HomeVideos

Trump wins! How it happened and what's next

Now Playing

Trump wins! How it happened and what's next

Transcript

2741 segments

0:00

well let's uh let's just go around the

0:01

horn who voted for Trump let's all raise

0:04

their hands for those who voted for

0:06

Trump ready one two three go I voted

0:10

twice I voted twice me too for me it was

0:12

so easy how many swing Stakes did you

0:14

vote in I voted in four swing stage they

0:17

sent multiple ballots to my house I

0:18

filled in all of

0:19

them cut this out okay let's

0:22

start your winner

0:25

ride Rainman David

0:30

and instead we open source it to the

0:32

fans and they've just gone crazy

0:34

[Music]

0:38

with hey everybody welcome back to my J

0:41

Kess God your energy is so

0:44

dork welcome welcome I'm Tim Waltz I'm

0:46

Tim Waltz of the all-in Pod welcome

0:49

welcome welcome knucklehead you're the

0:50

knucklehead of I'm a knucklehead did you

0:53

just sachche into the your seat I am

0:56

right here show us your Jazz show us

0:58

your Jaz by the way that name you just

1:00

enjoy that name Tim Waltz while you can

1:02

because you're never going to hear about

1:03

that guy again he's gonna be more

1:05

forgettable than Tim Kane they're gonna

1:07

be doing you see that live bit they're

1:10

gonna be doing SNL skits on how

1:11

forgettable he is that that SNL skit was

1:14

Next Level I agree okay so today we are

1:17

gonna cover the biggest in the news yeah

1:21

right um we'll start out with a little

1:22

housekeeping and then we'll get into it

1:24

so like And subscribe on YouTube

1:27

youtube.com/ Allin we're trying to hit a

1:29

million subscribers don't forget the

1:30

holiday party allin.com event it is

1:34

Saturday December 7th NSF we have a

1:36

couple of great announcements for the

1:37

holiday party which I think we are

1:39

spending way too much money on Steve

1:41

Aoki will be DJing nice Andrea botes

1:46

will be there doing the opening DJ set

1:48

and her sister Alex will be joining us

1:50

as well Andrea and Alex will also be

1:52

playing the botes sisters we're gonna

1:53

have a chess tournament during the party

1:56

which will be super fun Sachs you can

1:57

get in on that challenge um Alex bz or

2:01

David sxs to chess Gary Richards also

2:04

known as

2:06

Destructo for a rematch that's right as

2:09

I recall I I beat her last time yeah and

2:12

we will have on screen you totally told

2:14

me to go myself and wouldn't give me

2:17

any I also blundered my queen and still

2:19

won on time which I will always hold

2:21

dear in my heart she needed more time if

2:23

she if we had given her more time that

2:25

that was a tough situation yeah she

2:27

would have crushed all of us 4 V one

2:29

tough yeah but it's going to be a great

2:30

show other guests to be announced in the

2:32

future VIP is almost sold out and we're

2:34

doing um like a special dinner after the

2:37

live show and then the part's going to

2:39

be awesome casino games food drinks DJs

2:42

this is just to have fun guys this is

2:44

not meant to be kind of like the summit

2:47

type show we're going to just have a

2:48

great time so we hope everyone will join

2:50

us and if you've got startups that want

2:51

to join please come on by buy some

2:53

tickets and how much is this costing us

2:56

you a million buckss

3:00

we're going to lose money on this the

3:01

idea was how many tiets are we selling

3:03

not enough apparently not enough yeah

3:06

what's the total attendance size SX you

3:08

just won the White House I think you're

3:10

fine anybody can do this anyone can do

3:12

this math how many how many how big is

3:14

the theater and what are we charging for

3:15

the tickets well it's not a theater so

3:17

there's like the tickets are like 500

3:19

bucks I love you being the moderator and

3:20

taking all the arrows this is

3:23

great never moderating again well it's

3:26

the PFA remember where they used to have

3:27

the Exploratorium that that building

3:29

where they they built for the the

3:30

World's Fair or whatever so it's in

3:33

there and it's all empty so we're kind

3:34

of taking that we're building a stage

3:35

inside we're going to build all the set

3:38

and everything yeah should be fun okay

3:40

so um it sounds great yeah if you could

3:43

take some pictures sax would love to

3:47

only unless it's marago saak will not

3:49

show up I want to just congratulate like

3:51

oh we're spending a million dollars I

3:52

won't be

3:55

there okay sorry keep going I want to

3:57

congratulate someone really special uh

3:59

without whom Trump would likely not have

4:01

been elected

4:02

president so your bravery your Ingenuity

4:05

your

4:06

creativity you led the way and you

4:08

brought millions of people the direct

4:10

news they couldn't get anywhere else

4:11

Jason congrats by putting the all-in Pod

4:14

you've inadvertently architected a

4:16

system that's helped return Trump to the

4:18

White House and for that many people are

4:20

praising you today congrats Jason how

4:23

does it feel to have finally accompl

4:24

your dream feels great yeah absolutely

4:26

yeah big shout out to J I did see a

4:28

tweet where somebody somebody gave me a

4:30

lot of credit for moving the Overton

4:32

window in Silicon Valley and they said

4:34

that Jason was indispensable as my foil

4:37

if I didn't have him to dunk on for four

4:39

years with my political takes it

4:40

wouldn't have been nearly as effective

4:42

so thank you for that absolutely not

4:44

yeah my pleasure I'm I am Abit to your

4:48

internal MSM debating partner um we

4:51

needed someone to represent the Legacy

4:52

Media point of view absolutely

4:55

absolutely okay so let's kick it off

4:56

saak you were at maral Lago on election

4:59

night I thought it' just be great if you

5:01

could tell us a little bit about what

5:02

the scene was like how was it and when

5:04

did you guys kind of know that Trump had

5:07

kind of the victory in the bag was it

5:10

pre uh the polls coming in because you

5:12

had poster data early or you know tell

5:14

us a little bit about the experience

5:15

there and when it all kind of came

5:17

together yeah I went over there I guess

5:19

around 7:30 I want to say Eastern Time

5:22

Tucker invited me to come on his show

5:24

Tucker was doing a live stream from the

5:26

library at moral Lago I'd actually never

5:28

been over there before there was also a

5:30

dinner going on in the ballroom which

5:32

was I think primarily for maral Lago

5:35

members and you know there were some

5:37

Senators there members of The Campaign

5:39

and then there was another room set up

5:41

with a bunch of TVs for basically the

5:43

the staff to watch the results come in

5:47

when I first got there people were kind

5:49

of just watching trying to find out the

5:52

early results I would say that the The

5:54

Whispers were positive but people didn't

5:57

fundly know more than the rest of us you

6:00

know everyone's kind of waiting for the

6:01

results to come in I did get a chance to

6:04

take a photo with the president actually

6:07

Elon came in separately around the same

6:09

time and we got a very memorable

6:11

photograph here when I shook the

6:14

president's hand I got to tell you he

6:15

was cool as a cucumber he did not seem

6:17

nervous did he feel confident like he

6:19

had it in the bag yeah I think he was

6:20

confident but I don't think he was

6:21

acting like he had it in the bag or

6:23

anything like that they didn't know yet

6:24

but he was just super super relaxed and

6:27

calm and um taking photos with everyone

6:29

a good you remember the moment when his

6:31

hand touched yours take us to that just

6:35

unpack it a little

6:36

bit give you the shake he gives that

6:39

little shake to exert a little dominance

6:41

did he give you the shake it was just a

6:43

normal handshake but my point is like I

6:45

could detect no nervousness whatsoever

6:47

on his part and look the rest of us were

6:51

we were like nervous we were wondering

6:53

what was whole country was nervous yeah

6:55

yeah and what were you guys doing just

6:57

hanging out having cocktails having

6:58

dinner just everyone was Meandering

7:00

chilling what's the scene what's the

7:02

scene like at Marva Lago there's a

7:03

dinner in the ballroom actually I saw

7:05

Jared there Jared was very nice to me he

7:07

he asked me do you want to sit down at

7:09

the at the dinner and I I could have

7:10

joined him but then I decided to do the

7:12

the live stream with you guys and I

7:13

pulled in Don Jr and we did the live

7:15

stream with with Don

7:16

Jr like I said are you officially a Mara

7:19

Lago member by the way for 500 large oh

7:22

my Lord is that true 500,000 well that's

7:25

what Don junr told us but look there's a

7:27

process to get in I mean I don't I don't

7:28

live in Palm Beach I I think it's the

7:30

Palm Beach Community is members of mar

7:32

Lago yeah so I think that there were you

7:36

know it wasn't a huge group of people at

7:38

maral Lago and really all the supporters

7:42

were convened at the convention center

7:43

in Palm Beach there were thousands of

7:45

people there I think originally they had

7:47

talked about doing a election night

7:49

party at maral Lago but it just got too

7:50

big so they moved it to the convention

7:52

center so I don't know whatever it was

7:55

that I dropped off the live stream with

7:57

you guys I then moved to the convention

7:58

center Got Back back on with new and

8:02

then we were kind of waiting at the

8:03

convention center we were all feeling

8:05

good increasingly so throughout the

8:07

night I would say that when Pennsylvania

8:09

finally got called then I think everyone

8:11

knew that it was in the bag at that

8:12

point and it was just a matter of time

8:14

before the election got called for for

8:17

Trump and then you know at some point

8:19

they kind of hurted us downstairs into

8:21

that large Ballroom where Trump gave his

8:25

victory speech with the rest of the

8:27

campaign staff so the final t it looks

8:30

like is going to be 3112 Electoral

8:32

College votes for president Donald Trump

8:36

versus KLA Harris's

8:38

226 just for context in 2016 Trump won

8:42

with 304 electoral votes and Biden won

8:45

in 20120 with

8:46

306 so it's a pretty sweeping Victory he

8:49

won all the supposed swing States this

8:52

year fairly resoundingly there's there's

8:54

no real super close calls there's some

8:56

close calls but but pretty resounding

8:58

victory chth what happened wow it's a

9:03

it's a really good question I think that

9:06

there's many layers of the

9:09

answer but I think in its most basic

9:11

calculation I think that the bottom fell

9:14

out of the democratic party and if

9:17

you look at

9:20

why there's

9:22

a simple explanation and then there's

9:25

the more nuanced explanation I think the

9:26

simple explanation is like they just

9:28

lost the

9:30

script I think that there was so many

9:33

people that just got really tired of

9:37

being spoken

9:39

at and

9:42

labeled misogynist racist fascist

9:47

transphobe whatever it was and there was

9:49

just these Litany of these judgmental

9:52

labels that would come out instead of

9:54

engaging on the topics at hand so I

9:57

think the Democratic party played this

9:59

game of trying to use

10:02

identities genders

10:05

races as a bid to basically get people

10:08

that they thought should always vote in

10:10

their direction to continue to support

10:13

them and instead what happened was

10:14

people just started to think for

10:15

themselves and say hold on a second I'm

10:17

just a normal person that wants to be

10:19

left alone what matters to me and I

10:21

think what Donald Trump spoke to was a

10:23

desire for folks to have economic

10:27

Prosperity a safe neighbor

10:30

neighborhood a predictable educational

10:32

curriculum where these kids could go to

10:34

school not be indoctrinated and come out

10:36

the other side and just know some useful

10:38

skills so that they could get a good job

10:39

and do better than they did and all

10:41

these basic truths ended up on the

10:44

ballot and so it was a bunch of

10:46

perception versus just a bunch of hard

10:48

realities and I think Trump stayed

10:51

focused and

10:53

ultimately made sure that people

10:55

understood that that's what he was

10:56

focused on and I think the Democrats

10:59

just went to this place of demagoguery

11:01

and labels and I think it was just a

11:04

resounding defeat and David I just want

11:07

you to like just to put a pin in on how

11:09

resounding it

11:11

is in California and New York which I

11:14

would say are the two most prolific

11:17

bastions of elitist liberal

11:20

thinking Democrats won those States in

11:24

some of the narrowest margins they've

11:26

ever

11:27

seen I think in 2020 they won California

11:31

by 29 Points it was barely half is what

11:34

they won by this year in New York it

11:37

shrunk to a 12-point margin so what is

11:40

this telling you it's telling you that

11:41

the Democrats really need to retool and

11:43

get back to First principles it was a

11:45

cataclysmic

11:49

dismissal of wokeism of cancel culture

11:53

of

11:54

judgmentalism it was an ringing

11:56

endorsement of a meritocracy

11:59

of just plain simple common

12:02

sense of talking with people and to

12:06

people being able to tolerate

12:08

disagreements remaining

12:11

friends all of those things were on the

12:13

ballot and it it was just an absolute

12:15

resounding victory for just

12:17

normaly that's what I think we saw we

12:19

saw a return to normaly Jason do you

12:23

think that that message got across more

12:25

clearly in this election than ever

12:28

before as some have claimed because of

12:31

the power of alternative media for

12:34

reaching the audience rather than having

12:36

everything pushed through reporters and

12:38

traditional Legacy Media in this case

12:41

many of the candidates particularly on

12:43

the Republican side went direct to the

12:45

audience through long form podcasts like

12:47

ours but also Joe Rogan and Lex and many

12:50

others and did that move the needle for

12:52

a lot of people in a way that won this

12:54

or was it the policies and the

12:55

difference alone yeah I well clearly

12:59

being on podcast was a major part of

13:01

Trump's strategy that people are

13:03

starting to report on right now and you

13:05

know in media you go where the audience

13:07

is and I think the Democrats just didn't

13:09

get that now stepping back I think the

13:12

number one problem here is the candidate

13:15

that the Democrats put up and probably

13:18

the close number two is inflation and

13:22

you know the economy as you know we all

13:25

know it's the economy stupid if you were

13:27

paying $2 for a cheeseburger at

13:30

