HomeVideos

The Secret To Loving Your Work with Bruce Daisley | E66

Now Playing

The Secret To Loving Your Work with Bruce Daisley | E66

Transcript

2469 segments

0:00

you were the vp of twitter

0:03

obviously donald trump has just been

0:04

booted off twitter permanently what do

0:06

you think about that

0:07

there's a 70 year long study out of yale

0:10

university looking at what

0:11

the the secret of longevity and

0:13

happiness is and the secret of longevity

0:15

and happiness

0:16

is

0:24

work the thing we spend the majority of

0:26

our lives doing

0:27

today's guest is an expert on exactly

0:30

that

0:31

how can you be an expert on work bruce

0:33

daisley spent the last

0:35

five to ten years studying what makes

0:38

work

0:38

joyous what makes it miserable how we

0:41

get burnt out

0:42

and what matters the most when it comes

0:44

to work he's been named one of the most

0:45

influential londoners in the uk has been

0:48

named as one of the most influential

0:49

britons

0:50

in the united kingdom bruce daisley's

0:52

book the joy of work became the best

0:54

selling business hardback book in 2019

0:57

he has his own podcast so he's one hell

0:59

of a talker as well

1:00

and as the world has transitioned over

1:02

the last 10 months to this zoom-centric

1:03

remote working lifestyle

1:05

i think now is a great time to ask

1:06

ourselves the question

1:08

what makes work enjoyable how can we get

1:10

the most out of work how do we avoid

1:12

burnout

1:13

and how do we maximize our motivation

1:15

bruce has the answers

1:17

so without further ado my name is

1:18

stephen butler and this is the director

1:20

ceo

1:21

i hope nobody's listening but if you are

1:24

then please keep this to yourself

1:32

bruce you were you wrote a i feel like

1:35

that's an understatement you wrote a

1:36

smash hit book about

1:38

work called the joy of work and i've

1:40

seen this book absolutely everywhere

1:42

it's been an absolute phenomenon

1:44

so you know considering the fact that

1:45

the world has fundamentally shifted over

1:47

the last

1:48

nine ten months because of this pandemic

1:50

and the way we work has changed so much

1:53

i wanted to get your view of this remote

1:56

working

1:57

zoom um sort of working culture that has

2:00

now

2:01

been forced upon us just before i let

2:03

you answer i'm gonna give a little

2:04

sentence around around my take on it

2:06

i hate it um and

2:09

when when in march when we were forced

2:12

out as a ceo for business to tell my

2:13

employees that we're gonna be working

2:14

from home

2:15

and we have this amazing office which

2:16

gives us all this community um

2:19

i know that about 50 of my workforce

2:21

liked the idea

2:22

but i 100 hate it for a number of

2:24

reasons what's your take

2:26

so i think at the outset i shared some

2:29

of your reservations

2:30

brony brown talks about this thing which

2:32

is collective effervescence

2:34

and it's a it's a good way she's she's

2:36

coined to turn for something you see

2:38

quite a lot in social science

2:39

that even the introverts amongst us

2:41

actually quite like being around people

2:43

in

2:43

in some scenarios and we get

2:46

far more of our energy from the tribe

2:49

were in and the people were surrounded

2:50

with

2:51

then would probably admit and so when it

2:53

first happened

2:55

look the defining thing about work for

2:57

me is laughing every day

2:58

i if i laugh every day and i you know in

3:01

the organizations i've been in

3:03

they've been at times incredibly

3:05

stressful we've had

3:06

you know at times when i was at twitter

3:08

there was just for

3:09

good reason there was like big headlines

3:11

demanding stressful scenarios

3:14

but either the sort of the dark humor

3:17

that you find in those moments

3:19

or the moments of levity that you can

3:21

just get if you're around people that

3:22

you trust

3:23

soldiers talk about this or firefighters

3:25

talk about this you know you can find

3:26

human

3:27

and i used to love that so the idea of

3:29

shifting to a world where

3:31

somehow we're plugging into the matrix

3:33

and we were losing

3:35

that camaraderie that kinship that we

3:38

get

3:38

from being around other people i wasn't

3:40

necessarily the

3:42

the biggest advocate of it i think

3:45

what's clear though

3:46

is that we've fundamentally moved into a

3:49

different world and some of those

3:51

preconceptions that we might have had

3:53

might have been partly ill-judged so so

3:56

so working through those things that

3:58

the number one thing we know uh 91 of

4:00

people say they want to continue working

4:02

in some capacity

4:03

when you look at the numbers of that

4:05

people say broadly say they want to work

4:08

at home

4:08

three or four days a week so there's

4:10

some firms saying

4:12

we're going to let people work one day a

4:13

week or two days a week at home

4:15

people workers want to work more than

4:18

that so

4:19

there's going to be some degree of of

4:20

balance and we're going to achieve an

4:21

equilibrium

4:23

so that's the demand side of it and in

4:25

fact when you look at all age groups

4:27

young or old there is a slight

4:29

difference so

4:30

younger workers have said that they were

4:34

they're happy at home but they they it's

4:36

close to how happy they were in the

4:38

office

4:39

and we can partly understand that a lot

4:41

of young workers don't have

4:42

home offices they don't have nice desks

4:45

they're

4:46

sitting on their bed or they're sitting

4:47

on the table that

4:49

sits at the end of their bed so they're

4:51

working in slightly different scenarios

4:53

but even they report they're more

4:55

productive and happier than

4:56

than that they were in a big open plan

4:59

office so

5:00

that's the first thing older workers are

5:02

significantly happier

5:03

if you've got a bit of space it seems to

5:05

correlate with you feeling really happy

5:07

so broadly all of the evidence suggests

5:09

actually

5:10

the experience of it has been at least

5:13

unbalanced positive so then you look at

5:16

the

5:17

the other side and i guess it's firms

5:19

and it's really growing evidence that

5:21

firms are recognizing that

5:22

something has fundamentally changed

5:24

bloomberg did something interesting the

5:26

business people

5:27

they did an analysis of all the earnings

5:29

calls so all these transcripts of like

5:31

big bosses reporting to shareholders

5:35

what they think is going to happen and

5:36

bloomberg say that

5:38

already about one in eight firms are

5:40

talking about making their

5:41

offices smaller the ft did something

5:43

where they said about half of british

5:45

firms

5:46

are already talking about their offices

5:48

being smaller so

5:49

whether it's that demand side or whether

5:51

it's that supply side almost certainly

5:53

we're going into something that's going

5:55

to

5:56

look and feel a bit different to what we

5:57

were used to before

5:59

if you had to guess um i i completely

6:01

resonate with that i think

6:03

even for our organization we realized

6:05

how much money i'll be honest how much

6:07

money we could save

6:08

by not having an office because it's not

6:10

just the rent it's the

6:11

the cleaning the electricity it's the

6:13

food in the cupboards

6:15

you know the maintenance of a what was a

6:17

20 000 square foot office in manchester

6:19

uh and you you stripped back those costs

6:20

and you know it was that you were forced

6:22

to realize that

6:23

it is possible for there to be another

6:25

way and i think at first we were

6:27

we were skeptical that our business

6:29

could run in

6:30

completely remotely then we realized it

6:32

could and then we moved into phase three

6:34

which was like

6:35

okay but what have we lost now and it

6:37

was it was it was definitely a phase

6:39

three thing because in phase two we're

6:40

like oh everything's fine

6:41

in phase three we're like now we've got

6:43

a problem because we've lost the

6:45

uh the sense of community that our

6:48

company was giving to our employees and

6:50

for a company like ours

6:52

community was a huge part of our our

6:55

value-add you know we are the sterile

6:57

stereotypical like millennial office

6:58

with like the slides and the ballpark

7:00

and the freedom

7:01

and um and a real sense of strong

7:04

community where pretty much everyone

7:05

lives together

7:06

and so in phase three of this sort of

7:08

this sort of mental journey

7:10

what we saw and i actually resigned just

7:13

after in about

7:14

september time what we saw was a bit of

7:16

an exodus of our employees because now

7:20

they're sad at home they're looking at

7:21

their to-do lists

7:23

and that they're now thinking the

7:26

remuneration or the value i'm getting

7:27

from this job

7:28

is this amount of money and i'm doing

7:31

these set of tasks so now i think i can

7:34

get more

7:34

money down the street at that place that

7:37

has no working culture

7:38

whilst i'm still going to be sad at home

7:40

and it will be a similar set of tasks

7:42

and it was it was astonishing it was

7:45

astonishing how many people

7:46

um are being completely honest because i

7:48

have no reason not to be honest we

7:49

almost never lost

7:50

good people the month just before and

7:53

after i left

7:54

we we lost our the largest number of

7:56

employees

7:57

we've ever lost by a fault factor of 10.

