Joe Rogan Experience #2530 - Timothy Alberino
4436 segments
Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out.
>> The Joe Rogan Experience.
>> TRAIN BY DAY. JOE ROGAN PODCAST BY
NIGHT. All day.
Tim or Tim?
>> Tim is fine.
>> All right. What's up, Tim? What's going
on?
>> What's up, Joe?
>> Nice to meet you. [laughter]
>> Great to be with you.
>> Uh, I've seen a lot of your content
online, but the one that got me the most
was absolutely the giant in Afghanistan,
the Kandahar giant story. And I don't
know if you know, but um I had uh Devin
Lorat on the podcast, the arm wrestler,
and he told a story about how when he
was in the Canadian military, he was
deployed in Afghanistan. And um one of
>> the guys that he was working with over
there had to have a conversation with a
warlord, with a local warlord, and he
said this guy was eight feet tall. He
said this guy was [ __ ] huge. And and
not just tall, but wide. He said it was
the biggest man he's ever seen in his
life.
>> Well, I've heard a lot of things about
giants in in Afghanistan. And I find
that, you know, I I I talk about a lot
of different topics. I talk about a lot
of UFO stuff. Um, and I say some things
that I know are
that I know could get me in trouble, but
nothing makes me more nervous than
talking about Giants, specifically the
Kandahar giant and and the giants in
Kandahar in general.
>> Why?
>> You know, mainly because when I talk to
people who know things,
they're very, very nervous when we get
to this topic. And some of them will
just flat out will not talk about giants
in general, but specifically giants in
Afghanistan.
And some of these guys are high level
guys that worked at the Pentagon.
Um, and they'll talk rather freely with
me about UFOs, but as soon as we broach
this topic, it's it's like they they
warn they literally will warn me, be
careful with this topic. What [laughter]
>> What do you make of that?
Well, I think that uh the topic of
giants is intermeshed with the occult.
That's my personal theory because
nothing else makes sense.
Who cares if there's 8 foot tall guys,
right? Big deal.
>> Well, there's 8 foot tall humans, right?
There's We were just talking about that
young kid that's a basketball player
that's 7 foot n right?
>> There's a few of them now. I've seen
>> Yeah. So, there's actual giants that are
in public,
>> right? They're like play for the NBA and
they're out there. You could meet them.
>> Mhm.
>> But when I talk when I say giants, I'm
talking about 9 to 12 feet tall.
>> That's that's 8 to 12 feet tall would
would I would I would classify an 8 foot
tall person as a giant as well. As long
as they don't have gigantism,
>> right?
>> That's a completely different thing,
right?
>> Gigantism is a disability. This Kandahar
giant story is very crazy because um
what what's interesting about it is the
people that I've talked to that have
been in Afghanistan that were deployed
in Afghanistan, not just Devon but other
people, they don't dismiss it. They say
we've heard some weird [ __ ] about that
place. And the the thing that they
always say is you got to realize like
Afghanistan is an old country. It's old
and it's very remote. Like most of it is
very mountainous. It's controlled by
warlords. And you know, look, there's
these
what are those? Are they Greek or Roman?
Those uh structures that are there that
were that date Greek they look like
Greek temples that date back to
Alexander the Great. And archaeologists
can't study them. They can't go there
because it's too dangerous.
>> It's one of the most remote places on
the planet specifically because it's so
dangerous. You can't just go strolling
around Afghanistan. I mean,
>> you probably would it probably would be
easier to go to Antarctica than
Afghanistan.
>> And hilarious.
>> So, the story of the Kandahar giant.
>> Yeah. Let's tell the story.
>> This story has grown into a mythology
over the years. Um,
years ago, I was working with a
gentleman named Steve Quail, and we
started a production company called Gen
6 Productions, and we were making
documentary films mainly about giants,
mainly on the topic of giants.
giants as like referred to in the Bible
in ancient history, the Smithsonian
giants.
>> That's right. Biblical and historical
accounts of giants. So, I was traveling
around the world investigating giants.
And Steve is known for his
investigations into giants.
And he got a phone call from an elderly
an elderly woman who told him, "You need
to talk to my son. My son has a story he
needs to tell you." And she had to
convince her son to talk to Steve. and
and ultimately he did and he was active
duty. He was a C130 pilot, active duty.
He actually went on coast to coast with
Steve. They went on coast to coast
together and he related his story, I
believe, with George Nory, him, Steve,
and George. And then later on, we we
flew him into Bzoon, Montana
to put him in our documentary film that
we were making. And he did not he wanted
to be filmed in silhouette. he did not
want his face out there even though he
knew that they're going to be able to
mark him just by his voice. [snorts]
So he flies into Bosezeman. Uh we meet
with him. He shows us his credentials.
He was active duty C130. And then he
told us the following story
among many other things that he told us.
He said back in 2005
he was deployed in Afghanistan and Iraq
running missions as a C130 cargo pilot.
And oftent times they would have him fly
into Bram airfield.
And these were routine missions. And so
on one of these missions he's flying
into Bram.
But this time when he landed he was met
as soon as he deplaned he was met on the
tarmac by some individuals that he
describes as the babysitters. He calls
them the babysitters. He thinks they
were either army intelligence or air
force intelligence guys. And they didn't
tell him. But this was different because
when he disembarked,
they told him no photos, no mention of
this ever. This never happened. So he
knew that whatever was about to happen
was top secret. And he had flown uh
classified missions before, usually
retrieving Taliban guys, what what he
described as highvalued assets.
But this was different because these
there were intelligence guys on the
tarmac
waiting for something. And it turns out
what they were waiting for was the cargo
that was being delivered on a forklift
to the to the C130.
And the pilot says that the first thing
that struck him as this cargo is moving
toward him and [snorts] his crew was the
was the odor. He said it smelled like
this like musk b and death. And it was
extremely pungent.
And when the cargo arrived, it was on a
an air cargo pallet which is 7 by9. And
there was a he could see that there was
a person
on the pallet in the fetal position.
And this individual was so large that
his hands and his feet and part of his
head were were hanging off the pallet.
and
he and his load master and there were
some Marines who accompanied the pellet
who accompanied this cargo.
Uh they were actually putting their feet
up to this guy's feet, this dead giant's
feet and seeing how small their feet
were compared to his. Now the giant had
red hair. He had six fingers on each
hand, six toes on each foot. His feet
were wrapped in like a crude canvas foot
wrapping.
and he was solid as a rock. Again, most
of his body was covered by a tarp, but
the pilot and the guys around him were
were hitting him with their fists. And
he came up to about their their
midsection, laying in the fetal
position. And he and the pilot told me
he was solid as a rock, this guy. And he
asked the the Marines,
"What happened? Where did this guy come
from?" and they told him that they had
heard
that there was a team that was out in
Afghanistan
that was looking for Taliban or
something and they came upon a cave
because there was a nearby village and
the villagers were were bringing food
and other artifacts to the mouth of this
cave and so they thought that they're
aiding and abetting the Taliban. So they
went into the cave and rather than
encountering the Taliban, what they
found was this enormous humanoid
who killed them all. And then according
to these soldiers, they deployed another
team to go look for that team. And when
they found the cave, they found the
traces of that other team. They were
ready. They were prepared. And they were
able to kill the giant. In fact, the
soldiers told the pilot that the giant
was eating on members of the team who he
had who had killed previously.
But these new guys, they took him down
and then they had a a transport
helicopter come in and airlift him to
Bram.
>> Did you ever try to find records of who
was there and casualties that were
reported, deaths that were reported?
>> Um, it's very difficult. The Pentagon
actually released a statement some years
ago which is bizarre to me. [snorts] You
know, basically saying in paraphrasing,
the Kandahar giant incident never
happened. There was never a giant that
was killed in Afghanistan.
>> The Pentagon?
>> Yes. It was a represent It was like a
spokesman from the Pentagon or something
or a release from the Pentagon.
>> Is this available online?
>> Yeah. They actually felt the need to
debunk this.
>> That's hilarious. Now
>> that that gets me sketchy. Well, uh, I
believed the pilot because he was a very
credible guy. He didn't want his name
out there. He didn't want fame or
notoriety. He was very nervous. He
thought, "There's a good chance that
they're going to recognize me by my
voice." He was on Coast to Coast AM. And
then he's on in our documentary. There's
a good chance I'm going to get
recognized and there's going to be some
reprisal. He was nervous. Now, they
weighed the giant before they loaded him
on the C130 cuz they have to load
everything that goes on the C130. the
load master weighed him. He weighed
1,100 lb. And they estimated his his
height at 10 to 12 feet tall.
And so they loaded him onto the C130
and then they flew him to Qatar.
And then they they unloaded the cargo in
Qatar and the and our pilot told me he
heard through the grapevine
that the body ended up at Wright
Patterson Air Force Base. He said, "I
don't know. That's just what I heard.
So, this is a firsthand account from the
C130 pilot who flew the body himself
from Bram Airfield to Qatar.
>> Why does all the weird [ __ ] go to Wright
Patterson?
>> That's a good question. You know,
>> because that's where the weird [ __ ]
goes.
>> Wright Patterson used to have this the
blue room. I don't know if they still
have it, but they used to have a room
there called the blue room where they
had all of the alien artifacts that had
been recovered and that they were
studying.
And um it was completely off limits to
anybody except for people who had
access, the very few who had access. And
um but the Kandahar giant, you know,
that story, a colleague of mine, Ellie
Marculli, he had another guy come to
him, a different guy. We we interviewed
the pilot, Steve and I. LA had another
guy come to him that was I can't
remember the details. He was a special
forces guy. He had firsthand knowledge
of the event as well. And we're not sure
if it's the same one or a different one.
if it's were if there was just one
incident with the Giants or if there
were multiple incidents now years later
this would be just a couple of years ago
because we published that film I think
back in 2016 but just a couple of years
ago and I I do have to be very careful
here I I ran into a a gentleman who was
who was uh very high up let's say in the
operations happening out there during
the Iraq war and if and in Afghanist
And this individual
uh had um he he'd flown a lot of
missions
and and he was a commander
and I asked him, we were having a casual
conversation and he starts to walk away
and I said, "Hey, you were in flying
missions in Afghanistan." I said, "Did
you have you ever heard about the
Kandahar giant?" And his wife was
standing next to me and he's sort of
walking away. He turns around, the blood
rushes out of his face, and he literally
goes like this to me,
points to his phone, and his wife
whispers, "He can't talk about that."
[laughter] So later on, I was able to
[clears throat] we agreed to meet at
later on and and in a in a very
controlled environment. Um and and he
related a story to me that's the most
wild story I've I've ever heard in my
life. And I I'm sorry I can't relate
[laughter] it. Um I love this guy. I
want to protect him. But um
it's not the giant of Kandahar. It's the
giants of Kandahar. There's more than
one. The military has known about it. I
then and aside from him, I talked to
other soldiers who've also
um who've also had knowledge of that the
specific incident that I cited earlier,
but then also in general the giants in
Afghanistan.
And I have a friend of mine who
uh I met some years ago. Actually, I was
with Lou Alzando uh at LS Bar in
Wyoming. And uh there was a a friend of
LSE who's now a friend of mine there and
we were talking about the Kandahar
giant. I was just telling him the story
I told you and he just couldn't believe
it. He thought this is this is nuts.
This is crazy. And I said, "Okay,
do something for me. Next time you're
talking to somebody in government or in
the military who you think maybe might
know something about this, bring it up.
See what happens." So he called me one
day and he said, "Tim, you're not going
to believe it." He said, "I was talking
to
I have to be very careful here, too." He
said, "I was talking to a certain
individual who works for a senator. He's
a he's a a staffer. I think I believe
he's one of the a chief of staff for the
senator or at the very least an adviser.
And he's got a military background,
special forces." And he said, "I was
sitting there, we're really good
friends." He said, "We're having a
casual conversation as we always do.
And just in the midst of this
conversation, I said, "Hey, what what do
you know about
the Kandahar giant?" And he said his
face completely contorted
and he was no longer just they were no
longer just being happy and laughing. He
became very stern.
And he and he said, "What have you
gotten yourself into?
What what are you looking into?" He
said, 'You need to be really careful.
And he wouldn't tell him anything else.
That's the kind of reaction that that I
get and others get whenever we we try
and get information on this story.
>> It's a very fun story. I don't know why
it's so fun, but it's very fun. Um, but
the question is, what would be the
reason why they would want to keep
something like this a secret?
>> I don't I don't totally understand it.
>> I don't either. I mean, if there really
were
a race of giants that survive, let's
let's assume that what we're talking
about is what's referenced in the Bible,
right? Let's let's assume or at least
the book of Enoch, like the Nephilim,
right? If we're talking about giants,
>> like
>> the thing about giants is like
>> Native Americans have stories about
red-headed giants. They they talk about
the same thing about them having six
fingers and six toes. They have these
same myths. Like how is it that people
from the Middle East and people from
North America have this same ancient
story and what is it what is it in
reference to like why why does that
>> it's ubiquitous this I mean the legends
of giants are universal all over the
>> why hide that that's what I don't
understand like the stories about the
Smithsonian are always fascinating yeah
because the stories are
>> there have been archaeological digs and
they have discovered like enormous
femurss that they thought were like
woolly mammoths or something and then
they realize like well this is a giant
human
>> and they find hair and the hair is red
and that they and that they take these
bones and they tuck them away somewhere.
I mean this is always the myth. They
tuck them away in the basement of the
Smithsonian or somewhere else and for
whatever reason the general public is
not allowed to know about this. And I
don't totally understand what is it
about giants that they would try to key
from us. Like if they find a new species
of dinosaur that's extinct, they'll let
you know. Fascinating. Amazing. They
find um Homo Floresensis or however you
say it, the little hobbit people. Yeah.
Let you know. Look, we found little
hobbit people. Pretty cool.
Giants for whatever reason,
>> you know, it is a it's a conundrum. And
>> if it's real,
>> it it's
>> you think it's real.
>> I giants in general.
>> Yeah.
>> Oh, yeah. 100%.
>> What makes you think it's real?
>> Okay. So, um,
>> let me tell you why I think that this
thing's being covered up and then Okay.
And then I'll tell you why I think it's
real and we'll go to Sardinia for that.
So
I like you have been wondering for a
long time like what is the big deal and
initially people in my field especially
people who are coming from a biblical
perspective.
The common answer is well the existence
of giants would affirm the biblical
narrative right and [snorts] so the
secular atheist types don't want the
biblical narrative affirmed.
I that can't be that can't be right
because the existence of giants doesn't
just affirm the biblical narrative. It
affirms the myths and legends of every
ancient culture across the globe,
>> right?
>> Including the Bible. So, it's not
something that's specific exclusive to
the text of scripture. So, it would just
affirm all these legends in in general.
So the only thing that makes sense to me
at this point and the other line of
thinking by the way would be that it
would somehow conflict with the theory
of evolution by natural selection which
I don't really buy into that either
because they would just say that this
branch of humanoids
u they descended from gigantoopythecus
or something like that. I don't think it
would be that difficult of a problem for
the theory of evolution by natural
selection either. Um, I'm not myself an
evolutionist, but I don't I don't see
them having that difficult of a problem
here. So, the only thing left on the
table for me is that there's something
very sinister going on in regard to the
remains of giants. And
if you study the mythology of giants all
over the world, especially in the
ancient near east, you will discover
that there was in fact a cult of giants
that there that there were cultures that
venerated giants and that there was a
very particular belief about giants. And
this goes back into the book of Enoch.
And the idea is that this race of beings
who are not entirely human. They're
hybrids that when they die, you can
still make contact with their spirits,
with their souls. They can be summoned.
They in fact, these are the demons that
these are the in the New Testament of
the Bible. These are the demons that
possess people. This is the origin of
demons, by the way, in Hebrew cosmology.
So there's this pervasive idea again,
especially in the ancient near east,
that dead giants can be communicated
with and and can possess living human
beings. They're spirits. And so you have
a cult of giants of the ancient near
east, especially among the Canaanites.
And the Canaanites,
they had actually there's uh there's
various customs and and and rights
related to giants, but one of the
specific ones that we know about is
called Kispam, the right of Kispam. And
there's a fantastic book written by my
my friends Derek and Sharon Gilbert
called Veneration where they detail the
right of kispum and this idea of making
contact with the spirits of dead giants
and the veneration of giants.