McDonald's and now it's $4 that's what

13:33

people are going to remember and the

13:35

inflation that occurred over this last

13:37

four years was huge and people cited

13:41

that over and over and over again so

13:43

there's probably three buckets you could

13:45

put this conversation into there's the

13:47

candidate KLA Harris was a terrible

13:49

candidate she was put in at the last

13:51

minute and she was annointed and she

13:53

didn't go through a proper primary I

13:55

think that's probably number one in this

13:58

entire thing it was a terrible candidate

14:00

you're saying you're saying number one

14:01

is the candidate I number one's the

14:03

candidate uh number two I think because

14:05

remember Trump was incredibly unpopular

14:07

as well and all credit to Trump for

14:09

winning and running an incredible

14:11

campaign I mean just they they crushed

14:13

it on podcast with JD Vance turned out

14:17

to be spectacular on podcasts and really

14:19

delivered the

14:21

message and um you know then number two

14:23

is obviously inflation in the economy

14:26

and then I think number three is the

14:27

bucket that shamat started with which is

14:30

the country really really does not like

14:33

being told that they're racist or sexist

14:37

Etc cancel culture and you put those

14:39

three things

14:41

together one of the things that's coming

14:43

out right now is some of the ads and

14:45

we'll play an ad here I wanted you guys

14:47

to see this I think this ad sums up

14:49

exactly how bad kamla

14:51

was and we'll combine this ad with just

14:55

some of the statistics that have come

14:56

out of how many people have gone right

14:58

this is Charlemagne the God from The

15:00

Breakfast Club for those who don't know

15:02

in a Donald Trump ad taxpayer funded sex

15:06

changes for prison

15:08

surgery um for prisoners for prisoners

15:10

every

15:12

transgender inmate in the prison system

15:15

would have access hell no I don't want

15:16

my taxpayer dollars going to that comma

15:18

supports transgender sex changes in jail

15:20

with our money comma even supports

15:22

letting biological men compete against

15:25

our girls in their Sports Kamala is for

15:28

they them

15:29

president Trump is for you I'm Donald J

15:32

Trump and I approve this message and so

15:34

how does kamla come back from this with

15:36

black voters with male voters with

15:39

people who are tired of having this

15:41

agenda shoved down their throat

15:43

obviously it's going to be incredibly

15:45

difficult plus she was in charge of the

15:46

Border claimed she wasn't plus she was

15:49

in charge of uh you know and Biden were

15:52

in charge of the economy when inflation

15:54

spiked terrible candidate combined with

15:56

a bad track record combined with a

15:58

flawless campaign from Trump I think

16:00

easy Victory and you know if we pull up

16:04

this uh ft chart Nick that I sent you

16:07

ahead of time and I tweeted this you

16:10

know Americans Love winners and

16:12

Innovation and they hate socialism and

16:13

this woke nonsense and if you look at

16:16

how Trump's support increased look at

16:18

this chamat every single demographic

16:21

black Asian Hispanic 18 to 29 30 to 34

16:26

fale white college men except for two 6

16:29

5year old plus very moderately very

16:32

modestly went left and white college

16:35

women very modestly went left in terms

16:38

of increasing support otherwise a hard

16:40

shift right including some categories so

16:43

so so the biggest the biggest shift

16:45

right was in Hispanic and Asian

16:47

population right and these are groups of

16:49

people I think who you you can you can

16:52

double click on young people Hispanic

16:54

and Asians Asians believe in meritocracy

16:57

I think is what most people have read

16:59

into that dramatic swing and Hispanics

17:02

are anti or more traditional family

17:05

values and that's probably what pushed

17:06

that so far right but I wanted to just

17:08

get your take on that chart chamama in

17:11

relation to your handicapping of the

17:13

election and then how much comma and how

17:16

much the inflation played into it I

17:18

think that there are three ways to kind

17:21

of identify and tell me if you guys

17:23

think these are the wrong vectors

17:24

there's either the

17:26

policies the candidate

17:28

and the methods of the campaign all of

17:31

it it's all three right that's how I

17:33

kind of break down what happened in this

17:35

election cycle there's a a big

17:37

difference between the candidates as

17:39

people some people cannot see past the

17:42

fact that comma did not get any primary

17:44

vote some people cannot see past yep the

17:47

behavior of Donald Trump on Twitter and

17:49

when he talks to people and how he has

17:51

talked to people and perceived to be a

17:53

bully and the felony conviction and some

17:56

people cannot get past other factors of

17:57

those two candidates and then some

17:59

people can get past it I've been saying

18:00

this since I'm blew in the face but I'll

18:03

try it

18:05

again I think that the mainstream media

18:09

has been working hand inhand with the

18:11

Democratic party to propagate and move

18:14

forward an agenda that tried to vilify

18:17

Donald

18:18

Trump I did not know that when I

18:22

initially encountered him in 2015 as a

18:24

candidate but what you're supposed to do

18:28

as an adult is once you start to see a

18:31

pattern of behavior you know this is for

18:34

the safety security of your family this

18:36

is about how you think about

18:38

economically taking care of your family

18:40

like you have to

18:41

reerrr you must be prepared to change

18:44

your mind when you see important

18:47

information and I have said this till I

18:49

blew in the face but I'll say it again

18:52

if I think of all of the

18:54

people in the political infrastructure

18:57

of America that I have met

18:59

and spent time with from Bill Clinton on

19:02

I remember sitting and having dinner

19:04

with Barack Obama the day of

19:06

brexit and getting a note that he read

19:09

and he said oh my gosh and says wow the

19:12

UK just pulled out I was sitting across

19:14

from him that dinner I've been with all

19:16

of these

19:18

people the Democrats only come to me to

19:22

ask me for

19:23

money the only

19:26

politician that has ever called me

19:29

just to have a

19:31

conversation just to say thank you and

19:33

be kind the only one has been Donald

19:36

Trump isn't that incredible of all of

19:39

the people every other person has only

19:41

ever called and asked me for

19:44

money so what does that mean I think

19:46

what it means is that there has been a

19:49

concerted

19:50

effort to perturb the

19:53

way that you interpret who he

19:57

is separately there's been a concerted

20:00

effort to prop up whoever is sitting

20:03

against him in

20:05

opposition and I think this is an

20:07

opportunity to finally acknowledge that

20:10

if you trust these traditional Legacy

20:12

sources of helping you to get to a

20:16

decision you're going to get tricked

20:18

there's that old saying you know fool me

20:20

once shame on you but fool me twice

20:24

shame on me because I am now allowing

20:27

this to happen

20:29

and I think that for a lot of Americans

20:31

that is what happened I think it is

20:33

really as simple as that I think they

20:35

were able to see through the

20:37

veneer of an

20:39

attempt to malign and Corner somebody

20:44

and on the other side an

20:46

attempt to basically play on Vibes and

20:49

feelings and emotions and I don't think

20:52

that America wants that that is not what

20:55

they want in running the country they

20:56

want somebody serious running the

20:58

country where you can have disagreements

21:00

with them and you can still find an

21:02

opportunity to work together with those

21:04

people I think it's that sex do you do

21:08

you think about how important the policy

21:12

versus the

21:13

individual versus the way they ran the

21:16

campaign the media and how they reached

21:18

people as as kind of three vectors and

21:21

if so how would you kind of rank those

21:22

three in importance and what changed

21:24

people's votes and got them to vote

21:25

differently than they did in the last

21:27

election yeah I think it's a pretty good

21:28

framework I mean you have the message

21:30

you have the messenger and I guess you

21:32

have the the campaign at a tactical

21:34

level I think it's a little bit unfair

21:37

to blame this entire defeat on KLA

21:39

Harris being a bad messenger or

21:42

candidate it's true she's not the

21:44

greatest candidate she has a lot of

21:46

problems however I don't think she was

21:48

dealt particularly strong hand the fact

21:51

the matter is that we did have rampant

21:55

inflation in this country that really

21:57

hurt people in their pocketbooks every

21:59

time they went to the grocery store and

22:01

that resulted from the trillions of

22:03

spending that was agreed to by virtually

22:05

the entire Democratic party remember

22:08

they not only did they pass trillions in

22:10

spending they wanted four and a half

22:11

trillion more for build back better and

22:13

the only reason that didn't happen is

22:15

because mansion and Cinema voted against

22:17

it and can you imagine how much worse

22:20

how much worse would have been Mansion

22:22

was driven into retirement and Cinema

22:24

was basically kicked out of the party

22:25

she effectively told us that at the

22:26

all-in summit so this defeat is on the

22:29

entire Democratic party the Democratic

22:32

party was in support of Joe Biden and

22:34

KLA Harris's agenda they were in support

22:36

of the de facto open border policies

22:39

they were in support of the softon crime

22:41

Soros da decarceral policies you can see

22:45

that even in California which is a deep

22:47

blue State there's a huge backlash huge

22:50

this sort of insane soft on crime agenda

22:54

the Democrats have 70% of California

22:57

voted for prop 36

22:59

which basically reversed the excesses of

23:01

Prop 47 which a decade ago basically

23:04

made shoplifting legal in California you

23:07

know who opposed prop 36 despite its

23:09

massive popularity Gavin Nome KLA Harris

23:12

wouldn't say whether she supported it or

23:14

not so what you see is that even in blue

23:16

States the Democratic party Elites are

23:19

completely out of touch with what people

23:21

want and then finally you've got foreign

23:23

policy where I think that the the

23:26

Democratic agenda basically one to

23:28

engage in a proxy war with Vladimir

23:30

Putin because he's the Incarnation of

23:32

all evil that I think is blown up in the

23:35

collective West face that has been a

23:37

disaster that was supported by the

23:39

entire Democratic party so on issue

23:42

after issue that I think mattered in

23:43

this election you cannot just put the

23:46

blame on KLA Harris it's got to be on

23:48

the Democratic party as a whole and just

23:50

to Echo what Chamas said about the

23:53

cultural stuff they've talked down to us

23:55

they've lectured us they've insulted us

23:58

they've censored us they've gaslit us

24:01

they've tried to cancel us they've tried

24:02

to cancel us they tried to punish

24:03

descent with Warfare they turned Elon

24:06

into an enemy which was the single worst

24:08

own goal in history remember this wasn't

24:11

just and Joe Rogan don't

24:13

forget out as well Bernie supported Joe

24:16

Rogan but with Elon it wasn't just

24:18

disinviting him we never inviting him to

24:19

the EV Summit it goes all the way back

24:22

to Lena Gonzalez's tweet telling him to

24:24

F off and leave the state of California

24:27

so look the Democrat party as a whole

24:29

has to own this and they're not going to

24:32

start winning elections again until they

24:34

have an improvement in their agenda not

24:37

just their messenger so saak is this the

24:39

nature of democracy that over time when

24:44

you have a two-party system and one

24:46

party veers too far to the left or one

24:48

party veers too far to the right people

24:51

jump ship to the other party and

24:53

ultimately they pull the policies of the

24:55

party that they left back to the middle

24:57

and that's the way democracy is supposed

24:59

to work and has worked historically so

25:01

is this the way it's supposed to go and

25:03

do we project that four years from now

25:06

the Democrats will need to be and need

25:07

to adjust to the center and will'll see

25:10

less of this extremism because of the

25:12

way the voting turned out this this I

25:15

think that's a very interesting question

25:17

is whether the Democrats have the

25:19

necessary introspection to learn from

25:21

this loss I would say that one of them

25:24

does if you look at Mat glacius who's

25:25

someone I've sparred with on on Twitter

25:28

X who is a Democrat partisan he

25:30

basically tweeted a list of principles

25:33

that he thought the Democratic party

25:34

needed to adopt I read it and retweeted

25:36

I said laughing my ass off this is a

25:38

list of Republican principles it was all

25:40

about you know opposing woke and being

25:42

in favor of Merit and Innovation

25:44

tolerance I'm like great look you know

25:46

what if the Democratic party wants to

25:47

adopt these principles that's a

25:49

wonderful thing for the country I hope

25:51

that they do it okay but will they do it

25:54

I have my doubts you look at this tweet

25:57

by Ari f

25:58

where he talks about who the Democratic

26:00

party now is yeah I think that this is a

26:03

really important tweet because it sort

26:04

of tells you Sak who's going to be left

26:06

in the

26:07

room if these are the only people left

26:10

in the room the last thing they're going

26:11

to do is admit defeat right exactly so

26:13

what you see is that the Democratic

26:16

party base is these very affluent very

26:20

overeducated very non-religious types

26:23

and frankly I wonder whether they're too

26:25

out of touch to know they're out of

26:26

touch they're certainly very whiny and

26:28

entitled and I just don't think they're

26:31

going to

26:32

seed control of the party without a

26:34

fight and frankly they've disappeared so

26:37

far up their own woke asses that I don't

26:40

think they can find an electoral

26:42

majority if they try so if these people

26:44

stay in control of the party and these

26:47

are the people who you're seeing having

26:48

a mental breakdown on Tik Tok they're

26:50

posting all the videos they're insulting

26:52

the electorate and let's face it it's

26:54

not just on Tik Tok it's on the Legacy

26:56

Media it's on msdnc

26:58

it's basically the the Legacy Media who

27:00

are trying to diagnose a psychosis in

27:04

the American electorate to explain why

27:06

