon

56:11

Prime yearly, right? So, you pay I

56:13

forget exactly let's say $140 for the

56:15

year and they said if you there they

56:17

were putting ads inside of it, but if

56:18

you wanted to avoid the ads, you could

56:20

pay more. Now, this went to a judge and

56:22

the judge said because they are still

56:24

offering you the service that they

56:27

didn't increase the price because they

56:28

said in the terms that they can change

56:30

what they offer you, but because they

56:31

changed what they offer you and kept the

56:33

price the same and said if you want it

56:34

to go back to the way it was before

56:35

it'll cost more money. The judge ruled

56:37

that that is not a price change. So, if

56:39

I give you like if if I if you buy eggs

56:42

from Richard Ryan, if you buy a dozen

56:43

eggs from him and then he goes into your

56:45

fridge and takes out six of the eggs and

56:46

says if you want them back, you could

56:48

pay double, that's not a price increase.

56:49

That's a change in the service. It's

56:51

insane. And then that's why they did it

56:52

again cuz I think they started with

56:53

video and now they did it with music

56:55

afterwards because they realized that

56:57

they can just put ads in and say you can

56:58

pay a little bit more to have the ads

56:59

taken out. It's it's a change in the

57:01

it's a change in the sale after the

57:02

sale. And the thing with Netflix is that

57:04

at least they're honest. And at least I

57:06

don't like Netflix. I don't use N. I

57:07

shouldn't say they're honest. Not honest

57:08

about 4K, but that's another story. But

57:10

at least with Netflix, they are telling

57:12

you you don't own this. Here's the deal.

57:15

Is whereas and you pay every month. So

57:17

if you object to something, they do. you

57:19

could just stop paying. Whereas with

57:20

Amazon, they changed the terms of the

57:21

sale two or 3 months into a lot of

57:23

people's subscriptions and said if you

57:24

don't like it, you can suck it and pay

57:25

us more money for the because you

57:27

already paid for the year.

57:28

>> Yeah. Like I tell my mom like that she

57:31

should like be more like focused on like

57:33

online privacy cuz like she has like

57:35

lots of things like she has like um ch

57:40

like children like if like she gets like

57:42

her like bank gets compromised or

57:44

something that would not be good. And

57:45

I'm like she's like I shouldn't I don't

57:46

need to care about that. Like if if

57:48

someone was spying through your window

57:50

watching you, would you be fine with it?

57:52

>> Well, yeah. Like 27 years ago, the

57:53

people who were saying that your TV is

57:55

watching you and the government is

57:56

listening to you through the that was

57:57

like that was Alex Jones. And now the

58:00

people that are saying that your

58:00

television is spying on you, watching

58:02

it, and selling it to everybody are the

58:03

people that read the terms of service.

58:05

>> And that's that's the difficulty is that

58:07

everybody who said these types of things

58:08

20 to 40 years ago were insane. And now

58:11

you're just the person that read the

58:12

terms of service. So, it's going to be

58:14

it's it's a tough battle to win because

58:17

the people that were saying these things

58:18

before were usually people who were

58:19

just, you know, little nuts,

58:22

>> but I appreciate it. Thank you for

58:24

pushing.

58:24

>> Yeah, he tells his dad the same stuff,

58:26

too. I'm his dad, by the way. Some

58:27

people were wondering. And uh yeah, he's

58:29

he's my son. Don't

58:32

>> No, I'm just kidding. But yeah, he get

58:36

>> get your um get offline. Get all this

58:38

same thing he tells his mom. And I'm

58:40

starting to listen a little more.

58:42

>> I appreciate it. Also, thank you for

58:43

like encouraging your kids' interest. I

58:45

really appreciate it.

58:45

>> Oh, yeah. Of course.

58:46

>> That's awesome.

58:47

>> Thank you.

58:48

>> You're a cool son. Thanks.

58:51

>> That was a worthwhile conversation. How

58:52

did you hear about this to come out

58:53

here?

