HomeVideos

Joe Rogan Experience #2530 - Timothy Alberino

Now Playing

Joe Rogan Experience #2530 - Timothy Alberino

Transcript

4436 segments

0:01

Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out.

0:04

>> The Joe Rogan Experience.

0:06

>> TRAIN BY DAY. JOE ROGAN PODCAST BY

0:08

NIGHT. All day.

0:12

Tim or Tim?

0:13

>> Tim is fine.

0:14

>> All right. What's up, Tim? What's going

0:16

on?

0:17

>> What's up, Joe?

0:17

>> Nice to meet you. [laughter]

0:19

>> Great to be with you.

0:20

>> Uh, I've seen a lot of your content

0:22

online, but the one that got me the most

0:24

was absolutely the giant in Afghanistan,

0:27

the Kandahar giant story. And I don't

0:29

know if you know, but um I had uh Devin

0:32

Lorat on the podcast, the arm wrestler,

0:35

and he told a story about how when he

0:37

was in the Canadian military, he was

0:39

deployed in Afghanistan. And um one of

0:43

>> the guys that he was working with over

0:45

there had to have a conversation with a

0:47

warlord, with a local warlord, and he

0:50

said this guy was eight feet tall. He

0:52

said this guy was [ __ ] huge. And and

0:54

not just tall, but wide. He said it was

0:56

the biggest man he's ever seen in his

0:58

life.

0:59

>> Well, I've heard a lot of things about

1:01

giants in in Afghanistan. And I find

1:04

that, you know, I I I talk about a lot

1:06

of different topics. I talk about a lot

1:08

of UFO stuff. Um, and I say some things

1:12

that I know are

1:15

that I know could get me in trouble, but

1:17

nothing makes me more nervous than

1:19

talking about Giants, specifically the

1:22

Kandahar giant and and the giants in

1:24

Kandahar in general.

1:26

>> Why?

1:28

>> You know, mainly because when I talk to

1:31

people who know things,

1:34

they're very, very nervous when we get

1:36

to this topic. And some of them will

1:39

just flat out will not talk about giants

1:41

in general, but specifically giants in

1:43

Afghanistan.

1:45

And some of these guys are high level

1:47

guys that worked at the Pentagon.

1:50

Um, and they'll talk rather freely with

1:54

me about UFOs, but as soon as we broach

1:57

this topic, it's it's like they they

2:00

warn they literally will warn me, be

2:02

careful with this topic. What [laughter]

2:04

>> What do you make of that?

2:06

Well, I think that uh the topic of

2:10

giants is intermeshed with the occult.

2:14

That's my personal theory because

2:16

nothing else makes sense.

2:19

Who cares if there's 8 foot tall guys,

2:21

right? Big deal.

2:22

>> Well, there's 8 foot tall humans, right?

2:24

There's We were just talking about that

2:25

young kid that's a basketball player

2:27

that's 7 foot n right?

2:28

>> There's a few of them now. I've seen

2:30

>> Yeah. So, there's actual giants that are

2:32

in public,

2:33

>> right? They're like play for the NBA and

2:36

they're out there. You could meet them.

2:38

>> Mhm.

2:39

>> But when I talk when I say giants, I'm

2:41

talking about 9 to 12 feet tall.

2:44

>> That's that's 8 to 12 feet tall would

2:46

would I would I would classify an 8 foot

2:48

tall person as a giant as well. As long

2:50

as they don't have gigantism,

2:52

>> right?

2:53

>> That's a completely different thing,

2:54

right?

2:55

>> Gigantism is a disability. This Kandahar

2:58

giant story is very crazy because um

3:00

what what's interesting about it is the

3:02

people that I've talked to that have

3:04

been in Afghanistan that were deployed

3:06

in Afghanistan, not just Devon but other

3:08

people, they don't dismiss it. They say

3:11

we've heard some weird [ __ ] about that

3:13

place. And the the thing that they

3:15

always say is you got to realize like

3:17

Afghanistan is an old country. It's old

3:21

and it's very remote. Like most of it is

3:25

very mountainous. It's controlled by

3:27

warlords. And you know, look, there's

3:30

these

3:31

what are those? Are they Greek or Roman?

3:33

Those uh structures that are there that

3:35

were that date Greek they look like

3:38

Greek temples that date back to

3:40

Alexander the Great. And archaeologists

3:42

can't study them. They can't go there

3:44

because it's too dangerous.

3:45

>> It's one of the most remote places on

3:47

the planet specifically because it's so

3:49

dangerous. You can't just go strolling

3:51

around Afghanistan. I mean,

3:53

>> you probably would it probably would be

3:54

easier to go to Antarctica than

3:56

Afghanistan.

3:58

>> And hilarious.

3:59

>> So, the story of the Kandahar giant.

4:02

>> Yeah. Let's tell the story.

4:03

>> This story has grown into a mythology

4:06

over the years. Um,

4:09

years ago, I was working with a

4:11

gentleman named Steve Quail, and we

4:13

started a production company called Gen

4:15

6 Productions, and we were making

4:17

documentary films mainly about giants,

4:19

mainly on the topic of giants.

4:22

giants as like referred to in the Bible

4:24

in ancient history, the Smithsonian

4:27

giants.

4:27

>> That's right. Biblical and historical

4:29

accounts of giants. So, I was traveling

4:30

around the world investigating giants.

4:32

And Steve is known for his

4:34

investigations into giants.

4:36

And he got a phone call from an elderly

4:40

an elderly woman who told him, "You need

4:42

to talk to my son. My son has a story he

4:45

needs to tell you." And she had to

4:48

convince her son to talk to Steve. and

4:50

and ultimately he did and he was active

4:53

duty. He was a C130 pilot, active duty.

4:57

He actually went on coast to coast with

4:59

Steve. They went on coast to coast

5:01

together and he related his story, I

5:04

believe, with George Nory, him, Steve,

5:05

and George. And then later on, we we

5:08

flew him into Bzoon, Montana

5:10

to put him in our documentary film that

5:13

we were making. And he did not he wanted

5:17

to be filmed in silhouette. he did not

5:19

want his face out there even though he

5:20

knew that they're going to be able to

5:22

mark him just by his voice. [snorts]

5:25

So he flies into Bosezeman. Uh we meet

5:28

with him. He shows us his credentials.

5:30

He was active duty C130. And then he

5:33

told us the following story

5:35

among many other things that he told us.

5:38

He said back in 2005

5:40

he was deployed in Afghanistan and Iraq

5:44

running missions as a C130 cargo pilot.

5:47

And oftent times they would have him fly

5:49

into Bram airfield.

5:52

And these were routine missions. And so

5:54

on one of these missions he's flying

5:56

into Bram.

5:58

But this time when he landed he was met

6:01

as soon as he deplaned he was met on the

6:03

tarmac by some individuals that he

6:05

describes as the babysitters. He calls

6:07

them the babysitters. He thinks they

6:09

were either army intelligence or air

6:11

force intelligence guys. And they didn't

6:13

tell him. But this was different because

6:16

when he disembarked,

6:18

they told him no photos, no mention of

6:21

this ever. This never happened. So he

6:23

knew that whatever was about to happen

6:26

was top secret. And he had flown uh

6:29

classified missions before, usually

6:31

retrieving Taliban guys, what what he

6:34

described as highvalued assets.

6:37

But this was different because these

6:39

there were intelligence guys on the

6:41

tarmac

6:42

waiting for something. And it turns out

6:45

what they were waiting for was the cargo

6:47

that was being delivered on a forklift

6:50

to the to the C130.

6:52

And the pilot says that the first thing

6:54

that struck him as this cargo is moving

6:56

toward him and [snorts] his crew was the

6:59

was the odor. He said it smelled like

7:02

this like musk b and death. And it was

7:06

extremely pungent.

7:08

And when the cargo arrived, it was on a

7:12

an air cargo pallet which is 7 by9. And

7:15

there was a he could see that there was

7:17

a person

7:19

on the pallet in the fetal position.

7:23

And this individual was so large that

7:26

his hands and his feet and part of his

7:28

head were were hanging off the pallet.

7:33

and

7:35

he and his load master and there were

7:37

some Marines who accompanied the pellet

7:39

who accompanied this cargo.

7:41

Uh they were actually putting their feet

7:44

up to this guy's feet, this dead giant's

7:46

feet and seeing how small their feet

7:49

were compared to his. Now the giant had

7:52

red hair. He had six fingers on each

7:55

hand, six toes on each foot. His feet

7:57

were wrapped in like a crude canvas foot

8:00

wrapping.

8:02

and he was solid as a rock. Again, most

8:06

of his body was covered by a tarp, but

8:07

the pilot and the guys around him were

8:09

were hitting him with their fists. And

8:12

he came up to about their their

8:13

midsection, laying in the fetal

8:15

position. And he and the pilot told me

8:17

he was solid as a rock, this guy. And he

8:21

asked the the Marines,

8:25

"What happened? Where did this guy come

8:26

from?" and they told him that they had

8:29

heard

8:31

that there was a team that was out in

8:32

Afghanistan

8:34

that was looking for Taliban or

8:36

something and they came upon a cave

8:39

because there was a nearby village and

8:41

the villagers were were bringing food

8:44

and other artifacts to the mouth of this

8:46

cave and so they thought that they're

8:47

aiding and abetting the Taliban. So they

8:50

went into the cave and rather than

8:51

encountering the Taliban, what they

8:53

found was this enormous humanoid

8:56

who killed them all. And then according

9:01

to these soldiers, they deployed another

9:03

team to go look for that team. And when

9:07

they found the cave, they found the

9:08

traces of that other team. They were

9:10

ready. They were prepared. And they were

9:13

able to kill the giant. In fact, the

9:15

soldiers told the pilot that the giant

9:17

was eating on members of the team who he

9:19

had who had killed previously.

9:22

But these new guys, they took him down

9:24

and then they had a a transport

9:26

helicopter come in and airlift him to

9:28

Bram.

9:29

>> Did you ever try to find records of who

9:33

was there and casualties that were

9:37

reported, deaths that were reported?

9:39

>> Um, it's very difficult. The Pentagon

9:42

actually released a statement some years

9:44

ago which is bizarre to me. [snorts] You

9:46

know, basically saying in paraphrasing,

9:49

the Kandahar giant incident never

9:51

happened. There was never a giant that

9:52

was killed in Afghanistan.

9:54

>> The Pentagon?

9:55

>> Yes. It was a represent It was like a

9:57

spokesman from the Pentagon or something

9:58

or a release from the Pentagon.

10:00

>> Is this available online?

10:01

>> Yeah. They actually felt the need to

10:03

debunk this.

10:04

>> That's hilarious. Now

10:05

>> that that gets me sketchy. Well, uh, I

10:09

believed the pilot because he was a very

10:10

credible guy. He didn't want his name

10:13

out there. He didn't want fame or

10:14

notoriety. He was very nervous. He

10:18

thought, "There's a good chance that

10:19

they're going to recognize me by my

10:21

voice." He was on Coast to Coast AM. And

10:23

then he's on in our documentary. There's

10:25

a good chance I'm going to get

10:26

recognized and there's going to be some

10:27

reprisal. He was nervous. Now, they

10:30

weighed the giant before they loaded him

10:32

on the C130 cuz they have to load

10:35

everything that goes on the C130. the

10:36

load master weighed him. He weighed

10:38

1,100 lb. And they estimated his his

10:42

height at 10 to 12 feet tall.

10:45

And so they loaded him onto the C130

10:49

and then they flew him to Qatar.

10:51

And then they they unloaded the cargo in

10:54

Qatar and the and our pilot told me he

10:57

heard through the grapevine

11:00

that the body ended up at Wright

11:02

Patterson Air Force Base. He said, "I

11:04

don't know. That's just what I heard.

11:07

So, this is a firsthand account from the

11:10

C130 pilot who flew the body himself

11:13

from Bram Airfield to Qatar.

11:16

>> Why does all the weird [ __ ] go to Wright

11:18

Patterson?

11:19

>> That's a good question. You know,

11:20

>> because that's where the weird [ __ ]

11:21

goes.

11:22

>> Wright Patterson used to have this the

11:23

blue room. I don't know if they still

11:25

have it, but they used to have a room

11:27

there called the blue room where they

11:28

had all of the alien artifacts that had

11:30

been recovered and that they were

11:31

studying.

11:33

And um it was completely off limits to

11:36

anybody except for people who had

11:37

access, the very few who had access. And

11:42

um but the Kandahar giant, you know,

11:45

that story, a colleague of mine, Ellie

11:47

Marculli, he had another guy come to

11:49

him, a different guy. We we interviewed

11:51

the pilot, Steve and I. LA had another

11:53

guy come to him that was I can't

11:56

remember the details. He was a special

11:57

forces guy. He had firsthand knowledge

11:59

of the event as well. And we're not sure

12:01

if it's the same one or a different one.

12:03

if it's were if there was just one

12:05

incident with the Giants or if there

12:07

were multiple incidents now years later

12:11

this would be just a couple of years ago

12:12

because we published that film I think

12:14

back in 2016 but just a couple of years

12:17

ago and I I do have to be very careful

12:20

here I I ran into a a gentleman who was

12:25

who was uh very high up let's say in the

12:28

operations happening out there during

12:30

the Iraq war and if and in Afghanist

12:34

And this individual

12:38

uh had um he he'd flown a lot of

12:42

missions

12:44

and and he was a commander

12:47

and I asked him, we were having a casual

12:50

conversation and he starts to walk away

12:52

and I said, "Hey, you were in flying

12:54

missions in Afghanistan." I said, "Did

12:55

you have you ever heard about the

12:58

Kandahar giant?" And his wife was

13:00

standing next to me and he's sort of

13:02

walking away. He turns around, the blood

13:04

rushes out of his face, and he literally

13:06

goes like this to me,

13:08

points to his phone, and his wife

13:10

whispers, "He can't talk about that."

13:14

[laughter] So later on, I was able to

13:17

[clears throat] we agreed to meet at

13:18

later on and and in a in a very

13:21

controlled environment. Um and and he

13:24

related a story to me that's the most

13:26

wild story I've I've ever heard in my

13:28

life. And I I'm sorry I can't relate

13:29

[laughter] it. Um I love this guy. I

13:32

want to protect him. But um

13:36

it's not the giant of Kandahar. It's the

13:38

giants of Kandahar. There's more than

13:41

one. The military has known about it. I

13:44

then and aside from him, I talked to

13:46

other soldiers who've also

13:49

um who've also had knowledge of that the

13:53

specific incident that I cited earlier,

13:55

but then also in general the giants in

13:58

Afghanistan.

14:00

And I have a friend of mine who

14:04

uh I met some years ago. Actually, I was

14:06

with Lou Alzando uh at LS Bar in

14:09

Wyoming. And uh there was a a friend of

14:13

LSE who's now a friend of mine there and

14:16

we were talking about the Kandahar

14:18

giant. I was just telling him the story

14:19

I told you and he just couldn't believe

14:21

it. He thought this is this is nuts.

14:23

This is crazy. And I said, "Okay,

14:26

do something for me. Next time you're

14:28

talking to somebody in government or in

14:29

the military who you think maybe might

14:31

know something about this, bring it up.

14:33

See what happens." So he called me one

14:35

day and he said, "Tim, you're not going

14:37

to believe it." He said, "I was talking

14:39

to

14:41

I have to be very careful here, too." He

14:42

said, "I was talking to a certain

14:44

individual who works for a senator. He's

14:46

a he's a a staffer. I think I believe

14:49

he's one of the a chief of staff for the

14:51

senator or at the very least an adviser.

14:54

And he's got a military background,

14:56

special forces." And he said, "I was

14:59

sitting there, we're really good

15:00

friends." He said, "We're having a

15:01

casual conversation as we always do.

15:05

And just in the midst of this

15:06

conversation, I said, "Hey, what what do

15:08

you know about

15:10

the Kandahar giant?" And he said his

15:13

face completely contorted

15:16

and he was no longer just they were no

15:19

longer just being happy and laughing. He

15:21

became very stern.

15:24

And he and he said, "What have you

15:27

gotten yourself into?

15:29

What what are you looking into?" He

15:31

said, 'You need to be really careful.

15:34

And he wouldn't tell him anything else.

15:37

That's the kind of reaction that that I

15:39

get and others get whenever we we try

15:41

and get information on this story.

15:43

>> It's a very fun story. I don't know why

15:44

it's so fun, but it's very fun. Um, but

15:46

the question is, what would be the

15:50

reason why they would want to keep

15:52

something like this a secret?

15:54

>> I don't I don't totally understand it.

15:56

>> I don't either. I mean, if there really

15:58

were

16:00

a race of giants that survive, let's

16:02

let's assume that what we're talking

16:04

about is what's referenced in the Bible,

16:06

right? Let's let's assume or at least

16:08

the book of Enoch, like the Nephilim,

16:11

right? If we're talking about giants,

16:13

>> like

16:14

>> the thing about giants is like

16:17

>> Native Americans have stories about

16:18

red-headed giants. They they talk about

16:21

the same thing about them having six

16:23

fingers and six toes. They have these

16:24

same myths. Like how is it that people

16:28

from the Middle East and people from

16:30

North America have this same ancient

16:33

story and what is it what is it in

16:36

reference to like why why does that

16:40

>> it's ubiquitous this I mean the legends

16:43

of giants are universal all over the

16:45

>> why hide that that's what I don't

16:46

understand like the stories about the

16:48

Smithsonian are always fascinating yeah

16:50

because the stories are

16:52

>> there have been archaeological digs and

16:54

they have discovered like enormous

16:56

femurss that they thought were like

16:57

woolly mammoths or something and then

16:58

they realize like well this is a giant

17:00

human

17:01

>> and they find hair and the hair is red

17:06

and that they and that they take these

17:07

bones and they tuck them away somewhere.

17:10

I mean this is always the myth. They

17:12

tuck them away in the basement of the

17:13

Smithsonian or somewhere else and for

17:17

whatever reason the general public is

17:19

not allowed to know about this. And I

17:21

don't totally understand what is it

17:24

about giants that they would try to key

17:26

from us. Like if they find a new species

17:28

of dinosaur that's extinct, they'll let

17:29

you know. Fascinating. Amazing. They

17:32

find um Homo Floresensis or however you

17:35

say it, the little hobbit people. Yeah.

17:37

Let you know. Look, we found little

17:39

hobbit people. Pretty cool.

17:41

Giants for whatever reason,

17:44

>> you know, it is a it's a conundrum. And

17:47

>> if it's real,

17:48

>> it it's

17:49

>> you think it's real.

17:50

>> I giants in general.

17:51

>> Yeah.

17:52

>> Oh, yeah. 100%.

17:53

>> What makes you think it's real?

17:55

>> Okay. So, um,

17:58

>> let me tell you why I think that this

17:59

thing's being covered up and then Okay.

18:01

And then I'll tell you why I think it's

18:03

real and we'll go to Sardinia for that.

18:06

So

18:08

I like you have been wondering for a

18:10

long time like what is the big deal and

18:12

initially people in my field especially

18:14

people who are coming from a biblical

18:15

perspective.

18:17

The common answer is well the existence

18:20

of giants would affirm the biblical

18:21

narrative right and [snorts] so the

18:22

secular atheist types don't want the

18:25

biblical narrative affirmed.

18:28

I that can't be that can't be right

18:30

because the existence of giants doesn't

18:32

just affirm the biblical narrative. It

18:34

affirms the myths and legends of every

18:36

ancient culture across the globe,

18:37

>> right?

18:38

>> Including the Bible. So, it's not

18:41

something that's specific exclusive to

18:43

the text of scripture. So, it would just

18:45

affirm all these legends in in general.

18:48

So the only thing that makes sense to me

18:51

at this point and the other line of

18:53

thinking by the way would be that it

18:54

would somehow conflict with the theory

18:56

of evolution by natural selection which

18:58

I don't really buy into that either

18:59

because they would just say that this

19:02

branch of humanoids

19:04

u they descended from gigantoopythecus

19:06

or something like that. I don't think it

19:08

would be that difficult of a problem for

19:10

the theory of evolution by natural

19:11

selection either. Um, I'm not myself an

19:15

evolutionist, but I don't I don't see

19:17

them having that difficult of a problem

19:19

here. So, the only thing left on the

19:21

table for me is that there's something

19:23

very sinister going on in regard to the

19:26

remains of giants. And

19:30

if you study the mythology of giants all

19:34

over the world, especially in the

19:36

ancient near east, you will discover

19:38

that there was in fact a cult of giants

19:40

that there that there were cultures that

19:42

venerated giants and that there was a

19:45

very particular belief about giants. And

19:48

this goes back into the book of Enoch.

19:51

And the idea is that this race of beings

19:54

who are not entirely human. They're

19:55

hybrids that when they die, you can

19:58

still make contact with their spirits,

20:01

with their souls. They can be summoned.

20:04

They in fact, these are the demons that

20:06

these are the in the New Testament of

20:07

the Bible. These are the demons that

20:09

possess people. This is the origin of

20:11

demons, by the way, in Hebrew cosmology.

20:14

So there's this pervasive idea again,

20:18

especially in the ancient near east,

20:20

that dead giants can be communicated

20:22

with and and can possess living human

20:26

beings. They're spirits. And so you have

20:28

a cult of giants of the ancient near

20:30

east, especially among the Canaanites.

20:32

And the Canaanites,

20:35

they had actually there's uh there's

20:40

various customs and and and rights

20:43

related to giants, but one of the

20:45

specific ones that we know about is

20:47

called Kispam, the right of Kispam. And

20:50

there's a fantastic book written by my

20:52

my friends Derek and Sharon Gilbert

20:54

called Veneration where they detail the

20:56

right of kispum and this idea of making

20:59

contact with the spirits of dead giants

21:02

and the veneration of giants.