they were so wrong if those people stay

27:08

in control I think that the Republicans

27:11

could have an electoral majority as far

27:12

as the eye can see I completely agree

27:15

with you and I'll go even further which

27:16

is I think that the Democrats will lose

27:19

one of California or New York in the

27:22

next eight years if they don't attack

27:24

right that so that's the key question

27:26

they're not going to attack if you think

27:27

that the intelligent Genia quote unquote

27:30

the Bill Gates readed Hoffman of the

27:33

world that funds Dustin moskovitz that

27:35

funds the Democratic apparatus at the

27:38

highest

27:39

level if they can't change what are the

27:43

odds that the state infrastructure or

27:46

the local infrastructure changes I think

27:48

maybe on the margins the local

27:50

infrastructure can change more quickly

27:53

and adeptly because it just costs a lot

27:55

less money and it's much more

27:56

concentrated

27:58

but I think the states are very lagered

28:00

in that sense and I think that they take

28:02

the table scraps of what's left over so

28:04

if if you have the Democrats lead there

28:07

is no chance that if unless they change

28:09

the planks of their platform that the

28:12

state legislatures in New York and

28:13

California are going to change what they

28:14

believe Nick pull up the the link I just

28:17

sent so let me just underscore an

28:19

important aspect for you guys on this

28:20

which is the amount that the Democrats

28:22

spent in this campaign and obviously

28:24

they saw a significant negative return

28:26

they lost across the board Senate

28:28

majority House Majority governorships

28:31

the White House but they spent more here

28:33

you can see the difference between the

28:35

Harris campaign and the Trump campaign

28:37

spending Harris campaign spent nearly

28:39

$900 million the Trump campaign 350

28:42

million if you look at the super pcts

28:45

the super PCT spent 1.4 billion on the

28:47

Dem side roughly 400 million 450 million

28:51

on the Republican side and if you scroll

28:53

down in some of these key Senate races

28:56

the Dems far out spent the Republicans

28:58

and still lost the Ohio Senate race

29:00

shared Brown $58 million of spending

29:03

Bernie Moreno 21 million and Bernie

29:05

Moreno had a resounding Victory John

29:07

tester 84 million is spending Tim shei

29:09

22 million T Tim shei won the uh the

29:12

election so across the board the

29:15

spending was greater the return was

29:18

negative because money cannot overcome

29:20

common sense so my question again is

29:23

does this not necessitate attack to the

29:26

center for the Democrats they want to

29:28

see the party survive and if they're

29:30

going to continue to lose like this they

29:32

will not continue to maintain the same

29:33

policy agenda that got them into this

29:35

position in the first place jcal do you

29:38

think that the Democratic party will

29:39

need to tack to the center and that

29:41

they're going to start to adjust because

29:42

of this they they started that process

29:44

they knew that going into this election

29:46

and they started moving to the center it

29:48

was laughable in some cases because you

29:50

have like kamla talking about providing

29:53

sex changes for prisoners and you know

29:56

all of those receipts came out out so

29:58

even as she started to try to get to the

30:00

center people didn't buy it so of course

30:02

they're going to but what's very

30:04

interesting about spend there and the

30:06

genius of trump is earned media what's

30:08

earned media when you are trying to get

30:11

hits in media you will put them into two

30:13

buckets paid and earned what you just

30:16

showed was paid paid is considered what

30:18

you do if you can't earn media Allin

30:21

podcast is an example of earned media we

30:24

do this every week we earned our

30:26

audience we didn't pay anybody for this

30:28

audience and I think that was you know

30:30

what Trump did uh and JD importantly

30:33

someone someone that comes on the show

30:34

earns that uh correct so that's the

30:37

piece of this that I think is so

30:38

important you don't have to pay to go on

30:40

Joe Rogan but the candidate that the

30:43

Democrats put out there was so bad that

30:47

she could not even and I think Sax's you

30:50

know Master at setting people up here

30:54

the the Democrats put up a horrible

30:56

horrible candidate and I know sax is

30:58

saying oh it's not kala's fault kala

31:01

could not go on Joe Rogan because they

31:04

knew that it would be so embarrassing

31:06

and that she would get so embarrassed

31:07

that it would lose her votes his Doom

31:10

Loop uh you know observation from I

31:13

don't know eight weeks ago you had that

31:15

sax was exactly correct the more she

31:18

spoke the more she started going down

31:20

she was leading Trump at one point on

31:22

poly Market in some of these places and

31:25

she absolutely proved that she could

31:27

would not communicate well and so and I

31:31

just want to just circle back to the

31:33

point about inflation here's the

31:36

McDonald price increases that I was

31:37

mentioning before end of 2019 you could

31:40

buy a McChicken for a buck 29 and in mid

31:42

2024 it was

31:44

$389 the majority of Americans wind up

31:48

going to Taco Bell McDonald's every week

31:51

some cases multiple times a week you

31:53

cannot discount exactly how profound

31:58

this cost of eating food and buying

32:01

groceries had on this election it is the

32:04

number one issue I think this election

32:06

we can talk in our bubble about it but

32:09

about inflation this is what I mean by a

32:11

return to normaly these are normal

32:13

people problems how much does it cost to

32:16

put food on the table how much does it

32:18

cost to drive from point A to point B I

32:20

want to send my kid to a school where

32:22

they go and they learn the ABCs and the

32:24

one 123s because they're going to have

32:26

to graduate and compete with India and

32:28

China I don't want to worry about

32:30

indoctrination and all this other stuff

32:32

absolutely yeah so look I I did predict

32:34

the Doom Loop for Comm Harris two months

32:36

ago because she is just not good at

32:38

interviews or being off the cuff or

32:40

being unscripted not good is generous

32:43

yeah s sxra Damas was right about that

32:45

absolutely however and I would say the

32:47

biggest problem in her campaign is that

32:49

she would neither defend the Biden

32:52

Harris record nor say what she would do

32:54

differently the question you have to ask

32:56

is why and I think it's because she was

32:59

in a really tough position that her own

33:02

party put her in which is they said you

33:04

can't criticize Joe Biden yep because

33:06

he's the sitting president but at the

33:08

same time you can't defend him either

33:12

because he's so unpopular well what made

33:14

him unpopular Democratic party policies

33:17

they should have frankly looking back

33:19

they should have just let Joe Biden

33:21

defend his own record the old man must

33:24

have been in the White House nashing his

33:26

teeth saying please put me in the game

33:29

let me defend my own record he at least

33:31

believed in it the Democrats wouldn't

33:33

defend their own record because it was

33:35

so bad you have to put some blame for

33:37

that not just on KLA but on the entire

33:40

party that's my only Point sax it's so

33:42

obvious that the technique they used to

33:45

defeat Trump in 2020 after those chaotic

33:47

four years was hey do you want normaly

33:51

and thenni is that 15 million votes what

33:54

wait what's

33:55

that I I didn't hear the the joke I said

33:58

what what tactic was that 15 million

34:01

extra oh you're please don't start with

34:03

the conspiracy theories

34:05

well going to say this has to be a

34:08

conspiracy theory

34:11

nowy right who's the chart from what's

34:14

the Providence of the chart just just so

34:16

you know the Y AIS starts at 50 million

34:18

so don't be you know like a little too

34:20

crazy like they they mailed hold on we

34:22

go down this rabit let me just finish my

34:24

point then you guys can go to conspiracy

34:25

corner and say the election was stolen

34:27

the point I'm making here is obviously

34:30

Biden ran a very successful campaign

34:32

against Trump based on Vibes and based

34:34

on his creating chaos in the country in

34:37

most people's mind and this return to

34:39

normaly so that did work for them

34:41

previously it just didn't work this time

34:44

because they had to defend their record

34:46

on the border they needed to defend

34:47

their record on the economy and saxs is

34:49

exactly right they didn't touch that and

34:52

how do you not talk about their own

34:55

record and their record had some good

34:57

bright response to it record low

34:59

employment record high stock market and

35:02

we tamed inflation and they could have

35:04

had a really great discussion about

35:05

inflation and just said Hey listen both

35:08

of the last two terms there was a lot of

35:10

spending and so inflation manifested

35:12

during the last four years and uh hey we

35:14

tamed it so here we are we still have

35:16

record low unemployment we still have a

35:19

record high stock market and we tamed

35:21

inflation things are going to get better

35:23

but she couldn't even communicate that I

35:24

can communicate that better than the

35:26

presidential candidate

35:28

come on she could have easily done that

35:30

free let me just go back to your point

35:31

about the money it is true that the

35:32

Democrats had roughly three times as

35:35

much money as the Republicans did the

35:38

Democrats had something like a billion

35:39

dollars for this campaign the

35:41

Republicans had presal campaign for the

35:43

presidential campaign exactly the

35:45

Republicans obviously still won in a

35:47

landslide I'm sorry that excludes that

35:49

excludes the super pcts which had

35:50

additional funding that were going

35:51

towards supporting the nominee as fair

35:53

enough my point is just the Democrats

35:54

had a massive advantage on the money

35:56

side they also I think think had a

35:58

massive advantage on what you would call

36:01

the Legacy Media side I mean I don't

36:04

know how you put a value a dollar value

36:06

on what the Legacy Media has done not

36:08

just in this election cycle but for the

36:10

last eight or nine years they have

36:13

basically call Donald Trump a Nazi a

36:16

fascist a traitor a did it work or did

36:19

it their to get to that blew up in their

36:23

faces they called him an agent of Putin

36:25

they called him an insurrectionist they

36:26

called him a convicted fellow they

36:27

called him a dictator they've been

36:29

yelling that at the top of their lungs

36:31

now for at least four years the country

36:34

didn't believe it I would just say that

36:36

the Legacy Media spell is broken their

36:38

credibility has been destroyed and I

36:41

think that the repudiation of the Legacy

36:44

Media is one of the most important

36:47

results of this election it just shows

36:49

that the Democrats had I don't know how

36:51

you valued a trillion dollar propaganda

36:53

machine on their side and Trump was

36:56

still able to win and you have to at the

36:58

end of the day say that that's a result

37:01

not just of alternative media gaining

37:03

Steam and free speech on X I think those

37:06

were absolutely necessary enablers it's

37:08

also the fact that Trump has a trillion

37:11

dollar personality and is a tremendously

37:13

gifted communicator and politician in

37:15

his own unique way but then but finally

37:17

you have to say that the issues are on

37:20

Trump's side Americans want the border

37:23

to be sealed they see that the spending

37:25

and the bureaucracy in Washington are

37:27

out of control they do not want woke

37:29

cancel culture anymore they see America

37:33

getting over involved in Foreign Wars

37:35

they want the spending to be brought

37:36

back home where it benefits them these

37:40

are the key points of the Trump agenda

37:42

and at the end of the day whatever you

37:44

want to say about Trump he ran a

37:47

campaign based on issues he talked about

37:50

issues what did comma Harris run her

37:52

campaign on Vibes celebrity endorsements

37:56

name time debunked hoaxes I just want to

38:00

go around the horn real quick and ask

38:02

each of you guys once again I'm going to

38:03

ask you one more question after this

38:05

What mattered most was it the policy

38:07

sacks as you're proclaiming is what a

38:08

lot of people voted on was it the issues

38:10

with the candidate the individual or was

38:12

it the media or the the campaign tactics

38:14

are those three what What mattered most

38:16

you think in terms of moving votes what

38:17

moved the most V list I don't think you

38:18

can separate the man from the message or

38:20

the messenger from the message okay

38:22

listen if you had a conventional

38:25

Republican out there don't think that

38:28

they could have overcome the trillion

38:30

dollar propaganda machine in Hand of the

38:33

Legacy Media that being said I think if

38:36

Donald Trump had been campaigning with

38:39

Mitt Romney's message or Mitch

38:41

McConnell's message I don't think he

38:43

would have gone anywhere I don't even

38:44

think he would have been the Republican

38:45

nominee you have to say that Trump since

38:49

2016 has tapped into something very deep

38:52

in the American electorate and you know

38:55

this is something we can get into but I

38:56

think that if you look back now over the

38:58

last 10 years is clear that he's the

39:00

transformational figure in American

39:02

politics it's not Barack Obama with all

39:04

due respect j k your turn the policies

39:08

yeah the individual or the campaign

39:10

tactics it's very clearly this had to do

39:13

you know primarily with kamla it is the

39:16

candidate and how she was selected yeah

39:19

I mean obviously if you had it's it's

39:22

interesting for you to say that as a Dem

39:23

right because I think that may have

39:24

chased a lot of people moderate I'm not

39:25

a

39:27

voted Republican one third of the time

39:29

maybe even a little bit more recently

39:31

but two two3 you voted them so you were

39:33

open to that and I'm leaning moderate I

39:35

mean I've been very clear about that my

39:37

record's been very clear about that it

39:38

is clear that it was her because I will

39:40

say if you had put up fredberg and I

39:43

think it's great that you're forcing us

39:44

to pick one of the

39:45

three and it's a hard thing to do but if

39:48

you had picked Dean Phillips and Shapiro

39:50

I think they would have beat Trump very

39:52

easily or because remember Trump was

39:54

phenomenally unpopular and I think the

39:56

big question that's to come out of this

39:58

is how did Elon do getting young men and

40:02

how did Joe Rogan and podcasts like ours

40:04

do at getting young men to come out and

40:06

vote that's something we haven't talked

40:07

about yet and I feel like that could be

40:09

the one thing that comes out of this

40:11

election over the coming years that we

40:14

look at that'll be the sustainable

40:16

change is that young men are now voting

40:20

and they want to vote for something very

40:22

different than white women or old people

40:25

and chamat what is your on What mattered

40:28

most do you have one of those three how

40:30

would you wait you to R I think the

40:33

policies of the democratic party are

40:36

fundamentally

40:37

broken they've become the exact opposite

40:40

of where they were even 20 years ago so

40:42

the Democrats used to be the protector

40:45

of free

40:46

speech now they are pro censorship the

40:50

Republicans are free speech the

40:52

Democrats used to be all about anti-war

40:55

now they are more like

40:58

to get mangled into all of these foreign

41:00

Misadventures in partnership with the

41:02

military industrial complex whereas the

41:04

Republicans have been a bull workk to

41:06

war and they embraced the chaines

41:08

ultimate proof of that oh my gosh I mean

41:10

that was the scariest and oddest turn of

41:12

events so I think that what happened is

41:15

the policies they just lost their way

41:17

now the question is was it purposeful or

41:20

was it by accident and I think that

41:24

belies the bigger question which is just

41:26

the people in charge of the democratic

41:28

party I think to Sak's

41:31

point do they even have a sense of that

41:33

they have to change or are they just so

41:35

now fundamentally out of touch and they

41:38

just believe what they believe so

41:39

ferociously they're going to have to go

41:41

through maybe three or four or five more

41:43

elections of just getting totally

41:45

trounced in order to learn the lesson

41:46

okay I'll I'll um I'll wear my mlin hat

41:49

and say chof right answer now my next my

41:53

next question back to you chath is

41:57

I've had a lot of conversations in the

41:58

last few days um with good friends with

42:02

people I'm close with with family and so

42:03

on hold on freeberg what do you think

42:05

before you ask the next question I think

42:07

policy matter but but here's the the the

42:09

stumbling block if you talk to anyone

42:12

that did not vote that that did not vote

42:14

for Trump and voted for kamla Harris

42:16

that is you know kind

42:18

of reasonable people or what you know I

42:21

I don't want to kind of classify people

42:24

but people that you would normally have

42:25

decent long form conversations with and

42:28

you start talking specific policy issues

42:30

with them the convers keeps coming back

42:33

to Trump the person in my experience

42:36

people can't see past a person who is a

42:38

quote convicted felon as they claim who

42:40

is taking away women's rights who is a

42:42

bully who is mean a lot of this is

42:44

influenced by his past behavior and

42:46

things he said and the way he's said

42:48

things and done things on Twitter we can

42:50

we can Proclaim that there was a lot of

42:51

misrepresentation about Trump in the in

42:53

the Legacy Media but there were a lot of

42:55

tweets that Trump put out that we

42:57

offputting to a lot of people so I want

42:59

you chamat to speak to the many

43:02

individuals out there who are good

43:04

people who feel disenfranchised who are

43:07

not like the the funny people you can

43:08

make fun of on Libs of Tik Tok or what

43:10

have you but just everyday normal people

43:12

that said I really don't trust the guy I

43:14

really don't believe that this is a good

43:16

person and I think that the policies

43:19

make more sense I agree with a lot of

43:21

the policy issues but frankly the guy

43:23

doesn't seem like the right guy for me

43:25

how do you kind of break through is that

43:26

possible and can you speak to that

43:28

person to help them kind of see past the

43:31

individual to the policies and have

43:33

trust and faith that this individual can

43:35

actually Shepherd this nation

43:37

forward there are so many very powerful

43:41

examples of how the

43:43

media

43:45

colluded with the Democratic

43:49

party to fundamentally lie about things

43:54

that actually happened when it relates

43:56

to Donald Trump

43:58

one of the most simple and

44:01

Powerful was the lie about

44:03

Charlottesville when I process

44:06

Charlottesville I'm probably one of

44:08

those people David that you talk about I

44:11

was just so scared and angry and I took

44:17

at face

44:18

value what the media said that Donald

44:21

Trump

44:22

said and then I was really angry at

44:26

Donald Trump until I saw the footage and

44:30

saw that it was just an complete

44:33

lie and that is just an incredible

44:36

shirking of responsibility that the

44:38

media has undertaken the

44:40

deviousness the

44:42

dishonesty it's really bad and that's

44:46

where I said I have to stop as a grownup

44:50

rational man as the head of my family I

44:54

need to reer where I'm coming from well

44:58

head of my family with Nat when she lets

44:59

me be but

45:02

anyway feel I can feel

45:08

her you listen to I can feel that one

45:13

back to H me keep that line in Nick I am

45:15

the head of my family okay anyways

45:18

guys let's get let's get back up go back

45:21

go back go back go

45:23

back but but the thing is like I started

45:26

to reenter it

45:27

and I do that every day in my day job

45:31

I'm running a company is 8090 going well

45:34

or not well it depends on the conditions

45:36

on the ground when things are going well

45:38

I need to do more of those things when

45:40

things are not going well I need to re

45:41

underwrite is it something that I'm in

45:44

control of is it something that I've

45:45

missed how do I change it how do I get

45:47

my team to be better I live it every day

45:50

in investing it's the same thing you

45:52

know there was periods where I was on

45:54

top of the world and everything was

45:55

working then there were waves where

45:58

things were not working but I still had

46:00

to show up and do my job well as it's

46:02

turning out in those Darkest Hours was

46:05

when I probably have made some of my

46:07

absolute best new Investments that would

46:10

not have happened if I did not keep my

46:12

feet on the ground and constantly re

46:15

underwrite and try to challenge my

46:17

biases there are so many examples that

46:20

have happened to Trump that when you

46:21

actually unpack them there was a

46:23

concerted effort to lie and that is why

46:27

it's important for folks

46:29

to be able to suspend that judgment the

46:33

second thing I would say is then you saw

46:36

four years of the man in office and if

46:39

you actually

46:41

separate the interpretation by the media

46:45

who frankly just hate him with what he

46:48

actually did you take a step back and

46:51

you're like man these accomplishments

46:52

were incredible for example let's look

46:55

at what happened with the Abra hemicords

46:57

we have never been closer to substantial

47:01

and sustained peace in the Middle East

47:04

in any era of government under any

47:06

president than we were when Jared

47:09

Kushner on behalf of Donald Trump

47:11

negotiated those agreements and look how

47:14

far we have slipped since

47:16

then and all of that happened as a

47:19

result

47:21

of the incoming government wanting to

47:24

undo what was so logically right in in

47:27

the first

47:27

place and part of that was to feed a

47:30

media cycle so again I just go back to

47:32

David all of these normal people and I

47:34

know a lot of them as well speak to them

47:36

yeah like I mean yeah you guys need to

47:39

just take a step back and take a beat

47:42

and just think about something for a

47:43

second how do so many normal high

47:47

functioning well-intended people switch

47:50

sides how did that happen now jcal let

47:52

me ask you the flip side of the coin you

47:55

have expressed publicly recently even on

47:59

a podcast yesterday with Sachs in

48:02

vigorous debate on the show many times

48:04

reservations about Trump and the

48:06

character of trump yeah how do you feel

48:10

you obviously align with the policies

48:12

that he's highlighted and indicated you

48:14

you've said so absolutely yeah do you

48:16

see past the person or do you still have

48:17

a a strong degree of reservation about

48:20

the individual and do you see that

48:21

playing out in your cohort friends

48:23

family what have you that there's strong

48:25

reservation because of the character

48:27

yeah it's a great question you know I

48:30

think the thing we have to do now is

48:31

come together as a country he's the

48:33

president it's great that it was not a

48:36

debatable election and we're not going

48:38

to have riots at the capital and people

48:40

beating up police officers and now it's

48:43

time to actually look at what Trump said

48:46

and then we will grade him on what he

48:48

actually gets done and and you know if

48:50

he is able to hang out with the cohort

48:55

of Elon and chamath and Sachs and JD

48:59

Vance I feel a lot better about it now

49:01

there's a lot of people speculating he

49:03

will turn on shth he will turn on Sachs

49:06

he will turn on Elon and that

49:08

relationship will end in the next year

49:09

or two that's what I'm looking at Will

49:11

trump actually do the things he says

49:14

he's going to do and what did he say he

49:16

was going to do well he's not going to

49:18

have a National Abortion man he's not

49:20

going to have kick people out who get

49:23

college degrees here remember he said on

49:24

the show he's going to staple the green

49:25

guard to it and but then there's other

49:28

and he said he's going to end the

49:29

Ukraine the war in Ukraine on day one so

49:33

let's make a list of all the things he

49:34

promised and like anybody else let's

49:37

judge him based on what he gets done now

49:40

some of the things he promised like the

49:42

mass deportation of 15 million people I

49:44

think a lot of people even on this

49:46

podcast probably don't agree with I

49:48

don't think anybody here wants to see 15

49:50

million people who came here to have a

49:53

better life and who are working hard and

49:55

who are productive m MERS of our society

49:58

literally get dragged out of here the

50:00

the 500,000 that are criminals or a

50:02

million sure nobody wants to see them uh

50:05

get a free pass here but you know

50:07

there's going to be some of the items on

50:09

his agenda that are going to be very

50:11

uncomfortable to see executed and some

50:13

of them would be amazing and miracles if

50:15

he comes in and all of a sudden Ukraine

50:18

war is settled fantastic if he starts

50:20

dragging a million people

50:23

every you know two or three months out

50:26

of the country

50:27

that could be absolutely

50:29

disastrous and incredibly hard to watch

50:32

happen in America so we got a judgment

50:34

based on his actions that's great let's

50:36

give him the support he needs and I

50:38

really hope you know the thing that

50:39

gives me hope is the fact that saak

50:41

chamath Elon and JD Vance are by his

50:44

side so I'm goingon to move on to the

50:46

rest of the election the other races so

50:48

so the presidency we've talked about

50:51

let's talk about the house and the

50:52

Senate sacks in the house there's 37

50:55

races that have yet to be called but it

50:58

looks like the Republicans need about 12

51:01

more to be called to have a majority it

51:04

seems very likely I mean ACC according

51:05

to poly Market it's 99% that the

51:08

Republicans will have the majority in

51:09

the house the Republicans have control

51:11

of the Senate and Trump is in the White

51:14

House what are the top policy items that

51:18

the Republicans will pursue with this

51:21

degree of legislative and executive

51:24

control what's number 1 two3 on the list

51:27

what's top priority and how are they

51:28

kind of getting together to figure out

51:31

what and how to

51:32

execute those items in the in the weeks

51:35

and months after January

51:37

20th well so first of all I think the

51:39

Senate majority matters a lot in terms

51:41

of trump getting the appointments that

51:42

he wants because if he was just at 51

51:46

let's call it it would be quite hard

51:49

Susan Collins and Lisa marowski tend to

51:53

be very very moderate uh Republicans and

51:57

would oppose I think a lot of

51:58

conservative appointments Trump's

52:00

already at 53 senators and there's two

52:03

more that are still up for grabs and

52:05

waiting to be counted so he might get to

52:07

54 in the next week or so it just means

52:09

he's going to have a Freer range on

52:11

appointments I think that'd be really

52:12

good for for uh Bobby Kennedy I think it

52:15

might be harder to get Bobby Kennedy

52:17

confirmed for a major cabinet post with

52:20

51 with 53 54 I think we get there I

52:23

think that's a really great thing for

52:24

the country there's other appointment

52:26

appointments in a similar vein that I

52:27

think it be easier for for Trump to get

52:30

through in terms of the rest of the

52:32

agenda I mean Trump clearly does want to

52:34

end the war in Ukraine is he going to be

52:36

able to do it on day one no I mean I

52:38

don't think that's realistic because

52:40

frankly the ukrainians are not willing

52:43

to make the concessions yet they're not

52:45

in a place where they're willing to make

52:46

a deal I still think that what Trump was

52:49

saying during the campaign if you look

52:51

at it as expression of his motivations

52:53

and where his sentiments are coming from

52:55

they were good sentiment but if he can't

52:57

solve it on day one because the

52:58

ukrainians don't want to make a deal I

53:00

can't really fault him for that but I

53:01

think he'll try I think that on Doge

53:05

there's clearly a strong desire of many

53:08

in the Republican party and Elon and the

53:11

people that Elon brought with him for

53:13

major government reform much more

53:15

efficiency much less spending I think

53:18

that we have to get as much of that past

53:20

as possible in the first certainly the

53:22

first year there's a necessity for

53:24

legislative action to get all the cuts

53:27

in federal spending that they're looking

53:28

to cut is that right Sach so if if

53:31

elon's objective is cut trilon there

53:33

might be some things you can just do

53:34

through executive orders and they should

53:36

do as much as they can but I think you

53:38

do need some congressional action as