58:54

>> Um, he heard from me.

58:56

>> Oh, cool. How'd you hear about this?

58:57

>> Oh, cuz I watch your channel and

58:58

>> Awesome.

58:59

>> I would never have switched to Graphine

59:01

OS without you. I

59:02

>> That's awesome. Did you see how with the

59:03

Volkswagen app, they're trying to a lot

59:04

of companies are making it so if you use

59:06

Graphine OS, it doesn't work. And

59:07

they're claiming that it's for security.

59:08

The interesting thing is that if you're

59:10

using a 3 to 5y old unpatched version of

59:12

Android, as long as it's stock Android,

59:14

even if it's unpatched, no security

59:15

updates for 5 years, that's totally

59:16

okay. But if you use a upto-date version

59:18

of Graphine OS that has been patched 5

59:21

days ago, that's not secure. It's

59:23

complete [ __ ]

59:24

>> I have an app cellgate for my apartment

59:26

to go in and out the gates and it did

59:27

the latest update and now it doesn't

59:29

like graphine and it says it's unsafe.

59:31

>> They have to find some way to spoof

59:33

that. I I know. I appreciate that the

59:35

graphine team says these please leave

59:36

reviews telling them to allow our

59:38

signing keys and I get all that but at

59:39

the end of it I don't want my phone to

59:41

just not report location data. I want it

59:43

to report false location data. I want to

59:45

be able to do that cuz for the app

59:46

because there are some apps and there's

59:47

some things where it just requires your

59:48

location to work. So just not saying I

59:50

don't want to give you the location

59:52

means that you're just going to not

59:53

work. I want my phone to actually be

59:55

able to say I'm in Sarasota, Florida

59:57

right now and report that back to the

59:59

app. I want my phone to be able to

60:00

actually report something different to

60:01

the app and just pretend that you're

60:02

something else.

60:03

>> Yeah. The cellgate app was working just

60:05

fine and then I did the update and then

60:06

it's like

60:09

>> hello.

60:10

>> Hi, I'm Austin. Thanks to YouTube. Been

60:12

watching you since you were repairing

60:13

MacBooks. Love the section on New York

60:14

during co.

60:16

>> My cat also switched off Greenies on Mr.

60:18

Clinton's advice. Thank you for that.

60:19

>> And it's he's not very happy about it.

60:21

I'm trying to teach him the concept of

60:22

principles. The company that bought

60:24

Greenies

60:25

does something with they bought a

60:27

company that they shut down all the

60:28

products of with without an alternative.

60:31

Mars Pet Products purchased the I forget

60:33

what the device was. It's like some dog

60:34

tracker

60:35

>> and they said if you want this as soon

60:37

as they bought the company they shut it

60:38

down but they made their own dog tracker

60:40

and they say they think they send out

60:41

free ones but the new one is a

60:42

subscription service that's more

60:43

expensive. So I told Mr. Clinton we

60:45

don't support things being turned into a

60:46

subscription in this household. I can't

60:48

buy you treats anymore.

60:49

>> Yeah. I'm lingering on the end of my of

60:50

Fitbit here. Right. They find the app's

60:52

finally gone. It's Google now. Like

60:54

literally unusable app. I don't know

60:56

where I'm going after this.

60:57

>> Previously Pebble, right? Yeah, it was

60:59

Pebble and then they died to Fitbit and

61:01

then Google bought Fitbit.

61:03

>> Google likes to

61:04

>> buy companies and products that they do

61:06

not support for the long term.

61:07

>> Yeah. Well, I mean it's because they

61:09

want me to buy a Pixel watch

61:10

>> probably,

61:11

>> right? That's exactly why.

61:12

>> So, what are the experiences that you've

61:13

had with this in your life where you you

61:14

buy something and something changes

61:16

about it after you purchased it?