21:04

And the right of kispam was it was

21:06

practiced broadly speaking in in the

21:08

ancient near east but specifically among

21:09

the Amorites

21:11

and other Canaanite clans as well. And

21:15

and what they would do is they would

21:17

hold a feast and then they would invite

21:19

the dead to come and join them at the

21:23

feast. So this was a necroantic right

21:26

and they would they would evoke the dead

21:30

and they believed that the dead would

21:31

come and and and eat with them. Now the

21:32

kings and specifically the Amorite

21:35

kings, they would invoke the spirits of

21:37

the mighty ones, the great ones, the

21:39

giants of old, the rephim. The biblical

21:43

account names various different clans of

21:45

giants that inhabited the Levant during

21:48

and after the conquest by Joshua and the

21:50

and the Hebrews.

21:52

And you you had the Anakim who descended

21:55

from the Nephilim. You had the Raphaim,

21:59

the Zamzumim, the Amime. These are

22:02

various clans of giants that are

22:03

specifically named in the Bible. Of

22:06

course, we get Goliath of Gath. Gath is

22:08

a Philistine city. after Joshua entered

22:12

the promised land, they drove out and

22:14

eradicated a lot of these giant clans,

22:17

but some of them remained. Some of the

22:19

individuals remained and they were

22:21

primarily went to the Philistine cities

22:23

of Gaza, Gath, and Ashdad. And so you

22:26

have Goliath of Gath who David

22:28

encounters later in the biblical text.

22:30

So, it's these heroes of old, these

22:33

these descendants of the Nephilim that

22:36

the Amorites and the ancient

22:38

Neareasterners are are attempting to

22:40

make contact with because they have

22:42

knowledge and they they these are

22:44

possessing spirits. And so, the right of

22:46

Kispum that the kings would summon the

22:49

Raphaim by name and you can find this in

22:51

the Ugaritic texts. Uh, Ugarit was a an

22:55

Amorite citystate located on uh on on

23:00

the shore of the Mediterranean in in

23:02

what is today northern Syria.

23:04

And they have uncovered documents where

23:07

the Amorite kings are summoning

23:09

specifically by name summoning dead

23:11

giants, the Raphaim. And the idea is to

23:15

summon them and then to become empowered

23:18

by their spirits, their possessing

23:19

spirits. Again, this goes back to the

23:21

tradition of Enoch that the giants when

23:24

they die, their spirits are in sort of a

23:27

state of suspended animation and they

23:30

can be revived. They can be resurrected

23:32

as it were and and can be made to

23:35

inhabit the bodies of human beings. So,

23:37

there's this ancient cult that existed

23:40

in the ancient near east and in other

23:41

parts of the world and it's associated

23:44

with the cult of Baal.

23:46

Um, so you have

23:50

Baal, the the the giants were thought of

23:52

as the warriors of Baal. So today we

23:55

know that the cult of Baal persists. I

23:58

mean the Epstein files. We know that the

24:00

cult of Baal is still being practiced.

24:02

>> What when you say the Epstein files,

24:04

what do you mean? What is the

24:05

>> There's references to Baal. And there's

24:08

there's the there's this recurrent theme

24:10

of Baal worship.

24:12

and Baal Jesus

24:15

Jesus refers to Baal as Satan in the New

24:17

Testament. So, it's basically Satanism.

24:19

It's it's a satanic cult. And

24:22

>> and how how is it referenced in the

24:23

Epstein files?

24:24

>> There's some there's some references to

24:26

Baal. I can't remember the exact

24:27

references, but there's there's a

24:29

there's apparently a cult of Baal. And

24:32

the elites are obsessed with some of the

24:34

elites. I don't know who or how many of

24:36

them, but it's becoming increasingly

24:38

apparent that there's a a

24:42

that there's an infatuation

24:44

with these ancient Neareastern cults,

24:46

specifically the Canaanitish cults. And

24:49

so, the reason why I'm going through all

24:51

of this is because I think it's still

24:52

alive and well today in society. And I

24:55

believe that they're using the bones,

24:57

the remains of giants in these

24:59

practices. I think it's extremely dark.

25:02

I think um this is part of the reason

25:05

why part of the reason why there may be

25:07

a cover up around it.

25:09

Um, nothing else makes sense to me.

25:11

Nothing else makes sense to me

25:13

>> in terms of the cover up.

25:14

>> In terms of the cover up, we were

25:15

talking about

25:15

>> the cover up. It makes sense to me that

25:17

you have incredibly powerful, wealthy

25:19

people that don't want to be exposed as

25:22

being perverts and yeah,

25:24

>> whatever the [ __ ] they were up to.

25:26

There's all the weird [ __ ] with beef

25:29

jerky and pizza.

25:31

You know, there's these very strange

25:33

references that seem to not be talking

25:35

about beef jerky and not It's some kind

25:37

of code.

25:38

>> Yeah. And there's also the fact that he

25:42

brought an enormous amount of sulfuric

25:44

acid like right after he was indicted to

25:47

the island like I I forget how many

25:50

gallons of it but barrels of sulfuric

25:52

acid

25:53

>> which is what you would use to dissolve

25:54

bodies.

25:55

>> So it's like it seems like there's a lot

25:57

of reasons for a cover up. If this guy

26:00

was running some sort of uh blackmail

26:02

operation and had information on

26:05

powerful people, you would that would

26:08

make sense that that's why they would

26:10

cover it up.

26:11

>> Well, that's the cover up the pedophilia

26:13

>> or just even if it's not pedophilia,

26:17

even just adultery or drug use or

26:21

whatever. The ball [clears throat] thing

26:23

apparently comes up on a bank

26:27

file and it may have been

26:29

misinterpreted. It does say B a L.name,

26:34

>> but people who are digging into this say

26:35

that it might have just been a

26:36

misinterpretation. That's the only

26:38

mention of it.

26:39

>> Misinterpretation.

26:41

>> Uh yeah, [clears throat] I mean it's

26:43

another page here shows it. Here's like

26:45

the document.

26:46

>> It might have just I don't I it doesn't

26:48

even say it there that I can see it.

26:51

>> Yeah. I'm not sure exactly. Here's where

26:53

it says it, you know,

26:53

>> exactly where Baal is referenced

26:55

specifically. There there for one place

26:58

for sure.

26:58

>> Bank document. I don't know if that has

26:59

anything to do with the occult

27:00

specifically.

27:02

>> Just imagine if it's the name of Satan

27:04

and this is the name of your bank

27:06

account. [laughter]

27:07

>> Yeah.

27:09

Yeah. That's quite odd. Yeah.

27:11

>> That's

27:13

at least creepy.

27:14

>> Yeah. For sure.

27:15

>> At least creepy.

27:16

>> Yeah. So, you have this this this

27:18

scenario in which let's just say for the

27:20

sake of argument that it's true. Okay.

27:21

>> Okay. That the legends are true, the

27:22

giants are real, that

27:26

you can make contact with their spirits

27:28

>> through their bones

27:29

>> through maybe through their remains. Um

27:33

that or at least people believe this.

27:36

And so

27:36

>> is there some sort of a method that they

27:38

use?

27:38

>> Yeah. Well, okay. So, this will get us

27:40

into Sardinia. So, whenever anyone asks

27:44

me what's the what's the best evidence

27:45

you've ever seen for the existence of

27:47

giants? Now you've already cited some

27:50

some his some historical context around

27:52

this. The legend of giants is

27:54

everywhere. It's in every continent and

27:57

you have giants aside from the biblical

27:59

account obviously all over the

28:00

Mesopotamia the cult of giants in the

28:03

United States during this the era of the

28:05

the Smithsonian gate the Smithsonian's

28:08

apparent the Smithsonian institutions

28:10

apparent cover up of giants especially

28:12

the ones that were being discovered in

28:13

the mountains here in the United States.

28:15

But it's pervasive. In Peru, there's

28:18

legends of giants.

28:20

And uh the natives, the indigenous

28:23

peoples absolutely believe there was a

28:25

primordial race of giants. The same

28:27

thing in Central America. They believed

28:28

there was a primordial race of giants

28:30

that was destroyed in the cataclysm,

28:31

specifically a flood. That's what the

28:34

Inca believed that Beakocha, the guy

28:36

created first a race of giants, but they

28:38

were they were they were stupid and evil

28:40

and so he destroyed them in a flood.

28:42

Same same story down in up in Mexico.

28:45

and among the Aztec and the Native

28:49

Americans, the six-finger redhaired

28:50

giants and so forth. So, there's a lot

28:52

of um historical context and I would and

28:56

of course it's anecdotal, but it's but

28:59

how much anecdotal evidence just at one

29:01

point does anecdotal evidence just

29:03

become evidence when there's when it's

29:04

so pervasive all over the world,

29:07

>> right? So,

29:09

um, as I was traveling around the world

29:12

studying giants and researching this

29:13

topic and investigating different

29:15

stories and legends,

29:17

um, I went to Malta, which is very

29:20

interesting. Obviously, lots of legends

29:21

of giants in Malta associated with the

29:23

megaliths. And then, and then I kind of

29:25

hit ground zero for giants, which is the

29:28

island of Sardinia.

29:30

And the island of Sardinia is located

29:32

west of of Rome. It's part of Italy.

29:35

It's in the western Mediterranean. below

29:37

below Corsica.

29:40

And many people don't realize this about

29:42

Sardinia, but Sardinia has the highest

29:46

um has the most megaliths anywhere on

29:51

Earth. It has the highest concentration

29:53

of megaliths anywhere that I've been as

29:56

far as I'm aware of.

29:59

There there are these massive megalithic

30:01

towers called Nuragi

30:04

that were constructed allegedly by the

30:08

uh or conventionally by the uh Nuragi

30:12

the neurogic civilization bronze age

30:14

civilization

30:16

and there are today still at least 7,000

30:20

of these things standing you can go to

30:22

Sardinia and see 7,000

30:24

new ragi towers there at one time 10 to

30:27

30,000

30:29

of these megalithic towers and some of

30:32

these towers stood over 100 ft tall.

30:35

>> Chammy, can we see some pictures of

30:37

these?

30:37

>> I'm trying to figure out [snorts]

30:39

>> Yeah. How would he look?

30:40

>> Nurogi.

30:41

>> Sardinia.

30:42

>> Nurrai.

30:42

>> Nurogi. Three different things. So I

30:44

don't I guess this is it.

30:47

Is that Yeah, that's what it is.

30:50

>> So what is the timeline of this neurogic

30:53

how do you say it? Neurogic.

30:54

>> The neurogic civilization. It's the

30:56

bronze age.

30:57

>> Yeah, the bronze age. So, what is that?

30:58

>> 3,300 to 3,300 BC to about 1,200 BC.

31:03

>> And that's what this stuff is from.

31:05

>> And um they say it was they say that

31:07

these were built in the bronze bronze

31:08

age. That's the the conventional idea.

31:11

And again, there's 7,000 of them on the

31:14

island today,

31:16

but there were up up to I've seen

31:17

estimates up to 30,000 including at the

31:19

museum in Sardinia.

31:23

And aside from these towers, they also

31:26

have these are, by the way, these are

31:28

megalithic. So these are these are

31:30

megalithic towers that are constructed

31:32

in the cyclopian style. And cyclopian

31:36

masonry, cyclopian architecture is the

31:38

trademark of megaliths worldwide. And

31:41

cyclopian this is the this is the the

31:45

archaeological term for the technique.

31:48

cyclopian referencing the great cyclopes

31:50

of of Greek mythology who were believed

31:52

to be the inventors of tower building

31:55

and you know the builders the offspring

31:57

of the gods who were the great builders

31:58

and masons

32:00

um that's the that's the mythology but

32:04

the trademark of cyclopian architecture

32:06

is that these these are large stones

32:08

that are fitted together without the use

32:10

of any binding agent like mortar without

32:11

any kind of mortar and you have you have

32:15

ex exquisite examples of cyclopian

32:17

masonry in different parts of the earth

32:19

like in Peru the walls of Sakaiwaman are

32:22

are absolutely amazing, breathtakingly

32:25

um

32:27

beautiful in regard to their design and

32:29

the the polygonal

32:31

um tightly fitting blocks, immense

32:33

blocks of stone. Whereas in Sardinia,

32:37

these are crude blocks. the crudely uh

32:40

worked blocks of of bassalt and granite

32:43

and limestone that are fitted together

32:46

but without the use of mortar. So they

32:47

are built in the cyclopian style. Again

32:49

some of them were 100 ft tall and they

32:52

had a some of them were for defensive

32:55

purposes and they some of them had a

32:57

wooden platform that crowned the top and

33:00

that platform was buttressed by other

33:02

very large stones that were that were

33:04

finally cut sometimes bassalt. I've I've

33:06

seen some of these stones in Sardinia

33:08

and I've been to the island a few times

33:09

researching the towers and giants

33:13

and um aside from the towers, these

33:16

megalithic towers, you also have

33:18

megalithic tombs which are called to

33:21

this day the tombs of the giants

33:25

and you can go and visit them. There

33:26

were um there's 800 of them extent today

33:30

and archaeologists believe there were

33:32

many more in the past. Someone knows

33:33

exactly how many, but often times it

33:35

seems to me that the towers and the

33:37

tombs are closely associated. They

33:39

fulfill a function I think that is um

33:43

that is inter interrelated

33:46

and the megalithic tombs of the giants,

33:50

the legends in according to legend in

33:52

Sardinia,

33:54

uh they were associated with the bodies

33:56

of giants. But of course today you have

33:58

armchair archaeologists who say that's

34:00

just a myth. There's you couldn't even

34:02

fit bodies inside of these tombs. Yes,

34:05

you could. I mean, none of these guys

34:06

have ever bothered to go to Sardinia

34:07

with a with a tape measure. I did. And

34:10

yes, you can. You can you can fit the

34:13

bodies of nine 8 n 10 foot tall guys in

34:15

these tombs without a problem. And

34:18

there's two different styles of

34:19

megalithic tombs in Sardinia. You have

34:21

the steelely style which it's um

34:27

it's there's a large steely stone, a

34:29

monolithic stone in the front with a

34:31

little doorway in it. And a doorway is

34:33

almost like a little doggy door at the

34:34

bottom,

34:36

but it's big enough. I mean, a a young

34:38

person could crawl through it. Uh and

34:41

then you have the triilathon doorway,

34:43

this style of megalithic tomb, which is

34:45

a larger doorway. You still have to,

34:47

like a guy my size would still have to

34:48

bend down to get inside. But the tombs

34:50

are configured the same. They're shaped

34:51

the same. These two different styles.

34:54

And what a lot of people misunderstand

34:58

about the tombs is the tombs were not

35:01

built to house the bodies of giants.

35:05

They were built on top of the interred

35:08

giant.

35:10

So the giant was inhumed beneath the

35:11

tomb. It was buried beneath the tomb and

35:14

then the edifice was built on top. So

35:16

that opening

35:17

>> where are you getting this information?

35:18

Oh,

35:19

>> this is known in Sardinia. Um I spent a

35:22

lot of time researching the the the

35:24

tombs of the giants in Sardinia and

35:26

talking to various experts. Um

35:28

>> and who are these experts like local

35:30

historians like what

35:31

>> some of them? Yeah. One there's there's

35:33

you can go to the um you can also go to

35:35

the museums in Sardinia and read a lot

35:37

of this stuff. Um, now the I have a

35:41

friend named Paula Loy who's uh she's a

35:46

she's a I think she's the best tour

35:47

guide in Sardinia and she's extremely

35:50

knowledgeable about all this stuff. She

35:51

take you to the museum and you walk

35:52

through all of this information with her

35:54

and they have little models in the

35:55

museum

35:57

of the the tombs of the giants. And

36:00

there's a legend in Sardinia that it's

36:04

that it's it's called the it's called

36:06

the right of incubation.

36:09

And this is a necroantic right that was

36:11

practiced by the Sardinians. And it

36:14

describes the purpose of the tombs. So

36:16

the tombs when you walk into the tombs,

36:17

again, they're megalithic. The walls are

36:19

megalithic. Some pretty large stones

36:21

incorporated in these tombs. When you

36:23

walk into the tombs, there's a gallery

36:25

inside and the the gallery is rather

36:28

large. You could fit a body vagina in

36:30

there, but that's beside the point

36:31

because that's not the purpose of the

36:32

tomb. The purpose of the tomb of the

36:36

gallery inside the tomb is to

36:40

uh is for the it's to accommodate a

36:45

young person during a right of passage.

36:49

And dur in during the bronze age, you're

36:51

talking about boys from 12 to 14 years

36:53

old, right? generally speaking. And they

36:56

would go into the tomb alone and they

36:59

would be sealed in the tomb. So that

37:01

little doggy door that's in the stelle,

37:04

the steely version of the tombs of the

37:07

giants, they would crawl in there and

37:08

then they would be sealed inside. And

37:10

there's a little um on most of those

37:12

steelely tombs, there's a little hole at

37:15

the top as well. So there's so it's not

37:17

like they're they're sealed in there and

37:19

they can't breathe or anything. No, they

37:21

they they would go in there and they

37:23

would spend some days in the tomb alone.

37:25

>> This is what it looks like.

37:26

>> That's one of the doors with the steely

37:29

monolithic stone. And they're all shaped

37:31

the same. It's hard to tell because

37:33

they've been disassembled. Many of them

37:34

have been disassembled.

37:37

But you can see they're the triilon.

37:39

That's a triilon tomb.

37:42

That's a that's something else. That's a

37:43

well. Um but the tombs are all sh you

37:46

can see down there. See right the

37:47

picture right below that one. There you

37:49

go. See how the tombs are shaped?

37:51

>> Yeah.

37:53

>> Now, that's how all these tombs are

37:54

shaped that way. This has to do with the

37:56

right of incubation. So, the young

37:58

person would go inside the gallery.

37:59

They'd be sealed inside that young boy,

38:01

and they would The purpose of this was

38:02

to incubate inside of the gallery in

38:06

order to be empowered and energized by

38:08

the spirit of the mighty one buried

38:11

beneath the tomb. And again, according

38:13

to legend, the mighty ones were giants.

38:16

So I don't think it's coincidental that

38:17

the tombs are actually shaped like a

38:20

womb. If you look at that the the the

38:23

view of the tomb from above.

38:26

Originally when I was um researching

38:28

this in Sardinia I thought it was shaped

38:30

like a bull's head which would be

38:33

something like uh the iconographic of

38:36

Molech or something like that

38:37

Canaanitish.

38:39

But I I realized that actually this is

38:41

shaped like a womb. The tomb looks like

38:43

a womb. If you pull up a womb, you'll

38:46

see what I mean. It looks it looks like

38:47

a womb, shaped like a womb. And and this

38:50

was to accommodate the right of

38:51

incubation.

38:53

And so these young people, the idea is

38:55

they're in there, they are communing,

38:59

incubating in the presence of the dead

39:01

hero buried beneath and they're

39:04

absorbing their spirit, their prowess.

39:08

And then the tomb is unsealed and the

39:10

young person emerges from the womb as it

39:12

were.

39:15

It's like a new birth. They're now they

39:16

went in a boy. They're now coming out a

39:18

man empowered by the spirit of the of

39:20

their ancestral heroes. So these are

39:24

these are called to this day the tombs

39:26

of the giants. Now you can say, well

39:29

that's just that's just mythology.

39:31

That's just Sardinian legend. The

39:33

problem is

39:35

you can interview people or at least you

39:37

could in times past interview Sardinians

39:41

all across the island who have

39:43

themselves dug up the bones of giants or

39:46

encountered the bones of giants in in in

39:49

some kind of a in some context usually

39:52

around the towers the Nuragi towers. I

39:56

interviewed dozens of people in

39:57

Sardinia, most of them elderly,

40:00

who had themselves encountered the bo

40:03

the bones of giants in in different

40:05

contexts while plowing in fields. They

40:07

they they pull up bones [snorts] or they

40:10

would find the bones in the tombs or

40:12

whatever. And it's very easy to dismiss

40:15

the whole thing as well, they were just

40:16

digging up megapona, right? The bones of

40:19

mastadons and giant sloths. The problem

40:21

is some of these bones had jewelry. Some

40:25

of them had had Roman coins associated

40:27

with them. Some of them had rings on the

40:29

fingers and necklaces around the the the

40:31

neck, the collar and and they would

40:36

actually the the the and the most of

40:37

these were old-timers because um

40:42

this doesn't it's not really happening

40:43

anymore in Sardinia. This is something

40:44

that was happening in the 60s, 50s, 40s,

40:46

30s and and back. But especially between

40:49

like post World War II when the island

40:52

was undergoing a process of

40:54

industrialization and they were building

40:56

new roads and and and digging for

40:59

foundations and stuff. They were they

41:00

were digging up the bones of giants. And

41:02

there's a um there's a particular church

41:05

called Santa Anastasia in Sardinia.

41:09

Uh and it's in the region of Sada. And I

41:13

interviewed two gentlemen in in

41:15

Sardinia. Two guys who were officially

41:18

employed by the municipality and by the

41:20

university of Kajetti. Kajetti is the

41:22

capital city of Sardinia. They were

41:24

specifically employed to excavate the

41:26

ruins, the neurogic ruins on the

41:29

premises of the church of Santanastasia.

41:32

Santastasia is a small little Catholic

41:34

church. But if you go there, you'll see

41:36

that even today you can see the remains

41:38

of a neurogic settlement there. There's

41:42

a there there are Nuragi towers there.