53:39

well this is an area where it's just

53:41

going to be really hard because spending

53:44

is a bipar and problem and it's going to

53:46

be really hard to jam through the type

53:50

of deep reform that we really should

53:53

have at the federal level but I think

53:55

that now there's a shock because Trump

53:57

does have majorities in the House and

53:59

Senate that he can at least get

54:01

something through so at least we have a

54:02

shot of getting something done there are

54:04

we going to get two trillion in Cuts

54:06

Like Elon wants I would love that I

54:09

doubt you're going to be able to pass

54:10

that through Congress but do you start

54:12

with that number and then work your way

54:13

down to a number that you can get both

54:16

parties to support maybe that's possible

54:18

hopefully I would have started I would

54:19

have started with three

54:21

then but I mean that's just my that's

54:23

just my tactic but whatever but I think

54:25

reforming the bureau is just such a huge

54:28

theme coming out of this election and we

54:31

just have to figure out how to get that

54:32

done got the Mandate we have the Mandate

54:35

that's Trump's mandate and the the

54:37

federal government is such a large

54:39

sprawling it is the largest organization

54:41

on earth except for maybe the CCP and in

54:44

that sense you really have to have

54:47

leverage in leadership to be able to

54:49

realize that degree of action at that

54:51

scale so the cabinet positions matter a

54:54

lot to realize that agenda is that is

54:56

that fair to say chth and you know maybe

54:58

we can talk a little bit about who are

55:01

the the folks in the orbit of Donald

55:03

Trump and the transition team that are

55:06

being considered for different cabinet

55:08

posts and you know as an adviser or as a

55:11

let's call you a theoretical adviser uh

55:13

to the transition

55:14

team what are the kind of key posts that

55:17

matter to you how would you kind of

55:18

advise them who to look for that could

55:20

really realize the outcome that the

55:22

Mandate is dictating well I I have no

55:26

influence on this process so I'm just

55:28

totally spitballing but right people who

55:30

I think

55:32

are who I think are excellent I'm going

55:35

to put Bobby Kennedy right at the top of

55:36

the

55:37

list I think that Bobby has an

55:39

opportunity to allow the transparency of

55:43

information that will allow folks to

55:47

keep doing what we've done or to change

55:50

course in a way that right now I think

55:53

is a little bit more difficult than it

55:55

needs to be

55:56

I think Vive

55:58

ramaswami is indefatigable I think he's

56:03

a you know if you remember back to the

56:05

Republican primaries there was only one

56:07

person that did not attack Donald Trump

56:09

and it was viic I think he um believed

56:12

in what Donald Trump was doing and was

56:15

willing to sort of embrace and extend

56:16

this idea so I think he'd be a really

56:18

good proxy I don't know what role that

56:20

looks like but I just think that he

56:21

would be exing there's some rumors that

56:25

he's going to run for governor Ohio but

56:26

he'd be amazing in the federal

56:27

government tulsy gabard we got to get

56:30

there yeah yeah I just just to go

56:32

through the list I think tulsy gabard is

56:34

so awesome for what role what would you

56:37

put her in you know the rumor is is

56:40

Veteran Affairs yeah Veteran Affairs but

56:42

you know hopefully it's at least that

56:45

yeah that's a cabinet position right

56:47

just for those who you know there's

56:48

another race that's going on that's

56:49

really below the surface but is

56:51

extremely important and that is the new

56:53

Senate Majority Leader MIT Mitch

56:55

McConnell says he stepping aside there's

56:57

two major C th versus Mike Lee yeah well

57:00

it's it's John th versus Corin from

57:02

Texas and Mike Lee has been sort of

57:05

agitating it's not clear that Mike Lee

57:07

will throw his hat in the ring if he did

57:09

I would be all in favor of it if Mike

57:12

Lee who is from Utah doesn't we should

57:14

really go with whoever he recommends I

57:16

really trust that Mike Lee will

57:18

represent the Maga agenda whereas quite

57:21

frankly the other candidates will be a

57:23

continuation of Mitch and this Trump's

57:26

moment to weigh in on that he's basking

57:29

in the glow right now he is in the

57:32

winter Circle he can get anything

57:35

through the Republican caucus and I

57:38

think that he could weigh in right now

57:39

in the Senate majority race and make

57:41

sure the right person gets it if you get

57:44

a continuation of Mitch McConnell you

57:46

will not get real reform through the

57:47

Senate look at what happened during

57:49

Trump one Mitch McConnell was one of

57:51

Trump's biggest opponents so there would

57:54

be Alternatives but I think Trump would

57:56

have to step in and act there's some

57:58

talk about Rick Scot from Florida being

57:59

a candidate I think he'd be very good if

58:01

he's still in the race or just go right

58:04

over the top and go with a Mike Lee this

58:06

is your moment to basically put in a

58:09

loyalist and then the big cabinet

58:11

positions that are left I think defense

58:13

probably somebody like Rick grenell

58:15

who's already worked for Trump and was

58:18

the dni right at the end I

58:20

think and then in treasury it's you know

58:23

I think people say it's between scottt

58:25

bessent and

58:28

John

58:29

Paulson I'm not so sure I don't know fed

58:31

Governor I think it's like probably

58:33

hasal but then you know I saw like you

58:35

saw Jerome pal Jerome pal this morning

58:37

said he would not step aside if asked to

58:39

resign by Donald Trump no he's got two

58:41

more years so he's got until 26 he's got

58:43

until mid 26 so you know I mean the

58:45

rumor I don't want to say too much but I

58:47

think this is pretty much out there I

58:48

think reyell wants State not defense I

58:50

think that it's not to say he's going to

58:52

get it I don't know but that's been out

58:54

there for a long time I I think that

58:56

what a lot of people in let's call it

58:59

the Maga movement the America first

59:00

movement are going to be looking at very

59:02

closely is do neocons worm their way

59:07

into this Administration look at what

59:09

happened during Trump one he ran in

59:11

opposition to Forever Wars I think was a

59:13

major part of his appeal it's what

59:15

allowed him to shatter the bush Dynasty

59:17

it's what I think really hurt kamla in

59:19

terms of having the Chinese Embrace her

59:22

so it's a major part of his I'd say not

59:25

just appeal but also his legacy that he

59:28

will not continue forever Wars but the

59:29

problem is that the blob keeps

59:33

infiltrating the Trump Administration or

59:35

they did they infiltrated Trump one by

59:37

putting in John Bolton and esper and all

59:39

these guys who frankly betrayed Trump

59:42

totally so I think a lot of people are

59:43

looking closely at will neocons be able

59:45

to worm their way into this

59:47

Administration and if they do it's a

59:49

very it would be very very sad I think

59:51

the difference this time around which is

59:53

so incredible is that you're now seeing

59:56

on

59:57

X people asking all the neocons to be

60:00

named and shamed and they're creating

60:02

these lists so that they can't worm

60:03

their way in it's the most incredible

60:05

thing I've ever seen where have you

60:08

espoused those views in the past if so

60:10

the likelihood that somebody will raise

60:14

an alarm Bell now on the so that you

60:16

can't get near this

60:18

Administration I've never seen anything

60:20

like that before actually yeah and you

60:21

know what here's the great danger is you

60:23

look at the last few months okay who was

60:26

there for trump it was people like Elon

60:28

it was basically you know all of us who

60:30

worked and look I'm a very minor minor

60:33

figure but I did my little part and

60:35

there were a lot of other people on the

60:37

ground doing their thing but where is

60:38

Elon today Elon had to fly home for a

60:41

Tesla board meeting he's got real

60:42

companies to run and who all of a sudden

60:44

shows up in maral Lago the swamp

60:46

creatures they were nowhere to be found

60:48

for the last three months now the swamp

60:50

creatures come crawling out and they're

60:52

going to be swarming Mara Lago and

60:53

trying to worm their way into the

60:54

administration and that's that's the the

60:57

issue is we got to keep you know this is

60:59

where I I hope that all the the Maga

61:02

influencers Stay Frosty and stay

61:05

involved we have to consolidate this

61:07

Victory and get reform type people in

61:10

the administration not just the usual

61:13

type people from Washington would you

61:15

serve if asked no I mean look I I've

61:18

already said before I'm the key manic

61:19

craft I can't do that but you know look

61:21

I would do something part-time meaning

61:23

if it wasn't a full-time job if I didn't

61:25

have to leave my current job if it was

61:26

just serving on some advisory committee

61:29

or something that that was compatible

61:31

with my current job I would do that

61:33

that's a no-brainer I would love

61:35

absolutely if not full-time because I'm

61:37

running a company but yeah if there was

61:39

the opportunity to help basically just

61:41

put me on the Doge committee sacks if

61:43

you wouldn't mind I just want to go like

61:45

line item by line item in one afternoon

61:47

and I'm out of there like I'm just gonna

61:48

go did say this today but he said The A

61:51

Team are running companies we're all

61:53

we're all running companies but if asked

61:56

to serve especially in a part-time

61:59

capacity where you don't have to divest

62:01

everything you own and you can actually

62:02

just go and call and actually

62:04

just make sure good decisions get made

62:06

it would be an honor to serve in that

62:08

capacity yeah I think everybody should

62:10

have given a chance I want to say one

62:12

thing just to build on yeah and then I

62:13

want to ask you one more question sham

62:15

go ahead I do want

62:16

to give a shout out to Elon and in one

62:19

very specific way you know you've heard

62:22

all these stories where he gets obsessed

62:25

about something

62:26

and then he focuses on it at the sake of

62:30

everything else and strips it down and

62:33

gets to First principles rebuilds it

62:36

back up and it

62:37

works and as far as I can tell basically

62:40

when he decided that this election was

62:42

going to come down to

62:46

Pennsylvania on one hand and young men

62:51

on the

62:52

other he just kept doing that one thing

62:57

over and over and over again every time

63:01

you turned on X he was doing a rally

63:04

crazy he was speaking to the residents

63:07

of Pennsylvania and spent like two weeks

63:09

there young disaffected voters and

63:12

getting them out and then his pack built

63:16

an

63:17

infrastructure that rivaled the

63:19

Democratic infrastructure in terms of

63:21

get out the vote and

63:22

transation with a lot less money and

63:25

only a month or two is is incredible

63:29

well and then the sweet Stakes was also

63:32

inred it's really really incred there

63:34

was a lot of controversy around the

63:35

sweepstakes idea I don't know why that

63:37

was so controversial because if you

63:39

think about that was the media trying to

63:41

make an issue that was a nothing Burger

63:43

a burger yeah and so they you know I

63:45

think this is where it was dismissed on

63:47

its face because if any person spent

63:49

eight seconds understanding the law the

63:52

the the judge dismissed it within an

63:53

hour so you know if we look at that

63:55

million

63:56

sweep Stakes to sign up for his pack if

63:58

you think about how people normally uh

64:01

get people to sign up they're paying a

64:03

dollar a click probably $50 a click

64:05

whatever it is using giving money to ABC

64:08

or giving money to Facebook and he just

64:10

said hey I'll just do a sweep stake sign

64:11

up for this and then I have you in the

64:13

database and then I can Market it to you

64:16

there's no difference between giving

64:17

away a million dollar sweep Stakes or

64:19

buying a bunch of ads and paying by

64:20

click and for everybody to frame that as

64:23

he's buying votes when it was so clear

64:25

he wasn't

64:26

I think that's the kind of media

64:28

manipulation people are getting Savvy to

64:29

and does not work anymore it was very

64:32

clear it was just a sweep Stakes to sign

64:33

up for his pack no different than paying

64:36

$10 a click to Facebook when the legal

64:39

infrastructure of America dismisses a

64:40

case on its face within 60 Minutes of it

64:43

being heard it means it is a farce yeah

64:46

I mean look I think what Elon showed is

64:49

that a smart person can come in who who

64:52

basically like you said can go into

64:54

demon mode with how a startup or

64:56

innovation mentality is willing to spend

64:58

money but wants to do it smartly but is

65:00

really hardcore can come in and beat the

65:03

supposed professionals their own game I

65:05

think one of the big stories that's

65:08

going to come out there's already some

65:09

tea being spilt within Democratic

65:11

circles about Jen Ali Dylan who was the

65:14

campaign manager that kamla Harris

65:17

inherited from Biden she had a billion

65:19

dollars to spend billion doll the

65:21

campaign still ended $20 million in debt

65:24

in debt and this at least has been

65:26

reported Mone go so well I'll tell you

65:28

the money went to expensive Consultants

65:31

they did overly elaborate staged events

65:33

they did these like fake concerts

65:35

celebrity cameos supposedly they paid

65:37

Beyonce $10 million and they didn't even

65:39

get a song out of it and that ended up

65:41

you know pissing off she got paid they

65:42

were paying I don't know if that's true

65:44

I just read it in a tweet so I I can't

65:46

say for sure but that's what I read yeah

65:49

who knows it sounds it sounds suspect

65:50

but the point is they spent a lot of

65:53

money on the consultants and you know

65:57

the events and Elon went after the Amish

65:59

you know that's like a lot smarter the

66:02

person on the Democratic side where I

66:04

feel the most disappointment after all

66:06

of this is Barack

66:09

Obama I think he in the period when he

66:13

was elected to me was just

66:16

Transcendent and I thought that this is

66:19

a person that

66:21

really was immune to getting assimilated

66:25

into the B and I don't know why I

66:27

thought that but I did think that and I

66:31

was just so saddened to see the tone and

66:35

the rhetoric from Barack Obama during

66:37

this last home stretch it I think was

66:41

reputationally very damaging to him what

66:43

did you say that offended you it was

66:45

less about it didn't offend me it was

66:47

just observing or disappointed you the

66:50

when the rhetoric was you know trying to

66:52

propagate these lies the very fine

66:54

people hoax all these things I just

66:56

thought he's so much smarter than the

66:58

abortion ban the abortion ban he knows

67:00

that these things are not true why is he

67:03

saying objective lies I don't really

67:06

judge politicians for doing it in

67:09

general but I never considered him a

67:11

politician I sort of considered him here

67:12

just like this Echelon

67:14

above and I and I was I was really

67:17

disappointed that he chose to go down

67:19

that path yeah well I I I could

67:21

definitely add to that I mean look I

67:22

think o Obama's whole Mystique was that

67:24

he transcended into politics and he

67:27

tried to maintain that position of being

67:29

above the fry and Let The Grubby

67:31

business of politics be beneath him and

67:34

even during the whole coup against Biden

67:36

I mean they say that Obama signed off he

67:38

was basically in favor of the the

67:40

switcheroo to Harris but he was the last

67:43

person to endorse it right he did not

67:44

want to be seen as doing the dirty work

67:46

that was left to Nancy Pelosi but

67:48

there's no question that the switcheroo

67:50

I think was was backed by Obama and then

67:54

he did everything he could to prop of

67:56

Harris including using the very fine

67:57

people hoax telling these lies and I I

68:00

agree chamath I think that he has

68:02

diminished himself he's brought himself

68:04

now down to the level of politics down

68:06

to the level of a average politician

68:08

right I think probably you're

68:10

disappointed because you had such a high

68:11

Benchmark for him but we were just

68:13

talking about Trump saying he would end

68:15

the war on day one he said that he's

68:18

going to deport 15 million people and

68:21

you know all these politicians lie so I

68:23

think my closing statement on all of

68:26

this is y'all were a key part in putting

68:29

Trump in obviously and if he starts

68:34

behaving in the way he behaved during

68:35

his first term the darker things he did

68:38

I hope that y'all will call him on it

68:40

and publicly call him on it and that he

68:42

will steer towards you know his better

68:44

angels and that's my hope for America

68:46

and my hope for all of you who helped

68:48

put him in office and played a very

68:50

significant role in getting him here

68:51

when he does something crazy if he does

68:54

try to drag 15 million people out the

68:55

the country is that okay with you sex

68:58

well you said that he would start with a

68:59

million of people 500,000 to a million

69:01

who are clear criminals he should do

69:03

that what JD said and we all agree yeah

69:05

JD said that the way you about the other

69:07

14 he said that the way that you do

69:09

deportations is the same way you eat an

69:11

elephant you do it one bite at a time

69:13

eat a sandwich so the way you eat an

69:15

elephant is you do one bite at a time

69:17

let's start with the biggest criminals

69:19

the biggest people who shouldn't be here

69:20

and then let's see what happens after

69:21

that and look if he went 14 million what

69:24

would you you be in support of that I we

69:27

haven't gotten there yet the point is

69:28

you take the first bite of the sandwich

69:29

then you talk about the second bite but

69:31

there was a line from the 2016 election

69:33

about Trump that I think was attributed

69:34

to Peter teal which is very important

69:36

which is that Trump should be taken

69:38

seriously but not

69:40

literally sometimes when he expresses a

69:42

policy or a point of view he sells it so

69:45

when he says I'm going to end the

69:46

Ukraine war on day one does that mean

69:49

he's literally going to do it on day one

69:50

no what it means is he's going to try

69:52

really hard to end the Ukraine war if he

69:54

does it on day 365 of his presidency

69:57

instead of day one I'm not going to come

69:59

out and say he lied he didn't do what he

70:01

said no I'm going to say he got the job

70:02

done he did what he said he was going to

70:04

do so I think it's very important to

70:06

judge him in that way when he says I'm

70:08

going to deport 15 million people do I

70:10

expect him to do all 15 million not

70:12

necessarily but if he closes the Border

70:15

builds the wall seals it so it's no

70:17

longer a problem and deports 500,000 to

70:19

a million hardcore criminals out of this

70:21

country I'm going to say that was a

70:23

massive success and you know what's

70:24

going to happen Legacy me is going say

70:26

well he lied because he didn't Deport

70:27

the other 14.2 million come on let

70:31

understand let's understand the

70:32

difference between camping and governing

70:35

I agree with all that and I do think if

70:38

he does try to do the 14 million that's

70:39

the thing I have concerns about got it

70:41

okay freeberg over to you so let's talk

70:43

about the cabinet positions chamath a

70:45

guy like RFK Jr has never held an

70:47

executive position before you and others

70:50

on this panel saaks J myself we''ve all

70:54

kind of managed large groups of people

70:55

we've all been in positions of being a

70:57

CEO of a business you talk a lot about

71:00

bringing in The Outsiders and the Trump

71:01

campaign talks a lot about bringing

71:02

these Outsiders sexs begrudgingly

71:05

highlights the swamp creatures emerging

71:07

to ask for those slots and those

71:08

positions because they are lifelong

71:11

politicians and bureaucrats how do we

71:13

have trust and faith or do you think

71:15

that that's the whole point is that you

71:17

have folks that don't have the

71:18

experience to run these organizations

71:20

that don't have the insights on who

71:21

actually works there on how they operate

71:23

and them coming in is going to provide

71:25

enough of a fresh perspective and things

71:27

up enough that that's exactly the point

71:30

and like talk a little bit about

71:31

bringing in Outsiders but Outsiders that

71:33

can be effective in transforming these

71:35

government agencies not just blowing

71:37

them up or is the goal to blow them

71:39

up no again I would I would just temper

71:43

and tone down that rhetoric there's not

71:45

nobody's blowing up anything but I think

71:47

step one is going to be a level of

71:50

transparency so that doing the obvious

71:53

becomes obvious and I think that if you

71:55

look back over 40 or 50 years what has

71:58

happened is that secretaries and

72:00

political appointments have gone from

72:03

get the best person in the job because

72:04

they know it to here's political Peola

72:07

if you will and I think the pendulum has

72:10

swung to two far of an extreme that's

72:12

why the Swamp People are able to

72:14

maintain control because the person

72:17

above them who's appointed doesn't

72:18

fundamentally know the inner workings of

72:20

the

72:20

organization I suspect what you're going

72:23

to see is a radical push to

72:25

transparency and I think that when you

72:27

combine transparency and SX called for

72:29

this a version of the Twitter files for

72:31

the government I do think you're going

72:33

to see that but if you combine that push

72:36

to transparency with a handful of topics

72:39

you know by the way we introduced a long

72:41

time ago this idea of zerob based

72:43

budgeting into the Lexicon and language

72:45

of these political candidates that they

72:46

used all the way through to the Finish

72:48

Line I do believe the Republicans

72:51

earnestly mean it and so I think when

72:53

you put these two things together

72:55

freeberg I think what you will have is

72:58

all of this laid be and then I think

73:01

it'll start a debate on what to do and I

73:02

think the the decisions about what to do

73:06

will be so blindingly obvious the lwh

73:08

hanging fruit will save this country

73:11

once we pluck it can can I say a word

73:14

about I I think it's so important for

73:17

Bobby Kennedy to be confirmed in

73:18

whatever c a position that he's going to

73:20

get number one you know we look back the

73:23

campaign now and it seems obvious that

73:25

Trump was going to win it but at the

73:26

time that Bobby Kennedy came on board

73:28

that was a major factor in shifting

73:31

momentum towards Trump so that's number

73:34

one number two we need to keep Bobby

73:36

Kennedy's Coalition as part of our

73:39

movement it's not just about what he did

73:41

in this last election it's keeping all

73:43

of those people those young people and

73:45

those former Democrats on side and part

73:48

of the Republican Party in the Maga

73:49

movement and number three he's genuinely

73:52

going to reform that huge part of the

73:54

bureaucracy

73:55

and that's extremely important we need

73:57

Outsiders to come in and shake things up

73:59

he's right about the regulatory capture

74:01

he's right about the marriage of state

74:03

power and corporate greed let's have

74:06

someone go in there who's got fresh eyes

74:08

but also understands how the bureaucracy

74:10

works because he's litigated and shake

74:12

things up if you look at what Bobby

74:14

posted to Instagram Nick I don't know if

74:16

you can find it but it was pretty

74:18

telling on this dimension

74:21

of the first inning is going to be about

74:24

absolute radical transparency and

74:26

sharing with the American people

74:28

everything that's been that's been under

74:29

the covers by the way it's not just on

74:32

that Dimension right we're going to see

74:34

the Epstein files we're going to see the

74:36

Diddy lists we're going to see the JFK

74:39

file I know that these things are sort

74:40

of Fringe conspiracy theory type things

74:42

for some people but the point is from

74:45

Pillar To Post that first phase of this

74:48

radical truth seeking

74:50

transparency is an incredible

74:52

disinfectant that you can build from and

74:54

he told the FDA I think something to the

74:56

effect of pack your bags and keep your

74:58

records now let's let's take the

75:00

hyperbolic part of it out but it's the

75:03

keep your records part that should be

75:04

valuable because we deserve to have

75:07

answers now when you think at the same

75:10

time that you have inventions like AI

75:12

that can crunch every single piece of

75:15

data Under the Sun and tell you the

75:16

absolute truth imagine when you put

75:19

transparency and the government sharing

75:21

incredible amounts of information with

75:24

the compute power that the Googles and

75:25

the Facebooks and the and the open a

75:27

eyes of the world are creating you'll

75:30

know these answers to all of these

75:32

questions vaccines are they good or bad

75:34

when how fluoride is it good or bad when

75:37

how all of these drugs that have been

75:39

approved why all of these drugs that

75:41

have not been approved why you're going

75:43

to start to see some really interesting

75:45

things has there been research on the

75:47

impacts of food on physiology were they

75:49

suppressed were they not suppressed so I

75:51

think phase one is get it all out into

75:55

the open totally and and what I what I

75:58

said just what what shth referred to is

76:00

yeah I said we should do Twitter files

76:02

for the whole federal government just

76:04

what I meant by that is remember before

76:06

Elon bought Twitter they told us for

76:09

years that the idea that Twitter was

76:12

shadowbanning conservatives and engaging

76:14

in censorship was a conspiracy theory

76:17

then Elon opened up the Twitter files

76:18

and we saw that it was all true and

76:21

moreover that the government was engaged

76:23

in censorship they been working hand in

76:26

glove with the trust and safety

76:27

department the FBI had logins they could

76:29

just go in themselves I me crazy the FBI

76:31

had their own tool called teleport which

76:33

would allow them to transmit secret

76:35

instructions to the trust and safety

76:37

team at Twitter and they were censoring

76:38

based on those instructions that's

76:40

completely unacceptable Twitter

76:42

management lied about it the government

76:43

lied about it we only found out through

76:45

the Twitter files let's do a Twitter

76:47

files for the federal government what do

76:49

you think we're going to find out what

76:50

do you think we' find out about covid

76:53

what do you think really happened there

76:54

if Bobby Kennedy can do that the lies

76:57

they told us incompleteness of the

76:59

actual clinical validation studies the

77:02

authorizations and the waivers that were

77:05

secured how good or how brittle or how

77:07

fragile was that data by the way I think

77:10

what we what it'll also do freeberg is

77:12

if if it looks like this data is

77:14

actually of extreme high quality you

77:16

know what that does it reestablishes

77:18

trust in that institution which is also

77:20

a win so this whole thing is a

77:23

win-win well and well let's not forget

77:27

the foil leader they were literally

77:29

being taught how to route around fou

77:32

Team how to route around subpoenas and

77:35

people looking for information I mean

77:37

there's a lot to uncover here I'm 100%

77:40

here for it yeah so just to be clear

77:42

there there's a there's a there's a law

77:43

in the United States called the Freedom

77:44

of Information Act the Foya uh is kind

77:47

of a common term and it gives the power

77:50

and authority to individual citizens and

77:52

and third party agencies to have a check

77:55

and balance on the federal government

77:56

that they can go in they can request

77:58

actual data actual files and it is all

78:01

necessarily available to the public at

78:04

any time except for classified

78:06

information okay well the federal

78:08

government now over classifies

78:10

everything we have something like what

78:11

like a billion classified documents they

78:13

literally classify everything so through

78:15

the foyer process thirdparty lawyers and

78:18

nonprofits have made requests to federal

78:20

agencies to get access to this sort of

78:22

information and I've done it I don't

78:24

know if you guys have ever use foyer

78:25

powers for information from the federal

78:27

government I had to do foyer requests 10

78:29

years ago to get weather data or 15

78:31

years ago for my startup climate it was

78:33

the only way we were able to get access

78:35

to a bunch of weather data was through

78:36

foyer requests and then we were able to

78:37

use the that data in our services

78:39

because it is public data the taxpayers

78:41

pay for it so we had a right to it

78:43

similarly you can make foyer requests of