And the right of kispam was it was
practiced broadly speaking in in the
ancient near east but specifically among
the Amorites
and other Canaanite clans as well. And
and what they would do is they would
hold a feast and then they would invite
the dead to come and join them at the
feast. So this was a necroantic right
and they would they would evoke the dead
and they believed that the dead would
come and and and eat with them. Now the
kings and specifically the Amorite
kings, they would invoke the spirits of
the mighty ones, the great ones, the
giants of old, the rephim. The biblical
account names various different clans of
giants that inhabited the Levant during
and after the conquest by Joshua and the
and the Hebrews.
And you you had the Anakim who descended
from the Nephilim. You had the Raphaim,
the Zamzumim, the Amime. These are
various clans of giants that are
specifically named in the Bible. Of
course, we get Goliath of Gath. Gath is
a Philistine city. after Joshua entered
the promised land, they drove out and
eradicated a lot of these giant clans,
but some of them remained. Some of the
individuals remained and they were
primarily went to the Philistine cities
of Gaza, Gath, and Ashdad. And so you
have Goliath of Gath who David
encounters later in the biblical text.
So, it's these heroes of old, these
these descendants of the Nephilim that
the Amorites and the ancient
Neareasterners are are attempting to
make contact with because they have
knowledge and they they these are
possessing spirits. And so, the right of
Kispum that the kings would summon the
Raphaim by name and you can find this in
the Ugaritic texts. Uh, Ugarit was a an
Amorite citystate located on uh on on
the shore of the Mediterranean in in
what is today northern Syria.
And they have uncovered documents where
the Amorite kings are summoning
specifically by name summoning dead
giants, the Raphaim. And the idea is to
summon them and then to become empowered
by their spirits, their possessing
spirits. Again, this goes back to the
tradition of Enoch that the giants when
they die, their spirits are in sort of a
state of suspended animation and they
can be revived. They can be resurrected
as it were and and can be made to
inhabit the bodies of human beings. So,
there's this ancient cult that existed
in the ancient near east and in other
parts of the world and it's associated
with the cult of Baal.
Um, so you have
Baal, the the the giants were thought of
as the warriors of Baal. So today we
know that the cult of Baal persists. I
mean the Epstein files. We know that the
cult of Baal is still being practiced.
>> What when you say the Epstein files,
what do you mean? What is the
>> There's references to Baal. And there's
there's the there's this recurrent theme
of Baal worship.
and Baal Jesus
Jesus refers to Baal as Satan in the New
Testament. So, it's basically Satanism.
It's it's a satanic cult. And
>> and how how is it referenced in the
Epstein files?
>> There's some there's some references to
Baal. I can't remember the exact
references, but there's there's a
there's apparently a cult of Baal. And
the elites are obsessed with some of the
elites. I don't know who or how many of
them, but it's becoming increasingly
apparent that there's a a
that there's an infatuation
with these ancient Neareastern cults,
specifically the Canaanitish cults. And
so, the reason why I'm going through all
of this is because I think it's still
alive and well today in society. And I
believe that they're using the bones,
the remains of giants in these
practices. I think it's extremely dark.
I think um this is part of the reason
why part of the reason why there may be
a cover up around it.
Um, nothing else makes sense to me.
Nothing else makes sense to me
>> in terms of the cover up.
>> In terms of the cover up, we were
talking about
>> the cover up. It makes sense to me that
you have incredibly powerful, wealthy
people that don't want to be exposed as
being perverts and yeah,
>> whatever the [ __ ] they were up to.
There's all the weird [ __ ] with beef
jerky and pizza.
You know, there's these very strange
references that seem to not be talking
about beef jerky and not It's some kind
of code.
>> Yeah. And there's also the fact that he
brought an enormous amount of sulfuric
acid like right after he was indicted to
the island like I I forget how many
gallons of it but barrels of sulfuric
acid
>> which is what you would use to dissolve
bodies.
>> So it's like it seems like there's a lot
of reasons for a cover up. If this guy
was running some sort of uh blackmail
operation and had information on
powerful people, you would that would
make sense that that's why they would
cover it up.
>> Well, that's the cover up the pedophilia
>> or just even if it's not pedophilia,
even just adultery or drug use or
whatever. The ball [clears throat] thing
apparently comes up on a bank
file and it may have been
misinterpreted. It does say B a L.name,
>> but people who are digging into this say
that it might have just been a
misinterpretation. That's the only
mention of it.
>> Misinterpretation.
>> Uh yeah, [clears throat] I mean it's
another page here shows it. Here's like
the document.
>> It might have just I don't I it doesn't
even say it there that I can see it.
>> Yeah. I'm not sure exactly. Here's where
it says it, you know,
>> exactly where Baal is referenced
specifically. There there for one place
for sure.
>> Bank document. I don't know if that has
anything to do with the occult
specifically.
>> Just imagine if it's the name of Satan
and this is the name of your bank
account. [laughter]
>> Yeah.
Yeah. That's quite odd. Yeah.
>> That's
at least creepy.
>> Yeah. For sure.
>> At least creepy.
>> Yeah. So, you have this this this
scenario in which let's just say for the
sake of argument that it's true. Okay.
>> Okay. That the legends are true, the
giants are real, that
you can make contact with their spirits
>> through their bones
>> through maybe through their remains. Um
that or at least people believe this.
And so
>> is there some sort of a method that they
use?
>> Yeah. Well, okay. So, this will get us
into Sardinia. So, whenever anyone asks
me what's the what's the best evidence
you've ever seen for the existence of
giants? Now you've already cited some
some his some historical context around
this. The legend of giants is
everywhere. It's in every continent and
you have giants aside from the biblical
account obviously all over the
Mesopotamia the cult of giants in the
United States during this the era of the
the Smithsonian gate the Smithsonian's
apparent the Smithsonian institutions
apparent cover up of giants especially
the ones that were being discovered in
the mountains here in the United States.
But it's pervasive. In Peru, there's
legends of giants.
And uh the natives, the indigenous
peoples absolutely believe there was a
primordial race of giants. The same
thing in Central America. They believed
there was a primordial race of giants
that was destroyed in the cataclysm,
specifically a flood. That's what the
Inca believed that Beakocha, the guy
created first a race of giants, but they
were they were they were stupid and evil
and so he destroyed them in a flood.
Same same story down in up in Mexico.
and among the Aztec and the Native
Americans, the six-finger redhaired
giants and so forth. So, there's a lot
of um historical context and I would and
of course it's anecdotal, but it's but
how much anecdotal evidence just at one
point does anecdotal evidence just
become evidence when there's when it's
so pervasive all over the world,
>> right? So,
um, as I was traveling around the world
studying giants and researching this
topic and investigating different
stories and legends,
um, I went to Malta, which is very
interesting. Obviously, lots of legends
of giants in Malta associated with the
megaliths. And then, and then I kind of
hit ground zero for giants, which is the
island of Sardinia.
And the island of Sardinia is located
west of of Rome. It's part of Italy.
It's in the western Mediterranean. below
below Corsica.
And many people don't realize this about
Sardinia, but Sardinia has the highest
um has the most megaliths anywhere on
Earth. It has the highest concentration
of megaliths anywhere that I've been as
far as I'm aware of.
There there are these massive megalithic
towers called Nuragi
that were constructed allegedly by the
uh or conventionally by the uh Nuragi
the neurogic civilization bronze age
civilization
and there are today still at least 7,000
of these things standing you can go to
Sardinia and see 7,000
new ragi towers there at one time 10 to
30,000
of these megalithic towers and some of
these towers stood over 100 ft tall.
>> Chammy, can we see some pictures of
these?
>> I'm trying to figure out [snorts]
>> Yeah. How would he look?
>> Nurogi.
>> Sardinia.
>> Nurrai.
>> Nurogi. Three different things. So I
don't I guess this is it.
Is that Yeah, that's what it is.
>> So what is the timeline of this neurogic
how do you say it? Neurogic.
>> The neurogic civilization. It's the
bronze age.
>> Yeah, the bronze age. So, what is that?
>> 3,300 to 3,300 BC to about 1,200 BC.
>> And that's what this stuff is from.
>> And um they say it was they say that
these were built in the bronze bronze
age. That's the the conventional idea.
And again, there's 7,000 of them on the
island today,
but there were up up to I've seen
estimates up to 30,000 including at the
museum in Sardinia.
And aside from these towers, they also
have these are, by the way, these are
megalithic. So these are these are
megalithic towers that are constructed
in the cyclopian style. And cyclopian
masonry, cyclopian architecture is the
trademark of megaliths worldwide. And
cyclopian this is the this is the the
archaeological term for the technique.
cyclopian referencing the great cyclopes
of of Greek mythology who were believed
to be the inventors of tower building
and you know the builders the offspring
of the gods who were the great builders
and masons
um that's the that's the mythology but
the trademark of cyclopian architecture
is that these these are large stones
that are fitted together without the use
of any binding agent like mortar without
any kind of mortar and you have you have
ex exquisite examples of cyclopian
masonry in different parts of the earth
like in Peru the walls of Sakaiwaman are
are absolutely amazing, breathtakingly
um
beautiful in regard to their design and
the the polygonal
um tightly fitting blocks, immense
blocks of stone. Whereas in Sardinia,
these are crude blocks. the crudely uh
worked blocks of of bassalt and granite
and limestone that are fitted together
but without the use of mortar. So they
are built in the cyclopian style. Again
some of them were 100 ft tall and they
had a some of them were for defensive
purposes and they some of them had a
wooden platform that crowned the top and
that platform was buttressed by other
very large stones that were that were
finally cut sometimes bassalt. I've I've
seen some of these stones in Sardinia
and I've been to the island a few times
researching the towers and giants
and um aside from the towers, these
megalithic towers, you also have
megalithic tombs which are called to
this day the tombs of the giants
and you can go and visit them. There
were um there's 800 of them extent today
and archaeologists believe there were
many more in the past. Someone knows
exactly how many, but often times it
seems to me that the towers and the
tombs are closely associated. They
fulfill a function I think that is um
that is inter interrelated
and the megalithic tombs of the giants,
the legends in according to legend in
Sardinia,
uh they were associated with the bodies
of giants. But of course today you have
armchair archaeologists who say that's
just a myth. There's you couldn't even
fit bodies inside of these tombs. Yes,
you could. I mean, none of these guys
have ever bothered to go to Sardinia
with a with a tape measure. I did. And
yes, you can. You can you can fit the
bodies of nine 8 n 10 foot tall guys in
these tombs without a problem. And
there's two different styles of
megalithic tombs in Sardinia. You have
the steelely style which it's um
it's there's a large steely stone, a
monolithic stone in the front with a
little doorway in it. And a doorway is
almost like a little doggy door at the
bottom,
but it's big enough. I mean, a a young
person could crawl through it. Uh and
then you have the triilathon doorway,
this style of megalithic tomb, which is
a larger doorway. You still have to,
like a guy my size would still have to
bend down to get inside. But the tombs
are configured the same. They're shaped
the same. These two different styles.
And what a lot of people misunderstand
about the tombs is the tombs were not
built to house the bodies of giants.
They were built on top of the interred
giant.
So the giant was inhumed beneath the
tomb. It was buried beneath the tomb and
then the edifice was built on top. So
that opening
>> where are you getting this information?
Oh,
>> this is known in Sardinia. Um I spent a
lot of time researching the the the
tombs of the giants in Sardinia and
talking to various experts. Um
>> and who are these experts like local
historians like what
>> some of them? Yeah. One there's there's
you can go to the um you can also go to
the museums in Sardinia and read a lot
of this stuff. Um, now the I have a
friend named Paula Loy who's uh she's a
she's a I think she's the best tour
guide in Sardinia and she's extremely
knowledgeable about all this stuff. She
take you to the museum and you walk
through all of this information with her
and they have little models in the
museum
of the the tombs of the giants. And
there's a legend in Sardinia that it's
that it's it's called the it's called
the right of incubation.
And this is a necroantic right that was
practiced by the Sardinians. And it
describes the purpose of the tombs. So
the tombs when you walk into the tombs,
again, they're megalithic. The walls are
megalithic. Some pretty large stones
incorporated in these tombs. When you
walk into the tombs, there's a gallery
inside and the the gallery is rather
large. You could fit a body vagina in
there, but that's beside the point
because that's not the purpose of the
tomb. The purpose of the tomb of the
gallery inside the tomb is to
uh is for the it's to accommodate a
young person during a right of passage.
And dur in during the bronze age, you're
talking about boys from 12 to 14 years
old, right? generally speaking. And they
would go into the tomb alone and they
would be sealed in the tomb. So that
little doggy door that's in the stelle,
the steely version of the tombs of the
giants, they would crawl in there and
then they would be sealed inside. And
there's a little um on most of those
steelely tombs, there's a little hole at
the top as well. So there's so it's not
like they're they're sealed in there and
they can't breathe or anything. No, they
they they would go in there and they
would spend some days in the tomb alone.
>> This is what it looks like.
>> That's one of the doors with the steely
monolithic stone. And they're all shaped
the same. It's hard to tell because
they've been disassembled. Many of them
have been disassembled.
But you can see they're the triilon.
That's a triilon tomb.
That's a that's something else. That's a
well. Um but the tombs are all sh you
can see down there. See right the
picture right below that one. There you
go. See how the tombs are shaped?
>> Yeah.
>> Now, that's how all these tombs are
shaped that way. This has to do with the
right of incubation. So, the young
person would go inside the gallery.
They'd be sealed inside that young boy,
and they would The purpose of this was
to incubate inside of the gallery in
order to be empowered and energized by
the spirit of the mighty one buried
beneath the tomb. And again, according
to legend, the mighty ones were giants.
So I don't think it's coincidental that
the tombs are actually shaped like a
womb. If you look at that the the the
view of the tomb from above.
Originally when I was um researching
this in Sardinia I thought it was shaped
like a bull's head which would be
something like uh the iconographic of
Molech or something like that
Canaanitish.
But I I realized that actually this is
shaped like a womb. The tomb looks like
a womb. If you pull up a womb, you'll
see what I mean. It looks it looks like
a womb, shaped like a womb. And and this
was to accommodate the right of
incubation.
And so these young people, the idea is
they're in there, they are communing,
incubating in the presence of the dead
hero buried beneath and they're
absorbing their spirit, their prowess.
And then the tomb is unsealed and the
young person emerges from the womb as it
were.
It's like a new birth. They're now they
went in a boy. They're now coming out a
man empowered by the spirit of the of
their ancestral heroes. So these are
these are called to this day the tombs
of the giants. Now you can say, well
that's just that's just mythology.
That's just Sardinian legend. The
problem is
you can interview people or at least you
could in times past interview Sardinians
all across the island who have
themselves dug up the bones of giants or
encountered the bones of giants in in in
some kind of a in some context usually
around the towers the Nuragi towers. I
interviewed dozens of people in
Sardinia, most of them elderly,
who had themselves encountered the bo
the bones of giants in in different
contexts while plowing in fields. They
they they pull up bones [snorts] or they
would find the bones in the tombs or
whatever. And it's very easy to dismiss
the whole thing as well, they were just
digging up megapona, right? The bones of
mastadons and giant sloths. The problem
is some of these bones had jewelry. Some
of them had had Roman coins associated
with them. Some of them had rings on the
fingers and necklaces around the the the
neck, the collar and and they would
actually the the the and the most of
these were old-timers because um
this doesn't it's not really happening
anymore in Sardinia. This is something
that was happening in the 60s, 50s, 40s,
30s and and back. But especially between
like post World War II when the island
was undergoing a process of
industrialization and they were building
new roads and and and digging for
foundations and stuff. They were they
were digging up the bones of giants. And
there's a um there's a particular church
called Santa Anastasia in Sardinia.
Uh and it's in the region of Sada. And I
interviewed two gentlemen in in
Sardinia. Two guys who were officially
employed by the municipality and by the
university of Kajetti. Kajetti is the
capital city of Sardinia. They were
specifically employed to excavate the
ruins, the neurogic ruins on the
premises of the church of Santanastasia.
Santastasia is a small little Catholic
church. But if you go there, you'll see
that even today you can see the remains
of a neurogic settlement there. There's
a there there are Nuragi towers there.