41:44

It's just it's it's an archaeological

41:46

site. And these two individuals, one of

41:49

them, his name was Jeppe, the other's

41:50

name was Roberto. And Jeppe worked there

41:53

from um he worked there from I believe

41:57

it was uh 1979 to 1981. And then Roberto

42:02

worked there from 1982 to 1984.

42:06

Both of these guys employed officially

42:07

in an official capacity from the

42:09

municipality of Sada to do this

42:12

excavation.

42:13

And so they would be their the protocol

42:16

was you go and you excavate the ruins

42:19

and all the artifacts you find get put

42:22

into the church. So all the artifacts

42:24

went into the church of Santastasia. And

42:25

you can see this church by the way if

42:26

you pull it up it's called Sant

42:27

Anastasia in Sardinia. And all the bones

42:31

were put into the church. All the

42:33

artifacts were put into the church.

42:35

And among the artifacts that were being

42:37

collected were the skeletons of giants

42:41

and not mastadons, not giants.

42:44

>> Photographs of these things.

42:45

>> These guys they well of course not but

42:47

these guys were uh very reluctant to

42:50

talk to us. The one guy Roberto was very

42:53

nervous. He said we were told never to

42:56

talk about this. This never happened.

42:58

Again this was back in the 80s. He

43:00

didn't think anything of it. He wasn't

43:01

told go to Santa Anastasia and and look

43:04

for the bones of giants. He was just

43:05

told go excavate the site. He was one of

43:07

the excavators at Santastasia. And the

43:09

whole thing was being

43:12

um the whole thing was being supervised

43:13

by the municipality and the and the

43:15

university and and he dug up personally.

43:19

He said he dug up the bodies, two

43:21

bodies, 10 foot tall guys, full

43:23

skeletons, and he laid them out in the

43:26

these ones he laid out in the courtyard

43:28

of the church. And he said he he

43:31

notified the people in Kajetti of the

43:33

discovery. And what would happen is all

43:35

the artifacts that would go into the

43:36

church or in this case outside of the

43:38

church, somebody would come at night and

43:40

take them all away. So they get there in

43:43

the morning, all the artifacts are gone.

43:44

He didn't know where they went. Um the

43:47

other individual, Jeppe, he also

43:50

excavated giants from Santastasia.

43:53

various various uh artifacts related to

43:56

the giants, gigantic plates, gigantic

43:59

cups and goblets, chalicees. Um they

44:02

excavated they excavated a lot of

44:04

different artifacts, rings and and and

44:06

earrings and necklaces and all kinds of

44:09

all manner of artifacts. And he told me

44:13

that he remembers a particular case in

44:15

which he and his wife his wife was

44:16

helping on this particular day. They're

44:18

excavating in the ruins and they found a

44:21

skull that was so large. He said the

44:22

skulls were three to four times larger

44:24

than ours. He found this skull that was

44:26

very large and it had part of the

44:28

vertebrae attached. Some of these

44:29

remains were not just skeletal. There

44:31

was like almost like mummified.

44:34

And and he and his wife together carried

44:37

it into the church. He told me that

44:39

while they were digging, they they

44:41

unsealed a compartment

44:44

inside of one of the towers. There's

44:47

this large room that was sealed like the

44:51

it was just it had collapsed or whatever

44:52

it was sealed and they opened it up and

44:55

they went inside and there was a giant

44:58

this very large person sitting at a

45:00

table and and there were there's a

45:05

really large plate and a oversized

45:07

chalice there and and he even had he was

45:10

eating oysters and muscles and clams

45:13

that were still on the plate and he was

45:15

very large. I mean, these guys are

45:17

they're when I say large, they're 9 to

45:19

12 feet tall. That's how tall these guys

45:21

are. And they were it was remarkable. He

45:24

was extremely well preserved and because

45:26

apparently he had been almost like

45:28

hermetically sealed in this thing. And

45:30

so they they took all the artifacts and

45:33

the bones and put them into the church

45:35

and the next day they were all gone. I

45:37

mean, this was the procedure. It was the

45:39

these guys uncovered a lot of

45:40

interesting stuff at those at that that

45:42

one particular

45:45

um that one particular excavation at the

45:47

church of Santastasia in Sard in Sarda

45:50

and he they were filling the church up

45:52

with so many artifacts that Jeppe told

45:54

me that he went over to the mayor and he

45:58

told the mayor is there anywhere else

45:59

that we can put these bones these

46:01

artifacts because we're running out of

46:02

space in the church

46:04

and he was surprised at the mayor's

46:07

response. The mayor looked at him and

46:08

said, "Mind your own effing business.

46:12

Put the artifacts in the church and shut

46:14

your mouth." So, um, these are the kind

46:18

of stories I would hear all the time in

46:20

Sardinia. I mean, I could go on and on

46:22

and on. I talked to one guy that was,

46:24

uh, Sai Vergilio was his name. He was

46:28

100 years old. Very, um, very

46:31

interesting guy. And Sai had, uh, been

46:34

on a site when he was a young man. He he

46:36

he told me a couple of stories, but he

46:38

told me that he was he was he was

46:41

working in a vineyard one time and they

46:44

were excavating and this they weren't

46:46

excavating, they were they were tilling

46:47

the soil to plant a vineyard. And

46:51

[snorts] as they're tilling the soil,

46:52

they start to dig up bones and they

46:55

realize these are very large skeletal

46:57

remains.

46:59

And they were they found like 20 of them

47:02

and they were laying on top of each

47:03

other in a crisscross pattern.

47:06

And so as soon as they started to find

47:07

these bones, the owner of the vineyard

47:09

said, "Stop. Stop. I have to notify the

47:11

authorities." So he notifies the

47:13

authorities and he came back to the

47:14

workers and said, "You guys have to get

47:16

out of here. The authorities are coming.

47:17

You have to leave now." And Sai said

47:20

that everyone left, but he hid in the

47:23

bushes until everyone had left. And he

47:26

went back to work in the field because

47:28

he wanted he said, "I needed the money

47:29

and I wanted to actually get paid for

47:30

the day's wage." So I went back and I

47:32

worked and I kept tilling the field and

47:35

he said all of a sudden

47:37

well the the owner of the field came

47:39

back and he said, "What are you doing

47:40

here? I told you to leave." And he said,

47:42

"I needed the money, so I'm going to

47:44

keep working." And the guy said, "No,

47:45

no, I'll pay you double. Just get out of

47:46

here." And while they're talking, the

47:48

government guys pull up. And they they

47:50

pull up in some various vans and they

47:54

come out and they they start taking

47:56

pictures of all the bones

47:58

and they they take pictures of the bones

48:01

of these skele skeletal remains that are

48:04

laying in these cross configurations and

48:07

then they load them all into the vans

48:09

and then they went up into the nearby

48:10

nur. There was a uh a nur there, one of

48:12

these megalithic towers, and they were

48:15

inside the new ra looking at something,

48:17

taking pictures, and so I said that they

48:20

they sealed up like with cement, they

48:23

sealed up this this um tunnel, this this

48:27

something inside of it.

48:29

And then they and then they left.

48:32

And I heard dozens of these kind of

48:34

stories in Sardinia. Dozens. These

48:36

people have no reason to lie to me. I

48:38

mean, these are most of these are

48:39

old-timers. They we didn't pay them. Um,

48:43

they they you know, they live out in the

48:46

country. I don't know if you've ever

48:47

been ever been to Sardinia. It's it's

48:48

it's it's like going back in time in

48:50

Italy. These are very simple people that

48:52

live out in the country, but as I said

48:55

earlier, the bones, these giants are

48:56

being found with artifacts.

48:59

Sorry to interrupt, but I'm looking at a

49:00

story, but they're they're talking about

49:02

finding skeletons there. They're calling

49:04

them skeletons. They're calling them

49:06

giants, but they're referring to

49:07

statues. And they're

49:09

>> those are the the giants of Monte Prada.

49:12

Those are um

49:14

>> those different

49:15

>> those are statues. Those are giants of

49:17

Monte Pra.

49:18

>> I there's I mean there's news articles.

49:20

Goes back to the 70s.

49:21

>> Yeah, those are just statues. Yeah,

49:23

those are in a museum there.

49:24

>> But they call them skeletons is the only

49:26

thing I was saying. So there's like a

49:26

little

49:27

>> No, they're they're they're stone.

49:29

They're in the museum. I know

49:30

>> they're about seven feet tall, I think.

49:32

Um, some people wonder if those are

49:34

actually

49:35

>> uncovered skeletons. I saw another

49:37

article here where it said like they

49:38

found two giant skulls, but they're

49:41

talking about

49:43

>> the statues.

49:45

>> Yeah, those some people wonder if those

49:47

statues actually represented the, you

49:49

know, the the anatomical proportions of

49:52

the giants. I I don't know. I don't know

49:54

that that's the case, but yeah, that's

49:56

about all you're going to hear if you go

49:58

through. just seems insane that there's

50:01

not [snorts] a photo something of all

50:05

these things or that some wealthy crazy

50:09

person didn't get a hold of someone and

50:12

say, "Listen, I'll give you $10 million.

50:14

Get me a hand." You know, I want to put

50:17

it in a glass case in my house. We know

50:19

that they've done that with Egyptian

50:21

stuff. Like a lot of Egyptian artifacts

50:23

have been pilered.

50:24

>> Yep. Artifacts from Lot of artifacts

50:26

from Peru.

50:27

>> Yes. Central and South America. Yeah,

50:29

there's a there's a very robust black

50:30

market,

50:31

>> which is so wild. Like, who are these

50:33

people that have these things?

50:34

>> That's a good question. Well, I was told

50:36

in Sardinia, they told me that in some

50:38

cases they

50:40

the the bones were confiscated.

50:43

Um, they were gathered up and thrown

50:45

into into vehicles and carted away. Um,

50:49

Sai told me another story where he was

50:51

digging a foundation for a house. He and

50:53

he and an associate [snorts] and they

50:55

they came upon a very large sarcophagus

50:58

and they pried it open and he said there

51:00

was a body of a very large person

51:02

inside. And it had a black it was

51:04

wearing some sort of black fabric. And

51:05

there were coins uh that that were uh

51:10

that were minted from um Antoninus pious

51:14

the Roman emperor from that time. And

51:17

they reported there was a local priest

51:19

and they told the priest that they found

51:21

a body, right? Like we found a dead

51:22

body. What do we do? And so the priest

51:24

came over and he looked down in the pit.

51:26

He said, "Give me the coins." They gave

51:28

him the coins. He said, 'Break the bones

51:30

up and and and distribute them in the

51:31

foundation of the house. I mean, this

51:34

was, you know, if you went to Sardinia

51:36

today, I think you you you would think

51:37

to yourself, okay, yeah, I can see how

51:40

there's no one's taking pictures or

51:41

anything over here. This is like going

51:43

way back in time in Italy, especially

51:46

um especially back in the 40s, 50s, and

51:49

60s when most of these things happened.

51:51

Now the the excavations at Santastasia

51:53

happened in the late '7s, early 80s, but

51:56

all these other stories are coming from

51:57

the you know 60s, '50s, 40s. So um I I

52:02

mean there was just so many people who I

52:05

talked to you know random people would

52:07

tell me as I interviewed them that oh

52:09

yeah yeah I was digging in my basement

52:11

one time and you know years ago and and

52:13

and I dug up a hand. It was it was a

52:16

hand five fingers and you know it was it

52:18

was three times the size of my hand. No,

52:20

that's

52:21

>> five fingers.

52:22

>> Yeah, that's random. That could just be,

52:24

you know, megapon or something. I don't

52:26

know how many what a giant sloth hand

52:28

looks like or whatever. And let me say

52:29

this, there is no question, none, no

52:32

question,

52:33

>> that a lot of the accounts that you hear

52:35

about giants, not the ones associated

52:37

with coins and jewelry, but a lot of the

52:39

accounts that you hear about giants and

52:41

the skeletons of giants, they do have

52:43

prosaic explanations. A lot of them do

52:46

end up being megapana bones, especially

52:49

giant sloths and stuff like that. There

52:50

was a case in Peru, actually was in

52:52

Ecuador. This is referenced in the

52:54

Chronicles of Peru that there's a place

52:56

called Santa Elena, and it's the p it's

52:58

a peninsula in in Ecuador.

53:01

And um there's various chronicers who

53:05

talk about this and these are the

53:07

chronicers who chronicle the the history

53:09

of the conquest of Peru. you know, the

53:11

the Piso and the and the Conquistadors

53:14

who defeated the Inca and and

53:18

they say that, you know, there was a

53:20

race of giants that there was giants

53:22

came the natives told the concistadors

53:24

and and the chronicers that according to

53:26

legend, giants came over the sea on

53:30

large reedboats.

53:31

And these giants were were they were

53:33

very very large and they had they had

53:35

red hair and uh some of them were naked

53:39

and some of them were dressed in in in

53:42

um very primitive clothing and they

53:45

landed on the shores of Santena, one of

53:47

the places they landed and they began to

53:49

terrorize the local population. The the

53:51

the indigenous people hated them because

53:53

they were they were eating all of the

53:56

food. I mean they they they the natives

53:57

said that they consumed 50 times um the

54:01

the amount of food is as a regular sized

54:03

person [snorts]

54:05

and and so the natives hated them. They

54:07

said that the giants built these deep

54:09

wells. They dug these really deep wells

54:11

which you could still see. The

54:12

concisador said we could still see them

54:13

today. They built these houses with very

54:15

large blocks and huge beams of wood

54:17

which were still there when the

54:19

concisadors were writing about this in

54:20

the in the 16th and or 17th and 18th

54:24

centuries.

54:26

And and according to legend, these

54:28

giants, they were sodomites and they

54:32

didn't have any women with them

54:33

[clears throat] and they were basically

54:35

struck down by God. And um the natives

54:39

have that and other legends regarding

54:42

giants being destroyed by God in various

54:44

ways. But it turns out that Santena

54:50

is

54:52

it's one of the the most um important

54:55

sites for megapona bones and there's

54:58

tons of megapon especially giant sloths.

55:01

So you have lots of megapona bones in

55:03

Santaena.

55:05

And I have no doubt that the the the the

55:10

natives and um

55:12

the people living during that time um in

55:16

the aftermath of the conquest of of the

55:18

Inca Empire thought that those were the

55:20

bones of giants.

55:21

>> Right. Because there was no giant sloths

55:23

alive at that time.

55:24

>> Exactly. and and and in some of the

55:27

accounts you can see where they're

55:28

saying in the giants and and you know we

55:30

we uncovered a giant that was had a

55:32

deformed body and I thought oh that's

55:35

probably a it's probably a giant sloth

55:37

or something right so yeah there's a lot

55:39

of that unquestionably and you have to

55:41

be very careful as a researcher and in

55:43

the beginning I when I when I I this was

55:45

years ago when I first started out

55:47

researching this stuff I made the

55:48

mistake of of of just taking that story

55:53

literally and believing oh yeah they

55:54

were digging up bones of giants Santaena

55:56

until I realized that that is like one

55:58

of the best places in the world to find

56:01

megapona bones. So obviously you have to

56:03

concede to the facts of reality. They're

56:05

digging up megapona there. However,

56:08

however,

56:09

there are other stories that come from

56:12

the chronicles in Peru where there's no

56:15

way they're talking about megapana.

56:17

And these stories come from the same

56:20

chronicers who from which we derive from

56:23

the same text from which we derive the

56:25

history of the conquest of Peru. The

56:26

same guys

56:28

like Bernab Kobo and Antonio de La

56:30

Kalancha and Pedro Sesa DeLeon all of

56:33

the you know the famous chroniclers.

56:36

And there's one case in particular I

56:38

find very intriguing. There's lots of

56:39

them. By the way, when I was in I was I

56:41

lived in Peru for 10 years at some point

56:43

and and then later on I went back to

56:45

Peru and doing various investigations

56:47

when I was looking into this, making

56:49

documentaries about giants. And when I

56:52

was in Peru, I was in Puno some years

56:54

ago, probably back in 2015, 2016, I was

56:57

in Puno and I met with an archaeologist

57:00

in Puno. His name was Edmundo de Laa,

57:04

very well-known archaeologist.

57:06

And um I asked him, "Hey, are there any

57:09

accounts of giants in the historical

57:11

records here?" And he said, "Yeah, I

57:15

think there's a there's a couple

57:16

accounts of giants."

57:18

And I said, "Okay." He said, "I I don't

57:20

think there's many, but I think there's

57:21

a couple." Okay. Well, the next morning,

57:23

he comes walking into my hotel in the

57:26

lobby, and he's got a big smile on his

57:27

face, and he hands me a disc

57:30

and he said, "I went after we talked, I

57:32

went into the archives." They have

57:34

access to the digital archives. and I

57:36

did a word search to try and see if I

57:38

could find some of these accounts of

57:39

giants. He said, "I cannot believe how

57:42

many references to giants there are in

57:44

the Chronicles." And he handed me the

57:46

disc and I I I opened the files and

57:49

indeed there were many. Now, some of

57:51

them were in reference to Santelena.

57:55

But some of them were much more

57:56

remarkable. For example, I'll give you

57:57

one example here.

58:00

There was a a Jesuit priest named Pablo

58:03

Jose Ariaga who was going around Peru

58:07

and he wrote a book called the

58:08

exterpation of idolatry in Peru. I think

58:11

it was 1602

58:13

and he's he's going around Peru with the

58:17

what are called which were called the

58:18

BCadores who were the these were um

58:23

officials. There were clergymen that

58:26

were dispatched to Peru

58:29

who were extrepating idolatry. These

58:31

were the they were very fair at these

58:32

people, these BCor, these official um

58:36

idolatry hunters basically because they

58:39

were brutal. And what they would do is

58:41

they would go with the priests into the

58:43

villages. They would find out what are

58:45

the natives worshiping and then they

58:47

would destroy it and then force convert

58:49

the popula the population.

58:52

And they they chronicled everything.

58:53

They they everything they found because

58:55

they had to. This was an official

58:56

assignment, right? So they chronicle

58:58

everything that they find. This village,

59:00

they go to this village, they're

59:01

worshiping this. We we we broke it into

59:03

pieces or we burned it in the fire. And

59:07

these are official records. And among

59:09

these records, and this is this comes

59:11

from, as I said, Pablo Jose Ariaga, but

59:13

also later on Antonio de la Kalancha,

59:15

who is a austinian monk. Um it enlarges

59:19

the story. He expands on the story using

59:21

other documents including uh um

59:26

including um Kal um um Ariyaga's version

59:30

and the story goes that Ariyaga and

59:33

Bicadores they went into the village and

59:36

they were led they inquired what are

59:38

what are you worshiping where are your

59:39

gods and the indigenous people of Peru

59:44

they they worshiped wakas and the waka

59:47

could be anything it could be an idol it

59:49

could be a mountain, it could be a hill,

59:51

it was just wacas. Even to this day,

59:53

they call them wacas. And so they

59:55

inquired, "Where are your wacas?" And

59:57

they led them to the other side of the

59:58

village where there was a large cave.

60:01

And they go into the cave. And when they

60:04

went in there, they they record that

60:06

there were many dead Gentiles.

60:09

And among them were two giants

60:13

dressed in kumbi and they were

60:16

enshrined.

60:18

Now that's very interesting. Kumbi.

60:19

>> Kumbi is a very fine fabric

60:23

that is um it was it was used

60:26

exclusively by the Inca nobility. In

60:29

fact, it was illegal for any anyone else

60:32

to wear kumbi. Only the Inca nobility

60:34

could wear kumbi. This very fine fabric.

60:37

So, it's very ceremonial and it belongs

60:40

by law to the noble class. So, these

60:43

indigenous people, they can't wear

60:44

kumbi. But yet they dressed these two

60:48

uh and and it said that the bodies were

60:50

were well preserved almost like

60:51

mummified. They dressed these two giants

60:54

in kumbi

60:57

and they were enshrined in this tomb.

61:00

And so when they realized that they were

61:01

worshiping these giants, these dead

61:03

giants and the natives told them that

61:05

these were their ancestors, these were

61:07

their progenitors. That's what they told

61:09

the the bicadores of idolatry. They took

61:14

the bodies out of the tomb and they

61:16

burned them in the village.

61:18

Now, that's very interesting to me

61:21

because you have two

61:23

um bodies, not just skeletal remains,

61:27

bodies of giants decayed with time, but

61:30

still quite well preserved, dressed in

61:33

kumbi. This doesn't sound like a giant

61:35

sloth to me. This doesn't sound like a

61:38

mastadon. This is something else. And it

61:42

corresponds to all the legends among the

61:45

natives there in in Peru regarding the

61:48

existence of giants who were their

61:50

progenitors.

61:53

So those are just those are some

61:54

historical details, some historical

61:55

accounts that I find very intriguing.

61:58

>> Well, there's so many of them. That's

61:59

what's weird. And is there's also this

62:01

very bizarre desire that people have of

62:04

destroying things from the past. Yeah.

62:06

Uh we find that with uh I mean the

62:09

Taliban did that. You know,

62:11

>> there's there's a bunch of different

62:15

incredible archaeological sites that

62:16

were destroyed by past civilizations. We

62:19

we just talked the other day about um

62:21

the the Kyasa temple in India about how

62:25

they tried to destroy that for a couple

62:27

years. They sent a thousand people and

62:29

they could barely put a dent in it.

62:31

>> Who was trying to destroy that?

62:32

>> Oh, who was it, Jamie? Do we remember?

62:35

>> Didn't like it. I don't know [laughter]

62:37

>> some some uh [clears throat]

62:39

>> warlord or general or something. I I'll

62:41

find out

62:43

>> who they they came upon this temple that

62:45

they they didn't like that someone else

62:47

had built it and someone else owned it

62:48

and someone else had constructed it.

62:50

Yeah. You know the [clears throat] Kyasa

62:51

temple that was built entirely out of

62:53

stone.