8:00

yeah

8:00

and it's fascinating so let's look into

8:02

that because you're exactly

8:04

you spot on these the big themes that

8:05

are emerging now firstly

8:07

how can you make people feel like the

8:09

part of something when

8:10

the old way they felt part of something

8:12

was the energy they had when they're

8:14

around people right you know

8:15

there is some buzz and and it's not an

8:17

exaggeration i've chatted to

8:19

some of the world's leading experts and

8:21

they say good workplaces do have a buzz

8:23

to them they have

8:24

almost like this tangible energy um and

8:27

i think

8:28

that's one of the challenges we've got

8:29

now if you've got a situation where

8:31

people on video calls back to back

8:33

and you know it might be not with the

8:35

big boss it might be with clients

8:36

they're dealing with or it might be

8:38

with customers they've got to keep happy

8:40

but if there aren't back-to-back

8:41

meetings with those people

8:43

then they can just feel well look that's

8:45

going to be exactly the same wherever i

8:47

go we're not going to have

8:48

the same energy and there's far more

8:50

evidence that

8:51

when people feel part of something

8:53

bigger than themselves

8:54

it's transformational so i've been i'm

8:57

writing something about resilience at

8:58

the moment a book about resilience

9:00

and what you discover is that actually

9:02

what you hear about resilience is that

9:04

people

9:05

tell you all these myths about

9:06

resilience that it's this individual

9:08

strength or it's this

9:09

it's this trait that we can do develop

9:11

and what you discover about resilience

9:13

is it's normally a collective thing it's

9:16

because you

9:17

feel part of a resilient community you

9:19

feel like you've got

9:20

the strength of others to draw upon you

9:22

feel like you can

9:24

tap into something one person in some of

9:26

the research i was reading

9:28

said you can't be a resilient on your

9:29

own and there's so much truth in that

9:32

now what does that mean for the way

9:33

we're working right now well if you've

9:35

got someone in

9:36

a bed seat or a studio flat or a flat

9:38

chair

9:39

and they're sitting on their own all day

9:41

and they feel lonely

9:42

it's almost certain that those reserves

9:45

of resilience are being

9:46

tapped and you know there's one thing

9:49

that psychologists

9:50

talk about all the time it's this notion

9:52

of of affect

9:53

it's sort of it's a fancy way of saying

9:56

mood it's a psychologist a way of saying

9:57

mood

9:58

and what you discover about affect is

10:00

that

10:01

the the mood we're in is really

10:03

influential on a lot of the things on

10:05

our experience of life

10:06

and the uh creativity and our sense of

10:09

collaboration

10:10

so scientists talk about positive affect

10:12

and negative affect

10:14

and positive affect best way i can sort

10:16

of frame

10:17

uh positive affect it it suggests that

10:19

like the mood we're in

10:21

transforms some of the decisions we make

10:23

and the best way i can frame that is

10:24

that

10:25

when you're a kid growing up whether

10:27

your main carer is a grandparent or a

10:29

parent or a

10:29

a guardian but you knew from the age of

10:32

four or five

10:33

you knew that it was a good time to ask

10:34

for something and a bad time to ask for

10:36

something

10:36

you knew based on the mood that your

10:38

carer was in that there was a good time

10:40

to ask for something a bad time but

10:41

affect the mood we're in affects uh

10:44

decisions

10:44

well the situation we're all going

10:46

through right now is not positive affect

10:49

it's a negative affect

10:50

loads of people are feeling burnt out

10:52

average person during lockdown has been

10:54

working about an extra 45 minutes a day

10:57

that's on the back of the average

10:58

working day has gone up by two hours in

11:00

the last 10 years

11:01

so people are finding themselves in this

11:05

lonely unaffiliated disconnected

11:08

sense of exhaustive burnout so it's no

11:11

wonder people are quitting their jobs

11:12

because they just don't feel like the

11:14

good version of them that they used to

11:16

feel like you know the contrast as well

11:18

so this idea of contrast where you can

11:20

remember how your job used to be

11:22

and if your job used to be a 10 and now

11:26

because it's because a central part of

11:27

what made it a 10 say the community or

11:29

the culture in the office or you know

11:30

that sense of camaraderie

11:32

or that sense that you know you were a

11:34

group of people working together towards

11:35

a goal now you're kind of

11:36

sat in your bedside on your own on the

11:37

end of your bed doing a to-do list um

11:39

if your company was a 10 because of that

11:41

culture and it's now dropped down to a

11:42

six

11:43

something in my mind makes me think that

11:46

those companies will actually hurt more

11:48

versus the companies that were like an

11:50

eight before and an hour a six

11:51

um and that's part of what i think with

11:53

with our company social chain because

11:55

culture was such

11:56

a big thing that people must be thinking

11:58

oh my god what the hell is this

12:00

um being sat alone and we try i think

12:02

you know i can't speak to the company

12:03

now because i'm no longer there but

12:04

i know there was ample efforts with all

12:06

as with all companies to do these like

12:07

zoom bingo things and that lasted a

12:09

month before everyone got

12:10

sick to death of that but you mentioned

12:12

the word burn out there

12:13

uh a very popular phrase a topic of

12:16

much mystique as well i think um i saw

12:19

your ted talk about the topic of burnout

12:21

and i saw your

12:22

your thoughts there i guess my my

12:24

question is what causes burnout

12:26

in your view yeah there was a really

12:29

interesting there was a

12:30

a really interesting book that just came

12:32

out last year and it was based on

12:33

a a successful article that had sort of

12:35

blown up on

12:37

buzzfeed by a woman called an helen

12:39

peterson and she talked about

12:41

she the premise of her article really

12:43

good article worth searching for

12:45

is the the millennials of the burnout

12:47

generation you remember that one i think

12:48

maybe you showed it right there's all

12:50

these matchy

12:51

matches and what she said is she said

12:53

and she'd encountered it as a journalist

12:55

she's thinking

12:56

i'm feeling something i wonder if i

12:58

could capture it and she was thinking

13:00

is there such thing as errand paralysis

13:03

so what

13:03

she means by that is that she was

13:05

getting to the end of like these

13:06

productive working days

13:08

and then she would get back to her flat

13:10

and she would she would open a bill

13:12

or she had she had something she needed

13:14

to do and she just

13:15

didn't have the energy this high

13:17

performing

13:18

really successful person didn't have the

13:20

energy to get those things done

13:22

and so she was thinking in her head is

13:24

this some sort of weird

13:26

um this sort of duality that you can be

13:29

really accomplished

13:30

at one set of things but you can't

13:32

others she started looking into it and

13:34

she realized

13:35

it's not that you're avoiding one thing

13:37

you're just exhausted

13:38

and her lesson was that any time we

13:41

teach

13:41

we treat our energy as infinite that's

13:44

when burn out comes

13:45

and it we so often do it we we treat the

13:48

idea that we can work

13:49

all the time and the best examples i can

13:51

give you are the ones where

13:53

we actually check in on ourselves so i i

13:56

used to find myself

13:57

day job working at twitter worked on

13:59

twitter for eight years i used to

14:01

uh when i was especially guilty of this

14:03

i used to have back-to-back meetings on

14:05

monday

14:06

what's the consequence of back-to-back

14:07

meetings your inbox is

14:09

is exploding it's it's absolutely

14:11

overloaded

14:12

and so i used to get home on a monday

14:13

night get myself a cup of tea

14:16

deal with all my domestic

14:17

responsibilities and i would sit there

14:19

and work and do emails for about

14:21

four hours and just try and catch up

14:23

with what i was doing

14:24

and i quite often i would check myself

14:26

and about nine o'clock

14:28

i'd be spending as much time changing

14:29

the music as i would doing emails

14:32

or one long email that's like a

14:33

two-pager who sends these emails these

14:36

criminals sending long emails but i'd

14:38

find myself reading this

14:40

you know that feeling where you read it

14:42

i'll just read that again

14:43

and then read it again and what you

14:45

discovered there's this science for this

14:47

it's called ego depletion

14:48

and the people who look into this say

14:50

that our brains are sort of

14:51

far more finite far more limited than we

14:54

might imagine our brains are far closer

14:56

if you want a metaphor for it our brains

14:58

are far closer to the batteries on our

15:00

phone

15:00

than the infinite broadband that we we

15:03

normally deal with

15:04

so your brain's sort of got a certain

15:05

amount of charge in it and when you use

15:08

it

15:08

and so the way you'll you'll witness

15:09

this is maybe you walk into

15:12

a situation and someone asks you a

15:13

question at the end of a long day or

15:15

whatever

15:16

and you're like hang on can you just

15:18

just give me a minute just give me a

15:19

minute or someone asks you something

15:21

really complicated just as you're about

15:23

to oh

15:24

okay hang on can we just give and

15:26

effectively our brains are sort of far

15:28

more finite

15:29

once you recognize that you start

15:30

thinking okay i wonder if that

15:32

should influence the way i think about

15:34

doing my job and

15:36

and of course burnout is one of the

15:37

things where we don't

15:39

treat our energy as finite it is

15:42

it is uh finite but we don't treat it

15:44

like that and the end result is then

15:46

we just feel like we're running on empty

15:48

we're running on vapors

15:50

and so when you look into it the world

15:51

health organization

15:53

uh recognize burnout as a real

15:55

phenomenon

15:56

and they say that burnout is is all

15:59

about

16:00

when our energy feels spent when we feel

16:02

emotionally exhausted

16:04

they talk about this other thing called

16:05

depersonalization where

16:07

when you're really burnt out you don't

16:09

necessarily

16:11

construe other people as full and

16:15

empathetic individuals but sometimes

16:17

you're a bit sort of

16:18

dismissive of other people or you're a

16:21

bit reductive of their motives or

16:23

you start seeing people around you as an

16:25

annoyance so in the old days if you ever

16:27

found that the person you sat next to

16:29

their chewing or their tapping was

16:31

driving you crazy that can be a little

16:33

bit of an exam

16:34

example of deep personalization so it's

16:37

a real phenomenon

16:38

it's uh i think to my mind it makes you

16:41

rethink

16:43

the way you work so if you knew okay the

16:45

most i can do every day

16:47

is eight productive hours of work and

16:50

you can

16:50

you know there are evidence to suggest

16:52

you can do more than that but if you

16:53

started treating it like that

16:55

and said maybe actually if i'm honest

16:57

it's not a

16:58

really high intensity productive hours

17:00

but maybe it's five or six really good

17:02

hours

17:03

and then you know other stuff is dealing

17:05

with email or dealing with

17:07

with phone calls it i suspect it would

17:10

change the way you made decisions

17:11

and you see evidence of this barack

17:13

obama used to have someone who followed

17:15

him round

17:16

who uh barack obama never chose his

17:18

lunch in eight years

17:20

because this person just made all his

17:21