It's just it's it's an archaeological
site. And these two individuals, one of
them, his name was Jeppe, the other's
name was Roberto. And Jeppe worked there
from um he worked there from I believe
it was uh 1979 to 1981. And then Roberto
worked there from 1982 to 1984.
Both of these guys employed officially
in an official capacity from the
municipality of Sada to do this
excavation.
And so they would be their the protocol
was you go and you excavate the ruins
and all the artifacts you find get put
into the church. So all the artifacts
went into the church of Santastasia. And
you can see this church by the way if
you pull it up it's called Sant
Anastasia in Sardinia. And all the bones
were put into the church. All the
artifacts were put into the church.
And among the artifacts that were being
collected were the skeletons of giants
and not mastadons, not giants.
>> Photographs of these things.
>> These guys they well of course not but
these guys were uh very reluctant to
talk to us. The one guy Roberto was very
nervous. He said we were told never to
talk about this. This never happened.
Again this was back in the 80s. He
didn't think anything of it. He wasn't
told go to Santa Anastasia and and look
for the bones of giants. He was just
told go excavate the site. He was one of
the excavators at Santastasia. And the
whole thing was being
um the whole thing was being supervised
by the municipality and the and the
university and and he dug up personally.
He said he dug up the bodies, two
bodies, 10 foot tall guys, full
skeletons, and he laid them out in the
these ones he laid out in the courtyard
of the church. And he said he he
notified the people in Kajetti of the
discovery. And what would happen is all
the artifacts that would go into the
church or in this case outside of the
church, somebody would come at night and
take them all away. So they get there in
the morning, all the artifacts are gone.
He didn't know where they went. Um the
other individual, Jeppe, he also
excavated giants from Santastasia.
various various uh artifacts related to
the giants, gigantic plates, gigantic
cups and goblets, chalicees. Um they
excavated they excavated a lot of
different artifacts, rings and and and
earrings and necklaces and all kinds of
all manner of artifacts. And he told me
that he remembers a particular case in
which he and his wife his wife was
helping on this particular day. They're
excavating in the ruins and they found a
skull that was so large. He said the
skulls were three to four times larger
than ours. He found this skull that was
very large and it had part of the
vertebrae attached. Some of these
remains were not just skeletal. There
was like almost like mummified.
And and he and his wife together carried
it into the church. He told me that
while they were digging, they they
unsealed a compartment
inside of one of the towers. There's
this large room that was sealed like the
it was just it had collapsed or whatever
it was sealed and they opened it up and
they went inside and there was a giant
this very large person sitting at a
table and and there were there's a
really large plate and a oversized
chalice there and and he even had he was
eating oysters and muscles and clams
that were still on the plate and he was
very large. I mean, these guys are
they're when I say large, they're 9 to
12 feet tall. That's how tall these guys
are. And they were it was remarkable. He
was extremely well preserved and because
apparently he had been almost like
hermetically sealed in this thing. And
so they they took all the artifacts and
the bones and put them into the church
and the next day they were all gone. I
mean, this was the procedure. It was the
these guys uncovered a lot of
interesting stuff at those at that that
one particular
um that one particular excavation at the
church of Santastasia in Sard in Sarda
and he they were filling the church up
with so many artifacts that Jeppe told
me that he went over to the mayor and he
told the mayor is there anywhere else
that we can put these bones these
artifacts because we're running out of
space in the church
and he was surprised at the mayor's
response. The mayor looked at him and
said, "Mind your own effing business.
Put the artifacts in the church and shut
your mouth." So, um, these are the kind
of stories I would hear all the time in
Sardinia. I mean, I could go on and on
and on. I talked to one guy that was,
uh, Sai Vergilio was his name. He was
100 years old. Very, um, very
interesting guy. And Sai had, uh, been
on a site when he was a young man. He he
he told me a couple of stories, but he
told me that he was he was he was
working in a vineyard one time and they
were excavating and this they weren't
excavating, they were they were tilling
the soil to plant a vineyard. And
[snorts] as they're tilling the soil,
they start to dig up bones and they
realize these are very large skeletal
remains.
And they were they found like 20 of them
and they were laying on top of each
other in a crisscross pattern.
And so as soon as they started to find
these bones, the owner of the vineyard
said, "Stop. Stop. I have to notify the
authorities." So he notifies the
authorities and he came back to the
workers and said, "You guys have to get
out of here. The authorities are coming.
You have to leave now." And Sai said
that everyone left, but he hid in the
bushes until everyone had left. And he
went back to work in the field because
he wanted he said, "I needed the money
and I wanted to actually get paid for
the day's wage." So I went back and I
worked and I kept tilling the field and
he said all of a sudden
well the the owner of the field came
back and he said, "What are you doing
here? I told you to leave." And he said,
"I needed the money, so I'm going to
keep working." And the guy said, "No,
no, I'll pay you double. Just get out of
here." And while they're talking, the
government guys pull up. And they they
pull up in some various vans and they
come out and they they start taking
pictures of all the bones
and they they take pictures of the bones
of these skele skeletal remains that are
laying in these cross configurations and
then they load them all into the vans
and then they went up into the nearby
nur. There was a uh a nur there, one of
these megalithic towers, and they were
inside the new ra looking at something,
taking pictures, and so I said that they
they sealed up like with cement, they
sealed up this this um tunnel, this this
something inside of it.
And then they and then they left.
And I heard dozens of these kind of
stories in Sardinia. Dozens. These
people have no reason to lie to me. I
mean, these are most of these are
old-timers. They we didn't pay them. Um,
they they you know, they live out in the
country. I don't know if you've ever
been ever been to Sardinia. It's it's
it's it's like going back in time in
Italy. These are very simple people that
live out in the country, but as I said
earlier, the bones, these giants are
being found with artifacts.
Sorry to interrupt, but I'm looking at a
story, but they're they're talking about
finding skeletons there. They're calling
them skeletons. They're calling them
giants, but they're referring to
statues. And they're
>> those are the the giants of Monte Prada.
Those are um
>> those different
>> those are statues. Those are giants of
Monte Pra.
>> I there's I mean there's news articles.
Goes back to the 70s.
>> Yeah, those are just statues. Yeah,
those are in a museum there.
>> But they call them skeletons is the only
thing I was saying. So there's like a
little
>> No, they're they're they're stone.
They're in the museum. I know
>> they're about seven feet tall, I think.
Um, some people wonder if those are
actually
>> uncovered skeletons. I saw another
article here where it said like they
found two giant skulls, but they're
talking about
>> the statues.
>> Yeah, those some people wonder if those
statues actually represented the, you
know, the the anatomical proportions of
the giants. I I don't know. I don't know
that that's the case, but yeah, that's
about all you're going to hear if you go
through. just seems insane that there's
not [snorts] a photo something of all
these things or that some wealthy crazy
person didn't get a hold of someone and
say, "Listen, I'll give you $10 million.
Get me a hand." You know, I want to put
it in a glass case in my house. We know
that they've done that with Egyptian
stuff. Like a lot of Egyptian artifacts
have been pilered.
>> Yep. Artifacts from Lot of artifacts
from Peru.
>> Yes. Central and South America. Yeah,
there's a there's a very robust black
market,
>> which is so wild. Like, who are these
people that have these things?
>> That's a good question. Well, I was told
in Sardinia, they told me that in some
cases they
the the bones were confiscated.
Um, they were gathered up and thrown
into into vehicles and carted away. Um,
Sai told me another story where he was
digging a foundation for a house. He and
he and an associate [snorts] and they
they came upon a very large sarcophagus
and they pried it open and he said there
was a body of a very large person
inside. And it had a black it was
wearing some sort of black fabric. And
there were coins uh that that were uh
that were minted from um Antoninus pious
the Roman emperor from that time. And
they reported there was a local priest
and they told the priest that they found
a body, right? Like we found a dead
body. What do we do? And so the priest
came over and he looked down in the pit.
He said, "Give me the coins." They gave
him the coins. He said, 'Break the bones
up and and and distribute them in the
foundation of the house. I mean, this
was, you know, if you went to Sardinia
today, I think you you you would think
to yourself, okay, yeah, I can see how
there's no one's taking pictures or
anything over here. This is like going
way back in time in Italy, especially
um especially back in the 40s, 50s, and
60s when most of these things happened.
Now the the excavations at Santastasia
happened in the late '7s, early 80s, but
all these other stories are coming from
the you know 60s, '50s, 40s. So um I I
mean there was just so many people who I
talked to you know random people would
tell me as I interviewed them that oh
yeah yeah I was digging in my basement
one time and you know years ago and and
and I dug up a hand. It was it was a
hand five fingers and you know it was it
was three times the size of my hand. No,
that's
>> five fingers.
>> Yeah, that's random. That could just be,
you know, megapon or something. I don't
know how many what a giant sloth hand
looks like or whatever. And let me say
this, there is no question, none, no
question,
>> that a lot of the accounts that you hear
about giants, not the ones associated
with coins and jewelry, but a lot of the
accounts that you hear about giants and
the skeletons of giants, they do have
prosaic explanations. A lot of them do
end up being megapana bones, especially
giant sloths and stuff like that. There
was a case in Peru, actually was in
Ecuador. This is referenced in the
Chronicles of Peru that there's a place
called Santa Elena, and it's the p it's
a peninsula in in Ecuador.
And um there's various chronicers who
talk about this and these are the
chronicers who chronicle the the history
of the conquest of Peru. you know, the
the Piso and the and the Conquistadors
who defeated the Inca and and
they say that, you know, there was a
race of giants that there was giants
came the natives told the concistadors
and and the chronicers that according to
legend, giants came over the sea on
large reedboats.
And these giants were were they were
very very large and they had they had
red hair and uh some of them were naked
and some of them were dressed in in in
um very primitive clothing and they
landed on the shores of Santena, one of
the places they landed and they began to
terrorize the local population. The the
the indigenous people hated them because
they were they were eating all of the
food. I mean they they they the natives
said that they consumed 50 times um the
the amount of food is as a regular sized
person [snorts]
and and so the natives hated them. They
said that the giants built these deep
wells. They dug these really deep wells
which you could still see. The
concisador said we could still see them
today. They built these houses with very
large blocks and huge beams of wood
which were still there when the
concisadors were writing about this in
the in the 16th and or 17th and 18th
centuries.
And and according to legend, these
giants, they were sodomites and they
didn't have any women with them
[clears throat] and they were basically
struck down by God. And um the natives
have that and other legends regarding
giants being destroyed by God in various
ways. But it turns out that Santena
is
it's one of the the most um important
sites for megapona bones and there's
tons of megapon especially giant sloths.
So you have lots of megapona bones in
Santaena.
And I have no doubt that the the the the
natives and um
the people living during that time um in
the aftermath of the conquest of of the
Inca Empire thought that those were the
bones of giants.
>> Right. Because there was no giant sloths
alive at that time.
>> Exactly. and and and in some of the
accounts you can see where they're
saying in the giants and and you know we
we uncovered a giant that was had a
deformed body and I thought oh that's
probably a it's probably a giant sloth
or something right so yeah there's a lot
of that unquestionably and you have to
be very careful as a researcher and in
the beginning I when I when I I this was
years ago when I first started out
researching this stuff I made the
mistake of of of just taking that story
literally and believing oh yeah they
were digging up bones of giants Santaena
until I realized that that is like one
of the best places in the world to find
megapona bones. So obviously you have to
concede to the facts of reality. They're
digging up megapona there. However,
however,
there are other stories that come from
the chronicles in Peru where there's no
way they're talking about megapana.
And these stories come from the same
chronicers who from which we derive from
the same text from which we derive the
history of the conquest of Peru. The
same guys
like Bernab Kobo and Antonio de La
Kalancha and Pedro Sesa DeLeon all of
the you know the famous chroniclers.
And there's one case in particular I
find very intriguing. There's lots of
them. By the way, when I was in I was I
lived in Peru for 10 years at some point
and and then later on I went back to
Peru and doing various investigations
when I was looking into this, making
documentaries about giants. And when I
was in Peru, I was in Puno some years
ago, probably back in 2015, 2016, I was
in Puno and I met with an archaeologist
in Puno. His name was Edmundo de Laa,
very well-known archaeologist.
And um I asked him, "Hey, are there any
accounts of giants in the historical
records here?" And he said, "Yeah, I
think there's a there's a couple
accounts of giants."
And I said, "Okay." He said, "I I don't
think there's many, but I think there's
a couple." Okay. Well, the next morning,
he comes walking into my hotel in the
lobby, and he's got a big smile on his
face, and he hands me a disc
and he said, "I went after we talked, I
went into the archives." They have
access to the digital archives. and I
did a word search to try and see if I
could find some of these accounts of
giants. He said, "I cannot believe how
many references to giants there are in
the Chronicles." And he handed me the
disc and I I I opened the files and
indeed there were many. Now, some of
them were in reference to Santelena.
But some of them were much more
remarkable. For example, I'll give you
one example here.
There was a a Jesuit priest named Pablo
Jose Ariaga who was going around Peru
and he wrote a book called the
exterpation of idolatry in Peru. I think
it was 1602
and he's he's going around Peru with the
what are called which were called the
BCadores who were the these were um
officials. There were clergymen that
were dispatched to Peru
who were extrepating idolatry. These
were the they were very fair at these
people, these BCor, these official um
idolatry hunters basically because they
were brutal. And what they would do is
they would go with the priests into the
villages. They would find out what are
the natives worshiping and then they
would destroy it and then force convert
the popula the population.
And they they chronicled everything.
They they everything they found because
they had to. This was an official
assignment, right? So they chronicle
everything that they find. This village,
they go to this village, they're
worshiping this. We we we broke it into
pieces or we burned it in the fire. And
these are official records. And among
these records, and this is this comes
from, as I said, Pablo Jose Ariaga, but
also later on Antonio de la Kalancha,
who is a austinian monk. Um it enlarges
the story. He expands on the story using
other documents including uh um
including um Kal um um Ariyaga's version
and the story goes that Ariyaga and
Bicadores they went into the village and
they were led they inquired what are
what are you worshiping where are your
gods and the indigenous people of Peru
they they worshiped wakas and the waka
could be anything it could be an idol it
could be a mountain, it could be a hill,
it was just wacas. Even to this day,
they call them wacas. And so they
inquired, "Where are your wacas?" And
they led them to the other side of the
village where there was a large cave.
And they go into the cave. And when they
went in there, they they record that
there were many dead Gentiles.
And among them were two giants
dressed in kumbi and they were
enshrined.
Now that's very interesting. Kumbi.
>> Kumbi is a very fine fabric
that is um it was it was used
exclusively by the Inca nobility. In
fact, it was illegal for any anyone else
to wear kumbi. Only the Inca nobility
could wear kumbi. This very fine fabric.
So, it's very ceremonial and it belongs
by law to the noble class. So, these
indigenous people, they can't wear
kumbi. But yet they dressed these two
uh and and it said that the bodies were
were well preserved almost like
mummified. They dressed these two giants
in kumbi
and they were enshrined in this tomb.
And so when they realized that they were
worshiping these giants, these dead
giants and the natives told them that
these were their ancestors, these were
their progenitors. That's what they told
the the bicadores of idolatry. They took
the bodies out of the tomb and they
burned them in the village.
Now, that's very interesting to me
because you have two
um bodies, not just skeletal remains,
bodies of giants decayed with time, but
still quite well preserved, dressed in
kumbi. This doesn't sound like a giant
sloth to me. This doesn't sound like a
mastadon. This is something else. And it
corresponds to all the legends among the
natives there in in Peru regarding the
existence of giants who were their
progenitors.
So those are just those are some
historical details, some historical
accounts that I find very intriguing.
>> Well, there's so many of them. That's
what's weird. And is there's also this
very bizarre desire that people have of
destroying things from the past. Yeah.
Uh we find that with uh I mean the
Taliban did that. You know,
>> there's there's a bunch of different
incredible archaeological sites that
were destroyed by past civilizations. We
we just talked the other day about um
the the Kyasa temple in India about how
they tried to destroy that for a couple
years. They sent a thousand people and
they could barely put a dent in it.
>> Who was trying to destroy that?
>> Oh, who was it, Jamie? Do we remember?
>> Didn't like it. I don't know [laughter]
>> some some uh [clears throat]
>> warlord or general or something. I I'll
find out
>> who they they came upon this temple that
they they didn't like that someone else
had built it and someone else owned it
and someone else had constructed it.
