HomeVideos

Trump Ruined the Reflecting Pool. Now He's Arresting People for It | Pivot

Now Playing

Trump Ruined the Reflecting Pool. Now He's Arresting People for It | Pivot

Transcript

1835 segments

0:00

He's blaming everybody and it's the same

0:01

thing. Oh, it's vandals, it's this, it's

0:03

that. It's him. He's just a disaster.

0:11

Hi everyone. This is Pivot from New York

0:13

Magazine and the Vox Media Podcast

0:15

Network. I'm Kara Swisher live from the

0:17

South of France.

0:18

>> Bonsoir, Kara.

0:19

>> Bonsoir. Bonsoir. How are you?

0:23

>> How are you?

0:24

>> That's her entire friendship.

0:26

>> That's it. We're done.

0:28

>> That's it. We've got a lot to get to

0:29

today. There's so much going on

0:31

including green watergate. Get it? Green

0:33

watergate. I told you this thing would

0:35

blow up. President Trump says it will be

0:37

He said it will be in fixing the

0:38

seriously vandalized reflecting pool

0:40

vandalized by him. Trump is claiming

0:42

without evidence, he's lying, that

0:44

vandals cut the a 250-ft gash in the

0:46

pool's new lining and poured corrosive

0:48

and destructive chemicals into the

0:49

water. This is nonsense. There's cameras

0:51

everywhere in Washington, just so you

0:53

know. He said multiple people have been

0:54

arrested tied to the alleged

0:56

destruction. This is just nonsense. One

0:58

of them was a former Olympian and was

1:00

accused by the park police of destroying

1:01

government property. He says he reached

1:03

down to touch a strip of peeling paint.

1:05

I was down there, Scott. It was peeling.

1:07

It

1:08

Nobody was touching it. Everyone was

1:09

sort of shocked and amazed by how

1:12

grotesque it was cuz, you know, you go

1:14

down there I've gone down there quite a

1:15

bit and I've never really noticed the

1:17

the sliminess of it and it really is

1:19

it's green. All this paint's peeling

1:21

off. So, he's lying and Trump, of

1:24

course, should be accused of

1:26

vandalizing a lot of Washington whether

1:28

it was the East Wing or the the grass in

1:30

front of the White House for his his uh

1:33

his party. You know, it's just

1:35

ridiculous, but it's taking on a life of

1:36

its own. It really is in terms of a of a

1:39

metaphorical thing or maybe you don't

1:41

think that.

1:41

>> No, I mean, the president is caught

1:43

between two straights of water. It's

1:45

just

1:46

and [laughter]

1:47

>> We'll get to that in a minute.

1:48

>> I personally I think this is kind of a

1:51

non-story. America's turning 250 and

1:53

we've managed to turn a reflecting pool

1:55

into a culture war. I just for God's

1:57

sake, just fix it and let's move on. I

1:59

don't I don't I kind of

2:02

I you know, they

2:03

they're lying and saying that it's

2:05

sabotage and vandalism. It isn't. It's

2:07

incompetence. It's a government project

2:08

turning into another government project.

2:11

And the Democrats love to talk about

2:13

I think we have bigger fish to fry. I

2:15

think I I

2:15

>> I would agree, but I don't think it's a

2:16

bad I think people get it in a second

2:19

cuz it's again, as I told you, it's a

2:20

simple and it's also the the guy who did

2:22

it is another piece of grift.

2:23

>> 100% zero bid contract, yeah.

2:26

>> And it looks incompetent. It looks

2:27

incompetent. And you know, one of the

2:29

jokes online was that, you know,

2:31

Washington is now a scar after after he

2:34

took over uh

2:35

took over on the Lion King. Um

2:38

but

2:39

but there is more to that because then

2:40

you link it, I think, with Iran, too,

2:43

which continues to be like a problem.

2:46

Like here's, you know, they keep going

2:47

back and forth. And that is the real

2:49

problem. It is, but it's symbolic of

2:51

just complete idiocy. Like like really

2:54

stupid. We'll get to some other stupid

2:56

things coming up. But um it it Talk a

2:59

little bit about the I know I noticed

3:00

you were talking about a lot online um

3:02

the MOU, which seems the Iranians seem

3:06

to have us by the short hairs. That's

3:08

what it feels like to me.

3:10

I don't know about you, but they're

3:11

they're not doing anything. They're just

3:13

dragging us on, I guess, and being rude

3:15

to J.D. Vance, which I completely

3:18

think they should be.

3:19

>> So, Trump has delivered

3:22

on his

3:23

promise of unconditional surrender. The

3:25

problem is we're the ones

3:27

unconditionally surrendering.

3:29

>> Right.

3:29

>> It is insane. Anyone who can do math,

3:32

anyone who understands a memo of

3:34

understanding, anyone who can look at

3:35

their activities, in in my mind, it is

3:38

just so incredibly clear and tragic what

3:40

is going on.

3:42

The IRGC recognizes

3:45

he's left. The midterms are coming up.

3:48

It is a very unpopular war. He got no

3:50

support from the public, from Congress,

3:52

from other nations. He underestimated

3:55

the resilience of of of the missile

3:57

systems.

3:59

He has handed them something more

4:00

powerful than a nuclear weapon, and that

4:02

is an ability to choke the carotid

4:04

artery of the global economy in the

4:06

Strait of Hormuz.

4:07

They know we are out.

4:10

>> Right.

4:10

>> And they all they have to do is delay

4:12

obfuscation. It's just delay. Every day

4:15

that goes back, it's less likely we're

4:17

going to go back in with military

4:18

action.

4:19

>> No, he can't. He really can't.

4:21

>> They have to operate between

4:23

uh

4:25

humor them, agree to meet in

4:27

Switzerland, don't get a deal done. They

4:29

have the perfect false flag, oh, uh

4:32

Israel's bombed Lebanon, you're not

4:35

lead you're not living up to your part

4:37

of the agreement, we're out.

4:39

>> They have no intention of giving

4:42

anything back, and the only thing that's

4:44

going to come out of this, besides

4:46

Trump's Trump Trump's incompetence and

4:48

J.D. Vance

4:49

uh you know, having about as long a

4:51

presidential run as

4:52

Senator Gillibrand, is that we are going

4:54

to look back on this and recognize that

4:56

one of the greatest acts of diplomacy

4:58

was the JCPOA.

5:00

>> Right, which was and Obama's saying so.

5:02

He's doing a lot of press right now

5:04

around it, by the way, the comparative.

5:06

>> We had Russia and China sign or they

5:08

were co-signatories to the agreement. We

5:10

can't get Israel to sign this agreement,

5:12

much less European nations. It we had

5:15

limits at 3.7 enrichment, they're

5:17

already at 60. There's no There's no

5:19

constraints

5:19

>> There's no constraints around nuclear

5:21

enrichment in the agreement. We he keeps

5:25

saying all these [ __ ] threats, oh,

5:27

we'll we'll open the Strait of Hormuz.

5:29

>> We'll get you. We'll get you. I know.

5:31

>> The Strait of Hormuz would take to keep

5:33

it open would take two carrier strike

5:34

forces, paratroopers and Marines on the

5:36

ground on Iranian soil. That is not

5:39

going to happen. The The net net here is

5:41

the following.

5:43

America comes out of this much weaker,

5:45

Iran much stronger, and we're going to

5:47

look back and and realize that the JCPOA

5:49

was one of the more impressive acts of

5:51

diplomacy of the last 50 years.

5:53

>> Yep, except they still continue to deny

5:56

it. It's really like it's the same thing

5:57

with the reflecting pool. The reason why

5:59

I'm

6:00

harping on it, it's the same thing. It's

6:01

the same kind of like no, this is what's

6:03

happening. You know, you've seen all

6:05

these communications from the White

6:06

House, and we look it looks so

6:08

ridiculous when it's the reflecting

6:10

pool, but it's the same exact

6:11

communications. Um you know, they're

6:14

blaming the New York Times, they're

6:15

blaming you know, for the coverage.

6:17

They're He's blaming Obama, he's blaming

6:19

everybody, and it's the same thing. Oh,

6:21

it's vandals, it's this, it's that. It's

6:23

him. He's just a disaster. And again, I

6:26

point to Finally, someone is starting to

6:28

write about it, his mental state, which

6:31

seems demented, and we'll get into that

6:33

a little bit more. Um but the way he's

6:35

sort of lashing out in this crazy way

6:38

when it's all his fault, seems And of

6:41

course, blaming the poor J.D. Vance. I

6:43

mean, I never feel that sorry for that

6:44

guy, but I got to say he's been dragged.

6:46

He's been

6:48

He's been penced. I don't know what else

6:49

to say. He's sort of stuck holding the

6:51

bag here and try having to defend it,

6:53

and it's worse than when Karl Rove has

6:55

even lightly said, "I wouldn't change a

6:57

thing." on The View, right? Sort of the

6:59

same exact thing. So, I mean, it's

7:02

disastrous for the Republicans in so

7:04

many ways because he doesn't have an

7:05

out. So, my worry because of I think

7:08

he's he lashes out, like resting back

7:11

Jeanine Pirro arresting people for this

7:13

thing? This is like Let me tell you,

7:14

Jeanine, I was down there. I didn't

7:16

touch this strip of paint, but it was

7:17

stripping off by all by itself. Um is

7:20

going to be a disaster. These people are

7:22

soiling themselves in the most

7:23

ridiculous of ways. And in And in Iran,

7:25

it's staying With the reflecting pool,

7:27

it's just stupid, although costly to the

7:29

fed to to us as taxpayers. The same

7:32

thing with the rest of the mess he's

7:33

making. But um in this case, it's

7:35

disastrous. I mean, really truly disas-

7:38

I don't know what how anyone's going to

7:39

get us out of this.