decisions for him and

17:23

you see albert einstein said something

17:25

similar einstein used to wear that same

17:27

outfit every day

17:28

and uh it was because he knew when he

17:30

got to his lab when he got to

17:32

the the place he was making uh decisions

17:35

he knew that if he went there and he

17:36

hadn't

17:37

cluttered his brain with all these

17:39

little micro decisions

17:41

he was he just felt a bit more

17:42

imaginative inventive creative

17:45

so we see evidence of it in other

17:46

people's behavior but normally when it

17:48

comes to us we don't treat

17:50

our brains like that we don't treat it

17:52

like something we need to protect

17:54

our energy to protect we we tend to

17:56

treat our energy as infinite but that's

17:58

why burnout comes just

18:00

does the type of work you know you talk

18:02

there about eight hours or five hours or

18:04

whatever it might be

18:05

does the type of work you're doing and

18:07

the amount of intrinsic

18:09

motivation you have or joy you get from

18:11

it impact your

18:13

likelihood of being burnt out yeah

18:15

because like because that's what i

18:16

that's what i suspected in my life

18:19

because

18:20

the people that i've seen that get burnt

18:22

out and this is all anecdotal and

18:23

there's no scientific evidence really to

18:24

support

18:25

these these assertions but people that

18:26

i've seen get burnt out the most

18:28

typically typically especially during

18:31

the lockdown

18:32

working alone often often freelance um

18:35

often doing a repetitive task

18:37

usually doing things that aren't that

18:38

enjoyable and i had a friend actually

18:40

come here and sit on the sofa which i've

18:41

talked about i think in the last few

18:42

podcasts

18:42

and he basically told me that he was

18:43

feeling a bit burnt out um and

18:46

uh he was struggling to get out of bed

18:48

and go and do the

18:49

go and do his work in the morning he's a

18:51

he's a freelance freelancer

18:53

working on his own in his house he used

18:54

to work within teams during pre

18:56

pandemic and i i was saying to him like

18:58

think about the things that make your

19:00

work enjoyable and what other you know

19:02

what are the things about work that are

19:04

intrinsically and

19:05

motivating to you all those things have

19:07

gone right now so now you're just left

19:08

with

19:09

waking up alone sitting in front of a

19:11

computer

19:12

and maybe because your intrinsic

19:13

motivations or the intrinsic joy

19:15

of your work has been stripped maybe

19:17

you're now um

19:19

encountering burnout i think that

19:20

resonates with me as well to some degree

19:22

like

19:22

if i've ever got close to feeling

19:23

unmotivated or quote unquote

19:25

burnt out it was when i was doing things

19:28

alone pre-social chain

19:30

on my own just for money well there's a

19:32

couple of things there

19:33

so two things so like this i think is

19:36

all related to resilience

19:38

so there's two things there the first

19:39

thing is that the evidence we have

19:41

is that when we feel an absence of

19:44

control we do

19:44

we generally feel more burnt out so

19:46

let's think of examples and the research

19:48

on this some of the best research on

19:49

this is about nurses

19:51

so very timely for the moment we're in

19:52

right now when nurses

19:54

choose to work extra hours or you might

19:57

have known friends when you were doing

19:58

jobs before your career where you know i

20:01

used to work in fast food and some of

20:02

those dudes used to work 14 hour shifts

20:05

and you're like wow where did they get

20:06

the energy but they were electing to do

20:08

it

20:08

and the evidence we have is that when

20:10

people choose to do those things

20:12

it often impacts them less they they

20:15

feel like they've got control over it

20:16

so you know i these guys who used to

20:18

work with burger king king

20:20

at me with me and they were doing 100

20:22

hour weeks but because they were

20:23

choosing to do it because it was really

20:24

important for them to afford a car to do

20:26

things

20:27

they were what you discover is that when

20:30

you're electing to do it does

20:32

seem to give you some degree of

20:33

protection so control is a really

20:35

important part the more control

20:37

we feel over our lives so why might you

20:40

now be feeling burnt out because imagine

20:42

if your company has you on

20:44

40 hours of zoom calls a week or your

20:47

inbox is always

20:48

full or you've got a difficult person

20:50

you have to deal with a

20:51

client relationship who's phoning you

20:53

all the time you might be feeling the

20:54

absence of control

20:56

or your your friend who's the the

20:57

freelancer might be feeling like i'm

20:59

just

21:00

i'm not in control of things but there's

21:01

a couple of other really important parts

21:04

and they're about our identity and about

21:06

the the sense of community

21:08

and you get really good evidence of how

21:11

when we feel part of something bigger

21:13

than us and

21:14

feeling that connection being around

21:16

people is a really important part of

21:17

that

21:18

it tends to enrich us it tends to to

21:21

protect us and you see really good

21:22

evidence of this you see when people go

21:25

to hospital

21:26

if they have like a heart operation or

21:28

they have something serious when they

21:30

come out of hospital

21:31

the people who reported that they were

21:33

part of groups before

21:35

their chance of survival their chance of

21:37

avoiding depression

21:39

is massively higher than those who

21:42

live in isolation and look that's the

21:44

experiment we're going through right now

21:46

that

21:46

you might have wonderful friends that

21:48

are at the end of a zoom line or a

21:50

messenger link or a whatsapp

21:52

but if you're not around them and to

21:54

some extent some of the energy we get

21:56

from them is dissipating

21:57

and i think that's the challenge that a

21:59

lot of us are in right now

22:01

it's just a very lonely existence we've

22:02

got now all of the things that we found

22:05

nourishing enriching life-affirming a

22:08

lot of them have been taken away from us

22:10

now the challenge go on i was just gonna

22:11

say i was gonna say um

22:13

actually there's a lady that sat in your

22:15

in your chair yesterday

22:16

anna hemmings and she's an 11 time or

22:19

11 time world gold medal world champion

22:22

amazing olympian etc etc and she was

22:26

speaking to the fact that at one point

22:27

in her career

22:28

when she's when she she was training in

22:30

london to be a kayaker so she's like an

22:31

eleven-time world champion kayaker

22:33

right and then at one point in her

22:35

career they decided that they wanted her

22:36

to go to the olympics so she had to

22:38

learn sprint kayaking right

22:39

the coach was in florida so they took

22:41

her away from her team

22:43

in london and she had to basically train

22:45

on her own

22:47

via using an email that her her coach in

22:49

florida was selling her

22:50

and after doing that for a couple of

22:52

months she got chronic fatigue syndrome

22:53

wow

22:54

so she was out for two years she said

22:56

she couldn't lift her hands

22:58

and shampoo her and the thing that

23:00

brought her back was the realization

23:02

that taking away

23:03

her from her team as someone who was a

23:05

bit of an extrovert and got her energy

23:07

from people

23:08

had um set off a bunch of alarm bells in

23:10

her body

23:11

so the the reason that she managed to

23:13

recover and come back and

23:15

win more world titles after two years of

23:17

literally having this chronic fatigue

23:18

syndrome

23:19

was by realizing that and putting her

23:21

back with her teams

23:22

and changing her training which is wow

23:23

what a metaphor for what we're going

23:25

through

23:25

right and it shows how the mind is so

23:27

intrinsically connected to the body yeah

23:29

people don't think that

23:31

loneliness or removing you from your

23:33

tribe

23:34

can disable your body yeah or your

23:37

energy but although there's remarkable

23:39

amounts of evidence on that so there's a

23:41

woman in the u.s called

23:43

julianne holt lunchtime who's done like

23:44

a colossal survey

23:46

and she appropriates she says loneliness

23:48

is the equivalent of smoking 15

23:50

cigarettes a day

23:52

and so you know it has this big impact

23:54

on us and loneliness is

23:56

as bigger than obesity in terms of the

23:59

health impact it has on you

24:00

and that's what we're going through

24:02

right now and for all of these things

24:04

that we've tried to sort of create these

24:06

artificial intel alternatives

24:07

zoom quizzes and all manner and things

24:10

like that they just don't

24:11

have the same connection of

24:14

feeling surrounded with someone there's

24:17

some evidence as soon as you start

24:18

looking into these things it's

24:19

extraordinary

24:20

what an impact people have on each other

24:23

so these one

24:23

piece of evidence i went up to to oxford

24:26

to meet the woman who did this

24:27

research and she took groups of rowers

24:30

similar to

24:30

to the kayaker took groups of roads

24:33

first and there are oxford university

24:34

roads you've seen them the colossal

24:36

the monsters and she she put the first

24:39

group individually on rowing machines

24:41

second group she said okay i want you to

24:43

be on a

24:44

a made-up boat you know you're going to

24:46

sit on your rowing machines but you've

24:48

got to be in stroke with each other

24:49

and she wanted to see firstly what was

24:52

the different experience

24:53

what she noticed was that the firstly

24:55

they did about the same

24:57

exercise it wasn't like someone worked

24:59

harder than others but she measured the

25:01

endorphin levels

25:02

you do that by uh you put these arm

25:04

cuffs on people you sort of

25:05

you subject them to pain and then you

25:07

see how much pain they can take and

25:09

the endorphin levels of the people who'd

25:11

rode together was twice as high

25:13

as the people who'd rode alone and you

25:16

know you see this with choirs

25:17

people who sing inquired you know you

25:19

can grab strangers off the street

25:21

get them to sing some abba songs

25:22

together and you say to them at the end

25:24

of it

25:25

how do you feel they say i feel utterly

25:27

elated now that's not because singing

25:29

our songs on its own does it it's

25:30

because when you feel some connection

25:32

with other people

25:33

even strangers it seems to be

25:36

transformational it seems to sort of

25:38

elevate our mood and all of that has

25:39

been stripped from us

25:41

so you know if you've got i guess you

25:43

can try to do some approximations of it

25:45

but all of that has been stripped from

25:47

us and i think that's why

25:49

it's it's inevitable that we are feeling

25:52

flat energy-less we it doesn't feel the

25:55

same right now how do we fix that though

25:57

and this is i think it's going back to

25:58

the start of the conversation

26:00

why i hate it i hate the lack of

26:02

connection i hate the lack of community

26:03

i think are you an extrovert would you

26:05

say

26:05

oh god i really don't know i think on

26:07

one hand i'm a massive introvert yeah

26:09

i i i'm people know me i don't like to

26:11

do i don't like small talk i like to sit

26:13

alone for weeks on end

26:14

i like i went off to the jungle for four

26:16

weeks in september alone

26:17

went off to the costa rican jungle alone

26:19

so i like that although i

26:20

have this kind of like you know public

26:22

speaking and social media brand

26:24

so i actually don't know although a lot

26:26

of introverts like that ability to

26:28

switch on the public speaking side and

26:30

but i think actually the more you look

26:32

into the introvert extrovert thing it's