Yeah. You know the [clears throat] Kyasa
temple that was built entirely out of
stone.
>> Yeah. The one that was built like
literally carved into the ground
>> into the side of the mountain.
>> Yeah.
>> Emperor. Say that name. You could say
it. You're really good with words.
>> Mugal was what's his name? Looks like
Mughal to me. I've never heard of that.
>> What's the second word? Orang.
>> I don't know.
>> Orang.
>> Orang.
>> Historical figure widely reported to
have ordered the destruction of the
Kyasa temple in 1682. However, his
mission failed because the monolithic
temple was carved top down from a single
solid volcanic rock. His army could only
disfigure some sculptures before giving
up.
>> Oh, this was in 1682. Yeah.
>> Yeah. But it's just wild that people
have always had this inclination to
destroy old fascinating things.
>> Yeah, that's right. Especially you find
this. What's really sad is in Central
America among the Aztec, the Maya, there
were many codeexes of the Aztec and the
Maya that were intentionally destroyed
by by um by the the Catholic Church by
various agents of the Catholic Church
would intentionally destroy these
codeexes. Could you imagine the
information that was stored in those
things? Well, how about the Library of
Alexandria?
>> Yeah.
>> I mean, who knows what was in there and
and they burnt that several times,
right?
>> It's um
>> there's the historical accounts in North
America are are interesting because
there's actual newspaper stories from
God, was it like I believe it's the
1800s. What do Do you know what I'm
talking about?
>> Yeah.
>> There are all kinds of newspaper stories
about giants in the 1800s. newspaper
stories about giant skeletons that have
been discovered and excavated.
>> Yes. From the mid 1800s to the early
1900s.
>> And somehow or another, they all relate
to the Smithsonian.
>> Most of them are associated with the
mountains and the mound builders. There
were thousands of mounds east of the
Mississippi. I mean, uh, people don't
realize how many of these mounds there
were. And these are, you know, the
monumental mounds and earthwork. Some of
them still stand today. Not all of them
are burial mounds. You have different
kinds of mounds. Some of them are
effiges. Some of them are platform
mounds, but many of them are burial
mounds. And many of them contain contain
very prosaic things like the bones of
native people. But some of them were
said to have contained some very very
interesting artifacts. And among those
artifacts were the bones of giants
according to the newspaper reports. Now
>> see if you can find
>> there's a lot of them from the 1800s.
>> Yeah. I mean 10 ft high. 1872.
>> Yes.
>> Yeah. Especially in the in the latter
part of the 1800s.
>> How tall was it, Jimmy?
>> I mean, it's just it's a
>> giant over 10 feet high according to
Lewis and Richard Collins history
history of Kentucky.
>> Now, the the contention is, of course,
that that these are wildly exaggerated
and that the newspapers were engaging in
in hyperbole.
And that's true to some extent. I have
no problem with that. I think
>> hoaxes. I've brought this up.
>> Some of them were hoaxes. A whole lot of
hoaxes out there.
>> Sure. Some of them are hoaxes and they
and then you know these are the
periodicals of the United States at the
time were very competitive.
>> What is that photo? Is that [ __ ]
That far-left photo?
>> Yeah.
>> Now now that far left one
>> that one was actually that's a disputed
one. Um some people believe that that
one is in fact um was proven a hoax.
Other people think there might be a
conspiracy that in fact it wasn't a hoax
because it was actually on display for a
while. Um I don't I don't know. I don't
think there's any way to know but um so
many articles during that time were
discussing these astounding dis
discoveries of the bones of giants and
mountains. In fact, um I don't know if
you're aware, but even it it appears
that even Abraham Lincoln references
this in some lecture notes. He was
waxing poetically in some lecture notes
about Niagara Falls. And he says in
those notes, you can still read them
today. You can pull them up and read
them now.
He says, "The the eyes of that extinct
species of giants whose bones fill the
mounds of America have gazed upon
Niagara as ours do now." Those are from
Lincoln's lecture notes.
>> Really?
>> I believe it's 1845, the date of those
notes.
>> Oh, I got to read that.
>> And now, now here's the contention.
Okay, this is interesting because here's
the contention.
>> Okay,
>> the contention is that he was talking
about mastadons and and um mammoths
megapona,
>> right? Um, that's what people say
because he does mention Macedon and and
and the mammoth later on in in the in
the lecture in the speech. However, what
they won't tell you is before he
mentions that, he's talking he's in a
biblical context
and he's talking about he references
uh Jesus and Moses and Adam right before
he references the giants whose bones are
found in the mounds of America. See, so
the eyes of that species of extinct
giants whose bones filled the mounds of
America have gazed upon Niagara as ours
do now. Contemporary with the whole race
of men older than the first man. Niagara
as strong and fresh to today as 10,000
years ago. The mammoth and Macedon now
so long dead that fragments of their
monstrous bones alone testify that they
ever lived have gazed upon gazed on
Niagara
in that long long time never still for a
single moment never dried never froze
never slept never rested that seems like
he's talking about mastadons it very
well he very well could be
>> talking about the thousands of miles of
water that they all would have seen
>> well he could be talking about mastadons
and mammoth. But look what he references
before he gets to the giants. Christ and
Moses.
>> Where's that?
>> And Adam.
>> He says there's still more. It calls up
an indefinite past. When Columbus first
sought this continent, when Christ
suffered on the cross, when Moses led
Israel through the Red Sea, nay, even
when Adam was made
>> and he's talking in a, you know,
>> right? So here he's invisible.
>> Came from the hand of his maker. And as
now Niagara was roaring here, the eyes
of that species of extinct giants whose
bones filled the mounds of America.
That's what's weird. Now listen,
>> the bones filled the mounds of America.
>> So here's the question. Did
were the mounds of America filled with
the bones of Macedons and and giant
sloths? And
>> no,
>> no, they weren't. Now, there have been
some fragments of bones from mammoths
and mastadons found in the mountains.
That's true. They were they looked to be
um ritual pieces that people were buried
with that were used for ceremonial
purposes or something like that. Maybe
some of them were carved ornately, but
like people weren't digging up the
skeletons of giant sloths and mastadons
and mammoths in the mounds routinely.
That was it was very rare,
>> right? But it seems like if you found
dead giants in the mounds that it would
be more specific, you would talk about
it more than just that. I don't know.
>> I don't know either.
>> The reference is is is ambiguous. So,
we're left to wonder, is he talking
about dead giants
>> in the biblical context, which he's
clearly in a biblical context before he
gets there, or is he talking about
Macedons?
>> And the issue is that there are giants
in the Bible.
>> And also that when he wrote when he
pinned this these lecture notes, there
were newspaper articles circulating in
the United States announcing the
discovery of the bones of giants in the
mountains.
>> Right. So, it's a it's a it's it's up
for debate. I don't know the answer.
>> There's got to be somebody who works at
the Smithsonian
that is sick of this.
>> Yeah.
>> There's got to be someone. We need that
guy.
>> There's got to be some whistleblower
>> that just take your [ __ ] camera
phone, [laughter]
>> get down there and film something, man.
It just it seems like if there really
are
some remnants of some of these things
and then the thing that's interesting is
you know what is the uh museum that John
Reeves has issue with
>> the National American History Museum. I
think I don't it's I know it's in
Manhattan. I don't
>> So my friend John Reeves are you aware
of him? He owns the the boneyard in
Alaska.
>> No.
>> Okay.
>> So, this this area of Ala John's a minor
and uh he Museum of Natural History. So,
he's a minor and he bought this land in
um Alaska and they're doing gold mining
and they're blasting into the perafrost
with hoses and they have found an
enormous amount of mammoths.
>> Yeah.
um cave bears, animals that weren't even
supposed to be living in Alaska at the
time. So now they have to like
reformulate their idea of what the
population of this this these lands were
at this time, but also a layer of like
dark carbon that indicates there there
was some sort of an event. All of this
is sub 10,000 years ago. So he's finding
I mean he has warehouses and this is
like fully go to the boneyard Instagram
please.
>> He he has warehouses of this stuff that
he's pulled out of the ground. He won't
let anyone take it because the Museum of
Natural History has some of this stuff
from the previous owners. They have tons
of it and they would not release it to
him even though it's his property.
>> So this is I mean he's finding enormous
mastadon skeletons. mammoth tusks.
>> I mean, they find tons of them. Tons. I
mean, he has warehouses. He built a
scientific research facility there, and
he's like, "People can come here and
study it, but I'm not letting any Post
Malone was there." Shout out to Post.
>> Uh, Mastadon teeth and bones. He
actually gave me this. This is a mammoth
tooth that they take some of these
things and they they carve artwork into
him, which to me,
>> very cool.
>> The artwork is kind of [ __ ] It's kind
of weird that they do that cuz it's
>> But this is a m This is like a petrified
mastadon tooth.
>> A mer rather.
>> Wow. That is really cool.
>> Yeah. Amazing.
Yeah. So this is all from his property.
So I mean
>> So why why is there such a distribution
of uh megapona bones there? His belief
is that there was some sort of a mass
extinction event that happened
whatever year it was, you know, that
that coincides with the younger dry
impact theory. And he and when 11,000 BC
>> Yeah. And when he's had some of these
things tested and dated, they do they're
they're post they're around this time.
And he thinks that there was some sort
of a mass extinction event and the
flooding led them all to be washed away
into this one very particular area
because it's a a deep concentration of
these bones. Too many that seem to have
died around the same time and all
preserved. So it seems like because
they're preserved in the perafrost that
this is something that happened this
enormous event. the bodies are washed
down into this one area and because of
the landscape because the contours of
the land they
>> they they're collected into this one
area. Yeah. And it's not a big place. I
think it's four to six acres that he's
pulling most of these things out of. And
there's several other places that he's
now finding things in as well.
>> You know, I find really fascinating are
the the specimens that they find of
mammoth and mastadon that are frozen
solid with chewing food.
>> Yeah. With broken legs. sometimes where
it's like there's some sort of an
impact, some massive shock wave that
kills them all instantly.
>> Yeah.
>> Instantly freezes them.
>> Yeah.
>> And I think one of the hypotheses that
I've heard is that, you know, you had
referencing the younger dus impact
event. You had a potentially a comet or
comets that were ripping through the
atmosphere at such high rates of speed
that they were pulling in the vacuum of
space that that sub-zero temperature air
and like blasting it down on the earth.
>> Yes.
>> And that that air was was was so cold it
would instantly freeze whatever was in
its path, you know, as these comets are
breaking through the atmosphere. I don't
know if that's true, but it's it's very
difficult to explain how you can how you
can flash freeze something like that,
right? And then in other parts of the
earth you have apparent biomass burning.
So you have you have mastadons over here
freezing right solid. You have other
megapon over here that were clearly
swept up in a flood. You have other
megapon and other kinds of extinct
plants and stuff that have evidence of
burning biomass burning. So it's like
some sort of um uh absolutely
unimaginable cataclysm.
>> Yes. that that struck planet earth at
some time circ 11,000 BC
>> and it seems like there's a lot of
physical evidence in terms of aridium
and soil samples and it seems it's very
common in space very rare on earth
layers of aridium and then the dark
carbon layers of burnt material it seems
there was incredible fire so we were
probably hit by asteroids they also find
that nuclear glass the same stuff that
they found during the Trinity explosion
they find little particle of that
everywhere. That seems to indicate a a
huge impact
>> that happened. And he, you know, this is
what Randall Carlson also believes the
same timeline was what caused the
melting of the ice layer over North
America and created the Great Lakes.
>> Yeah.
>> And caused the massive flooding and the
the the land features that you see from
space. If you look down from satellite
imagery, it clearly looks like there was
just immense amounts of water that
washed over the land. Mhm. Yeah. And
yeah, Randall talks a lot about the uh
the the the impact of those comets on
the ice sheets, the Laurentide ice
sheet, for example, 2 miles thick. What
happens when you slam a comet into a
two-m thick ice sheet,
>> right? A comet the size of a city.
>> Yeah. You you superheat it. Then you
have all the ejecta coming off of it
>> and and landing in force and igniting
the forest. And of course, if you have
advanced civilizations at the time,
which I believe they did, you have a
mass extinction event where everything
gets annihilated.
>> Nothing left. There a few people survive
>> somewhere in the world and it takes
thousands of years for them to reinvent
civilization,
>> especially the civilizations living on
the in the coastal areas on the banks of
rivers where a lot of civilizations are,
right?
>> They're gone,
>> right?
>> I mean, they're gone.
>> They're gone. And not only that, the the
level of the ocean rises significantly.
>> And that's all documented fact,
historically accepted. Everyone, you
know, geologists, archaeologist,
everyone accepts that that this is
something that happened. And then that
the ice sheets in North America were a
mile, two miles high, 3/4 of the entire
continent covered with ice.
>> Yeah. recently in terms of like the
earth when you're you're going back
11,000 12,000 years ago that's not a
long time ago
>> and this whole thing covered in ice and
then you also have the almost
instantaneous extinction of 65% of all
North American megapana which is kind of
crazy kind of crazy like what caused
that
>> yeah which some anthropologists still
maintain today that that that that's
because the the indigenous people killed
them they hunted them into extinction
>> it's absolely absurd
>> with adelattles.
>> It's absolutely absurd.
>> Spears and adeladals. I mean, we don't
even know if they had bows and arrows
yet,
>> right? It's just
clearly something catastrophic
>> happened
>> in the in the relatively recent past.
>> Yes. And this is, as I said, it's the
same with giants. You know, you have
this
>> ubiquitous testimony about giants. Well,
concurrent with that, you have this
ubiquitous testimony about cataclysm.
Have you seen the work that there's this
Italian guy I'll send you the article
Jamie. There's this Italian guy that is
uh proposing that the um I'll send it to
you Jamie that there's uh a way of
measuring the erosion uh on the outside
of the pyramids that he believes
indicates they are at least 10,000 years
older than we believe so far. I'll send
this to you Jamie.
here. Um, but this is, you know,
obviously disputed because they're
10,000 years older,
>> super controversial at least. He's he's
talking about the erosion on the granite
and that there's by studying erosion and
by studying the uh timeline of uh
erosion and this is something that uh
Ben Van Kirkwick has talked about when
you look at the older uh nonupdated
versions of some of the sites in Egypt
where it's clear that there was original
stone and then there was stone that was
built on top of that
>> article that shows some better.
>> Okay, here's so here's the article. So
the the heading of the article, please.
So it says, "Could the Great Pyramid be
far older than we thought? A new study
says yes." And if you go to it down
there, what he's saying is, so this is
from January of 2026. Go up a little
bit. Right there. Make it bigger. A
paper released in January 2026, Italian
engineer Alberto Donini presents an
unconvent unconventional dating approach
known as the relative erosion method,
which he argues may challenge the long
accepted chronology placed in the
construction of the pyramid of Kufu
around 2560
BC. According to Donini's calculations,
erosion patterns at the pyramid's base
could suggest a construction date tens
of thousands of years earlier,
potentially as far back as the late
Paleolithic period. The claim, if
substantiated, would have farreaching
implications for the history of ancient
Egypt and early civilization. Yet, it
also raises immediate questions about
methodology, assumptions, and how such
results could be interpreted within
archaeological science. But I don't
think archaeology is a science. I I I
just I think what archaeology is is
they're looking at stuff and they're
guessing and they're using science and
then they're also they have timelines
that they establish that they're very
reluctant to let go of.
>> Yeah.
>> And we've seen this with the dating of
Gobecley. We've seen this with the
erosion around the the temple of the
Sphinx. They're very reluctant
>> while simultaneously disregarding the
ubiquitous testimony of our ancient
antecedants who say that their ancestors
were far greater than them. Look at this
right here. Other points yield far
higher values. Several measurements
suggest erosion equivalent to 20,000 to
more than 40,000 years of exposure.
While the arithmetic mean of all 12
points produces a result of
approximately 24,900
years before present corresponding to
roughly 22,900
BC. I mean, holy [ __ ] if that's
accurate.
>> Yeah.
>> And then you have also Filipo Bjundi's
work where they're looking the radio
tomography below the pyramids and they
have these structures that go 1.2
kilometers down into the earth.