61:17

>> The Fitbit's probably the most poant. Uh

61:19

cuz I I had Fitbits before they were

61:21

even when they were still clip-on. Uh I

61:23

got over a decade of health data in

61:25

there and I don't know where I'm going

61:26

to take that. Do they allow you to

61:27

export it in an easy fashion or an open

61:29

format or

61:30

>> You're laughing. You're grinning. Uh I

61:32

take that as a no.

61:33

>> No, it never. There was it was always

61:35

either a third party app or uh or just

61:38

somebody's open source project to scrape

61:39

your stuff out of Fitbit if you wanted

61:41

to move it for, you know, there was

61:42

brief flashes in time where there

61:44

somebody had a service that would act as

61:46

the connector that never seemed to last.

61:48

I haven't checked. I've kind of given up

61:50

that I'm assuming I'll have to start

61:51

fresh with my health data. I think I

61:53

have a short window now that the Fitbit

61:55

app is finally gone and Google has

61:57

finally closed that. I think there's a

61:58

short data export window. I'm probably

62:00

just going to hit him with a give me all

62:01

my data request since that's now my

62:03

Google data.

62:04

>> Google takeout.

62:05

>> Yeah,

62:05

>> sometimes Google Takeout is a mess. I

62:07

don't like this. But so let's say for my

62:09

YouTube videos, they'll split it into a

62:11

bunch of files. You have to click each

62:13

individual file. As you click each

62:15

individual file, you can only click two

62:16

or three at a time. There's about 5,000

62:19

different videos. I click two or three

62:20

at a time. If I click one file more than

62:22

two or three times, it stops working

62:24

altogether. And if you try to download

62:25

too many at a time, it doesn't work.

62:26

It's there's there's an option to export

62:28

to Google Drive that actually does work,

62:30

but then you have to pay $200 for their

62:31

cloud plan for the it's actually export

62:34

if it's a lot of data. Yeah. So, I've

62:36

I've essentially given up. I assume my

62:37

health data is gone. I'll have to start

62:38

over with some new company and service

62:40

that I don't know what it'll be. Uh I

62:42

don't know what I'm doing with the

62:43

tracker, right? I assume the software

62:44

side is is solvable much more than an

62:48

open health tracker, but I don't know. I

62:51

haven't looked I haven't had a chance to

62:52

look at that yet. The thing I've been

62:53

using for over a decade is going away.

62:55

>> That sucks.

62:56

>> That's the most point one. And what I

62:57

was telling them earlier, uh, we have a

62:58

cat we have a cat door. I had to cut a

63:00

hole in my door to put a cat door in,

63:02

right? And it is an internet connected

63:04

cat door.

63:04

>> Internet connected cat door

63:05

>> because it reads his microchip, but I

63:08

also have an app where I can set a

63:09

curfew. I know when he comes and goes. I

63:10

love I do love getting a little

63:12

notification that he's come or gone and

63:14

you know if it's raining or something I

63:15

can set it to where it'll let him in and

63:17

trap him. It's a useful capability. Uh

63:19

but it service doesn't work very well.

63:22

I'm on my third cat door from them all

63:23

under warranty thankfully. Uh but I

63:26

can't imagine that'll go on for very

63:27

long. But it's cat door talks over some

63:30

proprietary BS to a separate hub you

63:32

have to buy that that has to plug into

63:33

your router which by the way has to go

63:34

directly into your router. It cannot

63:35

handle being on a switch. I got that in

63:38

in writing from them from email. They

63:39

could not explain to me why, but it is

63:40

in it is in fact the case. Uh, which is

63:42

a whole hassle in of itself because I

63:44

sure hope I have a router near where I

63:46

need to put the thing that talks. But

63:48

anyway, um, there is an open source

63:50

alternative to their app for managing

63:52

that cat uh, that cat door ecosystem.

63:56

Uh, but it only works on version one of

63:59

the hub. And if uh, that's firmware and

64:02

they they did the thing where they

64:04

released a new firmware that once it

64:05

touches you, it's locked on there and

64:06

you can now no longer use the open thing

64:08

with there. So, I never actually got a

64:09

chance to try the open solution uh to

64:11

see if it's better than what they offer.