7:41

Cuz we got 2 more years of this lunatic.

7:43

As the entire

7:45

I don't even know. What would happen

7:46

What could happen?

7:47

He gets sidelined? What? I don't know.

7:50

Like he's not going anywhere, even if he

7:52

loses power.

7:53

>> If Democrats take Congress, have the

7:54

power of of subpoena, and uh hopefully

7:57

if they were to get back Senate, at a

7:58

minimum,

7:59

there'd be enough power to get in the

8:01

way of a lot of this stuff.

8:02

>> Except that

8:04

Iran will then develop a nuclear weapon.

8:06

I feel like he might now. You know what

8:07

I mean? Like that's what the worry I

8:09

That's the only thing

8:11

we all agree on. Iran cannot have a

8:13

nuclear weapon, but wow, we've given

8:15

them a chance here. He's This is And

8:17

then the economy itself. Anyway, let's

8:19

go on a quick break. When we come back,

8:21

resignations, feuds, and more, and we'll

8:22

get into all the European political

8:24

drama.

8:26

>> Support for this show [music] comes from

8:27

Cohere. As AI advances, one thing

8:30

matters more than ever, staying in

8:31

control. Most AI comes with strings

8:34

attached, like sharing your data and

8:35

infrastructure, [music] or compromising

8:37

your independence. With Cohere, you

8:38

don't have to give up control to gain

8:40

capability. You can have both. Cohere

8:42

started 7 years ago with a bold mission,

8:45

scale enterprise intelligence without

8:46

[music] sacrificing sovereignty. Their

8:48

solution, AI leaves you in charge of

8:50

your data and infrastructure, allowing

8:52

[music] you to maintain your competitive

8:54

edge. It's designed for enterprises,

8:56

governments, and organizations that

8:57

refuse to give up control in pursuit

8:59

[music] of innovation. From frontier

9:01

models to out of the box tools, Cohere

9:03

gives you everything you need to build

9:04

and deploy [music] secure, scalable AI

9:06

that drives growth and delivers results.

9:08

Their platform is designed around your

9:10

business with models that can be

9:11

customized and trained on your

9:13

proprietary data, so the solution is

9:15

uniquely yours. And [music] control

9:17

doesn't stop at customization. Cohere is

9:19

built with multi-layered protections,

9:21

[music] access, and industry certified

9:22

security standards that help safeguard

9:24

your data while supporting privacy,

9:26

compliance, [music] and other

9:27

requirements. As AI continues to

9:29

transform every industry, Cohere gives

9:31

[music] you the power to put it to work

9:32

today on your terms. Take charge of your

9:35

AI [music] with Cohere. To learn more,

9:37

visit cohere.com/vox.

9:42

>> Support for the show comes from Hims.

9:43

Anyone who's ever tried to lose weight

9:45

can tell you how hard it is because it's

9:46

not just about getting it off, it's

9:48

about keeping it off for the long haul.

9:50

Thankfully, there's weight loss by Hims.

9:52

It's designed to support you in your

9:53

journey to lose weight and keep it off.

9:55

And now, [music] Hims is offering access

9:57

to an affordable range of FDA-approved

9:59

GLP-1 medications, including the Wegovy

10:01

pill and the Wegovy pen. With Wegovy at

10:03

Hims, you can lose up to 20% or more of

10:05

your body weight when combined with diet

10:06

and exercise. It can help you regulate

10:08

your appetite and eat less, so success

10:10

is within reach. Plus, Wegovy is the

10:12

first-ever GLP-1 pill for weight loss,

10:14

so there are no needles needed. Hims has

10:17

[music] everything online. You'll

10:18

connect with a licensed provider who

10:19

will determine if treatment is right for

10:21

you. Ready to reach your goals? Visit

10:23

hims.com/pivot to get a personalized,

10:25

affordable plan that gets you. That's

10:31

Weight loss by Hims is not available in

10:32

all 50 states. Wegovy is a registered

10:34

trademark of Novo Nordisk AS. To get

10:36

started and learn more, including

10:38

important safety information, Wegovy

10:39

clinical study information, and

10:41

restrictions, visit hims.com.

10:45

>> Scott, we're back with big news here in

10:46

Europe. There's a lot going on. Keir

10:48

Starmer just announced he's stepping

10:49

down as Britain's Prime Minister, giving

10:51

in to mounting pressure from his own

10:53

party. Starmer said he'll stay in office

10:55

until the new party leader is selected,

10:57

and likely to be this guy named Andy

10:59

Burnham, former mayor of Greater

11:00

Manchester, very popular guy. Trump got

11:02

ahead of the announcement over the

11:03

weekend, noting Starmer would step down

11:05

and saying he had failed badly on

11:06

immigration, energy policy. Also, a lot

11:08

of attacks from Elon Musk, by the way.

11:11

Starmer's resignation comes almost 10

11:12

years to the day since the Brexit vote.

11:14

The UK has had six prime ministers in

11:17

that time.

11:18

>> I love that.

11:18

>> It's crazy.

11:20

Um talk a little bit about you you live

11:22

there. What has happened here?

11:23

Obviously, he was going to lose an

11:25

election, and he had won in a landslide

11:28

in a very short time ago.

11:29

>> I think a A of it comes down to

11:30

economics, and that is

11:33

I mean, it's very strange.

11:35

Uh Ibiza, Mykonos, and St. Barts, and

11:38

Hawaii are parts of those nations, but

11:40

they're not. They're islands that have

11:42

an entirely different culture. I feel

11:43

that way about London. I think islands I

11:45

think London's essentially an island in

11:47

the UK, cuz if you look at the UK,

11:49

seven out of 10 IPOs in the last 10

11:51

years are below their offering price.

11:52

GDP was supposed to take a 4 to 6% hit

11:54

from Brexit, this second greatest own

11:56

goal in geopolitical history behind our

11:58

entry into Iraq.

12:00

You have now the UK as a whole has a

12:02

lower average household income than

12:04

Mississippi.

12:05

And then there's London, which is

12:07

essentially where the richest people in

12:09

the world park capital and have a

12:12

European lifestyle with actually without

12:14

actually engaging in the UK economy. I

12:16

mean, it's just it's a very strange

12:18

place. Since I have moved there after we

12:20

have a new UK a new Prime Minister

12:23

in several weeks. I've been there 4

12:25

years. This will be my fifth Prime

12:27

Minister.

12:27

>> Fifth, right? You had a bunch of

12:28

conservatives. There was a bunch of

12:30

There was a conservative guy. There was

12:32

Boris.

12:33

>> It's It's not politics. It's speed

12:35

dating. It's beginning to feel like a

12:36

LinkedIn jobs page. It's just so

12:39

you know, it it but without growth until

12:42

they figure out a way

12:44

I thought they should do Brexit. They

12:45

should reintegrate into

12:47

the European economy, because without

12:49

growth

12:50

all of this gets harder and harder. And

12:52

the weird the quagmire here or the not

12:54

the quagmire, the enigma is that

12:57

the UK has all the underpinnings of a

12:58

great democracy and economic growth

13:00

engine. It has incredibly universities,

13:02

rule of law,

13:04

culture compounds. Everybody in the

13:06

world

13:07

it wants to or would wouldn't mind the

13:10

idea of living in the UK for a few

13:12

years.

13:13

It's a wonderful place. And yet they let

13:16

OpenAI, Anthropic, and SpaceX going to

13:18

raise 150 billion in fresh capital. The

13:20

UK raised a total of 2 billion last year

13:22

in its entire IPO market. They just

13:25

can't get out of their own way. And

13:26

Brexit, and just to go to politics,

13:29

since World War II, no individual's done

13:32

more harm to Britain, in my view,

13:34

than Nigel Farage, who might be a prime

13:36

minister at some point. So, I have

13:38

stayed woefully ignorant to UK politics,

13:41

but it is difficult for me to understand

13:44

how the foundation

13:46

of success, how they continue to snatch

13:49

defeat from the jaws of victory here.

13:51

And I got to think it's something it's a

13:53

got to be a big bold move. Even

13:55

even the non-dom thing, we kicked out

13:57

basically they chased a lot of

13:58

billionaires out of the UK. And

14:01

I understand the sentiment. It's let's

14:03

tickle the middle class sensors of

14:05

people who are angry, but at the same

14:06

time the Treasury's gone down because a

14:08

lot of wealthy people are leaving.

14:10

And that reduces your tax base to, you

14:13

know, provide for the NHS and these

14:14

social services.

14:16

But this is, I mean, UK politics, and

14:20

then what do you have? You have the rise

14:21

of populism. They have had real

14:23

problems,

14:24

you know, it

14:26

it it's a certain extent it's a metaphor

14:27

for the West. You have, or when the West

14:30

goes wrong, stagnant wages, housing

14:31

shortages, immigration anxiety,

14:34

and institutional distrust.

14:36

>> You also have a lot of uh meddling by

14:38

Elon Musk in terms of of backing a bunch

14:40

of very violent people against

14:42

immigrants.