>> Yeah. Did you see my uh I did an
interview on um I made an appearance on
Pierce Morgan's show and Pierce had on
uh Hawi Zawas
and I didn't know that I was going to be
interacting with Hawi Zawasi
>> or sorry Zahiwas
>> Zahi Awas the other way around. I didn't
know that uh I was going to be
interacting with him. I was just told
that they wanted me to come on and talk
about pyramids and stuff. But then
>> Pier Pierce loves a good scramble. He he
loves [laughter] he loves the squabble.
>> So So he set me up like here's your
opportunity to say whatever you want.
You know, it was me and Jimmy Corsetti
and some other people.
>> Here's your opportunity to ask Zahi
whatever you want. And I'm thinking to
myself, I don't I don't really have
anything to ask this guy. But then it
occurred to me, I actually have me and
my team are in possession of some
state-of-the-art ground penetrating
radar technology that we use to great
effect in Peru. And so I'm thinking
about this discovery, this alleged these
alleged uh mega structures under the
pyramids, and I'm thinking, you know, it
wouldn't be that difficult. You don't
have to you don't have to detect them
all the way down. You just have to
verify that there's something there,
right? And so I posited this to Zahi
and, you know, told him, look, I've got
this equipment. Would you facilitate us
coming down there? and and and it's it's
it operates off of a drone platform. So,
you don't you don't have to drag it.
It's it's uh fly you can fly it around
the the pyramid. You don't have to touch
the pyramid. You can just fly it in the
vicinity of the pyramids and see if you
can detect something. I mean, there's
there's no there's you know, you would
do no injury to any sort of any
artifacts there. [snorts] and he seemed
like he was very open to the idea, you
know, on camera and said that basically
told peers, get your people in contact
with him so that you know, give him my
information so I can reach out to him.
Of course, that never happened. So, it
would not be that difficult to verify
that. And that's why I'm wondering why
you don't have to dig,
>> right? Why wouldn't you want as much
exploration at the most spectacular site
Yeah. that human beings have ever
erected on the face of the earth that
has a very controversial timeline.
>> That's right.
>> I mean, even the conventional timeline's
super controversial because like how the
[ __ ] did they do it?
>> Mhm.
>> Even if you just accept that it's 2500
BC. Okay, great. How
>> I mean I I mean I don't know why it
being older is more controversial cuz
it's still the same people, the same
>> it's human beings that lived a long time
ago. That's all we're talking about. But
why are they sticking to 2500 BC? It's
because that they've always said that
they know. They've always said with
great certainty and and from a position
of authority that this is what we know.
We know Kufu did this. We know this guy
did this.
>> But you don't really know. And there's
also incredible amount of evidence that
these guys wrote their name on
everything. When they were in power,
they like to put their names on
everything
>> or recarve the head of the Sphinx.
>> Yeah. Well, that's definitely true.
>> Yeah,
>> it's definitely different. There's some
controversy about that as well because
there's layers of stone that have
different gradients like different
hardness
>> and they're different types of stone and
the face there. What the the controversy
is that the face is like a harder stone
and it wouldn't erode as quickly.
Problem with that is like the stuff
that's eroded for a long period in
history was covered in sand.
>> Mh.
>> And we know that for a fact. show that
there was no erosion going on during
that period of time yet it's massively
more eroded than the face.
>> Well, I think that one of the
fundamental problems that we have as
wester as modern westerners looking at
this stuff is we have an inversion of
the timeline of history.
When we look at the timeline of history,
we generally view our antecedants as
like cavemen.
>> Yes.
>> These are are very ignorant people.
They're basically, you know, chimpanzees
with with better brains. And as we
progress through the timeline of
history, we're becoming increasingly
more intelligent, increasingly more
incap capable of building and and of of
building these monuments and technology
and so forth. So we see ourselves as the
pinnacle of the human species. Like
we're the smartest, we're the greatest.
That's not the way that the ancients
viewed the anti-dolivian world. That's
not the way that they viewed their their
antecedants. They see the for them it
was the inverse. For them, they were
always trying to recover the glory of
the people that had come before them,
the majesty of the civilization that had
come before them. Uh so when they look
back down the timeline of history,
they're the dummies. And the further you
go back, the more extraordinary people
are
>> cuz they were closer to it, right? And
they all have a they all have a myth of
the flood of the antibian world in
general, you know? and they they lived
in a timeline that was closer to that
and more accepted because they probably
had a knowledge an understanding at
least the earliest ones that they didn't
make this and so they probably passed
that down.
>> Yeah. Well, they I think they inherited
traditions from their ancestors about
these things. Um you know I mean you
have you have [snorts] this this idea of
a golden age
uh among the ancients. Golden age
meaning there was a time on earth. The
the the Greeks coined that particular
phrase the golden age. The Egyptians the
ancient Egyptians called it zeppy the
first time. There was a time on earth
when the gods descended to the earth and
cohabited with human species and to some
extent coingled with the human species
and that it was during this time that
that knowledge was transferred and that
great cities were built. This is of
course this is where the the myth of
Atlantis falls into this category.
And and then their world was suddenly
and catastrophically destroyed.
And what we've been doing since that
destruction, in the mind of the agents,
what they've been doing since that
destruction was attempting to rebuild,
to rediscover the lost knowledge from
that age, to recover it and to try and
try and emulate their their superior
ancestors. That's what you see
everywhere everywhere around the world.
Doesn't matter if you're in Egypt or if
you're in Peru, you see the same sort of
thing. Um, same thing applies by the way
for the megaliths in Peru. I don't know
if you have you been to Peru.
>> No.
>> Some of the most astounding megaliths
that you'll see anywhere in the world.
Um,
I referenced earlier the walls of
Sakaiwan. Absolutely phenomenal
cyclopian architecture. And of course,
the construction of those of those walls
is attributed to the Inca.
So if you ask archaeologists in Peru who
built Sakaiwaman, who built Machu
Picchu, who built Ojantai Tambbo, it's
always going to be the same answer. The
Inca, the Inca built it. Now the problem
is there's no record of the Inca
building those walls. And if you ask the
the the ancient Ketchra people, uh if
you ask the actually the Ketra people,
the the Ketra people who continue in
their ancient traditions, the ones who
are there today, and they still wear
their um their typical
uh vestments and and they still speak
Ketwa. If you talk to them and you ask
them who built the walls of Sakaiwan,
specifically Sakaiwan, they'll tell you
a race of giants. This goes back to
those, you know, our progenitors, the
giants. The giants built Sakaiwam. But
if you go up to um if you go up to Titti
Titikaka, Lake Tikaka, and you you ask
the imata people who built Tiwanaku,
which is on the other side of Lake
Tittikaka in Bolivia, who built those
megalithic edififices? The giants are
progenitors. That's what they'll tell
you. So, and I don't necessarily think
that giants built all this stuff. I
don't necessarily think that at all. I
just think that there's everyone is
acknowledging that that something
extraordinary happened in the past that
that the our anticedants were much more
impressive than we've given them credit
for. I mean our anti-dolivian
anticcedants
and that um that in many cases
like you said there's no inscriptions on
megalithic stuff anywhere. You go to
Machu Machu Picchu and it's apparent
that in Sakaiwama, Machu Picchu, Jante
Tambbo and other places in Peru, it's
apparent that the Inca certainly built
on top. I mean, they took advantage of
these megalithic foundations, right?
Anyone would. I mean, if you're going to
build a edifice, you would you would use
the superior foundations here, massive
stones, and you'd build on top. And you
try to you try to emulate that style of
building because it's anti-seismic for
one thing. So in Machu Picchu, it's
evident to me and I think anybody who
walks walks around that complex
you can see and and we have to keep in
mind that much of Machu Picchu today is
a reconstruction. It's an archaeological
reconstruction except for the
foundations. We have pictures from Hyram
Bingum,
original pictures in black and white of
what Machu Picchu looked like when he
discovered it accidentally.
And what's there? The megalithic
foundations are there. That's what's
there, the megalithic foundations and
and you see and the the Inca built on
top of those foundations and that's what
a lot of the archaeological
reconstruction today reflects. So if you
walk around in Machu Picchu, I remember
I've been there several times filming
and doing different things and and I
remember one time I was I was with my
colleague Anel P. Rambla, we had a we
had a a guide with us and um he was an
older gentleman, very very knowledgeable
and um he was one of their official
guides in Machu Picchu and we're walking
around and he's telling us different
things about the Inca and how they did
certain things and certainly the Inca
built a lot up there. There's no
question about it. The Inca were
impressive. Don't not taking anything
away from the Inca. But if you you look
at some of the edififices at Machu
Picchu, you can see these magnificent
megalithic foundations, big stones,
polygonal, fit together so tightly you
couldn't pass a butter knife between the
joints. And then you have on top what
sometimes people describe as Inca slop
on top where it's like they kind of
they're kind of trying to match the
style of below, but it's it's not as
precise. It's not as fine. And you can
see the clear delineation clear
delineation between the megalithic and
then what the incor are doing and then
also the archaeological reconstruction.
And I remember asking this guide of
ours. [snorts] We I pointed across the
courtyard to some this beautiful this
exquisite polygonal found foundational
wall with just sort of crude inca stuff
on top. And I said, "Why are there two
different styles
here? Why do you see this this these
large megalithic blocks fit together so
precisely and then you have this other
style
and you know keeping in mind the
archaeological reconstruction but there
there was there there was enough of the
site there that they could model what
they did based on what the Inca had done
and he said
because they like the way it looked
that was the answer they liked the way
it looked and I said you you can't
really believe that I
You're not an idiot, right? They didn't
do that because they liked the way it
looked. The reason why there's an
inferior mode of building on top of
those megalith megalithic foundations is
because they didn't know how to do that.
They did the best they could. And they
were very good, right? Attempting to
adopt the cyclopian style. They were
good, the Inca,
but the only reason you would do that,
the only reason you would put inferior
architecture on top of s superior
foundations is because you don't know
how to do that. Yeah. Well, it's also
the just the sheer size of these blocks.
It it just gives you so many questions
because it's it's not like you could
recreate that with whatever the Inca
had. That's what's confusing. In order
to move those stones into position and
then put them and construct them in a
way that it appears like they've been
melted into place.
>> Yeah. You're you're like how how are you
moving them? How are you placing them?
What are you using?
>> You should go to Ojante Tambbo. Okay, so
you go to Ojanti Tambbo which is in
between Cusco and Machu Picchu. You have
to go to Ojante Tomo to get on the train
to go up to Machu Picchu. It's the only
way to get there. And Ojanta Tambbo has
some of the most exquisite megalithic
architecture on planet Earth. It is so
beautiful the way that they were able to
and it's it's large megalithic blocks
and there's two different styles
represented there. You have the
polygonal like at the walls of Saka
Woman in Peru and then you have the
interlocking blocks like at Tiwanaku.
Both of those styles are there and and
there's this one spot at at Ojanta Tamo
that I love to take people to because
you're going up the stairs and and the
wall curves. As you're going up the
stairs, the wall curves. Now, if you and
I were building a wall today, even if we
were like the best, we were the best
masons in the world and we're building a
wall for, I don't know, for for some
billionaire in his house, we would we
would interlock the blocks in the corner
like everyone does everywhere, right? Or
if it's cement, you could take cement
because it's cement is pliable and you
could make whatever shape you want. But
if it's blocks, you're going to
interlock the blocks into that corner or
do something like that. You know what
they did at Ojante Tambbo? They they
curved the stone into the wall. They
curved the stone. So they took the
stone.
>> There images of that that we can look
at.
>> Yeah, you can pull up stones like that.
And and they they cut the stone so that
it curved into the corner. Like who
would do that? That is so intricate.
That is so difficult.
>> And by what technology?
>> By what technology? But here's the
interesting thing. You find that same
the same fingerprints of these builders
all over the world. You find the same
thing in in Egypt. They curved stones.
Some of those stones are curved into the
corners and other places where there's
megalithic constructions. I mean, these
guys there is a there is like a
ubiquitous knowledge of masonry in the
world. The fingerprint is everywhere.
Everywhere you go. And it's interesting
because one of the things I was
trying to
trying to to to convince this this guide
of ours at Machu Picchu this one time of
was look, here's a problem. You guys
come over to Machu Picchu.
>> So, here it is. So yeah, that's that's
Sakaiwan.
>> Is that what you're talking about
though? No,
>> curved stone.
>> No, I'm talking about a stone that's
curved. See that there where it says
Inca stonework?
>> Uh in the middle. Yeah.
>> Yeah. Sakaiwaman. They'll take a a large
stone. That one looks like it's curved
too in the wall, but that's not a very
large stone. Sakai will take a large
stone and they'll curve it into the
wall. Um
it's I don't see Sakai in any of those.
You have to type I'm I'm sorry, not
Sakai. Oji Tambbo. Ojantai Tambbo.
>> How do you spell it? O L A N T. O L L A
N T.
>> A Y.
>> Say again.
>> T A M B O.
>> O L
>> O L L A N T.
>> Yeah, it's not
>> a Y
>> A N T
>> A Y
>> A Y
>> T A M B O.
>> Never going to guess that.
>> Whoa.
>> That's [laughter] That's Ojante Tambbo.
[sighs]
>> I'm looking for that curved uh
>> What is the nubs? What are the nubs?
>> I don't know. There's another
fingerprint of this. all over the world
everywhere.
>> No one really knows. I mean, there's a
lot of interesting theories out there,
but I think at the end of the day,
nobody has any idea what the heck those
nubs are.
>> Those things are so spectacular. Look at
that.
>> Look at the wall. Look at the Look at
the wall right there at Ojante Tambbo.
>> Make that look.
>> Look how exquisite that is.
>> That's nuts.
>> I mean, it is just absolutely
astonishing.
>> And the weight.
weight of these things and the fact that
they're they're carved and placed in a
way that would absorb the energy of
earthquakes.
>> Yes, they're anti-seismic.
>> Yeah,
>> they're anti-seismic. That's why they do
it that way,
>> which is
>> now I want you technology.
>> Think about this. Okay, so you are you
are with Francisco Pisaro. You're a
concistador
in the 1533
or 1532 or 1534. I can't remember
exactly when he landed. and you're
walking through Peru
and you you you see this you see this
kind of architecture as you're
conquering Peru and you overthrow the
Inca and then you go to build which they
did they overthrow the Inca the capital
city of Cusco they go to build their
cathedrals
they built lots of cathedrals and
palaces for themselves right so you have
the Inca palaces and cathedrals
um they took the blocks from Sakaiwaman
they took the upper layer blocks and
they use them to build their cathedral.
Okay, there's a couple cathedrals
downtown Cusco that were built with the
blocks from Sakaiwan.
They didn't build it like that. They
didn't build their cathedrals like that.
They took those blocks and they just put
them together with mortar like they do
in Europe. So, here's a question that I
always ask people who think that, you
know, the Inca were were doing that. If
you were an architect at that time, why
in the world wouldn't you have forced
the Inca to teach you that style
>> so that you could build your cathe? I
mean, you would be the greatest
architect in the world, right?
>> Right.
>> You could build you could build the most
magnificent cathedrals in the world in
the cyclopian style if you understood
how they did it. So, if the Inca were
the ones who built it, why didn't they
force the Inca to teach them how to
build it?
>> Just look at just look at that. That is
so crazy.
>> That's clearly sanded down, right?
>> Well, those are in the process. That's
Ojante Tombo. That's the temple of the
sun at the summit. I'm just looks the
faces of it look so smooth.
>> That's Ojonti. That's Ojantei Tambbo.
And this was in the process of being
constructed at the top when it halted.
You can see the blocks there. Those
blocks that you were just looking at
were something happened.
>> Yes. Those blocks were in the process of
being transported
and they were being they were being
worked right there. They were being
prepped to be incorporated into the
walls. Um,
and it just halted.
And the conventional explanation is that
it halted because the Spanish arrived.
That's what halted the work. But, but I
think what halted the work was
cataclysm.
Personally, I think that's what halted
the work. Something like a Younger D's
impact.
>> What's that, Jimmy?
>> Is that See, right here, it looks like
the face of the wall, you know, like it
looks like it's all uniform and fits
together, right? But if that right here
is part of
>> Yeah. filler in the backing.
>> Then that's like
>> Yeah, they have filler in the backing.
Some of them facade.
>> Yeah, some of them the blocks are it's
just gigantic blocks. Others it's like
the facade is exquisite and
>> like what we have here that brick. You
know that brick in the back the
background used to just be brick at the
other studio.
>> Uhhuh.
>> Kind of like that.
>> Right. Right. I know what you're saying.
Yeah. But except these are enormous.
>> Sure. Sure. Sure. Sure. Sure. Or I don't
know.
>> Yeah. I mean
>> hardened in place and sanded down or
>> Oh, there was a point of the guy
standing. There was a picture of the guy
standing in the corner. There was a guy
standing in the corner that I was
referencing earlier.
>> You just had There it is. Right there.
That guy.
>> No, the one below it.
>> I don't think you can see the corner
very well.
>> That right there. The middle.
>> You see the guy in the blue standing
there?
>> Yeah. Yeah. Right there.
>> Behind him. There's a You can see how
the stone below him. It's curved into
the corner. That's not a separate stone.
That's It's literally curved into that
corner.
>> It's It's just so weird. The nubs are
weird.
>> They are weird.
>> And it's weird that they occur all over
the world. And it's like it speaks
almost to like is that how they carried
them and placed them? Is that a part of
the construction? Is that something
about how they made them that they left
these nubs? Like what is what are the
nubs?
>> No one has any idea what the nubs are.
>> That seems so weird that we have no
answer to a feature that occurs over and
over again in all this magic
architecture
>> all over the world.
Yeah,
>> they keep showing these three. Those
they kind of look like the nubs, but
they look way different than
>> Yeah, they're a lot rougher. See those?
See those smaller pieces of stone there
in between the large blocks.
>> That's an anti-seismic property. That's
a technology that they use so that the
rocks can shift and move and the and and
>> not crumble. That's
>> it's ingenious. And like I said, you
have two different styles here. at
Ojante Tambbo you have you have the
polygonal
and then you have the the interlocking
rectangular those are two different
styles in the same site that's one of
the things that makes Ojante Tambbo
fascinating and that rectangular
interlocking style comes from Tiwanaku
which is another
amazing megalithic site in Bolivia
what's interesting is when you combine
all these sites all over the world and
you have all these questions that are
very similar like how how did they do
this? Why? Why is this stuff the oldest
stuff? Why is this stuff the bottom
stuff? Why is the base of it the most
spectacular construction? And why does
it seem like more primitive stuff is on
top of that?
>> Cuz they like the way it looked,
[laughter]
>> right? Yeah. But it's
>> it's the same question over and over
again. And the the reluctance to propose
that perhaps the oldest stuff is more
complicated because the civilization was
more complex.
>> That's it. That's what they're unwilling
to they're unwilling to open up that
door. But that door is the only door
that makes any sense.
>> Yeah. Not only was the civilization
complex, the knowledge was universal.
That's a problem.
>> It is a problem.
>> The knowledge was universal
>> cuz that means you're talking about a
seafaring traveling civilization.
>> You're talking about something that's a
lot more impressive than cavemen. Right.
>> Right. So,
>> especially if this guy, this Italian guy
is right in terms of his because
>> 20,000 BC, we're we're supposed to be
just brutes.
>> Mhm.
>> Oh, yeah. Caveman
>> skinw wearing Yeah. We're wearing animal
skins and we have spears.
>> You're you're a chimpanzeee with a
better brain. Yeah. back then. Yeah.
>> And and and as I said before, you know,
you look at that kind of
>> um architecture and you and I were we to
encounter the Inca. Go back in time the
in the late 1500s. The Inca are still
around. The builders, the the alleged
builders of these monuments. I mean,
they were building Ojante Tambbo, right?
When you arrived, they quit building.
Why did the Spanish architects not
incorporate any of that right
>> into their buildings?
>> Why did they not learn the techniques?
>> That's superior technology. That's
anti-seismic. And the point is
illustrated because in Cusco they built
their cathedrals, right? They they
knocked down the the the the palaces of
the Inca and they they raised the
cathedrals in uh in Cusco. And guess
what happens? You get a big earthquake?
The cathedrals crumble to the ground
except for their megalithic foundations
which remain unmoved. Earthquake comes,
cathedrals fall, the walls of Sakaiwaman
stand. And it's happened various times
throughout history.
Who, what architect
would not have taken advantage of that
knowledge had it been available to them
during the time of the Inca?
>> Yeah. I mean, like I said, you could
build the most magnificent cathedrals on
planet Earth and you could make the Inca
build it for you. And now you can say
that the the Inca refused would have
refused to to to pass this knowledge on.
Okay, maybe. I mean, there was a there
was a society within the Inca, you know,
they were taught by the Grandes
Almaltas, they called them, who were the
the great teachers of the Inca nobility
and the keepers of the secrets and so
forth. They had the Inca didn't even
have a written language. They used
Kipus. Kipus was a it's a system of
ropes and knots of string and knots.
They didn't even have language. So
absolutely extraordinary and there is
nobody can give me an an adequate
explanation as to why such amazing
knowledge is just forgotten.
I mean would we forget how to build
computers? No. So so why would we just
forget how to build megaliths?
Why? That's not something you forget.
These things don't fall down in
earthquakes. That's something you pass
on carefully from one generation to the
next. Unless, like our ancient
antecedants tell us, there was a
cataclysm that rocked the earth and
eliminated the civilizations that were
inhabiting the earth.
That's to me that that that's the best
explanation.
>> Well, it's certainly the most logical
explanation if you weren't attached to a
timeline. If you didn't have this
timeline that these archaeologists
insist upon, then you would say, okay,
clearly we know that a cataclysm
occurred. Clearly, we know the young
impact theory is accepted.
>> And especially now,
>> so
>> becoming more so over time,
>> more likely
>> much more likely that there was
something going on that we don't totally
understand tens of thousands of years
ago.
>> Yeah. I mean, I think we would do very
well to listen to take serious the myths
and legends.
>> Well, it's also weird that like the
Aztecs, like I used to think that the
Aztecs created those temples and those
pyramids and then I found out fairly
recently that they never even claimed to
have
>> No, they say they found them and that
these were the birthplace of the gods.
>> Yes. See, that's what I was going to say
about uh Machu Picchu. So mach you know
what the name of Machu Picchu is not
Machu Picchu in Ketwo it's umpu andju
means the abode of the gods or the
dwelling of the gods this is how they
viewed the megaliths I mean this is how
if we were primitive people coming upon
these megalithic structures what would
we think the gods must have done this
the gods lived here and so then we would
rebuild we would reinhabit the
habitation of the gods
>> yeah why would you live anywhere else if
you could live there
>> right and it would be the nobility
>> architecture you've ever imagined And
>> exactly.
>> That's right. Why would you let some
idiots take it over? He wouldn't
>> give me that. That's mine.
>> He wouldn't.
>> Yeah, of course.
>> You know, there's also the the weirdness
of Peru, like the Nazka lines. Like,
what the what the hell is all that
about?
>> I don't know. I don't know. That's a
great mystery.
>> There's a lot of weirdness to Peru.
>> There's a lot of weirdness in Peru.
>> And how about those uh the ancient
tapestries that show those
three-fingered, three-toed, big-headed
people with big eyes. And it's
ubiquitous. And these are a thousand
years old.
>> Yeah. You then you have the Paracus
culture with those massive
>> elongated skulls,
>> right?
>> In the in the Procus culture, by the
way, you know, people see these
elongated skulls online. I I was in I've
been in Procus a lot. They've done a lot
of research down there on the Proacus
culture and other things. Made some
interesting discoveries, by the way,
with our drone, with our GPR unit. Um,
but you see these images online, you
think that the the Paracas people, their
their skulls are so large and elongated,
you think they're these must have been
big people, right? That's what it looks
like. No, the they were tiny. They were
really little. They were bizarre.
Their their mor the morphology of their
body was different than ours. Um,
>> tiny with big heads. Yes, the Baracas
people were very small and they had a
proclivity to live in in underground.
They had subterranean dwellings and
their eye sockets of some of these
elongated skulls. The eye sockets are
like 25% larger the orbital socket. So
they big eyes, elongated skull, very
dimminionative people in some cases
living underground. Well, I've heard
people
have theories about Neanderthalss that
Neanderthalss with larger eye sockets as
well might have been able to see at
night like the way deer can and
>> y
>> the way, you know, other animals that
are nocturnal can see at night that they
have a different kind of eye structure.
Obviously, we don't know what the eye
structure was, but if you have a
significantly larger eye socket,
>> significantly larger eyeball,
>> it seem I mean, we know that nocturnal
vision exists in cats and exists in a
bunch of different animals, but the idea
of it existing in primates, we've, you
know, we kind of dismissed that.
>> Mhm. Yeah. I mean, a bigger eye gathers
more light.
>> Yeah.
>> So, it's a it's it's a nocturnal
feature.
>> Not only that, we have no idea what the
soft tissue structure of their eyes was
like. No, no. Now granted, for all the
skeptics out there, yes, many of the
elongated skulls in Peru and other
places around the world are the result
of cranial deformation. So yes, they
were deforming their skulls with
headboarding, cradle headboarding and
binding and so forth. Um, there's
evidence of that and you can see the
evidence when you're there if you know
what you're looking for on the skulls,
but I don't believe that that explains
all of the elongated skulls. Not just in
Peru, other parts of the world, but
especially in Peru. There are some
examples of elongated skulls that I mean
look like a look like a a genetic
um
alteration is the best way I can say it.
So, there's this there's a and you you
can pull this up, Jamie, if you can find
it. There's a there's a mummy. I'm
trying to think of the name of the of
the um museum where it's housed. There's
a I think it's the San Marcos Museum in
Lima. There's a mummy, one the first
mummy that was discovered by Julio Tejo.
Julio Tejo or one of the first, if not
the first. Julio Tejo was the eminent
archaeologist that discovered the prais
culture and he's like their greatest
archaeologist in Peru. was a phenomenal
archaeologist and he he discovered all
kinds of things about the Procus
culture. Uh, and he dug up this mummy
and it is the it is it is the most
bizarre mummy I've ever seen in my life.
It has a massive elongated skull.
Massive. And
>> we showed a few of those the other day
when Cassie Coppersmith was on. We
showed a few of these uh ones that don't
have the sagittal suture. Yeah,
>> they're they're weird. like the just the
actual structure of the skull is
different,
>> but this one has the skin on it
>> except for part of the face is gone, but
it's got the skin on it. So, you can
actually see what what this skull looked
like with the skin on it. And then the
morphology of the body is just weird. I
mean, I I think it's in the museum of if
I recall, the museum of San Marcos and
Lima. Um, so these are
>> How tall were these things?
>> Oh, they were small. I mean, we're
talking four foot tall.
>> What? These guys were little.
>> Giant heads and four feet tall.
>> Yeah, they were little. Everyone thinks
they were big. No, no, no. They were
little. Some of them. I mean, I think
they were 4 and 1/2 maybe averaged four
to four and 1/2 ft tall somewhere in
there. They were very small. Um maybe
from four to 5t tall. I don't remember,
but they're significantly they're
they're very small. They're
dimminionative people.
>> You also tell me which one it is. I
don't know.
>> I've never seen one with skin on it.
It's not really popping.
>> That one's nuts.
>> There. The one that uh Brian Forester's
looking at right here.
>> Right there. Yeah.
That run right right there is just
absolutely bizarre when you look at take
a look at the look at how tall that
forehead is on that. There's skin on
there. Very well preserved. And if you
look around the back, you can't see it
here in this image, but if you look
around the back side of it, the neck is
very bizarre. It's sort of it's a
curved.
>> That is so weird.
>> I mean, imagine coming upon somebody
here
>> weird
>> in Austin that has a a skull like that.
>> There might be a few of them here,
>> right? And that
[laughter]
>> I mean that does not look like cranial
deformation. That looks like a totally
different kind of head.
>> Looks like a genetic anomaly. Uh
it what is that one in the middle? Yeah.
What is that one? Jeez.
>> Yeah. There's all kinds of very
interesting specimens like that. And as
you said, Peru is a very very strange
place.
>> The one on the far left is the craziest
one to me.
>> That one.
>> That one.
>> It's a Chongo skull. That one was
discovered at the the Chongo's
necropolis.
>> Like what the hell is that? I mean just
the volume of the brain is so much
larger than a human being.
>> That picture might be elongated. You
know, someone might have altered that
picture. It is very impressive. That one
might be elongated. Um the picture I
mean
>> right that's more like it.
>> But the skull
the these skulls many of these skulls
that's in the Museum of EA and the city
of Ein Peru.
>> That's absolutely insane. These skulls,
the the Chungo skull was taken from the
Chongo's necropolis. If you go over to
the Chongo's necropolis today, which is
on the desert, you see these things
sticking out of the ground and they got
red hair all burned here. And we were we
were over there with our um with our
crew and there's a pyramid there, but
it's a it's an Adobe pyramid, and it's
called the uh the Jungles pyramid. And
no, nobody really goes to this area cuz
it's sort of off the beaten path. It's
not not wellnown. Um, we were actually
working in an area further down the road
because at the time we were looking for
treasure. We were filming a like a for
like a TV show looking for for treasure.
And there was this um there's this pond
that has a very interesting UFO story
attached to it further up the road. And
uh so we were working up there. But
every day when we we drive by the the
pyramid, the Trongos pyramid, and it's
an adobe pyramid, so it's not super
impressive. It's made of large adobe
blocks, but it was a large uh urban
center. It was some people think it was
the capital of the Proacus culture, very
large urban center, and it was a
necropolis. There's tons of of remains.
and the the elongated skull. Some of
these Paracus people, the the nobility
for sure, they were buried in in burial
bundles and they're in the fetal
position. And these burial bundles are
are they're usually layers of fabric and
there's various items in there and
they're just under the surface of the
sand. They're right there and you get a
lot of grave robbers, waos, who go in
there and and you know, steal all kinds
of artifacts and stuff. But we're
driving by. I looked at the pyramid and
I thought I had this intuition.
There's there's a there's there's a
tunnel under that pyramid. There's
there's there's a tunnel system under
that period. I don't know why. I just
had this intuition. So, we decided to go
over there one day and fly our our GPR
drone around the pyramid. And we did a
we we we did an extensive run around
that pyramid. We did like a cross
configuration with the drone to make
sure that we get a good reading. And we
found two massive artificial tunnels
under the pyramid that intersect a 100
feet below that pyramid. M you could
drive a semi-truck through them. And we
don't know how far they go, but they go
and we actually spent some time trying
to find a way into him. We couldn't. We
ran out of time. Um, but it's it's
remarkable because Julio Tejo remarks
in his writing about the Paracus culture
that the Paracas people seem to have a
affinity
for living under the ground. They had
subterranean dwellings. And I've
explored some of these subterranean
dwellings out in the out in the Procus
Reserve. And what's they're really cool
because
they you'll see like these these hills.
They look like um they look like long
houses that are built that are that are
buried in the ground. So you see like
this this this elongated hill. And
really what it is is it's whale bones.
They use like the vertebrae of a whale.
So you got whale bones and then they
would pack on top all kinds of they
would pack on earth but then they would
also add in organic material and it
would create like an insulating effect
and heat the interior. But they were
subterranean. So what you see are the
roofs of the of the dwellings and then
they went down into the ground and there
were tunnels and there was all kinds of
stuff. This is where these weird people
with the elongated skulls were living.
>> Absolutely.
>> Absolutely bizarre.
>> How old are these uh mummies?
>> I think the Procus culture Oh jeez. It
goes back maybe to
I don't remember 200 BC or something
like that. I can't remember. Maybe not
that far back. Um I really don't
remember. They're they're that's that
can't be accurate. I think it goes back
to
definitely to the first century AD. I
don't remember off the top of my head.
>> What happened? Where did those people
go?
>> That's that's the question. I mean the
the the I think that the prevailing
theory is that they became the Nazca
people that they didn't go anywhere.
That that essentially the the Nazca
people were the Paracas people
>> like they interbred. know that the
culture just sort of migrated and and
and became the Nazca people.
>> So what happened to those genetic
features
>> that well there are some among the Nazca
but not as much as among the Paracas.
Others think that the Paracus they just
disappeared like they were either
exterminated or there's you know there's
multiple theories but there's no
question that they were bizarre
bizarre and of course
>> and there's physical evidence of this
like we're talking about the the mummies
before excuse me the giants before and
we you know we're like it's just stories
this is actual physical evidence
>> you mean the elongated skulls
>> oh yeah they're everywhere down there
now granted as I said before many of
them are the result Oh,
>> many of them are the result of cranial
deformation.
>> But what about these [ __ ]
>> I don't know.
>> They're not all elongated.
>> I mean, yeah. How do you elongate that?
You got a balloon in someone's head.
>> I've seen some really big heart-shaped
heads.
>> That is so in Peru.
>> Meeting that guy. I just
>> small compared to some ones I've seen
like some of the ones I've seen like
look like a heart. Really big.
>> And um actually that particular skull
was was exceptionally large. The one I
saw that looked like a heart.
>> Um
>> yeah. So, just keep in mind cranial
deformation is what?
>> It says that these two in the front left
row are from the billow bait.
>> And now I don't know what the hell that
means.
>> Billow bait.
>> Yeah, that's what the picture says.
>> What does that mean?
>> Do you know what that means?
>> No.
>> Yeah. Two scrolls from the front are
from the billow bait and italicized.
>> They are billow bait. I don't know the
name.
>> Look at that one on the left in the
middle. Those are nuts. That is just
Imagine meeting that cat.
>> And here's the other question. the size
of his eyes.
>> Here's the other question, though. Why
bind the head,
>> right?
>> And and this is all over, as you know,
all over the world. It's they do it in
Africa. They do it all the Native
Americans, the flathead tribe up in
Montana. They're called the flathead
because they would cradle board. They're
young and they get these flat
>> um
>> um they [clears throat] they would have
these very distinct skulls. So, um why
>> are these cultures doing they're
emulating something?
>> Yeah. Who or what are they emulating?
That's the question. And of course, you
have in ancient Egypt, you have, you
know, figures with elongated skulls like
Nefertiti and her daughters
um who are depicted with very pronounced
elongated skulls. Now, is that the is
that just the result of cradle head
headboarding? Probably. I don't know.
But why do that?
>> Well, the problem is some of these
skulls have actual larger volume than a
human skull.
>> That's true. Some of them do.
>> That's that's where it gets really
weird.
>> That's true. So if you have 20% 30% even
40% more volume
>> which is like okay
>> 40% more brain is nuts like what does
that mean?
>> There's a slight explanation for what we
were just looking up and that also what
you
>> what is the
>> something to do with male and female.
>> So it says blobate
that thing you were talking about
tubular erect was the most common among
both sexes. Boate skulls were observed
at a much higher rate in female skulls.
This association with sex has evidence
in some paraca ceramics where men and
women are depicted with distinctly
tubular erect or biobait heads
respectively.
>> And then it even goes into this.
>> So the bio bait is then the the
heart-shaped
>> [ __ ] weird bending.
>> It is weird. It is extremely weird. And
then of course you have those, you know,
the alleged alien mummies down there.
>> Yeah. What do you think about those?
Because there's a lot of people now that
are saying that those are elaborate
hoaxes.
>> I went down to Peru. I was invited to go
down there um by uh Dr. Roger Zunya or
Professor Roger Zunya to go down and and
look at the specimens that they have at
the Eco Museum. Uh they have four
specimens at the Eco Museum. The most
impressive specimen that they have there
is called Maria and Maria's in the fetal
position. She's a large one of the
larger mummies. Um then they have a few
other ones. They have two of the of the
the small ones, the ones that Haime
Assan famously un, you know, revealed
over there in Mexico during that thing
that he did over there, that press
thing. And and then you have one that's
called Wawita,
which seems to be like uh some kind of a
combination of of different things. And
um so I went down there to the
university and uh walked up to these
things and and at first I have to say my
first impression of Maria, I didn't
really care about the little ones. I
never believed that the little ones
ever.
>> The little ones look squirly.
>> Yeah. I never believed that they were
living organic beings. They're very
rigid.
>> Yeah,
>> they're very rigid. I don't think that,
you know, like their morphology really
could have worked in the real world.
>> Like Monat, like that one.
>> Monerat and and Maria and um there's a
bunch of them. the those are very
compelling when you when you're standing
next to them looking at them.
The they were compelling. So I looked at
the mummies and then I interviewed um
Roger Zunya and he's very very convinced
that they're 100% real. Sincerely, I
mean I I like um Professor Zunya and he
really is convinced. I don't think he's
not trying to perpetrate some kind of a
hoax. Neither is anybody at the
University of Eeka. There's a good faith
effort going on there to try and
investigate this and and and and
continually do testing and there it's
it's an open field. They're
>> Have they done genetic testing?
>> Yeah, they've done all kinds of testing.
So,
>> what do they find?
>> Here's the problem. There's been a lot
of testing done, but but I don't think
the interpretation of the data has been
competent.
Um, and so initially I was pretty
impressed. I thought it was more likely
than not. I even said this on the
Michael Null show that it was more
likely than not in my mind that the the
the larger mummies like Maria were real,
but I've since reversed that position. I
think it's more likely than not that all
of them are a hoax.
That's my personal opinion. And this is
a hot topic, you know, like on X and
stuff. There's a lot of people who are
absolutely sincerely convinced that
these things are real. The problem is
that this entire thing started with a
with a grave robber,
a very shady individual.
And the very first mummies that were
brought forward were were were hoaxes,
were fake. That's how it started.
And you know, this is a whole it's a
whole saga we don't have to get into,
but it started with fakes. It started
with a hoax.
And then they alle, you know, then
allegedly they started to produce the
real the real ones. And I I just have a
hard time believing that that this is an
elaborate hoax. Now, I've talked to some
of the individuals who've
um who've done some of the scientific
work on these. They don't want me to
mention their names or anything. Um
they're trying to just sort of stay
neutral. They don't want the press and
they
they also doubt that they're they're
real. They think they're really really
elaborate hoaxes
and um I know that a lot of money has
exchanged hands regard to these things.
Maria was on up for sale for a million
dollars at one point and if I mean if
you're a proven grave robber a million
dollars is like a billion dollars. I
mean um so that's to me that's uh
>> Can we see what the Maria one looks
like?
>> That's not
that cast a lot of shade on the whole
thing for me. Now I can't say
scientifically the DNA data this that
the other but there's a lot of debate
going back and forth on this thing.
Well, I think one of the problems is
anatomists uh experts in anatomy have
looked at the structure of the feet.
Yes. In the hands and they they it
doesn't seem to jive with what they
understand about the structure of feet.
>> That's true.
>> That the bones are not in the proper
position. They're not the proper size.
They don't It doesn't look like it makes
sense. But damn, that's amazing.
>> Thanks, Maria.
>> Like, here's the thing. If it is a hoax,
like what an amazing job they did.
>> Yeah. Maybe maybe the greatest hoax ever
perpetrated in the history of
archaeology.
>> Like who did it and like what what
talent this person has.
>> There's a new note because this this
website was the tridactyls.org.
It [clears throat] got up there. There's
a little note that popped up. It says
they have ongoing research that just got
updated.
>> This is a great website. Uh what is the
ongoing research?
>> They're just there's more here than
Maria might be Mario.
>> Yeah, Mario. They call him Mario Mario
now. It's a dude.
>> Maybe he's nonbinary. Bunch more
[laughter] data down here. I don't know
what all this stuff is.
>> Interesting.
>> Bunch more data that people
>> That's a great resource there. Um,
>> so it's tridactyls.org.
>> Um, go to the uh images of it again. Go
down like right there. So this uh
Okay, this is a 3D scan.
>> Yeah, these are all scans. These are
videos of the scans.
>> [ __ ] weird, man. Look at the length
also of the fingers and the toes.
Well, you think that's a hoax?
>> People said it wouldn't work that way.
>> You know, [sighs]
I
>> What' you say, Jamie?
>> People said that like the you can't grab
stuff. There's pictures down here they
have of people trying where was it?
Trying to like grab stuff with uh I
might have been looking at a different
Yeah, I was looking at this. These are
the fingers that you couldn't bend. They
wouldn't bend or something like that.
It's hard to like this person trying to
grab stuff with long fingers without
bendable, you know? uh appendages, I
guess.
>> Well, we're assuming that they had to
grab things.
>> Well, what would you have fingers for?
>> Well, maybe they put them on a
spaceship. That's how they pilot it.
Maybe they've gone past the idea of
picking things up. Maybe they lift
things with their mind. Maybe that's how
they move the blocks into place.
>> I don't know.
>> I'm more convinced than that that
they're that they're a hoax. I don't I
can't say definitively.
>> Yeah, I would lean in that direction
because I want them to be real. And the
problem, but also whoever did hoax them,
like Monster, whoever hoax that, like
what an amazing job you guys did,
>> and also there's some of them that have
weird implants in their heads.
>> They have metal implants in the one a
couple of them have them in the hand,
others have them in the forehead.
>> Very weird stuff.
>> Some of them have fetuses apparently,
although that's there's some dispute
about that. They say the fetuses look
like, you know, that they look the same
as the adults, which would be remarkable
if true, but that's disputed.
Everything's disputed,
>> right? There's I mean there's there's
there's there's a factional battle here
between the the the believers and the
naysayers, right?
>> And they're both looking at the same
data, interpret interpreting it
differently. So that's why I just sort
of stand back and say I don't know. I
mean, I can tell you how it started. It
started with grave robbers, very um very
seedy people,
>> and it started the initial ones were not
real. I know that because I know um the
individuals who were involved in that
whole thing. So
>> just that alone.
>> Yeah.
>> Just that alone. I mean,
>> but then how did they make the skin? How
did they cover it? How did they make it
look like? They're really good.
>> I mean, you know, if you were selling
these things for hundreds of thou if you
were making $100,000 on just $100,000 on
one of these
>> mummies and you're a poor grave robber,
you would do anything. and take whatever
time it what whatever it took to produce
one of these to sell it to make
$100,000.
>> But haven't they aged them like and
they're really old?
>> They harvest the pieces from the graves.
>> Okay.
>> From from the Nazca graves.
>> They construct this somehow from really
old skeletons pieced it together.
>> That's the allegation. And also from old
llamas and stuff like that.
>> Yeah. Um,
>> one of the other weird things about
these elongated heads is that they have
where it connects to the spine is in a
different position than a human skull.
>> Yes, there is some indication of that.
Um, that's why I was pointing out on
that the one that with the skin on it.
There is a very interesting morphology
with the where the of the neck where it
connects into the spinal cord. Now, I'm
not an expert on anatomy. I don't know.
All I can look at it and say is that's
freaking weird. I mean, really, really
weird.
>> It is weird. And all I and and I mean I
always just remind people just you can
argue about all the dad all day long,
but if one of those people walked into
this room right now,
>> right,
>> it wouldn't just be a little weird,
>> right?
>> It would be it would be utterly bizarre.
>> Yeah.
>> And
>> an actual real human mummy or whatever
it is, mummy, if that was alive today,
it would freak you out.
>> Yeah. Larger orbital sockets, very
small, extremely elongated head.
>> Yeah. It freak you out.
>> It just makes you wonder like what was
the world like back then? What what were
these people like? Was there a separate
branch of the human species?
>> I don't know. I think I'm pretty sure
now I'm I'm recalling the date 2,00 2500
BC somewhere around there is where the
process culture goes back to and then it
I think it existed until 700 AD. I'm I'm
not sure that those numbers are accurate
but that's what I remember. Yeah,
there's a lot of weird stuff in Peru.
>> Well, a lot of weird stuff in just
ancient history in particular. What do
you make of like things like Zepte and
the Sumerian kings list where you you go
back in time and you have these
incredible ages of some of these rulers
that ruled for thousands of years.
Um, well, what's in what's really
interesting is that if you overlay the
Samrian kings list with the with the
list of patriarchs, pre-flood patriarchs
in Genesis 5, it's like a onetoone
match.
So, um, I'm not convinced that I think
that the the Sumerian kings list is is
the ages is mythological.
Um, I don't think that they were ruling
for thousands and thousands of years. Um
uh I like I said I see this very
interesting overlay over the over the
Genesis 6 genealogy. These are the
patriarchs from Adam to Noah. And
specifically I mean these are the
patriarchs who live before the flood.
The flood came in the time of Noah. And
you know, there's a lot of debate right
now, especially online, and I think
you've had people here on your show as
well, that talk about the Sumerian story
being the oldest story and being our
sort of the the original story of the
flood and and of the anti-dolivian
world. But I actually I have a different
view of that. I think actually the
oldest story is the story of Enoch. It's
the Enochian story. I think that's the
original story. And maybe some of this
strangeness, maybe some of the bizarre
things that we see and the the stories
of the flood and of the giants and all
of that, maybe something like the book
of Enoch is a is a actually an accurate
account of affairs of things that happen
in the anti-dolivian world. And
certainly the writers of the biblical
narrative believe that. I mean the
writer of Genesis and then obvious in
the New Testament you have references to
to what I call the Anakian tale. And so
when you think about this the
anti-delivian world the cataclysm that
that
destroyed it seemingly overnight the
great civilizations that existed back
then. Um,
you see a you see a series of of
parallels in all the stories, all the
ancient stories. Uh, whether it be the
the the Sumerianss, whether it be the
the ancient Egyptians, the um the
Hebrews,
the Greeks, the Romans, there are
parallels in certain details. Great
civilizations inhabited the earth, or at
least a great civilization. And that
doesn't necessarily mean that that they
had the kind of technology that we have
today. I think that's a mistake that
some people make when they're thinking
about the anti-livvian world and a lost
civilization. They think, well, that
means that there were skyscrapers and
and automobiles and aircraft and things
like that. That's not necessarily what
it means. Um and so
I think it's very very interesting that
you have all of these parallels a
cataclysm giants
um you have a fratricidal war that's
discussed for example in in you have the
the vet and and some of the ancient
Indian origin stories and another
component that you find everywhere is
this idea that the gods descended to the
earth comingled with human species
progenerated a race of demigods, in many
accounts, giants, who then governed the
earth. And depending on what
version of the story you're reading,
they were either good guys or bad guys
leading up to the cataclysm that
destroyed everything. You know, the
biblical account, the great flood, and
other accounts record various kinds of
cataclysm, right, all over the world. So
the question is I think an intriguing
question is is it true? I mean are these
basic um constituents of these stories
is it true?
And and I happen to believe that
I happen to believe that that the book
of Enoch is the beginning of the book of
Enoch. The oldest portion of the book of
Enoch called the book of the watchers
is
the earliest account of the
anti-dolivian world. And I don't mean
necessarily the book of Enoch that we
have today. I mean the tradition of
Enoch.
Was there a manuscript that Enoch wrote
himself? Enoch was the seventh from
Adam. So he's one of those individuals
on the Sumerian kings list.
I believe he corresponds to Endem and
Demaranki. I can't remember how to
pronounce the name in the Sumerian name.
But again, you have this overlay with
the pre- flood patriarchs. You have all
of these details that correspond.
Now, we have evidence of cataclysm.
We're finding evidence of cataclysm,
right? We talked about the younger D
impact hypothesis.
So, are some of the other details true
as well? Were there giants?
Were there beings who descended to the
earth in the anti-dolivian world? Did
they populate with human women? I mean,
that's
that's essentially the story of Enoch.
Enoch begins with
um this is first Enoch. Enoch begins
with a company of 200 watchers. These
beings that are designated as watchers
and they are they're heavenly beings.
And the the the watcher designation is
not exclusively extra biblical. You find
it in the book of Daniel in a very
interesting scene in which holy watchers
are judging Nebuchadnezzar, the
Babylonian king, and they sentence him
to a period of time of madness where
he's given the mind of a beast, and he's
eating grass. And this is a judgment
from the watchers. He's eating grass
like an animal, and his hair grows long,
and he's basically like a beast out in
the field. The the the hotty king of
Babylon, humbled in that way. And so the
watcher designation is you find it in
Daniel. But then in the book of Enoch,
it's much more specific. These were 200
of these watchers. These are nonhuman
celestial entities. You could describe
them as extraterrestrial entities.
And
they
they begin to lust after the daughters
of men
and they desire to uh to progenerate
families. They want to have families.
>> Do you think that this is a
simplification of genetic engineering
and that this depiction of it is just,
you know, like the game of telephone,
you're telling the old story
through oral tradition for a long period
of time as it gets relayed over time
post flood. So you get this sort of
distorted version of what the actual
event was.
>> I think it's possible there was genetic
engineering involved. because we
certainly look different than everything
else on the planet.