64:13

I just I just put a new dummy router in

64:16

place this morning to make that hub work

64:18

again. And I'm

64:20

>> Yeah. So, eyes rolling is what it is.

64:23

>> Lame. Thank you for coming out.

64:25

>> Thanks. Thanks for doing everything you

64:26

do, man.

64:26

>> Hopefully, we have to make some change.

64:28

>> Thank you.

64:28

>> Thank you, my friend.

64:37

Hello.

64:38

>> I mean, literally was just like, "Oh,

64:42

>> wire spinner."

64:54

>> Oh, I'm tired.

65:11

Hello.

65:14

>> You have any examples of stuff that you

65:15

bought that used to work and then does

65:17

not work anymore because the company

65:18

turned it off or changed it?

65:21

Yeah,

65:22

>> it's a it's suppose it's the stop

65:24

killing game stuff that like probably is

65:26

having the biggest impact. You have

65:28

stuff that you buy digital copies of

65:30

years ago and you want to sign back in

65:33

and the servers are gone and everything

65:35

doesn't work as expected. Um and don't

65:38

think it's a big loss. A lot of the lot

65:40

of the live service games aren't aren't

65:42

great. I don't really miss them. But

65:44

yeah, you have stuff like the Burnout

65:46

game which was completely available

65:48

offline and then just servers go and

65:50

then it's it's gone. Um like it's it's

65:54

being baked in from the the games being

65:56

created. I think it was one of the Sim

65:58

City games needed an always online

66:02

like connection for it to work and there

66:04

was no need for that cuz there was no

66:06

real uh digital or online stuff needed

66:10

for it. Uh yeah, that that that's

66:12

probably the biggest thing that I have

66:14

actual examples of. Uh I think I've I've

66:18

bought a couple of IoT devices that have

66:21

the servers go offline or like that

66:24

maybe the company's gone bankrupt and

66:27

then instead of having sort of

66:29

schematics or APIs that you could host

66:32

stuff digitally, just the fact that they

66:33

were cloud-based objects, they're

66:37

completely unusable. like I it's

66:39

something that I'm now conscious of when

66:40

I'm buying a smart bulb when when I'm

66:42

buying anything that has internet

66:44

connectivity. I want to be able to

66:45

manage it locally. I don't want to call

66:48

out to the web. I want to be able to

66:51

manage that stuff. I have the technical

66:53

skill set that I'm able to do that. But

66:55

it's not something the average person

66:56

could do. Write their own API calls and

67:00

automate the stuff that I'm doing. But

67:02

yeah, I think it's shifting toward like

67:05

it's shifting in the right direction. I

67:07

think we're becoming more and more aware

67:08

of how we're getting [ __ ] over and

67:12

yeah, like it it's growing and just I

67:15

think companies are whenever they get

67:17

the bad PR from people like yourself

67:19

that whip up the everyone into a frenzy

67:22

like they they do pull back whenever

67:24

they're they suffer through PR things.

67:26

So yeah, like I think doing an

67:29

exceptional job through doing an

67:30

exceptional job and yeah, it was a

67:32

pleasure to be here today and see

67:35

everything. Thanks for coming out. I

67:37

appreciate it, Mom.

67:38

>> Thank you, sir.

67:39

>> Can I get a foodu?

67:40

>> Absolutely.

Interactive Summary

This video features an event organized by the Fulu Foundation, led by Louis Rossman and Kevin O'Reilly, centered on the 'Right to Repair' and consumer ownership movement. The speakers discuss how modern technology companies are eroding traditional ownership rights by imposing software locks, forced subscriptions, and expiration dates on hardware like thermostats, baby monitors, and exercise equipment. They highlight the legislative hurdles, specifically Section 121 of the DMCA, which makes it difficult for consumers to repair or share solutions for their own devices. The event serves as a call to action for attendees to get involved, contact their congressional representatives, and build local organizations to push back against these anti-ownership practices.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts