HomeVideos

Joe Rogan Experience #2533 - Diana Pasulka

Now Playing

Joe Rogan Experience #2533 - Diana Pasulka

Transcript

4357 segments

0:01

Joe Rogan podcast. Check it out.

0:03

>> The Joe Rogan Experience.

0:06

>> TRAIN BY DAY. JOE ROGAN PODCAST BY

0:08

NIGHT. All day

0:13

like Travis Walton at all.

0:16

>> You know who he is, right?

0:17

>> Of course I know who he is. Yeah. Yeah.

0:19

And I I believe him.

0:20

>> I do, too.

0:21

>> I mean, he he certainly seems

0:24

believable. I I'm you know people that

0:26

tell the same story for decades and

0:29

decades without any variation to it.

0:32

It's hard. I mean, you know, he I don't

0:34

know what happened, but all the people

0:36

that were with him during the time we're

0:38

talking about, for people just listening

0:40

now, talking about Travis Walton, who

0:42

was a man who in the 1970s was a logger

0:44

in Arizona, and he was uh allegedly, or

0:48

according to him, abducted by aliens.

0:52

And uh the people that he was with saw

0:54

him get hit by a beam of light. They

0:56

freaked out, took off. They they were

0:58

driving away and they were like, "We got

0:59

to go back and get him. We got to go

1:00

back and get him." They turned around,

1:01

went back and got him. tried to get him.

1:03

He was gone. The craft was gone and uh

1:06

he uh disappeared for five days and then

1:10

turned up and had this insane story.

1:14

>> Yeah. And then he's taken uh those tests

1:17

like uh

1:18

>> polygraph test.

1:19

>> Yeah. Polygraph tests like every year or

1:21

something like that or he takes them

1:22

regularly and he always passes them.

1:25

>> Well, so did the people that were with

1:26

him.

1:27

>> Yeah. Yeah. And they and I've seen

1:29

people uh interview the people that were

1:31

with him even just recently and they're

1:34

like, "Well, whatever." Regardless of

1:36

what I think about Travis as a person,

1:38

yeah, that happened.

1:39

>> Yeah. One of the guys actually got in a

1:40

fist fight with him the day of the

1:42

abduction.

1:44

>> The guy did not like him. Like they

1:46

hated each other. And then, you know,

1:48

they were young guys. And then he had to

1:51

testify and he was like, "It happened."

1:54

>> Yeah. Yeah.

1:54

>> Whatever it was. So yeah, I believe him

1:56

and his his interpretation has changed a

1:59

lot too through the years in not the the

2:01

facts the facts are all the same but his

2:04

interpretation of them like you know

2:06

were they because he thought they were

2:08

pretty malign like bad right he didn't

2:10

enjoy being abducted let's put it that

2:12

way

2:13

>> um but then over the years he said well

2:15

maybe something spiritual happened but I

2:17

don't know where he's at right now I

2:18

haven't seen a recent interview

2:19

>> there's an interesting one that's out

2:21

now with him and Bob Lazar sitting

2:23

across from each other

2:24

>> wow Yeah. In a diner. It's very weird.

2:27

And they're sitting there eating pie

2:30

talking about, you know, what they think

2:32

this whole thing is.

2:34

>> Uh-huh. Uh-huh.

2:35

>> Yeah. Yeah. [clears throat]

2:37

>> So, what's new in the the world of all

2:40

this?

2:41

>> Well, a lot. Right. So, the government

2:44

has been releasing UFO files since May

2:48

2026. And this is something that a lot

2:52

of people think is really important and

2:55

you know it's a form of disclosure. Uh

2:58

they're pushing the group that is

3:00

pushing this and happy that this is

3:02

happening. They're also wanting the

3:04

president to come out and say yeah we

3:07

there are these things. Um I saw JD

3:10

Vance on your show the other day that

3:12

was really interesting. He's of course I

3:14

I was interested in what he had to say.

3:16

you kind of pushed back on his what he

3:19

was talking about in terms of calling I

3:21

don't want to use that word the dword

3:22

right

3:23

>> demons why don't you want to use that

3:24

word

3:25

>> because I must take this opportunity now

3:28

to say that I am speaking on your

3:30

podcast as a private individual and I

3:32

don't represent my university talking

3:34

about this okay [laughter]

3:36

>> so I mean seriously look what happened

3:38

to him so he basically you know was

3:40

honest and said yeah I think that these

3:43

are you know demons Well, you know, that

3:46

was the headline, Joe, but when you

3:48

actually listen to what he had to say,

3:50

it was more complicated. And so, I

3:53

thought that uh he did a good job of of

3:56

uh talking about it with you. And and if

3:58

you want, we can talk about that, why he

4:00

would think that. He is Catholic. Um I'm

4:03

Catholic. I do history of Catholicism is

4:06

part of what I do. Um by the way, I'm a

4:08

professor of religious studies at uh

4:10

university. So, uh yeah. So, I've been

4:13

like looking at that. I've been doing

4:15

Catholic history my whole life. So I

4:17

started doing looking into UFO

4:19

experiences in 2012

4:22

and um yeah so lost is new are lots of

4:26

stuff is new. Okay.

4:28

>> I didn't think that he had a very

4:29

satisfying explanation as to why he

4:32

would say I think they are demons.

4:35

>> Yeah I can fill that out.

4:36

>> Okay.

4:37

>> Okay. Or fill that in. Um all right. So

4:39

he's coming from the perspective of

4:41

Catholic theology. So in Catholic

4:44

theology there are generally if you're

4:46

looking at anomalous phenomena which

4:48

they do supernatural anomalous phenomena

4:51

a lot of weird stuff happens within the

4:53

history of religions. Okay. So they have

4:57

categories for understanding this stuff

4:59

and the categories include three

5:02

different um categories basically three

5:05

different types of things. Supernatural

5:07

things which they think can't be

5:09

explained and that they're like

5:10

miracles. um you know someone terminally

5:13

ill prays for a saint intercession and

5:17

then they become healed and doctors say

5:19

we can't figure that out. That's

5:21

supernatural. That's a miracle from God.

5:23

Okay. Uh that's one category. The other

5:26

category is the natural. So things that

5:29

are within nature, we can explain them.

5:32

You know, everybody's knows what a

5:34

natural kind of event is. Hurricanes and

5:36

things like that. Um, but there's an

5:38

there are events that cannot be

5:40

explained but don't merit supernatural,

5:43

the supernatural category. And those

5:45

events can, by the way, there's a word

5:47

for it and they call it the pternatural.

5:49

Okay, the pternatural. And this has been

5:51

a category that Catholics have had since

5:53

at least the medieval time period. And

5:56

because they're trying to figure out,

5:58

you know, if let's just talk about UFOs.

6:00

If UFOs are here now, most likely

6:02

they've been around for a long time. And

6:04

so whatever Cassix were seeing in the

6:07

medieval time period, they were they had

6:10

categories for trying to understand it

6:11

just like we're trying to have too. And

6:13

so they're they say uh the theologians

6:16

at the time said like Aquinas, Thomas

6:18

Aquinas, he said okay the pre-ternatural

6:20

these are events that happen and they're

6:24

either angelic like you know good things

6:27

like that or demonic which are fallen

6:29

angels or other things because God has

6:32

created other things other than you know

6:34

he's created the unseen and the seen

6:37

some things that we can't see. So in the

6:39

pre-ternatural, there happens to be

6:42

experiences that people have with things

6:45

that seem to be similar to what people

6:50

talk about when they're talking about

6:51

being abducted by UFOs. Um beings that

6:55

that appear and disappear. Uh beings

6:57

that can seemingly read your mind. So

7:00

this would be the theological category

7:02

that Catholics have called the

7:03

prednatural. And I think that's what uh

7:06

JD Vance was trying to get at. But why

7:08

would you call that a demon?

7:10

>> Okay, so this is a good question and

7:12

that's where I'm going to kind of like

7:14

help

7:15

>> push back on you and then you could push

7:16

back on me again. All right, [laughter]

7:18

so the the the fact is is that we don't

7:21

know. Okay, we don't know. So there's

7:24

analogous experiences that people have.

7:27

Now that I've been doing this since

7:29

2012, a long time, uh, it is beyond a

7:32

doubt that there's a pattern match

7:35

between people who have these

7:36

experiences and people who have demonic

7:39

experiences.

7:40

That's an analogy, but that doesn't

7:42

prove that they're identical.

7:44

>> When you say pattern match, what do you

7:45

mean?

7:45

>> Yeah. So, I'm talking about what people

7:47

actually experience. So, when people

7:49

have these experiences, what happens to

7:51

them? They report things like things

7:55

appearing and disappearing, luminous

7:58

lights, okay, light showing up, aerial

8:00

phenomena. They also report beings,

8:03

beings that can somehow read their

8:05

minds. They also report that sometimes

8:08

they feel like these beings put thoughts

8:10

in their minds. Okay, these are all

8:13

things that Catholics who know the

8:15

history would say, "Wow, that sounds

8:18

like this kind of situation." Um, does

8:21

that mean it is that situation? There's

8:23

no No, we can't say that it is. And

8:25

that's where your point is relevant.

8:27

Your point is that how do we know that

8:29

they're demons? We don't know that

8:30

they're demons. But it warrants an

8:33

investigation, I think, into the

8:36

similarities.

8:38

>> Okay. But when you think about demons,

8:41

most people think about evil. They think

8:43

about something that does horrible

8:45

things to you. possession, you know,

8:49

something that causes you to murder

8:51

people or something that wants to murder

8:52

you or something wants to steal your

8:54

soul. That doesn't seem at all like what

8:58

we're talking about with these UFO

9:00

experiences. What it seems like is

9:02

you're encountering something that has a

9:05

superior intelligence of superior

9:08

technology, something that's very

9:10

different that communicates

9:11

telepathically, but they don't seem to

9:14

have vicious intentions. So, I don't

9:17

understand the distinction. I understand

9:19

why you would call that a demon unless

9:21

you're just using that in this old

9:24

school term because the people that were

9:27

experiencing this supposedly

9:29

or assumably when we're talking about

9:32

ancient times and they didn't have words

9:34

for it and they didn't know what they

9:35

were experiencing, they would call that

9:37

a demon.

9:38

>> Yeah. Okay. So, this is a really good

9:41

comment and this is something that I'd

9:42

agree with you like in before 2016. I'd

9:48

say, "Yeah, you're right.

9:49

>> What changed?"

9:49

>> Okay, that I did a lot of research and

9:53

um and what I found was that

9:57

let's take an example because examples

9:59

are good. Uh Skinwalker Ranch. So, there

10:02

are a lot of people who are associated

10:04

with

10:05

looking into UFOs who are well known to

10:08

UFO people um who work at Skinwalker

10:12

Ranch. Okay. So, I learned about

10:14

Skinwalker Ranch pretty early on, 2013

10:17

or so, and I learned it from about it

10:20

from Gary, Gary Nolan. Um, all right.

10:23

So, he said he was talking to me about

10:26

it. He said, "Yeah, a lot of my friends

10:27

are working out there, and they want me

10:28

to go out there and do some study of

10:30

what's going on. There's anomalous

10:32

phenomena. Um, it they think it's

10:34

associated with UFOs because UFOs show

10:36

up and this and that." And I said, "Oh,

10:39

are you going to go out there?" And he

10:40

said, "No, I'm not going out there." And

10:43

so I I was like,"Well, okay, why?" And

10:46

he said, 'Because it's really negative,

10:48

the things that happen to people, they

10:50

they get something called the hitchhiker

10:52

effect. And so the hitchhiker effect is

10:55

when this scary stuff that's associated

10:58

with like a haunted place uh follows you

11:00

home,

11:01

>> right? I've heard of that before.

11:02

>> Yeah, the the hitchhiker effect. Um I

11:05

think it's called the hitchhiker

11:06

syndrome or something. And so I met a

11:08

lot of people who had this happen to

11:10

them who had had UFO experiences. So I

11:13

would say that no, not all UFO

11:16

experiences are like that. But enough of

11:19

them are like that for me not to ever

11:22

have one. and also to associate the

11:24

pre-ternatural. That's what I started to

11:26

understand that well the pre-ternatural

11:29

is still the best category that we have

11:32

for looking at this because not all

11:34

pre-ternatural phenomena even for

11:35

Catholics is negative right some of it's

11:39

actually really positive but the thing

11:41

the problem is is that human beings have

11:43

a hard time fig figuring out like you

11:46

know it could be deceptive this is

11:48

another thing where Gary Nolan comes in

11:50

um he was on Tucker Carlson I don't know

11:52

like four years ago or something And um

11:56

he said, and I've talked to him about

11:58

this too. Tucker asked him about,"Well,

12:00

what do these things, you know, what do

12:01

they say?" And he goes, "Oh, they lie.

12:03

They they're deceptive. They, you know,"

12:05

and he's a guy who doesn't have a dog in

12:08

the race in terms of religion. Like he's

12:11

not, you know, affiliated with any

12:12

religion. So, you know,

12:15

>> when he said they lie, like what

12:17

specific examples does he have of them

12:19

lying?

12:19

>> Okay. So listen when we start to look at

12:22

this type of situation with you know

12:24

these experiences and so forth what a

12:27

Catholic would do like what a what a

12:29

Catholic priest say would do would be to

12:32

identify if there if there's deceit

12:35

happening to identify if there are

12:38

negative effects and you know because

12:40

there's criteria for looking at the

12:42

pre-ternatural and so a lot of things

12:46

that happen are when you have um you

12:49

know these abductions. Um,

12:52

which some people view as positive, but

12:54

some people don't. They don't like these

12:56

abductions. Um, so yeah, they'll say

12:59

things that aren't true. And

13:01

>> what

13:02

>> um I don't know. They'll say like, okay,

13:05

I'll take I'll take an example. I'm not

13:07

going to out any experiences that I

13:10

know, but I I know a lot. [laughter] So,

13:12

at this point, I've had like I don't

13:14

know about a thousand people talk to me

13:17

about their experiences. So one in

13:21

particular regularly gets prophetic

13:24

messages. Some of which come true, most

13:27

of which are not true. Okay, that means

13:30

when when you have one or two prophetic

13:33

messages given to you by an anomalous,

13:35

you know, being or whatnot and it comes

13:38

true, you're willing maybe to believe

13:40

it, right? Oh, this is, you know,

13:42

telling this is telling me good

13:44

information. Um but

13:47

then they start not to come true and

13:49

then if that person makes this public uh

13:52

that person then is you know people

13:56

associate them with falsehood and deceit

13:59

and that's not a positive thing.

14:01

>> Okay. But have you taken into

14:02

consideration that that this person

14:04

might be mentally ill?

14:06

>> Of course. Of course. Yeah. Yeah.

14:08

>> This this idea that they're getting all

14:10

of these

14:12

like whatever it is visions. I mean, how

14:14

are they receiving this information? Are

14:16

they receiving it telepathically?

14:19

Like when you say prophetic?

14:21

>> Yeah. Yeah. So the So there are

14:23

different So you ask me what kinds of

14:25

people like what they would say, right?

14:28

When

14:28

>> Well, if the if these things are

14:30

deceiving them, so they have these

14:32

prophetic visions, right? How is how are

14:34

these visions

14:36

manifesting themselves in their mind?

14:37

Yeah.

14:38

>> Is it coming as a voice? Are they seeing

14:40

an event happen?

14:42

>> Okay. So

14:44

there are uh there are a variety of ways

14:47

in which people receive this type of

14:49

information like prophetic information.

14:51

Um I would say that some people actually

14:55

see things and the beings like impart

14:58

telepathically like mind-to- mind

15:00

transmission something this is going to

15:02

happen [clears throat] and then they

15:04

believe it. Okay, this happens within

15:07

like angel events like Marian

15:09

apparitions. happens to, you know,

15:10

people. It happens to people in

15:12

abductions as well. And, you know, I I

15:16

mean, that's what happens to them. They

15:18

see things. They sometimes have visions

15:20

in their dreams. So, there's there are a

15:23

variety of ways that people

15:25

>> Let's stop right there. Visions in their

15:27

dreams could also just be dreams. Like,

15:30

how can they make a distinction between

15:33

just dreams like, "Oh, Godzilla was

15:35

chasing me. I was on a skateboard. I ran

15:37

into my cousin. We hid in his basement."

15:39

and then I woke up. Like that's just a

15:40

dream. That's not a prophecy. And if

15:42

they're having those dreams as well as

15:45

these

15:46

visionary dreams that they think are

15:48

inspired by

15:50

>> some entity,

15:51

>> how are they making the distinction

15:53

between the two of them if both of them

15:55

exist at the same time in the same

15:56

person's mind?

15:57

>> Yeah. Yeah. So within the culture of

16:00

within our culture, we tend to put

16:02

dreams in the same category. We say the

16:04

dream about Godzilla is like, you know,

16:07

all dreams are the same, right? They're

16:09

either bad dreams or good dreams are

16:10

neutral. Um, within there are other

16:13

cultures that distinguish different

16:15

types of dreams. And within the western

16:17

culture, there have been times when

16:19

people have distinguished different

16:21

types of dreams. Like say you take the

16:23

Old Testament or Hebrew Bible, you have

16:26

Joseph, right? Joseph is a guy who's

16:28

going to be big uh he's a prophet and he

16:31

has dreams where he's able to uh tell

16:34

the future and he's able to distinguish

16:37

between those dreams. So within certain

16:38

cultures even cultures today like

16:42

different religious cultures they have

16:44

distinctions uh the martu in Australia

16:48

uh they have you know they they talk

16:51

about the dream time. So, we're kind of

16:53

a culture that puts all dreams in the

16:55

same category. And granted, that's true.

16:58

Uh, in terms of discussing whether or

17:00

not people are mentally ill, Travis

17:02

Walton's not mentally ill,

17:04

>> right? But Travis Walton is not having

17:06

prophecies.

17:07

>> No, I know, but he's he's one that

17:09

doesn't. And there are others who do.

17:12

>> I understand. But we got to this place

17:14

because you were talking about beings

17:15

that deceive.

17:17

>> Yes. So, I'm saying that not all of them

17:20

deceive. But I'm saying that I'm trying

17:22

to explain.

17:22

>> I'm trying to ask you. Yes.

17:24

>> How are they deceiving?

17:26

>> Well, I just told you. So, they'll be

17:28

giving people information about the

17:30

future. Some of which is correct and

17:31

some of which is not.

17:32

>> Okay. So, how are they giving them this

17:34

information? They giving it to them

17:35

telepathically or is it coming to them

17:37

in a vision in a dream?

17:39

>> It's two very different things, right?

17:41

>> Yeah. But that it could be both

17:43

depending on the instance,

17:44

>> right? But if it's in a dream, how do

17:46

they know it's coming from this entity

17:47

and not just a dream? That's my point.

17:49

like saying they're being deceived.

17:52

>> Well, a lot of them won't make that

17:54

distinction. And so that's where you

17:56

need a

17:57

>> the abductees.

17:58

>> Yeah.

17:58

>> Won't make that distinction

18:00

>> because they've never had this happen to

18:01

them before. So, of course, they're

18:03

going to think this is true. But my

18:06

position is that be careful because we

18:09

don't know if it's true or if it's not,

18:11

>> right? But I mean, how are you making

18:12

the distinction between what is just

18:14

their imagination and them being

18:16

deceived? This episode is brought to you

18:19

by Blue Chew. I'm sure you've heard of

18:21

Blue Chew by now, but let me tell you

18:23

what they've been up to. They've been on

18:25

a mission to get you bricked up for

18:27

years, and now the number one brand for

18:30

better sex. Over 5 million happy men

18:33

have bought Blue Chew for better sex.

18:36

And you know what? Girls love the

18:38

results, too. Their new 4in-one

18:41

chewable, Blue Chew Gold, is for

18:44

performance and passion. Two ingredients

18:46

maximize blood flow for stronger,

18:48

longerlasting boners, and two, get you

18:51

in the mood. It's designed to dissolve

18:53

under your tongue for fast results. They

18:56

are number one for a reason. And we have

18:58

a special deal for our listeners right

19:00

now. Buy two months of Blue Chew Gold

19:03

and get the third free with my code

19:06

Rogan. You'll also receive free

19:07

overnight shipping. Visit bluechw.com

19:10

for more details and important safety

19:13

information. This ad and the products

19:15

being advertised are intended for a

19:17

United States audience.

19:19

>> Right? That's the good question. I don't

19:22

know.

19:22

>> So, how is Gary Nolan saying they lie?

19:25

>> Well, he's taking data and he's saying

19:27

that they're saying this, you know,

19:30

they're telling these people this

19:32

information and it's wrong information.

19:35

And so, he's not making, you know, he's

19:38

not trying to make a big claim. He's

19:40

just basically saying, you know, Tucker

19:42

asks him why, you know, what kind of

19:44

things are they saying? And he said,

19:46

well, they're being deceived, right?

19:47

They say deceitful things. And my point

19:50

that, by the way, getting back to the

19:51

original,

19:52

>> but it would be it's very frustrating.

19:54

Go ahead.