14:43

>> export is political divisiveness.

14:44

>> Right, yeah.

14:46

>> It's not helpful.

14:46

>> himself that's meddling quite a bit.

14:49

>> Yeah, but then J.D. Vance comes over and

14:50

lectures them about free speech. It's

14:52

like, we shouldn't I you know, in my

14:54

view, Americans should be here saying,

14:56

"You're our greatest ally. How can we

14:58

help? What can we do together? How do we

15:00

open more free trade agreements?"

15:01

Instead, instead Musk shows up and says,

15:04

"Rise up, white people." Or or I mean,

15:07

essentially and J.D. Vance comes over

15:09

and waves his finger at them around free

15:11

speech. And now they've got to figure

15:12

out a way to to to basically untangle

15:16

the technology

15:18

their new Britain's nuclear arsenal runs

15:20

on American technology. And all of a

15:23

sudden Europe is waking up and going,

15:24

"What the [ __ ] We have become way

15:26

>> the conservatives aren't popular either.

15:28

And Farage kind of is. It's like

15:30

nobody's popular. It's a real

15:32

>> It's a very angry nation. But when you

15:34

don't have growth, people's prosperity

15:36

goes down and they just get angrier and

15:38

angrier. So I I I again, not to talk too

15:41

much about

15:42

money, but they have got to figure out a

15:45

way

15:46

to get growth going again.

15:48

>> How would you do that?

15:48

>> your growth grows, you have more money,

15:50

you have more flexibility, you have more

15:52

power abroad, you have more You can't

15:54

have a powerful nation that's shrinking

15:56

its GDP. And again, I was in Cannes when

15:59

Brexit happened and the pound crashed.

16:01

It's cost them 8% of their GDP, which is

16:04

like taking hundreds of billions of

16:06

pounds into the street and just lighting

16:07

it on fire.

16:08

>> Yeah, they may return to the I mean,

16:10

it's interesting cuz Europe is getting

16:11

more and more unified. Speaking of

16:13

which, Trump's latest feud is one of his

16:15

pals, basically his European Marjorie

16:17

Taylor Greene, Italian Prime Minister

16:19

Giorgia Meloni. The spat started after

16:21

Trump This is so strange. Again,

16:24

I'm sorry, that this guy's lost his

16:26

mind. After Trump claimed Meloni Meloni

16:28

uh begged him for a Meloni I'm sorry,

16:30

Meloni begged him for a photo of last

16:32

week's G7 Summit in France. Meloni

16:35

responded with a video on Instagram,

16:37

which was quite remarkable, calling

16:38

Trump's claims totally fabricated and

16:40

saying Italy and I never beg. She also

16:42

accused Trump of being more

16:43

accommodating to the enemies of the West

16:45

than his own allies. Trump then doubled

16:47

down, saying Meloni is doing poorly and

16:49

he would rather level popularity, which

16:51

she fired back, "My popularity is none

16:53

of your concern. I suggest you focus on

16:55

yours." pointing to his bad his lower

16:57

increasingly lowering popularity.

16:59

Um boy, this woman even though let me

17:01

just let's be clear, she's anti-gay

17:04

marriage, she's anti-trans, she's

17:05

anti-immigrant, she's not She's Marjorie

17:08

Taylor Greene essentially. This is the

17:10

European version of her. And at the same

17:12

time, I I was like, "Go, Georgia." Like

17:16

it was kind of interesting that he

17:17

continues again

17:19

the sign of someone who is having some

17:21

cognitive problems. It seemed like to

17:23

me. Not This is usually he's such an

17:25

>> like this.

17:26

>> He's always been an [ __ ] but not

17:27

this much of an [ __ ] Like and and

17:30

she just took it to him which I found

17:33

really I mean obviously it helps her in

17:35

Italy because he's not popular there and

17:37

he's not popular anywhere in Europe now.

17:39

And they were tight as ticks if you

17:40

recall, you know.

17:42

>> But this is again

17:44

greatness isn't the agency of others.

17:47

And European countries have been our

17:48

strongest allies. We share same values,

17:50

same democracies. We've worked together.

17:53

We've had incredible

17:56

the post World War II world was largely

17:58

shaped by America and European values.

18:02

And Trump decides again

18:05

he's figured out a way to manage to feud

18:07

with and alienate feud with and alienate

18:10

allies while simultaneously praising

18:12

adversaries.

18:14

And we've spent 80 years developing

18:16

these alliances and Trump treats them

18:18

like some sort of fantasy football

18:20

league.

18:21

And Melania to her credit she remains

18:23

her popularity is actually greater than

18:25

most Western leaders.

18:27

And picking and then he decides to pick

18:30

a fight with one of the few European

18:31

leaders who actually likes him.

18:33

And

18:35

is this and none of this

18:36

>> She went at him on the Pope too. She

18:38

didn't much like his comments on the

18:40

Pope either.

18:40

>> Yeah, well, I mean, come on.

18:43

Criticizing the Pope is like if someone

18:45

>> Not in Italy.

18:46

>> in Italy you just don't do You don't do

18:48

that. None of this makes any sense,

18:49

Cara. None of it makes any sense.

18:51

>> it. I believe her. Believe the woman.

18:55

I [laughter] totally believe her.

18:56

>> her.

18:57

>> He's such a creep. But this is

18:58

interesting cuz she's a really cuz she's

19:00

a really If you actually look at a lot

19:01

of her policies, they're pretty heinous

19:03

in terms of how she behaves, but she's

19:06

sort of shifted I mean she used Trump to

19:08

sort of get there and now she's cutting

19:11

him loose like like more than others

19:13

actually. The others haven't been quite

19:15

as critical of him.

19:17

Uh Starmer certainly hasn't, right? Or

19:19

any of them have. I don't know if the

19:21

Germans have it. This she's really taken

19:23

it to the wall.

19:24

>> Yeah, I think I think I think most of

19:26

them have decided wait him out. It's a

19:28

smart move for Melania cuz she comes

19:29

across as a leader and not afraid and

19:32

you know,

19:32

>> And he's not popular. It's not good for

19:35

her. We look terrible once again. By the

19:37

way, it's really interesting to be in

19:38

Europe because a lot of people are

19:40

saying, "You don't like Trump, do you?"

19:42

to me. I'm like, "No."

19:44

>> Really?

19:44

>> No. Yeah, a lot of the Europeans they

19:46

sort of test it. When we were in Paris

19:48

several different times,

19:50

um like, "Hmm, you're not a fan of

19:52

Trump." I'm like, "Hardly." Like he

19:53

Hello lesbian family. Like, "No." Um and

19:57

so they asked several Europeans There

19:59

was a tour guide Eiffel Tower or

20:01

whatever were sort of like poking to see

20:04

um if we liked him, which obviously we

20:06

look like an ad for not liking Trump in

20:09

anyway. Um

20:11

let's go on a quick break. When we come

20:12

back, new details about how Mark

20:13

Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos tried to cozy

20:15

up to Trump. This is an interesting

20:17

story.

20:19

>> Support for Pivot [music] comes from the

20:20

Freedom From Religion Foundation. Quick

20:22

reminder, America started a rebellion.

20:25

>> Uh yeah, we fired a king claiming divine

20:27

authority.

20:28

>> And then wrote a constitution with no

20:30

mention of God. [music]

20:31

>> Which is a big deal.

20:32

>> The whole separation of church and state

20:34

thing as you know.

20:35

>> And those lines are blurring. [music]

20:37

>> You see it in things like America

20:39

praises meant on May 17th where the

20:41

government starts uniting with religion.

20:43

>> [music]

20:43

>> Which typically or historically doesn't

20:46

end well for freedom.

20:47

>> And the Freedom From Religion Foundation

20:49

is working to protect [music] that line.

20:50

>> So, help us protect the First Amendment.

20:53

>> Go to ffrf.us/pivot [music]

20:56

or text pivot to 511511

20:59

to learn more and join. Remember to text

21:01

pivot [music] to 511511.

21:04

>> Because the First Amendment protects all

21:06

of us and it protects you. Text [music]

21:09

rates may apply.

21:14

Support for the show comes from Vanta.

21:15

>> [music]

21:15

>> What's growing across businesses even

21:17

faster than AI? AI risk. Every new tool

21:20

your team adds, every vendor launching

21:22

AI features, every new integration can

21:24

introduce risk into your company, and

21:26

most security programs [music] weren't

21:27

built for the speed of AI adoption.

21:29

That's where Vanta comes in. Vanta is

21:31

[music] the leading agentic trust

21:32

platform trusted by more than 16,000

21:35

fast-moving companies like Ramp, Cursor,

21:37

and Harvey to keep them audit ready at

21:39

all times. [music] And now, Vanta is

21:41

helping companies like yours stay on top

21:43

of the risk that emerge between audits,

21:45

across vendors, AI tools, and your

21:47

entire environment. The Vanta agent

21:49

works like a 24/7 GRC engineer in the

21:51

background, spotting issues, drafting

21:53

remediations, and cutting vendor

21:54

assessment time by up to 50%. Whether

21:57

you're a fast-growing startup or a

21:58

global enterprise, Vanta is here to help

22:00

you automate your security and

22:01

compliance and earn improved trust. Get

22:04

started today at vanta.com/pivot.

22:06

That's vanta.com/pivot.

22:12

>> Support for this show comes from

22:14

>> [music]

22:14

>> Teleport.

22:16

In the AI era, one of the biggest

22:17

questions is how to contain agent

22:19

behavior in your production

22:20

infrastructure. In Teleport's survey of

22:23

more than 200 infrastructure leaders,

22:25

the company found that those confident

22:26

in their AI deployments have more than

22:28

twice the incident rate of those that

22:30

aren't, 72% versus 33%. Let's talk

22:34

security basics. [music] The most

22:35

frequent causes of data breaches are

22:37

human error and compromised credentials,

22:39

but in the AI era, the challenge is that

22:41

agents [music] with broad privileges can

22:43

find these credentials and gain access

22:44

to sensitive data. Teleport establishes

22:47

a unified identity layer for humans,

22:49

machines, and agents that is

22:50

cryptographically backed, which enables

22:52

agents to be controlled and contained

22:54

with the same rigor that you apply to

22:56

other actors in your infrastructure.

22:57

[music]

22:58

Security is complicated, but with

23:00

Teleport, it doesn't have to be.

23:02

Download the free report at

23:03

goteleport.com/pivot. [music]

23:09

Scott, we're back. President Trump

23:10

reportedly took frequent jabs at Mark

23:12

Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos as he tried to

23:13

build ties with his administration.

23:15

That's according to a new book by New

23:17

York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and

23:18

Jonathan Swan, who I'm going to have on

23:20

the on podcast soon. The president told

23:23

guests stories about Zuckerberg and

23:25

Bezos kissing his ass, which they were

23:26

saying, "You would not believe the texts

23:28

I got from these tech guys. I got to

23:29

show you." Among them, Zuckerberg sent

23:32

Trump a photo of a letter written by one

23:33

of his young children, which said they

23:35

were looking forward to a golden age of

23:37

America, Trump a rally slogan. Bezos,

23:40

meanwhile, reportedly told Trump that

23:41

the Washington Post was one of his worst

23:42

investments and that people there are

23:44

really terrible. Oh my god. I mean,

23:48

honestly, and then of course they he was

23:49

showing it to Elon, too. They all made

23:51

fun of them and you know,

23:54

anyway, it was kind of I mean, by the

23:56

way, on the other side, they insult him

23:58

behind his back, too. But wait wait what

24:01

what is the

24:02

what has happened here from your

24:03

perspective when you're reading sort of

24:05

this stuff? I'm not surprised by one bit

24:07

of it whatsoever. Um but I don't know if

24:09

they'll get their reputations back. We

24:11

always thought Trump was a jerk, but

24:13

this is really kind of

24:14

>> Yeah, but it represents a flip that is

24:16

that is sort of represents something in

24:19

my view kind of dark. And that is

24:21

politicians used to kiss the ass of

24:22

billionaires because billionaires had

24:24

money and politicians wanted to get

24:25

elected. And it became kind of a

24:28

pay-for-play thing because of Citizens

24:30

United. But when you think about this,

24:32

Bezos and Zuckerberg are worth hundreds

24:33

of billions of dollars.

24:35

And yet they both still feel compelled

24:37

to kiss the ass of an 80-year-old real

24:39

estate developer.

24:40

>> Right. Yeah.

24:41

>> Capital always chases power, but Silicon

24:44

Valley spent 20 years telling us

24:46

government didn't matter and then

24:48

everyone started flying to Washington.

24:50

And

24:52

what this signals around the dark part

24:54

is the following.

24:56

If you're worth a quarter of a trillion

24:57

dollars and still kissing the ass

25:00

of the president, you're not This has

25:03

moved from buying influence

25:05

to renting protection.

25:07

This is a transition for pay-for-play

25:09

democracy to something even worse, and

25:11

that is a mob protection racket.

25:13

>> Yeah.

25:14

>> Where if I want if I want to hold on to

25:16

my wealth,

25:18

I got to start paying for protection

25:20

because anybody that doesn't sign up

25:22

gets in his crosshairs and potentially

25:25

you know, all of these guys and Jamie

25:28

Diamond is the only one I can tell about

25:30

these like this power crew that hasn't

25:32

kissed his ass and is actually willing

25:34

to occasionally say the obvious.

25:36

And now the government is suing JP

25:38

Morgan.

25:39

So it doesn't matter how powerful you

25:41

are, you got to pay the mob. And this is

25:45

What do you have? You want a democracy

25:46

where money can't buy influence or can't

25:49

buy too much.

25:50

Then you move to a democracy a

25:52

quote-unquote democracy or a cleptocracy

25:54

where money buys everything. And now

25:56

we're in in my opinion a protection

25:58

racket where Bezos and Zuckerberg got to

26:00

like

26:01

got to kiss the ring here. It's feeling

26:03

very Russian.

26:04

>> to? Do they got to? I feel like they're

26:06

more powerful. I don't even understand

26:08

it. Like

26:10

I

26:11

I don't I don't know. I mean, they could

26:12

wait him out. Like They got so much

26:15

money. They could do so much damage to

26:17

him.

26:17

>> I do think if the Democrats take

26:20

Congress and we get about 18 or 24

26:22

months out, I think you're going to all

26:24

of a sudden going to see

26:26

as I say these guys are going to grow

26:27

testicles again. I think you're going to

26:29

see a switch cuz I know they all tell

26:31

you they can't stand them.

26:33

But the smart play, I hate to say it,

26:36

the smart play is just to kiss his ass.

26:38

>> I guess, but it's so gro You don't have

26:39

to do it in a gro tape with your kids.

26:41

Oh my god. Like my child wrote this to

26:44

Do you know how what you much of a loser

26:46

you look like that you're pimping out

26:47

your kids? And then Bezos, just sell the

26:50

[ __ ] Washington Post if it's one of

26:51

your worst investments and people are

26:53

terrible.

26:53

>> that. We talked We've talked and I still

26:55

don't understand why he still owns that.

26:58

>> You know, it's not just me who was

26:59

interested. There was a dozen people.

27:00

Wouldn't engage with any of them. I've

27:02

talked to every one of them. Wouldn't

27:03

engage. Not once.

27:05

What What does he do What does he like?

27:07

Like

27:08

I don't know what's happening. If he

27:09

doesn't like it, if this is his worst

27:10

investments and people are terrible and

27:12

by the way, Jeff, they hate you.

27:14

Um why not just get rid of it? It's so

27:16

>> Yeah, I don't get that one. I don't

27:18

understand why.

27:18

>> give him power. By the way, it's do It

27:20

did an amazing story on Tulsi Gabbard

27:22

this week. Like it's done several

27:24

amazing stories.

27:25

Um around the corruption and everything

27:28

else. I mean, the news parts, the the

27:30

editorial section is such weak sauce

27:32

now. It's really hard to read.

27:34

Um but I agree. I don't understand it. I

27:36

think I don't know

27:37

when when they're sucking up to the

27:39

normal president, do are we going to

27:41

forgive them or do we care? Now, they've

27:43

sort of soiled themselves pretty

27:45

significantly.

27:46

>> It feels very Russian in the sense that

27:49

doesn't matter how rich you are.

27:50

>> Yeah.

27:51

>> You got to send Putin You got to send

27:53

Putin his vig and no matter where you

27:55

are, you might if you really piss him

27:57

off, he's going to put

27:58

a neurotoxin on a doorknob.

28:00

>> Yeah, but he's This guy isn't going to

28:02

do that. That's the thing. It's not like

28:04

In there, I kind of see it cuz he like

28:06

That's kind of going out a window kind

28:08

of thing. This is just something else.

28:10

>> Yeah, but I think I think these guys in

28:12

a capitalist society begin to equate

28:14

success and ego and influence just with

28:17

a number and that is your net worth.

28:20

And I think they're very smart and they

28:22

connect all the dots and see the matrix

28:24

around how to increase their net worth.

28:26

And they've con- they've connected the

28:27

dots here and say just kiss his ass.

28:30

It's just It's It's a really high ROI

28:32

activity.

28:33

>> Ugh, they're so gross. They're just

28:34

gross. They're pimping out kids. It's

28:36

just gross. Sorry, it's just gross. It's

28:37

gross. Um in other Amazon news, speak

28:40

This is interesting. Amazon's movie

28:42

studio is dumping an upcoming film about

28:43

Sam Altman saying the project would be

28:45

served than other studio. The decision

28:47

comes as Amazon plans to invest $50

28:49

billion in open AI this year. The move

28:51

reportedly stunned the filmmakers, very

28:53

good filmmakers by the way. Andrew

28:54

Garfield was in it.

28:56

I am in the script. I don't come off

28:57

very well. I look like I'm too nice to

28:59

Sam, but I don't care.

29:01

Since Amazon had already spent about $40

29:03

million on the movie, tested it for

29:04

markets, it was working towards a

29:06

release date. Um, they I don't know and

29:09

they can't this is not getting picked

29:10

up. Netflix passed apparently, a couple

29:12

of different places passed. Um, and it's

29:15

it you know, it's

29:17

a high-level film. I I read the script.

29:20

Um,

29:20

and I didn't like it. I thought it was

29:22

fictional in a lot of ways. They sort of

29:24

painted Jeffrey and his a party guy,

29:26

which I'm not in my experience and they

29:28

made that one guy who

29:30

rebelled against Sam into a hero and I

29:33

don't think he was either. I thought it

29:34

was kind of broad and didn't I thought

29:36

it was not a good script.

29:38

But there's of course the other ones

29:40

coming out about Mark Zuckerberg, the

29:41

the sequel of the social reckoning,

29:43

which we previously talked about. Um,

29:45

about Frances Haugen and and that that

29:48

whole situation. That's coming out.

29:50

That's

29:51

that is coming out. Um,

29:53

with the guy from The Bear, but uh,

29:55

you feel I don't know. I don't know.

29:57

Like I'm not surprised they got rid of

29:59

it if they just invested in open AI, but

30:01

it seems kind of dumb. Spending all that

30:03

money. Yeah, it's not much. 40 million,

30:05

who cares?

30:06

>> I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but

30:09

we were well into the development and

30:12

even production writers room of

30:15

>> Oh, yours.

30:16

>> our series on Netflix about big tech and

30:18

I got the plug pulled.

30:19

>> Oh.

30:20

>> This has gotten a plug pulled.

30:21

>> Yeah.

30:22

>> I think they've just decided that

30:24

>> They don't want to be villains.

30:26

>> Yeah, and they don't it's not worth the

30:28

risk. You piss off either powerful

30:30

people or you piss off the president.

30:32

All these M&A, all these regulatory

30:33

concerns and quite frankly, the American

30:35

public seems to have soured on AI.

30:38

Or it could just be the following. The

30:40

story of Sam Altman is not interesting.

30:42

And it it seemed more interesting 12

30:44

months ago than it is now. So,

30:46

I think they'd, you know, think, "Well,

30:47

let's just do season four of Euphoria."

30:49

I I don't I think they've done the math

30:51

here and decided that stories about big

30:53

tech

30:54

>> hockey people seems popular.

30:55

>> Yeah, let's do let's do the women's

30:58

hockey team this year.

30:59

>> Toy Story 5 is doing incredibly well.

31:00

Toy Story 5 is like killing it at the

31:02

box office.

31:02

>> opening. By the way, to your credit, I

31:04

meant to tell you you've been talking

31:06

about theaters and I've been shitposting

31:07

them. The best-performing media stock

31:10

the last 12 months hasn't been meta or

31:12

it hasn't been it's been theaters.

31:14

Theaters have made it

31:15

>> Alex went to the theater. He did. He

31:18

loved it. He's going again to watch the

31:19

>> RL is a is a is a trend again.

31:22

But anyways, back to quote unquote

31:24

artificial, the name of this that

31:26

they've killed, I think they just do the

31:28

math and go,

31:29

>> We're not going to make

31:30

>> "Okay, the story is not interesting.

31:32

It's going to piss off potentially a lot

31:34

of powerful people.

31:36

Is this worth it? And

31:39

I look, I saw this happen up close and

31:41

personal and I still

31:42

>> more about this plug pulling for you.

31:44

Tell explain to the people what your

31:46

show was so people understand.

31:48

>> So, I heard I connected with

31:51

Res Media who did The Morning Show and

31:53

then I had an we had an amazing

31:55

showrunner Scott Burns from The Bourne

31:57

Identity, incredibly talented guy. We

31:58

signed up Rosamund Pike to play the lead

32:00

character based on, you know, loosely

32:03

based or inspired by Sheryl Sandberg.

32:05

It got we we we did our pitch and it got

32:09

bought in the room, which never happens

32:10

in Netflix.

32:12

Netflix [clears throat] committed to the

32:13

entire first season.

32:15

Wow, finally, oh my god, finally, after

32:17

a swing and a miss and being beaned in

32:18

the face about 10 times,

32:20

I got something going.

32:23

Everything's going fine, everything's

32:24

going fine. Netflix doesn't like the

32:26

scripts.

32:28

The showrunner leaves. Rosamund has some

32:30

family issues. And just the wheels came

32:33

off the bus.

32:34

And what probably happened is Occam's

32:37

razor, probably just fell apart.

32:39

>> Mhm, cuz Hollywood stuff tends to and

32:41

the

32:42

>> Well, not not when you get to this

32:43

stage.

32:43

>> No, I know. I agree with you. All of it

32:45

just cut the burrows. Even though it was

32:47

Yeah.

32:47

>> Right, okay.

32:48

>> And then so I immediately went to was

32:50

there some polit- because okay,

32:52

meanwhile Netflix is making a bid for

32:54

Warner Brothers.

32:56

And so I immediately go is something

32:58

else at foot here and then I talked to

33:01

the that incredibly impressive woman at

33:03

Netflix who runs all their content

33:04

>> And she was very straight

33:06

>> She was very straight with me. She said

33:08

problems with the scripts,

33:10

you know, family issues for the lead and

33:13

this happens. And I believe that. I

33:16

believe that's what happened. But then

33:17

you see this thing get it the plug

33:19

pulled. I think the creative community

33:20

has basically said America is tired of

33:23

hearing about Big Tech

33:25

and there's a ton of there's a ton of um

33:28

second order risk around these stories

33:30

right now.

33:31

>> Yeah, that could be. It could be that

33:32

what's doing well and what's not. It'll

33:34

be interesting to see how the social

33:35

reckoning does, right? Uh although some

33:37

people say it's a mess of a script with

33:39

Aaron Sorkin. I haven't seen it. Um but

33:41

it's getting a big pull that's getting a

33:43

big push and that's the the second part

33:45

of the Facebook story. It's a it's a

33:47

it's an accompaniment to the social

33:48

network. Um but this time Sorkin and not

33:52

Fincher is directing which we'll see how

33:54

he does.

33:55

Um but you're right. It's like do we

33:56

want to see more about these [ __ ]

33:59

right? Like that kind of thing, I guess.

34:01

>> think the story of Big Tech is the

34:02

biggest story that's never been told. I

34:04

still think

34:05

>> someone's going to produce it. I think I

34:07

think Bezos and Musk and Sheryl Sandberg

34:10

and what I wanted

34:12

and they agreed to in the first season

34:13

was I actually think Sheryl Sandberg is

34:15

one of the more interesting characters

34:16

in Big Tech. I think she's actually in

34:17

many ways more interesting than Musk.

34:19

And but when you hear about these

34:22

people's lives

34:23

you just wouldn't believe it unless you

34:24

knew it was real. I think they're

34:26

incredibly complex, interesting, strange

34:28

people.

34:29

>> Petty.

34:30

>> And And stories

34:30

>> Angry, but unhappy. Yeah.

34:33

>> again, it's it really is and no one's

34:34

told it that well. It's the biggest

34:36

story that is yet to be told. People are

34:38

obsessed with obsessed with Succession.

34:41

News Corp is a pimple on the elephant of

34:42

Big Tech.

34:43

>> Right. You're right.

34:44

>> This story really hasn't been told yet.

34:45

>> to be? It's going to be theater and

34:47

opera. Like that I just have this

34:49

feeling there's going to be a theatrical

34:50

show or in that regard, right? Where

34:54

it's going to be told. Because I have a

34:56

couple ones going and I don't think

34:58

they'll ever get made. I just don't

34:59

think they will. Both my book, my

35:02

memoir, and then another one with Brad

35:03

Stone and I that we wrote years ago. We

35:06

wrote the treatment four years ago and

35:07

it's moving, but slowly. And the

35:09

question is do people want to watch?

35:11

Unless you make it really like

35:12

Succession worked cuz it was like

35:14

fantastic cast, fantastic script. You

35:17

know, rich people [ __ ] things up.

35:19

Really, I think it might have to wait a

35:21

step to get to these people, but they

35:23

will. They'll be gotten. They're amazing

35:25

characters in a terrible way.

35:27

Um speaking of uh things that are uh

35:30

crashing to the ground, SpaceX hype is

35:33

crashing. As we tape on Monday, SpaceX

35:35

shares are down to $167, down 17%,

35:38

valuing the company at 2.2 trillion,

35:40

still enormous. The stock is still up

35:42

24% from the IPO price, but uh down over

35:45

16% from its peak. Uh a lot of people

35:48

feel this is going to keep coming down.

35:50

I don't know, but some people are

35:51

buying. So, it will it have the effect

35:53

on the upcoming IPOs? Um and and let's

35:57

hear a question uh from a listener about

35:59

Elon's shares and his impact on the

36:01

company and then we can answer all these

36:02

questions.

36:03

>> So, if he tried to actually sell or

36:06

borrow against even a smaller percentage

36:09

of it tomorrow, what happens to the

36:10

price? If he dies or is incapacitated

36:13

tonight, what's the stock really worth

36:15

the next morning?

36:17

>> Zero.

36:18

Zero. Like oh my god, that would be look

36:21

out [ __ ] below, but your thoughts?

36:23

>> Well, my understanding is this there's a

36:25

lot of nuance there. My understanding is

36:27

he's agreed to a self-lockup of a year.

36:29

So, he hasn't sold he's not selling any

36:30

shares.

36:31

>> could borrow against it.

36:33

>> That's exactly right. And he can borrow

36:35

way more than he would could ever spend

36:37

against it.

36:38

>> rich people do that, Scott, for people

36:39

that don't understand. Borrow Borrow

36:41

against your stock.

36:42

>> Okay, so the the ultimate wealth

36:45

accumulation and income inequality

36:47

strategy is the following. If you're

36:48

fortunate enough to have equity in a

36:49

company that does real really well, it's

36:51

called the buy,

36:53

borrow, die strategy.

36:55

And that is Jeff Bezos owns $120 billion

36:58

in Amazon shares. And to fund his

37:00

lifestyle, he borrows against it at very

37:02

low interest rates.

37:03

And then he puts a lot of it in trust.

37:05

And when he dies, there's a step-up in

37:07

valuation, so his kid don't have kids

37:08

don't have to pay taxes on it. Or when

37:11

he actually starts selling, he decides

37:12

he needs to spend more time with his fam

37:14

with his dad in Florida such that he

37:16

doesn't have to pay back the cost of the

37:18

infrastructure of the great state of

37:19

Washington that built his $120 billion

37:21

in fortune.

37:22

And the greatest the greatest

37:25

distinction between the wealthy and the

37:28

not wealthy is the following. Are you an

37:29

earner or are you an owner? And you want

37:31

to do everything you can, whether it's

37:32

tax-free investment vehicles, getting

37:36

the money out of your hands, auto

37:37

automatic investment every month. You

37:40

have to get to be an owner cuz the thing

37:42

about owning stock or houses or assets

37:44

is they increase in value tax-deferred.

37:47

What do I mean by that? If you make a

37:49

$100,000 a year, you're an asset

37:52

increasing your wealth by $100,000, but

37:53

you lose 30% of it in taxes. Whereas, if

37:55

your stocks go up $100,000,

37:58

as long as you don't sell, there's no

38:00

taxable event. Now, what should happen

38:02

is that we need new laws such that when

38:04

you borrow against your assets, it

38:07

creates a taxable event on the on the

38:10

capital or the asset you're borrowing

38:11

against.

38:13

Because what effectively has happened is

38:14

the owners are just pulling away

38:17

from the earners. It's never sell your

38:19

stock, let it keep going up, and borrow

38:21

against it for your lifestyle needs. And

38:23

then you can take additional capital and

38:26

start investing in other things and

38:27

diversifying.

38:29

And we're going to have a the last 20,

38:31

30 years in America, we've been obsessed

38:33

with how to create wealth. Over the next

38:35

10 years, we're going to have a very

38:36

important conversation around what do

38:37

you do and what is expected of wealth.

38:41

Did that make any sense?

38:42

>> Yes, it did. Okay. But now what's going

38:43

to happen with this stock? So I mean

38:45

because he let's assume he's not going

38:47

to be incapacitated or dead or but he

38:49

will borrow against it if he needs the

38:51

money. I mean how much money does he

38:53

actually need if he wants to say fund

38:55

presidential election, for example.

38:58

>> He owns he's worth a trillion dollars.

39:01

He can he can go to JP Morgan and say,

39:03

"Loan me $10 billion."

39:05

>> Right.

39:06

>> And they're not going to ask him what

39:07

he's doing with it and he could

39:08

literally overwhelm the airwaves and and

39:11

social media with his chosen

39:14

candidates. Is the stock going to go

39:15

down? Okay, let me just be clear. SpaceX

39:18

trades at a price-to-sales ratio. Well,

39:22

let's let's do it the other way. Apple

39:23

trades at 10 and 1/2 times

39:25

price-to-sales. Alphabet, 11. Tesla, 16.

39:29

Nvidia, 39. By the way, all these

39:31

companies growing faster except for

39:32

Tesla than SpaceX. SpaceX trades at 131.

39:36

Meta, an amazing company, trades at 7.3.

39:39

Amazon trades at 3.7.

39:41

So

39:42

>> Amazon 3.7?

39:44

>> 3.7.

39:45

>> Oh my god, 10 is usually the thing,

39:47

right? 10 to 15, correct? 12

39:49

>> Yeah, those are higher margin companies.

39:50

Amazon's in a low margin business. I

39:53

think I think the the only stock in all

39:55

of these that I would buy right now is

39:57

Amazon. Because what you get is you get

40:00

a distant number two to SpaceX with the

40:02

core business

40:04

of the retail platform. If you want to

40:05

talk about AI, the adjacent AI plays to

40:07

go after industrial robots of which

40:09

Amazon has two and a half times the

40:11

total amount of America.

40:13

>> If you're FedEx, you have to be worried,

40:14

too. Same thing.

40:15

>> If I could go [clears throat] if I could

40:17

go short any category right now, it

40:19

would be a basket of the secondary eye

40:21

players. And if I could go long any

40:23

category, it would be a GLP-1s. I don't

40:26

know if you've seen what's coming out of

40:27

the American clinical oncology

40:30

gathering, but they're now saying that

40:32

metastatic cancers

40:34

get cut in half the growth rates when

40:36

people are on GLP-1s. Anyway, will it

40:39

come down?

40:40

>> foods, as you said, 2 years ago, you

40:43

know, the

40:44

the cuts in prices for Doritos and for

40:46

all that shitty food

40:49

is really quite significant. People,

40:51

there's now not enough cottage cheese

40:52

around and yogurt and things like, you

40:55

know, it's really interesting like in

40:57

terms of how people's tastes have

40:59

shifted cuz one in eight Americans is on

41:01

this drug at this point.

41:03

>> it's going to be one in two.

41:04

>> I agree. I agree.

41:05

>> You're going to I I my prediction is

41:07

both of us are on GLP-1s, some form or

41:09

microdosing.

41:10

>> to start. My cardiologist was like,

41:12

we're going to not have your stroke ever

41:14

again. We're going to give you a small

41:15

amount. I'm going to do it. I have to

41:17

start.

41:17

>> They're talking about potential

41:19

potential delay of dementia and

41:21

Alzheimer's. They're finding out

41:22

>> No, my cardiologist was like, absolutely

41:24

we're doing it for you.

41:26

>> They're just finding out all sorts of

41:28

I there's never been an innovation that

41:30

appears to have second order effects

41:31

that are this positive. You usually find

41:33

externalities that are negative.

41:35

You know, you get you blast someone with

41:37

chemo enough, they get leukemia 20 years

41:39

later, right? There's big tech, all

41:42

sorts of externalities. The

41:44

externalities of GLP-1,

41:46

uh you know, and there there are issues

41:48

around nausea, muscle loss, but the

41:51

every time they do more research, they

41:53

keep finding out better and better

41:55

things.

41:56

>> is the biggest test case. It'll be

41:57

interesting to see what the negative

41:59

There are some negative effects and

42:00

stuff like that, but it's a little like

42:01

a statin, you know.

42:03

But one of the things is people eating

42:05

whole foods and craving things that

42:08

protein

42:09

that protein-related healthy proteins,

42:11

um which is really interesting. Anyway,

42:13

we'll see. I I would agree with you. Um,

42:16

you called this one very hard two years

42:18

ago at least, if you recall. I remember

42:20

this. I remember being struck by it.

42:22

Anyway, SpaceX shares. Good luck if you

42:24

buy them. And let's not hope Elon dies

42:26

or is incapacitated tonight. Um, cuz it

42:29

is a look out below for that stock,

42:30

correct? I mean, let's just answer his

42:32

question. If something happens to him,

42:33

that price Even though SpaceX is a very

42:36

fine business, it's not a very fine

42:39

business. It's just a telco in the sky,

42:41

essentially, without

42:42

>> No, the meme, the cult leader of the

42:44

meme.

42:44

>> No, cannot

42:45

>> that would be, yeah, that would be, uh,

42:49

Yeah, I I I I got to believe that would

42:51

be disastrous for for Tesla and for

42:53

SpaceX. He's, yeah, 100%.

42:56

>> the one. He's the key man. Anyway, one

42:58

more quick break. We'll be back for wins

43:00

and fails.

43:02

>> Support for this show comes [music] from

43:03

ShipStation. There are only so many

43:05

hours in the day, and if you run a

43:06

business, then you can't afford

43:07

inefficiency, [music] especially when it

43:09

comes to shipping physical products. If

43:11

you're looking for an AI to help make

43:12

the process less of a headache, look no

43:14

further than ShipStation.

43:16

>> [music]

43:16

>> ShipStation's AI isn't a general purpose

43:18

tool. It's a highly specialized

43:20

intelligence that has been trained

43:21

[music] for decades on real shipping

43:23

data. With features like inventory

43:25

syncing across your sales channels,

43:27

branded [music] returns portal that

43:28

helps turn returns into revenue,

43:30

automatic rate shopping, and

43:32

integrations with [music] accounting and

43:33

CRM software, ShipStation eliminates the

43:36

need for multiple tools in your

43:37

workflow.

43:38

>> [music]

43:38

>> ShipStation can adapt to your unique

43:40

business by alerting you when stock is

43:42

low, recommending the best carrier

43:43

[music] selections and rates, and

43:45

automating tasks to save you time, so

43:47

you can stay one step ahead. The sooner

43:50

you switch, the sooner you start saving

43:51

time and money. Get started with

43:53

ShipStation today [music] and get 60

43:55

days free at shipstation.com with code

43:58

pivot. That's shipstation.com

44:00

code pivot. shipstation.com

44:03

code pivot. Taxes [music] and fees

44:05

apply.

44:07

>> Support for the show comes from Framer.