62:53

>> Yeah. The one that was built like

62:54

literally carved into the ground

62:56

>> into the side of the mountain.

62:57

>> Yeah.

62:58

>> Emperor. Say that name. You could say

63:00

it. You're really good with words.

63:02

>> Mugal was what's his name? Looks like

63:04

Mughal to me. I've never heard of that.

63:06

>> What's the second word? Orang.

63:09

>> I don't know.

63:09

>> Orang.

63:10

>> Orang.

63:11

>> Historical figure widely reported to

63:13

have ordered the destruction of the

63:14

Kyasa temple in 1682. However, his

63:17

mission failed because the monolithic

63:19

temple was carved top down from a single

63:21

solid volcanic rock. His army could only

63:24

disfigure some sculptures before giving

63:26

up.

63:26

>> Oh, this was in 1682. Yeah.

63:28

>> Yeah. But it's just wild that people

63:30

have always had this inclination to

63:32

destroy old fascinating things.

63:35

>> Yeah, that's right. Especially you find

63:37

this. What's really sad is in Central

63:39

America among the Aztec, the Maya, there

63:42

were many codeexes of the Aztec and the

63:44

Maya that were intentionally destroyed

63:46

by by um by the the Catholic Church by

63:50

various agents of the Catholic Church

63:52

would intentionally destroy these

63:53

codeexes. Could you imagine the

63:55

information that was stored in those

63:57

things? Well, how about the Library of

63:58

Alexandria?

63:59

>> Yeah.

63:59

>> I mean, who knows what was in there and

64:01

and they burnt that several times,

64:03

right?

64:04

>> It's um

64:05

>> there's the historical accounts in North

64:08

America are are interesting because

64:10

there's actual newspaper stories from

64:14

God, was it like I believe it's the

64:16

1800s. What do Do you know what I'm

64:19

talking about?

64:20

>> Yeah.

64:20

>> There are all kinds of newspaper stories

64:22

about giants in the 1800s. newspaper

64:23

stories about giant skeletons that have

64:25

been discovered and excavated.

64:27

>> Yes. From the mid 1800s to the early

64:29

1900s.

64:30

>> And somehow or another, they all relate

64:32

to the Smithsonian.

64:34

>> Most of them are associated with the

64:35

mountains and the mound builders. There

64:37

were thousands of mounds east of the

64:39

Mississippi. I mean, uh, people don't

64:42

realize how many of these mounds there

64:44

were. And these are, you know, the

64:46

monumental mounds and earthwork. Some of

64:48

them still stand today. Not all of them

64:50

are burial mounds. You have different

64:52

kinds of mounds. Some of them are

64:53

effiges. Some of them are platform

64:55

mounds, but many of them are burial

64:57

mounds. And many of them contain contain

65:00

very prosaic things like the bones of

65:02

native people. But some of them were

65:05

said to have contained some very very

65:07

interesting artifacts. And among those

65:10

artifacts were the bones of giants

65:11

according to the newspaper reports. Now

65:13

>> see if you can find

65:15

>> there's a lot of them from the 1800s.

65:19

>> Yeah. I mean 10 ft high. 1872.

65:22

>> Yes.

65:22

>> Yeah. Especially in the in the latter

65:24

part of the 1800s.

65:25

>> How tall was it, Jimmy?

65:26

>> I mean, it's just it's a

65:27

>> giant over 10 feet high according to

65:29

Lewis and Richard Collins history

65:31

history of Kentucky.

65:34

>> Now, the the contention is, of course,

65:36

that that these are wildly exaggerated

65:39

and that the newspapers were engaging in

65:42

in hyperbole.

65:44

And that's true to some extent. I have

65:45

no problem with that. I think

65:47

>> hoaxes. I've brought this up.

65:48

>> Some of them were hoaxes. A whole lot of

65:50

hoaxes out there.

65:51

>> Sure. Some of them are hoaxes and they

65:52

and then you know these are the

65:53

periodicals of the United States at the

65:54

time were very competitive.

65:56

>> What is that photo? Is that [ __ ]

65:57

That far-left photo?

65:58

>> Yeah.

65:59

>> Now now that far left one

66:01

>> that one was actually that's a disputed

66:04

one. Um some people believe that that

66:06

one is in fact um was proven a hoax.

66:08

Other people think there might be a

66:09

conspiracy that in fact it wasn't a hoax

66:12

because it was actually on display for a

66:13

while. Um I don't I don't know. I don't

66:16

think there's any way to know but um so

66:20

many articles during that time were

66:23

discussing these astounding dis

66:26

discoveries of the bones of giants and

66:28

mountains. In fact, um I don't know if

66:31

you're aware, but even it it appears

66:33

that even Abraham Lincoln references

66:35

this in some lecture notes. He was

66:37

waxing poetically in some lecture notes

66:40

about Niagara Falls. And he says in

66:42

those notes, you can still read them

66:43

today. You can pull them up and read

66:44

them now.

66:45

He says, "The the eyes of that extinct

66:48

species of giants whose bones fill the

66:51

mounds of America have gazed upon

66:53

Niagara as ours do now." Those are from

66:56

Lincoln's lecture notes.

66:57

>> Really?

66:57

>> I believe it's 1845, the date of those

66:59

notes.

67:00

>> Oh, I got to read that.

67:01

>> And now, now here's the contention.

67:02

Okay, this is interesting because here's

67:04

the contention.

67:05

>> Okay,

67:05

>> the contention is that he was talking

67:06

about mastadons and and um mammoths

67:10

megapona,

67:11

>> right? Um, that's what people say

67:13

because he does mention Macedon and and

67:16

and the mammoth later on in in the in

67:19

the lecture in the speech. However, what

67:23

they won't tell you is before he

67:24

mentions that, he's talking he's in a

67:26

biblical context

67:28

and he's talking about he references

67:31

uh Jesus and Moses and Adam right before

67:35

he references the giants whose bones are

67:37

found in the mounds of America. See, so

67:41

the eyes of that species of extinct

67:43

giants whose bones filled the mounds of

67:45

America have gazed upon Niagara as ours

67:48

do now. Contemporary with the whole race

67:51

of men older than the first man. Niagara

67:56

as strong and fresh to today as 10,000

67:59

years ago. The mammoth and Macedon now

68:02

so long dead that fragments of their

68:05

monstrous bones alone testify that they

68:08

ever lived have gazed upon gazed on

68:11

Niagara

68:12

in that long long time never still for a

68:15

single moment never dried never froze

68:17

never slept never rested that seems like

68:19

he's talking about mastadons it very

68:22

well he very well could be

68:23

>> talking about the thousands of miles of

68:25

water that they all would have seen

68:28

>> well he could be talking about mastadons

68:30

and mammoth. But look what he references

68:31

before he gets to the giants. Christ and

68:33

Moses.

68:34

>> Where's that?

68:34

>> And Adam.

68:35

>> He says there's still more. It calls up

68:37

an indefinite past. When Columbus first

68:39

sought this continent, when Christ

68:40

suffered on the cross, when Moses led

68:42

Israel through the Red Sea, nay, even

68:44

when Adam was made

68:46

>> and he's talking in a, you know,

68:48

>> right? So here he's invisible.

68:49

>> Came from the hand of his maker. And as

68:52

now Niagara was roaring here, the eyes

68:55

of that species of extinct giants whose

68:57

bones filled the mounds of America.

68:59

That's what's weird. Now listen,

69:01

>> the bones filled the mounds of America.

69:03

>> So here's the question. Did

69:06

were the mounds of America filled with

69:08

the bones of Macedons and and giant

69:10

sloths? And

69:11

>> no,

69:11

>> no, they weren't. Now, there have been

69:14

some fragments of bones from mammoths

69:16

and mastadons found in the mountains.

69:18

That's true. They were they looked to be

69:21

um ritual pieces that people were buried

69:24

with that were used for ceremonial

69:26

purposes or something like that. Maybe

69:28

some of them were carved ornately, but

69:30

like people weren't digging up the

69:32

skeletons of giant sloths and mastadons

69:34

and mammoths in the mounds routinely.

69:36

That was it was very rare,

69:37

>> right? But it seems like if you found

69:40

dead giants in the mounds that it would

69:43

be more specific, you would talk about

69:45

it more than just that. I don't know.

69:48

>> I don't know either.

69:49

>> The reference is is is ambiguous. So,

69:51

we're left to wonder, is he talking

69:53

about dead giants

69:55

>> in the biblical context, which he's

69:57

clearly in a biblical context before he

69:59

gets there, or is he talking about

70:01

Macedons?

70:02

>> And the issue is that there are giants

70:03

in the Bible.

70:04

>> And also that when he wrote when he

70:06

pinned this these lecture notes, there

70:08

were newspaper articles circulating in

70:10

the United States announcing the

70:12

discovery of the bones of giants in the

70:14

mountains.

70:14

>> Right. So, it's a it's a it's it's up

70:17

for debate. I don't know the answer.

70:19

>> There's got to be somebody who works at

70:21

the Smithsonian

70:22

that is sick of this.

70:25

>> Yeah.

70:25

>> There's got to be someone. We need that

70:27

guy.

70:27

>> There's got to be some whistleblower

70:29

>> that just take your [ __ ] camera

70:32

phone, [laughter]

70:34

>> get down there and film something, man.

70:37

It just it seems like if there really

70:40

are

70:41

some remnants of some of these things

70:46

and then the thing that's interesting is

70:48

you know what is the uh museum that John

70:53

Reeves has issue with

70:56

>> the National American History Museum. I

70:58

think I don't it's I know it's in

71:01

Manhattan. I don't

71:03

>> So my friend John Reeves are you aware

71:05

of him? He owns the the boneyard in

71:08

Alaska.

71:09

>> No.

71:09

>> Okay.

71:10

>> So, this this area of Ala John's a minor

71:13

and uh he Museum of Natural History. So,

71:17

he's a minor and he bought this land in

71:21

um Alaska and they're doing gold mining

71:23

and they're blasting into the perafrost

71:26

with hoses and they have found an

71:28

enormous amount of mammoths.

71:31

>> Yeah.

71:32

um cave bears, animals that weren't even

71:35

supposed to be living in Alaska at the

71:37

time. So now they have to like

71:38

reformulate their idea of what the

71:41

population of this this these lands were

71:44

at this time, but also a layer of like

71:48

dark carbon that indicates there there

71:50

was some sort of an event. All of this

71:52

is sub 10,000 years ago. So he's finding

71:55

I mean he has warehouses and this is

71:58

like fully go to the boneyard Instagram

72:01

please.

72:02

>> He he has warehouses of this stuff that

72:05

he's pulled out of the ground. He won't

72:07

let anyone take it because the Museum of

72:09

Natural History has some of this stuff

72:11

from the previous owners. They have tons

72:14

of it and they would not release it to

72:16

him even though it's his property.

72:18

>> So this is I mean he's finding enormous

72:22

mastadon skeletons. mammoth tusks.

72:25

>> I mean, they find tons of them. Tons. I

72:29

mean, he has warehouses. He built a

72:31

scientific research facility there, and

72:33

he's like, "People can come here and

72:35

study it, but I'm not letting any Post

72:36

Malone was there." Shout out to Post.

72:39

>> Uh, Mastadon teeth and bones. He

72:42

actually gave me this. This is a mammoth

72:45

tooth that they take some of these

72:47

things and they they carve artwork into

72:49

him, which to me,

72:50

>> very cool.

72:50

>> The artwork is kind of [ __ ] It's kind

72:52

of weird that they do that cuz it's

72:54

>> But this is a m This is like a petrified

72:56

mastadon tooth.

72:57

>> A mer rather.

72:59

>> Wow. That is really cool.

73:01

>> Yeah. Amazing.

73:03

Yeah. So this is all from his property.

73:06

So I mean

73:06

>> So why why is there such a distribution

73:08

of uh megapona bones there? His belief

73:12

is that there was some sort of a mass

73:14

extinction event that happened

73:17

whatever year it was, you know, that

73:19

that coincides with the younger dry

73:21

impact theory. And he and when 11,000 BC

73:25

>> Yeah. And when he's had some of these

73:26

things tested and dated, they do they're

73:28

they're post they're around this time.

73:32

And he thinks that there was some sort

73:34

of a mass extinction event and the

73:36

flooding led them all to be washed away

73:40

into this one very particular area

73:42

because it's a a deep concentration of

73:44

these bones. Too many that seem to have

73:47

died around the same time and all

73:49

preserved. So it seems like because

73:51

they're preserved in the perafrost that

73:53

this is something that happened this

73:56

enormous event. the bodies are washed

73:58

down into this one area and because of

74:00

the landscape because the contours of

74:02

the land they

74:04

>> they they're collected into this one

74:06

area. Yeah. And it's not a big place. I

74:08

think it's four to six acres that he's

74:10

pulling most of these things out of. And

74:11

there's several other places that he's

74:13

now finding things in as well.

74:16

>> You know, I find really fascinating are

74:18

the the specimens that they find of

74:20

mammoth and mastadon that are frozen

74:22

solid with chewing food.

74:25

>> Yeah. With broken legs. sometimes where

74:28

it's like there's some sort of an

74:29

impact, some massive shock wave that

74:32

kills them all instantly.

74:34

>> Yeah.

74:35

>> Instantly freezes them.

74:36

>> Yeah.

74:36

>> And I think one of the hypotheses that

74:38

I've heard is that, you know, you had

74:42

referencing the younger dus impact

74:44

event. You had a potentially a comet or

74:47

comets that were ripping through the

74:49

atmosphere at such high rates of speed

74:50

that they were pulling in the vacuum of

74:52

space that that sub-zero temperature air

74:55

and like blasting it down on the earth.

74:58

>> Yes.

74:58

>> And that that air was was was so cold it

75:00

would instantly freeze whatever was in

75:02

its path, you know, as these comets are

75:04

breaking through the atmosphere. I don't

75:06

know if that's true, but it's it's very

75:07

difficult to explain how you can how you

75:09

can flash freeze something like that,

75:11

right? And then in other parts of the

75:13

earth you have apparent biomass burning.

75:16

So you have you have mastadons over here

75:18

freezing right solid. You have other

75:20

megapon over here that were clearly

75:22

swept up in a flood. You have other

75:24

megapon and other kinds of extinct

75:26

plants and stuff that have evidence of

75:28

burning biomass burning. So it's like

75:31

some sort of um uh absolutely

75:34

unimaginable cataclysm.

75:37

>> Yes. that that struck planet earth at

75:39

some time circ 11,000 BC

75:42

>> and it seems like there's a lot of

75:44

physical evidence in terms of aridium

75:46

and soil samples and it seems it's very

75:49

common in space very rare on earth

75:51

layers of aridium and then the dark

75:54

carbon layers of burnt material it seems

75:56

there was incredible fire so we were

75:59

probably hit by asteroids they also find

76:02

that nuclear glass the same stuff that

76:04

they found during the Trinity explosion

76:06

they find little particle of that

76:08

everywhere. That seems to indicate a a

76:09

huge impact

76:11

>> that happened. And he, you know, this is

76:13

what Randall Carlson also believes the

76:15

same timeline was what caused the

76:18

melting of the ice layer over North

76:20

America and created the Great Lakes.

76:22

>> Yeah.

76:23

>> And caused the massive flooding and the

76:25

the the land features that you see from

76:28

space. If you look down from satellite

76:31

imagery, it clearly looks like there was

76:33

just immense amounts of water that

76:35

washed over the land. Mhm. Yeah. And

76:38

yeah, Randall talks a lot about the uh

76:40

the the the impact of those comets on

76:43

the ice sheets, the Laurentide ice

76:44

sheet, for example, 2 miles thick. What

76:46

happens when you slam a comet into a

76:48

two-m thick ice sheet,

76:50

>> right? A comet the size of a city.

76:52

>> Yeah. You you superheat it. Then you

76:53

have all the ejecta coming off of it

76:56

>> and and landing in force and igniting

76:58

the forest. And of course, if you have

77:00

advanced civilizations at the time,

77:02

which I believe they did, you have a

77:04

mass extinction event where everything

77:06

gets annihilated.

77:07

>> Nothing left. There a few people survive

77:10

>> somewhere in the world and it takes

77:12

thousands of years for them to reinvent

77:13

civilization,

77:14

>> especially the civilizations living on

77:16

the in the coastal areas on the banks of

77:18

rivers where a lot of civilizations are,

77:19

right?

77:20

>> They're gone,

77:20

>> right?

77:21

>> I mean, they're gone.

77:22

>> They're gone. And not only that, the the

77:24

level of the ocean rises significantly.

77:27

>> And that's all documented fact,

77:29

historically accepted. Everyone, you

77:31

know, geologists, archaeologist,

77:34

everyone accepts that that this is

77:36

something that happened. And then that

77:37

the ice sheets in North America were a

77:40

mile, two miles high, 3/4 of the entire

77:43

continent covered with ice.

77:45

>> Yeah. recently in terms of like the

77:48

earth when you're you're going back

77:50

11,000 12,000 years ago that's not a

77:52

long time ago

77:53

>> and this whole thing covered in ice and

77:56

then you also have the almost

77:58

instantaneous extinction of 65% of all

78:00

North American megapana which is kind of

78:03

crazy kind of crazy like what caused

78:05

that

78:06

>> yeah which some anthropologists still

78:08

maintain today that that that that's

78:10

because the the indigenous people killed

78:12

them they hunted them into extinction

78:15

>> it's absolely absurd

78:16

>> with adelattles.

78:17

>> It's absolutely absurd.

78:19

>> Spears and adeladals. I mean, we don't

78:21

even know if they had bows and arrows

78:22

yet,

78:22

>> right? It's just

78:25

clearly something catastrophic

78:28

>> happened

78:28

>> in the in the relatively recent past.

78:30

>> Yes. And this is, as I said, it's the

78:32

same with giants. You know, you have

78:34

this

78:34

>> ubiquitous testimony about giants. Well,

78:37

concurrent with that, you have this

78:38

ubiquitous testimony about cataclysm.

78:40

Have you seen the work that there's this

78:42

Italian guy I'll send you the article

78:44

Jamie. There's this Italian guy that is

78:47

uh proposing that the um I'll send it to

78:51

you Jamie that there's uh a way of

78:55

measuring the erosion uh on the outside

78:59

of the pyramids that he believes

79:01

indicates they are at least 10,000 years

79:04

older than we believe so far. I'll send

79:07

this to you Jamie.

79:12

here. Um, but this is, you know,

79:15

obviously disputed because they're

79:17

10,000 years older,

79:18

>> super controversial at least. He's he's

79:21

talking about the erosion on the granite

79:23

and that there's by studying erosion and

79:27

by studying the uh timeline of uh

79:31

erosion and this is something that uh

79:33

Ben Van Kirkwick has talked about when

79:35

you look at the older uh nonupdated

79:39

versions of some of the sites in Egypt

79:42

where it's clear that there was original

79:44

stone and then there was stone that was

79:45

built on top of that

79:46

>> article that shows some better.

79:48

>> Okay, here's so here's the article. So

79:49

the the heading of the article, please.

79:52

So it says, "Could the Great Pyramid be

79:53

far older than we thought? A new study

79:55

says yes." And if you go to it down

79:58

there, what he's saying is, so this is

80:00

from January of 2026. Go up a little

80:03

bit. Right there. Make it bigger. A

80:06

paper released in January 2026, Italian

80:08

engineer Alberto Donini presents an

80:11

unconvent unconventional dating approach

80:13

known as the relative erosion method,

80:15

which he argues may challenge the long

80:17

accepted chronology placed in the

80:19

construction of the pyramid of Kufu

80:21

around 2560

80:22

BC. According to Donini's calculations,

80:26

erosion patterns at the pyramid's base

80:27

could suggest a construction date tens

80:29

of thousands of years earlier,

80:31

potentially as far back as the late

80:34

Paleolithic period. The claim, if

80:37

substantiated, would have farreaching

80:39

implications for the history of ancient

80:40

Egypt and early civilization. Yet, it

80:42

also raises immediate questions about

80:44

methodology, assumptions, and how such

80:46

results could be interpreted within

80:48

archaeological science. But I don't

80:50

think archaeology is a science. I I I

80:52

just I think what archaeology is is

80:54

they're looking at stuff and they're

80:56

guessing and they're using science and

80:58

then they're also they have timelines

81:00

that they establish that they're very

81:02

reluctant to let go of.

81:03

>> Yeah.

81:04

>> And we've seen this with the dating of

81:06

Gobecley. We've seen this with the

81:09

erosion around the the temple of the

81:12

Sphinx. They're very reluctant

81:14

>> while simultaneously disregarding the

81:18

ubiquitous testimony of our ancient

81:20

antecedants who say that their ancestors

81:23

were far greater than them. Look at this

81:25

right here. Other points yield far

81:27

higher values. Several measurements

81:29

suggest erosion equivalent to 20,000 to

81:32

more than 40,000 years of exposure.

81:35

While the arithmetic mean of all 12

81:38

points produces a result of

81:40

approximately 24,900

81:42

years before present corresponding to

81:45

roughly 22,900

81:46

BC. I mean, holy [ __ ] if that's

81:50

accurate.

81:50

>> Yeah.

81:51

>> And then you have also Filipo Bjundi's

81:54

work where they're looking the radio

81:56

tomography below the pyramids and they

81:58

have these structures that go 1.2

82:00

kilometers down into the earth.