>> Well, the the book of Enoch, the the at
least the Hebrew account both in the
book of Genesis because the the there's
a there's a verse Genesis 6
um that says, "Now it came to pass that
when men began to multiply on the face
of the earth and daughters were born to
them that the sons of God saw the
daughters of men that they were
beautiful and they took wives of all
whom they chose. There were giants or
nephilim in the earth in those days and
also afterward when the sons of God came
into the daughters of men and they bore
children to them. These were the mighty
men of old, the men of renown. That's
the reference to the to the origin of
giants and Nephilim in the book of
Genesis.
And so in the Bible, you have these
angelic beings, the sons of God, who are
lusting. They're looking down at the
daughters of men. They see that they're
beautiful. The book of Enoch is even
more explicit. The book of Enoch says
that the that the angels of heaven, the
watchers lusted
after the daughters of men and they
desired to progenerate families. So they
descended they descended to the earth on
the summit of Mount Hermon and they
bound themselves by a pact of mutual
impreations.
In other words, we're all in this
together. They knew what they were about
to do was going to be very grave sin. So
they bind themselves with an oath.
That's why Mount Hermon has been known
since time immemorial as the mountain of
oath. Then they descended into the
plains and they began to choose wives
from among the daughters of men uh with
whom to copulate. But first these were
maidens that they intended to marry and
there was a transaction that happened
because in exchange for the for the
maiden's hands in marriage
the their fathers were given technology.
So the watchers taught men the knowledge
that they were already striving to
learn. So there's and that's and it
that's that's implied in the text. It's
not explicit, but it's implied because
the watchers give technology. They give
knowledge which results in technology
and they get an exchange the maidens
that they desired to marry. And then
they they copulate with them. They have
sexual intercourse with them. The women
conceive and give birth to giants. And
then these giants begin to terrorize the
earth. They're cannibalistic. They begin
to devour men.
>> So maybe a hybrid sort of like a liger.
You know how a liger is a combination of
a tiger and a lion? It's much larger.
Large. Yeah.
>> But they can't reproduce,
>> right?
>> Yeah. So the so the result is you have
these watchers. Yeah. Their DNA mixed
with the DNA of human women produces
giants.
And and you know this story by the way
is attested in the Dead Sea Scrolls. Not
just in the Bible, not just in the book
of Enoch. the book of Enoch. Of course,
fragments of it were discovered among
the Dead Sea Scrolls. But you find you
find this story in, for example, you
find it in the book of giants, the book
of Jubilees, the Genesis Apocryphan, and
other texts as well. And so this is this
story, as bizarre as it is, is
foundational to Hebrew cosmology.
This is what the ancient Hebrews
believed literally happened. Like this
was a in their minds, this was a
historical event. You go back in time,
you go to the anti-olivian world, the
world before the flood. What do they
envision? They envision the watchers,
these gods living among men, populating
with human women, giants who were who
who were cannibalistic. And then
God decides intervene because the giants
are there's it's a very bad scene on
planet Earth. And people begin to cry
out, petition heaven. God decides to
intervene according to Enoch and he's he
dispatches some angels and they one of
the things that they do is they set the
giants against each other in a
fratricidal war.
So they make the giants go to war with
each other. Now
when I envision this scenario playing
with the idea here that this actually
happened right in the anti-dolivian
world I don't imagine big dumb giants
you know bopping each other over the
heads with clubs I imagine a
technological war
because what I see unfolding here and I
think again this is implicit in the
inkian story is that
the watchers are essentially creating a
dynasty. They are building an empire
called the empire of the gods in the
anti-dolivian world there. They are each
portioning the earth among themselves
and their hybrids are ruling each of
these kingdoms and then they go to war
with each other. And again, I see this
as a technological war because I don't
believe that in the biblical account,
angels never have wings. Only in
prophetic icon iconography, but in the
historical narrative of the Bible,
angels are never depicted with wings.
They are depicted as
uh operating what what I would describe
as advanced aerospace vehicles, the
chariots of God, the chariots of Yahweh,
the chariots of fire, variously
denominated. And I think that these are
vehicles of conveyance
and and so the watchers when they
descended to the earth I think they
descended to the earth in some kind of a
vehicle you know like that right so they
would have the knowledge and there would
be some technology and so when these
when their offspring the giants went to
war with each other in this fractalidal
war it would have been a technological
war
now the reason why I say that is Because
you have the story of the watchers
as as chronicled in the book of Enoch,
but then overlay the story of Atlantis.
You have the same story. So of course
the story of Atlantis comes to us from
Plato's Tmus and Citrius dialogue and he
has Solen of Athens traveling to Egypt
and and and
interfacing with the priests of SC and
they tell him you know you don't have
any history that's horriy with age and
so forth and then they begin to relate
to him the story of Atlantis because
they told him that his ancestors were
remarkable people. They were the they
were the Athenians and only they could
resist the warlike Atlantanss, right?
And then we get the story of Atlantis.
How does the story of Atlantis begin in
uh in Plato's dialogue? Well, it begins
with the gods aortioning the earth
amongst themselves. That's how it
begins. So, here are the gods dividing,
divvying up the earth. They're going to
create what I again describe as an
empire of the gods. They're divvying up
the earth and each one is going to take
an a portion of the earth for himself.
Poseidon, Plato tells us, gets the area
of Atlantis. And what does Poseidon do?
Well, he becomes enamored of a human
woman named Plato. He takes her to wife.
He copulates with her. She gives birth
to 10 hybrid sons who become the kings
of Atlantis. And I think there's reason
to believe that they were giants in the
myths.
Atlas, for example, was chief among
them. So you have these 10 hybrid sons
ruling over Atlantis.
Then what happens? Then you have and
presumably the other gods did the same
thing in other parts of the world,
right? They went out and and married
human women and gave birth to hybrid
offspring, which is of course what
happens in Greek mythology with a lot of
these gods. They progenerate hybrid
offspring. Then you have
a war that breaks out. The Atlantanss
become very warlike. They go on a a
campaign and
they they're steamrolling everybody in
their way until they get to the
Athenians
and they're locked in this conflict. So
I'm hoping people are picking up the
parallels here with the book of Enoch
with this with the story of Enoch. And
in the midst of this conflict, what
happens? Cataclysm ensues.
Atlantis, but not just Atlantis.
Atlantis in the insinuation is everybody
gets destroyed in a cataclysm that
erupts suddenly
and Atlantis is consumed in in the waves
and and is no more. Well, the whole
point of the Egyptians when they're
telling this story to Solon, one of the
one of the points that they're trying to
convey to Solon is there have been many
cataclysms, world ending cataclysms. And
every time a cataclysm happens, we have
to start over like children, right? So
the parallels between the book of Enoch
and I think it, by the way, I think
Atlantis
that Atlantis is an allegory of the
anti-dolivian world in general.
I think that there was something like an
empire of the gods in the anti-dolivian
world and I personally believe that um
that the biblical record is the is the
faithful account of what happened in the
anti-dolivian world and with the
addition of the book of Enoch um because
you cannot separate you cannot separate
the Enochian narrative the Enochic
traditions from the Bible. Well, Enoch
is referenced in the Bible, and the only
reason why the book of Enoch is not in
the cannon of the Bible is because of
some rabbis, right?
>> Well, it's it's complicated. So, the
book of Enoch
is a compilation of texts
and ranging from the 4th century BC to
probably the 1st century AD.
The tradition of Enoch, I think, is very
old. I think the tradition of Enoch,
this that that story I just outlined,
that tradition of Enoch is the oldest
story we have,
the one upon which all the other stories
are based. That's my personal opinion.
Now, the actual book of Enoch that we
have today, the only reason we have it
is because it was preserved in Ethiopia.
That's the only reason we have the book
of Enoch today.
>> The Ethiopian Bible,
>> the Ethiopians preserved it. both the
the uh the the beta Israel Jews, very
very ancient Jewish community and the
Tawahedo Orthodox Christians.
>> Do you think they have the Ark of the
Covenant?
>> I think, let's put it this way. I think
Graham Hancock makes a very compelling
case that they do. Have you read his
book, The Sign in the Seal?
>> Yeah. It's the whole depiction of these
people that are the watchers of this
thing get cataracts because it has some
radiation properties.
>> Yeah. Very compelling narrative.
>> Yeah. None of them live more than a
couple years after they get the
assignment.
>> Yeah, it's I think it's a it's a very
strong possibility that they do.
>> That's crazy.
>> It would be crazy. Yeah. And I think
that um many people including Graham
think that the Ark of the Covenant was
there's something technological about
it, something radioactive about it.
Um,
but it it is it's interesting though
because you have
the idea at the very least the potential
for technology in the anti-dolivian
world, right? Advanced technology. So
what what do I mean? Well, what if
we're talking about the watchers who
descended the earth, like I said, the
Hebrews believe that that actually
happened, that that was historical. That
wasn't mythological to them. That was
historical, that event. Well, what if
they did arrive in something like like
that? like like a like a flying saucer,
right? What if there was some level of
of technology introduced?
But I don't believe that it would have
been distributed, broadly distributed,
you know,
talking about like an like an advanced
lost civilization. I don't think that
technology would be broadly distributed.
I think that the technology would remain
in these family lines in these dynasties
because their desire was to govern
everyone. So I think what we might be
looking for instead of a technologically
advanced civilization, maybe a
technologically advanced fraternity
within civilization. You see what I
mean?
>> Like a group that was in that was in
control of something advanced, but the
rest of the people maybe were Iron Age
or something like that or whatever
bronze age level, which is kind of a
different perspective.
>> Well, we see that today, right? I mean
there's plenty of people today that are
uncontacted tribes
>> that are living like people lived tens
of thousands of years ago.
>> That's exactly right. Yeah. So
>> yeah, it's not uniform even today.
>> Right. So we may So I think that's why
when we think about was there a
technologically advanced civilization in
the anti-living world in the world
before the great cataclysm. I think
really what we're looking what I'm
looking for is a is a is a fraternity
who were in possession of technology
that the rest of everyone didn't have.
Maybe something like that. Although I
will say that I believe that the
antilovians were much more remarkable
than we are in every way. I think they
were physically more robust than we are.
I think that they were intellectually
much more they were intellectually
superior to us. Uh as I was saying
before this how the ancients thought of
their anticedants. And so when I look
back on the timeline of history, the
further you go back all the way to those
pre flood patriarchs, you're looking at
human beings who
who were so superior to us. I mean
certainly according to the biblical
account, they were living much much
longer, almost a thousand years. You're
looking at human beings who who we would
scarcely be regarded as as as human like
them because they would have been more
human than we are because we've
degenerated. So I see a degeneration I
see a devolution in the human species.
We started as something really really
remarkable and we've been gradually
devolving over time so to speak. We've
been degenerating. I think that our
anticedants, our anti-delivian
anticcedants, I [snorts] think they were
telepathic.
I think that they had these incredible
abilities, capabilities that that that
are perhaps latent in the human species
today.
>> Well, that might have been why these
people had such large heads in Peru,
too.
>> Maybe.
>> Right.
>> Maybe everybody had elongated skulls at
one time. I don't know.
>> But I mean, think about that, though. I
mean, if if you were see from a biblical
perspective, Adam was created for two
for two fundamental reasons. He was
created to govern the earth, but more
than that, he was created
to fellowship with the maker, to commune
with the maker. He was created for
fellowship. So, think about that. If you
were created to fellowship with the
maker, with God, you would have some
extraordinary capabilities built into
your anatomy, into your biology. You
would be given the ability to interface
with the maker. And not just with the
maker, but with with whatever whatever
else is out there as well. So from the
very beginning I think that
mankind was was imbued was it was
intrinsic in our design that we had all
of these these incredible capabilities.
Maybe remote viewing, maybe certainly I
would say telepathy because telepathy is
conversation at the speed of thought,
right? I mean, we fumble around with
words. We we it takes us kind of a long
time to try and say what we mean. But
but what if what you wanted to convey to
me was done so instantaneously.
How much more could you convey? How much
more information? How much more
efficient would that mode of
conversation be?
>> It certainly seems like if we keep
evolving, that's the future.
or if we keep developing better and
better versions of technology. One of
the things that the gaps that we would
bridge is Elon said that he said we're
going to be able to talk without words.
>> Well, the problem is that our technology
is getting better, but our species is
getting dumber
>> and our biology is getting weaker and
we're poisoner.
>> But it's not just because of poison.
Yes, we poison our environment. We
poison our bodies certainly but I
believe that there it's clear to me that
there that we have degenerating and we
are degenerating. We are degenerating.
So um and this is genetic degeneration.
So we have what's called mutational
load. Human beings all creatures we have
mutational load. And mutational load is
all of the delletterious mutations all
of the negative mutations that happen in
our genome.
they compile
and it becomes this it becomes this
burden this genetic burden. We have all
of these mutations that we're carrying
mutational load and the further we go
down the line the more mutational load
we have and again these are
delletterious mutations. So you [snorts]
get all kinds of problems from that. I
mean we we basically what it amounts to
is we become less and less and less
impressive over time
>> and there's nothing we can do. You can't
reverse that. You can't just have a good
diet and and get and regain the
capabilities that were lost. That's
impossible. So, we're declining.
Our technology is ascending. We're
declining. So, what we're headed for
essentially is a posthuman future.
A future in which we have to we have to
evolve ourselves out of this condition.
I would say out of Adam, into something
else. And I'm not in favor of that, by
the way. I'm not a transhumanist. But
clearly,
you have this you have this conundrum
where we are clearly getting dumber as a
species. There's no doubt about it. I
mean, I saw I can't reference it here,
but I saw some data on this the other
day. Um, and it's astounding. It's it's
it's kind of alarming. And not only
that,
we've realized and I try and remember
the reference to this this book that's
um that details this, but the human
species is essentially becoming
reproductively inviable.
The sperm count of males in the west is
declining precipitously
as is our fitness. So that is on the
decline such that I think the projection
is in 2045 or something like that we're
going to basically be reproductively
inviable. We're going to need a
technological intervention like
artificial wombs. Well, what's happening
right now? We're developing things like
artificial wombs.
So it's it's very interesting that these
two things are running in parallel.
We're degenerating, but our technology
is increasingly getting better. So the
the result of this is going to be what I
describe as posthuman apocalypse. I mean
we're we're headed for a future that's
not human. That's what um the
you all know her is out there
prognosticating that in I think he says
in 120 to 130 years from now there will
be no more human beings left on planet
earth. So why am I saying this? Because
I'm illustrating that you go back in
time. [clears throat] You go all the way
back to the beginning. If you come from
a biblical par paradigm like I do,
you're you're in the first man, Adam,
the prototypical man. He has all of the
incredible capabilities that are innate
built into his system. He he can he he's
communing with his maker. He's governing
the earth. He's have he he can do all of
these amazing things. And then as we
become copies of copies of copies of
copies of copies of Adam all the way
down, we're we're gradually losing these
abilities. But I think that some of them
are still, you know, latent in the human
species. And I think that explains
remote remote viewing and telepathy and
things like that.
>> I don't know how I got on that. Uh
>> listen, it makes a lot of sense and it's
a fascinating conversation and uh
>> I enjoyed this very much.
>> I did as well.
>> Fun. Thank you very much for being here.
Uh, tell everybody if they want to get a
hold of your stuff, they want to find
you, where they could find you on social
media, where they could find your
website.
>> Um, Timothy Alberino on social media, on
Instagram, on X. Uh, I have a YouTube
channel, Timothy Alberino. So, I have a
book called Birthright. Uh, and I also
published commentary on commentary and
introduction of the book of Enoch with
my friends.
We're gonna have to get to that. That's
a whole another conversation. I'm
>> Next time
>> we're going to have to have that
conversation.
>> I would love to. I would love to. Thank
you very much. [music] My pleasure.
>> Bye everybody.
[music]
Ask follow-up questions or revisit key timestamps.
The video features Joe Rogan and guest Timothy Alberino in a discussion centered on the existence of giants, specifically the Kandahar giant in Afghanistan. Alberino details a firsthand account from a C130 pilot who claimed to have transported a dead giant from Afghanistan to Qatar. The conversation expands to the cultural, occult, and historical significance of giants, the role of megalithic sites in Sardinia and Peru, the cover-up of such findings, and connections to the biblical Nephilim. Furthermore, they discuss the Younger Dryas impact, the potential for an advanced ancient civilization, and broader themes of human degeneration and future transhumanism.
Videos recently processed by our community