26:33

sort of

26:34

a compartmentalization that doesn't

26:36

necess the vast majority of people sit

26:38

somewhere and sure

26:38

exactly i'm the same as you um no but

26:41

these

26:42

uh i i think look the point you raise is

26:45

there's no easy substitute

26:46

but there is some evidence i saw an

26:49

amazing piece of research

26:50

and it looked at couples who lived

26:52

distance relationships

26:54

so you know in the uk distance

26:55

relationship means you're half an hour

26:57

an hour's drive from someone

26:58

in the us it means you're like a three

27:00

hour flight so they did a piece of

27:03

research 40

27:04

000 couples living distant relationships

27:06

and they wanted to know so these were

27:08

unmarried so they wanted to know the

27:09

ones who made it through a year what

27:11

what was the thing that made it through

27:13

a year and this was research was done

27:14

three or four years ago so it's not from

27:16

a different era of technology

27:17

but the ones who stayed with each other

27:20

for the long term

27:21

phoned each other every day and you know

27:24

when they

27:24

they were asked what you talked about

27:26

they said oh we just talked about

27:27

trivial things

27:28

so i think so many of us have got into

27:31

this frame of mind of thinking

27:33

well i liked her a photo and i sent a

27:36

quick whatsapp saying what i sent

27:38

a voice note horrific use of technology

27:40

but they said

27:41

but you know we think somehow we've

27:44

serviced the relationship by doing these

27:46

things

27:47

and actually when you come down to it

27:48

and maybe future generations will be

27:50

different

27:50

but it's it's often quite analog it's

27:52

that sense of feeling

27:54

seen and appreciated so i suspect face

27:57

time might work the same way

27:58

but so many of us are sort of are

28:00

overwhelmed with these performative zoom

28:02

calls right now where he's sitting there

28:04

with

28:05

like a celebrity squares a blanky blank

28:07

uh

28:08

array of faces in front of you i know

28:11

and i wonder if it's that sense of being

28:13

seen and being heard

28:14

that probably connects and cuts through

28:16

a bit more

28:17

yeah i think so yeah i just think work

28:20

is just so much

28:21

more than the work right i think

28:22

especially in the world in

28:24

the world we live in at the moment where

28:25

we're getting lonelier as a society i

28:27

was looking at the stats when i was

28:28

writing my book about

28:29

you know the the when they ask americans

28:32

for example how many people

28:33

they can turn to at a time of crisis it

28:34

used to be three people a couple of

28:36

decades ago now they're like medium

28:38

answer is zero

28:38

yeah and um i think it was theresa may

28:41

that appointed a

28:42

head of loneliness where loneliness are

28:44

for the uk and i've seen the stats so i

28:46

think work is one of the few sort of

28:48

i don't know institutions where it still

28:50

binds us together

28:51

um and we're not between four white

28:53

walls tapping glass to order food and

28:55

alone speaking to our nan through a

28:56

piece of glass so it's a shame that that

28:59

that community that part of community's

29:01

gone but anyway moving on

29:02

creativity something you've talked about

29:05

at length and

29:06

um for me i've i've always believed that

29:09

i'm least creative in the office i've

29:11

always thought

29:11

i'm more creative in the gym and in the

29:13

shower than i am when i'm when i'm sat

29:15

in a boardroom with a bunch of people

29:17

and i know this is something you've

29:18

spoken about so i wanted to get your

29:19

take on where we're most creative what

29:21

kills and causes creativity

29:23

yeah i mean look firstly i would all i

29:25

ever feel in all of these situations is

29:27

that i feel like i'm a

29:29

a vessel that's passing on other

29:30

people's knowledge so i've found myself

29:32

being consumed with all these things and

29:34

interested in their learning so

29:36

look let me tell you um what i've i've

29:39

discovered that

29:40

neuroscience is really intriguing the

29:42

most compelling thing about neuroscience

29:44

is when you look into it

29:45

uh neuroscientists used to work on

29:48

experimenting on animals

29:50

you know i'm not i'm not keen on that i

29:52

was like i was

29:53

you know in a protest group about animal

29:55

experimentation when i was younger

29:57

um and they used to look at brain

29:58

injuries so that used to be the main way

30:00

that neuroscience worked

30:01

and it's only the last 20 years that

30:03

brain scans have had any degree of

30:05

sophistication

30:06

but what they've discovered in like the

30:07

time that they've had brain scanners

30:09

is some of the things that they presumed

30:11

about the way our brain works

30:12

aren't necessarily right so let me give

30:14

you one example but they used to put

30:16

people in these brand new brain scanners

30:18

and they would watch what their their

30:20

brains did they give them a puzzle they

30:22

give them a

30:22

rubik's cube their brains would light up

30:24

in these sort of different places

30:26

and then they'd notice what happened

30:28

when people stopped

30:29

playing on the puzzle and their brains

30:31

would light up in sort of

30:33

loads of places as well and so it was it

30:36

was baffling

30:37

what's going on right now they'd say to

30:38

these people they say oh right sorry i

30:40

was

30:41

a million miles away i was daydreaming

30:43

so okay

30:44

right that's interesting your brain's

30:45

lightened up when you're when you're not

30:47

thinking about something when you sort

30:48

of switched off

30:49

and so the way that neuroscientists

30:51

categorize this broadly they say

30:53

these three systems of cognition first

30:56

one is like

30:57

when you're doing that rubik's cube or

30:58

when you're typing an email

31:00

it's called the executive attention

31:02

network so it's the main thing you're

31:03

focusing on

31:04

and then you'll know while your

31:06

executive attention network is watching

31:07

netflix or

31:08

while you're writing an email you can

31:10

also be aware of like the room you're in

31:12

that's called the salience network and

31:14

the third one the third

31:15

so there's three of these systems the

31:17

third one is that one when you're

31:19

daydreaming the one where you're a

31:21

million miles away

31:22

the one when you're in the shower which

31:24

is called the default network

31:26

but what we discover is that people

31:28

generally report

31:29

having their best creative ideas not

31:32

when they're frowning into their laptop

31:33

screen

31:34

but when they're in these default mode

31:37

uh situations so you might have it in

31:39

the old days

31:40

if you're on a train somewhere or on a

31:41

plane somewhere loads of people

31:43

i've got a friend who says she has all

31:45

her best ideas

31:47

staring out the windows of planes yeah

31:49

and so you know

31:50

if that was you then this year has been

31:52

an uncreative year

31:54

but um my favorite example of it is a

31:57

really famous screenwriter

31:58

called aaron sawkin he's written the

32:00

west wing he wrote

32:02

there was a um there was a film he had

32:04

on netflix just before christmas called

32:05

the chicago seven he's written all these

32:07

big things

32:08

very famous for zingy dialogue so he

32:10

wrote the social network film things

32:12

like that sort of

32:13

you know um really sort of really what's

32:16

better than a

32:17

million a billion like he's written all

32:18

these zingy lines and he's

32:20

realized that uh he has all his best

32:22

ideas exactly like you in the shower

32:25

he said he had he told hollywood

32:27

reporter magazine he had a shower

32:28

installed in the corner of his office

32:30

and he has eight showers a day and he

32:32

was asked by them

32:33

he was asked by them hang on is this

32:35

like some weird

32:36

ocd thing he said not at all i find that

32:39

when i

32:40

you know so i'll be sitting there

32:41

thinking of something

32:43

trying to come up with an idea but it's

32:45

only when i disengage my brain

32:47

to something comes to me an idea comes

32:49

to me and so

32:50

what you described is exactly what a lot

32:53

of

32:53

these people whose job is to be creative

32:56

have recognized

32:57

and as soon as you know that you start

32:59

thinking

33:00

wow okay i need to think differently

33:03

about

33:04

being creative because creativity can

33:06

then be when i'm sitting at my desk i'm

33:08

sort of

33:09

taking all this inspiration in

33:12

stimulation

33:13

ideas but then it's about disengaging

33:16

going for a walk

33:17

going for a cycle ride going to to do a

33:19

workout

33:20

might be the moment where the idea hits

33:22

you and i don't think necessarily we

33:25

think about that enough

33:26

you know if you go back to this idea

33:28

that your brain is a bit like your phone

33:30

battery

33:31

then some of those moments that

33:33

effectively can recharge your battery

33:35

can be the moments where creativity hits

33:37

you and inspiration hits you

33:39

so i think sort of rethinking the way

33:42

that we

33:43

treat a productive week of work of you

33:46

know these blocks of work

33:47

but then moments where you know it might

33:49

be your

33:50

personal is you go for a walk every

33:52

lunch time

33:53

that can be far more creative and

33:55

productive than you might imagine

33:57

well how do we make our work

33:58

environments more conducive with

33:59

creativity then is there a way or do we

34:01

just resign to the fact that

34:03

that's not going to be the best place

34:04

for our creativity and if we're going to

34:06

reach our creative potential it's

34:08

probably going to be away from the

34:10

office

34:11

i think it's about recognizing there's a

34:13

yin yang there's a balance

34:15

of work and and imagination

34:19

so i i always loved the example of um

34:21

charles dickens

34:22

charles dickens obviously um like

34:25

incredibly productive i think he wrote

34:27

15 novels

34:28

200 short stories he edited a weekly

34:31

magazine about a mile from here

34:33

you know sort of incredibly productive

34:34

we didn't work afternoons

34:36

and so charles dickens would sit down at

34:38

his desk at eight in the morning

34:39

he'd write for about four or five hours

34:41

and then he'd go and walk and he'd walk

34:43

10

34:43

10 miles every afternoon and that was

34:46

like

34:46

him lost in his thoughts you know

34:49

striding through

34:50

east london probably sort of imagination

34:54

popping

34:54

when he sat down the next day he had

34:55

loads of ideas and i think

34:57

some of us have eliminated that

35:00

sort of the brain fermenting ideas we've

35:04

eliminated that a bit so

35:06

you know it might be that your way to do

35:08

this yourself is just

35:09

to make sure you just got some down time

35:12

or you've just got some time where

35:13

you know you put music on but you turn

35:15

podcasts off or you just

35:17

you try and get a bit more balance in

35:19

how you're

35:20

uh using your energy so let's conclude

35:23

this point about work

35:24

and creativity say that i today

35:27

made you the ceo of a company that had

35:29

100 employees

35:31

um and you could design from scratch the

35:34

the working environment how often people

35:36

worked and some of the sort of

35:37

key sort of principles and foundations

35:40

of that working environment what kind of

35:41

things would be important to you based

35:43

on all you know

35:44

so let's look into what happened in

35:46

lockdown the first part of lockdown most

35:48

people reported

35:49

that their engagement went up and why

35:51

did their engagement went up

35:53

their engagement went up because they

35:54

were solving problems like we'd never

35:56

worked like this before

35:57

everyone was you know the first moment

35:59

you're getting on a zoom call or a

36:01

google hangout or

36:02

you're getting on these things there's

36:03

like you know even though you're in this

36:05

crazy situation

36:06

there's a degree of excitement fight or

36:08

flight almost right and

36:09

and so what do we know about that we

36:11

know that people felt that they were

36:13

involved in firstly a bit of team

36:15

collaboration but secondly they were

36:16

helping solve problems

36:18

and so you know the whole organizations

36:20

computer sales

36:22

have gone through the roof whole

36:23

organizations that had no laptop

36:25

computers

36:26

so they had to arm their teams with kit

36:28

and so people

36:29

felt really engaged by the fact that

36:31

they back to what we talked about

36:32

earlier

36:33

had some control they had a a bit of

36:36

influence

36:36

so number one thing that we discover is

36:39

the more that people feel that they can

36:40

have an

36:41

impact in their job and it might be

36:43

something similar simple

36:44

they're they're just responsible for a

36:46

couple of things themselves

36:48

the more that they feel that they've got

36:50

some agency some control themselves

36:52

they feel motivated in their jobs when

36:54

do we feel unmotivated in our jobs

36:57

when our boss tells us what to do but we

37:00

don't get

37:00

any input into it we don't necessarily

37:03

think it's

37:04

the best thing to do we're doing

37:05

repetitive things that don't feel very

37:07

rewarding

37:08

so the best thing that any of us can do

37:10

think well how can i make

37:12

teams feel small and teams feel like

37:15

they've got a shared sense of

37:17

accomplishment and pride in what they're

37:18

doing so that's what i would be saying

37:21

what you discover is 100 is a really

37:22

nice size actually any time a

37:24

company goes over 100 what your

37:27

discovery is

37:28

you lose a bit of some of that

37:30

camaraderie

37:31

you better almost there's a few

37:33

organizations that do this

37:34

when you go over 100 split it into two

37:36

teams because your

37:38

that sort of cohesion you get works

37:40

really well when we

37:42

we've got a familiarity with each other

37:44

and what happens is when you go over

37:45

that you start losing it

37:47

and you think we want we want it to feel

37:49

like it used to feel

37:50

it's never going to feel like that

37:52

humans don't work like that so

37:54

far better to say you know we've got two

37:56

teams that love each other but we're

37:58

we're working on separate goals so

38:00

keeping things small

38:02

is really critical and there's lots of

38:04

evidence of

38:05

the smaller you can keep things you

38:07

almost get the economies of engagement

38:10

compared to the economies of scale that

38:12

when people feel they're part of

38:13

something that they're having an input

38:15

into

38:15

their engagement is higher they they

38:18

they work more effectively

38:20

so i would say that would be the

38:22

defining part making people feel like

38:23

they've got things that they're

38:24

responsible for

38:26

and generally all of those things

38:28

encourage

38:29

active engagement what you find when you

38:32

look into some of the stats

38:33

they're terrifying so and when you

38:35

globally there's

38:36

an organization gallop to this workforce

38:39

survey

38:40

opinion poll company and they they do

38:41

this workforce survey and they say that

38:43

globally

38:44

13 of people are engaged in their jobs

38:47

when they look into it what i mean by

38:49

that is that these there's almost as

38:51

many

38:51

people there's about 22 of people who

38:54

would

38:55

actively disengage their jobs so by

38:57

actively disengaged

38:58

they kind of hate their organization and

39:01

they want to bring the downfall of their

39:02

organization

39:03

so anytime you meet some someone on the

39:05

tuber in the street they're almost twice

39:07

as likely to want to destroy their

39:09

company

39:10

as make it succeed but then the vast

39:12

majority of everyone else over 50

39:14

percent of people

39:15

are just disengaged they're not actively

39:17

disengaged

39:18

they're just passively disengaged so

39:21

work for most of us

39:22

is something is something that sort of

39:25

feels arduous we don't necessarily enjoy

39:27

we don't necessarily

39:29

value the decisions and you'll know as

39:31

someone who's

39:32

run a company where culture was the

39:34

defining thing you'll know that when you

39:36

get it right

39:37

it can be this superpower where you know

39:39

you're on

39:40

high octane fuel compared to you know

39:43

the energy can feel low otherwise and so

39:47

just getting those things right

39:48

generally is far more about

39:50

people feeling a personal connection

39:51

with the people that are around

39:53

feeling like they're contributing

39:54

something these things play a really big

39:56

part

39:57

we talked a lot about the joy of work

39:59

obviously the i guess the antithesis of

40:00

the joy of work is the misery of work

40:02

and at some point when work

40:03

feels miserable um people are faced with

40:06

this quite

40:07

um this quite confounding question which

40:10

is

40:11

how do i know when to quit and we talk

40:13

that we know i think there's so much

40:14

written about

40:15

how to start and when to start and

40:16

starting being the thing but obviously

40:18

the thing that comes before starting

40:20

usually is knowing the right moment to

40:22

quit

40:23

people don't quit sometimes and they

40:24

spend many decades in a miserable job

40:26

and

40:27

you know then their fear of quitting

40:29

almost becomes stronger because they're

40:30

getting more comfortable and more

40:31

entrenched

40:32

so i wanted i've not seen you talk about

40:34

anything about quitting before but i

40:35

just wondered if you had a take on when

40:37

the right moment to quit a job was or

40:38

i know it's an incredibly personal

40:40

nuanced thing but people

40:42

i can i was thinking then i was thinking

40:44

what are some of the things people

40:45

really want to know right now one of

40:46

them i'm sure is like i hate my job

40:49

i don't have control my boss is an

40:52

do i quit i'm gonna tell you a secret

40:55

for the past five years while building

40:56

social chain into a 700 person

40:58

global social media powerhouse i've been

41:00

using a service that i've never really

41:02

mentioned

41:03

some of you might know that service it's

41:04

called fiverr f-i-v-e-r-r

41:08

it's my little secret if i've ever had a

41:10

project where i've needed affordable

41:12

skilled freelancers to help me whether

41:13

it's building a social media application

41:14

that made my company three

41:16

million pounds or just a video i needed

41:18

editing or

41:19

help making a logo or making a website

41:21

i've used fiverr

41:22

now that my secret's out the bag here's

41:24

what i'm gonna do for you if there's a

41:26

freelance service you need or a project

41:27

you need help with a logo

41:29

a website a voice over a video you need

41:31

made anything at all

41:32

go to fiverr.com ceo i'll put the link

41:35

in the description

41:36

that's fiverr.com ceo

41:39

message me the service you want from the

41:42

website and every single week i'll

41:43

personally

41:44

send you the credit to your fiverr

41:46

account so that you can get that project

41:47

done

41:48

thank you to fiverr for the sponsorship

41:49

and for supporting entrepreneurs and

41:51

freelancers around the world

41:52

i'm looking forward to all of your

41:53

messages i've been working my way

41:55

through these

41:56

huel nutrition bars this week um as you

41:59

know i love the ready to drink cure

42:00

flavors but

42:01

you will have also got these salted

42:03

caramel bars

42:04

and i'm a big salted caramel nut which

42:06

i've been having and if you're if you're

42:08

someone that does like to chew

42:10

not just drink your food then i really

42:11

highly recommend the salted caramel

42:13

flavor there's also another flavor

42:14

called the raspberry white chocolate

42:16

flavor

42:16

which i've been very addicted to over

42:19

the last couple of weeks but again just

42:20

like huel it's nutritionally complete

42:22

you get all of your

42:23

your proteins you get essential fats you

42:25

get it's gluten-free as well

42:27

and you get 26 vitamins and minerals

42:29

from these bars

42:32

tastes amazing and i'm a big salted

42:34

caramel fan give it a go if you do

42:36

send me a screenshot on instagram or

42:38

twitter or linkedin and let me know what

42:39

you think

42:40

again as someone that skips meals this

42:41

is an absolute lifesaver

42:43

i was thinking what are some of the

42:44

things people really want to know right

42:46

now one of them i'm sure is like

42:47

i hate my job i don't have control my

42:50

boss is an

42:52

do i quit yeah look you know big

42:56

questions you probably could tell us

42:58

more than that

43:01

um yeah i think you know the uh the

43:03

critical thing about that is

43:05

is probably checking in with yourself

43:07

and asking you know do i feel any sense

43:09

of

43:10

reward by my from my job obviously it's

43:12

not a great time for anyone right now to

43:14

be

43:15

debating doing something that makes them

43:18

economically precarious

43:19

that so you don't necessarily want to

43:21

risk something that is going to

43:23

put you in a difficult situation but i

43:25

think you know evaluating our jobs

43:27

generally when you look into the

43:28

research when you say to people have you

43:30

had a good days

43:31

a good day at work it generally comes

43:33

down to whether people feel pride in

43:35

their organization

43:37

and whether they feel like they've made

43:38

meaningful progress in something they've

43:40

been working on

43:41

so meaningful progress actually can be

43:44

difficult right now if your job feels

43:46

like

43:46

you're the expert in emailing and

43:50

video calls you sometimes feel like

43:52

you've made no progress for weeks you

43:53

haven't done

43:54

anything for weeks and also if your

43:55

organization is struggling

43:57

this is a really interesting phenomenon

43:58

because some organizations pre-covered

44:00

were in

44:01

uh were growing so naturally when you're

44:04

an employee in those organizations

44:05

you're dragged up with it you're giving

44:06

promotions and pay rises and

44:08

there's the cash to fund that now

44:11

organizations are in decline or a lot of

44:13

them are hanging on

44:14

and so you're not getting a promotion

44:15

your pay's been frozen you might have be

44:17

on a pay cut

44:18

you might be furloughed and it feels

44:19

like suddenly you've gone into decline

44:21

in your career because the organization

44:23

you're in is

44:24

in decline um and i think that also

44:27

causes a lot of people to start to think

44:29

well

44:30

you know i might my whole life up until

44:32

this point has been about

44:34

progress and climbing the ladder why am

44:36

i going down the ladder yeah

44:37

i didn't do anything different or wrong

44:39

you know it's a really interesting

44:40

philosophical thing about that because

44:41

the whole idea of the career

44:43

at korea is the invention of the last 40

44:46

years you know

44:47

uh ancestors uh grandparents our

44:50

great-grandparents

44:51

never had the idea of a career where i

44:53

was going to be

44:54

accomplishing something and developing

44:57

and changing

44:57

you know the job you were going to be

44:59

doing next year was the job you were

45:00

doing last year well done

45:02

and the job that your kids were going to

45:04

do was going to be the job that you did

45:06

and the the this idea and it brings with

45:09

it a degree of insecurity

45:11

this idea that we will be on this

45:13

developmental path

45:15

is a construct look and it's a construct

45:17

that suits the

45:18

economic system we live in because it

45:21

makes us

45:21

all we strive to be accomplishing more

45:24

than we did last year and to be earning

45:26

more than we did last year

45:28

but it's a construct for the last few

45:30

years whether it's the origin of

45:31

happiness

45:32

i'm not 100 sure if i was going to put

45:34

two things alongside some of the things

45:36

that you've talked about

45:37

that sense of feeling part of something

45:39

feeling connected to other people

45:41

i think is a more robust route to

45:42

happiness than

45:44

feeling like i'm on a career trajectory

45:47

even though that can the the illusion of

45:51

that can be incredibly powerful

45:53

it's interesting because you know with

45:54

there's this thing called like gold

45:55

medal depression where like michael

45:56

phelps he

45:57

set these set these tarts one thing i

45:59

kind of investigated in my book is the

46:01

idea that

46:02

we think stability we think chaos we

46:06

think we live in chaos

46:07

and and in search of stability but the

46:09

moment we find stability i.e completed

46:12

goals

46:12

and um you know roof over our heads and

46:15

everything's normal we actually descend

46:17

into chaos

46:18

so in fact we're meant to keep this is a

46:20

philosophical idea i guess but

46:22

we're meant to keep our lives in forward

46:24

motion in that chaos because

46:25

when you look at people that have

46:26

achieved all their goals and they have

46:28

nothing left to accomplish

46:29

they so often fall into some kind of

46:31

depression and lack of purpose and

46:32

meaning

46:33

i think jordan peterson talks about it i

46:34

know benjamin said a lot about it that

46:36

you know much of um i was looking at the

46:39

stats around

46:40

life expectancy in the uk and the us and

46:42

over the last two years it's declined

46:44

for the first time ever

46:45

but and they say when they say why is

46:46

that they say because the opioid crisis

46:48

and say why is there an

46:49

opioid crisis and they say well because

46:51

there's a lack of meaning

46:52

and so i i began to realize that in my

46:55

own life

46:56

i think i'm meant to keep myself

46:59

my goals way out in front of me almost

47:01

unattainable um

47:02

and keep myself striving and i've even

47:05

seen it in my person which i've talked

47:06

about a little bit on this podcast the

47:07

days where

47:08

someone came along and said here's 50

47:09

million will buy a company or we're

47:10

going to go to the stock market you're

47:11

going to be a millionaire were the most

47:13

confusing days of my life

47:14

because i immediately didn't know what

47:16

my point was anymore

47:18

i wonder what there's something really

47:19

fascinating so there's a there's a study

47:21

of

47:22

olympic medalist a british study really

47:24

fascinating piece of work

47:25

it's called the great british medalist

47:27

study and um it was commissioned by the

47:29

british olympic association so they

47:31

wanted to know

47:32

what was the what was the creation of a

47:35

champion

47:36

and they did this fascinating thing they

47:37

did they gathered 20

47:39

what they called super elite athletes so

47:42

these are athletes you'll know them

47:44

all of them are household names they

47:45

don't name them in the study but it's

47:47

people like kelly holmes it's people

47:48

like

47:49

the big iconic names and uh these were

47:52

people that every time they went to

47:54

a championship they would win gold or

47:56

they would win

47:57

they would be right in contention then

48:00

they took a second group and they called

48:01

these elite athletes

48:02

super elite elite and these were people

48:05

who went to championships

48:06

but kinda didn't meddle or if they

48:08

meddled they meddled third

48:09

biggest difference between them these

48:11

ones had all received significant

48:13

childhood trauma the elite ones the

48:15

super early best ones had achieved

48:18

significant childhood trauma let's start

48:20

counting the cases

48:21

so kelly holmes she was bullied at

48:24

school she was

48:25

the only child of mixed race

48:28

ethnicity in her village she said she

48:30

experienced continual racism

48:33

tom daley his father died when he was

48:36

training

48:36

yeah um you know you look at countless

48:39

examples of these things the

48:40

andy murray was you know greatest

48:42

british tennis player maybe

48:44

greatest british sports person he was at

48:46

the dumb lane shooting the only mass

48:48

shooting

48:48

in british history so all of these

48:50

people have experienced significant

48:51

childhood trauma

48:52

and what happens is they tend to direct

48:54

their energy

48:56

based on what we know they direct like

48:58

they're fortunate

48:59

there was a coincidence that they were

49:01

gifted supreme talent

49:03

and what you discover is childhood

49:04

trauma normally correlates with

49:05

addiction

49:06

so if you know if it correlates with

49:08

anything it correlates with

49:09

obsessive behavior but both of them have

49:12

something in common

49:13

you're trying to fill that void and so

49:15

these people are fortunate that they've

49:16

been gifted with this

49:18

super elite talent that they can fill

49:19

the void with striving for something

49:22

and the people who ends up at addicts

49:24

with the same challenge don't but

49:25

they're still striving to fill that void

49:27

and so there is something in you know

49:29

it's it's almost inevitable that these

49:31

people who are striving for the elite

49:33

uh accomplishment hoping to fill this

49:36

this hole that sits inside them of

49:37

course when they get there they realize

49:39

it was all an illusion it's like a

49:41

mirage in the desert but you know there

49:43

is something in what you say

49:44

i mean i've got i just i mean completely

49:46

like i think

49:47

when i i sit here and speak to people

49:48

that are tremendously successful

49:50

and the one thing that i've seen in

49:52

common with all of them actually think i

49:53

said it to joe wicks when he was sat

49:54

here

49:55

two weeks ago was they all seemed to

49:57

have some real severe childhood trauma

49:59

that no one else has experienced

50:01

and even in my i said to joe i said you

50:03

know my i've got a friend who's a

50:04

billionaire

50:05

he's not happy but he has had this deep

50:08

obsession since he was a kid because of

50:11

some things that happened with his

50:12

father and his father making him feel

50:14

that he just wasn't enough or he wasn't

50:15

adequate enough

50:16

which has made him obsessive about

50:18

success to the point where it's

50:20

unhealthy

50:21

um and he's got there now he's a

50:22

billionaire but he's not happy at all

50:24

he's he's you know he's tremendously

50:26

unfulfilled the same with eddie han i

50:28

went and eddie holmes on this podcast a

50:30

couple of weeks ago as well

50:31

and he he is the most relentlessly

50:34

obsessed person i've met

50:35

um just non-stop eat to the point where

50:38

he'll say to his kids like

50:40

he'll he'll tell his wife and kids that

50:41

they are second priority to his box to

50:43

being a boxing promoter

50:44

you ask him where that's come from he

50:45

said you know my dad my dad always made

50:47

me feel like i wasn't enough

50:49

it's really interesting though because

50:51

it depends i'm intrigued then

50:53

how these people pay it forward because

50:55

andre agassi

50:56

supreme tennis player great tennis

50:58

player married to the greatest the

51:00

up there equal greatest tennis players

51:02

for all time uh he's married steffi graf

51:04

and um and he says that his dad bullied

51:07

him constantly

51:08

like his dad was never happy he's the

51:10

only place his dad who was

51:11

a persian iranian cab driver could

51:14

afford to own a tennis court was in las

51:15

vegas

51:16

so they moved to las vegas and his dad

51:19

bullied him into becoming a tennis

51:20

player

51:20

and andre agassi fantastic autobiography

51:23

wrote about how much he hates tennis

51:25

hates it with every single bit every

51:28

fiber in his body

51:29

and he says i will never do to my kids

51:32

what my dad did to me

51:33

and so it's like this really interesting

51:35

origin of

51:36

success is the thing that propels you

51:39

this driving force that propels these

51:41

people

51:41

who just keep going relentlessly is it

51:45

something missing rather than something

51:47

extra and i think that's the interesting

51:49

conundrum

51:50

i don't think it's predictable and this

51:52

is the thing because i think you think

51:53

okay well if someone has trauma

51:54

they're going to become successful or

51:56

they're going to become an addict

51:57

or if someone has a

52:00

upbringing that lacked empathy from

52:02

their parents then they'll become an

52:03

or a serial killer

52:04

but in the case of joe wicks he was he

52:06

talked about how he had you know he

52:07

looked at

52:08

the doors in his house and they all had

52:09

fist holes in them his dad was an

52:11

addict his mom had these problems and

52:14

and he is the single most empathetic

52:15

person i've ever met

52:16

you know when they announce the third

52:18

lockdown he does a livestream crying his

52:20

eyes up because not because of him he's

52:21

fine he's saying i can i'm feeling the

52:23

pain

52:24

of people losing their jobs right now

52:25

and you think well if your dad was

52:27

you know you grew up in a home full of

52:28

domestic abuse right and violence

52:31

how can you become the most empathetic

52:33

person that i've ever encountered

52:35

genuinely genuinely empathetic this guy

52:37

like i've never seen

52:38

you know um i you know because everyone

52:41

says about you know pee with joe

52:42

and they all like send him the memes

52:43

every time there's a lock down of him

52:45

like putting his shoes back on or

52:46

whatever but the guy

52:47

gets really down really really really

52:51

down

52:51

because he knows that other people are

52:53

hurting never seen anything like it

52:54

however here's my question so we talked

52:56

about childhoods um

52:58

making people very interesting there's

53:00

one guy in particular who is

53:01

notoriously had a very um interesting

53:05

childhood which made him a certain way

53:06

donald trump and his father um

53:09

you know the story of donald trump and

53:11

his father being you know um

53:13

you were the vp of e-m-e-a

53:16

of twitter um obviously donald trump has

53:19

just been booted off twitter permanently

53:22

what do you think about that but also i

53:23

wanted to ask you where if you were jack

53:26

dorsey in that at that time would you

53:29

have made the same decision

53:31

number one it's so incredibly hard and i

53:34

think

53:35

the i mean i always felt lucky i worked

53:38

four years at youtube

53:39

before twitter and the time that i

53:43

worked at youtube

53:44

there was a lot of um mass shootings and

53:47

there's always mass shootings in the u.s

53:49

but there's a lot of mass shootings and

53:52

the phenomenon at the time was that a

53:53

lot of the mass shootings

53:55

it was being discovered that the people

53:57

had youtube channels

53:58

and so i remember sitting in a meeting

54:00

with lawyers in the

54:02

san bruno headquarters of youtube

54:04

watching them

54:05

debate what the the right moral thing

54:09

to do was in these fascinating to watch

54:11

things that were being invented

54:13

challenges that no one had conceived of

54:16

five years before now you've got these

54:18

things and so you're watching all these

54:19

things going on

54:21

and um and so you know when twitter was

54:23

invented when twitter was invented it

54:25

was a way

54:26

15 years ago it was a way to text all of

54:28

your mates at once

54:30

and so there was a short code and it was

54:32

a way it was

54:33

it took like your msn messenger status

54:36

and it sent it to text messages that was

54:38

the idea before everyone had internet

54:39

connection on their phone

54:40

so that it feels like a different

54:42

lifetime now

54:43

but just an illustration to be 15 years

54:47

on from that

54:48

debating whether you d platform the most

54:51

powerful most well-known is he the most

54:54

famous person in the world maybe the

54:56

most famous person in the world to

54:57

de-platform that person

54:59

is such a journey to be on and i know

55:02

the people

55:03

i mean i know jack i know uh the the

55:05

other person who made the decision

55:07

and i know that they don't make any of

55:10

those decisions lightly you know it's

55:11

like

55:11

it's really uh weighs on them but to my

55:15

mind

55:16

it was a singular situation where

55:18

firstly i saw some people on social

55:20

media saying

55:21

um saying that this was an illustration

55:23

that the employees of tech firms were

55:25

woke

55:26

and it's just really interesting

55:28

equivalents because six people died

55:30

in that event and if you watch back all

55:33

the footage

55:34

of what led to it then it

55:37

it doesn't take a huge leap of logic to

55:40

say

55:40

i can see why that created that so six

55:42

people died and i think

55:44

it was at the end of a long period where

55:47

increasing numbers

55:48

of the tweets by the president and the

55:51

people associated

55:52

were being labeled with this isn't true

55:56

and you you do reach a point where a lot

55:58

of critics were saying

56:00

where does your responsibility kick in

56:02

here do you have no responsibility for

56:04

what your platform is being used for i

56:07

think knowing the people concerned

56:09

that that was the last thing they wanted

56:11

to be to be in the position where

56:13

they were making a decision angela

56:15

merkel has come out saying

56:16

she's she feels uncomfortable with it

56:18

and i can definitely imagine that

56:20

everyone in twitter

56:22

felt uncomfortable with it it was one of

56:24

those difficult things everywhere you

56:25

went for the whole

56:26

trump presidency people would say um

56:30

what are you doing why are you not

56:31

taking this down and of course you know

56:33

the first thing you've got to say is

56:34

irrespective of anyone's opinion and

56:36

that's the only way you can look at this

56:38

that this is an elected leader of a

56:40

country

56:41

and so you know irrespective of anything

56:43

else

56:44

for a private company to be saying that

56:47

we

56:47

we take an opinion which transcends

56:51

uh the election result is a really

56:54

uncomfortable one

56:54

so i know that it would have been a

56:56

really careful decision i think a really

56:58

deliberate decision

56:59

jack's been on podcasts and any places

57:02

uh i'm joe rogan

57:03

talking about he believes that bands

57:05

shouldn't be forever

57:06

so who's to say that you know there

57:08

wouldn't be a root back

57:10

on these things but i do know that the

57:12

decision

57:13

was probably made

57:16

carefully reluctantly i think

57:19

i think it's the right decision i think

57:21

is the right decision and i think the

57:22

timing of it was probably right

57:24

i i would be you know it felt

57:28

it felt at the moment it took place

57:31

it felt like the intensity of dialogue

57:34

and the toxicity of dialogue was

57:36

reaching such a stage

57:38

that you know six people already dead

57:41

it's just like

57:42

this could get this can escalate even

57:43

further and i have to say

57:45

since it's happened it does feel to me

57:48

like a bit of the stress in the room has

57:51

gone

57:52

someone said something uh about i think

57:55

president-elect biden said um the you

57:58

know a natural order of things you don't

57:59

think about your leaders

58:00

every day you kind of know they're there

58:03

you've got context that they

58:05

have an awareness but you know this

58:06

sense of peril where you're thinking

58:08

about your leader and what might happen

58:09

every day

58:11

just contributes to bad mental health

58:13

it's not a healthy place for us to live

58:15

in

58:15

so you know i would guess that there

58:18

would always be a route back

58:19

for people even if they've had a

58:22

permanent ban

58:23

jack said that but i i do think it was

58:24

the right decision

58:26

i i am i'm really not sure i think

58:30

i consider myself as someone that's on

58:31

the left i guess to some degree or maybe

58:33

left to center left but

58:35

um i it does make me feel a little bit

58:37

uncomfortable because you're right it

58:38

sets a bit of a presence for the future

58:40

in terms of how we deal with um

58:44

opinions we don't like things that might

58:46

be considered to be inciting violence

58:48

would you have done in this case

58:49

i think i think i would have um

58:52

suspended

58:53

his account um temporarily like the

58:56

facebook approach

58:57

yes i think that was i think that was

58:59

probably a better approach all things

59:01

considered

59:02

um i think because trump is a very

59:05

unique very powerful individual

59:07

i would have also had someone i'm not

59:09

sure if this happened but someone from

59:10

twitter

59:12

contact his team and really have a

59:14

dialogue about it and

59:15

lay out that we can't allow our platform

59:18

to be a place where we're like denying

59:19

the election results and

59:20

therefore inciting you know these kinds

59:23

of things and basically

59:25

do and i would have used this suspension

59:27

period i think to have that conversation

59:31

uh um but yeah but i think with the

59:33

removal is it sets a bit of a strange

59:35

presence

59:36

and i did wonder before this moment you

59:39

know social media is very left

59:41

it's a very it's a very like a liberal

59:44

place

59:44

i think if you were to just look at

59:46

social media you would think that

59:48

the labor party you're always going to

59:49

win typically as well because

59:51

you think i think so because i think

59:52

that's more a reflection of who you

59:54

follow because

59:58

you know i definitely think there's

60:00

plenty of pockets of people who

60:02

are huge brexit supporters who clearly i

60:04

mean the numbers say that there's more

60:06

of them

60:06

yeah but it's just i think the brexit

60:08

and the conservative

60:09

narrative is less akin to like the

60:13

virtue signaling that you're rewarded

60:14

for on social media

60:16

so if i say uh child a lunch boxes for

60:20

all

60:20

right everyone's eager but if i was to i

60:23

i would prob i might even lose my job or

60:25

be canceled or be criticized if i said

60:28

oh no we don't need to fun give as much

60:29

money to the nhs or something

60:31

so just seems like the liberal the sort

60:33

of left talking points are a little bit

60:34

more

60:35

acceptable on social media and the right

60:37

ones might

60:38

make you lose your job or get you

60:39

cancelled or you know what i mean i

60:42

think it's about tonality rather than

60:44

uh perspective i mean look you know

60:46

absolutely it's not going to play well

60:48

if you're in the market for likes to say

60:50

that i think we need a tighter fiscal

60:52

policy

60:53

and you know and less benefits for

60:55

people he's going to play

60:56

differently i wouldn't necessarily agree

60:59

that the platforms have

61:02

a specific bias though i think you know

61:04

of course it's my echo chamber

61:06

yeah generally you know i've witnessed

61:08

plenty of strong

61:10

opinion on both sides likely as it was

61:13

my job to try and

61:15

ensure there was a a degree of good

61:18

conversation in those things

61:20

and i i've probably not seen that

61:21

because i've only seen my own little

61:22

echo chamber and i'm young i'm

61:24

you know i'm surrounded by very left

61:27

uh people in my organization and stuff

61:29

so i probably surrounded myself with

61:30

that narrative a bit more

61:31

but i just i've always felt that um

61:34

where does social media go from here i

61:35

mean it's

61:36

it feels like it's a really pivotal

61:38

moment we've got this big case with

61:40

facebook at the moment in the us where

61:42

they're trying to you know considering

61:43

breaking up facebook and

61:44

we've got trump being banned from

61:45

twitter we've got parlor being pulled

61:47

from the app store and amazon web

61:49

services

61:50

um it feels like we're in a bit of a i

61:52

don't know maybe we've always been

61:53

in this constant debate of what social

61:56

media is and where the lines are but

61:58

what what are some of the big changes

61:59

you see coming to look i think

62:01

it's pretty clear that regulations

62:03

coming in some in some

62:05

capacity uh i think to be honest i think

62:08

most of the big organizations would

62:10

welcome it when it comes to choosing to

62:12

de-platform people whether they're the

62:14

president or whether they're

62:15

troublemakers

62:17

having some rules that are agreed by an

62:19

independent

62:20

authority would be welcome for most of

62:23

those platforms i think

62:24

you know it's really uncomfortable when

62:26

organizations are losing sleep

62:28

being on the inside is really

62:29

uncomfortable when you're losing sleep

62:31

about

62:32

should we be doing this can we be doing

62:34

this how do we account for doing this

62:36

uh jack daughter did a series of tweets

62:39

a couple of nights ago

62:40

trying to he's formidable i think

62:43

trying to demystify how decisions are

62:45

made so no win almost everyone who reads

62:48

it will be critical of it

62:49

but you know he's trying to say look

62:51

this is how we reach that decision

62:53

um i think there'll be degree of

62:55

regulation i think that's probably a

62:56

good thing

62:57

i suspect some of the big groups will be

63:00

broken up

63:01

and you know facebook and google i think

63:03

will probably be broken up and the

63:05

question will be

63:05

whether they are willing to embrace that

63:08

and do it

63:09

and all of the shareholders and all of

63:11

the users and all the people who work

63:12

there benefit

63:13

or if they resist it and you know the

63:15

lessons of microsoft

63:17

bill gates and steve balmer will say we

63:19

lost 10 years of our company

63:22

because we spent 10 years resisting

63:25

uh regulation resisting control had they

63:28

just

63:29

given up to that they'd probably

63:31

microsoft's in a good place again i

63:32

think biggest company in the world again

63:33

but you know they

63:35

uh they would have been in a better

63:36

place to to avoid those things so

63:38

um i think regulations probably coming i

63:40

think it's probably a good thing

63:41

do you think they're gonna break up

63:42

facebook yeah you think they will yeah

63:44

in the next five years

63:45

really so you think they'll force

63:47

facebook to sell

63:49

whatsapp or instagram or something yeah

63:51

or both yeah or both yeah really

63:53

almost certainly i would guess youtube

63:55

will be sold from google as well

63:56

really yeah blimey that's crazy

64:00

better go somewhere is it better for a

64:03

consumer

64:04

so number one if you own any of those

64:06

shares every time that these breakups

64:08

uh the all of the value of the firms is

64:10

worth more than the constituent parts

64:12

so from shareholder point of view it's a

64:14

really good idea

64:15

to pick the right moment but break

64:17

yourself up and

64:19

um and it's good from a consumer point

64:21

of view

64:22

i often sit there big youtube consumer

64:25

if you're a youtube consumer you said go

64:27

going hang on this used to be like the

64:29

big daddy of video

64:31

they've missed tick tock they've missed

64:33

twitch

64:34

they've missed like all of these big

64:37

opportunities that youtube was

64:38

right in the box seat for they've missed

64:40

all of them why because big firms

64:43

generally are slow and don't innovate

64:45

and so it's better for everyone if

64:47

you've got people

64:48

experimenting doing new things and you

64:51

know if you've got a layer of regulation

64:53

over the top of that

64:54

saying these degrees of norms of

64:56

behavior that you expect

64:58

it's it's much better for everyone and

65:00

it's really exciting i think

65:02

in the case of facebook mark mark would

65:04

respond to that and say we've got 10

65:05

years or

65:06

15 years whatever it is now of

65:07

experience moderating

65:09

terrorist content and you know really

65:12

you know horrific types of content we've

65:14

built

65:14

ai systems which are the best in the

65:16

world and we're removing you know we're

65:17

spotting 90

65:18

of posts before they're reported and

65:20

this has taken us you know

65:21

decades and billions of dollars of

65:22

investment to get to this point if you

65:24

take instagram and put it in the hands

65:26

of an i don't know an adobe

65:28

they don't have that experience they

65:29

don't have that um data

65:31

that they don't have the ai systems and

65:32

so it's not going to help

65:34

for um missing misinformation and it's a

65:37

misdirection though isn't it i mean

65:39

that specifically if someone is saying

65:41

we have learned we've developed

65:43

machine learning that can do these

65:45

things that sounds like a marketable

65:47

product

65:48

that sounds like something that

65:49

shouldn't be the point of difference

65:51

that shouldn't be your differentiator

65:52

that you've got better capacity to deal

65:55

with those things but rather that should

65:56

be something that

65:57

some entrepreneur avails to other firms

66:00

and i think you know sometimes we can

66:02

get locked into an idea of thinking

66:04

oh the narrative that we're being given

66:07

is the right one here

66:08

but rather more than thinking actually

66:10

if someone could put a layer of safety

66:12

over the internet

66:13

that used that machine learning to spot

66:15

things that were really heinous that

66:17

that used that learning to make sure

66:19

that no one had a bad experience

66:21

wow pinterest could use that linkedin

66:23

could use that

66:25

tic toc could use that it should be

66:26

something that everyone could plug

66:28

into their products and then you

66:30

immediately start saying wow

66:32

there could be gaps in the market for

66:33

new products here maybe there's a

66:35

version of twitter that's mega safe

66:37

maybe there's a version of instagram

66:39

that just has a different aspect to it

66:42

so you know my view would be absolutely

66:45

we've learned

66:46

these things but the notion that somehow

66:49

that safety of experience should be a

66:51

proprietary benefit

66:52

rather than something that is afforded

66:54

to everyone

66:55

is just i think a a a

66:58

bit of deception and a bit of

67:00

misdirection the other talking point

67:02

mark zuckerberg would rebuttal you

67:03

basically

67:04

because i've looked at his arguments for

67:06

not breaking up facebook he says well

67:07

what have we got a monopoly in

67:09

we're not as big as imessage in

67:11

messaging we're not as big as this

67:12

platform

67:13

for uh he and he rattles through the

67:15

platforms and says what what are we

67:16

bigger what are we

67:17

the monopoly on and um he says there's

67:20

tons of competition we've got tick tock

67:22

our heels pinterest

67:23

twitter you know uh google you know

67:26

these platforms so he says you know

67:27

where is the monopoly here

67:29

um and i have found that kind of

67:31

compelling i know again it's a bit of a

67:33

misdirection but

67:34

i i can't tell you what he's the what

67:37

what

67:37

facebook have the monopoly on

67:41

yeah well firstly monopolies don't have

67:42

to be more than 70

67:44

i think you know i think by the rules

67:46

for monopoly in the uk it's like more

67:48

than 20 30 percent of a market so

67:50

you know so so to be monopolistic you

67:52

don't have to be dominant

67:53

but you know when you've got three of

67:55

the top five apps

67:57

you start questioning whether there is a

67:59

degree of undue influence look i've got

68:00

no dog in the fight

68:02

um my view personally is that

68:05

i i suspect these firms will be broken

68:07

up and the question then becomes

68:09

do you serve your employees better

68:12

do you serve the people who use your

68:14

apps better do you serve

68:16

the the state of society better

68:20

by just going with that and saying let's

68:22

do it but let's do it

68:24

joyfully get on with it and i suspect

68:27

personally i think you know some of

68:28

these organizations are going to be

68:30

presented with

68:31

the the challenge some of them will go

68:34

okay i'll break

68:35

we'll break ourselves up and others will

68:36

say actually we're going to

68:38

uh we're going to position with this and

68:39

just the less than microsoft is

68:41

you lose 10 years of your life by

68:42

resisting talk a lot about the joy of

68:45

work

68:45

we've talked a lot about you know your

68:46

past experiences at youtube and twitter

68:49

what is next for you when you're

68:50

thinking about what's going to give you

68:52

joy

68:52

from work in the future what are you

68:53

thinking about um i'm writing a book

68:56

about resilience

68:57

uh are you able to tell us the title

68:58

yeah i mean it's the title is

69:00

a big ongoing discussion okay i'm not at

69:02

that stage um

69:04

which is just about all about the things

69:05

we've talked about how resilience is

69:07

actually a collective thing rather than

69:08

an individual thing

69:09

um i've really enjoyed sort of doing

69:12

things like that

69:13

i i i'm doing a couple of things on

69:16

climate change so i worked with an

69:18

organization last year

69:20

yeah yeah so i'm working with alcohol's

69:22

climate reality now

69:24

but um i did something with an

69:25

organization last year that's trying to

69:27

reduce our plastic

69:29

footprint and you know so so

69:32

there's a few things like that and i

69:33

really enjoy those things because they

69:35

i think they're non-linear i think you

69:37

know what success looks like is really

69:39

hard to judge

69:40

and it's all about trying to achieve

69:42

things so i did something

69:44

through october where i presented into

69:47

about 100

69:49

70 different companies i presented

69:51

climate change into 70 different

69:52

organizations

69:53

and you know connections have started

69:55

from that so the

69:57

al gore's climate reality is al gore did

69:59

that film an inconvenient truth about 15

70:01

years ago probably short in school

70:03

my dad made me watch it right sat me

70:04

down and said to my brothers and sisters

70:06

you got to watch this

70:06

and he's turned he's work on that into

70:09

an organization

70:10

and it used to be he had to pay 7 000 to

70:12

go and be trained in las vegas

70:14

now he's in the era of zoom he said

70:16

anyone could be trained on it for free

70:18

really so i trained the only commitment

70:20

you have to do is you have to commit to

70:22

spread the word

70:23

so hence i did about you know all these

70:25

presentations getting out and

70:26

and spreading the word um and that's

70:29

really energizing sort of

70:30

because i think a lot of us feel a

70:32

certain way towards climate but

70:34

feel powerless about what can we do so

70:37

uh i've done a bit of that

70:38

hopefully i'll i'm i've got a few more

70:40

things coming along on that so

70:42

will you ever get back into the world of

70:44

social networking i i really want to

70:46

avoid

70:47

doing that so that's why i'm working

70:49

hard on

70:50

podcast and writing because if i can pay

70:53

the bills doing that

70:54

you know full-time jobs are really

70:57

demanding

70:58

and you know my my social media

71:00

consumptions remains

71:01

i'm a huge user of twitter i'm a huge

71:04

user of tick tock

71:05

and uh so my social media consumption is

71:08

still there i just don't want to

71:09

i just don't want to work in those

71:11

organizations again why

71:13

just you know they're really exhausting

71:14

you know like you work really hard i had

71:17

so much fun working at twitter and

71:19

youtube before

71:20

but you know you do long days especially

71:23

working with california

71:25

up in the morning and you you're working

71:27

late at night so

71:28

i don't want to really go and work in a

71:30

big company again

71:32

i'm going to conclude this podcast by

71:33

just asking you you know

71:35

for you and from everything you know

71:37

about the joy of work and what makes

71:38

work joyful and fulfilling

71:40

if you had to just focus on one thing

71:44

that was the most important factor for

71:46

you

71:47

um in work what would that be um

71:50

there's a 70 year long study out of uh

71:53

yale university looking at what

71:55

the the secret of longevity and

71:56

happiness is and the secret of it

71:59

studied

71:59

these guys for like the whole of their

72:01

lives and the secret of longevity and

72:02

happiness

72:03

is love and friendship and i think

72:06

work is far closer to that than we might

72:08

imagine when we feel a connection with

72:11

the people we work with

72:12

it makes everything worthwhile and i

72:15

think

72:15

hidden in all the chat about

72:17

productivity and strategy

72:18

and and you know market fear and usps

72:23

we lose the fact that when we feel most

72:25

motivated by work

72:27

it's when we feel like we're doing it

72:29

with other people

72:30

and so that's it for me i used to a

72:32

great day at work was when i laughed

72:33

12 times and you know and it was almost

72:36

it felt trivial to mention that it felt

72:38

like

72:39

oh why do you love your job to mention

72:41

that i just love these people i love

72:43

being around these people i'm energized

72:44

by these people

72:45

feels really embarrassing to admit but i

72:48

think that's the secret of it when we

72:50

feel part of something our jobs can feel

72:53

defining that can feel part of our

72:55

identity bruce thank you

72:57

um that loops perfectly round to the

72:59

start of the podcast in my expression

73:00

that i think remote work as hell so

73:02

but also it's uh it's something that

73:04

yeah i've come to learn over the last

73:06

nine months i'm sure a lot of other

73:07

people have

73:08

um thank you so much for all the work

73:10

you've done on work generally because i

73:12

think

73:13

it's a conversation not a lot of people

73:14

are having or breaking through with

73:16

and some of the ideas you deliver in

73:18

your book and just generally in your

73:19

content across

73:20

youtube and your social channels

73:22

linkedin your articles on there

73:23

i think really are helping to dismantle

73:26

a conventional and sometimes toxic

73:28

framework for how work has to be so on

73:31

behalf of someone that works and has

73:32

teams i want to thank you for that

73:33

because it's been um it's a value that

73:35

the world needs but also thank you for

73:36

the conversation today

73:37

thank you it's an absolute pleasure

73:38

thank you

73:53

[Music]

73:58

oh

74:03

you

Interactive Summary

The video features an in-depth conversation with Bruce Daisley, an expert on work culture and author of 'The Joy of Work'. They discuss the impact of the shift to remote work, the causes and effects of burnout, the importance of human connection and collective energy in professional environments, and how these factors contribute to personal happiness and resilience. The discussion also touches upon the challenges of maintaining company culture while remote, the nature of creativity, and the regulatory future of major social media platforms.

Suggested questions

4 ready-made prompts