82:02

>> Yeah. Did you see my uh I did an

82:04

interview on um I made an appearance on

82:07

Pierce Morgan's show and Pierce had on

82:11

uh Hawi Zawas

82:13

and I didn't know that I was going to be

82:15

interacting with Hawi Zawasi

82:17

>> or sorry Zahiwas

82:18

>> Zahi Awas the other way around. I didn't

82:22

know that uh I was going to be

82:23

interacting with him. I was just told

82:25

that they wanted me to come on and talk

82:26

about pyramids and stuff. But then

82:29

>> Pier Pierce loves a good scramble. He he

82:31

loves [laughter] he loves the squabble.

82:33

>> So So he set me up like here's your

82:34

opportunity to say whatever you want.

82:36

You know, it was me and Jimmy Corsetti

82:37

and some other people.

82:39

>> Here's your opportunity to ask Zahi

82:41

whatever you want. And I'm thinking to

82:43

myself, I don't I don't really have

82:45

anything to ask this guy. But then it

82:46

occurred to me, I actually have me and

82:49

my team are in possession of some

82:50

state-of-the-art ground penetrating

82:52

radar technology that we use to great

82:54

effect in Peru. And so I'm thinking

82:56

about this discovery, this alleged these

82:58

alleged uh mega structures under the

83:00

pyramids, and I'm thinking, you know, it

83:03

wouldn't be that difficult. You don't

83:04

have to you don't have to detect them

83:06

all the way down. You just have to

83:08

verify that there's something there,

83:10

right? And so I posited this to Zahi

83:16

and, you know, told him, look, I've got

83:19

this equipment. Would you facilitate us

83:21

coming down there? and and and it's it's

83:23

it operates off of a drone platform. So,

83:26

you don't you don't have to drag it.

83:27

It's it's uh fly you can fly it around

83:30

the the pyramid. You don't have to touch

83:31

the pyramid. You can just fly it in the

83:33

vicinity of the pyramids and see if you

83:35

can detect something. I mean, there's

83:39

there's no there's you know, you would

83:40

do no injury to any sort of any

83:43

artifacts there. [snorts] and he seemed

83:45

like he was very open to the idea, you

83:47

know, on camera and said that basically

83:50

told peers, get your people in contact

83:52

with him so that you know, give him my

83:54

information so I can reach out to him.

83:56

Of course, that never happened. So, it

83:59

would not be that difficult to verify

84:01

that. And that's why I'm wondering why

84:03

you don't have to dig,

84:04

>> right? Why wouldn't you want as much

84:06

exploration at the most spectacular site

84:10

Yeah. that human beings have ever

84:12

erected on the face of the earth that

84:14

has a very controversial timeline.

84:16

>> That's right.

84:17

>> I mean, even the conventional timeline's

84:19

super controversial because like how the

84:21

[ __ ] did they do it?

84:22

>> Mhm.

84:22

>> Even if you just accept that it's 2500

84:25

BC. Okay, great. How

84:28

>> I mean I I mean I don't know why it

84:30

being older is more controversial cuz

84:33

it's still the same people, the same

84:35

>> it's human beings that lived a long time

84:38

ago. That's all we're talking about. But

84:40

why are they sticking to 2500 BC? It's

84:42

because that they've always said that

84:44

they know. They've always said with

84:46

great certainty and and from a position

84:49

of authority that this is what we know.

84:51

We know Kufu did this. We know this guy

84:53

did this.

84:54

>> But you don't really know. And there's

84:56

also incredible amount of evidence that

84:58

these guys wrote their name on

85:00

everything. When they were in power,

85:03

they like to put their names on

85:05

everything

85:05

>> or recarve the head of the Sphinx.

85:07

>> Yeah. Well, that's definitely true.

85:09

>> Yeah,

85:09

>> it's definitely different. There's some

85:11

controversy about that as well because

85:13

there's layers of stone that have

85:14

different gradients like different

85:15

hardness

85:16

>> and they're different types of stone and

85:19

the face there. What the the controversy

85:22

is that the face is like a harder stone

85:24

and it wouldn't erode as quickly.

85:27

Problem with that is like the stuff

85:28

that's eroded for a long period in

85:32

history was covered in sand.

85:33

>> Mh.

85:34

>> And we know that for a fact. show that

85:35

there was no erosion going on during

85:37

that period of time yet it's massively

85:39

more eroded than the face.

85:40

>> Well, I think that one of the

85:41

fundamental problems that we have as

85:44

wester as modern westerners looking at

85:46

this stuff is we have an inversion of

85:48

the timeline of history.

85:50

When we look at the timeline of history,

85:53

we generally view our antecedants as

85:56

like cavemen.

85:58

>> Yes.

85:58

>> These are are very ignorant people.

86:00

They're basically, you know, chimpanzees

86:02

with with better brains. And as we

86:05

progress through the timeline of

86:06

history, we're becoming increasingly

86:08

more intelligent, increasingly more

86:09

incap capable of building and and of of

86:13

building these monuments and technology

86:14

and so forth. So we see ourselves as the

86:16

pinnacle of the human species. Like

86:20

we're the smartest, we're the greatest.

86:22

That's not the way that the ancients

86:24

viewed the anti-dolivian world. That's

86:26

not the way that they viewed their their

86:27

antecedants. They see the for them it

86:30

was the inverse. For them, they were

86:33

always trying to recover the glory of

86:37

the people that had come before them,

86:38

the majesty of the civilization that had

86:41

come before them. Uh so when they look

86:43

back down the timeline of history,

86:47

they're the dummies. And the further you

86:49

go back, the more extraordinary people

86:51

are

86:52

>> cuz they were closer to it, right? And

86:54

they all have a they all have a myth of

86:56

the flood of the antibian world in

87:00

general, you know? and they they lived

87:01

in a timeline that was closer to that

87:03

and more accepted because they probably

87:06

had a knowledge an understanding at

87:08

least the earliest ones that they didn't

87:10

make this and so they probably passed

87:13

that down.

87:14

>> Yeah. Well, they I think they inherited

87:16

traditions from their ancestors about

87:18

these things. Um you know I mean you

87:20

have you have [snorts] this this idea of

87:23

a golden age

87:25

uh among the ancients. Golden age

87:27

meaning there was a time on earth. The

87:29

the the Greeks coined that particular

87:31

phrase the golden age. The Egyptians the

87:33

ancient Egyptians called it zeppy the

87:35

first time. There was a time on earth

87:37

when the gods descended to the earth and

87:40

cohabited with human species and to some

87:43

extent coingled with the human species

87:46

and that it was during this time that

87:49

that knowledge was transferred and that

87:52

great cities were built. This is of

87:54

course this is where the the myth of

87:55

Atlantis falls into this category.

87:58

And and then their world was suddenly

88:02

and catastrophically destroyed.

88:06

And what we've been doing since that

88:08

destruction, in the mind of the agents,

88:10

what they've been doing since that

88:11

destruction was attempting to rebuild,

88:13

to rediscover the lost knowledge from

88:15

that age, to recover it and to try and

88:21

try and emulate their their superior

88:25

ancestors. That's what you see

88:27

everywhere everywhere around the world.

88:29

Doesn't matter if you're in Egypt or if

88:31

you're in Peru, you see the same sort of

88:32

thing. Um, same thing applies by the way

88:36

for the megaliths in Peru. I don't know

88:39

if you have you been to Peru.

88:40

>> No.

88:41

>> Some of the most astounding megaliths

88:43

that you'll see anywhere in the world.

88:44

Um,

88:46

I referenced earlier the walls of

88:47

Sakaiwan. Absolutely phenomenal

88:51

cyclopian architecture. And of course,

88:53

the construction of those of those walls

88:55

is attributed to the Inca.

88:58

So if you ask archaeologists in Peru who

89:01

built Sakaiwaman, who built Machu

89:04

Picchu, who built Ojantai Tambbo, it's

89:06

always going to be the same answer. The

89:07

Inca, the Inca built it. Now the problem

89:11

is there's no record of the Inca

89:13

building those walls. And if you ask the

89:16

the the ancient Ketchra people, uh if

89:20

you ask the actually the Ketra people,

89:22

the the Ketra people who continue in

89:23

their ancient traditions, the ones who

89:25

are there today, and they still wear

89:27

their um their typical

89:31

uh vestments and and they still speak

89:33

Ketwa. If you talk to them and you ask

89:36

them who built the walls of Sakaiwan,

89:41

specifically Sakaiwan, they'll tell you

89:42

a race of giants. This goes back to

89:44

those, you know, our progenitors, the

89:46

giants. The giants built Sakaiwam. But

89:48

if you go up to um if you go up to Titti

89:52

Titikaka, Lake Tikaka, and you you ask

89:55

the imata people who built Tiwanaku,

89:58

which is on the other side of Lake

90:00

Tittikaka in Bolivia, who built those

90:02

megalithic edififices? The giants are

90:05

progenitors. That's what they'll tell

90:07

you. So, and I don't necessarily think

90:09

that giants built all this stuff. I

90:11

don't necessarily think that at all. I

90:12

just think that there's everyone is

90:15

acknowledging that that something

90:16

extraordinary happened in the past that

90:20

that the our anticedants were much more

90:23

impressive than we've given them credit

90:24

for. I mean our anti-dolivian

90:26

anticcedants

90:27

and that um that in many cases

90:32

like you said there's no inscriptions on

90:33

megalithic stuff anywhere. You go to

90:36

Machu Machu Picchu and it's apparent

90:39

that in Sakaiwama, Machu Picchu, Jante

90:41

Tambbo and other places in Peru, it's

90:43

apparent that the Inca certainly built

90:46

on top. I mean, they took advantage of

90:48

these megalithic foundations, right?

90:49

Anyone would. I mean, if you're going to

90:50

build a edifice, you would you would use

90:53

the superior foundations here, massive

90:55

stones, and you'd build on top. And you

90:57

try to you try to emulate that style of

90:59

building because it's anti-seismic for

91:00

one thing. So in Machu Picchu, it's

91:04

evident to me and I think anybody who

91:06

walks walks around that complex

91:10

you can see and and we have to keep in

91:12

mind that much of Machu Picchu today is

91:14

a reconstruction. It's an archaeological

91:16

reconstruction except for the

91:17

foundations. We have pictures from Hyram

91:19

Bingum,

91:21

original pictures in black and white of

91:22

what Machu Picchu looked like when he

91:24

discovered it accidentally.

91:27

And what's there? The megalithic

91:30

foundations are there. That's what's

91:31

there, the megalithic foundations and

91:34

and you see and the the Inca built on

91:37

top of those foundations and that's what

91:39

a lot of the archaeological

91:40

reconstruction today reflects. So if you

91:44

walk around in Machu Picchu, I remember

91:46

I've been there several times filming

91:47

and doing different things and and I

91:49

remember one time I was I was with my

91:50

colleague Anel P. Rambla, we had a we

91:52

had a a guide with us and um he was an

91:56

older gentleman, very very knowledgeable

91:58

and um he was one of their official

91:59

guides in Machu Picchu and we're walking

92:03

around and he's telling us different

92:04

things about the Inca and how they did

92:06

certain things and certainly the Inca

92:07

built a lot up there. There's no

92:08

question about it. The Inca were

92:09

impressive. Don't not taking anything

92:11

away from the Inca. But if you you look

92:14

at some of the edififices at Machu

92:16

Picchu, you can see these magnificent

92:18

megalithic foundations, big stones,

92:20

polygonal, fit together so tightly you

92:23

couldn't pass a butter knife between the

92:24

joints. And then you have on top what

92:27

sometimes people describe as Inca slop

92:29

on top where it's like they kind of

92:31

they're kind of trying to match the

92:33

style of below, but it's it's not as

92:35

precise. It's not as fine. And you can

92:37

see the clear delineation clear

92:39

delineation between the megalithic and

92:42

then what the incor are doing and then

92:43

also the archaeological reconstruction.

92:46

And I remember asking this guide of

92:48

ours. [snorts] We I pointed across the

92:50

courtyard to some this beautiful this

92:53

exquisite polygonal found foundational

92:55

wall with just sort of crude inca stuff

92:58

on top. And I said, "Why are there two

93:02

different styles

93:04

here? Why do you see this this these

93:07

large megalithic blocks fit together so

93:09

precisely and then you have this other

93:11

style

93:12

and you know keeping in mind the

93:15

archaeological reconstruction but there

93:16

there was there there was enough of the

93:18

site there that they could model what

93:20

they did based on what the Inca had done

93:22

and he said

93:24

because they like the way it looked

93:27

that was the answer they liked the way

93:30

it looked and I said you you can't

93:33

really believe that I

93:34

You're not an idiot, right? They didn't

93:37

do that because they liked the way it

93:39

looked. The reason why there's an

93:40

inferior mode of building on top of

93:43

those megalith megalithic foundations is

93:45

because they didn't know how to do that.

93:47

They did the best they could. And they

93:49

were very good, right? Attempting to

93:50

adopt the cyclopian style. They were

93:52

good, the Inca,

93:54

but the only reason you would do that,

93:57

the only reason you would put inferior

93:59

architecture on top of s superior

94:01

foundations is because you don't know

94:02

how to do that. Yeah. Well, it's also

94:05

the just the sheer size of these blocks.

94:09

It it just gives you so many questions

94:13

because it's it's not like you could

94:16

recreate that with whatever the Inca

94:18

had. That's what's confusing. In order

94:21

to move those stones into position and

94:23

then put them and construct them in a

94:26

way that it appears like they've been

94:28

melted into place.

94:29

>> Yeah. You're you're like how how are you

94:32

moving them? How are you placing them?

94:34

What are you using?

94:34

>> You should go to Ojante Tambbo. Okay, so

94:36

you go to Ojanti Tambbo which is in

94:38

between Cusco and Machu Picchu. You have

94:41

to go to Ojante Tomo to get on the train

94:43

to go up to Machu Picchu. It's the only

94:44

way to get there. And Ojanta Tambbo has

94:48

some of the most exquisite megalithic

94:50

architecture on planet Earth. It is so

94:53

beautiful the way that they were able to

94:55

and it's it's large megalithic blocks

94:57

and there's two different styles

94:58

represented there. You have the

95:00

polygonal like at the walls of Saka

95:01

Woman in Peru and then you have the

95:04

interlocking blocks like at Tiwanaku.

95:07

Both of those styles are there and and

95:09

there's this one spot at at Ojanta Tamo

95:12

that I love to take people to because

95:13

you're going up the stairs and and the

95:17

wall curves. As you're going up the

95:19

stairs, the wall curves. Now, if you and

95:21

I were building a wall today, even if we

95:24

were like the best, we were the best

95:26

masons in the world and we're building a

95:27

wall for, I don't know, for for some

95:30

billionaire in his house, we would we

95:33

would interlock the blocks in the corner

95:35

like everyone does everywhere, right? Or

95:37

if it's cement, you could take cement

95:39

because it's cement is pliable and you

95:41

could make whatever shape you want. But

95:42

if it's blocks, you're going to

95:43

interlock the blocks into that corner or

95:45

do something like that. You know what

95:46

they did at Ojante Tambbo? They they

95:49

curved the stone into the wall. They

95:53

curved the stone. So they took the

95:54

stone.

95:54

>> There images of that that we can look

95:55

at.

95:55

>> Yeah, you can pull up stones like that.

95:57

And and they they cut the stone so that

95:59

it curved into the corner. Like who

96:02

would do that? That is so intricate.

96:04

That is so difficult.

96:06

>> And by what technology?

96:08

>> By what technology? But here's the

96:09

interesting thing. You find that same

96:11

the same fingerprints of these builders

96:13

all over the world. You find the same

96:15

thing in in Egypt. They curved stones.

96:18

Some of those stones are curved into the

96:20

corners and other places where there's

96:22

megalithic constructions. I mean, these

96:24

guys there is a there is like a

96:26

ubiquitous knowledge of masonry in the

96:29

world. The fingerprint is everywhere.

96:32

Everywhere you go. And it's interesting

96:33

because one of the things I was

96:37

trying to

96:39

trying to to to convince this this guide

96:41

of ours at Machu Picchu this one time of

96:43

was look, here's a problem. You guys

96:45

come over to Machu Picchu.

96:46

>> So, here it is. So yeah, that's that's

96:48

Sakaiwan.

96:49

>> Is that what you're talking about

96:50

though? No,

96:50

>> curved stone.

96:51

>> No, I'm talking about a stone that's

96:52

curved. See that there where it says

96:54

Inca stonework?

96:57

>> Uh in the middle. Yeah.

96:58

>> Yeah. Sakaiwaman. They'll take a a large

97:00

stone. That one looks like it's curved

97:02

too in the wall, but that's not a very

97:03

large stone. Sakai will take a large

97:04

stone and they'll curve it into the

97:06

wall. Um

97:09

it's I don't see Sakai in any of those.

97:11

You have to type I'm I'm sorry, not

97:12

Sakai. Oji Tambbo. Ojantai Tambbo.

97:15

>> How do you spell it? O L A N T. O L L A

97:19

N T.

97:20

>> A Y.

97:22

>> Say again.

97:22

>> T A M B O.

97:23

>> O L

97:24

>> O L L A N T.

97:26

>> Yeah, it's not

97:27

>> a Y

97:28

>> A N T

97:29

>> A Y

97:30

>> A Y

97:31

>> T A M B O.

97:34

>> Never going to guess that.

97:35

>> Whoa.

97:35

>> That's [laughter] That's Ojante Tambbo.

97:37

[sighs]

97:38

>> I'm looking for that curved uh

97:40

>> What is the nubs? What are the nubs?

97:43

>> I don't know. There's another

97:44

fingerprint of this. all over the world

97:46

everywhere.

97:48

>> No one really knows. I mean, there's a

97:49

lot of interesting theories out there,

97:50

but I think at the end of the day,

97:52

nobody has any idea what the heck those

97:54

nubs are.

97:55

>> Those things are so spectacular. Look at

97:57

that.

97:57

>> Look at the wall. Look at the Look at

97:58

the wall right there at Ojante Tambbo.

98:02

>> Make that look.

98:03

>> Look how exquisite that is.

98:04

>> That's nuts.

98:05

>> I mean, it is just absolutely

98:07

astonishing.

98:08

>> And the weight.

98:10

weight of these things and the fact that

98:12

they're they're carved and placed in a

98:15

way that would absorb the energy of

98:17

earthquakes.

98:18

>> Yes, they're anti-seismic.

98:20

>> Yeah,

98:20

>> they're anti-seismic. That's why they do

98:22

it that way,

98:23

>> which is

98:24

>> now I want you technology.

98:25

>> Think about this. Okay, so you are you

98:28

are with Francisco Pisaro. You're a

98:32

concistador

98:33

in the 1533

98:35

or 1532 or 1534. I can't remember

98:38

exactly when he landed. and you're

98:40

walking through Peru

98:42

and you you you see this you see this

98:45

kind of architecture as you're

98:47

conquering Peru and you overthrow the

98:49

Inca and then you go to build which they

98:52

did they overthrow the Inca the capital

98:54

city of Cusco they go to build their

98:56

cathedrals

98:58

they built lots of cathedrals and

98:59

palaces for themselves right so you have

99:01

the Inca palaces and cathedrals

99:04

um they took the blocks from Sakaiwaman

99:07

they took the upper layer blocks and

99:09

they use them to build their cathedral.

99:11

Okay, there's a couple cathedrals

99:13

downtown Cusco that were built with the

99:14

blocks from Sakaiwan.

99:16

They didn't build it like that. They

99:18

didn't build their cathedrals like that.

99:20

They took those blocks and they just put

99:21

them together with mortar like they do

99:23

in Europe. So, here's a question that I

99:25

always ask people who think that, you

99:26

know, the Inca were were doing that. If

99:29

you were an architect at that time, why

99:31

in the world wouldn't you have forced

99:34

the Inca to teach you that style

99:36

>> so that you could build your cathe? I

99:38

mean, you would be the greatest

99:39

architect in the world, right?

99:41

>> Right.

99:41

>> You could build you could build the most

99:43

magnificent cathedrals in the world in

99:46

the cyclopian style if you understood

99:49

how they did it. So, if the Inca were

99:51

the ones who built it, why didn't they

99:53

force the Inca to teach them how to

99:55

build it?

99:55

>> Just look at just look at that. That is

99:57

so crazy.

99:58

>> That's clearly sanded down, right?

100:02

>> Well, those are in the process. That's

100:03

Ojante Tombo. That's the temple of the

100:05

sun at the summit. I'm just looks the

100:08

faces of it look so smooth.

100:10

>> That's Ojonti. That's Ojantei Tambbo.

100:12

And this was in the process of being

100:14

constructed at the top when it halted.

100:17

You can see the blocks there. Those

100:19

blocks that you were just looking at

100:20

were something happened.

100:22

>> Yes. Those blocks were in the process of

100:24

being transported

100:25

and they were being they were being

100:27

worked right there. They were being

100:30

prepped to be incorporated into the

100:31

walls. Um,

100:34

and it just halted.

100:37

And the conventional explanation is that

100:39

it halted because the Spanish arrived.

100:40

That's what halted the work. But, but I

100:44

think what halted the work was

100:45

cataclysm.

100:47

Personally, I think that's what halted

100:49

the work. Something like a Younger D's

100:51

impact.

100:52

>> What's that, Jimmy?

100:53

>> Is that See, right here, it looks like

100:54

the face of the wall, you know, like it

100:56

looks like it's all uniform and fits

100:58

together, right? But if that right here

101:00

is part of

101:01

>> Yeah. filler in the backing.

101:02

>> Then that's like

101:03

>> Yeah, they have filler in the backing.

101:04

Some of them facade.

101:05

>> Yeah, some of them the blocks are it's

101:07

just gigantic blocks. Others it's like

101:09

the facade is exquisite and

101:11

>> like what we have here that brick. You

101:12

know that brick in the back the

101:14

background used to just be brick at the

101:15

other studio.

101:16

>> Uhhuh.