44:09

If your team wants a website that looks

44:10

and feels handcrafted, but is still fast

44:12

to ship, Framer is built for that. You

44:15

design on a visual canvas with

44:16

responsive layouts, hosting, and a CMS

44:18

built-in, so the work is [music]

44:20

production-ready from day one. Agents

44:22

work alongside you to draft pages and

44:23

polish sections, then you review and

44:25

publish what goes live. Framer [music]

44:27

is the pro site builder for creators,

44:29

teams, and businesses that want a

44:30

professional site and care enough to get

44:32

every detail [music] right. Agents solve

44:34

the gap between AI-generated ideas and

44:36

production-ready website work. The agent

44:38

works in the same place where the real

44:39

site is designed, managed, reviewed, and

44:41

published. It lands on the canvas, stays

44:43

editable, and can be published when the

44:45

team is ready. Agents in Framer work

44:47

alongside teams to streamline

44:49

collaboration on the same canvas, build

44:51

custom code components, create and

44:52

manage CMS content, optimize SEO

44:54

settings, and ship everything all in one

44:56

place. Learn how you can get more out of

44:58

your site from a Framer specialist, or

45:00

get started building for free today at

45:02

framer.com/pivot

45:04

for 30% off a Framer Pro annual plan.

45:07

That's framer.com/pivot

45:09

for 30% [music] off. framer.com/pivot.

45:12

Rules and restrictions may apply.

45:15

Support for the show comes from Gusto.

45:16

If you're a small business owner, you

45:17

know how hard it can be to navigate the

45:19

economy. You can't control interest

45:21

rates or tariffs, [music] but you can

45:22

control how you adapt and run your

45:24

business. Automating payroll and HR with

45:26

Gusto is one of the fastest ways to cut

45:28

friction and focus on what actually

45:30

moves the needle. Gusto is online

45:32

payroll and benefits software built

45:33

[music] for small businesses. It's

45:34

all-in-one, remote-friendly, and

45:36

incredibly easy to use, so you can pay,

45:38

hire, onboard, and support your team

45:39

from anywhere. If you've ever been stuck

45:41

working on repetitive administrative

45:43

tasks and thought [music] to yourself,

45:44

there has to be an easier way. That's

45:46

the kind of thing Gusto was built to

45:48

solve. [music] And they say they can

45:49

provide automatic payroll tax filing,

45:51

simple direct deposits, health benefits,

45:53

commuter benefits, workers comp, 401k,

45:55

[music] you name it. Gusto makes it

45:57

simple and has options for nearly every

45:59

budget. Save time with built-in

46:01

automated tools, offer letters,

46:03

onboarding docs, direct [music]

46:04

deposits, and more. With Gusto, you can

46:06

get direct access to certified HR

46:08

experts to help support [music] you

46:09

through any tough HR situation. Try

46:11

Gusto today at gusto.com/pivot

46:14

and get 3 months free when you run your

46:16

first payroll. That's [music] 3 months

46:18

of free payroll at gusto.com/pivot.

46:21

One more time, gusto.com/pivot.

46:24

[music]

46:26

>> Okay, Scott, let's hear some wins and

46:28

fails.

46:29

>> My win is uh tourists in the US for the

46:33

World Cup.

46:34

>> Oh, yeah.

46:34

>> Uh yeah, I think international fans are

46:38

leaving the World Cup raving about

46:39

America, our food. I mean, it's just

46:42

hilarious that "They love your Waffle

46:44

House." I mean, it's just like

46:47

They

46:47

>> Boston and the Scottish the Tartan Army

46:50

was delightful.

46:51

>> Uh what what what the world is finding

46:53

out is that America at its core,

46:54

distinctive podcasters like us and and

46:57

Trump, America [clears throat]

46:59

Americans are generous, interesting,

47:01

wonderful people, and it's an amazing

47:03

culture, and they're getting to see

47:05

that. And then Americans are getting to

47:06

see just how wonderful

47:09

these nations are.

47:11

And I like I said, I think the World Cup

47:12

is doing what the UN initially

47:14

envisioned it would do. I think it's

47:15

bringing people together. These viral

47:17

online videos show fans excited about

47:19

American food,

47:20

uh our huge portions, Chipotle, Shake

47:23

Shack, and many more. Visitors to to NYC

47:25

were able to be part of the legendary

47:27

Knicks parade.

47:28

The World Cup has attracted a projected

47:31

10 million visitors. Airbnb searches in

47:33

host cities jumped 80% year-on-year.

47:36

Visitors are staying about 12 days,

47:38

attending two matches, and spending over

47:40

$400 a day on average.

47:43

Uh New York City's tourism chief, Julie

47:45

Coker,

47:46

likened the boost to hosting as many as

47:48

eight Super Bowls in 6 weeks. I I just

47:52

think the World Cup I think FIFA is one

47:54

of the most corrupt organizations in

47:55

sport, but I think the World Cup is just

47:59

incredible.

48:01

>> It's the fans. They were just the fans

48:02

are delightful.

48:03

>> But you see you see people in Kansas

48:05

welcoming,

48:07

you know, these people from Norway. You

48:08

see the Japanese I I I just it really is

48:13

I think we forget that generally

48:15

speaking these cultures are wonderful.

48:18

>> And we're not Trump.

48:19

>> Yeah, generally speaking people want to

48:20

get along. Generally we're not that

48:23

divided. We just have the most

48:24

profitable companies in the world trying

48:26

to divide us.

48:27

>> And we have a president who's trying to

48:29

divide us. It's just is. Like I mean, I

48:31

think you know what I'm struck by here

48:32

is you get the feeling and this is just

48:35

being in France for a short time is they

48:37

really

48:38

want to like us. Like I know you know

48:40

what I mean? Like I had so many

48:41

Europeans like

48:43

testing to see are you one of those

48:45

people Americans? And you're not and

48:48

then they're like thrilled to have you

48:50

there one I have to say everyone's been

48:52

really lovely everywhere we've gone. And

48:53

I do think there's a backlash happening

48:55

Scott. I do. People are like

48:57

>> Mhm.

48:57

>> They're I'm tired of being angry at

48:59

these [ __ ] I'm like let's just get

49:01

rid of them. Let's just move along and

49:03

like and you're right the World Cup I

49:06

I know you don't think as much as the

49:07

Knicks but I think the Knicks thing like

49:08

it's just there's a feeling I think

49:10

you're absolutely right. I would agree

49:11

with you. These and this is these people

49:13

want to like us. They want to like us in

49:16

a lot of ways. So

49:17

>> My fail and this is indicative of of

49:20

social media is that Polymarket is

49:22

flooding social media with fake trading

49:24

videos.

49:26

Uh there was a great I think the Wall

49:27

Street Journal is doing a great job.

49:29

They did an analysis and found the

49:31

Polymarket paid dozens of college age

49:33

creators to post videos of fake trades

49:35

and fake wins on the platform.

49:38

So one of the videos for example

49:40

uh shows a young man that saying he won

49:43

$100,000 on a bet that Trump would say

49:45

McDonald's in public but in reality all

49:47

of the economy all the all of the

49:49

accounts that made the bet uh the money.

49:52

And to make these clips

49:54

>> Ugh, the gross.

49:55

>> Polymarket built copies of its website

49:57

and then told creators to make quote

49:58

trades on those sites and hide that they

50:00

were being paid by Polymarket.

50:03

>> Scammers.

50:04

>> So, uh by the way, I feel I should

50:05

disclose that at Prophet Markets we have

50:07

a data partnership with Kalshi.

50:09

>> Gambling and gaming for young men is

50:13

really corrosive and I still can't

50:15

resolve what to do about it cuz you

50:17

don't want to infantilize young people

50:18

and

50:19

it's a tough one, but at a minimum

50:21

these companies shouldn't be posting

50:23

fake social media posts that show

50:26

someone winning when they didn't.

50:28

It's just it's preying on their worst

50:30

instincts and it's not it's

50:32

disingenuous.

50:33

>> Yeah, it's just just do your business.

50:35

If people want to use it, you don't have

50:36

to like

50:37

>> And these are great businesses, but

50:38

Polymarket's audience is 70% male and

50:41

the most common age demographic is 25 to

50:44

34, so again, it's young men.

50:46

And a plural And guess this.

50:48

>> Can I use a comparison? You know those

50:50

two when you were after Robinhood for a

50:52

while and then the other people that you

50:54

worked with, Public?

50:56

>> Public, yeah, public.com.

50:58

>> They seem like the Robinhood people,

51:00

Polymarket people. I don't know.

51:02

>> Well, they're especially aggressive and

51:04

I have problems with all of it. I don't

51:05

I don't have moral clarity about all of

51:07

it quite frankly any of it, but

51:10

the deceptive marketing mostly affects

51:12

young men and and just evidence of who

51:15

they're targeting

51:16

a plurality of Polymarket's display ads

51:19

are on what site? I'll give you a guess.

51:23

Young men. They're trying to reach young

51:24

men.

51:25

>> Twitter.

51:26

>> Pornhub.

51:27

>> Pornhub, uh-huh, that makes sense.

51:30

>> So, this is

51:32

and again, I don't know if you can

51:33

regulate this. They'll say it's free

51:34

speech, everybody's making money,

51:36

but this does feel like deceptive

51:38

marketing.

51:40

Anyways, that's my feel.

51:41

>> That's a good feel. That's I agree with

51:43

you. I think you're I mean, it is. It's

51:44

just Why do you have to trick people?

51:46

Just You make a good card.

51:48

>> People love this stuff. They love the

51:50

prediction markets. The data is

51:51

interesting.

51:52

>> to do that to people. They just stupid.

51:54

It's just con people.

51:56

Um my fail is the the way the

51:58

Republicans are continuing to attack

52:00

James Talarico over his sexuality, which

52:04

is I think it must be Trump mistook sis

52:06

word sis gendered for six genders or

52:08

something. But Steven Miller is

52:10

particularly heinous in terms and

52:12

especially cuz he's such a loathsome

52:13

creature. Um uh

52:16

it's just it's grotesque. It's really

52:18

grotesque and weird and I hope it

52:20

doesn't work. I fear it might. Uh but

52:23

this this idea of of of

52:26

accusing someone of being transgender

52:28

and this so it continues. And especially

52:30

Ted Cruz. I mean honestly, I hate to say

52:34

he should know better, but I guess he

52:35

doesn't. But Miller and Cruz and a lot

52:38

of them are just grotesque. It's just

52:40

gross. It's I've never seen anything

52:42

like this and it's really hateful and

52:45

cruel and you know, and especially cuz

52:47

these particular men are particularly

52:49

loathsome men at the same time. And so I

52:52

think that's just I just can't stand it.

52:54

I Every time I see them do it and they

52:56

keep doing it. They must to be seeing

52:58

some polling or something. But and

53:00

they're also terrible people. Um it's

53:02

just gross. Like

53:04

I don't even so it's misogynist, it's

53:07

transphobic, it's it's definitely uh

53:10

it's all manner of weirdness on these

53:12

people's part and just I again, a bunch

53:15

of people I cannot wait to see go away

53:17

at some point relatively soon and we

53:20

never have to speak of them again.

53:21

That's how I feel about a lot of these

53:23

people. Um on the positive side, um I do

53:26

I do um

53:27

really thrilled to see Toy Story did so

53:29

well. It's one of my favorite movie

53:32

>> franchises. I The third one I lost I

53:36

lost it at the end of that one about

53:38

It's about It's about toys and it's

53:40

about everything. And this one is, you

53:42

know, focused in on empathy, focused in

53:45

on all the good things we've been

53:47

talking about in this show. And

53:49

I haven't seen it yet. I want I have my

53:51

kids at my little I saw the other ones

53:52

obviously with my older kids cuz it's

53:54

been so long. This is the fifth one. And

53:56

it sometimes you get to five you're like

53:58

you got to be kidding kids or you just

53:59

want to sell toys. But the the reviews

54:02

for this and I have not I want to see it

54:03

in the theater speaking of which.

54:06

And we're going to we I've downloaded

54:07

all of them here and I'm hoping to watch

54:09

all four movies with the little ones and

54:10

then take them to it. Um I just feel

54:13

like what a what an astonishing

54:15

franchise it's been and it's just I dare

54:18

you not to cry at almost any of them. I

54:20

just [laughter]

54:21

I cry and I don't cry.

54:24

That last the third one just killed me.

54:26

Just killed me.

54:27

And I don't know why. I just it's just

54:29

beautiful. And this one's about stuff

54:32

that's not not it's about digital but it

54:34

doesn't demonize digital. It just talks

54:36

about play with kids. And I and I'm very

54:39

excited to see it. So I'm really happy

54:41

for the Pixar people for putting out a

54:43

great film. And I'm excited to see it.

54:45

>> Well, you know what my

54:46

>> What? Go ahead. Sorry.

54:47

>> You know what my

54:48

uh ex-wife said when I came home and

54:50

found her [ __ ] Woody?

54:52

>> Oh, no.

54:53

>> She said she looked at me said she said

54:56

you have a friend in me.

54:57

>> Oh my god. How could you do this to me?

55:02

>> Come on. That's easy.

55:03

>> No. That's

55:04

>> That's easy.

55:05

>> worst. That is the I'm not going with

55:08

you to this movie and you're not getting

55:09

near my children. I'm on this trip to

55:11

Can.

55:12

I can't. I'm pronouncing it right.

55:13

Can't. Anyway.

55:14

>> [clears throat]

55:14

>> Can't. Can't. I don't Thank you for

55:16

ruining my beautiful gorgeous moment

55:18

about children play and everything else.

55:20

I truly appreciate it. You're not

55:22

allowed to go to this movie in any way.

55:25

All right, stop. Stop. Stop right now.

55:28

Anyway. So Scott, I'm looking forward to

55:30

seeing you. I might see you at a party

55:32

tonight. Maybe I won't see you at a

55:33

party. But I want to ride on that

55:35

>> You know Toy Story 6 is about Andy's

55:38

>> is about his

55:39

>> [clears throat]

55:39

>> No. No. No. No. No.

55:40

>> I'm serious. Toy Story 6 is about Andy's

55:43

mother's toys, which coincidentally are

55:45

also called Woody and Buzz.

55:46

>> Oh my god. All right. We're not playing.

55:48

You have ruined my win. Those are so

55:51

bad.

55:51

Those are so bad. They're so bad and

55:53

they're so sad.

55:54

>> turn on your cameras. Are the producers

55:55

laughing? That's my litmus test. Or do

55:57

they have their head in their hands?

55:58

>> Afterwards, they'll go, "Uh Scott, do we

56:00

really want to do this?" And we're going

56:02

to. So, that's the way That's That's

56:04

where Lera goes, "Uh like that." That's

56:06

the voice.

56:07

>> There we go.

56:08

>> Anyway, I will see you in person at

56:09

live. We're going to have lots of people

56:11

there. It'll be fun. I think it is sold

56:13

out. Um

56:15

we are and I am also doing a live

56:17

interview with Jim Bankoff and Meredith

56:19

Levien.

56:20

Uh from the New York Times. Oh, stop.

56:23

Stop.

56:24

>> [laughter]

56:25

>> I mean, that sounds really interesting.

56:28

>> Yeah, it's going to

56:29

>> hosting that?

56:29

>> Yeah, it's going to be great.

56:31

>> to talk about geoengineering the forest

56:33

service.

56:33

>> Listen, dirty [clears throat]

56:35

dirty

56:35

>> I'm going to see Team Scotland at the at

56:37

the Crane Club pop-up on the pallet

56:39

tomorrow at midnight. Then I'm going to

56:41

the Spotify party. Who wants to roll

56:43

with the dog? Who wants to roll with the

56:45

dog?

56:46

>> I will see you in a few days, Scott. And

56:48

we want to hear from you also, our

56:50

listeners. Send us your questions about

56:51

business, tech, or whatever's on your

56:53

mind, including Scott's filthy filthy

56:55

brain this week. Go to nymag.com/pivot

56:59

to submit a question for the show or

57:00

call 855-51

57:03

pivot or elsewhere in the Karen Scott

57:05

universe. This week on On with Kara

57:06

Swisher, I talked to Harvey Levin,

57:08

founder of the celebrity news juggernaut

57:09

TMZ, who I adore, about its new

57:11

Washington D.C. bureau and expanded

57:13

political coverage. Let's listen to a

57:15

clip.

57:15

>> I do want to just say one thing, that

57:18

you know, you're referring to this as,

57:20

you know, politicians being a form of

57:22

celebrities.

57:23

>> Right. Yeah. You can push that.

57:25

>> I don't view it that way.

57:26

>> Okay.

57:26

>> Um I view it as pop culture. We cover

57:29

pop culture. And pop culture can be a

57:31

lot of things. You know, it can be

57:33

sports, it can be entertainment, and pop

57:35

culture is politics because a lot of the

57:39

things that affect everybody emanates

57:42

from Washington D.C.

57:43

And um and it emanates from the courts,

57:46

it emanates from Congress, from the

57:47

president, and it affects all of us. So,

57:50

they are an integral part of pop

57:54

culture. So, to me, it has never been a

57:57

stretch.

57:58

>> It's a really good interview. They've

57:59

tried for years to do this. He's a great

58:01

guy. And by the way, they're breaking

58:02

some stories. I have to say that they

58:04

really are. They're like when they took

58:05

those pictures of politicians during the

58:08

shutdown, like like Lindsey Graham with

58:10

his bubble wand Disneyland. I think

58:12

they're doing an excellent job. Reminds

58:15

me of the old Washington Post which used

58:16

to

58:18

do this kind of stuff, a mix of things.

58:19

Anyway, he's great. I've known him for

58:21

many, many years. I like Harvey a lot. I

58:23

think he's a really interesting

58:24

entrepreneur in media. He's one of the

58:26

OG ones. Okay, that's the show. Thanks

58:28

for listening to Pivot. Be sure to like

58:30

and subscribe to our YouTube channel.

58:32

We'll be back on Friday live from

58:34

Cannes.

58:38

>> [music]

Interactive Summary

The podcast discusses a range of political and economic topics, starting with President Trump's unsubstantiated claims about the reflecting pool vandalism and its broader implications for his leadership. It then delves into US-Iran relations, criticizing the perceived 'unconditional surrender' by the US and highlighting the importance of the JCPOA. The conversation shifts to European politics, analyzing Keir Starmer's resignation in the UK amidst post-Brexit economic struggles and Trump's feud with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. A significant portion is dedicated to the changing power dynamics between politicians and tech billionaires like Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos, who are seen as 'renting protection' rather than merely seeking influence. The hosts also touch upon the challenges of producing Big Tech stories in Hollywood, the 'buy, borrow, die' wealth accumulation strategy, and the potential of GLP-1 drugs. The episode concludes with 'wins' like the World Cup boosting America's image and 'fails' such as Polymarket's fake trading videos and Republican attacks on James Talarico's sexuality.

Suggested questions

5 ready-made prompts