19:54

>> No, no, I know you're frustrated, but

19:56

the original question here is what is JD

20:01

Vance talking about when he's saying

20:02

these are demons? And I'm trying to

20:04

explain that he's referencing this

20:06

theological category that has been

20:08

around for a long time. And that is

20:10

actually quite useful in adjudicating

20:13

what's going on when people are having

20:15

these experiences. Now, I'm saying that

20:17

I'm not trying to propose that these are

20:21

like experiences. Honestly, I wouldn't

20:23

want them to happen to me and I don't

20:24

wish them upon anyone. But some people

20:27

>> You wouldn't want to meet an alien.

20:30

Not the aliens that people seem to be

20:32

meeting. So,

20:34

>> which one would you like to meet?

20:35

>> Well, I don't know. I mean,

20:37

hypothetically, like, I'm not sure.

20:39

>> I like to put it out there. I'm down. If

20:40

they want to meet me, I'm down.

20:42

>> Okay.

20:42

>> I'd love to meet one.

20:43

>> Yeah. Yeah.

20:44

>> Yeah. I mean, I want to know. I'm not

20:47

scared.

20:48

>> They don't seem to steal you. They don't

20:50

take you away and never bring you back.

20:52

They just they just interact with you.

20:56

I'm down with that. I mean, we have to

20:59

distinguish between Yeah, go for it.

21:01

Meet an alien.

21:02

>> You don't want that. You wouldn't want

21:03

that.

21:04

>> Look, if

21:05

>> you are a person who writes books about

21:07

aliens.

21:09

>> Yes, I do write books. Well, somewhat

21:11

about aliens. I write about the religion

21:13

about aliens.

21:14

>> Yes. But a lot of the subject matter has

21:17

to do with extraterrestrial intelligence

21:20

>> or whatever it is.

21:21

>> Yeah. We don't know what it is.

21:22

>> It might not be extraterrestrial. It

21:23

might be dimensional, right? Yeah. Or it

21:26

might be here, something that's of a

21:30

superior intellect that's been here all

21:32

along.

21:32

>> And it might be something within the

21:34

category of the pre-ternatural.

21:36

>> Right.

21:37

>> Yeah. So my point is that if it is if it

21:40

whatever it is, I you're right. I've

21:43

been studying it and I can say that if

21:46

those are the aliens, no, I don't want

21:48

to meet them. If the if they're the ones

21:50

that like people have come and told me

21:52

about and said, I wish this never

21:54

happened to me. um you know then no I

21:56

don't want to meet the

21:57

>> right but that's it's different people

22:00

right and different people have

22:01

different tolerances for experiences and

22:05

when someone says I wish this didn't

22:06

happen to me it's because they can't

22:08

handle it and whereas other people might

22:11

be able to handle it

22:13

>> um maybe but like look at the things

22:16

that the fighter pilots like uh David

22:19

Fraver and um

22:20

>> they don't seem to have a problem with

22:21

it like they they're they're not saying

22:23

I wish this never happened to me. No,

22:24

but they are saying that this looks

22:26

pretty dangerous. I wouldn't want it to.

22:27

First, I I hope that this does this

22:30

isn't an enemy technology. They're like,

22:33

if that's our if our enemies have this

22:35

technology,

22:36

>> it's done.

22:36

>> It's game over.

22:37

>> Yeah. Yeah. So, that's

22:39

>> scary. Um and if it's not, then it's

22:43

definitely um something that we should

22:46

take notice of, right? So if there that

22:48

that's what's in our skies and there

22:50

have been reports of people there is an

22:52

Australian report of pilots who have

22:55

passed away because of this type of

22:57

thing like they died and so forth. So

22:59

how so um I can't actually remember what

23:02

it is but it's a it's a report of an

23:05

Australian uh young guy who was who

23:09

encountered something in the sky and um

23:13

he was never found again. And he was

23:15

just, you know, what happened? I don't

23:16

know. Uh, and

23:18

>> he he disappeared in the sky.

23:20

>> Yeah. And there are

23:21

>> with the jet.

23:23

>> I don't know if he disappeared with the

23:24

jet.

23:25

>> I wish you knew more about this story.

23:26

>> I know. I know. [laughter] Maybe someone

23:28

could get it up for us and we can look

23:30

at it. But it's a really famous It's a

23:31

really key. Yeah, it's a really famous

23:34

Australian report.

23:35

>> Here it is. Uh, it's 1978. 20-year-old

23:38

Australian pilot Frederick Valentique.

23:41

>> I think it's Valentic. Valentic took off

23:44

on a routine training flight over Bass

23:46

Strait. Everything seemed normal until

23:48

his radio transmissions began.

23:50

Valentique reported a strange aircraft

23:52

hovering above him with four bright

23:54

lights and metallic surfaces moving at

23:56

impossible speeds. Then came his final

23:58

chilling words. It's not an aircraft.

24:01

After that, he vanished completely. His

24:03

Cessna was never found despite extensive

24:05

searches and no trace of him was ever

24:07

recovered. Radar had detected another

24:09

object in the area but never interacted

24:11

with other flights. To this day, no one

24:13

knows if Valente crashed, got lost, or

24:16

encountered something far more

24:18

mysterious. Even decades later, this

24:20

remains one of aviation's most baffling

24:22

disappearances, and the last words of a

24:24

terrified pilot still haunt those who

24:26

hear them. So, there's one guy.

24:29

>> I don't know. You can go meet that one,

24:31

Joe. And you know what? I think that

24:34

>> maybe he's like in a cool place right

24:35

now.

24:36

>> All right. just chilling, having a good

24:38

time in another dimension, hanging out

24:40

with these creatures and they're

24:41

explaining to him the future of the

24:43

universe.

24:44

>> But you know that the thing about what I

24:46

do is I'm I have a lot of information

24:48

that people impart to me that is that I

24:52

can't actually talk about, right? And

24:54

that sadly that happens to people in

24:57

>> because they ask you not to.

24:58

>> Yeah. They say I need help with this or

25:00

this is my experience and I don't want

25:02

it public and so forth. I mean, um,

25:05

>> even without disclosing their name.

25:06

>> No, no, they I know who they are. And so

25:09

I've had people who are pilots, uh, talk

25:12

to me. Is this, by the way, coffee?

25:13

>> This is ice cold coffee.

25:15

>> How's it cold?

25:16

>> What?

25:16

>> It's ice cold.

25:17

>> I boiled it twice.

25:18

>> This coffee

25:19

>> I'll try to make it again.

25:20

>> I mean, I made it today. It's I made I

25:22

boiled the

25:22

>> ice cold.

25:23

>> That's crazy.

25:23

>> It's literally ice cold. That's weird.

25:25

>> I'll make it.

25:26

>> Are you sure?

25:26

>> Yeah. I I hit the button twice. I I

25:28

>> It definitely degrees.

25:30

>> It binged and everything.

25:31

>> Must must be broken. I mean, it's crazy

25:33

cold. It's like cold water.

25:35

>> I'll start it over. Be right back. How

25:37

>> weird. But here, I got more information.

25:38

Oh, [laughter] couple more descriptions

25:40

from that.

25:41

>> Maybe it's aliens. They're deceiving us.

25:43

They with Jaime's cold water. Um

25:47

7:06 p.m. Valentique contacted the

25:49

Melbourne air traffic controller Steve

25:51

Roby reporting an unidentified aircraft

25:53

trailing him at about 4,500 ft. Over the

25:56

next several minutes, he described a

25:57

long shiny metallic object with a green

26:00

light. The craft appeared to be orbiting

26:02

above him. It was moving at high speed

26:04

and playing some sort of game in quotes.

26:06

His engine became rough idling and

26:09

coughing. His final words, "That strange

26:11

aircraft is hovering on top of me again.

26:13

It's hovering and it's not an aircraft."

26:16

The transmission ended with 17 seconds

26:18

of metallic scraping or keying sounds,

26:21

then silence.

26:24

>> So, yeah. So this isn't um

26:27

[clears throat]

26:27

so pilots and families of pilots have

26:31

told me things similar to this. Not as

26:33

dramatic maybe.

26:34

>> Can you get another cup too? I poured

26:36

cold coffee in this.

26:38

>> So um similar. And so I guess I just you

26:44

know it looks pretty grim.

26:46

>> That guy that one.

26:49

>> Yeah.

26:49

>> Yeah.

26:50

>> And there are other

26:51

>> that's like the movie Close Encounters

26:53

of the Third Kind. I've always wondered

26:54

like how much of that movie was there's

26:57

so much of that that was based on

26:59

previous UFO encounters and and even

27:02

figures like Jack Valet. Jacqu Valet

27:04

plays an the French

27:07

>> scientist in that movie is based on

27:10

Jacqu Valet.

27:10

>> Yes.

27:11

>> And so and there's scenes where these

27:13

pilots show up that from like World War

27:16

I, you know, and they've been gone

27:19

forever and now they're back and they

27:21

haven't lost any time. I've always

27:23

wondered like how much of this is based

27:26

on stories and reports and folklore or

27:29

whatever the government knew.

27:31

>> Yeah, I think that it's it's based on

27:34

stories and things that they like

27:36

Jacques has heard and so forth. And by

27:38

the way, Jacques thinks it's deceptive

27:40

too. So his you know his idea he spent

27:43

of course his whole life studying this

27:44

and he wrote a book called Messengers of

27:46

Deception.

27:47

>> Yeah, I think I read that one.

27:49

>> Yeah. So, you know, once you do

27:51

>> I read a bunch of his books.

27:53

>> John Keel John Keel doesn't have a good

27:55

idea about these things at all. Um,

27:58

thinks they're pretty nasty. Doesn't

28:00

want them in, you know, the Moth Man

28:02

Prophecy.

28:03

>> Yeah. So, he wrote that and that movie

28:05

is based on his life. Um, and he's he's

28:10

down on it. He's a doomer with respect

28:12

to aliens.

28:13

>> How so? What is his perspective?

28:15

>> Okay. I'm going to give it to you right

28:17

now. All right.

28:17

>> Okay. Okay, give everything right now.

28:19

>> All right, so he calls this it reminds

28:23

me of Catholicism in the sense that he

28:25

has a category for it. It's called the

28:26

sup uh basically the super spectrum.

28:30

Okay. And it's it's here with us now.

28:32

Just like you said, it's it's around us,

28:35

but you and I can't see it. But some

28:38

people do see it and some people

28:39

interact with it and have like it breaks

28:41

into their reality. And for those

28:44

people, he thinks that they're unlucky

28:47

because all the things that happen to

28:48

them like men in black show up. Um he

28:52

thinks things like the the beginning of

28:53

all religions is basically about someone

28:56

who had an interface with a parab being

28:59

like one of these uh parahumans in the

29:02

super spectrum. So it's kind of like an

29:03

invisible reality all around us

29:05

according to John Ke. Uh John Keiel was

29:08

a pal of of Jacques Valet's uh he's

29:10

passed away but his books are really

29:12

amazing and if you want to get an idea

29:15

about the super spectrum and the

29:16

phenomena you should watch that movie of

29:19

his called Moth Man Prophecies. It's

29:21

it's really good.

29:23

>> And so this super spectrum Yeah.

29:26

>> like what what does he think that is?

29:28

>> So he he thinks that it's a it's a like

29:32

a space all around us. It's been here

29:35

forever. It controls us. It controls

29:38

humanity because it sends things like he

29:41

thinks UFOs are part of it. He thinks

29:44

the Virgin Mary apparitions are part of

29:46

it. He thinks ghosts are part of it. So

29:48

any kind of woo thing um is there in the

29:52

super spectrum. And sometimes some

29:54

people have the ability to see what's in

29:57

the super spectrum and they're he thinks

30:00

they're cursed. Now he thinks angels are

30:03

part of the super spectrum. So he

30:04

doesn't make any kind of distinction

30:06

between the good things in it and the

30:08

bad things. He said they're all bad. If

30:10

there's one that appears to be good,

30:12

it's actually bad. So again, he started,

30:15

you know, he was kind of like a a

30:16

Charles Forte guy. So he started to get

30:20

a lot of these in, you know, these um

30:22

events and you study them and everything

30:24

like that. And uh over years he

30:27

developed a a theory that these were

30:29

nasty things and that they were like

30:32

even if they appeared good and that they

30:34

they be they were at the beginning of

30:36

all religions. All religions come from

30:38

the super spectrum. Um obviously not

30:40

that part about how it's like

30:41

Catholicism but you know religions tend

30:44

to have theological categories that talk

30:46

about things like the super spectrum. So

30:48

what Jacques talks about in his books is

30:51

it sounds very similar to you know his

30:53

control mechanism and uh is very similar

30:56

to John Ke's idea.

30:59

>> Well it seems like

31:01

just speculating but it seems like we're

31:03

dealing with a very limited framework

31:06

that we operate in that we as human

31:09

beings operate Do you want to take this

31:11

Jamie? Do you need this?

31:12

>> Okay. um that we operate

31:16

in this world of the senses that we

31:18

possess, sight, sound, feel, touch, all

31:21

that, you know, smell. We we have these

31:24

senses for understanding what's around

31:26

us, but only those. And it's not capable

31:30

of detecting everything that is reality,

31:34

everything that is the universe,

31:35

everything that is from subatomic

31:38

particles to whatever the it is

31:41

that we haven't even discovered yet

31:42

that's all around us all the time. And

31:45

so if there is

31:48

the potential for other realms or other

31:50

dimensions and these things exist in

31:54

some sort of a space where they can

31:55

interact and and

31:57

traverse in between these dimensions and

32:00

interact with with us at will whenever

32:03

we can. We're kind of left in this

32:06

speculation space where when people have

32:10

these very novel and unique experiences

32:13

like Travis Walton and then we are

32:15

supposed to go, okay, did that happen?

32:18

It didn't happen to me, but is he

32:20

telling the truth? Okay, maybe he is. If

32:24

he is, well, let's see if he lies about

32:26

other things. Well, he doesn't seem to

32:27

lie. He's been around a long time.

32:29

Travis had been around for a long time

32:32

telling that story. Like almost 50 years

32:34

now, right? Like when was his

32:36

experience?

32:37

>> I thought it Yeah. 50 years. Yeah. Yeah.

32:40

Yeah.

32:40

>> Um you would think he would have a few

32:43

other fibs.

32:44

>> I agree. I agree. And he doesn't. Yeah.

32:47

>> If it was a lie, and I don't think it

32:48

is, but if it was, that's a big lie to

32:51

have only one. Yeah.

32:53

>> Only one crazy cockamy lie from 1970

32:57

whatever it was.

32:58

See, you're what you're doing is you're

33:00

this is part of their criteria for

33:02

assessing these kinds of events. Okay?

33:04

It's called, you know, taking time,

33:07

>> right?

33:07

>> So over time, so when a when an

33:10

anomalous event happens within like say

33:13

Christian culture or whatnot.

33:16

>> Thank you very much, Jamie. Appreciate

33:17

it.

33:19

>> The cold was all right, but it's like

33:20

it's it's crazy. It's nice cold.

33:23

>> That is weird. Yeah,

33:25

>> dude. Something's going on. Put your

33:28

finger in it. Feel how cold it is. It's

33:29

cold like cold water.

33:30

>> I understand. I know. I know what

33:32

happened.

33:32

>> Oh, do you?

33:33

>> Yeah.

33:33

>> What happened?

33:34

>> You have to hit the start button to make

33:35

it boil.

33:36

>> I didn't hit the start button.

33:37

>> Oh, user [laughter] error.

33:40

>> But it beeped. I thought you

33:41

>> That did. That did beep because it

33:43

didn't It was turning off.

33:44

>> Okay. This is hot. Here we go.

33:46

[clears throat]

33:48

>> My bad.

33:53

Quiet as the French press. Where were

33:55

we?

33:57

Um

33:58

>> uh the categories.

33:59

>> Oh yeah. Yeah. You were basically just

34:01

making a movement. A strategy. Uh yeah,

34:04

sure. Thank you.

34:07

>> Yeah. Like looking at some like I mean

34:09

that's my perspective on Bob Lazar.

34:12

>> You know Bob Lazar has been telling the

34:13

exact same story forever. I've had many

34:16

conversations with Bob. I've had dinner

34:18

with him. I've hung out with him a few

34:19

times. Dinner with him several times.

34:21

Hung out with him in the studio. He

34:23

showed us uh that most recent

34:25

documentary before it was released with

34:28

uh Luigi, the guy who made it with him.

34:30

I don't, you know, I I know a lot of

34:32

people that are full of I meet a

34:34

lot of people that are full of

34:35

I've had people sit here in front of me

34:37

and then somewhere in the conversation

34:39

I'm like, "Oh, this person's not being

34:41

honest. This is this is some they've got

34:43

an agenda. They're pushing some or

34:44

they're pretending they know some things

34:47

because it sounds good, but they don't

34:48

really know some things." I get real

34:50

suspicious of people. I'm not suspicious

34:52

of him. It's weird. You know, he's he's

34:55

obviously incredibly intelligent and

34:57

very wellstudied when it comes to

35:00

science, when it comes to um you know,

35:05

whatever it is, whether it's um

35:07

elements, particles, when you know, he

35:10

he he understands what he's talking

35:13

about in a very deep way. And when he's

35:16

explaining these experiences, when he

35:17

talks about this craft and his

35:19

experiences at S4, he seems to be

35:22

telling the truth. And then since then,

35:25

we we know first of all that no one knew

35:28

about S4 back then, but he did. He knew

35:31

where it was. He knew exactly where it

35:33

was. And he knew about the flights that

35:35

take people out there. He he had a a

35:39

total understanding of uh Los Alamos

35:42

Labs. I mean, he he went there. He knew

35:45

the people that worked there. He knew

35:47

how to get around the building. When

35:49

George Knapp took him there, he he knew

35:51

everything about the facility. Yet, they

35:53

claimed that he never worked there. And

35:54

then they found him on the employee

35:56

roster.

35:57

>> So, he did work there. So, they they

35:59

lied and they tried to cover up. Why

36:00

would they lie and say that he didn't

36:02

work there?

36:03

>> Yeah.

36:03

>> Well, probably because he was involved

36:05

in some that they wanted to keep

36:07

secret.

36:08

>> Yeah. Yeah, that's right.

36:09

>> There's a lot of weirdness to the Bob

36:11

Lazar story. And then when you see some

36:15

of the footage that was released

36:17

particularly after the New York Times

36:19

story of 2017,

36:21

>> the footage that's released mirrors the

36:23

way he describes this craft operating.

36:26

>> Yeah.

36:26

>> And so how would he he guessed correctly

36:30

in 1989?

36:31

>> Those are all good points. So yeah, I

36:34

told you last time I was on here that

36:36

Tyler, right, in my American Cosmic book

36:39

um told me he that he was the real deal.

36:43

Even though I had people who, you know,

36:44

Eric Davis and you know, telling me,

36:46

"No, Diana, this guy's No, no, I believe

36:49

Tyler. So everything that you say I

36:52

agree with. Yeah, I don't know. I mean,

36:54

>> you're always going to have people when

36:55

you have a fantastic story like Bob

36:57

Lazar story, you're always going to have

36:59

people that want to say that the guy's

37:01

full of that there's something

37:03

wrong, he's lying, this is not true,

37:05

it's fake.

37:06

>> But I mean, Eric Davis would be a person

37:08

who might know, right?

37:10

>> So, he's a physicist who studies this

37:12

and even briefs Congress on. But, no, so

37:17

I don't know. I I tend to when Tyler

37:20

tells me things and now that he's

37:22

everything he said kind of has come

37:24

true, I believe him, you know, I believe

37:26

that is true.

37:28

>> But if Bob Bazar is telling the truth,

37:31

it's so disturbing the idea that there's

37:33

a group of humans that operate in our

37:37

government that have information that

37:40

the general public does not have and

37:42

that they're the gatekeepers of this

37:44

information. and they've determined for

37:46

whatever reason that either it's not

37:48

wise to tell people or it wouldn't

37:51

benefit them to tell people. Like

37:53

whatever it is, I think it's a crime

37:56

against humanity. I I think if you're a

37:58

person that knows for a fact that

38:01

there's something here other than us

38:03

that either visits us or exists amongst

38:06

us or travels here from another

38:08

dimension, I think you have an

38:10

obligation to tell people.

38:12

>> But what if it's not that? What if it's

38:14

actually something we've created and we

38:17

don't want anybody to know about it and

38:19

Lazar happened to find out and that's

38:21

why we don't want you know I mean think

38:23

about it from the perspective of people

38:25

who are trying to keep Americans safe.

38:27

So just to push back a bit

38:29

>> okay go ahead.

38:30

>> You know what if that's it?

38:32

>> So if that's the case why would they

38:33

bring a guy in to tell them how does

38:35

this work?

38:37

>> Show us how this works because that was

38:39

his job.

38:40

>> Oh yeah. They brought him in and said,

38:42

"Tell us how this works."

38:43

>> And like, and he was like, "What are you

38:45

talking about? This is ours. It has an

38:47

American flag sticker on it." Like, "Do

38:49

you know how it works? Why are you

38:52

asking me how it works? This seems kind

38:55

of crazy."

38:57

That's not what you do if you have

39:00

super advanced technology. What you do

39:02

is you bring in people to improve it and

39:05

make it better. You don't bring in

39:06

people and say, "How does it work?"

39:08

>> Yeah. Okay. Wait, I have a couple of

39:11

comments about that.

39:12

>> Okay.

39:12

>> So, when I first started, I was I was

39:16

aware that people I wasn't aware as much

39:19

as I should be, [laughter] but I was

39:21

aware that people in my position, you

39:23

know, who were basically just doing like

39:24

academic work on the UFO belief, the

39:27

rising UFO belief might have people come

39:29

and give me disinformation.

39:31

>> 100%. And I I have the same situation.

39:33

>> Of course you do. Yeah. So we have to be

39:36

that you're talking about discernment

39:38

like we have to be super discerning

39:39

about who's you know our BS meter has to

39:42

like be really

39:43

>> well working or working well.

39:45

>> Okay. So but

39:48

>> the person who took me out to the desert

39:51

right with Gary during that time to an

39:54

alleged crash site which you know

39:56

Jacques then goes out there. Um, he

39:59

basically also wants Gary to figure out

40:05

this debris. And so I'm thinking we

40:09

obviously don't know what we have here.

40:12

If he's if it's legit, it could Okay, so

40:16

here are my comments about what you just

40:18

told me about Lazar. Either they're

40:20

setting up this situation where they're

40:22

going to have someone like me and Gary

40:24

who are like they're trying to backineer

40:26

this, right? and were saying that

40:28

publicly um without any kind of like

40:32

knowledge that it could be disinfo and

40:33

then they have Lazar who we're going to

40:35

plant then they do this like with

40:37

benefits and stuff they plant stuff for

40:40

>> Yeah. Yeah. You know benefits um

40:42

>> the guy who uh what he had stuff planted

40:46

is in his computer. Do you not know

40:48

about him?

40:49

>> No. What is this called?

40:50

>> Oh, it's called Project Beta. Um this is

40:52

a this is a book a friend of mine wrote

40:54

about um I can't remember. Yeah. So, um

40:58

>> Oh, Paul Benovitz. I've heard his name

40:59

before.

41:00

>> Yeah. You should read this because this

41:02

is a disinfo scam on this poor guy who

41:05

>> So, Benovitz believed that he had

41:07

intercepted communications from alien

41:09

spacecraft and discovered a secret

41:11

underground facility called Dulce Base.

41:14

Duly Dulce Base Dolce.

41:17

>> Doli. Is that how you say it?

41:19

>> I'd say Dolce, but

41:20

>> Dolce U base managed by aliens in

41:23

cooperation with the US government. and

41:24

his claims appeared in the popular press

41:26

in the early 1980s. According to some

41:28

sources, benefits was the target of a

41:31

government disinformation campaign that

41:32

ultimately led to his psychiatric

41:34

hospitalization.

41:36

Author Greg Valdez proposes that

41:38

benefits was targeted for his

41:40

investigation of cattle mutilations.

41:42

Valdez argues the m mutilations were a

41:45

government testing program looking at

41:47

the after effects of radiation from

41:50

1967's

41:51

project gas buggy in which an

41:53

underground atomic device was detonated

41:56

just 21 miles southwest of Doli. They

41:59

were testing the cattle to avoid

42:00

panicking the public.

42:03

>> Okay, so this um

42:05

>> the problem with that story is cattle

42:07

mutilations

42:09

still go on. This is like completely not

42:12

accurate.

42:12

>> This is just a brief Wikipedia about

42:14

there's probably way more to the story

42:15

and

42:15

>> Yeah. Yeah. So, you know Dodie? Yeah.

42:18

Dodie. You know Dodie, right? The uh

42:20

>> the guy who went they they placed

42:23

misinformation on his computer so that

42:25

he believed that he was um

42:27

>> they placed it on his computer.

42:28

>> Yeah, they placed it on his computer.

42:30

Really? They went into his house when he

42:32

wasn't there and put it on there.

42:34

>> And what did they put on his computer?

42:35

they put on all this information about

42:38

um a like that he was in touch with

42:41

these aliens. So they they basically

42:43

cultivated his belief that he was in

42:45

touch with aliens. They did that

42:47

purposefully and Dodie um Dod's first

42:51

name. Oh gosh, I can't

42:52

>> Dodie.

42:53

>> No. Um he's really famous within

42:55

Euphology because he's a misin guy.

42:58

>> So, but back to

42:59

>> he's a misinfo guy purposefully.

43:01

>> Yeah. intentionally placing

43:03

misinformation out into the public about

43:06

UFOs, which is a thing. It does.

43:08

>> Is he still alive?

43:09

>> Yeah, he's still alive.

43:11

>> And that's what he does for sure.

43:12

>> Richard, he used to Yeah, Richard.

43:14

Richard. Yeah, he for sure does that.

43:17

>> Um,

43:17

>> how do you know he does that?

43:18

>> What do you mean? Everybody,

43:20

>> what do you mean? What do you mean

43:20

>> that? I'm surprised you don't know that

43:22

he does that.

43:22

>> I'm speaking sometimes when I talk I'm

43:25

speaking for the entire public that

43:27

probably doesn't know what we're talking

43:28

about. And I think it's probably good

43:30

that we fill them in.

43:31

>> Yeah. Sorry. Sorry. Okay. So, Richard

43:33

Dodie is has come out and said this is

43:36

what he does and I know people who know

43:38

him like the entire group in you know

43:41

the invisible college people with how

43:43

and they all know who he is.

43:44

>> Okay.

43:44

>> And uh Kit offered to introduce him to

43:47

me by the way Kate Green. So, and I and

43:50

by the way all of these people are

43:51

people who work on the used to work on

43:55

the program ATIP and so forth

43:58

>> uh to study UFOs. But my point though

44:00

here in talking about this was what if

44:03

Lazar was a person like me and Gary who

44:08

was being given information were

44:10

credible, right? He's not so credible,

44:12

but like you know he's he's this person

44:14

that's been given information and placed

44:18

out there so that and he's just on the

44:20

edge of credibility just so you know

44:23

he's credible but then he's not credible

44:25

so that he could be taken down if

44:26

necessary. That's how they get this

44:28

information out there. Now, who am I

44:30

talking about? They So, what I'm trying

44:32

to say is that what I've observed is

44:35

that the government isn't unified in

44:38

this whole UFO thing. They're fighting

44:41

against each other. I try to stay out of

44:43

their crosshairs. Frankly, what they're

44:45

doing though is that every time somebody

44:47

comes out and says, you know, here are

44:50

the new UFO files. I'm studying them and

44:52

so forth, then they get taken out by

44:54

like counter intelligence. So it's like

44:56

intelligence and counter intelligence.

44:58

So that it's really confusing. The end

45:00

result is total confusion and you really

45:03

have to have an ability like to

45:06

understand like your discernment has to

45:08

be welldeveloped.

45:11

>> Right? So I believe that I believe that

45:15

there is disinformation and deception. I

45:18

think that's a great strategy. If you

45:20

want to make something look ridiculous,

45:23

you take truth and then you attach a

45:25

bunch of fantastic, ridiculous claims to

45:28

that truth. And so that it dismisses all

45:31

of it, right? Because it's all in the

45:33

same category and it's all easily

45:36

debunked. Like, oh, this is the same guy

45:38

that also said that, so this is

45:40

nonsense. Right.

45:41

>> That's exactly right. Uh Tyler used to

45:44

say, we're we hide truth in a circle of

45:46

confusion.

45:47

>> Yeah.

45:49

which makes sense if they're trying to

45:51

>> Yeah, that's what they do, right? I

45:54

mean, I don't know anymore. Like today,

45:56

like Jacques at one point, uh, many

45:59

years ago decided that the field of

46:02

euphology was so confusing that he

46:06

wanted to go back before the industrial

46:08

revolution and do UFOs from a long time

46:12

ago. And he wrote Wonders in the Sky,

46:14

>> all about that. stopped at like I think

46:17

it was like 1860 or something like that,

46:19

>> right?

46:19

>> And so he did that and I feel like I've

46:21

done that too. Like I started that way

46:24

actually. Um and I wasn't looking for

46:26

UFOs. So I saw you know so in a sense I

46:29

understand that move because

46:31

>> when you say you weren't looking for

46:32

UFOs, what were you looking for? Oh,

46:34

well my first the first part of my

46:36

academic career was about looking at

46:39

souls from purgatory and Catholic things

46:41

like you know what Catholics thought

46:43

about things that they experienced like

46:46

angel contact events. Um and that's when

46:49

I started to take a log of these aerial

46:51

phenomena. I did not know what they

46:52

were. And so historically you can see it

46:55

all over the place in the records that

46:57

aren't digitized. So there are a lot of

47:00

records like people that say, "Oh, we

47:02

have, you know, AI has everything of

47:05

human all of human knowledge." No. Have

47:07

they never been to an archive? An

47:09

archive is a really old library. There's

47:11

a bunch of stuff there that's not

47:13

digitized and that's still human

47:15

knowledge.

47:16

>> And so what were you looking for?

47:19

>> Oh, okay. So back then, this is in my

47:21

book on purgatory. I was looking I was

47:24

trying to find out why purgatory was a

47:26

thing for Catholics for many, many

47:27

years. And then after the 1960s, people

47:31

rarely um talked about it as much. So,

47:35

by the way, I'll get a lot of hate from

47:37

people about this because Catholics who

47:40

do do devotions to souls in purgatory

47:42

for souls in purgatory will say, "No, we

47:45

still do this, Diana. I know that." But

47:47

the emphasis like Catholic churches used

47:49

to have a special place in the church

47:51

for these devotions. They we don't have

47:54

that here. And so, I wanted to know what

47:56

happened. And so what I did was I spent

47:59

10 years going through records and

48:01

archives all over the place. And uh and

48:05

I I found an answer to that. But I also

48:07

found a bunch of aerial phenomena that

48:10

people didn't know, you know, they were

48:11

like looking up the sky too back then.

48:14

And when they saw something in the sky,

48:16

they couldn't like place. Well, what is

48:17

this? They'd interpreted as like a soul

48:19

from purgatory. You know, we need to

48:21

pray that soul back into purgatory

48:23

because, you know, sometimes these

48:24

things would harass people. They'd come

48:26

down like orbs and harass people and

48:29

they just assumed it was like a bad

48:31

spirit or something like that.

48:33

>> So, I took all of this down because I

48:34

thought it was really strange and I

48:36

didn't I didn't want to put it in my

48:37

book.

48:38

>> Um, but I wanted to do something with it

48:40

at some point. Uh, so when I I had not I

48:43

didn't believe in UFOs. I had never

48:44

thought about UFOs, but I showed the log

48:47

to a friend after my purgatory book was

48:49

published and he said, "Oh, this looks

48:51

like Stephen Spielberg films." And I

48:54

thought he was crazy. So that's how I

48:55

started studying UFOs.

48:57

>> Oh

48:58

>> yeah, that's how I got into it. So I was

49:00

already doing that. Jacques was one of

49:02

the first people I actually wrote a hard

49:04

letter to, sent it through the mail to

49:05

him and uh that's how I met him.

49:09

>> So Jock's books, what's with what is

49:12

interesting is these old stories because

49:14

the old stories that go back to 1700s

49:17

and the 1800s, they mirror these UFO

49:21

encounters.

49:22

>> Yeah. Yeah, that's right. That's what my

49:24

work did. Yeah,

49:25

>> it's a very similar pattern which is

49:26

also strange because

49:29

if you think about human beings, the

49:32

exponential increase in technological

49:35

ability that we have just from the 1800s

49:39

to today, far superior technology. But

49:43

wouldn't would you assume that UFOs

49:46

would also have this exponential

49:49

increase in their technological ability?

49:51

>> Yeah, definitely. But yet the stories

49:53

seem very similar, which is weird,

49:56

right? Because if it's the same kind of

49:58

craft and the same kind of experiences

50:00

and the same kind of

50:01

>> like wouldn't they get better at it?

50:03

Like isn't there don't they have the

50:06

same ability to improve?

50:08

>> They might be better at it. They might

50:11

be better at it. We just are not good at

50:13

ascertaining if they have gotten better

50:15

at it. But so what if and this is kind

50:18

of what I've been exploring recently.

50:20

What if the you know our growth in

50:24

technology is pretty amazing. What if

50:27

the only way they can actually interface

50:29

with us in any super meaningful way

50:32

that's not creepy, right? What if it's

50:34

through AI? What if that so if religion

50:37

was a way for us to communicate with

50:41

non-human intelligences that kind of

50:43

evolved in different places, right? It's

50:46

like a technology itself, right?

50:47

Religion becomes these ways. You know,

50:50

if you look around and you see I noticed

50:52

that you had some cool Buddhist statues

50:54

out there. All right. So, if you look

50:56

around at religion, what is it that

50:59

people in religion do? A lot of them

51:01

pray in certain ways. Well, like why are

51:03

they doing that? what is prayer anyway?

51:05

Um some of the uh so you can see that

51:09

there's something that they're trying to

51:10

do. They're trying to interact contact

51:12

there's like a contact with these and so

51:16

what if AI all of a sudden is a

51:18

different form of contact. Um and I'll

51:20

give you a reason why I think this way

51:22

or that I'm speculating about it. Um

51:25

when I started to ask the people who

51:27

should know like Louzando and you know

51:30

the and before that Tyler and you know

51:33

um how put off and uh people like that

51:37

tell me what best if you were to

51:39

describe what it is we're dealing with

51:42

what best is the description and they

51:45

would always point me in the direction

51:46

of science fiction and they would say

51:48

read this read that and I was like

51:49

science fiction okay and I'd read it and

51:52

it would inevitably point to like a

51:54

technology that helps interface humans

51:57

with it. So that it's not us interfacing

52:00

because perhaps you remember you talked

52:01

about those faculties that you know

52:04

human beings have these faculties for

52:05

understanding reality but we can't

52:07

understand reality in its full reality

52:10

right we can't do that because we're

52:12

constrained by the ways in which we

52:14

perceive things those are the perceptual

52:17

faculties

52:18

>> um what if AI becomes a perceptual

52:21

faculty for us and we're able then to

52:24

you know interact with it so perhaps it

52:28

has has evolved and it's helped us

52:30

evolve too.

52:31

>> So that's what I'm trying to say. That

52:33

was a long answer to your to your

52:34

comment.

52:35

>> So perhaps AI is a bridge for helping us

52:39

interact with these things

52:41

>> communicate.

52:43

>> Okay.

52:44

Um so as far as what the government

52:47

knows and then deception

52:49

>> Yeah.

52:51

>> Why do you think that they don't

52:54

disclose all the information?

53:03

My personal opinion.

53:04

>> Yeah. [laughter]

53:05

>> Okay. So, this is nothing that I can

53:08

point to. Of course, I can't. You know,

53:10

there's no source for it.

53:12

>> Um, my personal opinion is because this

53:15

is uh above government. It's not theirs

53:19

to disclose. The government can't

53:20

disclose something that's not theirs to

53:22

disclose.

53:23

>> And what what do you mean by that? Um, I

53:25

mean that there's probably a group of

53:28

people that um

53:31

have this information or have parts of

53:34

the information. I don't even know if

53:36

one person has the whole story. It's

53:38

super compartmentalized. But my

53:41

intuition is that it's well, we know

53:45

that there are parts of it that are so

53:46

highly classified, right? We know that.

53:49

Mhm.

53:50

>> And so, um, yeah, it's like, you know,

53:54

they call presidents short- timerrs and

53:57

so forth. They're they're not read in

53:59

quote unquote to the to the program,

54:01

>> right?

54:02

>> So, I would What if it's like it's been

54:04

around for a long time and the people

54:06

who know about it have been around for a

54:07

long time, too? What if that's the case?

54:10

So, after after I um after I published

54:14

American Cosmic in 2019, I met other

54:16

people. So, you know, I met people who

54:19

indicated to me that they just basically

54:23

wanted me to not write anything else

54:25

about this stuff. They just were like,

54:27

"Why don't you just focus on what you

54:30

you know, your your Catholic stuff and

54:32

just like don't don't do this."

54:34

>> This episode is brought to you by

54:35

Visible. It's officially summer, folks.

54:37

And boy, what a summer we are having. It

54:40

feels like one of those good

54:41

oldfashioned summers where you just want

54:43

to enjoy every moment and keep up with

54:45

the action. your best companion this

54:48

summer. Visible wireless. Visible gives

54:50

you unlimited 5G data and unlimited

54:54

hotspot powered by Verizon for just $25

54:57

a month. So you can make this the summer

55:00

of fun and savings. Visible is more than

55:03

just a wireless plan. It's unlimited

55:05

wireless designed to always keep you

55:07

connected with no contract to tie you

55:10

down. Switch today at visible.com. Plans

55:13

start at $25 a month or get our premium

55:17

Visible Plus Pro plan and save $10 on

55:21

your first month when you use promo code

55:23

Rogan. Terms apply. See visible.com for

55:27

plan features and network management

55:29

details.

55:29

>> And who did that?

55:31

>> Yeah. Yeah. Some people that I had met.

55:33

So um they they're people that are

55:36

associated with the government in the in

55:38

the fact that they're part of

55:40

intelligence communities and you know so

55:44

I was interested in what they had to say

55:47

and to me what they didn't tell me

55:50

anything Joe so I'm not going to tell

55:52

any secrets or anything that I don't

55:53

have them but um they they indicated to

55:57

me that

55:59

yeah this is this is like nobody's going

56:01

to know about

56:02

So people like uh

56:06

yeah so that's that's what I that

56:08

happened after American Cosmic part of

56:11

that went into encounters but not

56:14

>> so they what how did they

56:18

express this to you that they don't

56:19

think that you should be talking about

56:20

this?

56:21

>> Well they they didn't express it that

56:23

way. They just said that my time would

56:26

be better spent looking into other

56:28

aspects of uh religion. Did you say why?

56:33

>> Of course. I wanted to know.

56:34

>> And what did they say to that?

56:36

>> Well,

56:39

they didn't really say they didn't

56:41

really answer that question, but I guess

56:43

you could say that my experience with

56:46

them was my answer. My experience with

56:48

them was that

56:51

um

56:53

this was something that people weren't

56:54

going to know about and that these

56:56

secrets wouldn't be told. So you like

56:58

they're essentially saying to you,

57:00

you're wasting your time

57:02

>> pretty much. Yeah.

57:04

>> We're not going to tell anybody. You're

57:06

not going to get any more information.

57:08

What's out there is out there and that's

57:09

it.

57:10

>> Yeah. Yeah.

57:11

>> H what's your opinion like when you know

57:16

one of the things I'm I assume you saw

57:18

the age of disclosure the documentary.

57:20

>> Yeah, definitely. One of the things that

57:22

I thought was really uh interesting and

57:26

made sense in the age of disclosure was

57:29

this thought that if there are these

57:32

hidden programs

57:34

they uh have essentially misappropriated

57:38

funds and lied to Congress in order to

57:40

fund these things and all these things

57:42

are huge crimes and if they don't have

57:45

amnesty they're never going to disclose.

57:50

This is like Lou Alzando talked about or

57:52

all these different people talked about

57:53

this like the only way you're ever going

57:55

to get this information is by

58:00

giving some sort of mass amnesty to all

58:02

these people that are involved in these

58:03

programs so that they never have to

58:05

worry about being prosecuted. My problem

58:07

with that is when I hear something like

58:09

that and you're talking about

58:11

misappropriation of funds, you're

58:12

talking about lying to Congress, you're

58:14

talking about enormous amounts of money

58:15

that are involved in these programs.

58:17

Where did that money go? And did that

58:19

money all go to those programs or all

58:21

those really ethical people involved? Or

58:23

did a bunch of people get rich

58:25

bullshitting about this stuff? And is

58:28

that why they're calling for amnesty so

58:30

that they don't have to worry about

58:31

being prosecuted for stealing money? And

58:34

that's a lot of this, you know,

58:36

obfuscating, a lot of this confusion, a

58:39

lot of this misinformation is because

58:42

there's a lot of people that are in deep

58:43

if this gets disclosed.

58:48

So basically they're in deep if

58:50

they if the thing that gets disclosed is

58:53

that they've been stealing money.

58:55

>> Yeah. Well, listen, if you have complete

58:58

total autonomy, you you get an enormous

59:01

amount of money and you're working on

59:04

these programs, you you know, no one

59:07

knows where this money is going. And we

59:09

have a problem with that already, right?

59:11

Like we have a problem with the Pentagon

59:12

never passes budgets. Where' the money

59:14

go?

59:17

You know, that's like part of the issue.

59:20

What is this, Jamie?

59:22

>> Uh, long hidden UFO information at the

59:25

center of Trump push uh to free former

59:29

officials. Former employees can now

59:31

share information

59:32

>> with Arrow or the Purse Task Force

59:36

without fear of violating agreements.

59:38

So, this is new.

59:39

>> Yes, last week.

59:40

>> Oh, interesting. So, no one's officially

59:43

come forward as far as

59:45

>> Okay, that's but look how it says that

59:47

there. Scroll back up. It says without

59:49

violating agreements. That's not the

59:52

same thing I'm talking about.

59:53

>> It's not exactly, but this they have

59:54

NDAs and it's uh

59:56

>> right. That's another issue. But what

59:58

that doesn't it doesn't exonerate them

60:01

from lying to Congress or

60:02

misappropriating misappropriating funds.

60:05

That's part of the problem is that if

60:07

they have these

60:09

programs that are hidden and there's no

60:12

congressional oversight, there's no they

60:15

don't have to be audited. If

60:19

in all these in any government program

60:23

that has no oversight, you're going to

60:25

have waste and you're probably going to

60:27

have fraud and you're probably going to

60:29

have a bunch of people that are, you

60:31

know, essentially beyond reproach. They

60:33

have so much power and no oversight at

60:36

all. Like, put a little bit over here,

60:39

put a little bit over there, a little

60:40

bit of this, a little bit of that. Next

60:42

thing you know, these people are wealthy

60:44

for some reason that you can't explain.

60:46

Like, look what's going on with

60:47

Congress, with insider trading or people

60:49

that are making $170,000 a year worth

60:52

hundreds of millions of dollars, and no

60:54

one can explain why.

60:55

>> Yeah. Yeah. You got you have to imagine

60:59

that these people would also be tempted

61:01

to do that if they were involved in

61:03

these programs. So even if these

61:05

programs are real, let's say it, let's

61:08

say the research, the back engineering

61:10

research costs a billion dollars. Let's

61:13

make it say it cost three billion.

61:15

Where's that money going? Where's it all

61:17

going? Where'd it go?

61:19

>> You know, that's part of the problem

61:20

with having no oversight.

61:22

>> Yeah. Yeah.

61:23

>> No auditing, no oversight, and a bunch

61:25

of people that have

61:27

>> complete ability to hide anything

61:29

they're doing,

61:31

>> including

61:32

>> what they do with the money.

61:35

>> Yeah. Yeah.

61:36

>> And so if they've been doing that for

61:38

decades,

61:40

who knows how much fraud is involved.

61:43

>> Yeah. You have to assume like these are

61:45

human beings and human beings if they

61:48

have that level of power

61:51

>> and that level of secrecy

61:54

>> and no oversight at all.

61:57

And also they're working with defense

61:58

contractors. They're working like you

62:00

know

62:01

>> overse offshore accounts. There's a lot

62:04

of weird goes on.

62:05

>> Yeah. Yeah. That's right. Yeah. It could

62:07

be that. Do you think it is?

62:09

>> Yes.

62:10

>> Really?

62:10

>> Yes.

62:11

>> You think I think that's a factor?

62:12

>> Okay. Hey. All right.

62:13

>> I think that's a major factor in this

62:15

whole thing.

62:16

>> All right. So,

62:18

>> I think that's the that's the I think

62:20

that is probably the reason why you have

62:23

these calls for amnesty

62:25

because if you if you're talking about

62:27

amnesty like amnesty for what you guys

62:29

do something, what' you do?

62:31

Misappropriation of funds, lying to

62:33

Congress. Okay. So, you you don't want

62:35

to be in trouble for misappropriating

62:37

money and you don't want to be in

62:38

trouble for lying to Congress. What if

62:39

that does that include all the fraud

62:41

that potentially could have taken place?

62:43

>> And I'm not accusing anyone of fraud. I

62:45

don't I don't know anything. This is

62:47

pure tinfoil hat. Let's just talk

62:51

That's all this is.

62:51

>> Yeah. Yeah. So, you think it's just

62:53

basically a big like almost like a Ponzi

62:55

scheme.

62:55

>> I think that has to be an aspect of it

62:58

because that's an aspect of it in almost

62:59

all aspects of government.

63:01

>> I hear what you're saying. I guess uh

63:04

>> just think of the problem that was

63:06

exposed with Doge

63:08

>> with the NOS's where you find out that

63:11

there's literally billions of dollars

63:13

gets distributed and there's no record

63:15

of it. There's no receipts.

63:16

>> The bottom of that article here,

63:18

>> uh during the same event, former Air

63:20

Force intelligence officer Grush renewed

63:22

his allegations that the secret UAP

63:24

programs had operated outside normal

63:26

congressional oversight, calling it a

63:28

real fraud, waste, and abuse issue.

63:30

There it is. and claiming his

63:32

investigation uncovered slush funds to

63:35

the tune of billions of dollars perom

63:37

for these activities. The Pentagon has

63:39

disputed Gush's central claims and Arrow

63:42

has said its investigations found no

63:44

evidence, no verified evidence of

63:46

extraterrestrial technology or credible

63:49

evidence that the government has

63:50

secretly recovered or reverse engineered

63:53

craft of nonhuman origin. But yet there

63:56

he has talked about programs that he has

64:00

been read in on that are back

64:02

engineering programs.

64:04

>> Yeah. Yeah. I know. So like is it is it

64:08

slush fun? Yeah. To call it a slush fund

64:10

I think is really an interesting you

64:12

know term because that indicates that

64:14

that they're not doing anything right.

64:17

>> Doesn't necessarily. It could indicate

64:19

that they are doing something, but

64:20

they're also profiting wildly off of

64:23

this something that they're doing

64:24

because they don't have any oversight,

64:26

right? Which is when you get creepy

64:28

people that have incredible power like

64:31

that. That's just normal. Absolute power

64:34

corrupts. Absolutely. What's more

64:36

absolute power than you're

64:39

>> You have massive amounts of money, a

64:41

blank check, and

64:43

>> you're also you're in the super

64:45

secret top secret group. Yeah,

64:48

>> you're in the club of the people that

64:49

know the wink and the nod and you you're

64:52

going into these vaults in the

64:53

middle of the mountain and you're

64:54

looking at an alien spacecraft and

64:56

you've got bodies that are in

64:57

formaldahhide or whatever the

64:59

they're doing with them. You know, you

65:01

would think those guys could do whatever

65:03

the they want.

65:05

>> Yeah, that's right.

65:06

>> They're humans.

65:06

>> Yeah. Yeah.

65:07

>> And they're men.

65:08

>> Yeah. Yeah.

65:08

>> They're men that are probably very

65:10

ambitious and wealthy.

65:12

>> Yeah. Yeah. and they want to be more

65:13

wealthy and they got all this money

65:15

coming in and they're working on these

65:17

programs and then they can occasionally

65:20

show you some stuff. Look, this is what

65:22

we've discovered. This is what we've

65:23

figured out. This is what we can apply

65:25

to military technology.

65:28

>> Okay, so maybe Okay, so maybe that's it.

65:32

>> Pure speculation, right? No accusations.

65:35

I'm just saying if you had to look at it

65:37

from the least charitable perspective,

65:38

you have to say that's probably an

65:40

aspect of what we're dealing with. And

65:42

that seemed to me when I watched Age of

65:45

Disclosure from a cynical perspective,

65:47

I'm like, what is this? What is this

65:49

request for amnesty? What's what's the

65:52

Amnesty is a weird thing to say, you

65:54

know, like if you're People get

65:57

suspicious when you have amnesty?

65:58

>> Mhm.

65:59

>> Why do you want amnesty?

66:01

>> Yeah.

66:02

>> You're worried about like, are they

66:03

really going to prosecute people that

66:05

have misappropriated funds and lied to

66:07

Congress because they have alien

66:09

spacecrafts?

66:10

Is that really what Congress is going to

66:12

do now? They're going to go after these

66:13

people and say, "I look, I know you

66:16

finally did tell us that we have been

66:17

visited, that we have these down alien

66:19

crafts, but we're going to put you in

66:20

jail because you didn't tell us before

66:23

and because you lied to Congress and you

66:25

use these funds to backineer these

66:27

crafts."

66:27

>> Yeah. Yeah.

66:28

>> Does that really make sense that they

66:29

would put these people in jail for these

66:31

top secret government programs?

66:33

>> No. No.

66:35

>> Yeah,

66:36

>> I agree. Um,

66:37

>> I just think if you just factor in

66:40

people,

66:41

>> factor in people and blank checks,

66:44

>> I always say someone's get it's not like

66:47

these are the most benign altruistic

66:50

people that they like they're super

66:52

charitable and they only want to do the

66:54

right thing for humanity and they're

66:55

they're very comfortable with their

66:57

meager government salary.

66:58

>> Yeah. Yeah.

67:00

>> Probably not. Right.

67:02

>> Right. probably when you think about

67:03

human nature and people when they have

67:05

access to money especially that kind of

67:08

money that's crazy money

67:10

>> all right so if I can offer my like

67:13

speculation totally speculative

67:15

>> totally okay

67:16

>> I like I like this kind of talk

67:17

>> okay okay so remember that I start out

67:21

not caring about UFOs at all not

67:23

believing nothing like that right

67:25

>> just kind of doing my boring Catholic

67:27

scholarship stuff right boring well yeah

67:30

I didn't think so but you know geeky

67:31

stuff Right. Right.

67:32

>> Okay. Not interested in that scene.

67:37

All of a sudden become realize that

67:39

there's this historical continuity,

67:41

right, in the records

67:42

>> and there's physical evidence.

67:43

>> Yeah. Yeah. There's physical evidence

67:45

>> which is important for people to know

67:46

that maybe if they've never heard this

67:48

subject before and this is the first

67:50

podcast they've listened to. When we're

67:52

talking about Gary Nolan and some of the

67:53

things they've found at these crash

67:54

sites, we're talking about alloys that

67:57

you can't make here.

67:58

>> Yeah. There there's something about them

68:00

where they're layered at an atomic

68:02

level. It's there's some weird to

68:05

them.

68:05

>> That's right. And so I try to keep

68:09

myself

68:11

autonomous from the euphology narrative

68:16

either proposed by the government. By

68:18

the way, a lot of people are like it's

68:20

government sponsored. There's a lot of

68:21

government sponsored stuff out there

68:22

that you're getting. None of my stuff is

68:24

government sponsored. like I did this

68:26

totally autonomously on my own. Still do

68:30

completely, you know, I don't have a

68:32

publicist, you know, I'm not like out

68:34

there doing it like that. Um, that said,

68:38

I've met a lot of people and I've seen a

68:40

lot of things now since 2012 about the

68:42

topic.

68:43

>> And so, if I were to speculate about it,

68:46

and let me just describe some of the

68:48

things that that come into my brain

68:50

every once in a while when I'm thinking

68:51

about it, I'm like, okay. Um, you know

68:54

how Eric Weinstein talks about like he

68:57

would know the smart people, he would

68:59

know the physicists who would be on this

69:01

case, right? He would know these guys

69:03

because he knows physics. He's super

69:05

intelligent,

69:06

>> you know? Um,

69:08

>> but I don't think he does know them. And

69:10

part of the reason I say that is because

69:13

this is in 2014 or so, so a long time

69:16

ago. um when I'm you know when you're

69:20

doing something for so long and you're

69:21

in this community of people and you you

69:25

can't make stuff up like stuff happens

69:27

you were like that really happened and

69:29

one of the things that happened was that

69:30

I got to see that there were some you

69:34

know laboratories associated with the

69:36

government that people couldn't get into

69:38

you know it was like you couldn't go to

69:39

those and the people that worked there

69:42

were the best of the best like the the

69:45

laser people the people who knew lasers

69:47

and who, you know, they were better than

69:49

anybody at Yale. They were better than

69:51

anybody at Harvard or Stanford or

69:54

anything like that. They were the best.

69:56

Um, through knowing [snorts] me, Gary

69:58

got to go there. So, I have a witness,

70:00

you know, and so because they were

70:02

cultivating him. They were trying to

70:04

figure out if he could actually help

70:06

with with figuring out what this was.

70:08

So, those things are things that I noted

70:11

and I, you know, kept in the my file in

70:15

my brain. Right. Okay. Well, that's

70:16

weird. Uh there uh think about people

70:19

like Harold Malgrim, right? So, you

70:22

know, he had been a um he's a person who

70:25

is uh was an official to adviser to a

70:30

couple different presidents in the

70:32

capacity of military. So, super high

70:34

level clearance and everything like

70:36

that. He had been recruited, he was a

70:38

physicist at Cornell. He'd been

70:40

recruited when he was 27. So, this

70:43

happens. So, people do get taken into

70:46

these I don't know what you'd call them,

70:48

programs or whatnot, and they do work

70:50

and they have these clearances and

70:52

they're hidden just like um they're

70:56

hidden. Sometimes they're given fake job

70:58

titles and so forth, so people wouldn't

71:00

think. I see people online now saying,

71:03

"Oh, that person doesn't have that

71:04

clearance because they had this job."

71:07

How do you know? Like, seriously, how do

71:09

you know that? because the government is

71:11

really good at hiding these kinds of

71:13

things. So over the years, that was a

71:15

long time ago when this happened to me,

71:16

2014, I started to form an idea, you

71:20

know, and it wasn't just that, it was

71:21

other types of of things that I learned

71:24

that there's something going on for

71:26

sure. And it is what they're saying, but

71:29

maybe it's not I don't know what they're

71:32

reverse engineering, if it's anomalous,

71:35

you know, from another planet or what it

71:38

is. Uh, I do know that they're they're

71:41

doing something and they've been doing

71:44

it and they're probably going to

71:45

continue to do it and that I don't think

71:49

they're going to share.

71:51

>> Yeah. And why would they? Especially if

71:52

it affects national defense.

71:55

>> And so part of what's happening now, you

71:58

know, with uh rich people getting into

72:00

this and trying to get the people in the

72:03

program to come out because that's what

72:04

that looks like when David Gush talks

72:06

about that. I'm thinking they're just

72:08

trying to get these people in the

72:09

program to come out and to, you know, so

72:11

they can they can get the technology,

72:13

right? And that's not I don't think

72:15

that's going to happen. I don't think

72:16

that's going to happen.

72:18

>> So, what do you think happens? Do you

72:20

think that they find very talented

72:22

physicists that are in universities and

72:25

they have these outreach programs where

72:27

they look for these people that are very

72:30

talented and they recruit them very

72:33

early on?

72:34

>> I think so. I think that they get

72:35

recruited really young. Uh 27 is

72:38

probably old to get recruited. Uh

72:40

>> which probably makes sense. Get them as

72:43

early as possible before they

72:44

>> get into the program

72:45

>> before they get involved in any sort of

72:48

commercial venture or any other company.

72:51

So, in um in my second book that I

72:54

written about it called Encounters,

72:55

there's a chapter called the Children of

72:57

the Invisles where I talk about um this

73:02

potential speculative group and it's

73:04

total speculation.

73:08

Have you heard Eric Weinstein's take on

73:11

there's a particular upstate university

73:14

uh upstate New York University that has

73:17

an completely overqualified physics

73:19

department that's also attached to a

73:21

hedge fund that does Bernie Maidoff type

73:23

numbers that don't make any sense at

73:25

all?

73:26

>> No, I didn't I haven't seen that one.

73:28

Yeah, it's he talks about it and this

73:30

one particular university he is keen on

73:35

this might be something

73:37

>> because he's like it doesn't make any

73:39

sense that these insanely talented

73:41

physicists are all in this one place and

73:43

no real research comes out of it. no

73:46

real nothing gets done, but yet they're

73:48

also attached to this hedge fund that

73:50

does these insane numbers that don't

73:52

make any sense at all, which is a great

73:54

way to just funnel money through and

73:56

keep these programs running that are

73:58

completely top secret. And these people

73:59

aren't publishing. They don't have

74:01

anything. These insanely talented

74:03

physicists are not really getting

74:04

anything done. [laughter]

74:06

>> Yeah. They get fired at my university if

74:08

they weren't publishing.

74:09

>> Right. Right. There's something there's

74:11

something weird about it, he says. Yeah.

74:13

>> And he keeps pointing to this one. Do

74:14

you remember that? What what they

74:16

>> Stony Brook and Renaissance Technologies

74:18

is the

74:18

>> Yes, that's it.

74:20

>> He's He's like, if there's something

74:22

there, if there's a there there, that's

74:24

where it's at.

74:26

>> Yeah. Which makes sense. Like if you had

74:30

some big time program like

74:33

um I know a guy who uh was a professor.

74:38

Uh so he was uh teaching at a

74:40

university. I probably shouldn't say

74:42

what he's teaching. He was also a CIA

74:45

operative. So he would literally um be

74:49

involved in gunfights and then a

74:53

week later he would be, you know, they

74:55

would extract they

74:58

take people. They they' do all this

75:00

crazy CIA super secret operative A

75:04

week later he's teaching university

75:05

courses.

75:07

>> Yeah.

75:08

>> Yeah. Like Indiana Jones on steroids.

75:10

like this guy was like really doing that

75:13

>> which is like wo okay. So if you have

75:17

this university where you have these

75:19

people that are teaching these classes

75:20

like this is and they're probably

75:22

looking for super super talented

75:25

physicists that are coming up to recruit

75:28

into these programs. But what they're

75:30

doing as far as their, you know, air

75:32

quotes research that's public is

75:34

nonsense. And what they're what they're

75:36

really doing is working on something

75:38

probably some sort of very novel

75:41

propulsion system.

75:43

>> And that's what Weinstein thinks.

75:46

And he thinks that a lot of this stuff

75:49

that people are seeing in the sky is

75:51

probably ours.

75:53

>> So that's right. So say it's ours and

75:56

say he's right. Okay. So, but I guess my

76:00

point is,

76:02

are you, you know, then shouldn't that

76:05

be okay? Shouldn't we be okay with that?

76:07

Because isn't, aren't they, aren't we

76:10

Americans? Aren't they like helping us?

76:12

>> Well, if that's the case, yes,

76:14

certainly. Why would we try to get them

76:16

to come out and, you know, and like

76:18

force them out?

76:20

>> Well, we certainly don't want that

76:21

information to get to China or Russia.

76:23

we if there is some sort of a race to

76:26

develop a novel propulsion system like

76:28

who was it Jamie that was in here that

76:30

was saying that one of the uses for this

76:33

technology would be instantaneous

76:36

delivery systems of nuclear weapons.

76:39

So you know when we're talking about

76:41

these propulsion systems that

76:43

essentially they're folding space

76:46

folding space and time or they can

76:49

instead of going from point A to point B

76:52

which is like you know a thousand lighty

76:54

years instead of doing it in however

76:58

much time it would take to travel that

76:59

through even if you're going the speed

77:01

of light you go instantaneously because

77:04

you're essentially folding space and

77:05

time and just appearing in this new

77:08

place. Well, you could do that with a

77:10

bomb. And so instead of like a missile

77:13

having to fly to Beijing or Moscow, it

77:17

instantaneously arrives and detonates.

77:20

And that this was one of the proposed

77:22

uses of this technology, which is

77:25

terrifying.

77:26

>> Yeah.

77:27

>> That these knuckleheads are taking this

77:30

incredibly potent technology that these

77:32

extraterrestrials have used to get here

77:35

from another planet. And we were like,

77:37

wouldn't that be a dope way to deliver a

77:39

bomb?

77:40

>> Yeah.

77:40

>> And then they're working on that.

77:42

>> Yeah.

77:42

>> But it's also, isn't it their

77:45

responsibility to do that? Because if

77:48

China figures out how to do that or

77:50

Russia figures out how to do that or

77:51

Iran figures out how to do that,

77:53

>> you've got a real problem.

77:55

>> So this was what remember you asked me

77:57

those people that I met like after

77:59

American Cosmic gets published. All

78:01

right. So this is pretty much the line

78:03

they gave me was that Diana

78:06

it's best to talk about this stuff about

78:08

morality and you know Christian stuff

78:11

and so forth because look what we're

78:14

doing is we're keeping us safe in the

78:16

United States and do you really want uh

78:20

a non-ally to have you know an enemy to

78:22

have this technology? I'm like well no

78:25

of course not you know I mean so yeah

78:27

what can you say to an argument like

78:28

that other than well yeah that would be

78:30

terrible. Well, if I believe them and if

78:32

they're being if it's true and they're

78:34

just looking out for the interest of

78:36

America, 100% I'm with them. I get it. I

78:38

understand. I mean, I don't know.

78:40

>> I know. That's the problem is I'm never

78:42

going to point fingers and go, "Fuck

78:44

those guys. They need to tell us

78:45

everything."

78:45

>> Right.

78:46

>> The problem is you're telling everybody

78:47

in the world everything, then you're

78:49

telling China everything. You're telling

78:51

Russia everything.

78:51

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. That's right.

78:53

>> I get it. And I get that. That's why if

78:56

say the Roswell crash of 1947, if that

78:58

is legit and if they really did fly it

79:00

out to Wright Air Force Base in, you

79:03

know, two separate planes just in case

79:05

one of them crashed, if that's really

79:06

the the case and the the the lore is

79:09

that Truman met them there and that they

79:12

disclose that they have this craft and

79:14

they have this material. You have so

79:16

many different people that were at that

79:17

crash site that have very similar

79:19

stories.

79:20

>> Yeah. And then you also have this

79:24

very

79:26

shortly after that you have technologies

79:28

emerge.

79:29

>> You have fiber optics, transistors, a

79:31

lot of and weird that's attached to

79:33

them in terms of like the providence of

79:35

like how these technologies were evolved

79:37

and developed.

79:38

>> There's some sketchy involved in

79:40

that. And the allegation is that this is

79:43

something that's been reverse

79:44

engineered.

79:47

And then okay, well you you don't want

79:49

that getting to someone else. Yeah.

79:51

>> Right. If if we are

79:54

>> involved in conflicts with other

79:55

nations, and we most certainly are, why

79:58

would you you got to keep that stuff

79:59

secret? So I get that argument as well.

80:01

And if so, if extraterrestrial

80:03

technology is real and that we do have

80:06

crafts and saying extraterrestrial is

80:09

just a placeholder word for whatever it

80:10

is, interdimensional, whatever it is,

80:12

some super advanced nonhuman

80:15

intelligence created technology. If it

80:19

does exist, yeah, I would say from a

80:21

national security perspective, yeah,

80:23

you've got to keep that under wraps.

80:25

Especially if we don't truly understand

80:27

it. If we don't truly understand it,

80:29

we're not really capable of making it.

80:32

Yeah.

80:35

I mean, the way Lazar describes the

80:37

craft itself, it was like it was 3D

80:38

printed. Well, there was no 3D printing

80:40

in 1989, right? Well, there is now that

80:43

we

80:44

>> that we know of, but there is now. But

80:45

that's the thing is this that we know

80:47

of. There's only so far you can go with

80:52

that that line of thinking is when you

80:57

go back far enough it doesn't work. So

81:00

like you go back to 1947 1947 you're

81:04

dealing with propeller planes.

81:07

Okay, propeller planes and then also

81:09

novel propulsion systems that can inst

81:11

instantaneously travel from one place to

81:14

another. You know, they can go like what

81:17

happened with the Tic Tac where where

81:19

they have it on radar going from 50,000

81:23

ft down to sea level in less than a

81:27

second.

81:28

>> So that's that's technology that we had

81:31

in 2004.

81:33

That doesn't seem likely, right? And it

81:36

it might be the case, but then you go

81:39

far enough back to like um

81:43

like the the what was the guy's name?

81:46

Kenneth Arnold.

81:47

>> Yeah.

81:48

>> Th those sightings which was what 47

81:51

>> 47. Okay. Well, that's there's no way

81:53

>> like a couple months like

81:54

>> right

81:55

>> after Roswell before Roswell I can't

81:57

remember.

81:58

>> So that's there's no way we didn't have

82:00

that technology then. There's no way

82:02

they would have such superior advanced

82:05

technology that our fighter jets look

82:07

like toys. They just whiz past them.

82:10

>> Well, I hear that, but but I don't know

82:12

if you've seen the images of Kenneth

82:15

Arnold's plane, but it looks like that

82:17

German fighter plane. So, it looks

82:19

exactly like that. Maybe we reverse

82:21

engineered that and had it. I don't

82:23

know. I'm just saying that

82:24

>> Kenneth Arnold's plane was only capable

82:26

of going like how fast? It wasn't that

82:28

fast. And this thing these these crafts

82:31

were going way faster. Yeah. This is

82:33

what he said he saw. Like he's got a

82:35

propeller plane.

82:36

>> I did just look up the first uh turbo

82:38

jet engine plane was 1941.

82:41

>> Yeah. Yeah.

82:42

>> Whoa. I didn't know that. Were they

82:44

using that for fighter jets back then?

82:46

>> 1947 was there was them flying around

82:48

World War II.

82:49

>> Uh in 47 they had fighter jets that had

82:52

um

82:55

propeller turbo jet. Yeah. But a a turbo

82:58

jet is a propeller. per uh here's the

83:01

>> like if you fly I've flown in turbo jet

83:03

propeller planes before and they're

83:06

pretty dope.

83:06

>> Those are the pictures coming up.

83:08

>> Oh, okay. So, that does look like a jet

83:10

engine.

83:10

>> It's definitely something different,

83:12

>> right? Was that What did the planes look

83:14

like back then? So, pull up a a fighter

83:16

jet from 1947. See, those are

83:20

>> the It was a It was a specific plane

83:23

that looked exactly like what he saw. It

83:26

was a German plane. Well, that one that

83:28

Jamie just pulled up is pretty crazy

83:30

because it's circular.

83:31

>> No, I know. But the other ones looked I

83:32

mean, literally exactly. They were

83:34

called uh they uh wing planes cuz they

83:38

they looked like wings basically.

83:40

>> I understand. But even that those right

83:43

there, those are still propeller planes.

83:46

>> That is what Kenneth Arnold says he saw.

83:48

That's totally different. Yeah. Like

83:50

whatever the that is. It's crazy.

83:52

And he saw that thing skipping across

83:54

the sky.

83:55

>> Okay. Wait a minute, Jamie. If you can

83:58

Keep going. So, the idea that our best

84:00

>> it's ho something.

84:02

>> Okay. The idea that our best is

84:04

propeller planes, but yet we also have

84:06

these things with no visible means of

84:09

propulsion that are all flying at 1,000

84:12

miles an hour or whatever it was.

84:14

Several thousand miles an hour.

84:15

>> Couldn't have been quiet either,

84:16

>> right? [clears throat] Yeah. It's just

84:18

weird. It's if you go back far enough,

84:21

it doesn't make sense that there's

84:24

superior technology that's not being

84:26

utilized ubiquitously across the entire

84:29

military.

84:31

>> Well, I think that most likely if they

84:33

they have something that they want.

84:34

Okay. So, this is again speculation. All

84:36

right.

84:37

>> Right.

84:37

>> I don't know. I entertained the idea.

84:39

>> This is 80 years ago.

84:40

>> No, I know that I entertained the

84:42

possibility that they had some pretty

84:44

amazing stuff.

84:45

>> I don't

84:45

>> Okay. I don't I just don't think that's

84:47

possible.

84:48

>> I think that we still have it. And

84:49

that's what

84:50

>> maybe today I I would say in 2026, 80

84:53

years later with all the technological

84:54

advancement, maybe there's some crazy

84:56

that they have today. And I bet

84:57

there is. Look at this thing.

84:59

>> This is a German bomber from

85:02

>> That's what I'm saying. Just like that.

85:03

>> All right. You got to believe that.

85:06

>> But that's just You're a witness. No.

85:08

No. That's an

85:09

>> That's not a Is that a photograph?

85:10

>> No, they have a photograph of those. I

85:12

am not kidding.

85:13

>> Stick them with your I was trying to

85:14

just start with that. No.

85:15

>> Yeah. So, look at that upper left hand

85:17

corner. It says secret Nazi UFO.

85:20

>> Yeah.

85:20

>> But are these photographs?

85:22

>> Yes, they're photograph. It could be AI,

85:24

but that's

85:24

>> No, it's not.

85:25

>> I'm just And I'm just to be uh

85:27

>> Okay. Well, what does it say up there?

85:28

It says uh a Horton

85:31

229. A German prototype.

85:33

>> Yeah.

85:34

>> Plane from 1945.

85:35

>> So, so literally, See, I'm telling you,

85:38

Joe, this looks exactly like Arnold's uh

85:42

It does UFO.

85:43

>> It really does. a jet powered flying

85:46

wingcraft. That looks that literally

85:47

looks exactly like it.

85:48

>> So, if I'm right about that, then you

85:50

should like listen to my speculations,

85:52

>> right? But how fast did this go?

85:54

>> All right. Let's see.

85:57

>> That's pretty dope.

85:58

>> Could have been pushing it to the limit.

85:59

>> I can't believe they had something like

86:00

that,

86:01

>> you know?

86:01

>> How are the Germans so advanced?

86:03

>> I know.

86:04

>> And so evil at the same time. Like, what

86:06

the hell?

86:08

>> Okay. Designed.

86:12

Where? Where is it?

86:14

>> 560 mph.

86:16

>> 600 mph.

86:17

>> And how fast was Ken Kenneth Arnold's

86:20

craft able to go? 621 miles an hour.

86:23

>> Wow.

86:24

>> So, you know, he saw these in

86:26

information. So, we were most likely

86:28

doing something with those.

86:30

>> We

86:31

>> what? United States.

86:32

>> The United States. So, you think that we

86:34

had acquired that technology?

86:36

>> We did. We we acquired it. We were

86:37

utilizing it.

86:38

>> Right. So, Operation Paperclip, we

86:40

brought over a bunch of these Nazi

86:42

scientists. And so, you think that what

86:44

he saw was these Nazi crafts.

86:47

>> Yeah.

86:47

>> That they had

86:49

>> Yes, I think so. But that doesn't take

86:51

out a lot of weirdness about it because

86:53

he also had a lot of very strange

86:55

anomalous experiences, men in black

86:58

experiences, paranormal experiences.

87:00

>> Kenneth Arnold did.

87:01

>> Yeah. So, and Yeah. And to to him, he

87:04

interpreted this as being religious. Is

87:07

there a video of that German thing

87:09

flying?

87:09

>> I was just looking at the the first

87:10

comment says, "It should be noted this

87:12

is a full-scale mockup made for radar

87:14

testing by North the Brumman for a net

87:16

geo documentary, not the actual HO229,

87:19

that picture I put up."

87:20

>> Oh, interesting. Is there any actual

87:23

documented photographs of the HO229?

87:27

>> Um, that's I'm going to go with if there

87:29

was only three of them and they weren't

87:31

ours. So we know that jets existed in 41

87:35

and so and the the Nazis had really

87:38

advanced technology in terms of

87:40

automobiles, in terms of engineering,

87:43

rocketry. They were way more advanced

87:44

than us, which is why we took all those

87:47

Nazi scientists.

87:48

>> Yeah.

87:48

>> From Operation Paperclip

87:50

>> and ignored their war crimes so that

87:52

they could work for NASA. And they had a

87:54

they had an important uh weapon too that

87:57

we never talk about that we also took a

88:01

form of propaganda.

88:03

They had propaganda specific form not

88:05

the kind that you can Google and see

88:07

Nazi propaganda and stuff like that.

88:09

Like a really effective form of

88:11

propaganda.

88:12

>> What how in what way would they have?

88:15

>> Um so that's another thing. So uh

88:18

>> so this is an actual photograph of it.

88:21

>> Whoa. So, if you saw that thing flying

88:23

through the sky in 1947, you would

88:26

probably think that's from another

88:27

planet.

88:28

>> That totally looks like an a space. I

88:31

remember um after September 11th in

88:35

2001, I was filming Fear Factor and we

88:39

were in uh Southern California near

88:43

[sighs] what is the base that's out

88:44

there? Is it Edwards? Um, we're we're

88:47

near one of the Air Force bases and I

88:49

saw a stealth bomber fly overhead and it

88:52

looks like it's from another planet. It

88:54

looks so crazy. We stopped filming. We

88:56

were like, "Dude, what the It

89:00

looks like Darth Vader's flying it."

89:02

>> Yeah.

89:02

>> You know, it's so weird.

89:04

>> Yeah.

89:05

>> It doesn't seem like it's ours now. I

89:07

know it is and I know they exist, but if

89:09

I didn't

89:10

>> and I saw that.

89:11

>> Yeah. So, you got to assume also that if

89:14

I saw it in 2001,

89:17

>> maybe they had it in 1999, maybe they

89:20

had it in 1989, maybe they had it in 79.

89:23

Yep.

89:23

>> Maybe they had something like that.

89:25

>> So, that article says that we found that

89:27

prototype in Germany, brought it back,

89:29

and then this is what North potentially

89:31

made after.

89:32

>> So, this is a this is a wing powered by

89:35

propellers, though.

89:36

>> We didn't know how to make those jets,

89:38

>> right? And so they probably put the jets

89:40

on it later. But that looks alien.

89:44

>> Yeah.

89:44

>> So when you think of the Kenneth Arnold

89:45

sighting and you think of the

89:47

description that he had, it's very

89:48

similar to that.

89:49

>> Yeah.

89:50

>> So that might have been it.

89:51

>> Yeah. Yeah.

89:51

>> But that doesn't that doesn't jive with

89:54

the tic tac. The tic tac's bananas.

89:56

>> Yeah, it is. It is.

89:57

>> Like that the speed that that thing

89:59

moved, every human being inside of it,

90:02

if there was a person flying in that,

90:03

they would have got turned into jello-.

90:05

Yeah.

90:05

>> Just from the G-forces.

90:07

>> That's right. That's right.

90:08

>> Also, there's no material that we have

90:10

that could survive that kind of speed.

90:12

>> Yeah.

90:14

Um I know

90:15

>> see this came out in those I think this

90:16

came out in those alien document or one

90:18

of the dumps.

90:20

>> Yeah.

90:20

>> So this is a lot of people have said

90:22

that it's Lockheed Martin created that

90:24

thing and that is exactly what it looked

90:27

like including those weird things at the

90:29

bottom. Mhm.

90:30

>> Those weird things at the bottom,

90:32

whatever that those little

90:34

whatever those little tube looking

90:36

things at the bottom of it, that is part

90:38

of what they describe when they said

90:40

they saw the tic tac. And there have

90:42

been people in the air quotes disclosure

90:45

movement that have said openly that

90:48

thing was a Lockheed Martin device.

90:51

>> Yeah, that's right.

90:53

>> Okay. So, that's the case. What What is

90:58

that? And how's that thing moving and

91:00

how's it moving that way in 2004?

91:04

>> Yeah.

91:04

>> And if Loheed Martin has this kind of

91:06

technology 22 years ago,

91:10

>> yeah,

91:10

>> that that baffles me and that defies

91:15

your imagination just runs wild. Like

91:18

>> so that's my point is that you know if

91:20

if this is happening and this has been

91:22

happening um it's like it's well this is

91:26

something that's

91:28

kept well guarded and even I don't think

91:32

even with the disclosure today I don't

91:35

think that push is gonna is going to be

91:37

effective is going to

91:39

>> I see what you're saying so that thing

91:41

from the disclosure dump from

91:43

>> I'm looking at more info right now

91:45

>> what is that

91:46

>> what the perplexity has to say about it

91:48

it's not a hoax real or uh it's

91:50

certainly a ho wait

91:51

>> almost certainly a hoax

91:53

>> oh how dare you perplexity

91:56

>> boo but what perplexity getting this

91:58

information from.

92:00

So it says what the story claims a

92:02

document circulating on social media

92:03

since August of 2025 purports to be a

92:06

leaked Lockheed Martin CIA flight manual

92:09

for a craft called the CL957

92:12

Gen 2 nickname Tic Tac per the claims

92:15

Instagram skunk works post someone made

92:18

it on Reddit it says

92:20

>> okay of course Jason Wild on X Reddit

92:24

forensic breakdown Tana YouTube analysis

92:27

no providence nothing in the freedom of

92:29

information act archives. Uh the CIA

92:32

crest database, black vault or national

92:34

archive references, CL 957 or orbit

92:38

lance real black programs. Ox cart uh

92:42

have blue tactic blue all eventually

92:44

left paper trails. Wrong designation

92:46

scheme locked CL um blank blank blank

92:50

California temporary design numbers are

92:52

documented. CL282 CL1200

92:57

Lancer etc. and CL 957 doesn't appear in

93:00

any credible listing document artifacts

93:03

analyst flag typography

93:06

formatting and classification marking

93:09

inconsistencies versus real technical

93:11

orders plus anacronistic

93:14

F-22 references and an odd CIA series

93:17

aircraft phase phrasing h

93:20

>> it's only been found on social media

93:21

nowhere else

93:22

>> well then it's real [snorts]

93:24

you know that X is the news now don't

93:26

you pay attention

93:28

God, Jamie, sorry.

93:31

I want to believe I want to believe that

93:32

Loheed Martin has that. They might

93:34

>> Well, we always have Travis Walton.

93:36

>> Yeah, but like Travis is one guy with

93:38

one story. Very interesting.

93:40

>> There's a lot of them, though.

93:41

>> Yeah. Oh, 100%. There's There's a lot of

93:44

weird stories. And there's a lot of

93:45

weird stories of what Travis the the the

93:48

thing is the real problem is once it

93:53

becomes iconic, right? Like once there's

93:57

once there's once there's a story that

93:59

gets out there like uh Betty and Barney

94:01

Hill for instance.

94:02

>> Yeah.

94:03

>> You hear that story and then that story

94:05

becomes a part of folklore. That story

94:07

becomes a part of people's imagination

94:09

and when you start thinking about grays,

94:12

you immediately start thinking about

94:13

Whitley Striber, right? You start

94:14

thinking about communion, you start

94:16

thinking about close encounters. So you

94:18

already have these images in your mind

94:19

of what these things are supposed to

94:20

look like. That's right. Yeah.

94:21

>> And that's a part of the problem, right?

94:23

>> Uh kind of. Yeah. Yeah,

94:25

>> that is a part of the problem. Um, I was

94:29

going to go down another path.

94:30

>> Okay.

94:31

>> Okay. So, about reverse engineering

94:33

stuff like how does this work,

94:35

>> right?

94:35

>> All right. So, one of the things that I

94:37

came to like understand was that um a

94:41

couple of people told me about this and

94:43

it was nothing that they intended to

94:45

tell me by the way, but I asked. So, you

94:47

know, Tyler was was doing this reverse

94:49

engineering type of thing. He's trying

94:51

to find people to help him with with

94:52

this. And he would have what he thought

94:55

were or alleged [snorts]

94:57

UFO debris that he had found at various

94:59

places like in New Mexico and so forth.

95:01

And then what he had to do was he had to

95:04

get together a group of engineers that

95:07

could actually reverse engineer it. And

95:09

he would tell them, he wouldn't say this

95:12

is a UFO or this is, you know, something

95:14

found in the desert. No, no. He would

95:16

say this is China's or this is Russia's

95:19

and we need in order to keep our you

95:21

know dominance or whatnot we need to get

95:22

this reverse engineered pronto and that

95:25

this lie would then motivate these guys

95:29

okay and that they would reverse

95:30

engineer this and he would come up with

95:32

something okay so later on I would

95:34

listen to how and how would give these

95:36

these talks how put off by the way who's

95:39

who's one of the people that is

95:41

interested in UFOs and knows a lot about

95:44

them and so He gave this talk at the

95:47

inaugural soul conference and I was

95:48

there. Um, and so I was listening to him

95:51

and to me it sounded like what he was

95:53

saying was exactly what Tyler was saying

95:55

that he was saying, "We have this, you

95:57

know, but we don't actually know how to

96:00

do this, how to backineer this, so we're

96:02

going to give it to this talented group

96:04

of people and we're going to tell them

96:06

that this was already made, but a a

96:08

nonally, like an enemy had it." So

96:11

basically by telling them this they

96:14

would then

96:16

like in a sense do kind of like a a

96:18

trick on their minds and they would

96:20

actually reverse engineer it. They would

96:22

reverse engineer something that he said

96:24

already existed. So in a sense it was

96:26

like um not only working with time in a

96:29

weird way like kind of like you know

96:30

projecting what was going to be in the

96:32

future telling them it already had been

96:34

done. So that made me think this is like

96:37

the propaganda that I'm talking about

96:38

and that you just started to talk about.

96:40

Like if we could then on a mass scale

96:43

tell people that we have something or

96:45

this is the case maybe there would be a

96:49

critical like mental construct and

96:52

people would actually do something or

96:55

rise to the occasion or something like

96:56

that. That could have been propaganda

96:59

for the space race, right? That could

97:02

have been like the moon landing stuff

97:04

like you know uh I'm not saying that

97:06

didn't happen by the way. I'm saying

97:08

that you know part of it was a way to

97:10

get Americans to win the space race we

97:13

had to already believe that we won it

97:16

right. In order to create this stuff we

97:18

already have to believe that someone

97:19

else created it. It's like the five

97:21

minute mile.

97:22

>> Mhm.

97:23

>> You see what I'm saying? So

97:24

>> four minute right?

97:25

>> Yeah. That why maybe it's a five minute

97:27

to me. [laughter]

97:29

The women's five minute mile right. No,

97:31

the four-minute mile. That's right. So,

97:33

we already had to believe that it had

97:35

been done in order to do it,

97:37

>> right? Because once someone broke it,

97:39

then a bunch of people broke it.

97:41

>> Yeah. Yeah. That's right. So, so Oh, and

97:44

then I was asked by people who are um in

97:49

the government to speak to inter agency

97:53

like people, scientists. And so they

97:56

would have me talk to these scientists,

97:57

like 50 of them, right, from various

98:00

parts of the government, and basically

98:01

tell them the story of like American

98:03

Cosmic. And I was like, okay, I'll do

98:06

that. Why? You know, they didn't say

98:08

anything about why. But I started to

98:10

think maybe this is like a how put off

98:12

thing or maybe this is like a Tyler

98:13

thing that I'm doing this for them so

98:15

that their brains can think this has

98:17

already been done. We better do this. M.

98:21

So when when you say the sophisticated

98:22

propaganda that the Nazis have that that

98:25

we took this technology from them like

98:27

what do you mean by that like what was

98:29

their tech what what was unique about

98:31

their propaganda?

98:33

>> All right. So I don't know exactly but I

98:35

do have some ideas and two of the ideas

98:39

I have are what I just told you that if

98:41

you can seed the population with images

98:45

and belief you know that will impact

98:47

their belief you can change it. Okay

98:50

there's that one but there's also the

98:51

one that you know Bill Cooper's book um

98:55

>> Behold Pay a horse. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

98:57

Okay. So in behold a to pay a horse he

98:59

talks about the quiet weapons where he's

99:02

talking about basically technology and

99:04

how technology is going to

99:07

engineer consent and he's talking about

99:09

this in I don't know what exactly when

99:11

he read that

99:12

>> engineer consent

99:13

>> yeah engineer consent of the population

99:15

about certain things and you do that

99:17

through uh utilizing social media well

99:22

he's not calling it that he's calling it

99:23

quiet weapons but you know back then

99:26

putting stuff on TV and you know

99:29

creating a narrative that people buy

99:31

into and believe and he said that this

99:34

is going to uh you see this by the way

99:36

with Arthur C. Clark in his book in his

99:40

short story childhood's end or no it's a

99:42

book um where you know that he's talking

99:44

about aliens where these aliens are

99:46

engineering humanity through technology

99:49

through social media and things like

99:51

that

99:53

[clears throat]

99:53

>> so this could be what the Nazi

99:56

propaganda the weapon is that it could

99:59

be used as a weapon but it could also be

100:01

used for good [snorts]

100:02

>> and it could be used to facilitate

100:05

technological innovation by telling them

100:08

that it's already been done.