101:16

>> Kind of like that.

101:18

>> Right. Right. I know what you're saying.

101:19

Yeah. But except these are enormous.

101:21

>> Sure. Sure. Sure. Sure. Sure. Or I don't

101:24

know.

101:24

>> Yeah. I mean

101:25

>> hardened in place and sanded down or

101:27

>> Oh, there was a point of the guy

101:28

standing. There was a picture of the guy

101:29

standing in the corner. There was a guy

101:31

standing in the corner that I was

101:32

referencing earlier.

101:34

>> You just had There it is. Right there.

101:35

That guy.

101:35

>> No, the one below it.

101:37

>> I don't think you can see the corner

101:38

very well.

101:38

>> That right there. The middle.

101:39

>> You see the guy in the blue standing

101:40

there?

101:41

>> Yeah. Yeah. Right there.

101:43

>> Behind him. There's a You can see how

101:44

the stone below him. It's curved into

101:46

the corner. That's not a separate stone.

101:48

That's It's literally curved into that

101:50

corner.

101:52

>> It's It's just so weird. The nubs are

101:56

weird.

101:56

>> They are weird.

101:57

>> And it's weird that they occur all over

101:58

the world. And it's like it speaks

102:00

almost to like is that how they carried

102:03

them and placed them? Is that a part of

102:06

the construction? Is that something

102:09

about how they made them that they left

102:11

these nubs? Like what is what are the

102:13

nubs?

102:13

>> No one has any idea what the nubs are.

102:15

>> That seems so weird that we have no

102:17

answer to a feature that occurs over and

102:20

over again in all this magic

102:22

architecture

102:23

>> all over the world.

102:26

Yeah,

102:27

>> they keep showing these three. Those

102:29

they kind of look like the nubs, but

102:30

they look way different than

102:32

>> Yeah, they're a lot rougher. See those?

102:33

See those smaller pieces of stone there

102:35

in between the large blocks.

102:37

>> That's an anti-seismic property. That's

102:39

a technology that they use so that the

102:40

rocks can shift and move and the and and

102:43

>> not crumble. That's

102:45

>> it's ingenious. And like I said, you

102:48

have two different styles here. at

102:49

Ojante Tambbo you have you have the

102:51

polygonal

102:52

and then you have the the interlocking

102:54

rectangular those are two different

102:56

styles in the same site that's one of

102:58

the things that makes Ojante Tambbo

102:59

fascinating and that rectangular

103:02

interlocking style comes from Tiwanaku

103:04

which is another

103:07

amazing megalithic site in Bolivia

103:09

what's interesting is when you combine

103:10

all these sites all over the world and

103:13

you have all these questions that are

103:15

very similar like how how did they do

103:18

this? Why? Why is this stuff the oldest

103:21

stuff? Why is this stuff the bottom

103:23

stuff? Why is the base of it the most

103:25

spectacular construction? And why does

103:27

it seem like more primitive stuff is on

103:29

top of that?

103:30

>> Cuz they like the way it looked,

103:31

[laughter]

103:31

>> right? Yeah. But it's

103:33

>> it's the same question over and over

103:35

again. And the the reluctance to propose

103:39

that perhaps the oldest stuff is more

103:42

complicated because the civilization was

103:44

more complex.

103:45

>> That's it. That's what they're unwilling

103:47

to they're unwilling to open up that

103:49

door. But that door is the only door

103:51

that makes any sense.

103:51

>> Yeah. Not only was the civilization

103:53

complex, the knowledge was universal.

103:56

That's a problem.

103:57

>> It is a problem.

103:58

>> The knowledge was universal

103:59

>> cuz that means you're talking about a

104:01

seafaring traveling civilization.

104:04

>> You're talking about something that's a

104:06

lot more impressive than cavemen. Right.

104:08

>> Right. So,

104:09

>> especially if this guy, this Italian guy

104:11

is right in terms of his because

104:14

>> 20,000 BC, we're we're supposed to be

104:18

just brutes.

104:18

>> Mhm.

104:19

>> Oh, yeah. Caveman

104:20

>> skinw wearing Yeah. We're wearing animal

104:23

skins and we have spears.

104:25

>> You're you're a chimpanzeee with a

104:27

better brain. Yeah. back then. Yeah.

104:28

>> And and and as I said before, you know,

104:31

you look at that kind of

104:33

>> um architecture and you and I were we to

104:37

encounter the Inca. Go back in time the

104:41

in the late 1500s. The Inca are still

104:45

around. The builders, the the alleged

104:46

builders of these monuments. I mean,

104:48

they were building Ojante Tambbo, right?

104:50

When you arrived, they quit building.

104:53

Why did the Spanish architects not

104:56

incorporate any of that right

104:58

>> into their buildings?

104:59

>> Why did they not learn the techniques?

105:01

>> That's superior technology. That's

105:02

anti-seismic. And the point is

105:04

illustrated because in Cusco they built

105:06

their cathedrals, right? They they

105:08

knocked down the the the the palaces of

105:10

the Inca and they they raised the

105:13

cathedrals in uh in Cusco. And guess

105:17

what happens? You get a big earthquake?

105:20

The cathedrals crumble to the ground

105:23

except for their megalithic foundations

105:25

which remain unmoved. Earthquake comes,

105:27

cathedrals fall, the walls of Sakaiwaman

105:30

stand. And it's happened various times

105:32

throughout history.

105:34

Who, what architect

105:37

would not have taken advantage of that

105:39

knowledge had it been available to them

105:41

during the time of the Inca?

105:43

>> Yeah. I mean, like I said, you could

105:45

build the most magnificent cathedrals on

105:47

planet Earth and you could make the Inca

105:48

build it for you. And now you can say

105:51

that the the Inca refused would have

105:54

refused to to to pass this knowledge on.

105:56

Okay, maybe. I mean, there was a there

105:58

was a society within the Inca, you know,

106:01

they were taught by the Grandes

106:02

Almaltas, they called them, who were the

106:05

the great teachers of the Inca nobility

106:06

and the keepers of the secrets and so

106:08

forth. They had the Inca didn't even

106:09

have a written language. They used

106:11

Kipus. Kipus was a it's a system of

106:14

ropes and knots of string and knots.

106:16

They didn't even have language. So

106:19

absolutely extraordinary and there is

106:21

nobody can give me an an adequate

106:23

explanation as to why such amazing

106:26

knowledge is just forgotten.

106:30

I mean would we forget how to build

106:32

computers? No. So so why would we just

106:36

forget how to build megaliths?

106:38

Why? That's not something you forget.

106:41

These things don't fall down in

106:42

earthquakes. That's something you pass

106:44

on carefully from one generation to the

106:46

next. Unless, like our ancient

106:48

antecedants tell us, there was a

106:50

cataclysm that rocked the earth and

106:54

eliminated the civilizations that were

106:56

inhabiting the earth.

106:58

That's to me that that that's the best

107:01

explanation.

107:02

>> Well, it's certainly the most logical

107:04

explanation if you weren't attached to a

107:06

timeline. If you didn't have this

107:08

timeline that these archaeologists

107:10

insist upon, then you would say, okay,

107:13

clearly we know that a cataclysm

107:15

occurred. Clearly, we know the young

107:17

impact theory is accepted.

107:19

>> And especially now,

107:21

>> so

107:22

>> becoming more so over time,

107:23

>> more likely

107:24

>> much more likely that there was

107:26

something going on that we don't totally

107:29

understand tens of thousands of years

107:31

ago.

107:33

>> Yeah. I mean, I think we would do very

107:35

well to listen to take serious the myths

107:39

and legends.

107:40

>> Well, it's also weird that like the

107:42

Aztecs, like I used to think that the

107:45

Aztecs created those temples and those

107:48

pyramids and then I found out fairly

107:51

recently that they never even claimed to

107:54

have

107:54

>> No, they say they found them and that

107:56

these were the birthplace of the gods.

107:59

>> Yes. See, that's what I was going to say

108:01

about uh Machu Picchu. So mach you know

108:03

what the name of Machu Picchu is not

108:04

Machu Picchu in Ketwo it's umpu andju

108:08

means the abode of the gods or the

108:10

dwelling of the gods this is how they

108:12

viewed the megaliths I mean this is how

108:15

if we were primitive people coming upon

108:17

these megalithic structures what would

108:18

we think the gods must have done this

108:20

the gods lived here and so then we would

108:22

rebuild we would reinhabit the

108:24

habitation of the gods

108:25

>> yeah why would you live anywhere else if

108:27

you could live there

108:28

>> right and it would be the nobility

108:30

>> architecture you've ever imagined And

108:32

>> exactly.

108:32

>> That's right. Why would you let some

108:33

idiots take it over? He wouldn't

108:35

>> give me that. That's mine.

108:36

>> He wouldn't.

108:37

>> Yeah, of course.

108:38

>> You know, there's also the the weirdness

108:40

of Peru, like the Nazka lines. Like,

108:42

what the what the hell is all that

108:44

about?

108:45

>> I don't know. I don't know. That's a

108:47

great mystery.

108:47

>> There's a lot of weirdness to Peru.

108:49

>> There's a lot of weirdness in Peru.

108:50

>> And how about those uh the ancient

108:53

tapestries that show those

108:55

three-fingered, three-toed, big-headed

108:57

people with big eyes. And it's

108:59

ubiquitous. And these are a thousand

109:02

years old.

109:03

>> Yeah. You then you have the Paracus

109:05

culture with those massive

109:07

>> elongated skulls,

109:08

>> right?

109:09

>> In the in the Procus culture, by the

109:10

way, you know, people see these

109:12

elongated skulls online. I I was in I've

109:14

been in Procus a lot. They've done a lot

109:16

of research down there on the Proacus

109:18

culture and other things. Made some

109:20

interesting discoveries, by the way,

109:21

with our drone, with our GPR unit. Um,

109:24

but you see these images online, you

109:26

think that the the Paracas people, their

109:28

their skulls are so large and elongated,

109:31

you think they're these must have been

109:32

big people, right? That's what it looks

109:34

like. No, the they were tiny. They were

109:37

really little. They were bizarre.

109:40

Their their mor the morphology of their

109:43

body was different than ours. Um,

109:46

>> tiny with big heads. Yes, the Baracas

109:48

people were very small and they had a

109:50

proclivity to live in in underground.

109:54

They had subterranean dwellings and

109:56

their eye sockets of some of these

109:57

elongated skulls. The eye sockets are

109:59

like 25% larger the orbital socket. So

110:02

they big eyes, elongated skull, very

110:05

dimminionative people in some cases

110:07

living underground. Well, I've heard

110:09

people

110:11

have theories about Neanderthalss that

110:13

Neanderthalss with larger eye sockets as

110:16

well might have been able to see at

110:18

night like the way deer can and

110:20

>> y

110:21

>> the way, you know, other animals that

110:24

are nocturnal can see at night that they

110:26

have a different kind of eye structure.

110:27

Obviously, we don't know what the eye

110:29

structure was, but if you have a

110:31

significantly larger eye socket,

110:34

>> significantly larger eyeball,

110:37

>> it seem I mean, we know that nocturnal

110:39

vision exists in cats and exists in a

110:42

bunch of different animals, but the idea

110:44

of it existing in primates, we've, you

110:47

know, we kind of dismissed that.

110:48

>> Mhm. Yeah. I mean, a bigger eye gathers

110:50

more light.

110:51

>> Yeah.

110:51

>> So, it's a it's it's a nocturnal

110:53

feature.

110:54

>> Not only that, we have no idea what the

110:55

soft tissue structure of their eyes was

110:57

like. No, no. Now granted, for all the

111:01

skeptics out there, yes, many of the

111:03

elongated skulls in Peru and other

111:05

places around the world are the result

111:07

of cranial deformation. So yes, they

111:10

were deforming their skulls with

111:11

headboarding, cradle headboarding and

111:13

binding and so forth. Um, there's

111:16

evidence of that and you can see the

111:17

evidence when you're there if you know

111:18

what you're looking for on the skulls,

111:20

but I don't believe that that explains

111:23

all of the elongated skulls. Not just in

111:26

Peru, other parts of the world, but

111:27

especially in Peru. There are some

111:29

examples of elongated skulls that I mean

111:32

look like a look like a a genetic

111:38

um

111:40

alteration is the best way I can say it.

111:42

So, there's this there's a and you you

111:45

can pull this up, Jamie, if you can find

111:46

it. There's a there's a mummy. I'm

111:49

trying to think of the name of the of

111:52

the um museum where it's housed. There's

111:54

a I think it's the San Marcos Museum in

111:58

Lima. There's a mummy, one the first

112:00

mummy that was discovered by Julio Tejo.

112:02

Julio Tejo or one of the first, if not

112:04

the first. Julio Tejo was the eminent

112:06

archaeologist that discovered the prais

112:08

culture and he's like their greatest

112:10

archaeologist in Peru. was a phenomenal

112:12

archaeologist and he he discovered all

112:14

kinds of things about the Procus

112:15

culture. Uh, and he dug up this mummy

112:20

and it is the it is it is the most

112:22

bizarre mummy I've ever seen in my life.

112:24

It has a massive elongated skull.

112:27

Massive. And

112:28

>> we showed a few of those the other day

112:30

when Cassie Coppersmith was on. We

112:32

showed a few of these uh ones that don't

112:34

have the sagittal suture. Yeah,

112:36

>> they're they're weird. like the just the

112:38

actual structure of the skull is

112:39

different,

112:40

>> but this one has the skin on it

112:43

>> except for part of the face is gone, but

112:44

it's got the skin on it. So, you can

112:45

actually see what what this skull looked

112:48

like with the skin on it. And then the

112:50

morphology of the body is just weird. I

112:52

mean, I I think it's in the museum of if

112:55

I recall, the museum of San Marcos and

112:58

Lima. Um, so these are

113:01

>> How tall were these things?

113:02

>> Oh, they were small. I mean, we're

113:04

talking four foot tall.

113:05

>> What? These guys were little.

113:07

>> Giant heads and four feet tall.

113:08

>> Yeah, they were little. Everyone thinks

113:09

they were big. No, no, no. They were

113:11

little. Some of them. I mean, I think

113:12

they were 4 and 1/2 maybe averaged four

113:15

to four and 1/2 ft tall somewhere in

113:16

there. They were very small. Um maybe

113:19

from four to 5t tall. I don't remember,

113:21

but they're significantly they're

113:22

they're very small. They're

113:23

dimminionative people.

113:24

>> You also tell me which one it is. I

113:25

don't know.

113:27

>> I've never seen one with skin on it.

113:29

It's not really popping.

113:30

>> That one's nuts.

113:30

>> There. The one that uh Brian Forester's

113:32

looking at right here.

113:33

>> Right there. Yeah.

113:35

That run right right there is just

113:37

absolutely bizarre when you look at take

113:39

a look at the look at how tall that

113:41

forehead is on that. There's skin on

113:42

there. Very well preserved. And if you

113:46

look around the back, you can't see it

113:47

here in this image, but if you look

113:48

around the back side of it, the neck is

113:50

very bizarre. It's sort of it's a

113:53

curved.

113:53

>> That is so weird.

113:55

>> I mean, imagine coming upon somebody

113:58

here

113:59

>> weird

113:59

>> in Austin that has a a skull like that.

114:02

>> There might be a few of them here,

114:04

>> right? And that

114:06

[laughter]

114:07

>> I mean that does not look like cranial

114:10

deformation. That looks like a totally

114:11

different kind of head.

114:12

>> Looks like a genetic anomaly. Uh

114:16

it what is that one in the middle? Yeah.

114:20

What is that one? Jeez.

114:22

>> Yeah. There's all kinds of very

114:24

interesting specimens like that. And as

114:25

you said, Peru is a very very strange

114:27

place.

114:27

>> The one on the far left is the craziest

114:29

one to me.

114:30

>> That one.

114:30

>> That one.

114:31

>> It's a Chongo skull. That one was

114:32

discovered at the the Chongo's

114:34

necropolis.

114:35

>> Like what the hell is that? I mean just

114:36

the volume of the brain is so much

114:39

larger than a human being.

114:40

>> That picture might be elongated. You

114:42

know, someone might have altered that

114:44

picture. It is very impressive. That one

114:46

might be elongated. Um the picture I

114:48

mean

114:48

>> right that's more like it.

114:50

>> But the skull

114:52

the these skulls many of these skulls

114:54

that's in the Museum of EA and the city

114:57

of Ein Peru.

114:58

>> That's absolutely insane. These skulls,

114:59

the the Chungo skull was taken from the

115:01

Chongo's necropolis. If you go over to

115:03

the Chongo's necropolis today, which is

115:04

on the desert, you see these things

115:06

sticking out of the ground and they got

115:08

red hair all burned here. And we were we

115:12

were over there with our um with our

115:14

crew and there's a pyramid there, but

115:17

it's a it's an Adobe pyramid, and it's

115:21

called the uh the Jungles pyramid. And

115:26

no, nobody really goes to this area cuz

115:27

it's sort of off the beaten path. It's

115:29

not not wellnown. Um, we were actually

115:32

working in an area further down the road

115:35

because at the time we were looking for

115:38

treasure. We were filming a like a for

115:40

like a TV show looking for for treasure.

115:42

And there was this um there's this pond

115:45

that has a very interesting UFO story

115:47

attached to it further up the road. And

115:50

uh so we were working up there. But

115:52

every day when we we drive by the the

115:54

pyramid, the Trongos pyramid, and it's

115:57

an adobe pyramid, so it's not super

115:59

impressive. It's made of large adobe

116:01

blocks, but it was a large uh urban

116:03

center. It was some people think it was

116:05

the capital of the Proacus culture, very

116:07

large urban center, and it was a

116:09

necropolis. There's tons of of remains.

116:13

and the the elongated skull. Some of

116:16

these Paracus people, the the nobility

116:19

for sure, they were buried in in burial

116:21

bundles and they're in the fetal

116:23

position. And these burial bundles are

116:25

are they're usually layers of fabric and

116:29

there's various items in there and

116:31

they're just under the surface of the

116:33

sand. They're right there and you get a

116:35

lot of grave robbers, waos, who go in

116:37

there and and you know, steal all kinds

116:39

of artifacts and stuff. But we're

116:41

driving by. I looked at the pyramid and

116:43

I thought I had this intuition.

116:47

There's there's a there's there's a

116:49

tunnel under that pyramid. There's

116:51

there's there's a tunnel system under

116:52

that period. I don't know why. I just

116:53

had this intuition. So, we decided to go

116:55

over there one day and fly our our GPR

117:00

drone around the pyramid. And we did a

117:04

we we we did an extensive run around

117:06

that pyramid. We did like a cross

117:07

configuration with the drone to make

117:09

sure that we get a good reading. And we

117:11

found two massive artificial tunnels

117:14

under the pyramid that intersect a 100

117:16

feet below that pyramid. M you could

117:18

drive a semi-truck through them. And we

117:20

don't know how far they go, but they go

117:22

and we actually spent some time trying

117:24

to find a way into him. We couldn't. We

117:26

ran out of time. Um, but it's it's

117:29

remarkable because Julio Tejo remarks

117:34

in his writing about the Paracus culture

117:36

that the Paracas people seem to have a

117:39

affinity

117:41

for living under the ground. They had

117:43

subterranean dwellings. And I've

117:46

explored some of these subterranean

117:48

dwellings out in the out in the Procus

117:50

Reserve. And what's they're really cool

117:52

because

117:54

they you'll see like these these hills.

117:56

They look like um they look like long

117:59

houses that are built that are that are

118:00

buried in the ground. So you see like

118:02

this this this elongated hill. And

118:04

really what it is is it's whale bones.

118:07

They use like the vertebrae of a whale.

118:10

So you got whale bones and then they

118:11

would pack on top all kinds of they

118:13

would pack on earth but then they would

118:15

also add in organic material and it

118:18

would create like an insulating effect

118:20

and heat the interior. But they were

118:22

subterranean. So what you see are the

118:24

roofs of the of the dwellings and then

118:26

they went down into the ground and there

118:28

were tunnels and there was all kinds of

118:29

stuff. This is where these weird people

118:31

with the elongated skulls were living.

118:34

>> Absolutely.

118:36

>> Absolutely bizarre.

118:37

>> How old are these uh mummies?

118:39

>> I think the Procus culture Oh jeez. It

118:42

goes back maybe to

118:46

I don't remember 200 BC or something

118:47

like that. I can't remember. Maybe not

118:48

that far back. Um I really don't

118:51

remember. They're they're that's that

118:52

can't be accurate. I think it goes back

118:54

to

118:56

definitely to the first century AD. I

118:58

don't remember off the top of my head.

119:00

>> What happened? Where did those people

119:01

go?

119:02

>> That's that's the question. I mean the

119:04

the the I think that the prevailing

119:06

theory is that they became the Nazca

119:08

people that they didn't go anywhere.

119:11

That that essentially the the Nazca

119:13

people were the Paracas people

119:15

>> like they interbred. know that the

119:17

culture just sort of migrated and and

119:19

and became the Nazca people.

119:21

>> So what happened to those genetic

119:22

features

119:23

>> that well there are some among the Nazca

119:25

but not as much as among the Paracas.

119:27

Others think that the Paracus they just

119:30

disappeared like they were either

119:31

exterminated or there's you know there's

119:34

multiple theories but there's no

119:36

question that they were bizarre

119:39

bizarre and of course

119:41

>> and there's physical evidence of this

119:42

like we're talking about the the mummies

119:44

before excuse me the giants before and

119:47

we you know we're like it's just stories

119:49

this is actual physical evidence

119:51

>> you mean the elongated skulls

119:52

>> oh yeah they're everywhere down there

119:53

now granted as I said before many of

119:56

them are the result Oh,

119:57

>> many of them are the result of cranial

119:59

deformation.