78:45

emails and uh inter agency

78:47

Communications and so on but SX I think

78:50

it seems and jcal to your point about

78:52

the foil lady there may over time have

78:55

been some degree of Corruption of the

78:56

foyer process in all of these agencies

78:59

which has made it more difficult for

79:01

individuals and third parties to have

79:02

the appropriate checks and balances on

79:04

the data in these agencies because of

79:06

the way they've kind of officiated

79:07

access slowed down the process sometimes

79:09

it takes months for them to respond to

79:11

you and it's become quite difficult so

79:12

the Foy the intention of the Freedom of

79:14

Information Act may have been hindered

79:17

by by the bureaucracy this will not be

79:19

through for let me make one other

79:20

suggestion is we need a massive

79:23

declassification effort of the federal

79:25

government maybe this is the way to

79:26

actually implement the Twitter files

79:28

strategy is the problem is we have a

79:31

massive over classification problem

79:33

billions of documents been classify at

79:35

the federal government why because those

79:37

bureaucracies know that they can kind of

79:39

do whatever they want and kind of work

79:41

in peace without having to disclose what

79:43

they're really doing if they just Mark

79:44

classified on a document someone needs

79:47

to go through that and start massively

79:49

declassifying and if they do that then

79:51

there'll be a lot more documents

79:52

available to foyer requests so that

79:55

right there would be a huge help and

79:56

then like you said the foyer process

79:58

could be tightened up it could be a lot

80:00

faster could be a lot easier and they

80:02

should not be able to circumvent it by

80:04

doing the kind of stuff that Jal

80:05

referred to during covid where they were

80:08

like deliberately misspelling

80:10

words Aster in you know hacker speak in

80:13

order to avoid this and they were also

80:16

told a bunch of people who are in

80:19

three-letter agencies just by default

80:22

put this at the highest level of

80:23

security not to be disass Declassified

80:27

so they unnecessarily put everything in

80:29

classified and so

80:32

now every email is marked at the highest

80:35

level of classification which means

80:37

there's no Discerning it and if you were

80:39

to blame an FBI agent if they told you

80:41

hey just put everything on classified so

80:43

it doesn't get out okay that seems like

80:45

a pretty good way to cover your ass and

80:47

that's got to change yeah well a lot a

80:49

lot to to come in the weeks ahead I'm

80:51

sure we will do more updates as the

80:53

cabinet position

80:55

you're a man of science I know you have

80:57

some differences with RFK do you want I

81:00

have very deep trepidation about RFK

81:02

having oversight I think the authority

81:05

might be limited with respect to the

81:08

legislative Authority that's vested by

81:10

the Congress which is the the one piece

81:12

I I look I mean as you guys know there's

81:13

a lot that RFK brings up that I very

81:16

that that resonates with me I I'm not a

81:18

black and white guy so there are things

81:20

that he says that make a lot of sense

81:21

there are things I've pointed out

81:23

particularly around microplastic in the

81:25

environment particular around chemistry

81:26

that we use in our food and our systems

81:28

of food and production and I I believe

81:30

very strongly that we have real issues

81:32

that have you know compounding effects

81:35

on our health so let let me not be be

81:38

too flippant about that I am not a all

81:40

vaccines are always good all the time

81:42

person I think that every one of them

81:43

needs to be studied on the merits and

81:44

the risks I think fluoride is is an

81:46

interesting conversation to have what

81:48

are the merits what are the risks and

81:49

why is it a federal why is there Federal

81:52

authority over fluide and water which by

81:54

the way there isn't it's it's all local

81:55

municipalities get to decide on a

81:57

nuanced basis then net net where do you

81:59

wind up freeberg net net where do you

82:01

wind up I will say that there are a

82:02

number of things that RFK have said that

82:03

that caused me a lot of trouble that

82:05

that I'm very troubled by because I

82:07

think that he has said things that are

82:08

factually wrong and I want him to be

82:10

open to debate and open to review of

82:13

objective truth and that's it and that's

82:14

it and as long as do you like him as a

82:19

disinfectant as a rabble Rouser as to

82:21

shake up the system or netn net do you

82:23

think it's too risky to let him in

82:24

generally I think all these systems

82:26

should be challenged 100% okay so you

82:28

want to send him in you say you want him

82:30

to be open to debate I I personally have

82:32

never seen a candidate for office who's

82:34

been more open to discourse debate

82:37

interviews than Bobby Kennedy's done

82:38

everything he's been on this show twice

82:40

classifying him otherwise I'm not

82:42

classifying otherwise you know who is

82:43

not open to debate and discourse and

82:45

transparency is a bureaucracy that's the

82:48

problem if you want government reform

82:50

you have to get into the bureaucracy you

82:52

need Outsiders to come in you need make

82:54

it transparent you got to

82:57

declassify that's what you got to do one

82:59

of the most important aspects of science

83:01

not the the recently Legacy Media or

83:04

jokingly definition of quotequote

83:06

science but science is meant to be a

83:08

process of skepticism interrogation and

83:11

the search for objective truth which

83:12

means that you should be constantly

83:14

questioning whether you are right or

83:16

wrong and I do think that that is a

83:18

necessary part of the process of science

83:20

science is not meant to be a dictatorial

83:22

regime and so I think that setting the

83:25

framework for how we operate some of the

83:28

agencies and authorities that are

83:30

supposed to be rooted in science to have

83:32

the necessary process of skepticism

83:35

review and transparency into that I

83:38

think will re reassert faith and

83:40

reassert trust by the public in how

83:42

these agencies are operating and I hope

83:44

that that happens I I really do because

83:46

I do think that there are very good

83:47

people in all these agencies who do very

83:49

good work and there's a lot of very

83:51

important advances that have come out of

83:52

the United States of America and have

83:54

have gone through processes through the

83:55

federal government that have actually

83:57

done really great things for Americans

83:59

and for Humanity and so I don't want us

84:01

to dismiss things as being Whimsical

84:03

bureaucracies that that don't have any

84:04

rooting in science but I do think that

84:06

it's important to have this degree of

84:07

skepticism and process and have

84:08

transparency so that's all

84:11

well I'd like you to show me in the

84:13

Constitution where the bureaucracy or

84:16

the administrative state is a branch of

84:18

the government I see in the Constitution

84:20

that we are supposed to be ruled by an

84:22

executive branch a islative branch and a

84:25

judicial branch I do not see hold on I

84:27

do not see an administrative branch that

84:29

has sprung into into existence over the

84:32

last several decades yep and it rules us

84:36

there's roughly three million people who

84:37

work for the federal government of those

84:39

the president basically appoints 3,000

84:42

and it takes forever to get them through

84:43

yeah so we have roughly three million

84:45

people who don't report to anyone

84:47

nominally they're supposed to report to

84:49

the executive branch but the president

84:51

can't fire him we talked about in the

84:53

previous show if Elon had gone into

84:55

Twitter and he hadn't been allowed to

84:57

fire anyone do you think he could have

84:59

restored free speech to Twitter of

85:01

course not they just would have kept

85:02

doing whatever they wanted to do and

85:04

that is the big problem in the federal

85:05

government right now is we are ruled by

85:07

a fourth branch of government that is

85:09

not in the Constitution that doesn't

85:11

report to anybody it is not subject to

85:14

elections we can't vote them out and we

85:17

can't fire them and they have been in

85:18

the Forefront of trying to stop Trump

85:21

and the larger Reform movement that he

85:23

represents ever since Trump got elected

85:25

in 2016 remember it was members of the

85:28

administrative State specifically the

85:30

security State who said don't worry

85:31

we're going to be the insurance policy

85:33

against Trump and they have done

85:35

everything possible through the rushia

85:37

gate hoax through laare through yeah the

85:39

whole steel dosier hoax to basically try

85:42

and stop Trump and the reform movement

85:45

that he represents and the big question

85:46

of Trump's second term will be whether

85:48

he can finally subdue this bureaucracy

85:51

and bring it under Democratic control

85:53

under the control the executive branch

85:55

as the American people want and as I

85:57

think the Constitution intended right

85:59

now we are run by an unelected branch of

86:01

government that has to stop and what

86:03

Trump represents is not dictatorship but

86:05

democracy the Triumph of democracy over

86:08

this bureaucracy and a and a big a big

86:10

important moment for for this movement

86:15

this

86:16

return to the fundamentals of what was

86:19

vested in the

86:20

constitution is the Chevon Doctrine case

86:23

at the Supreme Court earlier this year

86:25

It reversed the Authority for agencies

86:29

to create their own rules and

86:30

regulations that they can then enforce

86:32

on private Enterprise and if that case

86:35

carries through and is allowed to be

86:37

used to support the efforts to

86:40

deregulate or to De agency what you call

86:43

kind of the bureaucracy I think it

86:45

enables a lot of the change that that

86:47

folks are looking for why should for

86:50

example some commission be sprung out of

86:53

you know some assembly being being

86:54

created and then that commission gets to

86:56

create their own rules and their own

86:57

regulations that effectively are law

86:59

that prevent private citizens and

87:01

Enterprises from being able to operate

87:03

and make decisions and I think that was

87:04

a very important moment for this

87:07

movement was the the Supreme Court case

87:09

on the Chevon Doctrine earlier year I

87:10

don't know if you agree with me on this

87:12

seems totally agree I think that was an

87:13

absolute

87:14

precursor which is it it was insane I

87:16

mean again you had a Supreme Court

87:19

ruling that effectively made the

87:21

administrative State the highest law in

87:22

the land even though there's no

87:24

constitutional basis for it so yeah

87:26

repealing Chevron was definitely half of

87:28

it and I think the other half of it is

87:29

going to be whether lawmakers have to

87:32

pass laws you can't have individual

87:33

commissions pass laws that's that's the

87:35

whole point we need bills passed by the

87:38

Republican Congress that Trump can sign

87:40

but we also need I think cabinet level

87:43

appointments who will start to subdue

87:45

the bureaucracy bring them under control

87:47

find out what they're doing just give us

87:49

transparency around what they're doing

87:52

Twitter file this thing so then we can

87:53

reform

87:54

I think that we're going to look back on

87:56

this era and I think it's going to last

87:58

about 20 years or so at least which I

88:02

call a return to

88:03

originalism we are returning to the

88:07

founding principles of this startup

88:10

called America and I think it's

88:12

incredible I think saak is right there

88:14

is this unbelievable living

88:17

document that created this incredible

88:20

experiment we veered way far away from

88:22

it it's taken

88:25

us a lot of courage to get back to that

88:29

place where now you can actually let

88:32

that guiding document govern a highly

88:36

meritocratic country so it's going to be

88:39

a lot of hard work but my gosh it's just

88:40

an incredible moment and opportunity

88:43

everybody should just take a breath and

88:46

remember that I just like to do a quick

88:48

survey of some of the local and state

88:50

elections and and get some reactions I

88:52

was going to try and talk a little bit

88:53

about what's going on in San fr Frisco

88:54

in California I'll just hit on it our

88:56

friend my friend Daniel lur was it looks

88:59

like he's going to be the mayor of San

89:00

Francisco beating out the incumbent

89:03

mayor London breed

89:05

Daniel ran on a moderate platform and

89:10

has an intention of fixing a lot of the

89:13

operations and inefficiencies in the San

89:15

Francisco government which has seen a

89:17

ballooning in budget San Francisco has

89:18

the highest budget per capita of any

89:20

city in the United States I think 50%

89:22

higher than New York with a lower

89:24

functioning kind of set of Municipal

89:26

services and there's a lot of

89:28

opportunity for improvement there this

89:29

is the first time really important stat

89:32

first time an outsider has been elected

89:33

mayor in San Francisco since 1911 every

89:37

mayor elected since 1911 in San

89:39

Francisco was an existing government

89:43

employee or government civil servant so

89:45

just like what we saw in the federal

89:47

elections we are seeing an outsider

89:48

being placed inal office in S I wish I

89:51

wish I wish Lorie Hardy congrat rations

89:54

Nick can you show him the

89:56

Tweet your city has become a dangerous

89:58

dirty dumpster fire for bad ideas from

90:00

Libs I hope you do the obvious and be on

90:02

the side of cops Justice clean streets

90:03

and meritocracy that's your message to

90:05

the incoming well yeah I mean he is has

90:09

been a major proponent you were going to

90:12

run for mayor one once J I was lobbied I

90:16

was approached and I was given uh a a

90:19

lot of support uh seven figures of

90:21

support to go do it

90:24

it's a very hard job because the

90:26

supervisors uh actually run the city and

90:28

a lot of the supervisors uh like they

90:31

got booted too no couple of them got

90:33

booted Dean Preston got booted dopy Dean

90:37

andp Dean that was big so the the Board

90:39

of Supervisors has also shifted moderate

90:42

the mayor is now going to be a moderate

90:44

Outsider and there's a real opportunity

90:46

to rebuild and reform San Francisco it's

90:48

a place that I've called home for 25

90:50

years it's a place where I operate my

90:51

business and it feels like a lot of the

90:54

citizens what

90:56

hasic I still live there hold on I still

91:00

I still live there and I do think that

91:01

it was a big election in terms of

91:03

improving things in San Francisco so

91:04

congrats to Daniel lur he's a friend of

91:06

mine as well you go down to La another

91:09

big race we booted gasone who was the

91:12

Soros da who ruined San Francisco and

91:15

then failed his way up to La was ruining

91:16

LA and Nathan Hawkman who's uh you know

91:20

moderate beat him by something like 20

91:22

points and then like I me mentioned we

91:24

got prop 36 passed in California by

91:27

about 70% which reverse from the

91:29

excesses of Prop 47 which is the was the

91:32

proposition a decade ago that was passed

91:35

by then lieutenant governor Gavin and

91:37

then attorney general kamla Harris to de

91:41

facto legalize shoplifting so the people

91:45

of California have had enough of these

91:48

policies that frankly enable crime

91:50

enable homelessness enable drug use and

91:53

they want a correction look even wokes

91:56

and blue State liberals don't want their

91:58

cars broken into I mean it's really

92:01

shocking it's really simple and I mean

92:03

the crazy thing in Los Angeles with

92:05

gasone was the a number of people who I

92:07

know live there now know people in Santa

92:10

Monica in brenwood in belir where we

92:12

lived for so many years Sachs have home

92:16

invasions have started again I mean that

92:18

is like a real breaking point for it's

92:21

scary to have your home broken into by a

92:23

gang right and and you know one one

92:26

final point on this is that while the

92:29

people of California resoundingly again

92:32

over 70% supported prop 36 there was one

92:35

prominent figure who was opposed to it

92:37

which was Gavin Newsome he said when he

92:39

saw early polling I don't know what

92:40

state I'm living in so you know look the

92:43

state we're living in Gavin is the one

92:46

that you created you're the one who gave

92:47

us these policies you're the one who

92:49

gave us Prop 47 you're the one who gave

92:50

us zero bail you're the one who allowed

92:53

the the Democratic party in California

92:55

to be taken over by Soros da you've

92:57

never resisted these policies now you

92:59

have a choice you can see where the

93:00

people are at over 70% of California

93:03

wants a change I'd say on the rest of

93:06

the country if it's 70% California 90%

93:08

of the United States must you know is

93:11

opposed to these soft on crime policies

93:13

and if you ever have aspirations to be

93:16

anything more than Governor California

93:17

you better get on the right side of this

93:18

issue scks David scks should be the

93:21

governor of California let's do it

93:24

no I'm I I am 100% serious it's the

93:27

fifth largest economy in the

93:29

world let's do it this is this is this

93:31

is marked today as the day that I have

93:34

decided oh that I de has decided that I

93:37

am going to convince David to be the

93:39

governor of California I know great

93:41

campaign manager press secretary for him

93:43

hype man I will say um I'm just gonna

93:46

say that David sock would be an

93:47

incredible governor of Califor I really

93:50

I'm not a candidate I'm not a c I

93:52

understand blah BL right now he's lying

93:55

he said it to me privately there's no

93:57

rumor I'm just telling you right now

93:59

that within two years I will have

94:00

convinced him to do it it'll be the

94:02

perfect time Gavin Newsome has been

94:04

terrible for the state we have seen

94:07

trillions of dollars of market cap exit

94:10

the state in terms of corporations that

94:11

have left we have gone from record

94:14

surpluses to record deficits we have an

94:17

education system that is failing

94:18

millions of kids what is going on here

94:22

we have taxes that are through the the

94:23

roof and when you spend more and more

94:27

and more to get less and less and less

94:30

and it takes more and more out of

94:32

everybody's

94:33

pocket what is the answer the answer is

94:36

you have to fundamentally change

94:37

everything that's happening from first

94:39

principles well I will say one more

94:41

Point um about I will call it balance in

94:44

the

94:46

force when uh a party is captured and

94:49

moves too far in One Direction people

94:51

leave the party and they vote for the

94:53

other party

94:54

and then in order to attract people back

94:57

to the party they tack to the center my

95:00

big prediction over the next few years

95:02

as you will see a more Centrist

95:04

Democratic party as they try and I'll

95:06

take the other side and they try and

95:08

attract they're too I'll take the other

95:10

side so one one more topic before we W

95:13

Sacramento SE sax and Sacramento not

95:15

gonna happen not gonna guys before we

95:17

WAP there's one other topic that came up

95:19

in every conversation I had with

95:21

everyone about Trump that was a female

95:23

was abortion and it was and and look I

95:26

don't want to rehash again that it was

95:28

misrepresented what Trump's position is

95:30

but abortion has become a very sensitive

95:32

topic a woman's right to do what she

95:34

wants to do with her body when she wants

95:36

to do it is something that that most

95:39

women feel they are very deeply endowed

95:41

with and that should be an unalienable

95:43

right particularly in the United States

95:45

of America and that even sending this

95:47

back to States and States voting on it

95:50

creates a significant emotional response

95:52

that drives folks to one party the other

95:54

in Florida voters rejected an abortion

95:57

extension to 24 weeks Florida previously

96:00

had a 15we abortion ban but the current

96:02

six-week ban took effect in May so the

96:05

amendment that was being proposed on the

96:07

ballot this week uh would have a cified

96:10

abortion procedures up to 24 weeks in

96:12

the state constitution but it needed 60%

96:14

of the votes to pass but it only got

96:17

57% so it looks like a loss for a

96:21

pro-choice Advocates sax what is going

96:23

to happen now that these abortion laws

96:25

are being voted on these amendments to

96:27

state Constitutions are being voted on

96:29

how is this going to reshape American

96:31

politics and how are the parties going

96:33

to shift in the years ahead given how

96:35

important and how sensitive this this

96:37

topic has has become after the decision

96:40

of the Supreme Court recently look I I

96:42

think that what you're seeing in the

96:45

last election that we just had is the

96:47

beginning of the end of the salience of

96:49

this issue I mean abortion has been an

96:51

issue that has deeply fragmented America

96:53

for 50 years I mean the pro-choice

96:56

versus pro-life movements have been a

96:58

staple of American politics talking past

97:00

each other they were never able to get

97:02

to any sort of compromise with the

97:04

appeal of roie Wade with the do's

97:06

decision the issue has now been thrown

97:07

back to the States and every state is

97:09

working it out for themselves and in

97:11

Most states what's happening is it's

97:14

either the pro-choice totally wins or

97:16

they compromise on some number of weeks

97:18

I think that in Florida going for 24

97:20

weeks might have been a little bit too

97:21

many if they had tried to go back to 15

97:24

you know they probably could have gotten

97:25

there they probably could have gotten

97:26

from 57 to to 60 but that's what the

97:28

debate's going to be about now is just

97:30

basically in red States it's just going

97:31

to be agree about agreeing on a certain

97:33

number of weeks Blue states are pretty

97:35

much going to be pro-choice and you can

97:37

see that the federal level no one wants

97:39

to touch this anymore J you raised the

97:41

point during the the election cycle

97:43

during the campaign that dos would be

97:45

crushing for Trump and that women were

97:47

going to turn out in droves for Harris

97:50

on the base of this issue that simply

97:52

did not happen if you look at voter

97:54

turnout Trump increased his share of the

97:57

women's vote he did lose college

97:59

educated women so that subset of you

98:01

could call it more Progressive yeah

98:03

sorry College educ older women too I

98:05

think came out yeah but if you look at

98:06

women as a whole he won more of their

98:08

votes so how did Trump inoculate himself

98:11

on this issue he made it really clear he

98:13

was not in favor of a national ban he

98:15

said that he favored the exceptions and

98:17

that it was now up to the states he

98:19

basically assured the country the women

98:22

of the country that again that abortion

98:24

would not be banned and that was now a

98:25

local issue and I think the voters of

98:27

the country including women accepted

98:29

that and it is now a state issue so so

98:32

Maryland Missouri I think it's gone

98:34

Maryland Missouri Nevada Montana

98:36

Colorado Arizona all voted to codify the

98:39

right to abortion and remove abortion

98:41

bans on the other hand Nebraska voted

98:43

for a ban on abortions after the first

98:45

trimester and South Dakota voted against

98:48

a right to abortion so South Dakota

98:50

prohibits all abortions except when

98:52

necessary to you're going to end up

98:54

listen you're even in deep red States

98:57

like Ohio the pro-choice forces have won

98:59

these referenda it's just a handful of

99:02

cases like a very small number where the

99:04

pro-life have gotten their their way

99:07

again I think we're at the tail end of

99:09

this being a salian issue in American

99:11

politics I think Trump has ended it as a

99:13

federal issue and it's now going state

99:16

byst state and in most those States the

99:17

pro-choice forces are winning I think

99:19

this issue is over and I think it's over

99:21

because Republicans know not to touch

99:24

this jcal you've said it's the it's one

99:25

of the most important issues of the day

99:27

several times in the past you said women

99:29

were going to vote in droves for comma

99:30

because of the perception that Trump was

99:33

trying to pass a federal a lot of them

99:35

did clearly but not enough to swing the

99:37

election and you know it's going to be

99:41

you think it's gonna be to the question

99:42

is Sach right is this GNA stop being an

99:45

issue and it's now codified in state law

99:47

and or is this going continue to be

99:50

states where women will not be able to

99:52

get an abortion sadly they will not be

99:53

able to make that decision for

99:55

themselves that's my personal belief

99:56

they should be able to make the decision

99:57

for themselves I'd like to stay out of

99:59

it but sax is largely right that if you

100:02

don't if I'm reading it correctly think

100:05

about it if you're a state and you ban

100:07

abortion who's going to want to live

100:08

there you're going to have a lot of

100:09

people leaving and that's been an issue

100:11

here in Texas a lot of companies are

100:13

having a hard time with not only getting

100:15

women to move here to work at specific

100:17

companies in Texas but men are a well

100:20

are not are citing it as a concern so

100:23

it's going to make it really untenable

100:26

for an economy you're saying men don't

100:28

want to work for Tesla or SpaceX because

100:30

of abortions I have heard many stories

100:33

about people not wanting to come work at

100:35

companies in Texas because of this law

100:38

yes I have heard that from employers I'm

100:40

not talking about any of Von's companies

100:42

I don't speak for him

100:43

obviously but this has been an issue for

100:46

companies in Texas

100:48

okay guys this has been a fantastic

100:51

followup to this week's election I know

100:53

some people are bitterly disappointed

100:55

frustrated angry and sad about the

100:57

future of America and others are deeply

100:59

optimistic and excited and I think the

101:01

end of the day it's all gonna be okay

101:04

and I really do hope that everyone can

101:06

kind of have constructive conversations

101:08

about the future we'd all like to build

101:10

together we do here and uh I really

101:13

appreciate the friendship with you guys

101:15

I want to say congratulations to saak

101:16

and chamath for putting yourselves out

101:18

there as early as you did in campaigning

101:20

and promoting Donald Trump I think you

101:22

guys had a very influential role in

101:25

moving people for the effort you made

101:27

and the outcome congratulations more

101:29

than listen I'll say what I said again

101:32

he he's a good human being I would

101:34

encourage you to get to know him

101:36

yeah just that hold him accountable look

101:39

if he wants to invite me to Maro to have

101:41

a veggie burger and fries I'm there I

101:43

will um I will hang out what no veggie

101:46

burgers what are you talking about

101:47

before you go it's my

101:49

bestg B veggie burgers fake Bobby to ban

101:54

anything with I know remember all all of

101:58

your all that stuff is ver don't worry

102:00

Bears on the menu vegans better learn to

102:04

find natural sources of protein because

102:06

the unnatural sources the free market

102:07

Republicans have decided it's time to go

102:09

in and ban the market for fake meat

102:12

because my God we can't introduce fake

102:14

meat we have to tell you what to eat

102:15

what to do continues to disregulated

102:17

your physiology

102:19

s stop using your moderator privileges

102:22

to push your agenda free bur take care

102:24

guys I love you you byee love you guys

102:28

byebye let your winners

102:31

ride Rainman

102:35

David and instead we open source it to

102:38

the fans and they've just gone crazy

102:40

with it love you queen

102:44

[Music]

102:48

of Besties

102:51

are that's my take it I your

102:55

driveway man oh man my habiter will meet

102:59

me at we should all just get a room and

103:01

just have one big huge orgy cuz they're

103:03

all this useless it's like this like

103:04

sexual tension that they just need to

103:06

release

103:07

[Music]

103:12

somehow we need to get

103:18

[Music]

103:22

mer going all in

Interactive Summary

The podcast episode features a detailed analysis of the 2024 U.S. election results, where the participants discuss Donald Trump's victory and the shifting political landscape. Key topics include the impact of alternative media, the perceived failures of the Democratic party's messaging and candidate selection, and the role of inflation in voter decision-making. The discussion also covers potential administrative and cabinet changes, the role of figures like Elon Musk and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and the future direction of the Republican administration regarding government reform, bureaucracy, and transparency.

Suggested questions

3 ready-made prompts