100:09

>> Yeah. Yeah. Um, you know, when I was I

100:13

was uh I ran in college, so I was a

100:16

college runner uh for track and cross

100:18

country and I had a great team of

100:22

coaches who would teach us sports

100:24

psychology and part of what we would do

100:27

would be we would already see us

100:29

winning. We would already see and they

100:30

would also tell us so and so ran this,

100:33

you know, you can do this. So in a sense

100:35

they were utilizing that on our team and

100:38

it it was good. It was you know helpful.

100:43

>> Right. Well it's it's very important

100:45

your mindset especially when it comes to

100:47

athletics because there's so much that's

100:50

involved in competition that's

100:51

psychological.

100:52

>> Yeah.

100:53

>> Do you think that that also is the case

100:56

when it comes to technological

100:57

innovation?

100:58

>> Definitely. You have to believe that it

101:00

can be done or that it has been done and

101:02

that it helps you figure out the

101:04

pathway.

101:05

>> I mean, this is what I'm telling you.

101:07

So, with the the people that I just

101:09

talked about, we're talking about Tyler,

101:10

right? We're talking about um then how

101:13

even though I don't think he'd say that

101:14

that's what he was do doing or talking

101:16

about, that's what I interpreted his

101:18

talk to be. And he's talking, you know,

101:20

he's he has some really interesting

101:22

>> uh ideas about physics and matter and

101:25

reality and so forth. Um and then later

101:28

on uh yeah that's what I think you know

101:31

I think that that works that actually

101:33

works

101:33

>> it makes sense that it would that the

101:36

blocks that people have in their mind

101:37

about what is and what is not possible

101:40

that if you say not only is it possible

101:41

it's already been done so

101:42

>> yeah so yeah so I don't know like when

101:45

we start to talk about like the various

101:47

things that we've been talking about

101:48

like you know if this is real and that

101:50

happened and so forth maybe that's what

101:52

the they're trying to get us not to talk

101:56

about The really interesting things like

101:57

maybe that, you know, that form of what

102:00

what could be a form of mind control.

102:03

>> I understand that. But when it comes to

102:04

technology that could have military

102:07

applications and that we've had all

102:09

these military conflicts, you would

102:11

imagine that you would see some of this

102:12

stuff being utilized. And there's no

102:15

real evidence that there has been like

102:17

there's no evidence from Iraq or

102:19

Afghanistan from any of those conflicts

102:22

that we had something that moves faster

102:24

than the speed of light and that we have

102:26

weapons that were indescribable

102:29

until Nicaragua.

102:31

So, or Venezuela rather, the the

102:34

Venezuelan contact where we um conflict

102:37

rather where we abducted the president

102:39

and we came in and incapacitated

102:41

everybody with some sort of a sound

102:43

weapon like that all stuff sounds like

102:46

super science fictiony and when you

102:49

realize like that is real, they

102:51

absolutely did that. So they have had

102:54

something for a long time that can do

102:57

things that are beyond our understanding

103:00

of what we thought was possible.

103:02

>> Yeah. Yeah.

103:04

>> How put off had that crazy story about

103:05

when he was working for the Bush

103:06

administration where they brought him in

103:08

with a bunch of other scientists about

103:10

thought leaders.

103:11

>> Yeah. And they said we are going to

103:12

disclose that there are alien crafts and

103:15

that we have biological remains of

103:17

creatures from some other place. what is

103:20

the negative and what are the positive

103:22

impacts of this and I want you to put a

103:24

numerical value on each one of them and

103:27

tell us what what the result is and all

103:30

all the people that they brought in all

103:32

had similar conclusions when they said

103:35

how's it going to impact government

103:36

how's it going to impact religion how's

103:38

it going to impact society or economy

103:41

there's way more negative than there is

103:42

positive and so they decided not to

103:44

disclose and when he tells that story

103:46

just like

103:48

god that tracks that tracks like that

103:50

they would do that that they would say

103:52

maybe we should tell everybody but this

103:54

is going to be the impact.

103:57

>> My belief is that's a temporary impact

104:00

and that societyy's going to continue to

104:01

function because it's pragmatic. We're

104:03

going to have to you're going to have to

104:04

have an economy. You're going to have to

104:06

have government. You're going to have to

104:06

have all these things while also knowing

104:09

we're not alone. And maybe that would

104:11

help dissolve some of the conflicts that

104:14

we have because if we think that we're

104:15

the only gang in town and then there's

104:18

another gang over there and we're duking

104:19

it out with them.

104:21

>> If we find out well actually there's a

104:22

gang from another planet that's that's

104:25

the Reagan speech to the United Nations

104:27

that all the UFO dorks went like, "Oh,

104:30

he's telling us something that if we

104:32

were faced with a threat from another

104:33

world, how quickly we would put aside

104:35

our differences."

104:36

>> Yep. That's right. Yeah.

104:37

>> Yeah.

104:38

>> I mean, yeah. I I I'm with you. I think

104:41

that people won't be um they won't go

104:44

into shock and things,

104:45

>> but it would temporarily disrupt

104:47

everything. And that therein lies the

104:49

problem. The problem is the collapse of

104:51

the economy, global trust in government.

104:55

Like if the government really isn't the

104:57

people that are in control, if there

104:59

really is something far above and beyond

105:01

human government that has some sort of

105:04

an influence on world events, that's

105:07

that's that's a real it's tough to vote

105:10

in a congressman that says they're going

105:12

to enact change when we're being

105:14

observed by extraterrestrial life that

105:16

can read your mind.

105:17

>> I don't know if that's true. I don't

105:19

know if I agree with you on that. I

105:20

think that it's all I think people will

105:22

be all right. I mean, we're having the

105:24

government say today, right? I mean, JD

105:27

Vance on your podcast just said it's

105:29

they're demons, right? That's that's

105:31

[laughter]

105:31

>> If JD Vance doesn't know, aren't we all

105:34

if he just thinks that they're

105:36

demons, like what he doesn't seem

105:40

>> he says he's too busy to like really dig

105:43

into the UFO stuff, which I kind of get

105:46

and understand, but also don't because

105:48

if that was

105:49

>> obviously I'm never going to be vice

105:50

president, but if I was, that would be

105:52

like the first thing I would look into

105:54

as soon as I got into my desk. I'd be

105:56

like, where they have everything? I'm

105:58

going there. I'm going there. I'm going

106:00

to say you have to show me and I'll keep

106:02

my mouth shut, but I need to know like

106:04

you need to show me. We need to know

106:06

like what are we I need to know what

106:08

position we're at in order to move

106:11

forward. I don't know. I need to know

106:12

where are we operating from. Are we

106:14

operating from a position where human

106:16

beings are the advanced dominant

106:18

intellect on Earth or not?

106:22

>> Because if it's or not, that changes

106:24

everything.

106:25

>> But you're rare. You're the rare person

106:27

who like most people in the United

106:30

States believe in God. Like there are

106:31

more than 80% of people who believe in

106:33

God. They think God runs it, right? God

106:36

is a non-human intelligence.

106:38

>> But that doesn't they they're not

106:40

mutually exclusive. Like God could exist

106:43

and also intelligent life from elsewhere

106:45

could also exist.

106:46

>> That's right. And that's why most people

106:47

won't be shocked or upset. I don't think

106:50

that there's going to be a level of um

106:52

anxiety that people predict. Honestly, I

106:54

don't. Well, hasn't the Vatican even

106:56

addressed this and saying that if alien

106:58

life exists that God could have created

107:00

life other places?

107:02

>> Of course. Yeah.

107:03

>> Which really does make sense.

107:04

>> Yeah. Yeah. So, they're not going to be

107:05

upset. And there are a lot of Catholics

107:07

in the United States. So, I mean, people

107:09

in the United States or even all over

107:10

the world, there are countries like in

107:12

Brazil where they're okay with, you

107:14

know, if they're if there are aliens up

107:16

there, it's not going to change. They're

107:18

probably watching us and nobody's going

107:20

to be upset about that. They're still

107:21

going to vote for their presidents and

107:23

their congress people and so forth.

107:25

>> Yeah. So, you're like the only one here

107:27

that I not the only one, but you're

107:29

representing a small minority of people

107:31

in my opinion.

107:32

>> How so?

107:33

>> Because you think that that it's going

107:35

to change everything. You think that it

107:37

might actually change your worldview,

107:39

but it's not going to change the 80% out

107:42

there.

107:43

>> It's not going to change their

107:44

worldview.

107:45

>> I think that's a guess. Mine's a guess

107:48

as well. It's a guess of how it's going

107:50

to affect the world. I I would assume it

107:53

affects it in a pretty spectacular way.

107:57

If we have undeniable proof that there

108:01

is some superior intelligence that's

108:04

interacting with us and perhaps even

108:06

controlling events and preventing

108:08

certain things from happening like when

108:10

they go over nuclear bases and stop

108:12

weapons functions.

108:14

>> This is a religious worldview. That's a

108:16

that's the religious worldview. you're

108:18

you're identifying right there. How is

108:19

that a religious worldview that there's

108:21

an intelligent life form from another

108:22

planet that comes from

108:24

>> not another planet but like you know

108:26

there's an intelligent interdimensional

108:27

>> right we don't know if it's from another

108:29

planet that's a guess so most [snorts]

108:31

religions are assuming that there are

108:33

other there are gods and goddesses or

108:35

there is god and there are angels and

108:38

demons and things like that there you

108:40

know non-human intelligences so they

108:42

already think this and this is already a

108:44

world view

108:45

>> well that's what gets weird when you get

108:46

into the really old scripts like The

108:49

Book of

108:49

>> Enoch.

108:50

>> That's right.

108:51

>> That you know, Anna Paulina Luna, she's

108:54

the one who turned me on that. And yeah,

108:56

I've listen to the audio book of the

108:58

Book of Enoch twice now.

109:00

>> And every time I listen to I'm like,

109:01

what the were they talking about?

109:04

>> Like what is what are the Watchers who

109:08

came down and and bred with the

109:10

daughters of man and created the

109:12

Nephilim? Like what is what is all this

109:15

stuff?

109:17

>> Yeah. that informs a lot of Christian

109:21

doctrines basically.

109:22

>> Well, not really. Not today. But because

109:25

it's not included in the cannon, but

109:27

what if it was, right?

109:29

>> It's included in the canon, but just not

109:31

in reference to the book of Enoch. I

109:33

mean, if you

109:34

>> Well, the book of Enoch's not in the

109:35

canon, but Enoch is referenced in the

109:36

Bible.

109:37

>> Absolutely. Yeah.

109:38

>> Which is kind of nuts that you don't get

109:40

the book of Enoch,

109:41

>> but you have the worldview of Enoch. A

109:43

lot of Christians still believe in that.

109:44

And it's I would say that I don't know

109:47

like [snorts] more than 50%. So even

109:50

though so yes. So

109:51

>> more than 50% believe

109:52

>> they believe in the worldview of of

109:54

Enoch that we're that there are watchers

109:57

and fallen angels and things like that

110:00

that you know this is the supernatural

110:02

worldview and it's alive and well. Paul

110:04

uh she believes in it, right? She

110:06

believes that there that Yeah. Anna

110:09

Pelina. Oh

110:10

>> yeah. So, uh, I've heard her say that

110:12

she thinks they're interdimensional

110:13

beings also. So, in a sense, the

110:15

paternal,

110:17

>> right? Um, imagine a world, imagine how

110:22

different religion would be if the book

110:24

of Enoch was regularly taught in sun

110:27

Sunday at church that they would tell

110:30

you that story along with Moses and

110:32

along with all the other stories that

110:34

they would tell you about the book of

110:35

Enoch. And everybody in the church would

110:37

be sitting there like, "What? What are

110:39

you talking about? Who are the watchers?

110:42

Like what are they? They came down and

110:46

and lay with the daughters of man. What?

110:49

>> Yeah.

110:51

>> Like this is this was a part of an

110:53

ancient story. And the real question is

110:55

when whenever I read these biblical

110:57

stories, I'm always trying to I know

111:01

that they're writing things down. First

111:03

of all, they're writing it in ancient

111:04

Hebrew and then it's transcribed and and

111:07

translated into Latin and to Greek and

111:09

all these other languages and a lot is

111:10

lost in that translation. A lot lot gets

111:14

interpreted very weird because of just

111:16

the just the way languages are formed.

111:18

Just the way they they structure

111:21

sentences the way like a lot of the

111:23

context of it is weird. Also in ancient

111:25

Hebrew numbers double letters double as

111:29

numbers. So

111:30

>> a lot of coded stuff,

111:31

>> right? Yeah. So there's numerical value

111:33

to the words which is really weird.

111:35

>> There are churches though that do teach

111:37

that there are some religious

111:38

traditions. I agree with you that this

111:41

tradition is not well taught to

111:44

Christians or Jewish people or you know

111:47

today. But that doesn't mean that the

111:51

Christians aren't going to go out and

111:52

learn for themselves. They do. They do

111:54

learn for themselves and they actually

111:55

have communities that know about this.

111:57

So lots do.

111:58

>> Well certainly the Ethiopians.

112:00

>> Yeah. Of course. Right. Which is weird

112:03

>> that the Ethiopian Bible has that in it.

112:06

They have the book of Enoch as a part of

112:07

the Ethiopian Bible.

112:09

>> Yeah. That Well, it's one it's one of

112:10

the first Bibles. It's one of the first.

112:12

So, Ethiopian Christianity is like one

112:15

of the oldest forms of continuous

112:17

Christianity. But there's no

112:18

continuously practice.

112:19

>> No real translation of it that's

112:20

available in English,

112:22

>> right? Isn't that the case with the

112:24

Ethiopian Bible?

112:25

>> Well, let's see. Yeah, I guess you're

112:26

right. I don't actually know about that

112:28

if I mean, you can look it up. I mean,

112:31

people can look up this stuff and there

112:32

are people who write about it. Like my

112:34

field, people write about it,

112:36

>> right? Your field. But I mean, the

112:38

average Christian is not really aware of

112:40

what's in the book of Enoch.

112:42

>> Yeah, you're right. You're right. So,

112:45

that's where like a basic studies

112:47

religion class like where you know, if

112:49

you take my class, I'll make you aware

112:50

of it. I'll make you aware of the

112:52

different forms of Christianity, right?

112:54

The ones before the Roman Catholicism

112:56

and you know, the earliest forms of

112:57

Christianity. I'll also make you aware

112:59

of the supernatural world view.

113:01

>> I feel like it's all there was something

113:03

that happened there. There's real events

113:07

and

113:08

I just don't know

113:11

if the stories are accurate. I don't

113:13

know if the the written version of these

113:15

stories accurately relays the real

113:18

events that took place and what they're

113:21

trying to say, especially when in

113:24

regards to the Watchers and the Nephilim

113:27

and all that stuff and the giants.

113:30

There's just so many weird parts of

113:32

those stories that we're just supposed

113:34

to just accept.

113:36

Like, what is that? That sounds to me

113:38

like genetic engineering is what it

113:40

sounds like. It sounds like a primitive

113:43

translation of or explanation of what

113:47

genetic engineering of human beings was.

113:49

That's what it sounds like.

113:51

>> You know, that belief was still around

113:53

um after Jesus was crucified in within

113:56

the early church because Paul writes

113:58

about it in his letters.

114:00

>> What does he write about?

114:01

>> Okay. So, you know the um the tradition

114:05

of women wearing veils in church.

114:07

>> No.

114:08

>> Yeah. So if you go to a mass today like

114:11

a Catholic mass some women will be

114:12

wearing veils and if you go to a

114:14

traditionalist mass mass they will be

114:16

wearing veils and um the reason that

114:19

Paul gave was because of the angels that

114:22

were attracted to them in church. So you

114:25

have to be careful women when you go to

114:26

church the angels might be there who

114:28

might be attracted to you. He doesn't

114:29

say that specifically but that's part of

114:32

the reason why. So the early Christian

114:34

church was that they were immersed in

114:37

that worldview. That worldview was is

114:40

still around.

114:41

>> So the women wore veils so that the

114:43

watchers wouldn't find them attractive.

114:45

>> Yeah. Yeah.

114:47

>> Whoa.

114:48

>> Yeah. And some women still wear veils.

114:50

>> That's crazy.

114:52

>> So yeah, a lot of that tradition is

114:54

still here.

114:55

>> So just a residual interpretation of

114:57

whatever the original story, the

114:58

original event was.

115:00

>> That's right.

115:02

Do you think humans were genetically

115:04

engineered?

115:06

>> I'm, [laughter] you know, I'm Catholic,

115:08

right? I'm Christian. Okay. So,

115:10

>> what do you think happened?

115:12

>> I I mean, of course, my views have

115:14

changed. So, before I got into the UFO

115:16

thing, I was a, you know, I went to

115:19

Catholic church. I went to daily mass

115:21

sometimes. I was Christian. I've been

115:23

Christians since I was 11. I was raised

115:25

by secular parents. They were not

115:27

>> How did you get involved in

115:28

Christianity? I was converted through on

115:31

Easter, by the way, on Good Friday by

115:33

watching and I didn't try to watch it

115:36

was on TV. My parents had put it on and

115:37

I was 11 and I was doing Easter eggs and

115:41

they were playing uh Franco Zepharelli's

115:43

Jesus of Nazareth and I started to watch

115:46

it. Now, I didn't know that he was

115:48

crucified at the end because I was just,

115:51

you know, a kid. I wasn't raised

115:53

religious at all. And my dad came from a

115:56

Catholic family. My mother came from a

115:58

Jewish family or she's Jewish and so

116:00

they didn't practice religion. Total

116:02

rationalists. Um so I was watching it

116:05

and it was when the the scene where

116:08

where the woman the adulterous woman is

116:10

just about to be stoned to death by

116:12

these guys, right? This big group and

116:15

they're just about to throw the stones

116:16

and Jesus goes down and starts drawing

116:18

something. And I was like what the what

116:19

is he going to do? And um he basically

116:22

says, "Those of you with uh without sin,

116:25

throw the first stone." And I was like,

116:28

"Oh, that was brilliant, right?" And so

116:31

then I was hooked. I was hooked. And at

116:33

the end, he was crucified. I was

116:35

devastated. And so I told my mother, I

116:37

said, "Mom, you have to buy me a Bible.

116:39

Like, you have to." So the next day we

116:41

went out. She doesn't know what to look

116:43

for. So, we go to this store and the the

116:45

the person helped us out and they gave

116:47

us a a King James version of the Bible,

116:50

red letter. I said, "I want everything

116:52

that Jesus said. I want to know all that

116:54

he said." And I was hooked on it. And

116:56

so, I read this thing. I read the whole

116:58

thing. And at that point, I recognized I

117:01

had to grow up and I had to read the

117:03

original sources because that was hard

117:05

to read. It didn't make sense. And I was

117:07

like, "This doesn't make sense to me.

117:09

What he said was beautiful." And I was

117:10

hooked. Um, I became a Christian.

117:12

>> What didn't make sense to you? What part

117:14

of

117:14

>> the whole Bible? The whole Bible when

117:15

you start to read it from beginning to

117:17

end. You know, there are all those

117:18

things that you just don't understand.

117:20

There are two creation stories in

117:22

Genesis and you're like, well, why are

117:24

there two? And you know, there are all

117:26

those names and lineages and you're

117:27

like, what? You get to the book of

117:29

Leviticus and it has all these rules and

117:30

regulations and you're like, you just

117:32

don't understand it. And I knew that at

117:35

that point I needed to learn the

117:37

original languages and how they were put

117:38

together. That's why I decided to become

117:40

a professor of religion.

117:42

>> And so, um, I became a Christian and I

117:47

was a born again Christian. And then

117:49

when it came time to go to high school,

117:51

I asked my father, he had connections to

117:53

Catholics, if I could go to Catholic

117:55

high school. Luckily, I went to a

117:58

Sisters of Mercy high school where they

118:00

were beautiful people and I learned

118:02

Catholicism in action, like actually

118:04

helping people and stuff. And um, and I

118:07

became Catholic. And so I've been

118:09

Catholic my whole life after that. Uh

118:11

>> did your parents ever join you?

118:14

>> My dad My dad did. Yeah. He's passed

118:16

away. He died pretty young, but yeah, he

118:18

did. He he was brought back to religion

118:21

because of me.

118:22

>> Wow.

118:23

>> Yeah. Yeah. It was really pretty

118:25

intense.

118:26

But um my you know that's just how it

118:30

was. Uh but anyway, so that I became

118:32

very interested obviously you know I

118:35

thought this is super important. we have

118:37

to know about the how this happened just

118:39

like you said how do I know this really

118:41

happened and um and that's when I became

118:45

aware of the old like the Ethiopian

118:47

church the earliest texts for Christians

118:51

and the and I don't think Christian

118:54

churches do a good job of relaying this

118:57

information to Christians frankly I

119:00

think that they don't do the best job

119:02

and that they could do it better and so

119:04

I now I teach New Testament at my

119:06

university and you know I I do my best

119:09

to kind of convey what the what these

119:11

people were experiencing and and the

119:14

kinds of people still experience those

119:16

things today. So yeah, so that's how I

119:19

became uh that's how I became Christian.

119:22

>> Interesting. So

119:25

when I said do you think that human

119:27

beings were genetically engineered?

119:30

Your response was I'm Catholic.

119:34

>> Yeah. Unless you're talking about God

119:35

doing that genetic engineering.

119:37

>> So you you think that the Bible is a

119:39

absolute literal translation of real

119:42

events? So what do you think it is?

119:44

>> It's a Okay. So Catholics don't believe

119:46

in biblical literalism, which is that it

119:49

you can't because there are so many

119:51

parts of the Bible that contradict. So

119:53

you'd be, you know, that would be a

119:54

contradiction. Uh but they believe that

119:56

it is the inspired word of God written

119:59

by people, written by men. And so

120:01

there's fallibility in terms of the not

120:04

in morals and the conveying of the

120:07

spirit of Christianity,

120:08

>> right?

120:09

>> Uh but you know, so so yeah, that's what

120:12

they believe. So in terms of the genetic

120:15

engineering, do I I believe that Enoch,

120:18

the book of Enoch, it conveys the spirit

120:21

of truth. Absolutely. Do I believe that

120:23

there are um that's why I believe that

120:26

if the according listen when I started

120:29

to study UFOs I was not expecting at all

120:32

what I found and what I found reinforced

120:35

my own religion my own Catholic

120:38

upbringing or selfchosen upbringing

120:42

>> how did it reinforce it

120:44

>> okay so that's that's where I was at

120:46

actually so I was pretty secular even as

120:49

a Christian especially after I went to

120:51

graduate school. So I went to graduate

120:53

school, studied all of this stuff and

120:55

then became a professor and I believed

120:59

in the spirit of the book. I believed in

121:01

the spirit of Christianity. I believed

121:03

it's true. Therefore, I taught it to my

121:05

kids. I went to church. I'd sometimes go

121:07

to mass. You know, they have daily mass

121:09

and and Catholicism. I homeschooled my

121:12

kids in a Catholic homeschool group uh

121:14

for the most part until they needed some

121:16

outsourcing in math. And so um but it

121:20

wasn't until I became I studied UFOs

121:24

that I recognized that the book of Enoch

121:26

is alive and well today. That's what I

121:29

recognized in eupfology and I

121:32

encountered stuff that I thought looked

121:34

pretty dodgy and I was like this looks

121:37

like the pre-ternatural and I it so

121:40

that's what I'm saying. It supercharged

121:43

my Christianity to the point where I

121:46

went back and I reread all of that stuff

121:48

again. And I recognized that whatever

121:52

they're dealing with now when people are

121:54

having these experiences so forth, um

121:56

not all of them, but a good many of them

121:59

are uh you can, you know, look to me

122:03

similar in in kind. I don't say they're

122:06

identical, but they look similar. And

122:08

therefore, um, if that's the case, then,

122:11

you know, I I need to be a different

122:13

type of believer. I need to be a much

122:14

more, uh, believing believer, if that

122:17

makes

122:18

>> believe. Yeah. And if I can't be secular

122:20

about my Christianity, I actually have

122:22

to practice it, live it, be prepared for

122:25

what comes next. Kind of that lifestyle.

122:28

>> That's what that's the kind of

122:29

lifestyle. Is it in any way frustrating

122:32

that you have studied so much of these

122:35

encounters and these experiences but you

122:38

don't have a personal encounter or a

122:40

personal experience with these things?

122:43

>> Uh well that's an assumption that you

122:45

have

122:45

>> that you don't have one.

122:47

>> Yeah.

122:47

>> Do you have one?

122:48

>> Well maybe I'm I don't feel comfortable

122:51

talking about it but yeah I have some

122:52

experiences. But

122:54

>> why don't you feel comfortable talking

122:55

about it? You re This is part of what

122:57

you do for a living. you you talk about

123:00

other people's encounters. Why would you

123:02

not feel comfortable talking about your

123:04

encounters?

123:05

>> Um well because that is um I mean I'm

123:10

not sure what to think of them. That's

123:12

why I listen this is not what motivated

123:15

me to study euphology or those kinds of

123:17

things. When I think about the

123:19

>> Did you have these encounters before you

123:21

studied eupfology?

123:22

>> When I look back I say yes I had those

123:25

encounters. Yeah.

123:26

>> When did you first have an encounter? I

123:28

didn't interpret them as UFOs though.

123:31

Well, my I did have a family member who

123:33

had an experience with what looks like a

123:36

UFO and it was documented. I actually

123:39

found a documentation of it from the

123:40

time in a newspaper. Other people had

123:42

seen it too. So, I live in a place that

123:45

is called that has UFOs. So, I grew up

123:48

uh near Folsam Lake and that's there are

123:51

lots of UFOs around that area. And so he

123:54

had a this is of course a long time ago

123:57

when we he was not interested in UFOs. I

124:00

wasn't and he was he was young riding

124:02

his bike up a hill and he saw it and um

124:07

and it kind of it was a classic UFO

124:09

thing. Turned around, looked at him and

124:12

he was like, "What?" And sped down the

124:14

hill screaming. Uh came into the

124:18

driveway. My parents went out there.

124:19

Now, my parents complete rationalists

124:22

and they see it too and they uh they saw

124:26

it and it just kind of like hovered and

124:29

it was like a giant orb, orange orb and

124:32

it hovered for a while and then it just

124:34

went up in the sky and disappeared. And

124:36

so they had this. This is before I went

124:39

to college. Every it was a very long

124:41

time ago. And um and then later when I

124:44

started to study this uh I I had family

124:46

members tell me, "Yeah, remember that."

124:48

And I was like, "Yeah, yeah, tell me

124:50

about that." And so they reiterated that

124:52

this is what happened. And they wanted

124:54

to kind of get it on the record. And

124:56

then um one of them found the

124:58

documentation of a newspaper at the time

125:00

and sent it to me. So I have that data.

125:02

So there's been that. But that's kind of

125:04

a normal thing. Like people have those

125:06

experiences and you know they nothing

125:10

changes.

125:10

>> But you said that you had experiences

125:11

that you're not necessarily comfortable

125:14

talking about.

125:14

>> I wouldn't I didn't have a UFO

125:16

experience. Like I haven't had like UFO

125:18

experiences like that.

125:20

>> What have you had?

125:21

>> Well, I have the very normal experience

125:24

of a person who is a believing

125:26

Christian. And if you have if you're

125:29

that kind of person, you will have

125:31

experiences where you feel like this is,

125:34

you know, there's there's more to life

125:36

than kind of what you're taught at

125:38

school. So that's the kind of experience

125:41

I'm talking about. Uh people in the book

125:43

of Acts,

125:43

>> can you elaborate like what do you mean

125:45

by that? Yeah.

125:46

>> What what experiences have you had that

125:47

made you feel that way?

125:49

>> Oh, I've had lifelong experiences like

125:51

that that

125:51

>> like what? Well, just that certain

125:53

things happen at the right time at the

125:56

right moment. And you know, I mean, lots

125:58

of people have these experiences. If you

125:59

read about uh Mel Gibson doing his

126:03

movies, you know, the um Passion of the

126:05

Christ, he talks about very powerful

126:08

things that happened on the set. So

126:10

things like this, things that you you

126:13

know that they're not probable like Jim

126:16

Cavisel being hit by lightning when he's

126:19

on the cross and you know things like

126:21

that that happen. Uh that's you're like

126:24

wow. Okay. I mean you could say that's a

126:26

coincidence and you know you can look at

126:27

it from that perspective but uh

126:32

it's all outlined in the book of Acts in

126:34

the New Testament. If you read that

126:36

book, it talks about these very these

126:39

very uh significant experiences to the

126:42

people. But the reason I don't talk

126:44

about them is because if you talk about

126:46

them to people who don't have those

126:48

experiences, they will just say, "Well,

126:50

that's just a coincidence or that's

126:51

that." So you're like, "Yeah, that's one

126:53

way to look at it." So you can't convey

126:55

it's like a it's a question of just

126:58

qualia. It's a it's a question of your

127:01

own perception of it,

127:03

>> right? But as an educator, don't you

127:05

think perhaps if you have had these

127:07

experiences, you have a responsibility

127:09

to try to relay that information to

127:11

people?

127:11

>> No. No. No. Because I'm I teach

127:14

religious studies. So in religious

127:16

studies, you'll see this this in my

127:17

book, too. Uh you're teaching about the

127:21

actual book, the the cont social

127:24

context, the historical context. You're

127:27

not actually advocating for a belief

127:30

system,

127:31

>> but but relaying your personal

127:33

experiences is not advocating for a

127:35

belief system.

127:36

>> It would be. It would be.

127:38

>> Um

127:40

because

127:41

>> isn't it a belief? Isn't an experience

127:44

open to interpretation?

127:46

>> An experience.

127:47

>> So, how would you be relaying your

127:48

belief systems by having an experience

127:51

that you detail in an honest way that's

127:53

open to interpretation? I would do that

127:55

if I was in a a a situation where that

127:59

kind of experience was helpful to

128:01

people. I and I have done that before.

128:04

Like I've been on podcasts where um you

128:07

know where they would say they're

128:08

Christians and you know we're talking

128:10

about Christian life and so forth and I

128:12

would explain my experiences and we

128:15

would talk about that and people would

128:17

you know they would talk about their

128:18

experiences. But when you're at a

128:19

secular university that's not what you

128:22

do. You don't do that. When I'm writing

128:24

as a scholar of religion, you're not

128:27

that's not what it's about. It's not

128:29

about whether or not these experiences

128:31

are real. What it is about is about

128:36

how this is shaping culture. Now,

128:39

>> what I meant when I asked you that

128:41

question, I'm talking about UFO

128:43

abductions, encountering beings and

128:46

entities.

128:47

>> That's what I'm talking about. I'm like,

128:49

have you had one of those experiences? I

128:51

have not. Don't you wish he did?

128:54

>> Um, no. It doesn't look like I wish that

128:58

I did. When I look at what happens to

128:59

people who have had abductions and these

129:01

experiences, um, it looks traumatic,

129:05

Joe. I don't No, I don't want that.

129:08

>> Interesting.

129:09

>> Like, life is already traumatic enough,

129:11

you know? [sighs]

129:12

>> Right. I get what you're saying. Um,

129:15

when you hear about people that uh

129:18

supposedly

129:20

they they have this uh ritualistic

129:22

practice where they manifest orbs and

129:26

they they meditate and

129:28

>> psionics.

129:29

>> What do you think that is?

129:31

>> Yeah. So, I do believe that they're

129:33

doing something.

129:34

>> A friend of mine did it recently and

129:36

she's she's very rational. Okay.

129:38

>> She's a very rational person, very

129:41

intelligent person and she wants me to

129:43

do it with her. She's like, "You got to

129:44

come and try this out." And like, we

129:46

were trying to set a date where she's

129:48

like, "I'll explain to you how I did it

129:50

and how you do it." I was like, "All

129:52

right, I believe you." Like, I've been

129:55

friends with her for decades. She's

129:56

super rational, very normal person, very

130:00

intelligent, not crazy in any way,

130:02

shape, or form. And she's like, "This

130:04

gonna sound nuts, but if you do

130:07

this, and if you do it and you give it

130:09

enough time, they will show up."

130:11

>> Is this with like Steven Greer? or is it

130:13

like C5 with him?

130:15

>> She doesn't do She's She's not in any

130:17

way associated with that guy, but

130:19

>> she was taught how to do it by someone

130:22

else.

130:22

>> And she said she went on some

130:25

thing where they they all did it

130:26

together. Yeah.

130:27

>> And and then she's done it privately

130:29

alone and she said you could do it.

130:32

>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

130:34

>> She's gonna she said it's going to sound

130:35

insane, but it's real.

130:40

>> Okay.

130:41

>> What do you think about that?

130:43

All right. Well, I believe that it

130:44

happens.

130:45

>> What do you think is happening?

130:48

>> I'm not sure what's happening, but I

130:51

don't think I would do it.

130:52

>> Why not?

130:53

>> Because I I believe in cognitive

130:55

sovereignty. Like I believe that we

130:57

should be sovereign like our, you know,

130:59

not have something

131:01

>> interacting with us.

131:02

>> Yeah. Beyond mentally and spiritually

131:04

>> and you know, so yeah, that's why I

131:07

wouldn't do it.

131:08

>> But is does it take away your

131:09

sovereignty to communicate with

131:10

something else?

131:12

Yeah, a lot of times it does. So, one of

131:15

the things that I noticed when I started

131:17

to talk to people, and I don't want to

131:18

like, you know, tell you not to do it,

131:20

but

131:21

>> I'm going to do it,

131:21

>> but Okay.

131:22

>> You're not going to talk me out of it.

131:23

>> All right. [laughter] All right. I

131:25

wouldn't do it.

131:27

Um, [clears throat]

131:28

yeah. So, one of the things I noticed

131:30

was a lot of people in the beginning

131:32

when I was doing this research would and

131:33

still today would say, "Diana, you can

131:36

contact these beings, okay? And this is

131:38

how you do it and you have to give them

131:40

permission." And I was like, "What are

131:42

you talking about? That

131:42

>> sounds like vampire shit."

131:43

>> Yeah, that's right. I'm like, "I'm not

131:45

going to let the vampire in."

131:46

>> Yeah. Yeah. You have to give them

131:48

permission. Yeah. And And that's

131:50

>> Isn't that weird? I wonder if that's

131:51

where that comes from.

131:52

>> All right. Well, that's what I'm telling

131:54

you that you should

131:55

>> The vampire lore is that you have to

131:57

invite them in.

131:57

>> That's right. But that's the demonic

131:59

lore, too.

132:00

>> Really? You have to invite them in.

132:02

>> So, I mean, if you're going to do that,

132:04

that's you're inviting them in.

132:05

>> Oh, boy.

132:06

>> So,

132:07

>> now I'm secondg guessing it. [laughter]

132:09

I'm just saying uh there's

132:10

>> Jamie, would you do it?

132:12

>> I mean, I almost tried. I think I think

132:15

I try [laughter] daily, but like just in

132:17

my own head.

132:20

>> What do you think about people that have

132:22

psychedelic experiences where they

132:23

encounter entities?

132:25

>> I think they're encountering entities.

132:27

Yeah. So, I think psychedelics is the

132:30

quick way to open up that spiritual part

132:33

of your brain, but it's a dangerous way.

132:35

Well, look, okay, I'm not I don't want

132:38

to go down this. I've I've been on I've

132:40

gone down this road before, but um

132:42

>> what's wrong with the road? Why don't

132:44

you like to go down that road?

132:47

>> Oh, because I guess um

132:51

there's there's part of your brain

132:53

actually we talked about this last time

132:55

I was on here. We talked about the

132:56

spiritual sense, remember? We talked

132:58

about the pineal gland and stuff like

132:59

that. Okay. So, I've learned a lot about

133:01

it since then. All right. And what I I

133:05

it's a real thing. Okay. And the again

133:07

the Christian churches don't do a good

133:09

job of conveying that this is really

133:11

important for Christians to know about

133:13

and not just Christians but religious

133:15

people all over the world. This is what

133:17

they're doing when they're doing those

133:18

protocols of religion. They're trying to

133:20

cultivate the spiritual sense. Why?

133:23

Because the human being is oriented

133:25

toward the sacred. Like we're we're a

133:28

very specific type of thing. We're

133:30

oriented toward the sacred. The

133:32

spiritual sense is what helps us connect

133:34

to it. We could, you know, utilize the

133:36

spiritual sense through certain things,

133:37

fasting, um, living a certain way, you

133:40

know, and that sort of thing. It's

133:42

really important, by the way. And, um,

133:47

digital culture like is messing with

133:49

that, by the way, the spiritual sense.

133:51

Okay. So, psychedelics are one way to

133:55

like hijack into it and, you know, open

133:58

up that world. Uh, so it's a quick way,

134:01

but it's it's I wouldn't call it the

134:04

ideal way. Although in some religions

134:07

like the Church of Native Americans,

134:09

that's their way of doing it. That's

134:12

their way of doing it. All right. And

134:13

they have rituals to do it with, you

134:15

know, it's sacred. Um,

134:18

yeah. So to do it casually and without,

134:22

you know, without attention is probably

134:27

might be dangerous. I've done I've

134:30

utilized mushrooms when I was young. Um

134:33

>> I like that word

134:34

>> utilized.

134:35

>> Yeah. [laughter]

134:37

>> You know, when I did it though, like I

134:38

was really young.

134:39

>> Very official.

134:40

>> I was I was very young and uh I prayed

134:43

before I did it, my friend and I, and we

134:45

had a really, you know, good experience

134:47

and so forth. But I think I was just

134:49

lucky. Okay. I think I was lucky.

134:51

>> Why do you think that?

134:52

>> Because I've had friends who've had

134:54

really terrible experiences,

134:56

>> right? And so I think that it's best

134:58

just not to unless you're like born into

135:01

that culture that does that and that's

135:03

part of your religion.

135:04

>> One of the things that seems to be the

135:06

case in a lot of the people that have

135:08

had um these bad experiences is that

135:12

they try to fight it and that they they

135:14

try to battle with the experience. They

135:17

try to take control of it. The ego gets

135:19

in the way. they they want to regain

135:22

some sort of a control over their

135:24

consciousness and and they fight with it

135:26

and they have bad trips. You know,

135:29

there's moments when you do psychedelics

135:31

where you realize I just got to let it

135:32

go. I just got to realize that I'm not

135:34

in control of this at all and just let

135:36

it go. And some people can let it go and

135:39

some people can't. I've seen people

135:42

struggle with it. I've seen people that

135:44

can't let it go and they fight with it

135:45

and they have really bad trips and it's

135:47

very scary to watch. Mhm.

135:48

>> But I think that's the root of it. I

135:51

think the root of it is you're battling

135:53

with something that you can't beat.

135:56

>> You just have to just let go.

135:58

>> Mhm.

135:58

>> And just take it in. Here we go.

136:03

Just go on the ride. And some people

136:05

can't go on the ride like no. And

136:06

they're grabbing the walls and they're

136:07

grabbing vines and they're trying to

136:09

stop their progression. They don't want

136:11

to do it. Like it's too scary for them.

136:13

They don't want to let go. They don't

136:14

want to they don't want to erode their

136:16

belief system. They don't want to expand

136:19

their view of the world. They're just

136:20

too, it's too scary. They have a problem

136:24

with fear. They have a problem with the

136:26

unknown. They have a problem with having

136:28

this very isolated view of reality and

136:31

having that shattered in front of them.

136:33

And they they don't feel comfortable

136:36

with that. And they they try to they try

136:39

to resist it.

136:43

I think that's what's going on.

136:46

You have to understand like what it is

136:48

and you have to understand that you're

136:49

not in control and you got to let it go.

136:53

You got to go for the ride.

136:56

But that's also me saying that and my

136:58

psyche is very different than another

137:00

person's psyche and theirs is different

137:01

than yours. And everyone everyone's

137:03

different. Everyone has different

137:04

>> experiences, different psychological

137:06

vulnerabilities, different you know.

137:09

>> Right. Yeah. Yeah.

137:11

>> Yeah.

137:12

Um, we were talking before the podcast

137:15

about the Shroud of Turan.

137:16

>> Oh, yeah.

137:17

>> Yeah. And you were

137:18

>> And we, by the way, we brought that up

137:19

last time I was here and that happened

137:21

by accident, remember?

137:23

>> Yes.

137:24

>> Yeah. Yeah. So, a lot of people have

137:26

been talking about that since we talked

137:28

about it.

137:28

>> Yeah. Um, you were saying something

137:30

though that the piece that they used for

137:35

um, carbon dating that this was a piece

137:38

that had been repaired, but I saw

137:40

there's a lot of dispute about that

137:41

online

137:43

>> and it could be. Yeah.

137:44

>> Yeah. A lot of people say that that is

137:46

just some sort of apologetic excuse for

137:49

why the numbers don't match up

137:51

correctly. But then I've also seen

137:54

things that say that the pollen that is

137:56

on that the fibers matches up with the

138:01

the exact kind of plants that existed in

138:04

Jerusalem 2,000 years ago and that that

138:07

all aligns and that further testing

138:10

needs to be done to determine the actual

138:12

date of it. That aside, there's still no

138:17

explanation for why that image exists

138:22

and how it was created.

138:23

>> Yeah.

138:24

>> And um I've never seen anyone explain in

138:27

any way that makes any sense how that

138:29

could have been forged by someone how it

138:32

could been a forgery from someone that

138:35

long ago that they could figure it out.

138:37

Also, they could make it a a a reverse

138:41

negative image. So the only way you see

138:43

it is through when you look at it in a

138:45

negative.

138:45

>> Yeah, I know. It's pretty crazy. Yeah,

138:47

>> that doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

138:49

>> Yeah. Yeah.

138:50

>> Whatever it is is it's really weird.

138:53

>> It is totally weird. And there are

138:56

people who there is a guy who's a a

138:59

doctor of like blood, a hematologist,

139:02

and he's he seems to have no he he's not

139:05

religious um or he's not like you know

139:08

uh out there advocating for religion.

139:10

and he just happened to study it. Um he

139:13

studied the blood and again he was like

139:17

and the the uh injuries, you know,

139:20

because he can study the injuries and

139:22

identify and they match up. And I mean,

139:26

I'm not an expert on the shroud, but

139:28

believe me, every expert that's out

139:30

there since I was on your podcast a few

139:32

years ago have they've reached out to me

139:34

and they're like, "Tell Joe to get me on

139:36

and so forth." And um

139:38

>> do you know someone that's a real good

139:40

credible expert?

139:41

>> Yeah, I know someone. Well, that man I

139:43

think has a good video out there. Check

139:45

him out. Um I don't know his name, but

139:47

he's I mean you should be able to find

139:49

if you uh do a search. Yeah,

139:51

>> this would be him.

139:52

>> Uh

139:53

>> new study claims blood stains in the

139:55

shroud of turn consistent with torture

139:57

of Christ.

139:58

>> That's not He doesn't have an Italian

140:00

name, the one I know, but I mean that

140:02

could be too. I mean he could be out

140:04

there doing that. um the guy that that

140:08

we found. I can send you the link, but

140:10

he's he's an American guy and he's just,

140:13

you know, he doesn't have a fancy video

140:15

or anything like that. It's

140:16

[clears throat] just But there's another

140:18

guy who's Catholic called um his name is

140:20

Father Dalton and he's this is his

140:22

expertise. He knows about this now. He's

140:24

theological

140:25

>> but he actually does have studies and so

140:27

forth.

140:28

>> And what is what is unique about his

140:31

perspective? So his perspective is that

140:34

first you have to understand the

140:35

Catholic Church is very careful about

140:38

what they put their you know what they

140:41

say is true and not true. It takes them

140:42

forever to say something is a miracle.

140:45

And often when they identify something

140:47

as being miraculous they have a huge uh

140:51

team of people often [snorts] who are

140:54

the best at what they do. They and they

140:56

might not be Catholic. Okay? They could

140:58

be atheist and so forth. So this was

141:01

studied at Duke University, the Shroud

141:02

of Trin in the 1980s and I happened to

141:05

know a priest who was a graduate student

141:07

there in PhD program and he witnessed

141:10

the whole study. Um so father Dalton

141:14

would be a person who is Catholic

141:17

obviously he is a priest. However, he is

141:20

not going to say, you know, he's going

141:22

to give you the facts about each of the

141:24

studies and he's going to talk

141:26

specifically about uh what we don't know

141:29

what we don't know about it. What you

141:30

know, might be as a Catholic, you have

141:33

to say this is not we don't know about

141:34

that. Like, yeah, you're right. It could

141:36

be this or that. Same thing with the

141:38

Guadalupe tilma, right? So, you know, a

141:41

lot of people say it was created by God

141:43

and you know, put on this, you know,

141:44

about that, right? So the the Guadalupe

141:48

image of the Virgin of Guadalupe in

141:50

Mexico City that was miraculous said to

141:52

be miraculously put well there are some

141:55

you know things that have been added

141:57

later. So I think the shroud is like

141:59

that also. Um but there and there's been

142:03

a lot of studies by

142:04

>> what's so interesting about this

142:06

Guadalupe thing.

142:07

>> So this is a um this is a tilma which is

142:11

a a cloak. It's from this is from the

142:14

1500s. So this is the an image that

142:20

allegedly according to devotional

142:22

Catholicism this image was imparted onto

142:26

this cloak uh and the cloak was was uh

142:29

worn by a guy by the way I think I'm not

142:32

sure but uh you know Mel Gibson's icon

142:36

like he I think that might be the part

142:38

of this. I'm not entirely sure. But so

142:41

here you have something that is

142:47

unexplainable. Uh part of it is

142:49

explainable because after the image was

142:51

put on, people had painted over it like

142:54

I don't know a hundred years later and

142:56

subsequently you know just to upkeep it.

142:59

The I think the angel was added a couple

143:01

things were added later. Uh but it's

143:04

it's it's not as anomalous as the shroud

143:08

of term explained as well. Okay. What is

143:11

unexplainable about this painting?

143:13

>> Okay. So this appears to be a painting

143:16

but underneath there's an image and the

143:18

image is uh is the Virgin Mary herself

143:23

without her cloak without the angel and

143:26

without the sun around her. And this

143:29

image is allegedly had been put on this

143:34

guy's cloak um Juan Diego's cloak in the

143:38

1500s. So he was he had a she wanted a

143:43

basilica which by the way she's in right

143:45

now and that's what she asked for. The

143:49

bishop at the time said I don't believe

143:51

you Juan Diego. Uh you have to show me

143:54

proof. So he went back to the place

143:58

where he had seen her and she said, "Go

144:01

up and get a bunch of flowers and put

144:03

them in this cloak of yours and then

144:05

bring them to the bishop. You know,

144:07

they're out of season. They don't grow

144:08

in Mexico." So he did. He went he got

144:12

the flowers. He went back to the bishop

144:15

in Mexico City and he gave them to him.

144:18

And when they opened it up, there was an

144:20

image of the Virgin Mary on the cloak.

144:22

And that's where that's this is what

144:24

that's supposed to be.

144:27

>> I still don't understand why that's

144:28

unique. It's just a a painting.

144:30

>> No, no one painted. It just showed up.

144:32

It was just there.

144:33

>> Okay. Well, what's it made out of? Like

144:35

what is what is the ink? What is what is

144:38

the dye?

144:38

>> Yeah. So, okay. So, all right. So, this

144:40

is where it it gets complicated. Um, so

144:43

the original cloak is agave material.

144:47

It's made out of like um, you know,

144:49

agave.

144:50

>> Agave [clears throat] plant.

144:51

>> Yeah. And the original image appears to

144:54

be the agave plant fibers. Somehow the

144:59

image was from the fibers. It's not

145:01

paint. There's no drawing.

145:03

>> These colors.

145:05

>> Okay. So the colors of the cloak around

145:08

her that's later in a later edition.

145:13

>> Okay. How do we know that?

145:16

>> Uh art historians have looked at it.

145:18

like people who do they use infrared

145:21

photography and they're able to identify

145:24

uh the layers of it

145:25

>> so that the image existed originally and

145:27

then people painted over the image.

145:29

>> Well, they painted around it. They kind

145:31

of embellished it.

145:32

>> So, where can we see the original?

145:35

>> I'm looking I mean it's hard to get that

145:37

picture because time

145:38

>> that to me is not as interesting is the

145:41

shot of Turin.

145:42

>> Yeah. Yeah. I agree. They're both really

145:44

>> also it's painted over already. It's

145:46

like it's already been sort of

145:47

bastardized. Yeah,

145:50

>> that's the shroud of Tur is just weird

145:52

because it's not ink.

145:53

>> Yeah.

145:54

>> It's not dye. It It seems to be some

145:57

sort of like like it's burned in somehow

146:00

or another.

146:01

>> Yeah.

146:01

>> Right.

146:02

>> Yeah. So, if you got someone on here to

146:04

talk about it, I would either get Father

146:06

Dalton or I would get that doctor.

146:08

>> I would want someone to dismiss it as

146:10

well. I would want two people to talk

146:12

about.

146:12

>> Yeah. Yeah. I think that would be a

146:14

great I'd love to see it

146:15

>> because uh what you're saying about the

146:18

parts of the fabric that had been

146:20

repaired and that's what they had did

146:21

the radiocarbon dating on. I've heard

146:23

that disputed online.

146:25

>> Okay.

146:26

>> Yeah. But that would be a thing that you

146:28

would say if you wanted to really

146:31

believe that it was more than 2,000

146:32

years old. You would say, "Oh, no, no,

146:35

no. They got the wrong piece."

146:37

>> Yeah.

146:38

>> And also, why was it repaired? Like, why

146:40

would someone repair it? Well, because

146:42

it's it's a it's a devotional cloth for

146:44

the Catholic Church. So, they're going

146:46

to keep it, you know,

146:48

>> by adding more cloth to it.

146:50

>> Yeah. Because it'll, you know,

146:51

disintegrate or whatnot. I mean, it's

146:53

been making the rounds for a long time,

146:55

>> right?

146:58

>> Yeah.

147:00

Uh I don't know.

147:01

>> Yeah. It says it was found in 1350 and

147:04

they don't know how it got to where it

147:05

was.

147:06

>> And don't don't they Yeah, that's right.

147:08

And don't don't they say that that

147:10

that's the when they do the radiocarbon

147:13

dating it goes back to around that area.

147:16

I think it goes to like the 1200s.

147:20

That's what they think it came from.

147:22

That's where it originated.

147:23

>> Yeah. So even if it did, it's still

147:26

anomalous. It's still weird.

147:27

>> Yeah, it's definitely weird. It's weird

147:29

in the sense that it wasn't painted.

147:31

It's not dye. That it seems to have been

147:34

created by energy.

147:37

What is the uh conventional description

147:40

for how it was made? Let's see that.

147:43

Let's see what it says.

147:45

What's the conventional description?

148:01

>> Let's see how is it made. Rectangular

148:05

linen cross 4.4 meters long, 1.1 meters

148:08

wide, bearing the faint

148:11

front and back image of a bearded

148:13

crucified man. Conventional description

148:16

how it was made as a physical object.

148:18

Material handwoven woven linen made from

148:21

flax fibers weave thread side strip.

148:25

Okay, but what about the image? Okay, a

148:27

faint sepia.

148:29

>> Is that how you say that word? Sepia.

148:31

>> Sepia. Straw yellow image shows a man

148:33

with wounds consistent with crucifi

148:35

crucification crucifixion rather um side

148:40

wound wounds at the wrist and feet

148:42

puncture marks around the scalp.

148:43

Conventional skeptical mainstream

148:45

explanation for how the image was

148:47

produced falls into a few camps.

148:49

Medieval painting pigmentation or

148:51

pigment application.

148:54

Uhuh. Reported finding red ochre and

148:57

vermilion pigments in a gelatin gelatin

149:01

collagen tempera binder concluding it

149:04

was painted in the 14th century. This

149:07

remains the dominant skeptical

149:08

explanation. Rubbing or uh boss relief

149:13

transfer technique. Researchers like

149:15

Joel Nickel have reproduced shroudlike

149:18

images by rubbing dry pigment iron oxide

149:20

over a cloth laid on the boss relief

149:22

sculpture

149:24

producing the same negative image

149:26

surface only characteristic acid scorch

149:30

or chemical staining technique

149:32

dating 1988 radiocarbon test performed

149:36

independently by labs at Oxford Arizona

149:39

and Zurich dated the flax to 1260 to

149:42

1390 CE with a 95% confidence squarely

149:47

in the medieval period. Consistent with

149:48

its documented appearance in Liry around

149:52

1355. Under the conventional view, this

149:54

dating settles the question, it's a

149:57

medieval artifact artifact likely

149:59

produced as a devotational

150:03

or uh pilgrimage object during the

150:05

period when relic veneration was a

150:08

booming industry.

150:13

Okay. So, what they're saying is it's

150:15

made with pigment, but I thought it

150:17

wasn't made with pigment.

150:20

>> Yeah. And also that there are blood

150:22

stains on it.

150:23

>> Actual blood.

150:24

>> Well, that's what it's supposed to be,

150:27

[laughter]

150:28

>> right? But is any that's what it's

150:30

supposed to be. But has anybody ever

150:31

done a study a

150:34

any kind of tests on that? The blood

150:37

stains are real human blood applied

150:39

before the image was formed. This is

150:40

what propos

150:43

all the above, arguing the C4 sample

150:45

came from an evil repair patch. That no

150:48

reproduction fully matches the images

150:50

properties uh superficially of the 200

150:54

nanometer 3D encoded distance

150:57

information, no brush strokes, and that

150:59

the blood stains are real human blood

151:01

applied before the image formed. But the

151:04

mainstream conventional description

151:05

remains 14th century linen cloth with

151:08

hand produced image made in France as a

151:10

religious artifact.

151:16

>> Yeah. Yeah.

151:17

>> The thing is people want to believe that

151:19

it's the shroud that Jesus was buried

151:21

in. Right.

151:22

>> Well, people do want to believe it, but

151:24

I don't I didn't necessarily want to

151:26

believe it. Like I've had I used to not

151:28

believe it.

151:29

>> Do you believe it now?

151:30

>> Definitely. Yeah.

151:31

>> Why definitely? um because of the the

151:35

information by the blood doctor guy

151:37

which I'm I hate to keep calling him

151:39

that. I wish I knew who what his name

151:41

was and also my friend who was at the

151:43

Shroud analysis at Duke University and

151:47

uh also like what Father Dalton talks

151:50

about you know I mean the thing is is

151:53

that it looks pretty weird and

151:55

>> it's definitely weird.

151:56

>> Yeah. Yeah. So yeah, so I believe it,

151:58

but I'm not like I can't prove that and

152:01

I'm not going to. That's why I do

152:02

religious studies, by the way. I'm not a

152:03

theologian. I can't say yes, you must

152:05

believe this. I don't know. I I believe

152:08

it. That's what I can say.

152:09

>> Dr. John Campbell.

152:10

>> Yeah, I think

152:11

>> three million subscribers on YouTube.

152:12

>> Yeah. Yeah, that's him. Yeah, that's

152:13

him.

152:14

>> Okay. But why do you I still understand

152:16

why do you believe if it turns out that

152:18

these people are all saying the truth

152:20

that it was made with it would die?

152:24

>> Yeah. Yeah, of course. Then I'll just

152:27

change my perception because I have new

152:29

data. I will change my theory. Like

152:32

right now I believe it's the truth.

152:33

>> But that data does exist that it's made

152:35

with dye.

152:37

>> Okay. So there dye could have put on

152:40

been put on it. I believe that there is

152:43

a

152:43

>> an image on it. There is an image on it.

152:47

How did that image get there? That

152:49

image. So this is the kind of thing that

152:51

things could have been done with it. It

152:52

was repaired. It was, you know, it went

152:55

through many hands. I mean, I am a

152:57

person who knows about Catholic relics.

152:59

I know what happens to them. So, these

153:02

are things that would be normal in the

153:04

life of a relic that they would be

153:06

handled sometimes with care, sometimes

153:08

with not not with care. Um, so yeah,

153:11

that's my belief, Joe. Like if I get,

153:14

you know, analysis from somebody like

153:17

Gary Nolan and he does this like, you

153:19

know, microscopic analysis of everything

153:22

and says, "No, Diana, sorry. This is

153:24

not, you know, I'll be Oh, that's too

153:26

bad. I really enjoyed having that belief

153:29

for 10 years."

153:30

>> But it seems like if the radiocarbon

153:31

dating was from 1988, like, shouldn't we

153:34

do some sort of an updated analysis of

153:36

what this thing is?

153:37

>> Yeah, that's right.

153:38

>> To settle it.

153:40

>> Totally. Yeah, I'm all for that.

153:42

>> Ask a question. Where is it now?

153:44

>> Where does it live? Is [laughter] it

153:46

like

153:47

>> I think it's I think honestly I think

153:49

it's in Tin, but I could be wrong. Yeah.

153:51

Yeah. In Italy.

153:52

>> Oh, wow.

153:53

>> Yeah, I could be wrong though. But I

153:55

think it is.

153:56

>> Can you look at it? You can go there and

153:58

look at it.

153:58

>> Yeah, I think you can.

153:59

>> Yep.

154:00

>> It's in the Cathe Cathedral of St. John

154:03

the Baptist in Turan, Italy. It's been

154:04

housed there since 1578. Okay. That's

154:07

where it's always been.

154:08

>> Amazing. No one's trying to steal it.

154:12

Don't say that.

154:14

>> Why? [laughter]

154:17

>> Well, I mean,

154:18

>> would they have ever made a fake to hide

154:19

the real one? And that's like maybe

154:21

we're testing the fake one.

154:23

I don't know. Got special powers or

154:25

something if you put it on.

154:26

>> Plot thickens.

154:29

>> Um, anything else should we talk about

154:31

before we wrap this up? Is there

154:33

anything else we didn't cover?

154:35

>> No. You have a you have an alien image

154:38

up here and he has horns. Looks like a

154:40

demon.

154:41

>> Yeah, that's the mothership logo. Comedy

154:44

mothership.

154:44

>> Oh, yeah. Okay.

154:45

>> Yeah.

154:46

>> Just saying. [snorts]

154:48

>> I know. There's no real significance to

154:51

it, though. It's just fun.

154:52

>> Yeah, of course. Of course.

154:54

>> Allegedly.

154:57

I see you did notice that though. It is

155:00

weird. I get it. Especially after we're

155:02

talking. I should have showed that to

155:03

JD. I'm like, you think that's

155:06

>> Oh, yeah. Yeah. He may have noticed it

155:08

and chose not to say anything.

155:09

>> I don't think he did.

155:11

>> Okay.

155:11

>> I think he probably would have brought

155:12

it up.

155:15

>> So, nothing nothing else to Is there

155:17

anything else you wanted to talk about

155:18

before we wrap this up?

155:19

>> I just published a book. It came out

155:21

yesterday called The Others.

155:22

>> And what is it about?

155:24

>> Uh, it's about stuff we've been talking

155:26

about, but it's also about religion and

155:28

about the spiritual sense and things

155:30

like that and AI. So, it has a uh it has

155:33

a a theory of ET if if you know we're

155:38

talking about ET. It has a theory of ET

155:40

in it

155:41

>> and a couple other things. So, yeah.

155:44

>> Uh what is your theory of ET?

155:46

>> Well, I'm I'm uh rehousing some theory.

155:49

So, I'm like the theory of uh advanced

155:53

technology

155:54

being what people are encountering when

155:57

they're encountering what they consider

155:59

to be aliens and ET. We talked a little

156:02

bit about this last time. It was

156:03

something that I was thinking of it uh

156:05

and I just uh rehashed it. So, it's it's

156:08

there in the book in a more developed

156:10

form. Uh, if I were to just do an

156:13

elevator description of it though, uh, I

156:16

would say that Stephen Spielberg's film

156:18

AI is a really good film about ET and

156:23

what he thinks, you know, if ET were I

156:26

know he's just done disclosure day, but

156:28

a but his movie AI seems like

156:30

>> when was that movie?

156:31

>> It was a long time ago, but it's really

156:34

good if you rewatch it today. Um, at the

156:38

end I'm not going to do well people

156:41

should have seen it already, right? At

156:42

the end there are the are uh aliens and

156:45

they're basically humans have long since

156:48

gone and their technology their AI has

156:52

improved itself to the point where it's

156:54

a life form and so that would be like

156:57

the theory of

156:58

>> I think that's probably

157:00

>> Oh wow. Hill Josnut rap science.

157:03

>> I kind of remember this

157:05

>> law.

157:06

>> It's about AI, but at the end it ends up

157:09

being kind of like a uh a theory of of

157:12

ET.

157:15

>> Yeah. Which I kind of have a feeling

157:17

that life eventually stops being

157:20

biological and becomes digital and maybe

157:22

that's what people are encountering.

157:24

>> Yeah, that's what the the others is. It

157:27

has a chapter or two chapters about

157:29

that. Yeah. All right. Well, Diana, it's

157:33

always fascinating talking to you. I

157:35

really enjoyed it. Thank you very much.

157:37

>> Uh, did you do the audio book or did you

157:38

have an actor do it?

157:40

>> No, I did it.

157:40

>> Thank you.

157:42

>> It's always better. It really is. It's

157:44

always better when an an author actually

157:46

does the audio book. There it is. The

157:48

others UFO AI and the secret forces

157:52

guiding human destiny.

157:56

And I really loved your other book too,

157:57

American Cosmic.

157:58

>> Oh, thank you. Thank you. Appreciate

158:00

that. All right. Thank you so much.

158:01

>> Thank you. Thank you for being here.

158:02

Let's do it again sometime next time.

158:03

You got another book.

158:04

>> Okay.

158:04

>> I'm sure you're going to keep writing.

158:06

>> All right.

158:06

>> Next time. Yeah. About [music]

158:08

Christianity probably.

158:09

>> Okay. Cool. We'll do it. All right.

158:11

Thank you. Bye, everybody.

158:17

[music]

Interactive Summary

In this episode of the Joe Rogan Experience, Joe Rogan speaks with Professor Diana Pasulka about the intersection of UFO phenomena, religion, and technology. They discuss the credibility of figures like Travis Walton and Bob Lazar, exploring the historical continuity of "preternatural" encounters from ancient religious texts to modern sightings. Pasulka explains why some, including JD Vance, categorize these entities as "demons" based on pattern matching with historical accounts of deception and trauma. The conversation also delves into government secrecy, the potential for AI to act as an interface for non-human intelligence, and the mysteries of religious relics like the Shroud of Turin.

Suggested questions

7 ready-made prompts