119:59

>> But what about these [ __ ]

120:01

>> I don't know.

120:01

>> They're not all elongated.

120:02

>> I mean, yeah. How do you elongate that?

120:04

You got a balloon in someone's head.

120:05

>> I've seen some really big heart-shaped

120:07

heads.

120:07

>> That is so in Peru.

120:09

>> Meeting that guy. I just

120:11

>> small compared to some ones I've seen

120:13

like some of the ones I've seen like

120:14

look like a heart. Really big.

120:17

>> And um actually that particular skull

120:19

was was exceptionally large. The one I

120:21

saw that looked like a heart.

120:22

>> Um

120:23

>> yeah. So, just keep in mind cranial

120:26

deformation is what?

120:27

>> It says that these two in the front left

120:29

row are from the billow bait.

120:32

>> And now I don't know what the hell that

120:33

means.

120:34

>> Billow bait.

120:35

>> Yeah, that's what the picture says.

120:36

>> What does that mean?

120:37

>> Do you know what that means?

120:38

>> No.

120:38

>> Yeah. Two scrolls from the front are

120:40

from the billow bait and italicized.

120:43

>> They are billow bait. I don't know the

120:44

name.

120:44

>> Look at that one on the left in the

120:46

middle. Those are nuts. That is just

120:49

Imagine meeting that cat.

120:51

>> And here's the other question. the size

120:53

of his eyes.

120:54

>> Here's the other question, though. Why

120:55

bind the head,

120:57

>> right?

120:58

>> And and this is all over, as you know,

120:59

all over the world. It's they do it in

121:01

Africa. They do it all the Native

121:02

Americans, the flathead tribe up in

121:04

Montana. They're called the flathead

121:06

because they would cradle board. They're

121:08

young and they get these flat

121:10

>> um

121:11

>> um they [clears throat] they would have

121:12

these very distinct skulls. So, um why

121:17

>> are these cultures doing they're

121:18

emulating something?

121:20

>> Yeah. Who or what are they emulating?

121:22

That's the question. And of course, you

121:24

have in ancient Egypt, you have, you

121:26

know, figures with elongated skulls like

121:28

Nefertiti and her daughters

121:31

um who are depicted with very pronounced

121:33

elongated skulls. Now, is that the is

121:36

that just the result of cradle head

121:38

headboarding? Probably. I don't know.

121:40

But why do that?

121:41

>> Well, the problem is some of these

121:42

skulls have actual larger volume than a

121:45

human skull.

121:45

>> That's true. Some of them do.

121:47

>> That's that's where it gets really

121:48

weird.

121:48

>> That's true. So if you have 20% 30% even

121:51

40% more volume

121:53

>> which is like okay

121:55

>> 40% more brain is nuts like what does

121:58

that mean?

121:58

>> There's a slight explanation for what we

122:00

were just looking up and that also what

122:02

you

122:02

>> what is the

122:04

>> something to do with male and female.

122:06

>> So it says blobate

122:09

that thing you were talking about

122:11

tubular erect was the most common among

122:13

both sexes. Boate skulls were observed

122:14

at a much higher rate in female skulls.

122:18

This association with sex has evidence

122:20

in some paraca ceramics where men and

122:22

women are depicted with distinctly

122:24

tubular erect or biobait heads

122:27

respectively.

122:28

>> And then it even goes into this.

122:29

>> So the bio bait is then the the

122:30

heart-shaped

122:32

>> [ __ ] weird bending.

122:34

>> It is weird. It is extremely weird. And

122:35

then of course you have those, you know,

122:37

the alleged alien mummies down there.

122:38

>> Yeah. What do you think about those?

122:39

Because there's a lot of people now that

122:40

are saying that those are elaborate

122:41

hoaxes.

122:42

>> I went down to Peru. I was invited to go

122:44

down there um by uh Dr. Roger Zunya or

122:48

Professor Roger Zunya to go down and and

122:51

look at the specimens that they have at

122:53

the Eco Museum. Uh they have four

122:55

specimens at the Eco Museum. The most

122:57

impressive specimen that they have there

122:58

is called Maria and Maria's in the fetal

123:01

position. She's a large one of the

123:02

larger mummies. Um then they have a few

123:05

other ones. They have two of the of the

123:07

the small ones, the ones that Haime

123:09

Assan famously un, you know, revealed

123:12

over there in Mexico during that thing

123:14

that he did over there, that press

123:15

thing. And and then you have one that's

123:18

called Wawita,

123:20

which seems to be like uh some kind of a

123:23

combination of of different things. And

123:25

um so I went down there to the

123:27

university and uh walked up to these

123:31

things and and at first I have to say my

123:34

first impression of Maria, I didn't

123:36

really care about the little ones. I

123:37

never believed that the little ones

123:38

ever.

123:39

>> The little ones look squirly.

123:40

>> Yeah. I never believed that they were

123:41

living organic beings. They're very

123:43

rigid.

123:43

>> Yeah,

123:44

>> they're very rigid. I don't think that,

123:46

you know, like their morphology really

123:47

could have worked in the real world.

123:48

>> Like Monat, like that one.

123:50

>> Monerat and and Maria and um there's a

123:53

bunch of them. the those are very

123:56

compelling when you when you're standing

123:57

next to them looking at them.

124:00

The they were compelling. So I looked at

124:04

the mummies and then I interviewed um

124:06

Roger Zunya and he's very very convinced

124:09

that they're 100% real. Sincerely, I

124:13

mean I I like um Professor Zunya and he

124:17

really is convinced. I don't think he's

124:19

not trying to perpetrate some kind of a

124:20

hoax. Neither is anybody at the

124:22

University of Eeka. There's a good faith

124:23

effort going on there to try and

124:26

investigate this and and and and

124:28

continually do testing and there it's

124:30

it's an open field. They're

124:31

>> Have they done genetic testing?

124:33

>> Yeah, they've done all kinds of testing.

124:34

So,

124:34

>> what do they find?

124:36

>> Here's the problem. There's been a lot

124:37

of testing done, but but I don't think

124:39

the interpretation of the data has been

124:41

competent.

124:43

Um, and so initially I was pretty

124:47

impressed. I thought it was more likely

124:49

than not. I even said this on the

124:50

Michael Null show that it was more

124:51

likely than not in my mind that the the

124:54

the larger mummies like Maria were real,

124:56

but I've since reversed that position. I

124:58

think it's more likely than not that all

125:00

of them are a hoax.

125:02

That's my personal opinion. And this is

125:05

a hot topic, you know, like on X and

125:07

stuff. There's a lot of people who are

125:09

absolutely sincerely convinced that

125:11

these things are real. The problem is

125:14

that this entire thing started with a

125:16

with a grave robber,

125:19

a very shady individual.

125:22

And the very first mummies that were

125:23

brought forward were were were hoaxes,

125:25

were fake. That's how it started.

125:29

And you know, this is a whole it's a

125:31

whole saga we don't have to get into,

125:32

but it started with fakes. It started

125:35

with a hoax.

125:37

And then they alle, you know, then

125:39

allegedly they started to produce the

125:40

real the real ones. And I I just have a

125:43

hard time believing that that this is an

125:47

elaborate hoax. Now, I've talked to some

125:48

of the individuals who've

125:51

um who've done some of the scientific

125:54

work on these. They don't want me to

125:56

mention their names or anything. Um

125:58

they're trying to just sort of stay

125:59

neutral. They don't want the press and

126:03

they

126:05

they also doubt that they're they're

126:06

real. They think they're really really

126:09

elaborate hoaxes

126:11

and um I know that a lot of money has

126:14

exchanged hands regard to these things.

126:16

Maria was on up for sale for a million

126:19

dollars at one point and if I mean if

126:21

you're a proven grave robber a million

126:23

dollars is like a billion dollars. I

126:25

mean um so that's to me that's uh

126:29

>> Can we see what the Maria one looks

126:30

like?

126:31

>> That's not

126:33

that cast a lot of shade on the whole

126:34

thing for me. Now I can't say

126:36

scientifically the DNA data this that

126:39

the other but there's a lot of debate

126:41

going back and forth on this thing.

126:42

Well, I think one of the problems is

126:44

anatomists uh experts in anatomy have

126:48

looked at the structure of the feet.

126:49

Yes. In the hands and they they it

126:51

doesn't seem to jive with what they

126:54

understand about the structure of feet.

126:56

>> That's true.

126:56

>> That the bones are not in the proper

126:59

position. They're not the proper size.

127:01

They don't It doesn't look like it makes

127:04

sense. But damn, that's amazing.

127:06

>> Thanks, Maria.

127:07

>> Like, here's the thing. If it is a hoax,

127:09

like what an amazing job they did.

127:11

>> Yeah. Maybe maybe the greatest hoax ever

127:13

perpetrated in the history of

127:15

archaeology.

127:15

>> Like who did it and like what what

127:18

talent this person has.

127:20

>> There's a new note because this this

127:22

website was the tridactyls.org.

127:24

It [clears throat] got up there. There's

127:25

a little note that popped up. It says

127:26

they have ongoing research that just got

127:28

updated.

127:29

>> This is a great website. Uh what is the

127:31

ongoing research?

127:32

>> They're just there's more here than

127:35

Maria might be Mario.

127:36

>> Yeah, Mario. They call him Mario Mario

127:37

now. It's a dude.

127:39

>> Maybe he's nonbinary. Bunch more

127:40

[laughter] data down here. I don't know

127:42

what all this stuff is.

127:43

>> Interesting.

127:44

>> Bunch more data that people

127:45

>> That's a great resource there. Um,

127:48

>> so it's tridactyls.org.

127:50

>> Um, go to the uh images of it again. Go

127:53

down like right there. So this uh

127:58

Okay, this is a 3D scan.

128:00

>> Yeah, these are all scans. These are

128:01

videos of the scans.

128:03

>> [ __ ] weird, man. Look at the length

128:06

also of the fingers and the toes.

128:11

Well, you think that's a hoax?

128:12

>> People said it wouldn't work that way.

128:13

>> You know, [sighs]

128:15

I

128:15

>> What' you say, Jamie?

128:16

>> People said that like the you can't grab

128:18

stuff. There's pictures down here they

128:20

have of people trying where was it?

128:22

Trying to like grab stuff with uh I

128:25

might have been looking at a different

128:27

Yeah, I was looking at this. These are

128:29

the fingers that you couldn't bend. They

128:32

wouldn't bend or something like that.

128:33

It's hard to like this person trying to

128:34

grab stuff with long fingers without

128:37

bendable, you know? uh appendages, I

128:40

guess.

128:40

>> Well, we're assuming that they had to

128:42

grab things.

128:43

>> Well, what would you have fingers for?

128:45

>> Well, maybe they put them on a

128:47

spaceship. That's how they pilot it.

128:50

Maybe they've gone past the idea of

128:51

picking things up. Maybe they lift

128:53

things with their mind. Maybe that's how

128:55

they move the blocks into place.

128:58

>> I don't know.

128:58

>> I'm more convinced than that that

128:59

they're that they're a hoax. I don't I

129:01

can't say definitively.

129:02

>> Yeah, I would lean in that direction

129:03

because I want them to be real. And the

129:05

problem, but also whoever did hoax them,

129:08

like Monster, whoever hoax that, like

129:10

what an amazing job you guys did,

129:12

>> and also there's some of them that have

129:14

weird implants in their heads.

129:16

>> They have metal implants in the one a

129:18

couple of them have them in the hand,

129:18

others have them in the forehead.

129:20

>> Very weird stuff.

129:20

>> Some of them have fetuses apparently,

129:22

although that's there's some dispute

129:23

about that. They say the fetuses look

129:25

like, you know, that they look the same

129:26

as the adults, which would be remarkable

129:28

if true, but that's disputed.

129:30

Everything's disputed,

129:31

>> right? There's I mean there's there's

129:34

there's there's a factional battle here

129:37

between the the the believers and the

129:39

naysayers, right?

129:40

>> And they're both looking at the same

129:42

data, interpret interpreting it

129:43

differently. So that's why I just sort

129:46

of stand back and say I don't know. I

129:47

mean, I can tell you how it started. It

129:49

started with grave robbers, very um very

129:53

seedy people,

129:54

>> and it started the initial ones were not

129:57

real. I know that because I know um the

130:00

individuals who were involved in that

130:02

whole thing. So

130:04

>> just that alone.

130:06

>> Yeah.

130:06

>> Just that alone. I mean,

130:07

>> but then how did they make the skin? How

130:09

did they cover it? How did they make it

130:11

look like? They're really good.

130:13

>> I mean, you know, if you were selling

130:15

these things for hundreds of thou if you

130:16

were making $100,000 on just $100,000 on

130:18

one of these

130:20

>> mummies and you're a poor grave robber,

130:23

you would do anything. and take whatever

130:25

time it what whatever it took to produce

130:27

one of these to sell it to make

130:28

$100,000.

130:30

>> But haven't they aged them like and

130:32

they're really old?

130:34

>> They harvest the pieces from the graves.

130:38

>> Okay.

130:39

>> From from the Nazca graves.

130:41

>> They construct this somehow from really

130:44

old skeletons pieced it together.

130:46

>> That's the allegation. And also from old

130:48

llamas and stuff like that.

130:50

>> Yeah. Um,

130:51

>> one of the other weird things about

130:53

these elongated heads is that they have

130:55

where it connects to the spine is in a

130:58

different position than a human skull.

131:00

>> Yes, there is some indication of that.

131:02

Um, that's why I was pointing out on

131:04

that the one that with the skin on it.

131:07

There is a very interesting morphology

131:10

with the where the of the neck where it

131:11

connects into the spinal cord. Now, I'm

131:14

not an expert on anatomy. I don't know.

131:16

All I can look at it and say is that's

131:18

freaking weird. I mean, really, really

131:20

weird.

131:20

>> It is weird. And all I and and I mean I

131:23

always just remind people just you can

131:25

argue about all the dad all day long,

131:26

but if one of those people walked into

131:28

this room right now,

131:29

>> right,

131:31

>> it wouldn't just be a little weird,

131:33

>> right?

131:33

>> It would be it would be utterly bizarre.

131:36

>> Yeah.

131:37

>> And

131:38

>> an actual real human mummy or whatever

131:41

it is, mummy, if that was alive today,

131:44

it would freak you out.

131:44

>> Yeah. Larger orbital sockets, very

131:46

small, extremely elongated head.

131:49

>> Yeah. It freak you out.

131:51

>> It just makes you wonder like what was

131:53

the world like back then? What what were

131:57

these people like? Was there a separate

132:00

branch of the human species?

132:02

>> I don't know. I think I'm pretty sure

132:03

now I'm I'm recalling the date 2,00 2500

132:07

BC somewhere around there is where the

132:08

process culture goes back to and then it

132:11

I think it existed until 700 AD. I'm I'm

132:15

not sure that those numbers are accurate

132:16

but that's what I remember. Yeah,

132:19

there's a lot of weird stuff in Peru.

132:21

>> Well, a lot of weird stuff in just

132:23

ancient history in particular. What do

132:25

you make of like things like Zepte and

132:28

the Sumerian kings list where you you go

132:32

back in time and you have these

132:35

incredible ages of some of these rulers

132:37

that ruled for thousands of years.

132:40

Um, well, what's in what's really

132:42

interesting is that if you overlay the

132:45

Samrian kings list with the with the

132:47

list of patriarchs, pre-flood patriarchs

132:49

in Genesis 5, it's like a onetoone

132:50

match.

132:52

So, um, I'm not convinced that I think

132:56

that the the Sumerian kings list is is

132:59

the ages is mythological.

133:01

Um, I don't think that they were ruling

133:04

for thousands and thousands of years. Um

133:08

uh I like I said I see this very

133:11

interesting overlay over the over the

133:12

Genesis 6 genealogy. These are the

133:14

patriarchs from Adam to Noah. And

133:17

specifically I mean these are the

133:18

patriarchs who live before the flood.

133:20

The flood came in the time of Noah. And

133:24

you know, there's a lot of debate right

133:26

now, especially online, and I think

133:29

you've had people here on your show as

133:30

well, that talk about the Sumerian story

133:36

being the oldest story and being our

133:38

sort of the the original story of the

133:41

flood and and of the anti-dolivian

133:43

world. But I actually I have a different

133:45

view of that. I think actually the

133:47

oldest story is the story of Enoch. It's

133:50

the Enochian story. I think that's the

133:52

original story. And maybe some of this

133:56

strangeness, maybe some of the bizarre

133:58

things that we see and the the stories

134:00

of the flood and of the giants and all

134:03

of that, maybe something like the book

134:06

of Enoch is a is a actually an accurate

134:08

account of affairs of things that happen

134:10

in the anti-dolivian world. And

134:13

certainly the writers of the biblical

134:15

narrative believe that. I mean the

134:17

writer of Genesis and then obvious in

134:18

the New Testament you have references to

134:20

to what I call the Anakian tale. And so

134:24

when you think about this the

134:25

anti-delivian world the cataclysm that

134:29

that

134:31

destroyed it seemingly overnight the

134:34

great civilizations that existed back

134:35

then. Um,

134:39

you see a you see a series of of

134:42

parallels in all the stories, all the

134:45

ancient stories. Uh, whether it be the

134:47

the the Sumerianss, whether it be the

134:49

the ancient Egyptians, the um the

134:53

Hebrews,

134:55

the Greeks, the Romans, there are

134:57

parallels in certain details. Great

135:00

civilizations inhabited the earth, or at

135:02

least a great civilization. And that

135:03

doesn't necessarily mean that that they

135:06

had the kind of technology that we have

135:08

today. I think that's a mistake that

135:10

some people make when they're thinking

135:11

about the anti-livvian world and a lost

135:14

civilization. They think, well, that

135:15

means that there were skyscrapers and

135:17

and automobiles and aircraft and things

135:19

like that. That's not necessarily what

135:21

it means. Um and so

135:26

I think it's very very interesting that

135:28

you have all of these parallels a

135:29

cataclysm giants

135:32

um you have a fratricidal war that's

135:36

discussed for example in in you have the

135:38

the vet and and some of the ancient

135:41

Indian origin stories and another

135:44

component that you find everywhere is

135:46

this idea that the gods descended to the

135:48

earth comingled with human species

135:52

progenerated a race of demigods, in many

135:55

accounts, giants, who then governed the

135:57

earth. And depending on what

136:01

version of the story you're reading,

136:02

they were either good guys or bad guys

136:06

leading up to the cataclysm that

136:07

destroyed everything. You know, the

136:09

biblical account, the great flood, and

136:11

other accounts record various kinds of

136:15

cataclysm, right, all over the world. So

136:18

the question is I think an intriguing

136:22

question is is it true? I mean are these

136:25

basic um constituents of these stories

136:30

is it true?

136:32

And and I happen to believe that

136:35

I happen to believe that that the book

136:37

of Enoch is the beginning of the book of

136:39

Enoch. The oldest portion of the book of

136:42

Enoch called the book of the watchers

136:44

is

136:46

the earliest account of the

136:49

anti-dolivian world. And I don't mean

136:50

necessarily the book of Enoch that we

136:52

have today. I mean the tradition of

136:55

Enoch.

136:56

Was there a manuscript that Enoch wrote

136:58

himself? Enoch was the seventh from

136:59

Adam. So he's one of those individuals

137:02

on the Sumerian kings list.

137:04

I believe he corresponds to Endem and

137:06

Demaranki. I can't remember how to

137:08

pronounce the name in the Sumerian name.

137:11

But again, you have this overlay with

137:13

the pre- flood patriarchs. You have all

137:15

of these details that correspond.

137:17

Now, we have evidence of cataclysm.

137:19

We're finding evidence of cataclysm,

137:21

right? We talked about the younger D

137:23

impact hypothesis.

137:25

So, are some of the other details true

137:27

as well? Were there giants?

137:31

Were there beings who descended to the

137:33

earth in the anti-dolivian world? Did

137:37

they populate with human women? I mean,

137:40

that's

137:41

that's essentially the story of Enoch.

137:43

Enoch begins with

137:46

um this is first Enoch. Enoch begins

137:49

with a company of 200 watchers. These

137:52

beings that are designated as watchers

137:54

and they are they're heavenly beings.

137:58

And the the the watcher designation is

138:00

not exclusively extra biblical. You find

138:02

it in the book of Daniel in a very

138:03

interesting scene in which holy watchers

138:08

are judging Nebuchadnezzar, the

138:10

Babylonian king, and they sentence him

138:13

to a period of time of madness where

138:15

he's given the mind of a beast, and he's

138:16

eating grass. And this is a judgment

138:19

from the watchers. He's eating grass

138:21

like an animal, and his hair grows long,

138:24

and he's basically like a beast out in

138:26

the field. The the the hotty king of

138:28

Babylon, humbled in that way. And so the

138:32

watcher designation is you find it in

138:34

Daniel. But then in the book of Enoch,

138:36

it's much more specific. These were 200

138:37

of these watchers. These are nonhuman

138:42

celestial entities. You could describe

138:44

them as extraterrestrial entities.

138:47

And

138:48

they

138:51

they begin to lust after the daughters

138:54

of men

138:56

and they desire to uh to progenerate

138:59

families. They want to have families.

139:01

>> Do you think that this is a

139:03

simplification of genetic engineering

139:06

and that this depiction of it is just,

139:10

you know, like the game of telephone,

139:11

you're telling the old story

139:14

through oral tradition for a long period

139:17

of time as it gets relayed over time

139:20

post flood. So you get this sort of

139:22

distorted version of what the actual

139:25

event was.

139:26

>> I think it's possible there was genetic

139:28

engineering involved. because we

139:30

certainly look different than everything

139:31

else on the planet.

139:33

>> Well, the the book of Enoch, the the at

139:36

least the Hebrew account both in the

139:38

book of Genesis because the the there's

139:39

a there's a verse Genesis 6

139:42

um that says, "Now it came to pass that

139:44

when men began to multiply on the face

139:46

of the earth and daughters were born to

139:47

them that the sons of God saw the

139:49

daughters of men that they were

139:50

beautiful and they took wives of all

139:52

whom they chose. There were giants or

139:54

nephilim in the earth in those days and

139:56

also afterward when the sons of God came

139:57

into the daughters of men and they bore

140:00

children to them. These were the mighty

140:01

men of old, the men of renown. That's

140:04

the reference to the to the origin of

140:06

giants and Nephilim in the book of

140:09

Genesis.

140:10

And so in the Bible, you have these

140:13

angelic beings, the sons of God, who are

140:16

lusting. They're looking down at the

140:17

daughters of men. They see that they're

140:19

beautiful. The book of Enoch is even

140:21

more explicit. The book of Enoch says

140:23

that the that the angels of heaven, the

140:24

watchers lusted

140:27

after the daughters of men and they

140:29

desired to progenerate families. So they

140:34

descended they descended to the earth on

140:36

the summit of Mount Hermon and they

140:38

bound themselves by a pact of mutual

140:40

impreations.

140:42

In other words, we're all in this

140:43

together. They knew what they were about

140:44

to do was going to be very grave sin. So

140:47

they bind themselves with an oath.

140:49

That's why Mount Hermon has been known

140:51

since time immemorial as the mountain of

140:53

oath. Then they descended into the

140:55

plains and they began to choose wives

140:56

from among the daughters of men uh with

140:59

whom to copulate. But first these were

141:03

maidens that they intended to marry and

141:05

there was a transaction that happened

141:08

because in exchange for the for the

141:11

maiden's hands in marriage

141:14

the their fathers were given technology.

141:18

So the watchers taught men the knowledge

141:21

that they were already striving to

141:23

learn. So there's and that's and it

141:25

that's that's implied in the text. It's

141:27

not explicit, but it's implied because

141:28

the watchers give technology. They give

141:30

knowledge which results in technology

141:32

and they get an exchange the maidens

141:35

that they desired to marry. And then

141:37

they they copulate with them. They have

141:38

sexual intercourse with them. The women

141:40

conceive and give birth to giants. And

141:43

then these giants begin to terrorize the

141:44

earth. They're cannibalistic. They begin

141:48

to devour men.

141:49

>> So maybe a hybrid sort of like a liger.

141:53

You know how a liger is a combination of

141:56

a tiger and a lion? It's much larger.

141:58

Large. Yeah.

141:59

>> But they can't reproduce,

142:00

>> right?

142:01

>> Yeah. So the so the result is you have

142:03

these watchers. Yeah. Their DNA mixed

142:06

with the DNA of human women produces

142:07

giants.

142:09

And and you know this story by the way

142:12

is attested in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Not

142:13

just in the Bible, not just in the book

142:15

of Enoch. the book of Enoch. Of course,

142:16

fragments of it were discovered among

142:18

the Dead Sea Scrolls. But you find you

142:20

find this story in, for example, you

142:22

find it in the book of giants, the book

142:26

of Jubilees, the Genesis Apocryphan, and

142:29

other texts as well. And so this is this

142:32

story, as bizarre as it is, is

142:34

foundational to Hebrew cosmology.

142:37

This is what the ancient Hebrews

142:39

believed literally happened. Like this

142:41

was a in their minds, this was a

142:42

historical event. You go back in time,

142:45

you go to the anti-olivian world, the

142:46

world before the flood. What do they

142:47

envision? They envision the watchers,

142:50

these gods living among men, populating

142:53

with human women, giants who were who

142:57

who were cannibalistic. And then

143:01

God decides intervene because the giants

143:04

are there's it's a very bad scene on

143:06

planet Earth. And people begin to cry

143:08

out, petition heaven. God decides to

143:10

intervene according to Enoch and he's he

143:14

dispatches some angels and they one of

143:16

the things that they do is they set the

143:19

giants against each other in a

143:20

fratricidal war.

143:23

So they make the giants go to war with

143:25

each other. Now

143:27

when I envision this scenario playing

143:30

with the idea here that this actually

143:32

happened right in the anti-dolivian

143:33

world I don't imagine big dumb giants

143:36

you know bopping each other over the

143:38

heads with clubs I imagine a

143:40

technological war

143:42

because what I see unfolding here and I

143:45

think again this is implicit in the

143:46

inkian story is that

143:51

the watchers are essentially creating a

143:53

dynasty. They are building an empire

143:56

called the empire of the gods in the

143:57

anti-dolivian world there. They are each

144:00

portioning the earth among themselves

144:02

and their hybrids are ruling each of

144:04

these kingdoms and then they go to war

144:08

with each other. And again, I see this

144:10

as a technological war because I don't

144:11

believe that in the biblical account,

144:15

angels never have wings. Only in

144:18

prophetic icon iconography, but in the

144:20

historical narrative of the Bible,

144:22

angels are never depicted with wings.

144:24

They are depicted as

144:27

uh operating what what I would describe

144:30

as advanced aerospace vehicles, the

144:31

chariots of God, the chariots of Yahweh,

144:33

the chariots of fire, variously

144:35

denominated. And I think that these are

144:38

vehicles of conveyance

144:41

and and so the watchers when they

144:43

descended to the earth I think they

144:44

descended to the earth in some kind of a

144:46

vehicle you know like that right so they

144:51

would have the knowledge and there would

144:52

be some technology and so when these

144:55

when their offspring the giants went to

144:57

war with each other in this fractalidal

144:59

war it would have been a technological

145:01

war

145:03

now the reason why I say that is Because

145:06

you have the story of the watchers

145:09

as as chronicled in the book of Enoch,

145:11

but then overlay the story of Atlantis.

145:14

You have the same story. So of course

145:16

the story of Atlantis comes to us from

145:18

Plato's Tmus and Citrius dialogue and he

145:22

has Solen of Athens traveling to Egypt

145:25

and and and

145:27

interfacing with the priests of SC and

145:30

they tell him you know you don't have

145:32

any history that's horriy with age and

145:34

so forth and then they begin to relate

145:36

to him the story of Atlantis because

145:38

they told him that his ancestors were

145:39

remarkable people. They were the they

145:41

were the Athenians and only they could

145:43

resist the warlike Atlantanss, right?

145:46

And then we get the story of Atlantis.

145:47

How does the story of Atlantis begin in

145:50

uh in Plato's dialogue? Well, it begins

145:54

with the gods aortioning the earth

145:56

amongst themselves. That's how it

145:58

begins. So, here are the gods dividing,

146:00

divvying up the earth. They're going to

146:02

create what I again describe as an

146:03

empire of the gods. They're divvying up

146:06

the earth and each one is going to take

146:10

an a portion of the earth for himself.

146:12

Poseidon, Plato tells us, gets the area

146:14

of Atlantis. And what does Poseidon do?

146:18

Well, he becomes enamored of a human

146:20

woman named Plato. He takes her to wife.

146:24

He copulates with her. She gives birth

146:27

to 10 hybrid sons who become the kings

146:31

of Atlantis. And I think there's reason

146:33

to believe that they were giants in the

146:35

myths.

146:36

Atlas, for example, was chief among

146:38

them. So you have these 10 hybrid sons

146:41

ruling over Atlantis.

146:43

Then what happens? Then you have and

146:46

presumably the other gods did the same

146:47

thing in other parts of the world,

146:50

right? They went out and and married

146:52

human women and gave birth to hybrid

146:55

offspring, which is of course what

146:56

happens in Greek mythology with a lot of

146:58

these gods. They progenerate hybrid

146:59

offspring. Then you have

147:03

a war that breaks out. The Atlantanss

147:05

become very warlike. They go on a a

147:08

campaign and

147:11

they they're steamrolling everybody in

147:13

their way until they get to the

147:16

Athenians

147:18

and they're locked in this conflict. So

147:22

I'm hoping people are picking up the

147:23

parallels here with the book of Enoch

147:24

with this with the story of Enoch. And

147:26

in the midst of this conflict, what

147:28

happens? Cataclysm ensues.

147:32

Atlantis, but not just Atlantis.

147:35

Atlantis in the insinuation is everybody

147:39

gets destroyed in a cataclysm that

147:43

erupts suddenly

147:45

and Atlantis is consumed in in the waves

147:48

and and is no more. Well, the whole

147:52

point of the Egyptians when they're

147:54

telling this story to Solon, one of the

147:56

one of the points that they're trying to

147:58

convey to Solon is there have been many

148:00

cataclysms, world ending cataclysms. And

148:03

every time a cataclysm happens, we have

148:06

to start over like children, right? So

148:10

the parallels between the book of Enoch

148:12

and I think it, by the way, I think

148:14

Atlantis

148:16

that Atlantis is an allegory of the

148:18

anti-dolivian world in general.

148:21

I think that there was something like an

148:22

empire of the gods in the anti-dolivian

148:24

world and I personally believe that um

148:28

that the biblical record is the is the

148:30

faithful account of what happened in the

148:31

anti-dolivian world and with the

148:33

addition of the book of Enoch um because

148:35

you cannot separate you cannot separate

148:39

the Enochian narrative the Enochic

148:42

traditions from the Bible. Well, Enoch

148:44

is referenced in the Bible, and the only

148:46

reason why the book of Enoch is not in

148:48

the cannon of the Bible is because of

148:49

some rabbis, right?

148:51

>> Well, it's it's complicated. So, the

148:53

book of Enoch

148:55

is a compilation of texts

148:58

and ranging from the 4th century BC to

149:01

probably the 1st century AD.

149:04

The tradition of Enoch, I think, is very

149:07

old. I think the tradition of Enoch,

149:10

this that that story I just outlined,

149:13

that tradition of Enoch is the oldest

149:14

story we have,

149:17

the one upon which all the other stories

149:18

are based. That's my personal opinion.

149:21

Now, the actual book of Enoch that we

149:23

have today, the only reason we have it

149:25

is because it was preserved in Ethiopia.

149:28

That's the only reason we have the book

149:29

of Enoch today.

149:30

>> The Ethiopian Bible,

149:31

>> the Ethiopians preserved it. both the

149:33

the uh the the beta Israel Jews, very

149:37

very ancient Jewish community and the

149:39

Tawahedo Orthodox Christians.

149:41

>> Do you think they have the Ark of the

149:43

Covenant?

149:45

>> I think, let's put it this way. I think

149:46

Graham Hancock makes a very compelling

149:48

case that they do. Have you read his

149:50

book, The Sign in the Seal?

149:51

>> Yeah. It's the whole depiction of these

149:54

people that are the watchers of this

149:56

thing get cataracts because it has some

149:58

radiation properties.

149:59

>> Yeah. Very compelling narrative.

150:00

>> Yeah. None of them live more than a

150:02

couple years after they get the

150:03

assignment.

150:04

>> Yeah, it's I think it's a it's a very

150:06

strong possibility that they do.

150:09

>> That's crazy.

150:10

>> It would be crazy. Yeah. And I think

150:12

that um many people including Graham

150:14

think that the Ark of the Covenant was

150:15

there's something technological about

150:17

it, something radioactive about it.

150:19

Um,

150:21

but it it is it's interesting though

150:24

because you have

150:27

the idea at the very least the potential

150:30

for technology in the anti-dolivian

150:33

world, right? Advanced technology. So

150:34

what what do I mean? Well, what if

150:37

we're talking about the watchers who

150:38

descended the earth, like I said, the

150:40

Hebrews believe that that actually

150:41

happened, that that was historical. That

150:43

wasn't mythological to them. That was

150:44

historical, that event. Well, what if

150:46

they did arrive in something like like

150:48

that? like like a like a flying saucer,

150:50

right? What if there was some level of

150:52

of technology introduced?

150:55

But I don't believe that it would have

150:56

been distributed, broadly distributed,

150:59

you know,

151:01

talking about like an like an advanced

151:03

lost civilization. I don't think that

151:05

technology would be broadly distributed.

151:07

I think that the technology would remain

151:08

in these family lines in these dynasties

151:11

because their desire was to govern

151:12

everyone. So I think what we might be

151:14

looking for instead of a technologically

151:16

advanced civilization, maybe a

151:18

technologically advanced fraternity

151:20

within civilization. You see what I

151:21

mean?

151:22

>> Like a group that was in that was in

151:24

control of something advanced, but the

151:28

rest of the people maybe were Iron Age

151:30

or something like that or whatever

151:31

bronze age level, which is kind of a

151:34

different perspective.

151:35

>> Well, we see that today, right? I mean

151:36

there's plenty of people today that are

151:39

uncontacted tribes

151:40

>> that are living like people lived tens

151:42

of thousands of years ago.

151:44

>> That's exactly right. Yeah. So

151:46

>> yeah, it's not uniform even today.

151:48

>> Right. So we may So I think that's why

151:51

when we think about was there a

151:53

technologically advanced civilization in

151:54

the anti-living world in the world

151:55

before the great cataclysm. I think

151:58

really what we're looking what I'm

151:59

looking for is a is a is a fraternity

152:03

who were in possession of technology

152:05

that the rest of everyone didn't have.

152:08

Maybe something like that. Although I

152:09

will say that I believe that the

152:11

antilovians were much more remarkable

152:13

than we are in every way. I think they

152:15

were physically more robust than we are.

152:17

I think that they were intellectually

152:19

much more they were intellectually

152:20

superior to us. Uh as I was saying

152:23

before this how the ancients thought of

152:24

their anticedants. And so when I look

152:26

back on the timeline of history, the

152:29

further you go back all the way to those

152:32

pre flood patriarchs, you're looking at

152:35

human beings who

152:38

who were so superior to us. I mean

152:42

certainly according to the biblical

152:43

account, they were living much much

152:44

longer, almost a thousand years. You're

152:46

looking at human beings who who we would

152:50

scarcely be regarded as as as human like

152:53

them because they would have been more

152:55

human than we are because we've

152:56

degenerated. So I see a degeneration I

153:01

see a devolution in the human species.

153:03

We started as something really really

153:05

remarkable and we've been gradually

153:08

devolving over time so to speak. We've

153:10

been degenerating. I think that our

153:13

anticedants, our anti-delivian

153:14

anticcedants, I [snorts] think they were

153:16

telepathic.

153:18

I think that they had these incredible

153:21

abilities, capabilities that that that

153:23

are perhaps latent in the human species

153:26

today.

153:26

>> Well, that might have been why these

153:27

people had such large heads in Peru,

153:29

too.

153:29

>> Maybe.

153:30

>> Right.

153:30

>> Maybe everybody had elongated skulls at

153:32

one time. I don't know.

153:33

>> But I mean, think about that, though. I

153:35

mean, if if you were see from a biblical

153:37

perspective, Adam was created for two

153:41

for two fundamental reasons. He was

153:43

created to govern the earth, but more

153:47

than that, he was created

153:51

to fellowship with the maker, to commune

153:56

with the maker. He was created for

153:58

fellowship. So, think about that. If you

154:00

were created to fellowship with the

154:03

maker, with God, you would have some

154:05

extraordinary capabilities built into

154:08

your anatomy, into your biology. You

154:10

would be given the ability to interface

154:12

with the maker. And not just with the

154:14

maker, but with with whatever whatever

154:17

else is out there as well. So from the

154:20

very beginning I think that

154:23

mankind was was imbued was it was

154:27

intrinsic in our design that we had all

154:30

of these these incredible capabilities.

154:32

Maybe remote viewing, maybe certainly I

154:34

would say telepathy because telepathy is

154:36

conversation at the speed of thought,

154:39

right? I mean, we fumble around with

154:40

words. We we it takes us kind of a long

154:42

time to try and say what we mean. But

154:44

but what if what you wanted to convey to

154:47

me was done so instantaneously.

154:50

How much more could you convey? How much

154:51

more information? How much more

154:53

efficient would that mode of

154:55

conversation be?

154:56

>> It certainly seems like if we keep

154:58

evolving, that's the future.

155:01

or if we keep developing better and

155:03

better versions of technology. One of

155:06

the things that the gaps that we would

155:08

bridge is Elon said that he said we're

155:11

going to be able to talk without words.

155:13

>> Well, the problem is that our technology

155:16

is getting better, but our species is

155:18

getting dumber

155:19

>> and our biology is getting weaker and

155:21

we're poisoner.

155:23

>> But it's not just because of poison.

155:24

Yes, we poison our environment. We

155:26

poison our bodies certainly but I

155:28

believe that there it's clear to me that

155:31

there that we have degenerating and we

155:33

are degenerating. We are degenerating.

155:36

So um and this is genetic degeneration.

155:40

So we have what's called mutational

155:42

load. Human beings all creatures we have

155:44

mutational load. And mutational load is

155:48

all of the delletterious mutations all

155:50

of the negative mutations that happen in

155:51

our genome.

155:53

they compile

155:56

and it becomes this it becomes this

155:59

burden this genetic burden. We have all

156:01

of these mutations that we're carrying

156:02

mutational load and the further we go

156:05

down the line the more mutational load

156:07

we have and again these are

156:08

delletterious mutations. So you [snorts]

156:12

get all kinds of problems from that. I

156:14

mean we we basically what it amounts to

156:16

is we become less and less and less

156:18

impressive over time

156:19

>> and there's nothing we can do. You can't

156:22

reverse that. You can't just have a good

156:23

diet and and get and regain the

156:27

capabilities that were lost. That's

156:28

impossible. So, we're declining.

156:32

Our technology is ascending. We're

156:34

declining. So, what we're headed for

156:37

essentially is a posthuman future.

156:40

A future in which we have to we have to

156:43

evolve ourselves out of this condition.

156:46

I would say out of Adam, into something

156:49

else. And I'm not in favor of that, by

156:52

the way. I'm not a transhumanist. But

156:54

clearly,

156:56

you have this you have this conundrum

156:59

where we are clearly getting dumber as a

157:02

species. There's no doubt about it. I

157:03

mean, I saw I can't reference it here,

157:05

but I saw some data on this the other

157:07

day. Um, and it's astounding. It's it's

157:11

it's kind of alarming. And not only

157:13

that,

157:16

we've realized and I try and remember

157:18

the reference to this this book that's

157:21

um that details this, but the human

157:24

species is essentially becoming

157:27

reproductively inviable.

157:29

The sperm count of males in the west is

157:31

declining precipitously

157:34

as is our fitness. So that is on the

157:37

decline such that I think the projection

157:40

is in 2045 or something like that we're

157:42

going to basically be reproductively

157:43

inviable. We're going to need a

157:46

technological intervention like

157:48

artificial wombs. Well, what's happening

157:51

right now? We're developing things like

157:53

artificial wombs.

157:55

So it's it's very interesting that these

157:57

two things are running in parallel.

158:00

We're degenerating, but our technology

158:02

is increasingly getting better. So the

158:06

the result of this is going to be what I

158:08

describe as posthuman apocalypse. I mean

158:10

we're we're headed for a future that's

158:12

not human. That's what um the

158:17

you all know her is out there

158:20

prognosticating that in I think he says

158:22

in 120 to 130 years from now there will

158:25

be no more human beings left on planet

158:27

earth. So why am I saying this? Because

158:30

I'm illustrating that you go back in

158:33

time. [clears throat] You go all the way

158:34

back to the beginning. If you come from

158:35

a biblical par paradigm like I do,

158:37

you're you're in the first man, Adam,

158:40

the prototypical man. He has all of the

158:42

incredible capabilities that are innate

158:44

built into his system. He he can he he's

158:47

communing with his maker. He's governing

158:49

the earth. He's have he he can do all of

158:52

these amazing things. And then as we

158:54

become copies of copies of copies of

158:56

copies of copies of Adam all the way

158:57

down, we're we're gradually losing these

159:00

abilities. But I think that some of them

159:02

are still, you know, latent in the human

159:04

species. And I think that explains

159:05

remote remote viewing and telepathy and

159:08

things like that.

159:10

>> I don't know how I got on that. Uh

159:11

>> listen, it makes a lot of sense and it's

159:13

a fascinating conversation and uh

159:17

>> I enjoyed this very much.

159:18

>> I did as well.

159:19

>> Fun. Thank you very much for being here.

159:21

Uh, tell everybody if they want to get a

159:22

hold of your stuff, they want to find

159:23

you, where they could find you on social

159:25

media, where they could find your

159:26

website.

159:27

>> Um, Timothy Alberino on social media, on

159:29

Instagram, on X. Uh, I have a YouTube

159:33

channel, Timothy Alberino. So, I have a

159:35

book called Birthright. Uh, and I also

159:39

published commentary on commentary and

159:43

introduction of the book of Enoch with

159:45

my friends.

159:47

We're gonna have to get to that. That's

159:48

a whole another conversation. I'm

159:50

>> Next time

159:50

>> we're going to have to have that

159:51

conversation.

159:52

>> I would love to. I would love to. Thank

159:53

you very much. [music] My pleasure.

159:55

>> Bye everybody.

159:59

[music]

Interactive Summary

The video features Joe Rogan and guest Timothy Alberino in a discussion centered on the existence of giants, specifically the Kandahar giant in Afghanistan. Alberino details a firsthand account from a C130 pilot who claimed to have transported a dead giant from Afghanistan to Qatar. The conversation expands to the cultural, occult, and historical significance of giants, the role of megalithic sites in Sardinia and Peru, the cover-up of such findings, and connections to the biblical Nephilim. Furthermore, they discuss the Younger Dryas impact, the potential for an advanced ancient civilization, and broader themes of human degeneration and future transhumanism.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts